DOCSLIB.ORG

HIBEX/UPSTAGE Technology As Well As Other Aspects of the ARPA Hard Point Defense Program Seems to Have Been Effectively Transferred to the Army

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HIBEX/UPSTAGE Technology As Well As Other Aspects of the ARPA Hard Point Defense Program Seems to Have Been Effectively Transferred to the Army AD-A241 725 DTIC -DTC Ol-CTF.19 IDA PAPER P-2429 Sc DARPA TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS VOLUME II 0 AN HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SELECTED DARPA PROJECTS Ri¢chard H. Van Ap. Sidney Reed Seymour J. Deitchman "withcontributions from: "PenroseAlbright Earl Alluisi David Bushnell Erland Heginbotham Andrew Hull Robert Knapper David Markov Stephen Wooley 'pmm April 1991 Preparedfor Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency 91 10 24 051 0 • INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES '801 N. Beaweprd Greet Akexandria Virginia 22311-1772 IDA L" t.NO.II4S7 DEFINITIONS IDA publishes the following documents to report the results of Its work. Reports Reports are Ihe most authoritative and most carefully considered products IDA publishes. They normally embody results of major projects which (a) have a direct bearing on decisions affecting major programs, (b) address issues of significant concern to the Executive Branch, the Congress aqd/or the public, or (c) address Issues that have significant economic implications. IDA Reports are reviewed by outside panels of experts to ensure their high quality and relevance to the problems studied, and they are released by the President of IDA. Group Reports Group Reports record the findings and results of IDA established working groups and panels co..posed o1 senior individuals addressing major Issues which otherwise would be the subject of an IDA Report. ýDAGroup Reports are reviewed by the senior Individuals responsible for the project and others as selected by IDA to ensure their high quality and relevance to the proLierms studied. abid are released by the President of IDA. Papers Papers, also authoritative and carefully considered products of IDA. address studies that are narrower In scope than those covered In Reports. IDA Papers are reviewed to ensure that they meet the high standards expected of refereed papers In professional journals or formal Agency reports. Documents IDA Documents are used for the convenience of the sponsors or the analysts (a) to record substantive work done In quick reaction studies, (b) to record the proceedings of conferences and meetings. (c) to make available prelimlnary and tentative results of analyses, (d) to record data developed In the course of an Investlgatlon, or (e) to forward Information that Is essentially unanalyzed and unevaluated. The review of IDA Documents Is suited to their content at.1 intended use. The work reported in this document was conducted under contract MDA 903 89 C 0003 for the Department of Defntse. The publication of this IDA document does not indicale endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contints be construed as reflecting ths ofticial position of that Agency. This Paper has benn reviewed bW IDA to assure that it meets high standards of thoroughness, objectivity, and appropriate analytical methodology and that the results. conclusions and recommendations are properly supported by the material presented. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE -If 0MBNo.070.OI 8?UOIU006mMW00ffael ft*KaW.&t1W ___________________$ NO____ 1.AGENCY ULRE ONLY (Leav blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3.REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED IApril 1991 Final--January 1990 to March 1991 4. TITLE AND SUSmLF F FUNDING NUMBERS DARPA Technical Accomplishments Vol. Il: An Hittorical Review of C - MDA 903 89 C 0003 Selacted DARPA Projects -19 6.AUThOR(S0) Richard H. Van Atta, Sidney G. Reed, Seymour J. DeItchmanI 15R-OM ORM NNM() 10ADE %6. PU#wN=w VMS==zno Institute for Defense Analyses 1801 N.Beauregard Sti 'IDA Paper P-2429 Alexandria, VA 22311-1772 0. .-*.uORINLr .. OfIING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. AEC EOTNME * DARPNIDSO 3701 North Fairfax Drive Adrlngtorn VA 22204-2432 11. SUPPLER~ TARY NOME 12L. DISTRIBUITIOWAVALABLNTY STATAMEN j121). DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.I 1I& ABSTRACT (Ibxlmmnav m.do) This is the second of three volumes on the history of DARPA accomplishments and their implic'ations. The first two volumes include histories of selected DARPA projects. The purpose of these histories isto record, for projects and programs having impuwtant outputs and for which adequate and appropriate data * could be gathered, the chronological and technical histories insuch a way that (a)the influence of the projects or programs on defense and civilian technology could be traced, and (b)implementation lessons could be extra Wted that would help DARPA manage future programs insuch a way as to enhance their chances of success. This volume describes program histories of 21 DARPA projects. Each history describes the genesis of the project or program and the major participants and events in its lifetime. Each project review ends with observations about the project's success and the nature of its impact. Volume 11,along with * Volume icomprises the source material for Volume 1ll, which analyzes the projects inthe broader context of DARPA's history and the influences of the external environment on the agency. 14. SUBJECT TERMS IL NUMBER OF PAGES 407 * Defense Advanced Reseaich Projects Agency (DARPA) 16. PRICE CODE UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED SAR NSN 764001 .21104500 Sww on28 Rv -t ft4"tibNW*ZG1 IDA PAPER P-2429 DARPA TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS VOLUME II AN HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SELECTED DARPA PROJECTS Richard H. Van Atta Sidney Reed Seymour J. Deitchman with contributions from: Penrose Albright Earl Alluisi David Bushnell Erland Heginbotham Andrew Hull 9,T1, Robert Knapper David Markov C Stephen Wooley April 1991 Ac-- ID I Aalblt O, INSTITTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES itii.i Contact MDA 903899 C 0003 DARPA Assignment A-I 19 0_L -- CONTENTS Table. and Figures ................................................................................ ix Intioduction to Volune 1 ............................................................................. xiii A. DEFENDER ANTI-BALLISTIC MISSILE I. PRESS ............................................................................... 1 -1 A. Brief Overview ............................................................... 1-1 B. Technical Histoy ................................................................ 1-1 1. Bwxgmund ............................................................. 1-1 2. Project PRE S ............................................................ 1-9 C. Observations on Success ....................................................... 1-24 11. AREC BO........................................................................... 2-1 A. Brief Overview .................................................................. 2.1 B. Technical Histoy ........................................................... 2-1 C. Observations on Success ........................................................ 2-9 M.I HIBEX ............................................................................... 3-1 A. Brief Overview ............................................................... 3-1 B. Technical Histowy ............................................................. 3-1 (C. Observations on Success ....................................................... 3-10 IV. PENAIDS ........................................................................... 4-1 A. Brief Overview ................................................................ 4-1 B. TechnicaljHistry ........................................................... 4-1 C. Observations on Success ........................................................ 4-8 B. TACTICAL TECHNOLOGIES V. ASSAULT BREAKER .......................................................... 5-1 A. BrieOve ew ................................................................. 5-1 B. Ted ical lssm ......s ........................................................ 5-2 1. Program Origins .......................................................... 5.2 2. The DARPA ASSAULT BREAKER Pigo m ........................ 5-8 3. Trmifion ................................................. 0............... .5-11 C. Observations on Success ................................. .r-17 I VI. BE A ................................................................................... 6-1 A. Brief Overview .................................................................... 6-1 B. Technical History ................................................................ 6-1 C. Observations on Success ......................................................... 6-8 VII. CELT .................................................................................... 7-1 A. Brief Overview .................................................................... 7-1 B. Technical ii.ory ........ .............. .. 7-1 C. Observatimns on Success ......................................................... 7-5 VIII. ARMOR/ANTIARMOR .............................................................. 8-1 A. Brief Ov,-xview .................................................................... 8-1 B. TechnicalHistcry .................................. 8-2 1. History up to 19SI0 ........................................................ 8-2 2. I-istory of the 1980s ...................................................... 8-6 3. Structure of the New Joint Armor/Anti-Armor Program ............. 8-8 4. Areas of Investigation Under the New Program ..................... 8-11 C. Observations on Success ........................................................ 8-17 C. SURVEILLANCE IX. IRSURVEILLANCE: TEALRUBY/HICAMP .................................. 9-1 A. Brief Overview .................................................................... 9-1 B. Technical History ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archie to SAM a Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense
    Archie to SAM A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense Second Edition KENNETH P. WERRELL Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2005 Air University Library Cataloging Data Werrell, Kenneth P. Archie to SAM : a short operational history of ground-based air defense / Kenneth P. Werrell.—2nd ed. —p. ; cm. Rev. ed. of: Archie, flak, AAA, and SAM : a short operational history of ground- based air defense, 1988. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-136-8 1. Air defenses—History. 2. Anti-aircraft guns—History. 3. Anti-aircraft missiles— History. I. Title. 358.4/145—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public re- lease: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii In memory of Michael Lewis Hyde Born 14 May 1938 Graduated USAF Academy 8 June 1960 Killed in action 8 December 1966 A Patriot, A Classmate, A Friend THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii FOREWORD . xiii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . xv PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION . xvii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION . xix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xxi 1 ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD WAR II . 1 British Antiaircraft Artillery . 4 The V-1 Campaign . 13 American Antiaircraft Artillery . 22 German Flak . 24 Allied Countermeasures . 42 Fratricide . 46 The US Navy in the Pacific .
    [Show full text]
  • The Historyof Spaceflight
    CHAPTER15 THEHISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHYOF NATIONALSECURITY SPACE’ Stephen B. Johnson e intent of this essay is to provide space historians with an overview of Th.the issues and sources of national security space so as to identify those areas that have been underserved. Frequently, ballistic missiles are left out of space history, as they only pass through space instead of remaining in space like satellites. I include ballistic missiles for several reasons, not the least of which is that they pass through space en route to their targets. Space programs originated in the national security (NS) arena, and except for a roughly 15-year period from the early 1960s through the mid-l970s, NS space expenditures in the United States (U.S.), let alone the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), have equaled or exceeded those of civilian pro- grams. Despite this reality, the public nature of government-dominated civil- ian programs and issues of security classifications have kept NS space out of the limelight. The recent declassification of the early history of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the demise of the Soviet Union have led to a recent spate of publications that have uncovered much of the “secret history” of the early Cold War. Nonetheless, much of NS space history has received little attention from historians. One feature of military organizations that is of great value for historians is their penchant to document their histories, and space organizations are no exception. Most military organizations have historians assigned to them, with professional historians at many of the positions documenting events as they occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Space History: State of the Art ~
    SECTION VI SPACE HISTORY: STATE OF THE ART ~ INTRODUCTION hat is the current state of space history as the 21st century commences Wand the Space Age reaches its 50th anniversary? Is it a vibrant marketplace of ideas and stimulating perspectives? Is it a moribund backwater of historical inquiry with little of interest to anyone and nothing to offer the wider historical discipline? As the four essays in this section demonstrate, space history is at neither extreme of this dichotomy. It has been energized in the last quarter century by a constant stream of new practitioners and a plethora of new ideas and points of view. A fundamental professionalization of the discipline has brought to fruition a dazzling array of sophisticated studies on all manner of topics in the history of spaceflight.Y et, as the collective authors of the section argue, there is much more to be done, and each offers suggestions for how historians might approach the field in new and different ways, each enriching what already exists. This section opens with an essay by Asif A. Siddiqi assessing the state of U.S. space history. He asserts that scholars have concentrated their work in one of four subfields that collectively may be viewed as making up the whole. As Siddiqi writes, “Some saw the space program as indicative of Americans’ ‘natural’ urge to explore the frontier; some believed that the space program was a surrogate for a larger struggle between good and evil; others wrote of a space program whose main force was modern American technology; and oth- ers described a space program whose central actors were hero astronauts, rep- resenting all that was noble in American culture.” He notes that space history started as a nonprofessional activity undertaken by practitioners and enthu- siasts, always viewing the field from the top down and producing an excep- tionally “Whiggish” perspective on the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Sp-2006-4702-Section
    SECTION VI SPACE HISTORY: STATE OF THE ART ~ INTRODUCTION hat is the current state of space history as the 21st century commences Wand the Space Age reaches its 50th anniversary? Is it a vibrant marketplace of ideas and stimulating perspectives? Is it a moribund backwater of historical inquiry with little of interest to anyone and nothing to offer the wider historical discipline? As the four essays in this section demonstrate, space history is at neither extreme of this dichotomy. It has been energized in the last quarter century by a constant stream of new practitioners and a plethora of new ideas and points of view. A fundamental professionalization of the discipline has brought to fruition a dazzling array of sophisticated studies on all manner of topics in the history of spaceflight.Y et, as the collective authors of the section argue, there is much more to be done, and each offers suggestions for how historians might approach the field in new and different ways, each enriching what already exists. This section opens with an essay by Asif A. Siddiqi assessing the state of U.S. space history. He asserts that scholars have concentrated their work in one of four subfields that collectively may be viewed as making up the whole. As Siddiqi writes, “Some saw the space program as indicative of Americans’ ‘natural’ urge to explore the frontier; some believed that the space program was a surrogate for a larger struggle between good and evil; others wrote of a space program whose main force was modern American technology; and oth- ers described a space program whose central actors were hero astronauts, rep- resenting all that was noble in American culture.” He notes that space history started as a nonprofessional activity undertaken by practitioners and enthu- siasts, always viewing the field from the top down and producing an excep- tionally “Whiggish” perspective on the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Wars US Tools of Space Supremacy
    Wirbel 00 prelims 8/10/03 16:31 Page iii Star Wars US Tools of Space Supremacy Loring Wirbel Pluto P Press LONDON • STERLING, VIRGINIA Wirbel 00 prelims 8/10/03 16:31 Page iv First published 2004 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA and 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166–2012, USA www.plutobooks.com Copyright © Loring Wirbel 2004 The right of Loring Wirbel to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 7453 2115 1 hardback ISBN 0 7453 2114 3 paperback Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Wirbel, Loring, 1957- Star wars : US tools of space supremacy / Loring Wirbel. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–7453–2115–1 (HARDBACK) –– ISBN 0–7453–2114–3 (PAPERBACK) 1. Ballistic missile defenses––United States. 2. Astronautics, Military––United States. 3. Space weapons. 4. Space warfare. 5. Space surveillance––United States. 6. Militarism––United States. 7. United States––Military policy. 8. Military-industrial complex––United States. I. Title. UG743.W56 2004 358'.8'0973––dc22 2003015720 10987654321 Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services, Fortescue, Sidmouth, EX10 9QG, England Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Printed and bound in Canada by Transcontinental Printing Wirbel 00 prelims 8/10/03 16:31 Page v Contents Acronyms
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Space Force Debate: a Way Forward from the Past?
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2019-12 THE GREAT SPACE FORCE DEBATE: A WAY FORWARD FROM THE PAST? Johnson, Jordan M. Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/63989 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2019-12 PRESERVATION OF THE FORCE AND FAMILY AS A TOOL FOR TALENT MANAGEMENT Johnson, Nolan; Baker, Jonathan C. Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/63990 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE GREAT SPACE FORCE DEBATE: A WAY FORWARD FROM THE PAST? by Jordan M. Johnson December 2019 Thesis Advisor: James C. Moltz Second Reader: Stephen H. Tackett Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Form Approved OMB REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3.
    [Show full text]
  • STANLEY R. MICKELSEN SAFEGUARD COMPLEX Nekoma
    STANLEY R. MICKELSEN SAFEGUARD COMPLEX HAER No. ND-9 Nekoma vicinity Cavalier County North Dakota WRITIEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD MIDWEST SUPPORT OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1709 Jackson Street Omaha, NE 68102 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD STANLEY R. ldICKELSEN SAFEGUARD COMPLEX ·· HAER No. ND.::.9 L INTRODUCTION NOTE: For shelving purposes at the Library of Congress, Nekoma vicinity in Cavalier County was chosen as the "official" location for all SRMSC HAER documentation. Location: The Stanley R. Mickelsen Safeguard Complex (SRMSC) consists of six individual facilities located in extreme northeastern North Dakota, in Pembina, Ramsey, Walsh, and Cavalier counties. The Missile Site Radar (MSR) is located 102 miles northwest of Grand Forks, North Dakota, and 12 miles south of Langdon, North Dakota, close to the small town of Nekoma, North Dakota. The Perimeter Acquisition Radar (PAR) is located 145 miles northwest of Grand Forks and 24 miles east of Langdon. The four Remote Sprint Launch (RSL) sites are located within an approximately 20 mile radius of the MSR. Quad/UTM: RSL-1 Alsen S.E. 14/5307 53750 RSL-2 Langdon West 14/5409 54105 RSL-3 Hanks Comer 14/5744 54103 RSL-4 EdmoreN.E. 14/5553 53703 PAR Concrete 14/5805 53973 MSR Nekoma 14/5472 53819 Date of Construction: April 1, 1970 - January 1, 1973 Present Owner: U.S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command Huntsville, Alabama Present Use: The PAR is leased to the U.S. Air Force as Cavalier Air Force Station and remains in use as a radar sensor for the North American Air Defense Command and Satellite Surveillance Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Hughes GAR-1 Falcon
    November 2017 T OTAL IMPULSE VOLUME 17, NO . 4 Inside This Issue: Hughes GAR-1 Falcon Newsletter Name! 2 Hughes GAR-1 Falcon 3 View From the Flight Line 7 Working at THOY 8 Competition Basics 10 Brass Head Piston Launcher 11 This Month in Aerospace 12 History THOY Wren Plan 14 November Sport Launch 15 New Product News 18 Launch/Event Calendar • December 2 Maintenance Day! • TBD—Holiday Party • May 16-20 2018 LDRS 37 (Tripoli Central California) • May 26-28, 2018 NSL 2018 (Geneseo, NY) • August 4-10 2018 NARAM 60 (Pueblo, CO) NOTE: Launch dates are subject to change without notice. Be sure to call the “launch hotline” at 517.262.0510 for the latest weather and field infor- mation or sign up for the JMRC Notifi- cation GroupMe chat. Total Impulse Volume 17, No. 4 Page 2 CLUB OFFICERS FROM THE EDITORS’S RANGE BOX THE PRSIDENT’S CORNER President: Scott Miller NEWSLETTER NAME IS UNVEILED! A rocket club is a group of two or more people that share an interest in rockets. We as a club Vice President: Roger Sadowsky Welcome to the November issue of the JMRC can share stories and different interests in rock- News. I’d like to thank everyone that took the Treasurer: Tony Haga ets regardless of the weather, location, or any- time to email in their picks for naming the news- NAR Advisor: Buzz Nau thing else. The next best thing about rockets is letter. The winner, but an overwhelming margin, flying and/or watching them fly! The worst feeling Secretary: Rob Dickinson Total Impulse by Dale Hodgson.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Bliss Main Post Early Cold War BASOPS Building Inventory and Evaluation, 1951-63
    ERDC/CERL SR-06-53 Fort Bliss Main Post Early Cold War BASOPS Building Inventory and Evaluation, 1951-63 Susan Enscore, Adam Smith, and Sunny Stone December 2006 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. ERDC/CERL/CERL SR-06-53 December 2006 Fort Bliss Main Post Early Cold War BASOPS Building Inventory and Evaluation, 1951-63 Susan Enscore, Adam Smith, and Sunny Stone Construction Engineering Research Laboratory U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center PO Box 9005 Champaign, IL 61826-9005 Final Report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for Conservation Division, Directorate of Environment, Fort Bliss, Texas Under 21/2020/220/A/MIPR5K5192C162/PO ii ERDC/CERL SR-06-53 Abstract: This report inventories all of the Base Operations (BASOPS) buildings constructed at Fort Bliss Main Post between the years of 1951 and 1963. Determinations of Eligibility (DOE) to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are then made based on the significance of the buildings and the degree to which they retain their integrity for conveying that significance. The authors inventoried and evaluated 160 properties on the installation constructed during these years. As previous studies had established the Fort Bliss properties that are directly related to exception- ally important Army Cold War activities, this research effort will contrib- ute to the future determinations of standard eligibility to the NRHP for properties at Fort Bliss. The currently existing Program Comments for Unaccompanied Personnel Housing was taken into consideration when making DOEs for relevant buildings. DISCLAIMER: The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenhower and Ballistic Missile Defense: the Formative Years, 1944-1962 Donald R
    WINTER 2004 - Volume 51, Number 4 Eisenhower and Ballistic Missile Defense: The Formative Years, 1944-1962 Donald R. Baucom 4 Lt. Gen. Forrest S. McCartney:The First Space Professional David C. Arnold 18 From the Shadows to the Stars: James Webb’s Use of Intelligence Data in the Race to the Moon Dwayne A. Day 30 Unwanted Allies: What Influences Negative Domestic Reactions to Deploying Forces into Allied States? Sean Atkins 40 For the Record: Rob Bardua 52 Book Reviews 54 Baghdad or Bust: The Inside Story of Gulf War 2 by Mike Ryan. & Dark Victory: America's Second War against Iraq. by Jeffrey Record. Reviewed by Curtis H. O'Sullivan 54 Heroes Never Die: Warriors and Warfare in World War II by Martin Blumenson Reviewed by Jim Gates 54 The Two O’Clock War: The 1973 Yom Kippur Conflict and the Airlift that Saved Israel by Walter J. Boyne Reviewed by Sam McGowan 54 In the Company of Soldiers: A Chronicle of Combat by Rick Atkinson & Generation Kill: Devil Dogs, Iceman, Captain America and the New Face of American War by Evan Wright Reviewed by Henry Zeybel 55 Combat Legend: The F–117 Nighthawk by Paul Crickmore Reviewed by Kenneth G. Holliday 56 The Battle of Britain in Victory and Defeat: The Achievements of Air Chief Marshal Dowding and the Scandal of his Dismissal from Office by J. E. G. Dixon Reviewed by Robin Higham 56 Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations by Peter D. Feaver Reviewed by Stéphane Lefebvre 57 Pappy Gunn by Nathaniel Gunn Reviewed by Sam McGowan 57 American Soldiers: Ground Combat in the World Wars, Korea, and Vietnam by Peter S.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Is Unlimited Approved for Public Release 06-MDA-1964
    DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for Public Release Approved for public release; 06-MDA-1964 (1 NOV 06) distribution is unlimited DEFENSE IC IN G IT E I T A A T I R V T E S * ** D E E P S A N R E T M E F E N T O F D Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) 1984 – 1994 MISSILE C D I E T F S I E L N L S A E B D E E P S A N R E T M E F E N T O F D Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) 1994 – 2002 FENS DE E A E G IL E S N S C I Y M D E E P S A N R E T M E F E N T O F D Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Established January 2, 2002 Nike Zeus: America’s First ABM Nike Zeus: America’s First ABM As the Cold War unfolded after WWII, the United States realized that it faced a hostile and expansionist Soviet Union. The growing threat of Soviet long-range aircraft and missiles posed an unprecedented chal- lenge to America’s defense. In response, the policies of containment and deterrence became the cornerstones of American strategic doctrine, with a heavy reliance on offensive nuclear weapons (“massive retaliation” in the Eisenhower administration, “Mutual Assured Destruction [MAD]” in the Foreword Kennedy administration) and, ultimately, a triad of bombers and land- and sea-based ballistic missiles to discourage any Soviet or Soviet-supported The mission of the Missile Defense Agency History Office is to docu- aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Sił Powietrznych ISSN 1897-8428
    KWARTAlNIK GRUDZIEŃ 2013 przegląd NR 04 (064) sił powietrznych ISSN 1897-8428 str. 9 (w tym 5% VAT) Zintegrowane dowodzenie Cena 10 zł Integracja naszych sił zbrojnych z armiami innych państw NATO obejmuje także wdrażanie nowego systemu dowodzenia i kierowania. przegląd sił powietrznych GRUDZIEŃ 2013 | NR 04 (064) Szanowni Czytelnicy! Niedawno obchodziliśmy święto wojsk radiotechnicznych oraz łączności i informatyki. Jak są one ważne, aby jednostki lotnictwa oraz obrony przeciwlotniczej sprawnie funkcjonowały, nie trzeba nikogo przekonywać. To właśnie pododdziały radiotechniczne nadzorują naszą przestrzeń powietrzną. Wykorzystują do tego rozwinięte posterunki Aleje Jerozolimskie 97 radiolokacyjne. Dysponują też w większości sprzętem, który wyprodukowano w naszym 00-909 Warszawa kraju, co świadczy o jego światowym poziomie. Aby zapewnić żywotność środków tel.: CA MON 845 365, 845 685 będących w wyposażeniu tego rodzaju wojsk, będą wprowadzane mobilne pasywne faks: 845 503 stacje radiolokacyjne. Uwzględniając prace nad nową jakością obrony powietrznej, e-mail: [email protected] przewidziano również środki na opracowanie prototypu mobilnej trójwspółrzędnej stacji radiolokacyjnej dalekiego zasięgu. Redaktor naczelny: Święto wojsk radiotechnicznych, zgodnie z zarządzeniem nr1/MON z 6 stycznia WOJCIECH KISS-ORSKI 2005 roku, jest obchodzone 15 października. Ta data przypomina chwilę, gdy tel.: +48 22 684 02 22 49 Samodzielny Batalion Obserwacyjno-Meldunkowy osiągnął w 1950 roku pełną e-mail: [email protected] gotowość bojową. Redaktor wydawniczy: Z kolei wojska łączności i informatyki zapewniają sprawny obieg informacji nie tylko JOANNA ROCHOWICZ z posterunków radiolokacyjnych. Wdrażają, zgodnie z wymaganiami NATO, zintegrowane tel.: +48 22 684 52 30 systemy dowodzenia siłami powietrznymi i obroną powietrzną. To właśnie one pozwolą na wykorzystanie dostępnych danych do jak najefektywniejszego wykonania powierzonych Redaktor prowadzący: zadań przez jednostki sił powietrznych i obrony przeciwlotniczej.
    [Show full text]