DOCSLIB.ORG

Supp Table4 Genes Affected by Fus Knockdown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supp_Table4 Genes affected by fus knockdown. JGI ID symbol name affected_stage xetrov72010029m hpdl 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-like both xetrov72034761m nt5c3 5'-nucleotidase, cytosolic iii both xetrov72038905m pfkfb3 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 stage12 xetrov72019444m akap2 a kinase (prka) anchor protein 2 stage12 xetrov71010711m nosym abo blood group (transferase a; a3galt1) both xetrov72024186m anp32c acidic (leucine-rich) nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family, member c stage10 xetrov71029501m nosym acidic (leucine-rich) nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family; member b-1 stage10 xetrov72029734m alcam activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule both xetrov72001921m atf3 activating transcription factor 3 stage10 xetrov71022175m nosym activating transcription factor 4 (tax-responsive enhancer element b67) both xetrov72029982m acvr1b activin a receptor, type ib stage12 xetrov72029152m adamts1 adam metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 1 both xetrov72016826m asxl1 additional sex combs like 1 stage12 xetrov72035139m arl4a adp-ribosylation factor-like 4a both xetrov72017876m arl5c adp-ribosylation factor-like 5c stage12 xetrov72005097m aldh1a2 aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member a2 stage12 xetrov72007638m alpl alkaline phosphatase, liver/bone/kidney both xetrov72019748m aggf1 angiogenic factor with g patch and fha domains 1 both xetrov72006890m amotl2 angiomotin like 2 both xetrov72039620m asb7 ankyrin repeat and socs box containing 7 stage12 xetrov72006199m ag1 anterior gradient 1 both xetrov72021109m admp anti-dorsalizing morphogenic protein both xetrov71009016m nosym anti-silencing function 1 homolog b (s. cerevisiae) stage12 xetrov72026049m admp2 antidorsalizing morphogenetic protein 2 stage12 xetrov72009339m api5 apoptosis inhibitor 5 both xetrov72012187m adap1 arfgap with dual ph domains 1 both xetrov72030133m adc arginine decarboxylase stage12 xetrov72022864m avp arginine vasopressin both xetrov71028592m nosym arginine/serine-rich coiled-coil 2 stage12 xetrov72017833m armc7 armadillo repeat containing 7 stage12 xetrov72020924m arrdc2 arrestin domain containing 2 stage10 xetrov72003599m arnt aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator stage12 xetrov72012686m arid4a at rich interactive domain 4a (rbp1-like) stage12 xetrov72004901m atg16l1 atg16 autophagy related 16-like 1 both xetrov72033223m abcb5 atp-binding cassette, sub-family b (mdr/tap), member 5 both xetrov72000293m atp12a atpase, h+/k+ transporting, nongastric, alpha polypeptide both xetrov72031005m atp1b1 atpase, na+/k+ transporting, beta 1 polypeptide stage10 xetrov72016605m atp1b2 atpase, na+/k+ transporting, beta 2 polypeptide both xetrov72042240m aurkb aurora kinase b stage12 xetrov71002334m nosym axin-related protein both xetrov72026957m btg5 b-cell translocation gene 5 both xetrov72028767m bcor bcl6 corepressor stage12 Supp_Table4 Genes affected by fus knockdown. xetrov72000447m bend3 ben domain containing 3 both xetrov72034934m bambi bmp and activin membrane-bound inhibitor both xetrov72001243m bmp2 bone morphogenetic protein 2 stage12 xetrov72013980m bmp4 bone morphogenetic protein 4 both xetrov72005340m bmp7 bone morphogenetic protein 7, gene 2 both xetrov72025832m bmpr1a bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type 1a stage12 xetrov72001238m bix1 brachyury-inducible homeobox 1, gene 1 stage10 xetrov72001872m bix1 brachyury-inducible homeobox 1, gene 2 stage10 xetrov72002735m nosym brachyury-inducible homeobox 1; gene 1-2 stage10 xetrov71008171m nosym brachyury-inducible homeobox 1; gene 1-3 stage10 xetrov72007661m brd2 bromodomain containing 2 both xetrov72009642m btbd10 btb (poz) domain containing 10 stage12 xetrov72008551m cdh1 cadherin 1, type 1, e-cadherin (epithelial) both xetrov72037796m celsr1 cadherin, egf lag seven-pass g-type receptor 1 both xetrov72015042m chp calcium binding protein p22 stage12 xetrov72039804m camlg calcium modulating ligand stage12 xetrov71011517m nosym calmodulin 2 (phosphorylase kinase; delta) both xetrov71029280m nosym calponin 2 both xetrov72038774m creb3l2 camp responsive element binding protein 3-like 2 stage12 xetrov72016851m cass4 cas scaffolding protein family member 4 both xetrov72039848m cdx1 caudal type homeobox 1 both xetrov72031288m cdx2 caudal type homeobox 2 stage12 xetrov72014664m cdx4 caudal type homeobox 4 stage10 xetrov72010823m cd81 cd81 protein both xetrov72038934m clk1 cdc-like kinase 1 both xetrov72036329m clk2 cdc-like kinase 2 stage12 xetrov72025816m clk3 cdc-like kinase 3 stage12 xetrov72020877m cdc14b cdc14 cell division cycle 14 homolog b stage12 xetrov72016573m cdc42ep4 cdc42 effector protein (rho gtpase binding) 4 both xetrov72013235m ciz1 cdkn1a interacting zinc finger protein 1 stage12 xetrov72020982m cdkn2aip cdkn2a interacting protein both xetrov72027559m nosym cell adhesion molecule-related/down-regulated by oncogenes-like stage12 xetrov72029643m cdc16 cell division cycle 16 homolog stage12 xetrov72020237m cdc25b cell division cycle 25 homolog b both xetrov72018124m cdc6 cell division cycle 6 homolog both xetrov72026195m cdca3 cell division cycle associated 3 stage12 xetrov72014100m cdca4 cell division cycle associated 4 stage12 xetrov72010637m cdca5 cell division cycle associated 5 stage12 xetrov72005304m cdca7 cell division cycle associated 7 both xetrov71011375m nosym cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 both xetrov72000033m cenpf centromere protein f, 350/400kda (mitosin) both xetrov72002136m cep19 centrosomal protein 19kda both xetrov72005543m cxcr4 chemokine (c-x-c motif) receptor 4 both Supp_Table4 Genes affected by fus knockdown. xetrov72005496m cxcr7 chemokine (c-x-c motif) receptor 7 both xetrov72000357m chrd chordin both xetrov72009089m cdt1 chromatin licensing and dna replication factor 1 stage12 xetrov72035389m c11orf51 chromosome 11 open reading frame 51 stage12 xetrov72037750m c15orf42 chromosome 15 open reading frame 42 stage12 xetrov72006264m c16orf52 chromosome 16 open reading frame 52 stage12 xetrov72017847m c17orf62 chromosome 17 open reading frame 62 stage12 xetrov72017660m c20orf111 chromosome 20 open reading frame 111 stage12 xetrov72017994m c20orf24 chromosome 20 open reading frame 24 both xetrov72022745m c20orf27 chromosome 20 open reading frame 27 stage12 xetrov72021552m c22orf36 chromosome 22 open reading frame 36 both xetrov72034714m c3orf54 chromosome 3 open reading frame 54 both xetrov72035005m c6orf62 chromosome 6 open reading frame 62 both xetrov72035140m c7orf11 chromosome 7 open reading frame 11 both xetrov72015169m churc1 churchill domain containing 1 stage10 xetrov71005427m nosym cisplatin resistance-associated overexpressed protein both xetrov72035252m cmtm8 cklf-like marvel transmembrane domain containing 8 both xetrov72036516m cpsf1 cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 1, 160kda both xetrov72020936m f2r coagulation factor 2 (thrombin) receptor stage12 xetrov72021106m f2rl1 coagulation factor 2 (thrombin) receptor-like 1 stage12 xetrov72010596m f3 coagulation factor iii (thromboplastin, tissue factor) stage10 xetrov72021633m ccdc92 coiled-coil domain containing 92 stage10 xetrov72026191m c3ar1 complement component 3a receptor 1 both xetrov72014599m crx cone-rod homeobox both xetrov72017543m unnamed protein similar to mus musculus 13 days embryo cdna, riken clone:d330041b20 both xetrov72017134m cbfa2t2 core-binding factor, runt domain, alpha subunit 2; translocated to, 2 stage12 xetrov72027542m cnfn cornifelin, gene 1 both xetrov72009734m cry2 cryptochrome 2 (photolyase-like) stage10 xetrov71019007m nosym ctd (carboxy-terminal domain; rnapii; polypeptide a) small phosphatase 1 stage12 xetrov72013951m ccnb3 cyclin b3 both xetrov72036103m ccne2 cyclin e2 both xetrov72004733m ccnf cyclin f both xetrov72039717m ccng1 cyclin g1 stage12 xetrov72021008m ccng2 cyclin g2 stage12 xetrov72025805m ccnl2 cyclin l2 both xetrov72021382m ccno cyclin o stage10 xetrov72004831m ccnt2 cyclin t2 stage12 xetrov72031041m cdk2 cyclin-dependent kinase 2 stage12 xetrov72023143m cdk2ap1 cyclin-dependent kinase 2 associated protein 1 stage12 xetrov72014157m cdk9 cyclin-dependent kinase 9 both xetrov71016193m nosym cyp26a1 protein-2 stage10 xetrov72033953m csrnp1 cysteine-serine-rich nuclear protein 1 stage12 xetrov72017735m cyb561 cytochrome b-561 stage10 Supp_Table4 Genes affected by fus knockdown. xetrov72027702m cox7b cytochrome c oxidase subunit viib stage12 xetrov72025842m cyp26a1 cytochrome p450, family 26, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 stage10 xetrov72029489m ckap2 cytoskeleton associated protein 2 stage12 xetrov72012971m dact1 dapper, antagonist of beta-catenin both xetrov72030044m dzip1 daz interacting protein 1 stage12 xetrov72009758m ddx47 dead (asp-glu-ala-asp) box polypeptide 47 both xetrov72026628m dhrs3 dehydrogenase/reductase (sdr family) member 3 stage12 xetrov72019212m dlc1 deleted in liver cancer 1 stage12 xetrov72000591m dll1 delta-like 1 both xetrov72019314m dennd2c denn/madd domain containing 2c both xetrov72000607m dtl denticleless homolog stage12 xetrov72022003m dck deoxycytidine kinase, gene 1 stage12 xetrov72010661m nosym deoxyribonuclease gamma-like both xetrov72009435m depdc7 dep domain containing 7 stage12 xetrov72030420m dhh desert hedgehog stage12 xetrov72004436m dgkd diacylglycerol kinase, delta 130kda both xetrov72026864m dkk1 dickkopf 1 both xetrov72008771m diexf digestive organ expansion factor homolog (zebrafish) both xetrov72029455m dcbld2 discoidin, cub and lccl domain containing 2 stage12 xetrov72017857m dlx3 distal-less homeobox 3 both xetrov72034773m dlx5 distal-less homeobox 5 both xetrov72019347m
Recommended publications
  • Supp Material.Pdf

    Supp Material.Pdf

    Legends for Supplemental Figures and Tables Figure S1. Expression of Tlx during retinogenesis. (A) Staged embryos were stained for β- galactosidase knocked into the Tlx locus to indicate Tlx expression. Tlx was expressed in the neural blast layer in the early phase of neural retina development (blue signal). (B) Expression of Tlx in neural retina was quantified using Q-PCR at multiple developmental stages. Figure S2. Expression of p27kip1 and cyclin D1 (Ccnd1) at various developmental stages in wild-type or Tlx-/- retinas. (A) Q-PCR analysis of p27kip1 mRNA expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of p27kip1 protein expression. (C) Q-PCR analysis of cyclin D1 mRNA expression. Figure S3. Q-PCR analysis of mRNA expression of Sf1 (A), Lrh1 (B), and Atn1 (C) in wild-type mouse retinas. RNAs from testis and liver were used as controls. Table S1. List of genes dysregulated both at E15.5 and P0 Tlx-/- retinas. Gene E15.5 P0 Cluste Gene Title Fold Fold r Name p-value p-value Change Change nuclear receptor subfamily 0, group B, Nr0b1 1.65 0.0024 2.99 0.0035 member 1 1 Pou4f3 1.91 0.0162 2.39 0.0031 POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 3 1 Tcfap2d 2.18 0.0000 2.37 0.0001 transcription factor AP-2, delta 1 Zic5 1.66 0.0002 2.02 0.0218 zinc finger protein of the cerebellum 5 1 Zfpm1 1.85 0.0030 1.88 0.0025 zinc finger protein, multitype 1 1 Pten 1.60 0.0155 1.82 0.0131 phospatase and tensin homolog 2 Itgb5 -1.85 0.0063 -1.85 0.0007 integrin beta 5 2 Gpr49 6.86 0.0001 15.16 0.0001 G protein-coupled receptor 49 3 Cmkor1 2.60 0.0007 2.72 0.0013
  • Down-Regulation of Stem Cell Genes, Including Those in a 200-Kb Gene Cluster at 12P13.31, Is Associated with in Vivo Differentiation of Human Male Germ Cell Tumors

    Down-Regulation of Stem Cell Genes, Including Those in a 200-Kb Gene Cluster at 12P13.31, Is Associated with in Vivo Differentiation of Human Male Germ Cell Tumors

    Research Article Down-Regulation of Stem Cell Genes, Including Those in a 200-kb Gene Cluster at 12p13.31, Is Associated with In vivo Differentiation of Human Male Germ Cell Tumors James E. Korkola,1 Jane Houldsworth,1,2 Rajendrakumar S.V. Chadalavada,1 Adam B. Olshen,3 Debbie Dobrzynski,2 Victor E. Reuter,4 George J. Bosl,2 and R.S.K. Chaganti1,2 1Cell Biology Program and Departments of 2Medicine, 3Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and 4Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Abstract on the degree and type of differentiation (i.e., seminomas, which Adult male germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise distinct groups: resemble undifferentiated primitive germ cells, and nonseminomas, seminomas and nonseminomas, which include pluripotent which show varying degrees of embryonic and extraembryonic embryonal carcinomas as well as other histologic subtypes patterns of differentiation; refs. 2, 3). Nonseminomatous GCTs are exhibiting various stages of differentiation. Almost all GCTs further subdivided into embryonal carcinomas, which show early show 12p gain, but the target genes have not been clearly zygotic or embryonal-like differentiation, yolk sac tumors and defined. To identify 12p target genes, we examined Affymetrix choriocarcinomas, which exhibit extraembryonal forms of differ- (Santa Clara, CA) U133A+B microarray (f83% coverage of 12p entiation, and teratomas, which show somatic differentiation along genes) expression profiles of 17 seminomas, 84 nonseminoma multiple lineages (3). Both seminomas and embryonal carcinoma GCTs, and 5 normal testis samples. Seventy-three genes on 12p are known to express stem cell markers, such as POU5F1 (4) and were significantly overexpressed, including GLUT3 and REA NANOG (5).
  • Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer

    Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer

    Oncogene (2020) 39:6633–6646 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01459-w REVIEW ARTICLE Core transcriptional regulatory circuitries in cancer 1 1,2,3 1 2 1,4,5 Ye Chen ● Liang Xu ● Ruby Yu-Tong Lin ● Markus Müschen ● H. Phillip Koeffler Received: 14 June 2020 / Revised: 30 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 / Published online: 17 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) coordinate the on-and-off states of gene expression typically in a combinatorial fashion. Studies from embryonic stem cells and other cell types have revealed that a clique of self-regulated core TFs control cell identity and cell state. These core TFs form interconnected feed-forward transcriptional loops to establish and reinforce the cell-type- specific gene-expression program; the ensemble of core TFs and their regulatory loops constitutes core transcriptional regulatory circuitry (CRC). Here, we summarize recent progress in computational reconstitution and biologic exploration of CRCs across various human malignancies, and consolidate the strategy and methodology for CRC discovery. We also discuss the genetic basis and therapeutic vulnerability of CRC, and highlight new frontiers and future efforts for the study of CRC in cancer. Knowledge of CRC in cancer is fundamental to understanding cancer-specific transcriptional addiction, and should provide important insight to both pathobiology and therapeutics. 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: Introduction genes. Till now, one critical goal in biology remains to understand the composition and hierarchy of transcriptional Transcriptional regulation is one of the fundamental mole- regulatory network in each specified cell type/lineage.
  • Derivation of Stable Microarray Cancer-Differentiating Signatures Using Consensus Scoring of Multiple Random Sampling and Gene-Ranking Consistency Evaluation

    Derivation of Stable Microarray Cancer-Differentiating Signatures Using Consensus Scoring of Multiple Random Sampling and Gene-Ranking Consistency Evaluation

    Research Article Derivation of Stable Microarray Cancer-Differentiating Signatures Using Consensus Scoring of Multiple Random Sampling and Gene-Ranking Consistency Evaluation Zhi Qun Tang,1,2 Lian Yi Han,1,2 Hong Huang Lin,1,2 Juan Cui,1,2 Jia Jia,1,2 Boon Chuan Low,2,3 Bao Wen Li,2,4 and Yu Zong Chen1,2 1Bioinformatics and Drug Design Group, Department of Pharmacy; 2Center for Computational Science and Engineering; and Departments of 3Biological Sciences and 4Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Abstract sampling methods. Only 1 to 5 of the 4 to 60 selected predictor Microarrays have been explored for deriving molecular genes in each of these sets are present in more than half of the signatures to determine disease outcomes, mechanisms, other nine sets (Table 1), and 2 to 20 of the predictor genes in each targets, and treatment strategies. Although exhibiting good set are cancer related (Table 2). Despite the use of sophisticated predictive performance, some derived signatures are unstable class differentiation and signature selection methods, the selected due to noises arising from measurement variability and signatures show few overlapping predictor genes, as in the case of biological differences. Improvements in measurement, anno- other microarray data sets including non–Hodgkin lymphoma, tation, and signature selection methods have been proposed. acute lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, We explored a new signature selection method that incorpo- medulloblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and acute myeloid rates consensus scoring of multiple random sampling and leukemia (9, 15). multistep evaluation of gene-ranking consistency for maxi- Although these signatures display high cancer differentiation mally avoiding erroneous elimination of predictor genes.
  • Aggf1 Attenuates Neuroinflammation and BBB Disruption Via PI3K/Akt/NF-Κb Pathway After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats

    Aggf1 Attenuates Neuroinflammation and BBB Disruption Via PI3K/Akt/NF-Κb Pathway After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats

    Zhu et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2018) 15:178 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1211-8 RESEARCH Open Access Aggf1 attenuates neuroinflammation and BBB disruption via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats Qiquan Zhu1,2, Budbazar Enkhjargal2, Lei Huang2,4, Tongyu Zhang2, Chengmei Sun2, Zhiyi Xie2, Pei Wu2, Jun Mo2, Jiping Tang2, Zongyi Xie1* and John H. Zhang2,3,4* Abstract Background: Neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption are two critical mechanisms of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-induced brain injury, which are closely related to patient prognosis. Recently, angiogenic factor with G-patch and FHA domain 1 (Aggf1) was shown to inhibit inflammatory effect and preserve vascular integrity in non-nervous system diseases. This study aimed to determine whether Aggf1 could attenuate neuroinflammation and preserve BBB integrity after experimental SAH, as well as the underlying mechanisms of its protective roles. Methods: Two hundred forty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to the endovascular perforation model of SAH. Recombinant human Aggf1 (rh-Aggf1) was administered intravenously via tail vein injection at 1 h after SAH induction. To investigate the underlying neuroprotection mechanism, Aggf1 small interfering RNA (Aggf1 siRNA) and PI3K-specific inhibitor LY294002 were administered through intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) before SAH induction. SAH grade, neurological score, brain water content, BBB permeability, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry were performed. Results: Expression of endogenous Aggf1 was markedly increased after SAH. Aggf1 was primarily expressed in endothelial cells and astrocytes, as well as microglia after SAH. Administration of rh-Aggf1 significantly reduced brain water content and BBB permeability, decreased the numbers of infiltrating neutrophils, and activated microglia in the ipsilateral cerebral cortex following SAH.
  • Feedback Regulation Between Initiation and Maturation Networks Orchestrates the Chromatin Dynamics of Epidermal Lineage

    Feedback Regulation Between Initiation and Maturation Networks Orchestrates the Chromatin Dynamics of Epidermal Lineage

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/349308; this version posted June 18, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Li et al., p. 1 Feedback Regulation between Initiation and Maturation Networks Orchestrates the Chromatin Dynamics of Epidermal Lineage Commitment Lingjie Li1,3,4, Yong Wang2,4,7,8*, Jessica L. Torkelson1,3*, Gautam Shankar1, Jillian M. Pattison1,3, Hanson H. Zhen1,3, Zhana Duren2,4,7, Fengqin Fang5, Sandra P. Melo1, Samantha N. Piekos1,3, Jiang Li1, Eric J. Liaw1, Lang Chen7, Rui Li1,4, Marius Wernig6, Wing H. Wong2,4, Howard Y. Chang1,4, Anthony E. Oro1,3,9 1 Program in Epithelial Biology and Department of Dermatology 2 Department of Statistics and Biomedical Data Science 3 Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine 4 Center for Personal Dynamic Regulome 5 Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, 6 Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 7 CEMS, NCMIS, MDIS, Academy of Mathematics & Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing,100080, China 8 Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China *These authors made equal and independent contributions. 9 Correspondence to Lead Contact: Anthony E. Oro at [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/349308; this version posted June 18, 2018.
  • Single-Cell Sequencing of Human Ipsc-Derived Cerebellar Organoids Shows Recapitulation of Cerebellar Development

    Single-Cell Sequencing of Human Ipsc-Derived Cerebellar Organoids Shows Recapitulation of Cerebellar Development

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.182196; this version posted July 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Single-cell sequencing of human iPSC-derived cerebellar organoids shows recapitulation of cerebellar development Samuel Nayler1*, Devika Agarwal3, Fabiola Curion2, Rory Bowden2,4, Esther B.E. Becker1,5* 1Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics; University of Oxford; Oxford, OX1 3PT; United Kingdom 2Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics; University of Oxford; Oxford, OX3 7BN; United Kingdom 3Weatherall Institute for Molecular Medicine; University of Oxford; Oxford, OX3 7BN; United Kingdom 4Present address: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville Victoria 3052; Australia 5Lead contact *Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] Running title: hiPSC-derived cerebellar organoids 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.182196; this version posted July 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. ABSTRACT Current protocols for producing cerebellar neurons from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are reliant on animal co-culture and mostly exist as monolayers, which have limited capability to recapitulate the complex arrangement of the brain. We developed a method to differentiate hPSCs into cerebellar organoids that display hallmarks of in vivo cerebellar development. Single- cell profiling followed by comparison to an atlas of the developing murine cerebellum revealed transcriptionally-discrete populations encompassing all major cerebellar cell types.
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
  • Figure S1. Representative Report Generated by the Ion Torrent System Server for Each of the KCC71 Panel Analysis and Pcafusion Analysis

    Figure S1. Representative Report Generated by the Ion Torrent System Server for Each of the KCC71 Panel Analysis and Pcafusion Analysis

    Figure S1. Representative report generated by the Ion Torrent system server for each of the KCC71 panel analysis and PCaFusion analysis. (A) Details of the run summary report followed by the alignment summary report for the KCC71 panel analysis sequencing. (B) Details of the run summary report for the PCaFusion panel analysis. A Figure S1. Continued. Representative report generated by the Ion Torrent system server for each of the KCC71 panel analysis and PCaFusion analysis. (A) Details of the run summary report followed by the alignment summary report for the KCC71 panel analysis sequencing. (B) Details of the run summary report for the PCaFusion panel analysis. B Figure S2. Comparative analysis of the variant frequency found by the KCC71 panel and calculated from publicly available cBioPortal datasets. For each of the 71 genes in the KCC71 panel, the frequency of variants was calculated as the variant number found in the examined cases. Datasets marked with different colors and sample numbers of prostate cancer are presented in the upper right. *Significantly high in the present study. Figure S3. Seven subnetworks extracted from each of seven public prostate cancer gene networks in TCNG (Table SVI). Blue dots represent genes that include initial seed genes (parent nodes), and parent‑child and child‑grandchild genes in the network. Graphical representation of node‑to‑node associations and subnetwork structures that differed among and were unique to each of the seven subnetworks. TCNG, The Cancer Network Galaxy. Figure S4. REVIGO tree map showing the predicted biological processes of prostate cancer in the Japanese. Each rectangle represents a biological function in terms of a Gene Ontology (GO) term, with the size adjusted to represent the P‑value of the GO term in the underlying GO term database.
  • Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming

    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming

    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression Huanyu Zhou, Maria Gabriela Morales, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Matthew E. Dickson, Kunhua Song, Wenduo Ye, Min S. Kim, Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Zhaoning Wang, Beibei Chen, Bruce A. Posner, Rhonda Bassel-Duby and Eric N. Olson Supplemental Table 1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 2; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 3; related to the “quantitative mRNA measurement” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Table 4; related to the “ChIP-seq, gene ontology and pathway analysis” and “RNA-seq” and gene ontology analysis” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Figure S1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Figure S2; related to Figure 2. Supplemental Figure S3; related to Figure 3. Supplemental Figure S4; related to Figure 4. Supplemental Figure S5; related to Figure 6. Supplemental Table S1. Genes included in human retroviral ORF cDNA library. Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol AATF BMP8A CEBPE CTNNB1 ESR2 GDF3 HOXA5 IL17D ADIPOQ BRPF1 CEBPG CUX1 ESRRA GDF6 HOXA6 IL17F ADNP BRPF3 CERS1 CX3CL1 ETS1 GIN1 HOXA7 IL18 AEBP1 BUD31 CERS2 CXCL10 ETS2 GLIS3 HOXB1 IL19 AFF4 C17ORF77 CERS4 CXCL11 ETV3 GMEB1 HOXB13 IL1A AHR C1QTNF4 CFL2 CXCL12 ETV7 GPBP1 HOXB5 IL1B AIMP1 C21ORF66 CHIA CXCL13 FAM3B GPER HOXB6 IL1F3 ALS2CR8 CBFA2T2 CIR1 CXCL14 FAM3D GPI HOXB7 IL1F5 ALX1 CBFA2T3 CITED1 CXCL16 FASLG GREM1 HOXB9 IL1F6 ARGFX CBFB CITED2 CXCL3 FBLN1 GREM2 HOXC4 IL1F7
  • T-Brain Regulates Archenteron Induction Signal 5207 Range of Amplification

    T-Brain Regulates Archenteron Induction Signal 5207 Range of Amplification

    Development 129, 5205-5216 (2002) 5205 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2002 DEV5034 T-brain homologue (HpTb) is involved in the archenteron induction signals of micromere descendant cells in the sea urchin embryo Takuya Fuchikami1, Keiko Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo1, Shonan Amemiya2, Toshiya Hosomi1, Takashi Watanabe1, Daisuke Kurokawa1,*, Miho Kataoka1, Yoshito Harada3, Nori Satoh3, Shinichiro Kusunoki4, Kazuko Takata1, Taishin Shimotori1, Takashi Yamamoto1, Naoaki Sakamoto1, Hiraku Shimada1 and Koji Akasaka1,† 1Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan 2Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 3Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 4LSL, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 178-0061, Japan *Present address: Evolutionary Regeneration Biology Group, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe 650-0047, Japan †Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 30 July 2002 SUMMARY Signals from micromere descendants play a crucial role in cells, the initial specification of primary mesenchyme cells, sea urchin development. In this study, we demonstrate that or the specification of endoderm. HpTb expression is these micromere descendants express HpTb, a T-brain controlled by nuclear localization of β-catenin, suggesting homolog of Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus. HpTb is expressed that
  • Α Are Regulated by Heat Shock Protein 90

    Α Are Regulated by Heat Shock Protein 90

    The Levels of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I Are Regulated by Heat Shock Protein 90- α Tomoh Matsumiya, Tadaatsu Imaizumi, Hidemi Yoshida, Kei Satoh, Matthew K. Topham and Diana M. Stafforini This information is current as of October 2, 2021. J Immunol 2009; 182:2717-2725; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802933 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/5/2717 Downloaded from References This article cites 44 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/5/2717.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on October 2, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology The Levels of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I Are Regulated by Heat Shock Protein 90-␣1 Tomoh Matsumiya,*‡ Tadaatsu Imaizumi,‡ Hidemi Yoshida,‡ Kei Satoh,‡ Matthew K. Topham,*† and Diana M. Stafforini2*† Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) is an intracellular pattern recognition receptor that plays important roles during innate immune responses to viral dsRNAs.