The Chinchorro Culture: the Chinchorro Human Mummification
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
30857 TAPA B.pdf 1 16-09-14 12:02 THE CHINCHORRO CULTURE: ummification m A Comparative Perspective. The Chinchorro Culture: The archaeology of the earliest A Comparative Perspective. human mummification The archaeology of the earliest the earliest human human mummification f y o g . The archaeolo ive erspect P e iv ro Culture: A Comparat r The Chincho ARICA 2014 A Comparative Perspective. The archaeology of the earliest human mummification Nuria Sanz Bernardo T. Arriaza Vivien G. Standen Editors Arica 2014 Published in 2014 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Published in 2014 by the UnitedOrganization, Nations Educational, 7, Scientific place andde Cultural Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France, the UNESCO Office in Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France, the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Mexico,Polanco, Miguel Presidente Hidalgo, 11550 Masaryk Ciudad de México, 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de México, D.F., México, and UniversidadD.F., de Tarapacá, Mexico, Arica, Aricaand and Universidad Parinacota, Chile. de Tarapacá, Arica, Arica and Parinacota, Chile. © UNESCO 2014 © UNESCO 2014 ISBN 978-92-3-100020-1 ISBN 978-92-3-100020-1 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/ ). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-enThis publication is available). in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). The designations employed and theBy presentation using ofthe material content throughout of this this publication publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of do not imply the expression of any opinionuse whatsoeverof the on theUNESCO part of UNESCO Open concerning Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open- the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitationaccess/terms-use-ccbysa-en of its frontiers or boundaries. ). The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Editors: Nuria Sanz, UNESCOBernardo T. Arriaza, concerning Vivien G. Standen the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its Coverauthorities, photo: Raúl Rocha or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Cover design: Octavio Lagos and Manuel Alarcón Graphic design: Andros Impresores Illustrations: Photos and images presentedThe ideas in the texts and are opinionsthe copyrights expressedof the authors in this publication are those of the authors; they are unless otherwise indicated. Printednot by: Androsnecessarily Impresores those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Printed in Chile Editors: Nuria Sanz, Bernardo T. Arriaza, Vivien G. Standen Cover photo: Raúl Rocha Cover design: Octavio Lagos and Manuel Alarcón Graphic design: Andros Impresores Illustrations: Photos and images presented in the texts are the copyrights of the authors unless otherwise indicated. Printed inby:Chile Andros Impresores THE CHINCHORRO CULTURE: A Comparative Perspective. The archaeology of the earliest human mummification Foreword UNESCO ome of the earliest evidence for the phenomenon of mortuary behavior and funerary Srites appears in the archaeological record with the species Homo neanderthalensis in the sites of Kebara Cave in Israel, and, more notable the site of Shanidar Cave in Iraq. Shanidar 4, which has been dated to around 70 kya, is colloquially known as “the flower burial”, as the site has yielded the skeletal remains of a male in his late 30s or early 40s, alongside several concentrated clumps of pollen. Upon the emergence of Homo sapien sapiens, evidence for burial rituals has become more abundant. These behaviors, which transcend cultural boundaries, are distinctly human and as such, are representative of several distinctively human behavioral characteristics such as the human propensity to search for transcendence. One example of this behavior is the process of deliberate mummification, which first emerged with the Chinchorro Culture in Chile’s Camarones Valley, is evidenced to have occurred across all continents. It is most widely known for the Egyptian process, which is conceived of as preparation for the afterlife. The mummification process, along with its representation of human world view, also speaks to the human curiosity which propels anatomical discovery. In 1998 Council of National Monuments submitted the Archaeological Sites of the Chinchorro Culture for nomination to the Tentative List of the World Heritage Center of UNESCO. The nomination was justified on the terms of selection criteria iii: “to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared”. These pages provide a clear testimony to the Outstanding Universal Value of Chile’s Chinchorro Culture, while presenting case studies that forge the comparative analysis of the culture, which is notable for its gradual implementation of complex funerary rituals, which included preparing the remains of the dead through a sophisticated process of artificial mummification which was developed 3000 years earlier than the mummification technique of Egypt. This tradition lasted 4000 years. The Chinchorro Culture is also notable for their exceptional adapting to a coastal setting. For thousands of years the Chinchorro developed and kept alive their culture in one of the world’s most arid deserts. UNESCO FOREWORD 5 The book which the reader holds in hand features several case studies from all over the world which present the results reached through the field work and investigations of national and international experts. The results of these investigations discuss the singularity of the Chinchorro Culture and other archaeological sites in the Pacific. It features contributions from 11 national and international experts representing 7 countries and 10 institutions. These pages support the elements for the formulation of the Outstanding Universal Value of Chile’s Chinchorro Culture and provide in depth information, discussions and examinations of research, otherwise not available between one book binding. Here the reader will find information treating the Chinchorro human mummification processes and examples from other cultures and discourses of the raw materials used, which will allow the reader to contextualize these funerary rites. Further contextualization is provided in examination of the climatic conditions of the Archaic Period, when hunters began to exploit the extreme Pacific coastal environments. UNESCO wishes to express its sincerest gratitude to the University of Tarapacá in Arica, Chile and the National Monuments Council of Chile for their dedication to the investigation and conservation of the Chinchorro culture and for their outstanding support of this endeavor. UNESCO also wishes to thank the national and international researchers who have made contributions to this volume for their efficacy in promoting the cultural heritage of the Chinchorro culture and for demonstrating a remarkable capacity for thinking within the parameters of the Convention’s criteria and for building the bridges between scientific investigations and the World Heritage approach. Nuria Sanz Head and Representative of the UNESCO Office in Mexico, General Coordinator of the HEADS World Heritage Thematic Programme of UNESCO THE CHINCHORRO CULTURE: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF EARLIEST HUMAN MUMMIFICATION A COMPARATIVE THE CHINCHORRO CULTURE: 6 Foreword Perspectives from Chile he University of Tarapacá (Arica, Chile) and the National Monuments Council Tof Chile would like to acknowledge the privilege and the pleasure of presenting this book, entitled “The Chinchorro Culture: A Comparative Perspective. The archaeology of the earliest human mummification”. As a regional state university, the University of Tarapacá places a strong emphasis on the study, preservation, and promotion of Chile’s cultural heritage. Specifically, since the 1960’s, it has been inextricably linked, academically and scientifically, to the Chinchorro culture. To this end, it has conducted research, disseminated knowledge, and facilitated the local and national community the necessary inputs for the conservation of the Chinchorro culture. The present book is solid evidence of that fact. The university is delighted that scholars from Chile, Brazil, Peru, Canada, and France have shared their expertise and knowledge in Arica, in order to discuss issues related to the Chinchorro in a cross–cultural manner. The Chinchorro began settling this area 9 to 10 thousand years ago by populating the fringes of the Atacama Desert, one of the most inhospitable regions in the world. As such, this culture represents one of the earliest components of archaeological evidence in a kaleidoscope of subsequent cultural groups. Chinchorro studies have come a long way since the pioneer efforts of Max Uhle during the early 1900’s, and the work of our senior researchers Marvin Allison, Percy Dauelsberg, Guillermo