DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fujita Scale Is Used to Rate the Intensity of a Tornado by Examining the Damage Caused by the Tornado After It Has Passed Over a Man-Made Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Fujita Scale is used to rate the intensity of a tornado by examining the damage caused by the tornado after it has passed over a man-made structure. The "Percentage of All Tornadoes 1950- 1994" pie chart reveals that the vast majority of tornadoes are either weak or do damage that can only be attributed to a weak tornado. Only a small percentage of tornadoes can be correctly classed as violent. Such a chart became possible only after the acceptance of the Fujita Scale as the official classification system for tornado damage. It is quite possible that an even higher percentage of all tornadoes are weak. Each year the National Weather Service documents about 1000 tornado touchdowns in the United States. There is evidence that 1000 or more additional weak tornadoes may occur each year and go completely undocumented. The "Percentage of Tornado-Related Deaths 1950-1994" pie chart shows that while violent tornadoes are few in number, they cause a very high percentage of tornado-related deaths. The Tornado Project has analyzed data prior to 1950, and found that the percentage of deaths from violent tornadoes was even greater in the past. This is because the death tolls prior to the introduction of the forecasting/awareness programs were enormous: 695 dead(Missouri-Illinois-Indiana, March 18, 1925); 317 dead(Natchez, Mississippi, May 7, 1840);.255 dead(St. Louis, Missouri and East St. Louis, Illinois, May 27, 1896); 216 dead(Tupelo, Mississippi, April 5, 1936); 203 dead(Gainesville, GA, April 6, 1936). In more recent times, no single tornado has killed more than 50 people since 1971. The Fujita Scale (also known as the Fujita-Pearson Scale) may not be a perfect system for linking damage to wind speed, but it had distinct advantages over what had gone on before its inception. And it was simple enough to use in daily practice without involving much additional expenditure of time or money. From a practical point of view, it is doubtful that any other system would have found its way into widespread accepted use, even to this day. The entire premise of estimating wind speeds from damage to non- engineered structures is very subjective and is difficult to defend from various meteorological perspectives. Nothing less than the combined influence and and prestige of the late Professor Fujita and Allen Pearson , director of NSSFC(National Severe Storm Forecast Center) in 1971 could have brought this much needed system into widespread use. The FPP scale rates the intensity of the tornado, and measured both the path length and the path width. The Fujita part of the scale is as follows: F-Scale Wind Intensity Phrase Type of Damage Done Number Speed Some damage to chimneys; breaks branches off 40-72 F0 Gale tornado trees; pushes over shallow-rooted trees; damages mph sign boards. The lower limit is the beginning of hurricane wind Moderate 73-112 speed; peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed F1 tornado mph off foundations or overturned; moving autos pushed off the roads; attached garages may be destroyed. Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; 113- Significant mobile homes demolished; boxcars pushed over; F2 157 tornado large trees snapped or uprooted; light object mph missiles generated. 158- Roof and some walls torn off well constructed F3 Severe tornado 206 houses; trains overturned; most trees in fores mph uprooted 207- Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with Devastating F4 260 weak foundations blown off some distance; cars tornado mph thrown and large missiles generated. Strong frame houses lifted off foundations and 261- carried considerable distances to disintegrate; Incredible F5 318 automobile sized missiles fly through the air in tornado mph excess of 100 meters; trees debarked; steel re- inforced concrete structures badly damaged. These winds are very unlikely. The small area of damage they might produce would probably not be recognizable along with the mess produced by F4 and F5 wind that would surround the F6 winds. 319- Inconceivable Missiles, such as cars and refrigerators would do F6 379 tornado serious secondary damage that could not be directly mph identified as F6 damage. If this level is ever achieved, evidence for it might only be found in some manner of ground swirl pattern, for it may never be identifiable through engineering studies A key point to remember is this: the size of a tornado is not necessarily an indication of its intensity. Large tornadoes can be weak, and small tornadoes can be violent. A good example of a relatively "small" tornado would be the Pampa, Texas tornado of 1995. Eyewitnesses to this tornado claim to have seen as many as 6 vehicles in the air at the same time when it passed over a parking lot. The Fujita Scale is based on damage , not the appearance of the funnel. Storm spotters, storm chasers and other weather observers often try to estimate the intensity of a tornado when they are in the field, basing their judgement on the rotational speed and amount of debris being generated as well as the width. However, the official estimate is made after the tornado has passed. Personnel from the National Weather Service office that issued the warning survey the site to determine the F-Scale rating. Sometimes they call in experts from out of the area. Aerial surveys are occasionally done after violent tornadoes to determine the exact damage track. Insurance companies may also call in wind engineers to do their own evaluations, but the official rating is set by the NWS. A few of the things they all look for are: • attachment of the walls and floor to the foundation of the building • attachment of the roof to the rafters and walls • whether or not there are steel reinforcing rods in concrete or cinder block walls • whether there is mortar between the cinder blocks The Fujita Scale is very subjective, and varies according to how experienced the surveyor is. We have many readers who have tried to do their own "surveys" of tornado damage when storms have occurred in their area. However, the less experienced the surveyor is, the more likely he/she is to be awed by the damage, and the more likely they are to give it a high rating. Media hype and inexperience with tornado damage also plays a big part in exaggerated F-Scale claims seen on television or in the paper. A reporter may see a collapsed concrete block home and be very impressed, never noticing that there was no mortar between the blocks. They may be aghast to see a park whose trees have been leveled, but not know that the species had very shallow roots, planted in soil that was soft and soggy from torrential rains, and thus easily toppled. They may see a roof that had been blown a quarter of a mile from its house, and not know that the roof was attached to the house with only a few nails, and when lofted into the air, acted as a "sail." They may see a light post that is bent at a 30 degree angle and think that it must have taken a 600 mph wind to do that, not knowing that a van had been blown into the pole, bending it, then been towed off to help clear the streets. For some of the media, the exaggerations make for a better story than the actual facts. Fortunately, they often make up for this by printing helpful stories about aid available and inspirational human interest stories. Questions 1. What is the name of the scale used to measure tornado intensity? What exactly does it measure. 2. What percentage of tornadoes fall in the “weak” (F0 – F1) range? How many are violent? 3. What has been introduced that has reduced the number of tornado related deaths? 4. Explain what classifies a tornado as “significant”. 5. What wind speed is needed to level a well-constructed house? 6. Does the size of a tornado always relate to its Fujita scale rating? Explain. 7. What are some limitations of the Fujita scale? 8. List 2 examples of “mistakes” that could be made when trying to rate a tornado. .
Recommended publications
  • Temperature Change and Its Effects on the Great Lakes Climate

    Temperature Change and Its Effects on the Great Lakes Climate

    Temperature Change and its Effects on the Great Lake’s Climate. Ross Ellet Professor: Matthew Huber April 28, 2005 Temperature change and its effects on the Great Lakes climate. The Great Lakes create a very unique sub climate zone that is unlike most areas in the world. The Great Lakes act as a climate moderator. They contain some of the biggest fresh water lakes in the world. This allows temperature moderation to occur. Typically the lakes keep the eastward coastlines more humid. Since there is more humidity, clouds are more frequent. Thus the temperature fluctuation on a daily basis is a little less than areas not affected by the Great Lakes. This in turn affects the precipitation that falls, when it falls, and where it falls. In the winter time the cold air masses blow over the relatively warm water which creates lake-effect snowfall. This is a very important social and economical impact the climate has on the Great Lakes region. So what happens when a climate change occurs in this area? What types of impacts will it have on the Great Lakes region? Will it be any different than those areas directly west of the Great Lakes? Theory and Research Aral Sea In order to understand climate change in the Great Lakes, first one must understand the dynamics of what is already occurring. The Great Lakes is unlike most lakes in the world due to its size, power, and potential to affect climate. However, there is another body of water that is just as significant. The Aral Sea, which is located in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, is an important tool to see how much a large body of water affects climate.
  • Ref. Accweather Weather History)

    Ref. Accweather Weather History)

    NOVEMBER WEATHER HISTORY FOR THE 1ST - 30TH AccuWeather Site Address- http://forums.accuweather.com/index.php?showtopic=7074 West Henrico Co. - Glen Allen VA. Site Address- (Ref. AccWeather Weather History) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AccuWeather.com Forums _ Your Weather Stories / Historical Storms _ Today in Weather History Posted by: BriSr Nov 1 2008, 02:21 PM November 1 MN History 1991 Classes were canceled across the state due to the Halloween Blizzard. Three foot drifts across I-94 from the Twin Cities to St. Cloud. 2000 A brief tornado touched down 2 miles east and southeast of Prinsburg in Kandiyohi county. U.S. History # 1861 - A hurricane near Cape Hatteras, NC, battered a Union fleet of ships attacking Carolina ports, and produced high tides and high winds in New York State and New England. (David Ludlum) # 1966 - Santa Anna winds fanned fires, and brought record November heat to parts of coastal California. November records included 86 degrees at San Francisco, 97 degrees at San Diego, and 101 degrees at the International airport in Los Angeles. Fires claimed the lives of at least sixteen firefighters. (The Weather Channel) # 1968 - A tornado touched down west of Winslow, AZ, but did little damage in an uninhabited area. (The Weather Channel) # 1987 - Early morning thunderstorms in central Arizona produced hail an inch in diameter at Williams and Gila Bend, and drenched Payson with 1.86 inches of rain. Hannagan Meadows AZ, meanwhile, was blanketed with three inches of snow. Unseasonably warm weather prevailed across the Ohio Valley. Afternoon highs of 76 degrees at Beckley WV, 77 degrees at Bluefield WV, and 83 degrees at Lexington KY were records for the month of November.
  • What Are We Doing with (Or To) the F-Scale?

    What Are We Doing with (Or To) the F-Scale?

    5.6 What Are We Doing with (or to) the F-Scale? Daniel McCarthy, Joseph Schaefer and Roger Edwards NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, OK 1. Introduction Dr. T. Theodore Fujita developed the F- Scale, or Fujita Scale, in 1971 to provide a way to compare mesoscale windstorms by estimating the wind speed in hurricanes or tornadoes through an evaluation of the observed damage (Fujita 1971). Fujita grouped wind damage into six categories of increasing devastation (F0 through F5). Then for each damage class, he estimated the wind speed range capable of causing the damage. When deriving the scale, Fujita cunningly bridged the speeds between the Beaufort Scale (Huler 2005) used to estimate wind speeds through hurricane intensity and the Mach scale for near sonic speed winds. Fujita developed the following equation to estimate the wind speed associated with the damage produced by a tornado: Figure 1: Fujita's plot of how the F-Scale V = 14.1(F+2)3/2 connects with the Beaufort Scale and Mach number. From Fujita’s SMRP No. 91, 1971. where V is the speed in miles per hour, and F is the F-category of the damage. This Amazingly, the University of Oklahoma equation led to the graph devised by Fujita Doppler-On-Wheels measured up to 318 in Figure 1. mph flow some tens of meters above the ground in this tornado (Burgess et. al, 2002). Fujita and his staff used this scale to map out and analyze 148 tornadoes in the Super 2. Early Applications Tornado Outbreak of 3-4 April 1974.
  • Midwest to Northeast U.S. Winter Storm 12-13 March, 2014 By: Kwan-Yin Kong, WPC Meteorologist

    Midwest to Northeast U.S. Winter Storm 12-13 March, 2014 By: Kwan-Yin Kong, WPC Meteorologist

    Midwest to Northeast U.S. Winter Storm 12-13 March, 2014 By: Kwan-yin Kong, WPC meteorologist Meteorological Overview: A fast-moving winter storm brought a swath of significant snowfall from the Midwest eastward through the lower Great Lakes and across northern New England during the second week of March 2014 (fig. 1 and 2). The storm was a consequence of baroclinic development as a progressive upper-level trough from the Pacific merged with a shortwave trough dropping southeastward from central Canada. The surface low pressure center of the storm can be tracked back to the foothills in northern Wyoming on 10 March when the Pacific upper trough began to move off the Rockies into the High Plains (fig. 1). At this time, the upper-level shortwave trough was beginning to head southward from central Canada but was still quite far away from the surface low center. With a lack of upper-level support, the surface low deepened very slowly along a nearly stationary front while moving east-southeastward across the central plains. By 11 March, the shortwave trough and the associated cold air mass was moving into the Upper Midwest and approached the low pressure system in the central plains (fig. 3a, b). As the two systems merged over the Midwest early on 12 March, a new low pressure center formed near the Illinois-Indiana border and began to intensify rapidly under a favorable baroclinic environment (fig. 3c, d). Precipitation with embedded thunderstorms formed north of the surface low and became heavy at times as the coverage expanded rapidly to the east-northeast into the lower Great Lakes and New England during the day on 12 March (fig.
  • Tornadoes & Downburst

    Tornadoes & Downburst

    TORNADOES & DOWNBURST TORNADOES • A devastating F5 tornado about 200 meters wide plows through Hesston, Kansas, on March 13, 1990, leaving almost 300 people homeless and 13 injured. • Total destruction caused by an F5 tornado that devastated parts of Oklahoma on May 3, 1999. • A tornado is a violently rotating (usually counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere) column of air descending from a thunderstorm and in contact with the ground. Although tornadoes are usually brief, lasting only a few minutes, they can sometimes last for more than an hour and travel several miles causing considerable damage. In a typical year about 1000 tornadoes will strike the United States. The peak of the tornado season is April through June and more tornadoes strike the central United States than any other place in the world. This area has been nicknamed "tornado alley." Most tornadoes are spawned from supercell thunderstorms. Supercell thunderstorms are characterized by a persistent rotating updraft and form in environments of strong vertical wind shear. Wind shear is the change in wind speed and/or direction with height. • Tornadoes are natures most destructive weather hazard. Annual Number of Tornadoes per State (upper number) • Tornado incidence by state. The upper figure shows the number of tornadoes reported by each state during a 25-year period. The lower figure is the average annual number of tornadoes per 10,000 square miles. The darker the shading, the greater the frequency of tornadoes. • Average number of tornadoes during each month in the United States. Fujita Scale F0-F1 Fujita scale is a measure of tornado intensity Winds 60 - 115 mph quantified through a subjective analysis of relating tornadic damage to wind speed.
  • 1 International Approaches to Tornado Damage and Intensity Classification International Association of Wind Engineers

    1 International Approaches to Tornado Damage and Intensity Classification International Association of Wind Engineers

    International Approaches to Tornado Damage and Intensity Classification International Association of Wind Engineers (IAWE), International Tornado Working Group 2017 June 6, DRAFT FINAL REPORT 1. Introduction Tornadoes are one of the most destructive natural Hazards on Earth, with occurrences Having been observed on every continent except Antarctica. It is difficult to determine worldwide occurrences, or even the fatalities or losses due to tornadoes, because of a lack of systematic observations and widely varying approacHes. In many jurisdictions, there is not any tracking of losses from severe storms, let alone the details pertaining to tornado intensity. Table 1 provides a summary estimate of tornado occurrence by continent, with details, wHere they are available, for countries or regions Having more than a few observations per year. Because of the lack of systematic identification of tornadoes, the entries in the Table are a mix of verified tornadoes, reports of tornadoes and climatological estimates. Nevertheless, on average, there appear to be more than 1800 tornadoes per year, worldwide, with about 70% of these occurring in North America. It is estimated that Europe is the second most active continent, with more than 240 per year, and Asia third, with more than 130 tornadoes per year on average. Since these numbers are based on observations, there could be a significant number of un-reported tornadoes in regions with low population density (CHeng et al., 2013), not to mention the lack of systematic analysis and reporting, or the complexity of identifying tornadoes that may occur in tropical cyclones. Table 1 also provides information on the approximate annual fatalities, althougH these data are unavailable in many jurisdictions and could be unreliable.
  • April 3, 1974 Super Outbreak Poster

    April 3, 1974 Super Outbreak Poster

    Overview Across Indiana The Super Tornado Outbreak on April 3-4, 1974 was Twenty-one tornadoes affected 46 counties causing the worst tornado outbreak in United States history. one of Indiana’s worst tornado outbreak. Many of these Within a 16-hour period, 148 tornadoes touched down tornadoes traveled at nearly a mile a minute, and across 13 states from the Great Lakes to the Southeast. several were visually observed to have multiple When the storms finally dissipated, 330 people were funnels. killed, over 6,000 were injured, and thousands more The tornado devastation started in Boone county were left homeless. The damage path created by this when a brief F2 tornado touched down around 9:30 am tragic event covered 2,500 miles across the Midwest EST on April 3, 1974. The main event, however, with damage costs totaling around 600 million dollars. commenced in Indiana later that day at 2:20 pm EST Tornado damage at the Monticello court house (left) and throughout and lasted until 8:00 pm EST as 20 additional tornadoes the town of Monticello, IN (right). ripped through the state. Courtesy of the Monticello Herald Journal IN Counties Affected by Tornadoes Among the most destructive Indiana tornados was (Storm Prediction Center, Significant Tornadoes by T.P. Grazulis & the Monticello tornado. This half mile wide F4 tornado Superoutbreak 1974 map by T.T. Fujita) Summary tracked from just northwest of Lafayette through The Super Tornado Outbreak of April 3-4, 1974 Monticello to north of Fort Wayne killing 19 people. It will always be remembered by those who Tornado Strength had a path length of 121 miles which was the longest F0 – Blue witnessed and survived the event.
  • Damage Analysis of Three Long-Track Tornadoes Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

    Damage Analysis of Three Long-Track Tornadoes Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

    atmosphere Article Damage Analysis of Three Long-Track Tornadoes Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery Daniel Burow * , Hannah V. Herrero and Kelsey N. Ellis Department of Geography, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1000 Phil Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA; [email protected] (H.V.H.); [email protected] (K.N.E.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 May 2020; Accepted: 8 June 2020; Published: 10 June 2020 Abstract: Remote sensing of tornado damage can provide valuable observations for post-event surveys and reconstructions. The tornadoes of 3 March 2019 in the southeastern United States are an ideal opportunity to relate high-resolution satellite imagery of damage with estimated wind speeds from post-event surveys, as well as with the Rankine vortex tornado wind field model. Of the spectral metrics tested, the strongest correlations with survey-estimated wind speeds are found using a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI, used as a proxy for vegetation health) difference image and a principal components analysis emphasizing differences in red and blue band reflectance. NDVI-differenced values across the width of the EF-4 Beauregard-Smiths Station, Alabama, tornado path resemble the pattern of maximum ground-relative wind speeds across the width of the Rankine vortex model. Maximum damage sampled using these techniques occurred within 130 m of the tornado vortex center. The findings presented herein establish the utility of widely accessible Sentinel imagery, which is shown to have sufficient spatial resolution to make inferences about the intensity and dynamics of violent tornadoes occurring in vegetated areas. Keywords: tornadoes; tornado damage; remote sensing; Sentinel-2; NDVI; PCA; Rankine vortex 1.
  • Tornadoes Tornadoes

    Tornadoes Tornadoes

    Tornadoes Tornadoes A tornado is a violently rotating column of air in contact with the ground Tornadogenesis is the formation of a tornado A visible condensation funnel is NOT necessary to have a tornado However, just a funnel without a circulation in contact with the ground is NOT a tornado Tornadoes may have wind speeds between 40 and 300+ m.p.h! Photo: D. Zaras, NOAA On a local scale, the tornado is the most intense of Dr. Christopher M. Godfrey all atmospheric circulations University of North Carolina at Asheville ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 Tornado Alley When do tornadoes occur? Mainly during spring (April, May, June) in the U.S. Tornadoes can occur year-round! 75% of all tornadoes occur in the U.S. Note: This is the total number of tornadoes in Most tornadoes occur in tornado alley (central Texas a multi-year study. Do I know which years? No, to Nebraska) but you get the idea. Top number: # tornadoes reported by each state in a 25-year period Bottom number: Average annual # tornadoes per 10,000 square miles ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 Tornado Frequency by Time of Day The Fujita Scale (Used prior to 2007) Most tornadoes occur from late afternoon through Relates tornado intensity indirectly to structural early evening (1−8 p.m.) and/or vegetative damage ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 1 Tornado Damage The Enhanced Fujita Scale EF-Scale in use by the NWS starting February 1, 2007 More complex than F-Scale Photo: Jim LaDue ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 ATMS 179 – Fall 2013 Why the NWS created the EF-Scale EF-Scale Damage Indicators (DIs) Need more damage indicators The framed house is one of only 28 DIs identified initially To recalibrate winds a few FF--scalescale damage indicators.
  • Service Assessment

    Service Assessment

    Service Assessment Record Tornado Outbreaks of May 4-10, 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photographs: Left: F4 tornado near Girard, Kansas, May 4, 2003. (Chuck Robertson) Right: The tornado that moved through Girard later destroyed this home in Liberal, Missouri. The gun safe in the center of the basement was used as shelter by the residents of the home. None of the residents were injured. (Ken Harding, NOAA, NWS Aberdeen, South Dakota) Service Assessment Record Tornado Outbreaks of May 4-10, 2003 December 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Administrator National Weather Service John J. Kelly, Jr., Assistant Administrator Preface During the period May 4-10, 2003, an unprecedented number of tornadoes affected the central and southern United States. During this period, 393 tornadoes occurred across the central and southern U.S. resulting in 39 deaths across 4 states. Six of these tornadoes were classified as violent (F4) on the Fujita Tornado Intensity Scale. Due to the magnitude of this event, a service assessment team was formed to examine the warning and forecast services provided to emergency managers (EMs), government agencies and the public. Service assessments are used to improve techniques of National Weather Service products and services to the American public through the recommendations in the report. John J. Kelly,
  • NWSI 10-315, Marine Weather Message, Dated August 20, 2018

    NWSI 10-315, Marine Weather Message, Dated August 20, 2018

    Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION 10-315 FEBRUARY 11, 2020 Operations and Services Marine and Coastal Weather Services, NWSPD 10-3 MARINE WEATHER MESSAGE NOTICE: This publication is available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/. OPR: W/AFS26 (D. Wright) Certified by: W/AFS26 (D. Wright) Type of Issuance: Routine SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This directive supersedes NWSI 10-315, Marine Weather Message, dated August 20, 2018. This directive includes the following changes: 1. Marine Hazard products issued under the Marine Weather Message (MWW) have changed their format and Small Craft Advisories have been consolidated into one product. See Service Change Notice 19-83 for more information: https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/scn18-83hazsimp_marineaab.pdf 2. Figures 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, and 3 were all updated with the new format. 3. Removed the “Overview Section” for the Watch, Warning and Advisory sections. 4. Updated sections 1, 5.2.2.1, 5.3.4, 5.3.4.1, 6.2.2.1, 6.3.4, 6.3.4.1, 7.2.2.1, 7.3.3.1 with the new format. 5. Table 5. was also updated with the consolidation of Small Craft Advisory to a single product. 6. Updated Appendix A with examples with the new format. Signed 01/28/2020 Andrew D. Stern Date Director Analyze, Forecast and Support Office 1 NWSI 10-315 FEBRUARY 11, 2020 Marine Weather Message Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Marine Weather Event ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Marine Weather Event Beginning Time ...............................................................................
  • Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook Great Lakes Region

    Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook Great Lakes Region

    Quarterly Climate Impacts Great Lakes Region and Outlook December 2016 Great Lakes Significant Events - for September - November 2016 Fall 2016 was unseasonably warm across the entire Great Lakes basin. In the U.S., Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin experienced their warmest fall season in 122 years of records, while it was the 2nd warmest for Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. In Ontario, Toronto, Hamilton, Gore Bay, and Sudbury also experienced their warmest fall on record. Despite a few noteworthy precipitation events, conditions in the Great Lakes were generally dry over the past three months, the exception being Lake Superior, where water supplies were slightly above average. This was offset by high Lake Superior outflows, and dry conditions elsewhere resulted in all lakes declining more than average during the fall. The Windsor area in southwestern Ontario was deluged by a significant rainfall event from September 28-30. The Windsor airport reported over 110 mm (4.3 in) from the event, while volunteer rain gauge reports just north of the airport in Tecumseh measured amounts in excess of 190 mm (7.5 in). Strong gale-force winds raced across the Great Lakes on November 19-20. Marquette, Michigan reported gusts of 80-97 km/hr (50-60 mph), resulting in very large waves of over 7 m (24 ft) on the southeastern shoreline of Lake Superior. Strong westerly winds over Lake Erie produced a storm surge event, raising the water level by 0.6 m (2 ft) on the eastern edge by Buffalo, New York and dropping the water level by 0.8 m (2.5 ft) at the western edge by Toledo, Ohio.