DOCSLIB.ORG

Host Preference of Mosquitoes in Bernalillo County New Mexico'''

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Host Preference of Mosquitoes in Bernalillo County New Mexico''' Joumal of the American Mosquito Control Association, l3(l):71J5' L99'l Copyright @ 1997 by the American Mosquito Control Association' Inc. HOST PREFERENCE OF MOSQUITOES IN BERNALILLO COUNTY NEW MEXICO''' K. M. LOF[IN,3j R. L. BYFORD,3 M. J. LOF[IN,3 M. E. CRAIG,T t'ro R. L. STEINERs ABSTRACT. Host preference of mosquitoes was determined using animal-baited traps. Hosts used in the study were cattle, chickens, dogs, and horses. Ten mosquito species representing 4 genera were collected from the animal-baited traps. Aedes vexans, Aedes dorsalis, Culex quinquefasciatus, Culex tarsalis, and Culiseta inomata were used as indicator species for data analysis. Greater numbers of Ae. vexans, Ae. dorsalis, and C.s. inornata were collected from cattle and horses than from chickens or dogs. In addition, engorgement rates were higher on mammals than on chickens. Engorgement and attraction data for Cx. quinquefasciatrs suggested a preference for chickens and dogs over cattle and horses. A slight preference for chickens and dogs was seen with Cx. tarsalis, but the degree of host preference of C.r. tarsalis was less than that in either Ae. vexans or Cx. quinquefasciatus. INTRODUCTION used cattle-baited traps to determine the biting flies and mosquitoes attacking cattle in Canada. Host preference is an important aspect of arthro- Studiesin the USA comparing relative attraction pod-borne diseases. Determining the host prefer- of multiple host species in traps are limited. In a ence of mosquitoes can aid in understanding the Texas rice-growing area, Kuntz et al. (1982) used transmissionof diseaseswithin a geographicalarea multiple, paired host speciesto determine that cattle (Defoliart et al. 1987). Mosquito host preference and horseswere the preferredhosts for Psorophora varies among geographical strains of the same mos- colurnbiae (Dyar and Knab). quito species.In addition, host preference studies The only previous study concerning host pref- potential have led to mosquito control strategies erence in New Mexico was conducted by Jones et (Kuntz et d. 1982). al. (1977), who identified the biting flies and mos- Bertsch and (1983), Norment using the capillary quitoes that attack horses. The presence of mos- precipitin method, determined the sources of blood quito-borne diseasessuch as canine heartworm dis- meals from field-collected Culex quinquefasciatus ease(Pfaffenberger and Fawcett 1983) and western Say in Mississippi. Their study showed prefer- a equine encephalitis (WEE) (Clark et al. 1986) sug- ence for avian hosts. Other researchers(Jones et al. gests that host preference research is needed in 1977, Kuntz et ^1. 1982, McCreadie et al. 1984) New Mexico. have used animal-baited traps to study mosquito ln our study, traps baited with chickens, a cow, host preference. a dog, and a horse were used to determine the host Most studies using animal-baited traps have de- preference of mosquitoes in north-central New termined the mosquito species attracted to a single Mexico. The study design allowed mosquitoes to host specieswithin a region. Dog-baited traps were choosefrom 4 host speciesand evaluatedpreferred used to find species composition and abundance in domestic hosts, potential vectors of diseasesof do- Indiana (Pinger 1985), Tennessee(Hribar and Ger- mestic animals, and relative host utilization of sev- hardt 1986), and Louisiana (Villavaso and Steelman eral mosquito species. I970a,1970b). Joneset al. (L977')used horse-bait- ed traps to identify potential vectors of Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE) in the southwestern MATERHLS AND METHODS United States. Horses also were used to identify potential vectors of Potomac horse fever in Mary- Study sites: Mosquito trapping was conducted at land (Fletcher et d. 1988). McCreadie et al. (1984) 2 sites in the Rio Grande Valley in Bernalillo Co., New Mexico. The south valley site (site l) was an agricultwal area consisting of small, irrigated farms rThis research was supported in part by the New Mex- and pastures. In addition, a dairy operation was lo- ico Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State cated 1.2 km north and a small dog kennel was University, Las Cruces, NM, and the Albuquerque Envi- located 0.4 km west of the site. No domestic ani- ronmental Health Department, Albuquerque, NM. mals were present in the pasture during trapping. 'Animals used in this study were handled with the ap- The north valley site (site 2) was 24.2 km north proval and under the guidelines of the New Mexico State of site 1. Trapping was conducted on fenced prop- University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 3 erty between an irigation canal and a pasture. The Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and area directly east consisted of mixed hardwood Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, tree NM 88003. species and other vegetation. In comparison to site a Present address: 4823 Old 12 Crossroad. Chester. AR l, fewer domestic livestock were present in the sur- 72934. rounding area and no domestic animals were pres- 5 University Statistics Center, New Mexico State Uni- ent in the immediate trapping area. versity, Las Cruces, NM 88OO3. Iraps; Stable traps, 1.22 x 2.2O X 1.68 m, were 7l 72 JounNer- oF THE AMERTCAN Moseurro Cournol AssoctATroN Vol. 13, No. I constructed of standard aluminum screen (7 X 6 indicator species for data analysis. Site differences mesh/cm) and square steel rubing (1.9 cm). The ba_ within year for number of mosquitoes collected sic-design of the traps was similar to that used by were not statistically significant (X, : 6.48, p : Roberts (1965); however, rhe sides were modified, 0.09), but there were differences between years (1, with openings(1.3-1.9 : cm) running the length of 336, P < 0.0001). This year difference was de- the traps at heights of 22.9, 77.j, and 121.9 cm tected because of the large number (and therefore from ground level. These openingscould be closed high power of the test) of mosquitoes in the study. easily to prevent mosquitoesfrom entering or leav- Although the year difference was detected, trends ing traps. Nylon netting was placed behind each for host use were the same over years, so data were door to minimize mosquito loss when animals were pooled for final analysis. removed. Traps were placed 8 m apart and appro- Data summaries (Thbles 1-5) showed similar priate animal restraints were used to restrict animal seasonal distributions for Aedes and Culex indicator movement within traps. species, with low numbers of mosquitoes collected Design: Tfapping was conducted monthly from in June and September, and higher abundance in Junethrough Septemberat both sites.Each trapping July and August. Culiseta inornata catches were period consisted of 4 consecutive nights at each lowest in July, but due to the small number col- site. Using a random number table, relative loca- lected, this may not have shown the actual seasonal tions of animals were assignedfor each trapping distribution. Peak catches occurred in August for night. Because of the individualized animal re- all 5 species. straining modifications and possible residual host Total numbers collected, engorgement percent- odor, traps were rotated daily to assigned animal age, and proportion of engorged mosquitoes locations. Also, traps were washed out daily with showed preferences for either large or small animal tap water to minimize residual odor. hosts. Signiflcant differences were observed in host Animals used in the study were a cow (270 kg), preference parameters for attraction (X' : 7,514, P a horse (290 kq-),a dog (20 kg), and 6 chickens (3 < 0.0001) and engorgement (X' : 4,470, P < kg). Animals were placed in their respectivecages 0.001). at 1900 h; once all animals were in place, side slots Aedes vexans.' Collection numbers, percentage were opened,allowing host-seekingmosquitoes ac- of engorgement, and the proportion of engorged Ae. cessto bait animals. Side slots were closed at 070O vexans collected from each host showed that this h the following morning and traps were left undis- species preferred cattle and horses over chickens turbed for an additional 3Omin, allowing any unfed and dogs (Table 1). For all monthly trapping peri- mosquitoesthe opportunity to engorge.Mosquitoes ods, the cow and horse attracted almost the same then were collected with a battery-powered aspi- numbers of mosquitoes, and both hosts consistently rator (Meek et al. 1985) and identified according to attracted more than 3-fold as many mosquitoes as Darsie and Ward (1981). Engorgement was deter- the dog or chickens. Ninety-seven percent of allAe. mined by the expansionand coloration of engorged vexans collected from both the horse and cow were mosquitoes (Edman and Kale 1971). Partially en- engorged, versus engorgement rates of 78Vo for the gorged individuals were classif,edas engorged. dog and 34Vo for the chickens. The proportion of Data analysis was based on the number of mos- engorged mosquitoes collected from the large ani- quitoes attracted and number of engorged mosqui- mal hosts was similar, with 0.43 collected from the toes collected from the various hosts by site and horse and 0.46 collected from the cow. Small ani- year. The chi-square likelihood ratio statistic was mal hosts were less utilized, witln 8Vo of engorged used to compare utilization of each animal by se- mosquitoes collected from the dog and 3Vo from lected mosquito species. The chi-square test for chickens. These results agree with studies on wild- equal attraction or engorgementwas rejected at P collected Ae. vexans in Florida (Edman 1971) and < 0.01. Indiana (Nasci 1984). Both authors found that larg- er mammals served as primary blood sources for Ae. vexans. However, Edman (197I) suggested that RESULTS AND DISCUSSION blood meal sources are closely related to the avail- Ten mosquito speciesrepresenting 4 generawere ability of hosts within an area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saint Louis Encephalitis (SLE)
    Encephalitis, SLE Annual Report 2018 Saint Louis Encephalitis (SLE) Saint Louis Encephalitis is a Class B Disease and must be reported to the state within one business day. St. Louis Encephalitis (SLE), a flavivirus, was first recognized in 1933 in St. Louis, Missouri during an outbreak of over 1,000 cases. Less than 1% of infections manifest as clinically apparent disease cases. From 2007 to 2016, an average of seven disease cases were reported annually in the United States. SLE cases occur in unpredictable, intermittent outbreaks or sporadic cases during the late summer and fall. The incubation period for SLE is five to 15 days. The illness is usually benign, consisting of fever and headache; most ill persons recover completely. Severe disease is occasionally seen in young children but is more common in adults older than 40 years of age, with almost 90% of elderly persons with SLE disease developing encephalitis. Five to 15% of cases die from complications of this disease; the risk of fatality increases with age in older adults. Arboviral encephalitis can be prevented by taking personal protection measures such as: a) Applying mosquito repellent to exposed skin b) Wearing protective clothing such as light colored, loose fitting, long sleeved shirts and pants c) Eliminating mosquito breeding sites near residences by emptying containers which hold stagnant water d) Using fine mesh screens on doors and windows. In the 1960s, there were 27 sporadic cases; in the 1970s, there were 20. In 1980, there was an outbreak of 12 cases in New Orleans. In the 1990s, there were seven sporadic cases and two outbreaks; one outbreak in 1994 in New Orleans (16 cases), and the other in 1998 in Jefferson Parish (14 cases).
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Data Collection
    Smetzer et al. Movement Ecology (2021) 9:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00275-5 RESEARCH Open Access Individual and seasonal variation in the movement behavior of two tropical nectarivorous birds Jennifer R. Smetzer1* , Kristina L. Paxton1 and Eben H. Paxton2 Abstract Background: Movement of animals directly affects individual fitness, yet fine spatial and temporal resolution movement behavior has been studied in relatively few small species, particularly in the tropics. Nectarivorous Hawaiian honeycreepers are believed to be highly mobile throughout the year, but their fine-scale movement patterns remain unknown. The movement behavior of these crucial pollinators has important implications for forest ecology, and for mortality from avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum), an introduced disease that does not occur in high-elevation forests where Hawaiian honeycreepers primarily breed. Methods: We used an automated radio telemetry network to track the movement of two Hawaiian honeycreeper species, the ʻapapane (Himatione sanguinea) and ʻiʻiwi (Drepanis coccinea). We collected high temporal and spatial resolution data across the annual cycle. We identified movement strategies using a multivariate analysis of movement metrics and assessed seasonal changes in movement behavior. Results: Both species exhibited multiple movement strategies including sedentary, central place foraging, commuting, and nomadism , and these movement strategies occurred simultaneously across the population. We observed a high degree of intraspecific variability at the individual and population level. The timing of the movement strategies corresponded well with regional bloom patterns of ‘ōhi‘a(Metrosideros polymorpha) the primary nectar source for the focal species. Birds made long-distance flights, including multi-day forays outside the tracking array, but exhibited a high degree of fidelity to a core use area, even in the non-breeding period.
    [Show full text]
  • Aedes (Ochlerotatus) Vexans (Meigen, 1830)
    Aedes (Ochlerotatus) vexans (Meigen, 1830) Floodwater mosquito NZ Status: Not present – Unwanted Organism Photo: 2015 NZB, M. Chaplin, Interception 22.2.15 Auckland Vector and Pest Status Aedes vexans is one of the most important pest species in floodwater areas in the northwest America and Germany in the Rhine Valley and are associated with Ae. sticticus (Meigen) (Gjullin and Eddy, 1972: Becker and Ludwig, 1983). Ae. vexans are capable of transmitting Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEE), Western equine encephalitis virus (WEE), SLE, West Nile Virus (WNV) (Turell et al. 2005; Balenghien et al. 2006). It is also a vector of dog heartworm (Reinert 1973). In studies by Otake et al., 2002, it could be shown, that Ae. vexans can transmit porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in pigs. Version 3: Mar 2015 Geographic Distribution Originally from Canada, where it is one of the most widely distributed species, it spread to USA and UK in the 1920’s, to Thailand in the 1970’s and from there to Germany in the 1980’s, to Norway (2000), and to Japan and China in 2010. In Australia Ae. vexans was firstly recorded 1996 (Johansen et al 2005). Now Ae. vexans is a cosmopolite and is distributed in the Holarctic, Orientalis, Mexico, Central America, Transvaal-region and the Pacific Islands. More records of this species are from: Canada, USA, Mexico, Guatemala, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden Finland, Norway, Spain, Greece, Italy, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), Turkey, Russia, Algeria, Libya, South Africa, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Yemen, Cambodia, China, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia (Lien et al, 1975; Lee et al 1984), Malaysia, Thailand, Laos, Burma, Palau, Philippines, Micronesia, New Caledonia, Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Vanuatu, Tuvalu, New Zealand (Tokelau), Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • American Aedes Vexans Mosquitoes Are Competent Vectors of Zika Virus
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 96(6), 2017, pp. 1338–1340 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.16-0963 Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene American Aedes vexans Mosquitoes are Competent Vectors of Zika Virus Alex Gendernalik,1 James Weger-Lucarelli,1 Selene M. Garcia Luna,1 Joseph R. Fauver,1 Claudia Rückert,1 Reyes A. Murrieta,1 Nicholas Bergren,1 Demitrios Samaras,1 Chilinh Nguyen,1 Rebekah C. Kading,1 and Gregory D. Ebel1* 1Arthropod-Borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Abstract. Starting in 2013–2014, the Americas have experienced a massive outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) which has now reached at least 49 countries. Although most cases have occurred in South America and the Caribbean, imported and autochthonous cases have occurred in the United States. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are known vectors of ZIKV. Little is known about the potential for temperate Aedes mosquitoes to transmit ZIKV. Aedes vexans has a worldwide distribution, is highly abundant in particular localities, aggressively bites humans, and is a competent vector of several arboviruses. However, it is not clear whether Ae. vexans mosquitoes are competent to transmit ZIKV. To determine the vector competence of Ae. vexans for ZIKV, wild-caught mosquitoes were exposed to an infectious bloodmeal containing a ZIKV strain isolated during the current outbreak. Approximately 80% of 148 mos- quitoes tested became infected by ZIKV, and approximately 5% transmitted infectious virus after 14 days of extrinsic incubation. These results establish that Ae. vexans are competent ZIKV vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentialities for Accidental Establishment of Exotic Mosquitoes in Hawaii1
    Vol. XVII, No. 3, August, 1961 403 Potentialities for Accidental Establishment of Exotic Mosquitoes in Hawaii1 C. R. Joyce PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE QUARANTINE STATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE HONOLULU, HAWAII Public health workers frequently become concerned over the possibility of the introduction of exotic anophelines or other mosquito disease vectors into Hawaii. It is well known that many species of insects have been dispersed by various means of transportation and have become established along world trade routes. Hawaii is very fortunate in having so few species of disease-carrying or pest mosquitoes. Actually only three species are found here, exclusive of the two purposely introduced Toxorhynchites. Mosquitoes still get aboard aircraft and surface vessels, however, and some have been transported to new areas where they have become established (Hughes and Porter, 1956). Mosquitoes were unknown in Hawaii until early in the 19th century (Hardy, I960). The night biting mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, is believed to have arrived by sailing vessels between 1826 and 1830, breeding in water casks aboard the vessels. Van Dine (1904) indicated that mosquitoes were introduced into the port of Lahaina, Maui, in 1826 by the "Wellington." The early sailing vessels are known to have been commonly plagued with mosquitoes breeding in their water supply, in wooden tanks, barrels, lifeboats, and other fresh water con tainers aboard the vessels, The two day biting mosquitoes, Aedes ae^pti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) arrived somewhat later, presumably on sailing vessels. Aedes aegypti probably came from the east and Aedes albopictus came from the western Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Apapane (Himatione Sanguinea)
    The Birds of North America, No. 296, 1997 STEVEN G. FANCY AND C. JOHN RALPH 'Apapane Himatione sanguinea he 'Apapane is the most abundant species of Hawaiian honeycreeper and is perhaps best known for its wide- ranging flights in search of localized blooms of ō'hi'a (Metrosideros polymorpha) flowers, its primary food source. 'Apapane are common in mesic and wet forests above 1,000 m elevation on the islands of Hawai'i, Maui, and Kaua'i; locally common at higher elevations on O'ahu; and rare or absent on Lāna'i and Moloka'i. density may exceed 3,000 birds/km2 The 'Apapane and the 'I'iwi (Vestiaria at times of 'ōhi'a flowering, among coccinea) are the only two species of Hawaiian the highest for a noncolonial honeycreeper in which the same subspecies species. Birds in breeding condition occurs on more than one island, although may be found in any month of the historically this is also true of the now very rare year, but peak breeding occurs 'Ō'ū (Psittirostra psittacea). The highest densities February through June. Pairs of 'Apapane are found in forests dominated by remain together during the breeding 'ōhi'a and above the distribution of mosquitoes, season and defend a small area which transmit avian malaria and avian pox to around the nest, but most 'Apapane native birds. The widespread movements of the 'Apapane in response to the seasonal and patchy distribution of ' ōhi'a The flowering have important implications for disease Birds of transmission, since the North 'Apapane is a primary carrier of avian malaria and America avian pox in Hawai'i.
    [Show full text]
  • Floodwater Mosquito Biology and Disease Transmission
    Frequently Asked Questions Floodwater Mosquito Biology and Disease Transmission Updated: 10 April 2020 Updated: 10 April 2020 Table of Contents CATEGORY 1: MOSQUITO ECOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 3 QUESTION 1: WHAT TYPE OF MOSQUITOES ARE CONTROLLED BY MORROW BIOSCIENCE LTD (MBL)? ....................... 3 QUESTION 2: WHY DOESN’T MBL CONTROL CONTAINER MOSQUITOES LIKE THOSE IN RESIDENTIAL BACKYARDS AND CATCH BASINS? ............................................................................................................................................ 3 QUESTION 3: WHAT CONDITIONS NEED TO BE PRESENT FOR FLOODWATER MOSQUITOES TO HATCH? ........................ 3 QUESTION 4: WHAT ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN BC GOVERN FLOODWATER MOSQUITO DEVELOPMENT? ................ 3 QUESTION 5: WHY ARE ADULT MOSQUITOES MOST ABUNDANT AFTER THE PEAK IN LOCAL RIVERS? ........................... 4 CATEGORY 2: MOSQUITO DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 5 QUESTION 1: WHAT IS THE LIFECYCLE OF FLOODWATER MOSQUITO SPECIES WITHIN THE PROGRAM AREA? ................. 5 QUESTION 2: AT WHAT LIFE STAGE ARE MOSQUITOES TARGETED FOR CONTROL? .................................................... 5 QUESTION 3: HOW FAR CAN MOSQUITOES FLY FROM THEIR HATCH SITE? .............................................................. 6 CATEGORY 3: DISEASE TRANSMISSION ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Equine Encephalitis Case Definition
    CASE DEFINITION FOR EASTERN EQUINE ENCEPHALITIS 1. General disease/pathogen information: Eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE) is a mosquito-borne viral disease that primarily affects horses. EEE, also known as sleeping sickness, is characterized by central nervous system dysfunction and a moderate to high case fatality rate. The causal virus is maintained in nature in an alternating infection cycle between mosquitoes and birds. Humans and horses serve as dead-end hosts. Although horses and humans are most often affected by the virus, birds may exhibit clinical signs, and infection and disease occasionally occurs in other livestock, deer, dogs, and a variety of mammalian, reptile, and amphibian species. 1.1. Etiologic agent: EEE is caused by the Eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus (EEEV), an Alphavirus of the family Togaviridae. It is closely related to the Western and Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis viruses and Highlands J virus, all of which cause similar neurological dysfunction disorders in horses. There are two distinct antigenic variants of EEEV. The North American variant is more pathogenic than the South and Central American variant. 1.2. Distribution/frequency of agent or pathogen in U.S.: EEEV is distributed throughout the Western Hemisphere. It has also been reported in the Caribbean Islands, Mexico, Central America, and South America. In North America, it is found in eastern Canada and all States in the United States east of the Mississippi River as well as Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas. EEEV is endemic in the Gulf of Mexico region of the United States. 1.3. Clinical signs: Horses infected with EEEV will initially develop fever, lethargy, and anorexia.
    [Show full text]
  • An Odorant Receptor from Anopheles Sinensis in China Is Sensitive To
    Liu et al. Malar J (2018) 17:348 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2501-4 Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access An odorant receptor from Anopheles sinensis in China is sensitive to oviposition attractants Hongmei Liu1* , Luhong Liu2, Peng Cheng1, Xiaodan Huang1 and Maoqing Gong1* Abstract Background: Anopheles sinensis is an important vector for the spread of malaria in China. Olfactory-related behav- iours, particularly oviposition site seeking, ofer opportunities for disrupting the disease-transmission process. Results: This is the frst report of the identifcation and characterization of AsinOrco and AsinOR10 in An. sinensis. AsinOrco and AsinOR10 share 97.49% and 90.37% amino acid sequence identity, respectively, with related sequences in Anopheles gambiae. A functional analysis demonstrated that AsinOrco- and AsinOR10-coexpressing HEK293 cells were highly sensitive to 3-methylindole, but showed no signifcant diferences in response to other test odorants when compared to DMSO. Conclusions: AsinOrco was characterized as a new member of the Orco ortholog subfamily. AsinOR10, which appears to be a member of the OR2-10 subfamily, is directly involved in identifcation of oviposition sites. This fnding will help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying olfactory signaling in An. sinensis and provide many more molecular targets for eco-friendly pest control. Keywords: Anopheles sinensis, AsinOrco, AsinOR10, 3-Methylindole Background malaria in some regions; even if the source of infection Malaria is one of the most important infectious diseases can be discovered and cleared in a timely, there is still a seriously endangering human health and safety. Te risk of local transmission and epidemic rebound. With World Health Organization (WHO) lists malaria with rapid globalization and implementation of the national AIDS and tuberculosis as the top three public health “Belt and Road” initiative, the number of people visit- problems globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity of Culex Pipiens Mosquitoes in Distinct Populations from Europe: Contribution of Cx
    Shaikevich et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:47 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1333-8 RESEARCH Open Access Genetic diversity of Culex pipiens mosquitoes in distinct populations from Europe: contribution of Cx. quinquefasciatus in Mediterranean populations Elena V. Shaikevich1, Elena B. Vinogradova2, Ali Bouattour3 and António Paulo Gouveia de Almeida4,5* Abstract Background: Mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex are cosmopolitan, and important vectors of neglected tropical diseases, such as arbovirosis and lymphatic filariasis. Among the complex taxa, Cx. pipiens (with two forms pipiens and molestus) and Cx. quinquefasciatus are the most ubiquitous mosquitoes in temperate and tropical regions respectively. Mosquitoes of this taxa lack of morphological differences between females, but have frank behavioral and physiological differences and have different trophic preferences that influence their vectorial status. Hybridization may change the vectorial capacity of these mosquitoes, increasing vector efficiency and medical importance of resulting hybrids. Methods: Culex pipiens s.l. from 35 distinct populations were investigated by the study of mtDNA, symbiotic bacterium Wolbachia pipientis, nuclear DNA and flanking region of microsatellite CQ11 polymorphism using PCR with diagnostic primers, RFLP analysis and sequencing. Results: Six different mitochondrial haplotypes were revealed by sequencing of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene and three different Wolbachia (wPip) groups were identified. A strong association was observed between COI haplotypes/groups, wPip groups and taxa; haplogroup A and infection with wPipII appear to be typical for Cx. pipiens form pipiens, haplotype D and infection with wPipIV for form molestus, while haplogroup E, characteristic of Cx. quinquefasciatus, were correlated with wPipI and found in Cx.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryo Polarity in Moth Flies and Mosquitoes Relies on Distinct Old
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Embryo polarity in moth flies and mosquitoes relies on distinct old genes with localized transcript isoforms Yoseop Yoon1, Jeff Klomp1†, Ines Martin-Martin2, Frank Criscione2, Eric Calvo2, Jose Ribeiro2, Urs Schmidt-Ott1* 1Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States; 2Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, United States Abstract Unrelated genes establish head-to-tail polarity in embryos of different fly species, raising the question of how they evolve this function. We show that in moth flies (Clogmia, Lutzomyia), a maternal transcript isoform of odd-paired (Zic) is localized in the anterior egg and adopted the role of anterior determinant without essential protein change. Additionally, Clogmia lost maternal germ plasm, which contributes to embryo polarity in fruit flies (Drosophila). In culicine (Culex, Aedes) and anopheline mosquitoes (Anopheles), embryo polarity rests on a previously unnamed zinc finger gene (cucoid), or pangolin (dTcf), respectively. These genes also localize an alternative transcript isoform at the anterior egg pole. Basal-branching crane flies (Nephrotoma) also enrich maternal pangolin transcript at the anterior egg pole, suggesting that pangolin functioned as ancestral axis determinant in flies. In conclusion, flies evolved an unexpected diversity of anterior determinants, and alternative transcript isoforms with distinct expression can adopt fundamentally distinct developmental roles. *For correspondence: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46711.001 Present address: †University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Introduction Chapel Hill, United States The specification of the primary axis (head-to-tail) in embryos of flies (Diptera) offers important Competing interests: The advantages for studying how new essential gene functions evolve in early development.
    [Show full text]