DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Author”, “The Work” and “Literary Property” with Specific Refe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2018 The emergence & evolution of the concepts of “the author”, “the work” and “literary property” with specific efr erence to enlightenment england 1450-1769: The role and influence of John Locke in the case of Millar v Taylor (1769) Mark Doepel The University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Philosophy Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Doepel, M. (2018). The emergence & evolution of the concepts of “the author”, “the work” and “literary property” with specific reference to enlightenment england 1450-1769: The role and influence of John Locke in the case of Millar v Taylor (1769) (Master of Philosophy (School of Philosophy and Theology)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/221 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EMERGENCE & EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTS OF “THE AUTHOR”, “THE WORK” AND “LITERARY PROPERTY” WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO ENLIGHTENMENT ENGLAND 1450-1769 THE ROLE AND INFLUENCE OF JOHN LOCKE IN THE CASE OF MILLAR V TAYLOR (1769) Mark Thomas Doepel A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy The School of Philosophy & Theology The University of Notre Dame Australia 2018 Declaration of Authorship This thesis is the candidate’s own work and contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other institution. To the best of the candidate’s knowledge, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Candidate’s name Candidate’s signature Mark Thomas Doepel Date: 17 June 2019 1 For LES, with love 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER ONE .................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................ 35 CHAPTER FOUR .............................................................................................. 52 CHAPTER FIVE ................................................................................................ 72 CHAPTER SIX ................................................................................................... 92 CHAPTER SEVEN .......................................................................................... 118 CHAPTER EIGHT ........................................................................................... 143 CHAPTER NINE ............................................................................................. 173 CHAPTER TEN ............................................................................................... 228 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 247 3 Abstract This thesis argues that the political philosophy of John Locke, as mostly contained in his Two Treatises of Government, but also in a number of other of his works, and especially in relation to his theory on how property rights might be acquired, had a direct influence on the emergence of the modern notions of the author, the literary work and copyright as witnessed through a series of legal cases brought before the courts of England and Scotland over the period of 1700 to 1780. It is specifically shown that Locke’s philosophy had a direct influence on the acknowledgment of the English courts of not only property rights existing within authors in relation to their literary rights but also a subtle recognition that literary creativity also afforded authors moral rights over their works. The thesis does this by examining the emergence of the paper and printing industry over time and then following an historical arc which shows the emergence of the three notions under consideration. Having reviewed philosophical and political theories of property and property rights over the ages, the thesis then dissects a number of key legal cases to establish the direct influence that John Locke’s writings had in relation to an acknowledgment of intellectual property right acquired through mental labour. The thesis contributes to work in this are as it identifies Locke’s influence is establishing not only legal property rights over creative works but also certain moral rights. 4 Chapter One Introduction: overview of thesis This thesis examines how John Locke’s work on political theory, The Two Treatises of Government, played a central role in the history of ideas in respect of the emergence, development and acceptance of three interlocking concepts. These concepts concern literary property as private property and an author’s interest in literary property as both a legal and a moral right, being a legal right as recognised by the legal institutions of society and as a moral right, being an author’s right to attribution, reputation and control of the work, beyond mere economic rights. As will be considered, moral rights may exist beyond legal rights, sourced from natural rights and reason. The three concepts concerned are “the author”, “the literary work” and the right to commercially exploit that work through “copyright”. Locke’s writings concerning how private property rights are acquired and given legitimacy, especially within the Two Treatises of Government1, were essential in how English courts came to terms with the emerging notions under current consideration., that being “the author”, “literary property” and copyright held over such works, together with the “right”1 of the author to commercially exploit the work that he had created. These notions, fully formed in contemporary society, only came to be considered and argued into existence after the necessary pre-conditions of the printing industry were established and the rights and interests of authors were expressly considered. Technological developments challenged the old notions of the role played by the creative person in the process of writing, and the rights and interests, if any, that should be afforded to that person. The new economy of the book-trade caused an 1 See Peter Laslett, Locke: Two Treatises of Government, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988). 5 evolution in the history of ideas. The world would change profoundly, as knowledge and ideas came to be exchanged not by handwritten manuscripts but through mass production, achieved through the revolutionary process of moveable type and mechanical duplication. Existing laws provided no precedent on what rules applied to these new notions. It would be Locke’s theory that would greatly assist the English Courts in examining what was meant by “literary property” and what rights might be afforded to such property. Locke’s property theory would provide the legitimacy required to acknowledge “literary property” as an author’s claim-right capable of legal recognition. The Courts would expand Locke’s theory that property rights over tangible goods could be acquired through physical labour to an acceptance that property rights might be acquired over intangible goods through intellectual labour. Locke’s labour-mixing theory would be a suitable fit for the notion of “literary property” rights vesting in “the author”. The process would take 300 to 400 years to percolate through society and, ultimately, to come before the courts. Things would change dramatically over this period. At the time of the introduction of printing in 1476, the notion of “the author” as the individual most closely associated with the text, and the one who had property rights in the work, had little place as a legal or moral concept, with the author having at best very bare economic rights in the created work. Little regard was also afforded to the notion of the “text”, with the book-trade controlled by the printer-publishers who regarded text as a bare commodity, with limited concern for issues of textual accuracy and authorial attribution. By 1769 the “author” was acknowledged as playing a central role in the process, with ownership of the “literary work” vesting in the author, due to his creative labour. Literary property would be accepted as a new type of property, one held as a legal right and, in a primitive form, as a moral or human right. This acceptance of “literary property”, and its commercial exploitation through the institution of copyright, as a 6 new form of property right by the Courts was such a departure from long-standing ideas of what could be accepted as a property right that it would require as to how property rights could be acquired to provide it with justification and legitimacy. This acceptance of literary property as legal property would also give legitimacy, substance and context to the three evolving concepts under consideration. Various historical
Recommended publications
  • The United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the Copyright Term Extension

    The United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the Copyright Term Extension

    A SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES THE UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE COPYRIGHT TERM EXTENSION DR MATTHEW RIMMER LECTURER FACULTY OF LAW THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Faculty Of Law, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200 Work Telephone Number: (02) 61254164 E-Mail Address: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 3 Executive Summary 4 Part 1 An Act For The Encouragement of Learning 8 Part 2 Free Mickey: The Copyright Term and The Public Domain 12 Part 3 A Gift To IP Producers: The Copyright Term and Competition Policy 27 Part 4 Emerging Standards: The Copyright Term and International Trade 36 Part 5 Robbery Under Arms: The Copyright Term And Cultural Heritage 43 Conclusion 58 Appendix 1: Comparison Of Copyright Duration: United States, European Union, and Australia 62 2 "There is a whole constituency out there with a strong view against copyright term extension and we are arguing that case." Mark Vaile, Minister for Trade (December 2003) "Extending our copyright term by 20 years doesn’t really protect our authors, yet it still taxes our readers." Professor Andrew Christie, Director, Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, the University of Melbourne "Perpetual Copyright On An Instalment Plan" Professor Peter Jaszi, Washington University "A Piracy Of The Public Domain" Professor Lawrence Lessig, Stanford University "A Gift To Intellectual Property Producers" Henry Ergas "Intellectual Purgatory" Justice Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court of the United States "A No-Brainer" Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate in Economics "Actually, Sonny [Bono] wanted the term of copyright protection to last forever." Mary Bono 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The first modern copyright legislation - the Statute of Anne - was an "Act for the encouragement of learning".
  • JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission

    JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission

    U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page i The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER Copyright material: Irish Manuscripts Commission Commission Manuscripts Irish material: Copyright U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iii The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER 1600–1656 V O L U M E I I I 1640–1656 Commission Letters no. 475–680 editedManuscripts by Elizabethanne Boran Irish with Latin and Greek translations by David Money material: Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2015 U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iv For Gertie, Orla and Rosemary — one each. Published by Irish Manuscripts Commission 45 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland www.irishmanuscripts.ie Commission Copyright © Irish Manuscripts Commission 2015 Elizabethanne Boran has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000, Section 107. Manuscripts ISBN 978-1-874280-89-7 (3 volume set) Irish No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. The index was completed with the support of the Arts andmaterial: Social Sciences Benefaction Fund, Trinity College, Dublin. Copyright Typeset by December Publications in Adobe Garamond and Times New Roman Printed by Brunswick Press Index prepared by Steve Flanders U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page v S E R I E S C O N T E N T S V O L U M E I Abbreviations xxv Acknowledgements xxix Introduction xxxi Correspondence of James Ussher: Letters no.
  • What Is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H

    What Is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H

    CREATe Working Paper 2016/04 (March 2016) What is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui Editors Elena Cooper Ronan Deazley University of Glasgow Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.47710. This release was supported by the RCUK funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. What is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley (eds) 1. What is the Point of Copyright History? 3 Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley 2. The Persistent Myth of Perpetual Common Law Copyright 11 Howard B. Abrams 3. A Few Remarks on Copyright at Common law in 1774 24 Lionel Bently 4. A Page of History 31 Oren Bracha 5. Donaldson and the Muse of History 38 Mark Rose 6. Personal Comments on a Policy Perspective 43 Charlotte Waelde 7. A Reply to my Colleagues regarding Donaldson v Becket 46 H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui 8. Excerpts from the Symposium 61 Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley (eds) Appendix 83 What is the Point of Copyright History? Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley An understanding of the past – how we got to where we are today – informs the approach of much recent scholarship about copyright. This has been traced to a ‘historical turn’ in scholarship in the late 1990s, which marked a move away from the more forward-looking approach of the earlier twentieth century, when lawyers had little time for historical perspectives.
  • Satirical Legal Studies: from the Legists to the Lizard

    Satirical Legal Studies: from the Legists to the Lizard

    Michigan Law Review Volume 103 Issue 3 2004 Satirical Legal Studies: From the Legists to the Lizard Peter Goodrich Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Profession Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Peter Goodrich, Satirical Legal Studies: From the Legists to the Lizard, 103 MICH. L. REV. 397 (2004). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol103/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SATIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES: FROM THE LEGISTS TO THE LIZARD Peter Goodrich* ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................... .............................................. ........ .... ..... ..... 399 I. FRAGMENTA ANTIQUITATIS (THE ENDURING TRADITION) .. 415 A. The Civilian Tradition .......................................................... 416 B. The Sermon on the Laws ......................... ............................. 419 C. Satirical Themes ....................... ............................................. 422 1. Personification .... ............................................................. 422 2. Novelty .......................................
  • The Freedom to Copy: Copyright, Creation, and Context

    The Freedom to Copy: Copyright, Creation, and Context

    The Freedom to Copy: Copyright, Creation, and Context Olufunmilayo B. Arewa* Although much separates them musically, George Harrison and Michael Bolton share a common legal fate. Both have been held liable in copyright infringement cases in which a court articulated theories of liability based on subconscious infringement. This Article discusses how decisions in the Bolton, Harrison, and other copyright infringement cases reflect a common failing. Such decisions highlight the incomplete nature of the theories of creativity and creation processes in copyright doctrine. After discussing current approaches to questions of creation, this Article suggests ways in which copyright theory can better incorporate a contextualized understanding of creativity and creation processes. Creativity in copyright is frequently characterized as not involving copying, which is typically thought to be antithetical to both originality and creativity. This stigmatization of copying, however, means that copyright theory cannot adequately account for the reality of not infrequent similarities between works that are a result of copying both ideas and expression in the creation of new works. This missing theoretical link has significant implications for copyright in practice. The lack of legal analysis of the full range of creativity and processes of creation is also a major reason why copyright theory often has such difficulty delineating what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate copying of existing works. * Associate Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. A.B. Harvard College; M.A. Anthropology, Ph.D. Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley; A.M. Applied Economics, University of Michigan; J.D., Harvard Law School. For their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, I am indebted to Margaret Chon, Julie Cohen, Paul Heald, Kevin Jon Heller, Andrew Koppelman, Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Jacqueline Lipton, Andrew P.
  • The British Journal for the History of Science Mechanical Experiments As Moral Exercise in the Education of George

    The British Journal for the History of Science Mechanical Experiments As Moral Exercise in the Education of George

    The British Journal for the History of Science http://journals.cambridge.org/BJH Additional services for The British Journal for the History of Science: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III FLORENCE GRANT The British Journal for the History of Science / Volume 48 / Issue 02 / June 2015, pp 195 - 212 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087414000582, Published online: 01 August 2014 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007087414000582 How to cite this article: FLORENCE GRANT (2015). Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III. The British Journal for the History of Science, 48, pp 195-212 doi:10.1017/ S0007087414000582 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/BJH, IP address: 130.132.173.207 on 07 Jul 2015 BJHS 48(2): 195–212, June 2015. © British Society for the History of Science 2014 doi:10.1017/S0007087414000582 First published online 1 August 2014 Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III FLORENCE GRANT* Abstract. In 1761, George III commissioned a large group of philosophical instruments from the London instrument-maker George Adams. The purchase sprang from a complex plan of moral education devised for Prince George in the late 1750s by the third Earl of Bute. Bute’s plan applied the philosophy of Frances Hutcheson, who placed ‘the culture of the heart’ at the foundation of moral education. To complement this affective development, Bute also acted on seventeenth-century arguments for the value of experimental philosophy and geometry as exercises that habituated the student to recognizing truth, and to pursuing it through long and difficult chains of reasoning.
  • A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy and Ethics Jon M

    A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy and Ethics Jon M

    Cornell Law Review Volume 88 Article 2 Issue 5 July 2003 Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy and Ethics Jon M. Garon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jon M. Garon, Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy and Ethics, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1278 (2003) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol88/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORMATIVE COPYRIGHT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR COPYRIGHT PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS Jon M. Garont This Article explores the theoretical underpinnings of copyright to deter- mine which theories provide an appropriate basis for copyright. The Article first critiques the leading conceptual underpinnings, including naturallaw, copyright's intangible nature, economic balancing and copyright's role in creatingincentives for new authorship. The Article then addresses each of the three core elements in normative justice-the social contract, the legal rules, and the mechanisms of enforcement-to develop a schema for reestablishing a normatively valid copyright policy. The research presented demonstrates that the intangible nature of copy- right does not govern the public's attitude toward copyright. Instead, norms associated with plagiarism illustrate society's ability to accept intangible property rules, while comparison with shoplifting indicates a strong corollary to piracy involving physical goods.
  • The Forfar Directory and Yearbook 1894

    The Forfar Directory and Yearbook 1894

    1 FORFAR PUBLIC LIBRARY IL©CAIL <S©iLECTB@ No. Presented by - - C 1=1 1 2. ANGUS - CULTURAL SERVICES 3 8046 00947 115 1 ^c,, 21 DAYS ALLOWED FOR READING THIS BOOK. Overdue Books Charged at Ip per Day. : THE FORFAR DIRECTORY AND YEAR BOOK ' FOR 1 1 CONTAINING LIST OF THE HOUSEHOLDERS OF THE BURGH, DIRECTORY OF TRADES AND PROFESSIONS, LIST OF PUBLIC BOARDS, SOCIETIES, ETC. ETC. ETC. ALSO, COUNTY INFORMATION, AND LIST OF FARMERS AND OTHERS IN THE ADJOINING PARISHES. PROPERTY of FORFAR PU3L FORFAR f\ji PRINTED & PUBLISHED BY W. SHEPHER] 1893. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://www.archive.org/details/forfardirectoryy1894unse ..... .. ........ .. ..... INDEX TO ADVERTISEMENTS. Page. Page. Plumber, etc. Adamson, John, Grocer, etc. 148 Malcolm, William, 145 Anderson, Thomas, Coachbuildei- .. 115 Marshall, M. & R., Drapers, etc. .. 144 Andrew, William, Tobacconist, etc. .. 114 Masterton, David, Plasterer .. .. 113 Arnot, C., & Son, Nurserymen, etc. .. 130 Mathers, William, Watchmaker . 132 Arnot, James M., Ironmonger .. .. 130 Mitchell, C, & Co., Photographers .. 122 Aschberg, G., Clothier, etc. .. .. 133 Moffat, William, & Son, Slaters . 143 Merchants 121 . Coal Bell, Mrs, Draper, etc. 123 Muir, T., Son, & Patton, etc. Bruce & Robbie, Seedsmen, etc. 116 Munro, James, Toy Merchant, 113 .. D., Watchmaker .. .. Burke, J. F., Hatter .. .. 150 Murdoch, J. 143 Church, John R., Fi.shdealer, etc. .. 137 Neill, James, Music Teacher .. .. 113 . Grocer, etc. Clark, James, Plumber, etc. 150 Nicolson, James, 144 Currie, M'Dougall, & Scott, Wool Spinners, Oram, Miss, Milliner, etc. 126 Galashiels .. .. • 112 Petrie, John, Tailor . 150 . Hotel .. 116 Deuchar, Ale.x., Shoemaker . 144 Petrie, Thomas, Temperance .
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES L== L FACULTY OF

    FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES L== L FACULTY OF

    mn u Ottawa l.'Univcrsitc canndicnnc Canada's university FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES l==l FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Universittf canadienne Canada's university Amy Frances Larin AUTEUR DE LA THESE / AUTHOR OF THESIS M.A. (Histoire) GRADE/DEGREE Department of History TACUlTlTfCOLETDl^ A Novel Idea: British Booksellers and the Transformation of the Literary Marketplace, 1745-1775 TITRE DE LA THESE / TITLE OF THESIS Dr. Richard Connors WE'CTEURWECTRTC^^^^ EXAMINATEURS (EXAMINATRICES) DE LA THESE / THESIS EXAMINERS Dr. Sylvie Perrier Dr. Beatrice Craig Gary W. Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies A NOVEL IDEA BRITISH BOOKSELLERS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE LITERARY MARKETPLACE, 1745-1775 By Amy Frances Larin Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the M.A. degree in History Universite d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa © Amy Frances Larin, Ottawa, Canada, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-50897-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-50897-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats.
  • THE JUDICIARY OP TAP Oupcrior COURTS 1820 to 1968 : A

    THE JUDICIARY OP TAP Oupcrior COURTS 1820 to 1968 : A

    THE JUDICIARY OP TAP oUPCRIOR COURTS 1820 to 1968 : A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY A tiiesis presented for the lAPhilo degree University of London. JENNIFER MORGAl^o BEDFORD COLLEGE, 1974. ProQuest Number: 10097327 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097327 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Aijstract This study is an attempt to construct o social profile of the Juoiciary of the superior courts uurin^ the period 1 8 20-1 9 6 8. The analyses cover a vio: raepe of characteristics iacluuiap parental occupation, schooling, class op degree, ape of call to toæ luu' ^aa ape at appolnt^/^ent to tue -each. These indices are used to deter..line how far opportunities for recruitment to the dench lave seen circumscribed by social origin, to assess the importance of academic pualificaticns and vocational skills in the achievement of professional success and to describe the pattern of the typical judicial career. The division of the total population of judges into four cohorts, based on the date of their initial appointment to the superior courts, allows throughout for historical comparison, demonstrating the major ^oints of change and alsu underlining the continuities in tne composition of the Bench during the period studied.
  • The Political Views and Parliamentary Career of John Selden J.T

    The Political Views and Parliamentary Career of John Selden J.T

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Richmond University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 3-3-1995 The political views and Parliamentary career of John Selden J.T. Price Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Price, J.T., "The political views and Parliamentary career of John Selden" (1995). Honors Theses. Paper 710. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Richmond The Political Views and Parliamentary Career of John Selden J. T. Price Senior Honors Thesis Department of History Dr. John R. Rilling March 3, 1995 John Selden rose from a relatively obscure background to become an internationally renowned legal scholar and a key parliamentary leader during the contentious Parliament of 1628-1629. Selden's father was a "ministrell," yet the younger Selden became one of the most respected thinkers in London while still fairly young, and would eventually take a leading role in Parliament. 1 Selden's brilliant mind, personality, and actions as an "honest broker" in his turbulent times made him a man who all sides could respect and who could stay afloat and prosper in the shifting political sands of Seventeenth Century England. John Selden was the son of a minstrel who married Margaret Baker~ the daughter of a Kentish squire.