Scaphiopus Holbrookii) in West Virginia Keith A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scaphiopus Holbrookii) in West Virginia Keith A Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2003 Abiotic Factors Influencing the Breeding, Movement, and Foraging of the Eastern Spadefoot (Scaphiopus holbrookii) in West Virginia Keith A. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Keith A., "Abiotic Factors Influencing the Breeding, Movement, and Foraging of the Eastern Spadefoot (Scaphiopus holbrookii) in West Virginia" (2003). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 675. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abiotic Factors Influencing the Breeding, Movement, and Foraging of the Eastern Spadefoot (Scaphiopus holbrookii) in West Virginia Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biology by Keith A. Johnson Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Dr. Dan Evans Dr. Donald Tarter Marshall University May 2003 This thesis was accepted on_______________________________ Month Day Year as meeting the research requirements for the master’s degree. Advisor_____________________________________ Department of _______________________________ ____________________________________________ Dean of the Graduate College ii ABSTRACT Abiotic Factors Influencing the Breeding, Movement and Foraging of the Eastern Spadefoot (Scaphiopus holbrookii) in West Virginia By Keith A. Johnson Haphazard searches and telemetry methods were used to track movements and habitat use of two recently discovered and only known populations of Scaphiopus holbrookii in West Virginia. It was the purpose of this study to determine the home range and habitat use of S. holbrookii. Toads were found to forage a mean distance of 13.5 in. (34.5 cm) from their burrows. Habitat consisted of open areas with soil textures of sandy loam, loamy sand, or sand. Radio- transmitters were surgically implanted in two specimens from one breeding site to provide data about habitat use and emergence. Data loggers were installed at each of the two sites. Abiotic factors were recorded to help determine conditions required for breeding and foraging of S. holbrookii. Toads emerged at a minimum relative humidity of 73%, and a mean air temperature of 63.9 °F (17.7 °C). Toads were found at a minimum soil temperature of 59 °F (15 °C). Rain was not a factor in toad emergence. Toads did not breed at either site in 2002. iii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank the West Virginia Non-game Heritage Program, Marshall University Summer Research Grant Program, and the NASA Student Scholarship Program for funding this project. Additional thanks go out to Mayor Morrone and the Virginia Point Park Board for allowing the study at Virginia Point, Jeff Smith of Allied Warehousing for allowing the study at that site, Jack Wallace of the WVDNR for equipment use, Drs. Thompson and Linner at the Audubon Animal Clinic for surgical implantation of transmitters, Jeff Davis for a tour of the Spadefoot sites in Ohio, Patricia Morrison for information about the Belleville site, Nanci Bross-Fregonara for help with publications in Wildlife Diversity News and West Virginia Wildlife, and all the herpers in 310 who gave assistance and/or advice during the study. Thanks to Drs. Evans and Tarter for being on my committee. Thanks to my wife Nancy who helped, and put up with, long nights of “toading”. Thanks to Dr. Pauley for putting up with me for 2 years and providing little assistance in the study. Making me struggle was the best thing he could have done. iv Dedication I would like to dedicate this to all field biologists. May we stand the test of the molecular age. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements.............................................................................................. iv Dedication.............................................................................................................v Table of Contents................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ..................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ....................................................................................................... ix Chapter I ...............................................................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................................1 Objectives......................................................................................................1 Background....................................................................................................1 Description.....................................................................................................6 Habits and Habitats .......................................................................................9 Breeding ......................................................................................................12 CHAPTER II........................................................................................................16 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................16 Study sites ...................................................................................................16 Allied Warehousing......................................................................................16 Virginia Point Park .......................................................................................19 Haphazard searches....................................................................................22 Data logging equipment...............................................................................25 Soil collection and analysis..........................................................................26 Transmitter implant procedure.....................................................................28 Telemetry.....................................................................................................32 Chapter III ...........................................................................................................33 Results ............................................................................................................33 Overview......................................................................................................33 Monthly Data................................................................................................33 Telemetry.....................................................................................................40 Movement, Foraging, and Breeding.............................................................42 Historical Site Searches and New Records .................................................44 Soil...............................................................................................................51 Chapter IV...........................................................................................................52 Discussion.......................................................................................................52 Environmental Factors and Breeding...........................................................52 Telemetry and Movement ............................................................................53 Emergence ..................................................................................................54 Soil...............................................................................................................55 Summary ............................................................................................................58 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................59 Supplementary Data ...........................................................................................62 Curriculum Vitae .................................................................................................63 vi List of Figures Figure 1.1. Range of Eastern Spadefoot in United States................4 Figure 1.2. Map showing Eastern Spadefoot distribution in WV. Yellow indicates counties with historic records...................................5 Figure 1.3. Eastern Spadefoot found at Virginia Point Park. Notice olive-brown coloration and lyre or hourglass pattern on dorsum........7 Figure 1.4. Spadefoot at Allied Warehousing. Notice that toad is mostly black. Dark area behind toad is burrow. In front of toad is railroad track. .....................................................................................8 Figure 1.5. Spadefoot burrow at Virginia Point Park. Notice the turnip shape of the opening..............................................................11 Figure 2.1. Topographic map detailing locations of study sites. Flags represent approximate locations. ...........................................17 Figure 2.2. Breeding
Recommended publications
  • A New Species of the Genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the Eastern Slopes of the Western Ghats, India
    Alytes, 2017, 34 (1¢4): 1¢19. A new species of the genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, India S. Jegath Janani1,2, Karthikeyan Vasudevan1, Elizabeth Prendini3, Sushil Kumar Dutta4, Ramesh K. Aggarwal1* 1Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Uppal Road, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500007, India. <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>. 2Current Address: 222A, 5th street, Annamalayar Colony, Sivakasi, 626123, India.<[email protected]>. 3Division of Vertebrate Zoology, Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York NY 10024-5192, USA. <[email protected]>. 4Nature Environment and Wildlife Society (NEWS), Nature House, Gaudasahi, Angul, Odisha. <[email protected]>. * Corresponding Author. We describe a new species of the endemic frog genus Nasikabatrachus,from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, in India. The new species is morphologically, acoustically and genetically distinct from N. sahyadrensis. Computed tomography scans of both species revealed diagnostic osteological differences, particularly in the vertebral column. Male advertisement call analysis also showed the two species to be distinct. A phenological difference in breeding season exists between the new species (which breeds during the northeast monsoon season; October to December), and its sister species (which breeds during the southwest monsoon; May to August). The new species shows 6 % genetic divergence (K2P) at mitochondrial 16S rRNA (1330 bp) partial gene from its congener, indicating clear differentiation within Nasikabatra- chus. Speciation within this fossorial lineage is hypothesized to have been caused by phenological shift in breeding during different monsoon seasons—the northeast monsoon in the new species versus southwest monsoon in N.
    [Show full text]
  • Frogs and Toads of Rhode Island
    FROG & TOAD Chug-o-rum! Peep-peeep-peeep! Kraack-arrack! Frogs and toads thrive in the many ponds, forests , felds and open woodlands found on Audubon wildlife refuges. Spring and summer are great times to look and listen for them. Listed below are the common species found in Rhode Island. Bullfrog Northern Leopard Frog (Rana catesbeiana) (Rana pipiens) Bullfrogs are the largest frog in the United States Leopard frogs, as their name implies, are covered and have smooth, dull green to brown skin with in many, round black spots with lighter outlines. dark spots. Males have a yellow chin, and females Teir base color is usually brown or green but can have a white chin. Males make a deep echoing vary into yellow or blue. Tey have raised, golden croak “Chug-o-rum, Chug-o-rum” call in early ridges running down their back. Tey can be found summer. It can sound like a cow mooing, which in meadows and grasslands in the warmer months is why the word “bull” is in its name. Tey eat and near ponds and streams during breeding season. many insects, but will also eat fsh, rodents and Teir calls sound like a mix of “chucks” and “old small birds. creaky door” sounds. Green Frog Pickerel Frog (Rana clamitans) (Rana palustris) Green frogs greatly resemble bullfrogs, with a bright Nearly the twin of the leopard frog, pickerel green head and shoulders and hints of brown, blue or frogs are distinguished by their spots being black, but can be distinguished by the raised ridges square shaped rather than round and a bright down their backs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Missing Frogs by Bryan Hamilton Why Are There No
    The Case of the Missing Frogs By Bryan Hamilton Why are there no frogs in Great Basin National Park? Great Basin National Park seems like a perfect refuge for frogs, with plenty of water--ten perennial streams, hundreds of springs, and six alpine lakes, but apparently there are no amphibians. During 2002, an amphibian inventory was conducted within Great Basin National Park. Crews surveyed perennial streams, springs, and alpine lakes, but did not observe any adult amphibians, tadpoles, or egg masses. The reasons for this are unclear, but apparently frog distribution depends on more than just abundant water. Lack of suitable breeding habitat is a major limiting factor in amphibian distribution. Most amphibians require still or extremely slow moving water to lay their eggs in. High gradient streams in the Park do not provide appropriate breeding habitat. The hundreds of springs in the Park may provide this habitat, however, no amphibians were found at the dozens of springs surveyed this year. Isolation from source populations is another limiting factor. Streams leave the Park and then quickly disappear underground. Amphibian populations near the Park are not directly connected to these streams. Thus no corridors exist between the Park and nearby amphibian populations. One amphibian species that does not require aquatic corridors for migration is the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana), commonly referred to as a "toad." Spadefoots are distinguished from "true toads" (members of the family Bufonidae) by a black wedge shaped spade on their hind feet, used for burrowing. Spadefoots move considerable distances over land during spring and summer rains, travelling to breeding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhinella Marina) on Sanibel Island, FL
    Possible Introduction Mechanisms, Movement Patterns, and Control Efforts of the Giant Toad (Rhinella marina) on Sanibel Island, FL Chris Lechowicz Director-Wildlife Habitat Management Program/Herpetologist Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation Giant Toad (Rhinella marina) • Also called the cane toad, marine toad, Bufo toad, faux toad. • Previously Bufo marinus • Native to Central America, South America, Mexico, and south Texas. • A true toad (Family Bufonidae) belonging to a group of Neotropical toads (beaked toads = Rhinella). • Largest Bufonid toad (up to 5.8 lb), but not the largest Anuran (frog) in the world. Notable Facts • They have very large paired parotoid glands containing Bufotoxin that is oozed out when harassed. • This milky toxin has killed household pets (dogs, cats) and numerous wildlife species when ingested. • There has been documented human fatalities from “toad- licking” and ingestion. • Eggs/larvae are toxic to wildlife. • Highly nocturnal Prey and Predators • They consume invertebrates, small rodents, birds, amphibians, reptiles , and plants. • They will eat non-living prey (small dead animals, dog and food, feces). • The are preyed on in their natural range by caimans (C. latirostris), certain species of fish, Possums (Didelphis species), meat ants, banded cat-eyed snake (Leptodeira annulata), and some species of ibis. • They can lay up to ~30,000 eggs a year. Current uses for Cane Toads • Educational purposes (the dangers of exotic species) • Pregnancy tests • Leather goods • Pet trade • Eaten in Peru (after
    [Show full text]
  • A.11 Western Spadefoot Toad (Spea Hammondii) A.11.1 Legal and Other Status the Western Spadefoot Toad Is a California Designated Species of Special Concern
    Appendix A. Species Account Butte County Association of Governments Western Spadefoot Toad A.11 Western Spadefoot Toad (Spea hammondii) A.11.1 Legal and Other Status The western spadefoot toad is a California designated Species of Special Concern. This species currently does not have any federal listing status. Although this species is not federally listed, it is addressed in the Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon (USFWS 2005). A.11.2 Species Distribution and Status A.11.2.1 Range and Status The western spadefoot toad historically ranged from Redding in Shasta County, California, to northwestern Baja California, Mexico (Stebbins 1985). This species was known to occur throughout the Central Valley and the Coast Ranges and along the coastal lowlands from San Francisco Bay to Mexico (Jennings and Hayes 1994). The western spadefoot toad has been extirpated throughout most southern California lowlands (Stebbins 1985) and from many historical locations within the Central Valley (Jennings and Hayes 1994, Fisher and Shaffer 1996). It has severely declined in the Sacramento Valley, and their density has been reduced in eastern San Joaquin Valley (Fisher and Shaffer 1996). While the species has declined in the Coast Range, they appear healthier and more resilient than those in the valleys. The population status and trends of the western spadefoot toad outside of California (i.e., Baja California, Mexico) are not well known. This species occurs mostly below 900 meters (3,000 feet) in elevation (Stebbins 1985). The average elevation of sites where the species still occurs is significantly higher than the average elevation for historical sites, suggesting that declines have been more pronounced in lowlands (USFWS 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Anura: Pelobatidae) MCZ by LIBRARY
    Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 18 July 2003 Number 30:1-13 Skeletal Development of Pelobates cultripes and a Comparison of the Osteogenesis of Pelobatid Frogs (Anura: Pelobatidae) MCZ By LIBRARY Z008 Anne M. Magl.a' JUL 2 3 Division of Hcrpetologi/, Natural History Museiiui and Biodiversity Researcli Center, and Department ojEonbgi^gMSpY Evolutionary Biology, The University of Kansas, Laivreuce, Kansas 66045, USA CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 RESUMEN 2 INTRODUCTION 2 Acknowledgments 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2 RESULTS 3 Cranial Development 3 Hyobranchial Development 6 PosTCRANiAL Development 6 DISCUSSION 8 LITERATURE CITED 13 ABSTRACT The larval skeleton and osteogenesis of Pelobates cultripjes is described and compared to that of several pelobatoid and non-pelobatoid taxa. Several features of the larval skeleton are of inter- est, including: absence of a cartilaginous strip between the cornua trabeculae, type of articulation of cornua and suprarostrals, presence of adrostral tissues, and the condition of the otic process. By com- paring sequence of ossification events across taxa, several patterns of skeletal development for Pelobates cultripes emerge, including: conserved timing of prootic ossification, delayed onset of mentomeckelian ossification, and early formation of vomerine teeth. Several other developmental features, including the absence of a palatine (= neopalatine) bone and the formation of the frontoparietal, also are discussed. Key Words: Anura, Pelobatoidea, Pelobatidae, desarollo, osteologia, Pelobates,
    [Show full text]
  • Green Heritage Spring 2010
    GREENMONMOUTH COUNTY PARK HERITAGE SYSTEM The Newsletter of Monmouth County’s Open Space, Parks & Recreation Agency Vol. 44 No. 1 Spring 2010 The Park System has been hosting fishing contests since the 1960s. One of the earliest is shown at Shark River Park, right, 1968. Compare that to the annual Fishing Derby at Out- door Expo in Turkey Swamp Park, 2007, above. Monmouth County’s “Best Idea” Turns 50 The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same n the last issue, we printed old photos that showed how county park facilities have changed over 50 years. Certain sites, like the beach at Seven Presidents Oceanfront Park for instance, saw the landscape utterly transformed. Not only were buildings relocated, docks (or Iwhat was left of them) removed, and new dunes built, but later a pavilion was added, a Skateplex was constructed and most recently, the playground was renovated—see below. Old photos of the parks also demonstrate the opposite trend: some things haven’t changed much at all in the last 50 years. People visit the parks and recreate in much the same ways now as they did in the 1960s (there are just many more people recreating).This may be due to the enduring nature of classic outdoor activities such as fishing, camping, hiking, and canoeing. And, with the possible exceptions of new technologies (cell phones with GPS, bird identification “apps,” fish-finders, etc.) and improvements to equipment , these activities look pretty much the same today as they ever did. See for yourself… Continues on p. 2 Chair Steals The Show At Exhibit New Playground! Tony’s Place If you like antiques and didn’t visit Last November, a seaside-themed, oceanfront, universal access play- the “Sit Thee Down—Chairs That ground called Tony’s Place opened at Seven Presidents Oceanfront Park in Furnished Walnford” exhibit this past Long Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Bufo Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) Passionately Embracing a Bulge of Mud
    Correspondence ISSN 2336-9744 The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Strange affection: male Bufo bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) passionately embracing a bulge of mud SONJA ĐOR ĐEVI Ć1,2,* and ALEKSANDAR SIMOVI Ć2 1University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology. Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanovi ć”. Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. E- mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 13 March 2014 │ Accepted 20 March 2014 │ Published online 21 March 2014. On March 11 th 2014, app. between 10 AM and noon, we visited a pond on the Avala Mt. (44°40.879 ′ N, 20°33.098 ′ E, 230 m a.s.l.). Its north–northeastern portion, overgrown with reeds, was crowded with common toads, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). Males were vocalizing, chasing females (and males), struggling to clasp them in firm grip; we observed several “mating balls” – three to ten males were vigorously fighting over a single female. On the margin of that mating frenzy, at the edge of the pond, we observed a silent, lonely male holding on to a bulge of mud (Fig. 1). He was literally motionless in that position for at least half an hour (recorded time). Figure 1. Male common toad firmly grasping a muddy protuberance (Photo: S. Đor đevi ć) Anurans are notorious for making mistakes during mating. Their erroneous amplexuses include conspecific males, dead conspecifics of both sexes, other anuran species, caudates, fish, small tortoises, etc., and even inanimate floating objects (Banta, 1914; Davies & Halliday, 1979; Pearl et al., 2005; Simovi ć et al., 2014; Storm, 1952).
    [Show full text]
  • Class: Amphibia Amphibians Order
    CLASS: AMPHIBIA AMPHIBIANS ANNIELLIDAE (Legless Lizards & Allies) CLASS: AMPHIBIA AMPHIBIANS Anniella (Legless Lizards) ORDER: ANURA FROGS AND TOADS ___Silvery Legless Lizard .......................... DS,RI,UR – uD ORDER: ANURA FROGS AND TOADS BUFONIDAE (True Toad Family) BUFONIDAE (True Toad Family) ___Southern Alligator Lizard ............................ RI,DE – fD Bufo (True Toads) Suborder: SERPENTES SNAKES Bufo (True Toads) ___California (Western) Toad.............. AQ,DS,RI,UR – cN ___California (Western) Toad ............. AQ,DS,RI,UR – cN ANNIELLIDAE (Legless Lizards & Allies) Anniella ___Red-spotted Toad ...................................... AQ,DS - cN BOIDAE (Boas & Pythons) ___Red-spotted Toad ...................................... AQ,DS - cN (Legless Lizards) Charina (Rosy & Rubber Boas) ___Silvery Legless Lizard .......................... DS,RI,UR – uD HYLIDAE (Chorus Frog and Treefrog Family) ___Rosy Boa ............................................ DS,CH,RO – fN HYLIDAE (Chorus Frog and Treefrog Family) Pseudacris (Chorus Frogs) Pseudacris (Chorus Frogs) Suborder: SERPENTES SNAKES ___California Chorus Frog ............ AQ,DS,RI,DE,RO – cN COLUBRIDAE (Colubrid Snakes) ___California Chorus Frog ............ AQ,DS,RI,DE,RO – cN ___Pacific Chorus Frog ....................... AQ,DS,RI,DE – cN Arizona (Glossy Snakes) ___Pacific Chorus Frog ........................AQ,DS,RI,DE – cN BOIDAE (Boas & Pythons) ___Glossy Snake ........................................... DS,SA – cN Charina (Rosy & Rubber Boas) RANIDAE (True Frog Family)
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Genus Scaphiopus: the Spade-Foot Toads
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 1 Number 1 Article 4 7-25-1939 A study of the genus Scaphiopus: the spade-foot toads Vasco M. Tanner Brigham Young University, Provo, UT Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Tanner, Vasco M. (1939) "A study of the genus Scaphiopus: the spade-foot toads," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol1/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A STUI)^' ( )F THE CiI':NUS SCAIMIIOPUS^^) Thk Spade-foot Toads AWSCO M. TANNER Professor of Zoology and Entomolog\- Brigham Young University INTRODUCTION It is a little more than a Inindred years since Holbrook, 1836, erected the t;enus Scaplilopits descril)in,ij solifariiis, a species found along the Atlantic Coast, as the type of the genus. This species, how- ever, was described the year prevousl}-, 1835, by Harlan as Rana Jiolhrookii : thus holhrookii becomes the accepted name of the genotype. Many species and sub-species have been named since this time, the great majority of them, however, have been considered as synonyms. In this study I liave recognized the following species: holhrookii, hitrtcrii, couchii, homhifrons, haminondii, and interttiontamis. A vari- ety of holhrookii, described by Garman as alhiis, from Key West. Florida, may be a vaUd form ; but since I have had only a specimen or two for study.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project Forest Pacific Southwest R5-TP-040 January Service Region 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project by: USDA Forest Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Coordinators: Cathy Brown USDA Forest Service Amphibian Monitoring Team Leader Stanislaus National Forest Sonora, CA [email protected] Marc P. Hayes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Research Scientist Science Division, Habitat Program Olympia, WA Gregory A. Green Principal Ecologist Owl Ridge National Resource Consultants, Inc. Bothel, WA Diane C. Macfarlane USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Threatened Endangered and Sensitive Species Program Leader Vallejo, CA Amy J. Lind USDA Forest Service Tahoe and Plumas National Forests Hydroelectric Coordinator Nevada City, CA Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment Brown et al. R5-TP-040 January 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS The following may be the contact information at the time of team member involvement in the assessment. Becker, Dawne Davidson, Carlos Harvey, Jim Associate Biologist Director, Associate Professor Forest Fisheries Biologist California Department of Fish and Wildlife Environmental Studies Program Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 407 West Line St., Room 8 College of Behavioral and Social Sciences USDA Forest Service Bishop, CA 93514 San Francisco State University 1200 Franklin Way (760) 872-1110 1600 Holloway Avenue Sparks, NV 89431 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94132 (775) 355-5343 (415) 405-2127 [email protected] Boiano, Daniel [email protected] Aquatic Ecologist Holdeman, Steven J. Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks Easton, Maureen A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea Intermontana) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana) in Canada Great Basin Spadefoot 2017 1 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Recovery Strategy for the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. 2 parts, 31 pp. + 40 pp. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: © Karl Larsen Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement du crapaud du Grand Bassin (Spea intermontana) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2017. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-660-24364-1 Catalogue no. En3-4/279-2017E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE GREAT BASIN SPADEFOOT (Spea intermontana) IN CANADA 2017 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of British Columbia has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the Recovery Plan for the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana) in British Columbia (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
    [Show full text]