DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Senate Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Senate Report The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee The koala—saving our national icon September 2011 © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 ISBN 978-1-74229-524-4 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Committee members to 30 June 2011 Senator Mary Jo Fisher (LP, SA) (Chair) Senator Doug Cameron (ALP, NSW) (Deputy Chair) Senator the Hon. Ron Boswell (NATS, QLD) Senator Scott Ludlam (AG, WA) Senator the Hon. Judith Troeth (LP, VIC) Senator Dana Wortley (ALP, SA) Committee members from 1 July 2011 Senator Mary Jo Fisher (LP, SA) (Chair) Senator Doug Cameron (ALP, NSW) (Deputy Chair) (from 5 July 2011) Senator Catryna Bilyk (ALP, TAS) (from 5 July 2011) Senator the Hon. Ron Boswell (NATS, QLD) Senator Alex Gallacher (ALP, SA) (to 5 July 2011) Senator Scott Ludlam (AG, WA) (to 5 July 2011) Senator Bridget McKenzie (NATS, VIC) Senator the Hon. Lisa Singh (ALP, TAS) (to 5 July 2011) Senator Larissa Waters (AG, QLD) (from 5 July 2011) Substitute member for this inquiry Senator Bob Brown (AG, TAS) to replace Senator Larissa Waters (from 7 July 2011) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Richard Di Natale (AG, VIC) Senator Larissa Waters (AG, QLD) Committee secretariat Mr Stephen Palethorpe, Secretary Ms Sophie Dunstone, Principal Research Officer Mr Christopher Lawley, Senior Research Officer Ms Jacquie Hawkins, Research Officer Mrs Dianne Warhurst, Administrative Officer Committee address PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ec_ctte/index.htm iii iv Table of Contents Committee membership ................................................................................... iii Recommendations .............................................................................................. ix Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................ xiii Executive Summary .......................................................................................... xv Introduction .......................................................................................................... xv Threats ................................................................................................................. xvi Population and threatened species listing ........................................................... xvii National Koala Conservation and Management Strategy .................................xviii Conclusion ........................................................................................................... xix Chapter 1 - Introduction .................................................................................... 1 Conduct of the inquiry ............................................................................................ 1 Accessibility trial .................................................................................................... 2 Report structure ...................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 3 Species information ................................................................................................ 3 Species range – historic and current ....................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 - Koala population .......................................................................... 13 The importance of koala population data ............................................................. 13 Counting methodologies ....................................................................................... 15 Historical estimates of Australia's koala population ............................................ 23 Current estimates of Australia's koala population ................................................ 27 Concerns with current estimates ........................................................................... 38 The way forward ................................................................................................... 42 Committee comment ............................................................................................ 44 v Chapter 3 - Threats to koala habitat: urban development, forestry, mining, drought, bushfire and climate change .................................................. 51 Urban development .............................................................................................. 52 Forestry ................................................................................................................. 62 Mining .................................................................................................................. 71 Drought, bushfires and climate change ................................................................ 74 Committee comment ............................................................................................ 77 Chapter 4 - Other threats: disease, dogs and motor vehicles ....................... 81 Disease .................................................................................................................. 81 Predation by dogs ................................................................................................. 91 Motor vehicles ...................................................................................................... 99 Chapter 5 - The status of koalas under the law ........................................... 103 Conservation status of the koala ......................................................................... 104 Listing under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act . 110 Committee comment .......................................................................................... 125 Chapter 6 - The National Koala Conservation and Management Strategy ............................................................................................................ 129 The National Koala Conservation Strategy 1998 ............................................... 129 The National Koala Conservation and Management Strategy 2009–2014 ........ 132 Evaluation of the National Koala Conservation and Management Strategy ...... 134 Committee comment .......................................................................................... 137 State-based koala management plans ................................................................. 139 Appendix 1 - Submissions, tabled documents, additional information and answers to questions taken on notice ..................................................... 143 Submissions ........................................................................................................ 143 Tabled documents ............................................................................................... 146 Additional information ....................................................................................... 147 Answers to questions taken on notice ................................................................ 148 vi Appendix 2 - Petitioning documents ............................................................. 151 Petition from Koala Preservation Society of NSW Inc ...................................... 151 Petition from Ms Meghan Halverson ................................................................. 151 Appendix 3 - Public hearings ......................................................................... 153 Appendix 4 - Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000, Regulation 7.01: Criteria for listing threatened species ................................................................................ 157 vii viii Recommendations Recommendation 1 2.144 The committee recommends that the Australian Government fund research into the genetic diversity of the koala including a population viability assessment of the southern koala and determining priority areas for conservation nationally. Recommendation 2 2.147 The committee recommends that the Australian Government fund a properly designed, funded and implemented national koala monitoring and evaluation program across the full range of the koala. Recommendation 3 2.153 The committee recommends that the Australian Government establish a nationally coordinated and integrated program for population monitoring of threatened species and other culturally, evolutionary and/or economically significant species. Recommendation 4 2.155 The committee recommends that the Australian Government assist the koala research community and interested organisations to work towards a standardised set of methodologies for estimating koala populations. Recommendation 5 2.160 The committee recommends that the Threatened Species Scientific Committee provide clearer information to the Environment Minister in all future threatened species listing advices, including species population information, and that the Threatened Species Scientific Committee review its advice to the Minister on the listing of the koala in light of the findings of this inquiry. ix Recommendation 6 3.127 The committee recommends that the Australian Government undertake habitat mapping across the koala's national range, including the identification of priority areas of koala conservation, with a view to listing important habitat under the provisions of the Environment Protection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
    Roman Oszanski A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Preamble I have chosen not to follow the issues papers: their questions are more suited to those planning to expand the nuclear industry, and many of the issues raised are irrelevant if one believes that, based on the evidence, the industry should be left to die a natural death, rather than being supported to the exclusion of more promising technologies. Executive Summary The civil nuclear industry is in decline globally. [Ref charts on existing reactors, rising costs]. It is not an industry of the future, but of the past. If it were not for the intimate connection to the military industry, it would not exist today. There is no economic advantage to SA in expanding the existing industry in this state. Nuclear power does not offer a practical solution to climate change: total lifetime emissions are likely to be (at best) similar to those of gas power plants, and there is insufficient uranium to replace all the goal fired generators. A transition to breeder technologies leaves us with major problems of waste disposal and proliferation of weapons material. Indeed, the problems of weapons proliferation and the black market in fissionable materials mean that we should limit sales of Uranium to countries which are known proliferation risks, or are non- signatories to the NNPT: we should ban sales of Australian Uranium to Russia and India. There is a current oversupply of enrichment facilities, and there is considerable international concern at the possibility of using such facilities to enrich Uranium past reactor grade to weapons grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Institute of International Affairs National Conference
    Australian Institute of International Affairs National Conference Australian Foreign Policy: Navigating the New International Disorder Monday 21 November 2016 Hotel Realm Canberra, National Circuit, Barton Arrival 8:30 – 9:00am Australian Foreign Policy 9:00am – 11:00am The Hon Julie Bishop MP (Invited) Minister for Foreign Affairs Julie Bishop is the Minister for Foreign Affairs in Australia's Federal Coalition Government. She is also the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party and has served as the Member for Curtin since 1998. Minister Bishop was sworn in as Australia's first female Foreign Minister on 18 September 2013 following four years in the role of Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade. She previously served as a Cabinet Minister in the Howard Government as Minister for Education, Science and Training and as the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women's Issues. Prior to this, Minister Bishop was Minister for Ageing. Minister Bishop has also served on a number of parliamentary and policy committees including as Chair of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. Before entering Parliament Minister Bishop was a commercial litigation lawyer at Perth firm Clayton Utz, becoming a partner in 1985, and managing partner in 1994. The Hon Kim Beazley AC FAIIA AIIA National President Mr Beazley was elected to the Federal Parliament in 1980 and represented the electorates of Swan (1980-96) and Brand (1996- 2007). Mr Beazley was a Minister in the Hawke and Keating Labor Governments (1983-96) holding, at various times, the portfolios of Defence, Finance, Transport and Communications, Employment Education and Training, Aviation, and Special Minister of State.
    [Show full text]
  • HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957
    PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TRANSCRIPT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH HON. GIZ WATSON b. 1957 - STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2015-2016 INTERVIEWER: ANNE YARDLEY TRANSCRIBER: ANNE YARDLEY DURATION: 19 HOURS REFERENCE NUMBER: OH4275 COPYRIGHT: PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA. GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [ ] are used for insertions not in the original tape. ii GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS CONTENTS Contents Pages Introduction 1 Interview - 1 4 - 22 Parents, family life and childhood; migrating from England; school and university studies – Penrhos/ Murdoch University; religion – Quakerism, Buddhism; countryside holidays and early appreciation of Australian environment; Anti-Vietnam marches; civil-rights movements; Activism; civil disobedience; sport; studying environmental science; Albany; studying for a trade. Interview - 2 23 - 38 Environmental issues; Campaign to Save Native Forests; non-violent Direct Action; Quakerism; Alcoa; community support and debate; Cockburn Cement; State Agreement Acts; campaign results; legitimacy of activism; “eco- warriors”; Inaugural speech .
    [Show full text]
  • Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power
    Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power Jim Green & Others 2 Dollars for Death Contents Preface by Jim Green............................................................................3 Uranium Mining ...................................................................................5 Uranium Mining in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia..........................5 In Situ Leach Uranium Mining Far From ‘Benign’ by Gavin Mudd.....................8 How Low Can Australia’s Uranium Export Policy Go? by Jim Green................10 Uranium & Nuclear Weapons Proliferation by Jim Falk & Bill Williams..........13 Nuclear Power ...................................................................................16 Ten Reasons to Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Power in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................16 How to Make Nuclear Power Safe in Seven Easy Steps! by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................18 Japan: One Year After Fukushima, People Speak Out by Daniel P. Aldrich......20 Nuclear Power & Water Scarcity by Sue Wareham & Jim Green........................23 James Lovelock & the Big Bang by Jim Green......................................................25 Nuclear Waste ....................................................................................28 Nuclear Power: Watt a Waste .............................................................................28 Nuclear Racism .................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/99687/ c Copyright 2016 Monique Mann and Matthew Rimmer This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. September 2016 SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE ON THE 2016 CENSUS DR MONIQUE MANN LECTURER SCHOOL OF JUSTICE FACULTY OF LAW QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY DR MATTHEW RIMMER PROFESSOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    [Show full text]
  • Take Heart and Name WA's New Federal Seat Vallentine 2015 Marks 30 Years Since Jo Vallentine Took up Her Senate Position
    Take heart and name WA’s new federal seat Vallentine 2015 marks 30 years since Jo Vallentine took up her senate position, the first person in the world to be elected on an anti-nuclear platform. What better way to acknowledge her contribution to peace, nonviolence and protecting the planet than to name a new federal seat after her? The official Australian parliament website describes Jo Vallentine in this way: Jo Vallentine was elected in 1984 to represent Western Australia in the Senate for the Nuclear Disarmament Party, running with the slogan ‘Take Heart—Vote Vallentine’. She commenced her term in July 1985 as an Independent Senator for Nuclear Disarmament, claiming in her first speech that she was the first member of any parliament in the world to be elected on this platform. When she stood for election again in 1990, she was elected as a senator for The Greens (Western Australia), and was the first Green in the Australian Senate. … During her seven years in Parliament, Vallentine was a persistent voice for peace, nuclear disarmament, Aboriginal land rights, social justice and the environment (emphasis added)i. Jo Vallentine’s parliamentary and subsequent career should be recognised in the named seat of Vallentine because: 1. Jo Vallentine was the first woman or person in several roles, in particular: The first person in the world to win a seat based on a platform of nuclear disarmament The first person to be elected to federal parliament as a Greens party politician. The Greens are now Australia’s third largest political party, yet no seat has been named after any of their political representatives 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain-Reaction-#114-April-2012.Pdf
    Issue #114 | April 2012 RRP $5.50 The National Magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia www.foe.org.au ukushima fone year on • Occupy Texas Can we save the • Fighting Ferguson’s nuclear dump Murray-Darling? • A smart grid and seven energy sources • How low can uranium export policy go? 1 Chain Reaction #114 April 2012 Contents Edition #114 − April 2012 Regular items Publisher FoE Australia News 4 FoE Australia Contacts Friends of the Earth, Australia Chain Reaction ABN 81600610421 FoE Australia ABN 18110769501 FoE International News 8 inside back cover www.foe.org.au youtube.com/user/FriendsOfTheEarthAUS Features twitter.com/FoEAustralia facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-the-Earth- MURRAY-DARLING NUCLEAR POWER & FUKUSHIMA Australia/16744315982 AND RIVER RED GUMS Fighting Ferguson’s Dump 20 flickr.com/photos/foeaustralia Can we save the Natalie Wasley Chain Reaction website Murray-Darling Basin? 10 Global Conference for a www.foe.org.au/chain-reaction Jonathan La Nauze Nuclear Power Free World 22 Climate change and the Cat Beaton and Peter Watts Chain Reaction contact details Murray-Darling Plan 13 Fukushima − one year on: PO Box 222,Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065. Jamie Pittock photographs 24 email: [email protected] phone: (03) 9419 8700 River Red Gum vegetation Australia’s role in the survey project 14 Fukushima disaster 26 Chain Reaction team Aaron Eulenstein Jim Green Jim Green, Kim Stewart, Georgia Miller, Rebecca Pearse, Who is to blame for the Richard Smith, Elena McMaster, Tessa Sellar MIC CHECK: Fukushima nuclear disaster? 28 Layout
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Leading Practices in Ensuring Evidence-Based Regulation of Farm Practices That Impact Water Quality Outcomes in the Great Barrier Reef
    The Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee Identification of leading practices in ensuring evidence-based regulation of farm practices that impact water quality outcomes in the Great Barrier Reef October 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 978-1-76093-122-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. Contents Members ....................................................................................................................................................... v List of Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1—Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2—Governance framework and legislative arrangements ................................................. 15 Reef 2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan .................................................................................... 15 Legislation ......................................................................................................................................... 23 Summary of views concerning the Reef regulations package ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Defence Training Activities and Facilities on Rural and Regional Communities
    The Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee Impact of Defence training activities and facilities on rural and regional communities Final report May 2018 Commonwealth of Australia 2018 ISBN 978-1-76010-768-0 Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia Phone: + 61 2 6277 3535 Fax: + 61 2 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_fadt This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. ii Committee Membership Senator Alex Gallacher, Chair ALP, SA Senator Linda Reynolds CSC, Deputy Chair LP, WA Senator David Fawcett LP, SA Senator Kimberley Kitching ALP, VIC Senator Claire Moore ALP, QLD Senator Rex Patrick CA, SA Secretariat Ms Lyn Beverley, Committee Secretary Ms Margie Morrison, Acting Principal Research Officer Ms Anna Dunkley, Senior Research Officer Ms Margaret Cahill, Research Officer Ms Shannon Ross, Administrative Officer iii iv Table of contents Committee Membership ................................................................................... iii Recommendations .............................................................................................vii Chapter 1.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Osos Sobre Toro
    OSOS SOBRE TORO Assessment of Wiluna Uranium Project Report prepared by: Economists at Large Pty Ltd Melbourne, Australia www.ecolarge.com [email protected] Phone: +61 3 9005 0154 | Fax: +61 3 8080 1604 65 Bevan St, Albert Park VIC 3206, Melbourne, Australia Citation: Economists at Large, 2013, Osos sobre Toro: Assessment of Wiluna Uranium Project, a report for Senator Scott Ludlam and the member groups of the Anti-Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia, prepared by Economists at Large, Melbourne, Australia. Authors: Rod Campbell Julie Beatty Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the organisations involved. This report is distributed with the understanding that the authors are not responsible for the results of any actions undertaken on the basis of the information that is contained within, nor for any omission from, or error in, this publication. Economists at Large 2 Executive summary The Wiluna project is presently the most advanced uranium project in West Australia and is poised to commence development pending final approval of its environmental management plan including securing a bond for closure and rehabilitation costs and, importantly, pending financing from a joint venture equity partner. Our modelling of the project economics suggests a positive net present value (NPV) of $A 34Mn, however, this does not include any closure costs for the project. There has been no official closure cost estimate submitted by Toro Energy that we are aware of. We conducted an NPV sensitivity analysis and concluded that: Adding a closure cost to the model based on closed uranium mines in Europe and the USA will almost certainly deliver negative NPV even if incurred at the end of the project in 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives Rail Against Coalition Deal with Di Natale
    09 Mar 2016 The Australian, Australia Author: Sid Maher • Section: General News • Article type : News Item Classification : National • Audience : 104,774 • Page: 4 • Printed Size: 269.00cm² Market: National • Country: Australia • ASR: AUD 5,436 • Words: 475 Item ID: 556680870 Licensed by Copyright Agency. You may only copy or communicate this work with a licence. Page 1 of 2 Conservatives rail against Coalition deal with Di Natale SID MAHER Yesterday Senator Abetz NATIONAL AFFAIRS EDITOR renewed his warning: “I would be worried to learn that we Conservative Liberal MPs are would do a deal. I would trust warning party leaders not to do a that no such deal would be preference deal with the Greens, undertaken.’’ fearing it will spark a backlash South Australian senator among supporters. Cory Bernardi said: “As much as But moderate Liberals are I would like to get rid of Anthony more open to a deal, citing the Albanese, anytime you do a deal structural damage it could do to with the Greens you end up Labor if Liberal preferences catching gangrene.’’ unseated frontbenchers such as Andrew Nikolic, the Liberal Anthony Albanese. MP for Bass, attacked Mr Labor won a dozen seats Albanese who launched a media where its advantage on Green blitz claiming a deal between the preferences was greater than the Liberals and the Greens. He said ALP’s winning margin at the last he would not be lectured to by election: six in Victoria, three in the Labor Party, which had NSW and three in Queensland. formed government with the Greens leader Richard Di Greens in Canberra and Hobart’.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
    PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade JSCFADT membership or Senate may also ask the Committee to undertake an inquiry. Information online Introduction The Joint Standing Committee The Committee may initiate its own inquiries into annual The JSCFADT is the largest committee of the Australian reports of relevant Government departments and authorities Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Welcome from the Australian Parliament’s Joint Standing on Foreign Affairs, Defence Parliament with 32 members. Membership comprises: or reports of the Auditor-General. www.aph.gov.au/jfadt Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. and Trade • Five Senators and 12 House of Representatives Members An inquiry is based on the terms of reference – essentially The Parliament of Australia The Committee draws its membership from both the Senate from the governing party. a statement of the topic or issues to be examined. Usually, www.aph.gov.au and House of Representatives, with members sharing a Like many other legislatures, the Australian Parliament • Five Senators and eight House of Representatives inquiries are delegated to the relevant sub-committee to Department of Defence common interest in national security, international affairs and has established a system of committees. Australian Members from the opposition party. complete on behalf of the full Committee. www.defence.gov.au Australia’s role in the world. parliamentary committees each have a defined area of interest, such as the environment or economics. The Joint • Two Senators from a minority party or who are To complete the inquiry process, the Committee (or a Through its public inquiries and reports to Parliament, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and independents.
    [Show full text]