The Proposed Prize for Mountain Ascents
that, in the opinion of the Committee, none of the ascents which have been proposed for the prize, and the merits of which could, according to the stipulations of the competition, be taken into consideration, is of that exceptional importance which one has the right, as well as the duty, to demand for the award of an Olym pic Gold Medal; that the Committee is strongly of the opinion that there exists no satisfactory com mon basis for a comparison between different ascents, and that, consequently, a just award is impossible. The reasons on which the Committee bases this opinion are; 1. The frequent use of paid, professional guides in mountaineering, which makes it inevitable that the jury will run the risk of rewarding amateurs for what, in reality, is due to professionals, while it also makes it impossible to compare ascents carried out with, and without, assistance received from such guides. 2. The impossibility of comparing ascents of different character, such as, for in stance, a Dolomite rock-climb, a snow- and ice-climb in the Oberland, and an ascent in the Himalayas. 3. The impossibility of judging the conditions of weather and snow existing at the time of the ascent, factors which are of vital importance on every occasion. 4. The impossibility of correctly estimating the degree of safety with which an THE PROPOSED PRIZE FOR MOUNTAIN ascent has been made, it being evident that the sporting value of a climb must be considered very much diminished if the climber has exposed himself to ASCENTS. dangers that could have been lessened, or altogether avoided, by better judgment "7v'; ne part of the programme for The Fifth Olympiad was, and greater skill.
[Show full text]