Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Hexavalent Chromium Standards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hexavalent Chromium Hexavalent
Toxic Heavy Metals Series Toxic Heavy Metals Hexavalent ChromiumHexavalent This document will familiarize the reader with the toxic metal Hexavalent Chromium, OSHA standards, and methods for prevention and decontamination. Hygenall Corporation 6275 University Drive, STE 37-390 Huntsville, AL 35806 256.781.4486 [email protected] Toxic Metal Series Hexavalent Chromium Contents Introduction . 3 Worker Exposure and Health Consequences . 4 OSHA’s Hexavalent Chromium Standards . 4 Exposure Limits . 4 Exposure Monitoring and Determinations . 4 Scheduled Monitoring Option . 5 Regulated Areas . 6 Control Measures . 7 Requirements for Protective Work Clothing and Equipment . 8 Hygiene Areas and Practices . 9 Housekeeping . 10 Recommended Cleaning and Decontamination Products…11 Medical Surveillance . 12 Worker Training and Communication . 13 Recordkeeping . 14 Effective Dates . 14 Additional Information . 15 References . 16 2 | P a g e Hexavalent Chromium Toxic Metal Series INTRODUCTION This document is intended to give readers an overview of the provisions and requirements of the OSHA Hexavalent Chromium standards for general industry (29 CFR 1910.1026), shipyards (29 CFR 1915.1026), and construction (29 CFR 1926.1126). Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is a toxic form of the element chromium. Hexavalent chromium is rarely found in nature and is generally man-made. Cr(VI) is widely used in pigments, metal finishing electroplating), wood preservatives and fungicides, and in chemical synthesis as an ingredient and catalyst. Table 1 lists some selected Cr(VI) compounds with their synonyms and common uses. Hexavalent chromium may also be present in fumes generated during the production or welding of chrome alloys. Chromium metal is often alloyed with other metals or plated on metal and plastic substrates to improve corrosion resistance and provide protective coatings. -
Wood Modified by Inorganic Salts: Mechanism and Properties
WOOD MODIFIED BY INORGANIC SALTS: MECHANISM AND PROPERTIES. I. WEATHERING RATE, WATER REPELLENCY, AND IIIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF WOOD MODIFIEID WITH CHROMIUM (111) NITRATE VERSUS CHROMIC ACID' R. S. Willianzs and W. C. Feisl Research Chemists Forest Products Lab~ratory,~Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Madison, WI 53705 (Received October 1983) ABSTRACT Chromic acid treatment of wood improves surface characteristics. A simple dip or brush application of 5% aqueous chromic acid to a wood surface stops extractive staining, improves dimensional stability, retards weathering of unfinished wood, and prolongs the life of finishes. A better understanding of how chromic acid effects these improvements may facilitate the development of even better treatments. The improvements may be due to a combination offactors: oxidation ofwood by hexavalent chromium compounds, formation of coordination coml~lexeswith trivalent chromium, and the presence of insoluble chromium compounds at the surface. Most trivalent chromium compounds do not become fixed in wood (i.e., do not form water-insolublf: wood-chemical complexes). However, chromium (111) nitrate treatment of western redcedar (Thuja plicata), southern pine (Pinus sp.), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) produced modified wood with properties similar to chromic acid-treated wood. Evaluation of the chromium (111) nitrate- and chromic acid-modified wood by leaching, Xenon arc- accelerated weathering, and swellometer experiments clearly demonstrated similar fixation, erosion, and water-repellent properties. Based on the results from chromium (111) nitrate-treated wood, fixation through coordination of trivalent chromium with wood hydroxyls an(5 formation of insoluble chromium appear to be the critical factors in improving the performance of the treated wood. -
(VI) and Chromium (V) Oxide Fluorides
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1976 The chemistry of chromium (VI) and chromium (V) oxide fluorides Patrick Jay Green Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Chemistry Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Green, Patrick Jay, "The chemistry of chromium (VI) and chromium (V) oxide fluorides" (1976). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4039. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5923 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. All ABSTRACT OF THE TllESIS OF Patrick Jay Green for the Master of Science in Chemistry presented April 16, 1976. Title: Chemistry of Chromium(VI) and Chromium(V) Oxide Fluorides. APPROVEO BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS CO'"o\l TIEE: y . • Ii . ' I : • • • • • New preparative routes to chromyl fluoride were sought. It was found that chlorine ironofluoride reacts with chromium trioxide and chromyl chlo ride to produce chromyl fluoride. Attempts were ~ade to define a mechan ism for the reaction of ClF and Cr0 in light of by-products observed 3 and previous investigations. Carbonyl fluoride and chromium trioxide react to fom chro·yl fluoride and carbo:i dioxide. A mechanism was also proposed for this react10n. Chromium trioxide 11itl\ l~F6 or WF5 reacts to produce chromyl fluoride and the respective oxide tetrafluoride. 2 Sulfur hexafluoride did not react with Cr03. -
Chromium Compounds Hazard Summary
Chromium Compounds Hazard Summary Chromium occurs in the environment primarily in two valence states, trivalent chromium (Cr III) and hexavalent chromium (Cr VI). Exposure may occur from natural or industrial sources of chromium. Chromium III is much less toxic than chromium (VI). The respiratory tract is also the major target organ for chromium (III) toxicity, similar to chromium (VI). Chromium (III) is an essential element in humans. The body can detoxify some amount of chromium (VI) to chromium (III). The respiratory tract is the major target organ for chromium (VI) toxicity, for acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) inhalation exposures. Shortness of breath, coughing, and wheezing were reported from a case of acute exposure to chromium (VI), while perforations and ulcerations of the septum, bronchitis, decreased pulmonary function, pneumonia, and other respiratory effects have been noted from chronic exposure. Human studies have clearly established that inhaled chromium (VI) is a human carcinogen, resulting in an increased risk of lung cancer. Animal studies have shown chromium (VI) to cause lung tumors via inhalation exposure. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (7), which contains information on inhalation chronic toxicity and the RfC and oral chronic toxicity and the RfD, and the carcinogenic effects of chromium including the unit cancer risk for inhalation exposure, EPA's Toxicological Review of Trivalent Chromium and Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium (3), and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR's) Toxicological Profile for Chromium. (1) Uses The metal chromium is used mainly for making steel and other alloys. -
Health Hazard Evaluation Report 77-63-449
\ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HE1\LTH, EDUCATI0f1, AND WELFARE CENTER FOR DISEASE COllTROL I NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIOfU\L SAFETY AND HEALTH i CINCINNATI, OHIO 45226 HEALTH HAZARD EVALUATIOf~ DETERMINATION l REPORT NO. 77-63-449 McDONNELL AIRCRAFT COMPANY ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI DECEMBER 1977 I. TOXICITY DETERMINATION A health hazard evaluation was conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health on July 11-14, 1977, at the McDonnell Aircraft Company in St. Louis, Missouri. Based on the medical evaluation of employees in Department 151 and the industrial hygiene survey, it is determined that employees were not exposed to toxic concentrations of contaminants during this evaluatton. Potential contaminants studied included: iron oxide, nickel, chromium, sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide, toluene, xylene, benzene, refined petroleum solvents, tetrachloroethylene, acetone, and styrene. It is our opinion that workers in the masking operations may occasionally be exposed to concentrations of organic solvents, and workers involved in the etching operations may occasionally be exposed to concentrations of acids and/or associated emissions such as nitric acid, nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide which have produced medical symptoms among the employees. These substances are known to produce nose, throat and skin irritation, dizziness and headaches - symptoms which were reported by workers in private interviews during the survey and are important indications of excessive exposure. From this limited evaluation, the authors feel that no definitive statement can be made concerning the workers in Department 151 having an increased incidence of deaths which could be directly attributed to occupational exposure. -
Chromic Acid Chromium Trioxide Flake
CHROMIC ACID CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE FLAKE PROPERTIES: Chemical Formula: Stability in Air: CrO3 Deliquesces at humidity above 30% CAS Number: 1333-82-0 Solubility in Water: Highly soluble: 62.5% w/w at 20 ºC ( 68 ºF) 67.5% w/w at 100 ºC (212 ºF) Molecular Weight: 99.99 Bulk Density Loose 75 - 82 lbs. per cubic foot Appearance: Dark Red Flakes Heat of Solution Exothermic (24.7 cal./g.; 44.5 BTU/lb.) ThroughApplied Innovation Specific Gravity: 2.7 at 20 °C (68 °F) Behavior on Heating Melts at 197 ºC (387 ºF) - starts to decompose to intermediate chromium oxides at slightly higher temperatures. Chemical Characteristics: Performance d Chromic acid is a strong acid and oxidizing agent. When neutralized with alkalis, chromic acid forms dichromate or chromate compounds. In oxidation reactions, the chromium atom is reduced from the hexavalent to trivalent Enhance state. continued… www.elementis.com CHROMIC ACID CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE FLAKE TYPICAL ANALYSIS: * Specification Typical Analysis CrO3 99.85 % Min. 99.9 % Sulfate as SO4 0.10 % Max. 0.07 % Chloride as Cl 0.005 % Max. <0.005 % Insoluble Matter 0.005 % Max. 0.002 % Sodium as Na2O 0.020 % Max. 0.014 % pH of 1% Aqueous Solution NA 1.0 Meets GSA Commercial Item Description A-A-55827D, 20 April 2015 GENERAL APPLICATIONS: ThroughApplied Innovation The major uses of chromic acid are in wood preservation, metal finishing and plating. Secondary applications include catalyst manufacture and as an oxidizing agent. Chromic acid is used to produce salt-free CCA type wood preservatives. These preservatives are combinations of chromium, copper and arsenic. -
Beneficial Reuse and Waste Minimization of Hexavalent Chrome
Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Technologies Research and Development Office Science and Technology Program Final Report ST-2018-9085-01 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Research and Development Office 10/1/2018 Mission Statements Protecting America's Great Outdoors and Powering Our Future The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The following form is a Standard form 298, Report Documentation Page. This report was sponsored by the Bureau of Reclamations Research and Development office. For more detailed information about this Report documentation page please contact Miguel Arias-Paic at 303-445-2131. THIS TEXT WILL BE INVISIBLE. IT IS FOR 508 COMPLIANCE OF THE NEXT PAGE. Disclaimer Information in this report may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. The data and findings should not be construed as an endorsement of any product or firm by the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Interior, or Federal Government. The products evaluated in the report were evaluated for purposes specific to the Bureau of Reclamation mission. Reclamation gives no warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, for the products evaluated in this report, including merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 T1. REPORT DATE: T2. REPORT TYPE: T3. DATES COVERED SEPTEMBER 2018 RESEARCH T4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Hexavalent Chromium Treatment Technologies Z1759, X9085, FA280 5b. -
Jason Lotter, MS, CIH
Jason Lotter, MS, CIH Current Position Summary of Experience Supervising Health Mr. Jason Lotter is a Supervising Health Scientist with Cardno ChemRisk in Chicago. His Scientist principal areas of training and expertise include industrial hygiene, exposure and risk assessment, and occupational safety. He has been involved in researching, measuring, Discipline Areas and reconstructing exposures, and assessing risks to consumers, residents, and workers, > Industrial Hygiene from a variety of chemicals including formaldehyde, silica, diacetyl, coal dust, lead, > Exposure particulate matter, hexavalent chromium, asbestos, and metals. Mr. Lotter completed his Assessment master’s degree in Public Health Science, with an emphasis in industrial hygiene, from > Risk Assessment the University of Illinois at Chicago. For his master’s thesis, he evaluated groundwater > Occupational Safety arsenic in Guatemala and conducted a risk assessment related to arsenic exposure for local residents. Years' Experience 7 Years At ChemRisk, Mr. Lotter has conducted independent research on various topics and chemicals, and has presented his research at scientific conferences and published in the Joined Cardno peer-reviewed literature. He has also conducted indoor air modeling for formaldehyde, 2013 provided industrial hygiene and occupational safety support during refinery turnarounds, and has assisted in the completion of various exposure simulation studies. Education > MS, Public Health Mr. Lotter currently co-leads the Cardno ChemRisk Cleaning and Disinfectant Product Science, University initiative, focusing on peracetic acid and other antimicrobial chemicals. He is a member of of Illinois at Chicago, the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and currently serves on the Board of 2012 Directors of the Chicago Local Section of AIHA. He has been as a Certified Industrial > BS, Civil Hygienist (CIH) since 2016. -
Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013
Prepared in cooperation with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013 Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover and other images: Front cover shows collection of groundwater samples, Union-York Water District (intake 00251). This and other photography by Patrick Mills, U.S. Geological Survey. Hexavalent and Total Chromium at Low Reporting Concentrations in Source-Water Aquifers and Surface Waters Used for Public Supply in Illinois, 2013 By Patrick C. Mills and Richard P. Cobb Prepared in cooperation with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. -
National Wildlife Refuges by State
National Wildlife Refuges by State Refuges are listed alphabetically under each state. Refuges that cross state boundaries will be listed under each state where it occurs. Many refuges are managed by a complex office or "headquarters" refuge. In this case, the address will be "C/O" another station and/or the mailing address may be in a different state from its physical location. If you have any questions on this list, please contact: Division of Visitor Services National Wildlife Refuge System Falls Church, VA 22041 Telephone: 703-358-2517 This list was updated August 26, 2014 Alabama Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager P.O. Box 5087 Bon Secour NWR Fort Mcclellan Jereme Phillips, Refuge Manager AL 12295 State Highway 180 36205-0087 Gulf Shores Telephone: 256-848-6833 AL 36542-8203 Sauta Cave NWR Telephone: 251-540-7720 Emery Hoyle, Refuge Manager C/O Wheeler NWR Cahaba River NWR 2700 Refuge Headquarters Road Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager Decatur Post Office Box 5087 AL Fort Mcclellan 35603-5202 AL Telephone: 256-353-7243 36205-0087 Telephone: 256-848-6833 Watercress Darter NWR Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager Choctaw NWR P.O. Box 5087 Kimberly Sykes, Refuge Manager Fort Mcclellan Post Office Box 150 AL Gilbertown 36205-0087 AL Telephone: 256-848-6833 36908-0150 Telephone: 323-5548 Wheeler NWR Emery Hoyle, Refuge Manager Eufaula NWR 2700 Refuge Headquarters Road John Earle, Refuge Manager Decatur 367 Highway 165 AL Eufaula 35603-5202 AL Telephone: 256-353-7243 36027-8187 Telephone: 334-687-4065 Fern Cave NWR Emery Hoyle, Refuge Manager C/O Wheeler NWR 2700 Refuge Headquarters Road Decatur AL 35603-5202 Telephone: 256-353-7243 Grand Bay NWR Danny Moss, Refuge Manager 7200 Crane Lane Gautier MS 39553 Telephone: 228-497-6322 Key Cave NWR Emery Hoyle, Refuge Manager C/O Wheeler NWR 2700 Refuge Headquarters Road Decatur AL 35603-5202 Telephone: 256-353-7243 Mountain Longleaf NWR Refuge Address List current as of August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 79 Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager P.O. -
Professional Licensure Disclosure
PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE DISCLOSURE Background- Lincoln Memorial University offers several programs leading to professional licensure within the State of Tennessee. Lincoln Memorial University also offers the ASN and BSN in Kentucky and Florida, which can lead to professional licensure in those states. States vary in what professions they require to be licensed and how licensure functions. Some states require an individual to graduate from an approved program. Others require an individual to “meet [the] certification requirements of a national organization”. A specific amount of training can also be required as well as passage of an exam based on a state requisite exam score. Often, licensed professionals must complete continuing education on an annual. State Authorization- Lincoln Memorial University is a member of the National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (NC-SARA) which allows us to provide distance learning programs (both online and in the form of supervised field experiences) and coursework to residents of states other than Tennessee. NC-SARA membership, however, does not grant reciprocity or exempt us from state professional licensing requirements. As a result, licensing requirements in Tennessee may not be recognized as sufficient to obtain a license in any other state. Relocation- Relocating while in the course of a program to another state may have impacts if the student can remain in the program, meet the state licensure requirements and/or continue to receive financial aid funding. Prior to considering relocation, please log into your WebAdvisor account to complete the change of address process and contact your program advisor to discuss authorization and licensure eligibility requirements. -
Attachment 3-1 Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil
Attachment 3-1 Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs) Eco-SSL Standard Operating Procedure (SOP # 1): Plant and Soil Invertebrate Literature Search and Acquisition OSWER Directive 92857-55 November 2003 This page intentionally left blank OVERVIEW Currently, there is a lack of clear guidance in setting terrestrial effect thresholds when conducting risk assessments. Without an EPA-approved, peer-reviewed, ecologically-based terrestrial effect database, the process to develop thresholds is problematic both to EPA, other federal agencies, states, and concerned private parties. Identification of published toxicity studies on invertebrates, microbial processes and plants is a key step in the derivation of benchmarks. The purpose of the Task Group 4, Standard Operating Procedure Number 1: Literature Search and Acquisition (referred to as TG4-SOP#1) is to document procedures used to identify and acquire potentially relevant toxicology literature for use in setting ecological soil screening levels. The literature search strategy is designed to locate worldwide terrestrial toxicity literature that includes the effects of chemicals of concern on terrestrial soil-dwelling invertebrates and plants. The literature acquisition process is designed to ensure timely acquisition of relevant publications. LITERATURE IDENTIFICATION Potentially relevant literature for developing ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSLs) is identified by examining hard copies of relevant journals, bibliographies and guidance publications and through the use of a comprehensive computerized literature search strategy. These procedures are designed to locate worldwide terrestrial toxicology literature that includes the effects of specific toxic substances with an emphasis on exposure via soil. Paper-based Literature Identification The paper-based literature identification process includes the scanning of relevant review article bibliographies and key journals held in the U.S.