DOCSLIB.ORG

Who-Is-Who Directory on NIS–Edition 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Version 5.0 ENISA CONTACTS ENISA - Who - is - Who Directory on NIS - Edition 2010 TP-80-09-724-EN-C Visiting address: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) Science and Technology Park of Greece (ITE) Vassilika Vouton GR-70013 Heraklion, Greece Postal address: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) PO Box 1309 GR-71001 Heraklion, Greece Tel. (30) 28 10 39 12 80 Fax (30) 28 10 39 14 10 http://www.enisa.europa.eu Who-is-Who Directory on Network and Information Security E d i t i o n 2 0 1 0 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu) Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN-13 978-92-9204-020-8 European Communities, 2010 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Designed by Polyplano Printed in Greece PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER V e r s i o n 5.0 Who-is-Who Directory on Network and Information Security E d i t i o n 2 0 1 0 LEGAL NOTICE This publication is a deliverable under ENISA’s 2009 Work Programme. Unless stated otherwise, this publication represents the views and interpretations of the authors and editors. It should not be construed as an action of ENISA or ENISA bodies, unless adopted under Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council that has been amended by Regulation (EC) No 1007/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. This publication may be updated from time to time. Third party sources are quoted as appropriate. ENISA is not responsible for the content of the external sources including external websites referenced in this publication. This publication is intended for information purposes only. Neither ENISA nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use that might be made of the information it contains. ENISA cannot warrant that all information is up to date, correct or complete. ENISA welcomes correction requests which will be taken into account in a future edition. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of ENISA, or as expressly permitted by law or under terms agreed with the appropriate rights organisations. Source must be acknowledged at all times. Enquiries for reproduction can be sent to the contact address quoted in this publication. © European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), 2009-2010. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS >>004 Legal Notice >>321 EEA Member States >>007 Preface >>322 Iceland >>330 Liechtenstein >>008 European Time Zone >>334 Norway >>011 EU Member States >>343 EFTA Member State >>012 Austria >>344 Switzerland >>024 Belgium >>036 Bulgaria >>357 EU Institutions and Bodies >>044 Cyprus >>056 Czech Republic >>377 International Organisations >>064 Denmark >>072 Estonia >>385 Other Pan-European >>082 Finland Stakeholder Organisations >>098 France >>108 Germany >>415 Updates, Comments, >>144 Greece Corrections and Suggestions >>154 Hungary >>164 Ireland >>415 ENISA Contacts >>174 Italy >>188 Latvia >>196 Lithuania >>204 Luxembourg >>212 Malta >>218 Netherlands (The) >>236 Poland >>246 Portugal >>254 Romania >>260 Slovakia >>268 Slovenia >>280 Spain >>292 Sweden >>300 United Kingdom 5 Cut-off date of data gathering for this Directory: 15 September 2009 6 PREFACE Dear reader, Welcome to the fifth, extended and updated edition of ENISA’s Who-is-Who Directory on Network and Information Security. As with previous editions, this directory serves as the ‘yellow pages’ of Network and Information Security (NIS) in Europe. As such, it is a useful tool for those working closely with NIS issues in Europe. Comprising information on NIS stakeholders (such as national and European authorities and NIS organisations) and contacts, websites and areas of responsibility or activity, I am confident that it will serve well our common mission to enhance NIS security levels in Europe. This latest 2010 edition has been expanded and includes more contact information and data of EU Member States and European Institutions. All Member States of the EU, EEA as well as EFTA, have provided their most relevant contacts in NIS. Moreover,this edition provides you with more contacts of industry organisations and academia active in the field of NIS. It also contains a section with contacts of both other Pan-European Organisations and International Organisations working in this area. I would like to thank all contributors for their hard work and fruitful cooperation with ENISA. The 2010 edition of the Who-is-Who Directory on Network and Information Security is further evidence of the excellent collaborative work between ENISA and the network of national liaison officers (NLOs), who provided ENISA with the relevant data in previous years and with updates for this edition. It also successfully implements one of ENISA’s publications foreseen in the Agency’s 2009 Work Programme. Please bear in mind that this is a ‘living’ document. It should be continuously revised in order to remain valuable for all those interested in NIS: your input is therefore needed and most welcome. Please send suggestions for updates and contributions to [email protected],inclosecooperationwiththeNLOs. Dr.Udo Helmbrecht Executive Director ENISA, October 2009 7 European Time Zone Map Map retrieved from the publication “Travelling in Europe”, European Commission, 2007, and adapted also to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Iceland page 322 >>012 Austria >>024 Belgium >>036 Bulgaria >>044 Cyprus >>056 Czech Republic >>064 Denmark >>072 Estonia >>082 Finland >>098 France >>108 Germany >>144 Greece >>154 Hungary >>164 Ireland >>174 Italy Ireland >>188 Latvia page 164 >>196 Lithuania >>204 Luxembourg United Kingdo page 300 >>212 Malta >>218 Netherlands (The) >>236 Poland >>246 Portugal >>254 Romania >>260 Slovakia >>268 Slovenia >>280 Spain >>292 Sweden >>300 United Kingdom >>322 Iceland Portugal >>330 Liechtenstein page 246 >>334 Norway Spain page 280 >>344 Switzerland 8 UTC+1 UTC+2 Number indicates standard time Finland page 82 Norway page 334 Sweden Estonia page 292 page 72 Latvia page 188 Denmark Lithuania page 64 page 196 om Netherlands (The) page 218 Germany Poland Belgium page 236 page 24 page 108 Luxembourg Czech Republic page 204 page 56 France Slovakia page 260 page 98 Austria Switzerland page 12 Hungary page 344 page 154 Liechtenstein Slovenia Romania page 330 page 268 page 254 Italy Bulgaria page174 page 36 Greece page 144 Cyprus Malta page 44 page 212 9 10 11 Time Zone: Standard Time = UTC + 1; Summer Time = UTC + 2 12 National authorities in network and information security AT >>014 Federal ICT Strategy >>014 Austrian Data Protection Commission BE >>014 Informationssicherheitskommission BG (Information Security Commission, Federal Chancellery) CY >>015 BVT (Federal Ministry of the Interior, Federal Agency for State Protection and Counter Terrorism) >>015 Federal Chancellery, Dep. Media Affairs/ Information Society CZ >>016 TKK (Telekom-Control-Kommission Rundfunk & Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH) DK >>016 A-SIT EE FI Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) FR >>017 ACOnet-CERT DE >>017 CERT.AT >>017 GovCERT GR HU Industry organisations active in network and information security IE >>018 WKÖ (Wirtschaftskammer Österreich) IT >>018 it-safe.at LV >>018 IT-Security Experts >>019 ICT Austria LT >>019 Sicher-im-Netz.at LU MT Academic organisations active in network and information security NL >>020 Austrian Research Centers PL >>020 Graz University of Technology PT >>020 University Klagenfurt >>021 University Linz RO >>021 Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences SK >>021 Vienna University of Technology SI ES Other bodies and organisations active in network and information security SE >>022 IISA (Initiative Information Security Austria) UK >>022 SIC (Stiftung Secure Information and Communication Technologies) >>022 Secure Business Austria IS >>022 saferinternet.at LI >>023 Verein für Konsumenteninformation NO CH 13 AUSTRIA National authorities in network and information security AT Federal ICT Strategy Contact information and website: BE BG Federal Chancellery E-mail: [email protected] CY Ballhausplatz 2 A-1010 Wien CZ DK http://www.digital.austria.gv.at EE Area of responsibility: ICT and e-Government strategies. FI FR Austrian Data Protection Commission DE Contact information and website: GR HU Geschäftsstelle der Tel.(43-1)531152525 Datenschutzkommission Fax(43-1)531152690 IE Ballhausplatz 1 E-mail:[email protected] IT A-1014 Wien LV LT http://www.dsk.gv.at LU Area of responsibility: Supervisory authority on data protection. MT NL Informationssicherheitskommission PL (Information Security Commission, Federal Chancellery) PT Contact information and website: RO Federal Chancellery Tel.(43-1)531152594 SK Dep. Information Security Office Fax(43-1)531152615 SI Ballhausplatz 2 E-mail:[email protected] ES A-1014 Wien SE http://www.bka.gv.at UK IS Area of responsibility: National security authority. LI NO CH 14 AUSTRIA BVT AT (Federal Ministry of the Interior,Federal Agency for State Protection and Counter Terrorism) Contact information and website: BE BG Federal Agency for State Protection and Tel.(43-1)531264302 CounterTerrorism Department 3 Fax(43-1)531264342 CY Personal Protection and Physical Security E-mail:[email protected] CZ DK http://www.bmi.gv.at/cms/bmi_verfassungsschutz EE Area of responsibility: Procedure for security clearance and facility security clearance (FSC). FI FR Federal Chancellery, Dep. Media Affairs/ Information Society DE Contact information and website: GR Ballhausplatz 2 Tel.(43-1)531152843 HU A-1014 Wien Fax(43-1)531152692 IE E-mail:[email protected] IT LV http://www.bka.gv.at/informationsgeselschaft LT Area of responsibility: ’Safer Internet Plus’ programme.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Branding a Nation Online: Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism

    Re-Branding a Nation Online: Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism

    Re-Branding a Nation Online Re-Branding a Nation Online Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism Magdalena Kania-Lundholm Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Sal IX, Universitets- huset, Uppsala, Friday, October 26, 2012 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Kania-Lundholm, M. 2012. Re-Branding A Nation Online: Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism. Sociologiska institutionen. 258 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2302-4. The aim of this dissertation is two-fold. First, the discussion seeks to understand the concepts of nationalism and patriotism and how they relate to one another. In respect to the more criti- cal literature concerning nationalism, it asks whether these two concepts are as different as is sometimes assumed. Furthermore, by problematizing nation-branding as an “updated” form of nationalism, it seeks to understand whether we are facing the possible emergence of a new type of nationalism. Second, the study endeavors to discursively analyze the ”bottom-up” processes of national reproduction and re-definition in an online, post-socialist context through an empirical examination of the online debate and polemic about the new Polish patriotism. The dissertation argues that approaching nationalism as a broad phenomenon and ideology which operates discursively is helpful for understanding patriotism as an element of the na- tionalist rhetoric that can be employed to study national unity, sameness, and difference. Emphasizing patriotism within the Central European context as neither an alternative to nor as a type of nationalism may make it possible to explain the popularity and continuous endur- ance of nationalism and of practices of national identification in different and changing con- texts.
  • The World Internet Project International Report 6Th Edition

    The World Internet Project International Report 6Th Edition

    The World Internet Project International Report 6th Edition THE WORLD INTERNET PROJECT International Report ̶ Sixth Edition Jeffrey I. Cole, Ph.D. Director, USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future Founder and Organizer, World Internet Project Michael Suman, Ph.D., Research Director Phoebe Schramm, Associate Director Liuning Zhou, Ph.D., Research Associate Interns: Negin Aminian, Hany Chang, Zoe Covello, Ryan Eason, Grace Marie Laffoon‐Alejanre, Eunice Lee, Zejun Li, Cheechee Lin, Guadalupe Madrigal, Mariam Manukyan, Lauren Uba, Tingxue Yu Written by Monica Dunahee and Harlan Lebo World Internet Project International Report ̶ Sixth Edition | i WORLD INTERNET PROJECT – International Report Sixth Edition Copyright © 2016 University of Southern California COPIES You are welcome to download additional copies of The World Internet Project International Report for research or individual use. However, this report is protected by copyright and intellectual property laws, and cannot be distributed in any way. By acquiring this publication you agree to the following terms: this copy of the sixth edition of the World Internet Project International Report is for your exclusive use. Any abuse of this agreement or any distribution will result in liability for its illegal use. To download the full text and graphs in this report, go to www.digitalcenter.org. ATTRIBUTION Excerpted material from this report can be cited in media coverage and institutional publications. Text excerpts should be attributed to The World Internet Project. Graphs should be attributed in a source line to: The World Internet Project International Report (sixth edition) USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future REPRINTING Reprinting this report in any form other than brief excerpts requires permission from the USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future at the address below.
  • Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, T. 43, How Big Is the Digital Divide Between

    Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, T. 43, How Big Is the Digital Divide Between

    Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 2016, volume 43, pp. 45–58 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/SOW.43.3 kOmiSja ObSzaróW WiejSkich pOlSkie towarzyStwo geOgraficzne www.ptg.pan.pl inStytut geOgrafii i przeStrzennegO zagOSpOdarowania pOlSka akademia nauk www.igipz.pan.pl HOW BIG IS THE DIGITAL DIVIDE BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS IN POLAND? Krzysztof JANC1 • Piotr Siłka2 1Institute of Geography and Regional Development, Wrocław University pl. Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław [email protected] 2Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa [email protected] Abstract: in view of the development opportunities, the rural areas have a lower potential when compared to cities and towns. this disadvantage is caused mainly by smaller population densities, greater distances from urban markets as well as information, work, education, and most other resources. Seen from the perspective of the rural areas the internet means a possibility of equal development chances between the rural and city inha- bitants. access to the internet means availability of work (telework), administration, education, services offered on-line that are impossible to obtain elsewhere, of different kinds of databases, entertainment as well as contact with other users. thus, both social and economic aspects can be distinguished.t hese aspects can be studied in the digital divide context, which the authors try to investigate in this paper. Keywords: information society, digital divide, internet, rural areas. introduction the analyses of the internet-related issues in the context of their ‘rurality’ are most often conducted from the perspective of the differences between rural areas and urban areas in access to the internet and its usage.
  • Global Coordinates of Internet Histories

    Global Coordinates of Internet Histories

    INTRODUCTION: GLOBAL COORDINATES OF INTERNET HISTORIES Gerard Goggin and Mark McLelland In: Routledge Companion to Global Internet Histories, edited by Gerard Goggin and Mark McLelland New York: Routledge, 2016 Info at: https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Global-Internet-Histories/Goggin- McLelland/p/book/9781138812161 Introduction Nearly five decades since the Internet’s official launch in 1969, its historical study is finally gathering momentum. As this book appears, so too does a new scholarly journal devoted to the area entitled Internet Histories.1 Other markers of development include several significant edited volumes and journal special issues, many more academic papers, and dedicated book-length studies. In the spirit of the medium, and the emergence of digital humanities and social sciences, and associated e-research, we can also point to growing digital resources, online history sites, resources, archives, and data sets. Arguably, however, it is still the case that available Internet histories in the anglophone world have predominately focused on North American or European experiences, and then only some aspects of these. For instance, scholarly work on the early history of the Internet in the United States has been established for some time. In her Inventing the Internet, Janet Abbate charts the origin of the Internet, especially through the ARPANET, and how the technology developed in conjunction with its meanings (Abbate 1999). Patrice Flichy takes up the heyday of 1990s US cyberculture, best symbolized by the avidly read Wired Magazine (Flichy 2007). In his From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, Fred Turner explores the linking of military- industrial research culture with counterculture in the emergence of computer networks and digital cultures – something that developed long before the Internet appears publicly (Turner 2006: 9).
  • 2012Wip Report3rd Ed.Pdf

    2012Wip Report3rd Ed.Pdf

    11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 10011001010011 10011001010011 10011001010011 100110010100110 001011010011 001011010011 001011010011 0010110100110 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0010110 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 00101100 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0010110 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 001011011 11001010011 11001010011 11001010011 1100101001100 0 01 01 11001010011 0 01 01 11001010011 0 01 01 11001010011 0 01 01 1100101001100 10011001010011 10011001010011 10011001010011 100110010100110 10011001010011 10011001010011 10011001010011 100110010100110 11001010011010 11001010011010 11001010011010 11001010011010 11001010011010 001 11001010011010 001 11001010011010 001 11001010011010 001101 001011010011001011010011 00101101001100101101001100 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 10011001010011 10011001010011 10011001010011 100110010100110 001011010011 001011010011 001011010011 0010110100110 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0 11001010011010 1 1 0 0 1 0
  • The Politics of Anonymity Poland's Media Discourse on Anonymous Communication Online

    The Politics of Anonymity Poland's Media Discourse on Anonymous Communication Online

    The Politics of Anonymity Poland's Media Discourse on Anonymous Communication Online Kornelia Trytko A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2016 This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner(s) of the Intellectual Property Rights. 2 Abstract Online anonymity has been an important element in scholarly debates on the role of the internet in modern day democracy. Proponents of the right to anonymity argue that it helps secure users’ privacy, autonomy and freedom of speech. Critics, on the other hand, see the act of withdrawing identity information as a way to limit or avoid responsibility for one’s actions. Despite large amount of evidence that the role of anonymity on the internet is diverse and context sensitive, researchers have observed a unidirectional trend towards its limitation or even complete elimination. The process, which might be called de-anonymisation of online spaces, is influenced by what Lessig (2006) described as four main forces shaping internet’s architecture: law, technology, market and social norms. But it also features at the level of discourse, which so far has received very little academic attention. The meanings, values and power struggles underlying the debate on online anonymity have also been largely ignored in Central and Eastern European contexts.
  • WIP Reporting Countries Have Internet Access at Home

    WIP Reporting Countries Have Internet Access at Home

    World Internet Project International Edition | 2 PARTICIPANTS IN THE WORLD INTERNET PROJECT Fourth Edition AUSTRALIA ARC Center of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation (CCi) Institute of Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology www.cci.edu.au/project/digital-futures CANADA Canadian Internet Project (CIP)/ Recherche Internet Canada (RIC) www.ciponline.ca COLOMBIA Centro de Investigación de las Telecomunicaciones (CINTEL) www.cintel.org.co ITALY SDA Bocconi, Bocconi University www.sdabocconi.it/home/it MEXICO Tecnológico de Monterrey, Proyecto Internet www.wip.mx NEW ZEALAND Institute of Culture, Discourse and Communication (ICDC) AUT University www.wipnz.aut.ac.nz POLAND Gazeta.pl Research and Analyses Unit http://badania.gazeta.pl SPAIN Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Open University of Catalonia (UOC) www.uoc.edu/in3/pic/eng/communication.html SWEDEN .SE (The Internet Infrastructure Foundation) World Internet Institute www.iis.se | www.wii.se SWITZERLAND Media Change & Innovation Division IPMZ – Institute of Mass Communication and Media Research University of Zurich, Switzerland www.mediachange.ch UNITED KINGDOM Oxford Internet Institute (OII) www.oii.ox.ac.uk/microsites/oxis/ For the complete list of international partners in the World Internet Project, see page 89. World Internet Project International Edition | 3 LICENSE The fourth edition of the World Internet Project International Report is protected by all relevant copyright and intellectual property laws and may only be used in accordance with this license. By acquiring this publication I agree to the following terms: This copy of the fourth edition of the World Internet Project International Report is for my exclusive use, and cannot be distributed in any way.
  • EU Kids Online: National Perspectives

    EU Kids Online: National Perspectives

    Leslie Haddon, Sonia Livingstone and the EU Kids Online network EU Kids Online: national perspectives Report Original citation: Haddon, Leslie, Livingstone, Sonia and the EU Kids Online network (2012) EU Kids Online: national perspectives. EU Kids Online, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46878/ Originally available from EU Kids Online, Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science Available in LSE Research Online: May 2014 The EU Kids Online network is funded by the EC Safer Internet Programme © 2012 The Authors LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. ISSN 2045-256X EU Kids Online: National perspectives Leslie Haddon, Sonia Livingstone and the EU Kids Online network Summary This report This comparative report summarises the internet- . How do children use the internet in different related experiences of children in the 33 countries? What do they do online? Does this countries now participating in EU Kids Online. lead them into exposure to online risks? Is this Findings for eight new countries are added to the harmful and if so for whom? 25 included in our previous reports – Croatia, .