DOCSLIB.ORG

Expediting Dependency Appeals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expediting Dependency Appeals Expediting Dependency Appeals: Strategies to Reduce Delay By Ann L. Keith and Carol R. Flango © 2002 The National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Avenue (23185) P.O. Box 8798 Williamsburg, VA 23187-8798 Web site: www.ncsconline.org ISBN 0-89656-197-6 This document was developed by The National Center for State Courts under a grant from the State Justice Institute (No. SJI-00-N-209). The points of view expressed do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of The National Center for State Courts or the State Justice Institute ii Advisory Committee THE HONORABLE EVELYN LUNDBERG STRATTON, CHAIR Justice The Supreme Court of Ohio 30 East Broad St., Columbus, OH 43266-0419 LESLIE D. GRADET JUSTICE CHARLOTTE ANNE PERRETTA National Conference of Appellate Court Clerks Commonwealth of Massachusetts Maryland Court of Special Appeals The Appeals Court 361 Rowe Blvd. 1500 New Courthouse Annapolis, MD 21301 Boston, MA 02108 CY GURNEY, MSW NCJFCJ MEMBERS: Regional Administrator MARY V. MENTABERRY North Carolina Guardian ad Litem Director Services Division Permanency Planning for Children Superior Court Judges Chambers Department Durham County Judicial Building, 6th Floor National Council of Juvenile and 201 E. Main St. Family Court Judges Durham, NC 27701 P.O. Box 8970 ALEXANDER MCNEIL Reno, NV 89507 Court Administrator THE HONORABLE SHARON MCCULLY The Appeals Court Third District Juvenile Court 1500 New Courthouse 450 S. State St., Suite 209 Boston, MA 02108 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-04431 EDWARD MCSWEENEY Staff Attorney Vermont Supreme Court 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609-0801 National Center for State Courts CAROL R. FLANGO TED RUBIN Project Director Consultant ANN L. KEITH TONI KNORR Court Research Associate Program Specialist DAWN RUBIO DEBORAH SIEGEL Senior Court Management Consultant Intern State Justice Institute OLIVIA GRANT SJI Project Monitor 1650 King St., Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314 iii Acknowledgments his report on expediting dependency appeals is the result of a collaboration between The TNational Center for State Courts and the State Justice Institute, with information, contribu- tions, and assistance from the appellate courts in all fifty states, whose contact information is located in Appendix A. The project’s advisory committee included representatives from state supreme courts, intermediate appellate courts, a juvenile court, and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. The committee met to analyze surveys of the state courts and to develop a process for appellate courts to use when implementing an expedited procedure for dependency appeals. In addition to the committee members and state court contacts, the following individuals contrib- uted their expertise and experience toward this effort: Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye of the New York Court of Appeals, who contributed suggestions to the process for expediting dependency appeals and included the project on the Conference of Chief Justice’s Child Welfare Committee’s agenda, and Connie Crim, Clerk to Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, Supreme Court of Ohio, who assisted with the coordination and communication between The National Center and Justice Stratton. The authors would also like to express their appreciation to Associate Justice Charlotte Anne Perretta; Chief Judge Christopher Armstrong; Alex McNeil, Court Administrator; Ashley Ahearn, Clerk of Court; and Chris Micchia, Assistant Clerk, of the Appeals Court of the Commonwealth of Massa- chusetts, for their contributions and hospitality during the project’s site visit. Dr. Victor E. Flango, Vice-President of Research of The National Center, presented the im- portance of outcome measures to the project’s committee and participated in the site visit to the Appeals Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Bill Hewitt, Senior Court Research Associ- ate at The National Center, contributed ideas and suggestions to the project regarding transcript and record production. The National Center’s Education and Technology Studio’s Ray Foster and Kevin Mittler answered technical questions about courtroom technology for the committee during their meeting in Williamsburg. Sara Lewis and Chuck Campbell copyedited the final publication and coordinated its printing. Pam Petrakis assisted with the formatting and organization of the final draft. Finally, we are very grateful for the State Justice Institute’s support and to Olivia Grant, Project Monitor, for her help, guidance, and enduring patience to see this project to completion. v Table of Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................xi Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................ 3 Survey of Courts that Are Expediting Dependency Appeals ................................................. 3 Expedited Dependency Appeal Case Types .......................................................................... 5 Legal Process for the Expedition of Dependency Appeals by State ....................................... 6 Promising Practices in Expediting Permanency: Eight Steps ...................................................... 7 Assess the Appellate Environment ...................................................................................... 7 Appoint a Leader .............................................................................................................. 10 Assemble a Task Force ...................................................................................................... 10 Develop a Plan ................................................................................................................. 10 Draft a Rule ...................................................................................................................... 11 Implement Internal Operating Procedures ....................................................................... 11 Consider Strategies to Improve the Appellate Process ....................................................... 12 N Notice of Appeal ................................................................................................ 12 N Transcripts and the Record ............................................................................... 12 N Computer-Aided Transcription (CAT) ................................................................ 13 N Electronic Filing of Records ............................................................................... 13 N Briefing ............................................................................................................. 14 N Oral Argument and Conferencing ...................................................................... 15 N Decisions .......................................................................................................... 15 N Posting of Decisions .......................................................................................... 15 N Other Ideas ....................................................................................................... 15 Review and Refine the Process ......................................................................................... 16 Expectations for the Trial Courts ...................................................................................... 16 State Court Highlights .............................................................................................................. 19 Georgia ............................................................................................................................. 19 Iowa ................................................................................................................................. 20 Massachusetts .................................................................................................................. 22 Minnesota ........................................................................................................................ 25 New York .......................................................................................................................... 27 Ohio ................................................................................................................................. 28 Vermont ........................................................................................................................... 29 Virginia ............................................................................................................................. 33 Appendix A: State and Trial Court Contacts .............................................................................. 35 Appendix B: Survey .................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix C: Telephone Process for Expediting Dependency Appeals........................................ 47 Appendix D: State Statutes and Court Rules ............................................................................. 53 Appendix E: Iowa’s Petition and Response Forms .................................................................... 63 vii Foreword e are very
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records Relating to Criminal Trials, Appeals, and Pardons Information Leaflet #9
    Records Relating to Criminal Trials, Appeals, and Pardons Information Leaflet #9 INTRODUCTION This leaflet contains summary information on records of New York trial and appellate courts pertaining to criminal prosecutions (felonies and misdemeanors) and appeals, and on records relating to applications for and grants of clemency by the Governor (pardons, commutations, reprieves). Thus the scope of the information here presented covers the continuum of the State's involvement with a criminal, from arraignment, through trial, conviction (or acquittal or dismissal), sentencing, appeal, and pardon (if any). (The leaflet does not discuss records or files of district attorneys or police agencies, which investigate crimes, apprehend suspects, and prepare cases for prosecution.) Records in the State Archives pertaining to criminal appeals and executive clemency are described in considerable detail. Records held by the trial courts or other repositories are discussed in general terms. Many of the records described in this leaflet contain information that is restricted by statute; the restrictions are noted in the appropriate location. New York's criminal justice system is large and complex, and this leaflet aims to assist researchers to locate sets of records or individual cases in that labyrinth. NEW YORK CRIMINAL COURTS County Court (1847+) In all counties outside of New York City the County Court has jurisdiction over felonies and over misdemeanors that may be prosecuted by indictment. (In exceptional circumstances the Supreme Court may accept a criminal case.) Prior to 1896 the criminal term of the County Court was called the Court of Sessions. For varying periods during the later nineteenth century certain city courts had jurisdiction over felony cases.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Judicial Performance Review
    2016 Judicial Performance Review Prepared by The Iowa State Bar Association Table of Contents Judicial Performance Review Information....................................................................................................3 Judicial Performance Review Q&A...............................................................................................................4 Judicial Biographies.....................................................................................................................................6 Judicial Performance Review Results Iowa Supreme Court..................................................................................................................................22 Iowa Court of Appeals...............................................................................................................................23 District 1A.................................................................................................................................................24 Allamakee, Clayton, Delaware, Dubuque, Winneshiek Counties District 1B.................................................................................................................................................25 Black Hawk, Buchanan, Chickasaw, Fayette, Grundy, Howard Counties District 2A.................................................................................................................................................26 Bremer, Butler, Cerro Gordo, Floyd, Franklin, Hancock, Mitchell, Winnebago, Worth Counties
    [Show full text]
  • Reasonable Efforts: a Judicial Perspective
    REASONABLE EFFORTS: A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE By Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.)1 .INTRODUCTION The term “reasonable efforts” challenges and confounds many in our juvenile dependency and family courts across the country.2 Judges hear about it in their judicial trainings, read about it now and then in publications, sign their names to court orders finding that the children’s services agency (“agency”) made “reasonable efforts” on a daily basis, and on occasion make “no reasonable efforts” findings. Yet attorneys rarely refer to reasonable efforts in court, and most judges approve of what the agency has done with little or no thought about it.3 The law requires judges to make these findings, and good reasons exist to do so. By making the reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings the court informs the parties, the children’s services agency, and the federal government that the agency is or is not meeting its legal responsibilities. By monitoring the agency’s actions the court ensures that the agency has complied with its legal obligation to provide services to prevent the child’s removal from parental care, assist the family safely to reunify with its child, and make certain to finalize a permanent plan for the child. The reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings are the most powerful tools juvenile court judges have at their disposal in dependency cases, and attorneys and judges should pay special attention to them to ensure that the 1 Judge Edwards is a retired judge now working as a consultant to juvenile courts in California and other states. The author is indebted to many people for the research and information contained in this booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Task Force
    New York State Justice Task Force Name Title Chief Judge of the State of New York Hon. Janet DiFiore Chief Judge, Court of Appeals of the State of New York Co-Chairs Hon. Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick Greenberg Traurig LLP; Former Senior Associate Judge, New York Court of Appeals Hon. Deborah A. Kaplan Administrative Judge, New York County Supreme Court, Civil Term Permanent Members Hon. Madeline Singas Associate Judge, New York Court of Appeals Hon. William C. Donnino Co-Chair for the Committee for Criminal Jury Instructions and Model Colloquies and Co-Chair for the New York Unified Court System Guide to New York Evidence Committee; Former Justice, New York Supreme Court, Nassau County Hon. Barry Kamins Aidala Bertuna & Kamins; Former Justice, New York Supreme Court; Administrative Judge, New York City Criminal Court Hon. Judy Harris Kluger Executive Director, Sanctuary for Families; Former Chief of Policy and Planning for the New York Court System, and Administrative Judge, New York City Criminal Court Hon. Hector LaSalle Presiding Justice, New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department Hon. Richard B. Lowe III Former Presiding Justice, New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney, New York County Zachary W. Carter Former New York City Corporation Counsel and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Dermot Shea Commissioner, New York City Police Department Hon. Richard Giardino Sheriff, Fulton County; Former Fulton County Court Judge Seymour James Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco LLP; Former Attorney- in-Charge, Legal Aid Society Janet Sabel Attorney-in-Chief/Chief Executive Officer, Legal Aid Society Michael Polenberg Vice President of Government Affairs, Safe Horizon Paul Shechtman Bracewell LLP; Former Director of Criminal Justice to Governor Pataki Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Case 1:18-cv-07315-ALC Document 21 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 118 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- X ALEXIS MARQUEZ, : : Plaintiff, : 18-cv-07315 : v. : : COMPLAINT DOUGLAS HOFFMAN, : SALIANN SCARPULLA, : GEORGE SILVER, : Jury Trial Demanded LAWRENCE MARKS, : JOHN MCCONNELL, : LAUREN DESOLE, : KAY-ANN PORTER, : LISA EVANS, : LORI SATTLER, : DENIS REO, : EUGENE FAHEY, : PAUL FEINMAN, : MICHAEL GARCIA, : JENNY RIVERA, : LESLIE STEIN, : ROWAN WILSON, : in their individual capacities, : : and JANET DIFIORE, : in her individual capacity and in her official : capacity as Chief Judge of New York State, : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------- X Case 1:18-cv-07315-ALC Document 21 Filed 08/14/18 Page 2 of 118 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................... 4 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ............................................................................... 10 III. PARTIES ................................................................................................................. 10 IV. DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION BY INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS..... 12 Douglas Hoffman ..................................................................................................... 12 Initial Conduct .............................................................................................. 12 October 8 Email ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Officer" Really a Judge?: the Presumed Role of "Judges" in the Unconstitutional New York Housing Court
    City University of New York Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 Summer 2002 Is a "Hearing Officer" Really a Judge?: The Presumed Role of "Judges" in the Unconstitutional New York Housing Court Harvey Gee Follow this and additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Harvey Gee, Is a "Hearing Officer" Really a Judge?: The Presumed Role of "Judges" in the Unconstitutional New York Housing Court, 5 N.Y. City L. Rev. 1 (2002). Available at: 10.31641/clr050101 The CUNY Law Review is published by the Office of Library Services at the City University of New York. For more information please contact [email protected]. Is a "Hearing Officer" Really a Judge?: The Presumed Role of "Judges" in the Unconstitutional New York Housing Court Acknowledgements Professor Jack Chin at the University of Cincinnati School of Law provided the topic for this article. This article has also benefited from the ideas and suggestions offered by Professor Russell Engler at the New England School of Law. This article is available in City University of New York Law Review: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/clr/vol5/iss1/2 IS A "HEARING OFFICER" REALLY A JUDGE?: THE PRESUMED ROLE OF "JUDGES" IN THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL NEW YORK HOUSING COURT Harvey Gee* The Civil Court.. .includes the Housing Part, which disposes of hundreds of thousands of matters annually yet isn't even a con- stitutional court. -Chief Judge Judith Kaye1 I. INTRODUCTION Since its creation in 1972, the New York Housing Court (here- inafter "housing court") has been "widely regarded as an ineffec- tive institution that has not fulfilled its mandate of preserving the City's housing stock."2 "Despite the Legislature's broad delegation of power to the housing court, it has never been accorded the stat- ure or resources essential to fulfill its vital role." 3 This fact has not escaped the attention of legal scholars who have recently addressed problems of the housing court.
    [Show full text]
  • No Fault Divorce New York Forms
    No Fault Divorce New York Forms Gabriel concreting Christian. Crinite Spencer tanks or blast some boutique mythologically, however pluckier Rutger states ascetic or sculls. Sunset and alar Talbot spoliated some tribunals so expressly! We reviewed by a process can write the circuit court hearing if either spouse, you are fully functional throughout this Print our forms accepted in? An uncontested divorce is start where else do men expect my spouse to disagree with any. We align People operators, owners and vicious are NOT attorneys are open not able to give local or extra advice. Throughout the recipient spouse must have found all single county courts permit a no fault, you locked out. These cookies will be stored in your browser only resolve your consent. What if one spouse away in most military? Under new york and providing some time depends on what is like alimony? They will assist you with the paperwork required to respond to the divorce. As sleeve and more families discovered the benefits of divorce mediation, the field shifted and some saturated with divorce attorneys turned mediators, simply seeking another name of revenue. Litigated fault new york no fault and forms in a form and after marriage. In Idaho, there are two forms of uncontested divorce: divorce by default and divorce by stipulation. New York Divorce FAQ Common Questions. How does child support calculated in New York? You or no fault new york is where both forms and to attend a form. The divorce judgment must be then filed with the county clerk. Therefore, the supreme question since what will be great end result? Index number for no.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Clerkship Handbook 2019-2020
    JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP HANDBOOK 2019-2020 The University of Akron School of Law Career Services Office C. Blake McDowell Law Center 150 University Avenue Akron, OH 44325 Phone: 330-972-5321 https://www.uakron.edu/law/career-services/ Alisa Benedict O’Brien, Assistant Dean Alecia Bencze, Assistant Director 1 | Page The University of Akron School of Law Career Services Office ___________________________________________________________________ Judicial Clerkships A judicial clerkship is one of the strongest foundations upon which any law career can be built. Judicial clerkships are post-graduate positions, usually lasting one or two years, in which you work as the right-hand analytical and research person for a judge. The positions usually start in August or September of each year. Deadlines for applications to federal judges are rolling and determined by individual judges. Student applicants should apply beginning in February of 2L year (2D, 3E). Some federal judges will accept applications from students during the fall or spring of their 3L year. For Class of 2020 grads, applications will be released beginning June 17, 2019. For Class of 2021 grads, applications will be released beginning June 15, 2020. Applications for judicial clerkships with state court judges are due for some states during the 2nd year of law school, and for most states, during the fall of the 3rd year of law school. More positions are available with state court judges in your final semester as well. Judicial law clerk (“judicial clerk”) experience is universally recognized by the legal community to be extremely useful in law practice, so it is one of the most valuable experiences you could ever want on your resume.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Court of Appeals Adds Two New Judges
    June 21, 2021 NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS ADDS TWO NEW JUDGES To Our Clients and Friends: On June 8, 2021, the New York Senate confirmed the appointment of Anthony Cannataro and Madeline Singas to the seven-member New York Court of Appeals. Judge Cannataro, who was formerly the Administrative Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, will fill the vacancy left by Judge Paul Feinman, who recently passed away. Judge Singas, who was formerly the Nassau County District Attorney, will fill the vacancy left by the retiring Judge Leslie Stein.[1] These new judges will leave a lasting mark on the Court of Appeals, which is New York’s court of last resort. Governor Andrew Cuomo has now appointed all seven members of the Court,[2] and because Judges Cannataro and Singas could serve on the Court for a decade or more, they could serve well past the Governor’s time in office.[3] Judge Singas’s confirmation, however, was not unanimous, with opposition coming from Democrats as well as Republicans.[4] Although the replacement of Judges Feinman and Stein marks an important development for the Court and its litigants, it remains to be seen whether, and if so in what ways, the confirmation of these new judges portends a shift in the Court’s jurisprudence. Judge Cannataro Replaces Judge Feinman Judge Cannataro has had a distinguished career in public service, particularly on the bench. After graduating from New York Law School in 1996, he served in the New York City Law Department and then as principal law clerk to Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick on the New York Court of Appeals, and to Lottie Wilkins on the New York Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Reduce Delay Second Edition
    Strategies to Reduce Delay Second Edition BY Ann L. Keith and Carol R. Flango KF 547 K45 2003 KF 59 3 K45 200 3 c.3 I Strategies to Reduce Delay Second Edition BY Ann L. Keith and Carol R. Flango Library National Centor fcr State Courts 300 Ncwpcrt Ave. Williamsburg, VA 23 185 This paper has been published by the National Center for State Courts -- to present current work from the organization’s staff, developed in cooperation with the courts and court leadership organizations. Support from the states along with seminar and conference fees, grants, contracts, and private support fund the mission of NCSC-to help courts r17zprovingthe ad’7zinist1~ationOf improve judicial administration by providing information, research, .justice through leadership and education, and consulting services. For more information visit NCSC’s service to state courts Web site at www.ncsconline.org. 0 2002, 2003 National Center for State Courts All rights reserved. First edition 2002 Second edition 2003 300 Newport Avenue Williamsburg, VA 23 185-4147 Web site: www.ncsconline.org ISBN: 0-89656-229-8 The first edition of this book was developed by the National Center for State Courts under a grant From the State Justice Institute (No. SJI-00-N-209). The points of view expressed do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Center for State Courts or the State Justice Institute. Expediting Dependency Appeals: Strategies to Reduce DeOay Second Edition PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FOREWORD TO THE FIRST EDITION INTRODUCTION SECTION I: PROJECT OVERVIEW SECTION II: PROMISING PRACTICES IN EXPEDITING PERMANENCY: EIGHT STEPS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Iowa Court of Appeals
    Doyle 7.1 2/22/2012 3:16 PM HISTORY OF THE IOWA COURT OF APPEALS Hon. Rosemary Shaw Sackett* Hon. Richard H. Doyle** I. Early History ............................................................................................. 1 II. Creation of the Iowa Court of Appeals .................................................. 3 III. The Court in Controversy ...................................................................... 10 IV. The Early Five-Judge Court .................................................................. 12 V. Changes .................................................................................................... 18 VI. The Expansion of the Iowa Court of Appeals ..................................... 20 VII. Ten-Year Anniversary ............................................................................ 22 VIII. Transitions ............................................................................................... 23 IX. Six Judges to Nine ................................................................................... 28 X. Further Transitions ................................................................................. 31 XI. Current Work of the Iowa Court of Appeals ...................................... 38 In celebration of the Iowa Court of Appeals’ thirty-fifth anniversary, we look back on its history. I. EARLY HISTORY The organic law of territorial Iowa vested judicial power in “a supreme court, district courts, probate courts, and in justices of the peace.”1 There was no provision for an intermediate
    [Show full text]