• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration✩ David H. Weinberga,b, Michael J. Mortonsonb, Daniel J. Eisensteinc,d, Christopher Hiratae, Adam G. Riessf, Eduardo Rozog aDepartment of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH bCenter for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH cSteward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ dHarvard College Observatory, Cambridge, MA eCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA fDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD gKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Abstract The accelerating expansion of the universe is the most surprising cosmological discovery in many decades, implying that the universe is dominated by some form of “dark energy” with exotic physical properties, or that Einstein’s theory of gravity breaks down on cosmological scales. The profound implications of cosmic acceleration have inspired ambitious efforts to understand its origin, with experiments that aim to measure the history of expansion and growth of structure with percent-level precision or higher. We review in detail the four most well established methods for making such measurements: Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), weak gravitational lensing, and the abundance of galaxy clusters. We pay particular attention to the systematic uncertainties in these techniques and to strategies for controlling them at the level needed to exploit “Stage IV” dark energy facilities such as BigBOSS, LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST. We briefly review a number of other approaches including redshift-space distortions, the Alcock-Paczynski effect, and direct measurements of the Hubble constant H0. We present extensive forecasts for constraints on the dark energy equation of state and parameterized deviations from General Relativity, achievable with Stage III and Stage IV experimental programs that incorporate supernovae, BAO, weak lensing, and cosmic microwave background data. We also show the level of precision required for clusters or other methods to provide constraints competitive with those of these fiducial programs. We emphasize the value of a balanced program that employs several of the most powerful methods in combination, both to cross-check systematic uncertainties and to take advantage of complementary information. Surveys to probe cosmic acceleration produce data sets that support a wide range of scientific investigations, and they continue the longstanding astronomical tradition of mapping the arXiv:1201.2434v2 [astro-ph.CO] 6 Mar 2013 universe in ever greater detail over ever larger scales. Keywords: Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 History ......................................... 5 1.2 Theories of Cosmic Acceleration . ......... 7 1.3 LookingForward .................................. 10 ✩To Appear in Physics Reports. Preprint submitted to Physics Reports March 7, 2013 2 Observables, Parameterizations, and Methods 15 2.1 BasicEquations.................................. ..... 15 2.2 ModelParameterizations. ........ 17 2.3 CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure . ........... 20 2.4 Parameter Dependences and CMB Constraints . .......... 24 2.5 OverviewofMethods............................... ..... 32 3 Type Ia Supernovae 34 3.1 GeneralPrinciples ............................... ...... 34 3.2 TheCurrentStateofPlay . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 35 3.3 ObservationalConsiderations . .......... 38 3.4 Systematic Uncertainties and Strategies for Amelioration ............... 40 3.5 Spacevs.Ground.................................. 42 3.6 Prospects ....................................... 43 4 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 45 4.1 GeneralPrinciples ............................... ...... 45 4.2 TheCurrentStateofPlay . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 45 4.3 TheoryofBAO..................................... 50 4.3.1 LinearTheory .................................. 50 4.3.2 Non-linear Evolution and Galaxy Clustering Bias . ............ 52 4.3.3 Reconstruction ................................ 55 4.3.4 FittingtoData................................. 57 4.4 ObservationalConsiderations . .......... 59 4.4.1 StatisticalErrors . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... 59 4.4.2 FromBAOtoDarkEnergy . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 60 4.4.3 SamplingDensity............................... 63 4.4.4 Spectroscopic vs. Photometric Redshifts . ........... 63 4.4.5 TracersofStructure .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 64 4.5 Systematic Uncertainties and Strategies for Amelioration ............... 66 4.5.1 MeasurementSystematics . ..... 66 4.5.2 Astrophysical Systematics . ....... 68 4.5.3 Cosmological Systematics . ...... 69 4.6 Spacevs.Ground.................................. 69 4.7 Prospects ....................................... 70 5 Weak Lensing 73 5.1 Generalprinciples: Overview . ......... 73 5.2 Weak lensing principles: Mathematical discussion . ................ 75 5.2.1 Deflection of light in cosmology . ....... 75 5.2.2 Cosmic shear, magnification, and flexion . ......... 76 5.2.3 Power spectra and correlation functions* . .......... 78 5.2.4 Method I: Cosmic Shear Power Spectrum* . ...... 81 5.2.5 Method II: Power Spectrum Tomography* . ....... 81 5.2.6 Method III: Galaxy-galaxy Lensing* . ........ 82 5.2.7 MethodIV:Cosmography* . 85 5.2.8 Method V: Non-Gaussian Statistics* . ........ 86 5.3 TheCurrentStateofPlay . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 87 2 5.3.1 Cosmicshear ................................... 87 5.3.2 Galaxy-galaxy lensing as a cosmological probe . ........... 90 5.3.3 Lensingoutsidetheopticalbands. ........ 91 5.4 Observational Considerations and Survey Design . .............. 92 5.4.1 StatisticalErrors . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... 92 5.4.2 The Galaxy Population for Optical Surveys . ......... 95 5.4.3 Photometric Redshifts and their Calibration . ............ 95 5.4.4 LensingintheRadio............................. 98 5.4.5 LensingoftheCMB ............................... 99 5.5 MeasuringShears................................. 100 5.5.1 TheIdealizedProblem. 101 5.5.2 Shape Measurement Algorithms* . 103 5.5.3 ShapeMeasurementErrors*. 106 5.5.4 Noise Rectification and Selection Biases* . ..........107 5.5.5 Determining the PSF and Instrument Properties . ..........108 5.6 Astrophysicalsystematics . .........110 5.6.1 IntrinsicAlignments* . 110 5.6.2 Theoretical uncertainties in the matter power spectrum*............115 5.7 Systematic Errors and their Amelioration: Summary . ..............116 5.8 Advantages of a Space Mission . .......117 5.9 Prospects ....................................... 118 6 Clusters of Galaxies 123 6.1 GeneralPrinciples ............................... 123 6.2 TheCurrentStateofPlay . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 126 6.3 ObservationalConsiderations . ..........130 6.3.1 Expected Numbers and Cosmological Sensitivity . ...........130 6.3.2 ClusterFinding................................ 135 6.3.3 Calibrating the Observable–Mass Relation . ...........138 6.4 Systematic Uncertainties and Strategies for Amelioration ...............143 6.4.1 RedshiftUncertainties . 143 6.4.2 Contamination and Incompleteness: The Tails of P (X M, z) .........144 | 6.4.3 Calibrating the Core of P (X M, z)........................145 | 6.4.4 Theoretical Systematics . 149 6.5 Spacevs.Ground.................................. 150 6.6 Prospects ....................................... 151 7 Alternative Methods 154 7.1 Measurement of the Hubble Constant at z 0 .....................154 ≈ 7.2 Redshift-SpaceDistortions. ..........156 7.3 TheAlcock-PaczynskiTest . .......161 7.4 Alternative Distance Indicators . ...........164 7.5 StandardSirens.................................. 165 7.6 The Lyα ForestasaProbeofStructureGrowth . 166 7.7 OtherTestsofModifiedGravity . .......168 7.8 The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect . ........170 7.9 Cross-Correlation of Weak Lensing and Spectroscopic Surveys. .. .. .. ..171 7.10 StrongGravitationalLenses . ..........172 3 7.11GalaxyAges ..................................... 173 7.12RedshiftDrift.................................. 174 7.13 AlternativeMethods: Summary. .........174 8 A Balanced Program on Cosmic Acceleration 176 8.1 AFiducialProgram ................................ 177 8.2 ForecastingConstraints . ........179 8.3 Results: Forecasts for the Fiducial Program and Variations ..............189 8.3.1 Constraints in simple w(z)models ........................189 8.3.2 Constraints on structure growth parameters . ...........192 8.3.3 Dependence on w(z)modelandbinningofdata. 196 8.3.4 Constraints on w(z)inthegeneralmodel . .198 8.4 ForecastsforClusters . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .......206 8.5 Forecasts for Alternative Methods . ..........210 8.5.1 TheHubbleconstant.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 211 8.5.2 TheAlcock-PaczynskiTest . 212 8.5.3 Redshift-space Distortions . ........213 8.5.4 Distances ..................................... 214 8.6 Observables and Aggregate Precision . ...........215 8.7 ProspectswithManyProbes . 221 9 Conclusions 224 Appendix A Glossary of Acronyms and Facilities 231 4 1. Introduction Gravity pulls. Newton’s Principia generalized this longstanding fact of human experience into a universal attractive force, providing compelling explanations of an extraordinary range of terrestrial and celestial phenomena. Newtonian attraction weakens with distance, but it never vanishes, and it never changes sign. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity (GR) reproduces Newtonian gravity in the limit of weak spacetime curvature and low velocities. For a homogeneous universe filled with matter or radiation, GR predicts that

Load more

  289

Copy Link