The Contributions of David Malcolm Raup (24 April 1933–9 July 2015)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Contributions of David Malcolm Raup (24 April 1933–9 July 2015) Paleobiology, 42(1), 2016, pp. 172–183 DOI: 10.1017/pab.2015.54 Invited Essay IN MEMORIAM The Contributions of David Malcolm Raup (24 April 1933–9 July 2015) Michael Foote and Arnold I. Miller Michael Foote. Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A. E-mail:[email protected] Arnold I. Miller. Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, U.S.A. E-mail:[email protected] Submitted: 15 October 2015 Accepted: 9 November 2015 In recounting the exploits of the renowned do the talking; accommodating one’s own self- test pilot and World War II ace Chuck Yeager, doubts but not being defeated by them— Tom Wolfe (1979) observed that Yeager’s calm, profoundly influenced those who were lucky West Virginian drawl can still be heard in the enough to spend appreciable time around him voices of virtually all commercial pilots, dec- and, through this group, subsequent genera- ades after Yeager became the first to break the tions of students who have no idea that the sound barrier. This inflection caught on in the “voice” they are really hearing and, in turn, are late 1940s among a cadre of Yeager’s disciples seeking to emulate, is Dave Raup’s. at an airfield in the high desert of California, Dave’searliestwork,influenced in part by who sought to emulate the “ace of aces,” and it Ernst Mayr’s interest in geographic variation in spread further, from generation to generation, morphology and its relevance to the speciation aided by the participation of many of those process, concerned allometric, geographic, and disciples as astronauts in NASA’s manned environmental variation in the living sand dollar space program. During the heady days of the Dendraster (bibliog. 1–2). Among other results, Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs, the he made a convincing case for the ecophenotypic drawl and demeanor could be heard regularly basis of some among-population differences in in televised exchanges between astronauts and shape, and noted that many putative species- mission control. Little did any of us know that level differences among fossil populations are the voice was really Chuck Yeager’s. consistent with non-genetic variation in living Wolfe’s description of Yeager’sinfluence on populations. This work already exemplified the his peers reminds us that, in any field, there are careful analysis, logic, and attention to modern a few people whose work is so transcendent ecology and evolutionary biology that would that, by dint of the examples they set, colleagues come to characterize Dave’ssubsequent seek to emulate not only their methods, but also contributions. how they carry themselves in the arena. And so The Dendraster work was followed by a it was with Dave Raup, one of the most series of papers documenting the crystallo- influential paleontologists of the past half- graphic axis orientations of plates in the century, who died this past summer after a echinoid test (bibliog. 3–4, 6–8, 13, 18–19). brief illness. As is often true of people who These demonstrated that c-axis orientations become the best of the best, Dave did not are largely fixed within echinoid species and at actively seek the limelight. In fact, he tended to higher taxonomic levels; that species show avoid it and was never particularly comfortable ontogenetic variation following a few general as the center of attention in any forum. But the patterns; and that groups of plates within a way he carried himself—actively seeking out species often vary consistently from one holes in his own results; not dismissing some- another. Dave used the phylogenetic signal one else’sworkwithoutfirst fully understand- evident in cases where higher taxonomic ing it; letting one’s work, rather than one’sego, affinities are fairly well known as a basis for © 2016 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved. 0094-8373/16 DAVID M. RAUP (1933–2015) 173 suggesting solutions where affinities are less theoretical morphology—acomparisonbetween clear. He also tackled the functional signifi- actual and theoretically possible forms, the latter cance of axis orientations, ultimately arguing in turn developed from generative models such for the relevance of light penetration, in view of as that for logarithmic coiling. By comparing the the among-species covariation in light sensi- spectrum of possible forms to those that had tivity and axis orientation, and suggesting that actually evolved, Dave was able to use a light penetration in the apical plates might combination of architectural, phylogenetic, and even play a role in navigation. He also argued functional arguments to make sense of why that c-axes orthogonal to the plate surface bivalves, gastropods, brachiopods, and ammo- facilitated the ontogenetic development of noids occupy largely distinct regions of the plate curvature. A study of teratologies in coiling-parameter space (bibliog. 20). He also Strongylocentrotus demonstrated that crystal- demonstrated that the concentration of ammo- lography was inverted when plate position noids in certain regions of the coiling space is was inverted, and that the missing plates in unlikely to reflect optimization of a single tetraradiate specimens could be identified. functional demand such as stability or shell Toward the end of Dave’s echinoid period, efficiency, and therefore probably reflects he and geochemist Jon N. Weber documented a tradeoff resulting from multiple demands carbon- and oxygen-isotopic variation in echi- (bibliog. 21). noid plates (bibliog. 14, 16–17, 24). As with the Dave started with a consideration of gastro- crystallographic data, different components of pod coiling (bibliog. 5, 9), but eventually the skeleton vary systematically, and the modified and extended the model to other isotopes carry a phylogenetic signal—one that coiled forms (bibliog. 12, 20–22, 35–36) and matches the signal in the c-axes and suggests even developed a soap-bubble model of echi- solutions to taxonomic problems. Although noid plating (bibliog. 25), a model for helical oxygen isotopes are somewhat sensitive to bryozoans such as Archimedes (bibliog. 69, 133), temperature, they show enough genetic varia- and an algorithm for generating grazing traces tion to limit the use of echinoids for paleo- from a few simple rules with an added environmental inference. Taxonomic variation in stochastic element (bibliog. 28). In the last carbon isotopes suggests metabolic differences example, his simulation program occasionally among clades, and the taxonomic diversification generated “mistakes”—traces that looked like of echinoids since the mid Paleozoic correlates no ichnofossils ever found. He thought the with increased variance in isotopic composition. algorithm might not be working, but his This body of work represents one of the earliest collaborator Dolf Seilacher found sense in the demonstrations of vital effects in stable isotopic mistakes by noting that they mimicked sub- composition. optimal plowing patterns that he had seen in Judging from citations to his publications, the rural Swabia, when farmers didn’t plan prop- work discussed so far seems to have been of erly and ended up crossing their own furrows! interest mainly to students of echinoids, and Although Dave evidently realized the great even then the application and extension of potential of theoretical morphology from the Dave’s findings to phylogenetic problems has start, laying out possible applications to onto- been limited (for echinoid examples, see Emlet geny, phylogeny, ecology, and adaptation, his 1988 and Kroh and Smith 2010). However, a few treatment in his earliest papers seems somewhat paleontologists, notably Dan Fisher and his cautious, referring to the coiling model mainly students, have gone on to apply crystallography as an objective way to describe gastropod form, to the systematics of other echinoderm groups, in lieu of terms such as “turbiniform” or including stylophorans, crinoids, and blasto- “turriculate,” and stating that, “the objectives zoans (Fisher and Cox 1988; Bodenbender 1996; are practical rather than theoretical” (bibliog. 5: Bodenbender and Ausich 2000; Bodenbender p. 603). Likewise, he commented that his and Hiemstra 2004). insightful analysis of ammonoid coiling, “is While Dave was engaged with echinoids, he primitive in many regards” (bibliog. 21: p. 65). began a long-term research program in Downplaying the innovative aspects of his 174 MICHAEL FOOTE AND ARNOLD I. MILLER work is something that would characterize areas, such as image analysis and biostrati- Dave’s papers for his entire career; understate- graphy, but that they had clearly succeeded in ment and claims that his approaches were the areas of mathematical modeling and simu- rather similar to what others had already done, lation, and were likely in the coming years to differing only in emphasis, were to become enable “increasingly ambitious analyses of recognizable aspects of his style. (Even mun- large data sets having to do with distribution dane titles often belied clever and groundbreak- of fossil taxa in time and space” (bibliog. 60: ing analyses; see [bibliog. 62], for example.) A p. 269). His advocacy of computing was but one common theme that emerges in the echinoid example of a lifelong dedication to improving soap-bubble work and the simulation of grazing the infrastructure of paleontology. Others traces is that, even though we do not know include his collaboration with Bernie Kummel whether the model is biologically realistic, its on Handbook of Paleontological Techniques ability to generate forms so similar to what we (bibliog. 15); his chairmanship of the National see argues that the “rules” an organism follows Research Council’s Committee on Guidelines need not exceed the complexity of the model. for Paleontological Collecting (bibliog. 103); the Such statements of parsimony and a willingness workshop on “species as particles” that he to entertain unconventional ideas would taught with Tom Schopf at the Smithsonian in emerge in later work as well; for example, his 1978; and, of course, the two editions of conclusion that the available data allow the Principles of Paleontology, co-authored with possibility that species richness has not increased Steve Stanley (bibliog.
Recommended publications
  • The MBL Model and Stochastic Paleontology
    216 Chapter seven ised exciting new avenues for research, that insights from biology and ecology could more profi tably be applied to paleontology, and that the future lay in assembling large databases as a foundation for analysis of broad-scale patterns of evolution over geological history. But in compar- ison to other expanding young disciplines—like theoretical ecology— paleobiology lacked a cohesive theoretical and methodological agenda. However, over the next ten years this would change dramatically. Chapter Seven One particular ecological/evolutionary issue emerged as the central unifying problem for paleobiology: the study and modeling of the his- “Towards a Nomothetic tory of diversity over time. This, in turn, motivated a methodological question: how reliable is the fossil record, and how can that reliability be Paleontology”: The MBL Model tested? These problems became the core of analytical paleobiology, and and Stochastic Paleontology represented a continuation and a consolidation of the themes we have examined thus far in the history of paleobiology. Ultimately, this focus led paleobiologists to groundbreaking quantitative studies of the inter- The Roots of Nomotheticism play of rates of origination and extinction of taxa through time, the role of background and mass extinctions in the history of life, the survivor- y the early 1970s, the paleobiology movement had begun to acquire ship of individual taxa, and the modeling of historical patterns of diver- Bconsiderable momentum. A number of paleobiologists began ac- sity. These questions became the central components of an emerging pa- tively building programs of paleobiological research and teaching at ma- leobiological theory of macroevolution, and by the mid 1980s formed the jor universities—Stephen Jay Gould at Harvard, Tom Schopf at the Uni- basis for paleobiologists’ claim to a seat at the “high table” of evolution- versity of Chicago, David Raup at the University of Rochester, James ary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhandlungen Der Geologischen Bundesanstalt in Wien
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt in Wien Jahr/Year: 2002 Band/Volume: 57 Autor(en)/Author(s): Sprey Anton Martin Artikel/Article: Early Ontogeny of three Callovian Ammonite Genera (Binatisphinctes, Kosmoceras (Spinikosmoceras) and Hecticoceras) from Ryazan (Russia) 225-255 ©Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien; download unter www.geologie.ac.at ABHANDLUNGEN DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Abh. Geol. B.-A. ISSN 0016–7800 ISBN 3-85316-14-X Band 57 S. 225–255 Wien, Februar 2002 Cephalopods – Present and Past Editors: H. Summesberger, K. Histon & A. Daurer Early Ontogeny of three Callovian Ammonite Genera (Binatisphinctes, Kosmoceras (Spinikosmoceras) and Hecticoceras) from Ryazan (Russia) ANTON MARTIN SPREY*) 15 Text-Figures, 3 Tables and 8 Plates Callovian Ammonoidea Shell Structure Early Ontogeny Micro-ornament Contents Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................... 225 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 226 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 226 2. Material and Methods .................................................................................................... 226 2.1. Examined Taxa and Their Source ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEOS 33000/EVOL 33000: Winter 2006 Course Outline Page 1
    GEOS 33000/EVOL 33000: Winter 2006 Course Outline Page 1 Meetings: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:30-12:00, HGS 180 Nature of the course: This course is an introduction to mathematical modeling as applied to problems in paleobiology and evolutionary biology. Topics include: basic probability theory; general approaches to modeling; model comparison using likelihood and other criteria; forward modeling of branching processes; sampling models; and inverse methods. A series of programming exercises and a term project are required. Programming in R or C is recommended, but any language may be used. Requirements: 1. Short exercises 2. Readings to be assigned 3. Term paper: Original research, relevant to topics covered in course. Publication length and quality. Brief presentation of research. Prerequisites: Mathematics through first-year calculus; basic computer programming skills (or willingness to learn) URL for course materials: http://geosci.uchicago.edu/∼foote/MODEL Reading General Reference Works Burnham, K.P., and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York. Edwards, A.W.F. 1992. Likelihood. Johns Hopkins U. Press. Efron, B. and R.J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, N.Y. Feller, W. 1968 (and other editions). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (two volumes). John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. Gilinsky, N.L., and P.W. Signor, eds. 1991. Analytical paleobiology. Short Courses in Paleontology Number 4. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tenn. Gumbel, E.J. 1958. Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, N.Y. Press, W.H., S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P.
    [Show full text]
  • What Really Happened in the Late Triassic?
    Historical Biology, 1991, Vol. 5, pp. 263-278 © 1991 Harwood Academic Publishers, GmbH Reprints available directly from the publisher Printed in the United Kingdom Photocopying permitted by license only WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN THE LATE TRIASSIC? MICHAEL J. BENTON Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. (Received January 7, 1991) Major extinctions occurred both in the sea and on land during the Late Triassic in two major phases, in the middle to late Carnian and, 12-17 Myr later, at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Many recent reports have discounted the role of the earlier event, suggesting that it is (1) an artefact of a subsequent gap in the record, (2) a complex turnover phenomenon, or (3) local to Europe. These three views are disputed, with evidence from both the marine and terrestrial realms. New data on terrestrial tetrapods suggests that the late Carnian event was more important than the end-Triassic event. For tetrapods, the end-Triassic extinction was a whimper that was followed by the radiation of five families of dinosaurs and mammal- like reptiles, while the late Carnian event saw the disappearance of nine diverse families, and subsequent radiation of 13 families of turtles, crocodilomorphs, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, lepidosaurs and mammals. Also, for many groups of marine animals, the Carnian event marked a more significant turning point in diversification than did the end-Triassic event. KEY WORDS: Triassic, mass extinction, tetrapod, dinosaur, macroevolution, fauna. INTRODUCTION Most studies of mass extinction identify a major event in the Late Triassic, usually placed at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Latitude Origins of the Four Phanerozoic Evolutionary Faunas
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/866186; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Low-Latitude Origins of the Four Phanerozoic Evolutionary Faunas A. Rojas1*, J. Calatayud1, M. Kowalewski2, M. Neuman1, and M. Rosvall1 1Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden 5 2Florida Museum of Natural History, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: Sepkoski’s hypothesis of Three Great Evolutionary Faunas that dominated 10 Phanerozoic oceans represents a foundational concept of macroevolutionary research. However, the hypothesis lacks spatial information and fails to recognize ecosystem changes in Mesozoic oceans. Using a multilayer network representation of fossil occurrences, we demonstrate that Phanerozoic oceans sequentially harbored four evolutionary faunas: Cambrian, Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic. These mega-assemblages all emerged at low latitudes and dispersed 15 out of the tropics. The Paleozoic–Mesozoic transition was abrupt, coincident with the Permian mass extinction, whereas the Mesozoic–Cenozoic transition was protracted, concurrent with gradual ecological shifts posited by the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. These findings support the notion that long-term ecological changes, historical contingencies, and major geological events all have played crucial roles in shaping the evolutionary history of marine animals. 20 One Sentence Summary: Network analysis reveals that Phanerozoic oceans harbored four evolutionary faunas with variable tempo and underlying causes.
    [Show full text]
  • David M. Raup 1933–2015
    David M. Raup 1933–2015 A Biographical Memoir by Michael Foote and Arnold I. Miller ©2017 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. DAVID MALCOLM RAUP April 24, 1933–July 9, 2015 Elected to the NAS, 1979 David M. Raup, one of the most influential paleontolo- gists of the second half of the 20th century, infused the field with concepts from modern biology and established several major lines of research that continue today: Theoretical morphology. Why, despite eons of evolution, is the spectrum of realized biological forms such a tiny fraction of those that are theoretically possible? First-order patterns in the geologic history of biodiversity. Has biodiversity increased steadily over time? What does the answer imply about the biosphere and the nature of the fossil record? Mathematical modeling of evolution. What By Michael Foote patterns result, for example, from the structure of evolu- and Arnold I. Miller tionary trees? And what is the apparent order that emerges from stochastic processes? Biological extinction. What temporal patterns are evident in the history of life and what are their implications for the drivers of extinction and for Earth’s place in the cosmos? The pilot and the paleontologist In The Right Stuff(1979), author Tom Wolfe observed that the calm West Virginia drawl of the renowned test pilot and World War II ace Chuck Yeager could still be heard in the voices of virtually all commercial pilots, decades after Yeager became the first to break the sound barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosasauroid Predation on an Ammonite – Pseudaspido- Ceras – from the Early Turonian of South-Eastern Morocco
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 67 (2017), No. 1, pp. 31–46 provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) DOI: 10.1515/agp-2017-0003 Mosasauroid predation on an ammonite – Pseudaspido- ceras – from the Early Turonian of south-eastern Morocco ANDREW S. GALE1, WILLIAM JAMES KENNEDY2 and DAVID MARTILL3 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, United Kingdom.E-mail: [email protected] 2Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, and Department of Earth Sciences, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Gale, A.S., Kennedy, W.J. and Martill, D. 2017. Mosasauroid predation on an ammonite – Pseudaspidoceras – from the Early Turonian of south-eastern Morocco. Acta Geologica Polonica, 67 (1), 31–46. Warszawa. A juvenile specimen of the ammonite Pseudaspidoceras from the Early Turonian of the Goulmima area in the Province of Er-Rachida in south-eastern Morocco shows clear evidence of predation by a tooth-bearing verte- brate. Most of the body chamber is missing, as a result of post-burial compactional crushing. The adapertural part of the shell on the left flank of the surviving fragment of body chamber bears six circular punctuations; the right flank four. These are interpreted as the product of a single bite by a mosasauroid, probably aTethysaurus .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Picture of Life's History on Earth
    Commentary A new picture of life’s history on Earth Mark Newman* Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501 hen most people think of paleon- his primary source (2, 3). Other compila- database is as exhaustive as possible, sub- Wtology, they picture the field pale- tions also have been published (4, 5), but stantial biases are introduced. For exam- ontologist digging up fossils with a tooth- Sepkoski’s database has received more ple, it is quite feasible that the increase in brush and publishing descriptions of the attention by far than any other. Sepkoski’s diversity toward recent times seen in Fig. anatomies of uncovered specimens in the database was simple in structure: it re- 1 is a result primarily of the greater vol- trade literature. New discoveries of dino- corded the first and last known occur- ume of rock available from recent times, saurs even make the national headlines. rences in the fossil record of more than and the greater amount of effort that has For many decades the discovery and de- 30,000 marine invertebrate genera in been put into studying these rocks. A scription of a previously unknown fossil about 4,000 families. Marine invertebrates number of studies over the years have species was the calling card that gained have been the focus of most statistical presented evidence showing that apparent would-be paleontologists professional ac- studies, because preservation is much diversity is closely correlated with the ceptance. However, in the last quarter of more reliable in marine environments and intensity with which different periods of a century or so, many of the most intrigu- invertebrates are much more numerous geologic time have been sampled (6, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontologia Electronica the Paleobiological Revolution
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology Reviewed by Brian Switek David Sepkoski and Michael Ruse (editors) belief that paleon- University of Chicago Press, 2009 tology was more 584 pp., $65.00 (hardcover) closely related to ISBN 978-0-226-74861-0 geology rein- By the middle of the 20th century a great forced the idea divide had opened within evolutionary biology. As that it had little to summarized by paleontologist George Gaylord contribute to the Simpson, many geneticists “said that paleontology life sciences. had no further contributions to make to biology”, Despite this wide- while paleontologists believed that the emerging spread reticence science of genetics “had no significance for the to treat paleontol- true biologist.” (Simpson, 1944). Simpson, for his ogy as an evolu- own part, attempted to bring the disciplines into tionary discipline, accord in his classic Tempo and Mode in Evolution, however, paleon- but despite his efforts genetics eventually out- tologists such as stripped paleontology as the evolutionary science G.G. Simpson and du jour. Paleontology, some evolutionary theorists Norman Newell believed, could only testify to the fact of evolution fostered paleobiological research through the while telling us nothing of how such changes actu- 1950’s and 1960’s, setting a long fuse that finally ally occurred. Fortunately, however, some paleon- exploded in the 1970’s. Thomas Schopf, Niles tologists were not satisfied with this blinkered view Eldredge, Stephen Jay Gould, Elisabeth Vrba, of their discipline, and they began what historians David Raup, James Valentine, Jack Sepkoski, and David Sepkoski and Michael Ruse have called The many others transformed paleontology from a rela- Paleobiological Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Site of the Bodleian Extension in Broad Street
    The Geology of the Site of the Bodleian Extension in Broad Street By. W. J. ARKELL HE preliminary excavation for the Bodleian extension involved the removal of the greatest quantity of subsoil (' rock' in the geologist's sense) T ever taken out of one hole within the City of Oxford. The material was of two kinds, classified by geologists as • Superficial,' of Quaternary age, consisting of gravel laid down by the River Thames in Lower­ Middle Palaeolithic times (a few tens of thousands of years ago), and • Solid,' of Jurassic age, forming the foundation or country~rock, consisting of marine sediments deposited something like '30 million years ago. Both deposits contained fossil remains of animals which were alive at the time the rocks were formed and are of sufficient interest to put on record. The excavation as a whole was about 23 ft. deep. The highest 20 ft., approximately, was dug in Thames gravel, and the last two or three feet in the solid Oxford Clay underneath. The line of separation between the two was sharply defined and undulated only slightly, the surface of the Oxford Clay varying in elevation by only ,-,! ft. The lowest 1-2 ft. of the gravel was saturated with water, which rose to about 3- 4 ft. above the surface of the clay in the trial holes. In the bottom of the huge tank so formed, several pits were dug for founda­ tions. These exposed on an average 5 ft. and a maximum of 6 ft. 6 ins. of Oxford Clay (measured from the base of the gravel).
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Chronospecies in Ammonites
    Atti II Conv. Int. Pallini pp. 273-289 Chronospecies in Ammonites F.E.A. Pergola, 87 et alii cur. 3 taw., 6 figg. The concept of chronospecies in ammonites JERZY DZIK Zakfad Paleobiologii PAN, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland RIASSUNTO specific population in samples of the same geologic age (objective in principle), Le sole unita tassonomiche direttamente identificabili in paleonto- (5) reconstruction of evolutionary lineages by assembling logia sono i paleofena o gruppi di esemplari in un campione che pre- series of population from samples of different age, senta una distribuzione continua e unimodale della frequenza di tutti which are identified as being in close ancestor- i caratteri. Paleofena coevi possono essere sistemati in biospecie men- descendant relationships, tre serie temporali di questo formano delle linee filetiche. I risultati di entrambi i procedimenti sono empiricamente comprovabili. (6) delimitation of chronospecies within the lineage (sub- La ricostruzione delle linee e una condizione necessaria a priori per jective in principle), una definizione coscienziosa delle cronspecie, cioe segmenti arbitraria- (7) naming the chronospecies. mente designati di una linea. Un esempio empirico dimostra che pud Chronospecies is an evolutionary concept. Before any non essere possibile riconoscere i paleofena senza la biometria. chronospecies can be precisely defined, the evolution of Vengono discusse Ie prove per la presenza di due biospecie dimorfi- its lineage has to be determined. Even though the mean- che nel Calloviano di -Lukow (Polonia) e per la natura dimorfica dei ing of species in paleontology is so frequently vague, the generi valanginiani Saynoceras e Valanginites. gradualistic evolutionary nature of chronospecies is gener- ally assumed as self-evident.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeontology Newsletter
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents100 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Annual Meeting 2019 3 Awards and Prizes AGM 2018 12 PalAss YouTube Ambassador sought 24 Association Meetings 25 News 30 From our correspondents A Palaeontologist Abroad 40 Behind the Scenes: Yorkshire Museum 44 She married a dinosaur 47 Spotlight on Diversity 52 Future meetings of other bodies 55 Meeting Reports 62 Obituary: Ralph E. Chapman 67 Grant Reports 72 Book Reviews 104 Palaeontology vol. 62 parts 1 & 2 108–109 Papers in Palaeontology vol. 5 part 1 110 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no. 101 is 3rd June 2019. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 100 2 Editorial This 100th issue continues to put the “new” in Newsletter. Jo Hellawell writes about our new President Charles Wellman, and new Publicity Officer Susannah Lydon gives us her first news column. New award winners are announced, including the first ever PalAss Exceptional Lecturer (Stephan Lautenschlager). (Get your bids for Stephan’s services in now; check out pages 34 and 107.) There are also adverts – courtesy of Lucy McCobb – looking for the face of the Association’s new YouTube channel as well as a call for postgraduate volunteers to join the Association’s outreach efforts. But of course palaeontology would not be the same without the old. Behind the Scenes at the Museum returns with Sarah King’s piece on The Yorkshire Museum (York, UK). Norman MacLeod provides a comprehensive obituary of Ralph Chapman, and this issue’s palaeontologists abroad (Rebecca Bennion, Nicolás Campione and Paige dePolo) give their accounts of life in Belgium, Australia and the UK, respectively.
    [Show full text]