DOCSLIB.ORG

FRANKLIN COUNTY, MISSOURI and INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 of 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FRANKLIN COUNTY, MISSOURI AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 of 2 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER Berger, City of 290132 Franklin County 290493 Unincorporated Areas Gerald, City of* 290734 Leslie, Village of* 290304 Miramiguoa Park, 290992 Village of New Haven, City of 290133 Oak Grove, Village of 290554 Pacific, City of 290134 Parkway, Village of* 290532 St. Clair, City of 290135 Sullivan, City of 290136 Union, City of 290137 Washington, City of 290138 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified EFFECTIVE: October 18, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 29071CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Countywide FIS Effective Date: October 18, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ....................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Upper Mississippi River System Flood Frequency Study Methodology ................. 3 1.3 Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Scope of Study .................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Community Description ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Principal Flood Problems .................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Flood Protection Measures ................................................................................................. 8 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses ........................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Pre-Countywide Analysis ........................................................................................ 9 3.1.2 Countywide Analysis ............................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Upper Mississippi River System Flow Frequency Study Methodology ................ 12 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses ........................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Pre-Countywide Analysis ...................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Countywide Analysis ............................................................................................. 21 3.2.3 Upper Mississippi River System Flow Frequency Study Methodology ................ 22 3.3 Vertical Datum .................................................................................................................. 25 3.3.1 Methods for Missouri River ................................................................................... 25 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS ............................................................... 26 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries ...................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Methods for Missouri River ................................................................................... 27 4.2 Floodways ......................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 Methods for Missouri River ................................................................................... 28 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION ................................................................................................... 72 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP........................................................................................... 72 7.0 OTHER STUDIES ....................................................................................................................... 73 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA ............................................................................................................... 73 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ................................................................................... 73 FIGURES Figure 1 - Floodway Schematic .................................................................................................................. 28 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) VOLUME I Page TABLES Table 1 – Summary of Community Studies Used to Compile Initial Countywide FIS ................................ 2 Table 2 – History of CCO Meeting Held for Franklin County FISs ............................................................. 3 Table 3 – Streams Studied by Detailed Methods .......................................................................................... 4 Table 4 – Summary of Discharges .............................................................................................................. 13 Table 5 – Manning’s “n” Values for Detailed Study Streams .................................................................... 24 Table 6 – Floodway Data ............................................................................................................................ 29 Table 7 – Community Map History ............................................................................................................ 74 VOLUME II EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Flood Profiles Birch Creek Panels 01P-02P Bourbeuse River Panels 03P-09P Bourbeuse River Tributary Panels 10P Brown’s Branch Panels 11P-13P Brush Creek Panels 14P-17P Busch Creek Panels 18P-21P Calvey Creek Panels 22P-25P Dubois Creek Panels 26P-29P Fenton Creek Panels 30P Fiddle Creek Panels 31P-34P Flat Creek Panels 35P-38P Flat Creek North Tributary Panels 39P Happy Sock Creek Panels 40P-41P Labadie Creek Panels 42P Labadie Creek Tributary Panels 43P Little Calvey Creek Panels 44P-46P Little Meramec River Panels 47P-49P Little Tavern Creek Panels 50P-52P Meramec River Panels 53P-55P Missouri River Panels 56P-59P Monroe Branch Panels 60P-61P Pin Oak Creek Panels 62P-63P Pin Oak Creek Tributary Panels 64P Possum Creek Panels 65P-66P South Branch Busch Creek Panels 67P Southwest Branch Busch Creek Panels 68P-71P St. John’s Creek Panels 72P Thornton Branch Panels 73P Unnamed Tributary to Busch Creek Panels 74P Wild Horse Creek Panels 75P-76P ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) VOLUME II Winch Creek Panels 77P-80P Winsel Creek Panels 81P-87P Exhibit 2 - PUBLISHED SEPARATELY: Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Map iii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FRANKLIN COUNTY, MISSOURI AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) revises and updates information on the existence and severity of flood hazards in the geographic area of Franklin County, including the Cities of Berger, Gerald, New Haven, Pacific, St. Clair, Sullivan, Union and Washington; the Villages of Leslie, Miramiguoa Park, Oak Grove, Parkway, and the unincorporated areas of Franklin County (referred to collectively herein as Franklin County), and aids in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This study has developed flood-risk data for various areas of the community that will be used to establish actuarial flood insurance rates and to assist the community in its efforts to promote sound floodplain management. Minimum floodplain management requirements for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. This information will be used by the communities to update existing floodplain regulations as part of the regular phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The information will also be used by local and regional planners to further promote sound land use and floodplain development. As part of this revision, the format of the map panels has changed. Previously, flood-hazard information was shown on both the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Recommended publications
  • Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project

    Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project

    MERAMEC RIVER WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Funded by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency prepared by: Todd J. Blanc Fisheries Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Sullivan, Missouri and Mark Caldwell and Michelle Hawks Fisheries GIS Specialist and GIS Analyst Missouri Department of Conservation Columbia, Missouri November 1998 Contributors include: Andrew Austin, Ronald Burke, George Kromrey, Kevin Meneau, Michael Smith, John Stanovick, Richard Wehnes Reviewers and other contributors include: Sue Bruenderman, Kenda Flores, Marlyn Miller, Robert Pulliam, Lynn Schrader, William Turner, Kevin Richards, Matt Winston For additional information contact East Central Regional Fisheries Staff P.O. Box 248 Sullivan, MO 63080 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview The overall purpose of the Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project is to bring together relevant information about the Meramec River basin and evaluate the status of the stream, watershed, and wetland resource base. The project has three primary objectives, which have been met. The objectives are: 1) Prepare an inventory of the Meramec River basin to provide background information about past and present conditions. 2) Facilitate the reduction of riparian wetland losses through identification of priority areas for protection and management. 3) Identify potential partners and programs to assist citizens in selecting approaches to the management of the Meramec River system. These objectives are dealt with in the following sections titled Inventory, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyses, and Action Plan. Inventory The Meramec River basin is located in east central Missouri in Crawford, Dent, Franklin, Iron, Jefferson, Phelps, Reynolds, St. Louis, Texas, and Washington counties. Found in the northeast corner of the Ozark Highlands, the Meramec River and its tributaries drain 2,149 square miles.
  • Surdex Case History Meramec Flooding Articlev Page 1.Eps

    Surdex Case History Meramec Flooding Articlev Page 1.Eps

    30 Hours from Acquisition to Online: Surdex’s Emergency Orthoimagery of the Meramec River Flood (2017) From Emergency Responders to local authorities to insurance companies, those responding to the flooding of Missouri’s Meramec River could access imagery within 30 hours of acquisition. Despite tremendous rains and poor atmospheric conditions, Surdex was able to capture critical imagery to help the community quickly respond to the disaster. The Meramec River Flood Area Missouri’s Meramec River is one of the largest free-flowing The Meramec crested on Wednesday, 3 May, at 36.52’, waterways in the state. Its meandering 220 miles drains breaking the over 100 year record by three feet. This was nearly 4,000 square miles in a watershed covering six preceded by a crest of 31.48’ on December 19, 2015 — Missouri counties. In late April 2017, the St. Louis region essentially exhibiting two nearly “100-year” floods within a experienced exceptionally heavy rains. In Sullivan, Missouri, 16-month period. The Meramec Caverns attraction was again nearly 7 inches of rain fell from April 29 through May 1. Local temporarily closed , along with several campgrounds, boat authorities watched with concern as the rivers swelled access areas, etc. beyond capacity. Being a St. Louis County-based company, Surdex monitored the flood waters and was able to conduct aerial imagery acquisition — despite the exceptionally cloudy and rainy conditions – to pull together a complete coverage of the flooded area for local communities and disaster recovery officials. Surdex was able to capture the imagery at a timely point during the flooding and use our tested With the projection that the flood would crest early on Wednesday, May 3, Surdex acquired aerial imagery on May emergency response processes to ensure 2, processed the images, and provided web services expedited products to the government and the containing the orthoimagery within 24 hours.
  • Klondike Road Bridge HAER No. MO-71 (Votaw Road Bridge) Patf

    Klondike Road Bridge HAER No. MO-71 (Votaw Road Bridge) Patf

    Klondike Road Bridge HAER No. MO-71 (Votaw Road Bridge) patf? Spanning Big River at Klondike Road nrtcfc Morse Mill vicinity /77D Jefferson County SD-^on7 '' Vj Missouri , PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Rocky Mountain Regional Office U. S. Department of the Interior P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Klondike Road Bridge (Votaw Road Bridge) / - HAER No. MO-71 Original Location: The bridge was originally part of the Votaw Road Bridge over the Meramec River between Times Beach and Eureka from 1900 to 1933. Present Location: Spanning the Big River at Klondike Road Morse Mill vicinity, Jefferson County, Missouri UTM: Zone 15 N 4241040320 E 706950 Quad: Cedar Hill, 7.5 minute series Date of Construction: Built in 1900 as the two-span Votaw Road Bridge, one span was reconstructed in 1933 as the Klondike Road Bridge. Builder: St. Louis Bridge and Iron Company Present Owner: Jefferson County Courthouse Jefferson County Hillsboro, Missouri Present Use: Vehicular traffic bridge Significance: The bridge is the longest and oldest of eight surviving pinned Camelback through truss bridges in Missouri. The bridge is also the fifth longest of all the pinned through truss bridges in the state. Historians: Tom Gage, Ph.D., American History Craig Sturdevant, M.A., Anthropology John Carrel, Research Associate, ERC Klondike Road Bridge (Votaw Road Bridge) HAER No. MO-71 (Page 2) I. HISTORY The Votaw Road Bridge, later partially reconstructed in Jefferson County as the Klondike Road Bridge, was constructed across the Meramec River on the Votaw Road.1 The bridge provided the major thoroughfare between St.
  • Flood-Inundation Maps for the Meramec River at Valley Park and at Fenton, Missouri, 2017

    Flood-Inundation Maps for the Meramec River at Valley Park and at Fenton, Missouri, 2017

    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District, Missouri Department of Transportation, Missouri American Water, and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 7 Flood-Inundation Maps for the Meramec River at Valley Park and at Fenton, Missouri, 2017 Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5116 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Flooding from the Meramec River in Valley Park, Missouri. Upper left photograph taken December 30, 2015, by David Carson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, used with permission. Lower right photograph taken December 31, 2015, by J.B. Forbes, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, used with permission. Back cover. Flooding from the Meramec River near Eureka, Missouri, December 30, 2015. Photographs by David Carson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, used with permission. Flood-Inundation Maps for the Meramec River at Valley Park and at Fenton, Missouri, 2017 By Benjamin J. Dietsch and Jacob N. Sappington Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District, Missouri Department of Transportation, Missouri American Water, and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 7 Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5116 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.
  • Examination of Flood Characteristics at Selected Streamgages in the Meramec River Basin, Eastern Missouri, December 2015–January 2016

    Examination of Flood Characteristics at Selected Streamgages in the Meramec River Basin, Eastern Missouri, December 2015–January 2016

    Examination of Flood Characteristics at Selected Streamgages in the Meramec River Basin, Eastern Missouri, December 2015–January 2016 By Robert R. Holmes, Jr., Todd A. Koenig, Paul H. Rydlund, and David C. Heimann Overview methods (submersible pressure transducer, non-submersible pressure transducer, or non-contact radar). These obser- Heavy rainfall resulted in major flooding in the Mera- vations are recorded autonomously at a predetermined mec River Basin in eastern Missouri during late December programmed frequency (typically either 15 or 30 minutes) 2015 through early January 2016. Cumulative rainfall from dependent on drainage-area size and concomitant flashiness December 14 to 29, 2015, ranged from 7.6 to 12.3 inches of the stream. Although stage data are important, stream- at selected precipitation stations in the basin with flood- flow data are equally or more important for streamflow ing driven by the heaviest precipitation (3.9–9.7 inches) forecasting, water-quality constituent loads computation, between December 27 and 29, 2015 (National Centers for flood-frequency analysis, and flood mitigation planning. Environmental Information, 2016). Financial losses from Streamflows are computed from recorded stage data using flooding included damage to homes and other structures, an empirically determined relation between stage and damage to roads, and debris removal. Eight of 11 coun- streamflow termed a “rating.” Development and verification ties in the basin were declared a Federal Disaster Area of the rating requires periodic onsite discrete measurements (Nelson, 2016). of streamflow throughout time and over the range of stages The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in coopera- to define local hydraulic conditions. tion with the U.S.
  • Phelps Countycounty Missourimissouri States...And It Territories...For the Protection of Life and Property

    Phelps Countycounty Missourimissouri States...And It Territories...For the Protection of Life and Property

    National Weather Service “To provide weather and flood Natural Hazard Risk Assessment warnings, public forecasts and Information For: advisories for all of the United PhelpsPhelps CountyCounty MissouriMissouri States...and it territories...for the protection of life and property. Information Provided By WFO Springfield, Mo National Weather Service 2009 Update Includes data and information through December 2008 5808 W Hwy EE Springfield, Mo. 65802 Phone: 417-864-8535 Email: [email protected] [email protected] National Weather Service Table of Contents Local Climatology Averages and records for Rolla, Missouri in Phelps County Overview of Weather Hazards in Southwest Missouri 2 Normal Normal Normal Normal Record Record Record Record Historical information for Phelps County Missouri 3 High Low Precip. Snow High Low Precip. Snow Tornado Information 4 Jan 40 21 2.33 6.2 78 -24 9.72 19.7 Severe Hail, Lightning, Wind and Winter Weather 5 Feb 46 26 2.22 4.3 84 -14 5.84 13.1 Flooding 6 Mar 55 35 3.68 3.0 92 -3 9.68 17.8 Heat , Drought and Wildfires 7 Apr 66 45 4.30 0.7 93 13 11.95 8.0 Dam Failure 8 Historic Weather in Southwest Missouri 9 May 75 55 4.84 0 98 31 18.87 2.0 Local Climatology 10 Jun 84 64 3.96 0 104 40 15.44 0 Jul 89 68 4.56 0 113 46 15.66 0 Aug 88 66 4.05 0 108 42 12.29 0 Sept 79 58 3.80 0 105 32 14.65 0 Oct 69 47 3.44 0.1 94 19 14.87 2.0 Nov 55 36 4.33 1.6 85 3 11.75 16.9 Dec 43 25 3.34 4.4 79 -19 11.36 19.6 Links for Climate information www.crh.noaa.gov/sgf/ www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ www4.ncdc.noaa.gov This document is intended to provide general information on severe weather that has affected Phelps County and the communities with in the county.
  • 2016 Monitoring Network Plan, Revision 0

    2016 Monitoring Network Plan, Revision 0

    APPENDIX 6 Comments and Responses on Proposed 2016 Monitoring Network Plan, Revision 0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON PROPOSED 2016 MONITORING NETWORK PLAN, REVISION 0 The public comment period for the proposed 2016 Missouri Monitoring Network Plan opened on May 27, 2016 and closed on June 28, 2016. The Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program prepared the 2016 Monitoring Network Plan to address the requirements of 40 CFR 58.10 (a) (1) for annual submittal of a plan to provide information on current State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS), other ambient air monitoring, and any proposed network changes for the upcoming year. The following is a summary of comments received and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program’s (Air Program’s) corresponding responses. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: During the public comment period for the proposed 2016 Monitoring Network Plan, the Air Program received comments from Steven C. Whitworth (Ameren Missouri) and Maxine I. Lipeles (Washington University School of Law on behalf of the Sierra Club). The comments focus primarily on ambient air monitoring networks for the Ameren Missouri Labadie and Rush Island coal fired power plants and were generally related to the implementation approach of the 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Air Program is responding to comments that relate specifically to ambient air monitoring issues as appropriate and applicable to the requirements of 40 CFR 58.10 (a) (1). Our responses follow the original comments identified in italics. COMMENT #1: Both commenters addressed the issue of ambient air monitor classifications relative to 40 CFR 58 and EPA’s SO2 Data Requirements Rule (DRR) 40 CFR 51 Subpart BB.
  • DOWNLOAD Meramec Then & Now.PDF

    DOWNLOAD Meramec Then & Now.PDF

    REVISED—2003 Updates on River and Place Names Origins, Plus Meramec River Source. The story of a stream... Green’s Cave Sullivan, Mo. 1 For Edith & Alex The Meramec River: Then and Now. 2003 Revised Edition by William R. Kammer “The following text is a brief historical survey of the Meramec River. Comprised of general descriptions of the major evolutionary events which have occurred and features existing past and present - in the area of the Meramec Valley. It includes a description of geological formation; the river itself; past wildlife and human inhabitants; settlement and utilization; current conditions; guidelines to present usages (includes rules, regulations and safety tips); and a listing of some of the area’s best river service providers.” Some River & Cave Photo’s by: Delores Page, On Cover: Karin Barger & Andy Harbert (Greens Cave), John Barger (in canoe). Special thanks to: Professor Lawrence Christensen & Professor Larry Vonalt, University of Missouri, Rolla. Table of Contents Page # Note From Author Preface 3 Quotes (Nature) 3 A Special Place! -update- Introduction 4 Map 5 -update- Names Origins 6 Its Story! The Genesis 7 The Evolution 9 The Transition 12 Enter Man 14 The Paleo Indians 14 The Archaic Indians 15 The Woodland Indians 17 The Mississippians 18 The Historic Indians 20 Civilization and Commerce 23 Quiz Yourself 24 Early Settlement 25 The Iron Era 26 What It Has To Offer You Now! A Playground For All 33 Do’s and Don’ts 35 How To Canoe 36 Upper Meramec Map 37 Significant Tributaries 38 Statistical Information 44 How To Come Enjoy It! Sponsors 51 Trip Recorder 61 Endnotes 64 Photo Album 65 2 Preface Nature First, I must offer a special thanks to all the wonderful ? The tree which moves some to tears of joy is in floaters of whom over the years I have had the pleasure to the eyes of others only a green thing that stands meet, and for whom I have had the privilege of playing a in the way.
  • Monday, May 13Th, 2019@ 7:00 P.M

    Monday, May 13Th, 2019@ 7:00 P.M

    CITY OF WASHINGTON, MISSOURI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING 405 JEFFERSON STREET, WASHINGTON, MISSOURI COUNCIL CHAMBERS -- GROUND LEVEL Monday, May 13th, 2019@ 7:00 P.M. 1) Announcement of Meeting I Call to Order/ Roll Call/ Pledge of Allegiance. 1 2) Approval of Minutes from April 8 h, 2019 3) File No. 19-0501-Applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for 1807 E Fifth Street 4) File No. 19-0502-Applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat Approval 5) File No. 19-0503-Applicant is requesting to vacate E. Rose Lane 6) Zoning Code Amendment 7) File No. 19-0401-Applicant is requesting to rezone #4 & # 10 Franklin Avenue from C-1 Limited Commercial District to C-2, General Commercial 8) Other Business 9) Adjournment NOTE: ATTENDANCE AT THIS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING BY A KNOWLEDGEABLE REPRESENTATIVE OF YOUR INTERESTS IS RECOMMENDED. ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING YOUR REQUESTS THAT ARE NOT ANSWERED AT THIS MEETING MAY RESULT IN YOUR REQUEST BEING TABLED OR DENIED. CITY OF W ASIDNGTON, MISSOURI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 8, 2019 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was held on the aforementioned date and time in the Council Chambers of City Hall, located at 405 Jefferson Street in Washington, MO. 1) The meeting was called to order, Pledge of Allegiance, and the following roll call was taken: Present: Carolyn Witt, Mark Hidritch, Mark Kluesner, Mark Piontek, Tom Holdmeier, Sandy Lucy, John Borgmann, Chuck Watson, Sal Maniaci Absent: Tony Gokenbach, Samantha Cerutti Wacker 2) Approval of Minutes from March 11, 2019-Motion made to approve, seconded and passed without dissent.
  • Missouri Regional Condition 2 Seasonal Restrictions for Activities

    Missouri Regional Condition 2 Seasonal Restrictions for Activities

    Missouri Regional Condition #2 to Nationwide Permits Seasonal Restrictions for Activities Proposed in Fish Spawning Areas Listing Criteria Noted at Bottom of Table Listing Length ID Stream Name Downstream Boundary (From) Upstream Boundary (To) Closure Period County Criteria (Miles) the tributary (Unnamed Creek ⑦) confluence the upstream MDC boundary (Taberville 1 Baker Branch 15 May - 15 July 2,4,5 4.4 St. Clair immediately downstream of CR-SW 1075 Prairie CA) 2 Barren Fork ① its mouth (confluence with Tavern Creek) MO-17 15 March - 15 June 2,4 2.9 Miller 3 Barren Fork ② its mouth (confluence with Sinking Creek) CR-A-D 15 Nov. - 15 Feb. 6 3.4 Shannon 4 Bass Creek its mouth (confluence with Turkey Creek) US-63 15 May - 15 July 2,5,7 4.4 Boone 5 Bear Creek RT-A the south section line (6, 33N, 24W) 15 March - 15 June 2,4 10.5 Cedar, Polk 6 Beaver Creek Bull Shoals Lake (654' AMSL) MO-76 15 March - 31 July 2,4 24.3 Taney 7 Big Buffalo Creek Lake of the Ozarks (660' AMSL) its headwaters 1 April - 30 June 2,5 10.8 Benton, Morgan its source (convergence of Cane Creek & 8 Big Cane Creek the Missouri-Arkansas border 1 March - 15 June 2,7 4.2 Butler Little Cane Creek) 9 Big Creek its mouth (confluence with St. Francis River) MO-143 15 March - 15 June 5,6 12.3 Wayne, Iron 10 Big Piney River its mouth (confluence with Gasconade River) MO-17 15 March - 15 June 2,4,6,7 84.8 Pulaski, Phelps, Texas the upstream MDC boundary (Leadwood Jefferson, Washington, 11 Big River its mouth (confluence with Meramec River) 15 March - 15 June 2,6 108.4 Access) St.
  • The Pre-Impoundment Fish Fauna of Big River (Meramec Drainage, Missouri)

    The Pre-Impoundment Fish Fauna of Big River (Meramec Drainage, Missouri)

    1978] Mills, Hocutt, & Stauffer, Biological Sciences 25 THE PRE-IMPOUNDMENT FISH FAUNA OF BIG RIVER (MERAMEC DRAINAGE, MISSOURI) Paul A. Mills, Jr. Museum of Nat. His., Univ. Kansas, Lawrence, Ks. 66045, and Charles H. Hocutt and Jay R. Stauffer, Jr. Appalachian Environ. Lab., Univ. Maryland, Frostburg, Md. 21532 ABSTRACT: Eighty two species of fishes were collected from 37 localities on Big River (principal tributary of the Meramec River, East-central Missouri) from 1974-1976. Of these, 14 were newly reported from the system, and 5 others had not been collected since before 1945.The fauna is essentially "Ozarkian" and is divided into those species which are primarily headwaters and tributary inhabitants, those generally restricted to the lower river, and those widely distributed. In conjunction with literature records, we document the presence of 90 species of fishes in Big River and discuss some possible effects of the two proposed impoundments on the composition and distribution of the fauna. Introduction. The Meramec River system of east-central Missouri lies within that portion of the state known as the Ozark uplands. It is composed of two principal tributaries in addition to the mainstream and drains all or parts of 11 counties. Big River, the larger of these two tributaries, originates in northern Iron County south of Belgrade and enters the Meramec from the south near Eureka. The headwaters of Big River drain a portion of the St. Francis Mountain region, an area composed largely of igneous rocks of Cambrian and Pre-Cambrian age. The majority of its watershed, however, lies within the Salem Plateau province where sedimentary limestones and dolomites of Ordovician age and younger predominate (Thornbury 1965: 265-268).
  • Missouri Route 47 Franklin & Warren Counties, MO

    Missouri Route 47 Franklin & Warren Counties, MO

    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Missouri Route 47 Franklin & Warren Counties, MO Missouri River Bridge at Washington JOB NUMBER J3P2155 and Missouri Department of Transportation Finding of No Significant Impact Missouri Route 47 Franklin & Warren Counties, MO Missouri River Bridge at Washington JOB NUMBER J3P2155 and Missouri Department of Transportation August 2011 This page intentionally blank Finding of No Significant Impact 23 CFR 771.121 Missouri Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration REGION STATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE, ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT TYPE Missouri J3P2155 Missouri Route 47, Franklin and Warren Counties, Missouri Division Missouri River Bridge at Washington Environmental Assessment INCLUDES PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) and MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR MITIGATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS DECISION The Federal Highway Administration, Missouri Division, approved the Missouri Route 47, Franklin and Warren Counties, Missouri, Missouri River Bridge at Washington, Job Number J3P2155, Environmental Assessment (EA) on December 2, 2010. Notice of the EA’s availability was sent to agencies and the document was made available for public review on December 15, 2010. The EA was available at eight locations in the affected counties and also was posted on MoDOT’s District 3 website at http://www.modot.org/northeast/Route47BridgeatWashington.htm. The Selected Alternative to solve the transportation problems associated with the Route 47 Bridge is the adjacent upstream alternative. The selected alternative will replace the existing, deficient bridge with a new two-lane bridge approximately 50 feet upstream from the current location. This alternative will slightly realign the roadway beyond the bridge limits to tie into existing Route 47. The selected alternative will result in removal of the existing historic bridge after the new structure is built.