DOCSLIB.ORG

An Investigation of Seventh Grade Students' Attitudes Towards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Investigation of Seventh Grade Students' Attitudes Towards An Investigation of Seventh Grade Students’ Attitudes Towards Animals in a Middle School Science Classroom in Rural Alabama by Jackson Moss A dissertation proposal submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 4, 2019 Keywords: attitudes toward animals, conservation, education Copyright 2019 by Jackson Moss Approved by Christine Guy Schnittka, Chair, Associate Professor, Department of Education Melody Russell, Professor, Department of Education Debbie Folkerts, Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Chih-Hsuan Wang, Associate Professor, Department of Education Research Abstract This dissertation examines the different types of attitudes toward animals held by 7th grade students in one middle school in the rural southeastern part United States. This study was conducted using seven-point Likert scale surveys over the course of 5 weeks. Each survey contained twenty items consisting of a wide range of animals across four phyla. These surveys showed that students preferred smaller, local, colorful, vertebrates to other animals. The objective of the study was to determine what types of attitudes students exhibited towards animals presented in the surveys and what influenced these attitudes. The results show that students’ attitudes mostly result from knowledge and exposure to a certain species, with aesthetics and perceived threat of the animals used to inform their attitudes in the absence of content knowledge or exposure to the animals. This project also examined students’ attitudes and knowledge toward bats and questioned if the bat curriculum would influence these attitudes and science content knowledge. The survey toward bats used pre and post testing items and found that educational intervention did improve attitudes (t(48) = -6.9, p <.001) and knowledge X2 (1, N = 49) = 19.2, p < .001 toward bats by a statistically significant amount. Themes discovered that strongly impacted student attitudes toward animals were knowledge, aesthetics, exposure, and taxonomic relation of the animal to other animals. ii Acknowledgments I thank my advisor, Dr. Christine Schnittka. Without her willingness to accept a biology student looking to learn more about education, and her knowledge, experience, kindness, and infinite patience, I would not have been able completed this difficult task. She deserves a dissertation’s worth of praise for the hard work she does for all of her students. I thank the committee members who have agreed to be a part of the dissertation process, Dr. Debbie Folkerts, Dr. Melody Russell, and Dr. Chih-Hsuan Wang. Each of them has given advice and counseling related to their fields and to this dissertation. They have helped me see the progress I have been making. I thank Mrs. River and her 7th grade life science classes for allowing me to learn about how they feel about animals and teaching them to enjoy bats. The memories I have of teaching these students will be one I cherish my entire life. Last, I thank my family. I would like to thank my parents Dr. Bill Moss and Debbie Moss. They helped me stay positive and on task while working through this. I also thank my kind and patient wife Danielle for by patient and caring during these stressful times. You have been there motivating me to finish this task. iii Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I: THE PROBLEM .......................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Problems with Attitudes Toward Animals .................................................................................. 1 Geographic Location Problems ............................................................................................... 2 Symbolic Value Problems ....................................................................................................... 3 Attitudes................................................................................................................................... 4 Attitudes Toward Animals .......................................................................................................... 6 Definitions of Animal Values ..................................................................................................... 6 Attitudes in Teaching About Animals ..................................................................................... 8 Problems in Education About Animals ................................................................................... 8 Significance of the Study .......................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................... 11 iv The Southeastern United States................................................................................................. 11 The Ecology of the Southeastern United States .................................................................... 11 Economy and Education in Rural Schools ............................................................................ 13 Attitudes and Values Toward Animals ..................................................................................... 16 Attitudes and Definitions ....................................................................................................... 16 Perceived and Actual Values ................................................................................................. 18 Interactions of Values and Attitudes ..................................................................................... 19 Empathy Toward Animals ..................................................................................................... 26 Animals Promote Interest in Science Learning ..................................................................... 27 Summary of Attitudes and Values Regarding Animals ............................................................ 29 Attitudes Toward Bats ............................................................................................................... 29 Positive Attributes of Bats ..................................................................................................... 30 Negative Values Toward Bats ............................................................................................... 31 Bat Education ........................................................................................................................ 31 Educational Interventions for Animal Attitudes ....................................................................... 32 Surveys .................................................................................................................................. 33 CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY .................................................................................. 35 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 35 v Data Collection .......................................................................................................................... 35 Mixed Method Approach....................................................................................................... 37 Animal Attitudes Surveys ...................................................................................................... 38 Study Site and Participants .................................................................................................... 39 The Curriculum ......................................................................................................................... 40 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................. 42 Constructivism ....................................................................................................................... 42 Table 1 ................................................................................................................................... 45 Timeline for Research ........................................................................................................... 50 Figure 1 ................................................................................................................................. 50 Administering the Animal Attitudes Survey to Youth .......................................................... 51 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 51 Assessing Attitudes Toward Bats .......................................................................................... 52 Researcher Stance and Bias....................................................................................................... 53 CHAPTER IV: RESULTS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And
    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 46 March 10, 2015 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 16 Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Three Anaconda Species and One Python Species as Injurious Reptiles; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10MRR2.SGM 10MRR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 12702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3330) to list Burmese (and Indian) Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, pythons, Northern African pythons, Fish and Wildlife Service FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–562– Southern African pythons, and yellow 3909 ext. 256; facsimile 772–562–4288. anacondas as injurious wildlife under 50 CFR Part 16 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob the Lacey Act. The remaining five RIN 1018–AV68 Progulske, Everglades Program species (reticulated python, boa Supervisor, South Florida Ecological constrictor, green anaconda, [Docket No. FWS–R9–FHC–2008–0015; Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and Beni FXFR13360900000–145–FF09F14000] Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, anaconda) were not listed at that time and remained under consideration for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–469– 4299. If you use a telecommunications listing. With this final rule, we are Three Anaconda Species and One listing four of those species (reticulated Python Species as Injurious Reptiles device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service python, green anaconda, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual
    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Or Facility Visit with Animal
    Site/Facility Visits & ANIMAL ATTACKS NUMBER OF PETS IN THE U.S. BY RANKING 1 2 3 4 5 171.7M 93.6M 79.5M 15.9M 15M Dogs are the third most popular pet in the U.S. Over 36 percent of households own at least one dog. BIGGEST THREAT TO INSPECTORS: DOGS While many dogs are friendly, education and training, and intelligent, and obedient, some irresponsible breeding. While pit dogs can be aggressive due to bulls cause most fatal dog bites, irresponsible pet ownership, lack of all dogs can be dangerous. NEARLY Dog bites can lead OVER IN to pain, injury, nerve % damage, infection, OF18 DOG BITES people1 bitten 5 by and, in rare cases, become infected kinds60 of bacteria a dog requires with bacteria. live in dogs’ mouths. medical attention. DEATH Did you know? OTHER POTENTIALLY Dogs are the largest, most DANGEROUS ANIMALS YOU aggressive, most territorial animals MAY ENCOUNTER DURING that you’re likely to see. A INSPECTION: raccoons, snakes, rodents, bats, spiders, skunks, opossums, bees, fire ants, alligators, bears, FAST FACT and coyotes. Louisiana Black Bear may live up to 20 years. Adult males weight 150-350 pounds, and females weight 120-250 pounds. ANIMAL ATTACK PREVENTION ASK THAT ANY PETS KNOW WHAT WILDLIFE BE REMOVED FROM THE IS COMMON IN YOUR INSPECTION SITE. INSPECTION AREA. Asking that pets be removed rather What animals you than simply secured behind a fence may encounter or in another room is the best way to onsite often keep both you and the animals safe. depends on your A pet-free property also allows you to location.
    [Show full text]
  • Komplikace Setkání S Jedovatou Rybou Ropušnicí Obecnou (Scorpion Fish)
    KAZUISTIKA | E51 Nebezpečí číhající v mořích – komplikace setkání s jedovatou rybou ropušnicí obecnou (Scorpion fish) Nebezpečí číhající v mořích – komplikace setkání s jedovatou rybou ropušnicí obecnou (Scorpion fish) MUDr. Iva Tresnerová1,2, Břetislav Lipový1,2, Alexandra Mertová1, Jana Bartošková1, Yvona Kaloudová1 1Klinika popálenin a plastické chirurgie, FN Brno 2Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno Každoročně se stovky turistů vrací z dovolené z exotických zemí s nechtěnými suvenýry v podobě bakteriálních nebo parazi- tálních infekcí. Méně časté je napadení turisty jedovatým živočichem. Jedním z těchto nebezpečných živočichů je ropušnice obecná (Scorpaena scrofa). Prezentujeme případ 57letého pacienta přijatého na Kliniku popálenin a plastické chirurgie FN Brno s rozsáhlou hlubokou nekrotickou plochou na pravém bérci velikosti 1,5 % TBSA (total body surface area), která se u pacienta rozvinula po bodnutí ropušnicí v Rudém moři. Zranění bylo komplikované komorbiditami pacienta, zejména diabetem II. typu. Klíčová slova: interní komplikace, jedovaté ryby, komorbidity, ropušnice. Danger of the sea­‑complications After Scorpion Fish Attack Hundreds of people come back from exotic countries with bacterial or parasitic infection every year. Venomous animal attack is less common. One such animal is scorpion fish (Scorpaena scrofa). We present case report of a 57-year-old patient treated at the Clinic of Burns and Plastic Surgery with extensive necrotic skin defekt on the right lower leg (1,5 % total body surface area). Defect was caused by puncture injury by scorpion fish in the Red sea. The injury was complicated with comorbid dis- eases of the patient, especially diabetes mellitus type 2. Key words: comorbid diseases, internal complications, scorpionfish, venomous fish. Ropušnice obecná rýhu, po níž stéká jed ze žlázy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1944 Wolf Attacks on Humans: an Update for 2002–2020
    1944 Wolf attacks on humans: an update for 2002–2020 John D. C. Linnell, Ekaterina Kovtun & Ive Rouart NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is NINA’s ordinary form of reporting completed research, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the institute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on important problem areas in society. Usually given a popular scientific form with weight on illustrations. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing. In addition to reporting in NINA's own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their research results in international scientific journals and in popular academic books and journals. Wolf attacks on humans: an update for 2002– 2020 John D. C. Linnell Ekaterina Kovtun Ive Rouart Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA Report 1944 Linnell, J. D. C., Kovtun, E. & Rouart, I. 2021. Wolf attacks on hu- mans: an update for 2002–2020. NINA Report 1944 Norwegian In- stitute for Nature Research. Trondheim, January, 2021 ISSN: 1504-3312 ISBN: 978-82-426-4721-4 COPYRIGHT © Norwegian
    [Show full text]
  • PRICK TESTING in INSECT BITE REACTION Dissertation Submitted
    PRICK TESTING IN INSECT BITE REACTION Dissertation submitted to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai In fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Medicine in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Under the guidance of Dr. SHANMUGA SEKAR .C, MD., Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology PSG INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESEARCH, COIMBATORE THE TAMILNADU DR. M.G.R MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU MAY 2018 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “PRICK TESTING IN INSECT BITE REACTION” is a bonafide work of Dr. IYSHWARIYA SIVADASAN done under the direct guidance and supervision of Dr.C.R. SRINIVAS, MD and Dr. SHANMUGA SEKAR .C, MD, in the department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore in fulfillment of the regulations of The Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University for the award of MD degree in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. Dr. REENA RAI Dr. RAMALINGAM Professor & Head of Department DEAN Department of DVL DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation entitled “PRICK TESTING IN INSECT BITE REACTION” was prepared by me under the direct guidance and supervision of Dr.C.R.SRINIVAS, MD and Dr. SHANMUGA SEKAR C., MD, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore. The dissertation is submitted to The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University in fulfillment of the University regulation for the award of MD degree in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. This dissertation has not been submitted for the award of any other Degree or Diploma. Dr. IYSHWARIYA SIVADASAN CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “PRICK TESTING IN INSECT BITE REACTION” is a bonafide work of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment
    North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project Biological Assessment for Proposed, Threatened, United States and Endangered Wildlife Species Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2016 For More Information Contact: Ivan Green, District Ranger 24874 U.S. Highway 90 Sanderson, FL, 32087 386-752-2577 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 48/Friday, March 12, 2010/Proposed Rules
    11808 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 48 / Friday, March 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules Anyone is able to search the Issued: March 5, 2010. made final, interstate transportation electronic form of all comments Stephen R. Kratzke, could be authorized for scientific, received into any of our dockets by the Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. medical, educational, or zoological name of the individual submitting the [FR Doc. 2010–5177 Filed 3–11–10; 8:45 am] purposes. comment (or signing the comment, if BILLING CODE P DATES: We will consider comments we submitted on behalf of an association, receive on or before May 11, 2010. business, labor union, etc.). You may ADDRESSES: You may submit comments review DOT’s complete Privacy Act DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR by one of the following methods: Statement in the Federal Register at 65 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// FR 19477, April 11, 2000, or you may Fish and Wildlife Service www.regulations.gov. Follow the visit http://www.regulations.gov. instructions for submitting comments to 50 CFR Part 16 Docket No. FWS-R9-FHC-2008-0015. If you wish Docket Management to • notify you upon its receipt of your RIN 1018-AV68 U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. comments, enclose a self-addressed, [FWS-R9-FHC-2008-0015] stamped postcard in the envelope FWS-R9-FHC-2008-0015; Division of [94140-1342-0000-N3] Policy and Directives Management; U.S. containing your comments. Upon Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. receiving your comments, Docket Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing the Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington, VA Management will return the postcard by Boa Constrictor, Four Python Species, 22203.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Pig Attacks on Humans John J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for Proceedings 2013 Wild Pig Attacks on Humans John J. Mayer Savannah River National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc Mayer, John J., "Wild Pig Attacks on Humans" (2013). Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings. 151. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc/151 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Wild Pig Attacks on Humans John J. Mayer Savannah River National Laboratory, Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina ABSTRACT: Attacks on humans by wild pigs (Sus scrofa) have been documented since ancient times. However, studies characterizing these incidents are lacking. In an effort to better understand this phe- nomenon, information was collected from 412 wild pig attacks on humans. Similar to studies of large predator attacks on humans, data came from a variety of sources. The various attacks compiled occurred in seven zoogeographic realms. Most attacks occurred within the species native range, and specifically in rural areas. The occurrence was highest during the winter months and daylight hours. Most happened under non-hunting circumstances and appeared to be unprovoked. Wounded animals were the chief cause of these attacks in hunting situations. The animals involved were typically solitary, male and large in size. The fate of the wild pigs involved in these attacks varied depending upon the circumstances, how- ever, most escaped uninjured.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Rat Snake Class: Reptilia
    Pantherophis obsoletus Black Rat Snake Class: Reptilia. Order: Squamata. Family: Colubridae. Other names: western rat snake, pilot black snake, or simply black snake Physical Description: Juvenile black rat snakes are heavily blotched with patches of brown, grey and black. As they mature their coloration gradually darkens and maintains a white chin and throat. There can be remnants of the blotchy pattern maintained in the adult’s coloration. The black rat snake is Ohio’s largest snake and can reach 42-72 inches (four to five feet) in length. A record of 8.5 feet in length has been recorded! The black rat snake is a member of the family of harmless snakes, or Colubridae. This is the largest order of snakes, representing two-thirds of all known snake species. Members of this family are found on all continents except Antarctica, widespread from the Arctic Circle to the southern tips of South America and Africa. All but a handful of species are harmless snakes, not having venom or the ability to deliver toxic saliva through fangs. Most harmless snakes subdue their prey through constriction, striking and seizing small rodents, birds or amphibians and quickly wrapping their body around the prey causing suffocation. While other small species such as the common garter snake lack powers to constrict and feed on only small prey it can overpower. Harmless snakes range in size from 5 inches to nearly 12 feet in length. The largest American species of snake is the indigo snake, a member of this family. It can grow to 11 feet as an adult! Diet in the Wild: Primarily feeds on a wide variety of rodents and birds, as well as their eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Treatment and Care Guidelines for Rescued Echidnasdownload
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, INDUSTRY & ENVIRONMENT Initial treatment and care guidelines for rescued echidnas environment.nsw.gov.au © 2021 State of NSW and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. DPIE shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by DPIE and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. DPIE asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2021. Cover photo: Short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Peggy Rismiller/Mike McKelvey All other photos have been provided by Peggy Rismiller.
    [Show full text]