How Understanding Electrophile Selectivity Profiles Could Illuminate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Understanding Electrophile Selectivity Profiles Could Illuminate Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0341.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2019; doi:10.1089/ars.2019.7894 Getting the Right Grip? How Understanding Electrophile Selectivity Profiles Could Illuminate Our Understanding of Redox Signaling Marcus J. C. Long†, Lingxi Wang‡, and Yimon Aye‡,* ‡Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland †47 Pudding Gate, Bishop Burton, Beverley East Riding of Yorkshire, HU17 8QH, UK *Correspondence: Prof. Yimon Aye. CH A2 397, EPFL, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel: +41-(0)79 838 94 47. Fax: +41-(0)21 693 66 50. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Significance: Electrophile signaling is coming into focus as a bona fide cell signaling mechanism. The electrophilic regulation occurs typically through a sensing event (i.e., labeling of a protein) and a signaling event (the labeling event having an effect of the proteins activity, association, etc.). Recent advances: Herein, we focus on the first step of this process, electrophile sensing. Electrophile sensing is typically a deceptively simple reaction between the thiol of a protein-cysteine, of which there are around 200,000 in the human proteome, and a Michael acceptor, of which there are numerous flavors, including enals and enones. Recent data overall paint a picture that despite being a simple chemical reaction, electrophile sensing is a discerning process, showing labeling preferences that are often not in line with reactivity of the electrophile. Critical issues: With a view to trying to decide what brings about highly electrophile-reactive protein-cysteines, and how reactive these sensors may be, we discuss aspects of the thermodynamics and kinetics of covalent/non-covalent binding. Data made available by several laboratories indicate that it is likely that specific proteins exhibit highly stereo- and chemoselective electrophile sensing, which we take as good evidence for recognition between the electrophile and the protein prior to forming a covalent bond. Future directions: We propose experiments that could help us gain a better and more quantitative understanding of the 1 © 2019 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0341.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2019; doi:10.1089/ars.2019.7894 Long, et al. mechanisms through which sensing comes about. We further extoll the importance of performing more detailed experiments on labeling and trying to standardize the way we assess protein-specific electrophile sensing. Key words: Covalent labeling; stereoselectivity; electrophile signaling; affinity; mechanism; kinetic control 2 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0341.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2019; doi:10.1089/ars.2019.7894 Long, et al. Man’s appreciation for molecular shape, configuration, and topology in biology has had a checkered history. These vacillations are perhaps best exemplified by our understanding of enantiomers, although similar arguments hold for other minor structural changes. By the 1800’s, we had started to understand that many naturally-occurring compounds had the ability to change the orientation of plane- polarized light. The examples included several naturally-derived inorganic substances, like quartz crystals (16), as well as bioactive natural products, such as tartrate (15). In the 1840’s, Louis Pasteur performed his famous experiment separating racemic tartaric acid into different crystalline forms, which transpired to contain the resolved enantiomers of the compound (15). Later, it was noted that the enantiomers of borneol had distinctly-different odors, hinting that molecular recognition was linked to smell, and that our bodies can distinguish effectively between enantiomers (6). By the 1930s, the concept of enantiomorphism in biology had permeated the general conscience. A contemporary detective series writer, Dorothy L. Sayers, even used the concept that naturally-derived poisons are homochiral and synthetic versions (like would be found in a synthetic poison) are racemic as the denouement to her novel “The Documents in the Case” (48). In the book, the “poison” was muscarine, a sugar analog that is an agonist of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (23). Yet this appreciation for the differential biological properties of enantiomers did little to prepare scientists for the thalidomide crisis in the 1960s that has left medicinal chemists with the critical knowledge that enantiomers can be divergently bioactive. Ironically, this debacle occurred some 10 years after the observations on the potency of different enantiomers by C. Pfeiffer (5). A silent assumption in the above examples of molecules interacting with biological receptors/enzymes/proteins, is that non-covalent binding is the key driving force of the interaction. Indeed, it is the concept of non-covalent binding and the required spatial recognition between enzyme and substrate (or protein and ligand) that has preoccupied biochemists and biologists arguably since the work of Leonor Michaelis and Maud Menten in 1913, and the development of their eponymous equation (or its precursor, the Henri equation) (11). With our current understanding that ligand recognition is a key determinant of biological processes, it is clear why the different enantiomers of different molecules can exhibit divergent 3 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0341.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2019; doi:10.1089/ars.2019.7894 Long, et al. biological properties, such as having different odors. Because high affinity translates to large binding energy, the stabilization of the system incurred upon ligand binding can also be leveraged to induce changes in stabilization, conformation, association, etc., that can be transmuted into meaningful changes in cellular decision-making. The binding requirements can be so stringent, that even very similar molecules that are present together in the cellular milieu can be suitably differentiated by enzyme active sites, and hence this “chemical noise” is efficiently filtered out. The Michaelis-Menten equation also extends to situations where the enzyme forms a covalent bond to the substrate. The covalent intermediate can be harnessed for numerous possible ends, such as: to promote fission, e.g., in serine proteases; or to promote reaction with an electrophile, e.g., in thymidylate synthetase. Nevertheless, it remains generally true that it is the ability of the enzyme to accommodate the substrate(s) in the active site, and orientate reactive positions to promote reactivity that ultimately synergize to allow an overall selective process to occur. For instance, deubiquitinating enzymes mostly hydrolyze essentially “the same” substrate, i.e., an isopeptide bond formed between ubiquitin’s C-terminus and a protein-lysine. Selectivity is engendered by a combination of recognition of ubiquitin chain linkage, and the protein to which the ubiquitin(s) is(are) bound. But we now understand that there are numerous very simple biological signaling molecules that are proposed to regulate numerous important pathways. These molecules, however, appear to be assumed to have little ability to interact non-covalently with their targets. So how can, and indeed, do these molecules interact selectively? In this opinion piece, we compare and contrast the thermodynamics and kinetics of covalent and non-covalent binding, to try to better understand how reactive electrophiles work, and to try to derive some insight into how selectivity and concepts of biochemistry can be used to begin to interrogate electrophile signaling in more detail. Our ultimate hope is that this work will serve as a reminder of the importance of non-covalent interactions in marshaling even overwhelmingly strong covalent bond-forming events, and further to underline the insight that can be brought to the table by examining stereo- and chemoselectivity in biological systems. 4 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0341.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2019; doi:10.1089/ars.2019.7894 Long, et al. Thermodynamics of covalent binding compared to non-covalent bonding Covalent bond formation and non-covalent bonding are critically different. The bond energy of an sp3-hybridized C–H bond is around 420 kJ mol-1. Even a relatively weak sp3-hybridized bond, where orbital overlap is considered poor, such as C–S, has a bond energy of around 290 kJ mol-1. Alternatively the π- bond in C=C has an energy of 266 kJ mol-1. By contrast, “only” 11.5 kJ mol-1 represents the transition- state stabilization energy required for a reaction to proceed with 99% ee at room temperature. This energy difference is less than 5 times the corresponding available thermal energy. Less stabilization is required as the temperature decreases (8 kJ mol-1 at –78 oC). Even what are considered high affinity, non-covalent -1 binders (typically Kd = 0.1–10 nM, equivalent to ΔGbinding = ~60 to 46 kJ mol ) have binding energies significantly lower than that of particularly weak covalent bonds. Furthermore, to achieve even “nanomolar”
Recommended publications
  • Predicting Glycosylation Stereoselectivity Using Machine Learning† Cite This: Chem
    Chemical Science View Article Online EDGE ARTICLE View Journal | View Issue Predicting glycosylation stereoselectivity using machine learning† Cite this: Chem. Sci.,2021,12,2931 ab a ab All publication charges for this article Sooyeon Moon, ‡ Sourav Chatterjee, ‡ Peter H. Seeberger have been paid for by the Royal Society and Kerry Gilmore §*a of Chemistry Predicting the stereochemical outcome of chemical reactions is challenging in mechanistically ambiguous transformations. The stereoselectivity of glycosylation reactions is influenced by at least eleven factors across four chemical participants and temperature. A random forest algorithm was trained using a highly reproducible, concise dataset to accurately predict the stereoselective outcome of glycosylations. The steric and electronic contributions of all chemical reagents and solvents were quantified by quantum mechanical calculations. The trained model accurately predicts stereoselectivities for unseen nucleophiles, electrophiles, acid catalyst, and solvents across a wide temperature range (overall root mean square error 6.8%). All predictions were validated experimentally on a standardized microreactor platform. The model helped to identify novel ways to control glycosylation stereoselectivity and Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Received 11th November 2020 accurately predicts previously unknown means of stereocontrol. By quantifying the degree of influence Accepted 24th December 2020 of each variable, we begin to gain a better general understanding of the transformation, for example that DOI: 10.1039/d0sc06222g environmental factors influence the stereoselectivity of glycosylations more than the coupling partners in rsc.li/chemical-science this area of chemical space. Introduction retrosynthesis,9 reaction performance10 and products,11,12 the identication of new materials and catalysts,13–15 as well as Predicting the outcome of an organic reaction generally enantioselectivity16,17 have been addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldol Reactions: E-Enolates and Anti-Selectivity
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2005 Aldol Reactions: E-Enolates and Anti-Selectivity Matthew Grant Anderson Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Organic Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Matthew Grant, "Aldol Reactions: E-Enolates and Anti-Selectivity" (2005). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 1312. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/1312 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALDOL REACTIONS: E-ENOLATES AND ANTI-SELECTIVITY Prepared By: MATTHEW GRANT ANDERSON A non-thesis paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a Plan B Degree of Masters of Science in Organic Chemistry UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2005 Contents Page CONTENTS ...................................................................................... .i LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND SCHEMES ....................................... ii,iii ABSTRACT .................................................................................... iv CHAPTER I. ALDOL REACTIONS:E-ENOLATES AND ANTI SELECTIVITY ......... 1 CHAPTER II. SECTION 1. MODELS OF E-ENOLATE FORMATION ...... .... ....... ... 12 SECTION 2. PATERSON ENOLATE PAPER ..... .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Stereoselectivity in Atmospheric Autoxidation Kristian H
    Subscriber access provided by Caltech Library Clusters, Radicals, and Ions; Environmental Chemistry Stereoselectivity in Atmospheric Autoxidation Kristian H. Møller, Eric Joseph Praske, Lu Xu, John D. Crounse, Paul O. Wennberg, and Henrik Grum Kjaergaard J. Phys. Chem. Lett., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01972 • Publication Date (Web): 23 Sep 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on September 24, 2019 Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactions of Alkenes and Alkynes
    05 Reactions of Alkenes and Alkynes Polyethylene is the most widely used plastic, making up items such as packing foam, plastic bottles, and plastic utensils (top: © Jon Larson/iStockphoto; middle: GNL Media/Digital Vision/Getty Images, Inc.; bottom: © Lakhesis/iStockphoto). Inset: A model of ethylene. KEY QUESTIONS 5.1 What Are the Characteristic Reactions of Alkenes? 5.8 How Can Alkynes Be Reduced to Alkenes and 5.2 What Is a Reaction Mechanism? Alkanes? 5.3 What Are the Mechanisms of Electrophilic Additions HOW TO to Alkenes? 5.1 How to Draw Mechanisms 5.4 What Are Carbocation Rearrangements? 5.5 What Is Hydroboration–Oxidation of an Alkene? CHEMICAL CONNECTIONS 5.6 How Can an Alkene Be Reduced to an Alkane? 5A Catalytic Cracking and the Importance of Alkenes 5.7 How Can an Acetylide Anion Be Used to Create a New Carbon–Carbon Bond? IN THIS CHAPTER, we begin our systematic study of organic reactions and their mecha- nisms. Reaction mechanisms are step-by-step descriptions of how reactions proceed and are one of the most important unifying concepts in organic chemistry. We use the reactions of alkenes as the vehicle to introduce this concept. 129 130 CHAPTER 5 Reactions of Alkenes and Alkynes 5.1 What Are the Characteristic Reactions of Alkenes? The most characteristic reaction of alkenes is addition to the carbon–carbon double bond in such a way that the pi bond is broken and, in its place, sigma bonds are formed to two new atoms or groups of atoms. Several examples of reactions at the carbon–carbon double bond are shown in Table 5.1, along with the descriptive name(s) associated with each.
    [Show full text]
  • [4 + 2] Annulation and Enyne Cross Metathesis
    Communication pubs.acs.org/JACS Gold-Catalyzed Intermolecular Reactions of Propiolic Acids with Alkenes: [4 + 2] Annulation and Enyne Cross Metathesis † † † ‡ ‡ ‡ Hyun-Suk Yeom, Jaeyoung Koo, Hyun-Sub Park, Yi Wang, Yong Liang, Zhi-Xiang Yu,*, † and Seunghoon Shin*, † Department of Chemistry and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea ‡ Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China *S Supporting Information Scheme 1. Propiolic Acid as a Functional Equivalent of 1,4- ABSTRACT: A gold-catalyzed intermolecular reaction of C,O-Dipole or Biscarbene propiolic acids with alkenes led to a [4 + 2] annulation or enyne cross metathesis. The [4 + 2] annulation proceeds with net cis-addition with respect to alkenes and provides an expedient route to α,β-unsaturated δ-lactones, for which preliminary asymmetric reactions were also demonstrated. For 1,2-disubstituted alkenes, unprecedented enyne cross metathesis occurred to give 1,3-dienes in a completely stereospecific fashion. DFT calculations and experiments indicated that the cyclobutene derivatives are not viable We commenced our study using propiolic acid (4a) and intermediates and that the steric interactions during 10 concerted σ-bond rearrangements are responsible for the styrene derivatives as substrates. After extensive optimization, observed unique stereospecificity. we found that treating styrene 3a with 4a
    [Show full text]
  • Elimination Reactions Are Described
    Introduction In this module, different types of elimination reactions are described. From a practical standpoint, elimination reactions widely used for the generation of double and triple bonds in compounds from a saturated precursor molecule. The presence of a good leaving group is a prerequisite in most elimination reactions. Traditional classification of elimination reactions, in terms of the molecularity of the reaction is employed. How the changes in the nature of the substrate as well as reaction conditions affect the mechanism of elimination are subsequently discussed. The stereochemical requirements for elimination in a given substrate and its consequence in the product stereochemistry is emphasized. ELIMINATION REACTIONS Objective and Outline beta-eliminations E1, E2 and E1cB mechanisms Stereochemical considerations of these reactions Examples of E1, E2 and E1cB reactions Alpha eliminations and generation of carbene I. Basics Elimination reactions involve the loss of fragments or groups from a molecule to generate multiple bonds. A generalized equation is shown below for 1,2-elimination wherein the X and Y from two adjacent carbon atoms are removed, elimination C C C C -XY X Y Three major types of elimination reactions are: α-elimination: two atoms or groups are removed from the same atom. It is also known as 1,1-elimination. H R R C X C + HX R Both H and X are removed from carbon atom here R Carbene β-elimination: loss of atoms or groups on adjacent atoms. It is also H H known as 1,2- elimination. R C C R R HC CH R X H γ-elimination: loss of atoms or groups from the 1st and 3rd positions as shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Enzymes in Regioselective and Stereoselective Organic Reactions
    catalysts Review Application of Enzymes in Regioselective and Stereoselective Organic Reactions Ruipu Mu 1,*, Zhaoshuai Wang 2,3,* , Max C. Wamsley 1, Colbee N. Duke 1, Payton H. Lii 1, Sarah E. Epley 1, London C. Todd 1 and Patty J. Roberts 1 1 Department of Chemistry, Centenary College of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA 71104, USA; [email protected] (M.C.W.); [email protected] (C.N.D.); [email protected] (P.H.L.); [email protected] (S.E.E.); [email protected] (L.C.T.); [email protected] (P.J.R.) 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA 3 Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (Z.W.) Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 21 July 2020; Published: 24 July 2020 Abstract: Nowadays, biocatalysts have received much more attention in chemistry regarding their potential to enable high efficiency, high yield, and eco-friendly processes for a myriad of applications. Nature’s vast repository of catalysts has inspired synthetic chemists. Furthermore, the revolutionary technologies in bioengineering have provided the fast discovery and evolution of enzymes that empower chemical synthesis. This article attempts to deliver a comprehensive overview of the last two decades of investigation into enzymatic reactions and highlights the effective performance progress of bio-enzymes exploited in organic synthesis. Based on the types of enzymatic reactions and enzyme commission (E.C.) numbers, the enzymes discussed in the article are classified into oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, and lyases.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Alkenes: Structure and Preparation Via Elimination Reactions
    with cyanide anion affords a . N C: + H3C-H2C-H2C-H2C Br H3C-H2C-H2C-H2CC N + KBr K . with azide anion affords alkyl azides Br N3 + NaBr NN N + SN2 Na . with an thiols or thiolate ions affords a . – R–S + H3CH2C–Cl + H3CH2C– S–R + KCl S 2 + N Li 165 Chapter 8: Alkenes: Structure and Preparation via Elimination Reactions 8.1 Introduction to Elimination Reactions – Nucleophiles are Lewis bases. They can also promote elimination reactions of alkyl halides or sulfonates rather than substitution. SN2 – H3C-O Br OCH3 H H elimination + HOCH3 – H3C-O Br OH2 elimination + H O+ H 3 Br SN1 166 OH 83 8.2 Alkenes in Nature and in Industry (please read) 8.3 Nomenclature of Alkenes (please read and understand) Prefix-Parent-Suffix Suffix for alkenes: -ene Many of the same rules for alkanes apply to alkenes 1. Name the parent hydrocarbon by locating the longest carbon chain that contains the double bond and name it according to the number of carbons with the suffix -ene. H3C CH2 H C CH 3 2 C CH2 C CH 2 H C CH CH 3 2 2 H3C CH2 CH2 Parent = pentene not hexene (does not contain double bond) 2a. Number the carbons of the parent chain so the double bond carbons have the lowest possible numbers. Indicate the double bond by the number of the first alkene carbon. H3C CH2 CH2 CH CH CH3 123456 167 2-hexene 2b. If the double bond is equidistant from each end, number so the first substituent has the lowest number.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Interrupted Nazarov Cyclization of Allenyl Vinyl Ketones, with Application to the Total Synthesis of the Cyclooctane Natural Product Roseadione
    Development of the Interrupted Nazarov Cyclization of Allenyl Vinyl Ketones, with Application to the Total Synthesis of the Cyclooctane Natural Product Roseadione by Vanessa M. Marx Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia May 2011 © Copyright by Vanessa M. Marx, 2011 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance a thesis entitled “Development of the Interrupted Nazarov Cyclization of Allenyl Vinyl Ketones, with Application to the Total Synthesis of the Cyclooctane Natural Product Roseadione” by Vanessa M. Marx in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dated: May 19, 2011 Supervisor: _________________________________ Readers: _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ Departmental Representative: _________________________________ ii DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: May 19, 2011 AUTHOR: Vanessa M. Marx TITLE: Development of the Interrupted Nazarov Cyclization of Allenyl Vinyl Ketones, with Application to the Total Synthesis of the Cyclooctane Natural Product Roseadione DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: Department of Chemistry DEGREE: PhD CONVOCATION: October YEAR: 2011 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. I understand that my thesis will be electronically available to the public. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author’s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Nazarov Cyclization
    THE NAZAROV CYCLIZATION: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS Reported by Jenna Klubnick September 24, 2009 INTRODUCTION The classic Nazarov cyclization is a Lewis or Brønsted acid catalyzed 4-π electrocyclic ring closure of a divinyl ketone to a 2-cyclopentenone. Cyclopentenones and five-membered carbocycles are common structural motifs in biologically active compounds. Consequently, a number of methods have been developed to access these moieties.1 Recent modifications to the Nazarov cyclization have made this reaction a powerful tool for the construction of these important structural themes. For example, the Nazarov cyclization was essential to the syntheses of the three biologically active natural products shown in Scheme 1.2a-c Scheme 1. Natural Products Synthesized via the Nazarov Cyclization MeO O OH O HO O Cl Cl HO O Me O Me MeO NMe2 H Me Me O O O OH O H Me H Me HO O Br OMe H (-) -Scabronine G Nakiterpiosin (±)-Rocaglamide DISCOVERY AND ELUCIDATION OF MECHANISM The history of the Nazarov cyclization dates back more than a century. In 1903, David Vorlander reported a cyclization of dibenzylideneacetone upon treatment with acetic anhydride and sulfuric acid.3 He was unable to determine the structure the product, but it was later identified as the Scheme 2. Cyclization Observed by D. Vorlander 1 Copyright © 2009 by Jenna A. Klubnick cyclic ketol by Shoppee and coworkers (Scheme 2).4 In the context of his work on the hydration of dieneynes, C. S. Marvel also noted a cyclization but was unable to correctly identify the structure of the product.5 Similar hydration studies were what led Igor Nazarov to the discovery of the Nazarov cyclization in 1942.6 During his work on mercuric salt and acid-catalyzed formation of allyl vinyl ketones from divinyl acetylenes, Nazarov observed the spontaneous cyclization of the intermediate allyl vinyl ketones under the acidic conditions to yield 2-cyclopentenones.
    [Show full text]
  • Stereoselective Acetate Aldol Reactions from Metal Enolates
    REVIEW 2175 Stereoselective Acetate Aldol Reactions from Metal Enolates StereoselectiveXavier Acetate Aldol Reactions from Metal Enolates Ariza, Jordi Garcia, Pedro Romea,* Fèlix Urpí* Departament de Química Orgànica, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franqués 1-11, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Fax +34(93)3397878; E-mail: [email protected]; E-mail: [email protected] Received 27 January 2011; revised 24 February 2011 Dedicated to the memory of recently deceased Professor Rafael Suau often contests their capacity to install the required stereo- Abstract: This review deals with stereoselective acetate aldol reac- tions mediated by metal enolates. It summarizes recent advances in centers efficiently. Hence, it has always been seen as aldol additions of unsubstituted metal enolates that either incorpo- highly desirable to achieve parallel transformations from 8 rate chiral auxiliaries, stoichiometric Lewis acids, or catalytic metal enolates. Unfortunately, acetate aldol reactions Lewis acids or bases, or act in substrate-controlled reactions. These mediated by such intermediates can proceed through dif- approaches provide stereocontrolled aldol transformations that al- ferent six-membered cyclic transition states, represented low the efficient synthesis of structurally complex natural products. in Scheme 2, which hampers the proper differentiation of the two faces of the carbon–oxygen double bond by the 1 Introduction 3,9,10 2 Chiral Auxiliaries unsubstituted enolate. Therefore, stereocontrol in 3 Stoichiometric Lewis Acids these reactions relies on the appropriate choice of the met- 4 Catalytic Lewis Acids and Bases al and the chiral elements on the substrate, the aldehyde or 5 Substrate-Controlled Aldol Reactions the ligands (R1, R2, and L, respectively) to provide a single 5.1 a-Methyl Ketones highly organized transition state.
    [Show full text]
  • 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Nitrones and Nitrile Oxides. Yau-Min Chang Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1975 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Nitrones and Nitrile Oxides. Yau-min Chang Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Chang, Yau-min, "1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Nitrones and Nitrile Oxides." (1975). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2865. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2865 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]