Larenaz 3- Zcl I SCANNED

SCANNED

PHASE I - REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR (F THE RACEWAY A PAP.XR N IL L SE~=S

RECEIVED JUL 13 2005 DEP Preparedfor: NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE

SOffice of Planning & Development City of LawrnceM 147 Havuh Street Lawrence, Massac usetts 01840

Ptepared by:

Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. A Shaw Group: Company 100 Technology Center Drive Stoughton, MA 02072

July 2005 PHASE III - REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR AREAS NORTH OF THE RACEWAY

OXFORD PAPER MILL LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS

RTN 3-2691

Preparedfor:

Office of Planning & Development City of Lawrence 147 Haverhill Street Lawrence, Massachusetts 01840

Preparedby:

Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. A Shaw Group Company 100 Technology Center Drive Stoughton, MA 02072

July 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

2.0 BACKGROUND ...... 1 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION...... 1 2.2 OWNERSHIP HISTORY AND HISTORIC PAPER MILL ACTIVITIES...... 2 2.3 PREVIOUS RESPONSE ACTIONS AND ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES...... 3 2.4 REGIONAL AND SITE SPECIFIC GEOLOGY...... 5 2.5 N ATURE AND EXTENT...... 6 2.6 SELECTION OF REMEDIATION GOALS ...... 8 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES...... 9 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES...... 9 3.2 INITIAL SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES ...... 9 4.0 EVALUATION OF FEASIBLE REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES ....10 4.1 No FURTHER ACTION-INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS ...... 10 4.1.1 Effectiveness ...... 10 4.1.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability...... 11 4.1.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative ...... 11 4.1.4 Cost of the A lternative ...... 11 4.1.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative...... 11 4.1.6 Benefits of the Alternative...... 11 4.1.7 Tim elines ofAlternative...... 11 4.1.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-PecuniaryInterests ...... 12 4.1.9 Summary of DetailedEvaluation...... 12 4.2 SOIL EXCAVATION WITH OFF-SITE DISPOSAL ...... 12 4.2.1 Effectiveness ...... 13 4.2.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability...... 13 4.2.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative...... 13 4.2.4 Cost of the Alternative...... 14 4.2.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative...... 14 4.2.6 Benefits of the Alternative...... 14 4.2.7 Tim elines ofA lternative...... 15 4.2.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-PecuniaryInterests ...... 15S 4.2.9 Summary of DetailedEvaluation...... 15 4.3 CONTAINMENT/CAPPING - WEDGE AREA AND NORTH AREA ...... 15 4.3.1 Effectiveness ...... 16 4.3.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability...... 16 4.3.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative ...... 16 4.3.4 Cost of the Alternative...... 17 4.3.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative...... 17 4.3.6 Benefits of the Alternative...... 18 4.3.7 Tim elines ofAlternative...... 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

4.3.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-Pecuniary Interests ...... 18

4.3.9 Summary ofDetailedEvaluation...... 18 5.0 SELECTION OF THE FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE...... 19

6.0 PROJECTED SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE IV...... 19

7.0 LIM ITATIONS ...... 20

REFERENCES ...... 21

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Locus Map Figure 2 Site Plan and Selected Historical Features Figure 3 May 2002 & March 2003 Site Investigation Test Pit and Boring Locations Figure 4 MASS GIS Map Figure 5 Asbestos Soil Sampling Locations - November 2002 and August 2003

List of Tables

Table 2-1 November 2002/August 2003 ACM Soil Sampling Events Results (North Area) Table 2-2 PCB Analytical Results from Mobile and Fixed Laboratories (Wedge Area) Table 2-3 Asbestos Analytical Results - Soil and Bulk (Wedge Area) Table 2-4 Summary of Analytical Data for Composite Samples (Wedge Area), Compared to Applicable MCP Standards Table 2-5 Metal Analytical Results from Mobile and Fixed Laboratories (Wedge Area) Table 2-6 Summary of Analytical Results for Surface and Subsurface Samples (North Area), Compared to Applicable MCP Standards Table 2-7 Summary of Analytical Results for Groundwater Samples (North Area), Compared to Applicable MCP Standards Table 2-8 Summary Statistics, Wedge and North Area Surface Soil Samples Table 2-9 Summary Statistics, Wedge and North Area Subsurface Soil Samples Table 3-1 Initial Screening of Remedial Action Alternatives

List of Appendices

Appendix A Soil and Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Reports List of Acronyms

ACM Asbestos Containing Material AUL Activity and Use Limitation AWQC Ambient Water Quality Criteria CDM Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. COL City of Lawrence COPCs Contaminants of Potential Concern CSA Comprehensive Site Assessment EPC Exposure Point Concentrations EPH extractable petroleum hydrocarbons FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map GIS Geographic Information System

HSO 3 sulfurous acid IWPA Interim Wellhead Protection Area MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan MEK methyl ethyl ketone MHD Massachusetts Highway Department MIBK methyl isobutyl ketone NaOH sodium hydroxide

Na 2 S sodium sulfide OPM Oxford Paper Mill PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCB polychlorinated biphenyls RAO Response Action Outcome RTN Release Tracking Number S&W Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. THF tetrahydrofuran UST Underground Storage Tank VOC Volatile Organic Compounds Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Phase III Remedial Action Plan is to perform an evaluation of remedial action alternatives to address contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) for a portion of the Oxford Paper Mill (OPM) (the Site) in Lawrence, Massachusetts. The general site location is depicted on Figure 1 and the entire site is depicted on Figure 2. This Phase III is for the area north of the raceway including both the wedge area and the North area (See Figure 3). This Phase III was conducted by Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. (Stone & Webster or S&W), a Shaw Group Company, in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP), 310 CMR 40.0850, on behalf of the City of Lawrence (COL), the owner of the Oxford Paper Mill property. Oxford Paper Mill has been assigned release tracking number (RTN) 3-2691 by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP), to whom this report will be provided.

The objectives of the Phase III evaluation were to identify and evaluate remedial action alternatives and technologies that would be reasonably likely to achieve a level of no significant risk, and to select a remedial action alternative that will result in a Permanent or Temporary Solution for areas north of the raceway. The contents of this report provide detailed description of each of the selected remedial alternatives with a final recommendation for the most appropriate technology to achieve the remedial goals established for areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill.

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Description and General Information

The former Oxford Paper Mill (OPM) Site, Release Tracking Number 3-2691, is located on approximately three acres of land in Lawrence, Massachusetts, immediately northwest of the intersection of Canal Street and the Spicket River (refer to the Site Locus Map attached as Figure 1). A small portion of the OPM is also located north of Canal Street on the eastern bank of the Spicket River (an urban surface water body that abuts the OPM). The OPM is transected by a raceway, which discharges to the Spicket River. All nine buildings (Building Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, IA, and 28) that once occupied the south side of the OPM have been demolished. Buildings north of the raceway were demolished in the 1970s. Oxford Paper ceased operations at the Site in the mid-1970s. The City of Lawrence took ownership of the property in 1983.

Site Subiect Area - North of Raceway (Wedge Area and North Area)

Currently the areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill are in an area of commercial development within downtown Lawrence, Massachusetts. The property does not contain any buildings or structures and is unpaved. The Site is relatively flat throughout and slopes down to the Spicket River on the north and east sides. The Site consists mainly of tall grass and shrubs with portions consisting of wooded areas. The Site is bounded to the north and east by the

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 1 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

Spicket River, to the west by commercial property (the O'Gara Building), and to the south by the raceway. Access to the property is partially restricted by fencing along the western boundary. However, the Site can be accessed from the Spicket River or via an exit door from the O'Gara Building. A Site Plan for the area north of the raceway is presented in Figure 3. The property will be used in the future as a passive park.

Properties surrounding the OPM are used for commercial, institutional, and industrial purposes. GenCorp, Inc. (GenCorp), the Everett Mills property, and Union Street are west of the Site. Canal Street and the North Canal are south of the OPM beyond where there are other historic mill buildings. The Spicket River is north and east of the Site. The Lawrence General Hospital is beyond the Spicket River to the north. The Everett Mills property is currently used for commercial purposes. The GenCorp facility, which was formerly occupied by Bolta Products and used for manufacturing rubber and plastic products, is currently vacant. The GenCorp facility was used most recently for manufacturing plastics and vinyl coated fabrics; polyvinyl chloride, resins; methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were used as part of these manufacturing operations.

Based on a review of the Massachusetts Geographic Information System (GIS) map, (refer to Figure 4), the OPM is not within an Interim Wellhead Protection Area (IWPA) or Zone II. Mr. Madden at the Lawrence Water Department indicated that the City of Lawrence obtains its water from the Merrimack River. Water is drawn from one well in the Merrimack River; this well is located in the river at the foot of Ames Street (i.e., at the intersection of Ames Street, Water Street, and Riverside Drive), approximately one and one-half miles west and cross gradient of the OPM. The city's reservoir is approximately one and one-half miles northeast of the OPM on Ames Hill. According to Mr. Madden, several car washes and only one residence have private water supply wells in the city. The closest private well is at a car wash approximately one mile from the OPM. Based on a review of Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards (314 CMR 4.00), the Spicket and Merrimack Rivers are Class B surface water bodies (i.e., designated as habitat for fish, other aquatic life, and wildlife, and for primary and secondary contact recreation).

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts (Community Panel Number 250087 0002B), the northwestern portion of the OPM is within Zone A17 (i.e., an area of 100-year flood) and portions of the north and southeastern areas of the Site are within Zone B (i.e., an area between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year flood).

2.2 Ownership History and Historic Paper Mill Activities

HMM Associates conducted a preliminary site assessment in 1992, which summarized the history of the OPM. The following information is drawn from the HMM report (HMM, 1992). The HMM report states that paper making had been conducted on the Site for 135 years, first under the name Russell Paper Company, then Champion International, Oxford, Ethyl, and finally Pleasant Valley Paper Mills. Operations ceased completely in 1974. The City of Lawrence took ownership of the OPM in 1983.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 2 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

Pulping of the wood chips was done by the "soda and sulphite" chemical process, which produced a foul odor (HMM, 1992) and typically used a base (lime or sodium hydroxide) plus sulfurous acid (HSO 3). Another pulping process, called the kraft chemical pulping process, uses sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na2S), and may have also been used at the Oxford Site. The process was most likely conducted in steel digesters under steam pressure. Some papers were coated with clay, which was stored in silos that were once present on the property. Buildings identified on the Sanborn maps include the "soda pulp mill", the "chemical mill" (No. 15), a machine building, (No. 3), and a building containing "beating engines" and a "rotary bleacher" (No. 6). Bleaching of pulp may have been done using chlorine or hypochlorite. An open coal bin, boiler room, and "black ash room" are also identified on some Sanborn maps. Note that building numbers, arrangements, and uses changed over the years according to the Sanborn maps.

Contaminants that may be present on the Site, due to former paper mill operations, include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from coal, coal ash, and other combustion operations, chlorinated organic compounds that may have been formed during pulp bleaching operations, and sulfides from chemical pulp residues. The chlorinated organic compounds and sulfides would most likely have been released to surface water and air, as opposed to soil, because they are associated with mill operations that involved water discharges (to the raceway most likely) and air emissions (sulfur compounds and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from stacks and process tanks). In addition, underground storage tanks containing fuel oils and therefore, petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) may be present in soil and groundwater. Transformers containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have historically been present on-site.

2.3 Previous Response Actions and Assessment Activities

Information on the status of storage tanks, drums and containers is provided in various letters and reports regarding the area north of the raceway and is summarized below.

According to a review of City of Lawrence Fire Department records by Briggs Associates, Inc. in the 1984 study, no aboveground storage tanks were present at the OPM. However, the records indicated that one 20,000-gallon and three 30,000-gallon underground storage tanks (USTs) were present at the Site. The license for these tanks was issued on July 6, 1953. Fire Department records also indicated that gasoline was stored in two 300-gallon USTs. One tank was installed in 1921 and the other one was installed in 1928; both gasoline tanks were removed on July 23, 1968.

A March 19, 1992 letter from Mr. Robert J. Devaney, Jr., Director of Environmental Engineering at GenCorp to the City of Lawrence Community Development Department summarizes the results of Camp Dresser & McKee's (CDM) December 1985 report titled "Final Technical Memo Report #3 - Oxford Paper Site." The letter indicates that the presence of three 30,000-gallon tanks at the Site was confirmed in April 1989.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 3 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

The May 15, 1989 NOR letter from MADEP to the City of Lawrence indicates that based on MADEP's review of a July 25, 1967 plan of the Site, seven fuel oil storage tanks were located on the property (three 30,000-gallon, one 20,000-gallon, one 10,000-gallon, and two 1,000-gallon tanks). Figure 3 depicts the former tank locations on the north side of the property. The letter indicates that these tanks were abandoned in 1976. According to the letter, two of the tanks (one 20,000-gallon and one 1,000-gallon) were located on April 19, 1989 and were removed.

A Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Prevention, Permit for Removal and Transportation to Approved Tank Yard was obtained for the 20,000- gallon tank on April 18, 1989. The tank was removed on April 19, 1989 and no leakage was observed. The tank was transported off-site to John C. Tombarello & Sons of Lawrence, Massachusetts. The permit indicates that the tank was accepted at this location on June 9, 1989.

The 1,000-gallon tank was excavated on April 20, 1989. This 1,000-gallon tank was removed from the location of a supposed 10,000-gallon fuel oil tank shown on a historical map of the Site. According to a Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Prevention, Permit for Removal and Transportation to Approved Tank Yard, the tank was transported off-Site to John C. Tombarello & Sons of Lawrence, Massachusetts. The permit indicates that the tank was accepted at this location on June 9, 1989.

An April 23, 1991 letter from Eckenfelder, Inc. to Mr. Robert J. Devaney, Jr., Director of Environmental Engineering at GenCorp, indicates that GenCorp responded to the 1988 oil release to the Spicket River by assisting with UST location, identification, and removal on the former OPM property. The letter also indicates that subsequent excavations conducted by the City of Lawrence confirmed the presence of several large diameter USTs, which contained petroleum residuals of unknown composition.

According to information gathered, as part of HMM's Preliminary Site Assessment in 1992, five underground storage tanks were identified on the Site to the north of the raceway. Two of these tanks (one 500-gallon and one 1,000-gallon) were removed by Clean Harbors in 1988. Records maintained by the City of Lawrence Fire Department indicate that one 1,000-gallon tank was removed in 1989. The remaining USTs were each 30,000-gallons. The contents of the tanks were sampled by Clean Harbors in 1988; analytical results indicated that petroleum was stored in the tanks. Clean Harbors reportedly removed the contents of two of the USTs. According to records at the City of Lawrence Fire Department, the contents of the third tank had solidified.

ENPRO, Inc. removed the three 30,000-gallon fuel oil USTs in November 2000. Analytical data showed no exceedances of the MCP reportable concentrations. Based on the above information, it appears that there are no remaining underground storage tanks in the North area of the former OPM Site. Figure 3 shows areas north of the raceway where former USTs were once located.

In December 2004, an interim Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) Report for areas north of the raceway was submitted to the DEP. The Phase II CSA was submitted as an interim report due to additional investigations that will take place once the material from the wedge area

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 4 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

has been excavated. If significantly differing conditions are identified in this area, then the Phase II CSA will be amended to reflect those findings and a final report will be submitted to the MADEP. The Phase II CSA included a Method 3 Human Health Risk Characterization and Stage I Environmental Screening. The Risk Characterization concluded that under current site activities and uses, potential exposures to COPCs in soil and surface water (as estimated based on groundwater discharge to the Spicket River, and a dilution factor of 10) pose no significant risk of harm to current adolescent trespassers.

Under future foreseeable site activities and uses, potential direct contact exposures of COPCs in soil pose a significant risk of harm to human health. Significant risk of harm is posed to: (1) the future hypothetical young child user; and (2) the future hypothetical adult user. The risks are primarily attributable to the presence of carcinogenic PAHs and arsenic in soil. Future exposures to construction/utility workers or adolescent trespassers pose no significant risk to harm to health. Note that the assessment of future risk includes data for all soils currently present at the Site north of the raceway, including those in the wedge area. Removal of wedge area soils was not assumed in estimating future risk. Because wedge area soils and soils north of the wedge area are similar with respect to contaminant concentrations, the evaluation of future risk would not likely change, were the wedge area soils to be excluded from the evaluation.

The Method 3 Human Health Risk Characterization for the areas north of the raceway also concluded that risk of harm to safety and public welfare is not significant under both current and future foreseeable site conditions. Also since the water Exposure Point Concentrations (EPC), modeled from groundwater contaminant concentrations, do not exceed Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) for aquatic receptors, it is concluded that the area north of the raceway does not pose a significant risk to the environment.

Risk of harm to the aquatic organisms was evaluated by comparison of the modeled surface water EPCs to Massachusetts AWQC provided by MADEP (MADEP, 1994). COPC EPCs are below the corresponding AWQCs, and thus pose no significant risk of harm to aquatic receptors.

Based on the findings of the Stage I Environmental Screening, current and future foreseeable site conditions pose no significant risk of harm to the environment, as defined in 310 CMR 40.09. In addition, a Stage II Environmental Risk Characterization (as defined in 310 CMR 40.0995(4)) is not required.

2.4 Regional and Site Specific Geology

Based on the soil survey for the northern part of Essex County, Massachusetts, the overlying surficial deposits consist primarily of loamy soils formed over compact glacial till. Two drumlins are located near the Site, including Prospect Hill to the northeast and a smaller hill located to the northwest. The thickness of glacial till is often on the order of 15 to 20 feet, although thicknesses of up 175 feet have been observed in the drumlin area (Eckenfelder, Inc., 1998).

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 5 Oxford Paper Mill- Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

According to the GenCorp Phase II Groundwater Model Report conducted by Eckenfelder, Inc. in 1998, bedrock underlying the Oxford Paper Mill site lies within the Merrimack Belt lithotectonic zone. Major faults further subdivide the Merrimack belt into individual tectonic zones - each of which has a different and distinct lithology. Furthermore, the OPM site is located north of the Clinton-Newbury fault, which is accompanied by a series of many smaller faults and associated disrupted geologic strata. The bedrock lithology consists of a series of meta-sedimentary rock types of the Berwick formation. The encountered bedrock of the OPM site is composed of phyllite, argillite, and quartzite with minor amounts of calcareous metagraywacke and schist (Eckenfelder, Inc., 1998).

The area north of the raceway is relatively flat with the eastern portion of the Site sloping downward to the Spicket River. The average elevation of the Site is approximately 100 feet above mean sea level (msl).

The soils onsite are part of Urban Land, which consists of nearly level to moderately steep areas where the soils have been altered or obscured by urban works and structures. The site soils are part of the Paxton-Woodbridge-Monatauk association where the area is nearly level to steep, well drained and moderately well drained, loamy soils formed over compact glacial till (Soil Survey of Essex County, Massachusetts Northern Part, 1981).

The geology on the north side of the OPM was assessed through a subsurface boring program and test pits excavations. Based on observations of the test pits and split spoon samples, the general geologic profile was found to consist primarily of an assemblage of loamy and sandy soils. The mixture of differing sediment sizes indicates that the materials are not well sorted, and are consistent with glacial deposits. The soil borings also revealed similar conditions of differing amounts of loam, sand and gravel with coal ash, bricks, and debris encountered throughout the area north of the raceway.

Bedrock was not encountered on the north side of the OPM. Bedrock coring was not conducted as part of the Phase II CSA. Soil borings were advanced from 0 to 24 feet bgs and test pits were advanced from 0 to 15 bgs. A detailed description of Site geology is presented in Section 3.0 of the Phase II CSA dated December 2004, presented by Stone & Webster.

2.5 Nature and Extent

The following section of this report provides a summary of the nature and extent of the contamination that has been identified for areas north of the raceway at the OPM. A detailed description of the nature and extent of site contamination is presented in Section 6.0 of the Phase II CSA dated December 2004, prepared by Stone & Webster. In general, contamination in surface (0 to 3 feet below ground surface (bgs)) and subsurface (> 3 feet bgs) wedge area soils consist of extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (EPH) carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic), PCBs, and asbestos. In general for the North area, contamination in surface (0 to 3 feet bgs) soils consists of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic, beryllium, and lead), and asbestos. North Area subsurface (> 3 feet bgs) soils consists of EPH

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 6 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan carbon faction ranges, PAHs, and metals (namely arsenic, beryllium, and vanadium). PAH contamination in soils north of the raceway is not likely to be due solely to coal ash and wood ash. Since the contribution of background materials to the elevated concentrations of PAHs cannot readily be determined, the PAHs are not treated as meeting the MCP definition of "background". The risk characterization includes those PAHs that were detected above MADEP background levels for natural soils, and does not screen COPCs on the basis of MADEP background concentrations for soil associated with fill material, or any other source of background concentrations. A detailed description of the rationale is provided in Section 5.5 of the December 2004 Phase II CSA Report.

Soil

For screening purposes, the analytical results for soils were compared to applicable MCP Standards. Surface and subsurface soil samples were compared to RCS-1 Standards. Results of the Phase II CSA established that RCS-1 Standards were exceeded in both the wedge area and North area soils of the OPM. Tables 2-1 through 2-6 indicates which samples collected had concentrations above the applicable RCS-1 Standards for areas north of the raceway.

Specifically, in the wedge area, both surface and subsurface soils contained concentrations of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic), PCBs, and asbestos above applicable MCP Standards. Wedge area soil data collected from the Phase II CSA are summarized in Tables 2-2 through 2-5. The laboratory analytical reports for the wedge area soil data is presented in Appendix A. In the North area, surface soil contained concentrations of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic, beryllium, and lead), and asbestos above applicable MCP Standards. Lead impacted surface soils are only found in select locations within the North area. North area subsurface soil contained concentrations of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, and metals (namely arsenic, beryllium, and vanadium) above applicable MCP Standards. Asbestos samples were not collected during subsurface investigations. North area soil data collected from the Phase II CSA is summarized in Tables 2-1 and 2-6. The laboratory analytical reports for the North area soil data is presented in Appendix A. A summary of minimum and maximum statistics for surface and subsurface soil analytical data for both the wedge area and north area is presented in Tables 2-8 and 2-9.

The total tonnage of impacted wedge area soil is approximately 4,000 cubic yards. The total tonnage of impacted North area soil is approximately 16,900 cubic yards.

Groundwater

For screening purposes, the groundwater analytical results were compared to applicable MCP reportable concentration GW-2 Standards. Results of the Phase II CSA groundwater analyses revealed that only metals (selenium and vanadium) were detected exceeding the GW-2 Standards. No other analytes were detected above applicable GW-2 Standards. North area groundwater data collected from the Phase II CSA are summarized in Table 2-7. The laboratory

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 7 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone &g Webster Matsac~ts . Ic Phase III - Remedial Action Plan analytical reports for the North area groundwater data is presented in Appendix A. There was no groundwater data collected during the May 2002 wedge area investigation.

2.6 Selection of Remediation Goals

Selection of an appropriate and cost-effective remedial action plan requires the development of remediation goals based upon site-specific data. The MCP calls for selection of remedial action alternatives that reduce, to the extent feasible, the overall mass of contaminants in the environment to background levels, and therefore favors active removal or recovery alternatives over containment only. The goal for the areas north of the raceway is to achieve a permanent solution through a Response Action Outcome (RAO).

Stone & Webster has identified the following remediation goals and some of the remedial action alternatives that may be capable of achieving each goal.

Potential as or Activities to Attain the Remediation e l as Remediation Goals Alternative Feasible as a Remediation Goal? Perform response actions on the entire site to Excavation and disposal of 20,900 No achieve background or approaching cubic yards contaminated soil at the background conditions for a Class A-I RAO. Site. SExcavation and disposal of select No Perform response actions only on portions of areas the Site to attain of condition of no significant * Phytoremediation No risk for a Class A-2 RAO, without land use * Enhanced Bioremediation No restrictions. Soil Flushing No

* Excavation and disposal of all Yes Perform response actions to create a contaminated wedge area soils condition of no significant risk with the Geotextile capping/containment of Yes implementation of an Activity and Use wedge area and North area soils Limitation and a Class A-3 RAO, which * On-site stabilization/solidification No would limit land use to current utilization. * Enhanced Bioremediation No * Phytoremediation No • Soil Flushing No Perform response actions for a Temporary Institutional Controls Yes Solution or a Class C RAO.

Based on the results of the site assessment activities and risk characterization, Stone & Webster has selected three remediation goals, as identified in the table, to achieve an RAO at the Site. The first goal is the performance of response actions to attain a condition of no significant risk without the need for an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL). The second goal is the reduction of exposure to contaminant concentrations in soil through soil removal or capping to attain a condition of no significant risk with the implementation of an AUL. The third remediation goal would be to perform response actions to attain a Temporary Solution. The results of the Phase II will determine the appropriate remediation goal for the site based on a review of the pros and cons of remediation alternatives.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 8 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts. Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES

Remediation technologies are available to address the presence of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic), PCBs, and asbestos in wedge area soil matrixes at the OPM. Likewise, there are remediation technologies available to address the presence of EPH carbon fraction ranges, PAHs, metals (namely arsenic, beryllium, and vanadium), and asbestos in North area soil matrixes at the OPM. Each of these can be considered a stand-alone technology or as part of an integrated remedial approach. As part of the Phase III evaluation, several alternatives were identified and screened based on effectiveness, reliability, implementability and cost to implement. Based on these factors, appropriate alternatives will be selected for detailed evaluation.

3.1 Description of Remedial Action Alternatives

Remedial action alternatives for areas north of the raceway include in-situ and ex-situ treatment, containment and other miscellaneous options. In-situ treatment involves treatment of contaminated soil in place onsite. This does not involve removing soils. In-situ treatment includes the following technologies: enhanced bioremediation, phytoremediation, and soil flushing. Ex-situ treatment involves treatment of contaminated soils after they have been removed from the ground. Ex-situ treatment includes; chemical extraction, solidification/stabilization, separation, soil washing, and chemical reduction/oxidation. Containment would not involve extensive excavation activities and/or off-site removal and would consist of in place capping of contaminated areas on site. Other options include excavation and disposal of contaminated soils, institutional controls or no further action with institutional controls. Descriptions of these remedial alternatives are provided in Table 3-1.

3.2 Initial Screening of Remedial Action Alternatives

As presented in Table 3-1, Stone & Webster has performed an initial screening of the applicable remediation technologies to select remedial action alternatives for detailed evaluation. During the initial screening, a technology was considered feasible if the technology was reasonably likely to achieve a Permanent Solution pursuant to the MCP and achieve the remedial goals set for areas north of the raceway at a reasonable cost. The screening of alternatives indicated that:

* Enhanced bioremediation, solidification/stabilization, and separation do not adequately address all of the contaminants of concern at the site;

* Phytoremediation is not feasible due to the amount of time it would take to remediate the site; and

* Soil flushing, chemical extraction, soil washing, and chemical reduction/oxidation are not feasible due to the extremely high costs and the availability of other options that are less expensive.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 9 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachuet. . Phase III - Remedial Action Plan Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc.P

Therefore, the initial screening identified three remedial technologies that are feasible for areas north of the raceway at the OPM and need further evaluation to determine the most appropriate action. The three possible remedial actions are: (1) no further action with institutional controls; (2) soil excavation and off-site disposal; or (3) geotextile capping/containment. An evaluation of these feasible remedial actions is presented in Section 4.0.

4.0 EVALUATION OF FEASIBLE REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES

The following section discusses and compares the three remedial action alternatives chosen from the initial screening: no further action, soil excavation and off site disposal, or geotextile capping/containment. According to the Phase II Report, there are two areas that must be addressed in order to achieve one of the three remediation goals selected for areas north of the raceway at the OPM. These two areas consist of the wedge area and the North area.

Each technology is described in detail with site specific information explaining how it would be applied to achieve site cleanup goals. The general effectiveness, implementability, and estimated cost of each technology are then presented. Some of the technologies have several options, such as capping, while others have no alternatives within the overall action, such as the need for excavation and disposal. For the technologies with two or more alternatives, effectiveness, implementability, and costs are presented with some discussion that compares alternatives.

4.1 No Further Action - Institutional Controls

No further action is used on sites where remedial actions are either not necessary or not possible. This alternative often relies on the presence of permanent structures and or institutional controls (such as fencing). No further action often relies on natural degradation of contaminants of concern.

Selection of the no further action alternative for areas north of the raceway at the OPM was elected for further evaluation as a base alternative. With this selection, the contaminated media located throughout the site would remain in place, and fencing would be installed and maintained completely surrounding areas that may pose an imminent hazard and/or risk to the public. A Class C RAO, which is not a permanent solution, would be completed for the site and periodic maintenance reports would be required to indicate that the effectiveness of the fencing remained. Additional sampling would be required and eventually a Permanent Solution would have to be achieved through the performance of response actions because COPCs at the site do not undergo natural attenuation.

4.1.1 Effectiveness

A no further action alternative would not be effective as a Permanent Solution, but rather as a temporary solution because a condition of no significant risk would not be reached by this alternative. No further action would not eliminate any contamination, but would rather reduce potential exposure to the contaminants of concern. Also, the North area will be used as a passive

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 10 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan park in the future and the area currently does not have the means to separate the contaminants of concern from the would be park users. Installing a fence around the area would not allow the space to be used as a park in the future.

4.1.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability

No further action would be reliable as a short term solution as long as the fences remained in good repair and were periodically checked. For the long term this solution is not reliable because a permanent solution has not been achieved and the contaminants of concern do not undergo significant natural attenuation. No contamination would be removed in this process and a level of no significant risk would not be reached for areas north of the raceway at the OPM.

4.1.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative

Minimal work would be required to install additional fencing, and therefore would not be difficult to implement.

4.1.4 Cost of the Alternative

Minimal work would be required, and therefore this option would involve minor additional costs for the installation of fencing around sections of areas that are currently not fenced or for the installation of new permanent fencing. Periodic site visits would be required to assess the condition of the fences and to ensure that certain areas of the site remain inaccessible. A maintenance schedule would have to be developed and the execution of the schedule would have to be monitored. The cost of a new permanent fence around the entire area (wedge and North areas) would range from $35,000 to $45,000. The cost of maintenance (assuming 8 hours a day four times a year for 10 to 20 years at $60/hour) would be $20,000 to $40,000. The cost of the five year evaluation would be $20,000 and additional costs for one of the other alternatives. Therefore, the cost of this option would range from $75,000 to $105,000.

4.1.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative

Due to the presence of PCBs and asbestos located in the surface soils as well as the area not being controlled by an engineered barrier, the no further action alternative would not permanently eliminate risk at for areas north of the raceway at the OPM and therefore only a Class C RAO, Temporary Solution could be obtained. This alternative will disrupt the intended use of the property for areas north of the raceway and additional remedial actions would be required within five years.

4.1.6 Benefits of the Alternative

No further action would be the least cost for the owner and would include minimal work.

4.1.7 Timelines of Alternative

No further action will not require additional time and is immediately implementable.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 11 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan

4.1.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-Pecuniary Interests

The no further action alternative would not impact current site activities and would allow for the site to remain as is with areas not accessible to the public. The no further action alternative would impact future site activities. This alternative does reduce the overall use and aesthetics of the site. The fences and the inaccessibility of the portions of the property decrease the value gained by not spending money on the remediation.

4.1.9 Summary of Detailed Evaluation

According to the MCP, the goal of the Phase III is the identification, evaluation, and selection of a comprehensive remedial action alternative that will address the identified risk, which is likely to achieve a permanent solution. A detailed evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the requirements specified in 310 CMR 40.0850, which presents the detailed evaluation criteria to be utilized in the comparison of potential alternatives. This remedial alternative does not present a permanent solution for the site, but does have short term merit as a temporary solution due to the minimal cost required.

4.2 Soil Excavation with Off-Site Disposal

Soil excavation with off-site disposal of contaminated media was elected for further evaluation as a remedial action alternative for areas north of the raceway at the OPM. This is a common method of directly removing contaminated material from a site. This remedial action alternative involves removal of media from within areas of contamination with ultimate disposal of contaminated materials to an appropriately permitted off-site disposal facility. This option has been evaluated for the removal of wedge area and North area (entire Site) soils that cumulatively presents significant risk for the City of Lawrence. The volume of contaminated soil to be removed from the wedge area is approximately 4,000 cubic yards. The volume of contaminated soil to be removed from the North area is approximately 16,900 cubic yards. Therefore, the total volume of contaminated soil to be removed from the entire Site is approximately 20,900 cubic yards. Since this process physically removes the COPCs from all areas of the Site, this alternative is usually the quickest method of site remediation. If the site is fully accessible and proper field screening and sampling is conducted, this method also provides the greatest assurance that cleanup levels will be achieved. Restoration of the excavation area(s) would be completed once confirmatory samples have been collected and confirmed to meet site cleanup standards.

The excavation and disposal of the entire Site (approximately 20,900 cubic yards) would allow for the submittal of a RAO without the implementation of an AUL. This would also allow for the Site to achieve background or approach background conditions and ultimately be a permanent solution for the Site. The excavation and disposal of only wedge area soils (approximately 4,000 cubic yards) would allow for the submittal of a RAO with the implementation of an AUL if a geotextile cap were to be utilized. The removal of wedge area soils reduces the average

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 12 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III - Remedial Action Plan concentrations of COPCs across this portion of the Site. The degree and the amount of contamination are greater in the wedge area than that of the North area.

According to Metcalf & Eddy's site investigation report (August 2003) for areas north of the raceway, soil contamination was determined to be approximately 15 feet bgs for the North area. Therefore, the volume of contaminated soil to be removed from the rest of the North area would be approximately 16,900 cubic yards, which is greater than the wedge area volume.

The activities associated with this alternative are:

* Design of the final landscaping plan for " Landscaping and planting grass, etc. the area after excavation * Preparation of DEP Submittals (Release * Preparation of specifications and for Abatement Measure (RAM) Plan, RAM performing the work Completion, RAO, etc.) * Permitting (Conservation Commission, " Load and go and stockpile DEP, etc.) characterization of soil for off-site * Attendance at Town Meetings disposal * Clearing and grubbing * Health and Safety Plan * Excavation * Watering of soil * Confirmatory Sampling * Transportation and disposal * Backfill and grading

4.2.1 Effectiveness

If proper field screening and sampling procedures were performed, soil excavation would be the most effective alternative. This is the only alternative that will achieve a permanent solution without the requirement for the implementation of an AUL.

4.2.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability

Soil excavation is the most reliable of the alternatives both short term and long term, since the mass of contamination would be removed by a proven technology. A level of no significant risk could be reached and concentrations of contaminants would be significantly reduced for areas north of the raceway at the OPM. Excavation and off site disposal does not require future activities to manage remaining contamination.

4.2.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative

Excavation of soils for off site disposal is complex and requires use of large open areas for stockpiling soils and storing equipment. Off-site disposal of 4,000 cubic yards of wedge area material would be a significant undertaking. An even greater undertaking would be the off-site disposal of 20,900 cubic yards of all Site soils. Staging areas and disposal facilities that could accept such a large volume of soil would have to be identified. Numerous logistic issues relative

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 13 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan to the future land use, as a passive park, would have to be resolved. Overall this would be a difficult undertaking, but no more difficult than any other type of contaminated soil removal project. Also since the possibility of asbestos fibers becoming airborne exists, extensive measures are needed to control asbestos fiber releases to the ambient air. Continuous wetting of soil to prevent asbestos fibers releases into ambient air is needed. Perimeter air monitoring for asbestos is also needed for this remedial alternative. However, extensive measures would be in place and, therefore, this remedial option could be implemented.

4.2.4 Cost of the Alternative

Capital costs for excavation are relatively moderate but could increase significantly with the presence of rocks and old building foundations once excavation activities are underway. There are no operating and maintenance costs associated with excavation.

A summary of the costs associated with the excavation/disposal alternative of contaminated soils from each area of the Site is provided in the following table.

Excavation/Disposal Alternative Estimated Cost M$) Wedge Area $930,000 Wedge Area + North Area $4,860,000 Note: A 15% contingency is included in the above costs.

The cost for the excavation/disposal alternative to remove contaminated soils from the entire Site (wedge and North area) is approximately fives times as much as it would be for wedge area soils. Also there would be additional costs for backfill material for the North area excavation in order to get the area to site grade. An estimated amount for this alternative is not included in the table above. This would not be the case for the wedge area excavation/disposal alternative.

4.2.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative

The wedge area, which is the area that requires remediation through soil excavation and off-site disposal, is located in an area that the public has no access to on a daily basis. The OPM will be closed to the public during construction activities and therefore the risk of soil excavation/disposal impacting the public would be minimal. However, construction activities would involve exposing workers to contaminated soils through the use of heavy machinery and the presence of stockpiles and open excavations on-site. This alternative would require the development and implementation of a site specific health and safety plan to reduce risk (mainly asbestos fibers) during the performance of this alternative. The other risk would be of discovering, during construction, more contamination to be removed than currently identified, which could significantly increase the cost.

4.2.6 Benefits of the Alternative

Since contamination would be removed and a condition of no significant risk would be reached, excavation and off-site disposal would be the most beneficial for the soils at OPM. Soil

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 14 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan excavation and disposal would result in a condition of no significant risk for the wedge area and an AUL would not be required if all the area were excavated.

4.2.7 Tirnelines of Alternative

If a large enough crew were obtained the implementation of this project could be completed in one construction season or approximately three months. The upfront work for the design would most likely take three months. The on-going construction work by the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) on the south side of the OPM would not affect the excavation and disposal work that will be implemented on the areas north of the raceway.

4.2.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-Pecuniary Interests

The overall value of the OPM would be increased by this alternative. No use limitations would be placed on the wedge area and the entire site will require an engineered barrier to be utilized as a passive park by the public and use restricted due to contaminants on the site.

4.2.9 Summary of Detailed Evaluation

According to the MCP, the goal of the Phase III is the identification, evaluation, and selection of a comprehensive remedial action alternative that will address the identified risk and which is likely to achieve a permanent solution. A detailed evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the requirements specified in 310 CMR 40.0850, which presents the detailed evaluation criteria to be utilized in the comparison of potential alternatives. The excavation/disposal alternative of wedge area soils would be extremely effective at achieving a condition of No Significant Risk and will require the implementation of an AUL. Due to high costs associated with excavating and disposing of North area soils, an associated option would be to place a geotextile cap on this area. This would allow for the submittal of a RAO with the implementation of an AUL.

Due to the reduced interference of structural voids from old building foundations and the level of contamination found within the soil of the wedge area as compared to the North area, it would be beneficial to remove only the wedge area soil. The cost as well as the reduction of average concentrations of COPCs across the Site would be more beneficial to the project if wedge area soil was excavated and disposed of. The excavation and disposal of wedge area material would allow for the submittal of a RAO with the implementation of an AUL. Due to the presence of PAHs at locations throughout the wedge area at the OPM, an AUL would be placed on the property.

4.3 Containment/Capping - Wedge Area and North Area

Containment is a remedial action alternative where physical barriers are installed in an effort to prevent further contaminant migration and/or to eliminate potential exposure to contamination. For areas north of the raceway as part of this remedial action, the two existing areas, designated as the wedge area and the North area, would be contained under one continuous geotextile cap

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 15 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Sqtone & Webgster Massachuets Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan that would encompass the area from the toe of the wedge area excavation to the northern extent of the North area. Containment in this context means a secure geotextile cap meeting the capping requirements applicable to the solid waste regulations.

The activities associated with this alternative are:

" Design of the final landscaping plan for * Clearing and grubbing the wedge area and North area after * Excavation capping * Confirmatory Sampling * Preparation of specifications and for - Backfill and grading performing the work * Installing a geotextile cap " Installing erosion preventative measures * Landscaping and planting grass, etc. * Permitting (Conservation Commission, - Preparation of DEP Submittals RAM DEP, etc.) Plan, RAM Completion, RAO, etc.) * Town Meetings

4.3.1 Effectiveness

By installing a geotextile cap over the wedge area (after excavation) and the North area soils, COPCs are isolated from public contact as well as to prevent further contaminant migration.

4.3.2 Short Term and Long Term Reliability

The capping of the areas north of raceway is a reliable remedial solution on both a short and long term basis, as long as accidental disturbance does not breach the cap. Cap disturbance is highly unlikely in these areas. The most likely cause of accidental disturbance would be the installation of new utilities or the construction of a new park structure. As a long term measure, this alternative will not be as reliable if maintenance and inspection was not performed, if they are performed it will be very reliable.

4.3.3 Difficulty in Implementing Alternative

The geotextile capping alternative would be more difficult than No Further Action/Institutional Controls and would be the less difficult than the excavation only alternative of the entire site.

The capping of areas north of the raceway will require significant ground surface disturbance. Since the possibility of asbestos fibers becoming airborne exists, extensive measures are needed to control asbestos fiber releases to the ambient air. However, extensive measures would be in place and therefore this remedial option could be implemented. Due to the absence of paved roads and parking areas on site, the capping of the entire area north of the raceway would not be as overly difficult than if these structures were in place.

Protection of the adjacent Spicket River during all phases of construction will be implemented.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 16 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan

4.3.4 Cost of the Alternative

Capital costs for capping both the wedge and north areas are relatively moderate but could increase significantly with the presence of rocks and old building foundation once capping activities are underway. There are also operating and maintenance costs associated with capping.

A summary of the costs associated with the geotextile capping alternative for contaminated soils for the entire Site is provided in the following table.

Capping Alternative I Estimated Cost ($) Capping Wedge and North areas $670,000 Note: A 15% contingency is included in the above costs.

The cost above does not include landscaping costs after the entire Site has been capped.

4.3.5 Risks of the Remedial Action Alternative

Three risks are associated with the capping of the entire area north of raceway. They are 1) the risk of finding, during construction, more contamination to be removed than currently identified; 2) the public exposure and environmental risk of release of contamination during construction, and 3) future disruption of the geotextile cap.

Increased Extent of Contamination

During construction, should the contamination area and depth increase beyond the current assessment, the project costs would also increase. This may lead to an incomplete remediation project. The corresponding unresolved human and environmental risk factors that currently exist would remain. This project risk can be minimized by the order of construction. It is anticipated that the wedge area would be excavated and completed first due to the level and characteristics of contamination in this area before the capping activities were to take place for the entire site. The implementation of the geotextile cap will be associated with a separate remedial contract.

Public and Environmental Risks During Construction.

Public health risk is best minimized by closing and/or marking off areas during remediation activities. Exposure risk to contamination and physical hazard risk to construction activities are of key concern, and can be eliminated from the public by closing and/or marking off construction areas. Workers should be properly trained and outfitted with the necessary personal protection equipment to minimize their risks.

Environmental risks are controlled by proper containment of the contaminated materials by dust control and runoff control measures.

Geotextile Cap Disruption

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 17 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stonea &€ Webs~ter M~a~zt ct Phase III-Remedial Action Plan Xinnot Wohvt-or Mavvr Inc. Phase Ill-Remedial Action Plan

As identified above, contamination areas left in place and capped always will be susceptible to future cap disruption. This is especially true for the North area, where this area will be the most publicly used area of the passive park. Future site facility construction, while not currently planned, may include additional structures or utility work. After 50 years, the capping here could be forgotten and then accidental disruption is possible.

The wedge area disruption is not as large of a concern as the North area due to its location as being an area that will support a bridge that will transect the site. Due to the bridge, there will be greater public restrictions for use of the wedge area than the North area (passive park).

The risks associated with the capping of both areas are similar. The cap will eliminate exposure and, therefore, eliminate risks associated with exposure to the soil. The only risks are associated with erosion and degradation of the cap, which would lead to exposure to impacted soils. If the caps are maintained, there is little risk associated with this option.

4.3.6 Benefits of the Alternative

Risk reduction at a lower cost is the primary benefit of the capping option. This is the lowest cost alternative other than the no further action alternative, which does not eliminate risk. Capping the contaminated areas in place will always require attention since the contamination remains on site and may present a future human and environmental risk. 4.3.7 Timelines of Alternative

The time to construct a geotextile cap (with all layers) should be possible in a three-month time frame, excluding establishment of vegetative cover.

4.3.8 Relative Effectiveness of the Alternative upon Non-Pecuniary Interests

The overall value of the park would be increased by this alternative because complete use of the park would be gained for passive activities. An AUL would have to be placed on the site and future development of the passive park would be restricted in the capped areas. Due to the current and projected use of the site as a passive park, the implementation of an AUL would not have a significant impact on the projected utilization of the park.

4.3.9 Summary of Detailed Evaluation

One option for capping was evaluated. The evaluation determined that capping is the least expensive remediation option and provides the best fit to institute a Permanent Solution for the entire site.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 18 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. PaeIlRmda cinPa criteria to be utilized in the comparison of potential alternatives. A selection of an alternative is presented in Section 5.0.

5.0 SELECTION OF THE FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE

Three remedial alternatives have been evaluated for areas north of raceway at the OPM; no further action, soil excavation and disposal, and geotextile capping. No further action with institutional controls was evaluated as a baseline, however this would not be effective for areas north of the raceway at the OPM, due to the future use as being a passive park. If no further action was conducted for areas north of the raceway at the OPM, contamination would remain on site, exposure to the contamination would still be present and a permanent solution would not be reached.

Due to the level and characteristics of contamination of the wedge area soil, the best remedial alternative is excavation and disposal since it would achieve a permanent solution for this heavily contaminated area. The best remedial alternative for the excavated wedge area and North area for future use as a passive park, based on the screening provided in Section 4, is the geotextile capping alternative. The capping of the North area as opposed to excavating this area would save the project significant amount in costs. The significant costs are due largely to the amount of soil that would be excavated for disposal as well as the amount of backfill material that would be needed to bring the North area back up to site grade. Based on cost and risk reduction, these are the two best remedial alternatives for the entire site.

The table below summarizes the costs, cleanup time, and feasibility associated with all remediation goals for areas north of the raceway.

Remediation Goal Cost Cleanup Time Feasibility Class A-1 RAO $4,860,000 6 months Not Feasible Class A-2 RAO $930,000 3 months Not Feasible Class A-3 RAO, AUL $1,600,000 6 months Feasible Class C RAO $105,000 Less than 3 months Not Feasible

Based upon the table above, the Class A-3 RAO and AUL option for areas north of the raceway is the best remedial goal. The feasibility, cleanup time, and the cost for this remedial option work best for site closure and the City of Lawrence.

6.0 PROJECTED SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE IV

The Phase IV and Phase V reports are anticipated to occur within the deadlines established within the MCP. The Phase IV will be submitted within the next year and the Phase V will be completed within the following year. Completion of the work and the submittal of a RAO is anticipated to occur within the next three years.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 19 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachst. Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan

7.0 LIMITATIONS

This report was prepared for the use of the City of Lawrence. The observations made and results presented in this report are believed to be representative of current conditions at the time of Stone & Webster's assessment. Any additional information regarding Site conditions or past/current Site use should be brought to Stone & Webster's attention so it may be addressed and incorporated in the Site study. This information could potentially result in modification of Stone & Webster's conclusions and recommendations.

Stone & Webster is not responsible for the accuracy and veracity of information provided to us by outside parties with respect to areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill and adjacent properties. This report presents the opinions of Shaw/Stone & Webster Massachusetts Inc. with the respect to the environmental conditions of areas north of raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill. The actual determination of compliance of present or former operators of areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill with federal or state regulations can only be made by the appropriate regulatory agencies. The opinions rendered herein are not intended to imply a warranty or a guarantee and are based solely upon areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill conditions at the time of our investigation.

Chemical analyses were performed for certain parameters during this assessment. The parameters selected were based upon site knowledge and potential sources. However, chemical constituents not searched for during the studies may be present in soil and/or groundwater at areas north of raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill. Chemical conditions reported reflect conditions only at the locations tested at the time of testing and within the limitations of the methods used. Such conditions can differ rapidly from area to area and from time to time. No warranty is expressed or implied that chemical conditions other than those reported do not exist within areas north of the raceway at the Oxford Paper Mill.

Negative findings at a test location do not guarantee that the soil or groundwater at a greater depth is free of contaminants because geologic and/or hydrologic conditions may be present that prevents upward diffusion of contaminants from deeper horizons. Additionally, positive findings at a sample location can arise from soil contamination only and do not confirm that the underlying groundwater has been impacted.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 20 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway Stone & Webster Massachusetts,Inc. Phase III-Remedial Action Plan

REFERENCES

Eckenfelder, Inc. 1998. Phase II Groundwater Model Report for the GenCorp Inc., Volume I - Text. Prepared for GenCorp Inc. - Lawrence Location. September 1998.

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), 1997. Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000.

Metcalf & Eddy (M&E). 2002. Targeted Brownfields Assessment Final Report: Test Pit Investigation of Area North of Raceway to be Gradedfor Bridge Construction- Former Oxford Paper Mill, RTN 3-2691, Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. November 2002.

Metcalf & Eddy (M&E). 2003. Technical Memorandum and Method 3 Risk Characterization Oxford Paper Mill Site - Area North of Raceway and North of Bridge Construction Area, Volume 1: Text, Figures, Tables, and Attachments A through H. Prepared by Metcalf & Eddy with assistance from Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure (Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc.). Partial funding provided by USEPA Region I, Targeted Brownfields Assessment Program. Prepared for the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts, Office of Planning and Economic Development. August 2003.

Metcalf & Eddy (M&E). 2003. Technical Memorandum and Method 3 Risk Characterization Oxford Paper Mill Site - Area North of Raceway and North of Bridge Construction Area, Volume II: Attachment I - MCP Method 3 Risk Characterizationand Attachment J- Statement of Limitations. Prepared by Metcalf & Eddy with assistance from Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure (Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc.). Partial funding provided by USEPA Region I, Targeted Brownfields Assessment Program. Prepared for the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts, Office of Planning and Economic Development. August 2003.

Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. (S&W), 2004. Release Abatement Measure Planfor Areas North of the Raceway. June 2004.

Stone & Webster Massachusetts, Inc. (S&W), 2004. Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment for Areas North of the Raceway. December 2004.

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station. 1981. Soil Survey of Essex County, MassachusettsNorthern Part.

Office of Planning & Development - City of Lawrence Page 21 Oxford Paper Mill - Areas North of the Raceway 4 8

Kg8 I I U -U I U I I I I I I I .1! \ -. 4 ~ - a-. t

• ... L

Canal Street

Wkf

41 !I ;Af. ri.- ;

eGIS. CannonweauM t massacteuus. Execut O41e of Enkonm Afais Latitude: 42 427 27" N Figure 1: Site Locus Map Longitude 71 08' 59W Former Oxford Paper Mill

II im &all Lawrence, MA 0

cfs - mrI Ld

251 e ,_

~cu4- 00 (L

......

*...... :..

'...... ° ...... ° ...... -...... i......

......

...... -.. , I .. .. - ...... ". .

t / ...... ill

- * * *I a . ..- . . .' 'l .." ", L I

mmmmm m m ----- mm mm. -0L . -

xLo-Lz Z

...J M O0 E . ml < 8 m 2L>z<*1 . 0 V) .O o< 0 a . . , a oa .C. -C.L " . . z o0 ,0." .' " z Eoa-

oom.m.,m,04

,NuS z*LjL (D 80F.

" - - - - .' i "..-. I LL,

N I

N m I -. I 'II i~in Zzfr,- 0 , LI i------.. ------C-4 If.LW--..

Z 0 t, " • . : ' " LL o- a: aL

.m..z- I' 'm 0 c; L • • -I I I0 0 .., 00 CL o Co N LJ 8 Lazu-~ a.S Z 00 L clL

0 -I 00

, II - a < 0 C "" II .J aSH 0, 1 '. 2 p- xo Z)0 . L •Z . l)J-, I v8 't

r ------, b . ' LI I. ,, h . CLa.-

. ** Ip-. . cc ... N w C M C mm Z 0 , *- LaL2 . I m 0-- I.. • . .I 0, I* * _ - i C14l EI _ _.. .. a. ------o------,- D 0 ca 2 .- . . -- 0.co 0C> 4. ------1 ED1

Ui.v

L -. / 00 / b QV') I 5 = a // I/ =0 =-2'

u m m m m/

- BMpt'onbu\*cO-rgZ--- m J78\SUM\ --U m \ m EDZDH\r" O*IO -l * MA DEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ITE NAME: Site Scoring Map: 500 feet & 0.5 Mile Radii )xford Paper Mill me Irormatin shown on ha map .. s...u, Street s the best availal at the ate l iGa' . Ste et111 CE, MA .REN o pritng. Please reler to. w ...... is G11y. ra 758n 228732ew Site Location ala sowDe descridocument.

/HU oORRI

, 4$ ...... i . .

c TN NC 1P E

sTs

04f

LGA G*AE A

SRsEEEtgj -44

SUM @SREET zC .EE 114 .

SUO STREET

44L

131

A 0 -4 it>

(bads:Fbads: UrInied Access,Access. DidDivided. MajorMaor Road, a. ConorConcoStreet, Street. Tack.Fack, 1ailTil EPA SSoleole Source Aquifer FE.MAFEMAA 1d0-year100-veer flOOdplainfloodplmin ... irI ______- - AA& W earScp .'q"ison,Swrfc;@No iornuty 0~ Bounai:T n . y , P R ; F ; wer , P e A t A e Z W P urf ar2 i l an A p . Bians: MIi, Sub; Samams: Perennial, kermittent, Man Made Sh Dm r ogpy ae etratlcSraeWtrS Habs ...... Sea. ie imq Sub; Strew.n:.W-- ,tids: Fresh.Selt.NHESP Wttiand t'erwndsa. Iimeitienvt .Mu' Melid.Shoir. OanHk A.Wa ~wePtkSu esSpl Net*Paruu liczliLZ) 2Protected Open Space: ACEC ...... i l O rining W at eSour e A rea M High Y id ' - M DEP le ritte dSo ldW ate F cilie s:Certifed Ve rnal ols .. S Nor..,btMn-Nbteitd n wfuam "'.,OMTtS May 30, 2003 CALE 1:15000Orfn*ig I2 Watsa Source Area- k%6auKYild 1 DEP Pntted Solid Weste Feciliies CoM1Jd WMnFPcl .. Lw i S fiAL1:5001-2 - aorI s May 30, 2003 NRS SCORING MAP DATA SOURCES

AQUIFERS: USGS-WRDIMassGIS. 1:48,000. Automated by MassGIS from the USGS Water WETLANDS: Umass Amherst RMP/MassGIS, 1:25,000. Resources Div. Hydrologic Allas series manuscripts. The Includes nonforested wetlands extracted from the definitions of high and medium yield vary among basins. 1971-1991 Land Use datatayer, which was r rce dates 1977-1988. photointerpreted from summer CIR photography. Interpretation was not done in stereo. Also includes, in OLE SOURCE AQUIFERS: US EPA/MA most areas, forested wetlands from USGS Digital Line DEP/MassGIS, various scales. They are defined by EPA Graph (DLG) data. *aquifers that are the 'sole or principal source' of 'ikingwater for a given aquifer service area. Last PROTECTED OPEN SPACE: EOEA (Executive Office updated May 1996. of Environmental Affairs) MassGIS, 1:25,000. Includes federal, state, county, municipal, non-profit and ION POTENTIAL DRINKING WATER SOURCE protected private conservation and outdoor recreation AREAS: DEP-BWSC (Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup). lands. Ongoing updates. Those portions of high and medium yield aquifers, which not be considered as areas of groundwater ACECs: DEM, 125,000. Areas of Critical Envircnmrenrazi tZ ucive to the locations of public water supplles. Concern are areas designated by the Secretary of ECEAX Please refer to the MCP guidelines for the definitions of as having a number of valuable environmental features these areas. coexisting. Projects inACECs are subject to the highest standards of review and performance. Last updated DEP APPROVED ZONE II's: MA DEP, 1:25,000. As October 1996. stated in 310 CMR 22.02 'tat area of an aquifer which r tributes water to a well under the most severe ROADS: USGS/MassGIS/MHD. 1:100,000. MassGIS pumping and recharge conditions that can be realisticaily extracted roads from the USGS Tranrsporta-ftion DLG anticipated.' Digitized from data provided to DEP in files. MA Highway Dept updated roads through 1999. approved hydrologic engineering reports. Data is MassGIS and MA DEP GIS group further edited this updated continuously. layer. Numbered routes are part of the state, U.S. or Interstate highway systems. INTERIM WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS: DEP- OWS (Division of Water Supply), 125,000. These POLITICAL BOUNDARIES: MassGIS/USGS, 125,C000. Upolygons represent an interim Zone II for a .roundwater This datalayer was digitized by MassC-GIS from mylar source until an actual one is approved by t-e DEP . USGS quads. Source date is approximately 1585. Division of Water Supply. The radius of an W'A.ALies according to the approved pumping rate. Updated in DEP PERMITTED SOLID WASTE FACLITIES: DEP- parallel with the Public Water Supplies data. DSW (Division of Solid Waste), 1'25.000. Includes only faclities regulated since 1971. Data includes sanitary UBLIC WATER SUPPUES: DEP-OWS, 125,000. landfEs, transfer stations and recycling or composting Comunity and non-community surface and withdrawal facilities. Facility boundaries were compled or po were eld collected using Global Positioning approximate facility point locations drafted onto USGS System receivers. The atributes were added from the quadrangles and automated by the DEP Division of Solid DEP Division of Water Supply database. Continuously Waste. Last updated 1997. updated. NHESP ESTIMATED HABITATS OF RARE HYDROGRAPHY: USGSIMassGIS. 125,000 USGS WETLANDS WILDLIFE: Polygons show estimatea Digital Line Graph (DLG) data modified by MassGIS. habitats for all processed occurrences of rare wetlands Approximnately 40% of the data was provided by USGS wildlife. Data collected by Natural Heritage & and MassGIS created the remainder to USGS Endangered Species Program alnd compiled at 124,000 eciflcations. Source dates 1977-1997. or 125,000 scale. For use with Wetlands Protection Act Only. Effective 1999 - 2001. DRAINAGE BASINS: USGS-WRDIMassGIS, 1:24,000. mute by MassGS from USGS Water Resources NHESP CERTIFIED VERNAL POOLS: Points show all manuscripts with approximately 2400 vemrnal pools certified by NHESP/MADFW (Fisheries and ub-basins as interpreted from 1:24,000 USGS Wildlife) as of June 30. 1999. Data compiled at 124,000 quadrangle contour lines. 1987-1993. or 1:25,000 scale. Effective 1999 - 2001.

Last revised 2000 0 -j U -.J :jz (i 0 z P C z so U CL&0 OF ao MWCD " ,< mo

(0 S <$ m + I0--Z En(o-- ol k =.('-9, ZZ 0" O"L5p.agz 0 (4gS Z0Z<"mo

* . :...... :, .. .. :. *...:. S+ '', ,+ . .'. ;. .. .. ,. ,? , , .... ., ......

," , , ' , . , • , ,: v. ,+,+,+I,+ +.ii,'' -- ,+ ' '+.¢ ' 7", +, " ,

vs So **4

Nil

in0wI.?- ir

Sm m m m m m TABLES Table 2-1 - November 2002/August 2003 ACM Soil Sampling Events Results - North Area

Sample Number* Reported Value (%)

1 Not Detected 2 Not Detected 3 Less than 1.0 4 1.3 5 Not Detected 6 1.2 7 1.8 8 Less than 1.0 9 Not Detected 10 1.3 11 Not Detected 12 Not Detected 13 Not Detected 14 Less than 1.0 15 Less than 1.0 16 1.3 17 Less than 1.0 18 1.4 19 Not Detected 20 1.3 21 Not Detected 22 1.3 23 Not Detected 24 Less than 1.0 25 Not Detected 26 Less than 1.0 27 Less than 1.0 28 2.9 29 Less than 1.0 30 Less than 1.0 31 1.5 32 Less than 1.0 Not Detected 33 34 Not Detected 35 Less than 10

* Refer to Figure 5 for the corresponding asbestos sampling locations (November 2002/August 2003) - .-. - ; - ;n 5 5 F

oI '2222I" I..z z ...

-4

) 0 Q 0s0 ) E~assasla0 iu 0l 2sC) 0s()s I z z zz zzz z

OV. 0IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 UOQ0l2ll000ZlZZs 2,0 01 88l20 C1822 2 12

000 1u (Q 1 22u8888 z2 2OBBIB fri1us Z l i 2 oISBBUzi z z zzz

I0 I II I I a 2 Ca IL1 I I I I I I I i i ID lCI II 111111 1 i1 I II D I C; II I or I I I I l I I I llu 0 II Isc I I I "IN lci IIIIII oic 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I b il l I I I I I I II I. iD 0l I 1L

IDIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I r I I I I I I I N II1111IIII11 C4 I I I

...... 4 i n * 4III3I II

N I I I I I I I I I II I 111 11111 I lI Ill Ill IlIIII

- 4 - 0 4 CII I V 2 2 11111ol 'IS I I I Willie I I il 0 6

2 lllllol I I I I I I I I I I I I oo 2 2 II IIl lililir 6 III~t 00 l I II 4- I I I I I I l I I I II I 22 2 2 D I I I l l l l 0c IIIII lII i i i i i i 0 - Ill ,ZIN Ill 1II I I I I I I I 0

I I -I I 4.I 4I43 - coo 0 Doo a00 60 a 0 a-La. 22n22 CLa. o 0 22R00 CL2 SN a-a-0c( 00'Lf 00Ul c4 4.A a r I r 00c r-ro T 0)rtJ pm a.2.2

22222 =)Z)D2 =)2D2 ooo2 D Z) =01= = Dt:)I 10* 10 10t 101010W ooooo U U U 101 I1 6 00 4? U U? Im 000 00000 0 CD 0000000 000 6664 0d0o

222221222 N II N N U') 0 ' N%4N N -rT- r - Tr r r - - 'tNWNrIrrr 0 N

N D D NN rNNNN7rrNNM0N M Nrr rM r 1C NNCON r--

UOZIJOH 0 1I_____I______CF) Lo 0 ~ N CGo N

S m m- m m - m - - m- - - 1 MM- 3 0 (.) 1I) (- toOD rMS P!

Pi 2 B S00 I0QQQ2Z2 I0S82

C~.1 12 II(22N

-I-In,

I 'a D A 63 (N

lIlI o I T- oN Cl at N q u Jk IcpII .0 (

I 1I I1-7 1 I I 'D' l 04 78 Q

I I I I I I I I I

-- i i , 9 2o

IllD- IIS 1'II 1 1 I 1

Im I I

11I~ -0a W ri

2 2Eadza

o 0 D Ohg IIIc' o ad, C4 o o0 E

IIoI I 0

III I I m I lI I 78 Lo C

-Ii I I 9 - 0 o 0 CL 222 R 00 N (ND(D (NjLO 4 N ICM 0-cc .23h. 8 N c o o :) ) &6oooUI 00000 doo

o o S7--N NNN

8 N

-. ImI I - UOZIJOH wwou. < mo w.O< oo lid

m m m m -m m I I mWm m m Table 2-3. Oxford Paper MIII Site: Asbestos Analytical Results

Asbestos S 0, Estimated Vokwmne Percent 0~ Total Amosite Crocldoeft TO S Cht sotle Asbesto

3 A - - - - Notes KA - - - B - - - - KA = field duplicate C - - - D - - - - Bulk = sample of E - - - - bulk suspect ACM, F - - - - not sol G - - - - H - - - - <1 = ACM present, AB Composite 1 <1 2 3 but concentration is 4 A - - - - less than 1 percent B - - C - - - - ND = not detected AC Composte 4 <1 2 6 5 A 2 1 2 5 - = not sampled for ACM KA - - - - 6 A - - - - B - - - C 5 1 2 8 o 4 1 3 8 E 2 3 2 7 AS Composite 3 1 3 7 7 A - - - a - - - - B (Bdk) 3 30 ND 33 C - - - - D - - - E - - 8 A - - - - B - - - - C - - - - O - - - E - - - - F - - - - G - - - - 10 A - - - - B - - - - FC -.. - - KC - - - D -.. E -

G - -

HD -.. - 11 A - - B ....

C - -

O - E .... -

F - AC Composite <1 <1 <1 <1 OF Composite 3 ND <1 3 12 A - - - - B - - - - C <1 <1 <1 <1 O <1 <1 ND <1 E <1 ND <1 <1 F <1 <1 <1 <1 G <1 <1 <1 <1 H <1 <1 <1 <1 AB Composite NO ND ND ND 14 A - - - B - - C <1 ND ND <1 D <1 <1 ND <1 E <1 <1 ND <1 F <1 <1 ND <1 G <1 <1 <1 <1 AB Composite <1 1 <1 1 16 A - - - B - - - - C - - - - D - - - - ADComposite <1 <1 ND

Page 1 of I Iitlit gR

a6d

0 0r6 cN;)N6r-- N cm adSoN Se--N

4 tol agg

a ... d-.- . e

0-4 V-4 6 96 N IN dddsddo;

N N,

s , 00 r22,2R22 RMRR c; 1dfh 6 'do Lo o6. ar a 3 :1~ 35 L6I§SS§ ~ dSc Nc

C4~

IIC W: 3 2224224 N n~a coeonna oaoeccO'fl- 0 NOCNO

I'0 3~8 cs~l~8

N 000 gl m u n. c

4,. -'sad2jg3z ,

L2U

M6-" 4 0

m - m m m m m . iM-Mmi m= m TABLE 2-4 NOTES:

1. Hydrocarbon ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration ot target and Qc (surrogate) analytes.

** - Values shown for standards are in the same units as the analytical data. **- Total Target PAHs calculated by summing all detected concentrations, and including one-half the detection limit for target PAls that were not detected. Note that units are mg/kg (not ug/kg, as for individual analytes). MADEP Criteria MCP Reportable Concentrations, 310 CMR 40.0000 Subpart P Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material List "-" indicates no MCP Reportable Concentration available The MCP reportable concentrations are shown for comparison purposes only. ft bgs - feet below ground surface FD - Indicates Field Duplicate J - Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review. U - Analyte was not detected. Value reported is the sample-specific detection limit. UJ - Sample-specific detection limit is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review. [Bold j - indicates value greater than applicable MCP reportable concentration

Page 2 of 2 I- 402 E . E W0(0100 co III:::I Ce0 .20 IIliiii

*S >- -C S Cg3 toon I"1 IC'J i oC I x ) 01- ONC* (0 4)*W x 0 lllli I ?rj~-T ICe c2r a -0" CD - U -, -, ' , I I I I w I I I I I I I 0

no)oE . E 4 )0 * E U'ccoco C I 'o I I I Io IC4 oD a

l l4 t i t vl 4) 0 0 co oooo t e0 E 2 = .0 0 MM Ic 0 I0o0000 01-I W C~0 5 1, Xtr -o

- a ee i E o oooooooo

0 o V V2 VVVV V cVw> (D0o 1- on of Q)5 itoo1 W eZS00 Pzi x cicmem ')C V- rr r VVVVVVVV 0 0z

00er-em M 00 co cC ooom < 0ItrT-LO V 1 r I tNI %NNNC VVVVTo

lid q o w r r r r - ~fg~t~~i[71j I I I I I I I I I ~ MI ~ e I I I I I

a a ii.~ ~1 5

- ~ - ~ 0 I - I in in -. =1 in-.in N N N - - oin~o~oN •"' 20 in r~ in in .A' 11 N12 0) 0 - IIa... - liii - - 00000 0 N N N N N C N C1 4 444 * - * r zi "i it w,6 r41.o e I I RI ~.1 4 KKRR

0 00 0000000 N N N N P3~ N 4 *444 4 44

f4NN

0000000 0 0 In r, 0.0' 0' 0~ a a in in in in in in N -- in 0) 0) 030- *0 0 inN n . Nn N20N 00000 0 00 ~ ~NNNN r4 3 n i pi - -N ~ -. tin

NO NN N In It 0000000 I- ~ ccs* a cccc@ in q' -

0) 0)

00000 0 -fl-

- .- 3]JI

00000 0

- 0 -4C 0

- * N'.

On N 0000055

0) 0)

in U' in

N I 00 : 0~ 0

400 N -N N - a aY

0 0 000 0 flU 20inN - -- - N in -n v n 4n2N --i

00'0 0 000 0 -~IAll I) 0 Iii - N

0* 0 000 0

- N in 4

oooo : ooooo ooo oooo

000 I

I 00'0 0 ~ 0~0 0

Ul ~ 0,

1t I I' I. log - iiittlS ii I'G1t IIIJI IJJ ii1'

I u -& Im - - l l MLI IIIl III Ilhd *II-

m- m -im - I U m - m --- I JjIII I I I IJI H I iI - -_ = ,,,,, , ,, , ti .a.t. -mans

0' 0 n 0'000 D 0) 2 ~930 30 ! ~g$ -~ "~. NN.4 - <

~~0~000~~ 0 V rArVW30N w~ M"N ~ MO .0MM 0.00 o 0 0)r - N N N 5 3oo=5851 FF oo o- 30* r~-~30N- ~flN ~<< Mt 00..1N~ 30 N0 0-N o 0 N N N ' • • , ,.

00000 5 0300M* N D :) 4 ~ ~r~r.i- V 0 <

oooooo5 D00 DD0 Z Z NN 0 n-tM 030~30 3030303030"" 30- 30 30 ~9 3030 %n nN r n , 00 0 ~* .e-00 M IA' O N - - 0 0 Ow'i.-. %0.9 09 0 N N N

L' U~

0 -- =0000 0 CCC 303030303030 .NN ~ 30MM 0 0O..N~ 4 0 N N N 'C

00000 3 0'-.-. 0 --

C" C" N N NC N - *'~~'" '4' N 30 30 0 30 - O MOO -0- 0 N N N N

00000 5 U.-.-. -- -30 ~3 N N N

______A" 0000003 0-9-. ~ *A.OV t3030M .30Wr.~0~ 0 CCC 00 30D~0300 k 000 N N N

00000 0 0~-. - - -. 000 030 r4--~030N0C -- 'CCC N 00 ('4MM A"

0000000 - - NNNNNNN NM flNq30r~30m~C ~N0M 00 30 9n~~ .9.4.4.4.4.4.9 N N N CA CA ______I"

4 4 0000000 N 30 -. 4 0 30300 fl N 30 N ~ CCC NO - 0 0 MMN A"

0000000 SBS5SSSS SSSSSSES !4 30 3030-930., .. 4....4.4 Italitallinisits 0

; 1 o I

C. - e4 I I Iii 4~ I LII 1111 i 11111 tiLill Iii ii - i a i a i -~

- mi=---r-I I M a - rn=am TABLE NOTES:

1. Hydrocarbon ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes. ** - Values shown for standards are in the same units as the analytical data.

MADEP Criteria MCP Reportable Concentrations, 310 CMR 40.0000 Subpart P Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material List Background Values: MADEP, May 23, 2002. Technical Update: Background Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Metals in Soil. "-" indicates no MCP Reportable Concentration or background value available The MCP reportable concentrations and background values are shown for comparison purposes only.

ft bgs - feet below ground surface FD - Indicates Field Duplicate J - Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review. U - Analyte was not detected. Value reported is the sample-specific detection limit. UJ - Sample-specific detection limit is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review. x - indicates value greater than applicable MCP reportable concentration mandicates mat mthe detection lunmitexceeds me applicable Mr reportable concentration.

Page 1 of I Table 2-7. Summary Of Analytical Data For Grounadwater Former Oxford Paper MWill- March 200.3

LOCATION NAME MW-1 MW-3 MW-5 KMW-S MW-6 MW-l MCP Reportable M&E SAMPLE ID MW-I MW-3 MW-S KMW-5 MW-6 MW-l Cmcetratiems DATE RECEIVED BY LAX: 371713 3/2783 3/27/3 327163 3/2703 32713 - DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND SURFACE 36.5 14.3' 14.* 14ra 1 6s COMMr _D OW-2

PARAMI AERIANAYTE

Pefl - EPA SW-4I Metbdia 0L m.L Atockar-l~l6. wbD'-IOI16 Le U Lit U 1.0 fl .t V L@ U 0.3 I.I f/ LIP U 0.3 Azoclt-1221 LS V 1.0 & LI U LU U 03 Aroclor-1232 Lo U I,@ U L U LIt U LI U 0.3 Aroclor- 1242 L. U L U LIt U L. U Le U LI U 03 Aroclor- 1248 LU U I. U it U La Vl 0.3 Aoclor- 12354 IA0 IV L U It U L 8 U 0.3 Aroclar-1260 LIP V iLe U I. v 1.0 U

Iel VOTIL EPTIROr LE S- -. . I... . 100 U 100 U 100 U 1.000 too U 100 U 1,ooo q-, Aphs(l) 20U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 30 U 34 U 46U 40 U 15000 CrC,. Aomatics (I) I6 U 15 U 151) 15 U MTBE 5 U 15 U 2.000 5 U 5 U SU |5U Ii 0 $U 15 U 6,000 15 U Is U Is U 5U 5U 50 SU 5U 6,000 20U 20 U 20 U 20 U v- ad p-Xyke. 20 U lo U 10 U 10 U 10 U 6,000 o-X-Km 10 U 10 U 10 U LOU I0 U 10 U 6,000 ..-- 10 u

,-Al I AI S4t JASiLe. rap pvt..u'.n B Wi in-l .- o - I NenJr ,.- 30 U J 44 30 U1 35 30 U 40 1,000 crCl -pbn (I) 40 U 44 40U 49 .1 45 20,000 Cgr-C6Ahpbalks (1) 45 4 115U £3 U 85 U 85 U 85 U 30,000 CL,-Cl Aroa (I) 85 U 85 U 5 U 5 U 5U 5U 50 5.000 5U 50 5U 50 5U 3;000 505U 600 Andaxznc SU 5U SU 5o 50 5U 5U 5U 50U 3,000 50 Dmn-a)and- 5U 50 3U 5U 5U SU 3,000 5 U 5U 5 U 5U 3,000 SU 50 30 5U 5U 50 3.000 50 5U Bc-mW)-fMe 50 50 5U 5U0 3,000 50U 5U 5U 5U 3,000 5U 5U 5U 5U 5U 5 U 5U 5U 5U Dibeno(a~h)stbfacw 5U 50 200 FlMoranten 5 U 50 SU 50 s U 5U 5 U 530 3.000 U 50 5 U SU 5U5 50 50U 3.000 lndwo(I<,, )pyx 50 5U 5U 5 u 6,000 5U 50 50 5U 5u50U 50 5U 5 U 5U 50 5 U 3.000 Napehlapc 50 5U 30 5U 5U 5U 5 U 5 U 3.000

1 4,7 UJ r14M rem "s nLaa rum iDaiu US VomIUliU L-J 6.7 UJ 6.8 UJ 43 UJ 7.1 UJ 300 Anfliony 3.4 UJ 4.4 J 3.0 U 4.2 J 7.9 J 4.8 J I1.U J 400 J 14.7 UJ Etmium 76.8 J 3.4 J 341 J 81.6 440 30.000 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 03 1J 0.50 U 0.50 U 50 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 070 U t0 cadmium 0.60 U 0.85 U 2.000 1.1 3 1.0 3 [.03 097 J U 4.0 U It.1 U) 4.5 UJ 4.0 U 4.0 U 100.000 4.0 4.0 U 4,U U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 30 0.14 U 0.14 U 0,13 U U.13 U 0.12 U 1 0.12 U 0.94 3 1.1 J1 4.0 3 2.61 20.3 J 5.6 J 80 Nkkel 9.0 U 9.U U 9.0 U 16.0 J 12.1 I 2.0 U .U U 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.U U 100,.000 Siva 2.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.J U 3.0 U 7 15.U J Vladiwn 1.2 J1 15 U.U U I1.1 J 2,000 70 U0 7.U U IM9 J 15.9 J I'lU 7.0 U 900

B BO0502-01D 0502-4D B0502-02D B0502-03D BO002-OSD BO502-07D VPI4 B0502-0 A B0502-04A BO502-02A BU50243A 0502-05A BU$M2-U7A EPH BOSO52-01C 0502-04C 0502-02C B0502-U3C "0502-05C BUS02-UTC Pnoty FYolutant Metals pl Us ad V 05412z-UIH tUJz44 H05Y2-42 tuL502)38 U102SUZ-s3 10502-078

Page 1 of 1 Table 2-8 Surface Soil Minimum and Maximum Results Areas North of the Raceway - City of Lawrence RTN 3-2691

Wedc e Area North Area Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Analvtes .. m/kQ mA/kI n9L/kg mo0k9

Extractble Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) ..

C-C Ali phatics ND ND 4.3 26

19-C Aliphadcs ND 57 10 270 3-C2 Aromatics 16 460 35 400

Polycyvdlic Aromatic Hydrocarbodns (PAH)N

cenaphthene ND 64 ND 2.9 cenaptylene ND ND ND 0.95 nthracene ND 14 ND 6.9 enzo(a)antacene ND 35 ND 21 oa)pyrne . ND 24 ND 16 )uoranthene ND 35 0.9 27 ,h.i)perylene NO 13 ND 8.0 Benz)tuanene NDO 12 ND 8.9 Chrysene 0.66 38 0.72 20 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.69 22 ND 3.3 luoranthene 1.0 74 1.4 44 luorene ND 6.3 ND 2.4 Indeno(1,2,3-d)pyrene 0.69 22 ND 11 Naphthalene ..... 0.54 2.0 ND 0.8 Phenanthrene 0.66 58 0.96 23 1.0 73 1.3 42 -Methynapthalene ND 1.4 ND 0.64

P1ypchlorinated Biphemvs (PCB)

Arodor 1016 NT NT ND ND jArocor 1221 NT NT ND ND Aoo1232 NT NT ND ND 1242 ND ND ND ND oor1248 ND 18 NO ND oor 1254 ND 2.5 ND 1.8 rodor 1260 ND ND ND 0.47

Metals

Atimony 0.22 1.6 0.64 8.8 rsenic ND 140 7.0 49.1 arium 16 150 20.8 143 eryllium 0.14 1.0 0.33 1.0 hromium 6.8 66 5.8 62.9 admieumn 0.16 2.5 ND 4.2 12 91 ND 70.3 Lead 16 330 13.2 1970 0.073 5.3 0.23 3.3 Nickel 14 130 11.8 100 Selenium ND 0.76 ND 1.8 Ser 0.04 0.33 ND 0.87 Thallium 0.063 1.3 ND 1.08 anadium 20 520 30.7 376 35 390 24.1 274

Tota Asbestos (%) ND 7.0 ND 2.9

ND - Not detected above laboratory quantitation limknit NT - Not tested Table 2-9 Subsurface Soil Minimum and Maximum Results Areas North of the Raceway - City of Lawrence RTN 3-2691

Wed e Area North Area Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

Analytes _mILkg !i mI .l..mOA

Extractable Petrolegm Hydrocarbong (EP.H}_

Ce, Aliphatics ND 15 ND 460 C Mphalics 4.8 82 ND 76 C- Aromatics 35 360 ND 280

Polycyclc Amatic Hydroarbons (PAH,

enaphthene _ ND 6.2 .. ND 4.1 cenaphtylee ND ND ND 1.9 thracene 0.93 11 ND 8.1 enzo(a)anthracene 1.9 29 .ND 14 enzo(a)pyrene 1.8 21 ND 9.2 enzo(b)fluoranthene 2.0 27 ND 16 enzo(g,h,i)peryiene 1.0 14 ND 4.4 enzo(k)uoranthene 1.3 16 ND 5.4 Chrysene 4.4 28 ND 15 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1.9 21 ND 1.8 Fluoranthene 3.7 56 ND 39 Fluorene ND 5.1 ND 3.9 ndeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 1.9 21 ND 6.6 aphthalene 0.59 2.4 ND 1.1 Phenanthrene 2.7 41 ND 38 Pyrene .. 3.6 56 ND 35 -Methyinapthalene ND 1.5 ND 2.0

Polvchloinated Blthenvls (PCB)

roor 1016 NT NT ND ND Aoor 1221 NT NT "ND ND rodor 1232 NT NT ND ND roor 1242 ND 7.0 ND ND rodor1248 ND 15 ND ND Aroctor 1254 ND 16 ND 0.68 oor 1260 ND ND ND 0.042

II Metals

ntimony 0.33 3.8 0.17 2.3 enic4.4 97 2.3 47.4 Barium 29 300 9.8 113 eryllium 0.32 1.0 0.44 1.1 cmium 13 50 10.9 36 Cadmium 0.13 2.3 ND 2.4 30 140 ND 64.1 ead 44 250 2.4 208 ercury 0.11 17 ND 1.4 ickel 16 86 9.4 90.3 eenium ND 0.82 ND 0.54 iver 0.071 0.89 ND 0.33 halium 0.11 1.0 ND 1.2 anadium 27 360 7.7 598 65 560 14.5 429

Asbestos(oaAsbestos (%) ND 8.0 NT NTNTbestos

ND - Not detected above laboratory quanUtation fimit NT - Not tested zzi

0 II

hf! - i.(f.ii

.2e0.

•60 I i fli !

S 2

- m -- m - =-t -A m m m - m m 0

14 Ix

t 'az

m m - m m m m m m mmmm m I

a. oa aS

4@ 24QA en *@

SM M Mm m m ---- mm APPEDIM I II

1 I I

I I

I £ U

II WI i Nev MNUqs $UA SIB ACM .n da ^ 22 20M3 15:57 FR SCILAB BOSTON 781 339 8139 TO 16175892160 P.04/04

/ ! I l I I : I I . ! • a s. , . - .. -\

iA I 1 . 1I1. i i : 1 -11 1 I 7ll1

do Ci

Ii c!- - r .*1* - I,-0 :*i

Cb anwa I i-F- I I I I i I: I I ! I -- *I F 1 :

.i PH4'g i t t . I

-1.r 1 •C s

a,., . . ,Li--1-. > I H A

. - .- L .. , -I p I I :" L ; . I I

** TOTAL PAGE.04 *,* I .- - . .. t-'j04/0

SCILAB BOSTON, INC. 8 SCHOOL STREET Sv LAB WEYMOUTH, MA 02189 TEL: (781) 337-9334 * FAX: (781) 337-7842

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webster Engineering Date Received 08/15/2003 SciLab Job No. 503081303 Corporation Date Examined 08/2112003 P.O.# 608134.0500 -".: Lester Tyrala Page 3 of 3 10 Technology Center Drive RE: 608134.0500; Lawrence - Oxford Paper Mill Stoughton, MA 01721

_?p oft!ing Notes: SA though this sample was prepared, analyzed, and quantifled per EPA Region I Protocol, it should be noted that this protocol states that "tis protocol is not meant be used as a quantitative method'.

Ana'yzed by: John A. Bums :Da* nyz 'VAW.NSD= no asbestos detect : NVA ovsbe asb& .s NA - not anlyzed . S = no analyzed/ post ye s-op; PLM Bulk Asbest Analysis by EPA 8001M4-82-020 per 40 CFR 783 (NVLAP Lab #102079-0); Note: PLM is not conslstenly rele in detecting asbestos n tfoor coverings and similar non-friable organicaly bound materials. TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine if this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos-contaiing in New York State (also see EPA Adviso for floor Ile, FR 59. 146, 38970, 81194). National Institute of Standards and Technology Acore itatlon requirements mandate that this rporxt must not be reproduced except in full without the approval of the laboratory. This PLM report relates ONLY - the items tested. Reviewed By: P.03/05 RUG 22 2003 039:54 FR SC [ILAB BOSTON 781 339 8139 TO 16175892168 SCILAB BOSTON, INC. 8 SCHOOL STREET oc LAB WEYMOUTH. MA 02189 TEL: (7l81) 337-9334 * FAX: (781) 337-7642

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webster Engineering Date Received 08/15/2003 SelLab Job No. 503081303 Co.rporation Date Examined 08/21/2003 P.O.# 608134.0500 A'ta: Lester Tyrala Page 2 of 3 100 Technology Center Drive RE: 608134.0500; J.Lawrence - Oxford Paper Mill Stoughton, MA 01721

-!;ent No. / HGA Lab No. Asbestos Present Total % Asbestos SS-29 503081303-05 Yes <1I% 1< Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soll Asbestos Types: Chrysotile Trace Other Material: Cellulose Trace. Non-fibrous 100. % 1 SS-30 603081303-06 Yes < 1.% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Arnosite Trace, Chtysotile < 1. Other Material: Cellulose Trace, Non-fibrous 100. %

S$-31 503081303-07 Yes 1.5% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Amosite Trace, Chysotile 1.4 % Other Material: Cellulose 5. %, Non-fibrous 93.6 % 1 SS-32 503081303-08 Yes < 1.% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Chrysotile .7 % Other Material: Cellulose 3. %. Non-fibrous 96.3 %

SS-35 503081303-09 Yes <1 1

Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous. Soil Asbestos Types: Chrysotile Trace Other Material: Cellulose 1. %, Non-fibrous 99- % SCILAB BOSTON, INC. 8 SCHOOL STREET $ LAB WEYMOUTFI, MA 02189 TEL: (781) 337-9334 * FAX: (781) 337-7842

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webster Engineering Date Received 08/15/2003 SciLab Job No. 503081303 Corporation Date Examined 08/21/2003 P.O. # 608134.0500 ..:: "ssis- Tyrala Page 1 of 3 - - Nchology Center Drive RE: 608134.0500; Lawrence - Oxford Paper Mill Stoughton, MA 01721

C!irrt No. I HGA Lab No. Asbestos Present Total % Asbestos i SS-24 503081303-01 Yes <1.% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Sol Asbestos Types: Arnosite Trace, Chrysotile Trace Other Material: Cellulose 1. %, Non-fibrous 99.%

I SS-26 503081303-02 Yes < 1.% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area i Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Chrysotile Trace SOther Material: Cellulose Trace, Non-fibrous 100. %

S-27 503081303-03.1 Yes < 1.% 3 Location: Oxford Paper Mil - North Area

Description: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil IAsbestos Types: Chrysotile Trace Other Material: Cellulose Trace, Norn-fibrous 100. %

SSS-27 503081303-03.2 Yes < 1.% * Location: QC for sample SS-27

IDescription: Brown, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Chrysotle Trace Other Material: Cellulose Trace, Non-fibrous 100. %

SS-28 503081303-04 Yes 2.9% Location: Oxford Paper Mill - North Area

Description: Brovn. Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestos Types: Chrysotile 2.9 % Other Material: Cellulose 5. %, Non-fibrous 92.1% CUG 20 2003 15:57 FR SCILAB BOSTON ?81 339 8139 TO 16175892160 P.03/04 i U- Sc ii &1C U J site tI ill 8 Aei I ii Ii

as I ll zz; 814 IDs

a 0. 3 iii An-a ( a 1

a £t

&& I&

mma - a a(ACo c -o c A, 0 0

- -r > F

jC) 2 m

CIOC

al a am

~I @ I >-

awl I~~ a I I - I

* pg

p * * pO tG*/7:'.-4Iorar: a ep FRM SCILA BOSTON I 1617589 168 P. 0&6 | I ! • I J i ! . I ill I I I * !Q)° I II~ . • "I I ! -l.s ._ .I , i

I usa •I • i ! i ~I i i ' ; I 1 .! , I : 4I + i

I , I

I I j j • I . 1 i . : I • " I i .: i , 4 " ! i ! ! ; ! • :* I ! : i i * . ; I i : I !: : I I 1 I i , ' I Ii ii a I T IieII iI

iI I Iii. S!ij

I t I I I ' " I F 0 a *uo w(n -0 ii *U, * w - s ;r.** -o a e 3V * I , * * i . i _ I i . I a a. k'iik * m< c o I i vi K'~&Y i,I I' 'O' 01i Ii 'j

-1- -J .R~c~'rio'I I IiII I I ] I

**-

* I IRIS

! i i-- m. a. m , i i , wa ! N

i : Ii I ' !N J I PL al

! "o em. o I

i i -- [ I T [ 4 Ii I I I I -~-1 e o on

1 * I

I I .01ioz 2-4 ~i F j I r I I I , I I I IX-C 4'I I I * I 1!0 I * I ii.. OS rrr- I- I I I II I I iii II I 13 4k Ii I I j I I I

1 I m~ II ___ I I ' i 3 I J I

II o *i ! HO-12-2002 17:23 FRO SCILAB HOST1IN TO 1617592160 P.84/'06 SCLAB BOSTON, INC. 8 SCHOOL STREET Sci LAB WEYMOUTH, MA 02189 TEL (781) 337-9884 - FAX: (781) 337-7642

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webs Engineering Date Reoeved 10 30/2001 SofLab Job No. 502111153 Dle Examined 11/12/2002 P.O. f 08134.0500 AWL- Jim McCMby Pape 3 of 3 - 100 Technology Center Drive RE: 08134.0500; Lawrence Oxford Mill Stoughton, MA 01721

Client No. I HGA Lab No. Asbms Present Total % Asbestos SS-18 502111153-11 Yes 1A% Lcat Oxord MWs

DearpM o: Broa, H4 neous, Sol STpes: Chsoge 1.4% Other Matra:

SS-20 - 502111153-12 Ye. 1.3 % Latlogn Oxkford Mils

DesciptU. Hterogeneous, Sol Aslbest Types: Arnoee .1 %, Chrysoe 1.1 %, Crocldolite .1 % Otwer Matda:

SS-22 502111153-13 Yes 1.3% Ladat Okord iss

Deamnpom: Browrk, H areneous Sal Astussias t:Arnasfte .1 % Chryoille 1.2%

Reportng Notes: (1) Allhough i ample was prepared. analyzed, d qu ild per EPA Region I Po l I shad be noted tat hi pr wisal that V1hs pol Is not meat to be used as qumwhsve mhod.

kwAalyzed by lotven Gremos - Dale An*zet I && "NADJM - no asbetos de d NA . not anzed NNAPS - not analyzed / potive ap; PLM Bulk Aabeeoe Analyels by EPA 800M442-00 per 40 CFR 763 (NVLAP Lab #10207940); NoWte: PLM Is not cons irniy efllte indeleadig asesi in oor covefrtigs and skar non-f4d omgncoaly bound mateia. TEM s cuanly the only method Ih can be used to deft ine this matedel can be considerd or treated as norwisese-nti In Now York State (also see EPA AdviWsy forfloor tNe. FR 69, 148, 38970, 8/1/94). Naional Institut of Sutandrs and Tehmioloy Aooredlbon requkemnts mandate that this report must not be rproduod exept In u wout e qpnwalv of the lWmoratoy. hs PI report reltes ONLY to the Rems tested. Revtkwed By: SCILAB BOSTON, INC 8 SCHXL STREET Sci LAB WEYMOUTH, MA 0289 TEL (751) 337-9334 - FAx (781) 337-7842

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webster Engineering Date ReceIved 10/30/2001 SciLab Job No. 502111153 Corporamtion Date Examined 11/12/2002 P.O.# 08134.0500 Attn: Jimrn McComiskey Page 2 of 3 100 Technology Center Drive RE: 08134.0500; Lawrence Oxford Mll Stoughton, MA 01721

Cfent No.I HGA Lab No. Asbestos Present Total % Asbestos SS-10 502111153-06 Yes 1.3 1.3%% Location: Oxlord UMs

Descripton: Brownm% Heterogeneousm, Sol Asbasho Typ: Chrysotile 1.3 % Other Mstml-:

SS-14 502111153-07 Yes < 1.% Location: Oxford Mi

Description: Bmwn,H Sol Asbestos Type: Amnoeit < 1. Other MSeah:

SS-15 502111153-08 Yes < 1.% Location: Oxkord Mills

Description: OI-Whha Hetegeneou, So Aensos Types: Civysotle < 1. e MaMeril: 0 --- 16 502111153-09 Yes 1.3% Location: Oxford Ms

Dsarpton: Off-Whie Herogenocus Soil AsbItos Type: Ciwysotle 1.3% othMaterial:

SSS-17 502111153-10 Yes <1.% Locadon: Oxfowd Mis

DesctiUon: Onf-White, Heterogeneous, Soil Asbestme Typer. Chrysotle < 1. Other Materilw: 3--.. , NI-12-22 17:23 FIRU SCILUB ESTUN TO 16175892168 P.62/06 SCIAB BOSTON, INC. SSCHOOL STREET SCI LAB WEYMOUTH. MA 02189 TEL (781) 337-9334 * FAX' (781) 337-7842

PLM Bulk Asbestos Report

Stone & Webster Engineering Dalte Received 10/32001 ScILab Job No. 502111153 Corporaion Date Examined 11/12/2002 P.O. # 08134.0600 Attn: Jim McComiskey Page 1 of 3 100 Technology Center ODrive RE: 08134.0500; Lawrence Oxford MiH -Stoughton, MA 01721

Climnt No. I HGA Lab No. Asbetko Pesent Total % Asbeds I SS- 502111153-01 Yes < 1.A Locaon: Oxftord S

Decpou Brown. Hterogeneous So Asbestos Typ.: Cwhrysotlie <1. OUwer Mateil: 1 SS-4 502111153-02 Yes 1.3% Locatilnu Oxford Ms

Descdpuan: Brown, Heterogeneous, Sol Asbautom Typee: Amoelt .1%. ChrysaUe 1.1%, Crockdoite .1% Othwer MIild:

SS-6 502111153-03 Yes 1.2 % Location: Oxford Mis

Dew pton: Brown, Hotemgenn s. Sol Asbestoo Tpw: ChtYate 12% Other Mateial:

- 88-7 602111153-04 Yes 1.8% Locaion.-Oxford Mts

Descidpa: Brown, Heterogeneous, Sol Asbestos Types: Anosut .1 %. Ctysotile 1.7 % Other Nftl:

-8- 502111153-05 Yes <1.% Location: Oxford Mille

Description: Brown, Heterogeneaus. So Asbestos Types: Chrysotie < 1. Otherw Mauerhl: U) A3 tp c

Qa oft. r I ISE a,

C. -. ." '. i-4

Z;:i CR

so %i

-i0 00 - Cs

Zn.- o -. 8- 2.48 0> oSw.g> ag1F Sg .

~I C. rt a-

0 CD ***n - a ~2 I ;0% .@*u2 <* 4< *< 2: 2: Z 4< Z Z Z44 4

I tU 66 I I I I I I I I I I I -S 0 i -a-

1 ^ I I I I I I I 1 ) a i l ! 1 1 1 i

o C 04 0cn.. o o 0 0 0 0

as S - - o - a 'Jc Gn --- - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 La .3 - o0 c oa0 3 C (v A t w IQ .- -I

rU0 ftj-4 O' 44

t i l ii ; i l t 1 i

: ! i : . ... .

l l i lI l l i-l

flfl> (0 0> 0 w =9 x -r 5m -a- (g- Ii44o8 48 AlC.. A8C

Z Z Z ZZ Z ZZ Z ZZ > tzzz

C. ilI

I U I U U I I

I UI

I Woods Hole Group AC-d (.16 isz .W Environmental Laboratories - (V

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Preoared for: .Metcalf & Eddy 30 Harvard Mill Square Wakefield, MA 01880-5371

Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Report Date: June 04, 2002

Certifications and Accreditations Massachusetts MA30 Connecticut PH-0141 New Hampshire 220600B 4 Rhode Island 64 New Jersey 59015 Maine MA030 New York 11627 Loutsana 03090 Army Corps of Engineers Department of the Navy

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from the laboratory.

375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp com

1/171 CASE NARRATIVE Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories

ETR: 0205050 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA

All analyses were performed according to Woods Hole Group's documented Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs within holding time and with appropriate quality control measures except where noted. Blank correction of results isnot performed in the laboratory for any parameter. Soil/sediment samples an reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted.

E rweblet Petroleum Hydrcerbns by GC/FD

I. The laboratory control sample (LCS ESOS16L3 had a low recovery of 37% for the compound Naphthalene, which isbelow the 40% QC acceptance limit. Additionally, this LCS bad a recovery of 25% for the non-target compound n-Nonane (C9) and a recovery of 38% for the non-target compound n-Decane (C10), however, the C9-C18 Aliphatic range had a recovery of 64%, which is within QC acceptance limits. The matrix spike for sample 10D (0205050-08) had acceptable recoveries for these compmunds indicating that the problem was confined to the laboratory control sample.

2. The Aromatic fraction for samples 6S (0205050-02) and 4D (020505-04) required 1:2 dilutions for all compounds to be within the calibration range of the instrument

3. The matrix spike for sample 10D (0205050-08) had recoveries above the 140% QC acceptance limits for the compounds Fluoranthene (163%) and Pyrene (168%). This may be due to matrix interference or sample heterogeneity.

Totat Metals

Samples associated with this data package were digested according to Method 3050 and analyzed by ICP/MS (Method 6020) for antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadimn and zinc. A separate Method 3050 digestion, with the addition of hydrochloric acid, was used for the preparation of samples analyzed for antimony and silver. Mercury was determined by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy according to Method 7471.

Sample 10D (Lab ID 0205050-08) was digested and analyzed in duplicate with a matrix spike. All QC measures were within acceptance criteria except for the following:

Antimony-. The matrix spike recovery was 24%, which does not meet quality control criteria of 75%7-125%. This may be due to sample matrix interference. All results are flagged (N) to indicate this QC failure. The laboratory control sample was within the vendor's acceptance limits. The recovery of a post-digest spike was 98/%.

Arsenic: The RPD between duplicates was 89% and exceeds the method acceptance criteria of 20%. This may be due to sample non-homogencity. All results are flagged () to indicate this QC failure.

F:REPOR7WAIRRTEMPWEEDDIO20505dt

Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratormer 375 Paanomunt Drive, Suite 2, Raynlhrax MA 02767-5150 Ph 508-822-9300

2117 TCLP Mefals - -

Samples associated with this data package were extracted by Method 1311 ( LP). The extract was digested according to Method 3010 and analyzedby ICP AES (Method 6010) for arsenic, barium, cadmium chromiumn, lead, selenium and silver. The TCLP extr-act was analyzed for mercury by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy according to Method 7471.

Samples 4S (Lab ID 0205050-01), 8D (Lab ID 0205050-06) and SS (Lab ID 0205050-03) were analyzed by IC MS (Method 6020) due to matrix interference effects on the 6010B analysis resulting in elevated reporting limits.

Sample O10D(Lab ID 0205050-08) was digested and analyzed in duplicate with a matrix spike. All QC measures were within acceptance criteria.

The enclosed results of analyses are representative of the samples as received by the laboratory. Woods Hole Group makes no representations or certifications as to the method of sample collection, sample identification, or transporting& dg procedures used prior to the receipt of samples by Woods Hole Group. To the best of my knowledge, the information coutained in this report is accurate and complete.

Approved by:. - A Date: - Woods Hole Group tal Laboratories

F:RtEPOR7WARRTEWtMETEDO200St I Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboraories 375 Parumuount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, MA 02767-5150 Ph: 508-822-9300 3/II -- Surrogate Recovery Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIFID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: NIA Matrix: Soil is m~v

CUt ID Lab ID 5-alpha Audrestane orthe-Terphenyl Biphesyl 2-Fluorebpheyl 4S 02050-01 98 72 86 84 6S 0205050-02 79 56 94 85 88 0205050-03 78 64 83 82 4D o0205050-04 90 66 91 83 88 6D 0205050-05 67 42 81I 8D 0205050-06 97 60 87 82 10S 0205050-07 83 58 85 83 10D 0205050-08 94 73 85 83 12S 0205050-09 109 80 86 85 12D 0205050-10 100 71 92 89 88 KIOD 0205050-11 108 75 90 81 14S 0205050-12 82 49 89 1 - 0205050-13 83 62 88 84 10D 0205054M8 DUP 101 75 88 87 10D 0205504 MS 121 77 89 87 Fractoatio Ceck S utioFCS0520-t1 131 86 81 83 Method Blak ES0516B3 95 72 90 89 Laboratory Conl Sample ES0516L3 106 69 l7 86

N/A -Not Applicable QC Limits 5-pha Andsanem 40-140 or-Terphenyl 40-140 Biphenyl 40-140 2-Floobipl 40-140

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Far(508) 822-3288, [email protected] 5117' LaDoratory tuuLitus pAasnpc Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 IsVIsL XWa a Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205056 &Flq Case: N/A SDG: N/A Lab ID: ESSI05161E3 Client ID: Laboratory Control Sample Associated Blank ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: anlK

V Recove~y % Recovery Parameter Cone. % Recovery uia C,-Cn. Aiphaca' 19000 64 40-140 C,.-C, ARphics ' 39000 97 40-140 Naphthalone 1900 37" 40-140 2-Methylapthakene 2300 45 40-140 Acenaphthykae 2600 53 40-140 Acenaphtbeae 2700 54 40-140 Florne 3100 63 40-140 Phenandsan 3500 69 40-140 Antinace 3500 70 40-140 3600 72 40-140 Pyene IM~dWe 3600 72 40-140 3500 69 .40-140 BEMMntene 3800 76 40-140 3500 70 40-140 -4~afl 'nthae 3600 73 . 40-140

se Benzo(apyrene) oora 3500 70 Indeno(1y.3-c rymne 6900 69 40-140 40-140 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene' 6900 69 40-140 Blenzoe i prwlene 68 , 3400 ,

S= Range concentration excludes the concentration of any sunqrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. - Values reported reflect their sumn. Acc tface 0- Value outside of QC Limits- Extraction SiMoae Range (%) N/A - Not Applicable 5-alpha Andrstane 106 40-140 ortho-Tarphenmyl 69 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140

Concentrations reported as calculated values, which includes rounding fo0i significant figures. Percent recoveries and RPD values are calculated from the unrounded result. essm2a ,_ 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham. Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 61 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Dy GIU/PW

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 ETRI 0205050 -- - Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA Lab ID: 0205050-08 Case:- NIA SDG: NIA Client ID: lD Associated Blanik ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: ge/K

Date Collected Date Received Date Extracted Percent Solid Analyst 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 81.4 MLB

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample Result Duplicate Result RPD RPD Limit N/A 50 C,, Aliphatics 3600 U 3600 U C,,-C, Aliphatics ' 16000 14000 14 50 ' C,,-C Aromatics . 33000 35000 5 50 Unadjusted C,,-C , Aromatics' 49000 58000 17 50

Targeted PAH Analytes Sample Result Duplicate Result RPD RPD Limit 600 U 590 U N/A 5O 2-Methyloaphthalene 60D U 590 U N/A 50 .t....h 600U 590 U N/A 50 AcenaphtUese 600U 590 U N/A 50 600U 590 U N/A 50 rH drwne 2000 2700 28 50 Andncmee 630 930 38 50 Fln anns 2700 3700 31 50 oor 2600 3600 31 50 BMao(aa)nthacene 1400 1900 30 50 1900 2500 27 50 1500 2000 28 50 1000 1300 25 50 Benzo( )urmene 1400 1800 27 50 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)prene ' 1600 1900 19 50 Dtbenzo(a.h)ant acene 1600 190e 19 50 BenzozJ,ipeylene __v820 1000o 20 50

=Range concentration excludes the concentration of my srogatc(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. SCl I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocabons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. '-Values reported reflect their sum

Acceptance Range (%) Extraf Smegate % Recovery U -The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample 5-apha And&stane 101 40-140 /ci levelppo d. orftho-Terphenyl 75 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable Fractionatim Surrogate Bipbmenyl 8S 40-140 2-Fiuorobiphenyl 87 40-140

Concentrations reported as calculated values, which includes rouudig for significant figures. RPD values are reported based on the unrounded calculated result. orfM21 375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 7/171 Matrix spiKe Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETm 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Lab ID: See Below 5i--- - Client ID: 10D Associated Blanit ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: au/K

Lab ID: 0205050-08 0205050-08 S pe Matrix Spike % Recovery Parameter Cone. Cone. % Recovery Liits Naphtbaleae 600 U 4200 69 40-140 2-Methylnaphthalenc 600 U 4400 74 40-140 Acenaphthvle 600 U 4600 76 40-140 Acenaphthea 600 U 4800 80 40-140 Fluorene 600 U 5000 83 -40-140 Phenanthrne 2000 8200 102 40-140 Anthracenc 630 5900 88 40-140 Fluorantiene 2700 13000 163 40-140 PyrMe 2600 13000 168 40-140 Benzo(a)anthracene 1400 8600 121 40-140 Chrsen" 1900 9400 126 40-140 Benzo(b)fluornthene 1500 8400 114 40-140 Benzork)flommnthee 1000 7300 105 40-140 Benzo(a)py e 1400 8000 111 40-140 lndeno(12,3-cd)prne 1600 11000 82 40-140 Dibenzo(a,h)amthraccn ' 1600 11000 82 40-140 Benzo(hi)perylene 820 6000 86 40-140 n-Nomne (C9) 600 U 3600 61 40-140 n-Decane (C10) 600 U 4600 77 40-140 n-Dodecanc (C12) 600 U 5500 92 40-140 n-Tetradecane (C14) 600 U 6400 107 40-140 n-Hexadecane (C16) 600 U 7200 120 40-140 n-Octedca c (CS)N 600 U 7600 127 40-140 n-Nonadecano (C19) 600 U 7500 125 40-140 n-Eicone (C20) 600 U 7700 128 40-140 n-Docoosan (C22) 600 U 7500 126 40-140 n-Tetracosne (C24) 600 U 7300 121 40-140 n-Hexacsam e (C26) 600 U 6700 112 40-140 n-Octacwane(C28) 600 U 6000 100 40-140 n-Triacontane (C30) 600 U 5300 89 40-140 n-Hexatriacontane (06) 600 U 4200 71 40-140

S- Range concentration excludes dtheconcentration of any surrogate(s) and/or internal stanmdards eluting in that range. - Values rwoned reflect their sua Accepace * - Value outside of QC Limits. Extraction Sumgate %Recovery Rainge (%) U - The andyte was analyzed for but not detected at the smple 5-alpha Adrestane 121 40-140 specific level repoed. onrho-Tephenyl 77 40-140 I N/A -Not Applicable Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 404140 1|i

Concentrations reported as calculated values, which includes rounding for significant figures. Percent recoveries and RPD values are calculated from the unrounded result am 21:.21 IU 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288 [email protected] 8 8 - Method Blank Summary r Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Case: NIA SDG: NIA Lab ID: ES0516B3 Date Analyzed: 05/21/02 19:35

Clieat ID Iab ID Datedrime Analyzed Laboratory Conto Sampe ESOS16L3 05/21/02 20:01 4S 0205050-01 05/21/02 23:55 8S 0205050-03 05f22/D2 00-48 6D 0205050-05 05/22/02 02:58 8D 0205050-06 05/22/02 03:25 10S 02050507 0522/02 03:5 I 10D 0205050-08 05/22/02 04:17 10D 0205050-O8 DUP 05/22/0204:43 10D 0205050-08 MS 05/22/02 05:09 12S 0205050-09 05/22/02 0535 12D 0205050-10 05/22/02 06:01 KIOD 0205050-11 05/22/02 06:28 14S 0205050-12 05/22/02 06:54 14D 0205050-13 05/22/02 07:20 6S 0205050-02 05/22/02 1810 4D 0205050-4 05/22/02 18:46

N/A - Not Applicable

@l==Z 21:21 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham. Massachusetm 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 9/17 'A)LL* dutauIls A Lex" sus z .aa -- . - - v- .4 -

Client: Metcalf &SEddy Lab Code- M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR' 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: NIA Lab ID: f205M4-1 Client ID: 4S Associated Blat ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pjgfKg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyze Volume (ml; Factor Analyst A1omatic 05/21/02 1 1 MLB 05/13/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 79.8 Alishatic 05/21/02 I I MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPII) Result C,-C,, Aliphatics 3700 U C,,-C, Aliphatics' 5200 11 C,,-C Aromatics '. 240000 Unadjusted C,,-C4 Aromatics ' 420000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphthaline 620 2-Mcthylaa ee 620 U Acenaphthylene 620 U Acenaphthene 1600 Fluorene 1600

Phenanthrene 17000 Anthracene 4100 Fluorantbene 30000 Pymn 30000 Benzo(a)anthracev 16000 Chrysen 13000 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 17000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 9000 Benzo(a)pyrene 14000 ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 13000 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 13000 Benzo(ghiperylene 8500

S= Range concentration excludes the concentration of anysurrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2 = Cl I-C22 Armnatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytest S= Values reported reflect their sum.

Acceptance U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Srrogate %Recovery Range M%) specific level reported. 5-alpha Andrestanc 98 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable ortho-Terphenyl 72 40-140 Fractionation Surogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140

0 5.2 J2Z 21 : 03 375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2. Raynham. Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288 whale~whgrp corn 10/1 1 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIFID _i-f.

Client: Metcalf & Eddy fb Code: M-MA30 'g S Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA LIR: 0205050 I Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205050-02 Client ID: 65 Associated Blank: ES516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg I Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzd Volume (m) Fictor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 I 2 MLB 05/13/02 05/15/02/ 05/16/02 80.1 10.25 Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPHI) Result

C,-CS Amphatics ' 3700 U C,,-C, Aroatics 57000 C,,-Cz, Aromatics '*460000 Unadjusted C,3 -C, Aromatics 870000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphthalene 2000 2-Methylnaphthalene 1400 Acenaphthykne 1200 U Accoaphthene 6400 Fluorene 6300 Phenanthrene .. 58000 Anthracene 14000 Fluorantbene 74000 Pyren 73000 Bcnzo(a)antlracenc 35000 Chrysene 38000 Benzo(b)fluoranthmene 35000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 12000 Benzo(a)pyrene 24000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene'. 22000 Dibevnzo(a,h)anthracnc' 22000 Benzo(g,h,i)pCrylene 13000

SRange concentratio excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2= C I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. = Values reported reflect their sum.

Acceptance U -The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Surrogate %Recovery Range () specific level reported. 5-alpha Andmosane 79 40-140 NIA - Not Applicable ortho-Terphenyl 56 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Bipheyl 94 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 85 40-140

esl2292 21 pa 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachuserts 02767. (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 11/171 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons oy Aulr MU

Client: Metcalf 4Eddy SLab Code- M-MAO30 PMect: Oxford lper, Lawrence, MA ETL 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: NIA Lab ID: 02il505-03 e#fnr Client ID: SS Associated Blank ESOS16B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Colec1d ,Received Extracted Solid Amount(g SFraction Analyzed Volume (m Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 I MLB 05/13/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 69.9 10.15 Alphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarboms(EPB) Result C_.-C_. Alinhatics ' 4200 Utn. -711 CC, Aliphbatics' 9000 C-Cn Aromatics * 51000 Unadjusted C,,-C, Aromatics' 83000

Target PAl Analytes Result

Naphthalene 700 U 2-Methyinaphthalene 700 U Acenaphthylene 700 U Acenaphthene 700 U Floorene t 700 U

Phenanthrene • --3400 - Anthracene 1000 Floorathene 5600 Pyrw 5500 Benzo(a)anthrcene 2900 Chryseo 3100 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2300 Benzo(kflantbene 2300 Benzo(a)pyrene 2400 nde 3-cd)pyrene 3 2300 Dibezo(a,h)antacene 2300 Benz(ghi)perylene 1400

'= Range concentration excludes the concentration of many surrogate(s) and/or internal standards etluting in that range. =i CI -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAHl Analyes. = Values reported reflect their sun.

Accep (e U - The analye was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Emxaction Surrogate AMP % Recovery spectific kvd reportied S-alpha Andmrostanc 78 40-140 NIA - Not Applicable orflo-Tcrphyl 64 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140

nz2M 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2. Raynham. Massachusetts 02767 (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 121171 I rlractaDie retroleum nyurocaa usan u ,w xx,

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30

1 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 0205050 Lab ID: ia05050-04 C Case: NIA SDG: N/A. IDt Client ID: 4D Associated Blank: ESO516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/K Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount ( Fraction Ane Voumne (ml) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 2 MLB 05/13/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 79.5 10.00 Aoac Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarboas (EPH) Result C,-Cs Aliphatics ' 3800 U C,fC Aliphatics 34000 4 0T- C, -Cz Aromatics L. 360000 Unadjusted C,,-C2 Arornatics' 700000

Target PAIl Analytes Result

Naphthalene 2400,1 2-Methylnaphthalene 1500 Acenaphthylene 1300 U Acenaphthene 6200 Floorne 5100 Phenantbrene 41000 Anthracene 11000 Fluorantbene 56000 Pyne 56000 Benzo(a)anthracene 29000 Chrysene 28000 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 27000 Benzo(k)fluorantbene 16000 Benzo(a)pyrenc 21000 Indeno(l l-fyneM - 21000 Dibenzo(ah)nthracene' 21000 Bcnzo(gh,i)prykne 14000

'It

' = Range concentration excludes the concentration of any surMnogate(s) andfor internal standards eluting in that range. 2 - Cl 1-022 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. S= Values reported reflect their sum

Acceptance U - The anablyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) spe -vNd repo d. 5-alpha Andrestane 90 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable orho-Tespboyl 66 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Flturobiphenyt 40-140

OS2Fi 21:19 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham,. Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 13/171 Extractable Iretroleum nyorocat uiu, uy n,w. ,

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAI30

Is. am v a Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETRt 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: NIA Lab ID): 205050-05 Client ID: 6D Associated Blank: ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: Date Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Volume (mP Factor Analyst -4 -i Analyzd Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 ML 05/13/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 74.6 10.08 Aromatic 11 Aliphatic 05/221/02 1 1 MLB , Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) Result I C,-C,, Aliphatics ' 4000 U ?A C,,-C,, Aiphatics ' 82000 aq,-C Arom Aics2 320000 Unadjusted C,,-C,, Aromatics' 590000

Target PAIR Analytes Result Nqa ac 1300 / 2-Methyloaphtbalene 980 Acenaphthylene 660 U Acenaphthene 5100 Fluorene 4500 Phenanthrene 38000 Anthracene 9200 Fluorahe 44000 Pyrene 440** Benzo(a)anthracene 21000 Chrysene 240o00 Benzo(b)fIo thene 23 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 800 Bcnzo(a)pyrene 16000 Indeno(123-cd)pyce 16000 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 16000 Benzog~h~i)perylene 10000

'Range concentration excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. = Cl 1-22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Anlytes. = Values reported reflect their sum- mi

Acceptance U - The analyte was anlyzed for but not detected at the sample Extractiom Surrogsate % Recovey Ranme %) swecific kMl eported. 5-alpha Andremsme 67 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable obtho-Teqpbemyl 42 40-140 Fractionation Sunogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Ftuomrobiphenyl 40-140

0rm22 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 14/10

1 jrr Extractanle retroleum nyurocat uoa uyvJ Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 I 'I Project Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 0205050 Lab ID: 0~05050-86 Case. NIA SDG: NIA Client ID: 8D Associated Blank: ES0516B3 Matrix: Soi Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (mi) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB 05/15/02 05/16102- 72.5 10.39 Aromatic Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB I Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) Result I C,-C, Aliphatics ' 15000 -,I fr- 03 ,-C., Aromatics 250000

Unadjusted C,-C Aromatics ' 430000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphtbakne 1300 2-Methyluaphthalene 790 Acenaphtylene 660 U Acenaphthene 1000 Fluorene 840 Phenanthrene 20000 Anthacene 4300 Fluorantune 28000 Pyrene 29000 Benzo(a)anthracene 17000 Clayscue 18000 Benzo(b)fluomranwne 22000 Benzo(k)floranthne 5500 Bezo(a)pyrene 13000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrne 12000 Dibenzo(a,h)anracene 12000 Benzo(gJi)perylene 7400

= Rage concentration excludes the concentration of any umogate(s) andor internal standards eluting in that range. 2 = CII-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAll Analytes. S= Values reported reflect their sum

Acceptance U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Surrogate % Recovery leange (%) specific level reported. 5-aha Andostae 97 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable ortho-Tepbenyl 60 40-140 Fractination Suwrogate Bi2-pFuobiphenyl 40-140 2-Floorobiphcayl 40-140

0522/1 21:19 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachuseuts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 15/171 rs~a.a fl%,S~n -- a

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 0205050 Fl.a Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205050-07 Client ID: lOS Associate Blak ESOSI 6B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (ml Factor Anlyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 84.4 10.20 Awac Aiphatic 05/22/02 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) Result C,-C, Aliphatics ' 3500 U C-C,, Aliphatics 4300 11f- C,,-C. Aromatics u 74000

Unadjusted C.,-C n Aromatics' 110000

Target PAB Analytes Result Nahhalene 580 U " 2-Methylnaphthalene 580 U Acenaphthylene 580 U Acenaphthene 700 Fluorene 650 Phenanthrene 4400 Anthracene 1300 Flooranthese 6300 Pyrene 6200 Benzo(a)anthracee 27100 Chrysene 3100 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2700 Benzo(k)fluorauthene 2100 Benzo(a)pyrene 2600 ladeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrenen 3l'2500 2500 Dibenoa,h)anthracene 3 2500 Bezo(gh:)pcrylene 1500

SRange concentation exchudes the concentration of amy mrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. = CI I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. = Values reported reflect their surm

AccePtance U -The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the samnple Extraction Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) specific level reponed. Androstanc 5-alpha 83 40-140 N/A -Not Applicable otho-Tepbzy 58 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 85 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 83 40-140

O,5 2:19 ai 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508)822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 1611A - ... Quality Control Results Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 0205050 a Lab ID: 0205050-08 DUP Case: NIA SDG: NIA Client ID: 10D Associated Blanit FS0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units; P/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analzed Vohame (ml) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 I I MLB 05/15102 05/16/02 81.4 10.33 05/ 05/14/02 Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPiiH) Result C,-C, Aiphatics ' 3600 U '2' CWC, Aliphatics '14000 C,,-C, Aromatics * 35000 Unadjusted C,,-C, Aromnatics ' 58000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphthaklene 590 U " 2-Methyloapthalene 590 U Acenaphthylene 590 U Acenaphlithene 590 U Fluorene 590 U Phenandmne 2700 C Anthracene 930 FlioUanthene 3700 PyrnC 3600 Benzo(a)athracene 1900 " Chrysene 25so0 f Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2oo000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 " Benzo(a)pyrene 1800 5 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 1900 Dibeno(a,h)antlancene 190 Benzo(gh,i)perylene 1000

- Range concentration excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. S= CII -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. =-Values reported reflect their sumn

Acceptance U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) specific level reported. 5-alphia Androstanc 101 40-140 WNA - Not Applicable ordho-Terphlnyl 75 40-140 Fractionation Surroge Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140

USZ22WZ21I

11"..12 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 18/171 IatcUlaIC X CLu VItUllI! AAJUA ulOA EUsi "j "Ia,# Atp

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 .-- Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205150-08 Client ID: 10D Associated Blank: ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: ptaKg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (mr) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 81.4 1012 _oai 05222N L Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 Ie M SExtractable Petroleum Hydrocurbons (EH) Result / i ° " ° "-C, Aliphatics' 3600 U 117 C,,- Aliphatics ' 16000 C,-C, o 33000 Unad -C. Aromatics 49000

Target PAM t

Na phtalene 600 U 2-Methylnaphthalene 600 U Acenaphthylene 600 U Acenaphthene 600 U Fluorene 600 U Phenantbrene 2000 Anthracene 630 Fluoranthene 2700 Pyre=e 2600 Benzo(a)anthrlncene 1400 Chrysene 1900 Benzo(b)fluoran Benzo(k)flue e 10 BenzO(a 1400 I ,3-cd)pyrene' 1600 Di ah)anthracene' 1600 8,hi)perylene 820

S= Range concentration excludes the concentration of many srrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. = CI -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the conetration of Target PAN Analytes. = Values reported reflect their sum.

Acceptance U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Sunmogate % Recovery Rage (%) speci levd rcated. 5-alp Andrstane 94 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable ortho-Terphenyl 73 40-140 Fractionatiom Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fhorobiphenyl 40-140

ISD2= 21:19 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Far(508) 822-3288, [email protected] 171171 m I Ixtrartable retroleum nyorocaruouns vy .nru li Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 ,YioS Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Lab ID: -0205050-11 Client )D: KIOD Associated Blank: ES016B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Vohlune (mI Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 I I MLB I 05/22/02 1 1 I 05/14/02 05/15102 05/16/02 81.5 10.25 roatic Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB -E Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EP) Result 4-C,, Aliphatics ' 3600 U bjI C,.-C, Aliphatics ' 4800 U" C,,-C. Aromnatics a 60000- Unadjusted C,,-C-. Aromatics 1100e0

Target PAlI Analytes Result Napht ne 600 U 2-Methylnaphthalee 600 U Acenaphthylene 600 U Acenaphthene 780 Fluorene 800 Phenanthr e 5800 Anthracene 1900 1 Fluoranthee .7900 Pyrenme 7500 Benzo(a)anthracene 4300 J Chrysene o 4400 r Benzo(k)fluoranthene 4500 enzo )floranthene Benzo(a)pyrene 3500 Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene'. 3300 Dibezo(ah)anthracene 3300 J Benzo(gh)pesylene 2200 4

' = Range concentration excludes the concentration of my surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. C=CI -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAll Analytes S- Values reported rflect their sun.

.Accptamce Range (%) U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the swaple Extractim Sunogate % Recovery specif leved repxtd 5-lpa Andsamane 108 40-140 WNA - Not Applicable ortho-Tcprhnyl 75 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham. Massachxruses 02767, (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 21 117 I Aitl aiLcLUVIC r-cLI UICHHIS IIyuUCUIHUUH U y LIsIr IL

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205050-49 60iiO Client ID: 12S Associated Blank ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Colected Received Extracted Solid Amount ( ) Fraction Analyzed Volume (mi) Factor Aromatic 05/22/02 1 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 91.0 10.12 1 MLB Alatic 05/22/02 I I MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon s (EPH) Result C,-C,, Aliphatics ' 3300 U C,-CV, Aliphatics ' 4300 U -6 C,,-C. Aromatics 16000 Unadjusted C, -C2 Aromatics' 20000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphthalene 540 U 2-Methylnaphthalene 540 U Acenaphthylene 540 U A540 U Acenaphthene 540 U Fluorene 540 U Phenanthrene 660 Anthncese 540 U Fluoranthene 1000 Pyrene 1000 Beazo(a)anthracene 540 U Chrysene 660 Benzo(b)flumoranthene 540 U Benzo(k)fluoranthene 540 U Benzo(a)pyne 540 U Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyre e 69 Dibeo(alh)auacene 3 690 Bezo(g&h)peryene 540 U

SRange concentration excludes the concentration of any m gate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range, = Cl I-22 Asomatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAHi Analytes. '= Values reported reflec their sun.

Accqeance U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Surrogare %Recovery Range {%} specific level reported. 5-alpha Andmstane 109 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable oubo-Trphenyl 80 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Bibenyl 86 40-140 I 2-Fluorobiphenyl 85 40-140

05"Z21 21:19 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetr 02767, (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrpcom 19/171 Extractamle reroleuui nyuli uti uasa y ",%, &-a-"

S Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 55i? Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205050-10 Client ID: 12D Associated Blank: ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution I Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Voltume (ml) Factor Aalyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 88.0 10.14 Alihatic 05/22/02 1 1 MILB Aliphatitc OS0/2V02 I 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) Result C-C ,,Alipatics ' 3400 U C,,-C,6 Aliphatics' 11000 C,-Cn Amantics 2 90000 Unadjusted CC Aromaticsa' 160000

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphthalene 690 2-Methyloaphthalene 560 U Acenaphthylene 560 U AceWhthenie 1200 F ne 1200 Phenanthrene 8000 Antncene 2400 FiKrn e 12000 pyrene 12* Beazo(a)antncee 5400 Chrsene 5700 Benzo(b)fluorantheae 5700 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2800 Benzo(a)pyrene 4700 Indeno(l,2, 3-cd)pyrene' 4400 Diben(a,)antrene 4400 Benzo(g,kiperylene 3000

'= Range cocentration excludes the concentratiom of any sunrrogate(s) andfor internal standards cluting in that range. = CI I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. = Values reported reflect their sum.L

Acceptamc for but not detected at the sample Rne(%) U - The analyte was analyzed Extraction Surrogate % Recovery specific level reported. 5-alpha Andrstame 100 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable ostho-Terphenyl 71 40-140 Fractiouion SmMurrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyli 40-140 i 03fl2@, 21:19

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp 2.com 20/P1 U nz,aa taiusc x cII ucusIs Xyua UcaI nUIJb y 'Lt.i/NIl

I ru S Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 i Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 1. Case. N/A SDG: NIA Lab ID: 0205050-12 Client ID: 14S Associated Blank ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pJKg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (m) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 I IML 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 83.6 10.08 Armat 052202 1 1 L Alihatic 05/22/02 1 I MLB I Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbos (EPlI) Result CU-C, Aliphades 3600 U C,,-C, Aliphatics ' 12000 I C,,-C, Aromatics u 260000 Unadjusted C,,-Cn Aromatics' 470000

Target PAR Analytes Result

Naphthalene 2000 2-MethyhIpltalene 1100 Acenaphthylene 590 U Acenaphthene 4200 Floorene 4600 Phenanthrene 32000 Anthracene 7800 Flucanthne 33000 Pyrene 33000 BCD2D(a)anthraCeB 16000 Chrysene 16000 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 17000 Benzo(k)fluorantbene 6500 Benzo(a)pyrene 13000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 11000 Dibeno)antracene 11000 Benzo(gJv)perylne 7200

SRange concentraion excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) and/or intaernal standards eluting in that range. - CI 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentraiom of Target PAH Analytes. = Values reported reflect their sumn.

Acceta(%)nce U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Enxtraction. S U e % Recovery specific level reprted. 5-alpha Aadrstane 82 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable orho-Terphenyl 49 40-140 Fractionation srogaMte Bipbenyl 89 40-140 2-Flooabiphenyl 81 40-140

eZMfl 21:19 375 Paramount Drive,Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrpcom 22/171 rA.ts d'tMUzcq ak r-tsa uita USAjY&J .l flja -- _

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Case:- NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205050-13 .6__V Client ID: 14D Associated Blankc ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pg/Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (ml) Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB 05/14/02 05115/02 05/16/02 85.1 10-.11 A atic Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPII) ±Result C,-C, Aliphatics 3500 U C,,C Aliphatics ' 35000 1 1-1 ' C1 -Cn Aromatics u 97000 Unadjsted C.-C~, Aromatics ' 170000

Target PAH Analytes Result Naphthalene 800 2-Methyhphthalene 580 U Acenaphthylene 580 U Acenaphthenc 1500 Floorene 1500 Phenanthrene 9900 Anthracene 2900 Fluomanthee 13000 Pyrene 120M* Benzo(a)anthrace 5700 Chrysene 5700 Bemzo(b)fluoranthene 5300 Benzo(k)floranthene 2900 Benzo(a)pyrene 4700 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreve 4100 Dibenzo(a,h)antracene' 4100 Benzo(hjijp)prylne 2700

= Range concentration excludes the concentration of any sunogate(s) and/or internal standards cluting in that range. 2 CI I-C2 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAIl Analytes. SValues reported reflect their sum

AAccepta ~ oce) U - The mnalyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Exumactim Surrogate % Recovery specific level reported. 5-alpha Andrsane 83 40-140 IA - Not Applicable ortho-Tesnyl 62 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Bipheay 40-140 2-Fluorobipbenyl 40-140

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (50) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 23/~ I -- Quality Control Results Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 Project Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETm OZO5050 Case: N/A SDG: Lab ID: E80516B3 tcr Client ID: Method Blank Associated Blank- N/A Matrix: Soil Concentration Units: pgAKg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution

ColecUted Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (mP Factor Analys t Aromatic 10.00 Aroatic 05/21/02 I I I ML-B A NL/A 05/16/02 100 05A205/21/02 !102 I1 I1 MLB Aliphatic I Extractable Petrolem Hydrocarbons (EPH) t Result C-C, Aliphatics ' 3000 U 4000 U C,,-C Aliphatics ' Cn-Cn Aromatics U 8500 U 8500 U

Target PAH Analytes Result

Naphibaltene 500 U 2-Methlbylnaephtalne 500 U Aceaphwthylene 500 U Acenaphthene 500 U Fluorene 500 U Phenanthrec 500 U Anthracene 500 U Fluorandene 500 U Pylee 500 U Benzo(a)anthracenc 5o00 U Chrysene 500 U Benzo(b)fluoranthene 500 U Benzo(k)fluornthene 500 U Benzo(a)pyrene 500 U Indenao(l,2,3-cd)pyren 500 U Db:zo(a,h)anhracene ' 500 U Benzo(g,h)pA ykne 500 U

'= Iage concemtration excludes comceatrwation of my sorrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. *Cl 1-022 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the conceatration of Target PAH Analytes. ' Values repomted reflect their sum

Acceptnmce U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Extraction Snunoic %Recovery Rangw% 5-alpha Andretane 95 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable ortho-TeqpnAyl 72 40-140 Fraconation Surogate Biphenyl 90 40-140 2-Flumorbiphonyl 89 40-140

Oas2m :20 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynhanm, Massachusett 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 55/117 Quality Control Results Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIFID Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrenc e, MA ETR 02.05050 Case: N/A SDG: NIA Lab ID: ES0516L3 cllql Client ID: Laboratory Control Sample Associated Blank ESS16B3 Matrix: Soil Concentratio Units: /Kg Date Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution I Colected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzed Volume (ml Factor Analyst Aromatic c 05/21/02 1 1 MLB N/A N/A 05/16/02 100 10.00 Arm II Aliphatic 05/21/02 1 1 MLB Extractable Petrolekum Hydrocarboms (EPEI) Result C,-Cs Aliphatics ' 19000 S I C-C,, Aliphatics' 39000 S Cs,-Cn Aromatics ' 85o U Unadjusted C,,-C, Aromatics ' 55000 i

Target FAH Analytes Result

Naphthalene 1900 S 2-Methylnaphthalene 2300 S Accnaphthylene 2600 S Acenaphthenc 2700 S Fluorene 3100 S Phenantinene 3500 S Anthracene 3500 S Flmathne 3600 S Pyrene 3sse0s Benzo(a)anthracene 350s s clisene 3800 S Benzo(bfflooranthene 3500 S Benzo(k)flooranthene 3600 s Benzo(a)pyrene 3500 S Indeno(1 -cd)pyien 6900 S Dienzo(a,h)aenthrace 69"0 S anzo(ghperylne .3400 S

' = Range concmntration excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) andforlinternal standards eliting in that range. - CI 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. '= Values reported reflect their sn_

Accepitac U- The malyte was analyzed for but not detected at the smuple Extracti Surogatme %Recovery peci level Nte 5-alphaAndmusw 106 40-140 S - Spike copound. ortho-Terpmheyl 69 40-140 N/A - Not Applicable Fractionatim Surrogate Biploenyl 40-140 2-Flosobiphenyl 40-140

5#m 421:29 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288, whaIewhgrp.com 56/17 I Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ET 0205050 Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: FCS0520-1 Aromatic Analysis Date: 05/21/02 Aliphatic Analysis Date: 05/21/02 True Actual Percent QC Parameter Value Value Recovery Units Naphthalene 50o 37 74 40-140 2-Metylapthalene 50 36 72 40-140 Acenaphthylene 50 41 83 40-140 A hth 50o 40 80 40-140 enc cenap Floorene 50 43 85 40-140 Phenanthrene 50 43 86 40-140 Phenandutne Antuacene 50 45 90 40-140 FlorandEne 50 42 85 40-140 50so 42 84 40-140 Benzoaanthracene 39 78 40-140 Chysene 50 43 86 40-140 Beno(b)fluoanthene 50 37 74 40-140 Be ek3Yfhflra.ns 50 43 85 40-140

n() Be zo(a)pyrcue 50 39 79 40-140 ndeno(12,.3-cd)pyrene' 100 77 77 40-140 100 77 77 40-140 Bewz(Lf rylene 50 38 77 40-140 n-Nonane (C9) 50 49 99 40-140 n- ecano 50 52 105 40-140 n-Dodecane (C12) 50 54 107 40-140 n-Tetradcano (C14) 50 59 117 40-140 n-Hexadecane (Cl6) 50 63 126 40-140

n-Octadecanc (CI8) 50 65 . 130 40-140 n-Nonadecane (C19) 50 64 128 40-140 n-Eicosane (C20) 50 66 131 40-140 n-Docosanec (C22) 50 65 129 40-140 n-TeCtracosane (C24) 50 62 125 40-140 n-Hexacosane (C26) 50 59 117 40-140 n-Octacoanwe (C28) 50 53 106 40-140 n-Triacontane (C30) 50 48 96 40-140 n-lH atriacntn. IC3 t 50 39 77 40-140 '50 39 77 40-140

' = Values repoted reflect their sum. N/A - Not Applicable

Accplace Extraction Sunogate % Rec¢over'y Range (%) 5-alpha Androtane 31 40-140 ortho-Terph nyl 86 40-140 Fractionation Surrogate Biphenyl 81 40-140 2-Fluorobiphcyl 83 40-140

es2maando 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massadhmnsetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Far(508) 822-3288, [email protected] 571171 Extractable retroteum nyorocaroons oy tsrws

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO3O Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETRL 0205050 Lab ID: -02050546 MS Case: NIA SDG: N/A &nve'p Client ID: 10D Associated Blank ES0516B3 Matrix: Soil Concentration Units pg/Kg Dafte Date Date Percent Sample Date Final Dilution Collected Received Extracted Solid Amount (g) Fraction Analyzcd Vohume (m Factor Analyst Aromatic 05/22/02 1 1 MI 05/14/02 05/15/02 05/16/02 B14 10.23 A ati Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 1 ML KExtractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPI) Result -C,, Alipatics ' 35000 53000 C,j-C Aromatics a 59000 Unadjusted -C,, Aromatics' 180000

Target PAH Analytes Result Naph&thlene 4200 S 2-Melhylnaphthalene 4400 S Acnuaphthylene 4600 S Acenapthese 4800 S Fhxx=m 500 S Phenantiune 8200 S Anthncen 5900 S Fineranthene 13000 S PynmC 13000 S Benmo(a)anhracene 8600 sS crysene 9400 S Benzo(b)floorankne 8400 S Benzo~kfloorambee 7300 S Beno(a)pyne Im8000 S Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyenc 3 S Dibczo(a h)anthracme > 11000 S Beno(gJi)perylene 600 S

- Range concentratio excludes the concentation of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. = ClI -C22 Aromatic Hydrocabons exclude the concentration of Target PAN Analytes. -Values epa4rted reflect their a

Acceptance S - Spike compound- Extraction Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) N/A - Not Applicable 5-alpha Andrestane 121 40-140 ortho-Tcaphcayl 77 40-140 Fractionao Surrogate Biphenyl 40-140 2-Flurobiphenyl 40-140

ov'L2w 20t32 0522 23:32 375 ParamounmtDrive. Suite 2,Raynham, Mansachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp c 58/1I Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code- M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 02050 I Lab ID:- 205050-1 7 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentratio Units: ag/Kg I Client ID: 48 !A Date Colected: 05/13/02 Matrix: Soil () Date Received: 05/15/02 Percent Solid: 79.8 Repmrtig Date Date Analytical Parameter Result QualIer Lhat DOtio Analyzed Prepared Method Analyst Animony .77 o-.2s s os5r3 2 05/24/02 6020A LP Anemic 43 0.046 5 05/29102 05/4/02 6020A IAR IBr ium 130 0.046 5 050299 05/24/02 6020A LR B ein .48 0.046 5 05129/02 OS/24/02 6020A L3R Cadmium 2.5 0.093 5 0/2 05/24/02 6020A IMR IChromu 32 0.093 s 0529102 0W oz 6020A IJMR 4 0.o93 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR Lead -M 0.23 5 05/29/02 /2402 6020A LMR I Metry 2.0 0.034 5 05/25/02 05124/02 7471A CM Nca 79 0.23 5 05f29/02 54 2 6020A LMR ses.in *.41 0.23 5 05/29/02 05124102 6020A IMR Saver .25 0-.050 5. 0530o2 05o24/02 6020A LCP 1Thaium 0.46 0.046 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR VnadImn 350 0.093 s 05/29t2 o 02 6020A LMR Zinc 390 0.93 5 059/02 05124102 6020A IMR

IN - Spik recovery outsd control lbm. N/A - Not Applkable n - Duplicat outskle control irits. I O 21443 I 375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2,Raynam., Massaclmsets 02767,(508) 822-9300 Fax (508)822-3288 [email protected] 68/171 A ULMM .. a -am-

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 I Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 02050 Lab ID: 02050504 Case: N/A SDG: Concentrition Units: m -&&VIP . Client ID: 4D Date Collected: 05/13/0 2 Matrix- Soil %tI0- Percent Solid: 79.5 Date Received: 05/15/0 ! Reportng Date Date Analytical Parameter Result QUmaler Unit Dbution Analyzed Prepared Method Analyst 1-0 0.20 5 05/302 05/24102 6020A L

Dwilmd __ AnkArsenic 97 Y 0.047 5 05/2902 05/24/02 6020A IAR In 0.047 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR I! ntnn U 055 0.047 5 05/29/2 05/2402 6020A LIR cadmium 7.3 0.094 5 05/2902 05/24/02 6020A L 05/24/02 6020A LMR Bew,ansnkno wM 43 0.094 5 05/29/02 copper 85 0.094 5 05/29/02 05/2442 6020A LR ON-i- 250 0.23 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR My 3.2 0.037 3 05/25/2 05/24102 7471A CIH 15Icket 86 0.23 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR Selnium 2 0.23 5 05/29/02 05/2402 6020A LMR Silvera Uis 0.040 5 0513W02 05/24/2 6020A LCP Thllum 0.71 0.047 5 05/29102 05/24/02 6020A LMR Vaadihun 330 0.094 5 05/29/02 0524/02 6020A LIR 7.inc 560 0.94 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR

N - Spike secovay outside control limits. I WA - Not App~licabse a - Duplicate outside control limnits. I

822-3288, whale@whgr p.cons 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham. Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 67/1 a dr w L & a.t.AiM

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ER: 02050s0 I5 Lab ID: 0205050-02 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentration Units: mg/Kg tr Client ID- 6S Date Collected: 0S/13/02 Matrix Soil <0 1t162 Date Received: 05/15/02 PercenMt Solid: 80.1 Reportlag Date Date Analytical Rosalt Qualer Aalyzed Prepared Meathod Analst PAaaetr I.6 0.22 05/30A20 05/24/02 6020A LCP zjr S5 12*0 r ' 0.ea8 05/29102 05fl442 6020A LMR - 150 0.048 5 05/292 05t242 6020A LMR n alWi 0.048 5 05292 05o/4/02 6020A LMRLa I Cdulit 1. 0.096 5 05/2912 05/2402 6020A (....m.m 0s.e96 s 0sr2912 05/24/02 6o2o0A LMR C i91 0.096 5 05o/2942 0524/02 6020A LMR L.ad 2e 0.24 s 05/29102 05/24/02 6020A LM U CIH o05/24/02 7471A may 3 0.059 10 05/252 IMR Nic-l I30 0.24 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A *76 0.24 5 0529/02 0W24102 6020A U L$1 . iam S4cnum *. - LMLJP os05/24/02 6020A VE mss.m0-4 0.045 s5 0.04 5 0532 05s2402 6020A Tbafurn 1.3 LMRLaR 520 0.096 5S 05/29102 05/24/02 6020A LMR 30s520 0.96 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A 306

N - Spike recovery outside control lits. NA - Not Applicable n -Duplicate outside control lmits.

53fl 1*43 375 Paramoun Driw, Suite 2. Rajynham, Massachuefls 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (5O) 822-3288. [email protected] 70/171 A %F'Pt few

Client Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO3 Elt 020505

. Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA Lab ID:- 02050-405 Case* NiA SDG: N/A Coacentriion UnitLmgK Client ID: 6D Date Comflecte 05/13/02 Matrix: Soi 1 Date Received M5/1S/2 Percent Solid 74.6 Rep.rUtk Date Date Methld P uarmeter Resakt Qa.cr" us- Dofuthe Analyzed Prepred S 05/30 2 3.s 0.21 5 0M29/02 05/24102 6020A I.P 0.060 osram 6020A Asenic 34 05000 L.Wus 170 0.060 5 059/02 6020A LIR Bairn 0" e.oseo 1.0 0-. 5 esr2oz Mo2ox LAR A lids C MlJiaft" M"fARfl sozoA I (t Um san... .9 -%J. Qes dmn - s 0.12 5 05fa2 0O z 6020A IAR i MEr - 72 0.12 5 05r2202 05/24/02 6020A LMR 0.30 5 0SW29/02 052402 6020A LiR !Lead 210 Mecry 17 0.27 40 05/25412 OS/M02 7471A CJI I Nickel 33 0.30 s W29s02 0W24002 6020A Selema .54 0.30 5 05729O2 OS/24/02 6020A JMt Sile I. 0.042 5 05/3W02 05/MMl 6020A LCP 0.060 5 05/29/02 054402 6020A LR I Thaflia 1.0 Vadiun 360 0.12 5 05/29M2 05o4102 6020A LIR zinc 450 1.2 5 s92 05f24/C 6020A LW 1 I I I I I 4 I

N - Spike recovery outside control limits. I NIA -Not Applicabe - Duplicate outside control limits. I

nan1*44

375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2. Raynham, Massachuse t 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 6911P I .A Ut V LtA1S

Client: Metcalf& Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO39 ER: 02050 IU Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA -Lab ID: 9205050-03 SDG: N/A Case: N/A Concentration Units: mng/Kg Client I) IS - Date Collected: 05/13/102 Matrix; Soil 1 Date Received. 05/1/02 Percent Solid:- 69.9 Reporting Date Date Analytical Method Para meter Reswit Qualiler . Imit Dilution Analyzed Prepered As 6020A. Andrr ny $34 5 0513WO2 05124102 UP Z0.28 6020A Anen ic 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 au 0.057 16 5 05/29102 05/24102 6020A LMR BeA 0.057 5 05/20 05/24/02 6020A im U4i IR Cadmium 6 0.11 5 05/29/02 05r24 6020A UMIAIR 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A awm ium 6. 0.11 LMR e 12 0.11 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A M 28 0.29 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR Mer US 0.042 5 05/25/02 05/24/02 7471A CIJI Nickel 26 0.29 5 05/29102 05/24/02 6020A IMR un L47 0.29 5 05/29102 05/24/02 6020A DIR SheSelen r.I11 0.056 5 05/30/02 05/24/02 6020A IUP Thall iumn I3 0.057 5 05/29102 05/24/92 6020A IR Van diun 8a 0.11 l0529i02 05L4/ 2 6020UA WIUA LMR 35 1.1 5 05/29/02 05/24 U 6020A Zinc 35 1.1

I N -Spike n wvery outside control limuts. NA -N Applidctbleot n - DUplicate outside controt limit.

eear. eass 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynhanm, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300 Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 72/171 I MRal IVICL

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Codk M-MA30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR' 026505 Lab ID: 0205V650-46 Case: NIA SDG:- N/A Concent trim Units: mg/Kg 641 Client ID: 8D Date Coflecte& 05/13/02 Matrix: Soil Percent Solid: 72.5 Date Reced&0515/02 Repotng Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier IAmt Dil5tion Aaalyzed Prepared Method Amats Atimony 35 )#c 0.253 5 05f3M02 052402 6020A LCP Arsenic 4.4 0.045 5 0sr29/os es12 6020A IMR 30 0.045 5 05/2902 052402 6020A IAM BCariumn 5 6.52 .0.045 052~2 52402 6020A amIM Cadnian 0.79 0.090 5 052202 05/2402 6020A IMRtm 13 0.090 5 . 0/2902 0524"2 6020A 140 0.090 5 05o29M 0524102 6020A

Lead . . 140 0.22 5 OS/2902 0524/02 6020A 1.6 0.033 5 05/25/02 05124/02 7471A 0512902 OVU2 6020A Im Nickel 1s 0.22 5 am s e.22 osr202 o05V 2 6020A IAW Selenium . . 0.' .5 UmIMR Silwr .13 0.049 5 05/02 0524/02 6020A 5 IMR Tballium 0.11 0.045 05/29/02 052402 6020A IM Zinc' 5 Vanadim 27 0.090 05/29/02 05O2 6020A 30 0.90 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A

J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL but greater thn or MDL N - Spike recovery outside control limits NIA - Not Applicable a - Duplicate outside control liits. U I asonac it*

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusets 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgp com 71/17 I A ULM& IAICL&Sf

Client: Metcal & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA03 I ~1W Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 020505 Lab D -20os50S-07 Case NIA SDG: N/A - ConcentFation Units: mg/Kg Client ID: 10S Date Collected: Matrix: Soil 0 05/14/S2 I Percent Solid: 84.4A Date Received- 05/15/02 Date Date Analytical Farameter Result Quaikler Limit Dition Aalyzed Prepared Method Analyst .39 AIJ 0.22 5 05f3002 0524/02 6020A LCP Arsenic 10 AL 0.045 5 0529/02 05/24/02 6020A IMR Barihm . 45 0.045 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR Beryllium .34 0.045 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR Cain .24 Zin 0.090 $ 05/29M2 05/24/02 6020A IlMR cromhm is 0.090 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A IMR copper 36 0.090 I 05f29/02 0524/02 6020A IR Lead 49 0.22 5 OS/29/02 05f24/02 6020A IMR .14 0.0068 I OS/25/02 05/24/02 7471A CII Nickel 14 0.22 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A IMR Seleim 0.22 5 05/2942 05/244 602A IMR Siler 0.211tI 0.045 5 OS/3@0 0524102 6020A . IP lhalliumn 0.045 5 05/329/02 05/24/02 6020A IMR VaZinc 36 0.090 5 05/2910205/29/02 05/24/020242 6020A LMImR Zinc 75 0.90

J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL but greater than or MDL N - Spike recovery outside control limits. N/A - Not Applicabic a - Duplicate outside control linits.

cnM 145 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767 (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 621171 IULBI VAsasav

Lab Code M-MAGM Client: Metcalf & Eddy ETL 5205O50 Lawrence, MA Project: Oxford Paper, Lab ID: 6205050-08 SDG: NIA Case: NIA Concentration Units' mg/Kg &VUP Client ID: 10D Date Colected:- 05/14/02 Soil Matrix: ~t1v&\Q' Date Received. 05/5/82 Percent Solid: 81.4 Reportlog Date Date Analytal

Is m~~~ D lds Analyzed Prepared Method Anst* ra wa Remit Qualifir U i ILP Antimy . KX f 0.16 5 05/3W02 05/24/02 6020A a 6020A USX Arsenic is 0.04 $ 05129102 05/24/02 UR .. w 29 0.041 5 05t/902 05r2402 6020A I 6020A LIRLMR Cromium 13132 0.081 55 05f29O205/29102 05/24205242

a 44 020 5 0529102 0524/02 6020A LIR 7471A CI Macm.11i 0.0066 1 05/25102 05/24102 S. 0.20 5 05/2902 052441020524412 6020A IMR NkkeSeleandu - 16 0.2 5 05/202 6020A UR Seir n 0-02 5 05M M0 05/IM0 54 0.041 5 051210 0512402- 6020A LMtR Thuma MR Vawadi st 0.01 5 05129102 0524/02 6020A 0.81 5 05/2902 052402 6020A IR I zinc 65 I I I

N - Spike recovery outside control limits. N/A - Not Applicable n Duplicate outside control limits.

375 14. 4i 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusett 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrpCGm 61/11 I a %%4e AVALaVtdME

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Co- M-MA4O3 I Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ET- 02055 -Lab lDU 02 50-11 . ..- Cm: NIA SDG: NIA ctv~ Concentra Units: mg/Kg Client ID: KIOD g~V Matrix: Soil 1 Date Comlecte& 14/02 Percent Solid&- 81.5 Date Received 41515/02 Reportistg Date Date Ir Analst I Parameter Remit Qnalfer uamit Dsle Prepared Method ?Antimny IL62 j " 0.23 5 o5fm 05/24/02 6020A LCP SArenic 7.7 .5 05/24/02 6020A tMR 39' 0.048 S 05/24M2 6020A IBarian as59 5 05/t2m05/2902 LMR UR . Cadmimn 0.14 0096 $ 05/24102 6020A 19 0.096 5 05f29/02 6020A LMR Oemium 05/24/02 33 0.096 5 05/29/02 6020A LMR LeAad S5 0.24 5 05f2902 0524/02 6020A tMR 0.11 0.0063 OS/25102 7471A CI gNickel 19 0.24 5 0512902 05fam2 6020A UR eam 0.24 5$ 05/22 05/24/02 IMR 6020A Up i Silver 0.95 0.045 5S 05f3002 6020A 05/24/02 ThValwm 0.13 0.048 5 05r29102 6020A LMR 83 0.096 5S 05f29102 05724/02 IMR 05124/02 6020A602DA zinc 75 0.96 05/29102 UR

. 1

N - Spike recovery outside control nimut N/A - Not Applicale 1 - Duplicate outside control hnits.

stM I: 34:45 375 ParamountDrive Suite 2. Raynhant. Massachuseutts 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 73/171 A UMlE IIVajD

& Eddy Lab Code: M-MAIM Client: Metcalf E-T 020569 MA - Lawrence, - -- Paper, - Oxford Project: Lab ID: 0205050-9 Case: NIA SDG: NIA Couccautition Units: mgfKg Client ID: 12S Date Colecte& 05/14102 Soil Matrix: ~ Date Received: 0515M92 Percent Solid: 91.0 1 RK-fag Date Date Analytiacal Dilu ation Analyzed Prepared Medthed Amalyt panmee Result Qualier Limit 5s 05f3002 052402 6020A WIT AniUosY 6.22 0.20 5 05W22 0522 5 6020A Simi 36 0.030 5 LMta .34 0.030 5 05fa20205ta2*05/2 05fM2 6020A LC- 6020A un Cadmium 0.24 0.060 S 5 05/292 05/24/02 LML anfomium 26 0-060 wn2 0524/02 6020A 5 6020A 14 0-060 052542 05f/02 6020A6=A Lead 26 0.15 LMR 0.0065 I 7471A .073 05/2902 05/2402 0.15 osnm 05A/24 19 6020A cm .22 0.15 5S amR $ o05205/29/02 05402052402 6020A IMR Silver I.046 0.040 5 LMtWX 5 05/290205A02 0W24102O20 6020A Thah- LI 0.030 aMR 21 0.060 5 05294205124* 6020A 35 0.60 05/29W0 05/24*2 zinc - 5 I I I I I I I N - Spike recovery outside control limits. NIA - Not Applicabc n - Duplicate outside comol limit I

esown u-45 co64/ 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp I 10l 1 me1ais

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Lab Il! 020505-10 I. Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentration Units: mfKg 12D II Client ID: Date Collected:- 05/14/02 Matrix: Soil .Ibz6 Date Received: 05/15/02 Percent Solid: 88.0 Reporflng Date Date Analytical ParaEter Result QaMer Lnit D t Analyzed Prepared Mebod Analyst W Antimony e.ss )C 0.22 5 0513092 054/02 6020A LP SAanic 13 0 041 5 05/2902 05/24/02 6020A LMR Bw. 79 0.041 s s2902 osr/24102 6020A IMR 0ryi.33 0.041 5 05/29O2 0524/02 6020A LMR , Cadc un .52 4 0.083 5 05/29 02 05/24/02 6020A IMR ChIim 21 0.083 5 05/292 05/24/02 6020A IR 30 0.03 5 05/2O 2 05/24/02 6020A LIMR S65 .21 5 05/2Wo2 05t4102 6020A IAR Maecy .25 0.0057 I 05/25102 0/24/02 7471A CH iM 25 0.21 5 05/2902 0524102 6020A LMR Shai.20 0.21 5 05/29102 0524102 6020A IMR Silver t 9 0.043 5 053 05/24/02 6020A LP ium .14 0.041 5 0529102 05/24102 6020A IMR v...im so o.o03 s5 osr/2902 05os242 6020A ImR Zinc o.00 0.83 5 o0529/02 05/24/02 6020A IUAR

I 4. I J -Below CRDI, Proje DI, or RL but Var ta o - MDL N - Spik2c mmy outsi conl imi ts. 3IA - Not Applicable a - Dupli*ce outsi contl limits.

Ps,7l 1-43 375 ParamosmtDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachuretts 02767 (508) 822-9300. Far(508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp com 63/171 I ULD ITvActaiUa

Client Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA930 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- O20SOs Lab D 102055-42 Case: NIA SDG: N/A .C"I Concentlation Units: mg/Kg - Client ID: 14S Date Collected: 05/14*2 Matrix: Soil 14

\- Percent Solid: 83.6 4 Date Received: 05S15/2 Reporting . Date Date Analytical Paraete Rankmt Qwater U Dilato Analyzed Prepared Method 0.39 * 0.19 5 05/30102 05/2402 6020A LCP 6.6 0.035 5 05/29/02 05/242 6020A LMAR 5 Em 140 0.035 05/292 05/2402 6020A DIR .28 0.035 5 03/2942 05/24/02 6020A Asni.. 0.31 0.070 5 0S/29/2 05/2402 6020A - 27 0.070 5 03/29m2 0s24/02 6020A 36 0.070 5 05r2942 05/202 6020A Anan 6020A 53 0.18 ! 5 05/292 05/24/02 0.23 .0067 1 05/2502 05/24/02 7471A CH 0.18 5 05/2902 05/24102 020A Nickel 28 LIR 0.26 0.18 5 05/29*2 05/242 6020A Silvr .65 0.038 5 053(W02 05/24*2 6020A LCP Thalim 0.3 0.035 5 05/2902 05/24/2 6020A IMR Vuadian 20 0.070 LIR 5 0529/02 w24*2 6020A zinc 130 0.70

N - Spike coveuy outside control imts. I N/A - Not Applicable a - Duplicate outside contr lits. I

csom 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Raynham, Massachusetts 02767 (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp 661 I A ULARiVICtial

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO3 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ET-L 0205050 Lab 1D- 0205050-13 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentration Units: mg/Kg Client ID: 14D Matrix: SoBl Date Collected&- 0514/02 iJ Date Received: 05/15/02 I Percent Solid. 85.1 Repqmrtflag Date Date Analytical IParameter Remisult Q=uer Limit Dilution Analyzed Prepared Method Annimony 3.e &w" 0.18 5 05/30W02 0524102 6020A LCP Arsenic 7.5 r$ 0.034 5 05/29/02 6020A LMit

. 71 0.034 5 05/29/02 05/2402 6020A LMR 0.32 0.034 5 05/29/02 05a4/02 6020A ImR Cadmim an - 0.068 5 05/29/02 05/24102 6020A LMR Caffnims 29 0.068 5 05/2902 05/2412M 6020A IMR 37 0.068 5 05/29/02 05f24m 6020A IMR Lead 70 0.17 5 05/2902 05f24 6020A IMR 05/295/02 Mercury .59 0.0061 1 05/24/02 7471A CH ._ 19, 0.17 5 05/29/02 0524102 6020A IMR 0.23 0.17 - 5 0529/02 05*2442 6020A IMR Si" 0.1I 0.037 5 05/30/02 05/24/02 6020A LC? Thalimn 6.14 0.034 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A IMR 27 0.068 5 05/29/02 05/24/02 6020A LMR I aim 91 0.68 5 05/29/02 05/24m2 6020A IMR

N - Spike recovery outside control limits. N/A - Not Applicable n - Duplicate outside cantrol lits.

olneul geM 375 ParamountDrive Suite 2. Ranhan, Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 65/171 A L.,JAA A%A.Lmesa

Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code M-MA030 Client: ETR: 9205M5 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA j Ig1 - LablDI02*0S05 1- - Case: NIA SDG: NIA Concentraion Units: pg/IL Client ID: 4S Date Colected 05/13/92 Matrix: Water 1 I Date Received 0515/02

Reportlag Date Date Parameter Result Qualifier Limit Dudeo A lyz Prepared Method 200 I 05/24102 OS30 6010B DR. BirnArsenic 94 440 Jziz 200 I 05/2302 6010B DAE Cadmim 13 10 I 05/24/02 05/2 6010B DILR Chromium 11 J 20 I 024S 2 05/23 6010B DJL U 200 I 05/24102 05/2302 6010B Lead 29 DIi. U 0.30 i 05/24/02 05/23A0 7470A DJL Merct 017 Selenium I 120 U 200 100 06/03102 0S/2m 6020A IMR Silver IS* J 200 OS/24 OS/23m 6010B DIL

J - Below CRDL, Project DL. or RL but gpeater than or - MDL U -The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level reported. NIA - Not Applicoble I 375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (S08) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 1 116/1 I ILtr IVvictlas

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Ill Lab ID:- 020505%)4 NIA Case NIA SDG: Concentration Units: pg/L Client ID: 4D Date Collectch 05/13/02 Matrix: Water Date Received: 05/15/02

Reportlg Date Date Analytical I Parameter Resumilt Quaier Umt Diltiok Analyzed Prepared Method 130 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL BAnn U 120 200 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DEL 2.0 U 10 I1 OS/24/02 6010B DEL Cxadmim 11 J 20 1 0523/02 6010B DJL 29 U 200 1 05/24/02 05/2302 6010B DJL Mcary 0.12 U 0.50 I1 05/23102 7470A DJL 41 U 400 1 OS/23/02 6010B DJL ScICieum 05/24/02 05/23M02 saveSilver 20 J 6010B DJL

J- Below CRDL, Project DL,or RL Iut gratcr than or MDL U - The analye was malyzed for but not detected at the samp specific level rqpoted N/A - Not Applicable

O in 11:19 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetes 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 1151171 A .J- A AT. flflsta

Client Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205M Lab ID: 02050- 2 NIA SDG: N/A Concentrtion Units: pg/ -.60U01- Client ID: 6S Date Collected- 05/13/02 Matrix: ' Water Date Received: 05/15/02

Reportaing Date Date Analytical Parameter Resnk L-udt Diltte Analyzed Prepared Method An*as DEL Arsenic 220 , 200 I 05/24/02 05/23162 6010B DIL 200 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DIL Barium 70 I1 Cavera 2.0 U 10 05/2402 6010B DJL 9.8 U 20 05/2"2205/2302 6010B DEL 1 05/24102 DIL 29 U 200 I 05/24 05/23/02 6010B 7470A DJL 0.12 U 0.50 1 05/23/02 05/24/02 6010B DJIL Selcijin 54 400 I 05/23/0205f23/02 DIL sivm 20 J 20 05/24/02 6010B

J - Below CRDL, Project DL, oat RL but gpeater dthan or MDL U - The analy$e wus aalyzed for but not detected at the smpk specific level repoed. NiA - Not Applicable I 375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2, Raynhan. Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 118/1 I I Ljr 1VCLtal s

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 ETR 0205050 Paper, Lawrence, MA Project: Oxford Lab ID: 0205058-05 Case: NIA SDG: N/A r7 Concentration Units: pg/L Client ID: 61) Date Collected: 95/13/02 Water Matrix: AN Date Received: 05/15/02

ReportLing Date Date Analytical Result Qualifier Limi Dumude Amalyzed Prepared Method Analyst 6010B DJL 25e 200 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 DJL 120 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Barnium 4.2 3 10 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B J 20 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Clwomiann i DJL BsinLea 29 U 200 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B 0.50 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 7470A DEL DJL 52 ,/400 S 05/24/02 05/23/102 6010B SIlcm DIL 29 S 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B Silvar mJ 20

J - Below CRDL, Project DM or RIL but greater tin or - MDL U - The amalyie was analyzed for but ut detected at the sample specific level repoted. WA - Not Applicable

02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 117/171 I LL-r ITICL4I

Lab Code: M-MAO30 I Client: Metcalf & Eddy ETR: 0205050 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA - Lab ID- 020505-03 Case:" N/A SDG: N/A cocentrtion Units- pg/L Clicut ID: 3S Date Collected: 05/13/02 Water Matrix: Date Received: 0515/02 I

Reporting Date Date Analytical Prepared Metd A rirjmm rx Result Qualfer Limit DUilut Analyzed nalyt Paramter AAA I 05/23/02 6010B DJL I 05/24/02 29 J Arsenic 200 1I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DIL Barium Is* I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DI. 2.0 ,, I D, Ca&nim ...... 0/.. 23 6010B VJJ,&.,. uP'vAs. W&V&a DJL U[ 0V24"02 Chon u 9.8 -aM l 6010B S--- It UMLI6010B s U1I P.,4'. 9 W0 1B DIL IAM 29 II 05/4,PVfl 05/23102 IK 'lrl 05Pt23JO2/V 7470A Macuy 0.27 U4 : 05/24102 -- - DIL U ,5302 O/2 6020A thlR Sekniun 120 Ua -- u-- I , 6010B DAL Siwver 170 - -- 05/24/0 05/23/02

I J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL but great than or = MDL U - The analytse was analyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level nrmpoted N/A - Not Applicable I -UA4O09.319

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusems 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp 1201171 I A ta vJXntaa a

I Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Lab ID:.- 0205050-06 I1 SDG: N/A Case. NA Concentration Units: pg/L Client ID: 8D 6 Date Collected: 05/13/02 Matrix: Water 0 61 1) Date Received: 05/15/02 Repqrtnlug Date Date Analytical parameter Resmult Qualimer Umit DMtton Analyzed Prqepand Method Aalyust I Arsnic 27 .U 200 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010 DJL BaDum 450 200 1 05/242 0523/M2 6010B DJ.. I| CaSuin - 2.0 - U 10 1 05/2402. 05/23/02 6010B DJL Chmium 9.8 U 20 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Lead 230 200 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL MacU 0.27 U 050 1 05l4/02 05/23/02 7470A DJL I 120 U 200 100 06/03/02 05/23/02 6020A IIR Sela n Silver 160 1 200 10 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL I

J - Below CRDL, Project DL,or RLbut greater han or- MDL U - The anal$ was analyzed for but nt detected a the samnple specir level repoe & SN/A - Not Applicable I

I 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300. Fax (508)822-3288, whale~whgrp.com 119/171 A %#- A awA---ema

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Paper, Lawrence, MA ETh: 02050A . Project: Oxford Lab ID: 0205050-07 SDG: N/A Case- N/A Concentrition Units: pg/L Client ID: Wat10Ser ^WWb2 A Date Coflected: 05/14/02 Matrix: Water Date Received& 05/15/02

Reporting Date Date Amaytical Parameter Resl Qame Li t Analyze Prepared Method Anly Arsenic 27 U 200 1 05402 05/2302 6010B DEL S430 I os/23/02 6010fl DEL Barhan 200 0512402 U 10 I 0SM 6010B DJL Ca&nin 2.0 1 05/24102 Clwousn 9.8 U 20 I 6010B DJL 33 200 I 05/24 6010B DJIL Mac oVo23/02 0.12 U 0.50 I 05r24102 7470A DJL 05flO2 DJL Silveri 41 U 400 1 0Sfl302 6010B 42 20 I! 6010B DJL SiWer

J - Below CRDI, Project DI., orRL bt greater dortan - MDI. U - he analyt was analyzed for but ot detected at the s le specific level reported N/A - Not Applicable I

375 Paramoum Drive, Suite 2, Rayxham, Massachusettr 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whalewhtp.cm J I A r J.LA LVAT a4MA

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 Pr6ject Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETt S02S050 | ei l - LaWCoc-nt i-lness-es - Cs- N/A SDG: N/A Concentration Client ID: 10D Units: p/L Date Colkctd- I Matrix: Water 4 05/14/92 Date! teceive& 05/15/02

Qoreinm Rep Date Date Analytical Parameter Res"i Qasitkr Limit Dilaton Analyzed Prepared Method Anayst Arsenic LA-U I 0544fl2 0544f23 6010B DJL Barium 360 200 I 05/24/02 05232 6010B. DR. Cadimam 2.0 U 10 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL 9.8 U S20 I 10544/20544 02090523/02 23/02 6010B -42 200 6010B DIL Lead z D I 05/24/02 05/23/02 0.12 U 0.50 7470A DE. I 05/24/02 05/3/02 DA. Mermy / LAI 6010B DJL. I 05/24/0)205/24/02 05/23/02 OS/23/02 6010B DIL

J - Below CRDL, Pmjcct D, or RL but peta than or - MDL. U - The uanlyte was anlyzed for but not detected at the srmple specific level rported. NIA -Not Applcablc

OSOMIZ 1:20 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 109/171 A .JA JL IVATfLUAEG

Lab Code: M-MA30 Client: Metcalf & Eddy ETR: O2O5O5 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA LablD;- 20550-11 - -- - N/A SDG: N/A Case: ConceArttio Units: pg/L &ift Client ID: KIOD \ 7 Date Colleocted: 05/14/02 Matrix: Water ft t Date Received: 05tl5D02

.Reporting Date Date Amalytical Parameter Resmit Quaifer U Detim Analyzed Prepared MatedBE Analyst 601013 Asenic 27 U 200 1I ostms0523/02 DH Barium 276 200 I 0524102 OS/23/02 6010B DJL CadMnia 2.0 U 10 I 2002 05/23/02 6010B DL Chrmuhn 9.8 U 20 05t23 6010B DJL 2OO Lead 29 U 200 I 0523/02 6010B D. Mercury 0.12 U 0.50 I 05?4/2 7470A DJL I OS24/02 05/23102 41 U 400 6010B DJL Seleniunm I 0524102 Sver 25 20 05/2/2 6010B DR,

U-l monalyt was amdalyzed for but not detected at the sale specific level repotec WNIA -Not Applicable I I

05fmit 1121 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham. Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Far (508) 822-3288, whaole@wgrp co 3 121117 I TCLP Metals "S,

Client; Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO3 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR: 0205050 Lab ID- it205050-09 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentration I Client ID: 12S Units: pg/L Matrix: Water Date Collected 5/14/102 Date Receive& 05/15/02

Reportg Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Limit Dilamtion A-zed Prepared Method Analyst Aramic 27 U 200 I 0524/02 05/23/02 6010B. DIV. DE. Barium 48 200 1 0/24*2 05/23/02 6010B DJ. Cadmium 2.4 J 10 S 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Cheomium - 9.8 U 20 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Lead 65 / Ltd 200 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B DJL Mrculr 0.12 U 0-50 1I 0524/02 05/23/02 7470A DJL Selenium 41 U. 400 1 05 4/02 05/23/02 6010B DALDJL Silver IS U 20 I 05/24/02 05/23/02 6010B

I4 I J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL but greater than or - MDL. .U - Th> analye was analyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level repolted. IN/A - Not Applicable

*Soo= i120 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham,.Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288 whalek@whgrp com 112/171 TCLF Metals I Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 020505 Lab ID: 520505- 10 Case: NIA SIXDG: N/A Concentration Units: pg/IL Cliheat ID: 12D k Date Collected: 05/14/02 Matrix: Water S\A14V Date Received: 3 lS02

Reportlag Date Date Aslytical Parameter Rest Qunfier Anzd Prpred Method Arsose J 200 I 05/24102 DIL 285 1 6010B 200 05/23102 460 I 6010B DIL 7.5 10 05/24A02 05/23/02 J 1 6010B DAL Chromium is J I - 20 I 05/2402 05/23/02 6010B DIL 200 05/2402 05f23 6010B DILD.. Lead 31 I Mer/ 0.12 0.50 1 0524JO205/24102 05/23 7470A DJL U I! Selenium '4 400 0524/02 05/23/02 6010B DIL I! 050410 Saver 46 20 O30 2 6010B

J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL bvt g eter than or - MDL U - The mbanalyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sampwle specific level reported. N/A - Not Applicable I

usnMD I Lis 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Far (508) 822-3288, whale@ grp.com 111/1 1 I %-ar IvitvalS

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Comde M-MA3 ETL 0205054 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA -Lab ID--20505W- .. - Case- N/A SDG: N/A Cooceatration Units pg/L Client ID: 14S5 Date Collectc& 0514/ 2 I Matrix: Water 9Am ( Date Receive& 05/15/02

Reporting Date Date Analytlal Parameter Result QuaIer Limit Diltio Analyzed Prepared Method Analyst Aenic 29 J 200 I 05"24/02 05/2302 6010B DIL Banm a 200 1 05124/02 05/23102 6018 DL Cadmim 16 10 1 0524/02 05r23102 60100 DEL Chromim 13 J 20 I 05/2402 OS/23802 6010B DJL Lead 91 200 1 0524/02 0S/23102 6010 DJL MaecurMy 0.12 U 050 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 7470A DJIL Selenaium 41 U 400 1 05/24/02 05/23/02 60100 DJL Silver 34 20 1 05/24/02 05/23102 6010B DJL

S- Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL b grear than or- MDL U - The analye was analyzed fbF but not detected at the sample specfic level epoed. N/A - Not Applicable

093m Im1 375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham. Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 1114/17 Am ,M.SJ t.. .4

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code- M-MA039 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA - Lab IDM--25O13 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Concentiation Units: pg/L -&0VffP Client ID': 14D A Date Collectle& 05/14102 Matrix: Water 1 1 Date Received: 05/15/02

Reporting Date Date Analytical Result Prepared Method Parameter QuaBfcr Lmit Diution Analyzed An*als

1' 6010B DJL Arsenic 27 U 200 0*2402 05/23/02 05/24/02 DJI. I Bariwan 200 05/23/020523/02 6010B IS* I 05/24/02 05n/ 2 DJL Cadniun 10 6010B U 20 1 6010B DJL Candoun 9.87i I OV24/02 02302 05f24/02 05r3im2 6010B DJL n ./1 200 I - U 0.50 I 05/23/02 7470A DJL 0.12 05/24/02 SiMer 41 U 400 I 05/23/02 6010B DJL Selcedum I 05/24102 17 J 20 05/23O2W 601OB DJL silm I I I I I I IU

J - Below CRDL, Project DL, or RL bt grmatrthan or - MDL U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detectd athe sanple spemcific level repoted. NIA - Not Applicable I

375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp-com1 1i g Qient: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA00 heB Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA IaM IED-020505I0205IM- O-I' Case- N/A SDG: NI/A Date Collected: 05/13/02 4S Clicnt I D Date Received: 0515/02 Matrix: Soil Percent Solid 79.8 Reportlug lDn Ately Analytical Parm-r Reul Qaiter Ihalt Dila Assalyzed Unit Method An FA=k QWMWT U .aS u 25 U 25 I 05/4W02 UnflKf I./19 O MP lBdo 25 U

N/A -Not Applicable U - The analyte was malyzed for but not detected at the smuple specific level eported.

375 Paramount Drive. Suite 2, Raynham Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288. whale@whgr1co54114171 Client Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 IM II02050544 CaseC: NIA SDG: N/A eWs34 "Wr- Client ID: 4D Date Colnecte Matrix: Soi Da Received o sm Percent Solid 79.5 RepWting Date Anatfical Parameter Result Qawer Lidit Dlud Anayzed Unit Medthd Analyst Reactive Sulfide 25 U 25 1 /2402 agKg OLV/376. M

N/A - N ot Appicable U - he analyte was analyzed for ot Anotdetected at the sample specific levd repoarted.

375 ParamountDrive. Suite 2. Raynham Mo ssackuseur 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] p.com 157 I Client: - Metcalf & Eddy Lab Cod: M4GlM

Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA IETR: 2sesn - Case: N/A SDG: N/A V Date Collecta M3/0 ClientM . S Date Receive& M5/5/02 Matrix: Soil Percent Solid 830.1 Reporting Date Analytical Parameter Rema Quaiier Limit Dlha Analyzed Unit Method Analyst Reactive Sulide 25 U 25 1 05/2402 mgSiKg L713762 MP

N/A - Not Applcable U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected a the samp specific vl reporte&

375m Wo) Fax (508) 822-3288. whale@"JAP.cOm 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2. Rodyl Masmchustts 02767. (508) 822-9300, 155117" Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO3O Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA LabT- D205045 N/A SDG: NIA Case: Date Collected& 0S132 Client ID: 6D Date Receive& 15/02 Matrix: Soil Percent Solid&74.6 Reporting Date Analytical Parameter Result Quawlflr Limit Dilution Analyzed Unit Method Analyst Reactive Sulfide 25 U 25 1 05/24/02 g/Kg Ch.7/3762 MP

N/A - Not Applicable U - The anlyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level reponed.

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected]!m I Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA03 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA EIR. 0205050 IkbUti lSOssse -- N/A Case: NIA SIMi Date Colcte& 05/13/02 Clit ID: 88 Date Received 0511S2 Matr: Soil Percent Soli- 69.9 Reporting Date Analyed Parameter Resak Quainer lmit Dtion Analyed Unit Method Analyst I 05/24/02 n/Kz C.7/376.21 Reactiver Sulfide 25 U 25 . V V MP

N/A - Not Applicable U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected a the samic specificeIvel reported.

375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2,Raynham, Massachusets 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 156/17 Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: 1-MA,0 I Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR- 920505" lab ID- 020SM Case: N/A SDG: NIA Datc Colected& 51302 '&PUP Client ID: 8D Matrix: Soil Date Received: 15SI02 Percent Solid: 72.5 Reportling Date . AnSdalc ParaMmet Result Qualifier lmit Dilution Analyzed Unit Mlthed Aalyst Reactive Sulfide 25 U 25 1 05/2A4/02 agl CIL7/3762 MP

NIA - Not Applicable U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the saqpe specific level reportd U 375 Paramount Drive. Suite 2. Raynham. Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300., Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 159i;

I U Client: Metcalf & Eddy FM-:Lab Code: 02V-4".0 M-MA03 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA Et sosess I. Lab Il 4205050-07 Case: NA SDG: N/A Date Co ected I4 Clicot ID: 10S 0 41492 Matrix: Soil Date Received 05/15/S2 Percent Solid- 84.4 Reporting Date Analytical Prameter Rest Qailer Li t Dilution Analyzed Unit Method Reictive Suflide 25 U 25 I 0/24/02 mg/Kg Ch.7376.2 WAP

N/A - Not Applicable U - The anmalyte was malyzed for but not detected at the samwple specific level reported.

375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, Manachmuea 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whalewhgrpcom 160/171 I Client: Metcalf& Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 TwaU"N maws Project: Oxfiord Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Lab ID 020548- IL Case: N/A SDG: N/A Date Collected: Il4/42 Client I IOD Date Received: 05/1n502 Matrix: Soil i Percent Solid: 81.4A Remrting Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Limit Dilution Analyzed Unit Method Analyst Reactive Sulfide 25 U 23 1 05/24/02 mg/Sg Ch7/3762 MP

NA - Not Applicable U - The malyte was malyzed for bmt not detected at the sample specific level reported I

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusets 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 1611 I 'In Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M4A3e Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETm 0205050 Lab ID: .020505I0-11 Case: NIA SDGr NIA Date Collected- 5/14/2 Client ID: K10D Date Received: 0515/02 Matrix: Sol Percent Solidc 81.5 ReportLing Date Analytical Result Qualner thaM Dluto. Analyzed Unit Method Amalyst I 05/24/02 mlg Ch.7/376.2 .MP Reac ve S .ia 25 25 U I I I

NIA - Not Applicable U - The analyte was awlyzed for but not detected at the smplc specific kevdl reported.

375 ParamunedDrive. Suite 2. Raynkham, Massachusenas 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] 164/171 Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAl3O Ia% W nW"as Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA Lab HD? 0250549 I NIA SDG: Case NIA Date Collecdt M42 Client I:a 12S >V Date Received: 05/15/02 Matrix: Soil v r FrI I Percent Solid: 91 Reporting Date Analytles Paramee Realsm Quaiier Lmit Diltion Analyzed Unit Methd Analyst Reacvti Sufide 25 U 25 1 05/2402 mg/Ig Ch.71376.2 M

NtA - Not Applicabe U - The analye was aalyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level reported. I

- It

375 Paranmount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 162/ I I Client Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAf3 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 -Lab ID:S2050 I-S U . .. Case: NA SDG: N/A Date ecocte 014/02 Client t li12D Ii' Marix: soil Date Received: 05/5/02 Pecent Soli- 88 Reporting Date Analytical Parameter Re.as Qmuaer Ludt Diluton Anatyzed Unit Method Analyst Reactive Sulfide 25 U 25 I 05/24/02 mg/xg C2L713762 MP

NIA - Not Applicable U - The anammlyle was .aalyzed for but not detected at the sample specific level reported.

912M Io3 375 PammountDrive Suie 2, Raynwham. Manac maer 02767, (50) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 163/171 Client: Metealf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAM Project Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETI- 920505 Lab IW- 2050 412 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Date Collectek 9514/02 "Wr-- Client ID: 148 Date Received&- 05/5/2 Matrix: Soi C itri Percent Solid: 83.6 Reporting Date Analytical armeer Result Qualfer LiSt Di ado Asnlyzed Unk Method Analyst Recve Sulfde 25 U 25 1 05/24/02 mgKg CL7/376.2 MP

N/A - Not Applicable U -The aalyte was analyzed for but not detected a the sapln specific level reported.

375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetrs 02767, (508) 822-9300 Far(508) 822-3288, whale@whgrp. 165/1 I Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA30 Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205050 Lab ID' 02050.-13 Case N/A SDG: NIA Date Collected: 05/14/02 cf? Client ID- 14D Matrix: Soil \Q., Date Received: 0515/2 Percent Solid: 85.1 PA Reportig Date Analytical Paramekr Result Qualifier Limit Diluftlen Aaslyzed Unit Method Analyst R eactive Sulfide 25 U 25 1 05/2402 gg CL7/3762 MP

N/A -Not Applicable U - The manlyte was analyzed for hmt um deected at the sample specific level reported

375 Paramount Drive Suite 2. Raynham. Masschuets 02767. (508) 822-9300. Fax (508) 822-3288, [email protected] 166/171 I

U a I a I aI U I I I I U

I I i Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MAO30 S Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETRt 0205066

Case: NIA SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205066-01 Client ID: 7E water Associated Blank: EW0520BI Matrix: Water Concentration Units: pgIL Date Date Date Sample Final Date Dilution Collected Received Extracted Amount (ml) Vohne (l Fraction Analyzed Factor Analyst 05/15/02 05/1702 05/20/02 1000 1 Aromatic 05/22/02 1 MLB Aliphatic 05/22/02 1 MLB Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) Result C,-C, Aliphatics ' 30 U C,,C Aliphatics' 40 U C,,-Cn Aromatics "2 85 U Unadjusted C,,-C, Aromatics' 110

Target FAH Analytes Result

Naphthalene 6.2 2-Methylnaphthalene 5.0 U Acenaphthylene 5.0 U Acenaphthene 5.0 U SFluorene 5.0 U Phenanthrene 16 Anthracene 5.0 U SFluoranthene 6.9 Pyrene 6.0 Benzo(a)anthracene 5.0 U SChrysene 5.0 U Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.0 U Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.0 U Benzo(a)pyrene 5.0 U Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene' 5.0 U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ' 5.0 U Benzo(g,bi)perylene 5.0 U

= Range concentration excludes the concentration of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range. I I -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes Values reported reflect their sum.

Acceptance U -The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample faction Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) specific level reported. *phaAndrostane 109 40-140 NIA -Not Applicable ortho-Terphenyl 76 40-140 ctionation Surrogate henyl 92 40-140 Juorobiphenyl 90 40-140

05tnu &43 375 ParamountDrive, Suite 2.Ravnham, Massachusetts 02767. (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288. [email protected] I 20/5Z -r Polychlorinated Biphenyls by 8082-MCP

Client: Metcalf & Eddy Lab Code: M-MA030 V Project: Oxford Paper, Lawrence, MA ETR 0205066 Case: N/A SDG: N/A Lab ID: 0205066-01 Client ID: 7E water Associated Blank: PW0520BI Matrix: Water Concentration Units: pg/L Sample Final Date Collected I Date Received Date Extracted Date Analyzed Amount (ml) Volume (ml) Dilution Factor Analyst 05/15/02 05/17/02 05/20/02 05/21/02 970 10 1 DMB Parameter Result Arockor 1016 1.0 U Aroclor 1221 1.0 U

Aroclor 1232 . 1.0 U Arockor 1242 1.0 U Arocor 1248 1.0 U Aroclor 1254 1.0 U Arckor 1260 1.0 U ArMcor 1262 1.0 U Aroclor 1268 1.0 U

U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected at the sample Surrogate % Recovery Range (%) specific level rcported. Teuachloro-meta-xylene 90 30-150 N/A - Not Applicable Decachlorobiphenyl 70 30-150 N

375 Paramount Drive, Suite 2, Raynham, Massachusetts 02767, (508) 822-9300, Fax (508) 822-3288, whalewhgrp.com I U) z o C C T

m U) nl to a

m Q C

.° C E C I.. ^ld A-- I .I | S it C C uJ a 0j E F- C4

65 0 • . a S ir

2< 0 n CLa. coo ti0

4 cJ -4"4r

0C. a CL usz U

zZ r S 43 Cs 1 S * U . L=4-4L~ 0 a A' 0i I. a S C C 0 C C z 02 U) I a- LLLJ C)I It 0 ii ILI C S S -c C if! S S 3 .4 - a 0* * -C-. C -C- -C.- S S a 1111 a: C 5 I

I EPH/TPH SAMPLE INFORMATION

Client: lfiitm) ETR Number 205

Matx: I Aqueous Soil lSediment 0 Other.

Containers: Satisfactory [JBroken OLeaking

e IA OF s2 D ,i>2

Temperature: Received on ice Received at 4.C (-2rc) oer.Oth Extraction Method: Water Liq/Liq (3520C) Sep Funnel n5 OC)O] Sol Somication (3550) PFE' (354

Comments:

CERTIFICATION

Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH Method followed? [ es [ oN-

Were all perfonance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? [ es No *

Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method, as specified in Section 113? [Iwooe

- £PH Afethod Mody-fcaos I. Thefolm4ing soail aioa mand may be t. PFE-Preusued Fluid Eacton.Mehod 3545 W 46 Fnal Update Il 2. 5-Alphe-andrenuane is swusittedJfor she alfpharc esrction surrogate chloro-credecame. 3 Bip&enyl is abssiasedfor thefrioasolo surrogge 2-6&monapthelene * See Narratie pori of rep for detais.

I attesntunder the pains and penates ofperjuy that based agon my Inquiryof those indiv als inmuediately rcsponsible for obtainingthe fornation.the materialcontained in thi ret is, to the best ofny knowledge and belief accurateand cooet

SIGNATURE: . OSTION: / I

PRINTED NAME: Mu. E. Ciriir+i DATE: o

Wooes Hole Group Eanviremta Labontorles -375 Paramumt Dride - Suite2- Raysham, MA 2767 TeL (508) 22-93O

KREPO %TmmuATIECERT.DOCO0 O5 ESP 59/171 Memorandum

PROJECT NO: , 6~00006i0008 DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: aPyaSitfPilteFjBT3A) OFFICE: Wakefield FROM: S. Harvey COMPANY: Metcalf& Eddy, Inc. REVIEWED BY: L Krowitz b CC: B. Weir, N. Thurber (memo only)

SUBJECT: Limited QC Review/Modified Tier 11-Like Review EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, and/or Reactive Sulfide - Analytical Results Woods Hole Group, Raynham, Massachusetts ETR No. 0205050

On May 13 and 14, 2002, thirteen soil samples were collected at the Oxford Paper Brownfields Targeted Site Assessment (BTSA) site, located in Lawrence, Massachusetts by Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (M&E) field personnel. The sampling was performed as part of the BTSA Response Action Contract (RAC) Work Assignment (WA) #106-SIBZ-01ZZ. The samples were submitted to Woods Hole Group, located in Raynham, Massachusetts for the analysis of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) using the Massachusetts Department of Environmetal Protection (MADEP) Methodfor the DeterminationofExtractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH),January 1998; Priority Pollutant Metals using EPA SW-846 Methods 3050 and 6020; Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Metals using SW-846 Methods 1311, 6010B, and 7471A; and/or Reactive Sulfide using SW-846 Method, Chapter 7, Section 7.3.4. All samples were received by the laboratory on May 15, 2002. The data package was received in the M&E office on June 6,2002.

M&E reviewed the data in accordance with the EPA-approved Final Field Task Work Plan for the site, and the guidance received from EPA Work Assignment Manager, Mr. James Byme, in a September 17, 1999 letter to former M&E Work Assignment Manager, Barb Wyskowslki. The data review included:

* * Data Completeness * * Preservation and Technical Holding Times NA * GC/MS and GC/ECD Instrument Performance Check * * Initial and Continuing Calibrations * Blank Analysis Results * * Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Interference Check Sample Results * * Surrogate Compounds * * Internal Standards * Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 2 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002 * Laboratory Duplicate Sample Results S Field Duplicate Sample Results * Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB) and/or Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Results NA Furnace Atomic Absorption Results * ICP Serial Dilution Analysis Results * Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits NA Semivolatile and Pesticide/PCB Cleanup NA Performance Evaluation (PE) Sample Results

S = All criteria met for this parameter NA = Not applicable and/or no information was provided by the laboratory I

Note: Worksheets are not included for parameters that have met criteria or for criteria that are not applicable to the method and/or to the modified Tier II-like review.

Included in Attachment I is a copy of the chain-of-custody (COC) record. Included in Attachment II are the result summary sheets, annotated with qualifiers, if necessary, as detailed in this memorandum. Included in Attachment 1 are the data validation worksheets.

The Reactive Sulfide results are acceptable for use without qualification.

Blank Analysis Results ~I Priority Pollutant Metals

A review of laboratory blank analysis results indicates the presence of contamination for the priority pollutant metals analytes in the samples listed below.

Analyte Max. Blank Action Affected Samples/Action I cone. Levd (BAL) I.(Pg/L) II Ong/kgy

chromium 0.019 0.0095 None. All sample results are >BAL. selenium 025 0125 Qualify the reported value as nondetect "U" in priority pollutant metals sample 4S, 6D, 8S, SD, 10S, 10D, KIOD, 12S, 12D, 14S, and 14D.

silver 0.029 0.0145 None. All sample results are >BAL

thallium 0.096 0.048 None. All sample results are >BAL

vanadium 0.068 0.034 None. All sanmple results are >BAL

* The sample-specific preparation factors, dilutions, and percent solids were taken into account when evaluating blank contamination.

J:/Ine/brwnfld.soxford/dataval0205050soil ephmetals. wpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 3 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

The blank contamination validation actions include:

* concentration s blank action level; qualify the reported value as nondetect (U) * concentration > blank action level; report the value unqualified.

TCLP Metals

A review of laboratory blank analysis results indicates the presence of contamination for the TCLP metals analytes in the samples listed below.

Analyte Max. Blank Actiou Affected Samples/Action Coe. Levd (BAL)

barium 130 650 Qualify the reported values as nondetect (U) in TCLP Metals samples 4S, 4D, 6S,6,6D, 8,D, 10S, 10, KIOD, 12S,12D, and 14D.

lead 44 220 Qualify the reported values as nondetect (U) in TCLP Metals samples 10S, 10D, 12S, 12D, 14S, and 14D.

selenium 60 300 Qualify the reported values as nondetect (U) in STCLP Metals samples ,6S, 10D, and 12D.

The blank contamination validation actions include:

* concentration s blank action level; qualify the reported value as nondetect (U) * concentration > blank action level; report the value unqualified.

Matrix Spike Recoveries

EPH

The EPH compounds for soil samples that did not meet acceptance criteria of 40-140 percent recovery (%R) in matrix spike sarmle 10D, indicating possible matrix interference, are summarized in the table below: *

Compound Spiked Sample Matrix Spike Affected Samples/Action Sample Result %R Result (pgikg)

fluoranthlene 13,000 2,700 163 Estinmate (J) positive fluoranthene result in this sample.

J:/ne/brwvnfldsaford/data val/O2OSO50soitephmetals wpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 4 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

Compound Spiked Sample Matrix Spike Affected Samples/Action Sample Result %R Result (pg/kg)

pyrene 13,000 2,600 168 Estimate (J) positive pyrene result in this ,, jI I I Ijsample.

Priority Pollutant Metals

The low level priority pollutant metals analytes for soil samples that did not meet acceptance criteria of 75-125 percent recovery (%R) in matrix spike sample 10D, indicating possible matrix I interference, are summarized in the table below:

Analyte Spiked Sample Matrix Spike Affected Samples/Action Sample Result %R Result (mg/kg) I (nmrAg) antimony 1. 0.33 24 Estimte (J) the positive antimony results in all priority pollutant metals samples. Sample results may be biased low.

Laboratory Duplicate Sample Results

Prioriy Pollutant Metals

The priority pollutant metals analyte that did not meet acceptance criteria of relative percent difference (%/oRPD)<20 in soil sample O10D is summarized in the following table:

Analyte Sample Result Duplicate %RPD Affected Samples/Action (mg/kg) Sample Result

I 5arsenic 5.6 89% Estimate (J) the positive

I. ______I _I _II_

Field Duplicate Sample Results

Priority Pollutant Metals

The following table summarizes the priority pollutant metals analytes that did not meet acceptance criterion for relative percent difference (RPD) of <50% in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD:

J:/Ine/brwnflds/oxford/data_va/O20550soil. ephmetals.wpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 5 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

Analyte Sample Result Duplicate Sample %RPD Affected Samples/Action (mg/kg) (mg/kg)Result

arsenic 15 7.7 64% Estimate the positive arsenic result in all priority pollutant metals samples. A bias could not be determiad.

EPH

The following table summarizes the EPH compounds that did not meet acceptance criterion for relative percent difference (RPD) of <50% in field duplicate samples 10D and KI O0D:

Compound Sample Duplicate %RPD Affected Samples/Action Result Sample Result _(1r1/k) (mgg)

C,,-C," aliphatic 14,000 4,800U NC Estimate (J) the positive C 9-C aliphatic result in field duplcate samples 10D and estimate (UJ) the nondetect CI,-C aliphatic result in field duplicate sample KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

C,,-Cn aromatics 35,000 60,000 53% Estimate (J) the positive C,,-C, aronmatic result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

unadjusted CnI-C, 58,000 I110,000 62% Estimate (J) the positive unadjusted C,,- aromatics C. aromatic result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determined. acenaphthene 780 590U NC Estimate (3) the positive acenaphthene result in field duplcate sample 10D and estimate (UJ) the nondetect acenaphthene result in field duplicate sample KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

fluorene 800 590U NC Estimate (J) the positive acenaphthene result in field duplcate sample IOD and estimate (UJ) the nondetect acenaphthene result in field duplicate sample KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

phenanthrene 2,700 5,800 73% Estimate (J) the positive phenanthrene result in field duplicate samples 1 0D and KI0D. A bias could not be determined.

J:/ne/brwnflds/oxford/data_val/020SOSO.soil. ephmetals wpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 6 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

Compound Sample Duplicate %RPD Affected Samples/Action Result Sample Result ,. ... (mg/kg) (mg/kg),

anthracene 930 1,900 69% Estimate (J) the positive anthracene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determinned.

fluoranthene 3,700 7,900 72% Estimate (3) the positive flueranthene result in field duplicate samples 10D and K IOD. A bias could not be determined.

pyrene 3,600 7,500 70% Estimate (3) the positive pyrene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

benzo(a) 1,900 4,300 77% Estimate (J) bthe positive beuzo(a) antdiracene anthracene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be detemined.

chrysene 2,500 4,400 55% Estimate (J) the positive chrysene result in field duplicate samples IOD and KIOD. A bias could not be detennined.

benzo(b) 2,000 4,500 77% Estimate () the positive benzo(b) fluoranthene fluoranthene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

benzo(a) pyrene 1,800 3,500 64% Estimate (J) the positive benzo(a) pyrene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be detenrmined.

indeno(1,2,3-cd) 1,900 3,300 54% Estimate (J) the positive indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene pyrene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could not be determined.

dibenzo(a,h) 1,900 3,300 54% Estimate (J) the positive dibenzo(a,h) anthracene _ anthracene result in field duplicate samples 10D and KIOD. A bias could notbe determined.

The positive fluoranthene results in samples IOD and KIOD were previously qualified as estimated (J) due to poor matirx spike recovery. Therefore, no further action is taken on the fluoranthene results due to poor field duplicate sample results.

J:/ne/brwnfldsloxford/daia val/0205050soil.ephmetals-wpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 7 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Results

EPH

The following table summarizes the EPH compound that did not meet acceptance criteria of percent recovery (%R) of 40-140%:

Compound %R. Affected Samples/Action

naphthalene 37% Estimate (J) positive result in samples 4D, 6S, 6D, SD, 12D, 14S, and 14D. Estimate (UJ) the nondetect result in samples 4S, S, O10S,IOD, KIOD, and 128. Sample results may be biased low.

Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits

EPH

The laboratory performed a laboratory duplicate analysis on soil sample 10D. The laboratory duplicate sample results were detected at higher concentrations for all but one EPH compound than those concentrations detected in the original analysis of sample 10D. As a conservative measure, the data validator chose to report the laboratory duplicate sample results instead of the original analysis results of sample 10D.

Priority Pollutant Metals

The following table summarizes the priority pollutant metal results that are less than the sample- specific report limit (RL) but greater than the method detection limit (MDL) and were not previously qualified as estimated (J) due to quality control parameters discussed above. The listed results are qualified as estimated (J) due to uncertainty in the quantitation near the RL:

Aalyte Affcted Samples/Action

selenium "* SD, 10S, 12D

The positive selenium result in sample SD, 10S, and 12D were previously qualified as nondetect (U) due to blank contamination. The results are further qualified as estimated, nondetect (UJ) due to blank contamination and uncertainty in quantitation.

J:/ine/brwnflds/oxford/data_val/O2OSOSO.soil.ephmetalswpd EPH, Priority Pollutant Metals, TCLP Metals, Reactive Sulfide Page 8 ETR No. 0205050 July 10, 2002

TCLP Metals

The following table summarizes the TCLP metal results that are less than the reporting limit (RL) but greater than the method detection limit (MDL) and were not previously qualified as estimated (J) due to quality control parameters discussed above. The listed results are qualified as estimated (J) due to uncertainty in the quantitation:

A t Affected Sales/Action arsenic 4S, 4D, 8S, 12D, 14S

barium 4D, 6S, 6D, 8S

cadmium 6D, 128, 12D clomaium 4S, 4D, 6D, 12D, 14S lead 10S, 10D, 12S, 12D, 14S, 14D

scienium 6S, 6D, 10D, 12D

silver 4S, 4D, 6S,, S D, 14D

The positive results for barium, lead, and selenium in all samples listed above werepreviously qualified as nondetect (U) due to blank contamination. These results are further qualified as estimated, nondetect (UJ) due to blank contamination and uncertainty in quantitation.

J/ne/brwnflds/oxford/data val/O205050 soil ephmetals wpd Jos...... - MR - p . *.c -& a-t %45 1V

REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION The owing da package has been validatedt LNam e W dJs Wh. 6-CI SOW/itod No. 1 1t-as.ee .,-,o. a-- 1 Sampling Dawt(s) ( i si-4o9. SDG No. Shipping Da(s) -sg 194 No. of Sam4 pleu/Marix %!AV5j Date Re'd by lab TrfjcepnamlNos- ~±;b I ~op-t.si0a ) 014

I .Trip Blank No. - Equipumt Blank No. =- Bottle Blank No. Field Duplicate Nos. IO / 01 PES Nos. AC-

I The Rerion I, EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Enviromnenta Anal s, revision was used to evaluate the data and/or approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page: (anttach modified I criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPJP). A Tier II or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one). If a Tier II validation with a partial Tier HI was used, then identify samples, parameters, etc. that received partial Tier HI validation

The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters: o~ Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates M - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier ) k- Sensitivity Check (5) S dl--Preservation & Technical Holding Tmes P- PE Samples/Accuracy Check - GC/MS & GC/ECD Instrunent Performance Check- Target Compound Identification S- Initial & Continuing Calibrations /Compound Quantitation and Reported oI- - Blanks Quanitation Limits t - Surrogate Compounds M -TiCsl 0- Internal Standards Semivolatile and Pesticide/PCB Cleanup -- Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance U Region I Definitions and Qualifiers: A - Acceptable Data I - Numerical value associated with ompound is an estimated quantity. R - The data are rejected as unusable. The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit. U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit. I UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity. TB, BB. EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank, aqueous bottle blank, or aqueous equipment blank associated with soil/sediment samples.

Validator's Name S" kV-vL Company Name Wi_.1- Phone Number oa

Date Validation Started 6 - Date Validation Completed

12/96 - )atr Validation workshetFCr Page- -rage ,- -

Check if all criteria are met and no hard copy worksheet provided. Indicate NA if worksheet is not applicable to analytical method. Note: there is no standard worksheet for System Performance, however, the validator must docu ent all system performance issues in the Data Validation Memorandum.

Vy 9 1 8 worksheets: VOA/SV-Pest/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOA/SV-Pest/IPCB-I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES VOA/SV-Il GC/MS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK (TUNING) VOA/SV-Il INITIAL CALIBRATION VOA/SV-IV CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOAISV-Pest/PCB-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOA/SV-PestPCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS bt VOA-VI VOA SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES SV-VI SV SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES VOA/SV-VII INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE VOA/SV-Pes/PCB-VIII MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION 4~- VOA/SV-PstI/PCB-X SENSITIVITY CHECK VOA/SV-Pes/PCB-XI ACCURACY CHECK :-t VOA/SV-PesV/PCB-XII TARGET COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOAISV-Pest/PCB-XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION VOA/SV-XIV TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS tA VOA/SV-XV SEMIVOLATILE CLEANUP TABLE fl-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA PesIB worksheets:

VO -Pest/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOA/SV- I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES Pes tPCB-IA GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- RESOLUTION PeStPCB-IIB GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- RETENTION TIMES Pest/PCB-IIC CD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- AC CY CHECK OF INITIAL CALIBRATION Pest/PCB-IID GC/ECD UMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- PESTICIDE D ATION Pest/PCB-11l INITIAL CALIBRA N PesEtPCB-V CONTINUING CALIB ON VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOAISV-Pcst/PCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS Pest/PCB-VI SURROGATE COMPOUNDS: SPIKE RECOVERIES AND RETENTION E SHIFT Pcst/PCB-VII PESTICIDE CLEANUP VOAISV-Pesu/PCB-VIII MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION VOA/SV-PestPCB-X SENSITIVITY CHECK VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-XI ACCORACY CHECK Pcst/VWPCB-XII COMOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-PestPCB-XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION TABLE H-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA

I certify that all criteria were met for the worksheets checked above.

Signature: ,__ __ ,. Name: S ..

Date: £(Ii JoQ11.

12/96 4ro

!4 -.

aU _------I EAn U a o C 4)

- 'CO oto o 0

1 - a

CO)

I ._ S I @ _ _

I _ I I z

O i U 21

o C) EFA a)

-s

4o o o la. O.. oI 0 c. 0 z

0 L) I z 0 4) .

ci .x S.

0-e

sa s ~.5 z I- -->lP>C 0 0 * ....30. o Lo (o a 0c ZD . Q C) CUU >U NO

2 o .c O U

cis

0..

06.

ca0 s oo~ xa 4) .s '0 U o 5 z 064

FO 5 IS

cc 0b ac C0 a c 0 o. .0 I on4 -- 4 0 a Ia 0 a V)

0 C

Ii" 9a I -itoa

U7- 4 '-4 zzz zzz;z I1: (4 as I 3 C- -9 I i C I, I 8.-a 4 (2 I, 4.4ofl 0 00 a :1 0 CS 0 Os E 0 0U C) Lo U 'C to, C) - + - + - .9-9-9.- I - S C) I-. 0 '4-4 I- I 'a 4) a - gi P) .- u 80- E - 8 -aC I-. C 0 *!i 'a . st A -3 r44) g o -3a Etj 3 a' 0o 8 -o<09 d

~U ca,A .< 0* xa

* S - .8 'a

8 '0 S= 0 a 4 >z * 4- 0 a 'IN a I S.0...... U Region I SiteName: N b-. c.. Data Review Worksheet Refermnce Number.ow. o.oo."

REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) n e ncs data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and perfonmance data The data review include&

Od oSDSD0 SAS No. Sampling Date (s) 51j3, sqJ( SDG No. Matrix , . Slipping Date (s) 51j ,oy. No. of Samples Date(s) rec'd by lab rf

Traffic Report Numbers

Elxo6,9 zty t oD >$ to<'o Trip Blank No.: Equipment Blank Number: Field Duplicate Numbers:

SOW No. 2 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions, EMSL-LV, and SMO. The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an exammination of:

ZY -Data Completeness W-Field Duplicates 4-Holding Times (k-Lab Control Sample Results a -Calibrations -Furnace AA results t -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results i&-Detection Limit Results S-Matrix Spike Recoveries 4 -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Commaents: 4 JL -- 0Q6,Jt4A k

Definitions and Qualifiers: A - Acceptable data IJ- Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not deected

Reviewe Reviewr DateDate: Region I Inorganic Dat Review Wouksheeus

IV A. BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank comminaian in sections 1 and 2 below. A separate worksheet should be used for soil and waer blanks.

1. Laboratory Blanks Matrix:

DATE: IC/CCB# PREP BL ANALYTE CONCJUNITS urZ .. Ido

I I

i A W ,-as o 'o '- I at O U

2. Equipment/Trip Blanks

DATE: EQUIP BL # ANALYTE CONC.A S

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparatimon blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samples, and for each digestion batch? B. Was a calibration blank run at the beginning of the run, and Yes or No every 10 samples or eiery 2 hours whichever is more frequent? Yes or No

If no, the data may be affected. Use professional judgment to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any actions below, and list the samples affected InamocaReg[m iWa DacaRe-new workshees

IV B. BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS ISeczm -2

4. Blmank Actiom

The .an Le-ved frman,amrit asanal to X te hgest oimmman d that 2name An m anV blat Use sX h abso eain for an aeie tlnk restL The Acna Level for suammesu ha ve be cmcnunt mr daimmed shoal be badpeipb f er madnn factor No .astse remso msbe t tihe ca no at th anV m thed sabo exMds the Acmon Level iAL for that maim. Sezic amou are as follows:

L. When :he aOmon sire than the :DL m :ess man he --cen -...- L : or ne amne -ovWO=a ducad wih a U.

I 'hene smie n--cmanon :s greater. an - "Aon ". tcr: s:amrpe :ocnranon unsaiii

ELEMENT NL CONC -SI 1A . CONC. rs s -r-

t~q n- 0. 9syqK

SNOTE: Blanksma alyzed during a soil casemu be conveed to mg/kg in order to compare thv n the sample results.

conc. in ug/l X Voluhm diled to (200mif X IL X 1000 X Imst = mgkg Weigk digested (lgram) 1000ml Ikg 100ug Mut plymg tis reskblt 5 to arit at the Action Level gives a final result in mgkg which an then be comoared I to ample rsalts

I Region I Inorganic Data Review Workheets U VI. MATRIX SPMIKE

TR 4 !0 0 Matrix: So. I

1. Recovery Criteria

List thedpercent recovaies for analytes which did not meet the reoured criteri r . o # -4

S - amount of spike added SSR - spiked sample result SR - sample result

OR ACTION

. If the sample concenWtratin exceed the spike concentration by a facto r of 4 or more, no action is taken. 2. If any analyte does not meet the %R criteria, follow the actions state Sbelow:

PERCENT RECOVERY

<30% 30%-74% >125%

Positive Sample Resuks J J J Non-detected Results R UI ' A 2. Frequency Criteria YI A. Was a matrix spike prepared at the required frequency? Yes o No B. Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did YsNo not meet the required criteria for matrix spike recovery? A separate worksheet should be filled out for each matrix spike pair. I|I U I i Region I Inorganic Data Review Worksheets

VII.L LABORATORY DUPLICATES

Lis the concentraios of ay analyte not meeting the critea for duplicate precision. For soul duplica calculate the CRDL in mg/kg using the sample weightk ,vline and perant solids data for the sample. hk what criteria was used to evaluate precision by cuding either the RPD or CRDL for each element

CEAMPL DUPLICATE 5

4E5l Z RPD ACTION WATER SOIL

AI srks o Alhminim 200 Antimmy 60 Arsenic 10 20 0 BcrvfiumB ri n 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50

Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000

Mercury 0.2 Nickel 40 Potamm 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 4 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10

Laboratory duicate actions should be applied to all other samples of the sme matrxotpe.

ACTION:

1. Estimate (J)positive results for elements which have an RPD > 20% for waters and > 35% for soils. 2. If sample results are less than 5X the CRDL, estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is > CRDL (2XCRDL for soils) If both samples at ne-detectd the RPD is not calculated (NC) Repon i Iorgac Dan Renew Woksheas

VIII. FIELD DUPLIC TES

List wcm of al analytes m the field ducticate amr For soi dhias -na the CRDL n mWkaus=a the samic weit. vna an percs solids daa tor the smit. ocate wat auma was use to evaawacaoc vy cuCina eiher the RPD or CRDL M each eemt

CRL SAML DLCA i

aner_ If6DD EPD .no.

Amu.m ':I,,

C o1 l.a...-. iI

Cbium 10 ] - - C~beI 5 : " K ":. ..- I ______1 . "__ " I" toa. toO~ I._"a 3; 33,'-_7 o- +

______25 o 5 o______camsia_Lead .5 jIoopo _ _I (p'dL

Manidne is 0M.=v0.2 0 ' . . 0.I o/. o--" ..-

oss. ooo

s iler, po r.ut Halia+-,o= - . I r e 0.*(its cf oo' " -K-. ib.sl 'rnmenm so 6 0 1 f- Cramd.m,z0n .102o a67", , 0 --Dig

Fie dtapicaft actions sh be apid to all oe samples of thewm tr.e._

ACTION:

. Esm (1)positive rcsults for dements wbich have a RPD > 30% firaws md > 50% fo sodS 2. If sample resalft am less tmhan SX be CRDL, einse (J)po!sitive resuks for asaes who absolute difaerence is > 2X CRDL (4X CRDL for sol If both samples ar n-ndetected. the RPD is not calculated iNC). Repo- noramc D2m RIRew Wo mers

XI. "DCTIVELY COUPLED PL-ASMA ICPI SERIAL DILUTION -NALYS

zcas__ nnions were m ame a =rran resns oime miEa 52We aasns anreec = 0% Of 13e Grrnal tumDim waiVs.

Zer.i iirnon was merormed rr Ie noidowmg.

Mr.2a diimes wre vperforxme. but aaivacai rests ai not aaree worn = 10% tr ana-yre

:nciunrans reaer -an0X mie iDL adzreaiuien

Rmeor ad -nn4s DenAw that o no meet he -ourea jacoratcr-: :era :cr IC? seat tmn snawsis

Mana o\ Saoott(00

.nt=cr. car:m= 0

caiam ., 16 4:' O . . _J

Chremnum -J . coai I C c I _ i I I " one

II I I Ii Magne m I _ I I i _ s _o III I _ sum_ Ibm? 0- 0.0. 1 0.o 1--- i0,- si= !tt- 1

sVaim l . I 6 !

vA . odim { k )

Actics aly to al sames of the same mam

ACTIONS:

S E at. tJ) all osmrve rsuts and UJ) all ncndetecs :he " D > 15. Region I Inorgaic Data Review Worksheets

XIII. SAMPLE QUANTITATION (continued)

List the postivew sample results that wre reported at concentrations less than gnd and have not already been qualified. The positive resuts have been estimamted (J) due to uncertamty in the quantitmipmeare 1DL-

Samples Affected 4,; o 3, G, ,_ . 1 o.00 ./.24, V ,mj cL 4 o D)X4 D(

2,0 :qj j- Re wmi Size Namr t Dara Review Worksneet Renrce Nuwor 9t oo o

REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hzarcrnea laooratory pacxage .ecen at Resnm i as oee -evewe and me ananv assura an~ei nbr ancenm an The dara review mchnde

.-aem. 0 05 S5 No. -- Sauiing Date is; j,js -DGNc ...- _ Manm Sining Daze is No. iSammes .V D es) rec 5 !ao ,cAd.- I I - a-

rarmc Reacr Nunoers " a 1I0 t

ThuBlNx e. --:ummen Blank Numoer Fieid Duoiicae Numoers :

SOW No. _ requires that specific anai-, ncai w-ork be doe and that associated repcns be orovide - by d)e laboraiorv to the Regkm ESL-LV. and SMO. The general criena used to determine the perornmancce were based on an examination or

S-Data Completeness /-Field Duplicates -Holding Tines r kiLab Cuorrol Sam le Results cY-Calibranons W-Fumace AA results -ICP Serial Dilution Results k -ICPBlanks Interference Check Results Detection Limit Results tV-Marrix Spike Recoveries 4.-Sample Quamitation -Laboratory Dupficates Overall C om e : -3blo

Derfiri mad Qualifiers: A - Acz ablc"e dta J - Aprximate data due to qality canno crica R - Reject data due to qualit conrol cateia U - Analyze am

Reviewer JA4 ,1H Date: -7 Repo L horgn Dan Renew Wonsoas

IV A. BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS iSeCRM -

..z me olanx =nmmanm M secuoans and - Demow A sewarae monids-m oe usea or :i ana wa ians.

. Labo Bnks Maniz:

DATE, ICBICCB= PREP BL ANAL TE CONC..KNT S DA'I'"P2 V1" O i

2. EquipmenuTrip Blanks

DATE . EOULIP BL = ANAL1 = C ONC .UNITS I

?' I

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparationu blank analyzed for each mamx, for every 20 /. samples, and for each digestion batch? r No B. Was a calibration blank run at the beginning of the run.a and every 10 samples or evgry 2 hows whicheverdis more frequent? - No

If no. the data may be affected. Use professiwoal judgment to determme the seventy of the effect and qualif the data accodm&ngly Discuss any aicms below, and list the samples affected-

-: Iamper Daa Revw woswms

IV IL BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Secual -,

4. BlankAimes

Time Aaon L-vd fr aman is - w 5X te h cgsnammn of dia anin inmto am blank *Use 5X h absoi aae for aw uame bk rsab. The Acna Level for smoes winc have bhbrea or ilaad skhould be Idl de e. .. bat r. No vme r soald~lt be rnd uniss t c of thme anlw m d sIm s the Acton L-evel ALa r. bmadmaim. SafcS cms are as follows:

i. Wen the c Oei iCs thean die [DL a :eslalon dL i z'-o : . -btte sam :oncesurana deteard enh a, U .. ,W I. 3 ._

-. We be samnie ancenonu is greter san :he Acnon .e ::- amie nnranon

ELEMENT. MAc CONC. AL ELIE', NA. - CONC. As 9 rI'm,4 Uo t-ro

S NOTE: BlaM analyzed dAring a soil can must be converted to magg in order to compare them with the sample results

corc in g X Volm dihzd to X00lX IL X 1 X mI = mgkg W4eitdiksed (gram) 1000mi Ikg iOo0ug f ig this result by 5 to ie at the Action L vl gives a final result inm 4k which c3n then be compared to amle resabs

I 4 I 1 70 o q 11 1 D1tii' Region I Inorganic Data Review Worksheets

Xm. SAMPLE QUANTITATION (continued)

List the positive sample results that were reported at concentrations less than Land have not already bea qualified& The positive results have been estimunated (J) due to uncertamty in the quantitation near the IDL.

SauMles Affected

c t/o. 4z. Go P. Ct Dt , G2jtOQ. ~ N

q, .u, o Log VD 1uS.ILIoi~ 1,

i I

I I

I a

gt Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-110/-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: BO417-OIA Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix: Soil, 87% Solid Date Analyzed: 412103 Fl, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 2.5

Reporting Results Limits

09 - C18 Aliphatics 15,000 8,300 C19 - C36Aliphatics 150,000 11,000 C1 i - C22 Arornatics 120,000 23,000 Tartet Analytes Acenaphthene ND 1,400 Acenaphthylene ND 1.400 Anthracene ND 1,400 Benzo(a)anthracene 2,200 1,400 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,700 1,400 Benzo(b)iuoranthere 2,700 1,400 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 1,400 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NDO 1,400 Chrysene 2,300 1,400 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene ND 1,400 Fluoranthene 4,900 1.400 Fluorene ND 1,400 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 1.400 Naphthalene ND 1,400 Phenanthrene 3,700 1,400 Pyrene 4,500 1.400 2-Melhylnaphthalene ND 1.400

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chbrooctadecane 65% o-Terphenyl 74% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90% 2-Brornonaphthalene 54%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QAQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 112.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and 0C (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0417-01A (f5 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcaff & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-1117-19 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-03A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix: Soil, 80% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/2/03 Fl1, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration ki ug/kg, dry weight basis Diution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9- C18Alphaics 5,800 3,600 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 9.400 4,800 C11 - C22 Aronmatics 25,000 10,000 ~bO

Acenate ND 600 Acenapthyene ND 600 Anthracene ND 600 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 600 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 600 Benzo(b)1luoanthene ND 600 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 600 Benzo(k)0fuoranthene ND 600 Chrysene ND 600 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene ND 600 FkxwwdnmFluoranthene ND 600 Fluorene ND 60060 ND Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 600 Naphthatene ND Soin Phenanthrene ND 600 Pyrene ND 600 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 600

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batcht MB-6143 Chloroodadoe -63% o-Terpheny -. 69% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 99% 2-Bromonaphthalene 93%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted inthe Project Naative. al CNQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and eallp standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes

Page 1 of 1I B0417-03A

00 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10103 Client ID: SB-3/7-9 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-05A Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrix Soil, 84% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3103 Fl, 412/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Diuton- 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics ND 3,400 C19 - C36 Aliphatics ND 4.500 ClI - C22 Aromatics 15,000 10,000

pTarg! Analytes Acenaphthene ND -560 49K Acenaphthylene ND 560 Anthracene ND 560 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 560 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 560 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 560 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 560 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 560 Chrysene ND 560 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 560 Fluoranthene 740 560 Fluorene ND 560 Indeno(1 2,3-cd)pyrene ND 560 Naphthalene ND 560 Phenanthrene ND 560 Pyrene 630 560 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 560

Surrogate Recovery (%): OC Batch: MB-6143 Chloroctadecane 41% o-Terphenyl 40% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 124% 2-Brornonaphthalene 111%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, a QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al performance/acceptance standards for the required OAQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exdude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I 80417-OSA

009;- Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11103 Client ID: SB-2/0-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: BO417-07A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matricx: Soil, 75% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 FI, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ugkg, dry weight basis Dilutiorr 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C018 Aliphatics 4.700 3.900 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 38,000 5,200 ClI - C22 Aromatics 49,000 11,000 CV Target Anahttes AcenaphtheneAcenaphdhem ND 650 Acenaphthytenie ND 650 Anthracene ND 650 Benzo(a)anthracene 1,300 650 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.100 650 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1,800 650 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 650 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 820 650 Chrysene 1.400 650 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 650 Fluoranthene 2.700 650 Fluorene ND 650 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO 650 Naphthalene NO 650 Phenanthrene 1.500 650 Pyrene 2.600 650 2-Methytnaphthalene ND 650

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 49% o-Terphenyl 53% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 92% 2-Bromonaphthalene 82%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QAJQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and at performrnancefacceptance standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 BO417-07A

G" JL I Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-2/11-13 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: 80417-09gA Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrix: Soil. 91% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3103 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry wekight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 18,000 3,100 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 23,000 4,200 CiI - C22 Aromatics 52,000 8,900 Target Anltes ND 520 Acenaphthylenwe ND 520 cAO Anthracene ND 520 Benzo(a)anthracene 710 520 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 520 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 800 520 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 520 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 520 Chrysene 760 520 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 520 Fluoranthene 1,800 520 Fluorene ND 520 lndeno(12.3-cd)pyrer'e ND 520 Naphthalene ND 520 Phenanthrene 1,000 520 Pyrene 1,500 520 2-MethyInaphthatene ND 520

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chloooctadecane 59% o-Terphenyl 68% 2-Fluorobik0phenyl 96%. 2-Bromonaphthalene 94%'

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, a QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al peformanc acceptance standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to Iis method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I BO417-09A GOi4 AnalysisAnalysis Report: ExtractableExmractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Clent Metcalf & Eddy, Inc Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-87-9 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID 80417-11A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrbc Soil, 85% Sold Date Analyzed: 413103 Fl. 41303 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18Piphaics ND ',C 3.300 019 - C36 Aliphatics 9,700 -3 4.400 ClI1 - C22 Aromatics 96,000 9.400 TarqqtAnlytes Acenaphthene 1,900 560 Acenaphthylene ND 560 Anthracene 2.900 560 Benzo(a)anthracene 5.000 560 Benzo(a)pyrene 3,300 560 £9Q3 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.400 560 Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,600 560 Benzo(knluoranthene 2,000 560 Chrysene 4.900 560 Dbenzo(a,h)anthracene - 610 560 Fluoranthene 13,000 560 Fkwene 1,700 560 Indeno(I,2,3-cdpyrene 2.100 560 Naphthalene 1,100 560 Phenanthrene 12.000 560 Pyrene 12,000 560 2-Methyinaphthalene ND 560

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batcth: MB-6143 Chlorocdecane 35% o-Terphenyl 40% 2-Flororbiphenyl 74% 2-Bromonaphthalene 749C

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al pe;frmanceceptance standards for the required QAJQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 80417-11A

015 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-1/0-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: 80417-01A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix: Soil, 87% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/2/03 Fl. 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in: ug*kg. dry weight basis Dilution: 2.5

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits C9 - C18 Aliphatics 15,000 8.300 C19-C36AUiphatics 150.000 11,000 ClI - C22 Aromatics 120,000 23,000

Target Analytes Acenaphene NDO 1,400 Acenahthylene ND 1.400 Anthracene ND 1,400 Benzo(a)anthracene 2,200 1.400 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.700 1,400 Benzo(b)fluomranthen 2.700 1.400 Benzo(ghi)perytene NDO 1.400 Benzo(k)luorxanthene ND 1,400 Chrysene 2.300 1,400 Dibenzo(a.,h)anthracene ND 1,400 Fluoranthene 4,900 1.400 Fluorene ND 1.400 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene ND 1.400 Naphthalene ND 1,400 Phenanthrene 3,700 1.400 Pyrene 4.500 1.400 2-MethyInaphthalene ND 1.400

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chorooctadecane 65% o-Terphenyl 74% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90% 2-Brornonaphthalene 54%

ND- Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all perfkocaepce standards for the required QA/OC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 112.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 BO417-01A Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10103 Client ID: SB-115-7 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-02A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix: Soil. 79% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/2/03 Fl, 412/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics ND 3.500 I C19 - C36 Aliphaics 5,500 4,700 Cl1 - C22 Aromatics 51,000 10,000 TaMet Analvies ~I Acenaphthene ND 590 Acenaphthylene ND 590 Anthracene ND 590 Benzo(a)anthracene 820 590 i Benzo(a)pyrene 590 590 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 920 590 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 590 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 590 I Chrysene 880 590 Dbenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 590 Fkoranthene 1800 590 Fluoene ND 590 U Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrenr.x, ND 590 Naphthalene ND 590 Phenanthrene 1,400 590 I Pyrene 1.700 590 2-Methyinaphthalere ND 590

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 57% o-Terphenyl 65% 2-Florobiphen 102- 2-Broniaphthalene 100%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QAQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all pefon an standards for the required QA/QKC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 BO417-02A

n It'i 4;~, 0 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Clent Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-1117-19 Date Received: 3/12103 Lab ID 80417-03A Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrx Sol 80% Soid Dale Analyzed: 4/2103 Fl, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in:t ug/kg, dry weight basis Diton: 1

Reporting Umits

C9 - C18 Aiphatics 5,800 3,600 C19- C36Alphatics 9,400 4,800 ClI - C22 Aromatics 25,000 10,000 ?JDi~ TeaM tnates 600 Acenaphylene 600 AntOracene 600 Benzo(a)anthracene 600 Benzo(a)pyrene 600 Benzo(b~fluoanthne 600 benzo(ghi)perylene 600 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 600 Chrysene 600 Dienzo(a.h)anthracene 600 FkluoSthe 600 Fluorene 600 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 600 Naphthalene Phenanthrene 600 Pyrne 600 2-Methyinaphthalene 600

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane -63% o-Terphenyl - . 69% 2-Florobiphenyl 99"% 2-8tomonaphthalene 93%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted mithe Project Narrabve, aA OA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were foAowed, and al peonmance/acceptance standards for the required QNAIOC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exdude concentration of target and QC (surrxogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I BO417-03A 007 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc- Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID. SB-3/0-1 Date Received: 3/12103 Lab ID B0417-04A Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrix Sol, 81% Solid Date Analyzed: 41203 Fl, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in: ugtkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aihatics 4,300 3,500 C19 - C36 hatics 270,000 4,700 C1I - C22Aromatics 110,000 9.900 Target Analyes Acenaphthe ND 580 0 -, Acenaphthylene ND 580 cb klb IUD Anthracene 580 580 Benzo(a)anthracene 1,300 580 Benzo(a)pyrene 950 580 Benzo(b)Auoranthene 1,700 580 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 580 Benzo(k)fuoranthene 640 580 Chrysene 1,400 580 Dibenzo(a,h)antdhracene ND 580 Fluoranthene 2,800 580 Fluorene ND 580 Indenc 1 .2,3-cd)pyrene ND 580 Napht aene 740 580 Phenanthrene 1,800 580 Pyrene 2,600 580 2-Methynaphthalene ND 580

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-8143 Chorooctadecane 54% o-Terphenyl 55% 2-Fluorobophenyl 92% 2-Brornonap 87%

ND=- Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were foSowed, and al perfowr a aptne standards for the required QAIQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I B0417-04A

8lI- Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-3/7-9 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: BO417-OSA Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Marix: Soil, 84% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution-: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Alphatics ND 3,400 C19 - C36 Aliphatics ND 4,500 ClI - C22 Aromatics 15,000 10,000 Target Analytes Acenaphthene ND 560 O ) Acenaphthylene ND 560 Anthracene ND 560 gsv(0 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 560 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 560 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 560 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 560 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 560 Chrysene ND 560 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene ND 560 Fkanthene 740 560 Flukorene ND 560 Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene ND 560 Naphthalene ND 560 Phenanthrene ND 560 Pyrene 630 560 2-Methyinaphthalene ND 560

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 41% o-Terphen$ 40% 2-Forophen 124Y% 2-Brornonaphihalene 111%

ND= Not Detected

Excep where noled in ft Project Narrative, all QOAQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all perfoRmeacceptnce standards for the required QOQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exdude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 BO417-05A

009 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/10/03 Client ID: SB-3/13-15 Date Received: 3/12103 Lab ID: B0417-06A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix Sol, 82% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/2/03 F1, 4/2/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Linits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics ND 3,400 C19 - C36 Plphaics 14,000 4,600 ClI -022 Aroiatics ND 9,800

Target AnaMes , eapthimne Li) 580 Acenaphthylene 580 Anthracene 580 Benzo(a)anthracene 580 Benzo(a)pyrene 580 Benzo(b)fuoranthene 580 Benzo(ghi)perylene 580 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 580 Chrysene 580 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 580 Fluoranthene 580 Fluorene 580 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 580 Naphthalene 580 Phenanthrene 580 580 2-Methyinaphthalene2-MePyrnaphthalene 580

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batci MB-6143 Chloroctadecane 63% o-Terphenyl 67% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 88% 2-Bromrnonaphthalene 88%

ND- Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative. all QAOC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0417-06A 0. 03 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-2/0-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: BO417-07A Date Extracted: 3/1703 Matrix: Soil, 75% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 F1, 4/303 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilutior 1

Reporting Results Limits

C9 - 018 Alphatics 4,700 3.900 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 38,000 5.200 Cl1 - C22 Aromatics 49,000 11.000 C OW Trqt Analytes to-5 Acenaphthene ND 650 01 0 Acenaphthylene ND 650 Anthracene ND 650 Benzo(a)anthracene 1,300 650 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,100 650 Benzo(b)fltuoranthene 1,800 650 Benzo(gmhi)peylene ND 650 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 820 650 Chrysene 1.400 650 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene ND 650 Fluoranthene 2.700 650 Fluorene ND 650 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO 650 Naphthatene ND 650 Phenanthrene 1,500 650 Pyrene 2,600 650 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 650

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 49% o-Terphenyl 53% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 92-4 2-Bromonaphthalene 82%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al OAQN/QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all perfomance/acceptance standards for the required QAOQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination forn the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (sumxjrrogate) analytes

Page 1 of I BO417-07A

011 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-27-9 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-08A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 MatriE.Soil, 84% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics ND 3,400 I C19 - C36 Aliphalics 13,000 4,600 ClI - C22 Aromatics 34,000 9,700

Target Analtes Acenaphthee ND 570 , OIU Acenaphthylene ND 570 Anthracene ND 570 Benzo(a)anthracene 1,200 570 Benzo(a)pyrene 940 570 Benzob)fuoranthene 1,500 570 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 570 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 610 570 Chrysene 1,300 570 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 570 Fluoranthene 2,700 570 Fluorene ND 570 Indeno(1,.2,3-cd)pyrene ND 570 Naphthalene ND 570 Phenanthrene 1,600 570 Pyrene 2,500 570 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 570

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 56% o-Terphenyl 63% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 99% 2-Bromonaphthalene 99%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Nanrrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al per-frmanceceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B0417-08A

OKL Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3111/03 Client ID: SB-2/11-13 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-09A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrisc.Sol, 91% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ugtkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Rarnes Limits

C9- C18 Aihatics 18,000 3.100 c19 -c036 Afphatics 23,000 4.200 Cl1 - C22 Aromatics 52,000 8.900

Target Analytes Acenapht!hene ND 520 Acenaphthylene ND 520 EA2Qo Anthracene ND 520 Benzo(a)anthracene 710 520 Benzo(a)pyrene NDO 520 Benzo(b)tiuoranthene 800 520 Benzo(ghl*peryene ND 520 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 520 Chrysene 760 520 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene ND 520 Fluoranthene 1,800 520 Fluorene ND 520 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 520 Naphthalene ND 520 Phenanthrene 1,000 520 Pyrene 1,500 520 2-Methy inaphthalene ND 520

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batcv MB-6143 Chlooctadecane 59% o-Terphenyl 68% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 96%. 2-Bromonaphthalene 94%

ND= Not Detected

Except where rnoted in the Project Narraive, a QAJQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al performancelacceptIce standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved. The only significant modilication made to this method is the subaction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B0417-09A 0i Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. AnaFlysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11103 Client 0ID:SB-80-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab 1D B0417-10A Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrix Soil. 84% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 FI, 413/03 F2 Concentration in: ugkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - 018 Aliphatics 4,500 3.500 I C19 - C36 Aliphatics 13,000 4,700 C11 - C22 Aromatics 45,000 9,900 Targe Anaytes Acenaphthene ND 580 Acenaphthylene ND 580 I Anthracene ND 580 Benzo(a)anthracene 1,400 580 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,100 580 Benzo(b)&uoranthene 1,900 580 Benzo(ghipermqylene ND 580 Benrzo(k)fuoranthene 690 580 Chfrysene 1,600 580 Dtibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 580 Flukoranthene 3.100 580 Fluorene ND 580 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 580 I Naphthalene ND 580 Phenanthrene 2,000 580 Pyrene 2,900 580 2-Methynaphthalene ND 580

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Ckoroodadecane 50% o-Terphen)l 57% 2-Fluorobiphenyl Q% 2-Bromonaphthalene 89%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QAJQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al performanceacceptance standards for the required OAflC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I B0417-10A

,.U ij.- Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-817-9 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID B0417-11A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Malrbcx: Soil, 85% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3103 Fl. 413/03 F2 Concentration in: tug/kg, day weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Limit

C9-C 18 Aliphatics ND %: 3,300 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 9,700 "i- 4.400 ClI -C22 Arnmatics 96,000 9,400 Tamer les Acenahthene 1,900 560 Acenaphthylene NO 560 Anthracene 2.900 560 Benzo(a)anthracene 5,000 560 Benzo(a)pyrene 3,300 560 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5,400 560 \03 Benzo(ghs pe 1,600 560 Benzo(k)fuoranthene 2,000 560 chrysene 4,900 560 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene - 610 560 Floranthene 13,000 560 Fluorene 1,700 560 Indeno(1,2,3-cdlpryene 2.100 560 Naphthalene 1,100 560 Phenanthrene 12,000 560 Pyrene 12,000 560 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 560

Surrgate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlrooctadecane 35% o-Terphenyl 40% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 748% 2-Bromonaphthalene 74C

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Nanative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and a performancefaceptancrm standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I 80417-1 1A

(0it5 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: SB-8/7-9RE Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: 80417-11 ARE Date Extracted: 317/03 Matrir Soil, 85% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 F1 Concentratin: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Results Linits CrrI C3 ND *

4yr iOOA c5K (z~ou+<& czo(AQA (omY Ojvjrw "

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chloroodtadecane 36%

ND= Not Detected

Only the aiphatics fraction was reanalyzed to confirm low surrogate recovery.

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QAQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al pemne-acepace standards for the required QCAC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge Untawnon from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B0417-11 ARE

GiC Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11/03 Client ID: 88-910-1 Date Received: 3/12103 Lab ID: BO417-12A Date Extracted: 3/17103 Matrix: Sol, 70% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 F1, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1 Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aiphaics 26,000 3,90 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 30.000 5,200 ClI - C22 Aromatics 66.000 11.000

Targer Analytes Acenaphwthene ND 660 Acenaphthylene 950 660 Anthracene 1,800 660 Benzo(a)anthracene 1.200 660 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 660 Benzo (b)fuoranthene 1,900 660 Benzo(ghi)perytene ND 660 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 790 660 Chrysene 1,800 660 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 660 Fkoranthene 4.200 660 Fklorene ND 660 Jideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NDO 660 rph?#titlene ND 660 Phenanthrene 3,800 660 Pyrene 3,900 660 2-Methyinaphthalene NDO 660

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlroodtadecane 61% o-Terphenyl 63% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 94% 2-Bromonaphthalene 98%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted inthe Project Narrative, a QAfQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al performaxeacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I BO417-12A

ti - In Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Crient Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/11103 Client ID: SB-9/5-7 Date Received: 3/12103 Lab ID: B0417-13A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix Soil, 87% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 F1, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting LUmnits

C9 -C18 Aliatics 5,000 3,300. C19 - C36 Aliphatics 17,000 4,500 3 C I - C22 Aromatics 58,000 9,500 s\\YtO

Target Analytes Acenaphthene 640 560 Acenaphthylene ND 560 Anthracene 1,200 560 Benzo(a)ardnthracene 2,600 560 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,900 560 Benzo(b)lubranthene 3,000 560 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 560 Benzo(k)fmuoranthene 1,200 560 Chysenbe 2,600 560 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene ND 560 Fluoranhene 6,000 560 Fluxene 570 560 Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 1,200 560 Naphthalene ND 560 Phenanthrene 4.400 560 Pyrene 5,600 560 2-Methyinaphthalene ND 560

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batcit MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 46% o-Terphenyl 53% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 86- 2-Bromonaphthalene 85%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Naraive, al QAIQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed., and all peromanceacceptance standards forkthe required OAJQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0417-13A

0I8 Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/12103 Client ID: SB-10/0-1 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID BO417-14A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrbbc Sol, 85% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 2.5

Reporting EPH Ranes Results Limits c9 -C18Aliphatics 20,000 8,500 C19- C36 Aliphatics 54,000 11,000 CiI - C22 Aromatics 190,000 24,000 QAI N

Targt Anales Acenaphihene ND 1,400 Acenaphthylene ND 1,400 Anthracene 2,200 1.400 Benzo(a)anthracene 7,700 1,400 Benzo(a)pyrene 6,100 1.400 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10,000 1,400 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 1,400 Benzo(k)fuoanthene 3,700 1,400 Chrysene 7,800 1,400 Ditenzo(ah)anthracene ND 1,400 Fluoranthene 15,000 1,400 Fluorene ND 1.400 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pwene -5,000 1,400 Naphthalene ND 1,400 Phenanthrene 8,100 1,400 Pyrene 15,000 1.400 2-Methinaphthalene ND 1,400

Surogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctladecane 56% o-Terphen$yl 84% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91% 2-Bromonaphthalene 63%

NO= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narralive, all QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and all peutk nanrceaccpta standards for the required QAIQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B0417-14A

013 Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/12103 Client ID: SB-109-11 Dale Received: 3/12103 Lab ID B0417-ISA Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix Soit, 91% Sold Date Analyzed 413/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Diluti 1

Reporting Lirits

09 - C18 Aliphalics 460.000 3,200 019 - C36 Aliphatics 76,000 4,200 CI - 022 Aromatics 280,000 9,000 Ep Tamet Analytes ,NJ O(b Acenaphthee ND U 530 Acenaphthlene ND L, 530 Anthracene ND 530 Benzo(a)anthracene 910 530 Benzo(a)pyrene 800 530 Benzo(b)I oran hene 1,200 3- 530 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 530 Benzo(kluornthee ND 530 chrysene 1,000 530 Dbenzo(a.h)anthracene ND 530 Fluoranthene 2,200 7- 530 Fluoene 2.100 530 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 530 Naphthalene 620 ,530 Phenantene, 2,500 330 Pyrene 1,900 3" 530 2-Methyinaphthalene 960 530

Surrogate Recovery (%) QOC Batch MB-6143 C oocadecane 50% o-Terpheny 59% 2-Fuorotiheny 103% 2-Bromonaphthalene 64%

ND= Not Detected

Except where nroted in the Proect Narrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were foowed, and al perfonanceacceptaestandards for the required QA/QF procedures were actieved.

The only significant modification made to thiis method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contarnation from the EPH ranges per Sectiofi 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I 80417-1SA

~2ti AnaMs Repot: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/12/03 Client ID KSB-10/9-11 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-16A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrxbc Soil 91% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 F1, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: ugtkg. dry wejight basis DilutoniI

Reporting Results trlag

C9 -C18Alphatics 380,000 3,200 C19 - C36 phatics 60.000 4,300 C11 - C22 Aromatics 280,000 9,200

Tarqet Analtes X\ (7\ Acenaphene 1,200Z 540 Acenaphtylene 1,900!s 540 Anthacene NO 540 Benzo(awthmcene ND 540 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 540 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 540 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 540 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 540 Chrysene ND 540 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 540 RFuoranthene 540 Fluorene 540 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 540 Naphthalene 850 540 Phenarwaene 1.500ND US 540 Pyrene 540 2-Meth halene 1,100 540

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Bal MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 40% o-Terphenyl! 54% 106% 2-Brokonaphthaene 70%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QAfQC procedures requed by the EPH method were followed. and a* performancetacceptance standards for te required OAfC procedures were achieved. The only significant modiication made to this method is the subtractio of SPE cartridge contamina-Mtion from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (sunrrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0417-16A Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/12/03 Client ID: SB-1013-15 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: B0417-17A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Matrix Soil. 85% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Results Limits

C9 - C18 Alphatics 150,000 3,400 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 32,000 4.500 C1I - C22 Aromatics 140,000 9.500

Target Analytes Acenaphthene ND 560 FP Acenaphthylene 970 560 Anthracene ND 560 Akq)b Benzo(a)anthracene ND 560 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 560 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 560 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 560 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 560 Chrysene ND 560 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene ND 560 Fkoranthene ND 560 Fksorene 1,000 560 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 560 Naphthalene ND 560 Phenanthrene 750 560 Pyrene ND 560 2-Methyinaphthalene 2,000 560

Surrogate Recovery (%): 0C Batch: MB-6143 Chloocladecane 51% o-Terphenyl 65% 2-Fluorobphenyl 100% 2-Bromonaphthalene 80A

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QAQC procedures required by the EPH "ethod were followed, and all peformce/acceptance standards for the required OA/QC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contanination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of larget and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I B0417-17A

C,2 Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/12/03 Client ID: SB-9/13-15 Date Received: 3/12/03 Lab ID: 80417-18A Date Extracted: 3/17/03 Mar Soi, 85% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/3/03 Fl, 4/3/03 F2 C oaentration in: ugk dry wekjight basis Dilution: 1 Reporting EPH Ranges Result Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 6,000 3,400 C19 - C36 Aliphati" ND 4,500 ClI - C22 Aromatics ND 9.600

Amernaphtnes 570 Acenaphthylene 570 Antracene 570 Benzo(a)anthracene 570 Benzo(a)pyrene 570 Benzo(b)Iuoranthne 570 Benzo(ghiipr n 570 Benzo(k)fiuoranthene 570 570 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene 570 Fluoranthene 570 Fluorene 570 ChryseneIndeno(,2,3-cd)pyrene 570 Naphthalene 570 Phenanthrene 570 Pyrene 570 2-Methyinaphthalene 570

Surrogate Recovery (%): OC Batch: MB-6143 Chlorooctadecane 67% o-Terphenyl 74% 2-Fluorobiphenyl , 97%4 2-Bntoonaphthalene 90%

ND Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Naativew, al OA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all permbformanceacceptance standards for the required ONQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 80417-18A 03 FORN 1 CTENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT SHBBT

Lab Name: MITN CORPORATIC Co tract: Lab Code: MITK Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-01A Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E1E01847 t Moisture: 13 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sooc) SOC Date Extracted: 03/24/03

*occentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/27/03 Inj etion Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: - (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/IN) Y ONCERATIOUrWS: CAS NO. OMPOD (ug/L or wg/Kg) U/KG Q C U 12674-11-2----- Aoclor-1016 38 U I 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 38 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 38 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 38 U' 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 38 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 1800 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 38 I

FIORM I PCB

(;,,, PORN 1 ChlERT SAMPLE MD. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SB-1/5-7 Lab Name: MITKM CRPORATIO Ccntr-act: J Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SD NO.: 80417

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sanle ID: B0417-02A

Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/Lt) G lab File ID: E1B0221F t Moisture: 21 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03

Extraction: (SepP/Cont/Sonc) SC Date Extracted:03/24/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (UtL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC cleanup: (Y/N) N - pH: Sulfur Clearp: (Y/N) Y

(C/L or I/Q) U I/T

CAS ND. C[n (wg/L or rag/ Kg) UG3/EG Q '-

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 42 U 11104-28-2------Atroclor-1221 42 0 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 42 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 42 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 42 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 42 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 42 U0f

FcM I PCB

S.1 8 PCAM I ChlERT SAMPLB ND. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT)A SHEBT

Lab Name: MITKEM C(OR RATION Co tract: jSB-1/17-19 Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: S AS No.: SDG No.: B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-03A

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E10222F t Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) saOc Date tracted:03/24/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 Injection volue: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Clearmnup: (Y/N) Y

CAS NO. CpM (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q Jt

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 41 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 41 U 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 41 U I 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 41 U 12672-29-6----- Azoclor-1248 41 U 11097-69-1 ------Aroclor-1254 41 U 11096-82-5------Aroclor-1260 41 UT I

FORM I PCB

Ut'J9 RlM 1 CLIEMT SAMPLB ND. PCB OFANICS ANALYSIS DM A SHEET __-

.tract: SB-3/0-1 Lab Name: MIT E CORPORATI( Co ntract: Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: SA%S No.: SDG No.: B80417

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-04A Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/ML) G Lab File ID: fl80187F t Moisture: 19 decanted: (YIN) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SOC Date Extracted: 03/24/03

Concentrated ExRtract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 03/27/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (YI/N) N JA: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y C TI tIOUNMS: cAB No. corJom (ugL UG/IG 0 or g/g) /I. ib 12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 41 U 102 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 41 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 41 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-12427 41 U 12672-29-6 ------Ao lor-1248 41 U 11097-69-1----- A.o.or-1254 95 _ 11096-82-5----- A=oclor-1260 41 U -

FOM I Pc

tJj'~J FORM 1 CLIT SAMPLE NO. PCB -'GANICSANALYSIS DATALSHEBT

Lab Name: MITKN CORPOATIN Cot ktract:SB-3/7-9

Lab Code: MITKE Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : "B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sauple ID: B0417-05A Sanple vt/vol: 30.7 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EI0188F? % Moisture: 16 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03

Extraction: (SepF/cont/Scnc) SCIC Date Extracted:03/24/03

Conmcentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 03/27/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (UL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

CCCorNRATI/O UNTS: CAS NO. COMPOD (Ug/L or Ug/Kg) UG/rn Q 4 I 12674-11-2------Axoclor-1016 39 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 39 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 39 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 39 U I 12672-29-6------Axoclor-1248 39 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 44 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 39 U

I I I I I FORN I PCBI 041 1 PORK 1 C7lENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATASSHEBT SB-3/13-15 lab Name: MITKEN CORPORATI(ON Conitract:I I Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No. : SDG NO. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sanple ID: B0417-06A Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 1EI0189F t Moisture: 18 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (sepF/cont/Son) SCNl Date Extracted:03/24/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/27/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N ps: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y CCBRATIT tNIUTS: 4 CAS ND. COMPOD (ug/L or ug/Kg) DG/G Q

12674-11-2 ------Aroclor-1016 40 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 40 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 40 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 40 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 40 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 40 US 11096-82-5.------Aroclor-1260 40 U J

POrN I PCB

HZ PCB ANICS PORNLYSIS 1 DAT ClENr SAMPLE NO. A SHEET

SB-2/0-1 Lab Name: MITREN CORPORATION D Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SiS No.: SDG No.: B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-07A

Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E1E80190F t Moisture: 25 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/snc) Suoc Date Extracted:03/24/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) S Date Analyzed: 03/27/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanupm: (Y/N) N - P: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

CCETRATION UNITS: CAS NO. CChPOID (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/G Q K! 12674-11-2 ------Aroclor-1016 44 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 44 U e I 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 44 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 44 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 44 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 44 U :T 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 44 U "

FORM I PCB

043 FORM I ChlENT SAMPIB NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA7 I SB-2/7-9 Lab Name: r ORPORATION Co 3

Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No.: B0417

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sanple ID: B0417-08A Sample Wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mlT) G Lab File ID: E1EB0191F t Moisture: 16 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sanc) SOW Date Extracted:03/24/03 Cocentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/27/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N p: - Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y (ug or ug/ U) I~: cas No. CO-sOunD (ug/r. or ag/rg) rn/mn Qa ) 010 'Ci 12674-11-2----- Aroclr-1016 39 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 39 U 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 39 U 53469-21-9------Azoclor-1242 39 U 12672-29-6 ------Aroclor-1248 39 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 39 UJ7 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 39 UK-

FORM I PCB

.-,.- A ISM1 CLIENT SAMPLB ND. PCB ORGxNIS ANALYSIS DA2? LSHBT__

itract:SB-2/11-13 Lab Nam: KM E CORPORATION Co tract:I Lab Code: MITKM Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-09A Sample vt/vol: 30.6 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E1B0198F t oisture: 9 decanted: (YIN) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cmt/Sonac) SCINC Date Extratcted:03/24/03

.ConcentratedExtract Voltme: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 I GP Cleanup: (Y/N) N PH: Salfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y (Ug/L or -g/Xg) 1UG/V CAS O. COPOUNo C(ug/L or ug/) iT/S : Q - ) I 12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 36 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 36 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 36 U 53469-21-9 ---- Arolor-1242 36 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 36 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 _ 36 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 36 U T I I I I I I I I FORM I PCB

0-;5 3 FORN 1 CLTENr SAMPLE- NO. PCB ORGANICS AnwLYSs DAT A SHEET

Lab Name: MITCr COPWRATION C ntract:£ Itract:SB-8/0-1 K Lab Code: MITKEE CaBe No.: S S No.: SDG No.: B30417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-10A Saple wt/vol: 30.1 (g/l) G Lab File ID: E1E0199F t Moisture: 16 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (Sep/ont/Soanc) SONC Date Extracted:03/24/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL] S Date Analyzed: 03/28/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GW Cleanup: (YIN) N p: sulflur cleanup: (Y/N) Y

CAS NO. 00HOERD C(uCT/L(ug/L oroRATI( ug/Eg)n/Kg) UG/EI TS: G 0 I (o P3 12674-11-2 ------Aroclor-1016 40 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 40 U 11141-16-5------Azoclor-1232 40 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 40 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 40 U f1097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 40 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 40 UT

PORM I PCB

048 PORM 1 ClENT SAMPLB M. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SSHEET

SB-8/7-9 Lab Name: MITEEN CORPORATION Co itract: I Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sanple ID: B0417-11A sauple vt/vol: 30.3 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E180200F t Moisture: 15 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cbnt/Scnc) SGC Date TBtracted:03/24/03 Concentrated Extract Voluame: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GWC Cleanup: (Y/N) N PIE: Sulfur Clearup: (Y/N) Y (Ug/L or ug/g) QNITS: aLI CAS NO. CPOUIDh (wilL or wi U)/i; 5

12674-11-2 ------Aroclor-1016 39 U I 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 39 U 11141-16-5 ------AroClor-1232 39 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 39 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 39 U I 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 180 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 39 U I

FORN I PB

U47 PRcM 1 Crl SAMPIB NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DA A SHEBT SB-9/0-1 LabWae: MIlE CORPORATIN C £tract: I Lab oXde: MITKEN Case No. : S AS No. : SDG NO. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sauple ID: B0417-12A Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E1I02017 t Moisture: 30 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cout/Scoc) SO Date Extracted:03/24/03 Coucentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL] S Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPc cleanup: (Y/N) N 9: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y (cgmL orr.Gn g T :) Q CAS NO. CCHEOD (wgi.a or wg/rg) UG3/TG Q

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 47 U C) 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 47 U .11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 47 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 47 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 47 U 11097-69-1 ------Aroclor-1254 170 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 47 w

FOK=M I PCB

C I1 PORK 1 - CIMN SAMPLE NO. PCB OPGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHERT SB-9/5-7 Lab Nme: MITKIH CORPORATION Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No. : B0417 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL ab Sample ID: B0417-13A Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (9/miL) G ab File ID: E0202F t Moisture: 13 decanted: (Y/N) N ate Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (SepP/Cont/Sonc) SOC )ate Extracted:03/24/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 S Injection Volume: 1. 0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC cleanup: (Y/N) N PH: ;ulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

)r ug/Kg) CAS iO. a nOtla:o (ug/L oRAg/g) UsT/:rn/K s

12674-11-2 ------Aroclor-1016 38 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 38 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 38 U 53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 38 U I 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1-----Atoclor-1254 38 U 71 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 38 UZ I

FORM I PCB

649 PORM 1 CLENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEBT

tract: SB-10/0-1 Lab Na: ITK CORPORATION o 3 Lab Code: MITKHM Case No.: S S No.: SDG No.: "0417

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sanple ID: B0417-14A Sample vt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 1O0203F

V Moisture: 15 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/12/03 Extraction: (sepF/Cont/nc) SCIC Date Extracted: 03/24/03 I Cocentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 03/28/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanw: (Y/N) Y

CCNRATION UNTS: ,I cas No. clZom (ug/L or ug/Kg) MU/mN Q 12674-11-2------Aolor-1016 38 U I 11104-28-2----- AroMlor-1221 38 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 38 U 53469-21-9----- A oclor-1242 38 U 6 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 38 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 600 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 38 U T I I I

I1 ITI I; FOR I PCB I £50 U.S. EPA -CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SI-/17-19 Lab Name: MITKEM_CORPORATION_ Contract:

SLab Code: MNlXEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417.

Matrix (soilwater): SOL Lab Sample ID: 80417-03A.

Date Received: 03/12/03 I vl (ow/med): 80.0 1 % Solids: Concentration Units (ag/L or mkg dry weight): MG/KG

CASNo. Analyte Concentation C Q M

7429-90-5 Atunnnm "R 5 /c9 7440-36-0 Ai0.25 & X P 7440-38-2 Anic 2.3 5 P .7440-39-3 Rartmn .8 " P_ 3440-41-7- Beryllium- 44 - X P- -7440-43-9 . Cadminm_0080 0 U p 7440-70-2 Caini m - NR 7440-47-3 -hlmnium 1 3.5 P .7440-48-4 C_ _ah NR -7440-50-2 raopper 42 P- 7439-89 In NR -7439-92-1 l 3.5- P ..7439-95-4 - Manean INR .7439-96-5 Mananese- NR -7439-97-6- M= y 0.018 U .CV _7440-02- NNel -9.4 P. -7440)9-0; asdum NR _7782-49-2 0.48_Sium . P_ -7440-224 - dm 0 -ilve7 P- -7440-23-5- Snd= NR -7440.7114) Thalim i *O9"4$P.. -7440-62-2 V d; 7.7 T. P- -7440.6-6 7--- -- 25-.2 P Cyanide NR

: Color Befoe Texture:

Clarity After Artifacts jci a

FORM I - IN SW846 u.o. C'VA - ,17

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-3/0-I tab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION. Contract:

ab Code Ml Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: 910417

Ma rx (soilwad): SOL- Lab Sample ID: 0417-4A

vel (lonfmed): MED Date Received: 03/12/03_

81.0 I% Solids Concentation Units (ug/L or mgkg dry weighit): MGlKG

CAS No. Anatle Concenttion C Q M

_7429-90-5 Anmimn NR 7440-36-.. Antimony ,4 u P -7440*39-3 Rarium IK P_ £&(403 744041-7- Belium -0.75 ___ P _7440-43-9 . Cadmium- 0-39 P .7440-70-2 _ Ckinm _ .440-47.3Chrni m - 15 4P. 7440-48.4 elbateNR Coper_440-M-8 45.9 P... _7439-g -6 Ir R -7439-92-1- 1-ad 142- P__ -7439-95-4___ merinm--_ NR 7439-96-5 M Eag. NR 7439-976_ _44..2o. alcwyirke -0.92 +16 7 - ,,_..,. __p_C _7440-09-7 Ndm_

_7782-49-2_ Se0nium a 47 U P -7440-22-4- Silvr - 0. 11 I P -.7440-23-5 aodium O uN -7440-28- -4-rv v3 st P _7440-62-2 .Vanadim. - 129- P- -7440-66-6- Zinn 65.5 3.P' P cyanian NR

Clarity Before: Texture: SBefore: . r Afier Claiy After I1n I FORM I - IN SW846 U.b. EiPA - LU'

I I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-3n-9 Lab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION_ Contract:

Lab Code: fMITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: 80417

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL__ Lab Sample ID: B0417-05A.__

Leve (ow/med): MED- Date Received: 03/12/03_

% Solids: 84.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyt, Conentration C Q M

.7429-90-5 Aumnimnt INR .7440-36-0 Antimony 036 _7440-38-2_ Ari- - i3.2 P_ aI3 7440-39-3 Barium 42.7- P 744041-7- Berllium 0.5- P_

744043-9. .Cadmim-- 0.23 O" _ _ P_ 7440-70-2 .Cakimn NR _7440-47-3 Chm!minm!.2 P- _7440-48-4 nhakNR. _440-50-8 . -e-r 12.4 - P -7439-89--. I NR 7439-92-1- ln 7t 5 P" 7439-954 Magnesium- NR 7439-96-5 Manganews NR _7439-97-6 )Mesy 0. 18 CV 7440-02-0 Ni&.cl 27.3 _ P

-".7440-09-7. Jhnium ¢u NR -782-49-2 ernim0. P _7440-224 - Silr0.12 U. P- -7440-23-5- Sndium- NR _7440-28) 'llhum *I P. -7440-62-2 .Vana.1 9 -P-

Cyanide-N

SColor Befwo Clarity Before: Texture:

Clom Afk- Artifacts: tcmments

FORM I - IN SWS46

el I U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SB-3/13-15 Lab Name: MITIXEMCORPORATION Contract:

I ab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417

Matrix (soil/water): Lab Sample ID: B0417-06A_ U.d (lowlmed): Date Received: 03/12/03

82.0 I Solids- Coxentration Units (ug/L or mglkg dry weight): MG/KG

CA.-No. Anaye Concestration C Q M

7429-90-5 .Aliu- ... 8VIoBo 7440-36-0- ntn .7 P 43Arsenl_ 2- M -7440-39-3- an- -12.9 P- .-7440-41-7 Beyimn - a,,.4 P _ _7440-43-9 .C 0.085 p_ -7440-.70-2 Ctrim NR 3440-47-3 €hrmn13m3- - P_ -440-48-4- O"k NR -7440-50-8- Copper-? P- 744o-62-o7439.89-6 INRVuadia 2t.. O,[ f__ -7439-92-1- In 24 P _7439-95-4- M NR -7439-96-5- Manaer NR _439-97-6- M .y 0.016 ,. CV -7440-02-0 - Ni'kel- 103. P. -7440-09-7 P NR -782-49-2- .Selnm 0.46 U P. -440-224-4 ilWr a is 4-ATRP -7440-23-.5 .dnN 7440-2o. *n..m - .. I(P _440-62-. Va im. 76 I 5 P _440-664 7ine 14.5 P_ Cyanide' NR

Befor Cart Bem Tcture: I Anfas 1 o -fw

FORM I - IN SW846 InAl- U.0. rAPk - tr

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SU-2O-1I .b Name: MITKEMCORPORATION Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417

Matrix (soilwater): SOn Lab Sample ID: B0417-07A

Levd (lowima): Date Received: 03/12/03

% Solids: 75.0

Concehantion Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No Analyte Concmration C Q M

7429-90-5 AnmnR . 7440-364 Aimon O 3 £ -7440-3-2 19.6 1P 7440-39-3 Raran 67.2 ( P- -7440-41-7 Beslim a.73 X P _7440-43-9 Cadmiinn _ 0.40 p I 7440-70-2 .Cakium_ NR -7440-47-3-' Chemiam 16.4 P_ 7440-48-4 Coak NR 7440-50-8- r ______0.1 P U -7439-89-6 Irn NR _439-92-1-L e7 7_ __e_ P I 7439-95-4 M inm______NR -7439-96-5- Mangaman- _ NR _7439-97-6 Mercry.I CV -744002-0 Nir, 41.1" P 7440-9-7- PLmm NR U 7 7 -49- 2 - Selenium - 0 -4 II P -7440-22-4- Sver - 012 Pu_ a __440-28_0_'7440-23-5 SodimTmnu _ "pNR

7440-62-2 VmmI"P 3440-66-6 Zinc -y66.7-E.7 " P P_ a i cokoaBeore: Clarity Before: Texture: Color Afte Clarity Afra- Artfacts: ____ I Comments: I U FORM I- IN SW346lI U.S. EPA -CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-2/7-9 Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION Contract:

I ab Code: MfKEM Case No-: SAS No: SDG No.: B0417 Matrix (soilwater): soM- Lab Sample ID: B0417-08A _.

ew (lowimed): WMD Date Received: 03/12/03-

84.0 % Solids: Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MGlKG

CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q' M

-744o-36s0-7429-90-5A... Asians,l umim e.2 ,3' *f P.NR (-AD -7440-38-2 Ar. i 18.9 P 7440-39-3 rm 42.8 P .6116108 -7440-41-7- Berstinmo 0.75 P 7440-43-9 ,Cadnium 0.31 P _7440-70- .Cakinm NR 7440-47-3 Chatmium - 5_ P. _7440-48-4 .Ca , NR 7440-50 Copper 2 5 P 7439-9-6 Imoc NR 7439-92-1 - 16 P 7439-95-4- Magesiunm.. NR, 7439-965-. bMane .. NR 7439-97-6 Merc 0. I CV 7440-02-04 .IaW.W .. .3.9_ P__ _7440-09-7. Ptassinm 782-49-2_- -e-enim 347 L P 3440-224-4 Svr0.10 ... U-. P- -7440-23-5- Artu NR _7440-62-2,. aaiu95 ,P -7440-66-6 ine " o7 P Kyan9an a

Carity Befr Texture: t or Befor. L or Afte. Clarity Afer. I n I FORM I - IN SW846

I~1 U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-2/1I-13 Lab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION, Contract: lab Code: MIEM Case No.: SAS No.: -_ SDG No.: B0417t

Matrix (soil/waer): SO1. Lab Sample ID: B0417-09A

Level (low/med): MED Dale Received: 03112/03

%Solids: 91.0

Con4entration Units (rg/L or ngkg dry wight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Cocentration C Q M

429-9904 Alniann NR li p 7440-364 An0im -0.41 IP ;Sjjb10-3 -7440-38-2 A i 7.0- P_ -7440-39-3 R 7 1 i P_ _440-41-7- Beryllm 0.44 P _7440-43-9_ ad inm 0.16 U 3 9P 7440-70-2-t Cl mA R -744047-3 -Chrmium 10-9 P_ -7440-44. Cohnit. NR -7440-50-8 Caprr71 4- P -7439-896 NR 7439-92-I l aO _____0 0 P 7439-95-4- Magncsnt NR 7439-96-5- Manase NR 7439-97-6 Mkru- 0.29 Cv .7440-02-0o ic-1 P_ -7440-09-7- PaMssesim NR -792-49-2- Slenium - 048 U_ P_ 7440-224 Sib.er 0. II - P -7440-23-5- Setium NR .7440-28-0 h.ltim, I1. .- 1r if P_ -744042-2- .Vau m .*5.0- P -7440-6- 7in, 2.4 T P CyanideNR

Color Befose: Clarity Befoi: Texture:

Cor Aer ClWty Afr

Cens

FORMI -IN SWV46 larw1 %... &:,rn- %.X

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION Contract:

Sab Code: NMITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B04t7.

Matrix (soil/water): SOL Lab Sample ID: B0417-IOA

eve (low/med): MED- Date Rcceived: 03/12/03

84.0 I% Solids: I1 Concearation Units (ag/L or mgtkg dry weight). MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Cocentration C Q M

7429-90-5 .Alminum NR 7440-36-0 0.73. V * P.. 744f-384-7 Arrd 166Y P .7440-39-3 R-34 a- P S(/6(03 7440-41-7- B Am 0.l74 __P 7440-43-9- Cadmium _1 U P 7440-70-7 Caium- NR 7440-47-3- "Chromimn 13.4 P- -7440-4&4 oal NR -7440-50-8 Coppe 94.8 */ P- -7439-89-6- Iman NR -7439-92-1- IMad 91 O- P... _439-95-4 Magnesuse NR -7439-96-5- Mangane NR -7439-97-6 Mercury. 0.R CV -7440-02-0. '.1 l -6 2 I 4 7 . .P_ _7440-09-7. P .. _* NR -7892-49-2 eeima 6 44 -7440-23-3--7440-22-4- sodiumSilve - 0.10 -NRUII P- -,4o-0. Thal"-Ht- I.,_- __ I PG -7440-62-2 Vanaium 159 -_P -74406-6. Zie 1 7. -P f

Texture: orAftr Claity ARertc. Artifacts' I

FORM I - IN SW846

IC(o V, U.S. E.'A - U'

I E'A SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-87-9 Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION_ Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417

Matrix (soilwater): SOIL- Lab Sample ID: B0417-11 .A

Leve ow/med): MED Date Received: 03/12/03

% Solids: 85.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weighlt): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Concntmi C Q M

7429-90.-S Amnimmun NR -7440-36-0- Assimony t 9 _?440-38-2_ Arsenic 121 - - P -7440-39-3 arm - 65 -P- ;5)14K3 344041-7 RBeynim__ i P 7440-43-9- Cadmimn 062 P-- 440-70-2 Calum NR -7440-47-3 Chrmnium - 31.5 P- _7440-484 - Coalt NR -_440-50-8 Cope 67 -7439-89- Im NR 439-92-1- I 1.9_ P- 7439-95-4 . Magnesiumn 7439-96-5 . Mangaesr NR -7439-97-6 Mercuy - 0.95 CV 7440-2-0 NickeUt 65.1 P 7440-09.-72.Pn ium N _778249-2 Sele num 0-50 U- P _7440-22.4 Silr- 0. 11 U. P-- -7440-23-5- dium NR _7440-28.0 h.TaiW- . -7440-62-2 VY d inm 247 -p P 74Z40-66-6- ynniar 479 " NR

Color Bef- Clarity Before: Textue:

Color Afrl= Clarity After

Co-mm

FORM I -IN SW846 Ioi g U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

S SB-9/0-1 ab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION_ Contract:

I ab Code: MNTKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: D0417-

Matix (soilwater): SOL Lab Sample ID: 0417-12A .

U (ldow/med): MED Date Received: 03/12/03_

70.0 I% Soid Cocentration Units (ug/L or mWg/kg dzy weight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Cocenation C Q M

7429-90-5 Au.im NR 7440-36-0 A.any n064 P 7440-3-2- Dai 94rs. J' P 7440-39.3 Rarum 6.8. p -7440-41-7- eryium - 0.41 P_ -7440-43.9 .Cadmiu igA F- 7440-70-2. Cnakium NR 7440-47-3 CLnhmnum 5 P _7440-48.4-.Ca- NR _7440-504 . Capper .7 P- -7439-89-6 Ima NR 7439-92-1- g . 13.2 ___ P -7439-95-4- M&animN 7439-96-5 Manpans -449-W-07439-97-.. NTel-Mcr - 0211.8-2CV- P-

78249-2- eeimI TI -440-224-4 Silver 0.13-.U P- -40-23-5 4 NRWain -7440-72- Thallim I a9 IP- _744042-2 .Vafims 54.4- P F40-645 TE., 1 P

Texture: 6cfre r After Anifacts: tmes

FORM I - IN SW846 logt ua. nrA - %A1r

I EPA SAMPLNE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET S9/5-7 Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION. Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No: SAS No.: -_ SDG No: 80417-

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID-. 80417-13A_

Lvd mwhnmed): MED Date Received: 03/12/03

% Solids: 87.0

Concentratio Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight):- MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M

7429-90-5 Alminunm NR 7440-36-0 Antimony 0.39 O3 M 1 P -7440-38-2-. A ca _1.0 P_ s)1bt33 7440-39-3- Baiu- _ 993___ 6 P 7440-41-7- Be lin 0.61 pP _7440-43-9 .Cadmium.- - 0U P_ -7440-70.2-_ kin NR -7440 47-3 Chromim 17.3 P_ -7440-484 _Co it_ NR _744050--8 .Coppr 27.5 ' P_ -7439-89 __I_ ro INR _439-92-1 I -Md 91.6 " * P- 7439-95-4 Magnesiun NR -7439-96-5. Manganese NR _7439--97-6 - i.4 CV 7440-02-0 NickeMercy ____65.0_ -___ P_ -7440-09-7 Pm ... _ NR 7782-49-2 Sdeniu..mn 0.44 UP -7440-22-4-Silver 0.098 U. , ._ -7440-23-5 . -dinm NR -7440-28-0 ,11 trY " .I P_ 05 . P. _7440-62-27440-66-6- 7NVanadimn5 59.9P

Color Before: Texture:

Color Aflke. Artifacts. Comntrs I I FORM I- IN SWS46 I°le- I U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

I S NSB- 04-1 LabName: MITKEM CORPORATION Contract:

SDG No.: I Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: 10417 Mat ~ (soilwater): SOL Lab Sample ID: B0417-14A _

I _J atvwaedk MED Date Received: 03/12/03

85.0 I %Solids- Conctration Units (Wg/L Mgkggr dFy weight MG/KG

CAS No. Analyse Concatration C Q

.7429-90-5 A-um NR 7440-36- - Atimy 7 -P 7440-38-2. Aren~ 1 4.9.4 -. Py )If 3440-39.-3- - Iarium! / P_ -7440-41-7- ryl-li to.0- P_ 744043-9-. -mimn4. 7 P_ -7440-70-2_ i.Cam NR _7440-47-3_.Cnfmwim T8.6 P_ -7440-48-4- __a - NR _7440-50-8 Cppr_ 43.3 - .. .. -74394--89 Iswo NR -7439-92-1 IMa 120 - P_ -7439-95 4 JMagnimnI NR -7439-96-4 Mamngns NR 7439-97-6- Mkcury .3 CV 7440-02-0- NicL. 41.1 Ri- P_ -7440-09-7 Paraunf NR _7M249-2- Selenium 0.44 U . P_ -7440-22-4 Silver 0.097- 1U. P- 7440-23-5- Snelim NR _7440-28-0 .T-@* 0 I 1 If P_ 3440-6-2- Van.0 m P 7440-66-6- Zir 11 , P/ P N R -- I . A n

Carity Before- Txture.

-alor After Ugma I FORM I - IN Ito p U.N. E.YA - CIA

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET lab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION_ Contract: SDG N.: B0417-II

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: 'SAS No.: SDG No.. B04 17.

Matrix (soil/water): SOL- Lab Sample ID: B0417-15A_

Level (low/me): MED- Date Received: 03112/03_

% Solids: 91.0

Concentration Units (ngJL or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M sll (o3 _7429-90-5- Ahninum N 7440-36-0 An- nic P -7440-38-2 - 7440-39-3 Rariunm 34.4 J Pt

744041-7 -eryllim 0.77P 7440-43-9 - . .miu 0.20 U P 7440-70-2 . Cnrahn __ NR 7440-47-3 Chmromian 26.2 P 7440-48-4 Cotmba NR... 7440-504- Copper 16 1 P_ 743949-6.- - NR 7439-92-1 I mddL 150 7O P- 7439-95-4 Magsi . NPR 7439-96-5 tangane. NR 7439-97-6 Mercur 0.049 CV -7440-02-0 _ ickd 17.7P -7440-09-7 Potasium NR -782.-49-2 - Sele nm 041 U - P- _7440-224- Silver 0.092 U_ i . P_ _744..--5. Rare... N -744o.-& nm., o494as u at P. .. [_7440-62-. VanadiumL 19.8 "~7 , P... _440-66-6_ i,, 24 T" Pr P_ cya.dni. NR

Color Before: Caiy Before: Texture:

Color After Claly AfI r Arfifact iCc ewt

FORM I - IN SSW846 I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

KS-10/9-1 Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION Contract:

Lab Code: MINTKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417-

Matrix (soilVwate): SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0417-16A.. Iavd (low/med): MED Date Received: 03112/03 % Solids: 91.0

Cocetratio Units (ugL or ma/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyve Concentration C Q M

7429-90-3.... mimu.n N 7440-36-0- Aalmny it ?--N _7440-38-. Arsenic 4.4 P 7440-39-3 Rarinm- 44. P_ _7440-41-7 Ryln -la IIIF 1044 I 7440-43-9.- ..Ma s.. 05. P 7440-70-2. NRduc,,tP 7440-47-3 Zomnim 3t. . P -7440-49-48. . Cdn lt NR 44050- Onpr19.7- P- 7439-9"- _In NR -7439-92-1 letarl2d P- -7439-95-4-Magnedum -,NR -7439-96-5- MagneNR -7439-97-6-Mercury 0.048 CV _7440-02-0- Mercury9-2Nickde -0,..49-O91RP _P -7440-09-7- Putamn NR _7892-494 - .- le0.na47 . IT P _7440-22-4__ Silr 0.094_ U. P_ -.7440-23-3 Snsim NR 37440-28-0 .Tam jP -7440-46-6 Zim 230.5. IV P_ Cymis, N30

Ior Af Texture: Wr2ftZ Carity After AtifacW.

FORMI- IN SWS46 'Il-Ar '.'-u. anL" % - % w.IK

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB- 10 3-15 Lab Name: MITKCEM_CORPORATION_ Contrac:

Lab Code: MITCEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0417U

Matrix (soilwater): SOIL- Lab Sample ID: B0417-17A__

Lel (lowimed): MED Date Received: 03/12/03

% Solids: 85.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/ICG I

CAS No. Analyse Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5t. hIunimm. NR &, -7440-39-3440-38- Arsenir-- _ -34P -4.1- P_

-7440-41-7- BylIum 0.64 P_ _7440-43-9 .Carmin 0.17 U0"KT P_ 7440-70-2 - Calcium- NR -7440-47-3- Chrmium - 17.6 P_ 74408-4 -. obal-t NR 3440-50- .Cpper 7-5 P_ 7439-89_-6 Iro NR -7439-92-1 Imd _ 4.& r p 3439-95-4 &a sineNR 7439-96-5 fant NR

-7439-97-6 Mecy 0.030 XV 7440-02-0 - Nike . , I1.0 X_ P_ -7440-09-7 Potassion,_ _,I- NR _7782-49-2__ Seium 0.46 U P _7440-22-4 Sile a0 o I_ P_ -7440-23-5 - Sodium- NR _7440-28.0 .Th.allium I." -_ P_ -7440-62-2 Vanadium 12 9 & -7440-66-6 - Zian Is .6 P_ Cyanid HR

,Color Befori Clarity Before: Texture:

Color After. Clarity After Artifacts- Comnt

FORM I - IN SW46

j13%LI - .--. ,.,. nr - '.,I,

I EPA SAM -E NO INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-9/13-15 Iab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION _ Contract:

Case No.: SAS No.: - SDG No.: B0417 I ab Code: MTCEM alai (soillwater): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 80417-18A

:del (wmcd): MED- Date Received: 03/12/03

% Solids: 85.0 34 oncentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg day weig t): MG/KG

CAS No. AnaIyte Cotcatratio C Q M

-7429-90-5 __ o.__ --_ _ _ _ NR caf )1'\o 7440-360- Antimony031 I P

7440-3 . Ania 2-7.. T P_ 440-41-7- Beylim- -O7ilP

7440-43-9- -t -0mn o P 7440-39-37440-702- n.1 P4 .ai _.P_ NR 7440-47-3___o- ___ hi _ _ 17.&_6. p-".-P_ 7440-48- 17Uh' NR 744050--8 npper-6-5- PV 743949-66- Im NR _7439- 9-C.... Manesuu.R. -7439-92-1 - Lead 10. 1 - 16 - ? -7439-95-4- Maudam .NR -7439-96-5 M NR _7439-97-6 Mescsy 0.10 U CV -7440-02- Nihe _ I4 P3.4 -7444)9-7- -Ponsim N -77249-2_ Sn ad4 I. P_ -7440-22-4- Sit 0.096 L P... 34442-5RdinmNR _7440-2&-0 if-I"v"" U . - P-- -7440-62-7 Vam&mn 17 P_ -74406-6 Zine178 -cn.ide N

Textue: r Aftr r- ClariWy After

lmm no

FORM I - IN SW846 ("II(F , "...*.. 2- I

me II "'". "i ...4 -:-4, -- 1C4 .-. ." .a -

ii)p 33

.000 0 0 iEi

o r6

OOj I.- - .:

aa1:0

IDL

7~ 17 1 I I a 1 a a n a a a .

z wu S Cb 0 Po i

1*t P ~9~9 - U-6-I- a - L - A - .2 1 J

4-4--kh

1- 1 I • • "- -, ,- - I -.:;i , "

Eii 3cc U . -Ji- ' - -Y.'i--!. : -.i" ii-.. I-.;- 0 ..

I 1-fr- hr I 4-fr-f - * #44-1 -- I - I -~ 1 ~ ~' I - i L IAZIEtHL5LLLII a ._..._ --.-. C _0 Iii VF4444W1TI a F I IL2 a w ' ...... - - . ., . i -, . " -I • 'i "- -5 . I.. 3- r~cc 0- U t K 0: 9- I-a-- . I.. S. '" S UI a . -s -. C.-. l tttt~ I 4 .0

m - zl - ] -" - -" 1i"it . .. ii --.- U ; -.-c --. -.. ;. - A a -.. -. 3 . . (4--,.

E -- F-- ! . .. .-- .- ' . : . .s--. ir-., - -... !; 1~ . ., -,, :- , . : .., I - §, j40-. i it .''- ",..$.,z. . : " • t ~ - I n '-4. - . .. *, -C r.i ...... - : VI 'I-: S * S 0 anB -.-._ -,. ....-. . • _ .. - "- 4 ._ I___ t I A a ci I I s:. z 1:- 7 . . .. .;.r .. .T- S , a K V I ii a 1: L =. , . . I - IK I £ . - __''. . .- ;a _ 'a...... •;..! i !.!. '" " i I U

- Memorandum I PROJECT NO: 036200299.0001.00003 DATE: May 16,2003 TO: Oxford Paper Mill File OFFICE: Wakefield FROM: E. DeCola JQ COMPANY: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. REVIEWED BY: D. Truini CC: B. Weir, N. Thurber, D. Laferte (memo only)

SUBJECT: Limited QC Review/Modified Tier H-Like Review PCB, EPH and Priority Pollutant Metals Analytical Results Mitkem Corporation, Warwick, Rhode Island Lab Project # Bo0417

On March 10, 11, and 12,2003, 18 soil samples were collected at the Oxford Paper Mill site, located in Lawrence, Massachusetts by Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (Shaw) and Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (M&E) field personnel. The sampling was performed as part of Shaw's contract with the City of Lawrence, MA and Shaw's contract with M&E (Shaw Project Number 608134, M&E Project Number 200299-0001). 1 The samples were submitted to Mitkem Corporation, located in Warwick, Rhode Island for the analysis of Polychloinated Biphenyls (PCB) using EPA SW-846 Method 8082, Extractable Petrolemn Hydrocarbons (EPH) using the MADEP Methodfor the Determinationof Extractable Petroleman Hydrocarbons(EPH) (January1998), and Priority Pollutant Metals using EPA SW- 846 Methz ds 6&IOB and 7471A. All samples were received by the laboratory on March 12,2003. The data package was received in the M&E office on April 9, 2003.

In accordance with M&E's contract with Shaw, and the EPA and MADEP-approved work plan for the subject site dated January 2003, M&E reviewed the data using EPA Region I Tier H level guidelines, as modified by M&E/EPA for the Targeted Brownfields Assessment Program (EPA Response Action Contract, Work Assignment Number 106-SIBZ-0100). The data deliverables, and the modified Tier II level data vali4tion guidelines used to evaluate the data, are also U consistent with MADEPs Presumptive Certainty guidelines for the usability ofanalytical data. The data review included:

* Data Completeness * Preservation and Technical Holding Times NA * GCECD Instrument Performance Checks * Initial and Continuing Calibrations Blanks * Surrogate Recoveries and Retention Time Shifts

J:VWEBRPN oWori 8 ta dtBO7O7 e cbepkwpd I Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 2 May 16,2003 Lab Project #B0417

* * Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP)Interference Check Sample NA * Internal Standards * Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate * Laboratory Duplicates * Field Duplicates * ICP Serial Dilution Analysis Results NA * Sensitivity Check * * Performance Evaluation Samples/Accuracy Check NA * Target Compoun Ideantification * Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits * * System Perfomance

* = All citeia met for this prametr NA = Not applicable and/or no nfomatiou was povicd by the laboatoyw

Note: Worksheets are not included for parameters that have met criteria or for criteria that are not applicable to the method and/or to the modified Tier i-like review.

Included in Attachment I is a copy of the chain-of-custody (COC) record. Included in Attachment I are the result summamy sheets, annotated with qualifiers, if necessary, as detailed in this memorandum. Included in Attachment HIII are the data validation worksheets.

Data Completeness

Pdority Pollutant Metals

The following items were missing or incorrectly reported.

1) The laboratory incorrectly identified sample KSB-10-19-11 (lab ID B0417-16A) as SB-09-1 1 in the EPH fraction. 2) Barium and vanadium were not reported for any soil samples as requested on the chain-of- custody. 3) Unspiked analytes were not reported in the ICSA Form 4 for metals. A resubmital request was sent to Mitkem on April 28,2003 and a response was received on May 5, 2003 with the revised fonms.

The data package was complete for PCB analysis.

Initial and Continuing Calibrations

All initial and continuing calibration criteria was met for EPH and priority pollutants metals. However, it should be noted that the laboratory did not follow method requirements for

J:WEtBRV/FDtwsc ncmWrA1thsanoABOIlamegacbpkpd McqaE4InMerce& Eddy INC- Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH S Page 3 May 16, 2003 Lab Project # B0417 calculation of the EPH range continuing calibration calibration factors. Per the MADEP method, the range calibration factor is calculated by summation of the peak areas of all component standards in each range fraction against the total mass injected. The laboratory calculated calibration factors for each individual peak rather than a summation. No action was taken since the individual calibration factors were all <25 relative percent difference.

The following table summarizes the continuing calibration (CC) analysis results that failed to meet the CC criterion of percent difference (%D) <15.Note that the 3 pea-s used to quantitate the PCB results were averaged to detennine %D exceedances.

RXCLP/ pesa RTXCP/ pest RTXCLI pes2

Calbration Date CC 3/27/0O3 @ 12:47 CC 3/28/03 @ 00-34 CC 3/28&'03 @11.-05 %D ICmipoun Average % Average %D Average Arockor-1254 18 - Arockr- 1260 17.6 17.7 Estmate (J and UI) the Estmate (U) the nndetect Estimate (UJ) the noadetect Associated Samples positive and soaetect Aroctow-1260 result is all Aroclt-1260 results for and Action. Aroctor-1254 zesults in samples wcept SB-1/-7, samples SB-1/5-7, SB-thl7- samples SB-t0-1, SB- SB-Ill7-19, and SB-W9- 19 and SB-109-I. No 3/13-15, B-2/-I1 and I1. action was taken for sample , SB-2/7-9. No actions SB2-lI -13, SB-8/-1, SB- we taken for samplnes 8/7-9, SB-9/0-1I, SB-9/5-7, SB-3/M-I and SB-37-9 SB-10/O-1, KSB-1GW9-11, since Aroclar-1254 was SB-10/13-I5, SB-9/13-13. reported tom ab oe coluhmn in both samples.oht -. _ _-_ _I

Blanks

Priority Pollutant Metals

A review of laboratory blank results indicates the presence of positive and negative laboratory contamination for the analyte listed below.

-Analyte Max.Cone. BAL Affected Samples/Action

_ _MnI___ I.... I antimony 1.047 5.235 Qualify the reported value as "U"in all samples except I I SB-ID., -8/-9, SB-1/9-1 I, and KSB-109- 1. I

J:WEBRWNFIDS\LawrflttstawCor orkUdJV qutamBO4f7megnchcp& pd Metcalf& Edd. Ian Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 4 May 16,2003 Lab Project # B0417

Analyte Ma Couc. BAL Affected SamplesAction Con (mgkg)

aseic -0355- -1.775 None. All sample results > BAL

bariumn 0.923 4.615 None. All sample results >BAL

beryllium 0.056 0.28 None. All sample results >BAL

cadmiumn 0.147 0.735 Qualify the repo ted value as "U" in all samples except SB-10/0-1 and SB-I/0-i. chonniu 0.096 0.48 None. All sample results >BAL copper 0.86 43 Qualify the repoted value as "U" in sample S-3/13-15.

moraY 0.033 0.17 Qualify the eported value as "U" in samples SB-109-I I, KSB-10l9-II, SB-10/13-15 and SB-9/13-1 5.

silver 0.13 0.65 Qualify th repoted value as "U" in samples SB-1/5-7, SB-1/17-19, and SB-3/13-S.

-0205 -1.025 Qualify-"U"r at the negative BAL. in samples SB-I/O-1, thallium and sad SB-1/5-7, SB-1/17-19, SB-3,o-1, SB-3/13-15, SB-2/7-9, 0.155 0.78 SB-8/7-9, SB-10/C-I, SB-G10/9-11, and KSB-10/9-11.

Replace the noodetect value with the negative BAL in samples SB-8/0-1, SB-2/11-13, SB-2/0-1, SB-3/7-9, SB- , 9/D-1, SB-9/5-7, SB-10/13-15, SB-9/13-15.

vanadium 0.129 0.645 tWoil sample results >BAL

zinc 0.882 4.41 None. All sample results >BAL BAL- Blank Action Level

The sample specific preparation factods, dilios, and percenat solids were taken into accunt w hen evaluating bla coaination

Blank actions for analytes associated ith positive blac contamination

* concentatien s BAL; repot value on summary table as U. * conceation > BAL; report value unqualified.

Blank actions for analys associaed with negative blank ontamation and positive blank contamination where the negative JBAL is > positive BAL

* if the sample resut was positive and the positive and negative BALs, qualification of the data was not required.

JWEBARIWNFLSaruWoAIDaedtBl7snpcepkwpd Meas& EAdy. k.w Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH . Page 5 May 16,2003 Lab Project # B0417

No blank contamination was detected in the PCB and EPH analyses. However, it should be noted that the laboratory blank corrected the EPH range results for contamination from the solid phase extractionfractionation cartridges.

SSurrogate Recoveries and Retention Time Shifts

EPH The EPH surrogate compounds that did not meet the accep ance criterion of percent recovery (%R) of 40-140% for chloroctadecane ae summarized in the following table:

Sample D choroo%d Actio % Ican

SB-8/7-9 35 Estimat( and UJ) the positive ad nandtect CrC Aliphatic ad C,$C2 Aliphatic resalts in sanmple SB-8/7-9. These nslts any be biased low. SB8W-9RE 36 N The results frmm SR-8-9 were ret

The PCB surrogate compounds that did not meet the acceptance criterion of percent recovery (%R) of 29-155% for decachlorobiphenyl (DCB) are summarized in the following table:

Sampk ID DCB Action

SB-84O-1 161 No actioa. Only I srmogate of 4 was outside of recovay criania. SB84/7-9 430 No action. Only I srogate of 4 was outside of recovery criteria S1B9/5-7 404 No action. Only I srrogate of 4 was outside of recovery criteia SB-IOW -1 310 No action. Only I Pnogate of 4 was outside ofrecovery critria

Surrogate criteria is not applicable for priority pollutant metals analysis.

J:WtBRIWNFIDSLaremsaCo nWorkD*uatwABO47MepAwtpd Mess f& Eddy. lee Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH - Page 6 May 16, 2003 Lab Project # B0417

Field Duplicates

UPH

The compounds that did not meet acceptance criterion for relative percent difference (RPD) of g 50% in field duplicate samples SB-10-9- 11 and KSB-10/9-1 I are summarized in the following table:

Compound Saple Duphcate RPD Affected Sampleu/Act ou ReRt samplt

acenp5then 30 U 1200 NC Estimate (JUJ) the positive amd noletect esumlt in field duplicate samplcs SB-109- I awl KSB-W9-1I . A bias could not be detmied bae5nath e 30 U 1900 NC Emtiate (JJUJ) the positive and nondetect sh in field dqplicate sampks S8-109-1 I and KSB-10@-1I. A bias could not be deemied. benzo(b)flranthe 1200 540 U NC Estimate (JUJ) d positive ad anondetect result in fied deplicate samples SB-IOS I and KXSB-109-11. A bias coul not be demni ed. floraese 2200 540 U NC Estimate (I/UJ) the positive and nonetect resoft in field duplicate samples SB-IOS-11 and KSB-109-i l. A bias could not be detmawid pysNe 1900 M - NC Estimal (J) the positiv and nondetect eat in fEd duplicte sumpk SB-I-I ad KSB-lWOS1. A bas couol not be detenined. NC- tbe RPD a not caktWed due to the moodetoct saupe.

All criteria was met for PCB and prioritypollutant metals field duplicates.

Matrix Splke/Matrtx Spike Dupicate

All criteria was met for PCB and EPH matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates.

Priority Poihtant Metals

The priority pollutant metals analytes for soil samples that did not meet acceptance criteria of 75- 125 percent recovery (%R) in matrix spike sample SB-I/0-I, indicating possible matrix interference, are summarized in the table below:

.tWEBRWW7FLLSWtmaweShawcgnvnWarDesevolatwBiDInuepcha.wpd Metamy&M Eddy Mw Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH - Page 7 May 16,2003 Lab Project # B0417

Analyte Spiked Sample Matrix Spike Affected Samples/Action I Sampic Result %R Result (mg/kg)

antimony 8.64 8.7 -0.6 Fti t (J) die positive antimony results in al samples except SB-87-9,SB-I W9-1 1, and KSB-10W9-1 1. Reject (R) die nondelect antimony resuls in samples SB-8/7-9, SB-I9-II, and KSB- 109-11. __1 lead 90.06 1967.98 -8258.2 actio since the lead No sample result was >4x the _ __ L_ _ I spike addedI

The antimony results in all priority pollutant metals samples except SB-1/0-1, SB-8/7-9, SB- 10/9-11, and KSB-IW9-1 1 were previously qualified as nondetect due to laboratory blank. contamination.

Laboratory Duplicates

Priority Pollutant Metals

The priority pollutant metals analyte that did not meet acceptance critesia of relative percent difference (%RPD)<20 in soil sample SB-1/O- is summarized in the following table:

F I I sample Result supyicaft %RPD AeddSamples/Aca I (10&g) Sapl Result (MIFA)I ______•__- _ . ______• .______nmony 8.I77 0.15 U 200 Estimna ( ) the positive aimonfcy isiinall smpes.

arsenic 9.29 6.86 30 Estmft (J) the positive arsenic res lts inan samples. copper 373 26.5 33.6 Efiat (3) the positive copper ______eahe hnall samples. nickel 22.7 173 26.9 Estimate (1) ts positive nickel Mesl1-i all samples. lead 1967.98 59.00 188.4 Estinate (J) dthe positive lead resos in all samps.

vanadinum 30.7331 23.5681 26.4 Estimate (J) to positive vanadim results in all samples.

JWE1BRW a WorBDaUtMAO4eI7pcep&wpd Mess & Eddy. I- Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH SPage 8 May 16, 2003 Lab Project # B0417

No further actions were taken for antimony. The antimony results in all samples except SB-I/0-1, SB-8/7-9, SB-10/9-11 and KSB-10/9-11 were previously qualified as nondetect due to laboratory blank contamination. In addition, all antimony results were further estimated (J) or rejected (R) due to severely low matrix spike recovery.

The copper result in sample SB-3/13-15 was previously estimated for laboratory blank contamination.

ICP Serial Dilution Analysis Results

Barium, lead, nickel and zinc did not meet serial dilution criteria of 10% difference (11.6%, 11.8%, 11.5%, and 12.4%, respectively). Estimate (J) the positive zinc and barium results in all samples due to serial dilution exceedence. No further actions were taken for lead and nickel since these results were previously estimated for laboratory duplicate himprecision.

Laboratory duplicates are not required in EPH and PCB analysis.

Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits E H

The following samples were diluted (dilution listed in parenthesis) based on results exceeding the calibration range in the original sample analysis:

S-1/0-1 all compouads (25x) SB-1WD-1 allEco2omt (2.5x

Priority Pollutant Metals

The following table summarizes the priority pollutants metal results that are less than the reporting limit (RL) but greater than the instrument detection limit (IDL) and were not previously qualified as estimated (J) due to quality control parameters discussed above. The listed results are qualified as estimated (J) due to uncertainty in the quantitation:

AnayAffe Aced Samples/Actim selenium SB-3/f7-9, SB-2(79, SB-I/01, and SB-90-1 silver SB-1/0-1, SB-1/5-7, SB-1/17-19, a d SB-3/13-15.

thallium SB-1D-19,SB-/S-7, W-1/17-19, SB-310-I, SB-3/13-15, SB- 2/7-9. SB-817-9, SB-10 I. SB-IO9-I11, andI KSB-ItW-1 1.

JWEBWNRFIDS ~arcestacenracroidtvat tt7mnpchepkwpd MecalfMelcsffd Eddy£4 Inw Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 9 May 16,2003 Lab Project # B0417

Affected SamplesAction cadmimn S-11/17-19, SB-3/7-9, SB-3/13-15, SB-2/I 1-13, SB-I0/9-11, SB-9/01, SB-10/13-15, and SB-9/13-15.

amuy SB-IW13-15

The positive results for silver, thallium, mercury, and cadmium in all samples with the exception of silver in SB-1/O-i listed above were previously qualified as nondetect (U) due to blank contamination. These results are further qualified as estimated, nondetect (UJ) due to blank contanmination and uncertaint in quantitation.

All criteria was met for PCB analysis for compound quantitation and reported quantitation limits.

J:WVtBR*O lwpAW Many&MncO&neddagshrpdsEddy. Inc Data ValidaicWoksbect Cover Page - Page 1 Refti 140. MWC V E'VA _,w -Itq6 REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION The f ing data pa- been validam& abName M p SOW/Medod No. M Sampling Daft(s) ' o SDG No. & i Shipping Dam(s)p NO. of Sanles/Awrix 16( /;501 \ Date Itc'd by lb h _t7I

I(~e, -6 - - )- ,Z-Z1-2 il 0 Trip Blank No. ----- Equipment Blank No.- Bottle Blank No. - FieldDuplicareNos. - -- + - -i PES Nos. -----

The Rgion I. E .- 4E Data Validioq Futon GuiMd s for Evaaig Environmeral , revision " -r . was used to evalua the data and/or approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page: (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendmen. to QAPjP). Jii or Tier II evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one). If a Tier H validation with a partial Tier i was used, then identify samples, paramers, etc. that received panrtial Tier MI validation Pa& h" 201 il b% it)lflwb o d , The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters:

- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier 1) - Scsitivily Check - Preservamdon & Technical Holding Tunes - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS & GC/ECD Insnunm Performance Check - Target Can jioud etification - Initial & C Mining Calibration - Cobmpound Q.. .ion and Reported -Sha Quantiation Limits suS- e Co ounds -TICs - r Staards - Semivelatile and Pesticide/PCB Cleanup - Mar SpikeMatri Spike Duplicate - System Pformance Region I Deinition and Qualifiers: A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quamntity. R - The data are rejected as umable. The R replaces the m rical value or sample cpUatitation limit. U - Compound not detected at that nm rical sample qiratmiot limitr. UJ - The sample oaniation limit is a esti nated quantity. TB, BB, EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank, aquous bottle blank, or aqueous equipment blank assoced with soillsediment saam .

Validator's Namc_ I X kCompany Name Phone Number 2

Dale Validation Started A I L Date Validation Completed

12/96 EPA-NE -. - .. . . .- ...... - . .- .-I ..-. Dar Validaio Witshet Covr Page- Page 2- -

Check if all criteria are met and no hard copy worksheet provided. Indicate NA if worksheet is not applik:cable to analytical method. Note: there is no standard worksheet for System Performance, however, the validator must document all system performance issues in the Data Validation Memorandum.

VOA/SV wvrkshdts: VOA/SV-Pest/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOAISV-PeIPCB-I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES VOA/SV-H GC/MS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK (TUNING) VOAISV-m IDITIAL CALIBRATION VOAISV-IV CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOA/SV-Pcst/PCB-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOA/SV-Peu/PCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS VOA-VI VOA SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES SV-VI SV SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES VOA/SV-VU INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE VOA/SV-PcsfP'CB-VIl MATRIX SPIKEIMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE VOA/SV-cs/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION VOASV-Pst/n-X SENSIVITY CHECK VOASV-Pet/PCi-XI ACCURACY CHECK VOA/SV-Pcst/PC2-XII TARGET COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-Pe s/PCB-XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION VOA/SV-XIV TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS VOA/SV-XV SEMIVOLATILE CLEANUP TABLE Il-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA

3 worksbeets: VOA/SV-Pca/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT AM- VOA/SV-Ps/PCB-I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES -7-_ Pt/PCB-HtA GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- RESOLUTION IVA- PeiPCB-HB GC/ECD INSTRUMENF PERFORMANCE CHECK- p4-i RETENTION TIMES Pest/PCB-IHC OCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- ACCURACY CHECK OF INrITIAL CAULBRATION Pcz/PCB-lD GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- PESTICIDE DEGRADATION INITIAL CALIBRATION I Pesr/PCB-IVNMOw-zn- CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOA/SV-Pes/PCB-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOA/SV-PcstPC1-V-B BLAN ANALYSIS Pest/lPCBVI SURROGATE COMPOUNDS: was SPICE RECOVERIES AND RETENTION TIME SHIFT PESTICIDE CLEANUP VOA/SV-PtsuPCB-VBI. MATRIX SPIKEfMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE -1 VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION VOA/S V-Pesu/CB-X ACCURACYSENSITIVITY CHECK CHECK j VGA/SV-Pea/FPCB-XI PtsFPCB-XH COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-Pes/PCB-XIH SAMPLE QUANTITATION - TAB1E I-WORXSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA

I certify that all criteria were met for the worksheets checked above.

Signature: Nan me: t //A-A,4 ,

Date:.Qg . kWv EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet .4 CO VOAISV - Pest/PCB N%4q: vP~J £3oi* 1)-q7 COMPLETE SDG.FILE (CSF) AUDIT thj)-kbl 5QAWxQ - Organic Fractions:

Missin Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

£ak, npc V-3-o /g-... (6og,-',*) Adnk~ . _MAs-g-g /

Valitdaor: Date:

12/96 I

I I I

I I I I lb I I > O) -.

*0 I W - -_

I)U

**0-

IIO a TC

I Q . 8 * C5 I Em 00U

-- ...... - St 4)>

I * 3 V I& t

gI OOC-

1-0 - z

I 6)

a-a

0' o 2o I-:4 m)( .3

Sld o s 2 -

II - a. -0 E

z z?-= .0a sU I ( I sol 0 II 40 .ia

~ a 4 >

0. 0 >~ * L a 0 5 a I . a- S

S I 0

I 8 II II 4n

79 0 I' .0 o - - 0

*- 04O F 03 g I 0 I

0 ------4). PESTICIDE RESOLUTION CHECK (CLP FORM 6G)

List it resoktion between adjacent s e peak pesticides in the resoion eck mix that are less ha 60.0% on eiher chrdwomatograp ic cokm.

alyt Coklmn Compounds %Resolution Affected Samples Date

Ust the valdation acons taken below. IVthere were no positive results for the poody resolved peaks no action is requked.

PESTMa CAUBRATfION VERIFICAnON (CONTNUING CAUBRATMON CLP FORMS 7D.7E) ' -

Ust the percent dlfterence for the LcRrinds that exceed %.st the p breakdown for 4.4'-OT or Endrin that exceed 20.0% or the combined breakdown of these two compounds tat exceed 30.0%. On, wn - /%t eA

Analysis counm compond % reakdown ffeed Sam/'

60141 1(.-401tsI0%

(5/ic 124&Mn/M81J21at44114i . _ ._ 'StJAie.-&J.f. 51311,_1 is-to I.

tin the vaidaton acfto taken below. s6-/-41 -s///o-*sa-/o/o-{ KS -o-f t// Cd3-AS/3-

s -9 661 /i 117 ...•-- Il

t3 7 15% w- L5VPA Dta aviWvie W rsha s nIt aRefoce..er amkgcoC8EMot

REG-1Sn K IREVIEWOF ORGANIC CON.Trcr IAORATORY DATA PACKAGE

ur hatcaphi (lomy amn).A IOt ( data package scei- a Regim I has bon riesed ad th qua-y - dXpeIr.. daft maia The dau raview hch&t

SDCaGo. _SASNo. SapligDels) 1tiit No. oSamnes Dat*) rc'd by lab ii Traffic Rqepot Numbers ga?, fs c Ci@ skd.

Trip Blnk No.: Equipmet Blank Number Field Duplcate Nimbers

Sow No4 V- 16equies tat specific analytical work be doei and dt associaed report be provided by the labortoy to de Regions, EMSILV, and SMO. The gamesal ateria used to mdenine the perfanare rwe based a an aus.inars.i of

-Data Completwess -Field Duplicates -Holding runes -Lab Canrl Sample Results -Calibrations I -Funmace AA ntsubs -ICP Senal Dildio Resks- -Aciiterfawe Check Results 4-De o -iatintResa -Matrix Spike Recowveries

Overall Comments:

Denitis and Qualifiers A - A edata J - Apprwime daa &e to quality caot critia R - Reject daa doe to quality ao itia U - Analyt no dected Date: 4Lga I hrpte I~ cwW U L DATA a s &zt\ICA oc b n.I50 • 0 \ DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECEIVED I I I flr( wanocV Ike2AO I

I / I I I U

i46#4 I I I I I I I I U lmi flea Review Wmtsa

M A. IIWA T CAUARATION (Sectim 1)

1. Rcvr rtra(

List the malyts ii d n a the percet sevay (%R) cuiteia for JIiial or crahmhng Caicimut DATEIcvc# ANA LYE %it ACDH SAMLES AFFECTED S ~ rnt 1a cVffl?(>h

ACTIONS:

If any analyte does act meet the %R criteria follow the acims stated below - , I For positive resmk Reim U) Reie (R) I Metals 90%-110% 75%49% or 11 1%-125% < 75%or> 125% Macy M120% 65%-79%or 121%135% < 65% or > 135% I Cyamide 85%-115% ?p-4%or 116%-130% <70%or > 130% U For an-dated reamksl

Metals 90%-125% 75%49% <75% or> 125% I Mercury 80%-135% 65%-79% < 65% or> 135% Cyanle U 85%-130% 70%44% < 70% or > 130% I Iw....c ea Rview Wakma

IVA . ELANKANALYSIS RESULTS (Sectiws 1-3)

List due blnk m ati in sekins I and 2 below. A separt wmksAeet ould be used f sil and I "onr.

1. l4 msfyakr"Aug

*1HCJ N j DATE-

PATh- 3OW 01 Cl

air%

UI QI

-a-

3. Freqmcacy Reqruim

A. Was a prepaatio blat aaled fr each matri, fo my 20 a e, and futr each igsto ba ? Yes No B. Was a cahlbrtm blank r at Sthe begimniag ofthe a, and evey 10 samples i airy 2 haos whicbever ismo- fiequeut? No

fo, 6e data may be afectei Usthe professimal jdguat to dtcmie the effect and qalify te dta accohngly. D~e my acti below, and list tie samples aSde lsiom I loorganicaDtieiewldWme

IV L. MLANK ANALYSI RESU'lS (Secfia 4)

4. Umk Adism

The Aail ,d, r.isagdm*t -r a sxs3--apt-ei...--aim dmAnmioin my Wa.L (Use s M ~fleZliTcttirsamplaaUnat wratacshath d s <== wIboaintrSeelsnnete~sdacs. stka se nsk~..e eLse Asioeswd (A for fl eayt speceasion ae

1. Wis the cammsim s gae be RI, Wsshan the Acion Leve, port t sumple canaion &se wih a U.

2. Whe a mpi co&cenaagtio is geate than the Acion Lene upon uhe sample cnmie m a-liic x& ai, /+ 6- q*-, S6 /3AaI, :5 (,/0o/oa

IVx x~ HMU MAX COWC -Mbx aEl Mw cvWc AUr )mms UNT

*( Ad* at-L dsc .tA td±U,> &Ar-

Mi __

N_ _ _ _ ie 9A_ -- ra_ oa Q I b Vbd ap ___ei NORKh aii~~ b nat .wzi rrWw~uti ihtes4 cnin Xvolum ased 10) X Xs-gost x g_ gitn - Weiki pad (Ir ) 1000mi Jg 1000ag Multipyn his sea by 51o auive a the Actn Led gins a and zesk in agg which cn ten bce

S to MCs .A" - ,i k5( -

CA - -CACe S6- olI )1 o- P c"- 00k /Qc~C~~yxtb 3c 5f/i bI-3

-~I4 Qual I/- -540,-l-1-/r7-111sb P~-QaIC{5~ CA U (VI U l, , .,-, ,- 7 MJ V/f/I2YOQ 1 - sa xJC.K. I stagin I a - Dana Reiew ms I V A. K7 flg RN CRE SAMtE (Seaias I and2) 1. RemmYcwr A\ 0 tM I t.. s fl ABs hich iS tbe pe.. n my c.i.a DATE ELEMEIT %R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED I I

I U I ACTIONS: I Ia elnm t does nt med the "R critsia, t owlhe actions mdat b a r. PERCENT RECOVERY i - < 50% 50%-79% > 120% ' U Pos kive Sampleftes R J N-datected Sample Resuh R U A

2. Freqenmcy Xequiremet I

Ware Iherfmce QC samples n at the begimiug and end of each sampue mualysis ms or a miUm oftwic par hour shia, widkm is masa famqot? Y No I

If no, dtea may be aff& Use profssiowal m to dmennin the severity of dthefCud and quay d data owin0 Discuss ay actions below ad Est Ue smples afed U I I I VgIL IflCWRW CHKSAltRL (Section 3) CL

3. Rqcftthe fmay *6-*sdetected n the KS A solatin > 2X IDL t stmblat n p oss t a& , - - & '1/ n -

E 0M sCONIC. miDTiri acs CONC.amm OF I (FE NSt r 'r. IN 11W IWT!33EWStf~eus

AL CA FE MG

E the concenatima pcted by tim eleei all affected samples. See the gpia for eamples. Ust the smples affected by th6 hrtfaces bdow

SAMPLE fEE T SAMIt SAMWE INlEFRENT CO (pgL) ESIBAlED. AFFECTED AFFECED CONC.

AL CA FE MG

/- I

ACHIONS:

1. In geral, the sampl data ca be accqeed wihaut qualificaion if to samlc of A) Ca, F%and M areess tha 30% f ir rwspective le hi th KS sobiaoL 2. Ese. ) positi ma aScted S m for samples with Sew a iteres 50% or moe duiadt S sohaui. 3. R* (R) positiwe ub i th sewd concntr is doe mey to the iterfrig demel. 4. Est..s (UI) om-detected sSks rwI as negaivep are suqec. Give an explaai6 for anmy acis takem bdeov lugio IWmin...a wonsomeseww

VL MATRlX SPIKE T #2t- 1/ o ij ... L&-,

1. Reevery Caria Itlpercet secoie fir analyt whi&dotothe squI cria. I S - -amo of spike aI&d ss55 - s 1 leaa - smPl e est SR cb5-OOQQ ANAL'rE SSR sit S %R. Acn5ON vbI Stt % ->9l e k.5

. flA4 2 LI Matrix Spie Actis apply to al sales Of se mari

ACTIONS:

1. If the sample cacatratioxcceed do spike cmxaentra6tim by a factorf 4 or more, no actim is takm, 2. Ifay c,a*, es na meet d %R criteria, flukow m actw s stll below-- /

PERCENT RECOVERY

< 30% 3rfr74% >125%

Pesiti Sample Reud - Results S A

2. Frequaency Citeria

A. Was a matrix spike perep * the requird fieq cy? (4 No B. Was a past dpstin spie anlynd for eemans at d n m eet the requriedl I for m spike secovery? o No A sqarte worksbeet should be fMle out for each smarix spike pair. Itegion I horpaic D ta Rciew Wodksfress

VIL LABORATORY DUPLIUCATES

List the camfwiin ofuy ml)t au Mesgin acria fix dqic piaI For si ics, cakma tsheCa il jAg9 u" the s..4 wtin. wo..... paE.i daft Sic iuk bn& a wht atia was used b ceause pmsio by cmcirdg erRPDeR r C D for each u /

gu SIP, IRRTRAI I

A.mic ,o0 . 6.xcR( B 200

s aa..-- , .

Cicr 20 _ 3, ya too s..i. -,9 Ll/ K la a .,7 o LA~~~~cxa 59. 5tot9C4DZ£-,.. ) ..-

tdMaac 15 Thalisa so10 Macmy 01 ______Vaamlim 50 Hadc 40A p5m 5000 sck 5

TWIb= 10 A

van&=. 50 * Zin 20

-ymi a

Labt .y dplica e mc ims Am be api to a o empofh nix t y e. ACTION: ao%4A- 4,/sxjztAdAA, vr,_ ,v Estimate (J) positive sIub for cldamas wk e aven RPD > 20% fr w s amd > 35% for sils If samplezslt ae ka m th e CR , estimate () positive sbs feo s me absohdc diffauce is > CRDL (2X CRDL or ses). If bat samples ame se-desected the RPD is at calculated (HC UI Rtegal lhwmic Dan Rview Webas ClVELY COULED PLASM (IC) SERALDIUTWON ANALYSI I sr:_,I,- I w w.pe foreachm aid sesat of**sded smplkalysi aged with:m 10% dthe =4iA .. d analis. I Serial djm m sd for fonou'I I Seri la wr pm u malyticalreas did at agre within * 10% for aalyto Rpelad tmth sei ao tiafd I Report mU reals belowlht dons mmldthe Iu bou~oy m IC? seria d&6=ik aalysis. market } 5B-Io0- L I ELEMrT SlL SAM SIAL % ACTO L - RESULT NTUIW

A~sia I __i 1W snssvc n5 T a &Diy~ms 7.r4 ww1m .7 , .. -7-7 7_,1 t0 -- -, 0 aacqacian77W • hWm5iOm 67 53 7 Ca& 7;qJ~S2-7q P4 c , ',oo,,q .97 e 9,,i .,. I ia 2.0 ,1 /ls . 2 I 7.ot II W?WT r17,5a 1'111J i - TOago lo ~ r 15- c R p aI ahtaTh NEa <%cM I

Aaicuns apply to aD samples ofthe same matr I ACTIONS:

I Estimate (J) all positive resuls ad (U) al noodtect ifthe %D >

lo p rw Pdb ( . I I I-ra- Data ReviewWm

XIIL SM AQUANTNrATON (ctimo)

It de pa mple usiks th m pasted a - lesbs an2L mad hav nct ahady boqinat 'Ha poswiiw assave beean ed (1) deo awy in the naim newthe EIL

as s..eles Affected 54nw 53 /79 %2/7- o 5V ia-1

iS 7-1-7 3 7 3-(5ps- S~x'O15%~I~ft39~I~tSZ)-47ijej __ -3r IS56- 06-

I Die-I

1-5

4' *4c tt olA oJ- tC;-1eA c5 non

C,&4eqaA o-5 %ycMt &'c40 pcD W10M6j4t

A Xe-f \nV #. I/ nA,-r iv - L - i t- Ao, n-s S 0 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/13/03 Client ID: SB-6/0-1 Date Received: 3/14/03 Lab ID: 80428-01A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matrixbc Soil, 78% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/13/03 Fl, 4/13/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Results Linits (6

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 9,5007" 3,800 C19 - C36 Aliphalics 180,000s3 5,100. ClI - C22 Aromatics 400,000 7 11,000

Taret AnaMes Acenaphthene 2,900- 640 Acenaphthylene -oo- @o 0 640 Anthracene 6,900 T 640 Benzo(a)anthrlacene 21,000 S 640 Benzo(a)pyrene 16,000- 640 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 27,000 640 Benzo(ghl)perylene 8,000:7 640 Benzo(k)luoranthene 8,900 " 640 Chrysene 20,0003 640 Dbenzo(ah)anracene 3,3003- 640 Fluoranthene 44,000 U 640 Fluorene 2.400 "f 640 Indeno ,-.2;3-cd)pyrene 11,000"3- 640 Napht tene 800 3 640 Phenanthrene 23,000 S 640 Pyrene 42,000-"X 640 2-Methylnaphthalene -1 [ /- r 640

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chlorioctadecane 47% o-Terphenyl 56% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 89% 2-Bromonaphthalene 87%

ND= Not Detected

Except where norted in the Project Narrative, all QA3QC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all perfoimanceacceptance standards for the required QAJOC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contanmination fromrn the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes. BO42-1 1 _ Page 1 of 1 I Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/13/03 Client ID: 8-6/5-7 Date Received: 3114/03 Lab ID: 80428-02A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matritc Soil, 84% Sold Date Analyzectd: 4/14/03 Fl, 4/13/03 F2 Concentration in: ugkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Results Lits

C9 -0C18 Aliphatics 7,900oT 3,500 C19 - C36 iphaics 46,000 -r 4,700 Cl - C22 Aromatics 220,000 :- 10,000 TaMdtlytes Acenaphthene 4.100 : 590 W& S"" Acenaphthylene 109 flO 7 590 Anthracene 8,100 :- 590 Benzo(a)anthracene 14,000: 590 Benzo(a)pyrene 9,200 r 590 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 16,000 :r' 59s Benzo(ghi)perylene 4.400 :r 590 Benzo(k)Iluoranthene 5,400 X 590 Chryselne 15.000 Z3-' 590 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 590 Fluoranthene 39,000 X 590 Fluorene 3,900 T 590 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 6,600 r' 590 Naphthalene 920 3r 590 Phenanthrene 38,000:Y- 590 Pyrene 35,000 =r 590 240ethylnaphalene 720 - 590

Surrogate Recovery (%) OC Batch: MB-6238 Chlooodadecane 46% o-Terphenyl 51% 2-FluorobWhenyl 88 2-Bromonaphthalene 85%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all QAIQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all perfokmanceacceptance standards for the required CAQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are acdjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0428-02A _ 0CJ000L Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3113/03 Client ID: SB-6/14-16 Date Received: 3/14/03 Lab ID: B0428-03A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matrix Soil. 76% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/13103 Fi, 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting 4 Results Limits

C9 - C18 Alphatics 11,000 T 4,000 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 7,50soo0 T 5,300 CI - C22 Aromatics 14,000 7 11.000

TargetdAaly Acenaphtheyne 660 Acenaphthylene 660 Anthracene 660 Benzo(a)anthracene "Nf 660 T 660 Benzo(a)pyrene 660 Benzo(b)fuoranthene -N449- (o(,=o 0r o,.r 660 Benzo(ghi)perylenekm ND. 6O O 660 Benzo(k)0uoranthene 66W Chrysene NL 660 660 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene $60. 0:3- 660 .na6&o 03T Fluoranthene #4o- 660 or 660 Fluorene tf Gro uY 660 Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 660 Naphthalene to.NB- (GGO o Q 660 Phenanthrene 660 Pyrene fG 60 660 2-Methylnaphthalene N9T4GO or 660

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chloroctadecane 79% o-Terphenyl 80% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 93% I 2-Bromonaphthalene 88% I ND- Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all OAQC procedures required by the EPHnmethod were followed, and all performance/acceptance standards for the required ONAQC procedures were achieved. I

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B042(Q_M I AnalysisAnalysis ReportReport: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/13/03 Client ID: KSB-6/14-16 Date Received: 3/14/03 LablD: B0428404A Date Extracted: 3/21103 Matrbc Sol, 76% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/13/03 Fl, 4/13/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis. Dilution: 1

Reporting V Results Limits (+[oj C9 - C18 AiiphatiOcs 12,0001 3,900 C19 -C36 Aiphatics 6,400, 5,200 CI I - C22 Aromatics Stj c0oo 'T- V 11,000 Taqet Analts Acenaphthene 44(,&o tkT 640 Acenaph Wene -NO1 640 uC 640 Anthracene 640 jq"a'clo Ct40 LxrVa" Benzo(a)anthracene 640 Benzo(a)pyrene 640 Benzo(b)fluoranthene •ON qo ,LX3- 640 Benzo(ghi)perylene D(00 U'Tc 640 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 19 600 to- 640 Chuysene "e 6qoVS- 640 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0NB690 Q 640 Fluoranthene -NDtie (£o6(0(US U3r 640 bND bRO0U 5 Fluorene 0B 61to U-, 640 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 140 L qe tf3 640 Naphthalene NOU£/t 640 Phenanthrene 640 Pyrene No 610 VI 640 2-Methyinaphthalene -W 64o UJ 640

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chorooctadecane 72% o-Terphenyl 73% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 92%,; 2-Brornonaplhalene 87%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted inthe Project Narative al QA/OC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al peoancefacceptance sndards for the required OAQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0428-04A 0U;,0 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/14/03 Client ID: SB-7/0-1 Date Received: 3114103 Lab ID: B0428-05A Date Extracted: 3/21103 Matrix: Soil. 70% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/14/03 Fl, 4/14103 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dlution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits

C9- C18 Aiphatics 16,000 4,200 ((a(OS C19 - C36 Alphatics 12.000 1200 ClI - C22 Aromrnatics 35,000 12,000

AcenaphUtene -NR ?) 0 710 710 Acenaphthylene .4& i& Anthracene 449. 94Q U 710 Benzo(a)anthracene 710 M 3-to4C Benzo(a)pyrene 710 Benzo(b)fuoanthene 900 710 Benzo(ghi)perylene 710 -NB- Flo 8 Benzo(k)uorantene 710 Chrysene 720 710 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene 4N-FtkO 1 710 Fluoranthene 1.500 710 Fluorene 710 144ige-ho to Ud lIndeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 710 Naphthalene 710 Phenanthrene 960 710 Pyrene 1,300 710 2-Methylnaphthalene *ND -Wo 710

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batcir MB-6238 ChOorocladecane 76% o-Terphenyl 77% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 92% 2-Bromonaphthalene 89%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QNC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and a performance/acceptance standards for the required ONQOC procedures were achieved-

The only significant modification made to this rnmethod is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11-2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are acdjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 BO42-05& -- Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/14/03 Client ID: SB-7/7-9 Date Received: 314/03 Lab ID: BO428-06A Date Extracted: 3/21103 Matrxbc Soik 84% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/14/03 Fl, 4/14103 F2 Concentration in uglkg. dry weight basis Dilutio 1

Reporting EPH Ranqes Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 13,000 3,600 C1 9 - C36 Aliphatics 32,000 4,800 6 C11 - C22 Aromatics 120,000 10,000 Tarqe Anayes Acenapthene 1,000 600 Acenaphthylene -ma- 0 0 600 Anthrwacene 2,400 600 Benzo(a)anthracene 5,900 600 Benzo(a)pyrene 4,200 600 Benzo(b)fnuoranthene 6,800 600 Benzo(ghi]peXylene 2,200 600 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2,500 600 Chrysene 5.700 600 Dlbenzo(a,h)anthracene 880 600 Fluoranthene 13,000 600 Fluorene 990 600 Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene 3,000 600 Naphthalene 600 Phenanthrene 8,300 600 Pyrene 12,000 600 2-Methyinaphthalene -449. o60O 600

Surrogate Recovery (% QC Batch: MB-6238 Chlorooctadecane 59% o-Teoperryl 66% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90% 2-Bromonaphthalene 87%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted inthe Project Narrate, a QAQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al standards for the required QA/OC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 112.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes. Page 1 of I B02C)uQ f1A. Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/14/03 Client ID: SB-5/-1 Date Received: 3/14/03 Lab ID. B0428-07A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matrbc Soil, 78% Solid Date Analyzed: 4114/03 Fl. 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilutdon: 1

Reporting Results LiUrits C9- C18Aliphatics 9,100 3,800 (1Io( 6 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 10,000 5,100 CII - C22 Aromnatics 65,000 11,000

Acenaphthene -ND. (' ) 640 Acenaphtylene .ND- 6t04 0} 640 Anthracene 1,200 640 Benzo(a)anthracene 2,400 640 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,800 640 Berzo(b)lurantlene 3,000 640 Benzo(ghi)perylene -up 6(0 0 640 Benzo(k)oranthene 1,200 640 Chrysene 2.400 640 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene 640 Flomanthene 6,000 640 Fluorkene 4qo 0 640 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1,300 640 Naphthalene 64C Phenanthrene 4,800 640 Pyrene 5,400 640 2-Methyinaphthalene --ND* 60 640

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batd MB-6238 Chlorooctadecane 64% o-Teqrphenyl 68% 24luorob1phenyl 85% 2-Oromonaphthalene 88%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative. all QAQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all peorrn standards for the required QA/C procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exckide concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes. Page 1 of 1I 80420-Q7A00(011 1I Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/14/03 Client ID: SB-5/9-11 Date Received: 3/14/03 Lab ID: 80428-08A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matribc Soil, 84% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/14/03 FI, 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dl ution: 1

Results Limits

CS- C18 Aphatics 7,800 3.500 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 4,700 CilI - C22 Arionatics 32,000 10.000

Tanet Analties Acenaphthen ,q-W 590 Acenaphthylene 590 Anthracene -NB S':OQ 590 Benzo(a)anthracene 890 590 Benzo(a)pyrene 620 590 Senzo(b)fluoranthee 1,000 590 Benzo(ghi)perylene 590 Benzo(kfurnthene -WD 9o10V 590 Chrysene 900 590 Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene -N&590 590 Fluoranthene 2,000 590 590 "ito- YO Indeno(1, 2,3-ce)prene 590 Naphthalene 590 Phenanthrene 1,700 590 Pyrene 1,900 590 2-Methyinaphthalene jie -S9OQ 590

Surrogate Recovery (%): OC Batch: MB-6238 Chlorodadecane 68% o-Temphenyl 69% 2-Tuarobiphenyl 94% 2-8romonaphthalene 92%

ND= Not Detected

Except w"here noted inthe Project Narrative, all OAQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and al pefom standards for the required QAJOC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamnination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (sunogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I B0428-8. . Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/14/03 Cient ID: SB-5/14-16 Date Received: 314/03 Lab ID. BO428-09A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matrx Soil, 78% Solid Date Analyzed- 4114103 Fl. 4/14103 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dkldion 1

Reporting Results Linits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 11,000 3,800 84c) C19 - C36 Mphatics -W 5.000 ClI - C22 Aromnalics 19,000 11,000 Taret Anales Acenaphtne iD £70 0 630 Acenapthylene 190 go 0 630 Anthracene 630 Benzo(a)anthracene w 63o U 630 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 163c> 0 630 Benzo(b)fuoranthene .eiND.Ng Gtt)63&30 t)a 630 Benzo(ghi)peryene tieNt G3O6'3cOO J 630 Benzo(k)luoranthene 630 Chrysene +woND6300N04a30 63o000 630 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 630 Fuoranthem ND 163 0 V 630 Fuorene 630 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 630 Naphthalene ND6o 630 Phenanthrene 630 Pyrene 6300 630 2-Methyinaphthalene N5(3 o V 630

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 I Chlooadecane 76% I o-Teqrphenyl 72% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 86% 2-Bromonaphthalene 85% i ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, all ONAQC procedmres required by the EPH method were followed. and al petfmefcan standards for the required QA/QC procedwures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page lof 1 BO429 . -1 0jt JI-1Ul - 1 I Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/17/03 Client ID SBAMO-1 Date Received: 3/17/03 Lab ID: 80428-1 1A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matzrbc Soil, 75% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/14/03 Fi, 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: ug/kg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Results Limits

C9 - C18 Alphatics 11,000 4,000 019 - C36 Aiphalcs 66,000 5,300 ClI - C22 Aromatics 110,000 11,000

Target Analytes Acenaphhee 670 Acenaphtlene 670 Anthracene 880 670 Benzo(a)anthracene 2,000 670 Benzo(a)pyrene 1,500 670 Benzo(b)Iuoranthene 2,500 670 Benzo(giperyene "B C7 670 Benzo(kuoranthene 960 670 Chrysene 1,900 670 Dbenzo(a,h)anthracene -NO 670 Floranthene 4,500 670 Fluorene 670 !Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1,100 670 670 Phenanthrene 2,800 670 Pyrene 4,300 670 2-MethaphthaIene MAD 610 U 670

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chloroodadecane 61% o-Terphenyt 65% 2-Fluorbiphenyl 96% 2-Bromonaphthalene 94%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narratve, al OAQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al pesrom eacceptanc standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modiication made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 112.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are acdjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B04L211 , - 0.0'U014 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/17/03 Client ID: SB-4/5-7 Date Received: 3/17103 Lab ID: B0428-12A Date Extracted: 3/21103 Matrixbc Soil, 91% Solid Date Analyzed: 4/14103 Fl. 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: uglkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting Umit

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 8,500 3,300 Gho(o2 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 49,000 4,400 ClI - C22 Aromatics 160,000 9,300

Tame AnaMlyes Acenaphthene 1,400 550 Acenaphthylene -, 9 .55 ( 550 Anthracene 3,500 550 Benzo(a)anthracene 6,500 550 Benzo(a)pyrene 4,700 550 Benzo(b)fiuoranthene 7,700 550 Benzo(ghtw)perylene 2,200 550 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2,700 550 Chrysene 6.300 550 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 900 550 Fluoranthene 14,000 550 Fluorene 1,600 650 Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 3.100 550 Naphthalene 620 550 Phenanthrene 12.000 550 Pyrene 13.000 550 2-Methylnaphthalene -PX41;5MO 550

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chlorooctadecane 54% o-Terphenyl 61% 2-Fuorobiphenyl 85% *2-Brornonaphthalene 85%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative al QAOQC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al perfounance/acceptance standards for the required QAfQIC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method isthe subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination fromr the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes. B0428-12A Page 1 of 1I Ofu01 AnalysisAnaysis Report:Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/17103 Client ID: SB4/13-15 Date Received: 3/17103 Lab ID: B0428-13A Date Extracted: 3/21/03 Matrix: Soil, 76% Sold Date Analyzed: 4/14103 Fl, 4/14/03 F2 Concentration in: ugkg, dry weight basis Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranges Results Limits C9 -C18 Aliphatics 13,00 3,900 G(OtO3 C19 - C36 Aliphatics 14,000 5,200 C1I - C22 Aromatics -N o Goo L 11,000

Taret Analytes Acenaphthee -NB+lD 6 I-° 650 Acenaphthylene 650 Anthiracene .ID &SL 650 Benzo(a)anthracene NW65o0 650 Benzo(a)pyrene go 650 Benzo(b)fluorathene 650 Benzo(gf)perylene 650 N (SoU Benzo(k)uoranthene 650 4io So 0U Chrysene 650 -Na f5Z-oU Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 650 Fluoranthene AID 6S U 650 Fluorene N , ) 650 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NfID tOU .M9 oW@ 650 Naphthalene 650 Phenanthrene +49b 1 650 650 Pyrene No toc L) 2-Methyilnaphthalene 650

Surrogate Recovery (%): QC Batch: MB-6238 Chlorooctadecane 64% o-Terphenyl 67% 2-Fuorobiphenyl 92% 2-Bromonaphthalene 86%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted inthe Project Narrative, all OAIQC procedures required by the EPH method were followed, and all performanceacceptance standards for the required OAIQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modificationkm made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I 80428-13A . . u U1- Ji -I FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS IrA-LSHET

SB-6/0-1 Lab Name: MITKEN CORPORATION Con3tract:tract: Lab Code: MITKM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-01A Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EIE0287F t Moisture: 22 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/14/03 ) Extraction: (SepF/ContlSonc) SOC Date Extracted:03/27/03

Cncentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/01/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N PH:u Sulfur lean p : (Y/N) Y gCNTRATIgN UNITS: CAS No. CKIPOfRD (ug/L or Ug/Kg) UG/EG Q

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 42 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 42 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 42 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 42 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 42 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 210 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 42 O

I I I I

FORM I PCB 000030 I FORM 1 CLTENTI SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANIUCS ANALYSIS DATA SHEBT

SB-6/5-7 Lab Name: MITKEN CDRPORATICH Contract: Lab Code: MITKEK Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-02A Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: E1E0288F t Moisture: 16 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/14/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SC Date Extracted:03/27/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 04/01/03 ( Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 c| GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

RATIu/Kg)N UNITS:W Q CAS NO. CCOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/EG Q

FPORM I PCB

0 C1 0C 3-1 FORM 1I CLENT SAMPLB M. PCB OGANICE - ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I SB-6/14-16 Lab Name: MITKEM CODRPORATION Contract: Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-03A Sanple wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EIE0289F % Moisture: 24 decanted: (Y/N) N )ate Received: 03/14/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SOC )ate Extracted:03/27/03 ncentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/01/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (YIN) N pH: - ulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y RATIN UNITS: CAS NO. C -POKD (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/EG 0

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 43 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 43 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 43 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 43 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 43 U 11097-69-1----- Arcoclor-1254 43 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 43 UT

FORM I PCB UU(~ 1! PORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET act:I KSB-6/14-16

Lab Name: MITKfE CRPORATION Co ntract: I Lab Code: MITKM Case No. : S AS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-04A Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EI029OF t Moisture: 24 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/14/03 Extraction: (SepF/O3nt/Sanc) SOC Date Extracted:03/27/03 Ccentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL] Date Analyzed: 04/01/03 ( Injection Volume: 1.0 (UL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 4 52 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N -P: sulfur Clearnup: (Y/WN) Y (-/L or ug/Kg) usX CAS ND. C ONEOTD (ug/L Or ug/Kg) UG/EG Q

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 44 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 44 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 44 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 44 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 44 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 44 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 44 urS

PORM I PCB FORM 1 CIIENT SAMPLE NO. PS ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA7 SHEET itract: 1 SB-7/0-1 Lab Name: MITKE CRPORATIC Co Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-05A Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EIE0291F t Moisture: 30 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/14/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SOic Date Extracted:03/27/03 ) Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/01/03 b@( Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pU: sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) Y C/ONTrIOg UTS: cmS No. COMPOND (ug/L or uzg/Kg) (/KG Q

12674-11-2----- Aroclor-1016 47 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 47 U I 11141-16-5 ------Aroclor-1232 47 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 47 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 47 U I 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 47 U 11096-82-5 ------Aroclor-1260 47 UT I I I I I I I I FORM I PCB I FOR 1 ChIENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT t t: I SB-7/7-9 Lab Name: MITKHM CRPORATION o ntract:II

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: S AS No.: SDG No.: B0428 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-06A Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: EIE0292F t Moisture: 16 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 03/14/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cnt/Soac) SONC Date Extracted: 03/27/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/01/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 (62 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N p: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

COLTRNAION INITS: CAS NO. COMN (ug/L or ug/Kg) DG/EG Q

12674-11-2 ------Arclor-1016 39 U 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 39 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 39 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 39 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 39 U 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 100 11096-82-5------Aroclor-1260 39 UT

RM I RZo 0U U tb U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

KSB-6/14-16 Lab Name: MITKEM_CORPORATION _ Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428

Matrix (soilwateir): SOIL-_ Lab Sample ID: B0428-04A

Level (owmeM): MED Date Received- 03/14103

% Solids: 76.0

Concentration Units (ugfL or mg/kg dry weight): MGlKG ! CAS No. Anale Consatratio C Q M i G1 16(6 1 -7429-90-5- A NR ! -7440-36-0- Antimony - 4**tti 1thAP- ,7440-38-2 .Arsenic ,7 -C P- -7440-39-3- arium 12.8 R P- 7440-41-7 Beryliulm 0.55 P -7440-43-9- CC(md - 0.051 If W- P- 7440-70-2 Calciunm _ NR _7440-47-3 Chmmiumm 16.4= P_ -7440-48-4_ ets_ _ NR 7 .440-50-8- Coper 4.0 - P 7439- 9-_. Irom NR _7439-92-1_ I.d 3 P -7439-95-4- Marium NR _439-96-S Mangan. NR _439-97-6 e-rcy 0.018 U" + CV -7440-02-0- Nkl 10.6 P -7440-09-7- PaNassiumR 7782-49-2-_ Selenimn 0.55 U P _7440-22-4_ Silver 0.12 U P -7440-23-5- .Soe.m NR _7440-28-0 ThlAimn 0 1 11I P_ -7440-62-2- -Vanadium 157-- P- 7440-66-6. 7inc 17.9 P_ Cyanide .n

Color Belie- Clarity Before: Texture:

Colr After Clariy After. Artifacts:

Comments:

FORM I - IN SW846 U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

S SB134/0-1 MITKEM CORPORATION Conract: I b Name: Lab Code- IUTEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428

Irix (soil/water): SOL Lab Sample ID: 130428-1 I A. . (Coed)- MED Date Received: 03/171/03 MRSolids- 75.0

Comcatation Units (ug/L or ag/kg dry weigt): MG/KG

CAS No. Analy Coactnt2ion C Q M 1403 .7429-90-5A h NRM. 7440-36-0 Asimyl if FC 7440-38- Al I _ 7440-39-3 BaamT313 .KC P .7440-41-7 y1.0 7440-43-9 Cadmu 1.0 P 7440-70-. . CcNR.,kin 7440-47-3_739-- 40.4P 7440-4- CAdat.. NR 7440-50-8 Copper 193- P 7439-89-6 k NR N 7439-92-1 I-ad 35.5 3 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium- N...R 7439-96-5- ManganNR 7439-97-6- Mercuy *CV 7440-02-0 Nl 27.4 P____P

44009-7 Pntassium - NR _782-49-2 0.53oei T P _7440-22-4- ilr0. o 17 A a P_ -7440-23-- Rain NR -7440-284) .0.96 " r P- -7440-62-2- .Vanium 45.7--l- P_ -7440-66- Tar 7.9-9"- P- yneNR

or Before Clarity Before: TextArtifas: ar Aftkr Atas

FORM I -IN SWS46 p f-P U.S_ EPA CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-4/13-15 I Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION ContrSAS No.: La Code: MflKEM Case No: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428

SMatrix (soil/wtr): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: B0428-13A... Levl (lowmed): MED- Date Received: 03/17/03.

% Solisw 76.0

Concentration Units (ag/L or mg/g dy weight): MGlKG

CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 0463

7429-90-5 AR 7440-36-0- A C.9 P 7440-38-2 Arsenic. 4.4 - P 7440-39-3 Rjm Too or" P_ 744041-7 1eryllimnI.I P 7440.43-9 Caimim 02. P 7440-70-2 .Cakinin NR _7440-47-33L8 COaz20.9 Np

-7440-4"-t..... &Cdsli ______7440-50-8 Cpr 3.9 U P 7439-9-6Trn NR 7439-92-1- Iad 4.6 77 - / P 7439-95-4 Magnesinm NR 7439-96-5 Mangnese NR 7439-97 4_ Mecuy A - CV 7440-02-0 Nirke.. 7440-09-7 Passimn N 782-49-7- Slenium o48 -f P 7440-22-4 Silver 0 14 W 7440-23-3 dim N -7440-2"- ll 0.61 w P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium- S.7 P 7440-66-6_ .23.2 Zir P_ Cy-ad NR

"oor Before: Clarity Before: Texture: gorm AAer Clarity After:

Comments:

FORM I - IN SWS946 U.S. EPA - C.P

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SB4/5-7 ' b Name: M~TEM CORPORATION _ Connact: Lab Code: EM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: 130428__ I atrix (soilfwata): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID

Lved (ow md): MED Date Received: 03/17/03

I.; So ds: 91.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS o. Analye Cocention C M G((6 O

7429-9 -t4 Aluanimnn NR______7429-90-3650 Amn

7440-3-2- Ledn iI ____ 8 P_ -7440-39-3- Bari- 101 S - P_ -744041-7- Bayllm 0.9 - P 7440-43-9 -. Cadmium I17 P__ _440-70-2 .CAciun NR 7440-47-3C. __ .-0--27.0--T- P- _7440-44 .Cobak NR _7440-50-8 Copper 40. 2 P _439-89-6 Iron NR -7439-92-1 1-d -90-6 Z,' p -7439-95-4 Magnesiwan NR .7439-96-5- Mangance.. NR -7439-97-6. Mec y 0.42 7 CV _7440-02-0. Nicke 19. T 9 P_ 7440-09-7- P_ assim NR _78249-2- Selemim 0.47 .,"P- -7440-22-4_ il. r. 1.00 U" x p_ _7440-23-5.- mdim _7440-28-0 Thallmi 0.7- J ' P -7440-62-2 .Vnadinm 66 . , P -N440-66- Zinc IT P25 P- -Cyanide 4 -NR

or Bcfore: Claity Before: Textur:

or Aer- Clarity Me r Artifats- '-uments:a

FORM I - IN SWS" 6; V oo t- U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET II Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION ContaNct:

Lab Code: MITXEM Case No: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428

Matrix (solwater): Lab Sample ID: B0428 -07A._

LeJ (lowmed): MED- Date Received: 0314/3/03-

% Soid- 78.0 Concentraion Units (uglL or mng/kg dy weight): C1K( 3

CAS No. Analyle Concentration C Q M

7429-90-5 .luminnm .. NR 7440-36-0- Animony- atti P 7440-38-2- Arsmc 707. -" 4& P 7440-39-3-Barinm 70a....R .P 3440-41-7 Rrliam 0.33 P _7440-43-9- 0g.5o ) P 7440-70-2 Calcinm . NR 7440-47-3- hmni .I " P1 74404-4 Coaatk NPR 7440-50-. Coppr 9 0 L- _ P 7439-89-6 om N]R 7439-92-1I Jdl 1. ""ZX P 7439-95-4 Magnesium....N 7439-96-5 Manes..e- NR 7439-97-6- Mery 0.46 CV _7440-02-0- Nck 1.9 7 P. 7440-09-7 Passainm_ NR -782-49-2 .. Seenim _._1.3.X "- P 3440-22-4 Sil 0.1 u P- 7440-23-5 na NR 7440-28m- 0.19 iT p 7440-62-2 .Vanadmiat '7 8X P52 3440-66 7P 29.4

Opnian - NRE

Color Before: Textu:I

Color After Clarity Afltr Artifacts

'Comments:

FORM I- IN SW846

V g-- I U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-5/14-16 MrIKEM CORPORATION_ I *Name:b Contract:S No. Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No-- SDG No-: 80428-

I aUix (soil/water): SOL Lab Sample ID: B0428-09A__

IL (lormed): MED Date Received: 03/14103- USolids: 78.0 Concentatio Units (ag/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyt e Cctrafiom C Q M mt ')103 '2 :rfif 7429-90-5. Auwninm NR 7440-36-0 A -0-16- .. - t P 7440-38-2- Arsea ic . -- P_ 7440-39-3- _Rrim 4 1i E P_ -7440-41-7- Bi :sy~k=L -. 0.66- P_ _440-43-9- hm 0.038£ -49 " P_ _7440-70-2 Cadm NR -7440-47-3- -C m - 18,0- Jf P_ .7440-49- -Coas NR _7440-50-$• -oppr ss. P _7439-49-6 In NR .7439-92-1- I -and ' . P_ -7439-95-4- Magnsiun NR 7439-96-5 Mangance NR 7439-97-6- es:my 0.039 CV. _7440-02-0- Nickel IT 2.P __ -7440-09-7-Paramimn NR -7782-49-2 Seweim 0.49 - I P_. -7440.-22-4 Silv - 0.11 IT P_ -7440-23-5- Sodiumm NR -7440-20 Thallui- 0.16 U P_ -7440-62-. Vaoadim - !I.6 ,' P -7440-64 Zwn 5 1 ft -_p_ Cyanide & NR

or efore: Clarity Before: Texture:

Carity After After. V r 'maments:

FORM I - IN SW46 Qor U-S. EPA - CLP

I INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO.

SB-5/9-Il Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION_ Contract:

ILab Code: MTKEM Case No: SAS No.: SDG No.: B042

SMatrix (sol/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: BO428-8A

Levd (lowhned): MED 03/14/03

84.0

Concentration Units (agL or nglkg dry weigha): MG/KG

CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M G(5- 7429-90-5_. Almnim.. _NR 7440-36-0 1A.7mony:7 " _5 P 3440-38-2- Asi47.4 _ P_ 7440-39-3 Rarium 55.S - P_ -7440-41-7 Rey inm 0.57 P -744043-9 Cadmi m0.75- P_ _7440-70-2_ .CAcim .. NR -7440-47-3- Chemimn- 75.3 P_ _7440-48-4 _ _O _NR 7440-50- .Copper 27.1 P_ -7439-8"- Iron NR -7439-92-1- LAd 73.5 37 P_ -7439.-95-4- Magnesi NR 3439-%-5-Mnans NR _7439-97.6- r..ny. Cv _7440-02--__:__ lf II P -7440-09-77439-_ Potaiman tay! ______b ,_NRN -782-49-2- c _ 0.50 P_ -7440-22-4- ilvr 0. 10 1I P_ 7440-23-5- Sodi m N _3440-28-0 Thaltin - 0-82 Mr- jP 744042-2 -vanm= 9 i - P_ -7440-66-6 Zinc 33.5 7-Z" P_

Color Befoawe. Clarity Before:- Textmre:

Color Afta Clarity After Artiface.

Couments

FORMI -IN SW46

,flg. I U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO- INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MITKEM CORPORATION_ Contract: N S NoSB.: 4- IL ab Name: L -b Code: MIKEM Case No: SAS No.: SDG No.:B0428..

SOL- Lab Sample ID: B0428-01A. I -trix (soiwater): Level (low/med): MEDC Date Received: 03/14/03 '

Solids. 78.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MGKG (0 fK63 CAS No. Analyte CoOcnration C Q M

7429-90-. . umi HNR 7440-36-0 An wiy 7.0 -P 440-382 Arseic - 49.1 P_ _7440.39-.3 _ .mn 143 - P _440-41-7 Besyllinn 0.91 P... 7440-43-9 Cadmium. 20 A-C P 7440-70-7 Calhuriu NR 7440-47-3 c ,Chimn _ 62.9 = P -7440-48-4- Cobai NR 7440-50-8 .COppe 703 P- -7439-89-6 Irm NR 7439-92-1 Lead 140P P 7439-95-4 Magnesiumn NR 7439-96-5. Manganes NR -7439-97-6- NMrcuy I 3CV _7440-02-0 Nicket 1o0 - P.. -7440-09.-7 Potassinm. NR -7892-49-2 -el num_ 05 MI P -7440-22-4 ,Silver --- 0.17 II P- -7440-23-5 NR -7440-28-0 0.ha1im 1 P _7440-62-2 V=a ---- 376 - P- 7440-6-66- Zinc - 7,274-Z - - P Cyanide -NR

I r Befor. Clarily Befor. Texture: ats Anrtifacts

FORM I - IN SW846 U.S- EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SB-6/14-16 Lb Name: MICTKEMCORPORATION Contract:

'Lab Code MIKEM Case No.: SAS No.: -_ SDG No.: 80428_

Matrix (soil/watc): SonL- Lab Sample ID: BO428-03A.._

Lv (low/med: MED Date Reaeived: 03114/03

% Solids 76.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MGfI G

CAS No. Analyte Comcntration C Q M ,((cfb3

7429-90-5 Alumintmm NR -74W036-0-Atmn -M > P 7440-38-2-_ Anrsit__ 4.1 .E 1 P 7440-39-3- Barium. 14.4 P 7440-41-7- mlinm_ 0.55 P 7440-43-9C-L 0. , "060i )P._. _7440-70-2_ Oan NR _7440-47-3 hnwninm- 16 I P _7440-484 ,Codite NR 7440-50-" Copper 4.1 " P -7439-89-6 rImn NR -7439-92-1 1 td 4.6- P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium N _439-96-5 Mangarse _ NR -7439-97-6-. Merc - 0.019 CV -440-02-0- Nickel 11.4 P-... -7440-09-7- Potssium NR _32-49-2_ Sekaimn 0.51 IU P _7440-224_. Silver - 0. Il UI P- .7440-23-5 Smliam NR 7440-28-0 .Thalliam- 0.17 U P 744-62-2 Vanarlim 174 P 7in.1S7440-66- l Cyan, . NR

boa Befor- Texture:

Color After

Comments:

FORM I - IN SW846 q3 X- I U.S. EPA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SB-6/5-7 * Name: MfTKEMCORPORATION Contract:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0428&

atrix (soilfwatcr): SOL Lab Smple IED: BO428-02A_

(lowsmed): MED_ DabeReceived: 03/14/03

Sods- 84.0

ConceutratiomUnits (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG ( )

CAS No. Analyte Cmonceration C Q M (f(663

7429-90-.5 Ahmni=m .. NR on y - - 1. 1 P- -7440-38-744 0 -3 6 -0 -Annic- A tim 1---0.9 P. I 7440-39-3 . 111arium P_ -7440-41-7 Dylim 0.77 3 7440-43-9 Cauamn 4- P- -7440-70-2- .Ori.m NR -7440-47-3- Chmmim"-36.0 n - NRP- I _744o-5o-$_7440-484 ,.Co4a.Copper.. s3.s -7439-89 -_ km . P -7439-92-1 -I -i 84.4 I 7439-95-4 Magnesium- NR 7439-96-5- Manganese _7439-97-6 Memury .S-h NRCv I 7440-02-0- Nickel S1.1 - -,- P 7440-9-7- NR P- -7182-49-2- m 0.49 .U I,- S7440-22-4 ilve 0.11 I U P_ P _ _440-2-52 Soim I NR I P_ -7440-28- Thlim017 f ". P 7440-62-2 Vandium 264 - -___ P _

I Befo- ClartyB-efoe-h_' Texture: r After Clarity After Artifact ae: I

FORM I - IN SW846 qy, U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET IS-0-1 I Lab Name: MITKEM_CORPORATION_ Conrad.:

Lab Code: MITKEM Case No: I SAS No: _ SDG No.: B0428_

Matrix (soilwater): SOIL__ Lab Sample ID: B0428-05A..

Level (lowimed): MED_ Date Received: 03/14/03_

% Solid 70.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG (1 CAS No. Analyle entrati C Q M

7429-90-5- Alumimum. NR 7440-36-0 Antimony- _7440-38-2. Arsnic 1._P0 7440-39-3 Bariumn 57.5 - P_ 744041-7 ByJ L__ 0 93 P_ _7440-43-9_ .Cadi=_____ 0.31 _ P_ -7440-70-2 _Cacim NR _7440-47-3_ .Chrmnium_ 12S 7 3 P_ -7440-48-4 - Coahlt NR -7440-50-8- ppcr 16.2 P_ _7439-89-6 no NR -7439-92-1- 1ad 24.4 P_ -7439-95-4 Magnesium NR -7439-96-5- Mananese NR -7439-97-6 - Mkruy 0.23 CV -7440-02-0 - Nickt 97 P_ -7440-09-7- Ptassium NR -7782-49-2_ Seleimn_ 1 i t8 P_ -7440-22-4- Silve 0.13 U P_ -7440-23-5- Sadim NR -7440-28-0 Thallium 0.71 J- P_ _440-62-2 Vanadim - 166 P_ _440-66-6- 7ine 76 " p_ _Cyanide 4 NR

C iColor Befom- Clarity Befoe: Textwu-e:

Color After" Clarity Alter Artifacts:

Comnmts-

FORM I -IN SW846 ITVS. EPA- CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SB-77-9I MITKEM CORPORATON Contract: I ab Name: .ab Code: MI1TKEM Case No.: SASNo.: SDG No.: B0428- Inds (owwt): SOIL Lab Sample ID: B0428-06C Lcvd (owed): MED 03/1 4/03 I&SOlisW 84.0- MG/KG I Concentration Units (ug/L or mgkg dry wight):

CAS No. Analyw Concentration C Q M

7429-90-5 Almnim NR Cdo3 7440-36-0 Aadm -7440-38-2 - Assesicn --- 24.1 -7440-39-3- nr. ,103 ' K P -7440-41-7- BcryllinmL 0 72 P 7440-43-9 Edminm 0.96 IC P j N -7440-70-2- - -7440-47-39 Chani 1-2P I 7440-48-4 .hal. NR -7440-50-8 Cnppr - 64- P- -7439-896 .rom NR -7439-92-1- ldLd 103 P 7439-95-4- Mnem NR" I 7439-96-5- _ NR -7439-97-6- Mecury . .. 0.70_ -- V -7440-02-0- NiMs9 P- 7440i_o-o9-. am_ - .3 _ NR 78249-L Sduc0.47 U P 7440-22-4 Si - *.1 n T P I _7440-23.-5- ,M _7440-28-0 (.TJimm 0.16 U P 7440-62- Vmr lim P S4406- Zin _ cyani d NR

1ar Before- Carity BeOMe- Tecture: arity After- Artifacts r Aer. L.aments-

FORM I -IN SW46 -T !T17T1T1?T1Tfrw- U I aS I . .a &' It F. U

- L ' I 4-I--4I.4--4I- I -t - I - I - I - I - I - I -4--I-I-I - t ""I

EE :- I r .,:- ..--.. C .. 8 : !>-. r- r .g• ag " U -5. .5- L L - A - .1~1 L -~ J - £ at - I-.

. -- Ii -- - .t ztz ± ..-....I• I.5;. S I :_: - - .zirr .5 I II ii...:.! i a aEs C -I- -*-*-I I~~~~~~~~~~~--- t* ai -m ... .: 'tLL- t I.- S.- sq,4 1 r.= ------. • :.-i~w .: . .,,: , . . .I0- 'I-' z!L*'- '' h ":' .i 2!r,- ,. .-, Is S. I: AtS

wI'

9.-. -4..IT R WI I.aRH -Ji lbl - R i - I 4~ :-Iii~ •=-. = ".. *.* . *1- * I It (0

K*1_ ii 7.. -. "::.I T1

S a a C C Lb via ii m. a V

ll t i I-I-4-E-4-5-4-4-4-*-E-4-S4wk I

- * -~ - - -. -

i FE a

- - --- .- ~1~ 0~ LEIII4LI~~ V .1 Ia 1-4 I-I .-- 4-I - I I. - 1-4 -~ I-I - a - I .- ~---.; - o 'SWMo 4 € L,,.' " .:.-'" : - ,-I'. I 5:. u:- .- - . U-L - i- a Ic I I '3 I I 4.S. I it i -:..- -I- ."-/ • .- -." .r : : - " .- 0 ;..::. Li I .V ' --Z- .... - - -.

*0.

I ..- • ' ] I-.,-"- . * " I I!4 . .. - = " ii:i:"'1 •"4 .. , ,"7 .v i M - . .Is . If '-a 54F i.i:. I r

0..:.

- - - & - - .1~ £ - .r - ___ a - .em -.em a - a,- ~& a I. a. & . I - r a . a. • A 4 S 0 I ~1- 0. 2 = , ,, I i I. C 0 A.I: I . Memorandum

PROJECT NO: 036200299.0001.00003 DATE: June 10, 2003 TO: Oxford Paper LI File OFFICE: Wakefield FROM: R. Shoemaker[ COMPANY: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. REVIEWED BY: D. Truini. ,, r CC: B. Weir, N. Thurber, D. Laferte (memo only)

SUBJECT: Limited QC Review/Modified Tier II-Like Review PCB, EPH and Priority Pollutant Metals Analytical Results Mitkem Corporation, Warwick, Rhode Island Lab Project # B0428

On March 13,14, and 17,2003,12 soil samples were collected at the Oxford PaperMill site, located in Lawrence, Massachusetts by Shaw Enviromnental & Infrastncture, Inc. (Shaw) and Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (M&E) field personnel. The sampling was performed as part ofShaw's contract with the CityofLawrence, MA and Shaws contract with M&E (Shaw Project Number 608134, M&E Project Number 200299-0001). The samples were submitted to Mitkemn Corporation, located in Warwick, Rhode Island for the analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) using EPA SW-846 Method 8082, Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) using the MADEP Methodfor the Determinationof Extractable PetroleumHydrocarbons (EPH) (January1998), and Priority Pollutant Metals with the addition of barium and vanadium using EPA SW-846 Methods 601 OB and 7471A. Samples were received by the laboratory on March 14 and 17,2003. The daA package was received in the M&E office on April 21,2003. In accordance with M&E's contract with Shaw, and the EPA and MADEP-approved work plan for the subject site dated January 2003, M&B reviewed the data using EPA Region I Tier II level guidelines, as modified by M&E/EPA for the Targeted Brownfields Assessment Program (EPA Response Action Contract, Work Assignment Number 106-SIBZ-0100). The data deliverables, and the modified Tier II level data validation guidelines used to evaluate the data, are also consistent with MADEP's Presumptive Certainty guidelines for the usability of analytical data. The data review included:

Data Completeness N*N Preservation and Technical Holding Times NqA *• GC/ECD Instrument Performance Checks Initial and Continuing Calibrations Blanks

J:WEWRW FLDSarwowCoWaWoZlDaIO28merpecepwpd Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 2 June 10, 2003 Lab Project # B0428 * Surrogate Recoveries and Retention Time Shifts * * Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Interference Check Sample * ICP Serial Dilution Analysis Results NA * Internal Standards * Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate * Laboratory Duplicates * * Field Duplicates NA * Sensitivity Check * Performance Evaluation Samples/Accuracy Check NA * Target Compound Identification * Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits * System Performance

* = All criteria aet for thi pmrameer NA = Not applicable andar no infomationm was provided by the laboratmy

Note: Worksheets are not included for parameters that have met criteria or for criteria that are not applicable to the method and/or to the modified Tier fl-like review.

Included in Attachment I is a copy of the chain-of-custody (COC)record. Included in Attachment II are the result summary sheets, annotated with qualifiers, if necessary, as detailed in this memorandum. Included in Attachment III are the data validation worksheets. Included in Attachment IV are relevant communication records.

Data Completeness

The true values for lead and selenium in the ICS AB solution on the Form IV were incorrect. M&e- contacted the laboratory about this error on April22,2003. A revised Form IV with the correct true values for lead and selenium in the ICS AB solution was received at M&E on April 25,2003. The data package submitted did not include the barium and vanadium sample results and quality control data. M&E contacted the laboratory on this matter on April 28,2003. M&E also requested a revised Form IV with the data for the non-spiked analytes of the ICS A solution at this time as well. The barium and vanadium sample results, quality control data, and a revised Form IV were received at M&E on May 5,2003. However, the ftesubmitted data had errors on the Form I for sample SB-5/14- 16 and the Form XI. M&E contacted the laboratory about these errors on May 12,2003. A revised Form I for sample SB-5/14-16 and Form XlII were received at M&E on May 15, 2003. Relevant conmmunication records regarding this matter are included as an attachment to this memorandum.

The data package was complete for PCBs and EPH.

J:WEaRWNFLa s cWous ra_ ms.2 .eps .wpd Macf & Ed, Inc. Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 3 June 10, 2003 Lab Prbject #IB047Q INoL4 Preservation and Technical Holding Times

The 7-day extraction holding time was exceeded in samples SB-6/0-1, SB-6/5-7, SB-6/14-16, and KSB-6/14-16 by one day. The positive and nondetect EPH results for these samples were qualified as estimated (J and UJ, respectively) due to possible sample degradation.

All holding times were met for PCBs and Priority Pollutant Metals plus barium and vanadiumn.

Initial and Continuing Calibrations

The following table summarizes the continuing calibration (CC) analysis results that failed to meet the CC criterion of percent difference (%D) < 15. Note that the 3 peaks used to quantitate the PCB results were averaged to determine %D exceedances.

n inntCohm RTXCLPPEST 2 RTXCPPEST 2 Caliation Date CC 3/28/D3 @ 1 108 CC4/ID3 @ 17:47

2=Co.=d Average %D Avenge %D A:dor-1260 17.7 153 Associated Samples and Non. All associated samples are QC 'Estimae (UJ) t noddtect Aroclor Action samples. 1260 results in samples SB-0-l, SB- 6/5-7, SB-614-16, KSB-6I4-16, SB- 7/0-1, SB-7/7-9, SB-5/0-1, and SB-5/9- 11

Priority Pollutant Metals plus Barium and Vanadium

The following table summarizes the initial calibration verification (ICV) analysis results that failed to meet the ICV criterion of percent recovery (/%R) between 90%-11 0%:

Calibtio Date ICV 3124/03 cmound % Recovery mrcn y 34.6 SAssociated Samkles and Action Reject () e positive esults i samples SB-40-I and SB-4/5-7, and tbondetect result in sampile SB-4fl3-l15

All initial and continuing calibration criteria was met for EPH. However, it should be noted that the laboratory did not follow the method requirements for calculation of the EPH range continuing calibration factors. Per the MADEP method, the range calibration factor is calculated by tabulating

J:WEWRNWFLDSawraceanConracrhrkgarvaAWO42&npcequwd MercalffE.& Eddy, Inc- Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 4 June 10, 2003 Lab Project #8B4LZ the summation of the peak areas of all component standards in each range fraction against the total mass injected. The laboratory calculated calibration factors for each individual peak rather than a summation. No action was taken since the individual calibration factors were all <25% relative percent difference (RPD).

Blanks

Priority Pollutant Metals plus Barium and Vanadium

A review of laboratory blank results indicates the presence of positive and negative laboratory contamination for the analytes listed below.

Analyte Max. Coe BAL* Affected Samples/Action

ammony 0203 mg/Kg 1.0 Qualify threpo ed vae as acdetect (U) in samples SB1-1, SB- 4 113-15, SB-6/5-7, SB-6/14-16, and SB-7/7-9. Raise the detection -3.4 pg/L 0.85 limit to the IBALI inasamples SB-4/13-15 and SB-6/14-16.

asenic -3.0 pg/L 0.75 None. All sample scatmlts >IBAL. barium 0365 mg/Kg 1.8 Noc. All sample results >BAL

berAyllium -1.2 pg/L 0.30 Qualify the reported value as estimated (J) in sample SB-5/0-I. cadmium -0.80 pg/L 020 Qualify the reponed value as esmated (Jmdl UJ) in samples KSB- 6/14-16, SB-5/0-1, SB-5/14-16, and SB-6/14-16. clmnium 0.039 mg/Kg 0.20 None. Al sample results >BAL

copper 2.272 mg/Kg I1.4 Qualify the reporled value as mondetect (U) insarles KP,614- 16, S-6t14-16, S-4/13-15, and SB-5/-I. -IOA.4 pg/L 2.6 macury -020 pg/L 0.17 Qualify he rpnoraed value estimated (J and UJ) in samples SB- 6fl4-16,SB-6l4-16, and SB-5/14-16.

nickel 0.408 mg/Kg 2.0 None. All sample results >BAL -1.9 pg/L 0.48 silver 0.256 mg/Kg 13 Qualify the repled value as nondeect (U) in samples SB-4-/0-1, SB-4/5-7, and SB-4/13-15. vanadium 1.1 pg/L 0.28 None. All sample results >IBALI. -0.066 mg/Kg 0-33 zinc 2.291 mg/Kg 11.5 None. All sample results >BAL

-10.5 pg/L 2.6

J.:WE8RWNFLDS~awrencexhawContrct'orikDesavadi428nepcsp&wpd Mercal& Eddy. Jac- I

Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 5 Junme 10, 2003 Lab Prbject #B041

* Values adjusted for sample prparation factors. BALI - Negative Blank Action Level

Blan actions for analyses associated with positive blank contamination

* Ifdthe sample result was BAI, qualification of the data was not required Blank actions for amnlytes associated with negative instrument drit I * concentration > absolute value ofde negative BAL; report value unqualified. - concuntration nondetect pas detection limit as estimated (U1)4 * concentration < absolute value of the aegtve BAL; estimate (1) positive result.

For positive blank contamiti and negative nstrumet drift where the positive BAL is > the vegative BAL, sarmpe results were qualified as foows

* If the sample result was positive sad > the negative BAL and < the positive BAL, the result was qualified as noodetect (U) at the reported concentration * Ifthe sample result was positive and te positive BAI, qualification of the data was noDt required

Fr positive and negative blank cotambation e the netive IBLj is > positive BA sample results were qualified as follows-

* Ifthe sample result was positive and positive and negative BALs, qualification of the data was not required

Note: No further action was taken for mercury in sample SB-4/1 3-15 since this result was previously rejected (R) due to severely low ICV recovery.

No blank naminain was detected in the PCB and EPH method blanks. However, it should be noted that contamination from the solid phase extraction/fractionation cartridges used to separate the aliphatic from the aromatic hydrocarbons was present in the EPH method blank and in all sample analyses. Per section 11I2.6 of the MADE P Methodfor the DeterminationofExtractable Petroleum HyArocarbons (EPI) (January1998), the laboratory subtracted the contamination from the EPH range results.

Surrogate Recoveries and Retention Time Shifts

The PCB surrogate compounds that did not meet the acceptance criterion of percent recovery (%R) of 29-155% for decachlorobiphenyl (DCB) are summarized in the following table:

JWEItBRWNFLDS1awreShawCovwuaWor* am vawBO428eqpcxepwpd Afetcaf&A y. Inc I Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 6 June 10, 2003 Lab Project #

Sample ID DCB Action Cohn I

SB-6/5-7 687 No action. Only 1 sunogate of 4 was outside of recovery criteria. SB.7fl-9 236 No acto. Only I srpogate of 4 was outside of recovery criteria.

SB-4/5-7 j 361 No acti- Only I sungate of 4 was ouaside of 2ecovezy criteria.

All samplesmet surrogaterecoverycriteria for EPIH. Surrogate criteria is not applicable for priority pollutant metals analysis.

ICP Serial Dilution Analysis Results

The ICP serial dilution analysis produced percent differences (%D)s that exceeded the acceptance criteria of < 10% for axsenic, barium, chromium, lead, nickel, and zinc (11.6%, 13.1%, 11.5%, 18.4%, 16.6%, and 16.1%, respectively). The positive results for arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, nickel, and zinc were qualified as estimated (J) in all samples.

ICP serial dilution analysis is not applicable for EPH and PCB analysis.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplcate EPH

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) analysis was performed on soil sample SB-4/13- 15. The following table summarizes the EPH analyte that did not meet the MS/MSD acceptance criteria:

Comound MS %R MSD %R Acticm %R Acceptan I~m~I

- C 39 34 40-140 Estimate (J) the positive result in sample SB4/13-15.

Priority Pollutant Metals

Matrix spike (MS) analysis was performed on soil sample SB-6/0-1. The following table summarizes the analytes that did not meet the %R criteria of 75 - 125%:

JWEWNDWFFLDSitawreSewmContsrascWrkldiahranvIOd2Sanncbep&pId MacUf& Eddy. In Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 7 June 10, 2003 Lab Pfoject 04tt

-x '-j Analyte Spiked Sample Spike MS Affected Samp lAction Sample Result Amnt Y.R Result (ngkgB)

auimony 9.7185 7.0483 27.78 9.6 Estimte (3) the positive Teslts in samples SB-4/5-7, SB-5/9 l 1, and SB-Si. Reject (R)the nmdect results in samples KSB-14-16, SB-5/04, SB-5/14- 16,and SB7/0-1l. Estimate (UJ)the a -a f noodedtetest in samples SB-40-1, SB-4l3-15, SB-614-16, SB-6/5-7, and SB.7/7-9. arsenic 983934 49.15 57 27.78 177.4 Estimet (J)the positive es s ia all samples. zinc 261.903 274.1253 138.58-*. EsimaQe (O)pthereslsinalmes

Professionaljudgement was used to estimate (UJ) ratherlthan reject (R) the blank-qualified nondetect results for antimony in samples SB-4/0-1, SB-4/13-15, SB-614-16, SB-6/5-7, and SB-7/7-9. No further actions were taken for arsenic since these results were previously qualified as estimated () due to serial dilution %D exceedence.

All MS/MSD criteria were met for PCB analysis.

Laboratory Duplicates

Priority Pollutant Metals

The priority pollutant metals analyte that did not meet acceptance criteria of relative percent I difference (%RPD)<20 in soil sample SB-6/O-1 is summarized in the following table:

Analyte Sample Duplicate Sam %RPD Affected SampiesAction Resuk Reslt (mg/kg)

asniony 7.0483 2.7721 87.1 Estimate (J)the positive resls insamples SB-4/S- 7, SB-S/91, and SB-69-1. Estimate (UJ) the bhnk-quaified noumdetct resuls in sanples SB- 717-9. ~I

aicul 100.4591 81.5393 20.8 Estimate () the positive results in all samples. vaadim 376.219 5163786 31.4 Esdmate (J) the p! eMts in all sam

No further actions were taken for vanadium since these results were previously qualified as estimated (1) due to serial dilution %D exceedence. No further actions were taken for antimony since these

J:WEaRWRWF sVArncrShawComraWorkDaaM wllO4n pd AeClf&Mmecpr Eddy, . I. Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 8 June 10, 2003 Lab Project* results were previously qualified as estimated (J and UJ) due to poor matrix spike recoveries. Laboratory duplicates are not analyzed in EPH and PCB analysis.

Performance Evaluation Samples/Accuracy Check

Priority Pollutant Metals

The priority pollutant metals analytes that did not meet laboratory control sample (LCS) acceptance criteria are summarized in the following table:

Analye cnentaioLCS MS Acceptance ciauia Mftcet sawp/Action (mwXg) (nMI .....

ceium 82.5 84.4- 97.4 Estiate (J) the positive esults in samples SB- S44-1, SM-4/5-7, and sB-4/13-S. seienium 361 37.3 -46.9 Estimate (UJ) the amoletect results in samnpkles .. j.SB-410-, SB-4/5-7, sad SB-4/13-15.

No further actions were taken for chromium since these results were previously qualified as estimated (J) due to serial dilution %D exceedance.

All CS criteria were met for EPH and PCB analysis.

Compound Quantitation and Reported Quantitation Limits

Priority Pollutant Metals -

The following table summarizes the priority pollutants metal results, including those results blank- qualified as nondetect, that are less than the reporting limit (RL) but greater than the instument detection limit (IDL), and were not previously qualified as estimated (J) due to quality control parameters listed above. The listed results are qualified as estimated (J and UJ, respectively) due to uncertainty in the quantitation:

Analyse 4Affected SampicsAction cadmimt SB-4/13-15, SB-7/01

seknium SB-5Y/-1, SB-5/9-1 1, SB-7/0-1

silver SB-4/0-1, SB-4/5-7, SB-4113-15 thallium S -410-1, SB-4/5-7, S-4/13-15, SB-5/9-11, SB-6/5-7, SB- _ -7/0-1

J:WEIRRWNFDSI.wwceSwmaWorIDsevcABs8sepc6ephwpd Mecuq& Eddy,Ihc. Priority Pollutant Metals, PCB, and EPH Page 9 June 10, 2003 Lab Probject #S41

The positive results for silver in all samples listed above were previously qualified as nondetect (U) due to blank contamination. These results are further qualified as estimated, nondetect (UJ) due to blank contamination and uncertainty in quantitation.

All criteria was met for EPH and PCB analysis for compound quantitation and reported quantitation limits.

J:WEtBWR WNFLDSLaweS6a&wConfrd WorDta_veitB42&Ceqc pwpd MewJ& Eddy. Inc. EPA-NE Site Name (54 er- Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1 Reference No-

REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION

The following data package has been validated: Lab Name B3T11 SOWIMethod No. N 50 EN SU - T oS4 Case/Project No. w -z f.. Sampling Date(s) -SIWto3§3hetoA "31klo SDG No. 604 Shipping Date(s) st 163 VITro1 -s. ) No. of Sa lesiMatrix h So: Date Rec'd by lab )i' 31(1I a

Traffic Report Sample Nos. S-4fo4 , S IS4, S&L- /l- tpSSKi1t,4G-7o-1 s5- 7 i s&s& 4, < tr5 s-s/i-1,U5(H -r. sb-i-7 s&4flym

Trip Blank No. N t Equipment Blank No. A. Bottle Blank No. e491 Field DuplC Nos. 6 +- VS.(- 110t PES Nos.

The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation u Guideline for Evaluating Environca Anlyses revision was used to evaluate the data and/or approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page: (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP).

A Tier HIIor Tier Il evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one). If a Tier II validation with a partial T ier II s , then identify s es, parameters, etc.t received partial Tier Iu validaton

The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters:

- - Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completenes --(CSF Audit - Tier 1) I - Preservation & Tecta . olding Timunes -PE -Smpts/Accuracy Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial & Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported I-Sats Quantitaon Limits S - Blanurrogate Compounds at -,ystemn- -Pe- -&'&-.a.. - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Region I Definitions and Qualifiers:

A - Accepable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity. R -The data are rejected as unusable. The R replaces the numerical value or samplic qantitation limit. U - Compound not detected at that munerical sample quantitation limit. UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity. TB, BB, EB - Conmpound detected in aqueous trip blank, aqueous bottle blank, or aqueous ecquip* ent blank associated with soillsediment samples.

Validator's Namne VC1)AN #ki komany Name Phone Number el 2tY tL Date Validation Started Lfl2 S Date Validation Completed $()(o

12/96 PA-NE 'ataValidaiion Worksheet Cover Page - Page 2

'beck if all criteria are met and no hard copy worksheet provided. Indicate NA if worksheet is not applicable > analytical method. Note: there is no standard worksheet for System Performance, however, the validator mst document all system performance issues in the Data Validation Memorandum.

MAW workseets:

VOA/SV-Pest/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOA/SV-PaI/PCB-I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES VOA/SV-U GCJMS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK (TUNING) VOA/SV-III INfIAL CALIBRATION VOA/SV-4V CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOA/SV-Psu/PC-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS -r VOAISV-Pcu/PCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS VOA-VI VOA SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES SV-VI SV SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES VOA/SV-VII INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE VOA/SV-PesPCB-VIm MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE VOAISV-Pest/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-X SENSITIVITY CHECK VOA/SV-PcstIPCB-XI ACCURACY CHECK VOAISV-Pest/PCB-XI TARGET COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-Pes/PCR-XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION VOA/SV-XIV TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS VOAISV-XV SEMIVOLATILE CLEANUP TABLE H-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA -AZt eWtPC8 wotheets:

VOA/SV-PesPCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-1I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES br Pesr/PCB-IIA GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- RESOLUTION MA Pesu/PCB-IIB GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- RETENTION TIMES Pe /PCB-HC GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- ACCURACY CHECK OF INITIAL CALIBRA' LN PesPCB-IID GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHE.K- PESTICIDE DEGRADATION -r Pcs/PCB-W1 INITIAL CALIBRATION Pest/PCB-IV CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOA/SV-Pez/PCB-V-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOAISV-Pe/PCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS PeutICD-VI SURROGATE COMPOUNDS: AA4 Pes/PCB-VI SPIKE RECOVERIES AND RETENTION TIME SHIFT PatPBVII PESTICIDE CLEANUP VOAISV-Pes/PCB-VIII MATRIX TRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE VOA/SV-Pe/PCB-IX FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION VOA/SV-PesIPCB-X SENSITIVITY CHECK VOAISV-Pd/PCB-XI ACCURACY CHECK Pest/PCB-XI COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-Pesg/PCB-XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION TABLE II-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA

I certify tb checked above. Signature: Name:. r v . Date:

12% -- bInI-I4I

o j- --- soo 33

On a --

0 r

'SU 0 coo

03 a il- m-- a ab

9-0-*-0 .S E

U-cc. %o h

ca C O

z(U 0 U

4. laas

0 80 8

'C'

0 2l

16i

w~ Iii L jt r 0 I 0- r -I I (U ''--1 C.

e 0) 00 - ~--+- C)LL

a< - 3z .

m o6

,a - - -- I Mi I I-

*II I

U I I

Uo I 0 00Go v

------O as 0

'0 ' -- - a - ii I 90 ) 5 °U4 a C' 0 2 .. ±2 Li 1- , *6 ri 2

0- =- -

--7 e

a Od

_ _ 2------

O4 c >

$4 0 8. S E :2 itsS IECIOW I Data Review Worksheet

IV A. BL2MX AMLTSIS RESULZ S (Sections 1-3)

List the blank conminationl in Sections I & 2 below. A secarate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks. 1. La boratory Blanks ATR: /

, ICS/Sa ANALYTE _ _ ,UC

3all -k Cr i

- 4h1 ft C.. v

. -_ -iment/_ri- larZks PA'" ECUTP SLA ANALVE .CONc. /UNITrS

- /

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch? Ye r No

B. - Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent? Yes r No

If No, The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any actions below, and list the samples affected. 14-~-s24rL I SWUM0f I Data Revies Worksheet

I IV A. BLNa AslLSIS RULS (Sections 1-3)

I List the blank contasination in sections 1 & 2 below. A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks. I 1. Laboratory Blanks ANAYTE "ll3 cq '-- I CG* -1o.9 , I AR! 3Ic1h)-- I 3CONC./N S K I

2G. quipment''"-ip32ar..ks UA

I g" ECUIP SLA ANALE 13 -: I I 7, ,-- I I

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch? (Ye r No B. Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or I every 2 hours whichever is more frequent? GYe r No

I If No, The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine I the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any actions below, and list the samples affected. I Data Rev , orksheet

IV A. BLXM ZLYSIS RSULS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contaxination in Sections 1 & 2 bellow. A separate worksheet should be used far soil and water blanks. 1. Laboratory Blanks Mr

MePL CCLC:. 'UNS cC c.

__\_-c,_

, ___6-- -0,"

AT! EgUTP BL ANAL= CONC

- /

3. Frequency Requirements A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch? Yes r No B. -Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or e r .NoNo every 2 hours whichever is more frequent?

If No,

The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and quality the data accordingly. Discuss any actions below, and list the samples affected. k&k RESIDE I Oata Review Worksh:e-at

IV A. BLNx ANLTST.S RuSULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank conmin~'ation in Sections 1 & 2 belcw. A separate vworksheet should be used for soil and water blanks. 1. Laboratory Blanks QM IC/=334 2RE BL AM=YT C=( ut 31 - P&S I -o.

3101c3 I. ____ CC-&C

133V jll -

Blanks

ANALYTZ . c3?~C. 'mnr-sZ

- /,

3. Frequency Requirements A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 sampl s and for each digestion batch? KYe:sr No

B. - Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent? Ye r No

If No, The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any act i below and list the samples affected. 4 dje gZGlN I Data Review Worksheet

IV A. BLINK ILYSIS ESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 & 2 below. A separate I worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks.

1. Laboratory Blanks MAT I ATE, I cs/C"I PREP Acoar( I! IX: lh . - I 54,4!i) ... ON k3 0.4_ I I I

2. Equipnent/Trip Blanks

ATE EOUIP BL ANALY"'Z . CONC. /uITS

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samplts and for each digestion batch? Yesr No B. Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent? Yeir No

If No,

The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any actions below, and list the samples affected. REGIO I Data Review Worksheet rv A. BLn ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank co mnnton in Sections 1 & 2 below. A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks. 1. Laboratory Blanks

__-_---0

ne: ces us-r aars

coNc. r CC-T---

A - 7 - U--, a DAEECU7P aLE-

'5 r

3. Frequency Requirements

A. Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matrix, for every 20 samp lqs and for each digestion batch? Ye r No B- Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent? Yes r No

If No,

The data may be affected. Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly. Discuss any actio below, and list the samples affected. REils I Data Reviev orksheets

IV a. B.AE AwJ. IS RESULTS (Section 4)

4. Blank Act"ions The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five ties the hies oncantr-ation of that element's 'connation in any blank. The act in 3 level for samples which have been trated or diluted shni be altiplied by the cttion/dilution factor.. No positive s result should be recarted unless the --m-wt--aticn of the analyte in t-he sample exceeds the Action Level (AL). Specific ac=ions are as fomcws:

. When the- concent-atiocn is greater than the ZDL, but less than the Acticn Level, report the sample concen-ac--i= deec-ad "ith a U.

2. hTen te samrle concent--ation is c-eatear - "he Action Level, recc- =-he sainee concent-ation unqua"'e.

E'L ZLT M. CONC./ ALL MLLS MA4x. CONC./ A UNICs UNITS U- S UNITS A00 o454..~W

ICU -,r.q -_o, __A I /__, -- i,,Wg o.'& -- 4" -0. , 1

S - Ks -4/,--, 5 -5-- ) / tA()-. , c 1ao f- -6.I,",'

NOTE: Blanks analyzed iuring a soil case musit be converted to mg/kg in order to compare them with the sample results. -- nxalt4 OOZ. Conc. in ug/L X Volume diluted to (200ml) X r X l1000am X m = mg/kg Weight digested (igram 1000mI 1kg 1000ug & 6@- - S .- qs', 8 -S/--i, 458/-yi 3 Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mg/kg which can then be compared to sample results. A3 - 41 4S4k- 6~/3.. At

tV-ci S-n/ ata ReWiew worksheets

S VI. MATRIX 8 13

TR I MATRIX: )) 1. Recovery Criteria

I List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria.

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result I SR - sample result

S Anai a SSR SR S %R Act n . .L!2 i IV i' , ' I , I SI

*_ _ _ I _ __-_ _ I __ _ _ _ ,__I . --- _ I _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ I ,__ I ______

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix.

S ACTIONS: 'i. If the sample cdncentration exceeds the spike concentr'ation by a i factor of 4 or more, no action is taken. / 2. If any analyte does not meet the %R criteria follow the actions I stated below:

<301 30%-74% . >1254 I Positive Sample Results J I J Non-detected Results R UJ A

S 2. Frequency Criteria A. Was a matrix spike prepared at the required frequency? Ye or No B. Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements 3 that did not meet required criteria for matrix (7 spike recovery? (Yes r No

7 separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair. REGION I3 Data Review Worksheets

VII. LZaclTORr DUPLICITIS

ust the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the c=iteria for I duplicate precision. For soil duplicates, calculate the CRDL in mg/kg using the sample weight, volume and percent solids data for the samole. Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by circling either the RPD or cRDL for each element. MATRIX: Element .QLe_ D-4tQted RD!!e A 4013±o va soil 3&6 1-10 ug/L agkg Alum -num I -20 - Arsenic v-,:= _i:10 --___-14'IAo ! " 3o,, -______:;. ,,1\ Antieny ; _ , *

pBari'= -! "'200

Iron__100_ I___ Lead0. 3-QI A IA.______p1______Magnesium I5000 1 ! Manganese 15 _ I_ _ _ ' ..-" =cket-_cury-_ a--ir _-1*_~ ,,-Ir.*ts-__._2 _ I e.,4 C__ % z ___7_l__4 x,1: ,,ub%

Selenium Silver - 104si_; I I I Sodium - 52-000 Thallium - 101 I I Vanadium so- .--? -- 79 .": t1- Zinc 0o Cyanided e _101 .;

Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type. ACTIONS:

1. Estimate (3) positive results for elements which have an RPD >20% fcr waters and >35% for soils. 2. If sample results are less than Sx the CRDL, estimate (J) positive I results for elements whose absolute difference is >CRDL, (2xCRDL for soils). If both samples are non-detected, the RPD is not calculated (NC) I I a R EGION I Data Review Wrksheets

II. rABOa TcoR conOL SIMPLE

Aueous S List any ies rec3veries not within the 80-120% criteria and the samples affect ed. I EL g= ACTON SAMPLES AFFECT D i I

2. Solid LCS List any analytes '-hat were not within the control windows se by the EPA for the sclid LCS sample. The 80-120% ic--is not used :to evaluate solid LCS results.

E a T LiCS CONC. CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION S lPUS AFFECTED

1 ~ srA 1-___:u-,sib &&s&f

ACTIONS: Percent Recovery AOQEOUS LCS <50% -51-79% >120%

Positive Results - J J I Non-detected Results R 113 A S SOLID LCS EPA Control Windows S Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A S 3. Frequency Criteria A. Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix, every digestion batch, and every 20 samples? Yesor No I REGION I Data Review Worksheets

II. INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMa (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION LILYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis.

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the followi-g: I

Serial Dilutions were performed, but analytical results did not agree with.i 10% for analyte czncent-ations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution. I Repor- all results below that do not meet the requir-aed laborar r criteria for IC? serial dilution analysis.

DL 50x:DL SAXLhZ. RESULT DI- '_ON

A,.3.0 ro 14 £1mi. ok \\. & Barium ,o 4 WAo0 Axf3t ayllium Calcium chromium'C L321IO.3 _ _ _

Cobalt 7 Copper i . Iron Lead _,. O 5 ,319" I nagnesium I ManganeseSilver 1 I I ,"__ II I Nickel I .E7 Potassium o , Silver -[

Sodin___ _ zine q.o9 , pot-L -as- .4 , .. a

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix.

ACTIONS: 1. Estimate (J) positive results if %D I >I I nam Data Review WXorksheets I m UtX. mhCbWLW= RMULS Detection Limits

V Instrument Detection LMmit results were present and found to be . less than the Contract Required Detection Limits.

IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI.

i£IDLs were present, but the criteria was not met for the following elements:

2 . Reporting Requirements

Were sample results on Form I reported down to Sthe IDL not the RDL for all analytes? Y scr No Were sample results that were analyzed y ic for Se, TI, As, or Pb at least 5x IDL. Yes or Nc

Were sample weights, volumes, and dilutzicns i taken into account when reporting detactin 3 limits on Form I. Yes r Nc

If No, The reported results may be inaccurate. Make the necessary changes ,n the data summary tables and request that the laboratory rqsubmit the correct . e

sersct~wS6-~ 56-7/0-

3~vci' Ajo-I, Sflrflh3-Ssg1l srs _ 1 , b , -5 565/q' S645/e

4 cat-,4~t A44aW A4.'-t 9lAO-4Mn(- tt Cfl4L~&e /tlcanetA -(a) dtw" /4 6-tcra4> Analysis Report: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client M &E Date Colected: 3/26/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received: 3/27/03 Client ID MW-I Date Analyzed: 3/28/03 Lab ID: 80502-01A Aliquot Used for Analysis: 5 mA Marc Aqueous Sample pH: < 2 Concentration in: ugL Dilution Factor 1

Reporting VPH Rangs

CS - CS Aliphaics ND 10o ~ 1(0 Oa C9 - C2AUphatics ND 20 C9 - C1O Aromatics 40\J 30

Targiet Aalyt.es

MTBE 15 Benzene S5 Toluene 15 Ethytwbeizene 5 mrn- and p-Xylenes 20 o-Xylene 10 Naphthalene 10 OC Batch: V4B0328A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bromolluorobentzene (FID) 2,5-romotoen (FID) Bom beene (PID) 2,5-Obromotoluene (PID)

ND = Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QAQC procedures required by the VPH method were folowed, and al pwo a -capare standards for the required QA/QC procedures were achieved.

No significant mod ifications were made to this method.

VPH ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B050S-01 UUU~. 2 U Analysis Report: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client M &E Date Collected: 3/26/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received: 3/27/03 Client ID MW-5 Date Analyzed:- 3/29/03 Lab ID B0502-02A Aliquot Used for Analysis: 5 rnml MatrixC Aqueous Sample pH: < 2 Concentration in: ugIL Dilution Factor 1

Reporting VPH Ranges Resuits Limit

CS - CS Aliphatics z6t0o C9 - C12 Aliphatics C9 - C10 Aromatics

Target Analytes

MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m- and p-Xyklenes o-Xyene Naphthalene QC Batch: V4B0329A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bromrnluorobenzene (FID) 2,5-Oi otokene (MD) Bromoluoabenzene (PID) 2,5-Diromotoluene (PD)

ND = Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the VPH method were folowed, and all permancea ceptane standards for the required ONOC procedures were achieved.

No significant modifications were made to this method.

VPH ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of I B052. -- - - UUiV UUO AnalysisReport: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Report Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client M&E Date Collected: 3/26/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received: 3/27103 ClientD11. KMW-5 Date Analyzed: 3/28/03 Lab ID: B0502-03A Aliquot Used for Analysis: 5 ml Caoncenaon uus Sample pH: < 2 Concentration In: ugIL Dilution Factor, 1

Reporting VPH Re ULimit 60 CS- C Aiphatcs ND ,511 ( /(D3 C9 -C12 Alphaics ND 09-C010 Aromatics 34 0

Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m- and p-Xylenes o-Xylene Naphthalene QC Batch: V4B0 824

Surrogate Recovery (%): Broohorobenzene (FID) 2,5-bromoluene (FID) B~o o beae (PID) 2,5-Dlb otolene (PID)

ND = Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narratve, a QAIQC procedures required by the VPH method were folowed, and a ;Pefor.m nce standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved.

No significant modifications were made to this method.

VPH ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 E0502-03 UU W Analysis Report: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Clent M & E Date Collected 3/27/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received 3/27/03 Client ID MW-3 Date Analyzed: 328/03 Lab ID B0502-04A Alquot Used for Analysis: 5 mn Mark Aqueous Sample plt 5 2 Concentration in: ugL Dilution Factor 1

ReportingRMN

C5 - C8 AM htks ND C9 - C12 Aliphaics ND 1D1511402, C9- C10 Aromatics 45\

MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m- and p-Xylenes o-Xylem Naphthalene QC Batch: V480328A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bro-m obenzene (FID) 108 25brotokene (FID) 92 Bromaorombenzene (PlO) 110 Z5-Dbromoluene (PID) 90

NO = Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QAQC procedures required by the VPH method were followed, and al peformneaccpance1. standards for the required QNQOC procedures were achieved.

No significant modifications were made to this method

VPH ranges are adjusted to exclude the concentration of target and 0C (surrogate) analyes.

Page I of I B0502-MA ULUU JUO Analysis Report Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client M &E Dale Collected: 3/27/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received- 3/27/03 Clent ID MW-6 Date Analyzed: 3128/03 Lab ID B0502-45A Aliquot Used for Analysis 5 mi Matrix Aqueous Sample pHft < 2 Crcen on in ugL Dilution Factor I

Reporting VPH Rans Results

C5-C8Alhatics ND C9 -012 Aphatics ND C9 - C10 Aromatics 460) bloO

MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m- and p-Xyienes o-Xylene talene (c Batch: V4BO328A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bromolluoobnzene (FID) 2,-tvotxmotoluene (FI) Bs-rootmam T" Broroobn ene (PIDO) 2,54ixmtuene (PID)

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narraive al QoA QC procedures required by the VPH method were folowed, and al perormancelacceptace standards for the required QAC procedures were achieved.

No signicant mofications were made to this method. VPH ranges are a4usted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes. i

Page 1 of 1 B I II -: Analysis Report: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: M & E Date Collected: 3/27/03 Analysis: MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received: 3/27/03 Client ID: TRIPBLANK Date Analyzed: 3/28/03 Lab ID B0502-06A Akiquot Used for Analysi: 5 ml Matrbc Aqueous Sample pH 5 2 Concentration i ug/L Dikulton Factor 1

Reporting um*t cs - c8 Aliphatics C9 - C12AEphatics UD C9- C10 Aromalics

Target Analytes

MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethybenzene m- and p-Xylenes o-Xylene Naphheene QC Batch: V4BO328A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bromolhobenzene (FID) Z-iMiomatoluene (FED) Bromoluorobenzene (PIDO) 2.Dtxomoluene (PUD)

ND = Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QA/OC procecdues required by the VPIH method were folwed, and al pewfan standards for te required QAfQC procedures were achieved~.

No significant modifications were made to this method.

VPH ranges are acrjusted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 80502-06BA - LV'VIL V;LL Analysis Report: Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client M & E Date Colected: 3/27/03 Analysis:.- MADEP VPH 98-1 Date Received: 3/27103 Client ID: MW-10 Date Analyzed: 3/28/03 Lab ID. B0502-07A Aliquot Used for Analysis: 5 i Matrk Aqueous Sawpe pHrt 52 Concentration in: ugL Dilution Factor I

Reporting V Ranges Results Unit

CS - C8 Aiphalics ND 100 C9 - C12 Ahaics ND 20 5(16/O C9 - C10 Aromatics 460 30

Tarnt Anaies

MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethybenzene rm- and p-Xyktenes o-Xylene Naphtha ene C Batch: V4B0328A

Surrogate Recovery (%): Bromoluorobenzene (FID) 2.5-ibrmotoluene (FID) Bomhorobeen (PID) 25-tromotoluene (PID)

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted In the Project Narratve, al QAQC procedures required by the VPH method were folowed, and al peors cea standart for the required QAONQC procedures were achieved

No significant modifications were made to this method.

VPH ranges are a usted to exclude the concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1I B0502-7 -3 L/L UL.' -/ _11 Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons - crient Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 326/03 Client lD MW-1 Date Received: 3/27/03 Lab I- 80502-01C Date Extracted: 4/8/03 Matr Aqueous Date Analyzed 4/23/06 F1, 4/23/03 F Concentration in: ug/L Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranies Results Limits

C9 - C18 iphatics LC C19 - C36 Al phatics ClI -C22AroMacs

8 OS TamenaMeS Acephiben Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(gh)perylene Benzo(k uanthene Chrysene Dbenzo(ah)anthracene Fluormanthene Fluorene Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene Naphthwalene Phenanthrene Pyrene 2-MethyinaphthaIene QC Batcx-MB-6544 Survogate Recovery (%) Chloerocadecane 53% o-Tiphenyl 64% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 87% 2-Bromonaphhalene 90%

N= Not Detected

Excep where noted inthe Project Narabve, d QAAC proceures required by the EPH rnmethod were folowed, and al pet annce standads for the required QAC Procedures wee achieved. The only significant modifcation made to 2* method is the subtraction of SPE cartdge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.26 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to excjde concentration of target and (IC (surrogate) analytes.

:-m -. :-* --. .- : i-j i-i ij U -- ij---

Page 1 of I1 B0502-01C Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/26/03 Client ID: MW-5 Date Received: 3/27103 Lab ID: B0502-02C Date Extracted: 4/8/03 MatrIx. Aqueous Date Analyzed: 4/23/06 Fl, 4/23103 F: Concentration in: ug/L Drion: 1 Reporting EPH Ranqes Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics 30 C19 - C36 Alphatics 40 C1I -C22-Arornis 85 }ofos Taret AnaMes Acenaphne ND 5 Acenaphthylene ND S Anthracene ND 5 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 5 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 5 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 5 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 5 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 5 Chrysene ND 5 Dbenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 5 Fkloranthene ND 5 Fluorene ND 5 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND S Naphthalene ND 5 Phenantvhrene ND 5 Pyrene ND 5 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 5 QC Batch: MB-6544 Sumrrogate Recovery (%): Chtorooctadecane 52% o-Terphenyl 66% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 83% 2-Bromonaphthalene 96%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, a QAOC procedures required by the EPH method were folwed, and al performanefacceptance standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and OC (surrogate) analytes.

.J -, U:- iJ.7. U--- -.6.-. ;-

Page 1 of 1 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-I Date Collected: 3/26103 Client ID: KMW-5 Date Received: 3/27/03 Lab ID: B0502-03C Date Extracted: 4/8103 Matrix: Aqueous Date Analyzed: 4/23/06 Fl. 4/23/03 F: Concentration in: ug/L Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranqes Results Limits

C9 - C18 Aliphatics C19 - C36 A iphatics C11 - C22 Aromnatics Ol/ 1O3 Target Analytes Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dlbenzo(a,h)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene ndeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene 2-Methytnaphthatene QC Batch: MB-6544 Surrogate Recovery (%): Chloroocladecane 58% o-Terphenyl 70% 2-Fluorob~henyl 88% 2-Bromonaphthalene 9N

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narraive, al QAQC procedures nrequWed by the EPH method were folowed, and aM perfo standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved. The ornly significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

(ii

Page 1 of 1 B0502-03C Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/27103 Client ID: MW-3 Date Received: 3/27/03 Lab ID-B0502-04C Date Extracted: 4/8/03 Matrc Aqueous Date Analyzed: 4/23/06 F1, 4/23/03 F: Concentration in: ug/L Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH RanQes Results Limits

C9- C18 Aphatics C19 - C36 Aliphatics ClI - C22 Aromatics t1iG(o3 TaMr AnaMes Acenaphthenet ND 5 Acenaptytene ND 5 Anthracene ND 5 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 5 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 5 Benzo(b)fuoranthene ND 5 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 5 Berzo(k)fluoranthene ND 5 Chirysene ND 5 Ditenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 5 Fluoanthene ND 5 Fluorene ND 5 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 5 Naphthalene ND 5 Phenanthrene ND 5 Pyrene ND 5 2-Methyinaphthalene ND 5 oC Bat* M1-6544 Surrogate Recovery (%) 3 Chlorootadecane 42% o-Terphenyl 57% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 89% 2-Bromonaphthalene 96% ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Pject Naative, all QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and all peroaccetce standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved.

The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes. iti 1

Page lof 1I B0502-04C Analysis Report Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Client Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/27103 Client ID: MW-6 Date Received 3/27/03 Lab D10:80502-050C Date Extracted: 4/8/03 Marbc Aqueous Date Analyzed: 4/23106 Fl, 4/12303 R Concentration in: ughL Dilution: 1 Repodrting Results UiLs C9-C18Alphaics 40 S 019 -C36 Aliphatics 49 T ClI - C22 Arornatics ND Taret AnaMes Acenaphthene ND Acenaphthylene ND Anthrvacene ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND Benzo(a)pyrene ND Benzo(b)fluorantene ND Benzo(gi)pzylene ND Benzo(k)luoranthene ND Chrysene ND Dlbenzo(a.h)anthracene ND Pheoranthene ND Fluoene ND lndeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene ND Naphthalene ND Phenanthrene ND Pyrene ND 2-Methyinaphthalone24**~Mahe ND QC Batch: MB-6544 Surrogate Recovery (%):

Chlootcane - 34% o-Terphenyl 46% 2-Florbphenyl 91% 2-Bromonaphthalene 98%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted hn the Project Narratiev, all QAQC procedures requkired by the EPH method were followed, and at standards for the required QAQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE cartridge contamination from the EPH ranges per Section 112.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concenation of target and QC (sunogate) analytes

Page l of 1 Analysis Report: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Crient Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Analysis: MADEP EPH 98-1 Date Collected: 3/27/03 Client ID: MW-10 Date Received: 3/27/03 Lab ID. B0502-07C Date Extracted:- 4/8/03 Matri Aqueous Date Analyzed: 4/23/06 Fl, 4/23/03 F: Concentration in: ugIL Dilution: 1

Reporting EPH Ranes Results Limits

C9 -C18 Aliphatics C19 - C36 Aliphatics ClI - C22 Aronmatfics 4c416(03-> TaMe Anales Acenaphthene Acenaphhyene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylere Benzo(k)wranthene Chrysene Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Naphthalene PhenanUthrene Prene 2-Methynaphthalene QC Batch: MB-6544 Surrogate Recovery (%): Corooctadecane 53% o-Terphenyl 69% 2-Fluorobiophenyl 94% 2-Bromonaphthalene 8%

ND= Not Detected

Except where noted in the Project Narrative, al QA/QC procedures required by the EPH method were folowed, and al o standards for the requied QQC procedures were achieved. The only significant modification made to this method is the subtraction of SPE catridge contaminatioWn from the EPH ranges per Section 11.2.6 of the method.

EPH ranges are adjusted to exclude concentration of target and QC (surrogate) analytes.

Page 1 of 1 B0502-07C I IOM I CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PCB OFWNICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEHT

Lab Name: MITKEK CORPORATIOR Co ntract: MW- Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: S AS No.: SDG No.: B0502

Matrix: (soil/water) MATER Lab Sample ID: B0502-01D Sample vt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: E1E0749F t Moisture: decanted: (YIN) Date Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sanc) CoNT Date Extracted: 04/01/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uLI] ) Date Analyzed: 04/18/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y CONCERI N UNITS: CAS NO. C 0I (ug/L or ug/Kg) UIG/L Q c R ' Jk-F 12674-11-2------AroClor-1016 1.0 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 1.0 U 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 1.0 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 1.0 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 1.0 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 1.0 U

PORM I PCB

v_ '._) 0it , ! PORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHIET MW-5 Lab Name: MITKN COR mATIc Co tract: I Lab Code: MITKE Case NO.: S AS No.: SDG No.: B0502 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: B0502-02D Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: E1E0752F t Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) Ccur Date Extracted: 04/01/03 Concentrated Ectract Volume: 10000 (uL]) Date Analyzed: 04/18/03

Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N iP: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

CUMCENTRATION WuTS: CAS NM. CamximX (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q c I

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 1.0 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 1.0 U 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 1.0 U OWi 53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248- 1.0 U (1 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 1.0 U I 11096-82-5----- Arocor-1260 1.0 U

I POFL I P~CB

I FORM 1 CLTET SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT SSHEI

KNN-5 Lab Name: MITKM CORP SATICN CC ntract: Lab Code: MITKE Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : B0502 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: B0502-03D Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: EE0753F

t Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Soac) CORT Date Extracted: 04/01/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 04/18/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N PH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y TMNTRATICN UNITS: CAS NO. CMruD (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 0

12674-11-2------Arolor-1016 1.0 U %<6 11104-28-2----- Aroclor-1221 1.0 U 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 1.0 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 1.0 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 1.0 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 1.0 U

FORM I PCB FORM I CINT SAMPLE NO. PCB ORGAcwNICS ANALYSIS DATA SHET

MW-3 Lab Name: MITKM CORPORATION Contract:

Lab Code: MITKE34 Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0502 Matrix: (soil/water) hATER ab Sanple ID: B0502-04D Sanple wt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML ab File ID: E1E0764F t Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) D)ate Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/CQt/Sonc) Ccwr D)ate Extracted: 04/01/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) D)ate Analyzed: 04/19/03 Injection volume: 1.0 (uL) )ilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: _ ,ulfur Cleamp: (Y/N) Y I CCCHMTRATIgNK UITS: CAS NO. CCMPOUND (Ug/L Oir uglKg) UG/L Q I

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 1.0 U 11104-28-2 ------Aroclor-1221 1.0 U SI 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 1.0 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 1.0 U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 1.0 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 1.0 U I I I

FORM I PCB

.- 47, ORGANICS flElPCBALYSSDAT CLENT SAMPLB O. PCB ORGANCS N~ALYIS DATAASHERT

Lab Name: MITMKE CORPORATION Co ntract:n j1 Lab Code: MITKEN Case No.: SAS NO.: SDG NO.: B0502 Matrix: (soil/water) MATER Lab Sample ID: B0502-05D Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: 81E0765F t Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) COT Date Extracted:04/01/03

Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000(uL) Date Analyzed: 04/19/03 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N IS: Sulfur cleanup: (Y/N) Y CONNRATIO UNITS: CAS NO. COMOMD (g/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 1.0 U 5 Ilbp 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 1.0 U 11141-16-5----- Aroclor-1232 1.0 U 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 1.0 U 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 1.0 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 1.0 U

FORM I PCB

IJ'JIJiJtI PCB ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATALSHEET S MN-10 ~-

-1 Lab Name: MITKE CORPORATION Con tract: Lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : .80502 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sanple ID: B0502-07D Sanple wt/vol: 1000 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: E1E0766F

I Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 03/27/03 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CCHT Date Extracted:04/01/03 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/19/03 I Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pE: _ Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) Y I CCIC IT QI WITS: CAS NO. CPOD (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 0

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 1.0 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221i 1.0 U Ii6(c! 11141-16-5------Aroclor-1232 1.0 U 5S 53469-21-9----- Aroclor-1242 1.0 U 12672-29-6----- Aroclor-1248 1.0 U U 11097-69-1----- Aroclor-1254 1.0 U 11096-82-5----- Aroclor-1260 1.0 U I

FORM I PCB I U.. rlFA -L

I EPA SAMPLE NO INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MW-3 Lab Name: MflIEM CORPORATION

I bCode: MITXEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0502 WATER Lab Sample ID: B0502-04B _ r (soiVwater): wel (lowhed): MED Date Received: 03/27/03_

1 'S o i s Cocetraion Units (ug/L or mag/kgt dry weighot): UGL

CAS No. Analyte Concutrion C Q M

.7429-90-5 Ahmunmn NR 7 M P tc?-> r-440-36&0 Asioy6 _440-3& s-ei 442 P 7440-39-3_ im a34 I" , P -440-41-7 Bei 0 U P _744o-43-9.Ca 0.70 L P_ -7440-70-2-. C-akim NR _440-47-3 amim __ __o1 P .7440-4&4._ Crakt NR _7440-504 .pe 4.0 U P- -7439-8"- km NR _7439-92-1- lead - 4.0 M P 7439-95-4- Ma ,s NR _7439-96-5._ Mnar NR 3439-97-6 " scury a.14 UI CV _7440-02-0 L 4.0 I P -7440-09-7- NR _77-49-2- BetGran 18 I P _7440-224 - ilwr 2.0 T P _7440-23-5 nim NR 7440-2". Tha i m 0 U P .744062-2_Vaai&n 15& P _7440 -46-6 Zinn 70 UI P _ - 7yanide NR

Texture: r Befaoe: rA

FORMI - IN I~w(- U.a. rEA * -L

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Kh(W-5 Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION Contact SDG NI : B0502 SDG No.: Lab Code: MFIEM Case No.: SAS No.:

Matrix (soimewatr): WATERL Lab Sampic ID: B0502-03B__ Levd (wly MED Date Redve- 03/27/03

Concetration Units (Wg/L or mg/kg dry wdgh): UQL

CAS No. Analyte Cocaftiation C Q M

-7429-90-5 Amiumm- NR 7440.3-0 Aimmy 4-4 3 k Pv -7440-39-2 Anir, - 4. s Pm .7440-39.3 Ra 16 )( P- tjl i&G/oS .7440-41-7- Waynmm o5.' 43(]1 7440-43-9_. .um 0.70 U P _7440-7-2 _.Wcim NR 7440-47-3annm 97 P -7440-48-4.Cbl -l NR -7440-50- - r 4.5 M P- .743989-6 hm pr NR UI 7439-92-1 _ .d 44.0 . - II P .7439-95-4 . Magnsium NR 7439-.96-5 Mn4anean. NR I -7439-976- Mercy - 0.13 I . . C' -7444412-0 Nic------20.3 ----1 WP -7440-09-7. u_ NR _782-49-227 elnmm 16.0 P LP 7440-224- ilr.0 IIP I -7440-23-5 m NR U _7440-28-. Tarmn .0 II P 7440-62- Vmlimm II 1 " PR _3440o.4 7-mr 15.9 --f . P_ I

Colr Befoi- Textwe-

Arifacs

Cmet

FORM IN SW846 -'I,,k U.N. I'A - CLI

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MW-1 LabName: MITKEM CORPORATIONC CoSAS No.: I b Code: MITIEM Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: B0502.

" (soiwater): WATERL Lab Sample ID: B0502-01B__

(lowfd): MED.. Date Recvok 03/27/03- solids Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/ig dy weight): UG/L

CASNo. Analyte Conceation C Q M

7429-90-5- Aminu IP 7440-36-0 Atimoay .4 _ P 7440-38-2 .0zd- . P 7440-39-- auimn 7-_76. P F,--2kp - 7440-41-7 05yiam0 UP 7440-43-9 Caln 0.70 U P cc-)I/(o /01 7440-70-2 Caciws NR 7440-47-3 .. lmimnn " I Pl_ 7440-48-..4 NRwP 7440-50-8 Cyper 4.0 U P 7439-89... Irm N 7439-92-1 1ad 4.0 U P 7439-954 Magmesia NR 7439-96-5. Manne NR -439-97-6._ Mocmy 0.12 U - CV

-7440-09-7-Aaan NRL _-749- senim9.0 _4-0-_Nikei _i PirP _.______,__ __.] p_. -7440-224-_ ive 2 0 II P -7440-2-5- r NR _7440-28-.- Thtmm .0 U P_ _7440-62- .Varim, 12 g- p- _7440-66 zinr 70 u P Cyand INR

UABreor Clarity BeM Textu Color Alr Clarity Ancr gnn

FORM I - IN SWS4 -Is-P j. ,.. ' -- .

I EPA SAMPLE NO INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

' W10 I Lab Name: MITKEMCORPORATION_ Contract: lab Code: MITKEM Case No.: SAS Nob.: SDG No.: B0502

Matrix (soilwater): WATEIL Lab Sample ID:

Ivel (low/hned): MED Date Raeivd: 03/f2743

% Solids:

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight)-

CAS No. Aalyte Cocentratiom C Q M

7429-90-5- Aum. NR

7440-39-2- An 4.0 11-4.U. P .7440-39-3-74407440-39..... 4-7- DaBacrlimnMainm m i .14.7, o0-50O14 IT'M Pp-_ -7440-43-9 _ C 0.70 P_ _7440-70-2 Cakium NR _7440-47-3 .Chmnivu_ 0.85 -- li(l P. .7440-4&4- -Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-6 _nppr4.0-I 7439-89-6 1 INR -7439-92-1 InAd 4.0 II P -743%-95-4 Agnetinm NR _439-96-5M-n NR 439-97-6- Mercury 0.14 Tetr -7440-02-0- ixkl -. o94 /.- -7440-09-7 potassi_ NR -782-49-2-sacmanu _9 .0 SII, P_ -7440-22-4- Silvr 20 ITP 3440-23-5 Sodmn - NR .7440-28-0 -IBaimn . 0 II P .744-2-2V amamminm 0is. P _7440.6-6 Zinme 7.o II P- cyniadeN

Chriy Bdom Teamc

Color Af r Artifacts: Cme-

FORM I -IN SW846 U.S. PA - CLP

I EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: MITKEM CORPORATION Contract: No.:MW-S 502

b Code- MJTKEM Case No.: - SAS No.: SDG NO.: B3OLv-

Matix (sol"water) WATEIL Lab Sample ID: B050242B3

I vel 0owlhncd): MED Dale Received: O32703

lny Solids Concentration Units (ag/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L

CAS No. Aalyte Coancentratio C Q M

7429-90-5- Auim NR 7440-36.0 Aimony 6. "U P Sy/6/o3 -7440-38-2- Anni - 7.9 -5 P- 7440-39-3 - [L34.2ru W P.. 7440.41-7 Beryllinm- o50 II P_ .744043.9 r.Cimimn 0.70- P_ -7440-70-2.Cawim NR _44o47-3 cnm.nnio 1s P -744o.44- ehat - NR -440-50- -CMp - 1i1.1 (Z P_ 7439-39- kIm NR -7439-92-1- 1 a 4.0- U P- 7439-95-4- Magncsiumn. NR 7439-96--5- Mam0 NR _7440-02-0-Nir_3439-97-6 .Mercmy.l 0.132N6 -k11 ,T e PC V -7440-09- luniann n NR -778249-2- Sekn 90 IU- P- _7440-224 Rilve 2 0, I P -7440-23.-5 Rndnm NR _440-28.0 .Thnlim 0.0 U P_ .7440-6-2. VanL - 0.70 .U. P- _440-66 Zine 18.9 Ip cyadeNR.

*r lorBefoue: TextOue ' Afer" Oarity After

masa

FORM I -IN SWS46 11P !A4~ycgc REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION

Te fullowig d=a as been validatexE Me MKf\Y sown- d V414U.YaW a "saplnDa s) '3l<97 fo4 Sanoles/Ma -htCY5 Das~cc'dbylaRec)d byl 3 :7e O " s e .Ml TrTSIYCNO. N.W-%, Mampl %, --- kMiSiw- MW.S

TripBlankNo. -k 9 Q,"oAnL Equipmecnt Blank No. YM - - Boe Blank No. A Feld Dupicace Nos. KL MW--5 A- MW} - E PES Nos. 077--

The Retion L9 A-NE Data Validkatiom Funional Gouidelines for Evaluatin Enircmeralal revsion was used so evaluat the data aud/lor approved modificationm to the EPA-NE Fucrional Guidelines were used to evaluae the data and are aached to this cover page: (anach modified critcria from EPA approved QAPJP or amndmem to QAPjF). I2 Tier M evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one). If a Tier H validation with a p Tr I was used, then identify samples, parameters, etc. tha received panrtial Tier W validation &e2hS sovt I WP9 v &4 LADrEE aU13z The data were evamluated based upon the following parameters: I - Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Compleeness (CSF Audit - T r I)D - Sens ivkry Check - Preservaion & Technical Holding Tnes - PE Samples/Accuracy Check .1 - GC/MS & GC/ECD hnun k Petifmce Check - Target Cou und Idensification - Initial & Contining Calibrationa - Compound Quamiation an Reponed -Blanks Quatiion Limts I - Swrogate CompoUds - Tics - ral Stadakt - Scmivoatile and Pesicide/PCB Clkanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Dpllcate - Syse Pufmn Region I Definitiom and Quarfiers: A - Acceptable Data J. - Numerical vaine associated wi th copowl is an esumated qmuantity. R - litdata are njected as unsable. Te R replaces he mumerical value or sampl antiarieon limit U -Compound not detected tat m c qfuriso .limit U - The sample quasasiaion limit is an estimed qauiry. TB. BB, EB - Compound desected in aqwues trip blank, aqpeous boae blank, or aqueons equipec blank associated with soilsedin samples.

Validasor's Name Cmpay t -Name- .Phone Nunber 2 At) Date Validation Staed J<-- Date Validation Completed L & 3

12/9 z'aa viWaIu, il wuiwsnt ovtr ragr--iage 2---...... -...... -...... -

Check if all criteria are met and no hard copy worksheet provided. Indicate NA if worksbeet is not applicable to analytical method. Note: there is no standard worksbeet for System Performance, however, the validator Sast document all system performance issues in the Data Validation Memorandum.

VOAJSV worksheets:

VOA/SV-Pes/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT VOA/SV-PesaPCB-I PRESERVATION AND HOLDING TIMES VOA/SV-Hi GC/MS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK (TUNING) VOA/SV-WI INITIAL CALIBRATION VOA/SV-IV CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOAISV-NstPCB-Y-A BLANK ANALYSIS VOAISV-PtsPCB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS VOA-VI VOA SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES SV-VI SV SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERIES VOA1SV-VII INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE VOA/SV-ps/PCB-VIII MATRIX SPIKEJMATRIX SPIKE DUPULICATE VOA/SV-Pedss/PCIX FIELD DUPLI.CATE PRECISION $A-4 VOAISV-Pe/PCB-X SESnIVITY CHECK VOAISV-PesUPCB-XI ACCURACY CHECK VOA/SV-?cPCB-XII TARGET COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOA/SV-PessPCB-xm SAMPLE QUANTfATION VOAISV-XIV TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS VOA/SV-XV SEMIVOLATILE CLEANUP TABLE f-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA ftWCB woksbects:

VOA/SV-Pcs/PCB COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT Ak VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-vI PRESERVATION AND HOLDIG TIMES PcMIPCB-IIA GCECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- PestPCB-IIA RESOLUTION GC/ECD INSIRUMENT PERTORMANCE CHECK- RETENTION TIMES PestPCB-fHC GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- A- ACCURACY CHECK OF INITIAL CALIBRATION Pest/PCB-IID GCIECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK- PA- PESTICIDE DEGRADATION Pest/PCB-JlI INnAL CAIBRwATION PessfPCB-IV CONTINUING CALIBRATION VOA/SV-Pcs/PCB-Y-A BLANK ANALYSIS -7- VOA/SY-P1s/CB-V-B BLANK ANALYSIS PcsrPB-VI SURROGATE COMPOUNDS,- SPIKE RECOVERIES AND RETENTION TIME SHIFT Pest/PCB-VjI PESTICIDE CLEANUP VOAISV-PeftPCB-VI- MATRIX WKEJMATRIX SPKE DUPICATE VOA/SV-Pes/Pq-IX FIELD DUPUCATE PRECISION VOA/SV-Pest/PCB-X SENSITIVITY CHECK VOA/SV-Pcs/JCB-XI ACCURACY CHECK PesPCH-XII COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION VOAISV-Pcs/ICB-XIII SAMPLE QUANTIATION TABLE B-WORKSHEET OVERALL EVALUATION OF DATA I certify that all criteria were met for the worksheets checked above. raeNnature:-Na me: El zcit* 'ieto/u%

12156 EPA-NE - Data Va'wdation Wodsheet VOAISV - Pest/PCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT i " -

ota* as:_

Misshpy Infomuation Date Lab Contacted Date Received The na cxct44 Sat 0Vdhh Atg- YaIoA ,drr._ 6M(Z~f ;\AY -

Validator . Date: 0 C3 3

.. a n

VOb

o 0

.1.1

X- - - - - O

-n - -- clc et Regli~m I I . ns-o Revikw WAmkn

(saiiam 2)

2. AamIyslmSeqmrrcu

A. Didlthe laimy -dpmse rmmbe tof tsaddfr H aisarde=mk uliaSUW? es No

B. Wem.a Sti pia&n Ad ate uhg deadaaysis? Yes No

C . W smeimId I a.ln.dadtir iiga smple aaysis ml at a u mfreuey dfm peart EtifurN. or evy two boos darg smami5, whidrnr is 1m fiapra? No

Wee hE ULo 3 r we calira crve ". for AA, 14 ad CN>0.9957 Yes or NOA

E. Was a sandad at 2X CRDL analyzd for a ICP malyses. No

If n the daa may be a Hitd Use profesiko j=9-a to & ntveriy dote effect and ify the data aco&m. Dic any actios below and Est the samples affeaed. I I m

I I I I itrioa Ih nacmDeew mdmf

IV A. BLANKANALYSIS RESULITS (Sections 1-3)

List dh bink in sectims I mad 2 belowkm. A sepmate worksbem t shld be usd for si and

1. Labr atr- Mlari:

DATE ICB-CH PREP E ANALTIM CONCAWS DATE: VtXo.I _AI 5 I- q-

2. Eqier"trip BDlks - n -~y

DATE: EQUIP BL #- ANALYTE CONCAJNITS

I i

3. Freqncacy Ra eirmemts

A. Was a pepama blank amlyad for each mik for ey 20 smples and fo each geti bad? T er No B. Was a ca0brtm blk tdw begiu ing te un, and every 10 samples oi evay 2 hours 'whidcbever ismae iquemt? or No

If a the data may be affecSd Us. poessinal jwdgmat to detiannia d snity of tbo effect am qmbu U da acm d gly. Dic=mss any acties below, amd list d smp s aSct Iegiom Ii W - Inoremin oDa sterim wbb

IV . aLANK ANALs ISt Is (secam 4)

4. mkAim

The Assa.nLndor any-arynhi al..a sx thae Msoc atan .. 1*ywomai or u (use sx fress..reask as nheaMilaeIst fes.nrakulmaa.nt..-auw a*rmdteaSSisented f Ms..pcesasimusL (Ai.)rria aIyt Spcacons as ado- ows

L, Wi tde ah-e is grear aa the MDL, io k dan the Acle Lrd, zepot the sawe cfaideced with a U.

2. Whea the samqle conatain is peae tans the Action Lvd, sepat the sp coacaind ma-C I Mtr__ ELEIENT 0 MAX COW. AL EI MAX CONCl raflS Uars ksh13mMtrim -K- imet I L I i.~r L cD.o.q 9 j c % L

' II

NMI" BlaS a7ay dwing a soil ca mt be caeted ft ag is wdrto campa them with te sa -I

Cam inUg X Vou Mused to (200ml X L X X jIBM . Mgg !1 Wdgta (pant) 1000miHO 1000ag blhipying this eak by 5 o anive a the ctn IL ivd a fa ss in agkg whil can abe congm so smle s I jj zz Mw -3', IcMw5,*AwI, i, ; t SM I C 0 ;* WP-5 , IW- KUq T W. I

\V- . o.-, o I Re# m I lamc Da Rcview Waodukes

V ICYrIRIERV RK CHEOCK SAM (Saectm 3) A 3. Rqxi&the niuofcay d u deectd the ICS A so>en > 2X DL &t thM na bepesut

ELEMENT CONC. DETECTED CONC. Of INIEREKENTS IN mE S irlfIHlCS

CA FE MG I I

I EsMn the cocmratkm podced by the interfring del in all affected samples. See the Enprlises for eample list the sampls affeted by thd kteafrcsbeow

I SAIMLE fESIT SANIPL SAIU'U INTEREREHTCOC (pg/I.) ESTR(SIED. AFECTED AFECIED CNC.

AL CA FE MG

J t I 1. 1 e-b cqe ,atesy wkcn nidair .,ai -a I A, Ca, Fe, ad Mgwae the 50% ofirk sspectiv kveh iubs KS cam. 2. E.sbma (1) psiW ss for aleed .s for samples w lvebs of in 50% at I -mnaoftat in th ICS schimn- 3. Rec () positive 1emifh rpcuted cancertie is d entiry to the krfeig elmet I 4. Nine (LU) na-wdclted saks for which fs egaiws ae spect Giv an cplaatm fc my actioas taken below.

I I I IteginI h..a. .ia Review Wmomsn

XIL SAmX QUANrAIN (caloned)

Li.st d pwiti sa wals dota wr yut * ct s ls4: 2xZlDL mad have mt aha y be Mhei positive ul have n ) e to am inat i t narth IDL I a! AS <-,n . M CW-%-5 ,A)w-o -w-6, W-o I Cl Aw- 5 cV {q Lf- Y-s3l KIW-5 'Mw-j ',MW-0IMW-5 ch~arnIuA Kw-S, CrMW- 1AW-I 4w-0;MV-' AW-C, I Z0c. ICM* I CAMw-AW (Wo§ I I Mv-?,., gjwwVPS IAV W\

Ca o I I I rLAW3;KA' klvSg'b 1J; rVI5NWW, HP-lo M, 'io,- ,A-- -- I cMlk-O @$wjytel I I I I I