University Microfilms Inc 300 N
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University M icrofilm s International 1.25 VII 1.4 III 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL 1010a (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No 2 ) University Microfilms Inc 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages In any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing'pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.* 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format. * *For more inform ation about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. U niversity Microfilms International 8612415 Smith, Larry David THE NATIONAL NOMINATING CONVENTIONS AS VEHICLES FOR POLITICAL MOBILIZATION: A REPRESENTATIVE ANECDOTE OF THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS OF 1984 The Ohio State University Ph.D. 1986 University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Copyright 1985 by Smith, Larry David All Rights Reserved PLEASE NOTE: in all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. G lossy ph otog raphs or pages _____ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print_______ 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor co p y _______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy \ / ^ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page_______ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages ________ 8. Print exceeds margin requirements ______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine _______ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print _______ 1 1. Page(s)_____________ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. P age(s)_____________ seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered_______ . Text follows. 14. Curfing and wrinkled pages__ 15. Dissertation con‘ains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received __ 16. O th e r_____________________________________________________________________________ University Microfilms International The National Nominating Conventions as Vehicles for Political Mobilization: A Representative Anecdote of the Democrats and Republicans of 1984 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Larry David Smith, B.A., M.A., Ed.S. ****** The Ohio State University 1985 Dissertation Committee: Approved by J. L. Golden W. R. Brown J. E. Douglas Department of Communication Co pyri g ht by Larry David Smi t h 1985 I dedicate this work to Mr. Robert Petersen, Superintendent of the United States Senate Press Gallery. i i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research venture gratefully acknowledges four indi viduals who contributed significantly to the generation of this dissertation. First, I must thank Mr. Robert Petersen, Superintendent of the U.S. Senate Press Gallery in Washington, D.C. Mr. Petersen not only provided all my press credentials for the San Francisco and Dallas conventions, but he consistently went out of his way to help me in any way possible. Bob Petersen is a refreshing individual, a gentleman who recog nizes the modern demands of the Washington environment while displaying a respect for scholarly research. Second, I wish to thank Miss Julie Wiggenhorn ("Nation wide is on my side"). Julie's assistance in the preparation of this manuscript, the collection of data, and the analysis of those materials was invaluable. Julie advances the word "friendship" to a new plane. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the two gentlemen who in spired this research venture: Professors Dan D. Nimmo and James L. Golden. Pardon me, but I must borrow from James Madison and suggest that "Inspiration is to research what air is to fire . an aliment without which it instantly ii i expires.“ Indeed, as my adviser, James Golden has remained by my side throughout this project, moreover, he has taught me more than he will ever know through the eloquence of his example. Dan and Jan Nimmo have also supported me throughout this effort and I shall always be grateful for their patient fri end ship. In addition, I would like to acknowledge those who helped me attend the San Francisco and Dallas conventions as well as those who helped me maintain my sanity upon my re turn. I will always be grateful to Rick and Kevin (San Francisco); Suzle and Bill (Dallas); Dorcas, Julia, Pam, and John; Eve, Peg, Kim, Darlene, and Charles; Professor 8111 Brown and Professor Jack Douglas. Finally, I wish to extend my thanks to the Democrats and Republicans, two outstanding groups of Americans. 1 v VITA December 11, 1954 ...................................Born - York, South Carolina 1979 ................................................................B.A., University of South Carolina, Spartanburg, South Carolina. 1981 ................................................................ M.A., Appalachian State University, Boone, North Caroli na . 1983.................................................................... Ed.S., Appalachian State University, Boone, North Caroli na . 1982 - 1985 .................................................Graduate Teaching Asso ciate, Department of Com munication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. PUBLICATIONS IN PROGRESS "Metapolitics: Media, Money, and Power in the Helms-Hunt Senate Race," Co-authored with James L. Golden. "The Emergence of the Princess: A Machiavellian Analysis of the Nomination of Geraldine A. Ferraro," FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Political Communication. Concentration in political advertising, campaigning, and government--media relati ons. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION.......................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................ iii VITA ................................... v PART PAGE I. THE NATURE OF THE STUDY............................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 N o t e s ................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER ONE: OVERVIEW OF THE S T U D Y .............................. 7 Significance Of The Problem ......................................... 7 Research Question ................................................................. 10 Methodo l o g y ................................................................................ 11 Review of the Relevant Literature ......................... 16 Definition of Term s ............................................................. 35 Organization of the S t u d y ............................................. 36 N o t e s ............................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER TWO: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE NATIONAL NOMINATING CONVENTION...................................................................................... 44 The Evolution of the S y s te m ........................................ 46 Major Functions Performed by Nominating Conventions ....................................................... 67 The National Nominating Convention In the Age of T elevision .................................................. 83 vi N o t e s ............................................................................................... 101 SUMMARY OF PART I ............................................................................ 107 N o t e s ................................................................................................ 110 II. THE REPRESENTATIVE ANECDOTE .................................................. Ill INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... Ill N o t e s ............................................................................................... 116 CHAPTER THREE: THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION ............................................................ 117 The San Francisco Democrats: A Burkean V i e w ............................................................ 164 N o t e s ..............................................................................................