DOCSLIB.ORG

Salmon Region 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salmon Region 2013 IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT Virgil Moore, Director SALMON REGION 2013 Jordan Messner, Regional Fisheries Biologist Greg Schoby, Regional Fisheries Manager Marsha White, Regional Fisheries Technician Jon Flinders, Regional Fisheries Biologist Jon Hansen, Regional Fisheries Biologist Brent Beller, Pacific States Fisheries Technician Tom Curet, Regional Supervisor May 2015 IDFG # 15-103 TABLE OF CONTENTS ALPINE LAKES ........................................................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................. 2 Alpine Lake Stocking................................................................................................................ 2 Mountain Lake Surveys ............................................................................................................ 2 STUDY AREA AND METHODS .................................................................................................. 3 Alpine Lake Stocking................................................................................................................ 3 Mountain Lake Surveys ............................................................................................................ 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... 4 Mountain Lake Stocking ........................................................................................................... 4 Mountain Lake Surveys ............................................................................................................ 4 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 5 LOWLAND LAKES AND RESERVOIRS ................................................................................... 12 EVALUATING CONDITION OF HATCHERY TROUT AFTER WINTER HOLDOVER ............... 12 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 13 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 13 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 13 Iron Lake ................................................................................................................................ 13 Meadow Lake ........................................................................................................................ 14 Wallace Lake ......................................................................................................................... 14 Yellowjacket Lake .................................................................................................................. 14 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 15 Iron Lake ................................................................................................................................ 15 Meadow Lake ........................................................................................................................ 16 Wallace Lake ......................................................................................................................... 16 Yellowjacket Lake .................................................................................................................. 17 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 17 ZOOPLANKTON QUALITY MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................... 23 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 24 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 25 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 25 Herd Lake .............................................................................................................................. 25 Jimmy Smith Lake .................................................................................................................. 25 Wallace Lake ......................................................................................................................... 26 Plankton sampling .................................................................................................................. 26 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 26 Herd Lake .............................................................................................................................. 26 Jimmy Smith Lake .................................................................................................................. 27 Wallace Lake ......................................................................................................................... 27 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 27 i CARLSON LAKE BROOK TROUT REDUCTION EFFORTS .................................................... 32 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 32 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 33 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 33 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 34 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 34 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 35 MOSQUITO FLAT RESERVOIR – REMOTE CREEL SURVEY ................................................ 39 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 39 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 40 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 40 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 40 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 41 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 43 WILLIAMS LAKE RAINBOW TROUT EGG TAKE ..................................................................... 47 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 47 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 48 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 48 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 48 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 49 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 49 FISH COMPOSITION IN YELLOWBELLY LAKE ...................................................................... 50 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 50 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 51 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 51 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 51 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................. 52 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 53 RIVERS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Cloud Milkvetch), a Region 4 Sensitive Species, on the Sawtooth National Forest
    FIELD INVESTIGATION OF ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS (WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH), A REGION 4 SENSITIVE SPECIES, ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST by Michael Mancuso and Robert K. Moseley Natural Heritage Section Nongame/Endangered Wildlife Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1990 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost-share Project Sawtooth National Forest Idaho Department of Fish and Game Purchase Order No. 40-0261-0-0801 ABSTRACT An inventory for Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus (White Cloud milkvetch) was conducted on the Sawtooth National Forest by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Natural Heritage Program during August of 1990. The inventory was a cooperative Challenge Cost-share project between the Department and the Sawtooth National Forest. White Cloud milkvetch is a narrow endemic to the White Cloud Peaks and Boulder Mountains of central Idaho, in Custer County. Populations are scattered along the ridge systems that slope generally west to east on the east side of the White Cloud crest. Additionally, one population from the Bowery Creek drainage of the Boulder Mountains is known. It is a high elevation species, found mostly on exposed, dry, rocky ridge crests or upper slopes that typically support a relatively sparse vegetation cover. Prior to our 1990 survey, the species was known from three populations. Five new populations were discovered during the 1990 field investigation. Together, these eight populations support approximately 5,700 plants and cover an area less than 40 acres. Both current and potential threats have been identified at several populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Boulder Lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct
    Big Boulder lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct. 1-3, 2014 Time Location Big Boulder Lakes – Challis, ID Weather Clear & cold but very windy Fish Species Westslope Cutthroat, Grayling Size Range Potentially 18” or bigger Fish Caught 1 Westslope Cuthroat – The wind curtailed my fishing efforts and so I explored Flies Used Elk Hair Caddis, Pheasant Tail Nymph Techniques Dry fly, stripping nymphs Comments Some of the best scenery in Idaho! I cannot confirm the big fish stories. See additional photos of the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains: https://www.flickr.com/photos/120225686@N06/sets/72157648089810649 See trip video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Xsska2XlU When I think of big fish in alpine lakes in Idaho – I think of the Big Boulder Lakes. I’ve seen photos and heard several reports that the fishing is excellent for big Cutthroat. Unfortunately, the relentless wind made the wind chill unbearable and I was relegated to bundling up and bagging a couple of peaks instead. But trust me – I have no regrets! The scenery is spectacular and possibly my favorite in Idaho. The Boulder-White Cloud Mountains are part of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. The fight has continued for decades to designate the Boulder-White Clouds a Wilderness Area. I personally think it rivals the Sawtooths as my favorite backpacking destination in Idaho and I’ve set foot in most mountain ranges save a few in the panhandle. A view near the lower section of trail on the way to Walker Lake Itinerary Wednesday – Drive 4 hours from Boise; less than a mile hike to Jimmy Smith Lake; Backpack 6 to 7 miles to Walker Lake (camp).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring White Cloud Milkvetch (Astragalus Vexilliflexus Var. Nubilus) on the Sawtooth National Recreation Area: Baseline Results, 2005
    MONITORING WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH (ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS) ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA: BASELINE RESULTS, 2005 Idaho Conservation Data Center Idaho Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Michael Mancuso 2006 Sawtooth National Forest and Idaho Department of Fish and Game ABSTRACT White Cloud milkvetch (Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus) is a U.S. Forest Service, Region 4 sensitive plant species known from ten occurrences, all located within the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. It is endemic to an approximately 21 km x 10 km area on the eastern slope of the White Cloud Peaks and western slope of the adjacent Boulder Mountains in Custer County, Idaho. In 2005, the Sawtooth National Forest contracted the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Idaho Conservation Data Center to establish a monitoring program for this species. White Cloud milkvetch census, plant community, and ground disturbance information was collected along permanently marked transects at eight of the ten known occurrences. Photo point photographs and the collection of additional occurrence area disturbance and threat information were also part of the monitoring protocol. Baseline results showed occurrences had variable White Cloud milkvetch density and habitat characterized by low vegetation cover. The majority had minimal or no disturbance. The landscape surrounding all occurrences was dominated by native vegetation and unfragmented except for occasional secondary roads. Bowery Ridge is the occurrence requiring the most immediate management attention. Recent off-trail motorcycle and heavy cattle use were observed within and near the occurrence. Imminent, serious threats were not observed within the other occurrences visited. Periodic monitoring is recommended to ensure managers are kept appraised of population and habitat trends, the status of any threats, and to evaluate whether directed management actions such as grazing allotment boundary adjustments, are having the intended effect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Salmon River Boating Guide, East-Central Idaho
    THE UPPER SALMON RIVER BOATING GUIDE, EAST-CENTRAL IDAHO Idaho Department of Fish and Game | U.S. Forest Service | Bureau of Land Management INDEX AND LOCATION MAP NORTH FORK ! r ve S15 Ri on Salm S14 CARMEN ! SALMON TO NEWLAND RANCH —22.9 miles SALMON ! S13 S12 McKIM CREEK TO SALMON —33.4 miles S11 S10 ELLIS ! THOMPSON CREEK TO McKIM CREEK S9 —66.3 miles S8 CHALLIS ! S7 STANLEY TO THOMPSON CREEK —26.4 miles S6 S5 S3 ! S2 S4 ! CLAYTON STANLEY S1 Map Location IDAHO Cover photography © Chad Case UPPER SALMON RIVER BOATING GUIDE, EAST-CENTRAL IDAHO Idaho Department of Fish and Game Salmon Regional Office 99 Highway 93 North Salmon, Idaho 83467 208-756-2271 Sawtooth National Forest 370 American Avenue Jerome, Idaho 83338 208-423-7500 Bureau of Land Management Idaho Falls District 1405 Hollipark Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 208-524-7500 Bureau of Land Management Challis Field Office 721 East Main Avenue, Suite 8 Challis, Idaho 83226 208-879-6200 Bureau of Land Management Salmon Field Office Salmon-Challis National Forest 1206 S. Challis Street Salmon, Idaho 83467 208-756-5400 THE RIVER’S NAMESAKE The Salmon river supports three separate species of anadromous fish (fish born in fresh water that migrates to the ocean to mature, then returns to fresh water to spawn). A salmon’s life begins and ends here in the moun- tains of Idaho. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and sockeye salmon (Onrcorhynchus nerka) travel nearly 900 miles to reach the spawn- ing areas in the Stanley Basin and, unlike steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), die after spawning.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Reference Areas in Idaho: a Catalog of Plant Associations and Conservation Sites
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA United States ~ Department -· of Agriculture .Riparian Reference Areas Forest Service in Idaho: a Catalog of Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Plant Associations and Report RMRS-GTR-20 January 1999 Conservation Sites Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Steven K. Rust Robert K. Moseley Abstract Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel; Rust, Steven K.; Moseley, Robert K. 1999. Riparian reference areas in Idaho: a catalog of plant associations and conservation sites. Gen Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-20. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 141 p. Idaho land managers and regulators need knowledge on riparian reference sites. Reference sites are ecological controls that can be used to set meaningful management and regulatory goals. Since 1984, the Idaho Conservation Data Center, Boise, ID, has compiled information in a series of interrelated databases on the distribution and condition of riparian, wetland, and terrestrial plant associations in high quality reference sites in Idaho. This report summarizes association-specific and reference area-specific information from our databases and presents a standardized classification of Idaho riparian and wetland plant associations. Each plant association entry includes the current global and state conservation rank, and the plant association's occurrence in reference areas (if any). This is followed by a summary of each
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter III East Fork Salmon River/White Clouds Management Area 3
    Chapter III East Fork Salmon River/White Clouds Management Area 3 Sunbeam Riverside Clayton !9 75 3.2 Stanley 6 6 21 6 3.1 3.2 Railroad Ridge IRA k e e r C s g n i r p S 3.2 1.2 m r a Redfish W Lake 0 2 Bou 1 lder Ch ain La kes Ck 3.2 ek re 75 r C de ul 3.1 Bo e 209 ttl Li k ree y C r ul e J v of White Cloud-Boulder IRA i th R 4 n o m l a S k r k o ee F Cr ania t 3.1 erm s 3.2 G a E 3.2 Pettit k 1.2 e Lake k e e r e r C C s e iver s l R lmon a o k Sa t For 1.2 P S P Eas k t a t For es s 0 l W S m e 6 . o F 3 W n o R r i k v e E r . F o North Alturas r Fork Big Woo k d River Lake S a B l m ig W o n o o R d i R v e i v r e r Legend 0 2 4 6 8 10 Miles Management Prescription Categories 1.2 Recommended Wilderness 3.1 Passive Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial, and Hydrologic Resources 3.2 Active Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial, and Hydrologic Resources Non-Forest System Lands ¯ Wild & Scenic River Classification Eligible Wild & Scenic Rivers: Recreation Classification Eligible Wild & Scenic Rivers: Scenic Classification The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Eligible Wild & Scienic Rivers: Wild Classification data available.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter: 17 State(S): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Salmon River
    Chapter: 17 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Salmon River Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the recovery plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 17, Salmon River Recovery Unit, Idaho. 194 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparers of the Salmon River Recovery Unit Chapter include: Marilyn Hemker, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sam Lohr, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Will Reid, Idaho Department of Fish and Game (retired) In the Salmon River Recovery Unit, the Upper and Lower recovery unit teams were established in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2005
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2005 Ellis River Challis Fork Salmon Yankee Squaw T h o m Valley p s o n Creek Creek Creek Creek Elk Salmon River Stanley Iron Creek Salmon River Redfish Lake Obsidian July Salmon of Creek Fourth Champion Creek River Alturas Fork Lake Pole Creek Creek East Creek Beaver Smiley Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2005 By Terry R. Maret, Jon E. Hortness, and Douglas S. Ott Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK A. KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Maret, T.R., Hortness, J.E., and Ott, D.S., 2006, Instream flow characterization of upper Salmon River Basin streams, central Idaho, 2005: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Westslope Cutthroat Trout in Idaho
    Management Plan for the Conservation of Westslope Cutthroat Trout in Idaho Idaho Department of Fish and Game Fisheries Bureau Boise, Idaho November 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 3 Goals ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Distribution ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Morphometrics ....................................................................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Challis 1° X 2° Quadrangle, Idaho
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Challis 1° x 2° quadrangle, Idaho Compiled by Frederick S. Fisher1 , David H. Mclntyre, and Kathleen M. Johnson1 Open-File Report 83-523 1983 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature Denver, Colorado TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Surficial deposits............................................... 1 Miocene volcanic and sedimentary rocks........................... 1 Challis Volcanics and related sedimentary and intrusive rocks.... 2 Sunnyside Mine-Marble Creek area............................ 2 Yellowjacket Creek-Camas Creek-Panther Creek- Morgan Creek area........................................... 5 Intrusive rocks of uncertain age............................ 10 Corral Creek-Iron Creek area................................ 11 Twin Peaks caldera-East Fork Mayfield Creek area............ 12 Challis-Custer Graben-East Fork-Jerry Peak area............. 18 Area west and north of Stanley and White Cloud Peak area.... 24 Granitic rocks of Idaho batholith................................ 26 Paleozoic sedimentary rocks...................................... 29 Paleozoic(?) and Precambrian rocks............................... 33 Precambrian rocks................................................ 34 References Cited................................................. 37 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Geologic map of the Challis 2° quadrangle, Idaho Plate 2. Correlation of map units, Challis
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    EOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 47 June 1949 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PAET 13. SNAKE RIVER BASIN TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by Boise District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 13. SNAKE RIVER BASIN TO SEPTEMBER 30,1948 Explanation The index lists the stream-flow and reservoir stations in the Snake River Basin for which records have been or are to be published for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Parentheses around pert of a station name indicate that the inclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Sbme drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record1* breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the" station was in operation on September 30, 1948. The years given are calendar years.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of East-Central Idaho: Geologic Roadlogs for the Big and Little Lost River, Lemhi, and Salmon River Valleys
    Link and Janecke -- Geology of East-Central Idaho: Roadlogs 295 Geology of East-Central Idaho: Geologic Roadlogs for the Big and Little Lost River, Lemhi, and Salmon River Valleys Paul Karl Link Department of Geology, Idaho State University, Pocatello ID 83209 Susanne U. Janecke Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan UT 84322 INTRODUCTION As part of this introduction we present several summary fig- This article contains a discussion of the regional geology and ures. First is a regional geographic map (Fig. 1), and a simplified historical geography of east-central Idaho, north of the Snake River geologic map on the same base (Fig. 2). The Proterozoic and Plain and southeast of the Salmon River, and four roadlogs for Paleozoic stratigraphic correlation diagram (Fig. 3) also shows the main highways in this huge (15,000-km2) area. The roadlogs thrust fault relations. Figure 4 shows major structures and basins progress from south to north and west to east. They include: of the Trans-Challis fault zone and Figure 5 shows the Challis 1) Big Lost River Valley, Volcanic field. Photographs in the road log section illustrate many 2) Little Lost River-Pahsimeroi Valley, of the field localities. In the introductory summary we cite (out- 3) Birch Creek-Lemhi Valley, and of-sequence with their position in the text) several photographs 4) Stanley to Salmon along the Salmon River. in which specific stratigraphic features are present. This article covers much of the same country described by East-central Idaho contains diverse and economically impor- Ross (1963) in the first geologic roadlog of east-central Idaho, tant, mineral deposits.
    [Show full text]