DOCSLIB.ORG

Index of Surface-Water Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index of Surface-Water Records EOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 47 June 1949 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PAET 13. SNAKE RIVER BASIN TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by Boise District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 13. SNAKE RIVER BASIN TO SEPTEMBER 30,1948 Explanation The index lists the stream-flow and reservoir stations in the Snake River Basin for which records have been or are to be published for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Parentheses around pert of a station name indicate that the inclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Sbme drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record1* breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the" station was in operation on September 30, 1948. The years given are calendar years. Periods of records published by agencies other than the Geological Survey are listed in parentheses only when they contain more detailed information or are for periods not reported in publications of the Geological Survey. Records both of gage height and of discharge are listed for stream-flow stations, and records of gage height and of contents (or of change in contents) are listed for stations on reservoirs. Records of gage heights only and records consisting only of monthly figures either of stream flow or reservoir contents are designated by symbols and footnotes. For early years when daily discharges were not generally published by the Geological Survey, published daily gage heights and a published rating table were considered to be equivalent to daily discharges. An alphabetical index of streams, canals, and reservoirs is given on pages 22 to 25. INDEX, PART 13, SNAKE RIVER BASIN Snake River Main Stem. Drainage Area Period of Record (square miles) Snake River at south boundary of Yellowstone National Park...... 490 1913-25. Jackson Lake (Snake River) at Moran, Wyo. ...................... 816 1908-10 (fragmentary); 1911- Snake River (South Fork Snake River) at and near Moran, TJyo. ... 816 1903- Snake River (South Fork Snake River) at Grovont, Vtyo. .......... - 1899. Snake River above Greys River, near Alpine, Wyo. ............... - 1937-39. Snake River below Greys River,(above Salt River), at Alpine, Idaho...................................................... 3,940 1944- Snake River (below Salt River) near (at) Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho)... - 1916-18; 1934. Snake River at Calamity Point, near Irwin, Idaho................ 5»HO 1934-36; 1939-41. Snake River near Irwin, Idaho................................... - 1935-36. Snake River (South Fork Snake River) near Swan Valley (Lyon), Idaho...................................................... - 1903-11; 1934. Snake River at Dry Canyon, near Swan Valley, Idaho.............. - 1934-36. Snake River below Burns Creek, near Chokecherry, Idaho.......... - 1935. Snake River (South Fork Snake River) near Heise, Idaho.......... 5,740 1910- Snake River at Lorenzo, Idaho................................... - 1924-^7. Snake River near Menan, Idaho................................... - 1923. Snake River at Idaho Falls (Eagle Rock), Idaho.................. - 1889-90; 1892-94. Diversions from Snake River between Heise and Shelley gaging stations............................................ - 1919- Snake River near Shelley,'Idaho................................. - 1915- Snake River at Firth, Idaho..................................... - 1914-15. Diversions from Snake River between Shelley and Porterville gaging stations............................................ - 1919-23. Snake River at Porterville Bridge, near Blackfoot, Idaho......... - 1916; 1918-23. Diversions from Snake River between Shelley and Blackfoot Bridge gaging stations..................................... - 1924-27. Snake River below Blackfoot Bridge, near Blackfoot, Idaho....... - 1924-32. Diversions from Snake River between Porterville and Blackfoot (dough Ranch) gaging stations............................. - 1919-23. Diversions from Snake River'between Blackfoot Bridge and dough Ranch gaging stations..........................;..... - 1924-27. Diversions from Snake River between Shelley and Blackfoot (dough Ranch) gaging stations............................. 1928- Snake River (at Clough Ranch) near Blackfoot, Idaho............. - 1910- American Falls Reservoir (Snake River) at American Falls, Idaho. - 1926- Snake River at Neeley, Idaho.................................... - 1906- Lake Walcott (Snake River) near Minidoka, Idaho................. - 1909- Snake River near Minidoka, Idaho................................ - 1910- Snake River at Montgomery Ferry, near Minidoka, Idaho........... 1895^99; 1901-10. INDEX, PART 13, SNAKE RIVER BASIN Snake River Main Stem Continued. Drainage Area Period ,of Record (square miles) Lake Milner (on Snake River) at Milner, Idaho................... - 1911-27*j (1927- )a/* Snake River at Milner, Idaho.................................... - 1909- Snake River near Kimberly, Idaho................................ - 1923- Snake River near Twin Falls, Idaho.............................. 1911-17? 1919-47. Snake River near Buhl, Idaho.................................... - 1946- Snake River near Hagerman, Idaho................................ - 1912-17; 1919-41. Snake River below Lower Salmon Falls, near Hagennan, Idaho...... - 1937- Snake River at King Hill, Idaho................................. 1909- Snake River near Murphy, Idaho.................................. 41,900 1912- Snake River at Weiser, Idaho.................................... 1910- Snake River at Oxbow, Oregon.................................... - 1923- Snake River at Lewiston, Idaho.................................. - 1910*. Snake River near Claries ton, Wash. ............................... 103,200 1935- Snake River at Riparia, Wash. .................................. 104,000 (1909-15; 1922-28**)b/; 1915-22; 1928-35. Snake River near Burbank, Wash. ................................ 109,000 1907-8*j 1909-17. Pacific Creek near Moran, Wyo; ............................... 160 1906*; 1917-18; 1944- Buffalo Fork near Moran (Elk), Wyo. .......................... 378 1906*; 1917-18; 1944- Spread Creek near Elk, Wyo. .................................. - 1917-18. Spring Creek near Teton, Wyo. ................................ - 1917-18. Cottonwood Creek near Teton, Wyo. ............................ - 1917-18. Spring Creek near Zenith, Wyo. ............................... - 1917-18. Gros Ventre River at Kelly, Wyo. ............................. 622 1918; 1944- Gros Ventre River at Zenith, Wyo. ............................ 758 1917-18. Spring Creek at West Gros Ventre Butte, Wyo. ................. - 1918. Spring Creek at Zenith, Wyo. ................................. 1917-18. Fish Creek near Wilson, Wyo. ................................. 1917-18. Mosquito Creek near Wilson, Wyo. ............................. - 1917-18. Big Spring Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ........................... - 1918. Klat Creek near Jackson, Wyo. ................................ 40 1933-41. Flat Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ................................. 1917-18. Horse Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ................................ - 1917-18. Hoback River near Jackson (Cheney), Wyo. ..................... 564 1917-18; 1944- Fall Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ................................. - 1917-18. Dog Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ...........'....................... 1917-18. a/ In reports of Water District 36, Idaho. b/ In Washington State Water-supply Bulletin 5. * Gage heights only or gage heights and discharge measurements only. ** Only monthly figures of discharge. INDEX, PART 13, SNAKE RIVER BASIN Snake River tributaries Continued. Drainage Area Period of Record (square miles) Cabin Creek near Cheney, Wyo. ................................ - 1917-18. Bailey Creek near Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho)........................ 1917-18. Wolf Creek near Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho).......................... - 1917-18. Greys River near Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho)......................... - 1917-18j 1937-39. Salt River near Smoot, Wyo. .................................. 59*4 1932- Salt River near Thayne, Wyo. ................................. 570 1932-33. Salt River near Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho).......................... - 1917-18. Salt River at Wyoming-Idaho State line........................ 890 1934- Cottonwood Creek near Smoot, Wyo. .......................... 26.3 1933- Crow Creek near Fairview, Wyo. ............................. 114 1946- Swift Creek near Afton, Wyo. ............................... 2?.4 1943- Stump Creek near Auburn, Wyo. .............................. 103 1946- Strawberry Creek near Bedford, Wyo. ........................ 21.3 1932-43. McCoy Creek near Alpine, Wyo. (Idaho).'........................ - 1917-18; 1934. Indian Creek near
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Cloud Milkvetch), a Region 4 Sensitive Species, on the Sawtooth National Forest
    FIELD INVESTIGATION OF ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS (WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH), A REGION 4 SENSITIVE SPECIES, ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST by Michael Mancuso and Robert K. Moseley Natural Heritage Section Nongame/Endangered Wildlife Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1990 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost-share Project Sawtooth National Forest Idaho Department of Fish and Game Purchase Order No. 40-0261-0-0801 ABSTRACT An inventory for Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus (White Cloud milkvetch) was conducted on the Sawtooth National Forest by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Natural Heritage Program during August of 1990. The inventory was a cooperative Challenge Cost-share project between the Department and the Sawtooth National Forest. White Cloud milkvetch is a narrow endemic to the White Cloud Peaks and Boulder Mountains of central Idaho, in Custer County. Populations are scattered along the ridge systems that slope generally west to east on the east side of the White Cloud crest. Additionally, one population from the Bowery Creek drainage of the Boulder Mountains is known. It is a high elevation species, found mostly on exposed, dry, rocky ridge crests or upper slopes that typically support a relatively sparse vegetation cover. Prior to our 1990 survey, the species was known from three populations. Five new populations were discovered during the 1990 field investigation. Together, these eight populations support approximately 5,700 plants and cover an area less than 40 acres. Both current and potential threats have been identified at several populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
    Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Payette River Basin Initiative
    Payette River Basin Initiative Purpose The purpose of the Payette River Basin (PRB) Initiative is to utilize conservation easements in permanently conserving portions of land which hold natural, recreational, agricultural and hydrological water resource value. The PRB initiative hopes to receive and focus local, regional and national resources to accomplish this goal. The waterways, lakes, and wild country within and around the basin has drawn people to the area for generations and with increased use, development is inevitable. The Payette Land Trust (PLT) has long understood the importance of the Basin to the area’s quality of life, economic viability, unique natural beauty and the importance to the State’s water quality. The PLT will strive to keep the land in private ownership and provide the opportunity for public access through agreements with willing private landowners. Goal The Goal of the PRB initiative is to permanently conserve a connected corridor from the Payette Lake inlet to Cabarton Bridge along the main stem of the North Fork Payette River. This effort will allow for access, recreation and movement of both people and wildlife within the corridor, while conserving the existing natural beauty and water quality. Payette River Basin Initiative Payette Land Trust: What We Believe The PLT believes in conserving the rural landscape of west central Idaho for the benefit of our community and future generations. We promote a community ethic that values and conserves its working agricultural properties and timberlands in balance with thoughtful development. We envision dedicated areas of open access and connectivity encouraging people to take part in their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Boulder Lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct
    Big Boulder lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct. 1-3, 2014 Time Location Big Boulder Lakes – Challis, ID Weather Clear & cold but very windy Fish Species Westslope Cutthroat, Grayling Size Range Potentially 18” or bigger Fish Caught 1 Westslope Cuthroat – The wind curtailed my fishing efforts and so I explored Flies Used Elk Hair Caddis, Pheasant Tail Nymph Techniques Dry fly, stripping nymphs Comments Some of the best scenery in Idaho! I cannot confirm the big fish stories. See additional photos of the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains: https://www.flickr.com/photos/120225686@N06/sets/72157648089810649 See trip video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Xsska2XlU When I think of big fish in alpine lakes in Idaho – I think of the Big Boulder Lakes. I’ve seen photos and heard several reports that the fishing is excellent for big Cutthroat. Unfortunately, the relentless wind made the wind chill unbearable and I was relegated to bundling up and bagging a couple of peaks instead. But trust me – I have no regrets! The scenery is spectacular and possibly my favorite in Idaho. The Boulder-White Cloud Mountains are part of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. The fight has continued for decades to designate the Boulder-White Clouds a Wilderness Area. I personally think it rivals the Sawtooths as my favorite backpacking destination in Idaho and I’ve set foot in most mountain ranges save a few in the panhandle. A view near the lower section of trail on the way to Walker Lake Itinerary Wednesday – Drive 4 hours from Boise; less than a mile hike to Jimmy Smith Lake; Backpack 6 to 7 miles to Walker Lake (camp).
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Payette River Location Map
    Chapter III-2003-2010 integration North Fork Payette River Management Area 17 Management Area 17. North Fork Payette River Location Map III - 322 Chapter III-2003-2010 integration North Fork Payette River Management Area 17 Management Area 17 North Fork Payette River MANAGEMENT AREA DESCRIPTION Management Prescriptions - Management Area 17 has the following management prescriptions (see map on preceding page for distribution of prescriptions). Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 2.2 – Research Natural Areas 1 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 27 5.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forested Landscapes 72 General Location and Description - Management Area 17 is comprised of lands administered by the Boise National Forest within the North Fork Payette River drainage, from Banks to Cascade (see map, opposite page). The area lies in Valley and Boise Counties, and is part of the Emmett and Cascade Ranger Districts. The management area is an estimated 78,500 acres, of which the Forest Service manages 83 percent, 2 percent are private lands, and 15 percent are State of Idaho lands. The primary uses or activities in this management area have been dispersed and developed recreation, timber management, and livestock grazing. Access - The main access to the area is by paved State Highway 55 and well maintained, gravel- surfaced Snowbank Mountain Road and Clear Creek Road (Forest Roads 446 and 409). The density of classified roads in the management area is an estimated 3.0 miles per square mile, although part of the area is inventoried as roadless. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 1.9 and 6.0 miles per square mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring White Cloud Milkvetch (Astragalus Vexilliflexus Var. Nubilus) on the Sawtooth National Recreation Area: Baseline Results, 2005
    MONITORING WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH (ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS) ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA: BASELINE RESULTS, 2005 Idaho Conservation Data Center Idaho Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Michael Mancuso 2006 Sawtooth National Forest and Idaho Department of Fish and Game ABSTRACT White Cloud milkvetch (Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus) is a U.S. Forest Service, Region 4 sensitive plant species known from ten occurrences, all located within the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. It is endemic to an approximately 21 km x 10 km area on the eastern slope of the White Cloud Peaks and western slope of the adjacent Boulder Mountains in Custer County, Idaho. In 2005, the Sawtooth National Forest contracted the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Idaho Conservation Data Center to establish a monitoring program for this species. White Cloud milkvetch census, plant community, and ground disturbance information was collected along permanently marked transects at eight of the ten known occurrences. Photo point photographs and the collection of additional occurrence area disturbance and threat information were also part of the monitoring protocol. Baseline results showed occurrences had variable White Cloud milkvetch density and habitat characterized by low vegetation cover. The majority had minimal or no disturbance. The landscape surrounding all occurrences was dominated by native vegetation and unfragmented except for occasional secondary roads. Bowery Ridge is the occurrence requiring the most immediate management attention. Recent off-trail motorcycle and heavy cattle use were observed within and near the occurrence. Imminent, serious threats were not observed within the other occurrences visited. Periodic monitoring is recommended to ensure managers are kept appraised of population and habitat trends, the status of any threats, and to evaluate whether directed management actions such as grazing allotment boundary adjustments, are having the intended effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report Ordinance – Valley County Waterways Page 1 of 4
    Cynda Herrick, AICP, CFM PO Box 1350 VALLEY COUNTY 219 North Main Street IDAHO Cascade, Idaho 83611-1350 Planning & Zoning Administrator Phone: 208.382.7115 Floodplain Coordinator FAX: 208.382.7119 Email: [email protected] STAFF REPORT No. 2 (Addendum) Amendment to the Valley County Code Valley County Waterways Ordinance Ordinance 20-11 HEARING DATE: June 8, 2020 TO: Board of County Commissioners STAFF: Deputy Kevin Turner and Cynda Herrick, AICP, CFM REQUEST: Amends Title 4 Chapter 5 ______________________________________________________________________________ On May 26, the Valley County Board of Commissioners discussed changes to the proposed ordinance based upon testimony from the public. The updated version of the ordinance is attached for review. FINDINGS: 1. A properly noticed public hearing was held on May 26, 2020. The Board of County Commissioners asked for edits to be made to the proposed ordinance. The public hearing was tabled to June 8, 2020. 2. On May 27, 2020, the revised ordinance proposal was posted on the Valley County website under both “Board of County Commissioners Meetings” and “Ordinances”. A link was also added to the main webpage. Meeting procedures for participation in the public hearing for June 8, 2020, were posted on the website on June 1, 2020. 3. The deadline for written public comments for the previous public hearing was May 20, 2020. All comments received after that deadline are included with this staff report. 4. Agency Responses – Received by P&Z Office After May 20, 2020: 1) Valley Soil & Water Conservation District supports the provisions to limit pollutants, erosion, and sediments. Other consideration not currently addressed in the Ordinance are: • For irrigation purposes, some Idaho reservoirs only allow electric motors on the waterway to cut down on oil entering the irrigation water system • Small trolling motors, especially electric, an allowance noted for near-shore fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Letter to Valley Co. Commissioners
    Payette Land Trust Conserving the rural landscape of West Central Idaho a non proffit 501 (c)3 Conservation Organization April 4th, 2020 Valley County Commissioners Elt Hasbrouck Sherry Maupin Dave Bingaman Dear Valley County Commissioners, The Payette Land Trust (PLT) applauds and supports the strong defining positive environmental language used by the Commissioners in the Resolution portion of the Draft Valley County Waterways Ordinance. This language describes the importance of protecting and conserving our high-quality waterways and the adjoining natural habitat. This language aligns with the PLT’s Payette River Basin (PRB) Initiative. The Goal of the PRB Initiative is to permanently conserve a connected corridor from the Payette Lake inlet to Cabarton Bridge along the main stem of the North Fork Payette River. This effort will allow for access, recreation and movement of both people and wildlife within the corridor, while conserving the existing natural beauty and water quality. As the Ordinance moves through the hearing and the eventual final drafting stages, the Payette Land Trust strongly supports retaining the specific Resolution language in the final draft of the ordinance as currently written. WHEREAS, Residents of Valley County desire to protect the area’s natural environment including the special and high-quality fresh waters of the County’s waterways, recognizing that such outstanding natural attributes contribute to tourism, to the overall economic well-being, and to the quality of life enjoyed and appreciated by both residents
    [Show full text]
  • Valley County Pathways Master Plan
    Valley County Pathways Master Plan March 2017 valleycountypathways.org 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................3 Valley County Pathways Master Plan ..........................................12 Purpose and Need .........................................................................15 Public Outreach and Feedback .......................................................23 Identification of Pathway Corridors ..............................................25 Goals ..............................................................................................28 Recommended Implementation Schedule .....................................29 Funding Opportunities for Pathways ............................................30 Design Standards ...........................................................................34 Attachment A - Valley County Pathways Master Plan Map Attachment B - McCall Area Pathways Master Plan Attachment C - Greater Donnelly Area Pathways Plan Attachment D - City of Cascade Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Attachment E - Idaho Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Questions regarding this plan should be directed to Steve Stuebner, vice president, Valley County Pathways, 208-484-0295 or [email protected]. www.valleycountypathways.org 2 Executive Summary More than 11 years after Valley County Pathways completed the first concept master plan for a system of valley- wide pathways, much has changed. In the mid-2000s, when Tamarack Resort was fully permitted and moving full
    [Show full text]
  • Valley County Pathways Master Plan March 2017
    Valley County Pathways Master Plan March 2017 www.valleycountypathways.org Executive Summary More than 11 years after Valley County Pathways completed the first concept master plan for a system of valley-wide pathways, much has changed. In the mid-2000s, when Tamarack Resort was fully permitted and moving full steam ahead with ambitious development plans, there was a real sense of urgency to reserve pathway corridors in the valley -- at least on a conceptual level -- to link the communities of McCall, Lake Fork, Donnelly and Cascade. “We must act now to reserve key pathway corridors before they are bulldozed or paved over,” the 2005 Master Plan stated. “Development around the resort area and in Valley County in general has been sprouting at a frenetic pace. The building boom is happening from McCall to Cascade, and the formerly sleepy town of Donnelly is in the epicenter, with numerous projects now under construction and more on the way.” Operating under that sense of urgency, the Valley County Pathways Committee wrote the original concept master plan in 2005, presented it to the Valley County Planning & Zoning Commission and Valley County Commissioners for approval. With strong public support, and unanimous support by the elected officials, the plan was approved. Since that time, the plan has provided a vital and important vision for the future. Valley County Planning & Zoning Commission has used the plan for guidance as new development proposals have occurred. New pathways have been built in McCall, Donnelly and Cascade. All of those communities have created new pathway plans in the last several years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Bull Trout Populations on the Payette National Forest
    Bull Trout Populations on the Payette National Forest Migrating bull trout in Pete Creek in the Secesh River watershed by David Burns, Mary Faurot, David Hogen, Mike McGee, Rodger Nelson, Dale Olson, Linda Wagoner, and Caleb Zurstadt (Appendix 6) November 14, 2005 Abstract This paper was developed by the fisheries biologists of the Payette National Forest (PNF or Forest) to evaluate the population trends and relative viability of Columbia River bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) on the Forest. We infer that populations that are more fragmented have undergone long term population declines. We evaluated populations based on several quantitative criteria including the degree of fragmentation, the amount of habitat occupied, the number of life history forms in various watersheds, and other factors. Factors used in our evaluation include the number and extent of areas with bull trout, topographic relief to indicate areas with higher elevation and higher potential to support bull trout, the number of life stages of bull trout present, anthropogenic sources of fragmentation (e.g., roads), the extent of sympatry with brook trout, and the number of potential food sources as indicated by the number of anadromous salmonids. Considerations such as genetic integrity are also evaluated. Quantitative evaluations were all restricted to values of attributes on the Payette National Forest, but it is likely that off-Forest attributes are important. Insofar as viability varies among watersheds on the Payette National Forest in a fashion that we understand, several factors separating watersheds were useful for describing viability classes. We initially placed populations into viability classes based on a subjective evaluation of the factors we understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Cascade Quadrangle, Valley County, Idaho
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIGITAL WEB MAP 72 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO BRECKENRIDGE AND OTHBERG S URFICIAL G EOLOGIC M AP OF THE C ASCADE Q UADRANGLE, VALLEY C OUNTY, I DAHO Disclaimer: This Digital Web Map is an informal report and may be Roy M. Breckenridge and Kurt L. Othberg revised and formally published at a later time. Its content and format may not conform to agency standards. 2006 Mapping and data are incorporated in and superseded by DWM-68, Surficial Geologic Map of Long Valley, Valley County, Idaho , 1:50,000 scale. INTRODUCTION Qal Long Valley is bounded on the west by the West Mountains, a block of tilted Qobs Qop Columbia River basalt, and on the east by the Salmon River Mountains of Qop Qac Qcg the Idaho batholith. The valley floor is about 4800 feet in elevation and the Qops adjacent glaciated mountains rise above 7000 feet. The Payette Lakes are Qop dammed behind a sequence of Pleistocene end moraines and Tertiary basalt Qops is exposed along the shorelines. The geology of this part of Long Valley is dominated by valley alluvium and mountain-slope colluvium. The placer deposits of Long Valley were studied in the 1950s by D.L. Schmidt and J.H. Mackin. Geology depicted on this 1:24,000-scale Cascade 7.5' Qal quadrangle is based partly on their mapping (Schmidt and Mackin, 1970). Qops Colman and Pierce (1981, 1983) used weathering-rind dating techniques Qal Qac to subdivide the glacial sequence and estimate the numerical ages of Schmidt and Mackins units but did not map the quadrangle.
    [Show full text]