Knowledge and Perception of Nutritional Genomics Among Registered Dietitian Nutritionists

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knowledge and Perception of Nutritional Genomics Among Registered Dietitian Nutritionists KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION OF NUTRITIONAL GENOMICS AMONG REGISTERED DIETITIAN NUTRITIONISTS. A thesis submitted to the college of Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By Amy S Shiyab August 2019 Copyright, 2019 by Amy S Shiyab All Rights Reserved ii Thesis written by Amy S Shiyab B.S., United Arab Emirates University, 2012 M.S., Kent State University, 2019 Approved by _________________________, Director, Master’s Thesis Committee Eun-Jeong Ha _________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis committee Natalie Caine-Bish _________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis committee Jamie Matthews Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Health Sciences Ellen L. Glickman _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human Services James Hannon iii SHIYAB, AMY S M.S., AUGUST 2019 Nutrition and Dietetics KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION OF NUTRITIONAL GENOMICS AMONG REGISTERED DIETITIAN NUTRITIONISTS (170 pp.) Co-Director of Thesis: Eun-Jeong Ha Non-communicable diseases (NCD) are projected to cause 2.4 million deaths by 2025 unless urgent action is taken (World Health Organization, 2018). In an effort to decrease diet related NCD prevalence, nutrition interventions have been widely accepted as a resource for the prevention of long-term health conditions. Nutritional genomics is the study of how food affects a person’s genes, and how a person’s genes affects the way the body responds to food at a molecular level. The field aims to understand how a healthy, but also personalized diet can be used to prevent, mitigate, or cure NCDs (Tarantola, 2018). However, previous studies have shown low level of knowledge and perception among health care professionals on genetic testing. With RDNs considered to be the best qualified healthcare providers when it comes to nutritional genomics (Cormier et al, 2014), the current study aimed to examine the knowledge and perception of registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) on nutritional genomics. The participants of the study were registered dietician nutritionists actively registered with the Commission on Dietetic Registration. One sample t-test was used to compute average mean knowledge scores and perceptions levels. Genetic knowledge scores were computer as percent mean and perception levels were scaled to a five-point Likert scale where 1 indicated strong disagreement with perception statements, and 5 indicated strong agreement with perception statements. Our findings revealed an overall low genetic knowledge score at 46%, yet a slightly positive perception level towards nutritional genomics (3.66). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Eun-Jeong Ha, for her guidance and patience with me throughout this entire process. She contributed incredible knowledge and offered tremendous support, which allowed me to create quality work. I would also like to thank Dr. Natalie Caine-Bish and Jamie Matthews for their support and insight concerning my thesis. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my parents, who without them, this entire journey would not have been possible. My mother, Tamara Shiyab, for her undeniable positive attitude and support, and my father, Dr. Said Shiyab, who has been my rock and inspiration my entire academic journey, and has continued to support me despite many setbacks, and for that, I will forever be indebted to him. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………................iv LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………..............viii LIST OF TABLES.……………………………………………………….........................x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION……………………………............................................................1 Problem Statement…………………………………………………………………...4 Purpose Statement………………………………………............................................5 Hypotheses…………………………………………………………………………...5 Operational Definitions ……………………………………………………………...6 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE………………………………………………………...7 History of Genetics…………………………………………………………………...7 Gene versus Genome…………………………………………………………………8 What is a Gene……………………………………………………………..........8 Gene expression…………………………………………………………..11 Gene transcription……………………………......….…...…….11 Gene translation……………………………………….….……12 Histones…………………………………………………...…...12 Gene regulation…………………………………………………………..13 DNA Methylation…………………………………………………………………...14 DNA Modification via Methylation………………............................................14 DNA Modification via Acetylation....……………………………………........15 Polymorphisms……………………………………………………………………...15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms….………………………………………….16 Other Polymorphisms………………………………………………………….18 What is the Genome…………………………………...............................................19 Genetics versus Genomics……………………………………………………..19 Genetics…………………………………………………………………...19 Genomics……………………………………………………….................20 Nutritional genomics…………………………...................................21 Nutrigenetics…………………………………………………...21 Nutrigenomics………………………………………………….23 Diseases Related to Nutritional Genomics………………………………………….25 Diseases Related to Nutrigenetics……………………………………………...25 Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency…..…………………………25 Homocystinuria…………………………………………………...............29 v Irritable bowel disease.…………………………………………………...30 Phenylketonuria…………………………………………………………..33 Celiac disease….………………………………………………………….35 Diseases Related to Nutrigenomics…………………………………................41 Obesity………………………………………………………….................41 Diabetes mellitus …………………………………………………………46 Cancer……………………………………………………………………..50 Coronary heart disease.…………………………………………………...55 Current Genetic Practices…………………………………………………………...62 Ethical Considerations ……………………………………………………………...67 III. METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………………...70 Research Design…………………………………………………………………...70 Research Sample and Recruitment………………………………………………...70 Procedure………………………………………………………………..................71 Instrument of Measure…………………………………………………..................71 Qualtrics…………………………………………………………………..…....71 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………………72 IV. JOURNAL ARTICLE……………………………………………………………..75 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….75 Methodology……………………………………………………………………...77 Questionnaire……………………………………………………………………...78 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………..79 Results…………………………………………………………………………….80 Demographics………………………………………………………………….80 Genetic Knowledge…………………………………………………………….83 Nutritional Genomic Perception……………………………………………….87 Previous Genetic Education on Knowledge and Perception Scores…………...92 Previous Genetic Training on Knowledge and Perception Scores…………….93 Discussion………………………………………………………………………...95 Current Practices of Nutritional Genomics in the Health Care Field………….96 Genetic Knowledge among Registered Dietitian Nutritionists………………...96 Perception on Nutritional Genomics among Registered Dietitians Nutritionists…………………………………………………………………..101 Effect of Previous Genetic Education on Knowledge and Perception on Nutritional Genomics…………………………………………………………105 Genetic Knowledge Scores and Perception based on Practice Setting…….…105 Effect of Genetic Knowledge on Perception Scores…………………….……106 Limitations……………………………………………………………………….107 Implications……………………………………………………………………...109 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….110 vi APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………….112 APPENDIX A…………………………………………………………………...113 APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………115 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………128 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Breakdown of protein coding genes and non-protein coding genes. LTR; long terminal repeats, DNA; deoxyribonucleic acid, SNE; short interspersed nucleotide elements, LINE; long interspersed nucleotide elements………………………...…………………………………………10 2. Genes are made up of DNA. Each chromosome contains many genes….……………..10 3. Humans have 22 chromosome pairs and two sex chromosomes. Females have two X chromosomes; males have an X chromosome and a Y chromosome……………...……...…………………………………………..11 4. Example of mRNA’s three nucleotides matching up with its corresponding amino acid. Met; methionine, Ile; isoleucine, Ser; Serine…….....…………………………………………………...12 5. SNP variation in three different DNA sequences. SNP; single nucleotide Polymorphism………………………………………………………………………...18 6. An overview of the four major "omics" fields, from genomics to metabolomics………………...……………………………..……….…..21 7. Conversion of 5,10- MTHF to 5-MTHF via MTHF reductase enzyme, DNA methylation and interconversion of methionine and homocysteine. DHF; dihydrofolate, THF; tetrahydrofolate, MTHFR; Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase, MS; methionine synthase, MTRR; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase, MAT; methionine adenosyltransfer, BHMT; betaine homocysteine s-methyltransferase, DNMT; DNA methyltransferase…………….….............................................................................27 8. Folate cycle, methionine cycle, re-methylation pathway and trans-sulfuration pathway by Lamberton (n.d.). THF; tetrahydrofolate, MTHFR; Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase, MS; methionine synthase, MTRR; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase viii reductase, MAT; methionine adenosyltransfer, BHMT; betaine homocysteine s-methyltransferase, DNMT; DNA methyltransferase…...……………………………………………………...………..28 9. Phenylalanine hydroxylase reactions……………………………………….………...35 10. Human Leukocyte Antigen Major Histocompatibility Complex (HLA-MHC Complex). The HLA Complex is a gene complex on chromosome 6 that includes three
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacogenomics and Nutrigenomics: Synergies and Differences
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2007) 61, 567–574 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0954-3007/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejcn REVIEW Pharmacogenomics and nutrigenomics: synergies and differences D Ghosh, MA Skinner and WA Laing The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand The success of the Human Genome Project and the spectacular development of broad genomics tools have catalyzed a new era in both medicine and nutrition. The terms pharmacogenomics and nutrigenomics are relatively new. Both have grown out of their genetic forbears as large-scale genomics technologies have been developed in the last decade. The aim of both disciplines is to individualize or personalize medicine and food and nutrition, and ultimately health, by tailoring the drug or the food to the individual genotype. This review article provides an overview of synergies and differences between these two potentially powerful science areas. Individual genetic variation is the common factor on which both pharmacogenomics and nutrigenomics are based. Each human is genetically (including epigenetics) unique and phenotypically distinct. One of the expectations of both technologies is that a wide range of gene variants and related single-nucleotide polymorphism will be identified as to their importance in health status, validated and incorporated into genotype based strategies for the optimization of health and the prevention of disease. Pharmacogenomics requires rigorous genomic testing that will be regulated and analyzed by professionals and acted on by medical practitioners. As further information is obtained on the importance of the interaction of food and the human genotype in disease prevention and health, pharmacogenomics can provide an opportunity driver for nutrigenomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Determining the Integration of Nutritional Genomics Into Clinical Practice by Registered Dietitians
    Trends in Food Science & Technology 59 (2017) 139e147 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Trends in Food Science & Technology journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/trends-in-food-science- and-technology Review Factors determining the integration of nutritional genomics into clinical practice by registered dietitians * Mariette€ Abrahams a, Lynn J. Frewer b, Eleanor Bryant a, Barbara Stewart-Knox a, a Division of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Bradford, UK b School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, UK article info abstract Article history: Background: Personalized nutrition has the potential to improve health, prevent disease and reduce Received 17 October 2015 healthcare expenditure. Whilst research hints at positive consumer attitudes towards personalized Received in revised form nutrition that draws upon lifestyle, phenotypic and genotypic data, little is known about the degree to 2 November 2016 which registered dietitians (RD) are engaged in the delivery of such services. This review sought to Accepted 16 November 2016 determine possible factors associated with the integration of the emerging science of Nutritional Ge- Available online 24 November 2016 nomics (NGx) into the clinical practice setting by practicing registered dietitians. Scope: Search of online databases (Pubmed; National Library of Medicine; Cochrane Library; Ovid Keywords: Dietitians Medline) was conducted on material published from January 2000 to December 2014. Studies that Nutritional genomics sampled practicing dietitians and investigated integration or application of NGx and genetics knowledge Involvement into practice were eligible. Articles were assessed according to the American Dietetic Association Quality Personalized nutrition Criteria Checklist. Key findings: Application of nutritional genomics in practice has been limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheumatoide Arthritis Im Mausmodell - Immunologische Und Strukturelle Verän- Derungen Im Darm
    Rheumatoide Arthritis im Mausmodell - immunologische und strukturelle Verän- derungen im Darm in Medizin 3 Rheumatologie/ Immunologie des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen Klinikdirektor: Prof. Dr. med. univ. Georg Schett Dissertation der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. med. vorgelegt von Oscar Theodor Schulz aus Burgwedel Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Vorsitzender des Promotionsorgans: Prof. Dr. Markus F Neurath Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Mario Zaiss Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Krönke Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16. März 2021 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Zusammenfassung / Abstract ...................................................................... - 1 - 1.1.1 Hintergrund und Ziele ......................................................................... - 1 - 1.1.2 Methoden (Patienten, Material und Untersuchungsmethoden) .......... - 1 - 1.1.3 Ergebnisse und Beobachtungen ......................................................... - 2 - 1.1.4 Schlussfolgerung ................................................................................ - 3 - 1.2.1 Background and aims ......................................................................... - 4 - 1.2.2 Methods (patients, material and examination methods) ..................... - 4 - 1.2.3 Results ................................................................................................ - 5 - 1.3.4 Conclusion .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Naiyana Gujral
    University of Alberta ANTIBODY-BASED DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES ON GLUTEN-SENSITIVE ENTEROPATHY by Naiyana Gujral A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences © Naiyana Gujral Fall 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my beloved family with all my love respect, and gratitude. ABSTRACT Gluten-sensitive enteropathy, called Celiac disease (CD), is one of the most frequent autoimmune diseases, occurring in 1% people worldwide, upon gliadin ingestion. Currently, the only treatment available for CD individual is a strict life-long gluten-free diet. Chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin Y (IgY) is produced and examined for its efficacy in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo to prevent enteric absorption of gliadin. This antibody was also used to develop sensitive and rapid detection kits for gluten. The extracted toxic gliadin was immunized into chickens inducing humoral immune response to produced gliadin-specific IgY antibodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Agricultural Sciences PHYSICOCHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF GLIADIN BY DIETARY POLYPHENOLS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR CELIAC DISEASE A Dissertation in Food Science by Charlene B. Van Buiten © 2017 Charlene B. Van Buiten Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 The dissertation of Charlene B. Van Buiten was reviewed and approved* by the following: Ryan J. Elias Associate Professor of Food Science Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Joshua D. Lambert Associate Professor of Food Science John N. Coupland Professor of Food Science Gregory R. Ziegler Professor of Food Science Connie J. Rogers Associate Professor of Nutritional Sciences Robert F. Roberts Professor of Food Science Head of the Department of Food Science *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT Celiac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy that affects approximately 1% of the world population. Characterized by an adverse reaction to gluten protein, celiac disease manifests in the small bowel and results in inflammation and increased permeability of the gut barrier. This is followed by an immune response mounted against not only gluten, but also tissue transglutaminase 2 (TG2), a gluten-reactive enzyme secreted by intestinal epithelial cells. Despite the growing number of individuals affected by this disease, the only reliable intervention strategy available is lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet. Novel strategies for treating or preventing celiac disease include synthetic pharmaceuticals to modify the gut barrier, parabiotic infection to reduce inflammatory cytokine release and administration of a synthetic polymer that binds gluten proteins and prevents their digestion and absorption.
    [Show full text]
  • Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Is Driven by Zonulin-Dependent Loss of Gut Mucosal Barrier
    The Journal of Clinical Investigation CLINICAL MEDICINE Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is driven by zonulin-dependent loss of gut mucosal barrier Lael M. Yonker,1,2,3 Tal Gilboa,3,4,5 Alana F. Ogata,3,4,5 Yasmeen Senussi,4 Roey Lazarovits,4,5 Brittany P. Boribong,1,2,3 Yannic C. Bartsch,3,6 Maggie Loiselle,1 Magali Noval Rivas,7 Rebecca A. Porritt,7 Rosiane Lima,1 Jameson P. Davis,1 Eva J. Farkas,1 Madeleine D. Burns,1 Nicola Young,1 Vinay S. Mahajan,3,6 Soroush Hajizadeh,3,8 Xcanda I. Herrera Lopez,3,8 Johannes Kreuzer,3,8 Robert Morris,3,8 Enid E. Martinez,1,3,9 Isaac Han,3,5 Kettner Griswold Jr.,3,5 Nicholas C. Barry,3,5 David B. Thompson,3,5 George Church,3,5,10 Andrea G. Edlow,3,11,12 Wilhelm Haas,3,8 Shiv Pillai,3,6 Moshe Arditi,7 Galit Alter,3,6 David R. Walt,3,4,5 and Alessio Fasano1,2,3,13 1Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center and 2Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6Ragon Institute of MIT, MGH and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 7Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Infectious and Immunologic Diseases Research Center (IIDRC) and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. 8Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Gliadin Sequestration As a Novel Therapy for Celiac Disease: a Prospective Application for Polyphenols
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Gliadin Sequestration as a Novel Therapy for Celiac Disease: A Prospective Application for Polyphenols Charlene B. Van Buiten 1,* and Ryan J. Elias 2 1 Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Health and Human Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA 2 Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-970-491-5868 Abstract: Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a heightened immune response to gluten proteins in the diet, leading to gastrointestinal symptoms and mucosal damage localized to the small intestine. Despite its prevalence, the only treatment currently available for celiac disease is complete avoidance of gluten proteins in the diet. Ongoing clinical trials have focused on targeting the immune response or gluten proteins through methods such as immunosuppression, enhanced protein degradation and protein sequestration. Recent studies suggest that polyphenols may elicit protective effects within the celiac disease milieu by disrupting the enzymatic hydrolysis of gluten proteins, sequestering gluten proteins from recognition by critical receptors in pathogenesis and exerting anti-inflammatory effects on the system as a whole. This review highlights mechanisms by which polyphenols can protect against celiac disease, takes a critical look at recent works and outlines future applications for this potential treatment method. Keywords: celiac disease; polyphenols; epigallocatechin gallate; gluten; gliadin; protein sequestration Citation: Van Buiten, C.B.; Elias, R.J. Gliadin Sequestration as a Novel 1. Introduction Therapy for Celiac Disease: A Gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley and rye, is the antigenic trigger for celiac Prospective Application for disease, an autoimmune enteropathy localized in the small intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • (Nutrigenomics) “NTGE 2422” Level II Human Nutrition Mutayomba Sylvestre
    NUTRITIONAL GENOMICS (Nutrigenomics) “NTGE 2422” Level II Human nutrition Mutayomba Sylvestre Nutritional Genomics for Human Nutrition 6/18/2019 1 Level II (CUR) SUBJECT UNIT 1. Genetics variability 2. Nutrition and gene Nutritional Genomics for Human Nutrition 6/18/2019 2 Level II (CUR) GROUP ASSIGNMENTS 1. Preventive medicine and personalized diet 2. Metabolic syndrome 3. Genetics influence on cancer prevention. 4. Environmental influence on cancer prevention. Nutritional Genomics for Human Nutrition 6/18/2019 3 Level II (CUR) INTRODUCTION The link between food and health is a long and a well documented one. With over 24,000 people worldwide dying from hunger each day and obesity reaching epidemic proportions in developed counties, the consequences of too little or too much food are easily seen. People no longer view food as merely a source of calories but rather as a complex mixture of dietary chemicals, some of which are capable of preventing, mitigating, or treating disease. With the sequencing of the human genome, a new genetic dimension has been added to the equation linking the foods we eat to the good health we all hope to enjoy. We bring two things to the dinner table: our appetite and our genotype. Nutritional Genomics for Human Nutrition 6/18/2019 4 Level II (CUR) Genetic diversity makes each of us uniquely different, we are also beginning to understand why we respond to our nutritional environment differently and how these differences can, over time, lead to health or disease. Genomic analysis reveals that humans are 99.9% identical at the DNA level. This implies that the remaining 0.1% of the human genome (or about three million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) is responsible for all the morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular differences between any two individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Dietitians' Knowledge and Perception of Nutritional Genomics
    SPORTS DIETITIANS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION OF NUTRITIONAL GENOMICS AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE A thesis submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Masters of Science By Christopher S. Cooper August 2015 A thesis written by Christopher Samiá Cooper B.S., Howard University, 2004 M.S., Kent State University, 2015 Approved by _________________________, Director, Master’s Thesis Committee Amy Miracle _________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis Committee Karen Lowry Gordon _________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis Committee Natalie Caine-Bish Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Health Sciences Lynne E. Rowan _________________________, Interim Dean, College of Education, Health and Human Mark Kretovics Services ii COOPER, CHRISTOPHER S., M.S., August 2015 Nutrition SPORTS DIETITIANS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION OF NUTRITIONAL GENOMICS AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE (96 pp.) Director of Thesis: Amy Miracle, Ph.D., R.D., C.S.S.D., L.D. The purpose of this study was to investigate sports dietitians’ knowledge of nutritional genomics and their perceptions of nutritional genomics for enhancing athletic performance. The study was an online voluntary response sampling of Registered Dietitians (n=6219) from the membership database of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND). Participants completed a questionnaire composed of 3 sections designed to investigate: (1) Demographics; (2) Knowledge of genetics and diet-gene interactions; (3) Perceptions of nutritional genomics for enhancing athletic performance. For statistical analysis, participant demographic characteristics were used to differentiate between Sports Dietitians (SRDs) and Non-Sports Dietitians (NSRDs). Results of the study indicate that Total Knowledge Scores (TKS) among SRDs were significantly greater than NSRDs; however, there were only six knowledge questions to which >50% of the participants answered correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrigenomics and Nutritional Epigenetics – the State of the Science in Academia
    Nutrigenomics and Nutritional Epigenetics – The State of the Science in Academia THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kimberly Coile Grosh Graduate Program in Human Ecology The Ohio State University 2011 Master's Examination Committee: Lydia Medeiros, Advisor Amanda Bird Copyrighted by Kimberly Coile Grosh 2011 Abstract Nutrigenomics and epigenetics are not yet independent professional degrees in American graduate academia. Further, where in professional science this union between environmental and genetic regulation of health and disease state belongs isn't well characterized. The objectives of this study were to determine which American colleges or universities are training and researching in nutrigenomics and epigenetics, and what might characterize the successful training and research for professional development of such academic fields. We hypothesized that schools with strong supportive academics and funding would be the most likely to train and research in nutrigenomics and epigenetics. To test this hypothesis an internet survey of government-supported databases was conducted to determine which schools were producing the most graduates and receiving the most funding in supportive academics and research. An online questionnaire was then sent to academic and/or research program directors of nutrition, genetics, or related departments to directly measure the presence of, characteristics of, and perspectives on nutrigenomics and epigenetics in academic science. There was a general consensus found for the terminology of nutrigenomics and epigenetics, and for the relevance of nutrigenomics across science disciplines. At least 40% of schools offering doctoral degrees in nutrition and/or genetics have three or more supporting ii academics or funding fields in the 25th percentile for that field, and approximately 22% have both.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet, Genetics, and Disease: a Focus on the Middle East and North Africa Region
    Diet, Genetics, and Disease: A Focus on the Middle East and North Africa Region The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Fahed, Akl C., Abdul-Karim M. El-Hage-Sleiman, Theresa I. Farhat, and Georges M. Nemer. 2012. Diet, genetics, and disease: A focus on the Middle East and North Africa region. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2012:109037. Published Version doi:10.1155/2012/109037 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10345148 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism Volume 2012, Article ID 109037, 19 pages doi:10.1155/2012/109037 Review Article Diet, Genetics, and Disease: A Focus on the Middle East and North Africa Region Akl C. Fahed,1 Abdul-Karim M. El-Hage-Sleiman,2 Theresa I. Farhat,2 and Georges M. Nemer2 1 Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon Correspondence should be addressed to Georges M. Nemer, [email protected] Received 31 August 2011; Accepted 27 November 2011 Academic Editor: Hamed R. Takruri Copyright © 2012 Akl C. Fahed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrigenomics: a Systems Approach to Cardiometabolic Disease and Personal Nutrition
    Journal of Investigative Genomics Mini review Open Access Nutrigenomics: a systems approach to cardiometabolic disease and personal nutrition Abbreviations: GWAS, genome-wide association studies; Volume 2 Issue 5 - 2015 CVD, cardiovascular disease; TNH-CS, toronto nutrigenomics and health cross-sectional; HC, hormonal contraceptives; LA, linoleic Joseph Curtis acid; TFA, trans fatty acids Cascade Biotherapeutics Inc., USA Correspondence: Joseph Curtis, CEO President, Cascade Introduction Biotherapeutics, Inc., USA, Tel 2023601252, Nutritional genomics or nutrigenomics is the study of how dietary Email [email protected], [email protected] molecules interact with the genetic architecture of a species governing Received: May 14, 2015 | Published: October 14, 2015 the metabolic pathways contributing to the health of a population. The study of nutrigenomics contributes to our understanding of how diet and lifestyle effects the distribution of diseases under the influence of diet-genetic interactions. Nutrigenomic investigations combine’s insights generated from the meta-analysis of population-based ensure the quality and integrity of health communications translating studies, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene expression the value of nutrigenomic information to individuals making choices assays, lipidomics, metabolomics, metagenomics and proteomics to to support health and wellness. examine how the combination of genetic polymorphisms, diet, age, sex, ethnicity and lifestyle contribute to health and influence disease. Nutrigenomic biomarkers, fatty acid metabolism and Nutrigenomics at its core is a systems approach to the study of cardiovascular disease across populations metabolic heterogeneity. Under certain conditions, the human genome A considerable amount of progress has been made in understanding displays a level of plasticity that is just now being understood. the linkage between lifestyle and CVD.
    [Show full text]