Final Report of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force Final Report of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force Submitted to President Sally Roush April 30, 2018 Final Report of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force April 30, 2018 I. Executive Summary A. Introduction B. Mission Statement C. Process and Methodology D. Overview of Recommendations Relative to Moniker/Mascot II. Background and Situational Analysis III. Survey Results IV. Conclusion and Recommendations A. Education B. Governing Body To Secure the Ethical, Moral And Fiduciary Responsibility of Carrying the Aztec Name C. Meaningful Engagement with Native American and Indigenous Communities of the US and Mexico D. Appropriate Signage and Symbolic Representation of the Aztec Empire and Contemporary Nahua People Across the Campus E. Respectful and Correct Use of the Nahuatl Language by the University F. Guidelines for Mascot Representation G. Final Comments V. Bibliography VI. Appendices A. University Senate Resolution, November 7, 2017 B. Charge Letter from President Roush, dated February 12, 2018 C. List of Visiting Speakers/Expert Testimonies D. Historic Timelines of the Mascot, 1910-2017 E. Evolution of SDSU Logos/Moniker Graphics F. Survey Outcomes and Instruments G. Final Codebook for Data Analysis and Report on Qualitative Data H. Athletics Behavioral Guidelines for the Aztec Warrior I. 2001 Task Force Report J. CFA Assembly Resolution, April 15, 2018 K. Data on Self-identifying Respondents 2 Final Report of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force April 30, 2018 I. Executive Summary A. Introduction The 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force (AITF) was formed by President Sally Roush in response to the resolution of the San Diego State University Academic Senate dated November 7, 2017 (see Appendix A). The Senate called for a task force to be formed “to investigate and make recommendations regarding the appropriateness of the continued usage of the Aztec moniker including symbols, signage, logos, branding, buildings, statues (e.g., Monty), awards (e.g., Zuma) and other references to the possible misappropriation of Aztec Identity” (SDSU Senate minutes 11/7/17, lines 93 – 96). The resolution continued, “This task force shall also make recommendations regarding an education component in relation to Aztec Identity” (ibid, lines 96 – 98). This report is the official report of the task force that was formed and that met for a period of 10 weeks, beginning on February 12, 2018, and concluding on April 24, 2018. The 17 members appointed by President Roush included five current students, five alumni, four faculty, one staff, and two community representatives. On February 12, 2018 all appointees accepted the responsibility to contribute towards the mandate of the Senate (see Appendix B for the official charge of the AITF). At the initial meeting of February 12th, all members voted unanimously to keep the identities of the AITF confidential and this was confirmed at the meeting with President Roush on April 30, 2018. The AITF recognized the history associated with Aztec identity and requested all available documentation relative to the 2001 task force report that was presented to President Stephen Weber dated May 1, 2001 (Appendix J). This foundational document served as the baseline for the AITF of 2018. After review by all members, it was determined that the 2018 AITF neither needed to repeat the extensive data collected on the culture and history of the people known as the Aztecas nor had the time to do so. To that end, the members agreed to focus on what had transpired since that report and the impact that the subsequent actions of SDSU has had on the stakeholders of the University. We crafted a Mission Statement that focused on the charge set forth by President Roush. B. Mission Statement The mission of the 2018 Aztec Identity Task Force (AITF) is to consider the opinions of stakeholders associated with San Diego State University and provide recommendations related to the Aztec identity to the President of San Diego State University. C. Process & Methodology The AITF had approximately ten weeks to complete their research, deliberate and provide a recommendation report to President Roush for consideration. An electronic group poll was taken 3 to chart out the best days and times for the group to meet. No members of the AITF were provided release time from existing responsibilities nor any other form of compensation; all members volunteered their time and integrated the project into their existing schedules. As such, two standing meetings of three hours each were scheduled for each week and members were encouraged to attend at least one meeting each week. A conference call option was provided for those who could not physically be in the room. The group voted to organize themselves through a Tri-Chair organizational structure that represented faculty and staff, students, and alumni and community members. Each chair was to communicate with the members in their group as needed and a Google Drive folder was established for the sharing of materials and meeting minutes. At approximately week four of the ten weeks, the AITF requested a professional note taker in order to provide more accurate notes for those that could not make a meeting and to assure that we stayed focused on the issues. The first official notes of the AITF taken by the professional note taker were placed in the Google Drive and dated March 13, 2018. The group functioned much like a committee of the whole and ideas were freely exchanged in order to explore all options and viewpoints. Many of the committee members provided materials that they felt were pertinent to the conversation to include academic research relevant to university mascots, resolutions made by various organizations relative to mascots, email correspondence sent to the President’s office on the issue of Aztec identity, Facebook and other social media postings, documents from various archives held at SDSU, scholarly materials relevant to Aztec culture and society, scholarly materials on contemporary Nahua people, essays and articles on cultural appropriation, and other notes and materials. These research materials built upon the 2001 report and became part of our discussion and deliberations. A limited bibliography is included with this report. The AITF was in unanimous agreement that the most encompassing process of hearing what the various stakeholders wanted to say about the issues set forth by the Senate resolution was to conduct a survey across all stakeholder groups. The Alumni Association had initiated a survey prior to the AITF formation. To assure continuity in the data, we used the same questions on three separate surveys to Students, Faculty/Staff, and the Community. In order to provide a richer understanding of the numeric outcomes of the survey, we incorporated an open-ended free space on the surveys so that respondents could express their sentiments in their own words. The methodology for analyzing the data along with the results of these surveys are detailed in Section III of this report. In addition to the archival information noted above, the AITF received informative presentations from a small number of visitors pertaining to the history of the Moniker and the Aztec Warrior Mascot as well as the current Senate Resolutions. See Appendix C for a list of visitors. The presentations provided a deeper understanding of the actions taken by SDSU since the 2001 report and provided the AITF with a baseline for our recommendations. As evidenced by many of the comments from the surveys, the lack of action on many recommendations from this 2001 report has had a negative impact on the trust of many survey respondents in believing that appropriate action will be taken in the future. See Section II. Background and Situation Analysis for a summary of this issue. The AITF recognizes the significance of the many references to Title VI in documentation and debates on Native American mascots as well as the Senate’s reference to State of California Education Code Title I, Division I, Part I, Chapter 2. We did not undertake a review of these 4 proceedings and recommend that the President of SDSU review these issues and their significance to the recommendations of this report. The members of the AITF worked diligently to evaluate all data presented to us including the perspectives and opinions of each member. Each of us wrestled with the significance and meaning of the multiple issues relative to cultural appropriation, colonial and neocolonial aggressions, and the current social climate of our community. We sought to respect and honor each person’s contributions to these topics. We recognize that we do not hold a shared understanding of these issues, what they mean to each person, and how they are lived and experienced. Our conversations acknowledged that cultural appropriation, defined for our purposes as the invocation, use, or exploitation of cultural artifacts from a minority or disenfranchised group in a disrespectful manner, whether intentional or unintentional by a dominant group, was a primary concern of many people within the SDSU community. We also recognized that while there is a difference between cultural mixing, where these same processes can be integrated into another culture with due respect, this has not been done consistently and with true commitment at SDSU with the Aztec moniker. These were not easy conversations and we did not always agree but we were open to each person’s opinions, experiences, and suggestions for addressing our differences. We sought respect and empathy in our interactions. During our ten weeks together, two members of the AITF recused themselves from the project. Despite their absence, we referred to their many contributions to the project as we completed our work. Our recommendations are not unanimously held, nor do we find a need to make them so. The recommendations put forth in this report are based on: 1. Results of quantitative and qualitative survey responses.
Recommended publications
  • Aztec Culture Education Update
    Aztec Culture Education Committee Ideas Report Draft August 2018 ORIGINAL CHARGE/FRAMEWORK A committee of cross campus partners including faculty, staff and students was formed at the end of the 2016- 2017 academic year to work on and develop a comprehensive Aztec culture educational plan. As a result of the committee meetings, a number of proposed initiatives were identified. The charge of the group and the basis of the conversations have revolved around fulfilling prior commitments made by the campus, as an example: Associated Students Referendum Spring 2008, passed Implementation of an Aztec Culture Project. The Project will include three elements intended to promote historically accurate portrayals of the Aztec Culture: new botanical gardens around the campus that include indigenous plantings from areas where the Aztecs thrived, a glass-mosaic mural that depicts historically accurate images portraying the origins of the Aztec Culture, and educational programs about the Aztec Culture that would be offered to all new SDSU students As the committee incorporated the recognition of the University’s relationship to local Indian groups as well as other indigenous groups from Mexico that comprise the larger University community. To begin prioritizing ideas and potential campus efforts, the following framework has been created from the current committee’s discussions, to categorize the overarching topical areas and objectives identified to date: San Diego State University will enrich the environment and deepen campus learning, both inside and outside the classroom, by enhancing Aztec Culture Education knowledge and understanding by strategically: • Expanding opportunities for scholarship regarding Aztec Culture, as well as local indigenous and Native American groups, through innovative courses, experiences, and engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Organize PDF Index at 13;33;19 on 09/17/2016 By; Vilma Winters
    Organize PDF Index at 13:33:19 on 09/17/2016 by: Vilma Winters [Time: 13:32:41] !N,C,A,A,Watch. 'Old Dominion Monarchs vs NC State Wolfpack'. Football. Free !N,C,A,A,Watch. 'Old Dominion Monarchs vs NC State Wolfpack'. Football. Free [Time: 13:32:41] ^Yahoo-SportsWatch. 'Liberty Flames vs SMU Mustangs'. Online. Football. On. First. Row ^Yahoo-SportsWatch. 'Liberty Flames vs SMU Mustangs'. Online. Football. On. First. Row [Time: 13:32:41] $Fox-TVWatch. 'Pittsburgh Panthers vs Oklahoma State Cowboys'. Football. Live. Online. Free. P2P $Fox-TVWatch. 'Pittsburgh Panthers vs Oklahoma State Cowboys'. Football. Live. Online. Free. P2P [Time: 13:32:41] ^kick-Off$Watch. 'Ohio State Buckeyes vs Oklahoma Sooners'. Live. Football. Tv. Ru ^kick-Off$Watch. 'Ohio State Buckeyes vs Oklahoma Sooners'. Live. Football. Tv. Ru [Time: 13:32:41] @Fox-TVWatch. 'Michigan State Spartans vs Notre Dame Fighting Irish'. Atdhe. Live. Football. Streaming @Fox-TVWatch. 'Michigan State Spartans vs Notre Dame Fighting Irish'. Atdhe. Live. Football. Streaming [Time: 13:32:41] @Sche-duled%Watch. 'Michigan State Spartans vs Notre Dame Fighting Irish'. Live. Sport. Streaming. Websites @Sche-duled%Watch. 'Michigan State Spartans vs Notre Dame Fighting Irish'. Live. Sport. Streaming. Websites [Time: 13:32:41] !Sky-Sports%Watch. 'Monmouth Hawks vs Kent State Golden Flashes'. Live. Football. Streaming. Online. Pc !Sky-Sports%Watch. 'Monmouth Hawks vs Kent State Golden Flashes'. Live. Football. Streaming. Online. Pc [Time: 13:32:41] @N,C,A,A,!Watch. 'Ohio State Buckeyes vs Oklahoma Sooners'. American. Football. Free. Live. Streaming @N,C,A,A,!Watch. 'Ohio State Buckeyes vs Oklahoma Sooners'.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Ucla Bruins Softball
    UCLA SOFTBALL WEEKLY RELEASE • FEBRUARY 10, 2011 • PAGE 1 2011 UCLA BRUINS SOFTBALL SOFTBALL CONTACT: JAMES YBIERNAS • PHONE: (310) 206-8123 • FAX: (310) 825-8664 • E-MAIL: [email protected] • WWW.UCLABRUINS.COM 2011 UCLA SCHEDULE AND RESULTS GAMES 1-5 • STACY WINSBERG MEMORIAL TOURNAMENT • EASTON STADIUM OVERALL: 0-0 PAC-10: 0-0 2/11 UTAH STATE 2, A 3:30 P.M. Friday, Feb. 11 Sunday, Feb. 13 2/11 NORTH DAKOTA STATE 2 6 P.M. UCF vs. Utah State 10:30 a.m. UCF vs. North Dakota State 9 a.m. 2/12 NORTH DAKOTA STATE 2, A 4:30 P.M. North Dakota State vs. San Diego State 1 p.m. Utah State vs. San Diego State 11:30 a.m. 2/12 UCF 2 7 P.M. UCLA vs. Utah State 3:30 p.m. UCLA vs. San Diego State 2 p.m. UCLA vs. North Dakota State 6 p.m. 2/13 SAN DIEGO STATE 2, A 2 P.M. First team listed in third-base dugout 2/16 at Cal State Fullerton 4 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 12 Underlined team is home team 2/18 vs. Southern Illinois Edwardsville 3 9 a.m. San Diego State vs. Utah State 9 a.m. 2/18 vs. Arkansas 3 1:30 p.m. North Dakota State vs. Utah State 11:30 a.m. Gametracker available for all games at UCLABruins.com 2/19 vs. Utah 3 1:30 p.m. San Diego State vs. UCF 2 p.m. Live audio for Friday’s UCLA-Utah State, 2/19 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis for A
    Sport Management Master’s Program 1 SPORT MANAGEMENT MASTER’S PROGRAM SELF-STUDY Prepared for the College of Arts & Sciences, University of San Francisco February 4, 2008 Sport Management Master’s Program 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 MISSION AND HISTORY..................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 MISSION........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 HISTORY ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 GOALS .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 CURRICULUM .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 ADMISSION AND TRANSFER POLICIES........................................................................................ 19 2.3 ADVISING ................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 OVERALL ACADEMIC QUALITY .................................................................................................. 21 3.0 ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leon L. Williams San Diego County Human Relations Commission
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Leon L. Williams San Diego County Human Relations Commission Agenda Item Date: February 23, 2021 7 To: Leon L. Williams San Diego County Human Relations Commission Subject: UPDATE ON VACANCIES – DEMOGRAPHICS AND PROCESS FOR COMMISSION SEAT NOMINATIONS Overview The Commission has two (2) open seats for nomination. The Commission requested updated demographics of the current members. Today, staff will present the updated demographics and provide the overview of the process for the Commission nominated seats. Action Item(s) Review the demographics information presented and identify communities currently underrepresented on the Commission. Background The Leon L. Williams San Diego County Human Relations Commission (Commission) was established on May 19, 2020, to “promote positive human relations, respect, and the integrity of every individual regardless of gender, religion, culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, or citizenship status.” (Resolution Number 20-054, Section 1.) The County of San Diego Board of Supervisors established the Commission as a “positive step to reduce sources of tension and conflict in San Diego County,” with the intention of making “recommendations to alleviate discrimination and intolerance and serve as a resource to the Board of Supervisors and County departments on issues related to human rights and relations. The Commissioners would serve as a liaison to community groups, provide feedback on effective outreach and engagement tactics and review progress made to lessen hate crimes, bias, human rights violations and other related matters.” (Board Letter, Agenda Item 26, May 19, 2020.) The Commission is comprised of thirty-one (31) members. Of those thirty-one (31) members, the Commission nominates seven (7) for appointment by the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego State Aztecs Starters Returning/Lost
    GENERAL INFORMATION Team Information Head Coach ................................................................................. Lev Kirshner (Rutgers, 1991) Record at SDSU (Seasons) .............................................................................138-167-55 (19) Career Record ................................................................................................................Same E-mail .................................................................................................. [email protected] Men’s Soccer Office Phone ............................................................................. (619) 594-0136 Men’s Soccer Office Fax ................................................................................. (619) 594-1674 Associate Head Coach ...........................................................................Matt Hall (20th Season) Assistant Coach ......................................................................................Josh Hill (3rd Season) Home Facility ..................................................................................SDSU Sports Deck (1,250) 2018 Overall Record .................................................................................................... 7-10-1 2018 Home Record ....................................................................................................... 5-5-0 2018 Road Record ........................................................................................................ 2-5-1 2018 Pac-12 Record/Finish ......................................................................................2-8-0/6th
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of San Diego History V 51-2
    The Journal of San Diego History Book Reviews The Founding Documents of Los Angeles: A Bilingual Edition. Edited by Doyce Nunis. Los Angeles: Historical Society of Southern California, 2004. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, notes. 264 pp. $42.50 cloth. Reviewed by Michael J. Gonzalez, Associate Professor of History, University of San Diego. This volume claims a noble purpose. In 2003, the Zamorano Club of Los Angeles, commemorating its seventy-fifth anniversary, and the Historical Society of Southern California, honoring its one-hundred and twentieth anniversary, published in translation, and in the original Spanish, the eighteenth-century documents concerning the establishment of Los Angeles in what was known as “California Septentrional” — northern or upper California. The twelve documents first appeared in 1931 when the Historical Society of Southern California published a special volume of its journal to note the one-hundred and fiftieth anniversary of Los Angeles’ founding in 1781. Doyce Nunis, the editor of the current version, says that the publication will not go to bookstores. He explains that the Zamorano Club and the Historical Society of Southern California will donate their work to schools and libraries in Los Angeles County and research libraries around the nation. Documents that would otherwise crumble in an archive now sit within easy reach of the public. To help the reader, the volume republishes three essays by historians who supply details the documents do not contain. Thomas Workman Temple II, whose work appeared in the 1931 publication, provides biographical information about the settlers and soldiers who established Los Angeles. Harry Kelsey and Theodore Truetlein, scholars who published in the 1970s, offer other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 UNLV Rebel Volleyball Opponents 2005 UNLV Rebel Volleyball 35 TCU Horned Frogs Oct
    Opponents 2005 UNLV Rebel Volleyball 2005 CSTV / AVCA Division I Coaches Top 25 Preseason Poll 2004 Final Rank 1. Nebraska (35) 5 2. Washington (15) 3 3. Stanford (8) 1 4. Hawai’i (1) 8 5. Penn State (1) 7 6. Minnesota 2 7. Southern Cal 4 8. Florida 15 9. Tennessee 10 10. Wisconsin 14 11. Texas 11 12. Ohio State 6 13. UCLA 9 14. Louisville 16 15. UC Santa Barbara 21 16. Texas A&M 20 17. Arizona 22 18. San Diego 12 19. California 18 20. Georgia Tech 17 21. Missouri 24 22. Colorado State 19 23. Saint Mary’s (Calif.) 13 24. Long Beach State NR 25. Pepperdine NR Receiving Votes: Kansas State, Notre Dame, Santa Clara, Utah, Purdue, Ohio, Illinois, Wichita State, Kansas, Nevada, BYU, Florida A&M, Colorado, Duke, Loyola Marymount, Rice and Pacific. Bold indicates UNLV’s 2005 opponents. 29 30 Fremont Investment & Loan Invitational Friday, August 26 August 26-27 Saint Mary's vs. Arizona State 10:30 am Host: Cal State Northridge UNLV vs. Saint Mary’s 5 pm Cal State Northridge vs. Arizona State 7 pm Location: Northridge, Calif. Opponents: Arizona State, Cal State Northridge & Saturday, August 27 Saint Mary’s (Calif.) Cal State Northridge vs. UNLV 10:30 am UNLV @ Arizona State 5 pm Cal State Northridge vs. Saint Mary's 7 pm Saint Mary’s (Calif.) Gaels Cal State Northridge Matadors Arizona State Sun Devils General Information General Information General Information Location . .Moraga, Calif. Location . .Northridge, Calif. Location . .Tempe, Ariz. Founded . .1928 Founded . .1958 Founded . .1885 Enrollment .
    [Show full text]
  • Meth, HIV, and the Superstrain: “A Wake-Up Call”
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Risky Subjectivity : : The Effects of Cultural Discourses of Addiction on Methamphetamine Using HIV+ Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Diego Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x61w1jt Author Gideonse, Theodore Karwoski Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Risky Subjectivity: The Effects of Cultural Discourses of Addiction on Methamphetamine Using HIV+ Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Diego A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Theodore Karwoski Gideonse Committee in charge: Professor Janis H. Jenkins, Chair Professor Suzanne Brenner Professor Norman Bryson Professor Steven Parish Professor Thomas Patterson Professor Nancy G. Postero 2013 Signature Page The Dissertation of Theodore Karwoski Gideonse is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to the man who in the text I call Sam. iv Table of Contents Signature Page .......................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .................................................................................................................................. iv Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Dine
    08_596624 ch05.qxd 10/25/05 9:15 PM Page 69 5 Where to Dine San Diego’s dining scene, once a culinary backwater, has come into its own during the past decade. The spark for this new spirit of experimentation and style has been an explosion in the transplant population and cultural diversification. But other factors are at play. A bustling economy helps, motivating folks to step out and exercise their palates. These new foodies have been taught to respect the sea- sonality of vegetables, allowing chefs to revel in the bounteous agri- culture of San Diego County by focusing on vegetables when flavors are at their peak at specialized North County growers like Chino Farms and Be Wise Ranch. Top young cooks are increasingly lured by San Diego’s agreeable lifestyle and the chance to make a fast impression in the region’s din- ing scene. How many chefs have been seduced by the idea that you can surf in the ocean each morning, then hand-select fresh produce at the farm where it was grown for preparation that afternoon? And although we import chefs from around the world, we’ve even started exporting them—Marine Room wizard Bernard Guillas represents America at illustrious events like the Masters of Food and Wine. As you can imagine, San Diego offers terrific seafood: Whether at unembellished market-style restaurants that let the fresh catch take center stage or at upscale restaurants that feature extravagant presen- tations, the ocean’s bounty is everywhere. Those traditional main- stays, American and Continental cuisine, still carry their share of the weight in San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotary Club of La Mesa
    TheThe TattlerTattler Rotary Club of La Mesa Meeting Volume 2020-21, No.327 Date: 5/12/21 Wednesday’s @ Noon La Mesa Community Center, 4975 Memorial Drive, La Mesa CA 91942 www.LaMesaRotary.org LA MESA ROTARY Lunch Time Service Opportunities TO MEET IN PERSON WEDNESDAY MAY 12th May 12, 2021 Pledge Martin Brickson We are working on ways for us to begin Thought Jack Dargitz 4-Way Gary Clasen meeting in person again at the La Mesa st community Center! Our 1 in person May 19, 2021 meeting will be Wednesday May 12th ! Pledge Mary Ellington th We will start with 2 in-person meetings in May: May 12 & May Thought John Fistere th 26 . You will have to RSVP for these in-person meetings. We will 4-Way Nathan Oestreich not allow any food at either of these meetings. We are working on ways to make our in-person meetings a Hybrid Meeting – meaning May 26, 2021 it will be on ZOOM as well as in-person! Pledge Jim Kline Beginning in June we will look to bring lunch back to our meetings. Thought Ben Hamilton 4-Way Mark Bagula Here is the upcoming Calendar we are planning: June 2, 2021 th May 5 – ZOOM May 12th - In Person / Hybrid – No food – Must RSVP Online Pledge Rose Hurst Thought Sue Richardson May 19th – ZOOM 4-Way Marsha Starr May 26th - In Person / Hybrid – No food – Must RSVP Online June 2nd – ZOOM th June 9 - In Person / Hybrid – Box Lunch – Must RSVP Online June 16th – ZOOM June 23rd – In Person – Box Lunch – RSVP – DEMOTION! If you cannot perform June 30th - DARK for Lunch, Installation Dinner! your assigned duty, If you are not comfortable meeting in person the ZOOM option will please arrange for a still be available! replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Degree Project / Senior Project / Graduate Thesis 2015
    2015 Degree Project / Senior Project / and Graduate Thesis Woodbury School of Architecture 2015 Faculty Bachelor of Architecture Woodbury School of Architecture Los Angeles Ewan Branda, Coordinator Berenika Boberska Degree Project, Senior Project Frank Clementi and Graduate Thesis 201 Peter Culley Matthew Daines April Greiman Scrap Marshall Norman Millar Micah Rutenberg Architecture Marc J. Neveu, Chair 5 Dean Maxi Spina Los Angeles Mark Stankard Ingalill Wahlroos-Ritter Mark Stanley Associate Dean BArch faculty Berenika Boberska / Scrap Marshall 7 Master of Architecture Marc J. Neveu Ewan Branda / Maxi Spina 21 Architecture Chair, Los Angeles Anthony Fontenot, Coordinator Frank Clementi / Matthew Daines 41 Peter Culley Micah Rutenberg / Peter Culley 55 Christoph Korner Mark Ericson Mark Stankard / Mark Stanley 71 Interior Architecture Chair, Los Angeles Joshua Stein MArch faculty Peter Culley 86 Catherine Herbst Master of Science in Architecture Mark Ericson 92 Architecture Chair, San Diego Hadley Arnold Anthony Fontenot 98 Peter Arnold Joshua Stein 104 Bachelor of Fine Arts, MSArch faculty Hadley Arnold / Peter Arnold 111 Interior Architecture Annie Chu, Coordinator Heather Peterson Interior Architecture Christoph Korner, Chair 116 Faculty Bachelor of Architecture Los Angeles San Diego Marcel Sanchez-Prieto, Coordinator Philipp Bosshart Eric Johnson BFA Interior Architecture Annie Chu 118 faculty Heather Peterson Master of Architecture Hector Perez, Coordinator Stan Bertheaud Philipp Bosshart Architecture Catherine Herbst, Chair 136
    [Show full text]