Eddington References

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eddington References ARTHUR S. EDDINGTON Published Works1 CUP Cambridge University Press MNRAS Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Proc. Phys. Soc. The Proceedings of the Physical Society of London Proc. Roy. Soc. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A « Cours d’Astronomie. Première partie : Astronomie Theorique. By H. Andoyer », Nature, 75 (1906), p. 148. « A Criticism of Sir George Darwin’s Theories », The Observatory, 29 (1906), p. 179-181. « Greenwich in Danger » [Interview], The Daily News, 1 June 1906, p. 8. « Systematic Motions of the Stars », MNRAS, 67/1 (1906), p. 34-63. Abridged version: « The Double Drift Theory of Star Motions », Nature, 76 (1907), p. 248-250. « The “Double Drift” Theory of Star Motions », Nature, 76 (1907), p. 293-294. « On the Errors of a Photographed Réseau » [with W. H. M. CHRISTIE et C. DAVIDSON], MNRAS, 67/3 (1907), p. 175-184. « On the Mean Distances of the Groombridge Stars », MNRAS, 68/2 (1907), p. 104-109. « Notes on some Points connected with the Progress of Astronomy during the Past Year. Stellar Distributions », MNRAS, 68/4 (1908), p. 303-305. « On the Mathematical Theory of Two Star-drifts, and on the Systematic Motions of Zodiacal Stars », MNRAS, 68/8 (1908), p. 588-605. « On the Proper Motions of the Stars », The Observatory, 31 (1908), p. 119-122. « Aberration considered in relation to the two Star-Streams », MNRAS, 69/7 (1909), p. 571-573. « A Treatise on Spherical Astronomy. By Sir Robert Ball », Cambridge Review, 30 (1909), p. 198. 1 Contact : Dr Florian LAGUENS ([email protected]) 29 May 2019 version « Cours d’Astronomie. By H. Andoyer. Second part », Nature, 79 (1909), p. 395. « Groningen Publications », The Observatory, 32 (1909), p. 106-107. « Meeting of the British Association at Winnipeg », The Observatory, 32 (1909), p. 380-382. « Note by A. S. Eddington, B.A., M.Sc. », MNRAS, 70/1 (1909), p. 103-105. « Notes on some Points connected with the Progress of Astronomy during the Past Year. Stellar Distribution and Drift », MNRAS, 69/4 (1909), p. 313. « Notes on some Points connected with the Progress of Astronomy during the Past Year. Star Catalogue », MNRAS, 69/4 (1909), p. 303-305. « Note on the Major MacMahon’s paper “On the Determination of the apparent Diameter of a fixed Star” », MNRAS, 69/3 (1909), p. 178-181. « On new Members of the System of the Stars β, γ, δ, ε, ζ Ursæ Majoris », The Observatory, 32 (1909), p. 411-412. Some Recent Results of Astronomical Research. Weekly evening meeting, Friday, March 26, 1909, London, Royal Institution of Great Britain, 1909. Reissued in B. LOVELL (ed.), Astronomy, vol. 2, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1970, p. 97-112. Extracts: « Light Pressure and Comets’ Tails », Scientific American Supplement, 68 (1909), p. 411. « The Envelopes of Comet Morehouse (1908 c) », MNRAS, 70/5 (1910), p. 442-458. « Halley’s Observations on Halley’s Comet, 1682 », Nature, 83 (1910), p. 372-373. « The Law of Distribution of Stellar Motions », in BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, Report of the seventy-ninth meeting. Winnipeg 1909, August 25- September 1, London, John Murray, 1910, p. 402. « Lord Kelvin », The British Friend, 19/5 (1910), p. 121-122. « Note on a Moving Cluster of Stars of the Orion type in Perseus », MNRAS, 71/1 (1910), p. 43-44. « On the Improbability of a Random Distribution of Stars in Space », The Observatory, 33 (1910), p. 294-295. « Star Streams », Scientia, 8 (1910), p. 30-40. « The Systematic Motions of the Stars of Professor Boss’s “Preliminary General Catalogue” », MNRAS, 71/1 (1910), p. 4-43. « Discussion of the Greenwich Reflex Zenith-Tube Observations 1906-1909 », MNRAS, 71/7 (1911), p. 541-549. « Nebula », in The Encyclopædia Britannica. A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information, Eleventh edition, vol. 19: Mun to Oddfellows, New York, The Encyclopædia Britannica Company, 1911, p. 332-333. 2 « Notes on the Use of the Portable Reversible Transit Instrument and the Method of Calculation of the Observations. By Captain C.E. Monro », Nature, 87 (1911), p. 75. « Star », in The Encyclopædia Britannica. A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information, Eleventh edition, vol. 25: Shuvalov to Subliminal Self, Cambridge, CUP, 1911, p. 784-793. « A Determination of the Frequency-law of Stellar Motions », MNRAS, 72/5 (1912), p. 368-386. « Notes on some Points connected with the Progress of Astronomy during the Past Year. Stellar Distribution and Drift », MNRAS, 72/4 (1912), p. 316-319. « Stellar Distribution and Movements », in BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, Report of the eightieth meeting. Portsmouth 1911, August 31-September 7, London, John Murray, 1912, p. 246-260. Oral communication transcribed in Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal, 92 (1911), p. 381; American Supplement, 72 (1911), p. 306. Abridged version in The Observatory, 34 (1911), p. 355-359. « The Total Solar Eclipse of October 10 », The Observatory, 35 (1912), p. 328-330. « Determination of the Angular Diameters of Stars », The Observatory, 36 (1913), p. 71-72. « The Distribution of the Stars in relation to Spectral Type », Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 17/4 (1913), p. 351. « The Distributions in Space of the Bright Stars », MNRAS, 73/5 (1913), p. 346-358. « The Dynamics of a Globular Stellar System », MNRAS, 74/1 (1913), p. 5-16. « The Greenwich Eclipse Expedition to Brazil », The Observatory, 36 (1913), p. 62-65. « Jules Henri Poincaré », MNRAS, 73/4 (1913), p. 223-228. « Lehrbuch der sphärischen Astronomie. By Dr. L. de Ball », Nature, 91 (1913), p. 655-656. « Notes on some Points connected with the Progress of Astronomy during the Past Year. Stellar Distribution and Drift », MNRAS, 73/4 (1913), p. 286-291. « On a Formula for Correcting Statistics for the Effects of a Known Probable Error of Observation », MNRAS, 73/5 (1913), p. 359-360. « Preliminary Results of Observations made with the Cookson Floating Zenith-Telescope at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich », MNRAS, 73/8 (1913), p. 605-616. « Some Problems of Astronomy. III. The Distribution of Cometary Orbits », The Observatory, 36 (1913), p. 142-146. « Some Problems of Astronomy. XII. The Distribution of the Spectral Classes of the Stars », The Observatory, 36 (1913), p. 467-471. 3 « Total Eclipse of the Sun, 1912 October 10. Report on an Expedition to Passa Quatro, Minas Geraes, Brazil » [with C. DAVIDSON], MNRAS, 73/5 (1913), p. 386-390. « Tracks of the Sun and Stars, A.D. 1900 to A.D. 37900. By Thomas Edward Heath », Nature, 91 (1913), p. 318. « Notes on some Points connected with the Recent Progress of Astronomy. Stellar Distribution and Drift », MNRAS, 74/4 (1914), p. 345-347. « Stellar Motions », The Observatory, 37 (1914), p. 132-135. Stellar Movements and the Structure of the Universe, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1914. « Tafeln für Sonner. Dr. Paul V. Neugebauer », The Classical Review, 28/5 (1914), p. 179. « A Determination of the Systematic Motions of the Stars from the Radial Velocities » [with W.E. HARTLEY], MNRAS, 75/7 (1915), p. 521-530. « The Dynamics of a Stellar System. Third Paper: Oblate and other Distributions » MNRAS, 76/1 (1915), p. 37-60. « A Mathematical Paradox », Nature, 95 (1915), p. 345. « The Movements of the Stars », Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, 48 (1915), p. 29-42. « The Relation between the Velocities of Stars and their Brightness », The Observatory, 38 (1915), p. 392-396. « Sir David Gill », MNRAS, 75/4 (1915), p. 236-247. « Some Problems of Astronomy. XIX. Gravitation », The Observatory, 38 (1915), p. 93-98. « The Stellar Universe as a Dynamical System », Scientia, 18 (1915), p. 285-296. « Sundmann’s Researches on the Problem of Three Bodies », The Observatory, 38 (1915), p. 429-432. « The Distribution of Stars in Globular Clusters », MNRAS, 76/7 (1916), p. 572-585. « The Future of International Science », The Observatory, 39 (1916), p. 270-272. « Georg Friedrich Julius Arthur Auwers », MNRAS, 76/4 (1916), p. 284-289. « Gravitation and the Principle of Relativity », Nature, 98 (1916), p. 328-330. Reissued as « Eddington on Einstein’s new theory », Nature, 278 (1979), p. 213-214. Introduction to H.W. UNTHANK, « A Determination of the Mean Parallax of Stars for different Magnitudes », MNRAS, 76/6 (1916), p. 529-538 [p. 529-531]. « Karl Schwarzschild », The Observatory, 39 (1916), p. 336-339. « The Kinetic Energy of a Star Cluster », MNRAS, 76/6 (1916), p. 525-528. « The Nature of Globular Clusters », The Observatory, 39 (1916), p. 513-514. 4 « On the Radiative Equilibrium of the Stars », MNRAS, 77/1 (1916), p. 16-35. « Astronomical Consequences of the Electrical Theory of Matter. Note on Sir Oliver Lodge’s Suggestions », Philosophical Magazine, 34 (1917), p. 163-167. « Astronomical Consequences of the Electrical Theory of Matter. Note on Sir Oliver Lodge’s Suggestions, II », Philosophical Magazine, 34 (1917), p. 321-327. « Derivation of Dr Cowell’s Integration Formula », The Observatory, 40 (1917), p. 374. « The Distances, Absolute Magnitudes, and Spectra of 734 Stars. Arranged for Use with Ordinary Star Maps by T.E. Heath », Nature, 100 (1917), p. 223. « Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation », MNRAS, 77/4 (1917), p. 377-382. « Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation », The Observatory, 40 (1917), p. 93-95. « Further Notes on the Radiative Equilibrium of the Stars », MNRAS, 77/8 (1917), p. 596-612. « Karl Schwarzschild », MNRAS, 77/4 (1917), p. 314-319. « The Motions of Spiral Nebulæ », MNRAS, 77/4 (1917), p. 375-377. « The Pulsation Theory of Cepheid Variables », The Observatory, 40 (1917), p. 290-293. « The Radiation of the Stars », Nature, 99 (1917), p. 308-310. Reissued in Scientific American Supplement, 84 (1917), p. 135. « The Radiation of the Stars », Nature, 99 (1917), p. 365.
Recommended publications
  • Scientific Contacts of Polish Physicists with Albert Einstein
    The Global and the Local: The History of Science and the Cultural Integration of Europe. nd Proceedings of the 2 ICESHS (Cracow, Poland, September 6–9, 2006) / Ed. by M. Kokowski. Bronisław Średniawa * Scientific contacts of Polish physicists with Albert Einstein Abstract Scientific relations of Polish physicists, living in Poland and on emigration,with Albert Einstein, in the first half of 20th century are presented. Two Polish physicists, J. Laub and L. Infeld, were Einstein’s collaborators. The exchange of letters between M. Smoluchowski and Einstein contributed essentially to the solution of the problem of density fluctuations. S Loria, J. Kowalski, W. Natanson, M. Wolfke and L. Silberstein led scientific discussions with Einstein. Marie Skłodowska-Curie collaborated with Einstein in the Commission of Intelectual Cooperation of the Ligue of Nations. Einstein proposed scientific collaboration to M. Mathisson, but because of the breakout of the 2nd World War and Mathisson’s death their collaboration could not be realised. Contacts of Polish physicists with Einstein contributed to the development of relativity in Poland. (1) Introduction Many Polish physicists of older generation, who were active in Polish universities and abroad before the First World War or in the interwar period, had personal contacts with Einstein or exchanged letters with him. Contacts of Polish physicists with Einstein certainly inspired some Polish theoreticians to scientific work in relativity. These contacts encouraged also Polish physicists to make effort in the domain of popularization of relativity and of the progress of physics in the twenties and thirties. We can therefore say that the contacts of Polish physicists with Einstein contributed to the development of theoretical physics in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy and the Physicists Preview
    L. Susan Stebbing Philosophy and the Physicists Preview il glifo ebooks ISBN: 9788897527466 First Edition: December 2018 (A) Copyright © il glifo, December 2018 www.ilglifo.it 1 Contents FOREWORD FROM THE EDITOR Note to the 2018 electronic edition PHILOSOPHY AND THE PHYSICISTS Original Title Page PREFACE NOTE PART I - THE ALARMING ASTRONOMERS Chapter I - The Common Reader and the Popularizing Scientist Chapter II - THE ESCAPE OF SIR JAMES JEANS PART II - THE PHYSICIST AND THE WORLD Chapter III - ‘FURNITURE OF THE EARTH’ Chapter IV - ‘THE SYMBOLIC WORLD OF PHYSICS’ Chapter V - THE DESCENT TO THE INSCRUTABLE Chapter VI - CONSEQUENCES OF SCRUTINIZING THE INSCRUTABLE PART III - CAUSALITY AND HUMAN FREEDOM Chapter VII - THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY NIGHTMARE Chapter VIII - THE REJECTION OF PHYSICAL DETERMINISM Chapter IX - REACTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES Chapter X - HUMAN FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY PART IV - THE CHANGED OUTLOOK Chapter XI - ENTROPY AND BECOMING Chapter XII - INTERPRETATIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX BACK COVER Susan Stebbing 2 Foreword from the Editor In 1937 Susan Stebbing published Philosophy and the Physicists , an intense and difficult essay, in reaction to reading the works written for the general public by two physicists then at the center of attention in England and the world, James Jeans (1877-1946) and Arthur Eddington (1882- 1944). The latter, as is known, in 1919 had announced to the Royal Society the astronomical observations that were then considered experimental confirmations of the general relativity of Einstein, and who by that episode had managed to trigger the transformation of general relativity into a component of the mass and non-mass imaginary of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Helium Mrs. Ahng the Second Lightest Element on Earth, Helium Is One Of
    Helium Mrs. Ahng The second lightest element on Earth, Helium is one of the most important elements in our universe. It is the reason that we have sunlight, it makes balloons float, and used to cool down nuclear reactors. Although it is a simple noble gas with only two protons and two electrons, it is a powerful and essential resource. Discovered in1868 by astronomer Pierre Janssen while studying a solar eclipse; he noticed a yellow line around sun that had a wavelength that he had not seen before. English Astronomer Sir Norman Lockyer later named the element after the Greek word “Helios”, making the connection to how it was discovered. Helium only makes ups less than 1% of Earth’s atmosphere because of how light it is. It’s atomic mass is only 4.003, so the surrounding air is heavier than helium. An example of the difference in mass can be seen when comparing a helium filled balloon to a balloon filled with a mixture of atmospheric gases. The mass of the mixture is much heavier, and therefore is more effected by gravitational pull. Helium is found mostly in space in the core of stars, but it was also found on Earth in 1895 trapped underground. Scientists believe that the Helium that we harvest today was created during the creation of the universe, or the “Big Bang”. Only two electrons energize one orbital for this element, giving us the popular image for all atoms. With the outer orbital shell full, the element is referred to as inert and nonreactive.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0906.0144V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 31 May 2009 Event
    Solar physics at the Kodaikanal Observatory: A Historical Perspective S. S. Hasan, D.C.V. Mallik, S. P. Bagare & S. P. Rajaguru Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India 1 Background The Kodaikanal Observatory traces its origins to the East India Company which started an observatory in Madras \for promoting the knowledge of as- tronomy, geography and navigation in India". Observations began in 1787 at the initiative of William Petrie, an officer of the Company, with the use of two 3-in achromatic telescopes, two astronomical clocks with compound penduumns and a transit instrument. By the early 19th century the Madras Observatory had already established a reputation as a leading astronomical centre devoted to work on the fundamental positions of stars, and a principal source of stellar positions for most of the southern hemisphere stars. John Goldingham (1796 - 1805, 1812 - 1830), T. G. Taylor (1830 - 1848), W. S. Jacob (1849 - 1858) and Norman R. Pogson (1861 - 1891) were successive Government Astronomers who led the activities in Madras. Scientific high- lights of the work included a catalogue of 11,000 southern stars produced by the Madras Observatory in 1844 under Taylor's direction using the new 5-ft transit instrument. The observatory had recently acquired a transit circle by Troughton and Simms which was mounted and ready for use in 1862. Norman Pogson, a well known astronomer whose name is associated with the modern definition of the magnitude scale and who had considerable experience with transit instruments in England, put this instrument to good use. With the help of his Indian assistants, Pogson measured accurate positions of about 50,000 stars from 1861 until his death in 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Study on “The Black Hole”
    IJIRST –International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology| Volume 2 | Issue 10 | March 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 Review Study on “The Black Hole” Syed G. Ibrahim Department of Engineering Physics (Nanostructured Thin Film Materials Laboratory) Prof. Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Badnera 444701, Maharashtra, India Abstract As a star grows old, swells, then collapses on itself, often you will hear the word “black hole” thrown around. The black hole is a gravitationally collapsed mass, from which no light, matter, or signal of any kind can escape. These exotic objects have captured our imagination ever since they were predicted by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity in 1915. So what exactly is a black hole? A black hole is what remains when a massive star dies. Not every star will become a black hole, only a select few with extremely large masses. In order to have the ability to become a black hole, a star will have to have about 20 times the mass of our Sun. No known process currently active in the universe can form black holes of less than stellar mass. This is because all present black hole formation is through gravitational collapse, and the smallest mass which can collapse to form a black hole produces a hole approximately 1.5-3.0 times the mass of the sun .Smaller masses collapse to form white dwarf stars or neutron stars. Keywords: Escape Velocity, Horizon, Schwarzschild Radius, Black Hole _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION Soon after Albert Einstein formulated theory of relativity, it was realized that his equations have solutions in closed form.
    [Show full text]
  • Assaj V2 N4 1930-Jan
    ijtlJt Journal {If tl]t J\.strauamital ~ add!,! af ~ autb J\.frita. Vol. II. JANUARY, 1930. No.4. Astronomical Society of South Africa~ "' AT HOME" TO VISITING ASTRONOMERS OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION. July 26, 1929, will long be remembered in the annals of the Astronomical Society of South Africa, for on the evening of that day it was "At Home" at the Oddfellows' Hall, Plein Street, Cape Town, to the visiting astronomers who were attending the meetings of the British Association. The chair was taken by Mr. A. W. Long, President of the Society, who, in opening the proceedings, said: This gathering of the Astronomical Society of South Africa has been arranged to enable the members to greet the distinguished astronomers and other eminent scien­ tists interested in astronomy who are visiting South Africa in connection with the meetings of the British Association. We have with us to-night Sir Frank Dyson, the Astronomer Royal; Professor Eddington, Director of the Cambridge University Observatory; Professor Fowl~r, Yarrow Research Professor of the Royal Society; Pro­ fessor Chapman, of the Imperial College of Science; Professor De Sitter, Director of the Leiden Observatory; Dr. Guthnick, Director of the Berlin-Babelsberg Obser­ vatory; Dr. K110x-Shaw, Director of the Radcliffe Observatory; Mr. Greaves, of the Greenwich Observa­ tory; Mr. Wrigley, of the Edinburgh Observatory; Dr. Aston, of Cambridge, and I am pleased to say that at a later stage Lord Rayleigh will also be here. In the name of the Society I extend to these gentlemen a very hearty welcome. We have been familiar with them for a very long time by name, and through their scientific attainments; now we are delighted to have the honour of meeting them in person.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part Two ISBN 0 902198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART II K-Z C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Worshipful Company of Clockmakers Past Masters Since 1631
    The Worshipful Company of Clockmakers Past Masters since 1631 1631 David Ramsey (named in the Charter) 1700 Charles Gretton 1800 Matthew Dutton 1632 David Ramsey (sworn 22nd October) 1701 William Speakman 1801 William Plumley 1633 David Ramsey, represented by his Deputy, Henry Archer 1702 Joseph Windmills 1802 Edward Gibson 1634 Sampson Shelton 1703 Thomas Tompion 1803 Timothy Chisman 1635 John Willow 1704 Robert Webster 1804 William Pearce 1636 Elias Allen 1705 Benjamin Graves 1805 William Robins 1638 John Smith 1706 John Finch 1806 Francis S Perigal Jnr 1639 Sampson Shelton 1707 John Pepys 1807 Samuel Taylor 1640 John Charleton 1708 Daniel Quare 1808 Thomas Dolley 1641 John Harris 1709 George Etherington 1809 William Robson 1642 Richard Masterson 1710 Thomas Taylor 1810 Paul Philip Barraud 1643 John Harris 1711 Thomas Gibbs 1811 Paul Philip Barraud 1644 John Harris 1712 John Shaw 1812 Harry Potter (died) 1645 Edward East 1713 Sir George Mettins (Lord Mayor 1724–1725) 1813 Isaac Rogers 1646 Simon Hackett 1714 John Barrow 1814 William Robins 1647 Simon Hackett 1715 Thomas Feilder 1815 John Thwaites 1648 Robert Grinkin 1716 William Jaques 1816 William Robson 1649 Robert Grinkin 1717 Nathaniel Chamberlain 1817 John Roger Arnold 1650 Simon Bartram 1718 Thomas Windmills 1818 William Robson 1651 Simon Bartram 1719 Edward Crouch 1819 John Thwaites 1652 Edward East 1720 James Markwick 1820 John Thwaites 1653 John Nicasius 1721 Martin Jackson 1821 Benjamin Lewis Vulliamy 1654 Robert Grinkin 1722 George Graham 1822 John Jackson Jnr 1655 John Nicasius
    [Show full text]
  • The 29 of May Or Sir Arthur and The
    International Journal of Management and Applied Science, ISSN: 2394-7926 Volume-4, Issue-4, Apr.-2018 http://iraj.in THE 29TH OF MAY OR SIR ARTHUR AND THE BENDING LIGHT (TEACHING SCIENCE AND LITERATURE JOINTLY) MICHAEL KATZ Faculty of Education, Haifa University, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel E-mail: [email protected] Abstract - In this paper I present an instance illustrating a program of joint teaching of science and literature. The instance sketched here rests on recognition that at the age when children read books like Kästner's "The 35th of May" they can already taste notions of Relativity Theory through the story of Eddington's expedition to Principe Island. Eddington's story is briefly recounted here with references to Kästner's book. The relationships thus exhibited between science and fiction, fantasy and reality, theory and actuality, humor and earnestness, should help evoke school age children's interest in science and literature at early stages in their studies' endeavor. Keywords - Bending Light, Fantasy, Gravitation, Relativity, Science and Literature. I. INTRODUCTION South Seas" – a story of adventure and humor by Erich Kästner, the well known German author of The idea that teaching science and humanities in more than a few dearly loved novels, mostly for primary and secondary schools needn't necessarily be children and adolescents. The book was first seen as disjoint objectives is prevalent in the thought published in German in 1931 and in English shortly and practice of more than a few scholars and teachers after. in recent years. Carole Cox [1], for example, unfolds forty strategies of literature based teaching of various Twelve years earlier, in 1919, another journey topics in arts and sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Gravitational Wave Science: 100 Years of Development of Mathematical Theory, Detectors, Numerical Algorithms, and Data Analysis Tools
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, Number 4, October 2016, Pages 513–554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1544 Article electronically published on August 2, 2016 THE EMERGENCE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SCIENCE: 100 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL THEORY, DETECTORS, NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, AND DATA ANALYSIS TOOLS MICHAEL HOLST, OLIVIER SARBACH, MANUEL TIGLIO, AND MICHELE VALLISNERI In memory of Sergio Dain Abstract. On September 14, 2015, the newly upgraded Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) recorded a loud gravitational-wave (GW) signal, emitted a billion light-years away by a coalescing binary of two stellar-mass black holes. The detection was announced in February 2016, in time for the hundredth anniversary of Einstein’s prediction of GWs within the theory of general relativity (GR). The signal represents the first direct detec- tion of GWs, the first observation of a black-hole binary, and the first test of GR in its strong-field, high-velocity, nonlinear regime. In the remainder of its first observing run, LIGO observed two more signals from black-hole bina- ries, one moderately loud, another at the boundary of statistical significance. The detections mark the end of a decades-long quest and the beginning of GW astronomy: finally, we are able to probe the unseen, electromagnetically dark Universe by listening to it. In this article, we present a short historical overview of GW science: this young discipline combines GR, arguably the crowning achievement of classical physics, with record-setting, ultra-low-noise laser interferometry, and with some of the most powerful developments in the theory of differential geometry, partial differential equations, high-performance computation, numerical analysis, signal processing, statistical inference, and data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article (Pdf)
    244 Trimble, JAAVSO Volume 43, 2015 As International as They Would Let Us Be Virginia Trimble Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575; [email protected] Received July 15, 2015; accepted August 28, 2015 Abstract Astronomy has always crossed borders, continents, and oceans. AAVSO itself has roughly half its membership residing outside the USA. In this excessively long paper, I look briefly at ancient and medieval beginnings and more extensively at the 18th and 19th centuries, plunge into the tragedies associated with World War I, and then try to say something relatively cheerful about subsequent events. Most of the people mentioned here you will have heard of before (Eratosthenes, Copernicus, Kepler, Olbers, Lockyer, Eddington…), others, just as important, perhaps not (von Zach, Gould, Argelander, Freundlich…). Division into heroes and villains is neither necessary nor possible, though some of the stories are tragic. In the end, all one can really say about astronomers’ efforts to keep open channels of communication that others wanted to choke off is, “the best we can do is the best we can do.” 1. Introduction astronomy (though some of the practitioners were actually Christian and Jewish) coincided with the largest extents of Astronomy has always been among the most international of regions governed by caliphates and other Moslem empire-like sciences. Some of the reasons are obvious. You cannot observe structures. In addition, Arabic astronomy also drew on earlier the whole sky continuously from any one place. Attempts to Greek, Persian, and Indian writings. measure geocentric parallax and to observe solar eclipses have In contrast, the Europe of the 16th century, across which required going to the ends (or anyhow the middles) of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Theory of Gravity Doesn't Predict a Big Bang 12 July 2010, by Lisa Zyga
    Revised theory of gravity doesn't predict a Big Bang 12 July 2010, By Lisa Zyga decades he became more interested in finding a theory to unify gravity and quantum mechanics - a task that is still being studied today. In 1924, Eddington proposed a new “gravitational action” as an alternative to the Einstein-Hilbert action, which could serve as an alternative starting point to general relativity. In astrophysics, a gravitational action is the mechanism that describes how gravity can emerge from space-time being curved by matter and energy. However, Eddington’s theory of gravity only worked for empty space and didn’t Illustration: Time Line of the Universe Credit: include any source of energy such as matter, NASA/WMAP making it an incomplete theory. Since Eddington’s proposal, scientists have attempted various ways of including matter into the (PhysOrg.com) -- The Big Bang theory has formed theory, although they have run into problems. In the basis of our understanding of the universe's this study, Banados and Ferreira have tried a new origins since it was first proposed in 1927 by way to extend the theory to include matter by using Georges Lemaitre. And for good reason: the theory a gravitational action called the Born-Infeld action. is supported by scientists' latest observations and experiments, and is based on Einstein's widely In their analysis, the scientists found that a key accepted theory of general relativity. But scientists characteristic of Eddington’s revised theory of are always on the lookout for any evidence that gravity is that it reproduces Einstein gravity might suggest an alternative to the Big Bang.
    [Show full text]