“Acting Black:” How African-American Policy Debaters Negotiate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Acting Black:” How African-American Policy Debaters Negotiate THE HARSH REALITIES OF “ACTING BLACK”: HOW AFRICAN-AMERICAN POLICY DEBATERS NEGOTIATE REPRESENTATION THROUGH RACIAL PERFORMANCE AND STYLE by SHANARA ROSE REID-BRINKLEY (Under the Direction of CHRISTINE HAROLD) ABSTRACT Public discourse about education reform, particularly that which revolves around the black/white achievement gap, requires the use of race, class, and gender imagery that is intelligible to the general public. This project interrogates the use of social stereotypes in the news media and educational contexts and the resistance to such stereotypes by black youths. To investigate the relationship between racial stereotyping, representation, and identity performance, I utilize ideological criticism as the rhetorical method. I have chosen academic debate, at the high school and college level, as a localized example of social stereotyping in educational contexts. Current efforts within the policy debate community to increase diversity and inclusion offers an opportunity to study the rhetorical strategies engaged in by varying social actors in an educational context. I conclude that negative social stereotyping is embedded in reform efforts targeted at black youths, and that these same students develop diverse methods of performance, specifically through the use of black cultural styles, to combat such stereotyping. INDEX WORDS: Race, Representation, Performance, Academic Debate, Resistance, News Media, Rap Music, Acting White THE HARSH REALITIES OF “ACTING BLACK”: HOW AFRICAN-AMERICAN POLICY DEBATERS NEGOTIATE REPRESENTATION THROUGH RACIAL PERFORMANCE AND STYLE by SHANARA ROSE REID-BRINKLEY BA, Emory University, 2001 MA, University of Alabama, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILIOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2008 © 2008 Shanara Rose Reid-Brinkley All Rights Reserved THE HARSH REALITIES OF “ACTING BLACK”: HOW AFRICAN-AMERICAN POLICY DEBATERS NEGOTIATE REPRESENTATION THROUGH RACIAL PERFORMANCE AND STYLE by SHANARA ROSE REID-BRINKLEY Major Professor: Christine Harold Committee: Celeste Condit Tina Harris Kevin Deluca Ed Panetta Ede Warner Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been fortunate to have numerous mentors over the course of my educational career whose support has been critical to my intellectual development. Thus, I would like to thank Larry E. Moss, Melissa Wade, Will Baker, Bill Newnam, Everett Wilson, the Omicron Xi Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta, Inc., the faculty and staff at D. M. Therrell High School, and the Emory University debate team. I also thank, Marsha Houston, Dexter Gordon, Jerry Rozick, and Karma Chavez. I would like to thank Christine Harold for serving as my graduate adviser. Her help was integral to the development of this project. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee, Celeste Condit, Kevin Deluca, Tina Harris, Ede Warner, and Ed Panetta. I thank my graduate school classmates for their thoughtful engagement with my scholarship. A special thanks to the RWG membership, Dylan Wolfe, Kristy Maddux, Davi Johnson, Shannon Holland, and Jarrod Atchison. I would like to especially thank Judy Butler for her comments on earlier drafts of this project. I thank the DAWG writing group, especially Gordon Mitchell, for their comments on portions of this draft. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1 Representation and the Performance of Blackness: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Black “Underachievement”.......................................................................................1 “Acting White,” Representation and Performance: The Rise of Cultural Explanations of Black Underachievement ..........................................................9 Methodology: Power, Ideology, and Domination...................................................18 2 Redeeming Inner-City Youths: Media Representations of the Urban Debate League .................................................................................................................................25 The Urban Debate League Movement ....................................................................26 Race, Representation, and the News Media............................................................30 Scapegoating and Redemption: Framing Race, Class, and Gender in News Coverage of Urban Debate Leagues..................................................................35 Urban Debate Leagues Go Primetime: Scripting Racial Others.............................52 Conclusions.............................................................................................................60 3 The Rhetoric of Contemporary Black Social Protest: The Louisville Project and the Rhetoric of Confrontation.......................................................................................63 The Louisville Project: Rhetoric of a Social Protest Movement.............................73 v Signifying’ on Traditional Policy Debate: The use of African American Rhetorical Practices to Confront Social Normativity .........................................................79 Racial Performativity and Rhetorical Violations of Genre .....................................94 Conclusions...........................................................................................................123 4 Negotiating Contemporary Black Social Protest: The Community Responds ..........127 Goals vs. Methods: The Benevolence of the Rhetorical Establishment................134 Confrontations and Coalitions...............................................................................137 Rhetoric of Victimization......................................................................................143 Personalizing Debate.............................................................................................145 Conclusions...........................................................................................................149 5 Race, Education, and Performance: Some Concluding Thoughts .............................151 6 Conclusion.................................................................................................................162 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................201 vi Chapter One Representation and the Performance of Blackness: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Black “Underachievement” Ladies and gentleman, these people set – they opened the doors, they gave us the right, and today, ladies and gentleman, in our cities and public schools we have 50% drop out. In our own neighborhood, we have men in prison…The lower economic and lower middle economic people are not holding their end in this deal. In the neighborhood that most of us grew up in, parenting is not going on. In the old days, you couldn’t hooky school because every drawn shade was an eye. And before your mother got off the bus and to the house, she knew exactly where you had gone, who had gone into the house, and where you got on whatever you had on and where you got it from. Parents don’t know that today. Bill Cosby “Poundcake” (2003) As we near the end of the first decade of the 21st Century, American education is undergoing decisive changes. As other nations around the world have strengthened the public education offered to their youths, Western nations, including the United States and Great Britain, are experiencing a sharp decline in the effectiveness of their public education systems.1 Significantly, it is the persistent framing of poor and minority populations as most productive of this decline that seems to drive such feelings of discontent. For as we are told over and over again by the news media, political pundits, candidates, politicians, and experts, to be poor and of color in the United States exponentially increases one’s chances of failing within the public education system. Images of young, black and Hispanic youths in failing inner city schools resound through the American social imagination. And, these youths become representative of a “lost generation,” defying all social and institutional attempts at saving them. Bill Cosby’s 2003 “Poundcake” speech, from which I quote at the beginning of this chapter, is one such example of the rhetoric of educational failure that surrounds economically disenfranchised youths of color. 1 Delivered on the anniversary of the 1954 Brown vs. the Topeka, Kansas Board of Education Supreme Court decision, Cosby’s speech has had resounding consequences for the contemporary representation of black youths.2 Cosby’s remarks produced a maelstrom within the news media, creating a public frenzy around the issue. Cosby was interviewed, and re-interviewed. Important black public intellectuals like Cornel West and Michael Eric Dyson weighed in on the issue. Suffice it to say, everyone had an opinion. As you read the excerpt from Cosby that opens this chapter, it is important to note that he never mentions race, although blackness clearly haunts the address. One envisions the “kind” of people Cosby’s rhetoric represents through the use of rhetorical tropes like “prison” and bad parenting which signify upon images of young, poor Blacks. The audience for Cosby’s remarks is racially mixed, and news accounts of the speech note laughter and applause
Recommended publications
  • Debate Tips & Tricks
    Debate Tips & Tricks – Rhode Island Urban Debate League 2019/02/14 623 Home About Us ∠ For Debaters & Coaches ∠ News & Events ∠ Join the Movement Debate Tips & Tricks Partners & Partner Supporters: Schools: Alvarez Central Click Here to download Debate 101: This is a helpful guide to Policy Debate written by Bill & Will Smelko detailing everything 3 you need to know from Rudiments of Rhetoric to Debate Theory. E 5 tips to help you win Juanita every debate round: Sanchez 1. Think as if you were your judge, not yourself. Remember, the only person whose opinion matters at Mount the end of the round is the judge’s, not yours! A Pleasant common mistake everyone in public speaking makes is assuming that because you understand the argument that your audience does as well. Take into account the Paul Cuffee judge’s debate experience before using a lot of debate http://www.riudl.org/debate-tips-tricks/ Page 1 of 4 Debate Tips & Tricks – Rhode Island Urban Debate League 2019/02/14 623 lingo, and make sure you look up at your judge while making a key point. This will both reinforce your argument because of the eye contact you will make, and it will allow you to look for signals from the judge (ie, Woonsocket shaking her head) that she understands you. 2. Always think comparatively. Every argument that you make, at the end of the round, will be compared against something the other team said. If you’re affirmative, for example, you should always be thinking in the mindset of “how does my plan compare to the status quo?” [i.e., doing nothing, what the negative frequently advocates].
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh University's Project Impact: an Environmental Management Case Study
    The Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Funded by the U.S. Department of Education, with supplemental funding from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Reprinted from Journal of Drug Education and Awareness, 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 59-75, with permission of Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 400 Oser Avenue, Suite 1600, Hauppauge, NY 11788. Tel: 631- 231-7269; Fax: 631-231-8175; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; Web: www.novapublishers.com. Reprinted by the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention • (800) 676-1730 • www.higheredcenter.org 60 John W. Smeaton, Madalyn C. Eadline, Brenda Egolf and William DeJong LEHIGH UNIVERSITY'S PROJECT IMPACT: AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY High-risk drinking has been a long-standing problem on U.S. college campuses. According to national surveys of college students conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health, approximately 44% of college students engage in heavy, episodic drinking, which is defined for males as five or more drinks in a row within a two-week period, and as four or more drinks for females. 1, 2 About half of these heavy drinkers, or about one in five students overall, can be classified as frequent heavy drinkers, meaning that they drink at this level three or more times during a two-week period. These drinkers account for approximately 68% of all alcohol consumption by U.S. college students. 3 Progress in reducing heavy, episodic drinking among college students has been slow. One positive note is an increase in the percentage of students who abstain from drinking.
    [Show full text]
  • CX Firm Foundation I
    Stefanie Rodarte-Suto Canyon High School [email protected] §Policy Debate: US policy at home and abroad is the central issue of the topic/resolution. Debaters role play by acting as a policy maker, playing out possible scenarios. Evidence driven §CX Debate: Cross-Examination Debate §Team Debate: Two members constitute a team; Two teams of Two constitute a debate § “At the beginning, though, it is important to understand that, whatever else debate is, it is a game. It has teams, points, winners, losers, tournaments, and trophies. Like many games, it is not always fair (even though we try hard to make it fair). Most importantly, debate is supposed to be fun.” - Dr. Joe Bellon, Director of Debate Georgia State University 2006 § Just like any game, there are rules and a basic structure to learn and understand. Constructives § 8 min. 1st Affirmative Constructive (1AC) § 3 min. CX by 2nd Negative § 8 min. 1st Negative Constructive (1NC) § 3 min. CX by 1st Affirmative § 8 min. 2nd Affirmative Constructive (2AC) § 3 min. CX by 1st Negative § 8 min. 2nd Negative Constructive (2NC) § 3 min. CX by 2nd Affirmative Rebuttals § 5 min. 1st Negative Rebuttal (1NR) § 5 min. 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR) § 5 min. 2nd Negative Rebuttal (2NR) § 5 min. 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR) *8 minutes of prep time for each team §Resolution § Topic to be debated- Selected each year by a national vote § Debated across the US throughout the academic year § Wording is important: Each word has meaning (Topicality) Providing boundaries for each team § 2017-2018 Resolution: Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its funding and/or regulation of elementary and/or secondary education in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Siriusxm-Schedule.Pdf
    on SCHEDULE - Eastern Standard Time - Effective: Sept. 6/2021 ET Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Saturday Sunday ATL ET CEN MTN PAC NEWS NEWS NEWS 6:00 7:00 6:00 5:00 4:00 3:00 Rewind The Doc Project The Next Chapter NEWS NEWS NEWS 7:00 8:00 7:00 6:00 5:00 4:00 Quirks & The Next Now or Spark Unreserved Play Me Day 6 Quarks Chapter Never NEWS What on The Cost of White Coat NEWS World 9:00 8:00 7:00 6:00 5:00 8:00 Pop Chat WireTap Earth Living Black Art Report Writers & Company The House 8:37 NEWS World 10:00 9:00 8:00 7:00 6:00 9:00 World Report The Current Report The House The Sunday Magazine 10:00 NEWS NEWS NEWS 11:00 10:00 9:00 8:00 7:00 Day 6 q NEWS NEWS NEWS 12:00 11:00 10:00 9:00 8:00 11:00 Because News The Doc Project Because The Cost of What on Front The Pop Chat News Living Earth Burner Debaters NEWS NEWS NEWS 1:00 12:00 The Cost of Living 12:00 11:00 10:00 9:00 Rewind Quirks & Quarks What on Earth NEWS NEWS NEWS 1:00 Pop Chat White Coat Black Art 2:00 1:00 12:00 11:00 10:00 The Next Quirks & Unreserved Tapestry Spark Chapter Quarks Laugh Out Loud The Debaters NEWS NEWS NEWS 2:00 Ideas in 3:00 2:00 1:00 12:00 11:00 Podcast Now or CBC the Spark Now or Never Tapestry Playlist Never Music Live Afternoon NEWS NEWS NEWS 3:00 CBC 4:00 3:00 2:00 1:00 12:00 Writers & The Story Marvin's Reclaimed Music The Next Chapter Writers & Company Company From Here Room Top 20 World This Hr The Cost of Because What on Under the NEWS NEWS 4:00 WireTap 5:00 4:00 3:00 2:00 1:00 Living News Earth Influence Unreserved Cross Country Check- NEWS NEWS Up 5:00 The Current
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Abuse of Risk Analysis in Policy Debate
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 354 559 CS 508 069 AUTHOR Herbeck, Dale A.; Katsulas, John P. TITLE The Use and Abuse of Risk Analysis in Policy Debate. PUB DATE Oct 92 NOTE 16p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (78th, Chicago, IL, October 29-November 1, 1992). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.)(120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Debate; Debate Format; Higher Education; *Probability; Rhetorical Criticism; *Risk IDENTIFIERS *Policy Debate; Rhetorical Strategies; *Risk Assessment ABSTRACT The best check on the preposterous claims of crisis rhetoric is an appreciation of the nature of risk analysis and how it functions in argumentation. The use of risk analysis is common in policy debate. While the stock issues paradigm focused the debate exclusively on the affirmative case, the advent of policy systems analysis has transformed debate into an w,aluation of competing policy systems. Unfortunately, the illusion of objectivity masks several serious problems with risk analysis as it is presently used in academic debate. Risk analysis artificially assigns probability to arguments and overvalues arguments with large impacts. Four suggestions can dramatically improve the use of risk analysis in policy debate:(1) some risks are so trivial that they are not meaningful;(2) the increment of risk must be considered; (3) debaters must not become enslaved to large impacts; and (4) debaters must rehabilitate the importance of uniqueness arguments in debate. (Twenty-one notes are included.) (RS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Paying Attention to Public Readers of Canadian Literature
    PAYING ATTENTION TO PUBLIC READERS OF CANADIAN LITERATURE: POPULAR GENRE SYSTEMS, PUBLICS, AND CANONS by KATHRYN GRAFTON BA, The University of British Columbia, 1992 MPhil, University of Stirling, 1994 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (English) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2010 © Kathryn Grafton, 2010 ABSTRACT Paying Attention to Public Readers of Canadian Literature examines contemporary moments when Canadian literature has been canonized in the context of popular reading programs. I investigate the canonical agency of public readers who participate in these programs: readers acting in a non-professional capacity who speak and write publicly about their reading experiences. I argue that contemporary popular canons are discursive spaces whose constitution depends upon public readers. My work resists the common critique that these reading programs and their canons produce a mass of readers who read the same work at the same time in the same way. To demonstrate that public readers are canon-makers, I offer a genre approach to contemporary canons that draws upon literary and new rhetorical genre theory. I contend in Chapter One that canons are discursive spaces comprised of public literary texts and public texts about literature, including those produced by readers. I study the intertextual dynamics of canons through Michael Warner’s theory of publics and Anne Freadman’s concept of “uptake.” Canons arise from genre systems that are constituted to respond to exigencies readily recognized by many readers, motivating some to participate. I argue that public readers’ agency lies in the contingent ways they select and interpret a literary work while taking up and instantiating a canonizing genre.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Association & Debate Speech National ©
    © National SpeechDebate & Association DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko © NATIONAL SPEECH & DEBATE ASSOCIATION DEBATE 101: Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Copyright © 2013 by the National Speech & Debate Association All rights reserved. Published by National Speech & Debate Association 125 Watson Street, PO Box 38, Ripon, WI 54971-0038 USA Phone: (920) 748-6206 Fax: (920) 748-9478 [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, information storage and retrieval, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. The National Speech & Debate Association does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, gender identity, gender expression, affectional or sexual orientation, or disability in any of its policies, programs, and services. Printed and bound in the United States of America Contents Chapter 1: Debate Tournaments . .1 . Chapter 2: The Rudiments of Rhetoric . 5. Chapter 3: The Debate Process . .11 . Chapter 4: Debating, Negative Options and Approaches, or, THE BIG 6 . .13 . Chapter 5: Step By Step, Or, It’s My Turn & What Do I Do Now? . .41 . Chapter 6: Ten Helpful Little Hints . 63. Chapter 7: Public Speaking Made Easy .
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Parties Cooperate in Presidentialism?
    WHY DO PARTIES COOPERATE IN PRESIDENTIALISM? ELECTORAL AND GOVERNMENT COALITION FORMATION IN LATIN AMERICA ¿Por qué los partidos cooperan en sistemas presidenciales? Formación de coaliciones electorales y de gobierno en América Latina KENNETH BUNKER Universitá degli Studi di Milano [email protected] Cómo citar/Citation Bunker, K. (2019). Why do parties cooperate in presidentialism? Electoral and government coalition formation in Latin America. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 186, 171-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.186.06 Abstract The purpose of this article is to explore coalition formation in presidential sys- tems using evidence from Latin America. It puts forward three hypotheses based on formateur power, electoral structures and party systems to explore when and why electoral and government coalition formation occurs. It uses evidence stemming from eighteen democratic presidential regimes in Latin America from 1980 to 2010. It looks at 100 elections and 407 aggregate years of democratic government. It anal- yses data organized in a cross-sectional time-series fashion through a logit function with random effects and robust standard errors. It finds that in democracies with weak presidents, restrictive electoral rules and highly fragmented party systems, the president will seek the support of multiple parties. While the effective number of par- ties is the most important determinant, rules related to legislative elections are more important predictors of electoral coalitions, and those related to presidential elections are more important predictors of government coalitions. The findings in this article are important insofar as yielding critical insight into partisan strategies in both the run-up to elections and the maintenance of governments, as well as contributing to a general theory of coalition formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Debate Newsblast March 2007 Vol
    Urban Debate NewsBlast March 2007 Vol. II, No. 1 You are receiving this NewsBlast because you are a believer in and backer of urban debate and the National Association for Urban Debate Leagues. We thank you very much for that support. Through our NewsBlasts, we intend to keep you aware of the highlights of the work of the NAUDL, and of the state of urban debate in the U.S. The NAUDL upholds and advances the urban debate mission by building, institutionalizing, expanding, and connecting Urban Debate Leagues. Your support helps make it possible for us to serve thousands of urban youth across the country. We also would welcome and look forward to your feedback. Please email us at [email protected] or call (312-427-8101) with your views. The NAUDL Launches Three Year Expansion Plan with New UDLs and a National Championship Among Objectives Over the past several years the NAUDL has focused hard on its mission of increasing the number of urban students participating in debate programs. Its reach has effectively been restricted, however, by the organization’s limited “bandwith” – the fact that Executive Director Les Lynn, with some modest assistance from the board, part-time staff and volunteers, has essentially been working alone. The NAUDL has embraced an ambitious Expansion Plan that seeks dramatically to expand the organization’s bandwith over the next several years. Its goals include establishing seven new Leagues in seven major cities, institutionalizing an additional four existing leagues, developing debate-related curricula, and, beginning in May 2008, hosting a National Urban Debate Championship.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    BIG LEARNING IN SMALL COMMUNITIES: EXPLORING WITH YPAR IN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Lora Elaine Hawkins Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2021 Lora Hawkins All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT BIG LEARNING IN SMALL COMMUNITIES: EXPLORING WITH YPAR IN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Lora Hawkins This study is a critical evaluation conducted by a Youth-led Participatory Action research team that has, over the course of five years, sought to investigate culturally responsive pedagogies in international schools populated with Third Culture Kids. Previous to this work, the youth researchers and I developed an interdisciplinary, choice and project-based honors program which we called the Small Learning Community. As such, this program became the object of and context for this review. We were guided by the question, What are, if any, the perceived learning benefits for students in the Small Learning Community?, and we sought to critically evaluate the program’s perceived impact on meaningful learning experiences, student agency, and transference of skills. We leveraged constructivist-oriented Grounded Theory—in part because of the value this approach assigns to emic knowledge—to examine interview transcripts of SLC participants. I then developed case studies and argue for pedagogical shifts in the international classroom that center more deliberately on (1) active participation, (2) the perception of new, (3) choice, (4) attention to process, (5) personal interest, and (6) social emotional learning, while addressing the need for more intentional and systematic practitioner research. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Starter Packet SSRA Aff and Terrorism Disadvantage
    2015 Atlanta Urban Debate League Starter Evidence Packet (SSRA Affirmative and Terrorism Disadvantage) 2015 Starter Packet SSRA Aff and Terrorism Disadvantage Topic – Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. More resources at 1 2015 Atlanta Urban Debate League Starter Evidence Packet (SSRA Affirmative and Terrorism Disadvantage) Table of Contents ***How To***............................................................................................................................................. 4 What Is Policy Debate? ............................................................................................................................. 5 Speeches and Speech Order ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Constructive Speeches ....................................................................................................................... 7 The Rebuttal Speeches .............................................................................................................................. 9 How to write a block and why? .............................................................................................................. 12 Judge Adaptation ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Cutting Cards .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Participating in a Policy Debate Program and Academic Achievement Among At-Risk Adolescents in an Urban Public School District: 1997–2007
    Journal of Adolescence xxx (2012) 1–11 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Adolescence journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jado Participating in a policy debate program and academic achievement among at-risk adolescents in an urban public school district: 1997–2007 Susannah Anderson a, Briana Mezuk b,* a Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, USA b Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA abstract Keywords: This study investigates the relationship between participating in a high school debate Adolescent program on college-readiness in the Chicago Public School district over a 10-year period. Education At-risk school students were identified using an index including 8th grade achievement, Debate poverty status, and enrollment in special education. Regression analyses were used to Graduation assess the association between debate participation and graduation and ACT performance. At-risk Overall, debaters were 3.1 times more likely to graduate from high school (95% confidence interval: 2.7–3.5) than non-debaters, and more likely to reach the college-readiness benchmarks on the English, Reading, and Science portions of the ACT. This association was similar for both low-risk and at-risk students. Debate intensity was positively related to higher scores on all sections of the ACT. Findings indicate that debate participation is associated with improved academic performance for at-risk adolescents. Ó 2012 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction There are substantial disparities in educational attainment according to race, income, geography and ethnicity.
    [Show full text]