DOCSLIB.ORG

Council Letter Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Council Letter Template North Area Committee 4th February 2010 Application 09/02484/FUL & 09/02485/CAC Numbers: Decision Due by: 3rd March 2010 Proposal: 09/02484/FUL -Retention and refurbishment of facade to 123-125 Walton Street along with erection of 3-storey rear extension plus basement. Erection of 3-storey building including basement and part roof storey to replace 126-127 Walton Street and 32-32a Little Clarendon Street. Provision of 36 Student rooms and shared facilities across the upper floors. Provision of 3 new shop fronts to 123-125 Walton Street and provision of replacement retail units on ground floor to 126-127 Walton Street and 32-32a Little Clarendon Street. 09/02485/CAC-Demolition of 126-127 Walton Street and 32- 32a Little Clarendon Street. Part Demolition to the rear of 123-125 Walton Street. Site Address: 123 To 127 Walton Street And 32 And 32A Little Clarendon Street. (Appendix 1) Ward: North Ward Agent: Kemp And Kemp Property Applicant: Shirehall Properties Ltd Consultants Recommendation: i) North Area Committee are recommended to refuse both the applications for Planning Permission and Conservation Area Consent, for the following reasons: 09/02485/CAC. 1. 123 -125 and 127 Walton Street ,on a prominent corner site, serve as a reminder of the development of this suburb and through their qualities of age, form, style, materials and detailing individually and as a part of a group make a positive contribution to the special interest of the conservation area. Their loss would adversely affect the character and appearance of the conservation area contrary to national advice, and guidance in PPG15 . 2. Taking into account the contribution these buildings make to the character and appearance of the conservation area and having regard to the condition of the building and the merits of alternative proposals for the site the Council REPORT considers that demolition is not justified and the proposal is contrary to National advice and guidance in PPG15. 09/02484/FUL 1. The proposed building would result in the loss of existing buildings that contribute to the character and appearance of the conservation area and because of its scale, height , form, external appearance and use of materials and relationship to nearby properties would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area. As such the proposal would be contrary to policies CP1, CP7, CP8 and HE7 Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016. 2. The development proposes the loss of residential accommodation which would be contrary to Policy HS10 of the adopted Oxford Local Plan 2001- 2016. Main Local Plan Policies: Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 CP1 - Development Proposals CP2 - Planning Obligations CP3 - Limiting the Need to Travel CP5 - Mixed-Use Developments CP6 - Efficient Use of Land & Density CP7 - Urban Design CP8 - Design Develpmt to Relate to its Context CP9 - Creating Successful New Places CP10 - Siting Develpmnt to Meet Functionl Needs CP11 - Landscape Design CP12 - Designing out Crime CP13 - Accessibility CP15 - Energy Efficiency TR3 - Car Parking Standards TR4 - Pedestrian & Cycle Facilities NE10 - Sustainable Drainage NE14 - Water and Sewerage Infrastructure NE15 - Loss of Trees and Hedgerows HE2 - Archaeology HE7 - Conservation Areas HS14 - Speculative Student Accommodation HS19 - Privacy & Amenity HS20 - Local Residential Environment RC6 - Street Specific Controls RC13 - Shop Fronts Core Strategy – Proposed Changes CSP18 - Infrastructure & Developer contributions REPORT CSP14 - Supporting access to new development CSP32 - Retail CSP19 - Urban design townscape char & hist env CSP20 - Community safety CSP10 - Energy & natural resources CSP24 - Mix of housing CSP26 - Student accommodation Other Material Considerations: This application is in or affecting the Central Conservation Area. Planning Policy Guidance Note 15: Planning and the Historic Environment Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development Relevant Site History: 123 Walton Street. 50/01024/A_H-Alterations (Approved). 70/23002/A_H-Change of use from poodle parlour to coffee house (Approved) 72/25342/A_H-New shop front (Approved) 124 Walton Street. 63/14103/A_H-Alterations (Approved) 64/14931/A_H-Change of use of 1st and 2nd floors from residential to offices (Refused). 68/20325/A_H-Alterations to existing shop front (Refused) 74/00560/A_H-Change of use of ground floor from opticians to restaurant and alterations on first floor to provide cloakroom and kitchen (Refused) 74/00578/A_H-Change of use from opticians on the ground floor to retail use (Approved). 74/01159/A_H-Alterations to existing shop front (Approved) 83/00439/NFH-Change of use of ground floor and basement from retail shop to restaurant including new shop front. New stairs to rear basement and single storey and external flue. (Approved). 87/01030/VH-Change of use of ground floor & basement to restaurant without compliance with condition 3(a) & (b) of NFH/439/83 (restricting the use to the proprietor Mr F. Lee while in residence & to revert to retail use otherwise. (Approved). 90/00399/NFH-Single Storey rear extension (Approved). 125 Walton Street. 60/08949/A_H-Change of use of 1st and 2nd floor from residential to a showroom and offices (Approved). 61/10384/A_H -New shop front (Approved). 126 Walton Street. No planning history records available. 127 Walton Street. 60/09300/A_H-Extension to lavatory at the rear. (Approved) 60/09136/A_H-Change of use from shop and showrooms to launderette to offices REPORT with storage accommodation. (Approved) 78/00392/A_H-Change of use from launderette to restaurant. (Approved) 78/00926/A_H-Change of use of ground floor from launderette to retail shop (Approved). 82/00726/NFH-New shop window fronting Little Clarendon Street (Approved) 32 Little Clarendon Street. 58/06604/A_H- Demolition and rebuilding to provide three shops and form flats over (28-32 Walton Street) (Approved). 69/20809/A_H-Demolition of 4 shops and erection of new building including 3 shops, 2 floors of office accommodation and 4 flats (28-32 Walton Street) (Approved). Representations Received: Thirty–two letters of representation have been received from the occupiers of the following addresses: 6 Linton Road; 8 (x2), 12, 14, 32 and 45 Richmond Road; Wynniatts Cottage, Worcester; 4, 5, 6 & 7 Walton Crescent; 17 Chalfont Road; 11 St Bernard’s Road; 12 Bath Street; Worcester College; 7 Montague Road; 27 Little Clarendon Street; 22 & 33 Walton Street; 93 Kingston Road; 28 Walton Lane; 27 Hart Street; 298 Westbourne Park, London; 50 Bowstoke Road, Birmingham; 31 Little Clarendon Street; 98 Marks Road, Romford, Essex; 63 Observatory Street; 3 Walton Manor Court, Adelaide Street; 34, 57 and 63 Plantation Road; 66 Blythe Vale, London; Raising the following comments, objections and concerns: • Object to the demolition of this mellow and characterful building, which is integral part of this historic area. Façade should be retained • Insufficient regard given to the historical and aesthetic quality of the area/ Application fails to address the possibilities of the site • Council should have a policy of discouraging University encroachments in this area. • Corner site has been deliberately allowed to crumble for many years presumably with future development of the site in mind. Building has been left empty since 1987. A mere fraction of the total redevelopment costs would restore the existing buildings/refurbishment would be more in keeping with the ambience of the area. • Design of new building is poor and heavy. • Overdevelopment and density which is compatible with the scale of Walton Street. • Concerns about noise, pollution and continuity of access during demolition and rebuilding operations. • Concern regarding increase in number of residents on the site, increase in traffic and demand for parking permits. • Additional 36 student rooms is totally unacceptable-the area is already overpopulated with students. Concern that the accommodation is not provided or maintained by a particular college. • Bringing corner plot back to use is welcomed, however feel that the proposed new building is not in keeping with it neighbours. • Support for the application in principle, however raise concern about the REPORT potential continuous blocking of restricted parking spaces in Little Clarendon Street by contractors, suppliers and other vehicles involved in the work of redevelopment. • No objection to the conversion that has been proposed providing it doesn’t change the character of Jericho. • No objections raised but concern expressed regarding the proposed access way through to the existing yard where the occupiers of 31 Little Clarendon Street have an allocated parking space immediately to the rear and also to the proposed parking bays. Further details on the gates and number of parking bays are requested. Statutory, Internal and other Consultees: Oxfordshire County Council- comment that the development if implemented would impact upon County Services and Infrastructure. The County Council will accordingly wish to secure a legal agreement for appropriate financial contributions towards measures to mitigate the effects of this development before any planning permission is granted. The contributions required are as follows: • £ 1,260 towards Oxford City’s library infrastructure and bookstock. • £100 for the purposes of administration and monitoring Fire and Rescue ask that adequate provision be made for fire hydrants although the exact numbers and locations cannot be given until detailed plans showing the highway and the water main size and layout are provided.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appeal Decisions
    Appeal Decisions Hearing held on 19 June 2014 Site visit made on 19 June 2014 by Anthony Lyman BSc(Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 28 July 2014 Appeal A: Ref: APP/G3110/A/14/2215380 St Cross College, Pusey House, St Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LZ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by St Cross College against the decision of Oxford City Council. • The application Ref 13/01800/FUL, dated 15 July 2013, was refused by notice dated 22 October 2013. • The development proposed is the erection of new college accommodation to include 53 study bedrooms, seminar/meeting rooms, lecture theatre, library and student facilities including a bar, café, common room and cycle storage, demolition and rebuilding of existing boundary walls. Appeal B: Ref: APP/G3110/E/14/2215384 St Cross College, Pusey House, St Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LZ • The appeal is made under section 20 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 against a refusal to grant listed building consent. • The appeal is made by St Cross College against the decision of Oxford City Council. • The application Ref 13/01801/LBD, dated 15 July 2013, was refused by notice dated 22 October 2013. • The works proposed are the demolition and rebuilding of existing boundary walls. Preliminary Matters 1. The two applications use the same full description of the proposed development. Only the listed walls require listed building consent and, therefore, for Appeal B I have used the reduced description as it appears on the Council’s Decision Notice and on the appeal form – ‘Demolition and Rebuilding of Existing Boundary Walls’.
    [Show full text]
  • 58 St John Street, Oxford, OX1 2LQ (Site Plan: Appendix 1);
    Agenda Item 7 West Area Planning Committee 25th May 2016 Application Numbers: 15/01674/FUL and 15/01675/LBC Application Number: 15/01674/FUL; Decision Due by: 28.07.2015; Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension and two-storey first floor extension. Alterations to front and rear dormer windows and insertion of 1.No. rear rooflight. Formation of patio with associated landscaping (amended plans); Site Address: 58 St John Street, Oxford, OX1 2LQ (site plan: Appendix 1); Ward: Carfax Ward; Agent: Mr. Simon Beattie Applicant: Mr. Mark Blackwell Application Called in – By Councillor Hollingsworth, supported by Councillors van Nooijen, Brown and Lygo for the following reasons – potential overdevelopment and impact on neighbouring properties, in a conservation area. Recommendation: The West Area Planning Committee is recommended to resolve to grant planning permission subject to conditions for the following reasons: 1. Reasons for Approval: 1.1. The proposed development is acceptable in design terms and would not cause unacceptable levels of harm to the listed building, Central Conservation Area or amenities of the neighbouring properties. The proposal therefore accords with policies CP1, CP6, CP8, CP10, HE3 and HE7 of Oxford City Councils ‘Local Plan’2001-2016, and policy CS18 of the ‘Core Strategy’ and policies HP9 and HP14 of the ‘Sites and Housing Plan’ 2026. 1.2. The Council considers that the proposal accords with the policies of the development plan as summarised below. It has taken into consideration all other material matters, including matters raised in response to consultation and publicity. Any material harm that the development would otherwise give rise to can be offset by the conditions imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2015 Plan Document 01/01/2015
    Forward Plan January - April 2015 Ian Hudspeth Leader of the Council County Hall, Oxford OX1 1ND Date Issued: 5 December 2014 The Cabinet’s Forward Plan: Introduction This Forward Plan outlines the decisions which are expected to be made over the coming four-month period by or on behalf of the County Council’s Cabinet. NB Also included, for ease of reference, are items for the current month. The Plan is arranged according to the responsibility areas of the various members of the Cabinet. (The members and their portfolios are listed in the table on the next page.) Each entry briefly describes the subject and scope of the decision; indicates the “target date” on which the decision is expected to be taken and by whom (eg whether the full Cabinet or an individual Cabinet Member); what documents (normally a report by an officer) are expected to be considered; and contact details for the officer(s) dealing with the matter. Where consultation is being carried out prior to the decision being taken, the principal consultees are specified. The method of consultation will normally be by letter or – where the views of the wider public are to be sought – by press coverage, supplemented by local notices if the decision affects a particular area. Other methods, such as exhibitions, opinion surveys, community forums etc, may be used to supplement these. The lists include any “key decisions” - those which are “significant” under the terms of government regulations. In general, a key decision may not be taken unless notice of it has been included in the Forward Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Comments and Council Response
    OXFORD CITY COUNCIL CONSULTATION STATEMENT Oxford Local Plan 2036 March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Proposed Submission Consultation Process ............................................................................... 2 Sustainability Appraisal Consultation Statement ...................................................................... 4 Preferred Options Consultation ................................................................................................. 6 Appendix 1: Statutory Consultees (specific consultation bodies and Duty to Cooperate bodies) ................................................................................................................................................ 132 Appendix 2: Additional Local Groups and Organisations Contacted Directly ........................ 134 Appendix 3: Consultation Report from First Steps Consultation 2016 ................................... 138 Appendix 4: Summary of Press and Social Media Coverage During Each Consultation Stage ................................................................................................................................................ 216 Appendix 5: Summary of Responses Relating to the Proposed Submisison Draft Local Plan and Officer Responses……………………………………………………………………..…………....Filed separately Page 1 of 221 INTRODUCTION 1. Oxford City Council is required (Regulation 22)1 to produce a Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Unitary Development Plan: Expired Policies Direction Under Paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 8 to the Planning And
    MANCHESTER UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN: EXPIRED POLICIES DIRECTION UNDER PARAGRAPH 1(3) OF SCHEDULE 8 TO THE PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, which came into force in September 2004, introduced a new planning system, which means that the Unitary Development Plan will be replaced with a Local Development Framework. The Local Development Framework Core Strategy will not be adopted until 2010 therefore the policies in the Unitary Development Plan have to be ‘saved’ so that they can continue to be used in the meantime. The City Council was required to apply to the Secretary of State to continue saving the policies past the 27th September 2007. A number of policies were no longer relevant so the Secretary of State directed that these policies not be saved. The policies listed overleaf expired on the 27th September 2007 and no longer form part of the development plan for Manchester. All other policies remain saved. Policies that expired on the 27th September 2007 AREA 11 Rusholme and Fallowfield PART ONE H1.1 PART TWO AREA SPECIFIC POLICIES RF2 AREA 1: Blackley, Charlestown and Moston RF9 BM10 RF13 AREA 2: Cheetham and Crumpsall AREA 13: Chorlton and Barlow Moor CC11 CB4 CC12 CB5 CC13 CB6 AREA 5: City Centre CB7 RC11 CB8 RC16 CB9 RC19 CB12 AREA 6: Hulme CB14 HU4 AREA 14: Withington and Burnage HU5 WB5 HU6 WB7 HU7 WB8 HU8 AREA 15: Didsbury HU11 DB4 HU13 DB5 HU14 DB6 HU15 DB11 HU16 AREA 16 – West Wythenshawe HU17 WW4 HU19 WW5 HU21 WW6 AREA 7 Moss Side AREA 17 East Wythenshawe MS2 EW2 MS3 EW4 MS4 EW5 MS5 EW6 MS6 EW7 MS7 EW10 AREA 9 North and South Gorton EW16 GO7 EW18 AREA 10 Whalley Range EW19 WR2 EW22 WR4 PREFACE The Manchester Plan was adopted on 21st July 1995 following an extensive period of public consultation and a major public inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Application : 13/01075/LBD Former Ruskin College Site. Walton Street
    Planning Application : 13/01075/LBD Former Ruskin College site. Walton Street I am writing on behalf of the St John Street Area Residents’ Association to express our concerns about the proposals for the design, increased height and materials of the roof in this application. The current roof of the former Ruskin College building is substantially higher than the roofs of houses in Walton Street. As a result, this building’s roof is clearly visible from the backs of the houses in Beaumont Buildings and from many, if not all of those in St John Street (Beaumont Buildings and St John Street are in the City Centre conservation area). I would guess that the roof is also visible from a wider area such as Beaumont Street as well as from a good deal of Walton Street and Jericho. The present slate pitched roof with white painted dormer windows is similar to that of the surrounding houses and therefore is not very obtrusive in spite of its height. The proposed roof would stick out much more than that on the building at present for several important reasons:- 1. Its increased height compared with that at present. 2. The proposed shape of both the roof and the dormer windows, some of which would be high in the roof. 3. The proposed materials of stainless steel for the roof and aluminium cladding round the large dormer windows both of which are quite out of character with those used on the surrounding buildings or, indeed, in central Oxford. The result of all these factors is that the proposed building will obtrude on views from the conservation area in an unacceptable way and one which seems quite unnecessary.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2015 Plan Document 02/02/2015
    Forward Plan February - May 2015 Ian Hudspeth Leader of the Council County Hall, Oxford OX1 1ND Date Issued: 2 January 2015 The Cabinet’s Forward Plan: Introduction This Forward Plan outlines the decisions which are expected to be made over the coming four-month period by or on behalf of the County Council’s Cabinet. NB Also included, for ease of reference, are items for the current month. The Plan is arranged according to the responsibility areas of the various members of the Cabinet. (The members and their portfolios are listed in the table on the next page.) Each entry briefly describes the subject and scope of the decision; indicates the “target date” on which the decision is expected to be taken and by whom (eg whether the full Cabinet or an individual Cabinet Member); what documents (normally a report by an officer) are expected to be considered; and contact details for the officer(s) dealing with the matter. Where consultation is being carried out prior to the decision being taken, the principal consultees are specified. The method of consultation will normally be by letter or – where the views of the wider public are to be sought – by press coverage, supplemented by local notices if the decision affects a particular area. Other methods, such as exhibitions, opinion surveys, community forums etc, may be used to supplement these. The lists include any “key decisions” - those which are “significant” under the terms of government regulations. In general, a key decision may not be taken unless notice of it has been included in the Forward Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda West Area Planning Committee
    Agenda West Area Planning Committee Date: Tuesday 10 September 2013 Time: 6.30 pm Place: The Old Library, Town Hall For any further information please contact: Sarah Claridge, Democratic Services Officer Telephone: 01865 252402 Email: [email protected] West Area Planning Committee Membership Chair Councillor Oscar Van Nooijen Hinksey Park; Vice -Chair Councillor Michael Gotch Wolvercote; Councillor Elise Benjamin Iffley Fields; Councillor Anne -Marie Canning Carfax; Councillor Bev Clack St. Clement's; Councillor Colin Cook Jericho and Osney; Councillor Graham Jones St. Clement's; Counci llor Bob Price Hinksey Park; Councillor John Tanner Littlemore; The quorum for this meeting is five members. Substitutes are permitted HOW TO OBTAIN AGENDA In order to reduce the use of resources, our carbon footprint and our costs we will no longer produce paper copies of agenda over and above our minimum internal and Council member requirement. Paper copies may be looked at the Town Hall Reception and at Customer Services, St Aldate’s and at the Westgate Library A copy of the agenda may be:- - Viewed on our website – mycouncil.oxford.gov.uk - Downloaded from our website - Subscribed to electronically by registering online at mycouncil.oxford.gov.uk - Sent to you in hard copy form upon payment of an annual subscription. AGENDA Pages 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENC E AND SUBSTITUTIONS 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members are asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests they may have in any of the following agenda items. Guidance on this is set out at the end of these agenda pages. 3 WITHDRAWN_CASTLE MILL, ROGER DUDMAN WAY 11/02881/FUL The Council has taken external legal advice in relation to the discharge of conditions for the University development at Roger Dudman Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda West Area Planning Committee
    Agenda West Area Planning Committee Date: Wednesday 13 July 2011 Time: 6.00 pm Place: The Old Library, Town Hall For any further information please contact: Alec Dubberley, Democratic Services Officer Telephone: 01865 252402 Email: [email protected] If you would like help to understand this document please call Alec Dubberley, Democratic Services Officer on or email [email protected] in advance of the meeting. West Area Planning Committee Membership Chair Councillor Oscar Van Nooijen Hinksey Park; Vice -Chair Councillor John Goddard Wolvercote; Councillor Elise Benjamin Iffley Fields; Councillor Colin Cook Jericho and Osney; Councillor Michael Gotch Wolvercote; Councillor Graham Jones St Clement's; Councillor Shah Khan Cowley; Councillor Bob Pri ce Hinksey Park; Councillor John Tanner Littlemore; HOW TO OBTAIN AGENDA In order to reduce the use of resources, our carbon footprint and our costs we will no longer produce paper copies of agenda over and above our minimum internal and Council member requirement. Paper copies may be looked at in our Town Hall and Ramsay House (St. Ebbe's Street) reception areas and at public libraries. A copy of the agenda may be:- - Viewed on our website - www.oxford.gov.uk/councilmeetings - Downloaded from our website - Subscribed to electronically by registering online at www.oxford.gov.uk/ebulletins - Sent to you in hard copy form upon payment of an annual subscription. Subscription charges can be found online at www.oxford.gov.uk/agendacharges AGENDA Pages 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENC E AND SUBSTITUTIONS 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillors serving on the Committee are asked to declare any personal or personal prejudicial interests they may have in any of the following agenda items.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions from County Councillors PDF 198 KB
    CABINET – 25 FEBRUARY 2020 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL Questions Answers 1. COUNCILLOR NICHOLAS FIELD-JOHNSON COUNCILLOR YVONNE CONSTANCE, CABINET MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENT I have been asked by the St. Johns Street Connecting Oxford could deliver many benefits for residents and businesses Resident Association to put forward their case re: including reduced congestion and improved public transport connectivity, the exclusion zone. better air quality and reduced carbon emissions, and more people participating in active and healthy travel. These residents are among the worst and most directly affected by the congestion and poor air It is however fully acknowledged that the proposals, including a further “bus quality in Oxford city centre. As such, they gate” in the city centre and Oxford’s Eastern Arc, will need to be carefully welcome serious efforts by the City and County designed and assessed to ensure any adverse impacts are mitigated and Councils to tackle both problems. those directly affected, whether residents, employers or businesses, also benefit. They are however concerned that the following aspects of the current proposals will have a Proposals are still at a relatively early stage with more detailed feasibility work disproportionately disadvantageous effect on and consultation required before any decisions to implement them can be their members: made. 1. The Worcester Street “bus gate” would The feasibility work will however consider when the “bus gates” should mean that St John Street Area residents needing operate (days of the week and times of day) and whether there should be to travel west or south by car would have no exemptions and how these would be administered in practice, with the option but to drive a long way north to join the supporting transport improvements required to maintain accessibility and southbound A34 at the Pear Tree interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Wine Cafe at the Corner of Little Clarendon Street and Walton Street
    Agenda Item 1 To: Licensing & Gambling Acts Casework Sub-Committee Date: 16 February 2015 Item No: 1 Report of: Head of Environmental Development Title of Report: Oxford Wine Café (Jericho) Ltd – Application for a New Premises Licence: Oxford Wine Café, 32 Little Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX1 2HU. Application Ref: 14/04165/PREM Summary and Recommendations Purpose of report: To inform the determination of Oxford Wine Café (Jericho) Ltd’s application for a New Premises Licence for Oxford Wine Café, 32 Little Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX1 2HU. Report Approved by: Legal: Daniel Smith Policy Framework: Statement of Licensing Policy Recommendation(s): Committee is requested to determine Oxford Wine Café (Jericho) Ltd’s application taking into account the details in this report and any representations made at this Sub-Committee meeting. Additional Papers: Appendix One: Application for a New Premises Licence Appendix Two: Representations from Interested Parties Appendix Three: Location Map Introduction 1. This report is made to the Licensing & Gambling Acts Casework Sub- Committee so it may determine in accordance with its powers and the Licensing Act 2003 whether to grant a New Premises Licence to Oxford Wine Café (Jericho) Ltd. 1 Application Summary 2. An application for a New Premises Licence has been submitted by Oxford Wine Café (Jericho) Ltd. A summary of the licensable activities applied for and the times proposed for these activities can be found detailed below. Supply of Alcohol (on sales only): Sunday - Thursday 11:00 Until 23:00 Friday - Saturday 11:00 Until 01:00 St Patrick’s Night 11:00 Until 02:00 New Year’s Eve 11:00 Until 02:00 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Changes to Parking Places – St John Street Area, Oxford
    CMDE4 Division: Jericho and Osney CABINET MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENT– 15 JANUARY 2015 PROPOSED CHANGES TO PARKING PLACES – ST JOHN STREET AREA, OXFORD Report by Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Commercial) Introduction 1. This report considers objections to a formal consultation on proposals to introduce some changes to parking restrictions in the St John Street areas in Oxford City Centre. Background 2. As a result of long-term construction work at St Cross College which requires the suspension of some residents parking places in Pusey Street, discussions have taken place with the St John Street Area Residents’ Association to find alternative temporary on-street parking places. The proposals which were finally agreed are shown on the plan at Annex 1. 3. Whilst the suspension of parking bays can be done through a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order, introducing new parking bays, even if only for a temporary period, requires a Permanent Traffic Regulation Order and associated consultation. Formal Consultation 4. In October 2014 formal consultation took place on the proposals, with copies of the draft Traffic Regulation Order, statement of reasons, and a copy of the public notice deposited for public inspection at County Hall, and Central Library. At the same time, the Council wrote to local residents and businesses affected by the proposed changes and public notices were displayed at each site and in the Oxford Times. 5. Four responses have been received from local residents objecting to or commenting on the proposals; the responses are summarised at Annex 2 along with officer comments. Copies of all the consultation responses are available for inspection in the Members’ Resource Centre.
    [Show full text]