MEDIA GUIDELINES for REPORTING SHARK ENCOUNTERS Ever Since the 1920S, Sharks Have Been Portrayed by Hollywood and the Media As Mindless Killing-Machines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MEDIA GUIDELINES for REPORTING SHARK ENCOUNTERS Ever Since the 1920S, Sharks Have Been Portrayed by Hollywood and the Media As Mindless Killing-Machines MEDIA GUIDELINES FOR REPORTING SHARK ENCOUNTERS Ever since the 1920s, sharks have been portrayed by Hollywood and the media as mindless killing-machines. Now there’s genuine concern that this often-repeated, WE’RE yet unfounded, depiction is standing in the way of shark conservation efforts. It’s our belief that the language used But apathy for shark conservation by the media has kept the JAWS could come at a price. Healthy oceans mythology alive and created a blind provide 50% of the oxygen we breathe GONNA spot in the eyes of the public when and — critically — healthy oceans rely it comes to shark conservation. on healthy shark populations. “ For the survival of sharks and the future of the planet, it has to stop. On average the mainstream UK media reports or features one shark story NEED A Right now around 73 million sharks are every other a week. That’s 25 chances killed every year, that’s roughly two a year to make a difference to the fate every second and scientists predict of sharks and the health of the planet. key shark species could be wiped out forever. We hope that this guideline will BIGGER encourage reporters and editors to At the end of 2017 a nationwide depict sharks and shark encounters survey by Bite-Back Shark & Marine accurately, fairly, and in a way that Conservation, a UK charity, revealed doesn’t jeopardise our blue planet. VOCAB that nearly half (46%) of all Brits thought that ‘sharks are more terrifying that spiders, snakes and rodents combined.’ And 64% would ‘prefer sharks not to exist’. Bite-Back Shark & Marine Conservation Achieving public support for campaigns Campaign director ” to help save and protect a keystone species that is relentlessly described as ‘menacing, man-eating, monster, killer and beast’ have become especially challenging. BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 2 People expect journalists to be truthful, accurate, objective and impartial when covering a story. But, it could be argued that modern reporting on sharks doesn’t STOP match those ethics. After all, the language used to describe sharks is usually only reserved for serial FEEDING killers, terrorists and rapists. But sharks aren’t the bogeyman. In a world of 7.2 billion people, typically eight people a year die from shark encounters THE and only three shark species — the great white, the bull and the tiger — have been linked to multiple (double digit) human fatalities since records FEAR began in 1543. For the record, there has never been a According to a nationwide fatality from an unprovoked shark attack survey, nearly 30 million in the UK. people living in Britain are terrified of sharks. But why? BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 3 THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN REPORTING SHARK ENCOUNTERS HIGHLIGHT THE RARITY OF FATAL JAWS wasn’t a documentary Balance the story with details of ENCOUNTERS threatened shark populations Humans have a 1 in 3.7million Don’t label every bite as an attack; chance of being killed by a shark big sharks can only investigate objects with their teeth Don’t use gaping mouth open shots MOST SHARKS Avoid using words like monster, killer, of sharks to beast, man-eater and referencing JAWS illustrate the story ARE TIMID AND EASILY FRIGHTENED The mere presence of sharks in the sea shouldn’t prompt alarmist headlines BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 4 WORDS TO USE WORDS TO AVOID MAGNIFICENT KILLER AVOID THREATENED MAN-EATER ENDANGERED MONSTER CLICK MAJESTIC BEAST RARE MENACING BAIT ICONIC LURKING Sharks can’t sue, so it’s easy to misrepresent them in attention USE THE CORRECT IMAGE Not all sharks look like the great white. While it might be the most instantly grabbing headlines that sell recognisable of all the sharks, the overuse of great white shark images to illustrate newspapers and encourage shark stories could lead the public to think that all sharks are deadly. clicks. For decades, the media has relentlessly portrayed sharks in print, online and on air with language that inspires hate and fear. It’s time to accurately report shark encounters and turn the tide. GREAT WHITE SHARK BLUE SHARK BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 5 FOR THE SAKE OF LIFE ON EARTH, WE NEED SHARKS Healthy oceans are the lungs Sharks are the ‘big cats’ of the ocean and they sit at the top of the marine and larder of the planet. Healthy food web. oceans produce 50% of the oxygen For 450 million years sharks have we breathe, absorb 20% of all helped shape and maintain the balance man-made CO2 and safeguard 93 of the oceans. Their hunting helps stop species like tuna, jacks, grouper, turtles billion tonnes of wild seafood, for and rays from becoming too abundant human and animal consumption. and over-eating their prey, keeping the ocean ecosystem in balance. The fragile marine environment works in harmony with sharks as a keystone species; helping to prevent population boom- and-bust events from occurring across the food web that could ultimately starve the planet of oxygen and cripple its ability to provide billions of tonnes of protein each year. As apex predators, sharks have ruled the oceans with little to fear. They have survived six mass extinctions and outlived the dinosaurs but now overfishing could wipe out key species in our lifetime. BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 6 MOSQUITO 1,000,000 DEADLY OBJECTS (GLOBAL FIGURES) MORE SNAKES 50,000 TOASTERS 700 DOGS 25,000 BATH TUBS 300 DEADLY HIPPOPOTAMUS 2,000 PEANUTS 120 CROCODILES 1,000 LADDERS 110 THAN ELEPHANT 300 ICICLES 100 SHARKS COWS 200 BEES 100 Here’s a list of animals and the average number of human TIGERS 90 fatalities they cause each year. LIONS 70 BEARS 20 SHARKS 6 BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 7 A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS At the end of 2017 nationwide NO SHARKSA DANGEROUS PLEASE, WE'RE BRITISH THING research commissioned by RESULTS FROM A UK SURVEY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS SHARKS AND THE OCEANS | NOV 2017 Bite-Back revealed that 83% of Brits think more should be done FOUR TIMES to protect the oceans but 64% AS MANY PEOPLE WRONGLY THINK SHARKS ARE MORE DEADLY THAN TOASTERS AND COWS would rather sharks didn’t exist. ONE THIRD 83% 64% HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE BASKING SHARK, THE LARGEST FISH THINK THE OCEANS WOULD PREFER IN UK WATERS AND THE SECOND DESERVE GREATER SHARKS NOT THINK SHARKS ARE MORE LARGEST FISH IN THE WORLD PROTECTION TO EXIST TERRIFYING THAN SPIDERS, 46% SNAKES AND MICE COMBINED 97% SIMPLY HAVE NO IDEA THAT AN ESTIMATED KNOW THAT THERE ARE MORE THAN 30 SPECIES 73,000,000 1% OF SHARKS IN UK WATERS SHARKS ARE KILLED EVERY YEAR WITH MANY HUNTED JUST FOR THEIR FINS TO MAKE SHARK FIN SOUP CHARITY COMMITTED TO MAKING BRITAIN SHARK FIN FREE BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 8 THREATS TO SHARKS INDUSTRIAL FISHING SHARK FIN SOUP SHARK PRODUCTS Overfishing is the single biggest threat Once only served to Chinese Bite-Back is working to identify UK to shark populations. The advent of Emperors, shark fin soup is now businesses selling shark products and modern fishing boats — capable of regarded as an overt demonstration inspiring them to stop. By removing spending weeks at sea — coupled with of wealth and prestige. profit opportunities for shark products, sonar, satellite and fish-finders mean sharks will no longer have a commercial that sharks have nowhere left to hide. In a booming Asian economy, value. demand for shark fin soup has The International Union for the reached record levels. Already the charity has inspired Conservation of Nature recently ASDA, Iceland Foods and MAKRO (a reported that 85% of the world’s Shark fins feature cartilaginous nationwide cash-and-carry) to end the fish stocks are fully exploited or strands that run from the base to the sale of shark meat. As a result it’s no overexploited. Without intervention the tip. It’s these noodles of cartilage longer possible to buy shark meat from big fish, like sharks, will be the first to that are served in shark fin soup. any multiple retailer. disappear. Because shark cartilage only adds texture, they are prepared in a broth Other notable outcomes include Sharks are often caught as by-catch by made from fish or chicken stock to prompting Holland & Barrett to remove the swordfish and tuna fishing industry. add flavour. shark cartilage capsules from 580 While shark meat has a relatively low stores across the country. market value, shark fins (used as the Five years ago there were 65 UK title ingredient in shark fin soup) have restaurants serving shark fin soup. Shark teeth and jaws are readily become one of the most valuable Bite-Back’s campaign has helped available online from retailers including seafood items on the planet. As a prompt 82% of these restaurants to eBay and Amazon, while shark steak result, fishermen will cut the valuable drop the controversial dish. regularly features on fish counters and fins from sharks and throw the body restaurant menus across the country. overboard to die. BITE-BACK MEDIA GUIDELINES 2018 CONTACT GRAHAM BUCKINGHAM 07810 454 266 9 1. Sharks have three more senses than humans. 11. In some parts of the world populations of great This means they can easily detect electricity from whites, hammerheads and oceanic whitetips muscle movement in prey, vibrations in the water have fallen by 90% since 1950 and changes in water temperature SHARK 12.
Recommended publications
  • Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays Nicholas K Dulvy1,2*, Sarah L Fowler3, John A Musick4, Rachel D Cavanagh5, Peter M Kyne6, Lucy R Harrison1,2, John K Carlson7, Lindsay NK Davidson1,2, Sonja V Fordham8, Malcolm P Francis9, Caroline M Pollock10, Colin A Simpfendorfer11,12, George H Burgess13, Kent E Carpenter14,15, Leonard JV Compagno16, David A Ebert17, Claudine Gibson3, Michelle R Heupel18, Suzanne R Livingstone19, Jonnell C Sanciangco14,15, John D Stevens20, Sarah Valenti3, William T White20 1IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 2Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 3IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, NatureBureau International, Newbury, United Kingdom; 4Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, United States; 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; 7Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City, United States; 8Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC, United States; 9National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 10Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Table Tableau Tabla 2
    Table Tableau Tabla 2 Species codes of tunas, Codes des espèces de Códigos de especies de túnidos, tuna‐like species and thonidés, d’espèces de especies afines a los túnidos sharks apparentées et des requins y de tiburones Code / Scientific names / Common names Noms communs Nombres comunes Code / Noms sientifiques / (English) (Français) (Español) Código Nombres científicos Tunas ALB Thunnus alalunga Albacore Germon Atún blanco Thonidés BET Thunnus obesus Bigeye tuna Thon obèse(=Patudo) Patudo Túnidos BFT Thunnus thynnus Atlantic bluefin tuna Thon rouge de l’atlantique Atún rojo BUM Makaira nigricans Atlantic blue marlin Makaire bleu de l'Atlantique Aguja azul del Atlántico SAI Istiophorus albicans Atlantic sailfish Voilier de l'Atlantique Pez vela del Atlántico SKJ Katsuwonus pelamis Skipjack tuna Listao Listado SWO Xiphias gladius Swordfish Espadon Pez espada WHM Tetrapturus albidus Atlantic white marlin Makaire blanc de l'Atlantique Aguja blanca del Atlántico YFT Thunnus albacares Yellowfin tuna Albacore Rabil BLF Thunnus atlanticus Blackfin tuna Thon à nageoires noires Atún des aletas negras BLT Auxis rochei Bullet tuna Bonitou Melva(=Melvera) BON Sarda sarda Atlantic bonito Bonite à dos rayé Bonito del Atlántico BOP Orcynopsis unicolor Plain bonito Palomette Tasarte BRS Scomberomorus brasiliensis Serra Spanish mackerel Thazard serra Serra CER Scomberomorus regalis Cero Thazard franc Carite chinigua FRI Auxis thazard Frigate tuna Auxide Melva KGM Scomberomorus cavalla King mackerel Thazard barré Carite lucio KGX Scomberomorus spp
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Deep-Sea Cartilaginous Fishes Of
    Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean FAO. 2015. Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean. FishFinder Programme, by Ebert, D.A. and Mostarda, E., Rome, Italy. Supervision: Merete Tandstad, Jessica Sanders (FAO, Rome) Technical editor: Edoardo Mostarda (FAO, Rome) Colour illustrations, cover and graphic design: Emanuela D’Antoni (FAO, Rome) This guide was prepared under the “FAO Deep–sea Fisheries Programme” thanks to a generous funding from the Government of Norway (Support to the implementation of the International Guidelines on the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas project) for the purpose of assisting states, institutions, the fishing industry and RFMO/As in the implementation of FAO International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas. It was developed in close collaboration with the FishFinder Programme of the Marine and Inland Fisheries Branch, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The present guide covers the deep–sea Southeastern Atlantic Ocean and that portion of Southwestern Indian Ocean from 18°42’E to 30°00’E (FAO Fishing Area 47). It includes a selection of cartilaginous fish species of major, moderate and minor importance to fisheries as well as those of doubtful or potential use to fisheries. It also covers those little known species that may be of research, educational, and ecological importance. In this region, the deep–sea chondrichthyan fauna is currently represented by 50 shark, 20 batoid and 8 chimaera species. This guide includes full species accounts for 37 shark, 9 batoid and 4 chimaera species selected as being the more difficult to identify and/or commonly caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species
    United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre For Specially Protected Areas REPORT ON THE STATUS OF MEDITERRANEAN CHONDRICHTHYAN SPECIES D. CEBRIAN © L. MASTRAGOSTINO © R. DUPUY DE LA GRANDRIVE © Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2007 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] Citation: UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2007. Report on the status of Mediterranean chondrichthyan species. By Melendez, M.J. & D. Macias, IEO. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis. 241pp The original version (English) of this document has been prepared for the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) by : Mª José Melendez (Degree in Marine Sciences) & A. David Macías (PhD. in Biological Sciences). IEO. (Instituto Español de Oceanografía). Sede Central Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Avda. de Brasil, 31 Madrid Spain [email protected] 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION 3 3. HUMAN IMPACTS ON SHARKS 8 3.1 Over-fishing 8 3.2 Shark Finning 8 3.3 By-catch 8 3.4 Pollution 8 3.5 Habitat Loss and Degradation 9 4. CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN SHARKS 9 REFERENCES 10 ANNEX I. LIST OF CHONDRICHTHYAN OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 11 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NEA Shark Covers
    This report describes the results of a regional Red List Workshop held at the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), Peterborough, UK, in 2006, as a contribution towards the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Shark Specialist Group’s ‘Global Shark Red List Assessment’. The purpose of the workshop was to assess the conservation status of the chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, rays and chimaeras) of the Northeast Atlantic region (FAO Major Fishery Area 27). This region is bordered by some of the largest and most important chondrichthyan fishing nations in the world, including Spain, France, the UK and Portugal. A regional overview of fisheries, utilisation, trade, management and conservation is also presented. The Northeast Atlantic chondrichthyan fauna is moderately diverse, with an estimated 118 species (approximately 11% of total living chondrichthyans). These occur within a huge range of habitats, including the deep-sea, open oceans, and coastal waters from the Arctic to the Mediterranean. During the workshop, experts collated information and prepared 74 global and 17 regional species assessments, thereby completing the Red Listing process for the described chondrichthyan fauna of the Northeast Atlantic (two undescribed species were not assessed). These assessments were agreed by consensus throughout the SSG network prior to their submission to IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. Results show that 26% of Northeast Atlantic chondrichthyans are threatened within the region (7% Critically Endangered, 7% Endangered, 12% Vulnerable). A further 20% are Near Threatened, 27% Least Concern and 27% are Data Deficient. This is a significantly higher level of threat than that for the whole taxonomic group, worldwide. Globally, of the 1, 038 species of chondrichthyans assessed, 18% are threatened (3% CR, 4% EN, 11% VU), 13% are Near Threatened, 23% Least Concern and 46% Data Deficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised SEAFO Fisheries Resources Table 1. . FAO 3 Alfa Species Code
    Revised SEAFO Fisheries Resources Table 1. Latin Name Transboundary FAO 3 Alfa Species Code TOP* Patagonian toothfish 1.1.1 Dissostichus 1.1.2 Yes eleginoides ORY* Orange Roughy Hoplosthethus spp Unknown ALF* Alfonsino Family Berycidae Unknown CGE* Deep-sea Red Crab Chaceon maritae Unknown MAC* Mackerel Scomber scombrus Unknown EDR* Armourhead Pseudopentaceros spp. Unknown BOC* Boarfish Capros aper Unknown ORD* Oreo dories Family Oreosomatidae Unknown CDL* Cardinal Fish Epigonus spp. Unknown OCZ* Octopus Family Octopodidae Unknown SQC* Squid Family Loliginidae Unknown WRF* Wreckfish 1.1.3 Polyprion 1.1.4 Unknown americanus SKA* Skates Family Rajidae Unknown DGS Spiny Dogfish Squalus acanthias Unknown Unknown ETB Blurred smooth Etmopterus bigelowi lanternshark ETH Shorttail Etmopterus brachyurus Unknown lanternshark ETR Great lanternshark Etmopterus princeps Unknown ETP Smooth lanternshark Etmopterus pusillus Unknown Unknown APA Ghost catshark Apristurus manis SSQ Velvet dogfish Scymnodon squamulosus Unknown CYO Portuguese Dogfish Centroscymnus coelolepis Unknown GUQ Leafscale Gulper Centrophorus squamosus Unknown Shark GUP Gulper Shark Centrophorus granulosus Unknown CFB ǂ Black dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii Unknown CYP ǂ Longnose velvet Centroscymnus crepidater Unknown 30 dogfish CYY Unknown ǂ Shortnose velvet Centroscymnus dogfish cryptacanthus SCK ǂ Kitefin shark Dalatias licha Unknown ETE ǂ Etmopterus compagnoi Unknown ETI ǂ Broadbanded Etmopterus gracilispinis Unknown lanternshark ETM ǂ Unknown Southern Etmopterus granulosus lanternshark
    [Show full text]
  • And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Oxynotus Centrina (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for a world without hunger Fisheries Division Species Fact Sheets Oxynotus centrina (Linnaeus, 1758) Oxynotus centrina: (click for more) Synonyms Centrina salviani Risso, 1826 Centrina oxynotus Swainson, 1839 Centrina vulpecula Moreau, 1881 FAO Names En - Angular roughshark, Fr - Centrine commune, Sp - Cerdo marino. 3Alpha Code: OXY Taxonomic Code: 1090500601 Scientific Name with Original Description Squalus centrina Linnaeus, 1758, Syst.Nat., ed. 10, 1:233. Holotype : Unknown. Type Locality: "Mare Mediterraneo". Diagnostic Features fieldmarks: Short, blunt snout, high, sail-like dorsal fins with spines, no anal fin, first dorsal spine inclined forward, high, thick, triangular body with large, rough denticles, massive knobs on supraorbital ridges, vertically elongated spiracles, lanceolate upper teeth, lower bladelike teeth in less than 12 rows, colour pattern of darker marks on a light background. Spiracle large and vertically elongated, crescent or oval in shape. Supraorbital ridges enlarged over eyes, with a knoblike posterior expansion studded with large denticles and ending in front of spiracles. Apices of dorsal fins broadly triangular, posterior margins shallowly concave; first dorsal spine inclined forward. Grey or grey- brown above and below, with darker blotches on head and sides; a light horizontal line separates dark areas on head and another crosses cheeks below eyes. Geographical Distribution FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Launch the Aquatic Species Distribution map viewer Eastern Atlantic: Bay of Biscay and Mediterranean Sea to Senegal, north apparently as a stray to Cornwall, England; also possibly from Liberia to Nigeria, Gabon to Namibia, and South Africa. Habitat and Biology An uncommon, little-known bottom shark of the continental shelf and upper slope,at depths of 60 to 660 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Ecological Features Update on Eleven Rare Cartilaginous Fish in the Central-Western Mediterranean Sea As a Contribution for Their Conservation
    life Article Bio-Ecological Features Update on Eleven Rare Cartilaginous Fish in the Central-Western Mediterranean Sea as a Contribution for Their Conservation Antonello Mulas 1,2,*,†, Andrea Bellodi 1,2,† , Pierluigi Carbonara 3 , Alessandro Cau 1,2 , Martina Francesca Marongiu 1,2 , Paola Pesci 1,2, Cristina Porcu 1,2 and Maria Cristina Follesa 1,2 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09126 Cagliari, Italy; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.F.M.); [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (M.C.F.) 2 CoNISMa Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare, 00196 Roma, Italy 3 COISPA Tecnologia & Ricerca, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † Authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors. Abstract: Cartilaginous fish are commonly recognized as key species in marine ecosystems for their fundamental ecological role as top predators. Nevertheless, effective management plans for cartilagi- nous fish are still missing, due to the lack of knowledge on their abundance, distribution or even life-history. In this regard, this paper aims at providing new information on the life-history traits, such as age, maturity, reproductive period, in addition to diet characteristics of eleven rare cartilagi- Citation: Mulas, A.; Bellodi, A.; nous fish inhabiting the Central-Western Mediterranean Sea belonging to the orders Chimaeriformes Carbonara, P.; Cau, A.; (Chimaera monstrosa), Hexanchiformes (Heptranchias perlo and Hexanchus griseus), Myliobatiformes Marongiu, M.F.; Pesci, P.; Porcu, C.; Follesa, M.C. Bio-Ecological Features (Aetomylaeus bovinus and Myliobatis aquila), Rajiformes (Dipturus nidarosiensis and Leucoraja circu- Update on Eleven Rare Cartilaginous laris), Squaliformes (Centrophorus uyato, Dalatias licha and Oxynotus centrina) and Torpediniformes Fish in the Central-Western (Tetronarce nobiliana), useful for their assessment and for future management actions.
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A2.2 ICCAT Species Codes APPENDIX 2.2: SPECIES CODES Y ello wfin tuna Codes used to identify the ICCAT tuna and tuna-like species as well as by-catch species Atún blanco Tuna and tuna-like species G e r m o n Numerical Alphabetical Scientific Name English SkipjackFra tunancais EspañolR a b i l 1 BFT Thunnus thynnus Northern bluefin tuna Thon rouge du Nord Atún común (Cimarrón) 2 SBF Thunnus maccoyii Southern bluefin tuna Thon rouge du Sud Atún del Sur 3 YFT Thunnus albacares erocablA T hazard-bâtard L i s t a d o 4 ALB Thunnus alalunga erocablA Plain bonito 5 BET Thunnus obesus Bigeye tuna Thon obèse(=Patudo)P a l o m e t tPatudo e 6 BLF Thunnus atlanticus Blackfin tuna Thon à nageoires noires Atún des aletas negras 7 LTA Euthynnus alletteratus Little tunny(=Atl.black skipjack) Thonine commune BacoretaT a s a r t e 8 SKJ Katsuwonus pelamis WBlack a h o o m arlinoatsiL M akaire noir 9 BON Sarda sarda Atlantic bonito Bonite à dos rayé Bonito del AtlánticoA guja negra P e t o 10 FRI Auxis thazard Frigate tuna Auxide Melva 11 BOP Orcynopsis unicolor 12 WAH Acanthocybium solandri Pez espada 13 SSM Scomberomorus maculatus Atlantic SpanishS w mackerel o r d f i s hTh azard atlantique Carite atlántico 14 KGM Scomberomorus cavalla King mackerel Thazard Ebarr sé p a d o n Carite lucio 15 SAI Istiophorus albicans Atlantic sailfish Voilier de l'Atlantique Pez vela del Atlántico 16 BLM Makaira indica 17 BUM Makaira nigricans Atlantic blue marlin Makaire bleu de l'Atlantique Aguja azul del Atlántico 18 WHM Tetrapturus albidus Atlantic white marlin Makaire blanc de l'Atlantique Aguja blanca del Atlántico 28 19 SWO Xiphias gladius 3 20 SPF Tetrapturus pfluegeri Longbill spearfish Makaire bécune Aguja picuda 284 ICCAT MANUAL, 1st Edition (January 2010) 21 TUN Thunnini sanuT ien sédinohT acn senutA pen 23 YOU gnuoY sanut senueJ sédinoht senutA senevój 24 BIL Istiophoridae Marlins,sailfishes,etc.
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP/CMS/Inf/MS/9
    UNEP/CMS/Inf/MS/9 Embargoed until midnight GMT on Thursday, November 15, 2007 Mediterranean Sea: most dangerous place on Earth for sharks and rays More than 40% of shark and ray species in the Mediterranean are threatened with extinction, according to a new report from the World Conservation Union (IUCN) Malaga, Spain, 16 November, 2007 (IUCN) – The first complete IUCN Red List assessment of the status of all Mediterranean sharks and rays has revealed that 42% of the species are threatened with extinction. Overfishing, including bycatch (non-target species caught incidentally), is the main cause of decline, according to the research. The report, released today by the IUCN Shark Specialist Group and the IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, shows that the region has the highest percentage of threatened sharks and rays in the world. “From devil rays to angel sharks, Mediterranean populations of these vulnerable species are in serious trouble,” said Claudine Gibson, Programme Officer for the IUCN Shark Specialist Group and co-author of the report. “Our analyses reveal the Mediterranean Sea as one of the world’s most dangerous places on Earth for sharks and rays. Bottom dwelling species appear to be at greatest risk in this region, due mainly to intense fishing of the seabed.” The report also identifies habitat degradation, recreational fisheries, and other human disturbances as significant threats to the sharks and rays of the Mediterranean. These are the findings of an expert workshop at which 71 Mediterranean species of sharks, rays and chimaeras (cartilaginous fishes) were assessed using IUCN Red List categories and criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • AN OVERVIEW of MAJOR SHARK TRADERS CATCHERS and SPECIES Nicola Okes Glenn Sant TRAFFIC REPORT an Overview of Major Global Shark* Traders, Catchers and Species
    SEPTEMBER 2019 AN OVERVIEW OF MAJOR SHARK TRADERS CATCHERS AND SPECIES Nicola Okes Glenn Sant TRAFFIC REPORT An overview of major global shark* traders, catchers and species TRAFFIC is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Reprod uction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the authors or their supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published by: TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. ISBN: 978-1-911646-14-3 Suggested citation: Okes, N. and Sant, G. (2019). An overview of major shark traders, catchers and species. TRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK. © TRAFFIC 2019. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Design by Marcus Cornthwaite * Throughout this report, unless otherwise specified, the term “sharks” refers to all species of sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras (Class Chondrichthyes). CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Catch data 2 Trade data 8 3 Overview 9 Meat 9 Fins 11 CITES-listed species 16 4 Risk of overexploitation 21 Conclusions and recommendations 22 5 References 24 Annex I 26 Image credits 32 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The preparation, development and production of this publication was made possible with funding from a number of sources including the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BfN).
    [Show full text]