Wesselsbron 171 BRITZPAN 228 405 285 # PALMIETKUIL 218 # # ^ # # !C 902 R VAN LELIEVLEI THERONSHOOP 786 QUAGGAVLAKTE 21 !C 434 Mine # ## # BOSCHPAN BLUEGUM # # !

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wesselsbron 171 BRITZPAN 228 405 285 # PALMIETKUIL 218 # # ^ # # !C 902 R VAN LELIEVLEI THERONSHOOP 786 QUAGGAVLAKTE 21 !C 434 Mine # ## # BOSCHPAN BLUEGUM # # ! # # !C # # ### !C^ !.!C# # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C^ # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # ## # !C # # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # #^ # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C ## # ##^ # !C #!C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # ## # # # # #!C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # # !C # # #!C #!C # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # !C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ^ # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # !C # # !C ## # # #!C # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C# # ## # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # ### !C # # # !C !C# # # ## # # # ## !C !C # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # ## # # ## # # !C ## !C## # # # # ## # !C # # # ### # !C# # # # ^ # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # ^ ## #!C ### # # !C # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C # ## # # # # # # # !C # # ^ # ## # # # # # !C # # # # # # # !. # # !C# ### # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## !C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## ^ # # # # # # !C ## # ^ !C# # ^ # # # # ## # # # # # #!C # # # # ### # # ^ #!C # ## # # # !C # # ## # ## # ## ## #!C # #!C # #!C # # ## # # # # # # # # # !C # !C# # !C ## # # ## # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ^## # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C# # # # !C #!C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## !C # # # # # # ## # # !C## # # # # # # ^ # ## # ## # ## # ## # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## !C# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C # # # # # ## # !C## ## #!C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # ## !C ## # # ## # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ^ # # # !C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # !. # !C # ## #!C # # # # ^# # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # ## # # ^ # ## # # # # # # #!C !C # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # ^ # !C # !C # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # ## # # ^!C # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # #!C# # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # !C !C ## # # ## # # # !C ## #!C # # # # # # # # #!C ## # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # #!C# # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !. # # # # #!C# # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # ## # # # ## # # # # ## # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !.^# # # # # # # # !C # # ## ## # # !C # ## ## ## !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # ^ # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # ## !.## ## !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C ## ## # # ## !C## # ## # # # # # ## # ## # !C # !C # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # #!. # ^ # # # # # # !C # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # ^# # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## !.# # # ## # # # # # ## # ## ^ ## # ## !C # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # ### # # # # # # # ## #!C# !C# !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C #!C # # # # # # !C # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## !C # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !. # # # # ## # # # # !C!C# !C # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # !C #!C# # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # ^ # # # # # #!.!C # !C # # #!C## !C # # # # # !C ### # # # !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ### ^## # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # !C # # # # # !C # ## ## # # !.#^ !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # !C # # # # # !C # # !C !C # # # # # !C # ^ ## ## # ## # # # # # # !C### ^ # # # # ^##!C # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # !C#^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # ##!C # !. # # # ## !C # #^ #### # # # # ## # # ^ # # # # # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # !C## # # # # # ^ ^## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # ### ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # ## ## !C # # ## # # # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # !C !C !C !C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # !C # # ^ # # # !C # # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # #!C # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # !C # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # #!C # # ## # !. # # # # # # # !C # # # ^ # # # ## #!C # # # # # # # ## ### # ## # # # !C# # #!.## ### # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C # # # # # # ## #^ # # #!C. # # # ## ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # #!C # # # # # !C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # !C # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !.!C# # ## # # !C ^ !. # # # ##!. # # # # ## # # # # # ^ # # # !C # # !C# !. #!C # # # # # # # !C # !C ## # # ## # # # ^ # # # ^ !C # # # # # !C # ## # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!. # # # !C # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # ^ # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # !C # # # # !C# !. # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # #!C ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # !C# # # ^ !C## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # !C# ## # # ^!. ## # # # # # # ^ # !C# # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C# # # # #!C # !C# # # # # #!C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !. ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # # # !C #!C # # # # # ## # # # # # ^ # # # ## # # # # #!C !. # # !C # # !C ## #^ ## # !C # # # # # # # ^!.# # # !C ## # # # # !C !C # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # !C # # # #^ # !C # # # # ## # # # # ## # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # ## # # #!C # ## # # # # # ## # # # # ## # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # ^ # !C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C### # # # # # # # #!C. # # !C # # # # # # ^ # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # ### ^ # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## !C # ^ # # # # # # # !C # # # # ^ !C # # # !. !C# ## !C # # # # # # !C ^# # !C # # # ## # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ##!C ## # # # !C# # ^ # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ### # # # # # !C^ # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # #.
Recommended publications
  • Providing Education to Enhance Wildlife Conservation in South Africa
    Providing Education to Enhance Wildlife Conservation in South Africa Through the First Wildlife School for Game Ranchers - a Grassroots Effort by Government Authorized Conservationists David L. Bergman, USDA APHIS, Wildlife Services, Phoenix, AZ Nico Avenant, National Museum and University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State Province, South Africa Francoais Schutte, Mbogo Wildlife Facilities, Theunissen, Free State Province, South Africa Michael J. Bodenchuk, USDA APHIS, Wildlife Services, San Antonio, TX ABSTRACT: The establishment of the game ranching industry in South Africa has resulted in the conversion of 20 million hectares of marginal agricultural land to an economically viable and conservation oriented industry. The single biggest driving factor in the growth of the game ranching industry in South Africa was the promulgation of the Game Theft Act 105 of 1991 which conferred private ownership of game. Due to the Act, wildlife became economically viable and were managed according to the creation of this new market. The growth in game animals has reached its highest point since 1850 with over 20 million animals. In 1992, South Africa signed the International Convention on Biodiversity whereby the country committed itself to a goal of 12% of the country would be preserved for wildlife biodiversity by 2021. By 2016, the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) had determined that South Africa’s terrestrial protected area fell far short of the 12% agreed upon by the country. The DEA had determined that South Africa would have to depend on the assistance and conservation of the game ranching industry in order to meet the 12% target. In 2017 it was realized that a wildlife school for game farmers was needed, to address utilizing natural resources in a manner that supports sustainability and improves economic prospects while upholding conservation ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • MERCURY - PERSEUS 400 Kv TRANSMISSION LINE
    MERCURY - PERSEUS 400 kV TRANSMISSION LINE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE SOIL-LANDFORM RESOURCES Prepared by: Dr EBEN VERSTER (Pr Sci Nat) PEDOPLAN CC 247 KNYSNA AVE 0182 SINOVILLE Prepared for: STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL FOCUS P.O. Box 74785 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 MARCH 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This report deals with a desk-top study of the soil-landform resources of the Mercury-Perseus Transmission Line Project with the objective to provide a description of these resources, interpret these features in terms of their suitability for selected land uses, identify the impact landform would have on the project, identify sensitive soils along the proposed corridors, evaluate the impacts on the soils and recommend mitigatory measures and actions to minimise negative impacts. 2. As information base, the land type maps (scale 1:250 000) and accompanying memoirs covering the survey area were used. Aspects on the soils, landform and climate were derived from the land type survey, whereas topographic and other geomorphological data were obtained from the 1:50 000 topographical maps. 3. It must be clearly stated that the land type information is for broad-scale assessment purposes only and that the positioning of pylons and construction camps, for example, will require studies at the detailed level. 4. The land type map (FIGURE 1) shows the spatial distribution of the land types, while TABLE 4.1 summarises the soil and slope components occupying each land type. 4.1 In general, five broad soil-landform systems related to parent material and topography can be distinguished. These are freely drained, red and yellow-brown, fine sandy soils on level topography; fine sandy to loamy soils in plinthic catena on level topography; duplex soils with reddish subsoils on level topography; duplex and other clayey soils of mainly bottomland sites; and very shallow and rocky soils overlying calcrete and hard rock associated with steeper slopes in places.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of the Implementation of Demand-Side Management at the Theunissen-Brandfort Pumps Feeder
    POTENTIAL OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT AT THE THEUNISSEN-BRANDFORT PUMPS FEEDER by KHOTSOFALO CLEMENT MOTLOHI Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree MAGISTER TECHNOLOGIAE: ENGINEERING: ELECTRICAL In the Faculty of Engineering, Information & Communication Technology: School of Electrical & Computer Systems Engineering At the Central University of Technology, Free State Supervisor: Mr L Moji, MSc. (Eng) Co- supervisor: Prof. LJ Grobler, PhD (Eng), CEM BLOEMFONTEIN NOVEMBER 2006 i PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com ii DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENT WORK I, KHOTSOFALO CLEMENT MOTLOHI, hereby declare that this research project submitted for the degree MAGISTER TECHNOLOGIAE: ENGINEERING: ELECTRICAL, is my own independent work that has not been submitted before to any institution by me or anyone else as part of any qualification. Only the measured results were physically performed by TSI, under my supervision (refer to Appendix I). _______________________________ _______________________ SIGNATURE OF STUDENT DATE PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com iii Acknowledgement My interest in the energy management study concept actually started while reading Eskom’s journals and technical bulletins about efficient-energy utilisation and its importance. First of all I would like to thank ALMIGHTY GOD for making me believe in MYSELF and giving me courage throughout this study. I would also like to thank the following people for making this study possible. I would like to express my sincere gratitude and respect to both my supervisors Mr L Moji and Prof. LJ Grobler who is an expert and master of the energy utilisation concept and also for both their positive criticism and the encouragement they gave me throughout this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Report on Livestock Disease Trends As Informally Reported By
    Monthly report on livestock disease trends as informally reported by veterinarians belonging to the Ruminant Veterinary Association of South Africa (RuVASA), a group of the South African Veterinary Association November 2014 The following practices and la boratories (104 ) submitted reports in November 2014: Mpumalanga (10 ) Balfour – dr. Louis van Jaarsveld Bethal – dr. Hardus Pieters Delmas – dr. Johan Jooste Grootvlei – dr. Neels van Wyk Lydenburg – drs. Trümpelmann and Steyn Nelspruit – dr. André Beyte ll Middelburg – drs. Fourie and Rabie Piet Retief - drs. Niebuhr and Weber Standerton – dr. Kobie Kroon Volksrust – dr. André Visser Gauteng (5 ) Bapsfontein – dr. Evert Olivier Bronkhorstspruit – drs. De Bruin, De Bruin, Rudolph and Slabber Nigel – dr. Cindy van der Westhuizen Onderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital – proff. Annandale, Prozesky, Shakespeare, drs. Blignaut, Carrington, Gratwick, Grobler, Harmse, Holm and O’Dell Pretoria – dr. Hanneke Pienaar Limpopo (6 ) Bela - Bela – drs. Du Toit, Hans en, Bester and Herbst Lephalale (Ellisras) – dr. Brigitte Luck Machado (Louis Trichardt) – drs. Harris, Klopper and Jacobs Mokopane (Potgietersrus) - dr. Henk Visser Polokwane (Pietersburg) – drs. Watson, Viljoen, J ansen Van Vuuren, Van Rooyen, Snyman a nd Cremona Vaalwater - dr. Hampie van Staden North West (7 ) Brits – drs. Boshoff and Coertze Christiana - dr. Pieter Nel Leeudoringstad - dr. Ian Jonker Rustenburg – drs. Gaigher, Grobler, Sparks, Van Egdom, Van Rooyen, Goosen and Van Rensburg Schweizer - Reneke - dr. N.J. Heyns Stella - dr. Magdaleen Vosser Ventersdorp – dr. Olof Marais Free State (21 ) Bloemfontein - dr. Stephan Wessels Bothaville – dr. Johan Blaauw Bultfontein – dr. Santjie Pieterse Clocolan – drs. Marwick and Wasserman Dewetsdorp – dr. Marike Badenhorst Ficksburg – dr. Woody Kotze Frankfort - drs. Lessing, Cilliers and Janse van Rensburg Harrismith - drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa)
    FREE STATE PROFILE (South Africa) Lochner Marais University of the Free State Bloemfontein, SA OECD Roundtable on Higher Education in Regional and City Development, 16 September 2010 [email protected] 1 Map 4.7: Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006 Mining SASOLBURG Location PARYS DENEYSVILLE ORANJEVILLE VREDEFORT VILLIERS FREE STATE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VILJOENSKROON KOPPIES CORNELIA HEILBRON FRANKFORT BOTHAVILLE Legend VREDE Towns EDENVILLE TWEELING Limited Combined Potential KROONSTAD Int PETRUS STEYN MEMEL ALLANRIDGE REITZ Below Average Combined Potential HOOPSTAD WESSELSBRON WARDEN ODENDAALSRUS Agric LINDLEY STEYNSRUST Above Average Combined Potential WELKOM HENNENMAN ARLINGTON VENTERSBURG HERTZOGVILLE VIRGINIA High Combined Potential BETHLEHEM Local municipality BULTFONTEIN HARRISMITH THEUNISSEN PAUL ROUX KESTELL SENEKAL PovertyLimited Combined Potential WINBURG ROSENDAL CLARENS PHUTHADITJHABA BOSHOF Below Average Combined Potential FOURIESBURG DEALESVILLE BRANDFORT MARQUARD nodeAbove Average Combined Potential SOUTPAN VERKEERDEVLEI FICKSBURG High Combined Potential CLOCOLAN EXCELSIOR JACOBSDAL PETRUSBURG BLOEMFONTEIN THABA NCHU LADYBRAND LOCALITY PLAN TWEESPRUIT Economic BOTSHABELO THABA PATSHOA KOFFIEFONTEIN OPPERMANSDORP Power HOBHOUSE DEWETSDORP REDDERSBURG EDENBURG WEPENER LUCKHOFF FAURESMITH houses JAGERSFONTEIN VAN STADENSRUST TROMPSBURG SMITHFIELD DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING PHILIPPOLIS SPRINGFONTEIN Arid SPATIAL PLANNING DIRECTORATE ZASTRON SPATIAL INFORMATION SERVICES ROUXVILLE BETHULIE
    [Show full text]
  • South African Jewish Board of Deputies Report of The
    The South African Jewish Board of Deputies JL 1r REPORT of the Executive Council for the period July 1st, 1933, to April 30th, 1935. To be submitted to the Eleventh Congress at Johannesburg, May 19th and 20th, 1935. <י .H.W.V. 8. Co י É> S . 0 5 Americanist Commiitae LIBRARY 1 South African Jewish Board of Deputies. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. President : Hirsch Hillman, Johannesburg. Vice-President» : S. Raphaely, Johannesburg. Morris Alexander, K.C., M.P., Cape Town. H. Moss-Morris, Durban. J. Philips, Bloemfontein. Hon. Treasurer: Dr. Max Greenberg. Members of Executive Council: B. Alexander. J. Alexander. J. H. Barnett. Harry Carter, M.P.C. Prof. Dr. S. Herbert Frankel. G. A. Friendly. Dr. H. Gluckman. J. Jackson. H. Katzenellenbogen. The Chief Rabbi, Prof. Dr. j. L. Landau, M.A., Ph.D. ^ C. Lyons. ^ H. H. Morris Esq., K.C. ^י. .B. L. Pencharz A. Schauder. ^ Dr. E. B. Woolff, M.P.C. V 2 CONSTITUENT BODIES. The Board's Constituent Bodies are as. follows :— JOHANNESBURG (Transvaal). 1. Anykster Sick Benefit and Benevolent Society. 2. Agoodas Achim Society. 3. Beth Hamedrash Hagodel. 4. Berea Hebrew Congregation. 5. Bertrams Hebrew Congregation. 6. Braamfontein Hebrew Congregation. 7. Chassidim Congregation. 8. Club of Polish Jews. 9. Doornfontein Hebrew:: Congregation.^;7 10. Eastern Hebrew Benevolent Society. 11. Fordsburg Hebrew Congregation. 12. Grodno Sifck Benefit and Benevolent Society. 13. Habonim. 14. Hatechiya Organisation. 15. H.O.D. Dr. Herzl Lodge. 16. H.O.D. Sir Moses Montefiore Lodge. 17. Jeppes Hebrew Congregation, 18. Johannesburg Jewish Guild. 19. Johannesburg Jewish Helping Hand and Burial Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Plan V1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016 1.0)
    Biodiversity Plan v1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016_1.0) DRAFT 1 JUNE 2016 Map: Collins, N.B. 2015. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: CBA map. Report Title: Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0 Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. Date: $20 June 2016 ______________________________ Version: 1.0 Authors & contact details: Nacelle Collins Free State Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs [email protected] 051 4004775 082 4499012 Physical address: 34 Bojonala Buidling Markgraaf street Bloemfontein 9300 Postal address: Private Bag X20801 Bloemfontein 9300 Citation: Report: Collins, N.B. 2016. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0. Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. 1. Summary $what is a biodiversity plan This report contains the technical information that details the rationale and methods followed to produce the first terrestrial biodiversity plan for the Free State Province. Because of low confidence in the aquatic data that were available at the time of developing the plan, the aquatic component is not included herein and will be released as a separate report. The biodiversity plan was developed with cognisance of the requirements for the determination of bioregions and the preparation and publication of bioregional plans (DEAT, 2009). To this extent the two main products of this process are: • A map indicating the different terrestrial categories (Protected, Critical Biodiversity Areas, Ecological Support Areas, Other and Degraded) • Land-use guidelines for the above mentioned categories This plan represents the first attempt at collating all terrestrial biodiversity and ecological data into a single system from which it can be interrogated and assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2019
    Monthly report on livestock disease trends as informally reported by veterinarians belonging to the Ruminant Veterinary Association of South Africa (RuVASA), a group of the South African Veterinary Association November 2019 (Previous disease reports can be seen on the RuVASA website www.ruvasa.co.za ) These reports include data from individual practices Click on Disease Reports The following practices and laboratories (110) submitted reports during November 2019: Mpumalanga (13) Balfour – Dr. Lous van Jaarsveld Bethal – Dr. Hardus Pieters Grootvlei – Dr. Neels van Wyk Karino – Dr. Silke Pfitzer Lydenburg – Dr. Marietjie Malan Lydenburg – Drs. Trümpelmann and Steyn Malalane – Drs. Van Sittert and Van Sittert Middelburg – Drs. Erasmus and Bernitz Middelburg – Dr. Neil Fourie Nelspruit – Dr. André Beytel Karino – Dr. Silke Pfitzer Standerton – Dr. Kobie Kroon Volksrust – Dr. Johan Blaauw Gauteng (6) Bronkhorstspruit – Dr. De Bruin, De Bruin and Labuschagne Hammanskraal – Dr. Hentie Engelbrecht Muldersdrift – Drs. Speedy and Enslin Onderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital – Proff. Annandale, Shakespear, Holm, Pettey and Drs, Fitte, Grobler, Hamman, Koeppel, Leask, Mabu, Marufu, Mokoele, O’Dell, Tshuma and Van der Leek University of Pretoria – Dr. Emily Mitchell Vanderbijlpark – Dr. Kobus Kok Limpopo (3) Modimolle – Drs. Huber, Bredell and Barnard Mokopane (Potgietersrus)- Dr. Alwyn Venter Vaalwater – Dr. Hampie van Staden North West (9) Brits – Dr. Boshoff and Coertze Christiana – Dr. Pieter Nel Klerksdorp/Coligny/Fochville/Hartebeesfontein/Ottosdal/Potcheftroom – Drs. Van den Berg, Van den Berg, Van der Walt and Geral Leeudoringstad – Dr. Ian Jonker Lichtenburg – Dr. Nelmarie-Krüger-Rall Rustenburg – Drs. Goosen, Grobler, Sparks, Van Egdom, Van Rensburg and Van Rooyen Schweizer-Reneke – Dr. Pieter venter Stella - Dr. Magdaleen Vosser Ventersdorp/ Koster –Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette Free State Province Provinsiale Koerant Provinsie Vrystaat
    Provincial Provinsiale Gazette Koerant Free State Province Provinsie Vrystaat Published by Authority Uitgegee op Gesag No. 108 FRIDAY, 12 February 2010 No. 108 VRYDAG, 12 Februarie 2010 No. Index Page PROVINCIAL NOTICE 370 PUBLICATION OF THE RESOURCE TARGETING LIST FOR THE NO FEE SCHOOLS 2010 2 2 No. 108 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, 12 FEBRUARY 2010 PROVINCIAL NOTICE ____________ [No. 370 of 2010] PUBLICATION OF THE RESOURCE TARGETING LIST FOR THE NO FEE SCHOOLS IN 2010 I, PHI Makgoe, Member of the Executive Council responsible for Education in the Province, hereby under section 39(9) read with the National Norms and Standards publish the resource targeting list of public schools for 2010 as set out in the Schedule. PROVINCE: FREE STATE SCHEDULE - DATA ON NO FEE SCHOOLS FOR 2010 1 of 78 PER LEARNER LEARNER EMIS PRIMARY ADDRESS OF QUINTILE NUMBERS ALLOCATION NUMBER NAME OF SCHOOL /SECONDARY SCHOOL TOWN CODE DISTRICT 2010 2010 2010 441811121 AANVOOR PF/S Primary PO BOX 864 HEILBRON 9650 FEZILE DABI Q1 6 855 444306220 ADELINE MEJE P/S Primary PO BOX 701 VILJOENSKROON 9520 FEZILE DABI Q1 1,074 855 441811160 ALICE PF/S Primary PO BOX 251 HEILBRON 9650 FEZILE DABI Q1 14 855 442506122 AMACILIA PF/S Primary PO BOX 676 KROONSTAD 9500 FEZILE DABI Q1 23 855 441610010 ANDERKANT PF/S Primary PO BOX 199 FRANKFORT 9830 FEZILE DABI Q1 34 855 442506284 BANJALAND PF/S Primary PO BOX 1333 KROONSTAD 9500 FEZILE DABI Q1 14 855 442510030 BANKLAAGTE PF/S Primary PO BOX 78 STEYNSRUS 9525 FEZILE DABI Q1 9 855 443011135 BARNARD MOLOKOANE S/S Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • Free State Province
    Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province FREE STATE PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Free State Xhariep Springfontein 17 Districts PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Free State Thabo Mofutsanyane Tshiame (Harrismith) Lejweleputswa Wesselsbron Fezile Dabi Parys Mangaung Thaba Nchu 1 SECTION 1: 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS FREE STATE PROVINCE Xhariep District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub: Springfontein District Context Demographics The XDM covers the largest area in the FSP, yet has the lowest Xhariep has an estimated population of approximately 146 259 people. population, making it the least densely populated district in the Its population size has grown with a lesser average of 2.21% per province. It borders Motheo District Municipality (Mangaung and annum since 1996, compared to that of province (2.6%). The district Naledi Local Municipalities) and Lejweleputswa District Municipality has a fairly even population distribution with most people (41%) (Tokologo) to the north, Letsotho to the east and the Eastern Cape residing in Kopanong whilst Letsemeng and Mohokare accommodate and Northern Cape to the south and west respectively. The DM only 32% and 27% of the total population, respectively. The majority comprises three LMs: Letsemeng, Kopanong and Mohokare. Total of people living in Xhariep (almost 69%) are young and not many Area: 37 674km². Xhariep District Municipality is a Category C changes have been experienced in the age distribution of the region municipality situated in the southern part of the Free State. It is since 1996. Only 5% of the total population is elderly people. The currently made up of four local municipalities: Letsemeng, Kopanong, gender composition has also shown very little change since 1996, with Mohokare and Naledi, which include 21 towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism, Hate Speech and Double Standards
    Solidarity Research Institute Part of the Solidarity Movement Racism, hate speech and double standards: Not a simple black and white matter Dr Eugene Brink & Connie Mulder www.solidarity.co.za* 0861 25 24 23 Introduction Racism is a worldwide phenomenon and challenge and certainly not unique to South Africa. No country on earth is untouched by this ugly scourge and it has often led to bloodletting, wars and pogroms around the world. In multi-ethnic societies mutual respect, fairness and tolerance are of paramount importance for sociopolitical stability and sound race relations. Extremism and forced assimilation, on the other hand, provide the sparks that could ignite a racial powder keg and turn simmering tensions into a full-blown conflagration. Nobody wins in such situations, except maybe the extremists and their malignant agenda. South Africa does have a fairly unique and well-documented political history. After the demise of apartheid, a new constitution was adopted and new, democratic institutions were created to usher in, and of course buttress, the democratic era. Considering our history, race relations have been relatively good over the past 23 years. People of all cultures and ethnicities work, eat, worship and shop in common spaces. A recent study by the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) among all racial groups showed that a mere 3% of South Africans regard racism as a serious unresolved problem, and that in fact it pales in comparison with issues such as joblessness and crime. They also found in a 2015 study that a solid 55% of all respondents thought race relations had improved since 1994.
    [Show full text]