Spencelower Light Korunye Mudla Wirra0 Roseworthy 5 Km Gomersal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Spencelower Light Korunye Mudla Wirra0 Roseworthy 5 Km Gomersal

Light Nain Pinkerton Plains r ve Dublin Ri Mallala Freeling Daveyston Templers July 2018 Grace Redbanks Dublin Wasleys N Woolsheds MAP OF THE FEDERAL Seppeltsfield ht Fischer ig Shea-Oak Log ELECTORAL DIVISION OF L Nuriootpa SPENCELower Light Korunye Mudla Wirra0 Roseworthy 5 km Gomersal Y Kangaroo Flat Y W Kingsford W LIGHT H H Name and boundary of Kangaroo Flat Rd S Reeves Plains K T R C U Electoral Division River O T S R t h Gawler Belt REDB R Riv g ANKS R a er O r Li locality boundary D Pa H Names and boundaries of h GREY ort Ward Belt Gawler N Concordia adjoining Electoral Divisions Hewett Concordia ADELAIDE PLAINS Ward Belt Rd Belt locality boundary Lyndoch TWO Names and boundaries of Local RD Willaston GAWLER BARO Sandy SSA EY Government Areas (2016) Wingate Rd Reid VALL WY Creek Middle Two Wells WELLS RD Gawler East Beach P Lewiston This map has been compiled by Spatial Vision from data supplied by the Australian Electoral O Gawler Evanston BARKER Commission, Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, PSMA and Geoscience R T River Australia. Gawler G A GAWLER W Kalbeeba Kalbeeba locality Angle Hillier L E boundary R r RD e Vale iv R RD Bibaringa Gawler Kudla O BAROSSA N W VALE H E r A Virginia T ive K ANGLE R R E CURTIS O S ler F P N aw I X o G E Penfield E u L t T h Port Gawler D Munno R Williamstown Gardens Pa Para E ra R N E iv R I Uleybury er P D A EN FIE Andrews M LD N ER Farm Blakeview TH H Yattalunga I R RD Smithfield L H O L W N PLAYFORD Y Penfield Gulf Buckland Park SPENCE St Vincent R Craigmore D D D Humbug R Elizabeth Humbug R Waterloo Scrub Scrub Rd RD Corner K T Edinburgh One Tree Hill E E A Elizabeth N R R Y S S A East S W B P R A H G k B o e O ul e Kersbrook P Gould Creek d r O I K C H Burton L I T H L Hillbank U L P Ri I R O St Kilda Little Para ver Gould Creek H Sampson D S Flat MAYO Paralowie D E R E Greenwith R Salisbury T ver KI H Ri NG T SALISBURY S Y R a W O E Lower r N N Golden a H O Salisbury Outer Harbor P Hermitage Parafield IN Grove le RD A East itt HINDMARSH L Gardens M TEA TREE GULLY ADELAIDE HILLS Y North Haven Torrens R U MAKIN Island B Parafield Osborne IS L Inglewood © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 A © State of South Australia 2018 S Taperoo Dry Creek Mawson Para Hills Chain Of Ponds Gumeracha Gillman Cavan Pooraka Ridgehaven Largs North Port Adelaide Lakes Para Vista Millbrook Houghton Cudlee Creek.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Biodiversity
Biodiversity KEY5 FACTS as hunting), as pasture grasses or as aquarium species Introduced (in the case of some marine species). They have also • Introduced species are been introduced accidentally, such as in shipments of recognised as a leading Species imported grain or in ballast water. cause of biodiversity loss Introduced plants, or weeds, can invade and world-wide. compete with native plant species for space, light, Trends water and nutrients and because of their rapid growth rates they can quickly smother native vegetation. • Rabbit numbers: a DECLINE since Similarly to weeds, many introduced animals compete introduction of Rabbit Haemorrhagic with and predate on native animals and impact on Disease (RHD, also known as calicivirus) native vegetation. They have high reproductive rates although the extent of the decline varies and can tolerate a wide range of habitats. As a result across the State. they often establish populations very quickly. •Fox numbers: DOWN in high priority Weeds can provide shelter for pest animals, conservation areas due to large-scale although they can provide food for or become habitat baiting programs; STILL A PROBLEM in for native animals. Blackberry, for example, is an ideal other parts of the State. habitat for the threatened Southern Brown Bandicoot. This illustrates the complexity of issues associated •Feral camel and deer numbers: UP. with pest control and highlights the need for control •Feral goat numbers: DECLINING across measures to have considered specific conservation Weed affected land – Mount Lofty Ranges the State. outcomes to be undertaken over time and to be Photo: Kym Nicolson •Feral pig numbers: UNKNOWN.
[Show full text]
OPEN SPACE and PLACES for PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils
OPEN SPACE AND PLACES FOR PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils OPEN SPACE AND PLACES FOR PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils PROJECT NAME Whitmore Square/ Iparrityi Master Plan - Stage 1 Upgrade (City of Adelaide) COST AND FUNDING CONTRIBUTION Council contribution $1,400,000 Planning and Development Fund contribution $900,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,300,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Council is seeking funding to deliver the first stage of the master plan to establish pleasant walking paths and extend the valued leafy character of the square from its centre to its edges. This project involves: Safety improvements to the northern tri-intersection at Morphett and Wright Streets. Greening and paths that frame the inner edges of the square. The Northern tri-intersection will commence first, followed by the greening and pedestrian connections. TIMELINE OF THE WORKS Construction work to begin May and be completed by December 2020. Masterplan perspective PROJECT NAME Moonta Street Upgrade (City of Adelaide) COST AND FUNDING CONTRIBUTION Contribution Source Amount Council contribution TBC Planning and Development Fund contribution $2,000,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,000,000* PROJECT DESCRIPTION Council is seeking funding to establish Moonta Street as the next key linkage in connecting the Central Market to Riverbank Precinct through north-south road laneways. The project involves: • the installation of quality stone paving throughout and the installation of landscaping to position Moonta Street as a comfortable green promenade and a premium precinct for evening activity. TIMELINE OF WORKS • The first stage of this project is detailed design prior to any works on ground commencing.
[Show full text]
Summary of Groundwater Recharge Estimates for the Catchments of the Western Mount Lofty Ranges Prescribed Water Resources Area
TECHNICAL NOTE 2008/16 Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ESTIMATES FOR THE CATCHMENTS OF THE WESTERN MOUNT LOFTY RANGES PRESCRIBED WATER RESOURCES AREA Graham Green and Dragana Zulfic November 2007 © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2008 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001. Disclaimer The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. ISBN 978-1-921218-81-1 Preferred way to cite this publication Green G & Zulfic D, 2008, Summary of groundwater recharge estimates for the catchments of the Western
[Show full text]
Alan Mayne 2 Pages
Suggestion 161 Alan Mayne 2 pages South Australian secretariat Phone (08) 8237 6504 Fax (02) 6293 7663 Email [email protected] From: Alan Mayne Sent: Wednesday, 22 November 2017 2:30 PM To: FedRedistribution - SA Subject: Federal Seat Redistribution in South Australia Mayo: I submit below a general text that you will already have received from many Mayo electors, and which you may discount because it is based upon a shared template. However I want to emphasise here at the beginning that Mayo should not be abolished because the region it represents has historical, geographical, cultural and economic coherence and unity (AND ongoing vitality) which it would be foolish to unravel. At a time when this region is attracting world interest for its collective signature in premium-quality agricultural and viticultural production, and when its bid for UNESCO world heritage recognition is slowly gaining traction, it would be heart-rending to residents for the region to be removed from the nation's electoral map. The region would be reassigned to the margins of formal political activity (which is surely the antithesis of sensible planning for a healthy democracy?). I speak from the heart not only as a rural constituent of this complicated electoral mix of rural and city- fringe residents, but as a long-term volunteer member of the Oakbank-Balhannah CFS brigade. In the CFS (region 1) we give our all for this place, and I would expect that commitment to be considered seriously as you rework the federal electoral map of South Australia. To the Redistribution Committee for South Australia, I write to make suggestions to the South Australian Federal Redistribution currently being undertaken by the Australian Electoral Commission.
[Show full text]
Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Reports
Water quality Information Sheet Aquatic ecosystem condition reports 2011 panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM region Issued September 2012 EPA984/12: This information sheet describes the outcome of the panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges, NRM region based on monitoring data collected in 2011. Introduction The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) coordinates a monitoring, evaluation and reporting (MER) program on the aquatic ecosystem condition of South Australian creeks and rivers. This MER program is designed to meet several objectives: • Providing a statewide monitoring framework for creeks and rivers that revolves through the NRM regions with sufficient frequency to allow for State of the Environment Reporting purposes. • Describing aquatic ecosystem condition for broad general public understanding. • Identifying the key pressures and management responses to those pressures. • Providing a useful reporting format that can support environmental decision making within government, community and industry. This information sheet provides a summary of the scientific work used in assessing monitoring data from creeks and rivers. Aquatic ecosystem science is not always rigid and precise; it is often open to different interpretations in several respects. Therefore, the EPA has decided that the best way to assess the condition of streams is through an expert panel deliberation that uses a consistent descriptive modelling approach. The panel members comprised an environmental consultant, a biologist from the biomonitoring team at the Australian Water Quality Centre (AWQC), and two biologists from the EPA (the authors of this assessment). All have at least 10 years experience in monitoring and assessing a range of streams across South Australia.
[Show full text]
Using Hydraulic Head, Chloride and Electrical Conductivity Data to Distinguish Between Mountain-Front and Mountain-Block Recharge to Basin Aquifers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1629–1648, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Using hydraulic head, chloride and electrical conductivity data to distinguish between mountain-front and mountain-block recharge to basin aquifers Etienne Bresciani1,2, Roger H. Cranswick1,3, Eddie W. Banks1, Jordi Batlle-Aguilar1,4, Peter G. Cook1, and Okke Batelaan1 1National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, School of the Environment, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia 2Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea 3Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA Correspondence: Etienne Bresciani (etienne.bresciani@flinders.edu.au) Received: 8 June 2017 – Discussion started: 31 July 2017 Revised: 10 January 2018 – Accepted: 29 January 2018 – Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract. Numerous basin aquifers in arid and semi-arid data indicate that not only the Quaternary aquifers but also regions of the world derive a significant portion of their the deeper Tertiary aquifers are recharged through MFR and recharge from adjacent mountains. Such recharge can ef- not MBR. It is expected that this finding will have a signif- fectively occur through either stream infiltration in the icant impact on the management of water resources in the mountain-front zone (mountain-front recharge, MFR) or sub- region. This study demonstrates the relevance of using hy- surface flow from the mountain (mountain-block recharge, draulic head, chloride and EC data to distinguish between MBR).
[Show full text]
July 2018 MAP of the FEDERAL ELECTORAL DIVISION OF
Macdonald Park Blakeview Penfield Andrews Farm Gardens Smithfield Virginia Penfield Davoren Uleybury Park Craigmore Yattalunga Waterloo Elizabeth JulyCorner 2018 North Elizabeth N Smith Downs k MAP OF THE FEDERAL Edinburgh Cree Buckland Park ELECTORAL DIVISION OF North Cr Elizabeth Park eek A One Tree Hill dams Humbug Scrub MAKIN Edinburgh Munno Para 0 2 km Direk Port Adelaide Elizabeth A D E L Elizabeth A ID East D E Name and boundary of R - HWY P O PLAYFORD Electoral Division W R A T Elizabeth TE Burton A R U Grove LO G O RD U SPENCE Gould Creek Names and boundaries of S P T I L G A I o k uld ree adjoining Electoral Divisions R H C C A O P RD Sampson Flat RN IL Hillbank E L Elizabeth Little Para R L IN Kersbrook St Kilda Reservoir L E Vale I Names and boundaries of Local H RD Government Areas (2016) Salisbury REE Paralowie North ittle r T BOLIVAR L Para Rive Salisbury D Hannaford Hump Rd Port Adelaide R Salisbury This map has been compiled by Spatial Vision from data supplied by the Australian Electoral S Park E Greenwith Commission, Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, PSMA and Geoscience IT Heights E Australia. H Salisbury H N T O W Salisbury R T O HE Plain N r G Rive Salisbury Outer K R RD IN O G Downs FROST V Golden Grove Harbor S IN Salisbury Lower Bolivar E A E D Dry Creek N R I RD M East Hermitage locality boundary L Osborne IL TEA TREE GULLY Parafield A W a Salisbury r R RD Y a P Gardens South E R V E e E G tl RD O it L SALISBURY R Upper Hermitage A L W T Y G I Globe Derby A W H M Torrens Island Y G BRIDGE A - N
[Show full text]
Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia
Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia K S Edyvane May 1999 ISBN 0 7308 5237 7 No 38 The recommendations given in this publication are based on the best available information at the time of writing. The South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) makes no warranty of any kind expressed or implied concerning the use of technology mentioned in this publication. © SARDI. This work is copyright. Apart of any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the publisher. SARDI is a group of the Department of Primary Industries and Resources CONTENTS – PART ONE PAGE CONTENTS NUMBER INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction…………………………………..…………………………………………………………1 1.1 The ‘Unique South’ – Southern Australia’s Temperate Marine Biota…………………………….…….1 1.2 1.2 The Status of Marine Protected Areas in Southern Australia………………………………….4 2 South Australia’s Marine Ecosystems and Biodiversity……………………………………………..9 2.1 Oceans, Gulfs and Estuaries – South Australia’s Oceanographic Environments……………………….9 2.1.1 Productivity…………………………………………………………………………………….9 2.1.2 Estuaries………………………………………………………………………………………..9 2.2 Rocky Cliffs and Gulfs, to Mangrove Shores -South Australia’s Coastal Environments………………………………………………………………13 2.2.1 Offshore Islands………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.2 Gulf Ecosystems………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.3 Northern Spencer Gulf………………………………………………………………………...14
[Show full text]
U.2.5 New Modelling Capability to Target Stormwater Interventions That Support Seagrass Health Along Adelaide's Coast | I
New modelling capability to target stormwater interventions that support seagrass health along Adelaide's coast Project U.2.5 Karen Rouse, Dennis Gonzalez, Milena Fernandes, Jos van Gils, Shiroma Maheepala, Ying He, Fareed Mirza, Rob Daly, Susan Cuddy Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 16/9 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide, the University of South Australia and ICE WaRM (The International Centre of Excellence in Water Resources Management). The Institute will enhance the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. The following Associate organisation contributed to this report: Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 4, 33 King William Street Adelaide, SA, 5000 tel: +61 8-8236 5200 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Rouse K, Gonzalez D, Fernandes M, van Gils J, Maheepala S, He Y, Mirza F, Daly R, Cuddy SM (2016) New modelling capability to target stormwater interventions that support seagrass health along Adelaide's coast, Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 16/9, Adelaide, South Australia Copyright © 2016 CSIRO. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO.
[Show full text]
Council Agenda
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING To: Mayor Jan-Claire Wisdom Councillor Ian Bailey Councillor Kirrilee Boyd Councillor Nathan Daniell Councillor Pauline Gill Councillor Chris Grant Councillor Linda Green Councillor Malcolm Herrmann Councillor John Kemp Councillor Leith Mudge Councillor Mark Osterstock Councillor Kirsty Parkin Councillor Andrew Stratford Notice is given pursuant to the provisions under Section 83 of the Local Government Act 1999 that the next meeting of the Council will be held on: Tuesday 24 March 2020 6.30pm 63 Mt Barker Road Stirling A copy of the Agenda for this meeting is supplied under Section 83 of the Act. Meetings of the Council are open to the public and members of the community are welcome to attend. Public notice of the Agenda for this meeting is supplied under Section 84 of the Act. Andrew Aitken Chief Executive Officer Page 1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA FOR MEETING Tuesday 24 March 2020 6.30pm 63 Mt Barker Road Stirling ORDER OF BUSINESS 1. COMMENCEMENT 2. OPENING STATEMENT “Council acknowledges that we meet on the traditional lands of the Peramangk and Kaurna people and we recognise their connection with the land. We understand that we do not inherit the land from our ancestors but borrow it from our children and in this context the decisions we make should be guided by the principle that nothing we do should decrease our children’s ability to live on this land.” 3. APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE 3.1. Apology Apologies were received from …………. 3.2. Leave of Absence 3.3. Absent 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS Council Meeting – 25 February 2020 That the minutes of the ordinary meeting held on 25 February 2020 as supplied, be confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of that meeting.
[Show full text]
Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region
Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 December 2011 Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 December 2011 Board This Publication may be cited as: McNeil, D.G, Schmarr, D.W and Mathwin, R (2011). Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region. Report to the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 590. 65pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
[Show full text]
2019-20 Australian Electoral Commission Annual Report
2019 ANNUAL REPORT ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISSN: 0814–4508 Unless otherwise noted, the Australian Electoral Commission has applied the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence to this publication with the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the AEC’s logos, the AEC’s maps and content supplied by third parties. Use of material subject to the licence must not assert or imply any connection with or endorsement by the AEC unless with express prior written permission. The commission asserts the right of recognition as author of the original material. The publication should be attributed as Australian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2019–20. The term ‘Indigenous’ in this report refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people unless otherwise stated. This report may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. Produced by: Australian Electoral Commission Printed by: Elect Printing Annual report contact officer Director, Financial Management Section Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Contact phone number: 02 6271 4476 Contact email: [email protected] Entity website: www.aec.gov.au Make an online enquiry www.aec.gov.au/enquiry Accessible services http://www.aec.gov.au/assistance for telephone interpreter services in multiple languages. Readers who are deaf or who have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS). • TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 • Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 • Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 This publication is printed on an uncoated Australian made 30% recycled, FSC© certified carbon neutral paper.
[Show full text]