I HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE UST AREAS T-1 TIIROUGH T-3 T-4 TIIROUGH T-7, T-9, T-llA AND T-llB l\11LWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

August 8, 1996

Prepared for:

Milwaukee County Department of Public Works Engineering, Environmental and Energy Services Courthouse Annex, Room #314 907 North 10th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233

Prepared by:

Hydro-Search, Inc. Brookfield Lakes Corporate Center XII 175 N. Corporate Drive, Suite 100 Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045

Michael R. Noel, Sr. Vice President . ass ender, Sr. H ydrogeologist Manager of Milwaukee Operations t Manager

175 N. Corporate Drive, Suite 100, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045 Telephone (414) 792-1282 Facsimile (414) 792-1310 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE UST AREAS T-1 THROUGH T-3 T-4 THROUGH T-7, T-9, T-llA AND T-llB MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

August 8, 1996

was prepared by certified hydrogeologists as defined in NR712.02(1) Wis. Adm. Code

I, Judy L. Fassbender, hereby certify that I am a Hydrogeologist as that term is defined in s. NR712.03(1) Wis. Adm. Code, and that, to the best of my knowledge, all of the information contained in this document is correct and the document was prepared in compliance with all applicable requirements in chs. NR700 to 726, Wis. Adm. Code.

udy L. Fassbender Senior Hydrogeologist

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

2.0 INTRODUCTION 2-1

2.1 Site History 2-2

2.1.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3 2-2

2.1.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 2-2

2.1.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB 2-3

3.0 GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING 3-1

3.1 Regional Conditions 3-1

3.2 Local Conditions 3-1

4.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 4-1

4.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3 4-1

4.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 4-2

4.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB 4-3

4.4 Field Investigation Procedures 4-4

5.0 RESULTS 5-1

5.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3 5-1

5.1.1 Soil 5-1

5.1.2 Ground Water 5-1

5.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 5-2

5.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB - Soil 5-3

1

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1

6.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3 6-1

6.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 6-1

6.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB 6-2

FIGURES

1-1 Site Location and Local Topography

2-1 Site Layout

2-2 UST Area T-1 through T-3 Borehole/Monitor Well Locations

2-3 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 Location Map

2-4 UST Area T-llA and T-llB Borehole Locations

5-1 UST Area T-1, T-2 and T-3 Shallow Water Table Elevation (November 15, 1995)

TABLES

5-1 Summary of Soil Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-1, T-2, and T-3)

5-2 Summary of Ground-Water Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-1 through T-3)

5-3 Summary of Soil Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-1 lA and T-1 lB)

11

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

APPENDICES

A. WDNR Soil Boring Log Information Forms (4400-122) and Borehole Abandonment Forms (3300-SB)

B. Field PID Data Forms and Calibration Record Form

C. Laboratory Results and Chain-of-Custody Form

D. Monitor Well Construction Forms (4400-113A) and Monitor Well Development Forms (4400-113B)

E. Well Development/Purge Summary Forms and Field Water Quality Sampling and Analysis Forms

F. Survey Data

ll1

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 1. 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of this investigation was to was to evaluate the nature and extent of contamination of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and ground water remaining following the upgrading of underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Kinnickinnic Bus Garage (KKBG) at 1710 South Kinnickinnic Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Figure 1-1). The client and property owner is the County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (County). The remedial investigation was performed by Hydro-Search, Inc. (HSI) and overseen for the County by Mr. Robert L. Knighten, managing environmental engineer for the Milwaukee County Department of Public Works (MCDPW).

The scope of the investigation was based upon results obtained and reported by Foth and Van Dyke in their 1992 tank upgrade assessment reports to Mr. Robert Knighten of the MCDPW. These reports documented the excavation required to implement the UST upgrades and the removal and disposal of approximately 1,500 gallons of water at the T-4 through T-7 & T-9 UST area. Soil and water samples collected at the time of UST upgrade indicated contamination was present at levels requiring further investigation.

HSI evaluated the current petroleum compound concentrations and the horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum impacted soils and ground-water at three distinct UST areas in October and November of 1995. Soil borehole and monitor well installation along with UST excavation sump sampling were used in the investigation. Borehole installation included field screening of soils with a PID and obtaining soil samples from the borehole for submission to a state­ certified analytical laboratory for analyses. Similarly, ground-water samples were obtained from monitor wells and one UST sump for laboratory submission.

Soil and ground-water samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DROs), petroleum volatile organic compounds (PVOCs), 1,2 DCA, and VOCs as applicable. One soil sample was analyzed for natural biodegradation parameters.

None of the soil samples collected contained PVOC or DRO concentrations in excess of the NR720 Residual Contaminant Levels. At the UST area where ground-water monitor wells were installed and ground-water samples collected, no PVOC concentrations above NR140 Preventive Action Limits were detected. Three VOCs were detected at levels above the PAL, but these compounds are believed to be connected with laboratory procedures and not with the petroleum product stored in the USTs (diesel fuel). DRO was detected in the three monitor wells at levels ranging from 565 - 6,980 µgl £.

Hydro-Search recommends that natural biodegradation be used to remediate any remaining soil and ground-water contamination at the site. The three site monitor wells should be sampled quarterly for VOCs and DRO for one year. ,If the results indicate sufficiently decreasing levels of contamination in ground water, site closure may be requested unconditionally or conditionally with a deed restriction or incorporating the pending WDNR natural attenuation rules.

1-1

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 2.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the nature and extent of potential soil and ground-water contamination from petroleum hydrocarbons resulting from operations associated with the three UST areas located at the Milwaukee County Transit - Kinnickinnic Bus Garage (KKBG) at 1710 South Kinnickinnic Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Figure 2-1).

The client and property owner is the County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (County). The remedial investigation was performed by Hydro-Search, Inc. (HSI) and overseen for the County by Mr. Robert L. Knighten , a civil engineer for the Milwaukee County Department of Public Works (MCDPW).

I The scope of the investigation was based upon results obtained and reported by Foth and Van Dyke in their UST compliance upgrade on each UST area. These compliance upgrade reports were included in the Hydro-Search Work Plans for each UST area · (previously submitted; October 2, 1995) and are not reproduced here.

UST area T-1 through T-3 consists of three 15 ,000-gallon tanks used to store diesel fuel. UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 consist of one 1,000-gallon engine oil, 2,000-gallon waste oil, 4,000-gallon unleaded gasoline, and two 550-gallon transmission oil and antifreeze tanks, respectively. UST Area T-llA and T-1 lB consist of two 12 ,000-gallon tanks and are also used to store diesel fuel. All of the USTs are constructed of fiberglass and have been in service for approximately 11 years. Each of the UST areas will be described separately in this report.

2-1

HII HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 2.1 Site History

2.1.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3

The County owns and operates the KKBG in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which is used to service County owned mass transit vehicles. A compliance upgrade of the three USTs (Figure 2-2) was performed by Midwest Petroleum Service, Inc. in September 1991. The depth of the excavation was 4 feet below ground surface (bgs). One soil sample was collected from each end of the compliance upgrade excavation and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel range organics (TPH-DRO). TPH-DRO concentrations in the two samples ranged from 1950 parts per million (ppm) in Tl-PP to 3450 ppm in T2-PP, both of which exceed the WDNR action limits.

2.1.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9

In October 1991, Midwest Petroleum Service, Inc. performed a compliance upgrade on all five USTs. Observation of the excavation for the compliance upgrade procedures revealed no petroleum odors, however, soil staining was observed in the southern end of the excavation. Four soil samples were collected from locations around the limits of the UST excavation (Figure 2-3) and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-infrared (TPH-IR) and TPH-gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO). The results of the sampling showed TPH-IR concentrations above detection limits only in sample 04SW at a concentration of 6.8 ppm. TPH-GRO concentrations ranged from 11 ppm at 0lEW to 50 ppm at 02NW.

Ground water encountered within the UST excavation was also sampled and analyzed for benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX), total suspended solids and oil and grease. Benzene (16 µglf) was the only analyte detected above the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) enforcement standard of 0.5 µglf I

2-2

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 2.1.3 UST Area T-1 lA and T-llB

A compliance upgrade of the two USTs was performed by Midwest Petroleum Service, Inc. in September 1991. No soil staining or ground water was observed upon inspection of the compliance upgrade excavation, however, strong petroleum odors emanated from the excavation. A total of three soil samples were collected from the compliance upgrade excavation (See Figure 2-4) and analyzed for DRO. Two of the soil samples, TllA-F and TllB-F, were collected along the sidewalls of the excavation at a depth of approximately 3.5 feet bgs. The third sample (T 11 -PL) was collected from beneath the fuel supply line at a depth of approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet bgs. The DRO concentrations of the three samples ranged from a high of 99 ppm in Tl lA-F to a low of 15 ppm in Tll-PL.

2-3

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company I 3.0 GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING

3.1 Regional Conditions

Unconsolidated deposits in Milwaukee County are predominantly glacial drift of Pleistocene age ranging between 35 to 200 feet in thickness. Glacial drift consists largely of till which is a heterogeneous mixture of material ranging from clay to boulders deposited by the melting of glaciers. The uppermost bedrock surface underlying the County is formed by the Niagara Dolomite of Silurian age.

The principle geologic structure of the Milwaukee area is a monocline in which underlying resistant and non-resistant bedrock units dip gently eastward into the Michigan basin. Surface I elevations range between 580 and 950 feet above mean sea level. Relief is low except along the Lake Michigan shoreline bluffs abruptly drop approximately 120 feet. Surface drainage is primarily through the Milwaukee River system into Lake Michigan.

The principle shallow aquifer in the Milwaukee area are the Pleistocene sands and gravels and the Niagara Dolomite. The Niagara Dolomite is an important aquifer and is relied upon for numerous domestic and industrial water supplies, yielding water readily where joints and bedding planes have been enlarged by solution. Regional ground-water flow is predominantly to the east, into Lake Michigan.

3.2 Local Conditions

I Subsurface conditions encountered at the site during compliance upgrades reportedly consist of silts and silty clays to a depth of 4 feet bgs. Soil borings completed at UST area T-1 through T-3 and UST Area T-llA and T-11 Bin 1995 as part of this investigation indicated brownish yellow silty clay from 2.0 feet to 4.0 feet bgs, a light yellowish brown silt with sand from 4.0 to 12.0 bgs, and a grayish brown to gray silty clay from 12.0 to 20.0 feet bgs. Ground water was detected only at UST area T-1 through T-3 at a depth of 8.0 feet bgs. Topographic and

3-1

Ill HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company lithologic evidence seem to indicate that soils in the local area were developed by glacial drift, most of which were derived from calcareous bedrock.

According to well logs from the immediate area, depth to ground water ranges from approximately 12 to 48 feet bgs.

I

I

3-2

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 4.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION

4.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3

This section presents the scope of work for the investigation and remediation of impacted soils associated with tanks T-1, T-2, and T-3 at the Kinnickinnic Bus Garage UST site and the methods of investigation. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the current petroleum compound concentrations and the horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum impacted soils around the UST area. Four soil borings were installed in the vicinity of the three USTs. Borehole installation included field screening of soils with a photoionization detector (PID), and obtaining soil samples for submittal to a state-certified analytical laboratory for analyses. As elevated levels of TPH were known to be present, three ground-water monitor wells were to be installed in three of the four borings if ground water was encountered within 20 feet of the ground surface. The wells were installed to evaluate the possible extent of ground-water contamination and to allow additional site parameters, such as hydraulic conductivity to be determined, if necessary.

A limited investigation was completed to determine the extent of soil and ground-water I contamination around UST area T-1 through T-3. The following scope of work was I implemented: Four boreholes were drilled around the UST area. Borehole locations are shown on Figure 2-2. Monitor wells were constructed at borings SB-1, SB-3, and SB-4 and soil boring SB-2 was abandoned in accordance with NR141 requirements. The wells were properly completed and I developed per NR141 requirements. Ground-water samples were collected from each well to determine if ground water has been impacted at this UST area.

Soil samples were analyzed for DROs, and petroleum volatile organic compounds (PVOCs). Samples were sent to the laboratory using proper chain-of-custody procedures. A soil sample was also collected for analysis of natural biodegradation parameters. Sample collection,

4-1

Hill HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company I preservation, and handling procedures are included in Appendix B of the work plan (Hydro­ Search, October 2, 1995).

Ground-water samples, including a trip blank and a duplicate sample were analyzed for DROs and VOCs. Samples were sent to the laboratory using proper chain-of-custody procedures. Sample collection, preservation, and handling procedures are presented in Appendix B of the work plan.

I All drill cuttings were containerized in 55-gallon drums for subsequent appropriate disposal. The drums were sealed and labeled to identify contents (i.e. investigative derived waste), date and location from which the material was derived. The drums have been staged at the site in an area designated by the County. Approximately three drums of cuttings were generated in addition to four drums of liquids from the borings completed as ground-water monitor wells.

4.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9

This section presents the scope of work for the investigation and remediation associated with tanks T-4, T-5, T-6, T-7 and T-9 at the Kinnickinnic Bus Garage UST site and the methods of investigation. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the current petroleum compound concentrations in the ground water collecting in the excavation sump, and, if I significant impacts were present, evaluate the horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum impacted soils and the horizontal extent of ground-water impacts at the UST area.

In the work plan, soil borings were proposed to determine the horizontal and vertical extent of soil contamination. Based on the low levels of soil contamination present at the time of UST upgrade, it was decided to sample the UST area sump initially to determine the level of ground­ water impacts present. Based on this sampling, further soil investigation at this UST area was deemed unnecessary.

4-2

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company One ground-water sample was collected from the sump for analysis of VOCs, DROs, lead, and antifreeze to determine if ground-water impacts were present above NR140 standards. If impacts did not exceed WDNR NR140 Enforcement Standards, site closure would be requested from WDNR. If ground-water impacts are present at concentrations exceeding standards, additional I investigation would be completed.

4.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB

I This section presents the scope of work for the investigation and remediation of impacted soils associated with tanks T-llA and T-llB at the Kinnickinnic Bus Garage UST site and the methods of investigation. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the current petroleum compound concentrations and the horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum impacted soils adjacent to the UST area. Three soil borings were installed in the vicinity of the two USTs. The fourth soil boring was abandoned on the north end of the UST area due to refusal encountered at a depth of 3 feet bgs at five separate locations. Borehole installation included field screening of soils with a photoionization detector (PID), and obtaining soil samples from the borehole for submittal to a state-certified analytical laboratory. Ground water was not encountered during the investigation and, therefore, no monitor wells were installed at the UST area. The boreholes were properly abandoned per NR141.

Soil samples were analyzed for DROs and PVOCs. Samples were sent to the laboratory using proper chain-of-custody procedures. Sample collection, preservation, and handling procedures are included in Appendix B of the work plan.

All drill cuttings were containerized for subsequent appropriate disposal. The containers were I sealed and labeled to identify contents (i.e. investigative derived waste), date and location from which the material was derived. The containers were staged at the site in an area designated by the County. Approximately two drums of cuttings were generated.

4-3

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 4.4 Field Investigation Procedures

Prior to drilling at each UST area, the drill rig, auger, drill bits and tools will be steam cleaned. Potable water was used for all steam cleaning. Boreholes were advanced using 4.25-inch inside diameter (I.D.) hollow stem augers. All boreholes were logged using a 2-foot split spoon sampler with sample being collected continuously. Split spoon samples were logged as they were collected and blow counts required for each 6-inch interval were recorded on a log sheet (Appendix B). A photoionization detector (PID) with an 11. 7eV probe was used to field screen I each soil sample for total organic vapors (Appendix C). Samples were collected from the ground surface to the maximum depth of impacts or to the water table. The soil sample exhibiting the highest PID headspace reading was submitted for laboratory analysis, along with one sample from below the apparent base of impacted soil. If the impacted soil extended to the I water table surface, one soil sample was collected from immediately above the water table surface. PID readings were also taken in the breathing zone for health and safety purposes. Standard operating procedures (SOP) for soil sampling and screening are presented in Appendix B of the work plan (Hydro-Search, October 2, 1995).

4-4

I HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 5.0 RESULTS

5.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3

5.1.1 Soil

Five soil samples were collected from the four soil borings that were drilled around UST Area T-1 through T-3. These were submitted to Excel Laboratories, LLC in Milwaukee, Wisconsin I for analyses of DRO and PVOC. The soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2-2. WDNR Soil Boring Log Information Forms (4400-122) and Borehole Abandonment Form (3300-5B) are provided in Appendix A. Field PID Data Forms and Calibration Record Form are included in Appendix B. Copies of the laboratory reports and chain-of-custody record are provided in Appendix C, and analytical results are summarized on Table 5-1.

The soil sample collected from soil boring SB-1, 6 to 8 feet, located on the south side of the UST area contained 20 µglkg ethylbenzene, 130 µg/kg 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 35 µglkg 1,3,5- I trimethylbenzene, 38 µg/kg xylenes, and 89 mg/kg DRO. These detected concentrations are below the allowable residual contaminant levels. DRO and PVOCs were not detected in any of the other samples from this UST area.

5.1.2 Ground Water

At the completion of well development, ground-water samples were collected from MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 and were submitted to NOVA Environmental Laboratory in Milwaukee, Wisconsin for analyses of DRO and VOCs. The monitor well locations are shown on I Figure 2-2. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody record are provided in Appendix C. Monitor Well Construction Forms (4400-113A) and Monitor Well Development Forms (4400-113B) are provided in Appendix D. Well Development/Purge Summary forms and Field Water Quality Sampling and Analysis forms are contained in Appendix E. Table 5-2 summarizes the ground-water analytical results.

5-1

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company The ground-water analytical results indicate detected concentrations of chloromethane, methylene chloride, and trichloroethene at or above the NR140 preventive action limit (PAL) in the monitor wells. ehloromethane was detected in MW-1 (0.44 µg/£), MW-1 duplicate (0.42 µg/£), and MW-3 (0.53 µg/£). Methylene chloride was detected in MW-1 (3.88 µg/£), MW-1 duplicate (2.02 µg/£), MW-2 (4.75 µg/£), and MW-3 (4.82 µg/£). These two detected voes would appear to be lab artifacts. Methylene chloride was detected in each of two trip blanks at 4.64 µg/£ and 5.26 µg/£. Also, trichloroethene was detected in the MW-1 duplicate sample (0.50 µg/£), and is al_so considered to be a suspect detection. Further sampling will determine if this substance is present. None of the other detected voes were above the PAL. DRO was detected in MW-1, MW-1 duplicate, MW-2 and MW-3 at 1,127 µglkg, 2,818 µglkg, 565 µglkg, and 6,980 µglkg, respectively.

The three monitor wells were surveyed on July 20, 1996. Survey data are included in Appendix F. Based on this survey data, shallow water table elevations are shown on Figure 5-1. Flow direction is to the northeast.

I Well development with a bailer and small purge pump produced almost no change in water table elevation. Formal conductivity testing was not possible due to equipment failure. The borehole logs indicate sand at depth over the investigated interval and suggest a hydraulic conductivity in the 1 x 10-6 to 1 x 104 m/ sec range.

5.2 UST Area T-4 through T-7 and T-9

One ground-water sample was collected from the sump installed in the tank backfill at UST area T-4 through T-7 and T-9 (Figure 2-3). This sample was submitted for analysis of voes, DRO, lead, and antifreeze. The analytical results and chain-of-custody record are provided in Appendix C.

The ground-water analytical results from the sump located within the UST area were below the j method detection limit.

5-2

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 5.3 UST Area T-llA and T-llB - Soil

Four soil borings were placed around UST area T-1 lA and T-llB. One each was completed to the south, east, and west of the UST area with the boring to the north encountering refusal at five separate locations and subsequently abandoned (Figure 2-4). Five soil samples were submitted from the three completed soil borings, two each from SB-2 and SB-3, and one from SB-4 for analysis of DRO and PVOCs. WDNR Soil Boring Log Information Forms (4400-122) and Borehole Abandonment Form (3300-5B) are provided in Appendix A. Field PID Data forms and Calibration Record form are included in Appendix B. Copies of the laboratory reports and chain-of-custody record are provided in Appendix C.

The soil samples collected from the upper interval in SB-2, 10 to 20 feet bgs, and SB-3, 12 to 14 feet bgs, contained 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and DRO at 4.3 µg/kg, 5µglkg, 3.9 µglkg, and 32 µglkg, respectively, and DRO at 60 mg/kg in SB-3. DRO was detected at 22 mg/kg in SB-4 at 10 to 12 feet bgs. The analytical parameters in the soil samples collected from the lower interval in SB-2, 14 to 16 feet bgs, and SB-3, 16 to 18 ft. bgs were below the method detection limit. No other PVOCs were detected. All of the detected compounds are within allowable limits for site closure as defined in NR720. Table 5-3 summarizes the soil analytical results.

I

5-3

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 UST Area T-1 through T-3

Soil samples collected at the time of UST upgrade indicated TPH as DRO at levels of 1950 - 3450 ppm within the UST excavation at shallow depths. The results of this investigation indicate I that none of the soil samples collected from boreholes at the UST excavation perimeter have I contaminant levels above the NR720 Residual Contaminant Levels. Ground-water samples collected from monitor wells installed at the UST excavation perimeter contained no PVOCs in excess of NR140 PALs. The only detected VOCs were slightly above the PAL for Chloromethane, at the PAL for Trichloroethane (one sample duplicate), and near the ES for Methylene Chloride, which was also present in both trip blanks. It is highly likely that these detections are related to laboratory procedures and are not a result of the petroleum I product stored in the three USTs, which is diesel fuel.

DRO was detected in all three monitor wells at levels between 565 - 6980 µgl .e. Flow direction is indicated to be to the northeast, from greater to lesser DRO levels in ground water. The rate at which ground water is moving horizontally is estimated to be less than 100 feet/year.

Hydro-Search recommends that the remammg soil contaminants be allowed to naturally biodegrade and that quarterly ground-water sampling be implemented for one year to verify that I VOCs are not present and that DRO levels are decreasing. At the conclusion of one year of sampling, analyses may indicate that natural biodegradation is reducing the DRO contaminant I levels sufficiently and that no further action is necessary. I 6.2 UST Area T-4 Through T-7 and T-9

At the time of UST upgrade low levels of soil contamination were present at shallow depths and a water sample collected from pooled water in the excavation yielded a benzene result of 16

6-1

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company µgl f. The results of this investigation revealed that no detectable contaminants were present in water in the UST sump. Hydro-Search recommends that no further investigation of soil and ground-water impacts be conducted at this UST area.

6.3 UST Area T-llA & T-llB

At the time of UST upgrade, soil samples collected at shallow depths yielded DRO results of less that 100 mg/kg, below the current NR720 residual contaminant levels (RCLs) for site closure. The results of this investigation indicate that no perimeter soils contain DRO or PVOC levels above NR720 RCLs. Hydro-Search recommends no further action at this UST location.

I

6-2

UBI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company SCALE 0 5000

FEET

National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 Contour Interval 10 Feet

MIL WAUKEE CO. UST MANAGEMENT DATE: 09/09/95 KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE DESIGNED: CT M CHECKED: TMT SITE LOCATION and APPROVED: TM T LOCAL TOPOGRAPHY DRAWN: CTM QUADRANGLE LOCATION PROJ~ 302553295

Base map fro m U.5.G.5. 7.5' Milwaukee, WI, Figure 1-1 topographic quadrangle map, photorevised 1971 ( T-6 ) ( T-11B ) ( T-5 ) ( T-11A ) ( T-4 ) ( T-7 )( T-9)

fJl!}(!J

ENTRANCE ENTRANCE

KINNICKINNIC AVENUE

MILWAUKEE COUNTY DA TE: 07/22/96 KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE DESIGNED: bob CHECKED: dim NOT TO SCALE APPROVED: dim SITE LAYOUT DRAWN: bob PROJ.: 302553295 ■1 [l{]')fIDJ~[g}~~~OO~tW ~ITT][b Figure 2-1 1II A Tetra Tech Col'l1)any /hsl/255/32"15/3295-21 T-1 - 15000 O.C. FRP T-2 - 15000 O.C. FRP T-5 - '1;()()0 O.C. RIP T-11 - 15000 O.C. FRP

◄ BUS TRAFRC7

STORM SEWER 0 STORM SEWER

PROPERTY IN: II' OtAIN 1M FBICE wmt BARBS> WltE + SB-1/MW-1 BUS TRAFFIC fflRU WASH (DAO @ 2,818 ug/1)

CONfECT TO EXISTINO LN PUIIPS

...__,_ -:::::-- --:::::-_'-----_ - _-- -_-_ -- _---1 -_-_ 7 STORM SEWER I I I I I I + S8'4/ MW 0 3 I I I WASH BUILDING (DRO @ 6,980 ug/1) " SB'4l-1 000

EWALK

LEOEND

$ 0= 3 ~ SOIL BOUIO LOCATION AND DESIONA 110N SCALE SB=VMW=~ + MOMTOR Wal. LOCATION, DESICNATION, AND 0 25 MIL WAUKEE COUNTY DA TE: 07/22/96 DETECTED ORO CONCENTRATION IN ORO~D WATER KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE DESKMD: bob (ORO @ 2,818 ug/I) Feet UST AREA CtECKED: dim T-1, T-2, AND T-3 APPROVED: dim BOREHOLE/MONITOR DRAWN: bob WELL LOCATIONS PAOJ.: 302553295 ll~YrIDJlru(O}~~~rro[R1tlMl mrut Figure 2-2 nlli1 A Tetra Tech Company / hst/255/3295/3295-b22 PUMP ON 4" CONCRETE SLAB

4' BUMPER POSTS / 0--~------ACCESS PORT ACCESS PORTS~ --11a1'----- MC-SS-TK-01EW MC-SS-TK-03WW

.______LIMIT OF EXCAVATION

a-~~~~~~~~-'-'-6--- MC-SS-TIC-04SW

~ CONCREra-=:s

STORM SEWER MANHOLE ~ ------­ ------" STORM SEWER LINE SCALE 0 20

FEET LEGEND MILWAUKEE COUNTY DA TE: 07/22/96 ~ KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE DESIGIIED: MC-SS-TK-o,ew e FORMER CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLE j\j bob UST AREA Ct-ECKED: dim T-4 THROUGH APPROVED: dim T-7 AND T-9 DRAWN: bob LOCATION' MAP PROJ.: 302553295 No-te, I Unciergrounci piping o.nci utilities shown a.re bo.sed on field surveys only. Con-tro.ctor is responsible for verifying o.nd protecting o.ll underground utilities ~rr@~roJc~~~~~m,~ITTJ~ Figure 2-3 during exco. vo. tion o.nci construction. •111 A Tetra Tech Company /hsl/255/ 3295/3295-b23 LEGEND

MC-SS··T11-Pl· FORMER CONFIRMATION SOL SAMPLE

SB-2 () BOR&IOLE LOCATION AND DESIONATION

...T,.;118. .. . .

MANWAYS

...... ·. ·. . D. ··. . ·.

~ -,--,+--1-- MC-SS-T11B-F

() SB-4 I I I : :- : :- :-> :-:-.. I · · · · · · · · · I SB-2 () ~J~~~ FR/FS II 11 ,1 II I I II I I Ii II ,, Ii FI.L UN;ES II I I ! c::-:::--7 ~ CONCRETE ~ II ,1 II SCALE " II 11 Ii 20 11 II JJ 0 1 sB-3B 11 1 r, () MC-SS-T11 PL 11 ,.1 I REMOTE FD.l PIPES ct S B -3A Feet

MILWAUKEE COUNTY DA TE: 07/22/96 KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE DESIGNED: bob UST AREA CI-ECKED: dim APPROVED: dim Note, T-11A AND T-118 Underground piping o.nd utilities shown a.re bo.sed on field surveys only. DRAWN: bob Con tro.ctor IS responsible for verifying o.nd protecting o.ll underground utllitie>s BOREHOLE LOCATIONS PAOJ.: 302553295 during excovotion ond construction, ■1 [}{)if[DJ~[gJ 0 ~~fffi~t[}{l mrut Figure 2-4 1 1II A Tetra Tech Company / hsl/255/3295/3295-b20 ◄ BUS 'IUR'l:7

STORM SEWER 0 STORM SEWBI

BUS TRAFRC TltRU WASH

COMECT TO EXISTINO LN! .IUFS / ~/ / / + SB-4/ MW~3 WASH BUILDING (588.80) 0 S84J-1

CBnD lJliE S. DNQCNIIC AVENlE

LEGEND

S&,3 ~ SOIL BORINO LOCATION AND DESIONATION SCALE S&VMw-1 + MONITOR WB.L LOCATION, OESICNA TION, AND 0 25 MILWAUKEE COUNTY DA TE: 08/08/96 WATER LEVB. KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE (588.95) DESIGNED: bob CtECKED: dim 588--- WATER TABLE B.EVATION Feet UST AREA T-1, T-2, AND T-3 !Feet above mean sea leVell SHALLOW WATER APPROVED: dim TABLE ELEVATION DRAWN: bob FLOW DIRECTION .. (November 15 1995) PROJ.: 302553295 Figure 5-1

/h;l/255/3295 /32C\5-b24 Table 5-1 Summary of Soil Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-1, T-2, and T-3)

Borehole Residual Method Substance Contaminant Detection SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 Level Limit (MDL) 6-8ft.* 4 - 6 ft. 10 - 12 ft. 8 - 10 ft. 4 - 6 ft.

=,n Benzene 5.5 1.6 -I All values listed are in µg/kg unless otherwise noted (l)-... Ill -I (l) * Contains 130 µg/kg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene n :r Contains 35 µg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (") 0 3 "'C Ill :::, '< ~:\255\3295\3295- KK . 5-1 Table 5.2 Summary of Ground-Water Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-1 through T-3)

Substance ES PAL MW-1 MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 Trip Trip Dup CAMD* Blank

1, 1, I-Trichloroethane 200 40 2.55 1.48 1.16

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NS NS 3.52 3.99

1,3 ,5-Trimethylbenzene NS NS 1.96 2.03

Chloromethane 3 0.3

Ethyl benzene 700 140 1.58 1.63

Isopropylbenzene NS NS 5.65 5.56

Methyl-t-butyl 60 12 8.95 9.43 1.53 4.11

Methylene Chloride 5 0.5

n-Butylbenzene NS NS 6.24 5.75

n-Propylbenzene NS NS 8.59 8.54

Naphthalene 40 8 3.52 3.62

p-Isopropyltoluene NS NS 4.03 3.45

sec-Butylbenzene NS NS 4.41 4.32

tert-Butylbenzene NS NS 0.84 0.82

Toluene 343 68.6 0.26 0.36 0.28 0.56

Trichloroethene 5.0 0.5

Xylene 620 124 1.9 2.11

DRO NS NS 1,127 2,818 565 6,980

*Trip CAMD contained acetone @ 17. 84 µg/ £

All values listed are in µg/ £ unless otherwide noted

ES Enforcement Standard PAL Preventive Action Limit DUP Duplicate Ground-Water Sample I NS Substance has no NR140 ES or PAL Blank No Detection Shading Concentration Exceeds PAL DRO Diesel Range Organics

~:\255\3295\3295-KK.5-2 HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company Table 5-3 Summary of Soil Laboratory Analytical Results for KK Bus Garage (T-llA and T-llB)

Borehole Residual Method Substance Contaminant Detection SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 Level Limit (MDL) 10 - 12 ft. * 14 - 16 ft. 12 - 14 ft. 16-18ft. 10 - 12 ft. =~ :c Benzene 5.5 1.9 --i ...Cl) All values listed are in µg/kg unless otherwise noted -Ill --i Cl) C') * Contains 4.3 µg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene :; (") 0 3 "O Ill ::J '< ~:\255\3295\3295-KK.5-3 I

APPENDIX A WDNR SOIL BORING LOG INFORMATION FORMS (4400-122) AND BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT FORMS (3300-SB)

I

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company Sl3te of Wi.sconsin Route To: s01L BoRriH; Loe i~t:tlti. __ . Dc-pmment of Na.rural Resourcc.s 0 Solid Waste O Haz. Waste Form 4400-122 7-91 0 .Emergency Res po~ )ii! Underi;rotmd Tmks D Waste w atc:r O W ata Resourcc.s □ Other Page / of~ L1cense/Pennit/Moni1oring Number roring Number - -- - - SgJ-/ Boring Drilled By (Firm name [email protected] of crew chief) ~ Dm Drilling St.ar1ed IDm Drilling Completed Drilling Method L~I .LZ.! l...:€_ L~I .L-:LI U I l~n tfANG /}IG"ll./.££~;./G / JfrX,$J.J.L- MM DD Y Y MM DD Y Y rI-ort

Boring Location Local Grid Location (lf applicable) St.atePlane ______N, ______E S/C/NI Lat_·_____ □ N DE ~ 1/4 of~ 1/4 of Section __L_, T 6- N, R,2..2,__ff;p{ long Feet □ S Feet □ W County jNR County Code Civil Town/Cicy/ or Village_ /n~fiu./(L~ -- ~ILLJAukg~ Samole Soil Properties ti) -0 0 ~() C '2 c 0 ~ u.. Soil/Rock Descript}on El -=- 0 -o·.;:: ,___(l) C ... C o E o .... 111 (l) 0 13 u And Geologic Origin For 111 .... ~c 0 .0 · t; .c C/) :.c ~ u: -o- -a, -o- 0 ...:..E U II)" - 0 -5 > 3: Unit a. =o, .._ ca:> II)- ·=- OE E 0 a. Each Major Cl) 1110-0111 0 111 C --c ·s·E 111E C\I ~ ~§ Q) -a, Co o:_ Oo z ~~ co 0 ::::, (3 .3 ~o a. U)a_ :Eu ::]...J (LJ a. a:U

,/-//1 W&

1-8 ! 10.i) - .

- r - /a;,1/o!)/-i I ._ /' ;l, .3 - '- i./i - (!.&) I- r.o Vj.s) I -t .i- v).o) I hereb certl1f e. Signature

Tius fo 1S authorized by Ch - crs 144.147 and 162, Wis. Stats. Completion of trus report is me.ndatory. Penalties: Forfeit not lcs.s than S 10 nor more than S5,000 for ~ch violation; Fined not less than SlO or more than S l 00 or imprisoned not less th.an 30 days, or bo th for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offens.e, pur;uant toss 144.99 and I 62.06, Wis. Stats. Page..d._oc--i!:::._ Soil Prooerties Samo le 0 C 1/) .':'.? Q 0 " C -o·.::: 0 c ::, u. Soil/Rock Description .... rJ 0 a E 0 0 .... -a 0 .S And Geologic Origin For (I') .2 - rJ .... :,c 0 ._E 0 (.) (.) .c e l!.. -o- -oII)- -o- ·=-1/)·- 0 ..0 tJ .c a.. - C, -. cO ·s·E C\I OE -5 > r\1 C ·-C roE ~ 3: Each Major Unit (I') _r\1 0 Oo •cr: Oo E 0 a. e gio -o a. ::, 0 :::::, ~ ...J ~0 n. C/'JQ. ~(.) ...JJ o.~ o:O ---z ~! c3 0 '­ I-- - -+----l--~f ......

...... ------...... - -- -......

1-- -1-- . -._I-- ...... -...... _ -- ...... - ...... 1--- ...... - '-- .._- ...... ,__-- 1--.._ 1-- I ...... -- I-- £0/}:/;J,o I--- I- f--- '-- I- -I-- Stare of Wisroruin Route To: SOIL BORP.\G LOG I:-.FOR:\fATION Dcp:rrtmcnt of Natural Resources □ Solid Waste O Haz.. Waste Form 4400-122 7-91 D 'Emergency Res po= )Sa Underground Ti:nks D Wast.ewaJcr O Wata Rewurcc.s Page of ,;2_ □ Other _i__ License/Permit/Monitoring Number ioring Number ., , Sg!; -o<- (- ;-// 1 Boring Drilled By (Firm name and©).me of crew chief) Pate Drilling S wt cd Date Drilling Com pie tcd Dri1ling Method L(!_ I _L Z./ l._tf_ Lt2_ ILL I J..;[ I le;:- /J !,Jfil'/GE;/G/1./££~//G/~y ,§Ell- MM DD Y Y MM DD Y Y /7,drt

:::~ ·: :'::=.~:l'i:'.J~l:;_·:;.:j;fi ··;™:: e_:~;~~ :::t{.~~::{:::.~llCommon Well Nam~ ~mal Static ~:~r:s~el Surfa~ Elev~:t MSL Boreh&;e ~:~= Boring Location I . Local Grid Location (lf applicable) StatePlane ______N, ______E S/C/N Lat___ □ N □ E .5st;,__ 1/4 of~ l/4 of Section_;£_, T 6- N, R,2..2.@N Long Feet □S Feet□W County !DNR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village_ ,fr?/,Lb/A u/cZC 1-- ,/n/,LL,JAu/C.E.£.. Samofe Soil Properties ti) 0 ...... (!) ,E-() C c u.. 0 ti) a ~ Soil/Rock Descript}on -o ·;:: .... 0 ._ rd .__ ;: Each Major Unit a. =oi C

~g i lr2>.,v I--=- .

-~ -(J.ii)

mL

a.

Th.is fo 15 authorized by C a'pters 144. 147 and 162, Wis. Stats. Completion of this report is mandatory. Penalties: Forfeit not less than S 10 nor more than S5,000 for each violation; Fined not Jess than S10 or more th.an SI 00 or imprisoned not less l1u.n30 days, or both for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense, pursuant 10 ss 144.99 Md 162.06, Wis. Stats. P,ge ,:2. of 2 Soil Prooer1ies Samele .,., 0 C 0 0 ~ '2 c u. Soil/Rock Description -o·.::: 0 C C ::, 0 ... <11 0 0 CJ) .Q E <11... :::::,C u .... 13 .!: And Geologic Origin For r3 ----o- 0 0 (.) .c ... u.- -o- -oII)- II) · - 0 -E ..c (.) 0. co ·s -- C\I OE .D -::,>- tJ ==C'J r11C ·-C ·E r.iE 3: 0.. Each Major Unit CJ) r.l 8' Or.I 0- Do Qo E ...,§ 0 - -o O::::J a. a:O :::::, 0 ::::, (j ...J 3:o a. CJ) a. ~(.) ~:i z ..s::,:: a 0 - - -

-'- /o /co'/o t:J,D =-11 3,5' -'- ,-. . -~ £o§ -~o,o - ' '-- ' 1--'- '------I------'-- - - I--- -,-. '-- - ,-.- '- . - : - - - I - ---- ,-.- 1-- - - : St.at e of Wisconsin Rout.eTo: SOIL BORTh'G LOG I~FORMA TION Dc:p:irtrnent of Natural Resources □ Solid Waste O Haz.. Waste Form 4400-122 7-91 D ·Emersency Re.sp:m~ )'ia Underground Tenks D Waste w aJ.cr O Water Resources □ Othc:l- Licensc/Peimi t/M onitorin g

• ametc:r inches Boring Location Grid Location (If applicable) StatePlane ______N, ______E S/C/NI Lat_·____ ON □ E .5c;__ t/4of~l/4ofSection_:i__, T ~N, R..,2...2 Long___ Feet □ S Feet □ W County NR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village_ /7?/,LLJ,11 t.Ak£.E:., ·_ _ /??ILUAilK~ E.- Sam re Soi! Pro erties V) 0 '2 c 0 <) C: -:::- :::, u.. 0 . .!1 Soil/Rock DescriptJon -o·.;:: Q) C: '- -g 0 .__ CIS .__ • (l) C) .s Cl) _g E 0 . t; u And Geologic Origin For CIS CIS '- :::, C: u 0 .0 ..c (.) ..c '- LL -o- - Q) -a- ....:..E -5 > 3: a. =oi C: Q) V)- ·=-Cl)"- 0 E a. Each Major Unit Cl) CIS C) r1S CIS C: ·-C ·s·E C\I OE :::, ~§ 0 Q) .... 0-- Oo o:_ roE Oo - Q) z ..'.j~ Cll 0 :::, (!) --' ~i:5 0. C/)Q_ ~(.) :::J_.1 0:::i 0. a:O

I

!

3

1 I know!ed e.

Dus fo authorized by Ch ters 144.147 and 162. Wis. Slats. Completion of this report is mmdAt.ory. Penalties: Forfeit not less t.han S 10 nor more than SS,000 for esch violation; Fined not Jess than Sl 0 or more th.an $100 or imprisoned not Jess th.a.n 30 day,, or c-ot.h for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense, pursuant toss 144.99 and 162.06, Wis. Stats. Page .,:2- of .)_ Soil Prooerties Samole C 0 .".2 ,.... .!'.? 0 0 C u... Description -o·;:: 0 C ;.§, ::, Soil/Rock .... 0 Cl) 0 E 0 ...."' :::,C- .... 0 r:l "' .... -~ 0 13 .!: And Geologic Origin For ·..c .... -o- -o- 0 -E 0 (.) () u... co -oVl- --V)"- DE .c a. =e1 • ·s·E N ..0 -::,- >tl C1l C -C r:,E E 3: a.. Each Major Unit Cl) ~ g, 0 r:l 0- OQ .!:!- ao 0 -o _J_J 0:::::i 0.. :::, =§ 0 ::) (j ....J 3:·0- -0.. C/)Q.. ~() a:o z _gez: C!J 0

,__ ,__ ,__- - ,__- -'-- i--- '-- i--,__ i-- ,__ ---- ,__- ,__- '-- - I-'--- 1--,__ ,__ '--

,__1-o---- ,__ ,__ ,__----- ,__- ----1-o- -,__ 1-- -,__

-'--,__ - -,__

; ---- State of Wi..sconsin Route To: SOIL BORP.\G LOG I~FORMATION Dc:pmment of Na.rural Resourcc.s □ Solid Waste □ Haz. Waste Form 4400-122 7-91 0 D Emc:rgency Resi::onse Ji} Underground Tanks 0 Wa.st.ewau:r O Wat.er Re.so=.s □ Other Page / of ~

Boring Drilled By (Firm name [email protected] of crew chief) D a.t.e Drilling Started ID a.t.e Drilling Com pie Led Drilling Method L ~ I_/_ ~ I .f_;,f__ L ,e_ I L&... I J...? I I c;- /J j_;J/l;"IGE/fG'/1~£/ll;/G / ~)($Ell- MM DD y y MM DD y y n=1rt

111 1i::l/i::ill:@lllmi:!i!j:ji:fiiil:l11:i~:ijiJ:~:0~i:1:::1:11111 1 co;;; \~~Name ~mal Slatic ;::r:st ~urfa~ Elev~:t MSL U3orchole IA:~: Boring Location Local Grid Location (lf applicable) StatePlane ______N, ______E Lat_·_____ ON SIC/NI DE .5t;___ 1/4 of~ 1/4 of Section _.2_, T & N, RA,.2~ Long Feet □ S Feet □ W County INR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village .fr?/,Lbl/l ukL,£,, _ _ /nlLUAa/C.E E... Sample Soil Properties (I) ai (l) ;l-() C '2 c (I) C ::, u.. 0 Soil/Rock DescripHon ""O ·.;::: (l) ._ 0 C ._ a. C (l) Vl- (I)" - 0 E 3: Each Major Unit =o, ·-C ·s·E =- OE a. (/) Cl)

!

3

"'1. 0 //I ., O__,,,•~ _J ~

'­- ;a:'.,," t), I --i I, ( =-

I hereb Signature

1lus fo is authorized by apters 144.147 and 162, Wis. Stats. Completion of trus report is me.ndatory, Penalties: Forfeit not less than S10 nor more than S5,000 for each violation; Fined not Jess than S10 or more th.an SI 00 or imprisoned not Jess th.an 30 days, or bo th for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense, pu~uant toss 144.99 and 162.06, Wis. Stats. ., Page ,:,,<;. of ~ I Soil Procerties Samo le (.I) 0 C: 0 0 ~ C LL Description -o·.;::: 0 C: ::::, Soil/Roel< .... 1-;S 0 I E 0 (.J .... 0 Cl) .!:? .... ~c 0 13 (.) .s And Geologic Origin For .... - "' -o- ._E 0 .c "' L!.. -o- -o ·=-vi ·- 0 _:) -5 lJ () a. - C, C: 0 v,- ·:=;·E N OE -5 Each Major Unit 0 ·-C: E ~> 3:: a. C/) ~ - "' C: OQ .er. "'E oo 0 0 so "' -o ....J....J o...... J 0... cr:O ::i :::::, <.'.L..J S: 0 0... enc.. ~() z .s! CJ 0 1-- - --t---l---- ;::....;,;- 1- 1-- /:r, % 3, .:r -:::.._15 f 6,5 .....- .....

...../I> - .....-- -

'--- 1-- '---

.....- 1-- '­I-- '­I-­ ..... 1-­'- ...... - 1--- I- ._- - 1-- 1--- 1-- 1-­I­ ._I-­ L­ L­ ...... _'-­

'---- .....- - .....- '--- St.a te of Wisconsin Route To: SOIL BOR~G LOG I:SFORMA TION Dcp1rtrnent of Natural Resources □ Solid Waste □ Haz. Waste Form 4400-122 7-91 0 D Erne:rsency Response _M Underground Tanks D Was t.e w arcr D War.a Resources Page / of ,;Z_ □ Other Licensc/Permi!/Monitoring Nwnber ioring Nwnbcr /- , ·"I se;-2 ( /-11./ Boring Drilled By (Firm [email protected] of crew chief) Date Drilling S taned Date Drilling Com pie tcd Drill.in g Method LC!..../_f_l....11.L L~ILZIU 1/~IJ /µ/{IIGE;/G'il./££~//G /°Ja:Jt flJ/J- MM DD Y Y MM DD Y Y rT-='rt :~;;:;:;~:;: :::;::;~:~;:;;;:~;f;:':;::~:z:;::2:;;:i ;#:jj~'.:'.:'.;'.'.;j;ilrommon Well Nam~ ~lllal Static ~:~r~zl ~urfa~ ElevauF:t MSL Boreh6e Ui=~= Boring Location I . Local Grid Location (If applicable) St.atePlane ______N, ______E S/C/N Lat___ □ N □ E ~ 1/4 of~ 1/4 of Section _,2__, T 6- N, R,.t...2..@1/ Long Feet □ S Feel □ W County NR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village_ ,/n/Lbl/J I.All-~ F-- /?1/LUAuKEE- Sample Soil Properties II) 0 0 C '2 ;E<) II) c::, LL. 0 '-=- Soil/Rock Descript}on -o·.;:: CD ... 0 '-11' ..__ c 13 () .!: Cl) .!:2 E 0 C1S .... ::,C 0 CD · t; And Geologic Origin For ..c C1S ·;:: .- 0 ..8 ..c (.) ... -u.. -0 - -o u- 0 ...:..E -:5> ~ 0. =o, C CD II)- II)" - E a Each Major Unit Cl) C1S C ·-C ·s·E C\J OE ::, ft§ 0 0 0 C1S 0 roE - - CD Oo Oo z j,:,:: CJ 0 ::> g _§ 3:o -a. cno.. ~(.) :3°J 0::J a. a:U I -

/,o i

3

7

Dus fo 15 authorize by Ch ters 144.147 and 162, Wis. Stats. Completion of this report is mandatory. Penalties: Forfeit not less than S 10 nor more than S5,000 for uch violation; Fined not less than SIO or more than Sl 00 or imprisoned not less than 30 days, or both for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offen~. pursuant toss 144.99 and 162.06, Wis. Stats. Page ~ of ,;;?.., Soil Prooer1ies Samola VI -0 C V) ,,...... 0 0 c C ;§, :::, LL Soil/Rock Description -a·.::: 0 .... r.S .... 0 0 Cl) .!:! E 0 r.S .... :::,C- u .... 13 .s And Geologic Origin For r.S - 0 0 () .r. .... LL. -o- -o -o- ·=-V)"- 0 -E 11 v,- .D ~ -:5 () 0. ==c;) co ·s·E N OE -::, > Each Major Unit 0 r.S C ·-C o:_ ..sE E c.)§ 3: a.. Cl) 8' 0 r.S - Oo ao 0 e -o 0.. :::, 0 3:o -0.. Cl) 0.. ~() :.::i.J 0:::i a:O z _g~ CJ 0 :::J a ....J

l.1.2 h--'l-v

/ . .Z I<,.~ - t;:__ - /8 ->- /o Vw%~~ =-n ~ -$ 68 = I =• • coiJ-~•0 ~$) - ---+---4-----L,_-~ I- I-- ' I-- I-- ' I->-- - ....__- I- I-- - - I--- >-- I-- I-- -i- I-- i-I- >-- - I-- .__>-- .__ i-'-- >-- >- - L-- i->-- '-- '-- - - .__'-- '-- -i-'-- '--- >-- >-- : S t..a te of Wisconsin Route To: SOIL BORING LOG INFOR~fi\TI Department of Natural Re sou rces □ Solid Waste □ Haz. Waste Form 44 00-122 Rev. ~ D Emergency Response 13'1.Jnderground Tanks D WastewaJer O Wala Resources _ □ Supeifund □ Other Pagi: of £- Facility/Pro;ect Name ~ lsJN IC,\C-\ NN ,c. bt.\S 6 A.fL.!\6C/ License/Permit/Monitoring Number ioring Number ( MILWAU~ COUN°(Y lq1~ t,V;,1 f'f

::§ :j::i lli1ill~lilli~? '~:;i1l/i~it fi1;::~:j :l~ :1w :~:l:/:iiµ :~;/l:il~i;1iilJi!I Common Well Name final Stati c \~:::r~~el ~urface Elevat~~t MSL Bo&~,~ Dii: Boring Location o , • Local Grid Location (If applicable) St.ate Plane ______N, ______E SIC/NI La t ______a N [ O c:; C 1/4 of N ~ 1/4 of Section S- , T &l N, R ~V Long ' • Feet □ S Feet C County lf)NR Coun ty Code Civil Town/City/ or Village M I LvJAU ~ I __g_ _L M \ t..-WI\ u ~ Samola Soil Pror:-erties

~..; .§.- !:l 0 SoiVRock Description <) C: .:: :::, ~ And Gwlogic Origin For ... <"8 0 ti) <) <-4 0 .g ti u .5 ~.g Each Major Unit ij ... ell -C, ·u _gh ;I: -5 u ~§ w 0 "° > p. ::::: !;Ji p.6 .!,l i::: 0 C: ti) l..., e.l) u ..., ·g.·- §-o 8 .!a 0 Do N ~Q ~ §!l z ij j~ ~ Q :::, 0 .s E: Utll ::Eu :JJ ~j p...

,_--f- ._,,_ I N~ ,-Jlt ...,. NA NA --f-

-- 2- Z.o -&:,. o SA,Nt> I\ t-.:J"I;> 1.7 'R,P\\J tl, I t- I- ,_-- - ,_ Aioz,.t, gc,-'10~/"' "S'ANt>, CO/\((SC1 2.. ,i, I, .. '13,~ :=...s,_ Po t..1 Nt>a>1 5'- 2o% t'H2Ava, F, N£, o,~ z. -;, z. ,_ ,_ Ro~~f,Jl)a- 1 M~,'{1M. ~ M s,i-~ 1.0 \NC.\-\, S~N ( \ O'{i!- 5/3,") !)R.'r, (oA) -- /..f ,_ Ne f \.. A.-;-r ,c. 1"tY. ,- ,__ 1 ,,o, ,_ 3 LI / " \ I '2- :::...s- f .o - 8.o SANt>Y S \t,.,- W 1-nt ' 0 ,°r ,_ ,_-- ()RA \JO- 1 ( 1-'1 I... 1 ') A~ ,01.-1 1 5.0':'..-'o ,_ . (os) ,_ ..., Ft tJ~S 1 °?,.o"'/" SA10 b, Mr1>111 M 1 ,- ,_ l C' I - f- S-1.,1 B (Zoi..t N 'Pct> !-.a ..i ;~~AV CL- C/1, ~ I (p, 1«; F 1N~, sv.if:ou~t>i::t>, MA.'/C tM l-j -vl. 4 '=--7 ML- 2,8 ",1 -- S1z.1:.- t!:J,"1 > ' /NCl-t 1 \J E:f2.. \"' t>,1 12. K - (o71; - gl<.oWN ( \O Yr<. '2./z..,) l>R~, N t f- 8 fJ 1-A STt C \-,Y-. - ~ --'-- ,,i, 8.o- ci, o Ml-\- ~ qoolt, =-c; £"£...-A,s·nc...- S rt...T, (M H,) O.Ct 2,; ,_- A~t-11 iqDo/o F 1N£S 1 c;;% SA"lb - I '- f- (o,& .._ I foA.«s£, suge_o1,1....:it>61) I t::cro GR/\'v-~ Cl- - ,0 FI NI;-, <; u g !20UN t> 8) I fv',N;,(I /.,1 t.{ N\. ,--- ,___ ~ ,__ s,~ o. r;- t"1 C-H-, \f 82.Y i>A~~ f- tP-o\JJN ( \ oY (<.. 1.../-i.. ,) "D !2-Y '- 1 ,_- M8) I {...l /v\. f>t..-¥.,j"" IC. ( TY. -,_ I he re b Signatu re

This form is authorized by Cha t 144. 147 and 162, Wi5. St ats. Completio n of this report is m:u,datory. Penalties: Forfeit not less than S10 nor more than S5,000 for each violation. Fined n C1t less than SI 0 or mo re than SI 00 or imprisoned not less 1h:m 30 days, or both for each viola tion. Each day of continu ed violation is a separate offen se, pursuant to ss 144 .99 and 162.06, \V i~. St ~t 5. St.1te o{ Wisconsin Route To: SOIL BORING LOG INFOR:\1ATJ Department of Natural Resources □ Solid Waste □ Haz. Waste Form 4400-122 Rev. D Emergency Response e,r1Jnderground TBnks D Wa.stewaler D Water Rtsources -J □ Superfund O Other • Pag ..lQ.! _l'S..! Gt S: 11 A / f..-.c::" o c--~ M M D D Y Y M M D D Y Y rrS :iiij:j//i:lt:l/iJ~i~Jig~i;fl!i:ti:l:~i/~1:~~il~~:~~j/!~]j;~:IJi! fCommon Well Name ~u,al Static \~::~r:s~el ~urface Elevat:~t MSL ~&~/!~ l)j:: Boring Location O , • Local Grid Location (If applicable) Statel'lane ______N, ______E S/C[NI Lat _____. _ □ N r O $t; 1/4 of --1::l.i:1!4 of Section ~ , T _.!,Q__ N, R U JDw Long ' • Feet □ S Feet r County rNR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village fv\lLvJA.U~ _g__J_ M \WJAU ~~ Samola Soil Properties .:d ...... !:) 'o ..;;§, c:: SoiVRock Description CJ :::, ~ .:: 0 And Geologic Origin For ... CJ ?;- <"8 .s Cl) ~-5 -5 t, u Each Major Unit ij ...... , § ·13 _g! ...,> u i3 "d ... 0 ;:I: -5 :::=tJi -~"i: 0 §-c i: § 0 V) !~ ..., CJ ~ °'o ·i·- Is i §!:l Oo N Za j~ ~ Q ::> 0 j ~Q ~ uu, ~u ;_:Jj ~j Po

I- >- I- °l,o-/2..t) U"AN Cl-A Y, (CL--,) 1,:2., 6 3..◊ 1:J)e ;::_ I{ [00 /o f 1Ni;$, t)I\ ~¥'.- Yt:"i ....l ...OW \SH 4, {.p I- >- L-- I- i tZowN C\()Y'(<. '-1/4 ,) t>(Z.y Tb l (o:,) I- N '::>\<;,, Hl6H f>LAST\ C.. 1--ri-"', I- 12 r- ,--- .....:.- ofe- ~,/p, . 7 \ ()"t> ::_,3 CL-A: Y1 (Cl..,) I- [7,,..o-J..o.o- ~tJ ~o i,,o >- Cv I- . \0O°/o FtNt::;. I ~RAY'Gt1- ~N (o.,) I- '4 ,_ (10 VfZ- ~lz_,) t?f(Y I Hl~I-\ r-- I- - ..... 'f!...A 91"[ C.. t 1Y_ I- ~,,, f \{1Jofo (!_~ 11.-\ I--,~ /3", p., 8 LI,~ 1,., I---, (1,z.) i- 'IP r-- ,- I- i,;, -I- \00c,fp -/7 2.~ 14,~ - ' c~ - ( \.t,) >-- 18 I-- - ,- \ l "2.1 ,_- I. (q /D \(!J~ 4,lt ~Jc; C,L, - (, .y') - .... >- µ., -- ·-- ,- -I--• . I-- >- I- - and correct to Iha best of m knowled e.

This fonn is authorized by Cha t 144.147 and 162, \Vi~. Stats. Completion of this report is mmdatory. Penalties: Forfeit not Jess than S10 nor more t.han S5,000 for each violation. Fined nC\t less uian S10 or more th~ $100 or imprisoned nC1t less th:in 30 d:iys, or both for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense, pur~uant toss 144 .99 and 162.06, \Vi~. St :it~. Slate of Wisconsin Route To: SOIL BORING LOG INFOR:\11\TIC Department of Natural Resources D Solid Waste □ Haz. Waste Form 4400-122 Rev. 5- 0 Emergency Response eg--1.Jnderground Tanks D Wastewater D Wat.er Rrsources □ Superfund □ OLher ' Pag.: of z_ Facility/ProJect Name i::, )I) N I c Lt' 1.,.; ,vt ,__ ~[,\~ Gk a>6C / License/Permit/Monitoring Number ioring Number M11,wAu~ cou1s.1« l'l1G" t,.1~, P~PAM I ______sg - t{ /,- Boring Urilled By (Firm name and name of crew chief) Date Drilling SI.med IDate Drilling Completed Drilling Method WAN(;. f:~ ,NEEf2-.1 Nt;, , ,~c. I ___, n .J.. D.. / 1- &.1.1 ~ _l QI i S..11 ~ / ~~O 'D~0 1 M M o o Y Y M M o o Y Y tis A is:11:111:11:;111:~f:~i1:1l=/ilii!l:Jr::jiw=lfii/li~~:jli0:i~/ii//i/[illl/li l Common Well Name Final Static '~:::r~~el Surface Elevat::t MSL ~ore;,,oi1tl)\:; Boring Location o , • LOCaJ Grid Location (If applicable) Stale Plane ______N, ______E S/C/NI Lat _____._ D N □ 1 'S~ 1/4 of ti£ 1/4 of Section ~ , T _JQ__ N, R 12::_(F:N{ Long o • Feet □ S Fe.et D County !DNR County Code Civil Town/City/ or Village MtLvJA.!A~ I ~-L M H.. \.u ~t,:\ ~77 Sample Soil Properties <-<:!- ;I: ~ .,,_!:! -0 0 :::: ~ P.6 0 i:: Cl) :a § ·- i:: ·i·- --c:: §-o § ..9 ls "' 0.0 0 "' Oo N ;:3: §!l C z~ j~ ~ Q ::> 0 j i:S s:: {JV, ::Eu :J:3 l! Cl. ,:;z:: - I-- '-/-- I ....,. C ', --,i'A 1 Nfil ,_ NA Nf\ "2. I- ,___ - 2. Z.o-tf ,o Et...As,,c. StL-T wrn-1 SANt>,. r---- '-- I- (MHJ /\Bot;.1"" 8C>°le, FIN r.:; I I ~C>/6 SANl>, I ,_- ,,. I I 1. -- 1.0 ._s CDA-1z..si::-, 51,,1Bt--N$t..n.. A.@-, 5°/0 GtzAva. z. q; q,\°i- I- 1 M~ ,_ (o;,) I- \=\N€, AN6LJ L,Jr'2- 1 MAX rM!)M.. srz.e::- o. ';; INCr\ I 1)AJ2.~ G#-Yl>H - /.,f ~W/\l ,-- -- I-,_- {toYtz "1/z..) !>12-\", MBP I LJ ,v\ t'I,, 6",4. P1..t,; s,--t c l ..,-Y. :::_ .> " b~ gs $1!.t I-- ~-1-~,0 S--rA 1N IN~ (o;,) I-- • ,_ "I&' l-{.o-9. o S'Ar--.i1> I\N'i) &R,A_\JE::L \ t- ,- r(~ ;tt, A.~O~T 5°"D% ~ tN~, -- '15 o/0 '7Atv1> 1 q; 'b ,'2,..i =-1 t- 4 COA f<.Sf:", 'S'ug(1..-A. l.\l'<.r I N\) fLA S"1 I c tn-'. -,- Mµ. i o:-7) - ,0 t- - - -,_ I-- -

This fonn is authorized by Cha t 144.147 and 162, Wi~. St als. Cornplclion of this report is m:uidatory. Penallics: Forfeit not less than S10 nor more than $5,000 for each violation. Fined n0t less than S10 or more rhm Sl 00 or imprisoned n0t less thJn 30 UJ)'S, or both for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separa lc offrnsc, pur~uant 10 ss 144 .99 and 162.06, \Vi~. S1~1~ . St.1te of Wisconsin Route To: soIL aoRING Loe i:-lFotH _A 1 Department of Na rural Res ou rces D Solid Waste D Ha.z. Waste Form 4400-122 Rev. : D Emergency Response Erl.Jndaground Tanks D WMteWalu D War.a Re.sources □ Supafund D Other ' Page! 2- of ; Facility/ProJect Name t-, t.JN I c ~It,.} '-JI c,, E,l,l<;. 6Jt.. ti.16 c / License/Permit/Monitoring Nwnber roring Number ( Mlt.vJAU~ C0UP-J1°Y 1q 1q l,1'71 P~/2.AM ---- 5g - 4 1 Boring Drilled By (hrm name and name of crew chief) Date Drilling Started Date Drilling Complclcd Drilling Methe

WA~ (;Ni$ t N eEf2-J IVI;, 1 / f,JC,. //) r:v O r:, __L~ / J_ Q / __j _£' _l Q_ / J_ R_ / .:t_ ~ H t\ F--,r;,r\., Di;-L-t.--1 .M .M D D Y Y M M D D Y Y S t1-\ :i[i/~ii/i:l~:Jl :::~l::;//:j:'~i/fli:f~:;:ii!/;~0;~~;/:/:~:j~j;~j]~~!;:1Common Well Name final Static \~:::r~~l Surface Elevat~~t MSL ~o?;/to/; Dij: Boring Location o , • ILocal Grid Location (If applicable) S!Jlte Plane ______N, ______E S/C/NI Lat ___. _ □ N [ 1 se:- 1/4 of }J_£ 1/4 of Section ~ , T _jQ__ N, R _ll___ft;w Long o • Feet □ S Feet [ County !DNR County Code Civil Tov..71/City/ or Village MttvJA.U~ 1 ~-L 1',1\11.-wA.~ ~--s:. Sample Soil Properties ~,..,. !:) 0 SoiVRock Description .., ...;:.§. C: ::, ~ And Geologic Origin For -~ <"8 0 .s Cl) "'~-5 0 0 -5 ts u Each Major Unit ij .... c,j) ·o c,j)> ;I: -5 u 135 "O .... 0 ~! '.[ ::::: th 0.5 .!::IE 0 C: § 0 8- Cl) t1 ~ 0 "' Oo ·i·- N jiz i §!l ::i ~] E Q :::> 0 j ~Q E: UC/) ::Eu j ~l P. -,_ CJ .o-U>.o .E"l.-,t"STIC- S/I.. T (MH ,) O!o 1 \ ,1,, -=-,, 1r,o0 /c, F1N~, ~MY1$1-1 ~~tJ 3,\ le> C\~ j,,r; - '\. - ( 1tV~ TD MO\«;-r I M~ - ~z..) ~<2-.\" (oT1 ~-· q,11..11t'\ 71) HIQ+l ~As,-\u-rY. - 12 i------q¢ ,,~, - 7 .-/5- IO,"\-ILI c;A,N.t::, AN 'I> 6 f Cb,\~ t::"1 Su B.1N$u 1..-k~, ( tJ;'I) - C,(2.A\Jtl- - '4 f= IN~ \ S't.-1 ~NG!) LAI re.. _, i---- ,-

1-,S I ,_ - ~o/~. ' "'" -· 8 \tP le~ =-1~ MK t-, - o;'l - IP (0,1') - --- - c\e ~\\, ,_- \tP ---/7 M µ (, l9 ,'\ - ' e,,1 - (c:-1) ' )8 - ' ol - ·;{;, - t-o:-1 {D \01) '" ,_-)'j i,°' - M* (o.,, - ~ ,_.:.._ ,_- ..- - -- -,_ - I hereb and correct 10 the best of Signature

144.147 and I 62, Wi~. Stars. Completion of this report is m:mdatory. Penalties: Forfeit not less than S10 nor more than S5 000 for each violation. Fined n0t less Ihm S10 or more than SI00 or imprisoned n01 less thJn 30 c.hys, or both for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense, pur$uant toss 144 .99 and 162.06, \Vi~. St ~!~. siaie oi w iscoi i.:> ii i Department of NaruraJ Resources Form 3300- B All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, W Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

County Original Well Q.....,,cr (11 Known) /n/lI,,//) • ✓-c~ 1:- /nI 1/u. (;:,u--~ U!;) E c5e, 1/4 of d? 1/4 of Sec. 2_ T.~ N; R. » w Of applicable) Gov'1 Loi GridNumber · Grid Location ft. 0 N. 0 S., ft. 0 E. 0 W. Civil Tov.n ame el

WELUDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE !~FORMATION t3) Original Wcll/Drillhok, oorcnoJe>Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet) (Date) &i¼1;c L{aZ£ Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes □ 1'b ~ Not App Llncr(s) Remove£!? D Yes ON>~ Not App: 0 Morutoring Well Coraouotion Report Av,il,bJo7 SC'!UnRemoved? □ · Yes □ N> ~ NetApp I Casing in Place? Left 0 Wau:rWcll - □ Yes O 1'b 0 Yes O 1'b D Drillhoie If No, Explain ' ~ Borehole . .. Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? . □ Yes_ □ N> Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? D Yes ON> ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) □ Dug . Did Material Seole After 24 Hours? □ . Yes ON> 0 Othc:r(Specify) IfYcs. Was Hole Retopped7 D Yes ON> '5) Require£! Method of Placing Sealing Material Fonn2.tion Type: D Conductor Pipe-Gravity D Conductor Pipe-Pumped .@ Unronsolidated Formation o~ 0 Dump Bailer. ~ Other (Explain) Total Well Depth (ft.) NA Casing Diameter (ins.) /4 (6) Sealing Mat.eri als For morutoring wells an, (From groundsurfacc) D Neat Cement Grout ·morutoring well borchol 0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Casing Depth (ft) ~o D Concrete : D Bentonite P_cllets 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I D Granular Bcntonite Was Well Annular Space Grouted? Yes j8J'1'h 0 Unknown D Bcntonite-Sand Slurry : D Bentonite • Cement ( □ I IfYes. ToWhatDepth7 ._ Feet pa Chipped Bcnto~le . (7) No. r aras. (C' 1 Mix Rati Sealing Material Used From (Ft) To (Fr.) 1r.>ack, ,,;~ol.nt.J ITC e or Volume One) or Mud Wei .. % . Swf~ 2,..f.~i ,'f J» .. /-.... ;?,;,-k ~ ~/.., f"':A/;., -4,- ~o ¥-fo//,$/i~ I c...,,

(9) Name of Person or Firm Doing Scaling Work

S11cc1 or outc 450 Fenton, Unit 901R 231-7733 City, State, ip ode West Chicago. IL 60185-2688 WELUDRILLHOLE OWNER ~ i.aie ot w m == Department of Natural Rcs.ourus Form

All abandonment work shall ba performed in accordance with the provisions or Chapters NA 111, NA 112 or NA 141 , V Admin. Coda, whichever is applicable. Also, sea instructions on back.

GENERAL JNFOR.\1ATJON (2)

/ ~~ QslE ,,& 1/4 of .t:Lt;_ J/4 of Sec._£_ T.---'=£._ N; R.~ w t1 applicable) Gov't Lot GridNumber · Grid Location ft. 0 N. 0 s.. ft. 0 E. 0 W. Civil To...,n amc

S tr~t Add.ess of Well , ;L

. r WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION. t.:i) Original Wel.l/Drillhol.-..1:Soreno~_onstruclion Completed On (4) Depth LO Water (Feet) (Dat.e) . eJ,..;f;lv:c L?l.~f,£ Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes ON>@ NotAp Llnc:{s) Removed? 0 Yes O1'-h.Jg) NotAp 0 Monitoring Well Coraiructlon Report Av,il,blc? Saeen Removed? □ ·Yes O 1'b ~ NotAp .. I 0 Wau:cWell . 0 Yes O 1'b Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes O 1'b 0 Drillholc I!No, Explain . ~ Borehole . .. Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? . □ 'i'es_ □ N> Construct.ion Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? 0 Yes O 1'b ~ Drilled D Drivc:n (Sandpoint) □ Dug . Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? □ . Yes O NJ 0 Other (Specify) I!Yes, Was Hole Rctopped? 0 Yes O 1'b (5) Required Method of Placing Scaling Material Format.ion Type: .Q?J Unronsolidated Format.ion 0 ConduclOr Pipe-Gravity D Conductor Pipe-Pumped □ Bedrock 0 Dump Bailer. ~ Other (Explain) Total Well Depth (ft.) 6$ Casing Diameter (ins.) ~ (6) Scaling Materials For monitoring wells a (From groundsurl'~) D Neat Cement Grout 11_1oniloring well boreh, 0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Casing Depth (ft.) ~o D Concrete : 0 Bentonite P~lJets 0 Clay-Sand SIUIT)' I O Granular Bcntonite Was Well Annular Space Grouted? Yes .g] N> 0 Unknown 0 Bcntonite-Sand Sluny : D Bentonite - Cement □ I If Yes. To What Depth? .. Feet lg! Chipped Bcnto~te . (l) No. r ard.s, (Circle Mix Ra Scaling Material Used From (Ft.) To (Ft.) <..::>a~u :)eaJanl) One) or vo1ume orMudW. .. ~ . Surface '?;;~ .. ~/. '¥ft?_,-,/;~ ~ E,o-.,~/vf-Z- /:h;:.~ ~o §~l6B~ I u

(9) Name of Person or Finn Doing Scaling Work

S11cct or outc 450 Fenton, Unit 901R City, Slate, ip ode West Chicago. IL 60185-2688 WELUDAILLHOLE OWNER Siaie o isC Department of Narural Resources Form

Al l abandonment work shall ba performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NA 112 or NA 141 , W i Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back. GENERAL JNFOR.\1A TlON County M ll..-WAL--1 - -S~J/4 of Ni;- J/4 of Sec. ~ (1 applicable) Gov't Lot Grid Number · IA..~14 Grid Location ft. 0 N. 0 s .. ft.OE. □ W. Civil To"°n amc el

Str~t Address of Well eason or Abandonment l 7 IO S. ~ "4A), c. le,.-\ N N IC A\Jc:- 6P£"tJ '€:io~Vi o L-C City, illage aJ.e of Abandon.men} M1 t>J..IAV\L-~ •·· - .}o.ks-a,~ I WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE !~FORMATION t3) Original Well/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Dq,th to Water (Feet) . \ T> I' o {r; ~ Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes O Nl (3-- Not App Lina(s) Removed? 0 Yes O l'b BJ- Not App: 0 Monitoring Well ICon,ouctlon Report A v.;J,b!c7 SaeenRemoved? □ · Yes O l'b ~NetApp 0 Wau:rWell . 0 Ye:s O l'b Casing ~ft in Place? 0 Ye:s O Nl D Drillho!e If No, Explain , ~Borehole . .. Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface?· . 0 Ye:s. 0Nl CorutnJcr.ion Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? 0 Ye:s O Nl es]Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) □ Dug . Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? □ . Ye:s O NJ 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Ye:s O NJ (5) Required Method of Placing Sealing Material Formation Type: Conductor Pipe-Gravity Conductor Pipe-Pumped ~nconsolidated Formation 0 D □ Bedrock 0 Dump Bailer. ldtOther (Explain) b'tu\ V r Total Well Depth (ft.) ~(A--• Casing Diameter (ins.) LP'/ I-{ (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells an (From groundsurface) 0 Neat C~ent Grout monitoring well boreho: D Sand.Cement (Concrete) Grout Casing Depth (ft) 2-o Bentonite Pcllets I □ Conc-cte : 0 0 Oay-Sand Slurry I D Granular Bcntonite Was Well Annular Space Grouted? □ Ye:s 01b 0 Unknown 0 Bentonite-Sand Slurry : D Bentonite - Cement< If Yes. To What Depth? .. Feet ~Chipped Bento~te . I (T) No. y ,..,,~ c· Mix Rati Sealing Material Used From (FL) To (Ft.) '-'irlrr c:;,._.1.n'h. ( ircle or Volume One) or.Mud We: .. Swface 1 ? l-! (Z.f;" /7') l--1> Mf;l>)UM Cillf~ t.(; 6 h l;;t> I b.

(°li\ ) Comments.

(9) Name of Person or Finn Doing Scaling Work -· Unit 901R

60185-2688 · WELUDRILLHOLE OWNER State ol lscoruii1 Department of Natural Rcs-our~s Form 3300-

Al l abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis Admin. Coda, whichever is applicable. Also, sea instructions on back.

Sf;' 1/4 of t:l..Ji:1;4 of Sec. ~ ti applicable) -- Gov'1 I..ot GridNumber · 901 f,J, I Grid I..ocation ft. 0 N. 0 s .. fl. □ E. □ W. Civil To.,,,n ame ell J

Str~I Address of\ ell cason or Abandonmenl ,711) s. ~NN,e,~, ).J 10 \t.. Av~. Of)GN City, illage ate of Abandonment I . r WELUDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE""' u~ I~FORMA TION l-' Original Well/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth LO Water (Feet) (Date) \O h-& /9~ Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes ON> ~NotAppli< Lina{s) Removed? D Yes D N> 9'" NotApplic 0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Scrcat Removed? □ · res ON> ~NotAppl.ic 0 Wau:rWell . 0 Yes ON> Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes ON> D Drillhole If No, E,:plain e?"BorchoJe I Was Casing Cut Off Below Sw-face? . D Yes. Olli Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Sw-face? D Yes ON> ~ed D Driven (Sandpoint) □ Dug . Did Material Senle After 24 Hours? □ . Yes ON> 0 Other (Specify) If Yes. Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes ON> (5) Required Melhod of Placing Sealing Mate.rial Formation Type: D Conductor Pipe-Gravity D Conductor Pipe-Pumped ~Unconsolidated Formation OB«!rock 0 Dump Bailer. j8:"0ther(Explain) ~ JZA V I' Total W~ll Depth (ft.) N fr Casing Diameter (ins.) U' I f Lf (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From ground.surf~) D Neat Cement Grout ·Tl_lonitoring well borehole D Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Casing Depth (fl) 2o D Concrete : 0 Bentorute PcllelS 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I D Granular Bentonite Was Well Annular Space Grouted'? 0 Yes ~N> 0 Unknown D Bcntorute-Sand Sluny : 0 Bentorute - Cement G1 If Ycs. To What Depth? . Feet Q?"Chippea Bcntonite . I (l) Mix Ratio Sealing Material Used From (FL) To (Fr.) ~arPc §ea.hnu (Circle or Volume One) or.Mud Weig sun~ ~uczY:' f?OL-1" . M~ruM 0H-lf'7 w t.f '/z, 5D 1b,

·l~ J Comments •. (9) Name of Person or Firm Doing Scaling Work Rex Bell, Wang En ineerin , Inc. Si ture of Person Doing Work Date ~isncd . 1 1 ~ '-ll v I tJ 18/_ 0,- 1 Sue.ct or outc clcpho c Num..,.b._cr-"------1 450 Fenton, Unit 901R ( 708) 231-7733 City, State, ip ode We s t Chicago. IL 60185-2688 WELUDRILLHOLE OWNER I

I APPENDIX B FIELD PID DATA FORMS AND CALIBRATION RECORD FORM

I I

I

I I I I Ill HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company .. - .. -- -

Site: JGnm'cJ;,aa/c,/i-';i 0fir'1)c.­ Dnte: EJ-;do/2,::,c /7I f"l't~ Project !lo: ,§r.>.,2£-f,if~7:£ Personnel: --ic:DD Ir' · -.11.(MO/Ylzp,N ~ . / FIELD PID DATA FORM Heter !lo: Probe eV: IJ.Z

Sarrple Snrrple Moisture Time Time Volatilization PID Readings (ppn) llurber Location Depth Media Sorrple Sample Period Air Cooments -r-1 (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp CC) Background Peak Response I SE-/ .,i'" -,f s;.., ,;:n l-=1 : /o /,/.-,;la .,:?6 ~-s !.>< .,,,z_ /.;/: ;/-&i 5o /71 /.,.. : /:!> ,._...... ,, ,,,2~ rJ,5? J/'x ,t{-g 3 5.. /Tl, I.ii-~ /¢.-.;25 ...;-¼ &·25 Jt:Ji/ -I ff'-/o _5, J, r 1.:;:,2:$' J,/.·.:Z.7 -2& ;.g ,l.g

:;5' /o --j,:2, 5o J. I J.q :ifo /,/.-.;lo _-2~ J.o. 9.o 6 1..2-;,,I 5,, Ir I .:J:

7 ✓ Jt/-/6 -5:.,,, m ' /.:,': ;:f::, /,/:,;:,'£" _;l~ .9.g .,.2. f)

:I: -< □ ::IJ C) I c.n m :0 ::IJ C'"J :::c (1) so - Soil Cheadspace) (2) D - Dry SD· Sediment M - Hoist GV - Ground Vater \I • Vet SV - Surface \later S - Sot urated VS - Vaste (solid) VL • Vaste (liquid) .. -- -- -

FIELD PIO DATA FORH Heter No: Probe eV: //,7

San-ple San-ple Moisture Time Time Volntil i zation PIO Readings (PfXll) Nurber Location Depth Media Salq)le Sample Period Air Corrrnents r-1 (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Telql CC) Background Peak Response

I l5B-2 ~-./- -5:, ,h'1 c,%.'J,,,('" 0 'j.~,;f"" /5 r>- % ~-'if

2 .:/-C:, ~ h'l off:.,,,2o o 9-f 7 I~ 1, ✓ ;_/.t/-

3 6 -fs s;, h'l o5f.',.t.5 /o:co 15 /,;/ . ~ - ~ ,sr:· ... c/- $ -/c> ~ .h1 e> ,.?;? l o .· o;3 /.:.f J ./4 ~-v

:S /o ··/ .;'l ~ .h1 ox'·i/5 /o .'o;!° I~ j. /4 . ~-$ 6 /,.2-/,f ,5, /,J e>%.' ~o /<" :c,7 /5 j,/.P .,./ .ff 7 /./-/,? ,::;;;, )\ /LJ e,~.-,,,;;;:;- .1\/A ; ;5· /\1'1-1 AIA c;...,/:1---<":. ~ 5"!r.rVL, I I % /6-/B _Sc, 1,/n--&, (J-1 c:Jf!-•5,p' / 0 .· Jo J;f'" / ,b ~ -S 1 \Y ll,:J-,;2o :5',, vn-lo.?J o 'J .·co /o : J:;r /,:;{" /. % 3.;?

:I: -< □ ::0

□I CJ) m :0 :D C'"'J :c (1) SO - Soil Cheadspace) (2) 0 - Dry SO - Sediment H - Hoist G\.l • Ground \.later \.I - \.let SV • Surface \.later S - Sot urated \.IS - \.taste (solid) \.IL - \.taste (liquid) - ·- - - - c::., ·- s i t e: Kiaa/cl:.1M; · jf/v..S Gv-t: z)' Project Ile: -;?n.o,;£;S3d 7£ FIELD PIO DATA FORH Heter Ile: Probe eV: J/,7

Sa~le Sa~le Moisture Time Time Volatilization PIO Readings (ppm) Nurber Location Depth Media Sarrple Sample Period Air Comnents r-1 (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp CC) Background Peak Response I lS.e-3 ~- 1 ;:;;,:, /rt /o :,;2o /,,2:t>7 ,:23 /.6 ~ -b' ~ /cv/,,2 <.. /Yi A:, .·,,2;{ /~• : Jo J ,$ f.L, · ~ -b

~ /,,2-// ~ ;-n /o ,:k 12. /,:1. ,,;73 /.o _;:,.g

1 1/4-/c; ~ /.n /o .-/;$" /.:l:/5 YJJ /.& ,.,1'.1/- _:5, % /c:,'-j,!r h-1 Jo -~ /,;/./1 _:2,;3 J, I,, -2.6 r \1/ l~ -~o <. ,n //·o::, l2:,;2o ,,:23 /-~ ,..2.6

:r: . -< D :::0 0 I en m :n :D C'"J :c (1) SO - Soil (headspace) (2) -D • Dry SD· Sediment H - Hoist CV· Ground Vater \I • \let sv - surface Vater s • Sot uroted VS· Vastc (solid) VL · Vaste (liquid) ------s i t e: /G;vz lc/;//1a/Cc§4i-!.- bctCll Z)~ Project llo: ,:;J'e->d,£-c.J)~~'f,$" FIELD PIO DATA FORH Heter !lo: Probe eV: 1/.1

Sarrple Sarrple Hoisture Time Time Volatilization PIO Readings (ppn) 111..rrbcr Location Depth Media Sarrple sample Period Air Corrments Fl (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp CC) Background Peak Response

I 6B-¥ ,/"-tf ~ /77. cJ'/.'CO ; ... :,;:,"§ /6, /. t."> /.6, .. Lj.O ~ 1-o ~ /7"1. ~7.-£, /.:, :~'7 //4 /. l ')

3 ,6-,!3 -s:.. ./, I .tJ'J.-55 I~-. :,/<, //4 I. 0 ' LJ,o

c/ Y-/o s:. ) I lo :,:,o J.., :,/,2 lt:P /. i:, L/.o 5 /.:,-/,:2 ~ ) I /o:o;f" /o: ✓;6' /6, /. 0 . L/, 0 ,,;'/,0 ~ ,1 ,f;?-/¥, 6, ). ( /eo :/o lo :£; 16 /.o

:I: -< □ :D C) I en m :0 :D C'"'J :c (1) SO· Soil (headspace) (2) D • Dry SD· Sediment H • Hoist GV • Ground '.later ',I· Vet SV • Surface '.later s • Sot uratcd vs· Vaste (solid) VL • Vaste (liquid) f" ...... T1MC '· I~"

M1L-w,1u~~ co. fi~f;" uc;..-- f{L..(¥Jr1>.N"­ ps.:r: -~ Site: k1f'\NIC'.!--1,-..1 N\C., &\,~ Gkrt49C Date: !DI ,3 )qc;-- Project No: 3 rJ zi;,;; z.q s-/1;0-:7'8 Persomel: A1Ar-l 1-1-Ti:W S'p/ ' FIELD PIO DATA FORM Meter No: 3 Probe cV: 11.,

Scl"l)le Sarrple Moisture Time Time Volatilization PIO Readings (ppm) Nlnber Location Depth Media Sarrple Sarrple Period Air Cooments (ft.) ( 1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp (C) Background Peale Response ,,, .. ,. ~g-1 0-7... so - - "L (-i-'' 2-Y '3 !.I -t, =,,~ LJ (9-g :c ~ ?)-10 --< CJ (_p 10-,2 :a C) 7 1 l -1If I en g l ll - II.,, m :0 1 !&,-1',g :a ~ ~11 ("') lo r/ IS -2o :c -:::::, n ► -t -...ct) ll.l -t ct) 0 ';j" ("') 0 3 -0 (1) (2) D - Dry Q) SO - Soil ::J SD - Sediment M - Moist § Tl M t:"S. l US - Uaste (Solid) WL • Uaste (Liquid) - -· . .. - ..... #--•--. , -~. - . . . -. --- . . v .. . k; . E. G SJ te: fi.-JO(UC OO'C 0,'SG')a.S. D<1tc: 0a-/E/2?c /4 1715 Project No: 3~,..?;$"£#.::Z. 75" ./ PersoMel: --•/00"2 frl · ----lffe,/n.;;0/'f FIELD PIO DATA FORM Heter No: fl(IJ,s, :II .iJ Probe eV: //. 7

Sarrple Sarrple Moisture Time Time Volotiliz.<1tion PIO Readings (ppn) Nurber Location Depth Media Sorrple Sample Period Air Coornents T-'J/ (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Tcrrp (C) Background Peak Response

I ~e-2 .,,;?--/ ~ rn J,(f,·,,.2o /7:/;P .2:S t) .6 / , o ,., ,<- l-6 ~ >'YI /6 :,2.5 17.'1'1 25" .P). 6 1.L.J

3 6-!5 ~ .h1 /,d :,i>"o /7.~o -2-5" £)-x' ·Le,.f{

f ,7'-/o --5., .l?'I I~ :.;?.5 17.,?,:Z ..t5 ,,,.,.g :;, ..:z.

:$" Jo -/,Z. .e;:., .>-n //4 :¥o /7 ~"5 ..25 /,o . y,...

6 l.2-Jr/- Sc, h1. h:: .·¥§' /7-',,:<"1 Jj[ /-~ --1. ,Z 7 11✓-/u ~ .n1 //4.~ 17. ·_3, »- / .o 2~ % 1/&7'.S .::;-- h1 J/4 :~:f" /733 .,25 6) ,g / , ,,;2_, 1 \1/ /f(-~ < .rn ;7.·,-0 11~;;,' ,_p.5 19-&' ,<'e, -~

::I: -< D :0 C) I en rn :0 :D CJ :c ( 1) so - Soil (headspace) (2) D • Dry SD - Sediment H - Hoist CV - Ground \later \I - \let SV - Surface \later s - Sot urated vs· Vaste (solid) VL · Vaste (liquid) .. - =- - /'v\ 11.vJ4Ll \4::.7';:. w. 19'1 > l/S't FW.7 (2'1 ~ ,l - Site; \~N\C,~\~lv1C..- ~us b~t2A6C- 1: Date: ,r:,­. Project No: 5,02>->3"l-ctS- t/008 j Personnel: t~ ' FIELD PIO DATA FORM Heter No: ' Probe eV: I I.-, ·- ' Sarrple Sarrple Moisture Time Time Volatilization PIO Readings (ppm) NU!ber Location Depth Media Sarrple Sarrple Period Air Cooments (ft.) ( 1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp (C) Background Peak Response

) '58-s D-2 SD ~ N-0 SAM {'LL ~ D l.>-;oo l(o: o o o,°( Lo;9 2-- I'-~---'' z-tt 3 L/-IR i) { '>:2.o f 0: oc> c?,?J a,'i =,1~ '1 ln-Q l) I c;-; 2o \(9'. oJ 0,7 l,8 :I:- ~ )<-17} I) ( c;;z_r, ((,.,: Od Odo o.9 -< t) -AA (t:;,' 5() re~: o o 0 g,o □ ~ )0-12 17 :D 0 -J IZ--/4 1) (~: so {~;50 o,qo "3,Z> I Cl) 13 l!-l-1 L [) (>,'>> IS: >S- 1,2- ILf,Z. m !) :0 9 /&,-1~ I~ 40 llP:oo ( I 2-- 2.~ :D n 10 ""' v 15\-W ~ l) I r;.._c,~ f&:oo r, lf ( ' & :c- =::Jn ► -i -Cl)... DJ -i Cl) n ;;;; (") 0 3 "O (1) SO-Soil (2) D - Dry Ql ::, SD - Sediment M - Moist '< GU - Ground Uater U - Uet SU - Surface Uater S - Saturated US - Uaste (Solid) UL - Uaste (Liquid) - - - i;· 1'1,twAu 14,.-c ro. Acts- 1,1s.- ~~l2A iv-. t: Site: ~lt,J~.J1C,,~1N'AJK ~ GA-{llf&C Date: ro /,R /c, c;- _• 'L ~ Project No: t,O")..~e;; 2-CfS:/ t,b()'g AtAN l,!::T£:v) Persomel: ___.'-'-,;;...... ______;;__;,__)''/'(.,._( <.,.,:J . .· FIELD PIO DATA FORM Heter No: --~-\-,,------_-:-,.a}¥-! Probe eV: ..4 , • . tl ~t:·- ,-. r.. Sarrple Sarrple Moisture Time Time Volatilization PIO Readings (ppm) ~.'. Nllli:>er Location Depth Media Sarrple · Sarrple Period Air Cooments (ft.) (1) (2) Collected Analyzed Terrp (C) Background Peak Response .. I sg-y - <()-7- sv ,-Jo <;',1it.1Pu:- jv,_,~ 7- l-L-1 ::> I ?H~ 1lf: 0,7 1.o - ?o 3 ~, - ',. ~ ,·r:s-o (y :3o 0,7 0,4 =,1.4 ~ I _, - t '?>; >0 ( <.{: 50 o<, Lo,-, ::c g-10 t>-.,M. ,~ :r;'>- \l(:50 0,7 Z, l/ --< ~ CJ Ip I 1)-12- l> IL\ ; oo r L-( : 50 0,7 3, ( ::c o,, 0 17--'( lf t> \ t\ : 0 (J \1{:?,o 0,1 I en ''t /1-( - li, I> I'< .'o~ rY: so o,-, Lo,7 m :0 ~ II,.-& t:,-~ \l(:10 \l(; Cf o O,r Lo,, ::c .... 10 11 1R-2tJ , 't)-,...._ 11..1 : rn 1u:1ro o:-i co,, ::cC"'J :::, n ·; )> -i (!) -, -Qj -i (!) 0 -::1" ("") 0 3 "'C (1) D - Qj so - Soil (2) Dry ::, SD - Sediment H - Hoist '< GW - Ground Water IJ - \.let SW - Surface Water s - Saturated WS - Waste (Solid) WL - Waste (Liquid) - -

COUIPHCHT CALinRATIOO fOOH

Equ i pncnt H.il:c/Hodc l/l!S I I .D. Hurbcr _____/,'"-'--";/ U'--"'-.tA.:a..:.-...,_l?t.:....,..,.,5..,..U.....__.c_#_ .-'· 3""'------

/?DAT~.:S" TIHE CALIDRATIOII HEDIA RESULTS COHHEHTS

/D -/"7 o7.·;i. i y.:;:__L,c-/vk.,>,..,.._-.f ,£It r 1.:::;-.,.,1,t, ·~ - /.7..,,...,,..... <. 2/. 6,,,,:'L ,C-~s-hr'"l3s( ~ C (.) tt / . /o ··/7 I.:/' : co k_/ I /_ + .fJJ'- c:; ~ ,,__ "%-z,... _ ~,,_ 4-bD C1,,.,:~Y/ r 'E:>~I .2;2. 0 I c)/4~/ , t /o-/x .t'Jf(: 09 kL ,,,1 I ...,J-,flJr le:;:/ L! _ . --~ ✓- c/8 r~,,.,;~--l"tr YI ,;2/o I C) I I I I

. APPENDIX C LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC 205 WEST GALENA 11/29/95 MILWAUKEE, WI 53212 10:51 (414) 272-0500 ; ·

1995 Analytical Report · f5) DE .C . 4. m)D till ~©~~w~ lYJ HSl .. BROO ~(FIELD

Attn: Judy Fassbender WORK ID: K .K. Bus Garage Milwaukee Cty Client: Hydro-Search 175 North Corporate Drive Date Received : 10/17/95 Suite 100 Date Reported: 11 /29/95 Brookfield, WI 53045 9 EXCEL ORDER #: ?aa~teR FILE coPv . PROJECT# :pZ-5-5)2£15 CC: ______

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LAB ID DATE COLLECTED

SB-2, 4-6 Feet ( r-,) OIA 10/17/95 SB-2 10-12Feet(T-1) 02A 10/17/95 SB-3,' 8-10 Feet ( T-1 J 03A 10/17/95 SB-1 6-8 Feet C. T-' ) 04A 10/17/95 SB-2' 10-12 Feet C.. T-t, J 05A 10/17 /95 SB-2 ' 14-16 Feet ( T - 11) . ;06A 10/17/95 '

Laboratory ID Number (Wisconsin DNR): 241369260

I .,:} , , I P\ i '\ f7 L-- <--­ I • (; , EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC 11 /29/95

COMMENTS

CLIENT: Hydro-Search EXCEL Order//: 9510052

All analysis performed at Excel Laboratories, LLC according to approved methods cited in the following references:

Standard Methods for Evaluation of Water and Wastewater, APHA, 17th Edition , 1989 !v1ethods for Chemical Analysis for Water and Wastes,EPA 600/4-79-020, lJS~ P.c\ Revisfcl t\~";~'1,, )%:\ i\~l; 19]9;. lx' -~1 M,E-,\1 \,-:'i ~i ~ !1\r 1•. \'J.J\)..,:,\.\~~ ~,),,.; ,,. \\ 0\\v, b! .\ ~\\ ~ -l,<,,. :k ,~ l:~h i,ll\: Fi11:,l I \!, ,L,1,· l _ \ 1111. \ ~'. •\i

DRO Analysis: Excel sample 9510052-04 was analyzed at a 1:5 dilution due to high DRO component concentration. · ·

The DRO extraction blank analyzed with Excel samples 9510052-01 - 06 was 0. lrng/Kg above the method limit. The blank concentration was below the reported limit for all samples, and all other DRO method QC ,criteria were met.

SlJeldon Storie, Laboratory Director EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page . l 11/29/95

CLIENT:Hydro-Search

Test Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

Sample ID: SB-2, 4-6 Feet LT-I) Lab ID: 9510052-0lA Collected: 10/17/95

QC Approval Data Acceptable Reviewed Comments Acceptable Reviewed S260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

Heavier than DRO NP ma/Ka:::, . :::, 10/30/95 10/30/95 JKK

Sample ID: SB-2, 10-12 Feet ( T-/) Lab ID: 9510052-02A Collected: 10/17/95

8260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

Sample ID: SB-3, 8-10 Feet ( T-J) · Lab ID: 9510052-03A Collected: 10/ 17 /95

S260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are repo1ied on a dry weight basis unless indicated on the report. EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 2 11/29/95

CLIENT.Hydro-Search

Test Resu lt Limit Un its Analyzed Extracted BY Method

8260 - Soil 8260 1,2-Dichloroethane

Sample ID : SB-1, 6-8 Feet ( T-1 ) Lab ID: 9510052-04A Collected: 10/17 /95

8260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

Sample ID: SB-2, 10-12 Feet ( T- 11) Lab ID: 9510052-05A Collected: I 0/ 17 /95

8260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless indicated on the report. EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 3 11/29/95

CLIENT:Hydro-Search

Test Result · Limit. Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

8260 - Soil 8260 m/p-Xylene 3.9 1.8 ug/kg ' 10/25/95 AKJ Dry Weight 85 % 10/26/95 JKK Mod. DRO (WDNR), Soil WDNRMDR Diesel Range Organics 32 5.0 mg/Kg'. 10/30/95 10/30/95 JKK Lighter than DRO p mg/Kg 10/30/95 10/30/95 JKK Heavier than DRO NP mg/Kg'. 10/30/95 10/30/95 JKK

. .. Sample ID: SB-2, 14-16 Feet ( T-11) Lab ID: 9510052-06A Collected: 10/17/95

8260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless indicated on the report. -7 / '1 ;H Excel La.boratories, LLC 205 W. Galena Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 PHONE: 414-272-0500 or 1-800-438-9186 FAX: 414-272-3133 ~ 1im1m1,m~1 1:1■1111■1r1~111111:11111111r11,r111:.. :,: ;~.,

Street Address: Person to be Invoiced:

City, State, Zip Code: () Mail Invoice to: Client D Property Owner

Phone: Mail Lab Reports to: .@ Client D Property Owner

TURNAROUND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS ~ Normal (Approx. 2 weeks for non-TCLP routine tests) D NONHAZARDO.US 0 Rush* (Date FAX report needed: ______D Potentially Requiring Special Handling • SCHEDULE WITH CLIENT SERVICES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE RUSH PROCESSING. COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

s

. ' ) ;,.,,if-

• Soil (SI, Surface Water (SW). Groundwater (GWI. Wastewater (WW), Waste/Solid (WS), Waste/Liquid (WL); Note if COMPOSITE (C) or GRAB (G)

White - Lab Received by (Sig11aturel: Relinquished by (Signature): DatefTima: Received by (Signature): Yellow - Report

Pink - File DatefTlme: Received by (Signature): Relinquished by (Signature): DatefTime: Gold - Client '------· ------··-· ·-··-· ·-- -· -I I '1 ;H Excel Laboratories, LLC 205 W. Galena Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 PHONE: 414-272-0500 or 1-800-438-9186 FAX: 414-272-3133 ~

Pricing Quote/Reference//;;, '/.r., .C,,..~/-,.· ./'1'!',;:;- ll5/Jf:,c.

(,/ Mail Invoice to: ..29' Client D Property Owner Phone : Mail Lab Reports to: $1 Client D Property Owner

TURNAROUND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS Jg] Normal (Approx. 2 weeks for non-TCLP routine tests) 0 NONHAZARDOUS D Rush* (Date FAX report needed: 0 Potentially Requiring Special Handling • SCHEDULE WITH CLIENT SERVICES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE RUSH PROCESSING. COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

• Soil (S). Surface Water (SW). Groundwater (GW). Wastewater (WW), Waste/Solid (WS), Waste/Liquid (WL); Note if COMPOSITE (C) or GRAB (G)

Whitt - Lab Date/Time: Received by (Signature): .' Relinquished by (Signature): Date/Time: Received by (Signature): Yellow - Report 0 -/,, • -"/_;$"' ?! n ·;

Analytical Report

Attn: Judy Fassbender WORK ID: K.K. Bus Garage Milwaukee Client: Hydro-Search 175 North Corporate Drive Date Received: 10/19/95 Suite 100 Date Reported: 11/30/95 Brookfield, WI 53045 EXCEL ORDER #:9510054

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LAB ID DATE COLLECTED

SB-3 12-14 Feet OlA 10/18/95 SB-3 16-18 Feet 02A 10/18/95 SB-4 10-12 Feet 03A 10/18/95 Sump 04A 10/18/95 - r t/-- Trip Blank 05A 10/18/95 SB-4 4-6 Feet 06A 10/18/95 Bioremediation Pile 07A 10/17/95

Laboratory ID Number (Wisconsin DNR): 241369260

I EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC 11/30/95 COMMENTS CLIENT: f(ydro-Search EXCEL Order #: 9510054

All analysis performed at Excel Laboratories, LLC according to approved methods cited in the following references:

Standard Methods for Evaluation of Water and Wastewater, APHA, 17th Edition, 1989 Methods for Chemical Analysis for Water and Wastes,EPA 600/4-79-020, USEPA, Revised March, 1983 and 1979. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, EPA SW846, 3rd Edition, Final Update I, July 1991

DRO Analysis: Excel sample 9510054-01 was analyzed at a 1:3 dilution due to high DRO component concentration.

/ I' i

eldon Stone, Laboratory Director

I EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 1 11/30/95

- ..... LIENT: Hydro-Search

rest Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

=,ample ID: SB-3 12-14 Feet Lab ID: 9510054-0lA Collected: 10/18/95

QC Approval Data Acceptable Reviewed t Comments Acceptable Reviewed 260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

--.ample ID: SB-3 16-18 Feet Lab ID: 9510054-02A Collected: 10/ 18/95

260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis ;< k:._ 'Bu~ 611 121-1 G unless indicated on the report. I I EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 2 11/30/95

l IENT:Hydro-Search

st Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

ample ID: SB-4 10-12 Feet Lab ID: 9510054-03A Collected: 10/18/95

8260 - Soil 8260 Benzene

mple ID: Sump Lab ID: 9510054-04A Collected: 10/18/95

nraylene Glycol

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis /; /( !jr./f, 6 r1li'/JC7L unless indicated on the report. I EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 3 11/30/95

-~LIENT:Hydro-Search

es t Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

260 - Water 8260 Ethylbenzene

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis J/ unless indicated on the report. {-.. I/., f?u1$ b 1?lC119-l EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 4 11/30/95

-=:LI ENT: Hydro-Search

~est Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method 270 - Water 8270 Diethyl Phthalate

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis / 1 unless indicated on the report. K /.( t5u'f 6M/211 JC EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 5 11/30/95

=: LI ENT: Hydro-Search

'est Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

'ample ID: Trip Blank Lab ID: 9510054-05A Collected: 10/18/95

8260 - Water 8260 Acetone

ample ID: SB-4 4-6 Feet Lab ID: 9510054-06A Collected: 10/18/95

- l260 - Soil 8260

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor · P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis / / unless indicated on the report. //, ~ p';;f blllZ-/lJf EXCEL LABORATORIES, LLC Page 6 11/30/95

GuENT:Hydro-Search

est Result Limit Units Analyzed Extracted BY Method

8260 Benzene

7 ample ID: Bioremediation Pile Lab ID: 9510054-07A Collected: 10/17/95

\mmonia

MDL - Method Detection Limit corrected for Dry Weight and Dilution Factor P - Present NP - Not Present Results for solid and semi-solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis V ---7 /_ unless indicated on the report. f---_ /( "D1.,S, C7lr£ /JJf I I '1 ;H Excel Laboratories, LLC 205 W. Galena Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 PHONE: 414-272-0500 or 1-800-438-9186 FAX: 414-272-3133 ~ e89.R§Rrnx: llwN!R :l!NFQBM!\TJPN ::: Pr operty Owner: M11-w1tUKG1'Z' eou,-iiY Project I.D.:

Company: Company Name. If Applicable: Pricing Quote/Reference:

Mailing Address: (OM(2.0(t.,\~"t>(Z.. '7411£ lOO Per son to be Invoiced: ~Client D Property Ow.ner

Cily, State, Zip COde: City, State, Zip Code: ~u~:L.t> \JJ 1 5!>b'-f ~ Mail Invoice 10: ~lient D Property Owner

Phone : Phone '112.t 797..--(z.gz FAX: l-fll.{ 7£t7,. ·- /3/0 Mail Lab Reports to: ~lient D Property Owner

TURNAROUND SAMPLE CHARACTER1STICS ~Normal (Approx . 2 weeks for non-TCLP routine tests) 0 NONHAZARDOUS □ Rush* (Date FAX report needed: ~otentially Requiring Special Handling • SCHEDULE WITH CLIENT SERVICES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE RUSH PROCESSING. COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

• Soil (S) , Surfoco Wotor (SW), Groundwotor (GW), Wastowotcr (WW) , Waste/Solid (WS). Waste/Liquid (WL); Note if COMPOSITE (Cl or GRAB (G)

White - Lab Rollnqulshed by !Signature): Date!Timo: Receiv ed by (Signature): Yellow - Report

Pink - File Rollnqulshed by ISlgnaturo): OatcrTirno: Rec.,iv.•d .al/AL by l6i9na1ural: Gold - Client ------· - ----~------~ I I '1 ;H Excel Laboratories, LLC 205 W. Galena Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 PHONE: 414-272-0500 or 1-800-438-9186 FAX: 414-272-3133 ~ 1·•·~ ••fflY~1 •.fll .. ••:••·:~ :n ••••·•••:~ ••:mam1m:•m•111•1•

Property Owner:

Company Name. If Applicable:

Street Address• ~ N3v l ~\:='.-IN ,vlC- Person to be Invoiced• ~lient

City. State. Zip Code• Mail Invoice to: ~Client D Property Owner

Phone: Mail lab Reports to: Ia:-'Client D Property Owner

TURNAROUND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS ~Normal (Approx . 2 weeks for non-TCLP routine tests) 0 NONHAZARDOUS □ Rush* (Date FAX report needed : ,c&l-Potentially Requiring Special Handling • SCHEDULE WITH CLIENT SERVICES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE RUSH PROCESSING.

COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

.. ... )•~AM#~~ •Rt§w1.:.N·:···•·;·.:••·Q•.i.:..: .•.•. ·..·.!• •. •.! .. a .:..•.• .:.: .. .E:.. ; .:.. •. c.•. rm.• ·:Q··:···:···:~.•.:.. •.•..vo.•.••.:.:E~. :.•s•.• .•.•. •.: ..•.: .. •.•.•.•.•.•.•. m·::·•:•:•·•:•·•:•·.•.•.. •.•·.u••. ·.·.... o·.·.• .··.•.•.• i~w~1i~•fl ~~~/~;1 •I 2m!s~K..... •••• ❖❖ • ·•· •·•et.? •· ·· ·· w . . ·.·.·.~ ·.} ~ ..· ..

;i@@tt·•• :•~~p~ifirrn§ttr?tJM +~?Wtr~$~Wtmrirt~1t@ ..•.. ..•.. •..•..•..•..•..•..•. ·. ~...•..•..•.. 9.•.•. :.. •.. :.. ".. •.. ••.• .. :.• ••. ••. :.1 •.. :..c .. .rm~•. •:.~•:•.•:• .":•.·..· •·· '·.•.. •..v·.. •. •.• ·.. ·.•:•.E•.•.·. •.•.s•.•.•.·.•..• ..• ..• ..• .. •.. •.. .• •:.•··.•·.•.•· WJm,•.·· ·:•.•:•.::•. •: ·.·.•. ~....:. .• N•. ·.•.·.···•c·o ·.··.•.·.•.•.••..

9

• Soil (S), Surface Water (SW), Groundwater (GW), Wastewater (WW), Waste/Solid (WS), Waste/Liquid (WL); Note if COMPOSITE (Cl or GRAB (Gl

While - lab Relinquished by (Signature): OalerTime: Received by (Signature): Yellow - Reporl

Pink - File Received by (S ignature)• Relinquished by (Signature)• OatorTime• ~•l~•d .>t PALby f61gnaturo) ; Gold - Client Excel Laboratories, LLC 205 W. Galena Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 PHONE: 414-272-0500 or 1-800-438-9186 FAX: 414-272-3133

Person to be Invoiced:

Mail Invoice to:

Phone: Mail lab Reports to:

TURNAROUND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS ffel Normal (Approx. 2 weeks for non-TCLP routine tests) 0 NONHAZARDOUS □ Rush* (Date FAX report needed: ______D Potentially Requiring Special Handling • SCHEDULE WITH CLIENT SERVICES IN ADVANCE TO ENSURE RUSH PROCESSING. COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

• Soil (S), Surface Water (SW), Groundwater (GW). Wastewater (WW). Waste/Solid (WS). Waste/Liquid (WL); Note if COMPOSITE (Cl or GRAB (G)

While - lab Relinquished by (Signature): DatefTime: Received by (Signature): Yellow - Report

Pink - File Relinquished by (Signature): DatefTima: Gold - Client N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 06-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units MDL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Sample Number 1085 Sample analyzed within 5 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-IKK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: I 1/15/95 Time: 11 :20

Diesel Range Organics 1,127 ug/1 22 WIDRO jl 11/20/95

Sample Number 1086 Sample analyzed within 16 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-Dup!KK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 11 :20

Diesel Range Organics 2,818 ug/1 45 2 WIDRO jl 12/1/95

Sample Number 1087 Sample analyzed within 5 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-2KK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 10:24

Diesel Range Organics 565 ug/1 22 WIDRO jl 11 /20/95

Sample Number 1088 Sample analyzed within 5 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-3KK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: I 1/15/95 Time: 10:45

Diesel Range Organics 6,980 ug/1 112 5 WIDRO jl 11/20/95

Sample Number 1091 Sample analyzed within 5 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw4 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11 /15/95 Time: 14:37

Diesel Range Organics 117 ug/1 22 WIDRO j) 11/20/95

Sample Number 1092 Sample analyzed within 4 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: row! camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: I 1:25

Diesel Range Organics 259 ug/1 22 \VIDRO jl I 1/20/95

RR = Re-extracted and /or re -analyzed sample Page: 1 OC = Spike and/or surrogate out of control. Nc?VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 06-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units MDL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Sample Number 1093 Sample analyzed within 6 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw2 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 10:25

Diesel Range Organics 176 ug/1 22 \VIDRO jl 11/22/95

Sample Number 1094 Sample analyzed within 6 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw3 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 09:40

Diesel Range Organics 89 ug/1 22 \VIDRO jl 11 /22/95

Sample Number 1095 Sample analyzed within 6 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw-1 dup camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 11 :25

Diesel Range Organics 262 ug/1 22 \VIDRO jl 11/22/95

MDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B

RR = Re-extracted dnd /or re-analyzed sample Page: 2 OC = Sp ike and/or surrogate out of control. DRO SAMPLE RESULTS

Batch # : 950024 Prep Batch#: 950047 Analyst : Jian Lu

Analysis Data: 11-17-95 File: 111795

ug/ml DRO STD 500 546.9 D%=9.4 <20% DRO BLANK 44.7 <50 DRO SPIKE-1 266.8 RECOVERY=106.7% WITHIN 75-115% DRO SPIKE-2 273.4 RECOVERY=109.4% WITHIN 75-115% RPD=2. 7% < 20%

#1085 1283 #1086 2887 #1087 747 #1088 8625 Background became higher after run samples. #1091 210 Modify the method, i.e. Raise temp. to 320 for 15min #1092 362 after normal run. #1093 229 #1094 135 #1095 289

Analysis Data: 11-20-95 File: 112095

DRO STD 1000 927.2 D%=7.3 <20% DRO BLANK 30.5 <50 DRO SPIKE-1 256.3 RECOVERY=102.5% WITHIN 75-115% DRO SPIKE-2 248.1 RECOVERY=99.2% WITHIN 75-115% RPD=3.3% < 20%

#1085 1127 #1086 2715 #1087 565.3 #1088 1396 Dilution factor= 5 #1091 116.8 #1092 259.0

Analysis Data: 11-22-95 File: 112295

DRO STD 1000 1078 %0=7.8 <20% #1093 175.6 #1094 88.86 #1095 261.7

Analysis Data: 12-01-95 File: 120195

ORO STD 1000 934.5 %0=6.6 < 20% #1086 1409 Dilution factor= 2

C:\JIAN\950024.wb1 12/12/95 Simon Hydro-Search NQ 030662 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Brookfield, WI 53045

PROJECT NAME: M1UJ CoJr1.+

PRINT

M. l;J - \ l( \( '-t X 1- 'Y,?/1(' 11 : zo p )( M vJ - \ D V ~ K ~ "J,. 'V,c; I I '.ZD M w - z K \( tf "f.. 'i. '1/1I-::, --- 10:zf )( l ½,- yr) LU - .~ \(_ K ·Lt X 1'7 10: '-\.;;; .,. m w '-I {!; A fv\ D 8 '/-. )( )( i- ''Ii-I-:) IY ;7-;7 I l< I p C f\- \\I\ D I X 1,1/5 -- I/ fVl /;./ - I C A 1/\/\. D 8 >( 't 'A X I_½<., I I : z.-5' 'f M U) - z C Pr M. D 2, x X 'f. ¾11 lt):Z~ 'f. M w - ~ c_ A- v'v\ D 7 'I X 'l iiiI (, 9:,./0 I , M (A_, I c. DP C ~ Iv\ D B x X j. X Yi,o (I~· z_~ ,- R I p -t eL Pt rv }c_ I y /1~ I Date/Time RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time SHIPPING INFORMATION R-EU_N_:::._~1~~:..!!D!:::!ft-1·~:~~----l/D0t1/?me RELINQUISHED BY: - ~ Number of Shipping Containers- z COMPANY NAME: - - ....,., -,,. /) COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: -1. ~) Method of Shipment · t,k. 7 --R={f.-lV=ED:-:)fa::-},/VJ : --r.,,.,- .---/--r➔~Da.... te~,T~Tfln~,e:+R-E-C-EIV_E_D_BY-:------+D-a-te_'lT_lm-et-R-E-CE-IV_E_D -BY- : ------i-D-ate-/-Tim-e +\t::> I -0 ~u \J ~/ ·- 6-c.-Nt'TO (5 ~ ~. 'f/ /i9t(J_g ../J / l ( COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME:

RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time Special Handling Requirements

,...,,..,,,,,..,..,.,v .. ,11 1,r . N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Jee

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Sample Number: 1085 Sample analyzed within 1 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-lKK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 11 :20

1, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ugn 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.55 ugn 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 ,~1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.83 ugn 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ugn 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.45 ugn 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/1 6/95 1, 1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ugn 0.64 0.7 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ugn 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trich loro benzene <0.48 ugn 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ugn 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ugn 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 J<-· 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.52 ugn 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ugn 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ugn 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ugn 0.54 0.5 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ugn 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11 /16/95 f 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.96 ugn 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ugn 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ugn 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ugn 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12D ibromo-3-chloropropan < 1.24 ugn 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ugn 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ugn 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ugn 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ugn 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ugn 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methy 1-2-Pen ta none < 4.7 1 ugn 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ugn 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ugn 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ugn 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoch loromethane < 0.60 ugn 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Brom od ich lo ro methane < 0.25 ugn 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ugn 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ugn 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ugn 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ugn 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ugn 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 ~- Ch loromethane 0.44 ug/1 0.4 1 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1 ,2-Dich lorocthene < 0.41 ugn 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 . cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 / ' LOQ = 10 (S) x Dil111ion Facor, where "S" is !he Slandard Devialionfrom the MDL S!udy .\IDL: Methd Delee/ion Limil de/ermined by 40CFR Par! 136 Appendix B Page: 1 PAL: Prei·enlive A cl ion Limil , NR 140.10 Public health re/a led groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Di bro moch loromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 ¼'- Ethylbenzene 1.58 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ok Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 · 7 Isopropylbenzene 5.65 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene 1.21 ug/1 I.IS 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether 8.95 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 ;\! chloride 3.88 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Butylbenzene 6.24 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene 8.59 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene 3.52 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene 0.69 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Isopropyltoluene 4.03 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 -:{"i:. sec-Butylbenzene 4.41 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 &- tert-Butylbenzene 0.84 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 .\-- {, _., Toluene 0.26 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,2-Dich loroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.3 5 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.3 8 ug/1 0.3 8 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1086 Sample analyzed within 1 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-DuplKK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 11:20

1, 1, I ,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11 /16/95 I ,I, 1-Trich loroethane < I.OS ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, I ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/9 5 I, 1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/9 5 I, 1-Dich loroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2,3-Trich loropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzcne < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 'I 1,2,4-Tri methylbenzene 3.99 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0. 73 60 8260 cps 11 /16/95

LOQ = 10 (SJ x Dilution Facor, 11'here "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\fDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 2 PAL: Preventive Action limit, NR 140. IO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified Nc?VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 _ty, 1,3,S-Trimethylbenzene 2.03 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dich loropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/1 6/95 1,4-Dich lorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps l 1/16/95 12Dibromo-3-ch loropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11 /16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps I 1/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.5 4 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone < 4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps I 1/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps I 1/16/95 Benzene < 0.3 5 ug/1 0.3 5 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mo benzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.2 5 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform <0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps I 1/16/95 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 ~ Chloromethane 0.42 cis-1,2-Dich loroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dich loropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps I 1/16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 ff/' Ethylbenzene 1.63 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexach lorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.5 1 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 lsopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 7 Isopropylbenzene 5.56 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 m&p-xylene 1.35 ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether 9.43 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Methylene chloride 2.02 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11 /16/95 n-Butylbenzene 5.75 ug/1 0.5 7 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene 8.54 ug/1 0.57 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene 3.62 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene 0.76 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Iso propyltol uen e 3.45 ug/1 0.4 l ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 -,~✓ sec-Butyl benzene 4.32 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 LOQ = IO (S) x Dill!tion Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 3 PAL: Prerentive Action limit, NR 140. JO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified NOVA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: l 6-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

P' tert-Butylbenzene 0.82 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachlorotthene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 j'i Toluene 0.36 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 trans-I ,2-Dich loroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1 ,3-D ich loropro pene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 C:::.:s Trichloroethene 0.50 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trich lorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1087 Sample analyzed within 1 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-2KK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 10:24

I ,I ,I ,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 1.05 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.4 I 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 I ,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dich lorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 12 Di bro mo-3-ch lo ropro pan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps I 1/16/9 5 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro moch loromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95

LOQ = IO (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 4 PAL: Preventil'e Action limit, NR 140.10 Public health related grounduater standards. "ns" = not specified Nc?VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Bro mod ich lorometha ne < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch lorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0. 70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloromethane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1 ,3-Dich loropropen e <0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Di bro m och loro methane < 0:32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 11s 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0. 70 200 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Iso propyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene < I.IS ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 /1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 1.53 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 f; Methylene chloride 4.75 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Isopropyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 I 0 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 11s 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetra ch loroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-I ,2-Dichloroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-I ,3-Dich loropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: I 088 Sample analyzed within I Day(s) from collection. Client ID: MW-3KK Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: I 0:45

I ,I, I ,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, I, 1-Trich loroethane < 1.05 ug/1 I.OS 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, I ,2,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 11S 8260 cps 11 / 16/95

LOQ = JO (SJ x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: .\fethd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 5 PA l: Preventive Action limit, NR 140. l O Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified NOVA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

I, 1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1, 1-Dich loroethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1, 1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.8 I ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 1 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12 Di bro mo-3-chloro pro pan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps I 1/16/95 2,2-Dich loropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-.Methyl-2-Pentanone <4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform <0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Bro mo methane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Ch loroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch loroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 ~ Chloromethane 0.53 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dich loroethcne <0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11 /16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorod ifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Et hylbcnzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutad iene < 0.5 1 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ll S 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 LOQ = IO (SJ x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\IDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 6 P..tl: Preventive Action limit, NR 140. IO Public hea//h related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified Nc?VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

m&p-xylene < 1.15 ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 -'I 'i Methyl-t-butyl ether 4.11 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 - ~ Methylene chloride 4.82 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.5 7 JlS 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butyl benzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 c:_, Toluene 0.28 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tri ch loroethene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1089 Sample analyzed within 8 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: TRIPCAMD Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/8/95 Time:

1, 1,1 ,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.48 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0. 64 0.7 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trich loropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0. 54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.5 1 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12Dibromo-3-ch loropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

LOQ = JO (S) x Dllu.tion Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 7 PAL: Preventive Action limit, NR 140. l O Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps J l/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11116195 Acetone 17.84 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mod ichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mo methane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloromethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/1 6/95 m&p-xylene < 1.15 ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methylene chloride 4.64 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps I 1/16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps I 1/ 16/95 Naphtha lene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene <0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Iso pro pyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.4 1 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butylb enzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 JO 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 11S 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-] ,2-Dichlo roethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 llS 8260 cps 11/1 6/95 Tri ch loroethcne < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tri ch lorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 LOQ = JO (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 8 I PAL: Preventive Action Limit, NR I 40.10 Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 17 5 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: I 090 Sample analyzed within O Day(s) from collection. Client ID: trip blank Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time:

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,1-Trichloroethane 1.16 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1-Dichloroethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0. 73 60 8260 cps 11/16/9 5 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.5 1 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dich lorobenzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12Dibromo-3-chloropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone < 4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoch loromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch lorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0. 70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95

LOQ = /0 (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\!Dl: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 9 PAL: Preventive Action limit, NR 140.10 Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified Nc?VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Chloromethane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0. 70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ethyl benzene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexach lorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene < I.IS ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 \lethyl-t-butyl ether < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 \!ethylene chloride 5.26 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 ~aphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Isopropyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 I 0 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene 0.56 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1,2-Dich loroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trich loroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1091 Sample analyzed within 1 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw4 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/15/95 Time: 14:37

1, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, I, I-Trichloroethane < 1.05 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 I, 1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 I, 1-Dichloroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 I, 1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 115 8260 cps 11 / 16/95

LOQ = 10 (SJ x Dilu_tion Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\IDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part I 36 Appendix B Page: JO PA L: Preventive Action limit, NR I 40. l OPublic health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified NOVA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

I ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 I ,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11 /16/95 I ,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 I ,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 I ,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 I ,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 I 2 Di bro mo-3-chloro prop an < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dich loropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <4.71 ug/1 4.71 so 8260 cps 11 /16/95 A cetone <9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mo benzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mo methane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch loromethane 0.62 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11 /16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Dibromoch loromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dich lo rod ifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.3 8 llS 8260 cps 11 / 16/9 5 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 llS 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 m&p-xylene < I.IS ug/1 I.IS 124 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 i\Iethyl-t-butyl ether < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 ;\ Iethylene ch lo ride 2.57 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 n-Butylb enzene < 0.5 7 ug/1 0.57 llS 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 :'l'aphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 LOQ = JO (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\!Dl: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part I 36 Appendix B Page: 11 PA l: Preventive Action limit, NR 140. JO Public health related ground,rater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

p-Iso propyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butyl benzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/9 5 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1,2-D ich loroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1,3-Dich loropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichloroethene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluorometha ne < 0.3 5 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1092 Sample analyzed within O Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mwl camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 11:25

1, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,1-Trich loroethane 1.07 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1, 1-Dichloroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0. 7 8260 cps I 1/16/95 I, 1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2 ,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2 ,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 1 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,3-Dich loropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.4 I ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps I 1/16/95 I 2Dibromo-3-ch loropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps I 1/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropa ne < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps I 1/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 1 1/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-.'.\ lethyl-2-Pentanone < 4.7 1 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/9 5 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11 / 16/95

LOQ = 10 (SJ x Dilution Facor, 11'here "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\!DL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 12 PAL: Preventive Action Limit, NR 140. IO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bro mo benzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloromethane 0.42 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dich loroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0. 70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.3 8 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene 0.31 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 m&p-xylene < 1.15 ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether 0.86 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methylene chloride < 1.40 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-But)•lbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 a-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Isopropyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps I 1/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68 .6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1,3-D ich loro propene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 llS 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1093 Sample analyzed within O Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw2 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 10:25

LOQ = IO (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part l 36 Appendix B Page: 13 PAL: Preventive Action Limit, NR 140.10 Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

I, I, 1,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1,1-Trichloroethane 1.59 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1, 1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11 /16/95 1, 1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trich lorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12D ibromo-3-chloropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-;\ lethyl-2-Pentan one < 4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch lorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Chloromethane 0.68 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dich lorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.4 1 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 LOQ = JO (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study ,\fDL: ,\fethd Detection l im il determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 14 PAL Preventive Action limil, NR 140. 10 Public hea/Jh relaled groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified I N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DATE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

Hexach lorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 lsopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene 0.63 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene < I.IS ug/1 I.IS 124 8260 cps I 1/16/95 :\lethyl-t-butyl ether 0.54 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 :\lethylene chloride 1.99 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps . 11/16/95 n-But)·lbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 a-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-Iso p ropylto luene 0.56 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butylbenzene 0.69 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene 0.63 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene 0.28 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.3 8 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

Sample Number: 1094 Sample analyzed within O Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw3 camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 09:40

I, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1,1-Trich loroethane 1.51 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 1,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 11S 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1,2-Trich loroethane <0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1-Dich loroethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 I, 1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0. 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 I, 1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 11S 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.5 7 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 11s 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 11S 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dich lorobenzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dich lorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11 / 16/95

LOQ = IO (SJ x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study .\fDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 15 PAL: Preventive Action Limit. NR 140. IO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DA TE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12D ib romo-3-ch lo ro prop an < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dichloropropane < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 2-Ch lorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Penta none <4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene <0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromochloromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloromethane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform <0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug /1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chlorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ch loroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloromethane 0.48 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,2-Dich loroethen e < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1,3-Dichlorop ro pene <0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11 /16/95 Dibromomethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dich lorodifluoro methane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ethylbenzene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug /1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene < 1.15 ug/1 1.15 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methylene chloride < 1.40 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11 /16/95 p-lsopropyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 sec-Butyl benzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tctrachloroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 trans-1,2-Dichloroethcne < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 LOQ = JO (S) x Dilu/ion Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part 136 Appendix B Page: 16 I PAL: Preventive Action Limit, NR 140. l O Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory

WDNR# 241340550

Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite I 00 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield, WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal

tra ns-1,3-Dich lo ropropene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tri ch lorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 I Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 Sample Number: 1095 Sample analyzed within 0 Day(s) from collection. Client ID: mw-1 dup camd Sample Description: Simon hydro search Collection: 11/16/95 Time: 11 :25

1, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.19 ug/1 0.19 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,1-Trich loroethane < 1.05 ug/1 1.05 40 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane · < 0.83 ug/1 0.83 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.06 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.45 ug/1 0.45 85 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.64 ug/1 0.64 0.7 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,1-Dichloropropene < 1.81 ug/1 1.81 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.80 ug/1 0.80 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.67 ug/1 0.67 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dibromoethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.005 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dich lo ro benzene < 0.73 ug/1 0.73 60 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 125 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,3-Dich bro propane < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 12Dibromo-3-chloropropan < 1.24 ug/1 1.24 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95 2,2-Dich loropropa ne < 1.27 ug/1 1.27 llS 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Butanone (MEK) < 2.45 ug/1 2.45 90 8260 cps 11/16/95 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 115 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Chlorotoluene < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <4.71 ug/1 4.71 50 8260 cps 11/16/95 Acetone < 9.58 ug/1 9.58 200 8260 cps 11 / 16/95 Benzene < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromobenzene < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoch loromethane < 0.60 ug/1 0.60 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromodichloro methane < 0.25 ug/1 0.25 36 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromoform < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 0.44 8260 cps 11/16/95 Bromomethane < 0.99 ug/1 0.99 115 8260 cps 11/16/95 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.54 ug/1 0.54 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95

LOQ = JO (SJ x Dilu_tion Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection limit determined by 40CFR Part I 36 Appendix B Page: 17 I PAL: Preventive Action limit, NR I 40. IO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified N0VA* ORGANIC REPORT Environmental Laboratory I WDNR# 241340550 Judy Fassbender BATCH NUMBER: 950024 Simon Hydro-Search DATE REPORTED: 07-Dec-95 Suite 100 175 N. Corporate Drive DA TE RECEIVED: 16-Nov-95 Brookfield , WI 53045 SAMPLE TEMP (C): On Ice

Test Result Units LOQ PAL Dilution RQ METHOD Analyst Date Anal I Ch lorobenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroethane < 0.89 ug/1 0.89 80 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloroform < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 0.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 Chloromethane 0.46 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 I cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 7 8260 cps 11/16/95 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene <0.48 ug/1 0.48 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dibromochloromethane < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 43 8260 cps 11/16/95 I Dibromomethane < 0.45 ug/1 0.45 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.70 ug/1 0.70 200 8260 cps 11/16/95 Ethylbenzene <0.41 ug/1 0.41 140 8260 cps 11/16/95 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.51 ug/1 0.51 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropyl Ether < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Isopropylbenzene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 m&p-xylene < I.IS ug/1 I.IS 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methyl-t-butyl ether 1.27 ug/1 0.51 12 8260 cps 11/16/95 Methylene chloride 2.13 ug/1 1.40 15 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 n-Propylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Naphthalene < 0.92 ug/1 0.92 8 8260 cps 11/16/95 o-xylene < 0.48 ug/1 0.48 124 8260 cps 11/16/95 p-lsopropyltoluene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 ns 8260 cps 11 /16/95 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.57 ug/1 0.57 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Styrene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 10 8260 cps 11/16/95 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Tetra ch loroethene < 0.32 ug/1 0.32 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Toluene < 0.22 ug/1 0.22 68.6 8260 cps 11/16/95 tra ns-1 ,2-Dich lo roethene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 20 8260 cps 11 /16/95 tra n s-1 ,3-Dichloropro pene < 0.29 ug/1 0.29 ns 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichloroethene < 0.41 ug/1 0.41 0.5 8260 cps 11/16/95 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.35 ug/1 0.35 698 8260 cps 11/16/95 Vinyl chloride < 0.38 ug/1 0.38 0.02 8260 cps 11/16/95

ate: _ill_)_/i_F

LOQ = 10 (S) x Dilution Facor, where "S" is the Standard Deviation from the MDL Study MDL: Methd Detection Limit determined by 40CFR Part I 36 Appendix B Page: 18 I PAL: Preventive Action limit, NR I 40. IO Public health related groundwater standards. "ns" = not specified - Simon Hydro-Search - 030662 Suite 100 - 175 N. Corporate Drive CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Brookfield, WI 53045

PROJECT NAME: M1LW {oJV"\-f<.A # GC/MS GC INORGANICS OTHER SAMPLING INFO REMARKS PROJECT NUMBER: o/JZ~"?2q;;-- en 0 SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) ~ en w co ...... (.) ... Q.) a.. en Q.) ., If N [._ \:Ji;-vJ > ~} jj a a c:x: c§ a a a ...... Q.) en co 4~ t:" ,-NCO I- "O ro t-----,-----1 --~~~------~o~~>W ggg w ·u Q.) s: co I I I I I I I Q w ... x DATE TIME ..,_"

•c;tDA~ME: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME:

RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time RELINQUISHED BY: Date/Time Special Handling Requirements COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: I I I

I. APPENDIX D MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION FORMS (4400-113A) I AND MONITOR WELL DEVELOPMENT FORMS (4400-113B)

I

I I

I I I HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company : _•~ • • • l • • . • Swe o!Wi.w:>.nrln MONITOR.ING WEU. CONSTR I Dcp!ltl'Tlcn t ol Nan.u-aJ Reso= Fonn4400-113A F I.C1 [)' _j¢ci JJTlC l(::,i4,J.:hv1;c...i3,tSG;Jn'1• acili ry ~ cmut r

ell WaraT,ble Obse.n-a.tion Well .I] 11 SL Plane ft. N, Piczometa' □ 12 Seaion Lxa.tionofWaswS-Our~ und.uy J/4 of~l/4 of Sec ..;[_, T. ~ N, R~ ~ W. fL uon o ell elanve to as o~ A pp CAUon u □ lJpgrad.iau s '111 Sidegradjcnt □ Yes □ N:, d □ Down n □ Not Known A. Protective pipe. top elevation ____ , __ ft. MSL --t==~ _,-l. Cap and locl:7 liiJ Yes ~ 2. Protective rover pipe: B. Well casing, lop elevation a. Inside diameter: C. Lmd surf~ elevation ft. MSL b. Length: L c. Material: Steel D. Swf~ seal, bottom __. __ ,_ ft. MSL or _ L. Q ft. CilSL.7JrP/-{E),µs/lfr/cw-IT ()jx:- 12. USCS classification of soil near scrun: d. Additional protection? □ Yes GP □ GM □ GC □ GW □ SW .l2it SP ~ Ifyes, describe: ______SMgJ SC □ MLlii:1 MH □ CL □ CH □ BenUmiie Bedi::dc a 3.Surf~s-eal: Concrete .1 13. Sieve analysis a~hed? Yes _ RN:, I □ ------~ 14. Drilling method uS¢d: Rotary . □ _5 0 4. Material betwcat well casing and prot.c.ctive pipe: ·.. Hollow Stem Auge::r ,M :4Jv Bentorute ! I - · ~ D@M Annular~ seal I ------()jx:- I 15. Drilling fluid used: Wasr:r □ Qt . Air _ □ 01 5. Annular~ seal: a. Granular Benton.ite I Drilling¥u~ D o3 None)iJ 9 9 b; ·__ Lbs/gal mud weight ••• Bcntonite-sand shmy I c. __Lbs/gal mud weight. • • • • Bent.orute sluny I 16. Drilling additives ~7 a Yes fia N:, d, __ % Bentojte •••••• Bentorute-cementgrout I Describe ______e. ____.Ft volume added for any of the above f. How irut.alled: Tmrue I 17. So~ ofw21.er (l!.llach analysis): Tmrue pumped I Gravity [ I 6. Bentorut.e seal; a. Bent.orute granules E. Bentorute seal, top ____ ,_ ft. MSL or __ L . .£ b. Dl/4 in. J!a3/8 in. □ l/2 in. Bentonite pellets [ c. ldi" -.:fa 11,·& 75 ~ l F. Fine sznd. top ____ ·- ft.MSLor __-'l'.'.'..~ 7. Fine sand m!t.erial: Manufaaure:-, product name & me: a. &d~ffl,ai°?f"r· #.:/?-&'-' G. Filter pack, lop ----·- ft.MSLor __-:/._,~ b. Volum~ed ______ft3o,§~foi/..li 8. Filter pack material: Manufacturer, product name and rr. I ____ ,_ft. MSL or __,€,ez. H. Srncnjoinr., top a.&st ~V>·jP· (f_wi.,tz ➔4 #~ b. Volume adrled ft :B-~l6~ I. Well bottom ____ ·-ft. MSL or _L;,[_ .~ ft. 9. Well ca.sing: Aush threaded PVC schedule 40 ~ I Aush threaded PVC schedule 80 [ J. Filter pa.clc., bottom ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ L£ ?------=------,---~ C>lher [ ?vc,..~v/'4,., 4o I K. Borehole, bottom ____ ,_ ft. MSL or _L£ ,£ a. Scr~n type: Factory cut l! Continuous slot [ ______Other [ L Bore.hole, diameta' -~.!2 in. b. Manufacturer --''"'N-"-'e,"""hn.X'(\-...· -==....::::;.._ ___ _ :¼. O.D. well ca.sing -~-~~ in. c. Slot sii.e: d Slotted length: ~- 1.D. well cuing A .-2 _ in. 11. Baclcfill nutmal (below filter pack): I that the Information on this form Is true and correct to the best of m a. I s u :.c o CW 1SCCru in MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMJ ■ Dc;:-,u1mc:"J of Nan.tnl Reso\.UUJ . Form 4400-113B · Rev. ,ti

Route t.o: Solid Wut.e □ Hu. Waste □ Wa.stew-a!c:t □ ~.....-...-.------,.,,..----.-.----~---Env. Respo~ & Repair □ Undaground Tanks 2' 0th.ct D --- I

1. Can this ..,.·ell be purged dry? □ Yes ~NJ Before Development After Developm 11. Depth to Wat.er 2. Well de..-clopmcntmethod (from top of a. 1._,. &_':}_ ft. well casing) surged with bailer and billed □ 41 surged with bailer and y.:nped Qi;" 61 n:rs:d with block and bJ.E!eq □ 42 bj_J__/ .Q'J.1 j_£ .J. J_ / _! .s--, 3. Sl.!Jled with block and y.:nped □ 62 mm dd yy mm d d y Sl.!Jlcd with block. bailed znd pumped □ 70 com~seda.ir □ 20 T:me. c. J_ Q_ : 0 0 a;-:·. l_L: z.g_ru baJJedonly □ 10· p.irr;,cdonly □ S1 2. Sediment in well -::, 0 .5inchcs -.:::.. Cl .Q. incl bottom pwnp:d slowly . □ so Odxr □ sm 13. Water clarity Clear □ 10 Oear □ 20 Tumd Gt 1 5 Toroid S- 2 S 3. Time spe:lI developing well _ j_ .z.s:min. (Descn1:c) (Descn1:c) StwuiN\$i\ Getir 1_B=----&>~w..,.•,-J..;;... __ 4. Depth of well (from top oh·ell casisng) =Lt. -Ber.

5. Inside di1.-neterofwell

6. Volume of water in fitter pack and well casing . == G,, . Q 3al. Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste facility: 7. Volume of water removed from well =. (p 5"'. 0 gal. 14. Total suspended ____ • _ mgll _. _ J 8. Volume ofwa..ter wded (if any) ___ ._gal. solids

15. COD

10. Analysis p:rl'ormcd on wmr added? □ Yes □ NJ I (If yes, att.ach results) 16. Additionzl ~omments on development: I I

inn

Name: Signature: Print Initials: _A_ M L Firm: I

NOTE: Shaded arc~ are for DNR us.e only. See instructions for more information including a list of county codes. . •; ..... , . . ... SuUotw~·nnn· • MONITORING WELL CONSTR U Dcp.utmc:nt o! Na.runl Rc.soUI«.S Form 4400.113A Re j Ohcr □

ell Water Table Obsava.tion Well Ii 11 SL Plane ft. N, ______,...... ,.,.,.;;....-~rr-::--:,,:----,p,:-----:---:' □.;;.;....12-iSeciion Location of Wult/Sour~ undary c, 1/4 of~ 1/4 of Sec.,£_, T. e._ N, R~~ W.

A. Prot.ec:tive pipe. top elevation ____ •- _ ft. MSL --f;:::=~ ...,...... 1. Cap and lock? Ea Yes [ ~ -2. Protective rover pipe: B. Well casing, top elevation a. Inside dfonet.c:r. _,8 C. l..and nuf&ee elevation ____ ·- ft. MSL b. Length: LA c. Material: Sted t D. Surface ~al, bottom __. __ ·- fL MSL or _ Q ft. L. CA5f-.Il(pll~?'c!L Oh:r t 12. USCS clusification of soil near screen: d. A&litional prot.ec:tion7 □ Yes [ Ifyes, descnoe: ______GP □ GM □ GC □ G'r/ □ SW □ SP 61 SM □ SC □ ML~ MH □ CL ~ CH □ BC110nile 3.Swf~sul: t Barox □ Conaete~ 13. Sieve imalysis a_cuchcd7 □ Yes :· B N, ______Oh:r t 14. Drilling method used: Rowy. □ _S 0 4. Ma!crial between well casing and prot.ective pipe: ·.. Hollow Stan Auger ,E ·4 1 Bcntonite ~ ------. . ~ □ t.t® Annular space seal C 15. Drilling fluid used: 0 1 ------Oh:r C ·waz:r □ qJ_ ·. . ~ .□- S. Annular space seal: a. Granular Bc:ntonite C Drilling ¥u~ □ O3. None .el 9 9 b; ;___Lbs/gal mud weight ••• Bentoni!e-sand sluny C . c. __Lbs/gal mud weight..... Bcntonite slurry C 16. Drilling additives usa17 □ Yes I □ N> d._ 9& Bcnto~te •••••• Bcntonite-cemcnt grout C Dcscrib: ______e. ____Ft volume added for my of the above f. How installed: Trcmie C 17. Sowu: ofw21er (attach amlysis): Trcmie pumped · D Gravity iJ 6. Bentonite ~ a. Bcntonite granules □ E. Bcntonite seal, top b. □ 1/4 in. 813/8 in. □ 1/2 in. Bcntonite pellets D r , c:. 3-.5oiL, 73.i~ Oma- o ' F. Fine sand, top 7. Fine smd matmal: ¼anufacturc:r, product name & mcsl a.~ln~A✓v:,,;z· #4,-&o 1 G. Fili.er pack. top b. voiJTcadied ______ft 3/-ae,/l>C/J'?) 8. Filter pack marerial: Manufaclllrc:t, product name and me H. Screen joint. top a.B?StSAalc. ...,.. feu.11ci;:, ~if:= iitr b. Volurncadrled ·rt 'g,-;i,/1,~ .i I. Well bonom ____ ·-ft. MSLor _ if .5 9. Well ca.sing: AushduudedPVCschedule 40 @ Aush threaded PVC schedule 80 0 J. Filter pack. bottom ____ ·- ft. MSL or ...A: Q.. .a ------,---...... - Ol}u □ n"C .Sc/zd* -to .\ K. Borehole, bottom ____ ·- ft. MSL or ..A£ .;E a. Screen type: Factoty cut la Continuous slot □ ) L Borehole, diameter _&.Q in. ------,.------Other □ b. Man~facturer ::J;i,n.sn1y M. O.D. well casing A ..z&. in. c. Slot size: 0.Q. r d Slotted length: J.~ I.~- I.D. well casing _./s.E _ in. 11. Baclcfill mataial (below filter pad::): Ncn: Iii Olh:r □ S ~ :.c o C Wis:::on.s in MONITORING WELL DEVELOPME.l -.1· l)c;:'.tr.mc-J cf N 4n..""ll Resow«-J Fonn 4400-l 13B Rev. 4-! '· ·

Route to~ Solid Wur.e □ Hu. Waste □ Wutr.W!la □ Env. Response k Rcptlr □ Undaground Tanks~ Olhcr □ ---

1. Can this ~·ell be P".!!&ed dry? Before De.veto ment After Developmen ~- 11. Depth to Water 2. Well denlopmc:1tmethod (from top of a. __ 7. ·7 _Q ft. well casing) rurged with blilcr and blilcd 19-" 41 s-.::rsed v.ith biller md ?~;:,eel □ 61 s-.!rg:d wiL'1 block u.d t.:.:~ □ 42 b.lL, .2., 11£ S-.JJ'ted with b!cck a:1d P'-=nped □ 62 mm dd yy surted with block. bailed uid pumped □ 70 Cl 13ta.m. comi::-e,sscd a:r □ 20 Tune c •.-=.. ..1- : !i IL □ p.m. bailed only □ 10· ~only □ S1 2. Sediment in well -=.. 0 . 0 inches -- 0 • 0 inch,;nc pum?=d s1awly bottom O:h:r .g fl{] 13. Watc::rclarlty Clezr □ 10 Oear □ 20 Toroid er 1 s Toroid ~ s 3. Tune spot developing well ____(p~. Il'Ull. (Oescn1:c) {Dcscn1:c) ££oW.~,$H 6&\ Y ,_.... ~.... gpw=...,,.."""'~'---- 4. Depth of well (from top of well casisng) - J_1.... ::1 fr. 5. !.:-.side dit.-netcr of well --2.. ___O'S"· 1l1. ______, 6. Yclume of water b filter p&ck md well -----L' c.uing . ==-(;;,- 0 gal. Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at soUd waste facility: 7. Volumeofwmrrcmovcdfromwell _J_ lP .~gal. ____ ._mg/1 - !~ 14. Total suspended ____ ._mgi~ 8. Yolumeofwu.crz.cdcd(ifmy) ..=-__ ._gal. solids

I I 9. ~ ofwater sdded 1S. COD. ____ ._mg/1 ____------iir ._my.

~- 10. AnAlysis p::r(onned on wAic::r added? □ Yes □ N:, \ \ (If yes, attach results) L ~~~:---:------,.-...------:16. Additionz.l ~ommcnts on dcYelopmc:'lt:

Name: Signature:

Fi.rm: Print Initials:

F'mn: NOTE:· Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See instructions (or more Wonnation including a list of county codes. 1 . ·. . MONITORING WELL CONSTR U I Form 4400-113A Re

ell Water Table Obsavation Well DI 11 SL Plane ft. N, Picz.omettr □ 12 Sution Location of Was le/Source I unduy 61/4 of~ 1/4 of Sec. ,,2_, T. y_ N, R~~ W. ft. App CAUon □ Nl A. Protective pipe. top elevation ~ Yes [ B. Well casing, top elevation _2 C. LAnd rurf.i,ce elevation ft. MSL LA c. Material: Steel [ D. Surf= ~a.I, bottom ____ ·- ft. MSL or _ L. Q ft. CAsrJl(c,;.l~?JNC 0na- c I 12 USCS clusification of soil near screen: d. Additionai protection? D Yes [ GP □ GM □ GC a GW □ SW a SP 13 Ifycs. descnk ______SM O SC □ ML~ MH □ CL ~ CH □ Ben1oniJ.e [ 3.Swf~su!: :&dtx::k □ Conaete ~ 13. Sieve malysis attached? ______Ona- [ I □ Yes .· 14. Drilling method 1.1.S.e&: Rotaiy . D _5 0 4. M atcrial 1:ctwecn well casing and protective pipe: ·.. Hollow Stem Aug~ ..0 $..,t Bc:ntonite ~ ------. . ~ □ @=m Annular~~ C: ------Ona- C: 15. Drilling fluid used: Watr:r □ ~t . Air. □ 01 5. Annular space seal: a. Granular Bcntonite C Drilling¥ud □ 03 None E 99 b: ·__ Lbs/gal mud weight ••• Bcntoni!e-sand shmy C· c. __Lbs/gal mud weight. • • • • Bcntonite sluny C 16. Drilling 2.ddi ti V CS used? a Yes □ Nl d. __ % Bcntojte •• ••• • Bcntonite.«mcntgrout C: I Descri!::e ______c. ____Ft volume added for any of the above f. How installed: Trame C 17. Source of water (attach analysis): Trcmie pumped D Gravity 5;) 6. Bentonite seal: a. Bcntonite granules [J E. Bentonite sC4!, top b. □ 1/4 in. .8l3/8 in. □ 1/2 in. Bcntonite pellets D ~- ii-.£:, IL, EA~ 0ma- o I F. Fine sand, top ====:=::;~::==;; 7. Fine sand m2.terlal: ½Janufac:tllra, product name&: mcsl ~ a-~ar,✓~ •r2· 1h/..-4° I G. Fil~r pack. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or _ _:.."Z .~ fl"--.'-...~ b. voiJTeadded ______ft3/-;j;./J,Cfi?) 8. Filter pack material: Manufacturc:r, prodllct name and me H. Scrernjoint, top ______ft.MSLor __ 'l .~ ft. - "-. :'. JJ~C.-7,~wci.<: Siwl(yf-115 b. Volume~ · ft :g-,-:f,//,~ I I. Well bot10m ____ ·- ft.MSLor _if .:5° 9. Well casing: Flush threaded PVC schedule 40 @ Flush threaded PVC schedule 80 0 J. Filter pack. bottom ____ .- ft. MSL or _A Q. .Q ------=----,----,-- Olhe:r □ ?Ve .Sdz

knowled e. Su:e of W-i=ruin MONITOR.ING WELL DEVELOPM I Dc;:-,.utm C"J C ( N a.n.:nl Rc.50urc.t.S Form 4400-113B Rev•.

Route to; Solid Wute □ HU:. Wa.ne □ Wutr.~ □ Env. Respo~ &: Repair □ Underground Tanh~ ~ a --- _...... ,.,..._-..------.,.,..--~-----nTT"T:~--I

1. Can this 'il,'cll be p-..!I&ed dry? Before DeveJo ment After Developm, 11. Depth to Water 2. Well de,·c!opmcnt method (from top of a. ·~ _g_ . 'j_ J.e. ft. -Cf 01 well casing) ---·-- n:rged with b.iller and billed □ 41 rerged with biller tnd v.imped ~ 61 surged with block md b.8eq □ 42 b.iL, .J2. t / j_~ .J.1-t J_ s-, .5 surted '11:ith block and p-.:nped □ 62 mm d d y y mm d d y surged with block, bailed and pwnp¢i 70 a a-,t.m• □ . - , . 00 comp:c.ss ed air □ 20 c,___ • --0 p.m. iQ.= .:t s-wl bailed only □ 1 o· ~only 51 2. Sediment in well --::, 0 . 0 inches □ bottom -=-0 .e..incl _ pump:d slowly □ so ~ □ 36 13. Wa1.er clarity Clezr □ 10 Oezr □ 20 Turbid~ lS Turoid .S- 2 S 3. Time spent developing well -·"2s,.__ 2 _ mm. ~'be) (Descn'be) <:tflAY ~~WN 4. Depth of well (from top oh·ell casimg) ::._ 2- 2-. (2 ft. ____, S.Tnsidcdiunetcrofwell -_7- ,0 S:in.

6. Volume of water in filter p!Ck and well casing . =- J.... ~ gal. ----1 Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste facility: 7. Volume of wa.ter removed from well =2.i:{_,Qgal. 14. Tot.!.lsuspendo:i ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._rr= 8. Volume ofwau:r added (if any) ___ ._gal. solids

9. ~ ofwaLer added IS. COD. ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._rr-

10. AnAlysis p:rfonned on ww:r added? □ Yes □ NJ I (If yes, 2.ttach results) 16. Additionzl ~omments on development: I I

inn ormation is true and correct to the lx

Name: Signature: Firm: Print Initials: I F'mn: NOTE: Shaded are.!.S are for DNR use only. See instructions for more information including a list of county codes. I ::~ . . •: . -. . ._· .. S w.e of Wisro.nrin MONITORING WELL CONSTR l I Ixpmmcnt of N arunl Re.so= ()j-.:r0 Form 4400-113A R,

ell Wat.er Table Obsc.m.tion Well Jm 11 I Piacmettt □ 12 ft. uon o ell elanve to u o~ App . CAUon u a I.Jpgradkru s RI Sidcgnd:iait □ Yes □ NJ d □ Down n D Not Known A. Protective pipe. top elevation ____ ·- _ ft. MSL --t;:=~ _....-1. Cap md lock? ~ 2. Protective cover pipe: B. Well casing, top elevation a. Inside di ameta: ..L C. u.nd surf~ elevation ft. MSL b.ungth: I.A c. Maraia!: Steel [ D. Surf~ ~a.I, booom __. __ ·- fr. MSL or_ L .Q ft. 051jXcy ✓E1Af# /lfoU/{L ()j-a Ii I l 2. USCS clusification of soil near screen: d. Additional protection? □ Yes [ GP □ GM □ C,C □ GW □ SW .fiJ SP 11§ Ifyes. de.scnoc: ------SM~ SC □ Ml.Bl MH □ CT. 12 CH □ Bcmorute[ 3. Surf~~ Bo:hx:x □ Cona-et.e ~ I 13. Sieve ~!lysis all.ached? D Yes 22 NJ ______()j-a [ 14. Drilling method used: Rotary . D _5 0 4. Ma.tcrial bctwccn well casing md protective pipe: ·. . Hollow Stc:m Auger (iii :tt Bentonite -6: ------. . 0kt' 0 4:'J Annul ar space seal [ ------()j-a [ 15. Drilling fluid used: WaJr::c □ Qt . Air. □ 0 1 5. Annular space se.a1: a. Grznulzr Be:ntonit.e [ I Drilling :¥u~ D O3 None il 9 9 b; ·__ Lbs/gal mud weight ••• Beruonile~sand slurry [ c. __Lhs/gal mud weight. • • • • Bc:ntorute sluny [ 16. Drilling additives ~7 □ Yes d. __ 9'o Bc:ntojte ••.••. Bc:ntonit.e-cement grout [ Describe ______c. ____Ft volume added for any of the above f. How installed: Trame [ 17. Source of water (a.l!ach analysis): T~epumped C Gravity R 6. B entonit.e seal: a. Bentorut.e granules C E. Bentonite se.a1, top ____ ·-ft. MSL or __ L .~ b. □ l/4 in. Bl3/8 in. □ 1/2 in. Bentonite pellets D c. I. 5 - £o lh ·13;,~ Otlia- □ F. Fine sand. top ____ ·-ft. MSLor __ -t -~ 7. Fine sand material: Msfrdf'acrura, product name & mes! a/k~r/1l,i1l~orp• j/ ~-OD I G. Filttr pack, top ____ ,_ ft.MSLor __ ff:£ b. Voleao:1ed ______ft3c,.5-~i/.P,,l)- 8. Filter paclc material: Manufacturer, product name and me H. Screen joint, top ____ ·- ft. MSL or __.;f .!:! a/3.t;efS&./C.,rp, ~rk,£,~//'_5" b. Volume added · ft &-,;,c,/i>BPt; I. Well bottom ____ ·-ft. MSL or_ L:.f .~ 9. Well casing: Flush d-auded PVC schedule 40 Jii3 Flush threaded PVC schedule 80 D J. Filter pa.ck., bottom ____ ,- ft. MSL or_ L£ .£ ------,------.- Other a 10. Screen material: lf/C Ec:;-d,dul.r,, ¼ K. Borehole, bottom ____ ·-ft. MSL or _l{__ ;f_ a. Screen type: Factory cut ~ Continuous slot D I L. Bore.hole, di une ltt ....t:f.E in. ------=------Omer □ b. Man~facOJrer ....,c_M__o~ks.:=· ...... '"""/v-"------M. O.D. well cuing -~ ..:2S. in. c. Slot size: o." d Slotted le1gth: Le N. 1.D. well ell.sing -t..~ - in. 11. Baclcfill nuterial (below filter pack): Nco: lia Oh::- D I hereb certif that the Information on this form is true and correct to the best of m knowled e. ig-n~ irm J/yclro -5t:Ard-,.,, ~. • :n-: ' £..,/;' ... r'I us p ete bo side.s orm and return to the appropnatc o ice listed at the top o this orm required by du. 144, 14 and 1 , 1s. 1..1d ch. NR 141, W'i!J. Ad. Code. In accordance with ch.144, Wis Stats .. failure 10 file this form may result in a forfeiture o( no< less than S 10, nor more 1 155CXX) for each cuy of violation. In accordance with ch. 147, Wis. Stats., failure 10 file this form may re.suit in a forfeiture of not more rJu.n $10,000 fore. 6y of violation. NOTE: Shaded arus are for DNR use only. See instructions for more informa.uon including where the completed form s.hould be sent. S :.J :.e 0 f W IJaC.Oru in MONITORING WELL DEVELOPME.1 I ~c::-Jc!Nan.."1.l ResoUJUS Form 4400-113B Rev. 4-!

Route to; Solid Wute □ Hll. Waste □ Wa.ste'lllal.cr □ Env. Resp,rue &: Rcptlr □ Undaground Tanks~ Oih.er □ ---

1. Cm this ~·ell be p-.!rged dzy? Before Development After DeveJopmen 11. Depth to Water . 2. Well de,·e!opmotmethod (Crom top of a. __ 7. ·7 _Q ft. __"']_.ii> 1.: well casing) rurged with biller and b.tiled e- 41 s-..:rsed "ith biller md :=-~;:ed □ 61 I s-..:.rs:d wiL"l block ttd 1:-.:. 2!:d, □ 42 b.lL,mm ..Q,dd ii.£ ll..,i>i 9~ s-.Jr&ed with b!cck a:1d p-.:np:d □ 62 yy mm dd y~, surged with block, bailed tnd pumped □ 70 5ta.m. fit«-l cornir...ssed u □ 20 Tm1e c._-::._ :J_ : !::f. .fl.. □ p.m. J_ o_: H. ~ □ p,l bailed only □ 10· ~only □ 51 2. Sediment in well -=. 0 . 0 inches -- 0 . 0 inchrl purn?=d slcwl:-' bottom ~ .g zs 13. Wa1.er clarity Clear □ 10 Ocar □ 20 Tumd er 1 s Turbid ~ s 3. Tll11e spe:-.t developing well __ (p~min. (Dcscnoe) (De:scnoe) UG!WN\$H 6&\ Y 1-....a::~;..,;gp:w;:,,,;..:..;.__;....,=---- 4. Dq,th of well (from top oh,·ell casimg) _ .L1_ .:r fr. _____I 5. I:-.side diz..-netcr of well _____2.. O'S"· 111.

6. Yclume ofwatel' fa filter pack and well cuing . ==-fa,- 0 gal. Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at soUd waste facility: 7. Volume of w!!er removed from well _J_ l9 .s°ga1. 14. Total suspended ____ • _ mg/1 ____ • _ m~ 8. Volume ofwa.tcr wded (if my) ..;:-__ ._gal. solids

9. ~ of wa.tcr 2!&ed 15. COD. mg/1 ____ ._mJ

10. Analysis p:rfonned on ww::r added? □ Yes □ N, (If yes, attach results)

16. Additiontl ~ommcnts on developmc::1t:

Signature:

Print Initials: A M L- Firm: I F°lITil:

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR us.e only. See instructions ror more infonnation including a list of county codes. APPENDIX E WELL DEVELOPMENT I PURGE SUMMARY FORMS AND FIELD WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS FORMS

Ill HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company --

WELL DEVELOPMENT/PURGE SUMMARY ~ell M IAJ- / INSTRUMENTS PROJECT, MI cw AU~~N'IY' \"I'\;;' us,-­ ~ELL COORDINATES: TEMPERATURE, l>~rrA1.-- ::L PVC RISER ELEVATl-=:ON-:-:------~~ Jlc PROJECT #: 302~7...i; · 08 CONDUCTIVITY:~t::>~c~\13. M~ :ij.-1 LOCATION: ~ S - GROUND LEVEL ELEVATION: ______pH METER: )>\~,IT it~ PERSONNEL:: L. 1 W CONSTRUCTED ~ELL DEPTH: ~ATER LEVEL PRODE: u.) L-P 7i- ':f ~ELL CASING INSIDE DIAME,....TE_R_: _z___ o..,...4,---=T-~- OTHER: fui'i.1E.V2- ft11.AP :!:i.z._ Measured Appearance Elcc. Cond. ~ater ~cl l Volume (umhos/cm) Date Time Method Level* Depth Purged** Color/ Odor/ Clarity pH T Corrrncnts (ft.msl) (ft.msl) (gallons) (s.u.) (C) Measured at 25C

/\( Of ('1> 10 ',00 BA I U:(2. (,(oq 17,go 7,f/ 0 ~f?AY I vg; I Tu r-,5 1D 11 ,0 (o7,,1"JO - /0! (O s-- ~r'oi,,..)N19r Gr?Av! vf3.!ru{U;,,- ,.,~ l(i,:-7 (9000 ,, 10: 17 10 7,f~ It,, (p &oCb . 10: Zt; \I - IS- ~ I 11( /[g. 9 to ooc 10 ', ?3> ' 151 '2-0 l l r?. ty I &,9 CoDDc 11 :oo Pu§i1t7 2-!? f?VJ,...rnAJ( S J..t:f-,v1A-Y-/V!r"J.Sf' 7,tJCr 17. '{ booo ll ( i- ,I /{:oz 1 ~o ,...., 7 68 17,(p 6000 ll v 11 ;o7 ?> ' 7, (( (7.~ (I) o rin II: 12. ~D II 7. fl/ It.ff Ir> on,, II II; IC/ Cf> 7,/f I 7,z. (o Of) D II ;z lf 5"0 7,DCf 11.7- &roo Ir~ >I ~> I I 7,D~ 17,~ 006£~ I l {po ()7 l 7rW )7, Ip (p ! ij /( ;X> ~ ror; i?,~O\_AN\ (J,l/ (;'(l r..-Y I 'r1s/1_', .. 7_1 {JZ) 17,7 foOO l-'? 0 \\ /1,; II; 2o E:,4 ,uii -z.~l n,5'4 ,..,7 i- . t>eo w1s:>/ Vib Ie,;,l~ rJ'? u 7 ,fl-Z. \le.> (p{X)o - yV ----

..

·• Record both initial and final measurements when using as ~ell Development SUTmilry. ~ • o •,. · ~ •t I _ _ ! __ .._ _ -.-.,....- 1 :.,..,.. -

WELL DEVELOPMENT/PURGE SUMMARY \.Jell INSTRUMENTS \.JELL COORDINATES: PROJECT ' MI I-WA u = Clif-;y' l"I '\;' us r­ PVC RISER ELEVATI-ON_: ______TEMPERATURE: ___'C>_l .... ~_1"f:_A""""v___,f~~-:a:, _ _,:1..__ ,---,-----,- PROJECT #: Q8 CONDUCTIVITY: ___,.q"'--~..;;:t>c..:~=c'-'T'-'-'~.:a..•:..a:n::....,._...:.M-,:,.,:sr:£F::'-'-:!"'-i..;;;;...""':l}'---:1..=- · LOCATION: 302~~7..!l~\(.~ S - GROUND LEVEL ELEVATION: CONSTRUCTED \.JELL DEPTH: ______pH METER: ----~►.__1..,._1T-'-'A-_._k.,._~'i--~--:---!\------::l-____ PERSONNEL: JL,A L.1 W \.JA TER LEVEL PROBE: ---,..-~-\9 =t..P.,._..,.~"--'':t-,-__,...... ,... ___ \.JELL CASING INSIDE DIAMETER·. 2. ol-t, Tl'\ OTHER·. \5u(2.i,t!12- f>u M f' .:t.-'1.... Measured Appearance Elcc. Cond. \.Jatcr \.Jc l l Volume (umhos/cm) Date Time Method level* Depth Purged** Color/ Odor/ Clarity pH T Comments .. Cft.msl) (ft.msl) (gallons) (s.u.) CC) Measured at 25C '?~gf ~ ·-i:z.~ ll/n7he; CJ ~00 -g, .-C\"' ·o c.a_JV /Al/II.ff;_ (t:;1.,. ,('11"'l/11>1--' .,.,, ,0'1 ,s-, {n 7>0tJ - - ' q ~ ;r - lO ~f?.o-v_1'r.J!"10"1c..l c,r-.Ll1>tr' 1,0D ,~,7 71 {X.l - - . ,•' '"7 /Z..; I~ \~ - I/.£:' ~ 7 .\1 />,~ (o6re - - 11/ o& (lf ;Sg ((.$"'( ¥A rt.££. - ('.,{! A'( /410A£ /,; t. (' lOu f> 1' ·t,,7g p;j_ k,t;c,n - - (>.'( 0 ~fl ~\\o~- M ll¼ I / &,,79 IS°:ff; - 4 - (loSI '(l_ov~ N DNf_ (' UJuP'( &,,;:co - ·1 i'/r< \ \) ', lj-i;- q.01 72.DZ- Z-lt.o I '3>'2-ow rJ { t\) o N C f C t-t> I.I !> Y ts>.9.t ,~Cf (.,100 - - '1 ,

i I 1

: v

..

* Record both initial and final measurements when using as \.Jell Development SlXTlllary. ** o.,,.,,,, f,.,.,,. hnr-,,hnl<> vnlum<>s . if oossible. orior to samolinq. -

WELL DEVELOPMENT/PURGE SUMMARY \./ell Ml>J- 5 INSTRUMENTS PROJECT, M '"""AU~N1iY' 1"1"\(, us.­ \./ELL COORDINATES: TEMPERATURE: 'v-__lJ,rTAL--~l\ :A;. :::L PROJECT #: :So~~z...i! . cg PVC RISER ELEVATl=oN:-:-:------CONDUCTIVITY: CON. t>UC~\} '.!l: M sr£F- :ij--:1.. LOCATION: :ti S - GROUND . LEVEL ELEVATION: pH METER: }>\~,1T iS -¼\- '.l- PERSONNEL: ~ L "'1 CONSTRUCTED \./ELL DEPTH:------\.lATER LEVEL PROBE:»)'-P =#:'t \./ELL CASING INSIDE DIAMETER: :z. o'-17 l"°' OTHER: ______Measured Appearance Elcc. Cond. \.later \./cl l Volume (umhos/cm) Date Time Method Level* Depth Purged*"' Color/ Odor/ Clarity pH T Comncnts Cft.msl) Cft.msl) (gallons) (s.u.) CC) Measured at 25C q ; l{o i>A 1t.d<. I\ (07/q>" 1,7() \7¥ 0 f?Or--,..i,J(Sf( bfJAY' I Yt:'S /l(j(/../s11> t,07 /&,> S-oo~ - - /Z: ~l{ - - ~ P,{u}wtJ ~v~t7,uf-r3 t f/ 7 , 1~ 17,; ~SD6 - - \D I 2-~l \~ - · - '1~5° Gu7t1 Vt<;{( lsv?o~,IJ /c:,,___,(,ul? 7 , (Cf (~ .> S'ioo - I I ( O'? -- If; r~ ~Al 1,.(!lt - - tf.n el7ovvN I ye; /\}.rl.-OU; '< (o ,-, 0 li.J,, L (pt;"eo - - ~ f<;;Z7 - ~ Issi - - ll/1i, \~:4s- ~v 1.!PY 11,I.P> \ IP. <.;I :., t . { t ' ~~ , · 1,CFZ.. ( - -

I

..

·,., Record both initial and fina l measurements when using as \./ell Development Surmary. a ** P11r-n1> fn11r- hnr,-,t,nl,. vnltm<>s ··. ;f nnsidhli> . orior tn snmnl ;nn . FIELD WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

INSTRUMENTS \1 -" PROJECT: MtLwA ll ~r-£" C014 ~"fl< \~"I ~ 1,1s, P@o¢:&( M TEMPERATURE: °t)\ '7 IT J~l.-- e "T ~ :1_ PROJECT #: XZ9i3}/1£}

GENERAL: SAMPLE POINT Mw--:1. Mw --2- M w -- 3, Mw-1 t;>4.p IJATER TYPE &vJ Gw Gw ~1,,v DATE ( ( /1,;-/9~ I1l,s/1~ It/ ,c-/9s U / If;' /qs;- CLOCK TIME /(:Z,c) lD: ZJf \D :'ft: II ; z_.o DEPTH TO IJATER* 7,5Z 'Lo, 7, u,'( 7,~z_ MEASURED IJELL DEPTH I7.stf 2-2,.oz. {7,v:,S- 17,>tf PU RGE VOL/CASING VOL(g) &#,7 x,-xO f..o, 77 la, r 7 DEPTH SAMPLE TAKEN - - - - SAM PLING DEVICE ,sA f LEP-.. isA. ILtf<.. P.At~ gA t l--FJ2,.. FIELD TEMPERATURE ("C) /It,.~ (£:=i Ito. 3 I,,,. <;" ELEC. MEASURED {p COND. ooo (p1oo s:~ {nOOV (umos/cm) AT 2s·c -- - - - pH -, ,oz. 0,'1( 1,02.. -, ,0 z_ . ALKALINITY - - - - CO LOR g f<.o (JJ N ~\,\Jt,.( fsf2.olA) fJ Kt?-O VJ N OOOR Vf:S !Jol.J£ Ye; 0-ct,._, CL ARITY CL.Out>Y cwuet"' \)fP-Y Ct.0u1> r ct() t, P r SAMPLING PARAMETERS # OF CONTAINERS & CONT. VOLUME; CONTAINER TY PE (A=AMBER GLASS; G=GLASS; P=PLASTIC); PRESERVATIVE TYPE· (L=LAB ADDED; F=FIELD ADDED) OR NEUTRAL; FILTERED (YES OR NO)

~ ...... 3-t-{D~~,, ~i . r V \JOCs HCI-Li NO ;:1.- Lr At \)~ ~ ~ l-tC l- L l N'O 'V ,~

'\';,,\ ( L-tb, 8A ll.-Eb (;) (LT \)(l~,. r,._,. -z,sj /L, 3,0G-

LABORATORY: SENT TO: l;XCcl--;l- DATE SENT: \\In.,/~;,- ~ SAMPLED BY: AML- *Measured from top of well riser.

I I FIELD WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

INSTRUMENTS PROJECT: TEMPERATURE: 1)16 tTA L-- p/-1 iMTT-fil... ==t\:::1..- PROJECT#: CONDUCTIVITY: _ ___,t.....,s,r""'----=S::....:P'------"c_-,.,.,-,__..;..M....;..:.;:~'-'-::;:"--:-:...::#::c,___-:::1.....=-- LOCATION: pH : 12 If, 1p•r I-- t I+ AA cyE12-- .t\---::1...- PERSONNEL: 0T HER: -'""~:,,:..::;c=g:a..cf:t'--'-----"2.=-f1__._e"""ff?-l'-'-~"""r__,1~k~Tl=C.,'--'-e=~-....,"'"e__._1r:"-----'::1...=----

GENERAL: SAMPLE POINT 5uMF l.'ATER TYPE G~ A.) t> vJ II n:11- DATE ID/ 1~ fcii;;- CLOCK TIME !() 't l~ DEPTH TO l.'ATER* 0.s,s- MEASURED l.'ELL DEPTH I :i.-. 2 7 PURGE VOL/CASING VOL(g) -o- DEPTH SAMPLE TAKEN &.~7s' SAMPLING DEVICE EA1t.~ FIELD TEMPERATURE c·c) [C1 • 0 ELEC. MEASURED COND. Co "5: co (umos/cm) AT 2s•c N.A- pH ', --,~ ALKALINITY NA COLOR lLE:1,-re ODOR - CLARITY ll-EA.t<.. SAMPLING PARAMETERS # OF CONTAINERS & CONT. VOLUME; CONTAINER TYPE (A=AMBER GLASS; G=GLASS; P=PLASTIC); PRESERVATIVE TYPE - (L=LAB ADDED; F=FIELD ADDED) OR NEUTRAL; FILTERED (YES OR NO) iL. A. 't>e.o I r kc..\ - L i No

1.L- I- A·( At"-n - re.a:--z..~ \-\ t(- L. i NO G>L10w\;G; ~oe,, I r;(lb tH.1-L; NO .1..29:'l<-'Ji p rb UNO~ -L-; Y£S

LABORATORY: SENT TO: C XC£;:L--- DATE SENT: \V /1"1 \"Ir SAMPLED BY: ALA.v µ Tel,cXH *Measured from top of well riser.

NM-::: Nr;-r JJI~<; ~I(<£)> NA=- µOT Aff'L t (.A,g.1,..i;:- I APPENDIX F SURVEY DATA

HSI HYDRO-SEARCH, inc. A Tetra Tech Company Sheet1

1701 S. KINNICKINNIC AVENUE - KINNICKINNIC BUS GARAGE 7/20/96

WELL LOCATIONS ELEVATION WELL NUMBER NORTHING EASTING TOP OF CASING GROUND MW1 376409.77 . 2558916.74 596.47 596.87 MW2 376458.78 2558903.75 596.31 596.80 MW3 376435.17 2558876.56 596.44 596.79

I EMCS DESIGN GROUP 205 W. Highland Avenue Suite 501 P.O. Box 2148 I MILWAU KEE. WISCO NSIN 53201-2148 Page 1 (414) 347- 1607