The Newborn Physical Examination Joan Richardson's Assessment of A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Journal Home Page: http://www.ijmhs.net ISSN:2277-4505 Review article Examining the liver – Revisiting an old friend Cyriac Abby Philips1*, Apurva Pande2 1Department of Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, PVS Institute of Digestive Diseases, PVS Memorial Hospital, Kaloor, Kochi, Kerala, India, 2Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India. ABSTRACT In the current era of medical practice, super saturated with investigations of choice and development of diagnostic tools, clinical examination is a lost art. In this review we briefly discuss important aspects of examination of the liver, which is much needed in decision making on investigational approach. We urge the new medical student or the newly practicing physician to develop skills in clinical examination for resourceful management of the patient. KEYWORDS: Liver, examination, clinical skills, hepatomegaly, chronic liver disease, portal hypertension, liver span INTRODUCTION respiration, the excursion of liver movement is around 2 to 3 The liver attains its adult size by the age of 15 years. The cm. Castell and Frank has elegantly described normal liver liver weighs 1.2 to 1.4 kg in women and 1.4 to 1.5 kg in span in men and women utilizing the percussion method men. The liver seldom extends more than 5 cm beyond the (Table 1). Accordingly, the mean liver span is 10.5 cm for midline towards the left costal margin. During inspiration, men and 7 cm in women. During examination, a span 2 to 3 the diaphragmatic exertion moves the liver downward with cm larger or smaller than these values is considered anterior surface rotating to the right. -
Utility of the Digital Rectal Examination in the Emergency Department: a Review
The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1196–1204, 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA 0736-4679/$ - see front matter http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.015 Clinical Reviews UTILITY OF THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A REVIEW Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE*† and Stephen J. Bauer, MD† *Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and †University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Reprint Address: Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown Veterans Hospital, 820 S Damen Ave., M/C 111, Chicago, IL 60612 , Abstract—Background: The digital rectal examination abdominal pain and acute appendicitis. Stool obtained by (DRE) has been reflexively performed to evaluate common DRE doesn’t seem to increase the false-positive rate of chief complaints in the Emergency Department without FOBTs, and the DRE correlated moderately well with anal knowing its true utility in diagnosis. Objective: Medical lit- manometric measurements in determining anal sphincter erature databases were searched for the most relevant arti- tone. Published by Elsevier Inc. cles pertaining to: the utility of the DRE in evaluating abdominal pain and acute appendicitis, the false-positive , Keywords—digital rectal; utility; review; Emergency rate of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) from stool obtained Department; evidence-based medicine by DRE or spontaneous passage, and the correlation be- tween DRE and anal manometry in determining anal tone. Discussion: Sixteen articles met our inclusion criteria; there INTRODUCTION were two for abdominal pain, five for appendicitis, six for anal tone, and three for fecal occult blood. -
A Neurological Examination
THE 3 MINUTE NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION DEMYSTIFIED Faculty: W.J. Oczkowski MD, FRCPC Professor and Academic Head, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University Stroke Neurologist, Hamilton Health Sciences Relationships with commercial interests: ► Not Applicable Potential for conflict(s) of interest: ► Not Applicable Mitigating Potential Bias ► All the recommendations involving clinical medicine are based on evidence that is accepted within the profession. ► All scientific research referred to, reported, or used is in the support or justification of patient care. ► Recommendations conform to the generally accepted standards. ► Independent content validation. ► The presentation will mitigate potential bias by ensuring that data and recommendations are presented in a fair and balanced way. ► Potential bias will be mitigated by presenting a full range of products that can be used in this therapeutic area. ► Information of the history, development, funding, and the sponsoring organizations of the disclosure presented will be discussed. Objectives ► Overview of neurological assessment . It’s all about stroke! . It’s all about the chief complaint and history. ► Overview: . 3 types of clinical exams . Neurological signs . Neurological localization o Pathognomonic signs o Upper versus lower motor neuron signs ► Cases and practice Bill ► 72 year old male . Hypertension . Smoker ► Stroke call: dizzy, facial droop, slurred speech ► Neurological Exam: . Ptosis and miosis on left . Numb left face . Left palatal weakness . Dysarthria . Ataxic left arm and left leg . Numb right arm and leg NIH Stroke Scale Score ► LOC: a,b,c_________________ 0 ► Best gaze__________________ 0 0 ► Visual fields________________ 0 ► Facial palsy________________ 0 ► Motor arm and leg__________ -Left Ptosis 2 -Left miosis ► Limb ataxia________________ -Weakness of 1 ► Sensory_______________________ left palate ► Best Language______________ 0 1 ► Dysarthria_________________ 0 ► Extinction and inattention____ - . -
Central Venous Pressure Venous Examination but Underestimates Ultrasound Accurately Reflects the Jugular
Ultrasound Accurately Reflects the Jugular Venous Examination but Underestimates Central Venous Pressure Gur Raj Deol, Nicole Collett, Andrew Ashby and Gregory A. Schmidt Chest 2011;139;95-100; Prepublished online August 26, 2010; DOI 10.1378/chest.10-1301 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services can be found online on the World Wide Web at: http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/139/1/95.full.html Chest is the official journal of the American College of Chest Physicians. It has been published monthly since 1935. Copyright2011by the American College of Chest Physicians, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook, IL 60062. All rights reserved. No part of this article or PDF may be reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. (http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml) ISSN:0012-3692 Downloaded from chestjournal.chestpubs.org at UCSF Library & CKM on January 21, 2011 © 2011 American College of Chest Physicians CHEST Original Research CRITICAL CARE Ultrasound Accurately Refl ects the Jugular Venous Examination but Underestimates Central Venous Pressure Gur Raj Deol , MD ; Nicole Collett , MD ; Andrew Ashby , MD ; and Gregory A. Schmidt , MD , FCCP Background: Bedside ultrasound examination could be used to assess jugular venous pressure (JVP), and thus central venous pressure (CVP), more reliably than clinical examination. Methods: The study was a prospective, blinded evaluation comparing physical examination of external jugular venous pressure (JVPEXT), internal jugular venous pressure (JVPINT), and ultrasound collapse pressure (UCP) with CVP measured using an indwelling catheter. We com- pared the examination of the external and internal JVP with each other and with the UCP and CVP. -
Bates' Pocket Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking
Lynn S. Bickley, MD, FACP Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine School of Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Peter G. Szilagyi, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Chief, Division of General Pediatrics University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Rochester, New York Acquisitions Editor: Elizabeth Nieginski/Susan Rhyner Product Manager: Annette Ferran Editorial Assistant: Ashley Fischer Design Coordinator: Joan Wendt Art Director, Illustration: Brett MacNaughton Manufacturing Coordinator: Karin Duffield Indexer: Angie Allen Prepress Vendor: Aptara, Inc. 7th Edition Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2009 by Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2007, 2004, 2000 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 1995, 1991 by J. B. Lippincott Company. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materials appear- ing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please contact Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia PA 19103, via email at [email protected] or via website at lww.com (products and services). 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in China Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bickley, Lynn S. Bates’ pocket guide to physical examination and history taking / Lynn S. -
1- Assessing Pain
Foundations of Assessing and Treating Pain Assessing Pain Table of Contents Assessing Pain........................................................................................................................................2 Goal:..............................................................................................................................................2 After completing this module, participants will be able to:..............................................................2 Professional Practice Gaps............................................................................................................2 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 2 Assessment and Diagnosis of Pain Case: Ms. Ward..........................................................................3 Confidentiality..........................................................................................................................................4 Pain History: A Standardized Approach..................................................................................................4 Evaluating Pain Using PQRSTU: Steps P, Q, R, S T, and U..............................................................5 Ms. Ward's Pain History (P, Q, R, S, T, U)..........................................................................................6 Video: Assessing Pain Systematically with PQRTSTU Acronym........................................................8 -
Bitemedicine.Com/Watch
Aims and Objectives • Requires some basic knowledge of clinical examinations • Clinical examination station (OSCE) • Abdominal examination: 4 cases • Duration: 70 mins • Slides and recordings: www.bitemedicine.com/watch • Other common OSCE cases available in previous and upcoming webinars • Aim of the week is to cover most of the common scenarios 2 Abdominal examination: OSCE Cases list What cases could come up? 1. Renal transplantation (+ AV fistula) 2. Stoma 3. Chronic liver disease 4. Hepatosplenomegaly 5. Cushing’s syndrome This is not an exhaustive list • But by preparing for these you will be better at: • Your exam routine • Looking out for important signs • Formulating your findings systematically • Tackling the VIVA 3 How to present your findings? I performed an abdominal examination on this patient If you have an idea, then • Who has signs suggestive of XXX back yourself from the start. It gets the examiner listening My main positive findings are: 1. XXX 2. YYY My relevant negative findings are: RELEVANT negatives 1. XXX (Risk factors) 2. YYY (Signs of decompensation) 3. ZZZ (POSSIBLE associated features) Overall, this points towards a diagnosis of XXX with no signs of decompensation 4 Abdominal examination: Case 1 Background 65M Central (1) (2) • Palpable mass in the left iliac fossa Bedside/peripheral Tacrolimus 5 Question 1 Q1 Q2 What is the most likely diagnosis? Chronic kidney disease Diabetic nephropathy resulting in renal transplantation Tacrolimus-induced nephropathy resulting in renal transplantation Hypertensive nephropathy -
Medical Staff Medical Record Policy
Number: MS -012 Effective Date: September 26, 2016 BO Revised:11/28/2016; 11/27/2017; 1/22/2018; 8/27/2018 CaroMont Regional Medical Center Author: Approved: Patrick Russo, MD, Chief-of-Staff Authorized: Todd Davis, MD, EVP, GMO MEDICAL STAFF MEDICAL RECORD POLICY 1. REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF THE MEDICAL RECORD The medical record shall include information to support the patient's diagnosis and condition, justify the patient's care, treatment and services, and document the course and result of the patient's care, and services to promote continuity of care among providers. The components may consist of the following: identification data, history and physical examination, consultations, clinical laboratory findings, radiology reports, procedure and anesthesia consents, medical or surgical treatment, operative report, pathological findings, progress notes, final diagnoses, condition on discharge, autopsy report when performed, other pertinent information and discharge summary. 2. ADMISSION HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION FOR HOSPITAL CARE Please refer to CaroMont Regional Medical Center Medical Staff Bylaws, Section 12.E. A. The history and physical examination (H&P), when required, shall be performed and recorded by a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or privileged practitioner who has an active NC license and has been granted privileges by the hospital. The H&P is the responsibility of the attending physician or designee. Oral surgeons, dentists, and podiatrists are responsible for the history and physical examination pertinent to their area of specialty. B. If a physician has delegated the responsibility of completing or updating an H&P to a privileged practitioner who has been granted privileges to do H&Ps, the H&P and/or update must be countersigned by the supervisor physician within 30 days after discharge to complete the medi_cal record. -
Medical History and Physical Examination Worksheet
U.S. Department of State OMB No. 1405-0113 EXPIRATION DATE: xx/xx/20xx MEDICAL HISTORY AND ESTIMATED BURDEN: 15 minutes PHYSICAL EXAMINATION WORKSHEET (See Page 2 - Back of Form) Photo Surnames Given Names Exam Date (mm-dd-yyyy) I Birth Date (mm-dd-yyyy) Document Type Document Number Case or Alien Number I I 1. Medical History (Past or present) No Yes No Yes Obstetrics Applicant appears to be providing unreliable or false Pregnant, on day of exam □ □ information, specify in remarks □ □ Estimated delivery date (mm-dd-yyyy) General LMP □ □ Illness or injury requiring hospitalization (including psychiatric) □ □ Previous live births, number: Birth dates of live births (mm-dd-yyyy) Cardiology □ □ Hypertension □ □ Congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease Arrhythmia □ □ Sexually Transmitted Diseases □ □ Rheumatic heart disease Congenital heart disease Previous treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, □ □ specify date (mm-yyyy) and treatment: Pulmonology □ □ Syphilis □ □ Tobacco use: □ Current □ Former □ □ Gonorrhea □ □ Asthma Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease □ □ Endocrinology Tuberculosis history: Diagnosed (mm-yyyy) □ □ □ □ Diabetes Treatment Completed (mm-yyyy) Thyroid disease Diagnosed (mm-yyyy) □ □ Treatment Completed (mm-yyyy) Hematologic/Lymphatic Diagnosed (mm-yyyy) □ □ Anemia Treatment Completed (mm-yyyy) □ □ Sickle Cell Disease □ □ Fever □ □ Thalassemia □ □ Cough Other hemoglobinopathy Night sweats □ □ □ □ Other □ □ Weight loss □ □ An abnormal or reactive HIV blood test Psychiatry Diagnosed (mm-yyyy) □ □ Psychological/Psychiatric -
Abdominal Palpation/Auscultation of Fetal Heart Rate
Shared Maternity Care Program Guidelines Abdominal Palpation/Auscultation of Fetal Heart Rate Introduction Abdominal palpation and auscultation of the fetal heart rate is recommended as part of routine examination in pregnancy to assist in assessing fetal wellbeing. Requirements Sonicaid to identify the fetal heart rate. Aqueous gel Tape measure Recommendations for Abdominal Palpation Palpation is not performed during a contraction Only perform a GENTLE abdominal palpation for any woman with: History of ante partum hemorrhage Premature labour Severe (acute) abdominal pain Documentation of fundal height is advised from 24/40 A clinical estimate followed by a symphyso-fundal height using a tape measure should also be used A consistent approach to measurement increases accuracy Palpate the fundus first to identify the upper limit . Measure from the top of the fundus to the top of the pubic symphysis . The tape measure should stay in contact with the skin. It is not recommended to repeat the measurement. If the fundal height is more than 2cm below or above expected height, an obstetric opinion advised. Refer Antenatal Clinic 9784 2626 or if unavailable contact the obstetric registrar via switchboard 9784 7777 Fundal height measurement is of little value in a twin pregnancy. Recommendations for Intermittent Auscultation of fetal Heart Rate Is recommended from 20 weeks gestation It is important to identify maternal pulse before locating the fetal heart. Using intermittent auscultation the normal heart rate range is >110bpm and < 160bpm If fetal heart rate or fetal movements are not present after 24 weeks gestation immediately, contact the Women’s Health Unit on 9784 7959 SMCP GPLU 2018 Shared Maternity Care Program Guidelines Abdominal Palpation/Auscultation of Fetal Heart Rate Leopold’s manoeuvres:[1] a) Fundal palpation- to locate the upper pole of the fetus and note if cephalic or breech b) Lateral palpation- to locate the fetal back, anterior shoulder and limbs c) Pawlick’s grip- to assess the presentation and station. -
Abdominal Examination
Abdominal Examination Introduction Wash hands, Introduce self, ask Patients name & DOB & what they like to be called, Explain examination and get consent Expose and lie patient flat General Inspection Patient: stable, pain/discomfort, jaundice, pallor, muscle wasting/cachexia Around bed: vomit bowels etc Hands Flapping tremor (hepatic encephalopathy) Nails: clubbing (cirrhosis, IBD, coeliacs), leukonychia (hypoalbuminemia in liver cirrhosis), koilonychia (iron deficiency anaemia) Palms: palmar erythema (hyperdynamic circulation due to ↑oestrogen levels in liver disease/ pregnancy), Dupuytren’s contracture (familial, liver disease), fingertip capillary glucose monitoring marks (diabetes) Head Eyes: sclera for jaundice (liver disease), conjunctival pallor (anaemia e.g. bleeding, malabsorption), periorbital xanthelasma (hyperlipidaemia in cholestasis) Mouth: glossitis/stomatitis (iron/ B12 deficiency anaemia), aphthous ulcers (IBD), breath odor (e.g. faeculent in obstruction; ketotic in ketoacidosis; alcohol) Neck and torso Ask patient to sit forwards: Neck: feel for lymphadenopathy from behind – especially Virchow's node (gastric malignancy) Back inspection: spider naevi (>5 significant), skin lesions (immunosuppression) Ask patient to relax back: Chest inspection: spider naevi (>5 significant), gynaecomastia, loss of axillary hair (all due to ↑oestrogen levels in liver disease/ pregnancy) Abdomen Inspection: distension (Fluid, Flatus, Fat, Foetus, Faeces), incisional hernias (ask patient to cough), scars, striae (pregnancy, -
Teaching Bedside Physical Examination with Ultrasound
SHARE DECEMBER 2019 V42, NO.12 MEDICAL EDUCATION: PART II TEACHING BEDSIDE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION WITH ULTRASOUND: AN OPPORTUNITY TO RE-ENGAGE AND INVIGORATE LEARNERS Kang Zhang, MD, FACP; Irene Ma, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FACP, RDMS, RDCS Dr. Zhang ([email protected]) is associate program director, Internal Medicine Residency Spokane, and clinical instructor and internal medicine clerkship director, University of Washington School of Medicine-Spokane. Dr. Ma ([email protected]) is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, director of ultrasonography and procedural skills, Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Calgary. he bedside physical examination is an integral pleural effusion.3 However, accuracy of the examination component of the clinical encounter. However, is limited by patient characteristics and size of the effu- Twith decreased time spent teaching at the bedside,1 sions. POCUS offers direct visualization of the pleural there has been a notable decline in physical exam skills effusion, confirming not only of its presence, but also among medical trainees. In the past decade, there has allows for a visual estimation of its size. Bedside rounds been increasing literature supporting the use of point-of- is an excellent way to illustrate ultrasound augmented care ultrasound (POCUS) to augment the physical exam physical examination to learners. As the patient is sitting to better guide physicians with clinical decision making.2 upright, learners are asked to determine if pleural effu- In this article, we describe a strategy to teach bedside sion is present or absent by the traditional physical exam physical examination skills by incorporating POCUS, on both hemithoraces. A mark is made at the first area which provides immediate visual feedback to the learn- of dullness that either represents the diaphragm or top of ers.