DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil Society Monitoring on the Implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy and Decade Action Plan in CROATIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civil Society Monitoring on the Implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy and Decade Action Plan in CROATIA Civil Society Monitoring on the Implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy and Decade Action Plan in CROATIA in 2012 and 2013 DECADE OF ROMA INCLUSION 2005-2015 Civil Society Monitoring on the Implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy and Decade Action Plan in CROATIA in 2012 and 2013 Prepared by a civil society coalition comprising the following organizations Institute of the Association for Transitional Researches and National Education – STINA (lead organisation) Roma National Council n Centre for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance Written by Ljubomir Mikić n Milena Babić Coordinated by the Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat Foundation in cooperation with the Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma Program of the Open Society Foundations DECADE OF ROMA INCLUSION 2005-2015 www.romadecade.org DECADE OF ROMA INCLUSION 2005-2015 2 Published by Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat Foundation Teréz körút 46. 1066 Budapest, Hungary www.romadecade.org Design and layout: www.foszer-design.com Proofreading: Christopher Ryan ©2014 by Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any forms or by any means without the permission of the Publisher. ISSN: 2064-8413 All civil society monitoring reports are available at www.romadecade.org/civilsocietymonitoring Civil SocietyCivil Monitoring This report was prepared by a civil society coalition comprising the following organisations: Institute of the 3 Association for Transitional Researches and National Education – STINA Institute (lead organization), Roma National Council, and Centre for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance. The lead researcher of croatia the coalition is Ljubomir Mikić (Centre for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance) and the project manager is Stojan Obradović (STINA Institute). The authors of the report are: Ljubomir Mikić and Milena Babić (Centre for Peace, Legal Advice and Psy- chosocial Assistance) in consultation with Bibijana Papo and David D. Orlović (Roma National Council). The following researchers have been involved in the project: Agron Tahiri, Siniša Senad Musić, Čedo Todorović, Samanta Malkoč Hendeković and Branislav Tekić. The following organizations have been involved in advising on the report: the Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat Foundation, the Central European University’s Department of Public Policy, the European Roma Rights Centre, Habitat for Humanity, the Roma Education Fund, and from the Open Society Foundations: Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma program and the Roma Health Project. In 2013–2014, the Decade Secretariat has supported reports from civil society coalitions in eight countries: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Montenegro, Serbia, and the United Kingdom. In the pilot year of 2012, reports from the following countries were supported: Albania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Macedonia, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain. In the reports, civil society coalitions supplement or present alternative information to Decade Progress Reports submitted by Participating Governments in the Decade of Roma Inclusion and to any reports submitted by State parties to the European Commission on implementation of their NRIS. These reports are not meant to substitute for quantitative monitoring and evaluation by State authorities but to channel local knowledge into national and European policy processes and reflect on the real social impact of gov- ernment measures. The civil society reports provide additional data to official ones, proxy data where there is not official data, or alternative interpretation of published data. The project is coordinated by the Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat Foundation in cooperation with Open Society Foundation’s Making the Most of EU Funds for Roma program. Funding for the project comes from the OSF Roma Initiatives Office. TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 7 croatia Recommendations 15 List of Abbreviations 19 Introduction 21 1. Structural Requirements 23 2. Anti-Discrimination 35 3. Education 47 4. Employment 57 5. Health Care 63 6. Housing 69 Bibliography 75 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 This report is developed by a coalition of three Croatian civil society organizations, as an alternative con- croatia tribution to the monitoring and evaluation of the achievements of national strategies for integration of Roma in Croatia. It does not aim to be a comprehensive source of information on the situation of persons belonging to the Roma community in Croatia over the past decade or to substitute relevant state reports on this issue. Following a detailed monitoring template prepared by the Decade of Roma Inclusion Secre- tariat (in cooperation with the Open Society Foundation’s Roma Initiatives and Make the Most of EU Funds for Roma), the report attempts to provide a brief overview of the relevant Roma integration policies and strategies and to assess their impact in the period 2012–2013. In accordance with the specified reporting framework, the report includes information on structural requirements, anti-discrimination, education, em- ployment, health care and housing, which is presented in separate thematic chapters. Structural Requirements The Government Office for Human Rights and Rights of National Minorities (GOHRRNM) is the national contact point for the implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategies (NRIS). Although un- derstaffed and with limited financial resources provided from the State budget, the efficiency and effec- tiveness of GOHRRNM in performing a wide range of tasks was maintained at a reasonably satisfactory level. Professionally and administratively supported by GOHRRNM, a specialized cross-sectoral Monitoring Commission is designated to oversee operational components of NRIS. This Commission should further improve its work, primarily by strengthening the capacities of its Roma members. Involvement of local and regional authorities in NRIS remained at a low level and can be considered the “weakest link”. By the end of 2013, out of 33 local and regional self-government units (LRSGUs), only four had fulfilled their task to adopt local/regional action plans for implementation of NRIS 2013–2020. Being largely dependent on the adoption of LRSGU action plans, broad involvement of Roma CSOs and local Roma representatives did not happen in 2013. Efficient coordination between the different layers of governance in the implementation and monitor- ing of NRIS and accompanying Decade of Roma Inclusion Action Plans (DRAP) was generally missing. More formal coordination was rather rare. The impression is that institutions at the same or different levels of authority were often not familiar with each other’s implementation of certain Roma integra- tion measures. They usually acted in an uncoordinated manner; independently and on their own ini- tiative. Integrated monitoring and evaluation were lacking. NRIS 2013–2020 notes that the successful implementation of its objectives and measures requires concerted and co-ordinated action by all im- plementing partners and other stakeholders, which implies the establishment of mechanisms to ensure well-tuned vertical and horizontal co-ordination and action. It also reiterates that cross-sector collabora- tion between, inter alia, governmental authorities at all levels should be reinforced, to which effect the practice of cross-sector meetings, introduced in 2010, needs to be continued. However, it is noticeable that the central mechanism for monitoring the overall implementation of all operational components of the Strategy – the National Monitoring Commission – does not formally involve representatives of local and regional authorities. A certain discrepancy between mainstream and Roma-targeted policies can be seen above all in the area of housing, where there is a gap between the measures targeted at improving living conditions in segre- gated settlements and general policy efforts for the social inclusion of Roma in the wider community and the suppression of discrimination against them. DECADE OF ROMA The 2003 NRIS monitoring and evaluation system formally existed, but proved to be ineffective and not INCLUSION 2005-2015 sufficiently systematic or appropriate to provide for the comprehensive review of the implementation of envisaged policy measures in continuum. NRIS 2013–2020 envisages the establishment of a robust new system and mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation but, apart from the formal establishment of the 2013–2020 Monitoring Commission, not much progress was made in this regard in 2013. 8 NRIS 2013–2020 sets general principles for securing financial means for its implementation by 2020. Al- though this refers rather to a mid-term commitment, it can be concluded that the long-term financial commitment to sustainable implementation of NRIS was basically/initially confirmed by the adoption of the NRIS Action Plan 2013–2015. The Plan envisages the provision of around 6 million EUR in the three-year period, or about 2 million EUR annually, from the State budget alone. However, it does not explicitly refer to financing from EU funds. Potential funding from EU sources over the financial period 2014–2020 was diffi- cult to assess bearing in mind that the overall planning process is expected to be completed some time in June/July 2014. Several public events to raise awareness and encourage Roma and non-Roma stakeholders to participate in the process of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Opportunities for Roma Inclusion Editorial Note
    Special issue Development & Transition ISSUE Published by the United Nations Development Programme June 2012 19 2 Editorial note 3 Making inclusion truly inclusive 7 The way forward for Roma integration 10 The ties that bind: common belonging and equal citizenship 13 Towards better monitoring and evaluation 17 A new approach to parental empowerment 22 The Slovak Republic’s Roma Integration Strategy 26 Measuring results? Education indicators in Roma integration strategies 29 Roma inclusion: Who will do the work? 32 The human rights-based approach and community involvement www.developmentandtransition.net Opportunities for Roma Inclusion Editorial note Andrey Ivanov Social inclusion of marginalized Roma has been increasingly on the policy agenda – supported by UNDP since 2002. This issue of Development & Transition on Roma con- tinues our commitment to expanding partnerships. Individually, articles reflect distinct expertise; together, they weave the social inclusion and human rights perspectives into a comprehensive human development approach to Roma inclusion. The opening article raises the question of how to define the ‘Roma universe’ and sug- gests that, even without knowing exact population figures, inclusion can be achieved by taking a territorial approach. Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos of the European Union’s Agency for Fundamental Rights suggests that Roma inclusion should integrate socio-economic development concerns with a fundamental rights framework. However, that is not easy, as Bernard Rorke of the Open Society Institute asserts. The focus on the social inclusion framework has coincided with a rise in anti-Roma prejudice. Katarina Mathernova, Joost de Laat, and Sandor Karacsony of the World Bank call for better monitoring and evaluation of Roma inclusion projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Republika Hrvatska Ured Državne Uprave U Osječko-Baranjskoj Županiji Lista Prvenstva Za 2019
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA URED DRŽAVNE UPRAVE U OSJEČKO-BARANJSKOJ ŽUPANIJI LISTA PRVENSTVA ZA 2019. GODINU sukladno članku 16. Zakona o stambenom zbrinjavanju na potpomognutim područjima ("Narodne novine", br. 106/18) (5) LISTA PRVENSTVA ZA MODEL E - darovanje građevnog materijala za obnovu, dogradnju/nadogradnju i završetak izgradnje obiteljske kuće u vlasništvu podnositelja prijave odnosno darovanje građevnog materijala za izgradnju obiteljske kuće na građevinskom zemljištu u vlasništvu podnositelja prijave Broj Grad/Općina stambenog Redni Ukupno Podnositelj zahtjeva članova zbrinjavanja broj bodova obitelji ANTUNOVAC 1 147 DAVOR TAKAČ 3 ANTUNOVAC 2 112 JAKOV BUDEŠ 2 ANTUNOVAC 3 75 LJUBICA BIKIĆ 2 BELI MANASTIR 1 217 SNJEŽANA VUKOVIĆ 4 BELI MANASTIR 2 215 IVAN FRIČ 4 BELI MANASTIR 3 211 MARIJA KOCIĆ 6 BELI MANASTIR 4 208 JASMINA DOBOŠ 3 BELI MANASTIR 5 196 RENATA FARKAŠ 4 BELI MANASTIR 6 191 IVICA GOLUBOV 4 BELI MANASTIR 7 186 DESPOT SUTARIĆ 6 BELI MANASTIR 8 181 EVICA BUDIMIR 3 BELI MANASTIR 9 181 DAMIR MENDLER 5 BELI MANASTIR 10 180 ČEDOMIR PALKO 3 BELI MANASTIR 11 180 EDO JURIĆ 3 BELI MANASTIR 12 176 MILE OBRADOVIĆ 3 BELI MANASTIR 13 175 ANICA LOVRENČIĆ 1 BELI MANASTIR 14 172 MANUELA KASAK 3 BELI MANASTIR 15 166 NIKOLA DUDIĆ 2 BELI MANASTIR 16 165 RUŽA ŠIMUNOV 1 BELI MANASTIR 17 164 HELENA VADLJA 3 BELI MANASTIR 18 161 ADAM JANIĆ 1 BELI MANASTIR 19 160 JOVANA ZUBER MILIČEVIĆ 3 BELI MANASTIR 20 160 MARTIN ILIĆ 5 BELI MANASTIR 21 160 TOMISLAV BURGUND 3 BELI MANASTIR 22 160 MARIO KAZIMIR 3 BELI MANASTIR 23 149 MILAN DAMJANIĆ 2 BELI MANASTIR
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Osijek-Baranja County Basic Information
    CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD .........................................................................................................................................................5 Published by 2. REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ........................................................................................................................................7 Osijek - Baranja County 2.1. Basic information..............................................................................................................................................7 For publisher 2.2. Administrative and political structure ........................................................................................................7 Krešimir Bubalo, County prefect 2.3. Geographical position ....................................................................................................................................8 2.4. Economy .............................................................................................................................................................8 Developed by Center for Entrepreneurship Osijek 3. OSIJEK-BARANJA COUNTY ..................................................................................................................................9 3.1. Basic information ............................................................................................................................................10 Project coordination 3.2. Geographical position ...................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Vina Croatia
    Wines of CROATIA unique and exciting Croatia as a AUSTRIA modern country HUNGARY SLOVENIA CROATIA Croatia, having been eager to experience immediate changes, success and recognition, has, at the beginning of a new decade, totally altered its approach to life and business. A strong desire to earn quick money as well as rapid trade expansion have been replaced by more moderate, longer-term investment projects in the areas of viticulture, rural tourism, family hotels, fisheries, olive growing, ecological agriculture and superior restaurants. BOSNIA & The strong first impression of international brands has been replaced by turning to traditional HERZEGOVINA products, having their origins in a deep historic heritage. The expansion of fast-food chains was brought to a halt in the mid-1990’s as multinational companies understood that investment would not be returned as quickly as had been planned. More ambitious restaurants transformed into centres of hedonism, whereas small, thematic ones offering several fresh and well-prepared dishes are visited every day. Tradition and a return to nature are now popular ITALY Viticulture has been fully developed. Having superior technology at their disposal, a new generation of well-educated winemakers show firm personal convictions and aims with clear goals. The rapid growth of international wine varietals has been hindered while local varietals that were almost on the verge of extinction, have gradually gained in importance. Not only have the most prominent European regions shared their experience, but the world’s renowned wine experts have offered their consulting services. Biodynamic movement has been very brisk with every wine region bursting with life.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for the Roma in Republic of Macedonia 2014 – 2020
    REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY OF LABOR AND SOCIAL POLICY IN COLLABORATION WITH THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR OF THE DECADE AND STRATEGY OF ROMA STRATEGY FOR THE ROMA IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 2014 – 2020 June, 2014 This document is made within the frames of the project “Encouraging of the implementation of the Strategy for the Roma in Republic of Macedonia through improvement of the strategic and operational management processes on national level”, with financial aid from the foundation MAKING THE MOST OF EU FUNDS FOR ROMA (MTM) from Budapest. CONTENTS Page | 2 I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………............3 II. Review of the national and international legislation in the areas of action that imply preparation and implementation of policies, strategies and programs for social inclusion of Roma in Macedonia……….. …………………………………………………………………………..................9 III. Demographic Profile of the Roma community in Macedonia………………………………..36 IV. Commitment to the Strategy/Vision, Strategic objectives, Specific strategic (program) goals ………………………………………….................................................................................................... 40 V. Strategic intervention by areas of action/Strategic determinations, Context-actual conditions, Specific strategic (program) goals Employment ………………………………………………………….................................................................................. ...... 42 Education........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in the Dalmatian Coast Through Greening Coastal Development - COAST’
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ‘Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in the Dalmatian Coast through Greening Coastal Development - COAST’ ATLAS ID – 43199; PIMS - 2439 Report of the Mid Term Evaluation Mission 6th May 2010 Nigel Varty (International Consultant) Ru !ica Maru "i# (National Consultant) Acknowledgements The Mid Term Evaluation (MTE) Team would like to thank all the COAST Project and UNDP staff, and the many other people interviewed who gave freely of their time and ideas (all those listed in Annex 4 contributed). We would especially like to thank the staff of the PIU and the UNDP Croatia CO for their excellent logistical skills and hospitality – particularly Mr. Gojko Berengi (National Project Manager) and Mr Ognjen !kunca (Deputy Project Manager), and Jelena Kurtovi " (UNDP Croatia) for their organizational efforts and patience with the requests of the MTE. Following completion of the Draft Report on 8th April 2009, review comments were received from the PIU, UNDP CO and Regional Coordination Unit in Bratislava, and the Ministry of Environment Protection, Physical Planning and Construction. Comments have either been included in the text where these related to factual inaccuracies in the draft, or have been reproduced in full as a footnote to the appropriate text. The MTET has commented on these in some cases. We thank each of the reviewers for providing useful and constructive feedback, which helped to strengthen the final version of this report. The MTET has tried to provide a fair and balanced assessment of the Project’s achievements and performance to date and to provide constructive criticism. We have made recommendations aimed at helping to improve project delivery and sustainability and replication of project results for the remainder of the Project, as well as to aid in the development and execution of future GEF projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for Roma in the Republic of Macedonia
    Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Republic of Macedonia Strategy for Roma in the Republic of Macedonia December, 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 4 1. Basic Remarks 4 1.1 Goals of the Strategy 5 1.2 Actors in the Realization of the Strategy 6 1.3 National Strategy and the Roma Inclusion Decade 8 1.4 Initial Dilemma 8 2. Normative Frame for Equality of Citizens 9 2.1 International Documents 10 2.1.1 Documents of the United Nations 10 2.1.2 Documents of the Council of Europe 10 2.1.3 Documents of the OSCE 11 2.1.3 Documents of UNESCO 11 2.2 Domestic Normative Frame 14 3. The Need to Collect Relevant Statistics 16 4. Local Self-government as Primary Level of Strategy Implementation 17 5. The Key Role of Romani Civic Organizations 20 II. Priority Areas 21 1. Living and Housing Conditions 22 1.1 Normative Framework 22 1.2 Current Situation 23 1.3 Recommendations and Activities 25 1.4 Initial Activities 28 2. Employment 29 2.1 Normative Frame 29 2.2 Current Situation 30 2.3 Recommendations and Activities 33 2.3.1 Reintegration in the Labor Market 33 2.3.2. Program for Development of Entrepreneurship 35 2.3.3. Education and Training 36 2.3.4. Information and Participation 37 3. Education 38 3.1 Normative frame 38 3.2 Current Situation 40 3.3 Recommendations and Activities 43 4. Health 53 4.1 Normative Frame 53 4.2 Current Situation 54 4.3 Recommendations and Activities 57 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Službeni Glasnik, Broj 5/2012
    Godina XIV Beli Manastir, 31. listopada 2012. godine Broj 5 S A D R Ž A J Str. Str. AKTI GRADSKOG VIJE ĆA 64. Odluka o drugim izmjenama i dopunama Odluke 73. Zaklju čak o davanju prethodne suglasnosti na o Prora čunu i izvršenju Prora čuna Grada Belog Statut Umjetni čke škole Beli Manastir .................... 245 Manastira za 2012. godinu sa projekcijom za 74. Zaklju čak (o odbijanju Prijedloga Odluke o 2013. i 2014. godinu ............................................... 173 izmjeni Odluke o socijalnoj skrbi) .......................... 245 65. Odluka o donošenju Izmjena i dopuna Prostornog plana ure đenja Grada Belog AKTI GRADONA ČELNIKA Manastira (2) ........................................................... 222 66. Odluka o odvodnji otpadnih voda na podru čju 43. Zaklju čak o utvr đivanju Kona čnog prijedloga Grada Belog Manastira ........................................... 237 Izmjena i dopuna Prostornog plana ure đenja 67. Odluka o dodjeli javnih priznanja Grada Belog Grada Belog Manastira (2) ...................................... 245 Manastira u 2012. godini......................................... 243 44. Zaklju čak o davanju suglasnosti za uknjižbu 68. Odluka o prijenosu u vlasništvo gra đevinskog prava vlasništva Op ćini Petlovac na zemljišta u Poslovnoj zoni Grada Belog nekretninama koje se nalaze na podru čju Op ćine Manastira ................................................................. 243 Petlovac, a vode se kao vlasništvo bivše Op ćine 69. Odluka o popisu fizi čkih i pravnih osoba koje su Beli Manastir ........................................................... 246 imale prijavljenu i utvr đenu štetu od 45. Rješenje o dodjeli na korištenje poslovnog elementarnih nepogoda u 2012. godini na prostora u Belom Manastiru, Trg Slobode 32 poljoprivrednom zemljištu u vlasništvu (P+8), na prvom katu, soba 7, površine 20,21 m 2, Republike Hrvatske i izra čunu otpisa dijela Gradskoj organizaciji Hrvatske stranke zakupnine u visini od 25% koji je prihod umirovljenika .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Archaeology”: Pashas from the Dalmatian Hinterland As Cultural Mediators
    Chapter 10 Connectivity, Mobility, and Mediterranean “Portable Archaeology”: Pashas from the Dalmatian Hinterland as Cultural Mediators Gülru Necipoğlu Considering the mobility of persons and stones is one way to reflect upon how movable or portable seemingly stationary archaeological sites might be. Dalmatia, here viewed as a center of gravity between East and West, was cen- tral for the global vision of Ottoman imperial ambitions, which peaked during the 16th century. Constituting a fluid “border zone” caught between the fluctu- ating boundaries of three early modern empires—Ottoman, Venetian, and Austrian Habsburg—the Dalmatian coast of today’s Croatia and its hinterland occupied a vital position in the geopolitical imagination of the sultans. The Ottoman aspiration to reunite the fragmented former territories of the Roman Empire once again brought the eastern Adriatic littoral within the orbit of a tri-continental empire, comprising the interconnected arena of the Balkans, Crimea, Anatolia, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and North Africa. It is important to pay particular attention to how sites can “travel” through texts, drawings, prints, objects, travelogues, and oral descriptions. To that list should be added “traveling” stones (spolia) and the subjective medium of memory, with its transformative powers, as vehicles for the transmission of architectural knowledge and visual culture. I refer to the memories of travelers, merchants, architects, and ambassadors who crossed borders, as well as to Ottoman pashas originating from Dalmatia and its hinterland, with their extraordinary mobility within the promotion system of a vast eastern Mediterranean empire. To these pashas, circulating from one provincial post to another was a prerequisite for eventually rising to the highest ranks of vizier and grand vizier at the Imperial Council in the capital Istanbul, also called Ḳosṭanṭiniyye (Constantinople).
    [Show full text]
  • Prostornog Plana Osječko-Baranjske Županije Iv. Izmjene I Dopune
    IV. IZMJENE I DOPUNE PROSTORNOG PLANA OSJEČKO-BARANJSKE ŽUPANIJE S 2 400ha Županija: OSJEČKO - BARANJSKA ŽUPANIJA 1 100ha 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 km 4 1 1 Naziv prostornog plana: Općina Draž Draž IV. IZMJENE I DOPUNE PROSTORNOG PLANA PA 1 3 1 3 2 PODRUČJA POSEBNIH UVJETA KORIŠTENJA 2 4 c) OSJEČKO-BARANJSKE ŽUPANIJE Općina Popovac - OBUHVAT IV. IZMJENA I DOPUNA 1 3 Popovac 1 1 2 prijedlog HR201309 3 1 1 Naziv kartograma: 3 1 1 OBUHVAT IZMJENA I DOPUNA Grad Beli Manastir 1 PODRUČJA POSEBNIH UVJETA KOIŠTENJA 1 2 Beli Manastir 1 RP RP 1 6 2 PROMJENA GRANICA EKOLOŠKE MREŽE - OBUHVAT IV. IZMJENA I DOPUNA O 2 1 Općina Kneževi Vinogradi 3 HR100015 O HR500015 1 3 Podravska Moslavina PA Kneževi Vinogradi Broj kartograma: Mjerilo kartograma: 2 2 1 1 1 Petlovac 1 1 Viljevo Donji Miholjac c) 1 : 300.000 3 RP RP 1 2 3 3 1 Općina Petlovac Odluka predstavničkog tijela o izradi plana: Odluka predstavničkog tijela o donošenju plana 1 2 10 3 1 Jagodnjak Općina Čeminac Grad Donji Miholjac PP TUMAČ ZNAKOVLJA 1 "Županijski glasnik" broj 1/20. "Županijski glasnik" broj xxxx. 2 3 2 2 1 1 Belišće Čeminac HR200730 2 2 2 1 Općina Jagodnjak Javna rasprava (datum objave): Javni uvid održan Marijanci 1 1 1 TERITORIJALNE I STATISTIČKE GRANICE Grad Belišće SP PA 20. srpnja 2020. godine HR100011 3 DRŽAVNA GRANICA od: 27. srpnja 2020. godine Valpovo 1 1 HR200394 RP ŽUPANIJSKA GRANICA "Županijski glasnik" broj 8/20. do: 4. kolovoza 2020. godine 1 1 3 1 Općina Marijanci 1 1 1 2 1 HR100016 Općina Darda Općina Bilje OPĆINSKA/GRADSKA GRANICA Darda Magadenovac 2 TRASE CESTOVNIH I ŽELJEZNIČKIH PROMETNICA Pečat tijela odgovornog za provođenje javne rasprave:Odgovorna osoba za provođenje javne rasprave: 1 1 1 1 7 3 1 HR200573 3 O Općina Magadenovac Grad Valpovo HR201308 1 PA 3 2 3 1 Petrijevci SP Bilje 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Osječko-Baranjska Županija (OBŽ)
    PROGRAM RURALNOG RAZVOJA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE ZA RAZDOBLJE 2014. – 2020. POSTIGNUĆA I PREDSTOJEĆE MOGUĆNOSTI 12. ožujka 2018., Osijek www.ruralnirazvoj.hrwww.ruralnirazvoj.hr Osječko-baranjska županija (OBŽ) www.ruralnirazvoj.hr Potpore – biljna proizvodnja zob- livade djetelina kamilica jara ostalo zob- orah ugar ozima tritikale-ozime plemenita vinova loza kontinentalni travnjak soja za stočnu hranu kukuruz; 25% trave i travolika paša lucerna šećerna repa ječam-ozimi; 7% pšenica-ozima; 17% soja; 8% uljana repica; 9% suncokret; 10% www.ruralnirazvoj.hr Stočarstvo u OBŽ OSTALO GOVEDA SVINJE OVCE (KOZE, KONJI, MAGARCI) Broj gospodars. Broj životinja Broj gospodars. Broj životinja Broj gospodars. Broj životinja Broj gospodars. Broj životinja 1.609 86.477 9.958 348.573 921 40.985 833 3.577 OVCE 8% GOVEDA 18% ostalo 1% SVINJE 73% www.ruralnirazvoj.hr Bogata ponuda OBŽ i Slavonije SLAVONSKI KULEN 17. proizvod iz Hrvatske registriran u EU • dokaz nagrađivane izvrsnosti slavonske enogastronomije SLAVONSKI MED 19. proizvod iz Hrvatske registriran u EU www.ruralnirazvoj.hr PRR – raspoloživa sredstva Ukupna sredstva EU potpora HR potpora javne potpore EUR 2 026 222 500 EUR 357 072 000 EUR 2 383 294 500 Privatna sredstva EUR 350 000 000 Ukupna vrijednost ulaganja EUR 2 733 294 500 povećanje konkurentnosti hrvatske poljoprivrede, šumarstva i prerađivačke industrije te unaprjeđenje životnih i radnih uvjeta u ruralnim područjima uopće www.ruralnirazvoj.hr PRR – status provedbe po mjerama 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% M4 M6 M7 M5 M17 M11
    [Show full text]