DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SI J-A 2009 pgs 5/28/09 10:07 AM Page 14 CONFERENCE REPORT Highlights of CFI’s Twelfth World Congress ‘Science, Public Policy, and the Planetary Community’ KENDRICK FRAZIER The Center for Inquiry’s 12th World repeatedly that in opposing creationism, defending good science against political Congress in Washington (Bethesda, we are “fighting not religious belief but indifference and, worse, interference. Maryland, actually) was grandly yet the infusion of religious doctrine into Her lively title tells the story: “The appropriately titled “Science, Public public policy.” Philosopher/historian United States, a Former Global Leader in Policy, and the Planetary Community.” Barbara Forrest updated developments Science, Apologizes for the 2001–2008 In one way or another it covered just in the intelligent design wars since the Service Outage.” In her current job she about every topic CFI and its affiliated Dover decision in 2005, including the represents textbook publishers for grades organizations the Committee for latest troubling activities of antievolu- K–12. She warned that only a handful of Skeptical Inquiry (publisher of the tionists in Texas and Louisiana. And people pick the textbooks your children SKEPTICAL INQUIRER) and the Council Lincoln/Darwin historian David Con- use. “They are not teachers, usually. for Secular Humanism (publisher of tosta said: “I am convinced Lincoln was They are scary people, some of them.” Free Inquiry) deal with. a deist. He did not believe in the divin- She lamented that just the previous week Everyone seemed to enjoy it. The day in Texas opponents of evolution in text- afterward, CFI founder and chairman books declared an “insufficiency of evi- Paul Kurtz called the congress “exhila- dence” for natural selection. rating.” As he said, “The responses of •Author Susan Jacoby’s (The Age of our readers and supporters were over- American Unreason) litany of “anti-intel- whelmingly positive. What a stunning lectualism and sheer intellectual lazi- response that we received from them!” ness” in America over the past forty Ron Lindsay, CFI’s CEO and president, years. “We are in serious intellectual likewise called the conference very suc- trouble. We don’t value knowledge cessful and said many attendees com- enough.” She gave a long series of exam- mented favorably to him “that they ples of what she calls “junk thought,” noticed the skeptical/scientific side of ideas that are “impervious to evidence.” our organization was on display more She also defended the virtues of reading, than usual, which they appreciated.” a practice much marginalized in today’s That’s true, I think. Many people in hectic age of instant electronic commu- the audience told me at various times how nications. much they appreciate and value the •Paul Kurtz’s luncheon address on SKEPTICAL INQUIRER. SI and its articles the planetary perspective. He said and the work of the Committee for humanism includes genuine caring for Photo: Brian Engler Skeptical Inquiry got a lot of public men- Former Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder gave others and a respect for the dignity and tion, too, in the talks, intros, and sessions. an invigorating talk at CFI’s World Congress. value of every person on the planet. “We Here are a few highlights for me: have common ground with all members •The opening session on Darwin ity of Christ. He was not baptized. He of the human family.” He said we need and Lincoln, evolution, ID and cre- questioned miracles of the Bible. He a new planetary ethic that mitigates ationism, and legal challenges of liked to tell jokes about preachers.... human suffering and increases the sum church-state separation involving the He probably couldn’t get elected today.” of human good and happiness. “As skep- latter. Civil rights lawyer and CFI board •Former twelve-term U.S. Congress- tics and rationalists, we need to cultivate member Edward Tabash emphasized woman Patricia Schroeder’s rousing talk a new planetary ethic. We need to be 14 Volume 33, Issue 4 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER SI J-A 2009 pgs 5/28/09 10:08 AM Page 15 concerned with the planet Earth. It juror’s warning not to take at face value the very recent Talibanization of Paki- seems to me that is the positive state- any proclaimed evidence of psychic pow- stan, even in Islamabad, where he teaches ment of humanism.” ers. At the end, Randi announced that his at a university. It has become very dan- •Astrophysicist John Mather’s (the famous one-million-dollar challenge to gerous, he said. Terrible things have first NASA scientist to win the Nobel claimants for proof of paranormal powers begun happening there in just the past Prize) beautifully illustrated talk on the under controlled test conditions, which several months. (The day after the con- entire history and future of the universe, was to end, will in fact be renewed. “It ference ended, news organizations from its origin in the “Horrendous was going to terminate in 2012,” he said, reported the imposition of Islamic law by Space Kablooey” (as he calls the Big “but now it will continue.” the Taliban in the Swat Valley of Bang) 13.7 billion years ago to the time •Major awards to Paul Kurtz, Randi, Pakistan. Further Taliban inroads have when the Sun goes out 7.6 billion years and Lawrence Krauss (see story below). prompted subsequent military action.) from now . and beyond. He reported •A session I moderated on Skepti- •The Saturday evening awards ban- on the 1998 discovery that the cosmic cism and Science seemed well received quet featured a live oratorio of composer expansion is accelerating, the mystery of (due especially to the presentations by Richard Einhorn’s new original composi- dark energy, the plans for the next big the witty and lively Richard Wiseman, tion (personally introduced by Einhorn) space telescope to be launched in 2013 with lots of video demos on perception “The Origin,” a celebration of the life (the James Webb Space Telescope), and and misperception, and equally so and work of Darwin based on Darwin’s the quest to directly observe more exo- Elizabeth Loftus, with her research own words in On the Origin of Species. planets. Cosmology may have no practi- demonstrating false memory, plus Joe •Awards banquet speaker Lawrence cal benefits, he said, but space science Nickell, on investigating rather than just Krauss’s (a CSI fellow and Arizona State sure does. People often forget that their debunking, and Armadeo Sarma, on University physicist and author) talk on weather reports, GPS devices, tele- alternative medicine fads in Germany “Science and Public Policy: An Oxy- phones, and television all “depend on and the rest of Europe). moron.” He concluded with the call, things out there in space.” •A small lunch given by Paul Kurtz “We must all become evangelists for sci- •NASA climatologist Drew Shin- for international participants in the con- ence. We cannot tolerate unambiguous dell’s full report on “The Science of gress, including the Chinese delegation nonsense in a democracy.” Climate Change.” He noted that our (where we were able to renew acquain- knowledge of climate change comes tances with several of the Chinese col- Kendrick Frazier is editor of the SKEPTICAL from detailed scientific observations, and leagues we met in Beijing in October INQUIRER. he reviewed the interplay and repeated 2007) and those from the U.K., Ger- testing that goes on between scientific many, the Netherlands, France, Russia, observations and computer models of India, Pakistan, and Senegal. Randi, Krauss, Kurtz climate. Some conclusions: the planet is •A lively audience-participation, Honored with Major getting warmer, natural forcings (solar packed-house session at the end of the Awards variation, volcanoes, etc.) have been flat afternoon Saturday on The Future of in recent years, the twentieth-century Skepticism. Run by Ben Radford and James Randi, Lawrence Krauss, and Paul warming is largely caused by greenhouse myself, I gave some introductory com- Kurtz were honored with major awards at gas increases, and the rate of future ments. Barry Karr and James Under- the Center for Inquiry’s 12th World warming is likely to increase. He noted down also participated. Sean McCabe Congress in Bethesda, Maryland. All were that apathy and resistance to change in of the James Randi Educational Foun- presented at the Saturday evening awards this area goes back to the 1840s when a dation (he also writes a skeptical blog banquet, April 11. smokestack-cleaning technology for for the general public at www.weird- ships of the Royal Navy was squelched things.com) emphasized the positive * * * by industry. messages of skepticism, noting that James Randi received the Committee for •James Randi’s lively participation in there are now nine network TV shows Skeptical Inquiry’s In Praise of Reason many sessions, hallway discussions, and featuring scientists or science oriented. Award “in recognition of his distin- his own late afternoon talk about how eas- Proclaimed McCabe: “Skepticism is guished contribution to the use of critical ily we all can be fooled. “I know the art of cool . and it’s getting cooler.” We inquiry, scientific evidence, and reason in deception. I know how people are fooled. then opened it to the audience. A lot of evaluating claims to knowledge.” And I know how to do that.” He de- good ideas and discussion came out of As everyone knows, Randi has for scribed repeated examples of very smart the session. decades been a tireless and charismatic people being fooled by trickery. “You can •A sobering presentation by Pakistani critical investigator of those who claim be fooled as well,” he said. It’s the con- nuclear physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy on paranormal powers, forthrightly chal- SKEPTICAL INQUIRER July / August 2009 15 SI J-A 2009 pgs 5/28/09 10:25 AM Page 16 CONFERENCE REPORT lenging them to undergo testing under cosmology and also an author of popu- time achievement award from the Center controlled conditions and exposing lar science books (The Physics of Star for Inquiry.
Recommended publications
  • Clear Thinking and the Forces of Unreason

    Clear Thinking and the Forces of Unreason

    COMMENTARY Clear Thinking and the Forces of Unreason KENDRICK FRAZIER here is a new need for rational- still a dangerous world out there, but about. We no longer can indulge such ity and reason—as well as their warnings had fallen on mostly distractions. courage and resoluteness—in deaf ears. We were too distracted with I think in the short term at least we T living the good life. Now, suddenly, no are going to see less nonsense. Psychic defense of freedom and democracy and the highest values of civilization. Since one is distracted. abilities failed to warn us of the September 11 the world has changed, Much the same could be said for rJiose September 11 attacks, and now it and a previous pop culture of superfi- of us toiling on behalf of science and rea- should be clear to all but the most com- ciality, self-absorption, self-indulgence, son and scientific skepticism. Paul Kurtz mitted or muddle-headed that such and self-satisfaction has gone out the and CSICOP and many others in the powers just don't exist. The attacks were window with it. A several-decades skeptical movement have regularly been soon followed by bogus Nostradamus period of relative innocence and chided over die years for even raising the "predictions" and other inevitable clap- naivete' has ended. Things are serious possibility that forces of unreason could trap, but those were quickly countered now, and we need all our wits about us. actually threaten our modern democratic by anti-hoax, urban legend Web sites Intelligence and wisdom are called for.
  • Btg Hm Draft1 12-7-05 ID

    Btg Hm Draft1 12-7-05 ID

    No. 207 “To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them” (Isaiah 8:20). March 2006 Insufficient Design by Henry M. Morris* The modern Intelligent Design movement their dates for Earth’s age are incon- (ID) has been making substantial pro- sistent with scripture (too old).3 gress in recent years, at least in terms of The editor even entitled his diatribe “Twi- public interest. As one evolutionist re- light for the Enlightenment?” cently warned his colleagues: Similar alarmist articles have been The success of the ID movement to published in numerous other science jour- date is terrifying. In at least 40 states, nals and also in many popular magazines ID is being considered as an addi- (such as Newsweek) and local papers. Our tion to the required science curricu- own San Diego Union Tribune in a lum in public schools.1 lengthy lead editorial for November 21, The “terrified” author of this observation 2005, called Intelligent Design “Voodoo is Professor of Anthropology at Pennsyl- Science” in the editorial title. The lan- vania State University. He says he is be- guage seems inflammatory just about ing stalked by ID advocates! everywhere. Now I know that I and my colleagues One writer becomes unreasonably are being stalked with careful and virulent in his latest editorial. deadly deliberation. I fear my days The “Intelligent Design” movement are numbered unless I act soon and is the most pernicious pseudoscience effectively. If you are reading this, of our time.
  • With Professor Phil Zuckerman

    With Professor Phil Zuckerman

    4 The Secular Circular Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.SBHumanists.org FEBRUARY 2015 February Program: Jennifer Ouellette Me, Myself and Why: What Science Has to Say About Who We Are and How We Got That Way As diverse as people appear to be, all of our genes and brains are nearly identical. In Me, Myself, and Why, Jennifer Ouellette dives into the miniscule ranges of variation to understand just what sets us apart. She draws on cutting edge research in genetics, neuroscience, and psychology enlivened as always with her signature sense of humor-to explore the mysteries of human identity and behavior. Jennifer is the author of four popular science books, including Me, Myself and Why: Searching for the Science of Self (2014). She specializes in physics and many related topics, with particular emphasis on how science intersects with popular culture, as well as science communication and outreach. Ouellette is the former director of the Science & Entertainment Exchange, an initiative of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) designed to connect entertainment industry professionals with top scientists and engineers to help the creators of television shows, films, video games, and other productions incorporate science into their work. She is also a prolific blogger, maintaining a blog at Scientific American called Cocktail Party Physics, where she and other female contributors chat about the latest science news. When: Saturday, February 21st, 2015 Where: Patio Room, Vista del Monte (Park ONLY in spaces marked "VDM".) Time: Meet at 2:30pm for socializing and light refreshments provided by HSSB. Program begins at 3:00 pm Cost: $2 members/$5 non-members Dinner: Vista del Monte.
  • Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment Paul Kurtz and The

    Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment Paul Kurtz and The

    Jan Feb 13 2_SI new design masters 11/29/12 11:26 AM Page 14 Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment KENDRICK FRAZIER countries around the globe. From the beginning he was deeply knowledgeable about, and directly in - volved in, scientific-based skeptical in - quiry. This energized our committee and SI as well. He had more energy and enthusiasm than three people. His output of writing was prodigious. He was overwhelmingly positive and optimistic. And courageous. And something else—exuberant. It was such a pleasure to be his colleague. Paul was my mentor and my friend. He brought me into CSICOP (now CSI). He strongly supported me and SI. He granted us editorial autonomy, pub - A young CSICOP chairman Paul Kurtz, lower right, watches a younger Ken Frazier, then still editor of Science News but about to become editor of SI, speak at first CSICOP meeting in August 1977 in New York City. licly. When controversy came, as it often did, he always encouraged me. He felt Paul kurtz had a broad and clear vision aggressive. He always emphasized the that if you are not creating some contro - for a return to enlightenment values— positive. versy, you are not doing things right. And reason, scientific thinking, and reliance on By his own example of thoughtful he practiced his own humanist values. human thought, not authority or super - philosophical discourse and open- He was kind to me and my family in naturalism, for our ethical values and re - minded critical inquiry and by the caliber ways no one will ever know.
  • Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment

    Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment

    Jan Feb 13 2_SI new design masters 11/29/12 11:26 AM Page 14 Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment KENDRICK FRAZIER countries around the globe. From the beginning he was deeply knowledgeable about, and directly in- volved in, scientific-based skeptical in- quiry. This energized our committee and SI as well. He had more energy and enthusiasm than three people. His output of writing was prodigious. He was overwhelmingly positive and optimistic. And courageous. And something else—exuberant. It was such a pleasure to be his colleague. Paul was my mentor and my friend. He brought me into CSICOP (now CSI). He strongly supported me and SI. A young CSICOP chairman Paul Kurtz, lower right, watches a younger Ken Frazier, then still editor ofScience He granted us editorial autonomy, pub- News but about to become editor of SI, speak at first CSICOP meeting in August 1977 in New York City. licly. When controversy came, as it often did, he always encouraged me. He felt Paul Kurtz had a broad and clear vision aggressive. He always emphasized the that if you are not creating some contro- for a return to Enlightenment values— positive. versy, you are not doing things right. And reason, scientific thinking, and reliance on By his own example of thoughtful he practiced his own humanist values. human thought, not authority or super- philosophical discourse and open- He was kind to me and my family in naturalism, for our ethical values and re- minded critical inquiry and by the caliber ways no one will ever know. sponsibilities to each other.
  • Center for Inquiry Institute Launches Three-Year Academic Program

    Center for Inquiry Institute Launches Three-Year Academic Program

    CSICOP MEWS Center for Inquiry Institute Launches Three-Year Academic Program JOE NICKELL program of intensive education founded by him, CSICOP and the Oxford at Oxford University, England, in skepticism and rationalism has Council for Secular Humanism. The and a Center for Inquiry-Moscow is Abeen successfully launched by Institute began as the sponsor of an forthcoming in Russia. Each center will the Center for Inquiry Institute, an edu- informal series of seminars and work- have a research library, the one at die cational institution co-sponsored by the shops. Although these were popular and international headquarters already Committee for the Scientific fulfilled their purpose, fJicy presented approaching some 20,000 volumes, in Investigation of Claims of the Para- only a first step toward a more ambi- addition to periodicals. The interna- normal (CSICOP), publisher of the tious goal: a permanent program that tional headquarters also has a nearby SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, and die Council confers on its graduates a certificate of residence for visiting scholars. for Secular Humanism, publisher of proficiency, ensuring that the bearer has In addition, an international faculty Free Inquiry magazine. In addition to undergone rigorous training and exami- has been appointed, its members being increasing public awareness of the need nation over a broad range of studies. chosen for their diverse interests and dis- for critical thinking across the spectrum This new goal has involved building tinguished professional training, as well of human concerns, and providing spe- a permanent home for the Institute— as the level of respect their scholarship cific courses in that regard, the goal of the new Center for Inquiry—Inter- has earned over the years.
  • Where Do We Go from Here? Has Classic Skepticism Run Its Course? by Daniel Loxton, 2007

    Where Do We Go from Here? Has Classic Skepticism Run Its Course? by Daniel Loxton, 2007

    Where Do We Go From here? Has classic skepticism run its course? by Daniel Loxton, 2007 antasy and sci-fi fans may recall an Emmy organizations to whom media could turn; they Award-nominated musical episode of the television published an extensive body of literature probing Fseries Buffy the Vampire Slayer, in which the heroes the validity of pseudoscientific assertions; they sadly sing lyrics posing the key existential question: engaged in watchdog activism; they tracked the evolution of claims and contributed to the scientific The battle’s done, and we kinda won understanding of belief and anomalous experience. So we sound our victory cheer. Where do we go from here?1 This took no small effort. Skeptical leaders like Randi, Kurtz and Shermer have racked up heroic mileage, and Looking around the skeptics movement over the no shortage of bumps and bruises along the way. And, for last few years, it’s seemed to me that everyone some skeptical trailblazers, at long last, the battle’s finally is asking this same question. I’d like to suggest done. Some of the early titans, like Martin Gardener, have an answer: we should return to basics. retired. Others, like Asimov and Sagan, have passed away. When skeptics first organized, the landscape was in some Still others are just sick of this crap. ways very different. Pseudoscientific fads that have since faded back somewhat into the fringe — from Uri Geller to After all, in a world where Peter Popoff can once again flying saucers to Von Däniken’s ancient astronauts — were make a sweet fortune performing miracles — Popoff, for then sweeping the culture.
  • Ann Druyan Talks About Science

    Ann Druyan Talks About Science

    THE SKEPTIC'S DICTIONARY • BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA ON EVOLUTION • GHOST TOWN CURSE * • • Ann Druyan Talks About Science. Religion, Wonder, Awe...and Carl Sagan Art and Science (Larry) King of the Paranormal Intelligent Design * « Neither Intelligent Sylvia Browne Nor Designed Nor Designed TV Psychic Fellowship Sidesteps of the Rings lest Challenges UFO Rings and Fairy Rings Published by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION off Claims off the Paranormal AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAL (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro. Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Toronto Saul Green. PhD. biochemist, president of ZOL James E. Oberg. science writer Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, Consultants, New York, NY Irmgard Oepen, professor of medicine (retired), Oregon Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts Marburg, Germany Marcia Angell, M.D.. former editor-in-chief, New and Sciences, prof, of philosophy. University Loren Pankratz, psychologist, Oregon Health England Journal of Medicine of Miami Sciences Univ. Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales John Paulos. mathematician, Temple Univ. Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, Al Hibbs, scientist. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist. MIT consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, execu­ Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Simon Fraser understanding and cognitive science, tive director CICAP, Italy Univ.
  • Psychic Experiences Explained

    Psychic Experiences Explained

    SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol. 16PSYCHI No. 4 C EXPERIENCES EXPLAINED The Scientist's Skepticism The Paranormal's Popularity Self-Help Books/Ghost Lights Published by the Commute Investigation of Claims of the PParanormaa an l THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER (ISSN 0194-6730) is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, an international organization. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. Klass, Paul Kurtz. Consulting Editors Isaac Asimov, William Sims Bainbridge, John R. Cole, Kenneth L. Feder, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, David F. Marks, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Contributing Editor Lys Ann Shore. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Assistant Business Manager Sandra Lesniak Chief Data Officer Richard Seymour. Computer Assistant Michael Cione. Production Paul E. Loynes. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Librarian, Ranjit Sandhu. Staff Leland Harrington, Jonathan Jiras, Atfreda Pidgeon, Kathy Reeves, Elizabeth Begley (Albuquerque). Cartoonist Rob Pudim. The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo. Barry Karr, Executive Director and Public Relations Director. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock, psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Isaac Asimov, biochemist, author; Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky; Barry Beyerstein, biopsychologist, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; Irving Biederman, psychologist, University of Minnesota; Susan Blackmore, psychologist, Brain Perception Laboratory, University of Bristol, England; Henri Broch, physicist, University of Nice, France; Vern Bullough, Distinguished Professor, State University of New York; Mario Bunge, philosopher, McGill University; John R.
  • Curriculum Vitae Steven Pinker Department of Psychology Harvard University William James Hall 970 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA

    Curriculum Vitae Steven Pinker Department of Psychology Harvard University William James Hall 970 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA

    Curriculum Vitae Steven Pinker Department of Psychology Harvard University William James Hall 970 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02l38 Office: 617-495-0831 pinker at wjh period Harvard period edu Web site: http://www.stevenpinker.com Twitter: @sapinker ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-4085 Biographical Information Born September 18, 1954, Montreal, Canada U. S. Citizen Education Doctor of Philosophy (Experimental Psychology), Harvard University, 1979. Bachelor of Arts (First Class Honors in Psychology), McGill University, 1976. Diploma of College Studies, Dawson College, 1973. Academic Positions 2008-2013 Harvard College Professor, Harvard University 2003- Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology, Harvard University 2000-2003 Peter de Florez Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1994-99 Director, McDonnell-Pew Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at MIT 1989-2000 Professor, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1985-94 Co-Director, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1985-89 Associate Professor, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1982-85 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1981-82 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Stanford University 1980-81 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Harvard University 1979-80 Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 of 39 Honors and Awards General:
  • Dossier: Martin Gardner

    Dossier: Martin Gardner

    Dossier Adiós a Martin Gardner Ferrán Tarrasa Blanes l pasado 23 de mayo, la triste noticia de la muerte de sabe más sobre menos. Martin Gardner escribió con brillantez Martin Gardner me llegó a través de un correo electró- sobre matemáticas, lógica, filosofía, religión, literatura, relati- Enico en la lista de socios de ARP-SAPC, donde se vidad, mecánica cuántica, magia y, por supuesto, enlazaba un comentario que James Randi publicaba en su pseudociencia. blog. Martin Gardner había muerto el día anterior a la edad de A pesar de no recordar con claridad cuándo y cómo empecé 96 años. a leer a Martin Gardner, sí que recuerdo perfectamente cómo Para todos los miembros de la comunidad escéptica esa era devoraba con asombro sus artículos sobre temas tan vario- una noticia que nos llenaba de pesar. En mi caso, Martin pintos como códigos cifrados, las paradojas del infinito, ℵ0 y Gardner era el tercero de un grupo de autores, junto a los ya ℵ1, las curvas que llenan el espacio y los fractales, ð, e, desaparecidos Isaac Asimov y Carl Sagan, que, de muy joven, cicloides y braquistocronas, espirales, paseos aleatorios, me llevaron a admirar la ciencia y la razón y, al mismo números primos, topología, las coincidencias asombrosas que tiempo, me introdujeron en el escepticismo científico. no lo son tanto (lo asombroso sería que no hubiera coinciden- No recuerdo con claridad cuando compré (o más bien pedí cias asombrosas), los viajes a planilandia y a la cuarta que me compraran), mi primer libro de Martin Gardner, ni dimensión, magia e ilusionismo, o el arte de M.

  • ROBERT T. PENNOCK, PH.D. Michigan State University Curriculum Vitae (August 13, 2019)

    ROBERT T. PENNOCK, PH.D. Michigan State University Curriculum Vitae (August 13, 2019) OFFICE: HOME: 919 E. Shaw Lane, Rm. E35 227 Clarendon Rd. East Lansing, MI 48825-1107 East Lansing MI 48823 (517) 432-7701 (517) 324-9994 E-mail: [email protected] WEB: <www.msu.edu/~pennock5> CURRENT APPOINTMENTS: • Michigan State University. University Distinguished Professor. (2019 – present). - History, Philosophy & Sociology of Science. Lyman Briggs College. - Philosophy. Department of Philosophy. - Computer Science, Department of Computer Science & Engineering - Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (EEBB) Graduate Program. - Associate Faculty, Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences. PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS: • Michigan State University. Professor. (2005 – 2019) • University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. Visiting Scholar (2014 – 2018) • American Association for the Advancement of Science. Visiting Scholar (2015) • Duke University, National Evolutionary Synthesis Center. Sabbatical Fellow (2008) • Michigan State University. Associate Professor (2000 – 2005) • The College of New Jersey. Assistant Professor of Philosophy. (1999 – 2000) • The University of Texas at Austin, Assistant Professor of Philosophy. (1991 – 1999) • Pennsylvania Governor’s School for the Sciences (P.G.S.S.), Faculty member. Carnegie-Mellon University (Summers, 1987-1991) EDUCATION: • B.A. w/ Honors, Biology/Philosophy, Earlham College, 1980. • Ph.D., History & Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh, 1991. “Causally Licensed Inference and the Confirmation Relation.” Advisor: Wesley Salmon Committee: John Earman, Clark Glymour, Kenneth Schaffner, Herbert Simon Robert T. Pennock, Curriculum Vitae Page 2 ACADEMIC AWARDS / HONORS: • International Society for Artificial Life Education & Outreach Award as lead for Avida-ED. 2017. • MSU Phi Kappa Phi Excellence Award in Interdisciplinary Scholarship. For Avida-ED Project.