English Edition Notice N O Contents I Information 1990/91 Session 90/C 175/01 Minutes of the Sitting of Monday, 11 June 1990 1

Notice No Contents Page

I Information

1990/91 session

90/C 175/01 Minutes of the sitting of Monday, 11 June 1990

Proceedings of the sitting

1. Resumption of session 1 2. Approval of minutes 2 3. Membership of minutes 2 4. Membership of committees and of the delegation to the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly . . 2 5. Statement by the President on the adjustment and revision of the financial perspec tive 2 6. Petitions 2 7. Authorization to draw up reports 4 8. Referral to committee 4 9. Transfer of appropriations 4 10. Written declarations (Rule 65) 4 11. Documents received 4 12. Order of business 11 13. Deadline for tabling amendments and motions for resolutions 14 14. Speaking time 15 15. Topical and urgent debate (subjects prpposed) 15 16. Amendment of Rules 56, 58 and 64 (debate) 15 17. Driving licence * (debate) 16 18. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods * (debate) 16 19. Agenda for next sitting 16

(Continued overleaf)

Price: ECU 32,KM) Notice No Contents (continued) Page

90/C 175/02 Minutes of the sitting of Tuesday, 12 June 1990

Part I: Proceedings of the sitting

1. Approval of minutes 23

2. Documents received 23

3. Topical and urgent debate (announcement of motions for resolutions tabled) 23

4. Decision on urgent procedure 26

5. Official welcome 27

6. EEC-EFTA relations (debate) 27

7. Right of residence */** I (debate) 27

VOTING TIME

8. Driving licence * (vote) 28

9. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods * (vote) 28

10. EEC-EFTA relations (vote) 29

END OF VOTING TIME

11. Topical and urgent debate (list of subjects to be included) 29

12. Right of residence */** I (continuation of debate) 31

13. Direct life assurance ** I (debate) 31

14. Damage caused by waste ** I (debate) 31

15. Question Time (questions to the Commission) 31

Key to symbols used REGI: Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning * ordinary consultation (single reading) TRAN: Committee on Transport and Tourism ** I cooperation procedure (first reading) ENVI: Committee on the Environment, Public Health ** II : cooperation procedure (second reading) and Consumer Protection *** parliamentary assent CULT: Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, the Media and Sport (The type of procedure is determined by the legal basis DEVE: Committee on Development and Cooperation proposed by the Commission.) CONT: Committee on Budgetary Control INST: Committee on Institutional Affairs Information relating to voting time RULE: Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verifi — unless stated otherwise, the rapporteurs informed the cation of Credentials and Immunities Chair beforehand in writing of their position on WOME: Committee on Women's Rights amendments; PETI: Committee on Petitions — the results of roll-call votes are given in Annex I. Abbreviations used for political groups Abbreviations used for Parliamentary Committees SOC Socialist Group POLI: Political Affairs Committee EPP Group of the European People's Party (Chris AGRI: Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural tian-Democratic Group) Development LDR Liberal, Democratic and Reformist Group BUDG: Committee on Budgets ED European Democratic Group ECON: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Greens Green Group in the European Parliament and Industrial Policy EUL Group for the European Unitarian Left ENER: Committee on Energy, Research and Technology EDA Group of the European Democratic Alliance RELA: Committee on External Economic Relations ER Technical Group of the European Right LEG A: Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights LU Left Unity Group SOCI: Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and RB Rainbow Group in the European Parliament the Working Environment NA Non-attached members Notice No Contents (continued) page

16. Action taken by the Commission on the opinions of Parliament 32

17. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs ** II (debate) 33

18. Appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II (debate) 33

19. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sec tors ** II (debate) 33

20. Machinery ** I (debate) 33

21. EURET and EUROTRA programmes ** I (debate) 33

22. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990 and preliminary draft budget for 1991 (debate) .- 34

23. UK beef exports (Commission statement followed by a debate) 34

24. Financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing coun tries * (debate) 34

25. Agenda for next sitting 35

Part II: Texts adopted by Parliament

,1. Driving licence: * proposal for a directive COM(88) 705 final 36

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a directive on the driving licence (Doc. A 3-80/90) 40

2. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods: *

proposal for a directive COM(89) 7 final 41

parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a directive con cerning minimum requirements for vessels entering or leaving Community ports car rying packages of dangerous or polluting goods (Doc. A 3-108/90) 48

3. EEC-EFTA relations:

(a) resolution on the Community's future political relations with the EFTA countries (Doc. A 3-116/90) 49 (b) resolution on economic and trade relations between the European Community and the EFTA countries (Doc. A 3-146/90) 51 (c) resolution on the opening of negotiations between the European Economic Community and the EFTA countries concerning scheduled air passenger services (Doc. A 3-131/90) 54

90/C 175/03 Minutes of the sitting of Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Part I: Proceedings of the sitting

1. Approval of minutes 59

2. Documents received - 59 3. Agenda 60

4. Calendar of part-sessions for 1991 60 5. Topical and urgent debate (objections) 60

6. Statement on the term in office of the Irish Presidency and on institutional orienta tions with a view to the second Dublin Summit (followed by debate) 60 7. Official welcome _ 61 8. Cooperation on security (debate) ' 61 9. Question Time (questions to the Council and EPC) 62

(Continued overleaf) Notice No Contents (continued) Page

10. Cooperation on security (continuation of debate) 63

11. Membership of Parliament 64

12. Communication of common positions of the Council 64

VOTING TIME 13. Amendment of Rules 56, 58 and 64 (vote) 64

14. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (vote) 64

15. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs ** II (vote) 65

16. Appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II (vote) . 65

17. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sec tors ** II (vote) 65

18. Statistical classification of economic .activities ** I (vote) 65

19. Right of residence */** I (vote) 66

20. Direct life assurance ** I (vote) . .' 68

21. Damage caused by waste ** I (vote) 68

22. Machinery ** I (vote) 69

23. EURET and EUROTRA programmes ** I (vote) 69

END OF VOTING TIME 24. Statements by the Council and the Commission on racism and xenophobia (debate) . 69

25. Immigrant workers from third countries — visas (debate) 70

26. EEC-China relations (debate) 71

27. Agenda for next sitting 71

Part II: Texts adopted by Parliament

1. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990:

resolution on draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for the 1990 financial year (Doc. A 3-157/90) 75

2. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs: ** II

decision on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adop tion of a directive on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs (Doc. A 3-118/90) 76

3. Appliances burning gaseous fuels: ** II decision on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adop tion of a directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (Doc. A 3-128/90) 77

4. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sec tors: ** II decision on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adop tion of a directive on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (Doc. A 3-129/90) 78

5. Statistical classification of economic activities: ** I

proposal for a regulation COM(90) 1 final — SYN 241 83

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation on statistical classification of economic activities in the European Communities (Doc. A 3-123/90) 84

6. Right of residence: */** I

(a) Council orientation Doc. C 3-12/90 84

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Council orientation for a directive on the right of residence (Doc. A 3-124/90) . . 89 Notice No Contents (continued) page

(b) Council orientation Doc. C 3-13/90 — SYN 200 90

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the orientation of the Council for a directive on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity (Doc. A 3-133/90) 95

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Council orientation concerning a directive on the right of residence for students (Doc. A 3-141/90) 100

7. Direct life assurance: ** I

proposal for a directive COM(90) 46 final — SYN 177 101

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the amended proposal from the Commission to the Council for a second directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance, laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 79/267/EEC (Doc. A 3-130/90) 107

8. Damage caused by waste: ** I

proposal for a directive COM(89) 282 final — SYN 217 108

9. Machinery: ** I

proposal for a directive COM(89) 624 final — SYN 233 Ill

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a directive amending Directive 89/ 392/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machi nery (Doc. A 3-125/90) 120

10. EURET and EUROTRA programmes: ** I

(a) proposal for a decision COM(89) 557 final — SYN 226 121

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of transport (EURET) 1990-1993 (Doc. A 3-148/90) 128

(b) proposal for a decision COM(89) 603 final — SYN 228 129

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific programme concerning the preparation of the development of an operational EUROTRA system (Doc. A 3-136/90) 131

90/C 175/04 Minutes of the sitting of Thursday, 14 June 1990

Part I: Proceedings of the sitting

1. Approval of minutes 150

2. Official welcome 150

TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE

3. South Africa (debate and vote) 150

4. Israel (debate and vote) 151

5. Situation in certain African countries (debate and vote) 151

6. Human rights (debate and vote) 152

7. Schengen (debate and vote) 153

END OF TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE

8. Agenda 154

(Continued overleaf) Notice No Contents (continued) Page

9. Atypical employment (debate) 155

10. EEC-China relations (continuation of debate) 155

11. Competition in the air transport sector * (debate) 155

12. Efficiency of agricultural structures * (debate) 155

13. Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions (debate) 156

14. Maximum levels for pesticide residues * (debate) 156

15. EEC-accepted plant protection products * (debate) 156

16. Commission statement on Romania 156

17. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGIS programmes (debate) 156

VOTING TIME

18. Calendar of part-sessions for 1991 (vote) 157

19. UK beef exports (vote) 157

20. Financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing coun tries * (vote) 157

21. Institutional orientations with a view to the second Dublin summit (vote) 157

22. Cooperation on security (vote) 158

23. Measures to combat racism and xenophobia (vote) 158

24. Immigrant workers from third countries (vote) 159

25. Atypical employment (vote) 159

END OF VOTING TIME

26. Agenda for next sitting 159

Part II: Texts adopted by Parliament

1. South Africa:

resolution on South Africa (replacing Docs B 3-1205, 1226, 1233, 1244 and 1260/90) . 161

2. Israel:

resolution on Israel and the situation in the occupied territories (replacing Docs B 3- 1194, 1199, 1207, 1223, 1245 and 1261/90) 163

3. Situation in certain African countries:

(a) resolution on the consequences of the grave violation of human rights in Sudan (Doc. B 3-1183/90) 164

(b) resolution on the bloody conflicts in various countries in central Africa (replac ing Docs B 3-1201, 1202, 1218, 1225, 1229, 1231, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1246, 1247 and 1262/90) 165

4. Human rights:

(a) resolution on the disturbances in Kashmir and Pakistan (replacing Docs B 3- 1189, 1195, 1254 and 1267/90) 167

, (b) resolution on human rights and support for democracy in Haiti (Doc. B 3-1224/ • 90) 167

(d) resolution on the assassination of Ignacio Ellacuria and five other Jesuits in El Salvador and the assassination of Hector Oqueli and Gilda Flores (Doc. B 3- 1264/90) 169 Notice No Contents (continued) Page

5. Schengen:

resolution on the Schengen Agreement, the Convention on the right of asylum and the status of refugees as defined by the ad hoc Group on Immigration (replacing Docs B 3-1208, 1209, 1227, 1232 and 1248/90) 170

6. UK beef exports:

resolution on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) (replacing Docs B 3-1274, 1285, 1287 and 1288/90) 173

7. Financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing coun tries: *

proposal for a decision SEC(89) 1456 final 174

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a decision setting general guidelines for 1990 for financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian develop ing countries (Doc. A 3-151/90) 175

8. Institutional orientations with a view to the second Dublin Summit:

resolution on the institutional guidelines for the second Dublin Summit (replacing Docs B 3-1271, 1279, 1284 and 1290/90) 175

9. Cooperation on security:

resolution on EPC's role in security policy cooperation in Europe (Doc. B 3-1167/90) 177

10. Measures to combat racism and xenophobia:

resolution on measures to combat racism and xenophobia (replacing Docs B 3-1270, 1273, 1275 and 1291/90) 178

11. Immigrant workers from third countries:

resolution on migrant workers from third countries (replacing Docs B 3-1169, 1173, 1174, 1180, 1181 and 1182/90) 180

90/C 175/05 Minutes of the sitting of Friday, 15 June 1990

Part I: Proceedings of the sitting

1. Approval of minutes 192

2. Agenda 192

3. Documents received 192

4.. Texts of treaties forwarded by the Council 194

5. Procedure without report * 195

6. Indirect taxes on the raising of capital * (vote) 195

7. EEC-China relations (vote) v • • 195

8. Competition in the air transport sector *(vote) 195

9." Efficiency of agricultural structures * (vote) 196

10. Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions (vote) 196

11. Maximum levels for pesticide residues * (vote) 196

12. Commission statement on the situation in Romania (continuation) 197

13. Integrated transport market * (debate and vote) 197

14. Food-aid policy and food-aid management * (debate and vote) 197

15. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGIS programmes (continuation of debate and vote) . . 198

16. Membership of committees 199

17. Seat of the European Environment Agnecy (debate and vote) 199

(Continued overleaf) Notice No Contents (continued) Page

18. Fisheries agreement between the EEC, Denmark and Greenland * — Allocation of catch quotas 199

19. Written declarations (Rule 65) 200

20. Forwarding of resolutions adopted during the sitting 200

21. Dates for next part-session 200

22. Adjournment of session 200

Part II: Texts adopted by Parliament

1. Procedure without report: *

(a) proposal for a directive CC)M(90) 134 final 201

(b) proposal for a regulation COM(90) 140 final 201

(d) proposal for a decision COM(90) 172 final 201

2. Indirect taxes on the raising of capital: *

proposal for a directive COM(90) 94 final 201

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a directive amending Directive 69/ 335/EEC concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (Doc. A 3-144/90) 201

3. EEC-China relations:

resolution on relations between the EEC and China (replacing Docs B 3-1272, 1276 and 1289/90) 202

4. Competition in the air transport sector: *

proposal for a regulation I COM(89) 417 final 203

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation amending Regu lation (EEC) No 3975/87 laying down the procedure for the application of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector (Doc. A 3-106/90) 204

proposal for a regulation II 205

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation amending Regu lation (EEC) No 3976/87 on the application of Article 85 (3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector (Doc. A 3-106/90) 205

proposal for a regulation III 206

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation (EEC) on the application of Article 85 (3) to certain categories of agreements and concerted prac tices in the air transport sector (Doc. A 3-106/90) 208

5. Efficiency of agricultural structures: *

proposal for a regulation COM(89) 597 final 208

legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures (Doc. A 3- 122/90) 213

6. Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions:

resolution on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the parliamen tary year 1989-1990, with indications as regards future procedure for handling peti tions (Doc. A 3-107/90) 214

(Continued on inside back cover) 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/1

(Information)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

1990/91 SESSION

Sittings from 11 to 15 June 1990 Palais de l'Europe — Strasbourg

\ MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF MONDAY, 11 JUNE 1990 (90/C 175/01)

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MR BARON CRESPO

President

(The sitting was opened at 5p.m.)

1. Resumption of session decided by a number of Community countries (the President pointed out that this subject was on the The President declared resumed the session of the agenda of the part-session); European Parliament which had been adjourned on 18 May 1990. — Mr Stewart, who djew attention to an error in the verbatim report of proceedings of the sitting of 17 May The following spoke: 1990; — Mr Pannella, on a statement allegedly made by the — Mr Fitzgerald, who also condemned the recent ter President of Parliament to the Italian press to the effect rorist attacks, and then deplored the risks run by fisher that the vote on the resolution on 'Expo 2000 in Ven men from his constituency following incidents with ice' was of little importance (the President denied that other Community fishing vessels; he had said this); — Mr Lane, who likewise condemned terrorism, and — Mr Nicholson, who referred to the recent terrorist then also spoke on the ban on exports of beef from the attacks in the Community, and expressed his sympathy United Kingdom (the President cut him off as the sub for the families of the victims; he asked that Com ject was due to be debated the following day); munity action be undertaken to combat terrorism; — Mr Suarez Gonzalez, who insisted that statements — Mr Paisley, on the same subject, and then on the made outside debates should be restricted to proce ban of exports of beef from the United Kingdom dural matters; NoC 175/2 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990

— Mr Dillen, who asked, on behalf of the ER Group, 3. Membership of Parliament that the formal sitting to be held for Mr Mandela be cancelled (the President cut him off); The President announced that Mrs Flesch had informed him in writing of her resignation as Member — Mr L. Smith, who asked that the Commission of Parliament with effect from 5 June 1990. make a statement under Rule 56 on plans to discharge into the sea several hundred containers of nuclear In accordance with Article 12 (2), second subparagraph waste coming from the Federal Republic of Germany of the Act concerning the election of representatives to (the President cut him off); the European Parliament, Parliament established that there was a vacancy; the Member State concerned — Mr McCartin, who deplored, on behalf of the EPP would be informed accordingly. Group, that the subject of terrorism first raised by Mr Nicholson had not been retained among the subjects proposed for topical and urgent debate; 4. Membership of committees and of the delegation to the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly — Mr Gollnisch, on the order of business. At the request of the EPP Group, Parliament ratified the appointment of:

— Mr Pierros, as member of the Committee on the 2. Approval of minutes Rules of Procedure, — Mr Zavvos, as member of Parliament's delegation to the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly, to replace Mr Stav- The President announced that Mr Laroni had informed rou. him in writing that he had wanted to vote against the motion for a resolution on 'Expo 2000 in Venice' (part /, item 6 of the minutes). 5. Statement by the President on the adjustment and revision of the financial perspective

The following spoke: The President announced that, during the past week, he and the President-in-Office of the Council had signed — Mr McGowan, who referred back to the statement two decisions concerning the Interinstitutional Agree he had made denouncing alleged irregularities during ment of 29 June 1988 on budgetary discipline and voting, and more specifically an instance where a improvement of the budgetary procedure. The first Member had, according to him, voted on more than decision concerned the adjustment of the financial per one machine during the vote on the Theato report (part spective in accordance with paragraphs 10 and 11 of I, item 1 of the minutes); he asked for details of the the Agreement, and the second the revision of the results of the inquiry into the application of Rule 93, financial perspective in accordance with paragraph 12 and named Mr KJepsch (the President replied that it of the Agreement ('). was not strictly speaking a question of interpreting the Rules since Rule 93 was perfectly clear, and that a for mal accusation would have to be made for any action 6. Petitions to be taken); The President announced that he had received the fol — Mr Klepsch, who, speaking in reply, stated that lowing petitions: during a roll-call vote he had asked another member to by Mr Antolino (No 296/90) press his voting button as he himself was too far away from his seat at the time; by Mr Theonas (No 297/90) by Mr Stratogiannis (No 298/90) — Mr Cot, who stated that he had seen no irregulari ties and expressed the view, on behalf of the SOC by Syllogos Prostasias Kampou (Association for the Group, that the incident was closed; Protection of Kampos (No 299/90) by Mr Macedonio (No 300/90) — Mr McGowan, who disagreed with this; by Mr Moutzouridis (No 301/90) — Mr Stevenson, Mr Falconer and Mr Bandres by Nodaf (No 302/90) Molet, who were each cut off by the President. by Mrs Alfano (No 303/90)

The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. (') These decisions are annexed to the minutes. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/3

Monday, 11 June 1990

by Mr Blinde (No 304/90) by Mrs Kostarelos (No 344/90)

by Miss Perez Perez (No 305/90) by Studenti Accademia di Belle Arti (No 345/90) by Mrs Braddell (No 306/90) by Mr Totino (No 346/90) by Mr Da Silva Oliveira (No 307/90) by Mr Rivera Avendano (No 308/90) These petitions had been entered in the register pur suant to . Rule 128(3) and had been referred to the by Verbond der Christelijke Mutualiteiten (No 309/90) Committee on Petitions pursuant to paragraph 4 of that by Mr Munier (No 310/90) rule. by Mr Munier (No 311/90) by Section locale C.G.T. (No 312/90) Decisions on various petitions by Mrs Duliere-Derniest (No 313/90) (a) petitions declared admissible pursuant to Rule by Mrs Delia Mura (No 314/90) 128 (4) (consideration closed): by CERGA (Centre d'Economie Rurale et de Gestion des Ardennes) (No 315/90) — Nos 10, 12, 27, 37, 42, 45, 46, 64, 77 and 97/90: information would be sent to the petitioners; by Mr Berteaux (No 316/90) — Nos 6, 36, 39, 41, 51, 61, 74 and 76/90: forwarded by Mrs Herz (No 317/90) to the relevant committee for information and for any by Mr Reffel (No 318/90) action to be taken; by Dr. Benedikter (No 319/90) — Nos 8, 11, 50, 67 and 83/90: the petitioners would receive the committee's report on transfrontier property by Mrs Leuffen (No 320/90) transactions and would be advised to contact the Span by Mr Marten (No 321/90) ish office for consumer protection;

by Comunidad de Propietarios (No 322/90) — No 55/90: forwarded to the Commission for addi tional information; by Mr Procter (No 323/90) by Mr Govaert (No 324/90) by Pena Taurina 'El Tentadero' (No 325/90) (b) petitions declared admissible pursuant to Rule 128 (4) (action to be taken): by Mr Anton del Amo (No 326/90) — Nos 1, 2, 4, 13, 1*7, 19, 21, 23, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 34, by Mr Mlodzick (No 327/90) 43, 44, 49, 53, 56, 57, 59, 60, 63, 65, 68, 72, 75, 81, 82, 85, by Mr Garcia Rodriguez (No 328/90) 87, 90, 93, 94, 96 and 98/90: forwarded to the Commis sion for additional information; by Pro Natura Riviera dei Fiori (No 329/90) — Nos 29 and 89/90: would be considered with other by Mr Ibanez Garcia (No 330/90) petitions on pensions; by Mr Gonzalez Perez (No 331/90) — No 92/90: declared inadmissible; however, the by Mr Kuypers (No 332/90) decision on any action to be taken would be postponed until more information had been received from the by Mr Durrand (No 333/90) petitioner; by Mrs Capricoglio-Sinturel (No 334/90) by Mrs Bystrek (No 335/90) (c) petitions declared inadmissible and filed without by Mr Reffel (No 336/90) further action, pursuant to Rule 128 (5):

by Mr Schibbe (No 337/90) — Nos 566/88 ('), 69/89 ('), 156/89 (2), 191/89 (3), 4 4 2 2 by Mr Sanchez Rodriguez (No 338/90) 283/89 ( ), 294/89 ( ), 3, 5, 7, 9, 14 ( ), 15 ( ), 16 (5), 18, by Mr Foutry (No 339/90) (') On the basis of the opinion of Parliament's Legal Service. by Mr Koletas (No 340/90) (2) The petitioners had been advised to contact their national ombudsman. by Mr Darlas (No 341/90) (3) The petitioners had been advised to contact the European Commission of Human Rights. by Mrs Simon (No 342/90) (4) On the basis of the Commission's opinion. (5) The petitioner was advised to submit his case to the Ital by Mr Cunningham (No 343/90) ian legal authorities. NoC 175/4 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Monday, 11 June 1990

20, 22 ('), 24, 26 (2), 33, 35 (2), 38, 40 (2), 520, 58, 62Q, 11. Documents received 66, 69 (2), 70, 71, 73 (2), 78, 79, 80, 84 ('), 86, 88, 91/ 90(2); The President announced that he had received:

(d) other decisions: (a) from the Council, requests for opinions on the fol lowing proposals from the Commission of the Euro — petition No 221/89: Parliament's Legal Service pean Communities to the Council: has been asked for its opinion;

— petitions Nos 26/88 and 313/89: forwarded to the — proposal from the Commission to the Council for Committee on Social Affairs which has been asked to a regulation (EEC) concerning the creation of a supple give special attention to this matter. mentary protection certificate for medicinal products (Doc. C 3-121 /90 — COM(90) 101 final — SYN 255) 7. Authorization to draw up reports referred to: LEGA (responsible) The enlarged Bureau had authorized: ENVl, ECON, ENER (opinion)

(a) on the basis of Rule 34 (1): — proposal from the Commission to the Council for — the Committee on Transport to draw up a report a directive amending Directive 66/403/EEC on the on the negotiations between the European Economic marketing of seed potatoes (Doc. C 3-122/90 — Community and the EFTA countries concerning sched COM(90) 134 final) uled air passenger services (rapporteur: Mr Liittge); referred to: LEGA (responsible) (b) on the basis of Rule 121: — the Committee on Social Affairs to draw up a — proposal from the Commission to the Council for report on atypical employment (rapporteur: Mrs Sal- a decision on Community actions for the elderly (Doc. isch); C 3-126/90 — CC)M(90) 80 final)

— the Committee on Development to draw up a referred to: report on the work of the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly. SOCI (responsible) BUDG (opinion) 8. Referral to committee — proposal from the Commission to the Council for The Committee on Budgets and the Committee on a regulation (EEC) laying down, in respect of hops, the Regional Policy had been asked for an opinion on amount of aid to producers for the 1989 harvest (Doc. Economic and Monetary Union (authorized to draw up C 3-127/90 — CC)M(90) 140 final) a report: Committee on Economic Affairs — rappor referred to: teur: Mr Herman). AGRI (responsible) BUDG (opinion) 9. Transfer of appropriations — proposal from the Commission to the Council for The Committee on Budgets had approved the proposal a regulation (EEC) oh reinforcing the monitoring of for transfer of appropriations No 5/90 (SEC(90) 615 certain expenditure chargeable to the Guarantee Sec final —C 3-108/90). tion of the European Agriculture Guidance and Guar antee Fund (Doc. C 3-128/90 — CC)M(90) 151 final) The Committee on Budgets had given favourable opi nions and the requests for carry-overs of appropriations referred to: from the financial year 1989 to the financial year 1990 CONT (responsible) — Section III — Commission (SEC(90) 636 final — AGRI, BUDG (opinion) Doc. C 3-123/90). — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision on the conclusion by the European Econo 10. Written declarations (Rule 65) mic Community of an Agreement on trade and com mercial and economic cooperation between the Euro Written declaration No 4/90 had not received the pean Economic Community and the European Atomic required number of signatures and had therefore lapsed Energy Community and the Czechoslovak Socialist pursuant to the provisions of Rule 65 (5). Republic (Doc. C 3-130/90 — SEC(90) 734 final)'

referred to: (') The petitioners had been advised to contact the European RELA (responsible) Commission of Human Rights. (2) The petitioners had been advised to contact their national POLI, BUDG, ECON, AGRI, ENER, TRAN, ENVI, ombudsman. CULT (opinion) 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/5

Monday, 11 June 1990

— proposal from the Commission to the Council for — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision on the conclusion by the European Econo a decision on the conclusion of the Articles of Agree mic Community of an Agreement on trade and com- ment establishing a European Bank for Reconstruction merial and economic cooperation between the Euro and Development (Doc. C 3-143/90 — COM(90) 190 pean Economic Community and the European Atomic final) Energy Community and the People's Republic of Bul referred to: garia (Doc. C 3-131/90 — SEC(90) 733 final) RELA (responsible) referred to: POLI, BUDG, ECON (opinion) RELA (responsible) POLI, BUDG, ECON, AGRI, ENER, TRAN, ENVI, — proposal from the Commission to the Council for CULT (opinion) a Regulation (EEC) No 283/72 concerning irregulari — proposal from the Commission to the Council for ties and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connec a regulation (EEC) on common rules for a denied tion with the financing of the common agricultural boarding compensation system in scheduled air trans policy and the organization of an information system port (Doc. C 3-132/90 — CC)M(90) 99 final) in this field (Doc. C 3-144/90 — COM(90) 122 final) referred to: referred to: TRAN (responsible) , CONT (responsible) ENVI, LEGA (opinion) AGRI, BUDG (opinion)

— proposal from the Commission to the Council for — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation (EEC) amending Regulations (EEC) No a regulation (EEC) on action by the Community relat 3972/86 on food-aid policy and food-aid management, ing to nature conservation (ACNAT) (Doc. C 3-145/90 No 2507/88 on the implementation of storage pro — COM(90) 125 final) grammes and early warning systems and No 2508/88 on the implementation of co-financing operations for referred to: the purchase of food products or seeds by international ENVI (responsible) bodies or non-governmental organizations (Doc. C 3- BUDG (opinion) 134/90 — COM(89) 193 final) referred to: (b) from the parliamentary committees, the following DEVE (responsible) reports: BUDG, CONT (opinion) — interim report drawn up on behalf of the Political — proposal from the Commission to the Council for Affairs Committee, on the Community's future politi a directive on the approximation of the laws of the cal relations with the EFTA countries; rapporteur: Mrs Member States relating to the labelling, presentation Jepsen (Doc. A-116/90) and advertising of foodstuffs (Doc. C 3-136/90 — SEC(89) 2151 final — SYN 235) — drawn up on behalf of the Political Affairs Com mittee, on the seat of the European Environment referred to: Agency; rapporteur: Mrs Reding (Doc. A 3-117/90) ENVI (responsible) LEGA (opinion) — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, — proposal from the Commission to the Council for on the proposal from the Commission to the Council a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 1307/85 for a decision on the introduction of a standard authorizing the Member States to grant consumption Europe-wide emergency call number (COM(89) 452 aid for butter (Doc. C 3-137/90 — COM(90) 187 final) final — Doc. C 3-177/89); rapporteur: Sir James referred to: Scott-Hopkins (Doc. A 3-119/90 — SYN 223) AGRI (responsible) — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Envi BUDG (opinion) ronment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on — proposal from the Commission to the Council for the measures to be taken in the context of the Euro a decision amending Decision 85/360/EEC on the re pean Year of Tourism to protect the environment structuring of the system of agricultural surveys in against possible damage resulting from mass tourism;, Greece (Doc. C 3-138/90 — CC)M(90) 192 final) rapporteur: Mrs Diez de Rivera Icaza (Doc. A 3-120/ referred to: 90) AGRI (responsible) — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the BUDG (opinion) Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, — proposal from the Commission to the Council for on improving the prevention and treatment of acute a decision amending Decision 89/45/EEC on a Com human poisoning (COM(89) 505 final — Doc. C 3- munity system for the rapid exchange of information 199/89); rapporteur: Mr Bombard (Doc. A 3-121/90) on dangers arising from the use of consumer products — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Agri (Doc. C 3-139/90 — CC)M(90) 172 final) culture, Fisheries and Rural Development, on the pro referred to: posal from the Commission to the Council for a regula ENVI (responsible) tion amending Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 on NoC 175/6 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990 improving the efficiency of agricultural structures Doc. C 3-4/90); rapporteur: Mr Miranda da Silva (COM(89) 597 final — Doc. C 3-45/90); rapporteur: (Doc. A 3-132/90) Mr Kofoed (Doc. A 3-122/90) — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environ Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, ment, on the orientation of the Council for a directive on the proposal from the Commission to the Council on the right of residence for employees and self- for a regulation on the statistical classification of employed persons who have ceased their occupational economic activities in the European Communities activity (Doc. C 3-13/90); rapporteur: Mr Megahy (COM(90) 1 final — Doc. C 3-51/90); rapporteur: Mr (Doc. A 3-133/90 — SYN 200) von Wogau (Doc. A 3-123/90 — SYN 241) — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Social — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment, Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the Council's orienta on an initiative aimed at a proposal for a directive on tion for a directive on the right of residence (Doc. C 3- atypical employment contracts and terms of employ 12/90); rapporteur : Mr van Outrive (Doc. A 3-124/90) ment; rapporteur: Mrs Salisch (Doc. A 3-134/90) — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Envi — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on ronment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a on the proposal from the Commission to the Council decision amending Decision 86/138/EEC concerning for a directive amending Directive 89/392/EEC on the a demonstration project with a view to introducing a approximation of the laws of the Member States relat Community system of information on accidents involv ing to machinery (COM(89) 624 final — Doc. C 3-21/ ing consumer products and fixing the financial alloca 90); rapporteur: Mr Christiansen (Doc. A 3-125/90 — tion for the last two years of its operation (COM(89) SYN 233) 550 final — Doc. C 3-216/89); rapporteur: Mr Vernier — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on (Doc. A 3-135/90) Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the proposal — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on from the Commission to the Council for a directive on Energy, Research and Technology, on the proposal civil liability for damage caused by waste (COM(89) from the Commission to the Council for a decision 282 final — Doc. C 3-154/89); rapporteur: Mr Ferri adopting a specific programme concerning the prepara (Doc. A 3-126/90 — SYN 217) tion of the development of an operational EUROTRA — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Rules system (COM(89) 603 final — Doc. C 3-15/90); rap of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and porteur: Mr Desama (Doc. A 3-136/90 — SYN 228) Immunities, on the election of the vice-chairmen of — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Envi committees; rapporteur: Mr Vecchi (Doc. A 3-127/90) ronment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the amended proposal from the Commission of the — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on European Communities to the Council for a directive Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the amended proposal from the Commission to the Council, submit concerning the placing of EEC-accepted plant protec ted pursuant to Article 149 (3) of the EEC Treaty, for a tion products on the market (COM(89) 34 final — Doc. second Council directive on the coordination of laws, C 3-64/89); rapporteur: Mr Velverde Lopez (Doc. A 3- regulations and administrative provisions relating to 137/90) direct life asurance, laying down provisions to facilitate — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Envi the effective exercise of freedom to provide services ronment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on and amending Directive 79/267/EEC (COM(90) 46 the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a final — Doc. C 3-90/90); rapporteur: Mr Saridakis regulation on thfe importation of certain furs (COM(89) (Doc. A 3-130/90 - SYN 177) 198 final — Doc. C 3-82/89); rapporteur: Mrs Banotti (Doc. A 3-138/90) — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Trans port and Tourism, on the negotiations between the — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on European Economic Community and the EFTA coun Regional Policy and Regional Planning, on a Com tries concerning scheduled air passenger services; rap munity initiative in favour of border areas (INTER- porteur: Mr Liittge (Doc. A 3-131/90) REG programme); rapporteur: Mr Cushnahan (Doc. A 3-139/90) — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Agri culture, Fisheries and Rural Development, on the pro — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Trans posal from the Commission to the Council for a regula port and Tourism, on the modified proposal from the tion relating to the conclusion of the Protocol laying Commission to the Council for a regulation for an down the conditions relating to fishing provided for in action programme in the field of transport infrastruc the Agreement on fisheries between the European ture with a view to the completion of an integrated Economic Community, on the one hand, and the transport market in 1992 (COM(89) 238 final — Doc. Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Govern C 3-117/90); rapporteur: Mr Romera i Alcazar (Doc. ment of Greenland on the other (COM(89) 617 final — A 3-140/90) 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/7

Monday, 11 June 1990

— ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on co-financing operations for the purchase of food prod Youth, Culture, Education, the Media and Sport, on ucts or seeds by international bodies or non-govern- the Council orientation concerning a directive on the mental organizations (COM(90) 193 final — Doc. C 3- right of residence for students (Doc. C 3-14/90); rap 134/90); rapporteur: Mr Wynn (Doc. A 3-149/90) porteur: Mr Estgen (Doc. A 3-141/90 — SYN 199) — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Agri — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Regional culture, Fisheries and Rural Development, on the pro Policy and Regional Planning, on a Community initia posal from the Commission to the Council for a regula tive to assist the most remote regions of the Com tion (EEC) on the conclusion of the Protocol establish munity (REGIS); rapporteur: Mr Welsh (Doc. A 3- ing for the period from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 142/90) 1991 the fishing rights and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Regional Republic of Guinea on fishing off the coast of Guinea Policy and Regional Planning, on a Community initia (COM(90) 92 final — Doc. C 3-114/90); rapporteur: tive concerning regional capacities for research, tech Mrs Domingo Segarra (Doc. A 3-150/90) nology and innovation (STRIDE); rapporteur: Mr Raf- farin (Doc. A 3-143/90) — * third report drawn up on behalf of the Com mittee on Development and Cooperation, on the pro — * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on posal from the Commission to the Council for a deci Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, sion setting general guidelines for 1990 for financial on the proposal from the Commission to the Council and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian for a directive amending Directive 69/335/EEC con developing countries (SEC(89) 1456 final — Doc. C 3- cerning indirect taxes on the raising of captial 169/89); rapporteur: Mrs van Putten (Doc. A 3-151/90) (CC)M(90) 94 final — Doc. C 3-116/90); rapporteur: Mr Merz (Doc. A 3-144/90) — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on External Economic Relations, on the scope of the free trade — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Budgets, agreement to be concluded between the EEC and the on the classification of expenditure in the 1991 budget; Cooperation Council of the Gulf States; rapporteur: rapporteur: Mr von der Vring (Doc. A 3-145/90) Mr Moorhouse (Doc. A 3-152/90)

— interim report, drawn up on behalf of the Com — drawn up on behalf of the Committee on External mittee on External Economic Relations, on economic Economic Relations, on the draft trade and economic and trade relations between the European Community cooperation agreement between the European Com and the EFTA countries; rapporteur: Mr Rossetti (Doc. munity and the GDR; rapporteur: Mr Chabert (Doc. A 3-146/90) A 3-153/90)

— * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Exter nal Economic Relations, on the proposal from the (c) from the parliamentary committees, the following Commission of the European Communities to the recommendations for the second reading: Council for a regulation (EEC) opening a special autonomous import quota for 1990 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef covered by CN codes 0201 — ** II by the Committee on Economic and Mone and 0202 and for products covered by CN codes tary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the common posi 0206 10 95 and 0206 29 91 (COM(90) 6 final — Doc. tion of the Council with a view to the adoption of a C 3-88/90); rapporteur: Mr De Clercq (Doc. A 3-147/ directive on the frequency bands designated for the 90) coordinated introduction of pan-European land-based radio paging in the Community (Doc. C 3-120/90); — ** I drawn up on behalf of the Committee on rapporteur: Mr Seal (Doc. A 3-115/90 — SYN 193) Energy, Research and Technology, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision — ** II by the Committee on Environment, Public adopting a specific research and technological develop Health and Consumer Protection, on the common posi ment programme in the field of transport (EURET) tion of the Council on a directive on the nutrition 1990-1993 (COM(89) 557 final — Doc. C 3-244/89); labelling for foodstuffs (Doc. C 3-74/90); rapporteur: rapporteur: Mr Pierros (Doc. A 3-148/90 — SYN 226) Mr Pimenta (Doc. A 3-118/90 — SYN 155)

— * drawn up on behalf of the Committee on — ** II by the Committee on Economic and Mone Development and Cooperation, on the proposal from tary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the common posi the Commission to the Council, for a regulation tion of the Council with a view to the adoption of a amending Regulations (EEC) Nos 3972/86 on food-aid directive on the approximation of the laws df the Mem policy and food-aid management, No 2507/88 on the ber States relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels implementation of storage programmes and early warn (Doc. C 3-38/90); rapporteur: Mr Lataillade, (Doc. ing systems and No 2508/88 on the implementation of A 3-128/90 — SYN 178) NoC 175/8 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990

— ** II by the Committee on Economic and Mone policy cooperation in the context of EPC and the tary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the common posi realignment of relations between states in Europe tion of the Council with a view to the adoption of a (Doc. B 3-1049/90); directive on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecom — Oral question (O-l 17/90) by Mr Telkamper, on behalf of the Green Group, to the Commission, on munications sectors (Doc. C 3-99/90); rapporteur: Mr arms trade: duty and tax exemptions (Doc. B 3-1050/ Herman (Doc. A 3-129/90 —SYN 153 + 154) 90); (d) the following oral questions with debate: — Oral question (O-l 18/90) by Mr Telkamper, on behalf of the Green Group, to the Council, on arms — Oral question (0-59/90). by Mr Vandemeule- trade: duty and tax exemptions (Doc. B 3-1051/90); broucke, on behalf of the RB Group, to EPC, on Euro pean arms exports (Doc. B 3-819/90); — Oral question (O-148/90) by Mrs Catasta, Mr Rag- gio, Mr van Velzen, Mrs Salisch, Mr Bontempi, Mr van — Oral question (0-60/90) by Mr Vanderheule- Outrive, Mr Cabezon Alonso, Mr Barros Moura, Mrs brOucke, on behalf of the RB Group, to the Council, on van Dijk, Mr Suarez Gonzalez, Mrs Buron, Mr Papay- European arms exports (Doc. B 3-820/90); annakis, Mr Speciale, Mr Alvarez de Paz, Mrs — Oral question (0-61/90) by Mr Vandemeule- Sandbaek, Mrs Cramon Daiber, Ms Tongue, Mr Pisoni, broucke, on behalf of the RB Group, to the Commis Mr Langer, Mr Hughes, Mrs Van Hemeldonck and Mrs sion, on European arms exports (Doc. B 3-1044/90); Ernst de la Graete, to the Commission, on immigrant workers from third countries (Doc. B 3-1052/90); — Oral question (0-63/90) by Mr Poettering, Chair man of the Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament, — Oral question (O-l49/90) by Mrs Catasta, Mr Rag- Mr Briant, Mr Baget Bozzo, Mr Bertens, Mrs van den gio, Mr van Velzen, Mrs Salisch, Mr Bontempi, Mr van Brink, Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Mr Holzfuss, Mr Outrive, Mr Cabezon Alonso, Mr Barros Moura, Mrs Lacaze, Mr Lagakos, Mr Newton Dunn, Mr Penders, van Dijk, Mr Suarez Gonzalez, Mrs Buron, Mr Papay- Mr Prag and Mr Tindemans, to the Commission, on annakis, Mr Speciale, Mr Alvarez de Paz, Mrs arms cooperation, the conversion of defence industries Sandbaek, Mrs Cramon Daiber, Ms Tongue, Mr Pisoni, and the monitoring of arms exports (Doc. B 3-1045/ Mr Langer, Mr Hughes, Mrs Van Hemeldonck and Mrs 90); Ernst de la Graete, to the Council, on immigrant work ers from third countries (Doc. B 3-1053/90); — Oral question (0-74/90) by Mr Langer, Mr New- ens, Mr Ephremidis, Mr Crampton, Mr White, Mr Romeos, Mrs Fernex, Mr Simeoni, Mrs Aglietta, Mr (e) oral questions from the following members pur Perez Royo, Mr Hughes, Mrs Castellina and Mr A. suant to Rule 60, for Question Time on 15 and 16 May Smith, to the Commission, on initiatives in the sector 1990 (Doc. B 3-1054/90): of cooperation on disarmament, the reduction and con trol of trade in and exports of arms and on industrial Pery, Habsburg, Zeller, Killilea, Howell, Pasty, Coony, restructuring in the armaments sector (Doc. B 3-1046/ De Rossa, Papayannakis, Lalor, Peter, van Putten, 90); Ephremidis, Elmalan, Barros Moura, Iversen, Cassidy, — Oral question (0-75/90) by Mr Langer, Mr New- Andrews, D. Martin, Morris, Crampton, Seligman, ens, Mr Ephremidis, Mr Crampton, Mr White, Mr Schmid, Fantuzzi, Jepsen, Hoon, Dury, Cox, Lannoye, Romeos, Mrs Fernex, Mr Simeoni, Mrs Aglietta, Mr Ruiz-Simenez Aguilar, Wynn, Patterson, McMahon, Perez Royo, Mr Hughes, Mrs Castellina and Mr A. Simmonds, I. Christensen, L. Smith, De Donnea, Smith, to the Council, on initiatives in the sector of Simeoni, Marques Mendes, Di Rupo, Mayer, Calvo cooperation on disarmament, the reduction and control Ortega, Speciale, Bandres Molet, Papoutsis, Raffarin, of trade in and exports of arms and on industrial res Price, Pollack, Deprez, Stewart-Clark, Muscardini, van tructuring in the armaments sector (Doc. B 3-1047/90); Dijk, Dessylas, Lomas, Fernex, Hadjigeorgeou, Pons Grau, Rawlings, Bonde, Ewing, White, Cushnahan, — Oral question (0-76/90) by Mr Langer, Mr New- McCartin, Newton Dunn, Fitzgerald, Lane, Fitzsimons, ens, Mr Ephremidis, Mr Crampton, Mr White, Mr Livanos, Nianias, Arbeloa Muru, Stewart, Pompidou, Romeos, Mrs Fernex, Mr Simeoni, Mrs Aglietta, Mr Alavanos, Escuder Croft, Robles Piquer, T. Nielsen, Perez Royo, Mr Hughes, Mrs Castellina and Mr A. Pierros, Langer, Van Hemeldonck, Hughes, Scott-Hop- Smith, to EPC, on initiatives in the sector of coopera kins, Banotti, Crawley, Habsburg, Raffarin, Calvo tion on disarmament, the reduction and control of Ortega, Jepsen, Salema, De Vries, Hoon, Dury, Wijsen- trade in and exports of arms and on industrial restruc beek, Marques Mendes, D. Martin, Speciale, Livanos, turing in the armaments sector (Doc. B 3-1048/90); McMahon, Fernex, Alavanos, Ephremidis, Kellett- — Oral question (0-98/90) by Mr Poettering, Chair Bowman, Pierros, Barros Moura, Bandres Molet, Cas man of the Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament, sidy, Bandres Molet, Papoutsis, van der Waal, Latail- Mr Penders, Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Mr Pesma- lade, Wynn, Ephremidis, Crawley, Pierros, Kostopou- zoglou, Mrs Reding, Mr Robles Piquer, Mr Klepsch, los, Livanos, Gutierrez Diaz, Ruiz-Gimenez Aguilar, Mr White, Mr Hansch, Mr Crampton, Mr Newens, Mr Robles Piquer, Alavanos, Medina Ortega, Langer, Romeos, Mrs von den Brink and Mr Planas Puchades, Elmalan, Ainardi, Dessylas, Cabezon Alonso, De to EPC, on the Irish Presidency's views on security Rossa, Arbeloa Muru, Ewing, Hughes; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/9

Monday, 11 June 1990

(f) the following motions for resolutions tabled pur — by Mr Siso Cruellas, on the teaching of history in suant to Rule 63: the European Schools (Doc. B 3-832/90) — by Mr Arbeloa Muru, on behalf of the SOC referred to: Group, on persons imprisoned without charge for the CULT (responsible) last eighteen years in Syria (Doc. B 3-823/90) — by Mr Siso Cruellas, on aid from the European referred to: Community for the establishment of the Cervantes POLI (responsible) Institute (Doc. B 3-833/90) DEVE (opinion) referred to: i — by Mr Arbeloa Muru, on prisoners of conscience CULT (responsible) in the Sudan (Doc. B 3-824/90) BUDG (opinion) referred to: — by Mr Siso Cruellas, on improving the rural envi POLI (responsible) ronment to provide better prospects for the farming DEVE (opinion) population (Doc. B 3-834/90) — by Mr Bru Puron and Mr Arbeloa Muru, on a sum referred to: mit between the EEC/Council of Europe and the AGRI (responsible) countries of Eastern Europe (Doc. B 3-825/90) TRAN (opinion) referred to: — by Mr Fernandez Albor, on representation of the POLI (responsible) regions at Community level (Doc. B 3-835/90) RELA (opinion) referred to: — by Mr Arbeloa Muru and Mr Alarez de Paz, on the REGI (responsible) situation in Sudan (Doc. B 3-826/90) — by Mr Ortiz Climent and Mr Navarro VelasCo, on referred to: the cessation of farming and alternatives such as rural POLI (responsible) * tourism (Doc. B 3-836/90) DEVE (opinion) referred to: — by Mr Sierra Bardaji, Mr Bofill Abeilhe, Mr Oliva AGRI (responsible) Garcia, Mr Verde i Aldea, Mr Arbeloa Muru and Mr TRAN (opinion) Colom i Naval, on the drawing-up of a transborder programme for the Franco-Spanish area of the Pyre — by Mr Robles Piquer, on ethical conduct in the nees on the basis of the Community FRONTIERS pro public service (Doc. B 3-837/90) gramme (Doc. B 3-827/90) referred to: referred to: LEGA (responsible) POLI (responsible) :— by Mr de la Camara Martinez, on the use of recy REGI (opinion) cled paper (Doc. B 3-838/90) — by Mr Pons Grau, on aid to citrus growers in Val referred to: encia (Doc. B 3-828/90) ENVI (responsible) referred to: — by Mr Bandres Molet, Mr Staes, Mr Bettini and AGRI (responsible) Mr Falqui, on desert-encroachment in the Mediterra BUDG (opinion) nean (Doc. B 3-839/90) — by Mr Siso Cruellas, on official recognition by the referred to: Council, enabling wine produced and prepared under ENVI (responsible) the Rioja designation of origin to be granted the Euro pean designation of 'quality wines produced in specific — by Mr Ferri, on harmonization of the Community regions (quality wines p.s.v.)' (Doc. B 3-829/90) provisions on road safety (Doc. B 3-840/90) referred to: referred to: AGRI (responsible) TRAN (responsible) .— by Mr Siso Cruellas, on authorization for new — by Mr Ferri, on the importance of recognizing vineyards in the Autonomous Community of La Rioja andrology as a separate branch of medicine (Doc. B 3- (Doc. B 3-830/90) 841/90) referred to: referred to: AGRI (responsible) CULT (responsible) ENVI (opinion) — by Mr Siso Cruellas, on teaching in schools on the aims and objectives of the European Community (Doc. — by Mr Ferri, on anti-trust legislation for the media B 3-831/90) (Doc. B 3-842/90) referred to: referred to: CULT (responsible) CULT (responsible) NoC 175/10 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Monday, 11 June 1990

— by Mr Ferri, on the recognition and development — by Mr Titley and Mrs Green, on the unilateral end of accident research (Doc. B 3-843/90) ing of collective bargaining agreements by Associated Newspapers in the UK (Doc. B 3-852/90) referred to: LEGA (responsible) referred to: ENVI (opinion) SOCI (responsible) — by Mr Titley, on the inauguration of Patricio Ayl- — by Mrs Aglietta, on safety problems at the Krsko win as President of Chile (Doc. B 3t853/90) nuclear plant (Doc. B 3-844/90) referred to: referred to: POLI (responsible) ENER (responsible) — by Mr Falconer and Mr Hughes, on nuclear safety ENVI (opinion) in the Community (Doc. B 3-854/90) — by Mr Muscardini, Mr Rauti, Mr Mazzone and Mr referred to: Fini, on free facilities for persons staying with children ENVI (responsible) in hospital (Doc. B 3-845/90) — by Mr Newens, Mr White, Mr Crampton, Mr referred to: Hughes, Mrs Buchan, Mr B. Simpson, Mr Elliott, Mrs SOCI (responsible) Rothe, Mrs Read, Mr Coates, Mrs Pollack, Ms Tongue, Mr A. Smith, Mr Barton, Mr Newman, Mr Titley, Mr — by Mr Goria and Mr Guidolin, on disarmament, Langer, Mr Stewart, Mr Collins, Mr Balfe, Mr Hindley, energy and development (Doc. B 3-846/90) Mr Adam, Mr Megahy, Mr West, Mrs Randzio-Plath, referred to: Mrs Crawley, Mrs Oddy, Mr Harrison, Mr McCubbin, POLI (responsible) Mr Wilson, Mr Hoon, Mr Stevenson, Ms Jensen, Mr Morris, Mr Visser, Mrs Hoff, Mr Wynn, Mr Schinzel, ENER, DEVE (opinion) Mrs Schmidbauer, Mrs Simons, Mr von der Vring, Mr — by Mr Lalor, Mr Fitzgerald, Mr Andrews, Mr Fitz- Ford, Mr Muntingh, Mr Linkhohr, Mr Vittinghoff, Mrs simmons, Mr Killilea and Mr Lane, on a grant-aid pro Vayssade, Mr Loma^, Mr Metten, Mrs Izquierdo Rojo, gramme for Irish border regions (Doc. B 3-847/90) Mr David and Mr Bowe, on the assessment of women's unwaged work (Doc. B 3-855/90) referred to: referred to: REGI (responsible) WOME (responsible) BUDG (opinion) — by Mr Martin, on the export and transportation of — by Mr Alber, Mrs Braun-Moser, Mr Moorhouse, live horses and ponies within and from the European Miss Mcintosh, Mr Brok, Mr Cano Pinto and Mr Community (Doc. B 3-856/90) Pasty, on Polish industrial and infrastructure invest referred to: ments (Doc. B 3-848/90) AGRI (responsible) referred to: ENVI (opinion), TRAN (opinion) RELA (responsible) — by Mr Newton Dunn, concerning unacceptable ECON (opinion), BUDG (opinion) secrecy of the Council of Ministers (Doc. B 3-857/90) — by Mr McMahon, Mr A. Smith, Mr Collins, Mr referred to: Coimbra Martins, Mr Vazquez Fouz, Mr Bru Puron, Mr INST (responsible) Martin, Mr Sapena Granell, Mrs Belo, Mr Stewart, Mr — by Mr Sakellariou, on behalf of the SOC Group, Marinho, Mr Desmond, Mr Oliva Garcia, Mr Cra- on the murder of Reynaldo Zuniga in Honduras (Doc. vinho, Mr McCubbin, Mr Falconer, Mrs Buchan, Mrs B 3-858/90) Garcia Arias, Mr Sanz. Fernandez, Mr Cabezon Alonso, referred to: Mr Megahy, Mr McGowan and Mrs Izquierdo Rojo, POLI (responsible) on the European Year of Tourism (Doc. B 3-849/90) — by Mrs Braun-Moser and Mr Estgen, on the right referred to: of the phild to childhood and family (Doc. B 3-859/90) TRAN (responsible) referred to: REGI (opinion), BUDG (opinion) LEGA (responsible) — by Mr Collins, Mr Iversen, Sir James Scott-Hop SOCI (opinion), WOME (opinion) kins and Mrs Schleicher, on consumer protection and — by Mrs Schleicher, Mr F. Pisoni, Mrs Oomen- public health considerations (Doc. B 3-850/90) Ruijten, Mr Cushnahan, Mr Menrad, Mr Munch, Mr referred to: Pronk and Mr Valverde Lopez, on a ban on trade in ENVI (responsible) transplant organs (Doc. B 3-860/90) referred to: — by Mr Balfe, on behalf of the SOC Group, on LEGA (responsible) human rights in South Korea (Doc. B 3-851/90) — by Mrs van Dijk, Mr Staes, Mr Cochet, Mr referred to: Telkamper and Mr Falqui, on environmental pollution POLI (responsible) (Doc. B 3-861/90) 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/11

Monday, 11 June 1990 referred to: The President pointed out that the draft agenda for the ENVI (responsible) part-session (PE 142.055) had been distributed, and AGRI (opinion) that the following changes had been proposed or made to it (Rule 73 and 74): — by Mrs Muscardini, Mr N. Pisoni and Mr Ferri, on a common programme to prevent drug abuse and related school social services Monday, 11 June: referred to : Request for the Vernier report on the Ehlass project ENVI (responsible) (Doc. A 3-135/90), scheduled for Friday's agenda, to CULT (opinion), LEGA (opinion) be brought forward and entered on Monday's agenda, after the Harrison report (Doc. A 3-109/90).

(g) from the Council: However, the SOC Group opposed this request. — draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (Doc. C 3-129/90) The following spoke: Mr Cot, on behalf of the SOC Group, and Mr Vernier, rapporteur. referred to: BUDG (responsible); Parliament rejected the request. •

— opinions on the request for carry-overs of appro priations from the financial year 1989 to the financial Tuesday, 12 June: year 1990 within Section III — Commission (non-auto matic carry-overs) (Doc. C 3-123/90) (Doc. C 3-133/90) The reports by Mrs Salema on the legal protection of referred to: computer programs (Item 92) and Mr Gasoliba i Bohm BUDG (responsible); on natural gas (Item 101) had not been adopted in committee and had therefore been withdrawn from — opinions on the proposal from the transfer of agenda. appropriations No 5/90 between chapters within Sec tion III — Commission — Part A — of the general At the request of the Committee on the Environment, budget of the European Communities for the financial an oral question by the committee to the Council (Doc. year 1990 (Doc. C 3-108/90) (Doc. C 3-135/90) B 3-1055/90) would be included in the debate on the recommendation for the second reading on nutrition referred to: labelling for foodstuffs (rapporteur: Mr Pimenta — BUDG (responsible); Doc. A 3-118/90) (Item 95).

(h) from the Commission: At the request of the Committee on Budgets, a report by Mr Tomlinson on the supplementary and amending budget No 2, which was due to be adopted in com — proposal for the transfer of appropriations No mittee on Monday evening, was included on -the 6/90 between chapters within Section III — Commis agenda. It would be debated jointly with the prelimi sion — Part B — of the general budget of the European nary draft budget for 1991, on which there would be a Communities for the financial year 1990 (Doc. C 3- 125/90) Commission presentation followed by a short debate.

referred to: A statement by the Commission under Rule 56 on BUDG (responsible) United Kingdom beef exports (BSE) was included.

— communication concerning the Commission parti At the request of the Committee on Development, a cipation in the 1992 Genoa International Exhibition third report by Mrs van Putten on cooperation with the (Doc. C 3-140/90) developing countries (Doc. A 3-151/90) was included. referred to: CULT (responsible) Any items left over from the previous day would then BUDG (opinion) be taken.

12. Order of business Wednesday, 13 June:

The next item was the order of business. The order of business would be as follows: NoC 175/12 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Mtfnday, 11 June 1990

9 a.m. to 12 noon and 3 p.m. to 9 p.m. (the sitting would — by the Green Group, to the Commission (Doc. be extended by one hour): B 3-1061/90).

Joint debate on three oral questions with debate to the Statements, followed by a debate, by the President-in- Commission on the situation in China: Office of the Council on: — by the SOC Group (Doc. B 3-1060/90); — the Irish Presidency — by the EUL Group (Doc. B 3-1063/90); and — by the EPP Group (Doc. B 3-1103/90). — institutional prospects with a view to the second Possibly, continuation of Tuesday's agenda. Dublin Council meeting.

at 12 noon: Oral question with debate by Mr Poettering and others, to ECP (Doc. B 3-1049/90), on the Irish Presidency's views on security policy cooperation in the context of Formal sitting: address by Mr Mandela, winner of the EPC and the realignment of relations between states in 1988 Sakharov Prize. Europe. On behalf of the ER Group, Mr Gollnisch called for the formal sitting to be cancelled, pursuant to Rule 74 It was proposed to postpone the joint debate on oral (the President replied that formal sittings were not, question on arms (Items 106 to 109) to a future part- legally speaking, part of parliamentary proceedings, session. and that this request could therefore not be taken into account).

However, the Green Group opposed this proposal. Mr Ford spoke on these remarks on behalf of the SOC Group. The following spoke: Mr Langer, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Telkamper, Mr White and Mr Poet 3p.m. to 4.30p.m.: tering, the latter calling, on behalf of the EPP Group, for assurances that the debate would be held in July Question Time (to the Council and EPC) (the President replied that the enlarged Bureau would decide on the agenda for the July part-session the fol lowing day, and that he himself was in favour of 5 p.m.: including the debate in that agenda). Votes on: Parliament decided to postone these items to a future — the Harrison report on amendments to the Rules part-session. of Procedure (Doc. A 3-109/90) — the Tomlinson report on the draft supplementary Mr Telkamper asked for his oral question to the Coun and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (Doc. A 3-157/90) cil (Doc. B 3-1051/90) to be included by the Council in — the report without debate by Mr von Wogau on the its statement on the Irish Presidency. statistical classification of economic activities (Doc. A 3-123/90) Statements, followed by a debate, by the Council and — other reports under the Single Act the Commission, on the resolution adopted by the Council on 29 May 1990 on racism and xenophobia. The following spoke: Mr L. Smith, who renewed his request for the Commis Joint debate on seven oral questions with debate on sion to make a statement on the discharge into the sea migrant workers from third countries: of toxic waste from the FRG (the President replied that this request should have been made in the manner laid — by Mrs Catasta and others, to the Council (Doc. down by the Rules of Procedure); B 3-1053/90) and to the Commission (Doc. B 3-1052/ 90); — Mr Chanterie, on the time of Question Time (the President confirmed that it would be held from 3 p.m. — by the EI£ Group, to the Commission (Doc. B 3- to 4.30 p.m.). 1056/90), to the Council (Doc. B 3-1057/90) and to EPC (Doc. B 3-1058/90); Thursday, 14 June: — by Mr Brok and others, to the Commission (Doc. B 3-1059/90); The order of business would be as follows: 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/13

Monday, 11 June 1990

10 a.m. to 1 p.m.: The EDA Group had asked for the De Clercq report on beef (Doc. A 3-147/90), scheduled without debate, to Topical and urgent debate. be taken with debate and it would therefore be post poned to a future part-session.

3 p.m.: The LU Group requested, pursuant to Rule 74, that an oral question by the Committee on Agriculture to the Salisch report on atypical employment (Doc. A 3-134/ Commission, on the participation of Parliament in fish eries agreements, the allocation of quotas and the 90). granting of structural aid (Doc. B 3-1062/90) be included in a joint debate with the Miranda da Silva Possibly, continuation on Wednesday's agenda. report on fisheries (item 120).

Request by the SOC Group to postpone the von der Mr Miranda da Silva spoke on behalf of the LU Vring report on the classification of expenditure to a Group. future part-session, and to include in its place the Kofoed report on agricultural structures (Doc. A 3- 122/90) (item 119). Parliament approved the request.

The following spoke: Mr Langes, who opposed this The following spoke: request, Mr Cot, on behalf of the SOC Group, on the — Mr Lane, who regretted that items relating to fish previous speaker's remarks, Mr Langes and Mrs Napo- eries were regularly included on the agenda for Friday; letano. — Mr Newton Dunn, who wanted an answer to the Parliament agreed to the SOC Group's request. question he had asked at the previous part-session con cerning the assizes of the European Parliament with Reding report on the procedure for handling petitions national parliaments in Rome (the President replied- (Doc. A 3-107/90). that the Committee on Institutional Affairs was in the process of drawing up a report on this subject).

The reports by Mr Imbeni on pesticide residues (Doc. — Mr Ford, who, referring to Rule 56(1), repeated, A 3-12/90) and Mr Valverde Lope? on plant protection Mr L. Smith's call for a Commission statement on the products (Doc. A 3-137/90), which were to have been discharge of toxic waste in the sea at this part-session taken in a joint debate, would be debated separately. and pointed out that the Commission appeared to be willing to make such a statement;

Joint debate on the reports by Mr Raffarin on the — Mr Wynn, who asked when his report on food aid Stride programme (Doc. A 4-143/90), Mr Cushnahan (Doc. A 3-149/90) would be taken; on the Interreg programme (Doc. A 3-139/^90), and Mr Welsh on the Regis programme (Doc. A 3-142/90). — Sir Christopher Prout, who pointed out, in reply to the previous speaker, that a request had been made for The oral question by Mr Muntingh to the Commission urgent procedure in respect of this report and that the on the application throughout the Community of legis decision would not therefore be taken until the follow lation on environmental protection in connection with ing morning. the structural funds (Doc. A 3-1102/90) was included in this joint debate at the request of the SOC Group. Request for procedure without debate (Rule 38) Reding report on the seat of the European Environ ment Agency (Doc. A 3-117/90). — in respect of the Merz report on indirect taxes on the raising of capital (Doc. A 3-144/90).

6.30 p.m.: This item was included at the beginning of Friday's agenda. Votes on motions for resolutions on which the debate had closed. Request for application of urgent procedure (Rule 75) Friday, 15 June: (a) from the Council, in respect of: The Barzanti report without debate on COMETT II had not been adopted in committee and was therefore — a regulation on the operation of air cargo services withdrawn from the agenda. (Doc. C 3-98/90) NoC 175/14 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Monday, 11 June 1990

Justification: the Council wished to take a decision on munity system for the rapid exchange of information this proposal at its next meeting on 18 and 19 June so on dangers arising from the use of consumer products that the regulation could come into force on 1 July (Doc. C 3-139/90). 1990. Since the Committee on the Environment had decided — a regulation on organic production of agricultural to adopt the procedure without report in respect of this products and indications referring thereto on agricul proposal, this item was included on Friday's agenda. tural products and foodstuffs (Doc. C 3-249/89)

Justification: the Council wished to take a decision on Requests for procedure without report (Rule 116(1)) this proposal as quickly as possible, given the growing interest in this method of agricultural production and From the Committee on Agriculture, in respect of: the need to provide a framework of fair competition for producers and adequate information for consumers. — a directive amending a directive on the marketing of seed potatoes (Doc. C 3-122/90) — a regulation laying down, in respect of hops, the (b) from the Commission, in respect of: amount of aid to producers for the 1989 harvest (Doc. C 3-127/90)

— a proposal for a regulation amending regulations — a decision amending a decision on the restructur with regard to the conversion rates and monetary com ing of the system of agricultural surveys in Greece pensatory amounts to be applied for the purposes of (Doc. C 3-138/90) the common agricultural policy (Doc. C 3-89/90)

Justification: in the present situation, the method for from the Committee on the Environment, in respect of: calculating the conversion rates could be amended — a decision amending a decision on a Community without serious consequences. system for the rapid exchange of information on dan gers arising from the use of consumer products (Doc. — a regulation on the introduction of the final regime C 3-139/90) for the organization of the market for the carriage of goods by road (Doc. C 3-102/90) These texts would be put to the vote at the beginning of Justification: the Council intended to include this item Friday's sitting. on the agenda of its meeting of 18 and 19 June 1990. The order of business was thus established. — a regulation for an action programme in the field of transport infrastructure with a view to the comple tion of an integrated transport market in 1992 (Doc. 13. Deadline for tabling amendments and motions for C 3-117/90) resolutions

Justification: the Council intended to include this item The President pointed out that the deadline for tabling on the agenda of its meeting of 18 and 19 June 1990. amendments to the reports on the draft agenda had expired.

(c) from the Council and the Commission, in respect The deadline for tabling amendments to reports which of: had been added to the agenda was 5 p.m. on Tuesday.

— a regulation amending three regulations on the For: management, storage and cofinancing of the purchase (a) the Commission statement on UK beef exports of food products (Doc. C 3-134/90) (b) the Council statement on institutional orientations Justification: these regulations would expire at the end with a view to the secdnd Dublin summit of June and it had not been possible to start the proce dure earlier because of 'comitology' difficulties. (c) the Council and Commission statements on racism and xenophobia Parliament would be consulted on the requests for (d) the oral questions on the situation in China urgent procedure at the beginning of the sitting on Tuesday. (e) the oral question on fisheries agreements.

the deadlines were as follows: The Commission had also asked for urgent procedure in respect of a decision amending a decision on a Com — motions for resolutions 5 p.m. on Tuesday 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/15

Monday, 11 June 1990

— amendments to these motions: 12 noon on Commission: 110 minutes in all Wednesday Members: 210 minutes

14. Speaking time — Speaking time for debates on Wednesday Speaking time for the part-session was allocated as fol Council: 75 minutes in all (including replies) lows pursuant to Rule 83: Commission: 40 minutes in all — Speaking time for debates on Monday Authors: 40 minutes (8 x 5 minutes) Members 150 minutes Rapporteurs: 20 minutes(4x5 minutes) Draftsmen: 8 minutes in all — Speaking time for debates on Thursday (excluding Commission: 15 minutes in all the debate on topical and urgent subjects of major Members: 90 minutes importance) Rapporteurs: 45 minutes(9x5 minutes) — Speaking time for debates on Tuesday Draftsmen: 32 minutes in all Rapporteurs: 80 minutes(16x5 minutes) Commission: 45 minutes in all Draftsmen: 36 minutes in all Members: 90 minutes

Allocation of speaking time for members (in minutes)

Total 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Group

Socialist Group 14 25 35 45 55 65 76 86 96 Group of the European People's Party 10 17 24 31 38 45 51 58 65 Liberal, Democratic and Reformist Group 6 8 11 14 16 19 22 25 28 European Democratic Group 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Green Group in the European Parliament 4 6 7 9 11 12 14 15 17 Group for the European Unitarian Left 4 5 7 9 10 12 13 15 17 Group of the European Democratic Alliance 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 Technical Group of the European Right 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Left Unity Group 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 9 Rainbow Group 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 9 Non-attached members 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 . 13 14

15. Topical and urgent debate (subjects proposed) cation of Credentials and Immunities, on the amend The President proposed the following five subjects for ment of Rule 56, 58 and 64 of the Rules of Procedure the next topical and urgent debate to be held on Thurs with reference to the procedure in cases where two or day: more motions for resolutions on the same subject are to — South Africa be put to the vote (Doc. A 3-109/90). — Israel — situation in the occupied territories — situation in certain African countries (Zaire, Gabon and Sudan) — human rights IN THE CHAIR: MR CAPUCHO — Schengen agreements Vice-President 16. Amendment of Rules 56, §8 and 64 (debate) Mr Harrison introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verifi Mr Rogalla spoke on the list of speakers. NoC 175/16 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Monday, 11 June 1990

The following spoke: Mr Gollnisch, on behalf of the behalf of the RB Group, Mr van der Waal, non- ER Group, Mr Rogalla, on behalf of the SOC Group, attached member, Mr de Rossa, Mr Alavanos and Mr Mr Malangre, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Sal- van Miert, Member of the Commission. ema, on behalf of the LDR Group, Miss Mcintosh, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Langer, on behalf of the The President declared the debate closed. Green Group, and Mr Vecchi, on behalf of the EUL Group. He announced that the vote would be taken at 12 noon the following day (part I, item 9 of minutes of 12 June 1990). The President declared the debate closed.

19. Agenda for next sitting He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m.. on Wednesday (part I, item 13 of minutes of 13 June The President announced the following agenda for the 1990). sitting on Tuesday, 12 June 1990:

9 a.m. to 1 p.m., 3p.m. to 7p.m. and 9p.m. to midnight: 17. Driving licence * (debate) — topical and urgent debate (announcement of Mr Amaral introduced his second report, drawn up on motions tabled); behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a — decision on urgent procedure; directive on the driving licence (COM(88) 705 final — — joint debate on two interim reports by Mrs Jepsen Doc. C 3-41/89) (Doc. A 3-80/90). and Mr Rossetti and on the Liittge report on relations with EFTA; The following spoke: Mr B. Simpson, on behalf of the — joint debate on the van Outrive, Megahy and Est- SOC Group, Mr Siso Cruellas, on behalf of the EPP gen reports on the right of residence */** I; Group, Mr Wijsenbeek, on behalf of the LDR Group, — Saridakis report on direct life asurance **I; Miss Mcintosh, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bet- tini, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Porrazzini, on — Ferri report on damage caused by waste **I; behalf of the EUL Group, Mrs Muscardini, non- — recommendation for the second reading by Mr attached member, Mrs Denys, Mr Cushnahan, Mr Cox, Pimenta on nutrition labelling of foodstuffs (') ** II; Mr Paisley, Mrs Braun-Moser, Mr Mendes Bota, Mr van der Waal, and Mr van Miert, Member of the Com — recommendation for the second reading by Mr mission. Lataillade on appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II; — recommendation for the second reading by Mr The President declared the debate closed. Herman on public works contracts ** II; — Christiansen report on machinery ** I; He announced that the vote would be taken at 12 noon — joint debate on two reports by Mr Pierros and Mr the following day (part I, item 8 of minutes of 12 June Desama on EURET and Eurotra programmes ** I; 1990). — joint debate on a report by Mr Tomlinson on the draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 and 18. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods * presentation by the Commission of the preliminary (debate) draft budget for 1991; — Commission statement on UK exports of beef (fol Mrs Joanny introduced her report, drawn up on behalf lowed by a debate); of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the — third van Putten report on the guidelines for coop proposal from the Commission to the Council for a eration with the developing countries *; directive on the minimum requirements for vessels — Mcintosh report on competition in air transport *. entering or leaving Community ports carrying packages of dangerous or polluting goods (COM(90) 7 final — Doc. C 3-61/89) (Doc. A 3-108/90). 12 noon:

The following spoke: Mr Pereira, draftsman of the opi Vote on: nion of the Committee on the Environment, Mr Ste — the second Amaral report (Doc. A 3-80/90); wart, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Sarlis, on behalf of the EPP Group, Miss Mcintosh, on behalf of the ED — the Joanny report (Doc. A 3-108/90); Group, Mrs Fernex, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Schodruch, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Miranda da (') Oral question Doc. B 3-1055/90 was included in the Silva, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr Blaney, on debate. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/17

Monday, 11 June 1990

— other reports on which the debate had closed, with 5.15p.m. to 6.45p.m.: the exception of Single Act items and the van Outrive report. — Question Time (Commission).

3p.m. to 5p.m.: 6.45 to 7p.m.: — topical and urgent debate (list of motions to be included). — action taken on the opinions of Parliament.

(The sitting was ?d at 8.20 p.m.)

Enrico VINCI Nicole FONTAINE Secretary-General Vice-President NoC 175/18 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

11 June 1990 ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDREWS, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BANOTTI, BARROS MOURA, BARTON, BAUR, BEAZLEY CH., BEAZLEY P., BELO, BERTENS, BETTIZA, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BJ0RNVIG, BLANEY, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONETTI, BONTEMPI, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BREYER, BRIANT, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARIGLIA, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASSIDY, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLOM I NAVAL, CONTU, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, COT, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DAVID, DEFRAIGNE, DE GIOVANNI, DENYS, DE ROSSA, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DE VRIES, DIEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, DI RUPO, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DE DONNEA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EPHREMIDIS, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRARA, FERRER I CASALS, FITZGERALD, FONTAINE, FORD, FORLANI, FORMIGONI, FRIEDRICH, FUCHS, FUNCK, GAlBlSSO, GALLAND, GALLE, GELLENZI, GALLO, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA ARIAS, GASdLIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GISCARD D'ESTAING, GLINNE, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GOLLNISCH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HAPPART, HARRISON, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERVfi, HERZOG, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HORY, HUGHES, HUME, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON CH., JAKOBSEN, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, JOANNY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KOSTOPOULOS, KRIEPS, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LA MALFA, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LA PERGOLA, LARONI, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LOMAS, LOTTGE, LULLING, LUSTER, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MAIBAUM, MALANGRfi, DE LA MALfcNE, MALHURET, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MAYER, MAZZONE, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENARD, MERZ, METTEN, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MONTERO ZABALA, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORRIS, MULLER, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSCARDINI, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN, NORDMANN, ODDY, O'HAGAN, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, PAGOROPOULOS, PAISLEY, PANNELLA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PAPOUTSIS, PARTSCH, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PEREIRA, PEREZ ROYO, PERREAU DE PINNINCK DOMENECH, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PIERMONT, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIQUET, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, POMPIDOU, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PORTO, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUNSET I CASALS, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAFFARIN, RAGGIO, RAMfREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, REGGE, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, R0NN, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SALEMA, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANTOS, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SARLIS, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SCHONHUBER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SEAL, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAjJ, SIMEONI, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPERONI, STAES, STAMOULIS, VON STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TSIMAS, UKEIWfi, VALENT, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERNIER, VERWAERDE, VISENTINI, VISSER, VOHRER, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAECHTER, WALTER, VON WECHMAR, WETTIG, WHITE, WlJSENBEEK, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN, ZELLER. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/19

Monday, 11 June 1990

ANNEX

DECISION ADJUSTING THE FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE

annexed to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 29 June 1988 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure

The European Parliament and the Council of the European Communities,

Having regard to paragraphs 10 and 11 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure ('),

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, given the conditions of implementation of the budget in 1988 and 1989, the financial perspec tive annexed to the Interinstitutional Agreement should be adapted to allow the transfer of unused appropriations to subsequent financial years,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The ceilings appearing in the financial perspective, as revised by the joint decision of the European Par liament and the Council in response to the article 12 proposal by the Commission dated 22 February 1990, are hereby adjusted as follows:

— The ceilings on commitment appropriations for non-compulsory expenditure are increased by ECU 157 million in 1991 and ECU 250 million in 1992 for heading 2 and by ECU 63 million in 1991 and ECU 80 million in 1992 for heading 3. The totals for commitment appropriations are adjusted accordingly.

— The totals for payment appropriations required are increased by ECU 466 million in 1991, of which ECU 460 million is for non-compulsory expenditure, and by ECU 758 million in 1992, of which ECU 650 million is for non-compulsory expenditure.

For the European Parliament For the Council

(') OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 33. NoC 175/20 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990

DECISION ON THE REVISION OF FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE

annexed to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 29 June 1988 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure

The European Parliament and the Council of the European Communities,

Having regard to point 12 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure ('),

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, within the existing framework of the financial perspective, it is not possible to satisfy the new requirements of co-operation with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, to step up co-operation with the countries of the Mediterranean region, Latin America and Asia and to provide the required increase in the stimulus which the Community, can give in several sectors to the implementation of the Single Act and completion of the internal market; whereas the financial perspective in force must there fore be revised with due respect for the principle of budgetary discipline; whereas concerning the ceiling for heading 5 (Repayments and Administration) the amounts for stock disposal cannot be used for other purposes;

Whereas the treatment of certain budget items in the financial perspective must be clarified to facilitate management of the budget or make it more transparent;

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The ceilings in the financial perspective revised by the joint decision of Parliament and the Council on 13 December 1989 and last adjusted by the Commission Decision of 21 February 1990 under Article 9 of the Interinstitutional Agreement are hereby amended as follows:

1. The ceiling for heading 2 (Structural operations) is revised to include an additional amount of ECU 250 million in 1991. This amount addresses the difference between forecasts and current estimates of the rate of inflation. When account is taken of the effect in 1991 of the decision of the Agricul ture Council of 26 April 1990 in relation to vine-grubbing (ECU 160 million) the net increase in heading 2 is ECU 90 million. This decision will not affect the ceilings for heading 2 in 1990 and 1992.

2. The ceilings for heading 4 (Other policies) are increased by ECU 200 million in 1990, ECU 1 175 million in 1991 and ECU 1 628 million in 1992. The subceilings for non-compulsory expenditure under this headling are increased by the same amounts for each of the years concerned.

3. The ceilings for heading 5 (Repayments and Administration) are lowered by ECU 40 million for 1991 and ECU 150 million for 1992. The amount proposed for stock disposal under this heading is reduced by ECU 450 million for 1992.

4. The total of commitment appropriations and the total of payment appropriations are increased by ECU 200 million for 1990, ECU 1 225 million for 1991 and ECU 1 478 million for 1992. The break down of these totals between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure is adjusted accordingly.

The amounts indicated in this article for 1992 are at 1991 prices.

Article 2

1. The following footnote shall be added with reference to headings 1 and 4:

'In accordance with the joint statement made by the three institutions when the revision of the Financial Regulation was adopted and in order to ensure the proper financing of food aid without having To revise

(') OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 33. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/21

s Monday, 11 June 1990

the financial perspective, compliance with the ceilings for headings 1 and 4 will not rule out the possibil ity of a transfer between the headings for Article 292 (Refunds in connection with Community food aid) and Chapter 92 (Food aid). This means that the amounts of these transfers will not count towards the totals of appropriations to be taken into consideration for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the ceilings in the financial perspective. The criteria for the examination of these transfers are those agreed by the Council, Parliament and the Commission in their statement of 12 February 1990.'

2. The existing footnote on the breakdown of total commitment appropriations into compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure shall be replaced by the following: 'Based on the classification in the 1990 preliminary draft budget. Modifications resulting from decisions by the budgetary authority on changes of classification will be implemented as a technical adjustment, under point 9 of the Agreement.'

For the European Parliament For the Council NoC 175/22 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Monday, 11 June 1990

STATEMENT BY THE INSTITUTIONS

related to heading 4

(to be added to the decision to be taken under point 12 of the Interinstitutional Agreement)

The decision to revise heading 4 covers three priority sectors: — co-operation with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, — increased co-operation with Mediterranean, Latin American and Asian countries, — bolstering of certain policies in connection with the Single Act.

As regards co-operation with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Institutions confirm that the maximum amounts in non-compulsory expenditure to be applied are ECU 500 million in 1990, ECU 820 million in 1991 and ECU 970 million in 1992. During the budgetary procedures in the remainder of the period covered by the Interinstitutional Agreement, these amounts will not be used for other purpose without the agreement of both branches of the budgetary authority. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/23

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF TUESDAY, 12 JUNE 1990 (90/C 175/02)

PART I

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MRS FONTAINE

Vice-President

(The sitting was opened at 9 a.m.)

The following spoke: (a) from the parliamentary committees, the following — Mr Pannella, who referred to the comments he had report: made at the beginning of Monday's sitting and repeated what he had said about statements made by — report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the President of Parliament concerning the resolution Budgets, on the draft supplementary and amending on Expo 2000 in Venice; budget No 2 for the financial year 1990 (Doc. C 3-129/ — Mr Bettini, who protested at statements apparently 90) (rapporteur: Mr Tomlinson) (Doc. A 3-157/90); made by the President of Parliament to the Italian press concerning this resolution; (b) the following oral question with debate: — Mr Pimenta, who agreed with the previous speak ers' comments and criticized the attitude of the Presi dent of Parliament; — oral question (O-147/90) by Mr Pimenta, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public — Mr Colajanni, who agreed with the previous com Health and Consumer Protection, to the Council, on a ments. proposal for a Council directive on the introduction of The President replied that she would inform the Presi compulsory nutrition labelling of foodstuffs intended dent of Parliament of these comments. for sale to the ultimate consumer (COM(88) 489 final — SYN 155) (Doc. B 3-1055/90). The following spoke: — Mrs Ewing, who, in relation to oral question Doc. 3. Topical and urgent debate (announcement of B 3-1062/90, entered on the agenda for Friday, 15 motions for resolutions tabled) June, asked that the deadline for tabling amendments to any motions for resolutions should be set after the statement which the Commission was due to made on The President announced that she had received from the subject and that the vote on these motions for reso the following Members requests for the inclusion in the lutions should be taken during the July part-session; debate on topical and urgent subjects of major import — Mr C. Beazley, who seconded Mrs Ewing's ance of motions for resolutions pursuant to Rule 64 (1): remarks and asked when a decision would be taken on — by Mr Saby, Mrs Aulas, Mrs Belo, Mr Pons Grau, this subject (the President replied that the decision Mr Perschau, Mr Galland, Mrs Daly, Mrs Andrews, Mr would be taken at the end of the morning); Gutierrez-Diaz, Mrs Pery, Mr Telkamper, Mr Verhagen, — Mr Miranda da Silva, who opposed Mrs Ewing's Mr Balfe, Mr Lomas, Mrs van Putten, Mrs Van Hemel- request; donck, Mrs Schmidbauer, Mr Nordmann, Mr Vohrer, Mr Borgo, Mrs Domingo Segarra, Mrs Santos, Mr Jack — Miss Mcintosh, who asked for her report on the air transport sector (Doc. A 3-106/90) to be taken after the son and Mr Fitzsimons, on the consequences of the joint debate on EEC-EFTA relations (Items 86 to 88 of grave violation of human rights in Sudan (Doc. B 3- the agenda). 1183/90); — by Mr Wurtz, on behalf of the LU Group, on can 1. Approval of minutes celling the debt of ACP countries to the Community (Doc. B 3-1184/90); The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. — by Mr Bertens, Mr Gasoliba i Bohm, Mr Cox, Mr De Donnea, Mr Amaral, Mr Verwaerde, Mr Nord 2. Documents received mann, Mr Maher, Mr Galland and Mr Wijsenbeek, on behalf of the LDR Group, on the situation in the Baltic The President announced that she had received: States (Doc. B 3-1185/90); NoC 175/24 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

— by Mr Capucho, Mr Lacaze and Mr Bertens, on continuation and effective implementation of sanctions behalf of the LDR Group, on the danger of war by the Community and its Member States against between India and Pakistan (Doc. B 3-1186/90); South Africa (Doc. B 3-1205/90); — by Mr De Donnea, Mr De Montesquiou, Mr — by Mr Miranda da Silva, Mr Gremetz, Mr Ephrem Maher, Mr Galland, Mr Wijsenbeek, Mr Nordmann, idis and Mr De Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on the imprisonment of the Director of 'El Siglo' (Doc. Mr Amaral and Mrs Martin, on behalf of the LDR B 3-1206/90); Group, on the consequences of the elections in Romania (Doc. B 3-1187/90); — by Mr De Rossa, Mr Piquet, Mr Ephremidis and — by Mr Arias Canete, Mr Ortiz Climent and Mr Mr Carvalhas, on behalf of the LU Group, on the mas Navarro Velasco, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the sacre at Rishon-le-Zion and the repression in the Occu violent repression of Spanish farmers exercising their pied Territories (Doc. B 3-1207/90); constitutional right,to demonstrate (Doc. B 3-1188/90); — by Mr Wurtz, Mr Alavanos, Mr Miranda da Silva — by Mr Verhagen and Mr Herman, on behalf of the and Mr De Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on the EPP Group, on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir convention on the right of asylum and the supplemen (Doc. B 3-1189/90); tary Schengen Agreement (Doc. B 3-1208/90); — by Mr Blaney, on behalf of the RB Group, on — by Mr Colajanni, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, Mr Iversen cross-frontier pollution in the Lough Foyle area located and Mr Papayannakis, on behalf of the EUL Group, on in North-West Ulster, Ireland (Doc. B 3-1190/90); the Schengen Agreement and the right of asylum (Doc. B 3-1209/90); — by Mr Calvo Ortega and Mr Raffarin, on behalf of the LDR Group, on the elections of 27 May in Colom — by Mrs Jepsen, on behalf of the ED Group, on the bia (Doc. B 3-1191/90); need to implement a programme of research into the effect of algae on the quality of bathing water (Doc. — by Mrs Ferrer, Mr Lucas Pires and Mrs Oomen- B 3-1210/90); Ruijten, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the elections in Romania (Doc. B 3-1192/90); — by Mr Newton Dunn, on behalf of the ED Group, on the human rights of Ethiopian students in Eastern — by Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, Europe (Doc. B 3-1211 /90); on executions in China (Doc. B 3-1193/90); — by Mr Price, on behalf of the ED Group, on the — by Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, kidnapping and imprisonment of Mr Mordechai Van on the situation in the Middle East (Doc. B 3-1194/90); unu (Doc. B 3-1212/90); — by Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, — by Mr Bonetti, Mr Ruffini, Mr N. Pisoni, Mr Fori- on the disturbances in Pakistan (Doc. B 3-1195/90); goni, Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti and Mr Klepsch, on — by Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, behalf of the EPP Group, on the damage caused by the on the elections in Burma (Doc. B 3-1196/90); exceptionally bad weather in the province of Brescia — by Mr Pierros, on behalf of the EPP Group, on (Doc. B 3-1213/90); earthquakes in Romania and Peru (Doc. B 3-1197/90); — by Mr Prag, Miss Rawlings and Mr McMillan- — by Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, Scott, on behalf of the ED Group, on the latest devel on the US-USSR summit in Washington (Doc. B 3- opments in Irsrael and the danger of war in the Middle 1198/90); East (Doc. B 3-12148/90); — by Mr Pierros, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the — by Miss Mcintosh and Mr McMillan-Scott, on tragic events in the Gaza Strip (Doc. B 3-1199/90); behalf of the ED Group, on the coach accident on the — by Mr Vandemeulebroucke, on behalf of the RB French motorway (Doc. B 3-1215/90); Group, on the situation in Kosovo and the continuing — by Mr Garaikoetxea Urriza, Mr Vandemeule flagrant violation of most fundamental human rights broucke and Mrs Ewing, on behalf of the RB Group, (Doc. B 3-1200/90); on the situation in the Baltic Republics (Doc. B 3- — by Mr Vandemeulebroucke, on behalf of the RB 1216/90); Group, on the massacre at the University of Lubum- — by Mr Carvalhas, Mr Wurtz, Mr Ephremidis and bashi (Zaire) (Doc. B 3-1201/90); Mr De Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on the dis — by Mr Simeoni, on behalf of the RB Group, on the 1 pute between India and Pakistan (Doc. B 3-1217/90); recent demonstrations calling for democracy in Gabon — by Mr Tindemans, Mr Klepsch, Mr Saridakis, Mrs (Doc. B 3-1202/90); Oomen-Ruijten, Mr Chanterie, Mr Herman and Mrs — by Mr Cassidy, on behalf of the ED Group, on Fontaine, on behalf of the EPP Group, on Zaire (Doc. anti-semitism and other forms of racism in the Soviet B 3-1218/90); Union and elsewhere (Doc.' B 3-1203/90); — by Mr Dillen, Mrs Lehideux and Mr Gollnisch, on — by Mr Wurtz, Mr De Rossa, Mr Ephremidis and behalf of the ER Group, on developments in South Mr Carvalhas, on behalf of the LU Group, on the con Africa (Doc. B 3-1219/90); viction of Mr Mordechai Vanunu in Israel (Doc. B 3- — by Mrs Oomen-Ruijten, Mrs Bindi, Mr Penders, 1204/90); Mr Robles Piquer, Mr Verhagen, Mr Chanterie and Mr — by Mr Wurtz, Mr De Rossa, Mr Barros Moura and Klepsch, On behalf of the EPP Group, on South Africa Mr Ephremidis, on behalf of the LU Group, on the (Doc. B 3-1220/90); 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/25

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

— by Mrs Veil, Mr Nordmann and Mr Cox, on pro-democracy movements in Gabon and French mili behalf of the LDR Group, on South Africa (Doc. B 3- tary intervention there (Doc. B 3-1236/90); 1221/90); — by Mr Mendes Bota, on behalf of the LDR Group, — by Mrs Veil, on behalf of the LDR Group, on the on events in Zaire (Doc. B 3-1237/90); imprisonment of Wang Du (Doc. B 3-1222/90); — by Mr Dillen, Mr Schonhuber, Mrs Lehideux and — by Mr Arbeloa Muru, Mr Pons Grau, Mr Romeos Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, on viola and Mr Sakellariou, on behalf of the SOC Group, on tion by the ANC of human rights in South Africa (Doc. Jewish settlements and the violation of human rights in B 3-1238/90); the Israeli Occupied Territories (Doc. B 3-1223/90); — by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, — by Mr Saby and Mrs Dury, on behalf of the SOC on rail transport (Doc. B 3-1239/90); Group, on human rights and support for democracy in — by Mrs Lehideux and Mr Dillen, on behalf of the Haiti (Doc. B 3-1224/90); ER Group, on the AIDS epidemic (Doc. B 3-1240/90); — by Mrs Dury, Mr van Outrive, Mr Di Rupo, Mr — by Mrs Lehideux, Mr Ceyrac and Mr Le Cheval Desama, Mr Galle, Mr Glinne, Mr Happart, Mrs Van lier, on behalf of the ER Group, on the African crisis Hemeldonck, Mrs Belo, Mr Woltjer, Mr Saby, Mr (Doc. B 3-1241/90); Coates, Mr Pons Grau and Mr Papoutsis, on behalf of — by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, the SOC Group, on the violation of human rights in on the Schengen Agreements and the right of asylum Zaire (Doc. B 3-1225/90); (Doc. B 3-1242/90); — by Mr Cot, Mr Ford, Mrs Simons, Mrs. Dury, Mr — by Mr Dillen, Mrs Lehideux, Mr Gollnisch, Mr Papoutsis, Mr Saby, Mr Pons Grau, Mr Barton, Mrs Martinez and Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Van Hemeldonck, Ms Tongue, Mrs Belo and Mr Group, on the Schengen Agreements (Doc. B 3-1243/ Glinne, on behalf of the SOC Group, on the situation 90); in South Africa (Doc. B 3-1226/90); — by Mr Telkamper, Mrs Aulas, Mr Melandri and — by Mrs van den Brink, Mr van Outrive and Mrs Mrs Santos, on behalf of the Green Group, on the situ Dury, on behalf of the SOC Group, on the signing of ation in Southern Africa (Doc. B 3-1244/90); the convention of the ad hoc Group on Immigration on — by Mrs Aulas, Mr Melandri, Mr Telkamper and the determination of the State responsible for examin Mr Bandres Molet, on behalf of the Green Group, on ing an asylum application presented in one of the the massacre at Rishon-le-Zion and the repression in Member States of the EEC (Doc. B 3-1227/90); the Occupied Territories (Doc. B 3-1245/90); — by Mr Coates, on behalf of the SOC Group, on — by Mrs Aulas, Mr Melandri, Mrs Santos and Mr Jerusalem Supreme Court's rejection of the appeal of Telkamper, on behalf of the Green Group, on the lack Mordechai Vanunu (Doc. B 3-1228/90); of democracy in Gabon (Doc. B 3-1246/90); — by Mr Newens, on behalf of the SOC Group, on — by Mrs Ernst de la Graete, Mrs Aulas, Mr Staes, human rights in the Sudan (Doc. B 3-1229/90); Mr Melandri and Mr Telkamper, on behalf of the — by Mr. Arbeloa Muru, on behalf of the SOC Green Group, on the political situation in Zaire (Doc. Group, on capital punishment in the USA (Doc. B 3- B 3-1247/90); 1230/90); — by Mrs Roth, Mrs Tazdait, Mrs van Dijk, Mrs — by Mr Glinne, Mrs Pery and Mrs Dury, on behalf Aglietta, Mr Taradash, Mr Bandres Molet, Mr Melan of the SOC Group, on the need for peace to be restored dri, Mr Verbeek, Mr Telkamper, Mr Staes, Mrs Santos. and Mrs Ernst de la Graete, on behalf of the Green in Liberia (Doc. B 3-1231 /90); Group, on the planned signing of the supplementary — by Mr Vandemeulebroucke, on behalf of the RB Schengen Agreement on 17 June 1990 (Doc. B 3-1248/ Group, on free traffic of persons and services and the 90); forthcoming signing of the Schengen Agreement (Doc. — by Mrs Roth, Mrs van Dijk and Mr Staes, on B 3-1232/90); behalf of the Green Group, on hunger strikes by politi — by Mrs Ewing, Mr Vandemeulebroucke, Mr Garai- cal prisoners seeking the deletion of paragraphes 141, koetxea Urriza, Mrs Sandbaek, Mrs Piermont and Mrs 142 and 163 of the Turkish penal code (Doc. B 3- Bjornvig, on behalf of the RB Group, on recent devel 1249/90); opments in South Africa and the need to maintain — by Mr Waechter, Mrs Fernex, Mr Telkamper and economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure pending Mr Lannoye, on behalf of the Green Group, on the the complete eradication of apartheid (Doc. B 3-1233/ protection of the alluvial forest along the Rhine and 90); more specifically of the Marscholsheim mountain — by Mr Simeoni and Mr Garaikoetxea Urriza, on range (Doc. B 3-1250/90); behalf of the RB Group, on massacres of the civilian — by Mr de la Malene, Mr Musso, Mr Pasty, Mr population in Liberia (Doc. B 3-1234/90); Ukeiwe, Mr Lane, Mr Marleix and Mr Perreau de Pin- — by Mr Wurtz, Mr Barros Moura, Mr Ephremidis ninck, on behalf of the EDA Group, on the^Situation in and Mr De Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on mas the occupied territories (Doc. B 3-1251/90); sacres of Zairean students in Lubumbashi (Doc. B 3- — by Mr de la Malene, Mr Guillaume, Mr Ukeiwe, 1235/90); Mr Pasty, Mr Lane, Mr Perreau de Pinninck, Mr Mar — by Mr Wurtz, Mr Barros Moura, Mr De Rossa and leix and Mr Lalor, on behalf of the EDA Group, on the Mr Alavanos, on behalf of the LU Group, on social recent events in Zaire and Gabon (Doc. B 3-1252/90); NoC 175/26 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

— by Mr de la Malene, Mr Musso, Mr Pasty, Mr subjects to be included on the agenda for the next Ukeiwe, Mr Lane and Mr Lalor, on behalf of the EDA debate on topical and urgent subjects of major import Group, on summary executions in China (Doc. B 3- ance to be held from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Thursday, 14 1253/90); June 1990. — by Mr de la Malene, Mr Musso, Mr Pasty, Mr Ukeiwe., Mr Lane and Mr Lalor, on behalf of the EDA 4. Decision on urgent procedure Group, on violence against women and children in The next item was the decision on six requests for Pakistan (Doc. B 3-1254/90); urgent procedure: — by Mr Lalor, Mr de la Malene, Mr Perreau de Pin- ninck, Mr Lane Mr Ukeiwe and Mr Pasty, on behalf of — Proposal from the Commission to the Council the EDA Group, on the Schengen Agreement (Doc. (COM(90) 73 final — Doc. C 3-89/90) for a regulation B 3-1255/90); amending Regulations (EEC) Nos 1676 and 1677/85 in regard to the conversion rates and monetary compensa — by Mr Nianias, de la Malene, Mr Musso, Mr tory amounts to be applied for the purposes of the Ukeiwe and Mr Lalor, on behalf of the EDA Group, on common agricultural policy the oil slick in Kavo Malia (Doc. B 3-1256/90); Mr Colino Salamanca, Chairman of the Committee on — by Mr Perreau de Pinninck and Mr Ruiz Mateos, Agriculture, spoke. on behalf of the EDA Group, on the possible imprison ment of a journalist in Spain (Doc. B 3-1257/90); Parliament rejected the request for urgent procedure. — by Mr Lamassoure, on behalf of the LDR Group, — Proposal from the Commission to the Council on the application of the Schengen Agreements (Doc. (COM(90) 63 final — Doc. C 3-98/90) for a regulation B 3-1258/90); on the operation of air cargo services — by Mr Speroni and Mr Vandemeulebroucke, on Mr Amaral, Chairman of the Committee on Transport, behalf of the RB Group, on current problems involving spoke. Israel (Doc. B 3-1259/90); Mr van Miert, Member of the Commission, also asked — by Mr Colajanni, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, Mr Iversen, for the EHLASS project, which was the subject of the Mr Papayannakis, Mrs Napoletano, Mr Puerta Gutier Vernier report (Doc. A 3-135/90), scheduled for Friday, rez and Mrs Valent, on behalf of the EUL Group, on 15 June, to be considered that same day (the President South Africa (Doc. B 3-1260/90); replied that she would forward this request to the enlarged Bureau, but pointed out that the agenda had — by Mr Vecchi, Mr Imbeni, Mr Perez Royo, Mr been established by Parliament the previous day). Puerta Gutierrez, Mr Duverger, Mr Iversen and Mr Papayannakis, on behalf of the EUL Group, on the The following spoke: Mr Tomlinson, on behalf of the bloody repression in Israel and the Occupied Territo Committee on Budgets, and Mr Lalor. ries (Doc. B 3-1261/90); Parliament rejected the request for urgent procedure. — by Mrs Napoletano, Mr Trivelli, Mr Vecchi, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, Mr Iversen and Mrs Valent, on behalf — Proposal from the Commission to the Council of the EUL Group, on the bloody confrontation in var (COM(90) 64 final — Doc. C 3-102/90) for a regulation ious Central African countries (Doc. B 3-1262/90); on the introduction of the final regime for the organ ization of the market for the carriage of goods by road — by Mrs Ceci, on behalf of the EUL Group, on res Mr Amaral, Chairman of the Committee on Transport, pect for the rights of peoples from third countries to health and environmental protection (Doc. B 3-1263/ spoke. 90); Parliament rejected the request for urgent procedure.

— by Mr Gutierrez Diaz, Mr Rossetti, Mr Papayan — Amended proposal from the Commission to the nakis and Mr Iversen, on behalf of the EUL Group, on Council (COM(89) 238 final — Doc. C 3-117/90) for a the assassination of Ignacio Ellacuria and five other regulation for an action programme in the field of Jesuits in El Salvador (Doc. B 3-1264/90); transport infrastructure with a view to the completion — by Mrs Santos, on behalf of the Green Group, on of an integrated transport market in 1992 (Romera i the assassination of the Brazilian ecologist Sebastiao Alcazar report — Doc. A 3-140/90) Francisco da Silva (Doc. B 3-1265/90); Mr Amaral, Chairman of the Committee on Transport, — by Mr Klepsch, Mr Lagakos, Mr Chanterie and Mr spoke. Saridakis, on behalf of the EPP Group, on Schengen Parliament approved the request for urgent procedure. (Doc. B 3-1266/90); — Proposal from the Commission to the Council — by Mr Newton Dunn, on behalf of the ED Group, (COM(90) 193 final — Doc. C 3-134/90) for a regula on human rights in Kashmir (Doc. B 3-1267/90). tion amending Regulations (EEC): The President announced that, pursuant to Rule 64, I. No 3972/86 on food-aid policy and food-aid man Parliament would be informed at 3 p.m. of the list of agement 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/27

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

II. No 2507/88 on the implementation of storage pro between the EEC and the EFTA countries concerning grammes and early warning systems scheduled air passenger services (Doc. A 3-131/90). III. No 2508/88 on the implementation of co-financing operations for the purchase of food products or The following spoke: Mr Verde i Aldea, on behalf of seeds by international bodies or non-governmental the SOC Group, Mr Tindemans, on behalf of the EPP organizations Group, Mr De Vries, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Moorhouse, on behalf of the ED Group, and Mr Lan- (Wynn report — Doc. A 3-149/90) ger, on behalf of the Green Group. Mr Wynn, rapporteur, spoke.

Parliament approved the request for urgent procedure. IN THE CHAIR: MR ANASTASSOPOULOS

Vice-President — Proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 552 final — Doc. C 3-249/90) for a regula tion on organic production of agricultural products and The following spoke: Mr Lane, on behalf of the EDA indications referring thereto on agricultural products Group, Mr van der Waal, non-attached member, Mr and foodstuffs Ceyrac, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Christensen, on behalf of the RB Group, Mr Titley, Mr Defraigne, Mr The following spoke: Mr Colino Salamanca, Chairman Visser, Mrs Peijs, Mr Wijsenbeek, Mr Stavrou, Mr of the Committee on Agriculture, Mrs Fernex and Mr Porto, Mr Cornelissen, Mr Pinxten, Mr Pannella, Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf. Andriessen, Vice-President of the Commission, and Mr Parliament rejected the request for urgent procedure by van Miert, Member of the Commission. RCV (SOC):

Members voting: 140 IN THE CHAIR: MR ROMEOS For: 5 Against: 131 Vice-President Abstentions: 4 Mr Wijsenbeek put a question to the Commission, The items for which urgent procedure had been which Mr van Miert answered. approved were entered on the agenda for Friday, 15 June. The President declared the debate closed.

The deadline for tabling amendments was set at 12 He announced that the vote would be taken at the next noon on Wednesday, 13 June. voting time (part I, item 10 of these minutes).

5. Official welcome 7. Right of residence */** I (debate) On behalf of Parliament, the President welcomed a delegation from the Japanese Diet, led by Mr Tadashi The next item was the joint debate on three reports. Kurunari, who had taken their seats in the official gal lery. Mr van Outrive introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the orientation of the Council for a directive 6. EEC-EFTA relations (debate) on the right of residence (Doc. C 3-12/90) (Doc. A 3- 124/90)*. The next item was the joint debate on three reports. Mr Megahy introduced his report, drawn up on behalf Mrs Jepsen introduced her interim report, drawn up on of the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and behalf of the Political Affairs Committee, on the Com the Working Environment, on the orientation of the munity's future political relations with the EFTA coun Council for a directive on the right of residence for tries (Doc. A 3-116/90). employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity (Doc. C 3-13/90 — SYN Mr Rossetti introduced his interim report, drawn up on 200) (Doc. A 3-133/90)** I. behalf of the Committee on External Economic Rela tions, on economic and trade relations between the Mr Estgen introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of EEC and EFTA countries (Doc. A 3-146/90). the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, the Media and Sport, on the orientation of the Council for Mr Liittge introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of a directive on the right of residence for students (Doc. the Committee on Transport, on the negotiations C 3-14/90 —SYN 199) (Doc. A. 3-141/90) ** I. NoC 175/28 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

The following spoke: Mr Zeller, draftsman of the opi teur said that the Commission had made its position nion of the Committee on Social Affairs, Mr de Don- clear. nea, draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Economic Affairs, Mr Medina Ortega, on behalf of the Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, SOC Group, Mr Janssen van Raay, on behalf of the item 1). EPP Group, Mr Marques Mendes, on behalf of the LDR Group, Lord O'Hagan, on behalf of the ED Group, Mrs Tazdait, on behalf of the Green Group, 9. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods * Mrs Catasta, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Killilea, (vote) on behalf of the EDA Group, Mrs Grund, on behalf of the ER Group, and Mr Barros Moura, on behalf of the (Joanny report — Doc. A 3-108/90) LU Group. — Proposal for a directive COM(89) 7 final — Doc. As it was voting time, the debate was suspended at that C 3-61/89:• point. It would be resumed after voting time (part I, item 12 of these minutes). Amendments adopted: 26 by electronic vote, 1 by elec tronic vote, 2, 3, 4, 5, 30, 31, 6, 32 by electronic vote, 8, 9, 10, 11, 36, 12, 13, 14, 15, 37 (introductory phrase by IN THE CHAIR: MRS PERY electronic vote), 16, 17, 38, 18, 40, 19, 41 by electronic vote, 20, 53 by electronic vote, 21, 22, 44, 45 (first part), Vice-President 23 and 24

Amendments rejected: 29, 56, 55, 35, 37 (first and VOTING TIME second indents), 39, 42, 54, 51, 43, 52, and 45 (second part)

8. Driving licence * (vote) Amendments fallen: 58, 27, 28, 57, 7, 33, 34, 25, 46 to 50. (Amaral report — Doc. A 3-80/90)

The rapporteur spoke: — Proposal for a directive COM(88) 705 final — Doc. C 3-41/89: — at the beginning of the vote on the amendments by the Committee on the Environment,

Amendments adopted: 2, 3, 5, 6, 23, 7, 20 by electronic — to request a split vote on amendment 32 (as the vote, 9, 11, 24, 14, 15, 16, 21, 17 and 18 vote had already opened, the President rejected this request), Amendments rejected: 1,4, 10, 22, 32, 13 by electronic — to point out that amendment 17 had not fallen, vote, and 34 since the second part of amendment 37 had been rejected (the President endorsed this view), Amendments fallen: 29, 30, 31, 8, 33, 12 and 36. — on amendment 23: following a question by the President, she took the view that this amendment had Parliament approved the Commission proposal as fallen, but Mr Visser and Mr Wijsenbeek disagreed. amended (part II, item 1). The President put amendment 23 to the vote with the rapporteur's agreement.

— Draft legislative resolution: A split vote was requested on amendment 37 (SOC):

First part: introductory phrase Explanations of vote: Second part: first and second indents

The following spoke: Mrs Ewing, Mr Falconer and Miss Mcintosh. A split vote was requested on amendment 45 (SOC): First part: up to point 1 (b) inclusive Mrs Jackson asked for details of the Commission's Second part: remainder. stance on these amendments (the President replied that, under the provisions of the Rules of Procedure, such a request could only be made by the rapporteur or Parliament approved the Commission proposal as chairman of the committee responsible). The rappor amended by electronic vote (part I, item 2). 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/29

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

— Draft legislative resolution: The different parts of the text were adopted in succes sion. Explanations of vote: Mr Wijsenbeek spoke his amendment 1. The following spoke: Mr Sarlis, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Bettini, on behalf of the Green Group, and Mr L. Smith. Mr Visser spoke on amendment 1/rev., on behalf of the SOC Group. Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part /// item 2). Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3 (c)).

10. EEC-EFTA relations (vote) END OF VOTING TIME (Motions for resolutions contained in the interim reports by Mrs Jepsen (Doc. A 3-116/90) and Mr Ros- setti (Doc. A 3-146/90), and the report by Mr Liittge (The sitting was suspended at 1.05p.m. and resumed at 3 (Doc. A 3-131/90) pm.)

(a) Jepsen report — Doc. A 3-116/90: IN THE CHAIR: MR GALLAND Amendments adopted: 13 by electronic vote, 6 by elec tronic vote, 15, 9, 8 by electronic vote, 10, 11 and 14 Vice-President

Amendments rejected: 7, 5,4, 3, 2 and 1. The following spoke:

Both unamended and amended parts of the text were — Mrs van Putten, to point out that there would be adopted. an exhibition on Anne Frank in the IPE Building open ing that same evening;

Explanations of vote: — Mr Speroni, who asked for the deadline for tabling amendments to the motion for a resolution by the LDR Mr Elliott spoke. Group and by the LU Group to wind up the debate on oral questions on migrant workers, which had been set at 7 p.m. on ^Monday, should be extended, since these Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3 (a)). motions for resolutions had only become available that morning (in the light of this situation, the President (b) Rossetti report — Doc. A 3-146/90: agreed to postpone the deadline until 5 p.m. that day).

Amendment adopted: 3 11. Topical and urgent debate (list of subjects to be Amendments rejected: 1 by electronic vote, 4 and 5 included)

Amendment withdrawn: 2. The President informed Parliament that, in accordance with Rule 64 (2), the list of subjects for the debate on Both unamended and amended parts of the text were topical and urgent subjects of major importance to be adopted, with the exception of paragraph 6, which we held on Thursday had been drawn up. rejected.

This list contained 55 motions for resolutions grouped Explanations of vote: together as follows:

Mr Klepsch spoke.

I Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3 (b)). I. SOUTH AFRICA

1205/90 by the LU Group (c) Liittge report — Doc. A 3-131/90: 1219/90 by the ER Group Amendments rejected: 1/rev., 2 by electronic vote, and 3. 122Q/90 by the EPP Group NoC 175/30 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

1221/90 by the LDR Group IV. HUMAN RIGHTS 1226/90 by the SOC Group Pakistan-Kashmir 1233/90 by the RB Group 1195/90 by the EPP Group 1238/90 by the ER Group 1254/90 by the EDA Group 1244/90 by the Green Group 1267/90 by the ED Group 1260/90 by the EUL Group China 1193/90 by the EPP Group II. ISRAEL 1222/90 by the LDR Group 1194/90 by the PPE Group 1253/90 by the EDA Group 1199/90 by the EPP Group Mordechai Vanunu 1207/90 by the LU Group 1204/90 by the LU Group 1214/90 by the ED Group 1223/90 by the SOC Group 1212/90 by the ED Group 1245/90 by the Green Group 1228/90 by the SOC Group

1251 /90 by the EDA Group El Salvador 1259/90 by the RB Group 1264/90 by the EUL Group 1261/90 by the EUL Group Chile 1206/90 by the LU Group I. SITUATION IN CERTAIN AFRICAN COUNTRIES Sudan 1183/90 by Mr Saby and others V. SCHENGEN 1229/90 by the SOC Group 1208/90 by the LU Group Zaire 1209/90 by the EUL Group 1201/90 by the RB Group 1227/90 by the SOC Group 1218/90 by the EPP Group 1232/90 by the RB Group 1225/90 by the SOC Group 1242/90 by the ER Group 1235/90 by the LU Group 1243/90 by the ER Group 1237/90 by the LDR Group 1248/90 by the Green Group 1247/90 by the Green Group 1255/90 by the EDA Group 1262/90 by the EUL Group 1258/90 by the LDR Group Gabon 1266/90 by the EPP Group 1202/90 by the RB Group In accordance with Rule 64 (3), the overall speaking 1236/90 by the LU Group time for this debate had been allocated as follows, sub 1246/90 by the Green Group ject to modification of the list: 1252/90 by the EDA Group For one of the authors: 1 minute Members: 90 minutes in total Central Africa 1241/90 by the ER Group In accordance with Rule 64 (2), second subparagraph, any objections to this list, which would have to be Liberia tabled and justified in writing by a political group or at least 23 members, had to be tabled by 8 p.m. that eve 1231/90 by the SOC Group ning; the vote on these objections would be taken with 1234/90 by the RB Group out debate at the beginning of the next day's sitting. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/31

Tuesday, 12 June 1990 ,

12. Right of residence */** I (continuation of debate) EPP Group, Lord Inglewood, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bandres Molet, on behalf of the Green The following spoke: Mrs Piermont, on behalf of the Group, Mr Bontempi, on behalf of the EUL Group, RB Group, Mr Hughes, Mr Pronk, Miss Rawlings, Mr Mrs Muscardini, non-attached member, Mr Garcia Bandres Molet, Mr Nianias, Mr Le Chevallier, Mr Spe- Amigo, Mr de Rossa and Sir Leon Brittan, Vice-Presi- roni, Mr Pagoropoulos, Mr Oostlander, Lord Ingle- dent of the Commission. wood, Mr Fitzgerald, Mr Simeoni, Mrs Diihrkop Diihrkop, Mr Reymann, Mr Kostopoulos, Mr Bange- The President declared the debate closed. mann, Vice-President of the Commission, Mr van Out- rive, rapporteur, who put a question to the Commission He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. which Mr Bangemann answered. the following day (part 1, item 21 of minutes of 13 June 1990). The President declared the debate closed. IN THE CHAIR: MR CAPUCHO He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. the following day (part I, item 19 of minutes of 13 June Vice-President 1990). 15. Question Time (questions to the Commission) 13. Direct life assurance ** I (debate) I Parliament then considered a number of questions to the Commission, the Council and European Political Mr Saridakis introduced his report, drawn up on behalf Cooperation (Doc. B 3-1054/90). of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the amended proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 46 final — Doc. C 3-90/90 — Questions to the Commission SYN 177), submitted pursuant to Article 149 (3) of the EEC Treaty, for a second directive on the coordination Question 1 by Mr Pery would receive a written answer of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relat as its author was absent. ing to direct life assurance, laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 79/267/EEC (Doc. Question 2 by Mr Habsburg: The European dimension in the A 3-130/90). , postal service Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission, IN THE CHAIR: MR FORMIGONI answered the question and supplementaries by Mr Habsburg and Mr Howell. Vice-President

The following spoke: Mr Rothley, on behalf of the Question 3 by Mr Zeller: Present gaps in East German know ledge of the European Community SOC Group, Mr Janssen van Raay, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Price, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bontempi, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Bru Puron Mr Dondelinger, Member of the Commission, answered and Sir Leon Brittan, Vice-President of the Commission. the question and supplementaries by Mr Zeller, Mr Lane, Mr Habsburg and Mr Ephremidis.

The President declared the debate closed. Question 4 by Mr Killilea would receive a written answer as its author was absent. He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. the following day (part I, item 20 of minutes of 13 June Questions 5 by Mr Howell and 6 by Mr Pasty were not 1990). called as the subject was already entered elsewhere on the agenda for the part-session.

14. Damage caused by waste ** I (debate) The following spoke: Mr Howell, who disputed this decision with regard to his question 5 as he considered Mr Ferri introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of that it did not concern the same subject as the Commis the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, sion statement due to be made later in the day, Sir Jack on the proposal from the Commission to the Council Stewart-Clark, who agreed with him, Mr MacSharry, for a directive on civil liability for damage caused by Member of the Commission, who announced that he waste (COM(89) 282 final — Doc. C 3-154/89 — SYN was willing to answer the question, Mr Nicholson, who 217) (Doc. A 3-126/90). also endorsed Mr Howell's comments, Mr Howell, who asked for his question to be dealt with, and Mr Bange The following spoke: Mr Medina Ortega, on behalf of mann, Vice-President of the Commission, on the proce the SOC Group, Mr Janssen van Raay, on behalf of the dure followed in this case. No C 175/32 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

The President reminded Members of the provisions of Mr Barros Moura disputed this decision with regard to Annex II to the Rules of Procedure and upheld the his question 15 and asked for an assurance that it decision not to call the question. would indeed be dealt with by the Commission when it made its statement the next day.

Question 7 by Mr Cooney: Shannon-Erne Link The President replied that he could not speak on behalf of the Commission and upheld the decision not to call Mr Millan, Member of the Commission, answered the the question. question and supplementaries by Mr Cooney, Mr Bla- ney and Mr Cushnahan.

Question 16 by Mr Iversen: Directive 88/379/EEC on danger ous preparations Question 8 by Mr De Rossa: North-South Rail Link, Ireland

Mr Bangemann answered the question and supplemen Mr Millan answered the question and supplementaries taries by Mr Iversen, Mr Bonde and Mr Cassidy. by Mr De Rossa, Mr A. Smith and Mrs Banotti.

Mr Nicholson spoke. Question 17 by Mr Cassidy: 88/379/EEC preparations Direc tive

Question 9 by Mr Papayannakis: Granting of transit permits for road haulage through Yugoslavia Mr Bangemann answered the question and a supple mentary by Mr Cassidy. Mr Millan answered the question and supplementaries by Mr Papayannakis, Mr Lane and Mr Ephremidis. Question 18 by Mr Andrews would receive a written answer as its author was absent. Mr Killilea asked whether his question 4 could still be taken at the end of Question Time as he had been in a meeting at the time when his question was called. Question 19 by Mr Martin: Exploitation of the Alaskan walrus \ • for ivory and The President replied that he could not agree to this.

Question 20 by Mr Morris: Ivory trade in Alaskan walruses Question 10 by Mr Lalor: Joint Committee on transport

Mr Papandreou, Member of the Commission, answered Mr Bangemann answered the question and supplemen the question and a supplementary by Mr Lalor. taries by Mr Martin and Mrs Pollack.

Question 11 by Mr Peter would receive a written The President declared the first part of Question Time answer as its author was absent. closed.

Mr Dessylas protested at the organization and the con Question 12 by Mrs van Putten: Refugees from Irian Jaya duct of Question Time and in particular at what he felt to be the excessively lengthy replies of the Commis Mr Papandreou answered the question and supplemen sion. Mr Bangemann rejected these criticisms as being taries by Mrs van Putten, Mr McMahon and Mrs Pol unjustified. lack.

16. Action taken by the Commission on the opinions of Question 13 by Mr Ephremidis: Measures for the re-establish ment of Pontic Greek refugees within the framework of new Parliament Community initiatives The President pointed that the Commission statement Mr Papandreou answered the question and a supple on the action taken by it on the opinions adopted by mentary by Mr Ephremidis. Parliament during the April and May 1990 part-session had been distributed ('). Questions 14 by Mrs Elmalan and 15 by Mr Barros Moura were not called as the subject was already (') See Annex to the verbatim report of proceedings of the entered on the agenda for the following day. sitting of 12 June 1990. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/33

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

The following spoke: Mr McMahon, Mr Bangemann, 19. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, trans Vice-President of the Commission, Mr McMahon, Mr port and telecommunications sectors ** II (debate) Bangemann, Mr McMahon, Mr Bangemann, Mr Cox and Mr Bangemann. The next item was the recommendation for the second reading, drawn up by Mr Herman, on behalf of the (The sitting was suspended at 7p.m. and resumed at 9 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and p.m.) Industrial Policy, on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the procurement procedures of entities operating in IN THE CHAIR: MR CRAVINHO the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (Doc. C 3-99/90 — SYN 153 and 154) (Doc. Vice-President A 3-129/90).

The following spoke: Mrs Hoff, Mr de Donnea, on 17. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs ** II (debate) behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Bangemann Vice-Presi dent of the Commission, and Mr Herman, rapporteur, Mr Pimenta introduced the recommendation for the who apologized for not having been present when the second reading, drawn up on behalf of the Committee item was called. on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Pro tection, on the common position drawn up by the The President declared the debate closed. Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs (Doc. C 3-74/90 — He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. SYN 155) (Doc. A 3-118/90) (')• the following day (part I, item 17 of minutes of 13 June 1990). The following spoke: Mr Schleicher, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Jackson, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission, Mrs 20. Machinery ** I (debate) Jackson who put a question to the Commission which Mr Bangemann answered. Mr Christiansen introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Economic and Mone The President declared the debate closed. tary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 624 final — Doc. C 3-21/90 — SYN 233) for a regulation amending He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. Directive 89/392/ECC on the approximation of the the following day (part I, item 15 of minutes of 13 June laws of the Member States relating to-machinery (Doc. 1990). A 3-125/90).

18. Appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II (debate) Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission, spoke. Mr Lataillade introduced the recommendation for the second reading, drawn up on behalf of the Committee The President declared the debate closed. on the Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the common position drawn up by the He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the following day (part I, item 22 of minutes of 13 June the approximation of the laws of the Member States 1990). relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (Doc. C 3- 38/90 — SYN 178) (Doc. A 3-128/90). 21. EURET and EUROTRA programmes ** I (debate)

The following spoke: Mr Patterson, on behalf of the The next item was the joint debate on two reports, ED Group, Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Com drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Energy, mission, and the rapporteur, who withdrew amendment Research and Technology. 2.

Mr Pierros introduced his report on the proposal from The President declared the debate closed. the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 557 final — Doc. C 3-244/89 — SYN 266) for a decision adopting a He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. specific research and technological development pro the following day (part I, item 16 of minutes of 13 June gramme in the field of transport (EURET) (1990-1993) 1990). (Doc. A 3-148/90).

(') Oral question Doc. B 3-1055/90 was included in the Mr Desama introduced his report on the proposal from debate. the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 603 final — NoC 175/34 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

Doc. C 3-15/90 — SYN 288) for a decision adopting a an early vote pursuant to Rule 56(3) to wind up the • specific programme concerning the preparation of the debate on the Commission statement: development of an operational, EUROTRA system (Doc. A 3-136/90). — by Mr Pisoni, Mr Boge, Mr Klepsch, Mr Bocklet, Mr Navarro Velasco, Mr Borgo, Mr Dalsass, Mr Car- valho Cardoso, Mr Mottola, Mr Funk and Mr Sonnev- The following spoke: Mr Seligmann, on behalf of the eld, on behalf of the EPP Group, on Bovine Spongi ED Group, Mrs Goedmakers, on behalf of the SOC form Encephalopathy (BSE) (Doc. B 3-1274/90); Group, Mr Bettini, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Pompidou, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Pandolfi, — by Mr Martinez, on behalf of the ER Group, on Vice-President of the Commission, Mrs Goedmakers, the health risks connected with British beef exports who put a question to the Commission which Mr Pan (Doc. B 3-1277/90); dolfi answered. — by Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf, Mr Verbeek and Mrs Fernex, on behalf of the Green Group, on the emerg The President declared the debate closed. ence of the BSE virus in Great Britain and other Com munity countries and on the measures to be taken to He announced that the vote would be taken at 5 p.m. prevent the epidemic from spreading (Doc. B 3-1285/ the following day (part I, item 23 of minutes of 13 June 90); 1990). — by Mr Thareau, Mr Stevenson, Mr Gorlach, Mr Colino Salamanca, Mr Woltjer and Mr Happart, on behalf of the SOC Group, on BSE (Doc. B 3-1287/90); 22. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990 — Preliminary draft budget for 1991 (debate) — by Mr Howell, Mr Simmonds, Sir James Scott- Hopkins and Lord Inglewood, on behalf of the ED Group, on BSE (Doc. B 3-1288/90); Mr Tomlinson introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Budgets, on the draft sup plementary and amending budget No 2 for the 1990 He stated that the request for an early vote would be financial year (Doc. C 3-129/90) (Doc. A 3-157/90). put to the vote at the end of the debate.

Mr Schmidhuber, Member of the Commission, first The following spoke: Mr Stevenson, on behalf of the spoke on the draft supplementary and amending SOC Group, Mr Nicholson, on behalf of the EPP budget No 2 for the 1990 financial year, then introd Group, Mr Howell, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr uced the preliminary draft budget of the European Graefe zu Baringdorf, on behalf of the Green Group, Communities for the financial year 1991. Mr Lane, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Paisley, non-attached member, Mr McCartin, Mr Killilea, Mr Boge and Mr MacSharry. The following spoke: Mr Lamassoure, general rappor teur on the budget for 1991, who also spoke on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Colom i Naval, on behalf of the The President declared the debate closed. SOC Group, Mr Lo Giudice, on behalf of the EPP Group,- Mr Elles, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Pasty, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Schmidhuber, Mr Decision on the request for an early vote: Tomlinson, rapporteur, and Mr Schmidhuber.

Parliament agreed to an early vote. The President declared the debate closed.

The motions themselves would be put to the vote at He announced that the vote on the supplementary and 6.30 p.m. on Thursday (part I, item 19 of minutes of 14 amending budget No 2 for 1990 would be taken at 5 June 1990). p.m. the following day (part I, item 14 of minutes of 13 June 1990).

24. Financial and technical assistance to Latin Ameri can and Asian developing countries * (debate) 23. UK beef exports (Commission statement followed by a debate) Mrs van Putten introduced her third report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Development and Mr MacSharry, Member of the Commission, made a Cooperation, on the proposal from the Commission to statement on UK beef exports. the Council for a decision setting general guidelines for 1990 for financial and technical assistance to Latin The President announced that he had received the fol American and Asian developing countries (SEC(89) lowing five motions for resolutions with a request for 1456 final — Doc. C 3-169/89) (Doc. A 3-151/90). 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/35

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

The following spoke: Mr Verhagen, on behalf of the — oral question with debate to EPC on cooperation EPP Group, Mr Telkamper, on behalf of the Green on security; Group, and Mr Matutes, Member of the Commission. — Council and Commission statements on racism and xenophobia (followed by debate); The President declared the debate closed. — joint debate on five oral questions to the Council, He announced that the vote would be taken at 6.30 the Commission and EPC on immigration; p.m. on Thursday (part I, item 20 of minutes of 14 June — joint debate on three oral questions to the Com 1990). mission on relations between the Community and China. Miss Mcintosh, rapporteur on the last item on that day's agenda (Doc. A 3-106/90), criticized the organ 12 noon: ization of business which had resulted in her report being postponed twice that week, and insisted that it be — formal sitting (address by Mr Mandela, winner of taken without fail the next day. the 1988 Sakharov Prize).

The President took note of her remarks. 3p.m. to 4.30p.m.:

25. Agenda for next sitting — Question Time (questions to the Council and EPC). The President announced the following agenda for the sitting on Wednesday, 13 June 1990: 5 p.m.:

Votes on: 9 a.m. to 12 noon and 3 p.m. to 9p.m.: — the Harrison report on the Rules of Procedure; — topical and urgent debate (objections); — the Tomlinson report on the supplementary budget — Council statements on the term of office of the No 2 for 1990; Irish Presidency and institutional orientations for the — reports taken under the Single Act (including the second Dublin Summit (followed by debate); van Outrive report on the right of residence).

(The sitting was closed at 0.15 a.m.)

Enrico VINCI Enrique BAR6N CRESPO Secretay- General President NoC 175/36 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

PART II

Texts adopted by the European Parliament

1. Driving licence

— Proposal for a directive COM(88) 705 final

Proposal from the Commission for a Council directive on the driving licence

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (•) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 2)

Article 1(2)

2. The Community model driving licence within the 2. The Community model driving licence within the meaning of this Directive and driving licences issued by meaning of this Directive and driving licences issued by the Member States before this Directive took effect shall the Member States before this Directive took effect shall be mutually recognized by the Member States and the be mutually recognized by the Member States for at least conditions of their validity shall be determined by the one year after a holder takes up normal residence in a State which issued them regardless of the State of resi Member State other than that which issued the licence. dence of the holder of the licence. After the time limit has expired, the provisions of Article 10 shall apply.

(Amendment No 3)

Article 4(1), before category A, category 0 (new)

Category 0:

Motor-assisted pedal cycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding 50 cm3.

(Amendment No 5)

Article 4(4)

4. Within category A, a specific driving licence shall be 4. Deleted issued for driving the following vehicles: — motorcycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding 400 cm3 or of a power not exceeding 35 kW, — motorcycles with a cubic capacity of over 400 cm3 or of a power of over 35 kW.

Within the sub-category for motorcycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding 400 cm3 a specific licence may be issued for driving light motorcycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding 125 cm3.

(*) For full text see OJ No C 48, 27.2.1989, p. 1. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/37

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 6)

Article 4(5), category C

— Category C: Category C: Motor vehicles other than those in category D and Motor vehicles other than those in category D and whose maximum authorized mass is over 3 500 kg whose maximum authorized mass is over 3 500 kg but not more than 7 500 kg. but not more than 7 500 kg; notwithstanding this provision and those of Article 8(l)(a), a Member State may, after consultation with the Commission, permit these vehicles to be driven by holders of a category B licence.

(Amendment No 23)

Article 4(6), indent la (new)

— 'Motor-assisted pedal cycle' means any two-wheeled vehicle with a maximum design speed not exceeding §0 km/h or, if it is powered by an internal-combustion engine, with a cubic capacity of less than 50 cm3

(Amendment No 7)

Article 4(6), third indent, first part

'tricycle' and 'quadricycle' mean respectively any — 'tricycle' and 'quadricycle' mean respectively any three or four-wheeled vehicle in category B with a three-wheeled vehicle, including motorcycles with a maximum design speed of over 50 km/h or, if these sidecar, or four-wheeled vehicle with a maximum vehicles are powered by a spark-ignition internal design speed of over 50 km/h or, if these vehicles are combustion engine, with a cubic capacity of more powered by a spark-ignition internal combustion than 50 cm3 or any other engine of equivalent power. engine, with a cubic capacity of more than 50 cm3 or The unladen mass shall not exceed 500 kg. The any other engine of equivalent power. The unladen unladen mass of electrically-propelled vehicles shall mass of electrically-propelled vehicles shall not take not take account of the battery mass. account of the battery mass.

(Amendment No 20)

Article 4(7a) (new)

7a. Member States may, after consultation with the Commission, allow on their territory vehicles of catego ry D (maximum 16 seats without the driver's seat and maximum weight of 3 500 kg excluding any specialized equipment for the carriage of disabled passengers) to be driven by holders over 21 years old of a driving licence of category B which was obtained at least two years before, provided that: (a) the vehicles are being used by non commercial bodies for social purposes, and (b) the driver is employed by the non-commercial body, or (c) the driver provides his services as a driver on a voluntary basis. NoC 175/38 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 9)

Article 4(7b) (new)

7b. Member States may, after consultation with the Commission, allow on their territory vehicles of a maxi mum authorized mass exceeding 3 500 kg to be driven by holders over 21 years old of a driving licence of category B which was obtained at least two years before, provided that the main purpose of the vehicles is to be used only when stationary as an instructional or recreational area, and that they are being used by non-commercial bodies for social purposes and that the vehicles have been modified so that they may not be used either for the transport of more than nine persons or for the transport of any goods other than those strictly necessary for their purposes.

(Amendment No 11)

Article 7(1 )(a)

(a) Category A: (a) Category A: — Motorcycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding Applicants must be at least 18 years of age. 3 400 cm or a power not exceeding 35 kW: appli Member States may derogate from this provision cants must be at least 18 years of age. Member and issue such licences from the age of 17. States may derogate from this provision and issue such licences from the age of 17 years. — Motorcycles with a cubic capacity of over 400 cm3 Deleted or with a power of over 35 kW: applicants must have held a licence to drive vehicles in the sub category immediately below for two years.

(Amendment No 24)

Article 7(1)(f)

(0 Optional sub-categories (f) Optional sub-categories — Light motorcycles with a cubic capacity not — Deleted exceeding 125 cm3: applicants must be at least 16 years of age. — Tricycles and quadricycles: applicants must be — Tricycles and quadricycles: applicants must be at least 16 years of age. at least 17 years of age.

(Amendment No 14)

Annex II, point 2.2

2.2 mechanical aspects with a bearing on road safety; 2.2 mechanical aspects with a bearing on road safety; in particular they must be sufficiently familiar with, and in particular they must be sufficiently familiar with the be able to put right, the most common faults in the steer most common faults in the steering system, tyres, lights ing system, tyres, lights and direction indicators, reflec and direction indicators, reflectors, rear-view mirrors, tors, rear-view mirrors, windscreen washers and wipers, windscreen washers and wipers, the exhaust system and the exhaust system and seat-belts; seat-belts; 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/39

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 15) Annex II, point 5, title and point 5.0 (new) 5. Specific requirements for driving category A, C, D, 5. Specific requirements for driving category 0, A, C, C + E and D + E vehicles D, C + E and D + E vehicles 5.0. Category 0 Drivers of motor-assisted pedal cycles must know how: 5.0.1: to adjust their crash-helmet and to check the other safety devices on the vehicle; 5.0.2. to remove the motor-assisted pedal cycle from its stand and to move it, without the aid of the engine, by walking alongside the vehicle; 5.0.3. to park the motor-assisted pedal cycle on its stand; 5.0.4. to perform a U-turn; 5.0.5. to keep the vehicle balanced at various speeds, including slow speeds, and in different driving sit uations; 5.0.6. to lean over to turn; 5.0.7. to judge the road space occupied by the vehicle; 5.0.8. to drive the vehicle in road traffic.

(Amendment No 16) Annex II, point 8.1.2, before category A, category 0 (new) Category 0 Motor-assisted pedal cycles with a cubic capacity not exceeding 50 cm3.

(Amendment No 21) , ANNEX II, point 8.1.2., Category A — sub-category; motorcycles with a cubic capacity not motorcycle without sidecar with a power of at least 20 exceeding 400 cc or a power not exceeding 35 kW; kW or a cubic capacity of at least 240 cc and a mass motorcycle with a power of at least 20 kW or a cubic of at least 120 kg. capacity of at least 240 cc and a mass of at least 120 kg. — sub-category; motorcycles with a cubic capacity of over 400 cc or a power of over 35 kW; motorcycle with a cubic capacity of at least 600 cc. — optional sub-category; light motorcycles; motorcycle with a cubic capacity of at least 80 cc.

(Amendment No 17) Annex III, point 7 HEARING 7. Driving licences shall not be issued to or renewed for 7. Deleted applicants or drivers in group 2 if their hearing is so deficient that it interferes with the proper discharge of their duties. NoC 175/40 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 18) Annex III, point 10.1 Group 2 10.1 Only in very exceptional cases may driving 10.1 Deleted licences be issued to or renewed for applicants or drivers in this group suffering from diabetes mellitus and requiring insulin treatment, and then only where duly justified by authorized medical opinion and subject to regular medical check-ups.

Doc. A3-80/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a directive on the driving licence

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(88) 705 final) ('), — having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 75 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-41/89), — considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A3-80/90),

1. > Approves the Commission's proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal; 4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJNoC 48, 27.2.1989, p. 1. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/41

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

2. Vessels carrying dangerous or polluting goods *

— Proposal for a directive COM(89) 7 final

Proposal from the Commission for a Council directive concerning minimum requirements for vessels entering or leaving Community ports carrying packages of dangerous or polluting goods

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 26)

Title

Proposal for a Council directive concerning minimum Proposal for a Council directive concerning minimum requirements for vessels entering or leaving Community requirements for vessels entering or leaving Community ports carrying packages of dangerous or polluting goods ports or moving through the waters of its Exclusive Econ omic Zone (EEZ) carrying dangerous goods or polluting substances in packaged forms;

(Amendment No 1)

First recital

Whereas the volume of dangerous goods carried by sea Whereas the volume of dangerous or polluting goods has been growing unabated, increasing the risk of acci- carried by sea has been growing unabated, increasing the dents that could be on a catastrophic.scale; risk of accidents that could be on a catastrophic scale;

(Amendment No 2)

Second recital

Whereas it is necessary to minimize the risk of such Whereas it is necessary to minimize the risk of such accidents with their potential of seriously injuring any accidents with their potential of seriously injuring any person coming into contact with the goods and damaging person coming into contact with the goods and damaging the marine environment; the marine environment, and whereas the first step to be taken is to restrict, or even reduce, the volume of such goods;

(Amendment No 3)

Recital 4a (new)

Whereas recent cases of accidents have shown the difficul ty of providing speedy and proper compensation for victims (including fishermen, tourists, coastal communities), and whereas it is therefore the political responsibility of gov ernments and carriers to reduce the risks before having to provide compensation;

(*) For full text see OJ No C 147, 14.6.1989, p. 3. I NoC 175/42 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 4)

Fifth recital

Whereas observance of certain navigation standards Whereas observance of certain navigation standards would help to reduce the accident risk; would help to reduce the accident risk and whereas the Community's role is to contribute to the improvement and application of international conventions such as the 1974 SOLAS Convention (Chapter VII of which concerns the transportation of dangerous goods) and the MARPOL Convention 73/78 (Annex III of which, as amended, covers pollution caused by harmful substances carried by sea in packaged forms);

(Amendment No 5)

Recital 5a (new)

Whereas fourteen European countries, including the Member States of the EC, have signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control, which includes MARPOL 73/78 among the relevant instruments com pliance with which is required by inspections;

• (Amendment No 30)

Recital 5b (new)

Whereas, as a result, the introduction of different less rigorous standards would put Community vessels which respect MARPOL standards at a disadvantage compared to those from states which have not adopted the conven tion;

(Amendment No 31)

Sixth recital

Whereas the port authorities must be informed in good Whereas the port authorities must be informed in good time of the dangerous nature of the goods loaded, time of the dangerous nature of the goods loaded, unloaded or moved in their port so that they can take all unloaded or moved in their port and in the waters of the the necessary measures considering the dangerous nature Exclusive Economic Zone so that they can take all the of those goods; necessary measures considering the dangerous nature of those goods;

(Amendment No 6)

Recital 6a (new)

Whereas more tangible progress and fairer competition between ports in the Member States will be achieved if the Community is given supplementary supervisory powers in relation to the application of standards; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/43

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 32)

Article 1

The purpose of this Directive is to require vessels enter The purpose of this Directive is to require vessels enter ing or leaving Community ports carrying packages of ing or leaving Community ports and those moving dangerous goods to observe a minimum standards through the waters of its Exclusive Economic Zone carry designed to improve shipping safety, safeguard human ing dangerous or polluting goods in packages to observe a life and protect the marine environment. number of minimum standards designed to improve shipping safety, safeguard human life and protect the marine environment.

(Amendment No 8)

Article 2

For the purpose of this Directive: For the purpose of this Directive: — 'vessels concerned' means vessels carrying dangerous — 'vessels concerned' means vessels entering or leaving goods in packages, containers, mobile tankers, tanker Community ports and carrying dangerous or polluting lorries and tanker wagons; goods in packages; — 'dangerous goods' means the substances, products, — 'dangerous or polluting goods' means the goods listed solutions and mixtures listed in Annex 4.1 to this in the IMDG Code (International Maritime Dange Directive. rous Goods Code); — 'packages' means any form of packaging listed in Annex III of the MARPOL Convention 73/78.

(Amendment No 9)

Article 4

Member States shall take all necessary and appropriate Member States shall take all necessary and appropriate measures to ensure that the vessels concerned entering or measures to ensure that the vessels concerned observe leaving Community ports observe the minimum require the minimum requirements set out in Articles 5 to 8 of ments set out in Articles 5, 6, 7 and 8 of this Direc this Directive and in Annex III of the MARPOL Conven tive. tion 73/78, and, in particular, observe the conditions on packaging, marking, labelling, documents and stowage set out in the IMDG Code. By 31 December 1990 the Com mission will transpose into a proposal for a regulation the paragraphs concerning notifications and will cooperate with the IMO in making labelling more readily under standable for workers.

(Amendment No 10)

Article 5, first indent

— communicate to the competent authority of the — communicate to the competent authority of the Member State in which the port of berthing or depar Member State in which the port of berthing or depar ture is located, either directly or via agents represent ture is located, either directly or via agents represent ing their line, the information listed in Annex I to ing their line, the information listed in Annex I to NoC 175/44 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

this Directive. This information must be submitted this Directive. This information must be submitted not later than 24 hours before the vessel berths or not later than 24 hours before the vessel berths or sets sail (or in good time for short-sea sailings); sets sail (or in good time for short-sea sailings), since the competent authorities of the State where the port of berthing is situated will have to authorize the entry and the departure of the vessel. This information shall be communicated by the competent authority to port workers' representatives and to environmental protec tion organizations on request;

(Amendment No 11)

Article 5, first indent, second subparagraph (new)

as soon as possible, the competent authorities shall use the data processing networks set up under the Memorandum of Understanding on shipping control to forward this information to the other ports affected;

(Amendments Nos 36 and 12)

Article 5, second indent

establish as soon as possible radiotelephone commu — establish as soon as possible radiotelephone commu nication with the coastal radio stations in the Mem nication with the coastal radio stations in the Mem ber State concerned — in particular with the nearest ber State concerned — in particular with the nearest radar station, if there is one — and maintain such radar station, or maritime emergency services, where communication; they exist — and maintain such communication in conformity with the international rules normally applied;

(Amendment No 13)

Article 5, fourth indent

avail themselves of the pilot services available on the — avail themselves of the pilot services available on the spot and provide the pilot — and on request the spot and provide the pilot — and on request the competent authority in the Member State in which , competent authority in the Member State in which the port is located — with a check list based on the the port is located — with a check list complying with model in Annex II to this Directive plus a copy of the the international regulations plus a copy of the list or list or manifest mentioned in point 1.8 of Annex I. manifest mentioned in point 1.8 of Annex I.

(Amendment No 14)

Article 5, second paragraph (new)

The shipping authorities of the Member States may pro hibit movement by the vessels concerned where they con sider that shipping safety, the safety of workers or the protection of the marine environment so requires. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/45

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 15)

Article 5, third paragraph (new)

The shipping authorities of the Member States may also order the vessels concerned to follow certain courses or to take on board a pilot within their territorial waters.

(Amendment No 37)

Article 6, introductory phrase

Before entering the territorial waters of a Member State Before entering the waters of the Exclusive Economic or, if they are already there, immediately, the vessel con Zone of a Member State or, if they are already there, cerned shall notify the competent authorities in the immediately, the vessel concerned shall notify the com Member State or Member States concerned of: petent authorities in the Member State or Member States concerned of:

(Amendment No 16)

Article 6, first indent

any deficiencies or incidents which may decrease the — any deficiencies or incidents which may decrease the normal safe manoeuvrability of the vessel, affect the normal safe manoeuvrability of the vessel, pose a safety and flow of traffic or constitute a real or poten risk to the health or safety of crews or land-based tial hazard to the marine environment or coastal workers, affect the safety and flow of traffic or con areas; stitute a real or potential hazard to the marine envi ronment or coastal areas;

(Amendment No 17)

Article 6, second indent

— any leak of dangerous goods within the vessel and — any leak of goods covered by this Directive within the any discharges at sea of such goods, particularly of vessel and any discharges at sea of such goods. This goods listed in Annex 4.II. This notification must be notification must be based on the IMO's standard based on the model set out in Annex 3. procedures.

(Amendment No 38)

Article 6a (new)

Article 6a

The shipping authorities of the Member State who have been notified of the presence in the waters of its Exclusive Economic Zone of the vessels concerned must immediately indicate the routes to be followed by such ships.

(Amendment No 18)

Article 7

Pilots engaged in the berthing or departure of the vessels Pilots engaged in the berthing or departure of the vessels concerned shall immediately inform the competent auth- concerned shall immediately inform the competent auth- NoC 175/46 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ority in the Member State in which the port is located ority in the Member State in which the port is located whenever they learn of any deficiencies which may pre whenever they learn of any deficiencies which may pre judice the safe navigation of the vessel or cause pollution judice the safe navigation of the vessel, pose a risk to the of the marine environment. health or safety of crews and land-based workers or cause pollution of the marine environment.

(Amendment No 40)

Article 8

The shipping authorities in the coastal State shall inform The shipping authorities in the coastal State shall inform all vessels sailing in their territorial waters, and likely to all vessels sailing in the waters of its Exclusive Economic be concerned, of the presence in the area of vessels Zone, and likely to be concerned, of the presence in the known to be carrying dangerous goods and shall alert area of vessels known to be carrying dangerous goods and them to keep a closer watch and adopt the most .appro shall alert them to keep a closer watch and adopt the most priate measures called for by the presence of these vessels appropriate measures called for by the presence of these and by the dangerous nature of their cargo. vessels and by the dangerous nature of their cargo.

(Amendment No 19)

Article 8, second paragraph (new)

Crews of vessels from the Member States which carry dangerous or polluting goods in packages and land-based personnel must have the necessary training in the loading, unloading and handling on board of dangerous or polluting goods and on the procedures to be followed in case of accident. In particular, they must be aware of the risks to. health and the environment presented by the substances they are handling.

(Amendments Nos 41 and 53)

Article 8a (new)

Article 8a

It is forbidden for passenger-carrying vessels from the Member States to carry in any form dangerous goods or polluting substances in packaged forms.

(Amendment No 20)

Article 9

The provisions laid down in this Directive shall not apply Deleted to: (a) warships and other official vessels used for non-com mercial purposes; (b) stores and equipment for use on board vessels. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/47

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 21)

Article 10

Whenever appropriate, the Council shall decide, on a pro The Commission shall cooperate with the International posal from the Commission, on the system to replace the Maritime Organization (IMO), trade unions and environ information and notification procedure introduced by mental protection organizations in updating the informa this Directive in the light of technological progress and tion and notification procedures introduced by this information exchanges between vessels and shore-based Directive in the light of technological progress in infor installations. mation exchanges between vessels and shore-based in stallations.

(Amendment No 22)

Article 10a (new)

Article 10a

By 31 December 1990 the Commission shall submit a proposal for a regulation introducing supplementary ar rangements for Community monitoring of the application of the standards laid down by ports in the Member States of the Community.

(Amendment No 44)

Article 10b (new)

Article 10b

The provisions of this Directive shall be without prejudice to the application of the rules drawn up by the 1973/1978 MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships.

(Amendment No 45)

Annex I, title

Information on vessels carrying packages of dangerous Information on vessels carrying dangerous goods or pol goods luting substances in packaged forms

(Amendment No 23/corr.)

Annex I, points 1.7 and 1.8

1.7.- Precise nature of the dangerous goods carried, 1.7. Precise nature of the substances carried, in accord based on the lists set out in Annexes 4, 4a and 4b, numbers ance with the provisions of Annex III of the MARPOL and quantities involved and location on the vessel Convention 73/78 and the nomenclature of the IMDG Code, the numbers and quantities involved and location on the vessel

1.8. Confirmation that a list or manifest or appro 1.8. Confirmation that a list or manifest and a stowage priate loading plan is on board giving details of the dan plan are on board, pursuant to the provisions of Annex III gerous goods carried and of their location on the vessel. of the MARPOL Convention 73/78. NoC 175/48 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 24) Annexes II, III and IV These annexes are deleted

— Doc. A3-108/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a directive concerning minimum requirements for vessels entering or leaving Commu nity ports carrying packages of dangerous or polluting goods

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 7 final) ('), — having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 84(2) of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-61/89), — considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection (Doc. A3- 108/90),

1. Approves the Commission's proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal; 4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJ No C 147, 14.6.1989, p. 3. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/49

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

3. EEC-EFT A relations

(a) Doc. A3-116/90

RESOLUTION

on the Community's future political relations with the EFTA countries

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Luxembourg Declaration of 9 April 1984 on relations between the Community and EFTA,

— having regard to the statement made by the President of the Commission to the European Parliament on 17 January 1989 on improving and strengthening relations between the Community and EFTA,

— having regard to its resolution of 13 December 1989 on relations between the Community and EFTA ('),

— having regard to the Joint Declaration of 19 December 1989 by the Foreign Ministers of the twelve Member States of the Community and the seven EFTA countries on initiating formal negotiations for future cooperation between the two groups of countries and on the institu tional framework for such cooperation,

— having regard to its resolution of 5 April 1990(2) concerning the European Parliament's participation in drawing up Community guidelines for negotiations on and the conclusion of an association agreement between the Community and the EFTA countries on the basis of Article 238 of the EEC Treaty,

— having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 28 and 29 April 1990 in Dublin,

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Mr Pirkl and others on the role of EFTA in the next stage of European integration (Doc. B3-409/90),

— having regard to the interim report of the Political Affairs Committee (Doc. A3-116/90),

A. considering that the Community and EFTA share common principles, political values and conceptions of society and that cooperation between the Community and EFTA is crucially important for the future of Europe,

B. recalling that the EFTA countries are the Community's most important trading partners,

C. stressing that the Community is faced with taking a wide range of important and far- reaching decisions about its own future particularly in order to strengthen both its economic and monetary structures and its political structures,

D. stressing that it is in Europe's interest — and not only that of the twelve Community Member States — that the Community can continue to play an active as well as stabilizing role in the creation of the new European architecture,

E. whereas cooperation between the Community and EFTA will be one element of the new European architecture,

F. whereas the Community and the EFTA countries should extend their cooperation in future with a view to supporting and promoting the democratization and reform process in Eastern and Central Europe,

(') OJ No C 15, 22.1.1990, p. 336. (2) See minutes of that day's sitting — Part II, Item 11. No C 175/50 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

G. recalling the positive joint role played by the Community and EFTA within the PHARE programme in assisting the countries of Central and Eastern Europe,

1. Confirms its interest in the setting up of a European Economic Area and the establishment of closer relations between the Community and the EFTA countries;

2. Considers that the process of European integration launched by the European Community and the participation of EFTA in that process are positive factors in efforts to promote broader relations between Western Europe and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe;

3. Considers that suitable procedures should be developed to maintain a continual dialogue between the European Parliament and the parliaments of the EFTA countries;

4. Takes the view that a subsequent expansion of the Community tp include those EFTA countries that aspire to accede individually is both desirable and possible taking account of progress made by the Community at that time towards political union, with particular reference to the achievement of economic and monetary union;

5. Calls for the Member States' governments and the European Community's Institutions to ensure that the Community retains its decision-making autonomy and that the Community's decision-making process is made more efficient and more democratic before any new Member State accedes;

6. Reiterates the need to strengthen the European Parliament's rights and powers, in order to provide a more democratic instrument for those countries wishing to join the Community in future; stresses that the rights and powers of the European Parliament must be respected in the context of this process and in the course of the official negotiations on future cooperation between the EEC and EFTA;

7. Assumes that cooperation will be set up in compliance with the following principles: — that it does not hold up the process of economic and political integration now under way, including the development of increasingly closer foreign policy cooperation between the Community Member States, — that a reasonable balance between rights and obligations is established in the cooperation process;

8. Considers it vital to the establishment of the European Economic Area that negotiations with EFTA be based on the following principles: — autonomy of decision-making within the Community must be safeguarded; — the four freedoms — free movement of people, goods, capital and services — must be respected; — the achievements of the Community thus far — the acquis communautaire — must be respected; — EFTA must speak with a single voice in the negotiations; — negotiations must not jeopardize the European Parliament's powers set out in the European Single Act nor should they bring into question the development of these powers through future reform of the Treaties at the intergovernmental conferences on political union and economic and monetary union;

9. Urges the Council to keep the European Parliament informed at all levels of negotiations for the conclusion of all cooperation agreements, in particular with the EFTA countries;

10. Stresses its wish that a delegation of its Members be authorized to participate in the negotiations;

11. Requests the President-in-Office of European Political Cooperation to give his observa tions on this resolution officially, in accordance with the seventh subparagraph of Paragraph 2 of the Decision of 28 February 1986; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/51

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments of the Member States and the member states of EFTA.

(b) Doc. A3-146/90

RESOLUTION

on economic and trade relations between the European Community and the EFTA countries

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Luxembourg Declaration of 9 April 1984 on relations between the Community and the EFTA countries,

— having regard to the statement by the President of the Commission to the European Parliament on 17 January 1989, in which he proposed improving and strengthening rela tions between the EEC and EFTA,

— having regard to the Oslo Declaration signed by the EFTA countries in March 1989,

— having regard to the outcome of the third joint meeting between its Committee on External Economic Relations and the Committee of Members of Parliament of the EFTA countries of 30 November 1989, and the communique issued at the conclusion of this meeting,

— having regard to its resolution on EEC-EFTA relations of 13 December 1989 ('),

— having regard to the joint declaration by the Foreign Ministers of the 12 Member States of the EC and the seven EFTA countries of 19 December 1989 in which they resolved to begin formal talks with the aim of establishing a European Economic Area and reaching an agreement on the institutional arrangements for its management,

— having regard to its resolution of 5 April 1990 on EEC-EFTA relations (2), which, in reiterating its support for the creation of a European economic area (EEA), underlines the absolute necessity of safeguarding the Community's autonomy in the decision-making process and the role of the European Parliament,

— having regard to the Commission's proposed negotiating mandate submitted to the REX Committee by Vice-President Mr Andriessen on 15 May 1990,

— having regard to the interim report of the Committee on External Economic Relations (Doc. A3-146/90),

A. whereas the countries of the EEC and EFTA share common principles and values and a common concept of society, and whereas they can together make a positive contribution to closer cooperation between all the countries of Europe,

B. whereas the EFTA countries are the EEC's most important external trading partner,

C. whereas it is of mutual interest to establish ever closer cooperation which takes account of the current changes concerning the EEC's objective of establishing the internal market and the prospect of expanding the Community into a genuine economic, monetary and social union in the institutional context of a political, union of States,

(') OJ NoC 15, 22.1.1990, p. 336. (2) See minutes of that day's sitting — Part II, Item 11. NoC 175/52 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

D. whereas the EEC and the EFTA countries are now being required in their own interests to take on the new, demanding tasks of supporting and encouraging the processes of democra tization and reform begun in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe; whereas such tasks call for not only coordinated measures but also common policies on the overall choices to be made and on the allocation of Western European resources,

E. whereas over the last few months a group of experts from the EEC and EFTA has drawn up a list of the questions which could be raised at the forthcoming negotiations, but whereas nothing has yet been decided,

1. Confirms its interest in and support for the objective of closer and more structured cooperation between the EEC and the EFTA countries leading to the establishment of a European Economic Area;

2. Considers that this objective should not in any way slow down or contradict the planned economic and political integration of the Community;

3. Considers that the agreement to be implemented regarding the European Economic Area does not rule out the possibility of a favourable response from the Community to the accession application already submitted by Austria and to those which may be submitted by other EFTA countries;

4. Stresses that Article 238 chosen as the basis for these negotiations involves joint decision making by Parliament and Council, and that in order to perform this duty properly the EP has already asked for a delegation of its Members to be allowed to attend the negotiations as observers;

5. Considers that the European Economic Area aims at a fundamentally improved free trade area which could eventually be further developed into a customs union;

6. Considers that negotiations must not jeopardize the institutions' powers set out in the European Single Act nor should they take into question the development of these powers through future reform of the Treaties at the intergovernmental conferences on political union and economic and monetary union;

7. Considers that the European Economic Area should involve:

— the application of a competition policy similar to that of the European Community;

— the extension of freedom of movement for persons, goods, services and capital on the basis of the Community patrimony; recommends that any transitional periods for the incorpo ration of Community legislation should be of limited scope and duration, and should not take the form of an actual derogation or exception; — the extension of cooperation, from the outset, to other sectors such as research, develop ment, education, social protection and the environment, the promotion and exchange of culture, development cooperation, equal treatment for men and women and consumer protection, with the proviso that such cooperation should not lead to any reduction in existing standards for environmental protection, social rights and employees' rights in any part of the EEA, or prevent the later raising of any such standards above the general level of the EEA; — some harmonization of taxation on savings, to avoid repercussions from the liberalization of capital movements, and the simplification of border crossings, matters which must be discussed in depth at the forthcoming negotiations, in addition to those already identified by the high-level working party (problems concerning fisheries, the movement of agricultural products, movement of workers and transit and the environment); — the intensification and harmonization of efforts to improve economic and social cohesion and consequently to support the regions and groups of less-favoured people concerned in the European Economic Area and to develop the developing countries of the Third World to a level corresponding to their economic strength; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/53

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

— a concentrated effort vis-a-vis Eastern Europe, with a view to the common European home and in order to consolidate the process of internal democratization and detente in interna tional relations and to help to stabilize economic development and to save the environ ment;

8. Considers it necessary to identify instruments to monitor compliance with the rules in force in the European Economic Area and institutions empowered to settle any disputes which may arise over matters falling within the province of the EEA; considers it necessary, therefore, for the EFTA countries to establish an instrument of surveillance similar to the Community instrument for monitoring competition be met and for an additional chamber to be attached to the Court of Justice with jurisdiction over the European Economic Area;

9. Points out that at the moment there are serious difficulties in coming to an agreement because of the number of exceptions put forward by the EFTA countries regarding freedom of movement for goods, the total liberalization of services, capital movements and freedom of establishment for individuals and hopes that these problems can be resolved during the nego tiations;

10. Considers it desirable to establish instruments or mechanisms allowing close coordina tion in the initial stage of drawing up proposals for decisions in the context of the EEA (decision-shaping); notes also that it is extremely difficult to create joint instruments or mechan isms for decisions (decision-making), given that participation of EFTA countries in commito- logy and the organization of meetings between the 19 EEC and EFTA countries is not acceptable if this would affect the EEC's autonomy in decision-making;

11. Stresses that protection of the EEC's decision-making autonomy now coincides in partic ular with protection of the European Parliament's prerogatives and the prospect of a European political union in which Parliament must have greater powers; that is why an EC/EFT A Agreement should also be based on the results of the upcoming intergovernmental conferences concerning the completion of the economic and monetary union and further institutional reforms;

12. Repeats its demand that the present and future rights and powers of the European Parliament should be respected irrespective of the outcome of negotiations on future cooper ation between the Community and the EFTA countries;

13. Calls on the European Community and the EFTA countries to establish a network of communication at political, administrative and parliamentary level as well as close contacts between the social partners on either side;

14. Considers parliamentary supervision of the joint bodies of the EFT A countries to be a sine qua non of successful cooperation;

15. Hopes that the EFTA countries succeed in speaking with one voice with regard to their relations with the EEC, thereby overcoming the present limitations of an intergovernmental agreement;

16. Calls on the negotiating partners to make every effort to ensure that the EC/EFTA Agreement on establishing a European Economic Area can enter into force on 1 January 1993;

17. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the member countries of EFTA. NoC 175/54 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

RESOLUTION

on the opening of negotiations between the European Economic Community and the EFTA countries concerning scheduled air passenger services

The European Parliament,

— having been informed of the Commission recommendation for a Council decision on the opening of negotiations between the European Economic Community and the EFTA coun tries concerning scheduled air passenger services (COM(90) 18 final),

— having regard to its previous statements on external relations in the civil aviation sphere, in particular its resolution of 10 September 1985 ('),

— having regard to Rule 34(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, the opinion of the Committee on External Economic Relations and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights concerning the appropriate legal basis (Doc. A3-131/90),

A. whereas the completion of the internal air transport market will have to be accompanied by the gradual replacement of existing bilateral aviation agreements between the Community Member States and third countries by agreements concluded by the Community,

B. whereas Community civil aviation is inextricably linked with that of the EFTA member countries; whereas a Community airline is also established in two EFTA countries; whereas all the EFTA member countries have asked the Community to open negotiations on mutual aviation relations on the basis of the package of measures adopted on 14 December 1987 (2), t C. whereas the legal basis which the Commission has proposed for a series of Community measures concerning external air transport relations (Article 113 of the EEC Treaty) is not appropriate because — the provisions of Title IV take precedence, as more specific standards, over the other provisions of the EEC Treaty, — the specific characteristics of transport policy justify its separate treatment on purely practical grounds, — the use of the legal basis proposed by the Commission would lead to unproductive institutional disputes in the Community,

D. whereas, at the current stage of development of the common air transport policy, two and a half years after the entry into force of the package of measures adopted on 14 December 1987 and shortly before a decision is taken on the second stage of this policy (3), it is in the interest of the Community to conclude agreements with the EFTA member countries on tariffs, market access, capacity and the application of competition rules to scheduled air passenger services,

1. Calls on the Council immediately to empower the Commission to open negotiations with Austria, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Sweden and Switzerland concerning the conclusion of an agreement on scheduled air passenger services;

(') OJ NoC 262, 14.10.1985, p. 44. , (J) Regulations (EEC) Nos 3975 and 3976/87; Directive 87/601/EEC and Decision 87/602/EEC, OJ No L 374, 31.12.1987. (3) Commission proposal COM(89) 373 final; in this connection, see Parliament's resolutions of 14 March 1990 (OJ No C 96, 17.4.1990, p. 53) and 18 May 1990 (minutes of that day's sitting — Part II, Item 3). 16. 7. 90 Texts adopted by the European Parliament NoC 175/55

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

2. Calls on the Council to do this on the basis of Articles 84(2) and 228(1) of the EEC Treaty, and calls on the Commission to amend its proposals accordingly;

3. Calls on the Council, when issuing the negotiating mandate, to incorporate the following aspects in the negotiating directives for the Commission: (a) the process of establishing a European economic area should embrace efforts to secure the extensive opening up of air transport markets, including the air freight market, on condition that all participants in that market can exploit the benefits of liberalization and bear equal responsibilities; (b) in the interests of securing speedy results, the negotiations should initially be conducted on the basis of current Community rules; an additional protocol, to be ratified by the Council after the decision-making procedure, should cover the transition to the second stage of the common aif transport policy, the EFTA countries being granted appropriate transitional periods which enable them to adjust gradually; efforts should be made to ensure that the agreed rules also apply to air transport services between EFTA countries; (c) in the interests of the integration of the European air transport market, if possible there should be a uniform timetable for the negotiations with all the EFTA countries; efforts should be made to ensure that the agreed rules also apply to air transport services between EFTA countries; (d) appropriate agreements should ensure, in particular, that future Community measures regarding the taxation of air transport services and the operation of tax free shops do not lead to distortions of competition on intra-European air transport markets; (e) the agreements should be drawn up in such a way that they can be extended, by means of further additional protocols, to cover aspects of technical harmonization, safety, air traffic control cooperation and the rules governing employment in the air transport sector as soon as the Community has taken action in these areas; (f) regardless of the institutions which may be established in future in connection with the European economic area, the agreement should provide for an arbitration mechanism for the rapid and effective settlement of differences of opinion concerning the rights and duties deriving from that agreement;

4. Calls on the Commission to keep Parliament regularly informed on the progress of the negotiations and reserves the right, where appropriate, to deliver additional opinions;

5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the EFT A member countries and the EFTA Parliamentarians Group. NoC 175/56 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

12 June 1990

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AM ARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDREWS, ANGER, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRkS MOLET, BANOTTI, BARROS MOURA, BARTON, BAUR, BEAZLEY CH., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BELO, BENOIT, BERNARD-REYMOND, BERTENS, BETHELL, BETTINI, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BJ0RNVIG, BLAK, BLANEY, BLOT, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONDE, BONETTI, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BOWE, BRAUN-MOSER, BREYER, BRIANT, VAN DEN BRINK, BROK, BRU PURON, BUCHAN, BURON, CABEZON ALONSO, CALVO ORTETGA, CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARIGLIA, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASSIDY, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CEYRAC, CHABERT, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTENSEN F. N., CRISTENSEN I., CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOMBO, COLOM I NAVAL, CONTU, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, COT, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DEFRAIGNE, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DIEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, DI RUPO, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DE DONNEA, DOUSTE-BLAZY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, DUVERGER, ELLES, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EPHREMIDIS, ERNST DE LA GRAETE, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FALQUI, FANTINI, FANTUZZI, FAYOT, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRARA, FERRER I CASALS, FERRI, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORLANI, FORMIGONI, FRIEDRICH, FUCHS, FUNCK, GALLE, GELLENZI, GALLO, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GLINNE, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GORIA, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HANSCH, HAPPART, HARRISON, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERVfc, HERZOG, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, HUME, IMBENI, INGLEWOOD, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON C., JACKSON CH., JAKOBSEN, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KOSTOPOULOS, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LAGORIO, LALOR, LA MALFA, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LA PERGOLA, LARIVE, LARONI, LATAILLADE, LAUGA, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LIMA, LINKOHR, LIVANOS, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LOMAS, LUTTGE, LULLING, LUSTER, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MALANGRE, DE LA MALfeNE, MALHURET, MARCK, MARINHO, MARLEIX, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MAYER, MAZZONE, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENARD, MERZ, METTEN, MICHELINI, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MONTERO ZABALA, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORODO LEONICO, MORRIS, MULLER, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSCARDINI, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN, NORDMANN, ODDY, O'HAGAN, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PAGOROPOULOS, PAISLEY, PAPAYANNAKIS, PAPOUTSIS, PARTSCH, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PEREIRA, PEREZ ROYO, PERREAU DE PINNINCK DOMENECH, PERSCHAU, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, - PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIQUET, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLANAS PUCHADES, POETTERING, POLLACK, POMPIDOU, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PORTO, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA GUTIERREZ, PUNSET I CASALS, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAFFARIN, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, REGGE, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, R0NN, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROUMELIOTIS, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SABY, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SALEMA, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANTOS, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SARLIS, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SCHONHUBER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SEAL, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SISO CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STAMOULIS, VON STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/57

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TARADASH, TAURAN, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TORRES COUTO, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, UKEIWE, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERNIER, VERTEMATI, VERWAERDE, VISENTINI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VOHRER, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAECHTER, WALTER, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN, ZELLER. NoC 175/58 Official Journal of the European Communities 46. 7. 90

Tuesday, 12 June 1990

ANNEX

Result of roll-call votes

( + ) = For

( —) = Against

(O) = Abstention

Urgent procedure

Organic production

( + )

FITZGERALD, LANE, O'HAGAN, PESMAZOGLOU, TITLEY.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ANGER, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BANDRfcS MOLET, BARROS MOURA, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., BETTINI, BINDI, BOOKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PUR6N, CALVO ORTEGA, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DALSASS, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE VRIES, DEFRAIGNE, DESMOND, DfEZ DE RIVERA, D0HRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, ELLIOTT, EWING, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FORD, FUCHS, FUNK, GAIBISSO, GALLE, GALLO, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GRONER, GUIDOLIN, HERMAN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., LAMBRIAS, LANGER, LANNOYE, LULLING, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MCCARTIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENRAD, METTEN, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MONTERO ZABALA, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWTON DUNN, NICHOLSON, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, PACK, PARTSCH, PEIJS, PIERMONT, PINXTEN, PIRKL, POETTERING, PRAG, PROUT, RINSCHE, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, SANTOS, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOT-HOPKINS, SIERRA BARDAjf, SIMPSON B., SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPERON, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, THAREAU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TONGUE, TOPMANN, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VISSER, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(O)

CEYRAC, DILLEN, GRUND, LE CHEVALLIER. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/59

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF WEDNESDAY, 13 JUNE 1990

(90/C 175/03)

PART I

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MR BARON CRESPO

President

(The sitting was opened at 9 a.m.)

1. Approval of minutes relations with the People's Republic of China (Doc. B 3-1060/90); The following spoke: — Oral question (0-200/90) by Mr Melandri, on — Mr De Vries, Mr Cot and Mr Rossetti; behalf of the Green Group, to the Commission, on — Miss Mcintosh, on the organization of business; immigration from third countries (Doc. B 3-1061/90); she complained again that her report (Doc. A 3-106/90) had already been postponed twice that week and in — Oral question (0-201/90) by the Committee on sisted that it should be considered at this sitting, prefer Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, to the ably before item 127 (the President noted her com Commission, on the participation of Parliament in fish ments); eries agreements and distribution of quotas, the alloca tion of structural aid, through fisheries agreements, to — Mr Pannella, on the Italian Government's with regions outside the Community, and the take-up and drawal of Venice's candidacy for Expo 2000; distribution of the catch possibilities provided for in — Mrs Joanny, on the adaptation of the next of her Council Regulation (EEC) No 4054/89 of 19 Decem report (Doc. A 3-108/90) following Parliament's vote. ber 1989 (Doc. B 3-1062/90);

The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. — Oral question (0-206/90) by Mr Colajanni, Mrs Ceci, Mr Perez Royo, Mr Papayannakis, Mr Iversen and Mr Rossetti, on behalf of the EUL Group, to the 2. Documents received Commission, on relations between the EEC and Peo ple's Republic of China (Doc. B 3-1063/90); The President announced that he had received: — Oral question (0-208/90) by Mr Muntingh, on (a) the following oral question with debate: behalf of the SOC Group, to the Commission, on the geographical coverage of environmental protection leg — Oral question (O-l 70/90) by Mr Le Chevallier, on islation and the structural funds (Doc. B 3-1102/90); behalf of the ER Group, to the Commission, on immi gration policy in the Community (Doc. B 3-1056/90); — Oral question (0-211/90) by Mr Habsburg, on behalf of the EPP Group, to the Commission, on Com — Oral question (0-171/90) by Mr Le Chevallier, on munity's relations with the People's Republic of China behalf of the ER Group, to the Council, on immigra (Doc. B 3-1103/90); tion policy in the Community (Doc. B 3-1057/90); — Oral question (O-l72/90) by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, to EPC, on the abolition of (b) the following written declarations, to be entered in visas for Eastern European countries (Doc. B 3-1058/ the register pursuant to Rule 65: 90); — Oral question (O-l79/90) by Mr Brok, Mrs Oomen-Ruijten, Mr Chanterie, Mr F. Pisoni and Mr — by Mr Donnelly, on the present situation in China Klepsch, to the Commission, on migrant from third (No 6/90); countries (Doc. B 3-1059/90); — by Mrs Piermont, on the reinstatement of Henry — Oral question (O-l88/90) by Mr Cot, on behalf of Bernard of Guadeloupe as a philosophy teacher (No the SOC Group, to the Commission, on Community's 7/90). NoC 175/60 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

3. Agenda ing objections, tabled and justified in writing, to the list of subjects for the next debate on topical and urgent subjects of major importance: The President announced that the enlarged Bureau had decided to keep the deadline for tabling amendments to any motions for resolutions to wind up the debate IV. Human Rights on oral question No B 3-1062/90, entered on the agenda for the sitting of Friday, 15 June, at 12 noon on Wednesday. — a motion by the EPP Oroup seeking to include in the item 'Pakistan-Kashmir' its motion for a resolution on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir (Doc. B 3- Mrs Ewing protested at the manner in which issues 1189/90): relating to fisheries were handled by Parliament. The motion was adopted.

4. Calendar of part-sessions for 1991 — a motion by the SOC Group seeking to replace the item 'China' (Docs B 3-1193, 1222 and 1253/90) by its motion for a resolution on human rights and support The President said that the enlarged Bureau had not for democracy in Haiti (Doc. B 3-1224/90): proposed any modifications to the calendar of part-ses sions for 1990 and that it had adopted the following The motion was adopted. proposals for the calendar of part-sessions for 1991:

21-25 January — a motion by the EPP Group seeking to remove the 18-22 February motion for a resolution by the LU Group on the impri 11-15 March sonment of the editor of the 'El Siglo' newspaper (Doc. 15-19 April B 3-1206/90): 13-17 May The motion was adopted by RCV (EPP): 10-14 June 8-12 July Members voting: 252 9-13 September For: 126 7-11 October (to be confirmed) Against: 110 21-25 October Abstentions: 16 18-22 November 9-13 December — a motion by the EUL Group seeking to include in this item its motion for a resolution on the respect for He announced that the deadline for tabling amend the rights of the peoples of third countries to health and ments to these proposals was 12 noon the following environmental protection (Doc. B 3-1263/90): day and that the vote on these proposals would be taken at 6.30 p.m. the same day (part I, item 18 of min The motion was rejected by electronic vote. utes of 14 June 1990). — a motion by the Green Group seeking to include its motion for a resolution on the hunger strike by polit Mr Cot spoke. ical prisoners to secure the abolition of paragraphs 141, 142 and 163 of the Turkish criminal code (Doc. B 3- Mr Beumer, Chairman of the Committee on Economic 1249/90): Affairs, spoke on the general question of the responsi bilities of standing and temporary committees; he The motion was rejected. asked whether it was true that the enlarged Bureau had taken a decision on extending the responsibilities of — a motion by the Green Group seeking to include the Temporary Committee on German Unification to its motion for a resolution on the murder of the Brazil include the adaptation of Community legislation fol ian ecologist Sebastino Francisco da Silva (Doc. B 3- lowing the inter-German State Treaty. 1265/90):

The motion was rejected.' The President replied that no final decision had been taken. 6. Statement on the term in office of the Irish Presi dency and on institutional orientations with a view to 5. Topical and urgent debate (objections) the Second Dublin Summit (followed by debate)

The President announced that he had received, pur Mr Collins, President-in-Offfice of the Council, made a suant to Rule 64 (2), second subparagraph, the follow statement on the term in office of the Irish Presidency 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/61

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

and on institutional orientations with a view to the 7. Official welcome Second Dublin Summit of the European Council.

The following spoke: Mr Desmond, on behalf of the On behalf of Parliament, the President welcomed mem SOC Group, Mr Oreja Aguirre, on behalf of the EPP bers of the delegation of the French National Assembly Group, Mr Cox, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Prag, to the European Communities, led by Mr Josselin, who on behalf of the ED Group, and Mrs Aglietta, on had taken their seats in the official gallery. behalf of the Green Group.

The President announced that, to wind up the debate 8. Cooperation on security (debate) on the Council statements on institutional orientations with a view to the Second Dublin Summit, he had received the following motions for resolutions with Mr Poettering, Chairman of the Subcommittee on request for an early vote, pursuant to Rule 56 (3): Security and Disarmament, presented the oral question — by Mr Cot, on behalf of the SOC Group, on the with debate which he had tabled with Mr Penders, Mrs Foreign Ministers Meeting in Parknasilla and the forth Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Mr Pesmazoglou, Mrs Red coming meeting of the European Council in Dublin ing, Mr Robles Piquer, Mr Klepsch, Mr White, Mr (Doc. B 3-1271/90); Hansch, Mr Crampton, Mr Newens, Mr Romeos, Mrs van den Brink and Mr Planas Puchades, to EPC, on the — by Mr Giscard d'Estaing, on behalf of the LDR Irish Presidency's views on security policy cooperation Group, on the institutional guidelines for the second in the context of EPC and the realignment of relations Dublin summit (Doc. B 3-1279/90); between states in Europe (Doc. B 3-1049/90). — by Mr Colajanni, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mrs Aglietta, Mrs Joanny and Mr Bandres Molet, on Mr Collins, President-in-Office of EPC, replied to the behalf of the Green Group, on institutional orienta question. tions with a view to the second Dublin summit (Doc. B 3-1284/90);

— by Mr von Wogau, Mr Oreja Aguirre, Mr Herman, Mr Planas Puchades spoke on behalf of the SOC Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Mrs Peijs and Mr Group. Klepsch, on behalf of the EPP Group, on institutional orientations with a view to the second Dublin summit (Doc. B 3-1290/90). The President announced that she had received the fol lowing motions for resolutions, with request for an early vote, pursuant to Rule 58 (5), to wind up the He said that the vote on the request for an early vote debate on the oral questions: would be taken at the end of the debate. — by Mr Poettering, Mrs Reding, Mr Habstyarg, Mr Penders, Mr Pesmazoglou, Mr Klepsch, Mr Lagakos, IN THE CHAIR: MR FONTAINE Mr Oostlander and Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the Vice-President EPP Group, Mr McMillan-Scott and Mr Newton Dunn, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Crampton, Mrs van den Brink, Mr Sakellariou, Mr Ford, Mr Planas The following spoke: Mr Napolitano, on behalf of the Puchades and Mr Hansch, on behalf of the SOC EUL Group, Mr de la Malene, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Lacaze and Mr Holzfuss, on behalf of the Group, Mr de Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr LDR Group, Mrs Castellina and Mr Perez Royo, on Blaney, on behalf of the RB Group, Mr Martin, Mr behalf of the EUL Group, on EPC's role in security Cooney, Mr Mendes Bota, Mr Newton Dunn, Mr policy and on security policy cooperation in Europe Ephremidis, Mr Cushnahan, Mr von Wogau, Mr Pier- (Doc. B 3-1167/90); ros, Mr Mazzone, Mr Pannella and Mr Collins. — by Mr Blaney, on behalf of the RB Group, on The President declared the debate closed. security policy cooperation in the context of EPC and the realignment of relations between states in Europe (Doc. B 3-1171/90); Decision on the request for an early vote: — by Mr Langer and Mrs Santos, on behalf of the Green Group, on security policy cooperation in the Parliament agreed to an early vote. context of EPC (Doc. B 3-1175/90);

The vote on the motions themselves would be taken at — by Mr Carvalhas, Mrs Mayer, Mr Alavanos and 6.30 p.m. the following day (part I, item 21 of minutes of Mr de Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on security 14 June 1990). policy cooperation (Doc. B 3-1178/90). NoC 175/62 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

She announced that the vote on the request for an early dent had said would receive written replies since their vote would be taken at the end of the debate. authors were absent, were now in the Chamber, and asked for these questions to be answered. The following spoke: Mr Reding, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Galland, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr The President referred to the provisions of points 9 and McMillan-Scott, on behalf of the ED Group, and Mr 10 of Annex II of the Rules of Procedure but said, Langer, on behalf of the Green Group. however, that he was prepared to call them if there was time, when all other questions to the Council had been (The debate was suspended at this point for the formal answered. sitting. It would be resumed after Question Time (part I, item 10 of these minutes). The following spoke: Mr Dillen, who protested at the display on certain benches of flags with the colours of (The sitting was suspended at 12 noon.) the ANC which he described as a terrorist organization, and Mr Papayannakis, in reply to the previous speaker. (Parliament met in formal sitting from 12.10 p.m. to 12.45 p.m. for the visit by Mr Nelson Mandela, winner of the Question 96 by Mr Livanos would receive a written 1988 Sakharov Prize.) answer as its author was absent.

(The sitting was resumed at 3p.m.) Question 97 by Mr McMahon: European Social Fund and Vol untary Organizations

IN THE CHAIR: MR TELKAMPER Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a Vice-President supplementary by Mr McMahon.

Mr Holzfuss referred to Mr Dillen's comments (the 9. Question Time (questions to the Council and EPC) President upheld the display of these flags which bore witness to solidarity with the anti-apartheid policy). The next item was the continuation and end of Ques tion Time. Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered a further supplemen tary by Mr Lane. Questions to the Council

Question 98 by Mrs Fernex: Suspension of imports of timber Questions 84 by Mr Habsburg, 85 by Mr Raffarin, 86 from Sarawak, the production of which jeopardizes the living by Mr Calvo Ortega, 87 by Mrs Jepsen, 88 by Mrs Sal- conditions of the Penan ema, 89 by Mr de Vries, 90 by Mr Hoon, 91 by Mrs Dury and 92 by Mr Wijsenbeek would receive written authors as their authors were absent. Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a supplementary by Mrs Fernex.

Question 93 by Mr Marques Mendes: Harmonization of the office of notary, public solicitor, etc. Question 99 by Mr Alavanos: Atmospheric pollution in Athens

Mrs Geoghegan-Quin, President-in-Office of the Coun Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and sup- cil, answered the question and a supplementary by Mr plementaries by Mr Alavanos and Mrs Fernex. Marques Mendes.

Question 94 by Mr Martin would receive a written Question 100 by Mr Ephremidis: Protection of national trea answer as its author was absent. sures

Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and sup- Question 95 by Mr Speciale: Incidents between Italien and plementaries by Mr Alvanos, deputizing for the author, French fishermen in the Golfe du Lion. Mr Lane and Mr Papayannakis.

Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and supplementaries by Mr Speciale, Mr Lane and Mrs Ban- Question 101 by Mr Kellett-Bowman: Council recommendations otti. on discharges

Mr Wijsenbeek, author of question 92, pointed out that Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and sup- the authors of a number of questions which the Presi plementaries by Mr Kellett-Bowman and Mr de Vries. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/63

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Question 102 by Mr Pierros: Unacceptable treatment of Greek Questions to EPC property in Istanbul

Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a Question 106 by Mr Bandres Molet: Territories occupied by the supplementary by Mr Pierros. State of Israel and Question 107 by Mr Papoutsis: Acts of viol ence in Israeli occupied territories

Question 103 by Mr Barros Moura was not called as the Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn, President-in-Office of EPC, subject was already entered on the agenda for the part- answered the questions and supplementaries by Mr session. Bandres Molet, Mr Arbeloa Muru, Mr Papoutsis-, Mr Patterson, Mr Dessylas and Mr Papoutsis.

Question 104 by Mr Bandres Molet: Urban development project in Santa Pola (Autonomous Community of Valencia) Mr Gollnisch protested at the holding of an exhibition on Anne Frank on Parliament's premises (the President cut him off). Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a supplementary by Mr Bandres Molet. Question 108 by Mr van der Waal: The situation of the Papuan Mr Lane spoke on the admissibility of question 103 inhabitants of Irian Jaya which he judged to be inappropriate in the context of questions put to the Council. Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a supplementary by Mr van der Waal. The President replied that- the question met the admis sibility criteria set out in Annex II of the Rules of Pro The President declared Question Time closed. cedure. He announced that questions which had not been Mr Kellett-Bowman spoke. taken would receive written answers unless their authors had withdrawn them before the end of Ques tion Time. Question 105 by Mr Cassidy would receive a written answer as its author was absent. 10. Cooperation on security (continuation of debate) The President then called questions which had been called previously when their authors were absent. Mrs Castellina spoke.

The authors of questions 84 to 87 were still absent. Mr Gollnisch referred to Rules 100 and 101, and men tioned again the exhibition on Anne Frank on Parlia ment's premises, and Mrs Lehideux also spoke in pro Question 88 by Mrs Salema: Completion and modernization of test against the flags and colours of the ANC which the computerized documentation system for Community law were displayed on certain benches. (CELEX)

The following spoke in the continuation of the debate: Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and a Mr Nianias, Mr Schonhuber, Mr White, Mr Pesmazo- supplementary by Mr Marques Mendes, deputizing for glou, Mr de Donnea and Mr Holzfuss. the author. Mr Collins, President-in-Office of EPC, spoke.

Question 89 by Mr de Vries: Voting by the Council of Ministers in accordance with the Single Act The President declared the debate closed.

Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn answered the question and sup- Decision on the request for an early vote: plementaries by Mr de Vries, Mr Kellett-Bowman, Mr Pronk and Mr Wijsenbeek Parliament agreed to an early vote. Mr Dessylas spoke on the conduct of Question Time, protesting that Parliament had already gone well over The vote on the motions themselves would be taken at the time originally set aside for questions to the Coun 6.30 p.m. the following day (part I, item 22 of minutes of cil. 14 June 1990). NoC 175/64 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

IN THE CHAIR: MR PERY The three-month period available to Parliament to deliver its opinion would therefore begin the following Vice-President day, Thursday, 14 June 1990.

The following spoke: She added that Parliament would be applying to the Council, under Article 149 (2) (g) of the EEC Treaty, — Mr Tomlinson, who requested that steps should be for the statutory deadline to be extended by one month taken to withdraw from distribution letter of amend in respect of the directive on the protection of workers ment No 1 which the Committee on Budgets had not against the risks involved in exposure to biological yet considered (the President assured him that this agents at work. would be done);

— Mr Elliott, who asked that, in furture, Members VOTING TIME should be informed of the procedure to be followed to obtain passes to the gallery from formal sittings (the Mr Klepsch requested a vote to establish that the vot President noted this request and said that the necessary ing machines were working. steps would be taken);

— Mr Rogalla, on the presence of Members in the The President held this vote by electronic vote (280 Chamber for votes. members voted).

Mr McGowan called for the strict application of Rule 93 during the votes. 11. Membership of Parliament

13. Amendment of Rules 56, 58 and 64 (vote) The President informed Parliament that the Luxem bourg authorities had informed her that Mrs Wurth- (Harrison report — Doc. A 3-109/90) Polfer had been appointed to replace Mrs Flesch as a member of the European Parliament with effect from — Text of the Rules of Procedure : 12 June 1990. Rule 56: She welcomed the new member and drew attention to the provisions of Rule 6 (3). Amendments rejected: 6, 8 by RCV (RB), 1 (first part by electronic vote: 259 for, 57 against, 5 abstentions);

Amendment fallen: 1 (second part). 12. Communication of common positions of the Council The remaining amendments were not put to the vote.

The President announced, pursuant to Rule 45 (1), that The rapporteur spoke on the amendments. she had received from the Council, in accordance with the Single Act, the following common positions, together with the reasons which had led to their adop The LDR Group had requested a split vote on amend tion, and the Commission's positions on: ment 1: First part: text without the words 'to which no amend ments shall be admissible' — a directive amending Directive 79/695/EEC on the harmonization of procedures for the release of goods for free circulation (Doc. C 3-141/90) Mr von der Vring, asked what the exact majority of cur rent Members of Parliament was at present, and the referred to: ECON (responsible) rapporteur, referring to Rule 103 (1), asked for the report to be referred back to committee after the vote on amendment 1. — a directive on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (sev Mr Rogalla and Miss Mcintosh spoke on this last enth individual directive within the meaning of Article request. 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) referred to: The request was approved. SOCI (responsible) BUDG (opinion) The report was therefore referred back to committee. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/65

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Result of RCV: The rapporteur pointed out that he had withdrawn amendment 2. amendment8: Members voting: 305 The common position was thus amended (part II, item For: 53 3). Against: 249 Abstentions: 3 17. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, trans port and telecommunications sectors ** II (vote) 14. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (vote) (recommendation for the second reading Doc. A 3- 129/90 — rapporteur: Mr Herman) Tomlinson report — Doc. A 3-157/90)

Draft amendments adopted: 3, 2, 4 and 1 by electronic — Common position of the Council Doc. C 3-99/90 — vote (274 for, 37 against, 21 abstentions) SYN 153 + 154:

Draft amendment fallen: 5. Amendments adopted: 28, 1, 2, 4 to 6, 7, 29, 10, 11, by electronic vote (298 for, 18 against, 4 abstentions), 13, Mr Elles pointed out that his group had requested a 14, 15, 17, 16, 18 to 23 (en bloc) split vote on amendment 1 (the President replied that she had not received any such request). Amendments rejected: 32, 33, 3, 30, 31 by electronic vote (138 for, 162 against, 25 abstentions), 8, 9, 12 and 34 — Motion for a resolution :

Amendments inadmissible: 35, 24, 27, 26 and 25. A separate vote had been requested by the Green Group on paragraph 2: Mr Metten spoke on the result of the vote on amend Text without paragraph 2: adopted ment 9. Paragraph 2: adopted The comtnon position was thus amended (part II, item Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 1). 4).

15. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs ** II (vote) The rapporteur asked the Commission to state its posi tion on the amendments adopted by Parliament. (recommendation for the second reading Doc. A 3- 118/90 — rapporteur: Mr Pimenta) Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission, said that it could accept amendments 1, 3, 7, 8 (the latter — Common position of the Council Doc. C 3-74/90 — subject to a clarification of the text), 11 to 14, 18 to 22, SYN 155: and 29.

Amendments adopted: 1 to 6 (en bloc). 18. Statistical classification of economic activities ** I The rapporteur pointed out a mistake in amendment 5, (vote) where 'two years' should read 'five years'. The next item was the report without debate drawn up The common position was thus amended (part II, item by Mr von Wogau, on behalf of the Committee on 2). Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy,

\ on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation on the statistical classification of 16. Appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II (vote) economic activities in the European Communities (recommendation for the second reading Doc. A 3- (CC>M(90) 1 final — Doc. C 3-51/90) (Doc. A 3-123/90 128/90 — rapporteur: Mr Lataillade) — SYN 241).

— Common position of the Council Doc. C 3-38/90 — SYN 178: — Proposal for a regulation COM(90) 1 final — Doc. C 3-51/90 —SYN 241: Amendments adopted: 1 and 3 Parliament approved the Commission proposal (part Amendment withdrawn: 2. II, item 5). NoC 175/66 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— Draft legislative resolution: amendment 9 (second part):

Members voting: 337 Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, For: 151 item 5). Against: 179 Abstentions: 7

19. Right of residence */** I (vote) amendment 9 (third part):

(reports by Mr van Outrive (Doc. A 3-124/90), Mr Members voting: 339 Megahy (Doc. A 3-133/90) and Mr Estgen (Doc. A 3- For: 186 141/90) Against: 151 Abstentions: 2 (a) Van Outrive report — Doc. A 3-124/90: * amendment 26: — Proposal for a directive Doc. C 3-12/90: Members voting: 339 For: 179 Amendments adopted: 1, 2, 3, 28 by electronic vote, 5, Against: 159 6, 27 by RCV (EDA), 17, 7, 8, 9 by split vote (first part Abstentions: 1 by electronic vote, third part by RCV (EPP), fourth part by electronic vote, fifth part), 24 31, 10, 26 by RCV amendment 14: (Greens), 33, 11 by split vote (EPP), 12, 13, 14 by RCV (SOC), 15 and 16 Members voting: 350 For: 221 Amendments rejected: 9 (second part by RCV (EPP)) Against: 127 Abstentions: 2 \ Amendments fallen: 4, 29 and 30 Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 6 (a)). Amendment withdrawn: 25

The rapporteur spoke, first to withdraw amendment 25, — Draft legislative resolution: secondly to request a split vote on amendment 9, and finally to request a vote on Article 1 as a whole (the Mr Staufenberg, Chairman of the Committee on Legal President refused this last request). Affairs, asked the Commission to guarantee that the three texts on the right of residence would be consid A split vote was held on amendment 9: ered as a whole and that, if substantial amendments were made, Parliament would be consulted again. First part: to 'and their partner'

Second part: to 'nationality' Mr Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission, gave this guarantee. Third part: to 'Member State of origin'

Fourth part: to 'by law' Explanations of vote Fifth part: remainder. The following spoke: Mr Bandres Molet, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Antony, on behalf of the ER A split vote was held on amendment 11: Group, Mr Dillen and Mr Le Chevallier. First part: first phrase Parliament adopted the legislative resolution by elec Second part: second phrase. tronic vote (part II, item 6 (a)).

Results of RCVs: (b) Magahy report — Doc. A 3-133/90: ** I amendment 27: — Orientation for a directive Doc. C 3-13/90 — SYN Members voting: 325 200: For: 175 Against: 148 Amendments adopted: 1, 2 by electronic vote, 3, 4, 5, 6, Abstentions: 2 7 by RCV (ER), 8, 9 by split vote (LDR and EDA) and 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/67

Wednesday, 13 June 1990 by RCV (EPP), 10 by RCV (EPP), 11 by electronic vote, Against: 89 12, 13, 14 by split vote (EPP), 15, 16, 17 by split vote Abstentions: 2 (second part by electronic vote), 18 and 19 amendment 9 (fourth part): Amendment rejected: 21 by RCV (Greens) Members voting: 290 For: 197 Amendment withdrawn: 20. Against: 91 Abstentions: 2 The rapporteur spoke on the French version of the amendments including the word 'partner' and with amendment 10: drew amendment 20. Members voting: 274 For: 179 A split vote was held on amendment 9: Against: 95 Abstentions: 0 First part to 'Member States'

Second part to 'Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68' amendment 21:

Third part to 'dependent children' Members voting: 304 For: 43 Fourth part: remainder. Against: 260 Abstentions: 1 A split vote was held on amendment 14: Parliament approved the Commission proposal as First part to 'as rapidly as possible' amended (part II, item 6 (b)). Second part: remainder.

— Draft legislative resolution: A split vote was held on amendment 17:

First part: first subparagraph The following spoke: the rapporteur, who asked the Commission to state its position on the amendments Second part: second subparagraph. adopted by Parliament, and Mr Bangemann, Vice- President of the Commission, who said that it could accept amendments 4, 5, 15, 16, 18, 19 and, in part, Results of RCVs: amendments 9, 12 and 8.

amendment 7: Explanations of vote: Members voting: 265 For: 159 Against: 105 Mr Brok spoke on behalf of the EPP Group. Abstentions: 1 The SOC Group had requested a separate vote on the fourth indent of the preamble. amendment 9 (first part):

Members voting: 281 Fourth indent: rejected For: 178 Against: 88 Parliament adopted the legislative resolution as Abstentions: 15 amended by electronic vote (part II, item 6 (b)).

amendment 9 (second part): (c) Estgen report — Doc. A 3-141/90: ** I Members voting: 280 For: 191 Against: 86 Amendments adopted: 1, 2, 31 by RCV (ER), 3 to 6 (en Abstentions: 3 bloc), 33 by electronic vote, 7, 34, 9, 10, 32 by RCV (EPP), 12 to* 14, 35 by electronic vote, 36 by split vote (EPP, LDR), 37 19, 20, 38 and 22 amendment 9 (third part):

Members voting: 281 Amendments rejected: 26, 27, 24, and 30 by electronic For: 190 vote NoC 175/68 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Amendments fallen: 25, 8, 11, 28, 29, 15, 16, 17, 18 and Amendment fallen: 15 21. Amendments withdrawn: 13 and 14. Mrs Diihrkop Diihrkop spoke on the voting order of the amendments. Part B of the Annex was rejected (separate vote requested by the SOC Group). A split vote was held on amendment 36: First part: to 'as quickly as possible' A split vote was held on amendment 5:

Second part: remainder. First part: the text as a whole except paragraph 6 Second part: paragraph 6.

Results of RCVs: A split vote was held on amendment 7:

amendment 31: First part: first subparagraph Members voting: 237 Second part: second subparagraph For: 141 Against: 96 Parliament approved the Commission proposal as Abstentions: 0 amended (part II, item 7).

amendment 32: — Draft legislative resolution: Members voting: 252 For: 142 Against: 110 Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, Abstentions: 0 item 7).

Parliament approved the Commission proposal as 21. Damage caused by waste ** I (vote) amended (part II, item 6 (c)). (Ferri report — Doc. A 3-126/90)

— Draft legislative resolution: — Proposal for a directive COM(89) 282 final — Doc. C 3-154/89 — SYN 217: The following spoke: the rapporteur, who asked the Commission to state its position on the amendments Amendments adopted: 1 to 11 by successive votes, 12 adopted by Parliament, and Mr Bangemarin, Vice- by split vote (ED), 13 by split vote (Greens), 14, 15, 16 President of the Commission, who said that it could by split vote (EPP) (second and fourth parts by elec accept amendments 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22 and, tronic vote), 17, 18, 19, 20 to 22 (en bloc), 24, 25 and 27 in part, amendments 11 and 15. The rapporteur spoke. Amendments rejected: 35 and 36 (en bloc), 32, 37, 23, 26 by electronic vote, 38 and 28 Explanations of vote:

Amendments fallen: 34, 31, 33 and 29. The following spoke: Mr Estgen, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Larive and Mr Speroni. A split vote was taken on amendment 12: Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, First part: paragraph 1 item 6 (c)). Second part: paragraph 2

20. Direct life assurance ** I (vote) A split vote was taken on amendment 13: (Saridakis report — Doc. A 3-130/90) First part: point (a) Second part: point (b) — amended proposal for a second directive COM(90) 46 final — Doc. C 3-90/90 — SYN 177: Third part: point (c) Fourth part: point (d) (a) to (c) Amendments adopted: 1 to 4 (en bloc), 5 by split vote (ED), 6, 7 by split vote (ED), 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 Fifth part: point (d) (remainder). 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/69

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

A split vote was taken on amendment 16: Amendments rejected: 34, and 24 by electronic vote First part: paragraph 1, introductory text and point (a) Amendment fallen : 36 Second part: point (b) Third part: paragraphs 2 and 3 A split vote was held on amendment 8 Fourth part: paragraph 4 First part: first subparagraph Fifth part: paragraphs 5 and 6. Second part: second subparagraph Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 8). Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 10 (a)). — Draft legislative resolution:

The following spoke: the rapporteur, who asked the * — Draft legislative resolution: Commission to state its position on the amendments, and Sir Leon Brittan, Vice-President of the Commission, who said that it could accept amendments 17, 20, 22, Parliament adopted the legislative resolution by RCV and, in part, amendments 6, 7, 12, 34, 13, 33, 15, 16, 18, (EPP). 19 and 29. Members voting: 226 For: 226 The rapporteur asked for the vote on the draft legisla Against : 0 tive resolution to be postponed, on the basis of Rule Abstentions: 0 40(2).

Parliament approved the request. (part II, item 10(a)).

The matter was therefore deemed to have been referred back to the committee responsible. (b) Desama report — Doc. A 3-136/90:

22. Machinery ** I (vote) — Proposal for a decision COM(89) 603 final — Doc. (Christiansen report — Doc. A 3-125/90) C 3-15/90 —SYN 228:

— Proposal for a directive COM(89) 624 final — Doc. Amendments adopted: 1 to 10 by successive votes C 3-21/90 — SYN 233: (amendment 3 by electronic vote)

Amendments adopted: 1 to 3 (en bloc). Parliament approved the Commission proposal as Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 10 (b)). amended (part II, item 9).

— Draft legislative resolution: — Draft legislative resolution:

The rapporteur spoke. Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, item 10(b)). Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, item 9). END OF VOTING TIME 23. EURET and EUROTRA programmes ** I (vote)

(reports by Mr Pierros (Doc. A 3-148/90) and Mr IN THE CHAIR: MR GALLAND Desama (Doc. A 3-136/90)) Vice-President (a) Pierros report — Doc. A 3-148/90:

— Proposal for a decision COM(89) 557final — Doc. 24. Statements by the Council and the Commission on C 3-244/89 — SYN 226: racism and xenophobia (debate) Amendments adopted: 1 to 7 (en bloc), 8 by split vote (SOC), 9, 10, 11 to 14 (en bloc), 15 to 23 (en bloc), 32, Mrs Geoghegan-Quinn, President-in-Office of the Coun 35, 25 and 26 (en bloc), 33, 27 to 31 (en bloc) cil, and Mrs Papandreou, Member of the Commission, NoC 175/70 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

made statements on the resolution adopted by the Alonso, Mr Barros Moura, Mrs van Dijk, Mr Suarez Council on 29 May 1990 on racism and xenophobia. Gonzalez, Mrs Buron, Mr Papayannakis, Mr Speciale, Mr Alvarez de Paz, Mrs Sandbaek, Mrs Cramon Daiber, Ms Tongue, Mr Pisoni, Mr Langer, Mr Hughes, Mrs The President announced that he had received the fol van Hemeldonck and Mrs Ernst de la Graete, to the lowing motions for resolutions with request for an early Council (Doc. B 3-1053/90) and the Commission (Doc. vote, pursuant to Rule 56 (3), to wind up the debate on B 3-1052/90), on immigrant workers from third coun these statements: tries ; — by Mr Antony and Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, on immigration and the rise of racism — by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, (Doc. A 3-1268/90); to the Council (Doc. B 3-1057/90) and to the Commis sion (Doc. B 3-1056/90), on immigration policy in the — by Mr Colajanni, Mrs Valent, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, Community; Mr Iversen and Mr Papayannakis, on behalf of the EUL Group, on measures to combat racism and xeno — by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, phobia (Doc. B 3-1270/90); to EPC, on the abolition of visas for Eastern European countries (Doc. B 3-1058/90); — by Mr Cot and Mr Ford, on behalf of the SOC Group, on racism and xenophobia (Doc. B 3-1273/90); — by Mr Brok, Mrs Oomen-Ruijten, Mr Chanterie, Mr F. Pisoni and Mr Klepsch, on behalf of the EPP — by Mrs Roth, Mrs Tazdait, Mrs van Dijk, Mrs San Group,'to the Commission, on immigrant workers from tos, Mrs Ernst de la Graete, Mrs Aglietta, Mrs Cramon third countries (Doc. B 3-1059/90); Daiber, Mr Bandres Molet, Mr Melandri, Mr Staes, Mr Telkamper, Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf, Mr Langer and — by Mr Melandri, on behalf of the Green Group, on Mr Verbeek, on behalf of the Green Group, on the immigration from third countries (Doc. B 3-1061/90). forthcoming Council resolution on combating racism and xenophobia in the Community (Doc. B 3-1275/ 90); Mrs Catasta moved questions Docs B 3-1053 and 1052/90. — by Mrs Elmalan, Mr Barros Moura, Mr Ephremi- dis and Mr de Rossa, on behalf of the LU Group, on racism and xenophobia (Doc. B 3-1291/90). Mr Ford spoke on the application of Rule 58 (4).

He announced that the vote on the request for an early Mr Le Pen moved questions Docs B 3-1057 and 1056/ vote would be taken at the end of the debate. 90.

The following spoke: Mr Belo, on behalf of the SOC Mr Brok moved question Doc. B 3-1059/90. Group, Mrs Bindi, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Roth, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Papayannakis, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Vandemeulebroucke, Mr Antony spoke on the previous speaker's comments. on behalf of the RB Group, Mr Ford, Mr Nordmann and Mrs Papandreou, Member of the Commission. Mr Melandri moved question Doc. B 3-1061/90.

The President declared the debate closed. The President announced that he had received the fol lowing motions for resolutions with request for an early vote, pursuant to Rule 58 (5), to wind up the debate on Decision on the request for an early vote : the oral questions:

Parliament agreed to an early vote. — by Mr Nordmann and Mr Marques Mendes, on behalf of the LDR Group, on migrant workers from The vote on the motions themselves would be taken at third countries (Doc. B 3-1168/90/rev.); 6.30 p.m. the following day (part I, item 23 of minutes of — by Mr Brok, Mr Pronk, Mr Suarez Gonzalez, Mr F. 14 June 1990). Pisoni, Mr Chanterie, Mr Menrad, Mr Klepsch and Mr Deprez, on behalf of the EPP Group, on migrant work ers from third countries (Doc. B 3-1169/90); 25. Immigrant workers from third countries — visas (debate) — by Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, on immigrant workers from third countries (Doc. B 3- The next item was the joint debate on seven oral ques 1172/90); tions with debate: — by Mrs van Dijk, Mrs Tazdait and Mrs Roth, on — Mrs Catasta, Mr Raggio, Mr van Velzen, Mrs Sal- behalf of the Green Group, on migrant workers from isch, Mr Bontempi, Mr van Outrive, Mr Cabezon third countries (Doc. B 3-1173/90); 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/71

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— by Mrs Catasta, Mr Raggio, Mrs Valent, Mrs Iversen and himself had tabled, on behalf of the EUL Domingo Segarra, Mr Papayannakis and Mr Iversen, Group, on relations between the EEC and the People's on behalf of the EUL Group, on migrant workers from Republic of China (Doc. B 3-1063/90). third countries (Doc. B 3-1174/90);

— by Mr van Velzen, Mrs Salisch, Mr van Outrive, Mr Habsburg moved the oral question which he had Mr Cabezon Alonso, Mrs Buron, Mr Alvarez de Paz, tabled, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the Com Ms Tongue, Mr Hughes, Mrs van Hemeldonck, Mr munity's relations with the People's Republic of China Marinho, Mrs Belo, Mr Peters, Mrs Onur and Mrs Pol (Doc. B 3-1103/90). lack, on behalf of the SOC Group, on immigrant work ers from third countries (Doc. B 3-1180/90); The President announced that he had received the fol lowing motions for resolutions, with a request for an — by the LU Group, on immigrant workers from early vote, pursuant to Rule 58 (5), to wind up the third countries (Doc. B 3-1181/90/rev.); debate on the oral questions:

— from the SOC, EUL, Green and LU Groups, on — by Mr Habsburg, on behalf of the EPP Group, on immigrant workers from third countries (Doc. B 3- the Community's relations with the People's Republic 1182/90). of China (Doc. B 3-1272/90);

— by Mr Woltjer, Mr Sakellariou, Mr Hindley, Mr He announced that the vote on the request for an early Colom i Naval and Mr Coates, on behalf of the SOC vote would be taken at the end of the debate. Group, and Mr Colajanni, on behalf of the EUL Group, on the Community's relations with the People's Mr Geoghegan-Quinn, President-in-Office of the Coun Republic of China (Doc. B 3-1276/90). cil, and Mrs Papandreou, Member of the Commission, answered the questions to their respective institutions. — by Mr de Montesquiou, on behalf of the LDR Group, on the Community's relations with the People's Republic of China (Doc. B 3-1286/90) (withdrawn); The following spoke: Mr van Outrive, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Suarez Gonzalez, on behalf of the EPP — by Mr de la Malene, on behalf of the EDA Group, Group, Lord Inglewood, on behalf of the ED Group, on EEC-China relations (Doc. B 3-1289/90). Mr Guillaume, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Cabezon He announced that the vote on a request for an early Alonso, Mr Deprez, Mrs Van Hemeldonck and Mr F. vote would be taken at the end of the debate. Pisoni.

In view of the time, the debate was suspended at that The President declared the debate closed. point; it would be resumed the following afternoon (part I, item 10 of minutes of 14 June 1990).

Decision on the request for an early vote: 27. Agenda for next sitting Parliament agreed to an early vote. The President announced the following agenda for the sitting on Thursday, 14 June 1990: The vote on the motions themselves would be taken at 6.30 p.m. the following day (part I, item 24 of minutes of 14 June 1990). 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 3p.m. to 8p.m.:

26. EEC-China relations (debate) 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.:

The next item was the joint debate on the three oral — topical and urgent debate. questions with debate to the Commission.

3 p.m.: Mr Colom i Naval moved the oral question which Mr Cot had tabled, on behalf of the SOC Group, on the Community's relations with the People's Republic of — Salisch report on atypical employment; China (Doc. B 3-1060/90). — joint debate on three oral questions on EEC-China relations (continuation); Mr Rossetti moved the oral question which Mr Cola- janni, Mrs Ceci, Mr Perez Royo, Mr Papayannakis, Mr — Mcintosh report on air transport *; No C 175/72 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— Kofoed report on agricultural structures *; — Reding report on the seat of the European Envi — Reding report on the handling of petitions; ronment Agency. — Imbeni report on pesticide residues *;

— Valverde Lopez report on plant protection prod 6.30 p.m.: ucts *; — joint debate on three reports by Mr Raffarin, Mr Cushnahan and Mr Welsh (') on the Stride, Interreg Vote on; and Regis programmes; — the calendar of part-sessions for 1991

(') Oral question Doc. B 3-1102/90 would be included in the — the motions for resolutions on which the debate debate. had closed

(The sitting was closed at 9.05p.m.)

ENRICO VINCI HANS PETERS Secretary- General Vice-President 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/73

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

PART II

Texts adopted by the European Parliament

1. Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for 1990

— Doc. C3-129/90

Draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for the financial year 1990

Amendments adopted by the European Parliament:

(Amendment No 3) SECTION I — PARLIAMENT Item 1005 — Special travel expenses in the exercise of the parliamentary mandate

REMARKS To read as follows: This appropriation is to provide an annual sum of ECU 2 500 per Member, which may be exceeded only in exceptional cases, to cover travel within Europe (but not the country of election), and hotel costs and related expenses in order to enable Members to discharge their duties.

(Amendment No 2)

SECTION III — COMMISSION Revenue Article 130 — Own resources accruing from Value Added Tax Article 140 — Own resources based on Gross National Product Article 300 — Surplus available from the preceding financial year

NOMENCLATURE Unchanged

REVENUE A. Amendment Commitments Payments Article 130 — Item 1300 Preliminary Draft 27 407 933 974 Draft 26 601 047 824

Amend./mod. + 806 886 150

New amount 27 407 933 974

Article 140 — Item 1400 Preliminary Draft 94 602 333 Draft

Amend./mod. + 94 602 333

New amount 94 602 333 NoC 175/74 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Article 300 Preliminary Draft 3415 631 318

Draft 4 296 000 000

Amend./mod. - 880 368 682

New amount 3 415 631 318

B. Effect on revenue After account is taken of the impact of these changes on title 8 of the budget, the overall effect is to increase the revenue requirement in relation to the draft budget by ECU 21 119 801 thereby bringing total revenue to the figure in the preliminary draft supplementary and amending budget, that being ECU 46 698 406 854.

REMARKS:

Item 1300 Amend as follows: 'the uniform VAT rate is 1,2557%'. Furthermore, the contributions of the Member States are amended accordingly to correspond with the Commission figures.

Item 1400 Delete the phrase 'the GNP-based own resources need not be called up' and replace with 'the GNP-based own resources are called up only in connection with the financial compensation for the United Kingdom'. The breakdown of payments is as indicated in the preliminary draft.

Article 300 Amend as follows: 'a provisional amount of ECU 3 416 million has been entered for 1989'.

(Amendment No 4)

SECTION III — COMMISSION Article 682 — EHLASS (monitoring operations in relation to the safety of consumer products)

REMARKS

Add the following paragraph to the remarks under this article: 'Notwithstanding Article 26 (3) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission shall consult the budgetary authority before making any transfer to this Article from within Chapter 68.'

(Amendment No 1)

SECTION III — COMMISSION — Part B

Chapter 99 — Cooperation with third countries Article 996 — Aid for the economic restructuring of Poland and Hungary

NOMENCLATURE

Amend Article 996 to read 'Aid for the economic restructuring of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe' 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/75

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

EXPENDITURE

Non-differentiated appropriations

A. Amendment Commitments Payments

Article 996 Preliminary draft 300 000 000 300 000 000

Draft 300 000 000 300 000 000

Amend. + 200 000 000 + 200 000 000

New amount 500 000 000 500 000 000

B. Net effect on the volume of expenditure + 200 000 000 + 200 000 000

/ C. Effect on revenue + 200 000 000

REMARKS

Amend the second paragraph of the existing remarks to read as follows: This appropriation is intended to cover financial aid to Poland, Hungary, the German Demo cratic Republic, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania and Yugoslavia in support of their economic development programmes, including operations in connection with trade and commercial and economic cooperation agreements which the Community has concluded with those coun tries.' Remaining paragraphs unchanged.

— Doc. A3-157/90

RESOLUTION

on draft supplementary and amending budget No 2 for the 1990 financial year

The European Parliament,

— having regard to preliminary draft and supplementary amending budget No 2 for 1990 (SEC(90) 467 final),

— having regard to the draft supplementary and amending budget drawn up by the Council (Doc. C3-129/90),

— having regard to the report by the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A3-157/90),

1. Considers that the draft supplementary and amending budget should reflect the decision on own resources and in particular Article 2(4) concerning the application of a uniform rate of VAT,

2. Takes the view that the draft budget should take account of the newly agreed revision of the financial perspective and its provision for additional resources for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe,

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution, together with the amendments it has adopted to the draft budget, to the Council and Commission as the outcome of Parliament's first reading. NoC 175/76 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

2. Nutrition labelling for foodstuffs ** II

— Doc. A3-118/90

DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading)

on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the common position of the Council (Doc. C3-74/90 — SYN 155),

— having regard to the relevant provisions of the EEC Treaty and its Rules of Procedure,

1. Has amended the common position as set out below;

2. Has instructed its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission.

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Recital 9a (new)

Whereas there is an urgent need for the Commission to fund a thorough research programme into the best form of presenting nutrition information to consumers;

(Amendment No 2)

Tenth recital

Whereas in order to encourage interested parties, espe Whereas in order to encourage interested parties, espe cially small and medium-sized undertakings, to provide cially small and medium-sized undertakings, to provide nutrition labelling for as many products as possible, nutrition labelling for as many products as possible, measures to make information more complete and more measures to make information more complete, more bal balanced should be introduced gradually; anced and compulsory should be introduced gradually;

(Amendment No 3)

Article 6(2)

2. Information shall be expressed per lOOg or per 2. Information shall be expressed per lOOg or per 100 ml. In addition, this information may be given per 100 ml. For substances where the total quantity is less serving as quantified on the label or per portion, pro than lOOg or 100 ml, this information shall be given per vided that the number or portions contained in the pack serving as quantified on the label or per portion, pro age is stated. vided that the number or portions contained in the pack age is stated. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/77

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 4)

Article 6(5)(a), second paragraph

Exceptions to the requirement set out in the first para- Deleted graph may be decided on in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 10.

(Amendment No 5)

Article 11(2)

2. Until .... (six years following notification of this 2. Until .... (five years following notification of this Directive), the declaration in nutrition labelling either on Directive), the declaration in nutrition labelling on a a voluntary basis or following a nutrition claim of one or voluntary basis of one or more of the following nutrients: more of the following nutrients: sugars, saturates, fibre, sugars, saturates, fibre, sodium, shall not trigger the obli sodium, shall not trigger the obligation set out in Article gation set out in Article 4(1) and (2) to declare all these 4(1) and (2) to declare all these nutrients. nutrients.

(Amendment No 6)

Article 11(3)

3. The Commission shall, by.... (eight years after noti 3. The Commission shall, by.... (eight years after noti fication of this Directive), submit to the Council a report fication of this Directive), submit to the Council and the on the application thereof, together with any appropriate European Parliament a report on the application thereof, proposal for amendment. together with any appropriate proposal for amend ment.

3. Appliances burning gaseous fuels ** II

/ — Doc. A3-128/90

DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading)

on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the common position of the Council (Doc. C3-38/90 — SYN 178),

— having regard to the relevant provisions of the EEC Treaty and its Rules of Procedure,

1. Has amended the common position as set out below;

2. Has instructed its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission. NoC 175/78 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Article 1(1), second indent

safety devices, controlling devices or regulating — safety devices, controlling devices or regulating devices and sub-assemblies separately marketed for devices separately marketed for trade use and trade use and designed to be incorporated into an designed to be incorporated into an appliance burn appliance burning gaseous fuel or assembled to con ing gaseous fuel or assembled to constitute such an stitute such an appliance, hereinafter referred to as appliance, hereinafter referred to as 'fittings'. 'fittings'.

(Amendment No 3)

Annex II, point 2.3

2.3. On-site checks of appliances must be undertaken 2.3. On-site checks of appliances must be undertaken at random at intervals of one year or less. An adequate at random by the notified body at intervals of one year or number of appliances must be examined and appropriate less. An adequate number of appliances must be exam tests as set out in the applicable standards referred to in ined and appropriate tests as set out in the applicable Article 5 or equivalent tests must be carried out in order standards referred to in Article 5 or equivalent tests must to ensure conformity with the corresponding essential be carried out in order to ensure conformity with the requirements of this Directive. Where one of the corresponding essential requirements of this Directive. appliances under examination does not conform, the The notified body shall in each case determine whether notified body must take measures appropriate to the nat these tests need to be carried out in full or in part. In those ure of the defects(s) and immediately inform the other cases where one or more products are rejected the notified notified bodies of the measures taken. body shall take the appropriate measures to prevent these products from being placed on the market.

4. Procurement procedures in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors ** II

— Doc. A3-129/90

DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading)

on the common position drawn up by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunica tions sectors

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the common position of the Council (Doc. 3-99/90 — SYN 153 and 154),

— having regard to the relevant provisions of the EEC Treaty and its Rules of Procedure,

1. Has amended the common position as set out below;

2. Has instructed its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/79

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 28)

Article 1(4)

(4) 'framework agreement' shall mean an agreement (4) 'framework agreement' shall mean an agreement between one of the contracting entities defined in between one of the contracting entities defined in Article 2 and one or more suppliers or contractors, Article 2 and one or more suppliers or contractors, the purpose of which is to establish the terms, in the purpose of which is to establish the terms, in particular with regard to the prices and, where particular with regard to the prices and, where appropriate, the quantity envisaged, governing the appropriate, the quantity envisaged, governing the contracts to be awarded during a given period; contracts to be awarded during a period not exceed ing four years;

(Amendment No 1)

Article (14) and (14a)(new)

(14)'Public telecommunications services' shall mean ser (14)'Public telecommunications services' shall mean vices offered by telecommunications organizations telecommunications services the provision of which and whose provision consists wholly or partly in the the Member States have specifically assigned to one transmission and routing of signals on the public or more telecommunications entities. telecommunications network by means of telecom munications processes, with the exception of radio broadcasting and television.

(14a) 'Telecommunications services' shall mean services whose provision consists wholly or partly in the transmission and routing of signals on the public telecommunications network by means of telecom munications processes, with the exception of radio broadcasting and television.

(Amendment No 2)

Article 2(2)(a)

(a) the provision or operation of fixed networks in (a) the provision and/or operation of fixed networks tended to provide a service to the public in connec intended to provide a service to the public in connec tion with the production, transport or distribution tion with the production, transport or distribution of: of:

(i) drinking water; or (i) drinking water; or (ii) electricity; or (ii) electricity; or (iii) gas or heat; (iii) gas or heat;

or the supply of drinking water, electricity, gas or and/or the supply of drinking water, electricity, gas heat to such networks; or heat to such networks;

(Amendment No 4)

Article 3(1), introductory phrase

1. Member States may request the Commission to pro 1. Member States may request the Commission to vide that exploitation of geographical areas for the pur authorize that exploitation of geographical areas for the pose of exploring for, or extracting, oil, gas, coal or other purpose of exploring for, or extracting, oil, gas, coal or solid fuels shall not be considered an activity defined in other solid fuels shall not be considered an activity Article 2(2)(b)(i) and that entities shall not be considered defined in Article 2(2)(b)(i) and that entities shall not be as operating under special or exclusive rights within the considered as operating under special or exclusive rights NoC 175/80 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

meaning of Article 2(3)(b) by virtue of carrying on one or within the meaning of Article 2(3)(b) by virtue of carry more of these activities, provided that all the following ing on one or more of these activities, provided that all conditions are satisfied with respect to the relevant the following conditions are satisfied with respect to the national provisions concerning such activities: relevant national provisions concerning such activities:

(Amendment No 5)

Article 3(4), first subparagraph

A Member State which wishes to apply paragraph 1 shall A Member State which wishes to apply paragraph 1 shall inform the Commission accordingly. In doing so, it shall request authorization from the Commission. In addition, inform the Commission of any law, regulation or admin it shall inform the Commission of any law, regulation or istrative provision, agreement or understanding relating administrative provision, agreement or understanding to compliance with the conditions referred to in para relating to compliance with the conditions referred to in graphs 1 and 2. paragraphs 1 and 2.

(Amendment No 6)

Article 3(4), second subparagraph

The Commission shall take a decision in accordance with The Commission shall take a decision in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 32(4) to (7). It shall the procedure laid down in Article 32(4) to (7). It shall publish its decision, giving its reasons, in the Official publish its decision, giving its reasons, in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Journal of the European Communities. Should the Com mission refuse to grant authorization, this Directive shall apply with the exception of the present Article.

(Amendment No 7)

Article 6(3)

3. The contracting entities shall notify the Commis 3. The contracting entities shall notify the Commis sion at its request of any activities they regard as excluded sion of any activities they regard as covered by the above under paragraph 1. The Commission may periodically exclusion. The Commission shall periodically publish publish lists of the categories of activities which it con lists of the activities which it considers to be covered by siders to be covered by this exclusion, for information in this exclusion, for information in the Official Journal of the Official Journal of the European Communities. In so the European Communities. In so doing, the Commis doing, the Commission shall respect any sensitive com sion shall take account of any sensitive commercial mercial aspects the contracting entities may point out aspects the contracting entities may point out when for when forwarding this information. warding this information.

(Amendment No 29)

Article 12(5)

5. The basis for calculating the value of a framework 5. The basis for calculating the value of a framework agreement shall be the estimated maximum value of all- agreement shall be the estimated maximum value of all the contracts envisaged for the period in question. the contracts envisaged for the period in question, which shall not exceed four years. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/81

. Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 10)

Article 12(6), new paragraph after first paragraph

Before 31 December 1991, the Commission will publish in the Official Journal of the European Communities a notice to the Member States describing in practical terms how the notion of work is to be understood and applied.

(Amendment No 11)

Article 13(6)(a)

(a) the European specifications do not include the provi (a) it is technically impossible to establish satisfactorily sion for establishing conformity or technical means do the conformity of a product with these European not exist for establishing satisfactorily the conformity specifications. of a product with these European specifications. Both these conditions must be met simultaneously in the case of specifications relating to supply contracts to be awarded by the entities exercising an activity referred to in Article 2(2)(d);

(Amendment No 13)

Article 17(1), introductory phrase

1. Contracting entities shall regularly make known by 1. Contracting entities shall make known, at least once means of a periodic indicative notice: annually, by means of a periodic indicative notice:

(Amendment No 14)

Article 17(3)

3. Where the notice is used as a means of calling for , 3. Where the notice is used as a means of calling for competition in accordance with Article 16(l)(b), it must competition in accordance with Article 16(1 )(b), it must have been published not more than 12 months prior tp have been published not more than 12 months prior to the date on which the contract is awarded. the date on which the invitation referred to in Article 16(2)(c) is sent. Moreover, the contracting entity shall meet the deadlines laid down in Article 20(2).

(Amendment No 15)

Article 23(2)

2. A contracting entity which supplies the information 2. Those participating in a contract procedure shall referred to in paragraph 1 may request the tenderers or indicate that they have taken account, in their tender, of those participating in the contract procedure to indicate the obligations relating to employment protection provi that they have taken account, when drawing up their sions and the working conditions which are in force in tender, of the obligations relating to employment protec the place where the work is to be carried out. This shall be tion provisions and the working conditions which are in without prejudice to the application by the contracting force in the place where the work is to be carried out. This entity of the provisions of Article 27(5) concerning the shall be without prejudice to the application of the pro examination of abnormally low tenders. visions of Article 27(5) concerning the examination of abnormally low tenders. NoC 175/82 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 16)

Article 28(1)

1. Article 27( 1) shall not apply where a Member State 1. Article 27( 1) shall not apply where a Member State bases the award of contracts on other criteria within the bases the award of contracts on other criteria within the framework of rules in force at the time of adoption of this framework of rules in force at the time of adoption of this Directive whose aim is to give preference to certain ten Directive whose aim is to promote or safeguard equal derers, provided the rules invoked are compatible with rights and opportunities for women, the disabled or work the Treaty. ers from minority groups or to give preference to certain tenderers, provided the rules invoked are compatible with the Treaty.

(Amendment No 17)

Article 28(2)

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, this. Directive 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, this Directive shall not prevent, until 31 December 1992, the applica shall not prevent, the application of national provisions tion of national provisions in force on the award of in force on the award of supply or works contracts which supply or works contracts which have as their objective have as their objective the reduction of regional dispari the reduction of regional disparities and the promotion ties, the renewal of urban areas and the promotion ofjob of job creation in disadvantaged regions or those suffer creation in disadvantaged regions and areas or those suf ing from industrial decline, provided that the provisions fering from industrial decline, provided that the provi concerned are compatible with the Treaty and with the sions concerned are compatible with the Treaty and with Community's international obligations. the Community's international obligations.

(Amendment No 18)

Article 29(-l)(new)

-1. This Article shall apply to tenders from third coun tries with which the Community has not concluded, mul- tilaterally or bilaterally, an agreement ensuring compar able and effective access for Community undertakings to the markets of those third countries. It is without preju dice to the obligations of the Community or its Member States in respect of third countries. (See Amendment No 21)

(Amendment No 19)

Article 29(1)

1. Any tender made for the award of a supply contract 1. Any tender made for the award of a supply contract may be rejected where the proportion of the products may be rejected where the proportion of the products manufactured outside the Community in the total value manufactured in third countries, determined in accord of the manufactured products constituting the tender ance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 802/68 of 27 June exceeds 50%. For the purposes of this Article, software 1968 on the common definition of the concept of the origin used in the equipment of telecommunication networks of goods, as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No shall be considered as manufactured products. 3860/87, in the total value of the manufactured products constituting the tender exceeds 50%. For the purposes of this Article, software used in the equipment of telecom munication networks shall be considered as manufac tured products. (See Amendment No 20) 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/83

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COMMON POSITION TEXT AMENDED OF THE COUNCIL BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 20)

Article 29(4)

4. For the purposes of this Article, in order to determine 4. Deleted (see Amendment No 19) the proportion of products manufactured outside the Com munity in the total value of the manufactured products constituting the tender, origin shall be determined in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 802/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common definition of the concept of the origin of goods, as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3860/87.

(Amendment No 21)

Article 29(5)

5. This Article shall apply to tenders from third coun- 5. Deleted (see Amendment No 18) tries with which the Community has not concluded, mul- tilaterally or bilaterally, an agreement ensuring compar able and effective access for Community undertakings to the markets of those third countries. It is without preju dice to the obligations of the Community or its Member States in respect of third countries.

(Amendment No 22)

Article 29(7)

7. For the purposes of this Article, and in particular for 7. For the purposes, in this Article, of determining the determining the products, parts and materials manufac proportion of manufactured products from third countries tured outside the Community as provided for in para referred to in paragraph 1, those third countries to which graphs 1 and 4, those third countries to which the benefit the benefit of the provisions of this Directive has been of the provisions of this Directive has been extended by a extended by a Council decision in accordance with para Council decision in accordance with paragraph 5 shall graph -1 shall not be taken into account. not be taken into account.

(Amendment No 23)

Annex XV, Point 13a (new)

13a. Share of the contract put out to subcontractors and the value thereof;

5. Statistical classification of economic activities ** I

— Proposal for a regulation COM(90) 1 final — SYN 241: approved No C 175/84 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990 -

— Doc. A3-123/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation on the statistical classification of economic activities in the European Communities

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 1 final) ('),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 100a of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-51/90 — SYN 241),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy (Doc; A3-123/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal in accordance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Instructs its President to forward this opiniqn to the Council and Commission and, for information, to the parliaments of the Member States.

(') OJ No C 58, 8.3.1990, p. 25.

6. Right of residence * / ** I

(a) — Council orientation Doc. C3-12/90

Council orientation for a directive on the right of residence

Approved with the following amendments:

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Title

Proposal for a Council directive on the right of resi- Proposal for a Council directive on the right of resi dence dence (')

(') This amendment does not apply to the English version. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/85

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 2) First citation Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 Economic Community, and in particular Article 7, thereof, second paragraph, thereof,

(Amendment No 3) Third citation i Having regard to the opinion of the European Parlia- In cooperation with the European Parliament, ment,

(Amendment No 28) Fourth recital Whereas beneficiaries of the right of residence must not Whereas the existing disparities between the Member become an unreasonable burden on the public finances of States as regards the extent and scope of social security the host Member State; provisions must not result in constraints on freedom of movement or the right of residence of Community citiz ens;

(Amendment No 5) Recital 4a (new) Whereas the Treaties and the Single Act require the removal of all barriers to freedom of movement and impli citly confirm the right of people to choose to reside in any one of the Member States without any discrimination whatsoever;

(Amendment No 6) Recital 4b (new) Whereas this Directive is the first step towards securing the right of residence anywhere in the Community for all citizens of the Member States;

(Amendment No 27) Recital 4c (new) Whereas this Directive applies only to nationals of the Community and whereas it will be necessary to submit, in the appropriate legal forms, the texts required for the granting by the Member States to nationals of third coun tries of rights identical to those laid down in this Directive for Community nationals;

(Amendment No 17) Recital 5a (new) Having regard to Article 5(2) of the ACP-EEC Convention (Fourth Convention signed in Lome on 15 December 1989); No C 175/86 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 7)

Sixth recital

Whereas the beneficiaries of this Directive should be Whereas the beneficiaries of this Directive should be covered by administrative arrangements similar to those covered by the same administrative arrangements as laid down in particular in Council Directive 68/360/EEC those laid down in particular in Council Regulation and Council Directive 64/221/EEC; (EEC) No 1612/68, Council Directive 68/360/EEC and Council Directive 64/221/EEC;

(Amendment No 8)

Recital 6a (new)

Having regard to the Declaration against racism and xeno phobia by the European Parliament, the Council and the Representatives of the Member States meeting within the Council and the Commission of the European Community, signed in Strasbourg on 11 June 1986;

(Amendment No 9)

Article 1(1), first subparagraph

1. Member States shall grant the right of residence to 1. Member States shall grant the right of residence to nationals of Member States who do not enjoy this right nationals of Member States who do not enjoy this right under other provisions of Community law, and to mem under other provisions of Community law, and to their bers of their families as defined in paragraph 2, provided spouse, where the latter are recognized by law or adminis that they and the members of their family are covered by trative provision either in the Member State of origin or in sickness insurance in respect of all risks in the host Mem the host country, and to their relatives in the ascending or ber State and have sufficient resources to avoid becoming descending line, provided that they and the members of a burden on the social assistance system of the host their family are covered by sickness insurance and have Member State during their period of residence. sufficient resources to avoid becoming a burden on the social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence.

(Amendment No 24)

Article 1(1), second and third subparagraphs

The resources referred to in the preceding subparagraph The amount of means of support that the applicant shall be shall be deemed sufficient where they are higher than the required to show shall not exceed the amount of the sub- level of resources below which the host Member State may sistence minimum in the host country. grant social assistance to its nationals, taking into account the personal circumstances of persons admitted pursuant to paragraph 2. Where the preceding subparagraph cannot be applied, the 1 resources of the applicant shall be deemed sufficient if they are higher than the level of the minimum social security pension paid by the host Member State. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/87

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 31)

Article 1( la) (new)

la. In the event of death, divorce or final separation, members of a family shall retain the right of residence within the meaning of paragraph 1.

(Amendment No 10)

Article 2(1), first subparagraph

1. Exercise of the right of residence shall be evidenced 1. Exercise of the right of residence shall be evidenced by means of the issue of a document known as a 'Resi by means of the issue of a document known as a 'Euro dence Permit for a National of a Member State of the pean Communities residence card' whose validity may be EEC' whose validity may be limited to five years on a limited to five years. Where this restriction is imposed by renewable basis. However, the Member States may, when a Member State, on expiry of the five-year period, the they deem it to be necessary, require revalidation of the validity of the card, shall automatically be renewed for permit at the end of the first two years of residence. Where periods of 10 years. Where a member of the family does a member of the family does not hold the nationality of a not hold the nationality of a Member State, he or. she Member State, he or she shall be issued with a residence shall be issued with a residence card of the same validity permit of the same validity as that issued to the national - as that issued to the national from whom his or her rights on whom he or she depends. derive.

(Amendment No 26)

Article 2(1), new subparagraph after first subparagraph

The same European Communities residence card shall be issued to legal non-Community residents. This permit, which could be known as a 'European Resident's Card' shall be issued under the same conditions as for Commu nity nationals.

(Amendment No 33)

Article 2(1), second subparagraph

For the purpose of issuing the residence permit, the For the purpose of issuing the residence document with Member State may require only that the applicant pre out charge, the Member State may require only that the sent a valid identity card or passport and provide proof applicant present a valid identity card or passport and that he or she meets the conditions referred to in Arti provide proof that he or she and the members of his or her cle 1. family meet the conditions referred to in Article 1.

(Amendment No 11)

Article 2(1), third subparagraph (new)

The documents shall be issued free of charge to the appli cant or to members of his or her family, and the formalities shall be completed as quickly as possible. Presentation of the residence card may not be demanded when the holder crosses a frontier or in the event of a police check. NoC 175/88 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 12)

Article 2(2)

2. Articles 2, 3, 6(l)(a) and (2), and 9 of Directive 2. All the rights deriving from Regulation (EEC) No 68/360/EEC, shall apply mutatis mutandis to the benefi 1612/68 and Directives 68/360/EEC and 64/221/EEC ciaries of this Directive. and from any legislative provisions amending them shall apply mutatis mutandis to persons covered by the present Directive. The spouse and the dependent children of a national of a Member State entitled to the right of residence within the territory of a Member State shall be entitled to take up any employed or self-employed activity anywhere within the territory of that Member State, even if they are not nation als of a Member State. Member States shall not derogate from the provisions of this Directive save on grounds of public policy, public security or public health. In that event, Directive 64/221 shall apply.

(Amendment No 13)

Article 2(3)

3. This Directive shall not affect existing law on the 3. Deleted acquisition of second homes.

(Amendment No 14)

Article 3

The right of residence shall remain for as long as benefi This Directive shall apply to the territories of the Member ciaries of that right fulfil the conditions laid down in States and to their nationals, as well as to non-nationals Article 1. who, before having reached the age of six years, were resident in a Member State and have since regularly held residence there, as well as to recognized political refugees and displaced persons in a Member State who hold resi dence there.

(Amendment No 15)

Article 4

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 June 1992. They shall forthwith this Directive by 30 June 1991. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. inform the Commission thereof. The national provisions adopted pursuant to the first para graph shall refer explicitly to the present Directive. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/89

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN-PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 16)

Article 4a (new)

Article 4a

The Commission shall, before the end of the second year following the entry into force of the present Directive, and at three-yearly intervals thereafter, draw up a report on the application of this Directive and submit it to the Council and Parliament.

— Doc. A3-124/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Council orientation for a directive on the right of residence

The European Parliament, — having regard to the original proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 275 final) ('), — having regard to its initial opinion on that proposal delivered on 13 December 1989 (2),

— having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(89) 675 final) (3),

— having been reconsulted by the Council following a political agreement reached in the Council, and text of which was forwarded to Parliament (Doc. C3-12/90),

— having regard to its amendment contesting the legal basis proposed by the Commission and proposing that Article 7 of the EEC Treaty be taken as the legal basis,

— having regard to the second report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights and the second opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Indus trial Policy and the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environ ment (Doc. A3-124/90),

1. Approves the text forwarded to Parliament by the Council subject to Parliament's amend ments and in accordance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty; 3. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty;

4. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 5. Calls for the conciliation procedure to be initiated pursuant to the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 4 March 1975, should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

(') OJ No C 191, 28.7.1989, p. 5. (2) OJ No C 15, 22.1.1990, p. 70. (3) OJNoC 26, 3.2.1990, p. 22. NoC 175/90 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

6. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission and for information to the Member States.

(b) — Council orientation Doc. C3-13/90 — SYN 200

Council orientation for a directive on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity

Approved with the following amendments:

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Title

Proposal for a directive on the right of residence for Proposal for a directive on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity their occupational activity (')

(') This amendment does not apply to the English version. Throughout the text replace the words 'residence permit' with 'residence card'.

(Amendment No 2)

Fourth recital

Whereas beneficiaries of the right of residence must not Deleted become a burden on the public finances of the host Mem ber State;

(Amendment No 3)

Fifth recital

Whereas under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) Whereas under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No No 1408/71, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1390/81, recipients of invalidity or old age cash benefits 1390/81, recipients of an invalidity pension, a social or pensions for accidents at work or occupation diseases security pension, an early retirement pension or old age are entitled to continue to receive these benefits and benefits or pensions for accidents at work or occupation pensions even if they reside in the territory of a Member diseases are entitled to continue to receive these benefits State other than that in which the institution responsible and pensions even if they reside in the territory of a for payment is situated; Member State other than that in which the institution responsible for payment is situated; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/91

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 4)

Recital 5a (new)

Whereas action on the social dimension of the Internal Market will serve to reduce the disparities existing between Member States in levels of pensions and benefits but in the interim such disparities cannot be allowed to pose a barrier to the free movement and right of residence of retired Community citizens;

(Amendment No 5)

Recital 5b (new)

Whereas this directive is the first step towards securing the right of residence anywhere in the Community for all retired Member States' nationals;

(Amendment No 6)

Recital 6a (new)

Whereas the Treaties and the Single Act require the removal of all barriers to freedom of movement and impli- N citly confirm the right of people to choose to reside in any one of the Member States without any discrimination whatsoever;

(Amendment No 7)

Recital 6b (new)

Whereas this Directive only refers to Community citizens and therefore texts will have to be drawn up in the appro priate legal form for the recognition by the Member States of the rights for citizens of third countries identical to the rights laid down for Community citizens in this Direc tive;

(Amendment No 8)

Seventh recital

Whereas the beneficiaries of this Directive should be Whereas the beneficiaries of this Directive should be covered by administrative arrangements similar to those covered by the same administrative arrangements as laid down in particular by Council Directive 68/630/EEC those laid down in particular by Regulation (EEC) No and Council Directive 64/221/EEC, 1612/68 of the Council, Directive 68/360/EEC of the Council and Directive 64/221/EEC of the Council and/or by such amending legislation as may subsequently be adopted thereto; NoC 175/92 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 9)

Article 1(1), first subparagraph

1. Member States shall grant the right of residence to 1. Member States shall grant the right of residence to nationals of Member States who have pursued an activity nationals of Member States who have pursued an activity as an employee or self-employed person and to members as an employee or self-employed person and to members of their families as defined in paragraph 2, provided that of their families as defined in Article 10 of Regulation they are recipients of an invalidity or early retirement (EEC) No 1612/68, and to his or her partner who, either in pension, or old age benefits, or of a pension in respect of the Member State of origin or in the host country, enjoys an industrial accident or disease of an amount sufficient administrative or legal recognition, and to their dependent to avoid becoming a burden on the social security system children, provided that they are recipients of an invalid of the host Member State during their period of residence ity pension, a social security pension or pre-retirement and are covered, by sickness insurance in respect of all (bridging pension), or old age benefits, or of a pension in risks in the host Member State. respect of an industrial accident or disease, or are entitled to survivor's benefits and are covered by a sickness insu rance scheme. In the event of the death of the person concerned, or of divorce or de facto separation, members of the family as defined in the first sub-paragraph of this Article shall retain the right of residence granted to them.

(Amendment No 10)

Article 1(1), second subparagraph

The resources of the applicant shall be deemed sufficient Deleted where they are higher than the level of resources below which the host Member State may grant social assistance to its nationals, taking into account the personal circum stances of the applicant and, where appropriate, the per sonal circumstances of persons admitted pursuant to para graph 2.

(Amendment No 11)

Article 1(1), third subparagraph

Where the preceding subparagraph cannot be applied in a Deleted Member State, the resources of the applicant shall be deemed sufficient if they are higher than the level of the minimum social security pension paid by the host Mem ber State.

• (Amendment No 12)

Article 1(2)

2. The following shall, irrespective of their nationality, 2. Deleted have the right to install themselves in another Member State with the holder of the right of residence: (a) his or her spouse and their descendants who are dependants: (b) dependent relatives in the ascending line of the holder of the right of residence and his or her spouse. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/93

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 13)

Article 2(1), first subparagraph

1. Exercise of the right of residence shall be evidenced 1. Right of residence shall be exercised by means of a by means of the issue of a document known as a 'Resi document known as a 'European Communities residence dence Permit for a National of a Member State of the card',which is the same for all citizens and whose validity EEC', whose validity may be limited to five years on a may be limited to five years. Where this restriction is renewable basis. However, the Member States may, when imposed by a Member State, on expiry of the five year they deem it to be necessary, require revalidation of the period, the validity of the card shall automatically be ren permit at the end of the first two years of residence. Where ewable for periods of ten years, provided that the two a member of the family does not hold the nationality of a conditions laid down in Article 1 are still fulfilled. Member State, he or she shall be issued with a residence permit of the same validity as that issued to the national on whom he or she depends. Where a member of the family does not hold the nation ality of a Member State, he or she shall be issued with a residence card of the same validity as that issued to the national from whom he or she derives his or her rights. Where the person concerned dies, or in the event or divorce or separation, the aforesaid right shall not be forfeited.

(Amendment No 14)

Article 2(1), second subparagraph

For the purpose of issuing the residence permit, the For the purpose of issuing the residence card, the Mem Member State may require only that the applicant pre ber State may require only that the applicant present a sent a valid identity card or passport and provide proof valid identity card or passport and provide proof that he that he or she meets the conditions laid down in Arti or she meets the conditions laid down in Article 1. cle 1. Documents shall be issued free of charge to the applicant or to members of his/her family, and the formalities shall be completed as rapidly as possible. Presentation of the residence card may not be required when the holder crosses a national frontier, nor in the event of a police check.

(Amendment No 15)

Article 2(2)

2. Articles 2, 3, 6(1 )(a) and (2) and Article 9 ofDirective 2. The beneficiaries of this Directive shall enjoy muta 68/360/EEC shall apply mutatis mutandis to the benefi tis mutandis all the rights deriving from Regulation (EEC) ciaries of this Directive. No 1612/68, from Directives 68/360/EEC and 64/ 221/EEC and from any legislative provisions amending The spouse and the dependent children of a national of a them. Member State entitled to the right of residence within the territory of a Member State shall be entitled to take up any employed or self-employed activity anywhere within the territory of that Member State, even if they are not nation als of a Member State. Member States shall not derogate from the provisions of this Directive save on grounds of public policy, public safety or public health. In that event, Directive 64/221 shall apply. NoC 175/94 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 16)

Article 2(3)

3. This Directive shall not affect existing law on the 3. Deleted acquisition of second homes.

(Amendment No 17)

Article 3

The right of residence shall remain for as long as benefi In those instances where a person is granted right of ciaries of that right fulfil the conditions laid down in residence in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 of Article 1. this Directive, but whose resources are unexpectedly reduced and who has urgent need of assistance, he/she shall receive such help as is necessary from the host Mem ber State. The total cost of the assistance will, however, be reclaimed from the person's Member State of Origin. This Directive shall be applicable on the territory of the Member States and shall apply to nationals of Member States and to non-nationals who have lived on a regular basis in a Member State since before the age of six, as well as to political refugees and to stateless persons recognized as such in a Member State and residing there.

(Amendment No 18)

Article 3a (new)

Article 3a

The Commission shall before the end of the second year following the entry into force of this Directive, and at three yearly intervals thereafter, draw up a report on the appli cation of this Directive which it shall submit to the Coun cil and the European Parliament.

(Amendment No 19)

Article 4

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 June 1992. They shall forthwith this Directive by 30 June 1991. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof inform the Commission of the measures taken. The national provisions adopted pursuant to the first para graph shall refer explicitly to the present Directive. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/95

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— Doc. A3-133/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the orientation of the Council for a directive on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupa tional activity

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the orientation of the Council,

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Articles 49 and 54 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-13/90 — SYN 200),

— having regard to the original proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 275 final) ('),

— stressing that it considers the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A3-133/90),

1. Approves the Council's orientation, provided the proposed legal basis is retained, subject to Parliament's amendments and in accordance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Calls for the conciliation procedure to be opened in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 4 March 1975, should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and the Commission and, for information, to the Member States.

(') OJ No C 191, 28.7.1989, p. 3. NoC 175/96 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Council orientation for a directive on the right of residence for students

Approved with the following amendments:

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Title

Proposal for a Council directive on the right of residence Proposal for a Council directive on the right of residence for students for students (')

(') This amendment does not apply to the English version. Throughout the text replace the words 'residence permit' with 'residence card'.

(Amendment No 2)

Recital 4a (new)

Whereas disparities between the Member States as to student-related measures can be lessened by action in con nection with the social dimension of the internal market, though, pending this, such disparities must not act as an impediment to freedom of movement or to right of resi dence for Community citizens;

(Amendment No 31)

Recital 4b (new)

Whereas this Directive applies only to nationals of the Community and it will therefore be necessary to submit, in the appropriate legal forms, the texts required for the granting by the Member States to nationals of third coun tries of rights identical to those laid down in this Directive for Community nationals;

(Amendment No 3)

Fifth recital

Whereas beneficiaries of the right of residence must not Deleted become an unreasonable burden on the public finances of the host Member State;

(Amendment No 4)

Recital 5a (new)

Whereas the right of residence for students forms part of a set of related decisions designed to promote vocational training and to bring about the freedom of establish ment; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/97

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 5)

Recital 5b (new)

Whereas the Treaties and the Single Act require the removal of all barriers to freedom of movement and con firm the right of people to choose to reside in any one of the Member States without any discrimination whatsoever;

(Amendment No 6)

Recital 5c (new)

Whereas this Directive is the first step towards securing the right of residence anywhere in the Community for all citizens of the Member States;

(Amendment No 33)

Sixth recital

Whereas, in the present state of Community law, assist Whereas this Directive also constitutes a point of refer ance granted to students, as established by the case law of ence for the extension of the right of residence to students the Court of Justice, does not come under the scope of from third countries, who at present encounter difficulties application of the EEC Treaty within the meaning of with regard to residence and access to services connected Article 7 thereof; with the right to education;

(Amendment No 7)

Seventh recital

Whereas it is necessary for the Member States to adopt Whereas it is necessary for the Member States to adopt administrative measures to facilitate residence without administrative measures to ensure residence without dis discrimination; crimination for students from another Member State of the Community and to grant them the same facilities as their own students and, in particular, to guarantee the transfer of scholarships or student loans from the country of origin to the host country;

(Amendment No 34)

Eighth recital

Whereas the exercise of the right of residence becomes a Whereas the exercise of the right of residence becomes a genuine possibility only if it is granted to the spouse and genuine possibility only if it is granted to the members of dependent children; " the family;

(Amendment No 9)

Ninth recital

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 10)

Recital 9a (new)

Whereas if the right of residence is to be made more extensive and effective, it is necessary in any case in all the Member States to make decisive factors such as condi tions of access to courses of study and educational esta blishments, the availability of accommodation and ser vices in general gradually more comparable with a view to securing higher standards;

(Amendment No 32)

Article 1

The Member States shall take the necessary measures to The Member States shall take the necessary measures to facilitate the exercise of the right of residence in order to facilitate the exercise of the right of residence in order to guarantee access to vocational or professional training in guarantee access to vocational or professional training in a manner free from discrimination. Accordingly they a manner free from discrimination. Accordingly they shall recognize the right of residence of any student who shall recognize the right of residence of any student who is a national of a Member State and who does not enjoy is a national of a Member State and who does not enjoy this right under other provisions of Community law, and this right under other provisions of Community law, and, of the student's spouse and dependent children, where irrespective of his or her nationality, of the student's the student vouches to the relevant national authority by spouse or partner living with him or her in a relationship means of a declaration or by such alternative means as the recognized by law or administrative provision in the Mem student may choose that are at least equivalent, for having ber State of origin or in the host Member State, and sufficient resources to avoid becoming a burden on the dependent children provided that the student is enrolled social assistance system of the host Member State during in a recognized educational establishment for the pur their period of residence provided that the student is pose of following vocational or professional training enrolled in a recognized educational establishment for courses there and that the student and the members of his the principal purpose of following vocational or profes or her family, as defined above, are covered by sickness sional training courses there and that they are covered by insurance. sickness insurance in respect of all risks in the host Mem ber State.

(Amendent No 12)

Article 1, second paragraph (new)

Where the social security system of the host Member State has to intervene on behalf of a student referred to in paragraph 1, the benefit shall be granted in accordance with the rules of that State. At the request of the host Member State, the Member State of origin shall reim burse the amount of benefit granted. For the purposes of this directive, 'Member State of origin' shall mean that State in which the student has his or her principal resi dence for ten consecutive years before seeking the right of residence in a Member State on the basis of this directive, or that State which has granted citizenship to the stu dent.

(Amendment No 13)

Article 1, third paragraph (new)

They shall grant students who are nationals of a Member State the same facilities as students from their own coun try. They shall facilitate the transfer of grants or student loans from the country of origin to the host country. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/99

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 14) Article 1, fourth paragraph (new)

In the event of the death of the person in question or of dissolution of the marriage or de facto separation, mem bers of the family as defined in the first paragraph shall retain the right of residence granted to them.

(Amendment No 35) Article 2(1), first and second subparagraphs 1. The right of residence shall be restricted to the 1. The right of residence shall be evidenced by means duration of the course of studies in question. of the issue of a document known as a 'European Com Exercise of the right of residence shall be evidenced by munities' Residence Card', the validity of which may be means of the issue of a document known as a 'Residence limited to the actual duration of the course of studies followed. The card may be extended annually. If a member Permit for a National of a Member State of the EEC', the of the family does not hold the nationality of a Member validity of which may be limited to the duration of the State, he or she shall be issued with a residence card of the course of studies or to one year where the course lasts same validity as that issued to the national to whose longer; in the latter event it shall be renewable annually. family he or she belongs. Where a member of the family does not hold the nation ality of the Member State, he or she shall be issued with a residence permit of the same validity as that issued to the national on whom he or she depends.

(Amendment No 36) Article 2(1), fourth subparagraph (new)

The documents shall be issued free of charge to the appli cants or to members of his or her family and the formali ties shall be completed as quickly as possible. Presenta tion of the residence card may not be demanded when the holder crosses a frontier or in the event of a police check.

(Amendment No 37) Article 2(2), first and second subparagraphs 2. Article 2, 3 and 9 of Directive 68/360/EEC shall 2. All the rights deriving from Regulation (EEC) No apply mutatis mutandis to the beneficiaries of this Direc 1612/68, Directives 68/360/EEC and 64/221/EEC and tive. any legislative provisions amending them shall apply The spouse and the dependent children of a national of a mutatis mutandis to persons covered by this Directive. Member State entitled to the right of residence within the territory of a Member State shall be entitled to take up any employed or self-employed activity anywhere within the territory of that State, even if they are not nationals of a Member State.

(Amendment No 19/corr.) Article 3 This Directive shall not establish any entitlement to the Deleted payment of maintenance grants by the host Member State on the part of students benefiting from the right of resi dence. NoC 175/100 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7,90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

COUNCIL TEXT AMENDED ORIENTATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 20/corr.)

Article 4

The right of residence shall remain for as long as benefi- Deleted ciaries of that right fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 1.

(Amendment No 38)

Article 5

The Commission shall report to the Council on the imple The Commission shall, before the end of the second year mentation of this Directive three years after the date laid following the entry into force of this Directive, and at three down in Article 6. yearly intervals thereafter, draw up a report on the appli The Commission shall pay particular attention to any cation of this Directive which it shall submit to the Coun difficulties to which the implementation of Article 1 might cil and Parliament. give rise in the Member States; it shall, if appropriate, submit proposals to the Council with the aim of remedying such difficulties.

(Amendment No 22/corr.)

Article 6

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 June 1992. They shall forthwith this Directive by 30 June 1991. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. inform the Commission of the measures taken. The national provisions adopted pursuant to the first sub paragraph shall refer explicitly to the present Directive.

— Doc. A3-141/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION ^ (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Council orientation concerning a directive on the right of residence for students

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Council orientation,

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 7 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3- 14/90 — SYN 199),

— stressing that it considers the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, the Media and Sport and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A 3-141/90), ) 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/101

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

1. Approves the Council orientation, provided the proposed legal basis is retained, subject to Parliament's amendments and in accordance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty;

4. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

5. Reserves the right, in this event, to open the conciliation procedure;

6. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and the Commission and, for information, to the Member States.

7. Direct life assurance ** I

— Proposal for a directive C()M(90) 46 final — SYN 177

Amended proposal from the Commission pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty for a second Council directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance, laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 79/267/EEC

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Seventeenth recital

Whereas provision should be made for a flexible procedure Whereas it is appropriate also to make provision for a to make it possible to assess reciprocity with third coun separate procedure for requests for authorization of a sub tries on a Community basis; whereas the aim of this sidiary or the acquisition of a participation by a company procedure is not to close the Community's financial mar which is governed by the law of a third country with a view kets but rather, as the Community intends to keep its to securing for Community undertakings reciprocal arran financial markets open to the rest of the world, to gements in the third countries concerned; whereas it is the improve the liberalization of the global financial markets intention of this directive to lay down the details of this in other third countries; whereas, to that end, this Direc procedure, the aim of which is not to bar access to the tive provides for procedures for negotiating with third Community's financial markets but rather, as the Com countries and, as a last resort, for the possibility of taking munity intends to keep its financial markets open to the measures involving the suspension of new applications for rest of the world, to improve the liberalization of the authorization or the restriction of new authorizations; global financial markets in other third countries;

(*) For full text see OJ No C 72, 22.3.1990, p. 5. No C 175/102 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 2)

Nineteenth recital

Whereas, in view of the differences in the national legis Whereas, in view of the differences in the national legis lations, it is also appropriate to grant to those Member lations, it is also appropriate to grant to those Member States which so wish transitional arrangements enabling States which so wish transitional arrangements enabling them to adapt their legislation before applying in their them to adapt their legislation before applying in their entirety, as regards group insurance contracts linked to a entirety, as regards group insurance contracts linked to a contract of employment or the intervention of a broker, contract of employment, the provisions of this Directive the provisions of this Directive relating to the case where relating to the case where the policy-holder takes the the policy-holder takes the initiative to conclude a con initiative to conclude a contract by way of provision of tract by way of provision of services. services.

(Amendment No 3)

ARTICLE 4(2a) (new)

2a) The Member State whose law governs a contract entered into by way of freedom to provide services under the provisions of Article 13, may not, subject to paragraph 4 of this Article, seek to prevent the policy holder from entering into any contract relating to the commitment which may be lawfully undertaken in the Member State of establishment.

(Amendment No 4)

ARTICLE 9 Article 32a (Directive 79/267/EEC)

The competent authorities of the Member States shall 1. Requests for authorization of a subsidiary whose par inform the Commission: ent undertaking is governed by the laws of a third country (a) of any authorization of a direct or indirect subsidiary or the acquisition of a participation therein as provided for one or more parent undertakings of which are gov in paragraph 3 shall be subject to the procedure laid down erned by the laws of a third country. The Commission in this Article. shall inform the Insurance Committee referred to in 2. The competent authorities of the relevant Member Article 32b(6) accordingly; State shall inform the competent authorities of the other (b) whenever such a parent undertaking acquires a hold Member States and the Commission of the request for ing in a Community insurance undertaking which authorization of a subsidiary. would turn the latter into its subsidiary. The Commis 3. Member States shall provide that where an under sion shall inform the Insurance Committee referred to taking governed by the laws of a third country is consider in Article 32b(6) accordingly. ing the acquisition of a direct or indirect participation in an When authorization is granted to the direct or indirect insurance undertaking established in the Community such subsidiary of one or more parent undertakings governed that the latter undertaking will become its subsidiary, it by the law of third countries, the structure of the group shall inform the supervisory authorities of the Member shall be specified in the notification which the competent State concerned. These authorities shall inform the com authorities shall address to the Commission. petent authorities of the other Member States and the Commission. 4. The competent authorities of the Member State con cerned must suspend their decision regarding requests as referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 until the procedure provided for in paragraphs § and 6 is completed. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/103

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

5. The Commission shall, within three months of receiving the information provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3, examine whether all undertakings of the Community enjoy reciprocal treatment, in particular regarding the establishment of subsidiaries or the acquisition of partici pations in insurance undertakings in the third country in question.

6. If the Commission finds that reciprocity is not ensured, it may extend suspension of the decision referred to in paragraph 4, after having consulted the competent authorities of the Member States under the collaboration procedure provided for in Article 38.

7. The Commission shall present suitable proposals to the Council with a view to achieving reciprocity with the third country in question.

(Amendment No 5)

ARTICLE 9 Article 32b (Directive 79/267/EEC)

1. The Member States shall inform the Commission of 1. Deleted any general difficulties encountered by their insurance i undertakings in establishing themselves or carrying on their activities in a third country.

2. Initially no later than six months before the applica- 2. Deleted tion of this Directi ve, and thereafter periodically, the Com mission shall draw up a report examining the treatment accorded to Community insurance undertakings in third countries, in the terms referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4, as regards establishment and the carrying on of insurance activities, and the acquisition of holdings in third-country insurance undertakings. The Commission shall submit those reports to the Council, together with any appropriate proposals.

3. Whenever it appears to the Commission, either on 3. Deleted the basis of the reports referred to in paragraph 2 or on the basis of other information, that a third country is not granting Community insurance undertakings effective market access comparable to that insurance undertakings from that third country, the Commission may submit proposals to the Council for the appropriate mandate for negotiation with a view to obtaining comparable competi tive opportunities for Community insurance undertak ings. The Council shall decide by a qualified majority.

4. Whenever it appears to the Commission, either on 4. Deleted the basis of the reports referred to in paragraph 2 or on the basis of other information, that Community insurance undertakings in a third country are not receiving national treatment offering the same competitive opportunities as are available to domestic insurance undertakings and that the conditions of effective market access are not being fulfilled, the Commission may initiate negotiations in order to remedy the situation. NoC 175/104 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

In the circumstances described in the first subparagraph above, it may also be decided at any time, and in addition to initiating negotiations in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 32b(6), that the competent authorities of the Member States must limit or suspend their deci sions:

— regarding requests pending at the moment of the deci sion or future requests for authorizations and

— regarding the acquisition of holdings by direct or indi rect parent undertakings governed by the laws of the third country in question.

The duration of the measures referred to may not exceed six months.

Before the end of that six months period and in the light of the results of the negotiations, the Council may, acting on a proposal from the Commission, decide by a qualified majority that the measures shall be continued.

Such limitations or suspension may not apply to the set ting up of subsidiaries by insurance undertakings or their subsidiaries duly authorized in the Community, or to the acquisition of holdings in Community insurance under takings by such institutions or subsidiaries.

5. Whenever it appears to the Commission that one of 5. Deleted the situations described in paragraphs 3 and 4 has arisen, the Member States shall inform it at its request:

(a) of any request for the authorization of a direct or indirect subsidiary one or more parent undertakings of which are governed by the laws of the third country in question:

(b) of any plans for such an undertaking to acquire a holding in a Community insurance undertaking such that the latter would become the subsidiary of the former.

This obligation to provide information shall lapse once an agreement is concluded with the third country referred to in paragraph 3 or 4 when the measures referred to in the second and third subparagraphs of paragraph 4 cease to apply.

6. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee com composed of representatives of the Member States and posed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission representative. chaired by the Commission representative.

The Commission representative shall submit to the Com The Commission representative shall submit to the Com mittee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Commit mittee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Commit tee shall express its opinion on the draft within a time tee shall express its opinion on the draft within a^ime limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be expressed by urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be expressed by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty for the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty for adoption of decisions which the Council is required to adoption of decisions which the Council is required to take on a proposal from the Commission. When a vote is take on a proposal from the Commission. When a vote is taken in the committee, the votes of the representatives taken in the committee, the votes of the representatives of the Member States shall be weighted as laid down in of the Member States shall be weighted as laid down in the said Article. The Chairman shall not vote. the said Article. The Chairman shall not vote. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/105

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The Committee shall adopt the proposed measures if they The Commission shall adopt measures which may apply are consistent with the Committee's opinion. immediately. However, if these measures are not in Where the proposed measures are not consistent with the accordance with the opinion of the Committee, they shall Committee's opinion or if no opinion is issued, the Com be communicated by the Commission to the Council forth mission shall submit to the Council without delay a pro with. posal concerning the measures to be taken. The Council In that event, the Commission shall defer application of shall act by a qualified majority. the measures which it has decided for a period to be laid If on the expiry of a period to belaid down in each act to down in each act adopted by the Council, but which may in be adopted by the Council under this paragraph but which . no case exceed three months from the date of communica may in no case exceed three months from the date of tion to the Council. referral to the Council, the Council has not acted, the The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission, different decision within the time limit referred to in the (sic) previous paragraph.

7. Measures taken under this Article shall comply with 7. Deleted the Community's obligations under any international agreements, bilateral or multilateral, governing the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance undertak ings.

(Amendment No 6)

ARTICLE 12(4)

4) If the competent authorities of the Member State of 4) If the competent authorities of the Member State of provision of services have not taken a decision by the provision of services have not taken a decision by the end of the period referred to in paragraph 3, authori end of the period referred to in paragraph 3, authori zation shall be deemed to be refused. zation shall be deemed to be approved.

(Amendment No 7)

ARTICLE 13(1), SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH

The policy-holder shall be deemed to have taken the The policy-holder shall be deemed to have taken the initiative: initiative where the contract is signed by both inter — where, on the one hand, the contract is entered ested parties in accordance with Article 4 without the into by both parties in the Member State in which undertaking previously having contacted the policy the undertaking is established or by each of the holder in his State of habitual residence, either parties in that party's own State of establishment through an insurance intermediary or any person or of habitual residence, and where, on the other authorized to act for the undertaking. hand, the policy-holder has not been contacted in his State of habitual residence by the undertaking or through an insurance intermediary or any per son authorized to act for it or by means of any solicitation of business addressed to him person ally; — where the policy-holder approaches an intermed — Deleted iary established in the Member State in which the policy-holder has his habitual residence and carrying on the professional activities defined in Article 2(l)(a) of Directive 77/92/EEC in order to obtain information on assurance contracts of fered by undertakings established in Member States other than his State of habitual residence or with a view to entering into a commitment through the intermediary with such an undertak ing. In that event the policy-holder shall sign a statement, the text of which is set out under item A in the Annex, expressly so requesting.

\ NoC 175/106 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 8)

ARTICLE 14(5)

5) Member States may not prevent the policy-holder 5) Deleted from entering into any commitment which may .be lawfully undertaken in the Member State of establish ment unless it is contrary to public policy in the Mem ber State of the commitment.

(Amendment No 9)

ARTICLE 18(1 a) (new)

la) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 13(6) of the first Directive, Member States whose regulations allow the insurance undertakings established on their territory to offer life assurance and 'non-life' insu rance services concurrently shall undertake to adopt, within a period of § years from publication of this Directive, the necessary measures to enable the abovementioned undertakings to be converted into under takings specializing in life assurance only, providing at least for: (a) the automatic granting of administrative authori zations to any specialized undertaking which forms and sets up in the same Member State in which the composite undertaking is established and, (b) preferential tax arrangements in regard to the basis for assessment which the conversion of the composite company may give rise to and in regard to the operations necessary to effect the conver sion.

(Amendment No 10)

ARTICLE 24b(2)

2) Member States may, up to three years at the latest 2) Deleted after the date of application laid down in Article 27(2), consider that the policy-holder shall be deemed to have taken the initiative only in the case provided for in the first indent of Article 13(1).

(Amendment No 11)

ARTICLE 24ba (new)

ARTICLE 24ba

I The Commission shall, by 31 October 1990, submit pro posals for directives harmonizing technical reserves, in cluding mathematical reserves, and conditions of insu rance, which shall be adopted by Council by the end of 1992. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/107

) Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 12)

ANNEX, point A

A. Statement to be signed by the policy-holder under A. Deleted Article 13(1), second indent 7 hereby state that I wish (name of intermediary) to provide me with information on assurance contracts offered by undertakings established in Member States other than (Member State of habitual residence of policy-holder). I understand that such undertakings are subject to the supervisory arrangements of the State in which they are established and not to the supervisory arrangements of (Member State of habi tual residence of policy-holder).'

(by separate vote)

ANNEX, point B

B. Statement to be signed by the policy-holder under B. Deleted Article 13(2) 7 hereby take note that (name of the assurer) is esta blished in (Member State of establishment of assurer) and I realize that supervision of that assurer is the responsibility of the supervisory authorities in (Mem ber State of establishment of assurer) and not the responsibility of the authorities in (Member State of habitual residence of policy-holder)'.

— Doc. A3-130/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the amended proposal from the Commission to the Council for a second directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance, laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 79/267/EEC

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(88) 729 final) ('),

— having regard to the Commission's amended proposal submitted pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty (COM(90) 46 final — SYN 177) (2),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 57(2) and Article 66 of the EEC Treaty (Docs. C3-43/89 and C3-90/90),

(') . OJ NoC 38, 15.2.1989, p. 7. (J) OJNoC 72, 22.3.1990, p. 5. NoC 175/108 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens Rights and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy (Doc. A3-130/90),

1. Approves the Commission's amended proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accordance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Commission again to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty; 3. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty;

4. Calls on the Council to consult Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 5. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal; ' 6. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and the Commission.

8. Damage caused by waste **I

— Proposal for a directive COM(89) 282 final — SYN 217 (')

. Proposal for a Council directive on civil liability for damage caused by waste

Approved with the following amendments: (2)

TEXT PROPOSED bY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (•) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Title

Proposal for a Council Directive on civil liability for Proposal for a First Council Directive on civil liability damage caused by waste for damage caused by waste and certain industrial activi ties

(Amendment No 2)

Third recital

Whereas disparities among laws of the Member States Whereas this Directive applies to waste and to certain concerning the liability for damage and injury to the industrial activities, already identified under Community environment caused by waste could lead to artificial pat- law in Council Directive 82/501/EEC, which are likely to terns of investment and waste; whereas such a situation produce dangerous waste; whereas disparities among laws would distort competition, affect the free movement of of the Member States concerning the liability for damage

(') Dealt with in Doc. A3-126/90. 0) Rule 40(2) was applied. The matter was therefore referred back to committee. (*) For full text see OJ No C 251, 4.10.1989, p. 3. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/109

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT goods within the internal market and entail differences in and impairment of the environment caused by waste and the level of protection of health, property and the envi certain industrial activities could lead to artificial pat ronment; whereas an approximation of the laws of the terns of investment and waste disposal; whereas such a Member States on this subject is therefore needed; situation would distort competition, affect the free movement of goods within the internal market and entail differences in the level of protection of health, property and the environment; whereas an approximation of the laws of the Member States on this subject is therefore needed;

(Amendment No 3)

Sixth recital

Whereas Article 11(1) of Directive 84/631/EEC requires Whereas Article 11(1) of Directive 84/631/EEC requires the producer of waste to take all necessary steps to dis the producer of waste to take all necessary steps to dis pose of the waste, or arrange for its disposal, so as to pose of the waste, or arrange for its disposal, so as to protect the quality of the environment; protect the quality of the environment; whereas Directive 82/501/EEC is concerned with the prevention of major accidents which might result from certain industrial activ ities and with the limitation of their consequences for man and the environment;

(Amendment No 4)

10th recital

Whereas the principles established in 130r(2) of the Trea Whereas the principles established in 130r(2) of the Trea ty that the polluter should pay and that preventive action ty that the polluter should pay and that preventive action should be taken cannot be effectively implemented in the should be taken cannot be effectively implemented in the waste management sector unless the cost of the damage waste management sector unless the cost of the damage or injury to the environment caused by the waste is or injury to the environment caused by the waste is reflected in the cost of the goods or services that give rise reflected in the cost of the goods or services that give rise to the waste; whereas, in view of the risk inherent in the to the waste; whereas, in view of the risk inherent in the very existence of waste, the strict liability of the producer very existence of waste and in certain industrial activities, constitutes the best solution to the problem; the strict liability of the producer and the manufacturer constitutes the best solution to the problem;

(Amendment No 5)

12th recital

Whereas, in order to safeguard the injured party's rights, Whereas the Directive must also cover the liability of the the holder of waste must be able to identify the producer, carrier and the eliminator of waste; on pain of himself being considered the producer;

(Amendment No 6)

14th recital

Whereas the protection of persons and the environment Whereas the protection of persons and the environment requires that the producer's liability should not be requires that a person's liability should not be reduced by NoC 175/110 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

reduced by the involvement of other persons having con the involvement of other persons having recklessly or tributed to causing the damage or injury to the environ negligently contributed to causing the damage or impair ment; whereas, however, the contributory negligence of ment of the environment; whereas, however, the intent of the injured party may be taken into account to assign, the injured party to cause such damage or impairment or reduce or disallow such liability; contributory negligence on his part may be taken into account to assign, reduce or disallow such liability;

(Amendment No 7)

17th recital

Whereas to ensure the effective protection of persons and Whereas to ensure the effective protection of persons and the environment, no contractual derogation should be the environment, no contractual derogation should be permitted as regards the liability of the producer in rela permitted as regards the liability of the producer, the tion to the injured party; carrier, the manufacturer or the eliminator in relation to the damage or to the impairment of the environment;

(Amendment No 8)

18th recital

Whereas market conditions at present are such that it is Deleted not opportune to establish a mandatory system of insu rance;

(Amendment No 9)

Recital 18a (new)

Whereas, since the Convention on Third Party Liability in the field of Nuclear Energy of 29 July 1960 does not cover impairment of the environment caused by radioactive sub stances, this Directive must apply to liability for impair ment of the environment caused by radioactive waste;

(Amendment No 10)

Recital 18b (new)

Whereas this is only a First Directive; further Directives will be required, inter alia, to extend common rules on civil liability to other economic activities, including the field of nuclear energy;

(Amendment No 11)

19th recital

Whereas rules must be laid down at Community level for Whereas rules must be included in this directive for com compensation for damage and injury to the environment pensation for damage and impairment of the environ caused by waste in the event that payment of full com ment caused by waste in the event that payment of full pensation is not possible; compensation is not possible; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/111

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 12)

Article 1

Scope of the Directive

1. This Directive shall concern civil liability for 1. This Directive shall complement, where necessary, damage and injury to the environment caused by waste the laws of the Member States relating to civil liability for generated in the course of an occupational activity, from damage and for impainnent of the environment caused by the moment it arises. waste and by certain industrial activities.

2. This Directive shall not apply 2. This Directive shall not apply

— to nuclear waste covered by national law based on the — to damage caused by radioactive waste, although Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of impairment of the environment caused by radioactive Nuclear Energy (Paris, 29 July 1960) and the Conven waste shall remain within the scope of this Direc tion supplementary to the aforementioned Conven tive; tion (Brussels, 31 July 1963), as well as the Protocols attached to these Conventions;

— to waste and pollution covered by national law based — to damage and impairment of the environment caused on the International Convention on Civil Liability by oil from ships at sea insofar as the question of for Oil Pollution Damage (Brussels, 29 November liability is regulated by the International Convention 1969) and the International Convention on the Esta on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 29 blishment of an International Fund for Compensa November 1969 as amended by the Protocols of 19 tion for Oil Damage (Brussels, 18 December 1971). November 1976 and 25 May 1984 and by the Interna tional Convention on the Establishment of an Inter national Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage of 18 December 1971 as amended by the Protocols of 19 November 1976 and 25 May 1984.

2a. This Directive shall apply not only to the territories of the Member States but also to the exclusive economic zone over which the Member States enjoy rights and obli gations under Article 56 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 12 December 1982.

(Amendment No 13)

Article 2, title (new) and paragraph 1

Definition

1. For the purposes of this Directive 1. For the purposes of this Directive:

(a) 'producer' means any natural or legal person whose (a) 'producer' means a person who, in the course of a occupational activities produce waste and/or anyone commercial or industrial activity or otherwise, pro who carries out pre-processing, mixing or other oper duces waste or holds waste for disposal; ations resulting in a change in the nature or composi tion of this waste, until the moment when the damage or injury to the environment is caused; NoC 175/112 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(b) 'waste' means any substance or object defined as (b) 'waste' means: waste in Article 1 of Council Directive 75/ (i) those categories of products listed in Annexes I 442/EEC; and II to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (March 1989);

(ii) any materials arising from human activity, for which no further use is envisaged and which con tain, or are contaminated by, radionuclides of which the levels of radioactivity or the concentra tions of radioactive material exceed the limits which the Community has set itself in Directive 80/836/EURATOM as amended;

(iii) wastes which, as a result of being radioactive, are subject to any international control systems, including international instruments applying spe cifically to radioactive materials;

(iv) wastes which are not covered by (i) and (ii), but are defined as hazardous or radioactive wastes by the domestic legislation of Member States, where these wastes arise out of the activities listed in Annex IV of the Convention referred to under (0;

(i) damage resulting from death or physical inju (i) damage resulting from death or physical injury; . ry;

(ii) damage to property; (ii) damage to property;

(d) 'injury to the environment' means a significant and (d) 'environment' means the sum of the earth's biotic and persistent interference in the environment caused by a abiotic natural resources, such as air, water, soil, flora modification of the physical, chemical or biological and fauna or any part thereof within a landscape that conditions of water, soil and/or air insofar as these are respects or should respect the quality of life, welfare not considered to be damage within the meaning of and health of human beings; subparagraph (c)(ii).

(da) 'impairment of the environment' means any signifi cant physical, chemical or biological deterioration of the environment;

(db) 'person' means any natural or legal person as defined by public or private law;

(dc) 'manufacturer' means a person responsible for the operation of an industrial activity;

(de) 'industrial activity' means any operation carried out in an industrial installation as defined in Article l(2)(a) of Council Directive 82/501/EEC on the major accident hazards of certain industrial activities;

(df) 'carrier' means a person who transports waste by air, road, rail, inland navigation or sea; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/113

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(dg) 'unauthorized carrier' means a carrier who does not possess a certificate issued by a competent authority attesting that the carrier comes under the supervision of that authority within the meaning of Article 10 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC or of Article 9 of Council Directive 78/319/EEC on toxic and dange rous waste;

(dh) 'eliminator' means a person who collects and/or holds and/or processes waste with a view to its elimi nation or transformation into any substance and/or who is responsible for the management of a site where waste is dumped or collected below or above ground;

(di) ^unauthorized eliminator' means a person who does not possess the requisite authorization pursuant either to Article 8 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC or to Article 6 of Council Directive 75/439/EEC on the disposal of waste oils or to Article 9 of Council Direc tive 78/319/EEC or to Article 6 of Council Directive 76/403/EEC on the disposal of polychlorinated biphe- nyls and polychlorinated terphenyls.

(Amendment No 14)

Article 2(2)

2. The following shall be deemed to be the producer of 2. Deleted the waste in place of the person defined in paragraph 1(a):

(a) the person who imports the waste into the Communi ty, except where the waste was previously exported from the Community and its nature or composition was not substantially changed prior to its reimporta tion;

(b) the person who had actual control of the waste when the incident giving rise to the damage or injury to the environment occurred: (i) if he is not able within a reasonable period to identify the producer as defined in paragraph 1; (ii) if the waste is in transit in the Community with out having undergone there a substantial change in nature or composition before the occurrence of the incident giving rise to the damage or injury to the environment;

(c) the person responsible for the installation, establish ment or undertaking where the waste was lawfully transferred to such installation, establishment or undertaking licensed pursuant to Article 8 of Directive 75/442/EEC, Article 6 of Council Directive 75/439/EEC or Article 9 of Directive 78/319/EEC, or approved pursuant to Article 6 of Council Directive 76/403/EEC NoC 175/114 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 15)

Article 3

Scope of Liability

The producer of waste shall be liable under civil law for 1. While the producer, the carrier or the eliminator has the damage and injury to the environment caused by the control of the waste, he shall be liable under civil law for waste, irrespective of fault on his part. the damage and impairment of the environment caused by that waste, irrespective of fault on his part.

2. Waste shall be deemed to be also under the control of the producer or the carrier or the eliminator, if he consigns the waste to an unauthorized carrier or to an unauthorized eliminator.

3. The manufacturer shall be liable under civil law for damage and impairment of the environment, irrespective of fault on his part.

4. The producer, carrier or eliminator in paragraph 1 above shall in their Annual Report include the names of the Company Insurers for liability purposes.

(Amendment No 16)

Article 4

1. The plaintiff may take legal action to obtain: 1. The national laws of the Member States shall deter mine: (a) the prohibition or cessation of the act causing the (a) the person who may bring a legal action in the event of damage or injury to the environment; damage or impairment of the environment caused or (b) the reimbursement of expenditure arising from meas about to be caused by waste or an industrial activity; ures to prevent the damage or injury to the environ (b) the remedies available to such persons which shall ment; include: (c) the reimbursement of expenditure arising from meas (i) an injunction prohibiting the act or correcting the ures to compensate for damage within the meaning of omission that has caused or may cause the subparagraph (c)(ii) of Article 2(1); damage and/or compensation for the damage suf- • fered; (d) the restoration of the environment to its state imme diately prior to the occurrence of injury to the environ (ii) an injunction prohibiting the act or correcting the ment or the reimbursement of expenditure incurred in omission that has caused or may cause impair connection with measures taken to this end; ment of the environment; (iii) an injunction ordering the reinstatement of the (e) indemnification for the damage. environment and/or ordering the execution of preventive measures and the reimbursement of costs lawfully incurred in reinstating the environ ment and in taking preventive measures (includ ing costs of damage caused by preventive meas ures); (c) the burden of proof on the plaintiff, when affirming the causal link between the waste or the industrial activity on the one hand and the damage or impair ment of the environment suffered or likely to be suf fered on the other hand; the burden of proof shall be no higher than the standard burden of proof in civil law; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/115

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(d) whether and to what extent damages for loss of profit or economic loss may be recoverable.

2. With regard to the restoration of the environment 2. With regard to reinstatement of the environment provided for in paragraph 1 (d), the plaintiff, in the case provided for in paragraph l(b)(iii), the plaintiff may seek of injury to the environment, may seek such restoration or such reinstatement or the reimbursement of expenditure the reimbursement of expenditure incurred to this end incurred to this end except when: except when:

— the costs substantially exceed the benefit arising for — the costs substantially exceed the benefit arising for the environment from such restoration, and the environment from such reinstatement, and — other alternative measures to the restoration of the — other alternative measures to the reinstatement of environment may be undertaken at a substantially the environment may be undertaken at a substantial lower cost. ly lower cost. In this latter case, the plaintiff may seek the imple In this latter case, the plaintiff may seek the imple mentation of these other measures or the reimburse mentation of these other measures or the reimburse ment of the expenditure incurred to this end. ment of the expenditure incurred to this end.

3. As regards injury to the environment, the public 3. Deleted (but cf. paragraph 1(a) above) authorities may take the legal action provided for in para graph 1(a), (b) and (d).

4. Where the law in Member States gives common- 4. Duly authorized associations or interest groups hav interest groups the right to bring an action as plaintiff, ing as their object the conservation of nature and the they may seek only the prohibition or cessation of the act quality of the environment may bring an action as plaintiff giving rise to the injury to the environment. If, however, seeking the prohibition or cessation of the act giving rise they have taken the measures provided for in paragraph to the impairment of the environment. If however they 1(b), and (d), they may seek reimbursement of the expen have taken the measures provided for in paragraph diture resulting from such measures. l(b)(iii), they may seek reimbursement of the expendi ture resulting from such measures.

5. This Directive shall be without prejudice to nation 5. This Directive shall be without prejudice to nation al provisions relating to non-material damage. al provisions relating to non-material damage.

6. The plaintiff shall be required to prove the damage or 6. Deleted (but cf. paragraph 1(c) above) injury to the environment, and show the overwhelming probability of the causal relationship between the produc er's waste and the damage or, as the case may be, the injury to the environment suffered.

(Amendment No 17)

Article 5

Where, under this Directive, two or more producers are 1. Where, under this Directive, two or more persons liable for the same damage or the same injury to the are liable for the same damage or the same impairment of environment, they shall be liable jointly and severally, the environment, they shall be liable jointly and several without prejudice to the provisions of national law con ly. cerning the right of redress.

2. Nothing in this Directive shall prejudice the provi sions of the national laws of the Member States concern ing the right of redress. No C 175/116 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 18)

Article 6

1. The producer shall not be liable under this Directive No liability shall attach to any person if he proves that, in if he shows that the damage or injury to the environment the absence of fault on his part: results from force majeure as defined in Community (a) the damage or impairment of the environment was law. caused by an act or omission of a third party with the 2. The producer shall not be relieved of liability by the intent to cause such damage or impairment; or sole fact that he holds a permit issued by the public auth (b) the damage or impairment of the environment resulted orities. from any act of war, hostilities, insurrection or a nat ural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character.

(Amendment No 19)

Article 7

1. Without prejudice to the provisions of national law 1. No liability for damage or impairment to the environ concerning the right of recourse, the liability of the produc ment caused by waste shall attach to the carrier or the er shall not be reduced when the damage or injury to the eliminator if he can prove that, in the absence of fault on environment is caused both by the waste and by an act or his part, the consignor of the waste deceived him as to the omission of a third, party. true character of the consignment of waste which caused such damage or impairment; in such an eventuality, liabil ity shall rest with the consignor.

2. The liability of the producer may be reduced or dis 2. The liability of any person may be wholly or partial allowed when, having regard to all the circumstances, the ly waived if he can prove that the damage or impairment of damage is caused both by the waste and the fault of the the environment has been caused in whole or in part by the injured party or of any person for whom the injured party injured party or by any servant or agent of the said par is responsible. ty.

(Amendment No 20)

Article 8

The liability of the producer arising from this Directive The liability of any person arising from this Directive may not be limited or excluded in relation to the injured may not be limited or excluded by any contractual pro person by any contractual provision limiting his liability vision limiting his liability or exempting him from liabil or exempting him from liability. ity.

(Amendment No 21)

Article 8a (new)

Article 8a

If the person responsible for the damage cannot be iden tified, the State must bear the cost of repairing the damage until a fund is set up. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/117

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 22)

Article 9, title (new) and paragraph 1

Limitation period

1. Member States shall provide in their legislation that 1. Member States shall provide in their legislation that any legal proceedings under this Directive shall be barred any legal proceedings under this Directive shall be barred upon expiry of a period of three years from the date on upon expiry of a period of three years from the date on which the party taking legal action under Article 4(1) which the person taking legal action under Article 4(1) became aware or should have become aware of the became aware or should have become aware of the damage or injury to the environment and of the identity of damage or impairment of the environment. the producer.

(Amendment No 24)

Article 11

Compulsory insurance

1. The liability under this Directive of the producer who, in the course of a commercial or industrial activity, produces or holds waste, the carrier, the manufacturer and the eliminator shall be covered by insurance or any other financial security.

2. The Member States may fix a limit on the liability of any person for claims arising from any one incident, which shall be no lower than: (a) as regards a carrier other than a carrier by air: — ECU 11,5 million for damage — ECU 8 million for impairment of the environment (b) as regards any other person who may be liable: — ECU 70 million for damage — ECU 50 million for impairment of the environ ment, which figure shall be increased to ECU 100 million in respect of impairment of the environ ment caused by radioactive waste.

3. Where sums provided for under one head of compen sation, either for damage or for impairment of the environ ment, are insufficient to meet claims, unused sums under the other head may be set against the unpaid balance.

4. A person may not be entitled to any limitation of liability available under paragraph 2 if it is proved that the damage or impairment of the environment resulted from his personal act or omission on his part or on the part of his servants or agents acting within the scope of their employment, committed with the intent to cause such damage or impairment of the environment or recklessly with the knowledge that such damage or impairment would probably result. NoC 175/118 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

5. The Council, acting on a proposal from the Commis sion, shall determine by 31 December 1992 common rules as to any limitation of liability which may be permitted in the Member States.

The council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, 6. A 'European Fund for Compensation for Damage shall determine by 31 December 1992 at the latest the Caused by Waste', financed by producers of waste, shall be conditions to be applied and the means to be used in order set up, with effect from 1 January 1992, in order to to provide compensation for the damage and injury to provide compensation for the damage and impairment to the environment covered by this Directive in the event the environment covered by this Directive in the event that: that: — the person liable under this Directive cannot be iden — the person liable under this Directive cannot be iden tified; tified; — the person liable is incapable of providing full com — the person liable is incapable of providing full com pensation for the damage and/or injury caused. pensation for the damage and/or injury caused.

(Amendment No 25)

Article 12

Final Provisions

This Directive shall not affect: This Directive shall not affect any rights established by (a) any rights which may be relied upon by the plaintiff the International Convention on Limitation of Liability under this Directive under international conventions for Maritime Claims (London, 19 November 1976). on civil liability for the carriage ofdangerous goods in force at the relevant time; (b) any rights established by the International Conven tion on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (London, 19 November 1976).

(Amendment No 27)

Article 13a (new)

Article 13a

Winding up, liquidation and insolvency

In the event of a company producing or eliminating waste winding up, being liquidated or becoming insolvent, the insurers of that company, in accordance with the Annual Report, shall be held liable for any damages subsequently incurred and proven against the company concerned. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/119

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

9. Machinery ** I

— Proposal for a directive COM(89) 624 final — SYN 233

Proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 89/392/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1) ARTICLE 1(3) 3) The second indent of Article 1(3) is replaced by the 3) Deleted following: — Lifting equipment designed and constructed for raising persons where the height of a possible fall is 2 metres or more.

(Amendment No 2) ARTICLE 1(8) 8) The following subparagraph is added to Article 8) Deleted ' 13(1): 'Furthermore, Member States may allow the placing on the market and/or the putting into service of machinery in conformity with the regulations in force in their territory, to 31 December 1992 for a period extending: (a) to 31 December 1994for machinery to which the essential health and safety requirements of points 1 and 2 of Annex I apply; (b) to 31 December 1996for machinery to which the essential health and safety requirements of points 3 and 4 of Annex I apply in addition to the essen tial health and safety requirements of points 1 and 2 of Annex I.

(Amendment No 3) Annex 1, point 3.4.4., 3rd paragraph, 1st indent — hydraulic excavators on tracks or wheels — hydraulic excavators on tracks or wheels with booms pivoting both horizontally and vertically

(•) For full text see OJ No C 37, 17.2.1990, p. 5. NoC 175/120 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

— Doc. A3-125/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a directive amending Directive 89/392/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89)624 final) ('),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 100a of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-21/90 — SYN 233),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A3-125/90),

1. Approves the Commission's proposal subject to Parliament's amendments in accordance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position which it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty;

4. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJ NoC 37, 17.2.1990, p. 5. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/121

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

10. EURET and EUROTRA Programmes ** I

(a) — Proposal for a decision COM(89) 557 final — SYN 226

Proposal for a Council decision adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of transport (EURET)

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION ' TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Fourth recital

Whereas completion of the internal market will require Whereas completion of the internal market will mean a the transport system as a whole to meet the increased considerable increase in the demand for transport and will demand for the carriage of goods and persons, and to do require the transport system as a whole to meet the so as efficiently, economically and with as little damage increased demand for the carriage of goods and persons to the environment as possible and in a manner benefit in the Community and to do so as efficiently, economi ing the least-favoured regions; cally and with as little damage to health and the environ ment as possible and in a manner benefiting above all the least-favoured, insular and peripheral regions;

(Amendment No 2)

Fifth recital

Whereas technological innovation can make an impor Whereas technological innovation can make an impor tant contribution to the efficiency and competitiveness tant contribution to the efficiency and competitiveness of the various modes of transport and can improve their of the various modes of transport and can reduce their safety and reduce their negative environmental impact; negative aspects, in particular their impact on the environ ment and their energy consumption, while improving their safety and whereas it can also contribute to improved working conditions for persons employed in this sector;

(Amendment No 3)

Recital 5a (new)

Whereas current growth and the expected increase in the future in the volume of trade and travel and hence in intra-Community transport will cause serious traffic con gestion problems for which original solutions will be required and, in appropriate cases, fundamental changes - in the common transport policy; whereas research, devel opment and technological innovation should be geared towards this end in order to permit such far-reaching changes, should the need arise;

(•) For full text see OJ No C 318, 20.12.1989, p. 5 NoC 175/122 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 4)

Sixth recital

Whereas cooperation in research enables progress to be Whereas cooperation in research enables progress to be made towards the standardization, compatibility and, in made towards the standardization, compatibility and, in some cases, unification of transport networks; some, cases, unification of transport networks, which are key features of a transport system which is both more efficient and less harmful to the environment;

(Amendment No 5)

Seventh recital

Whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) Whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) should be involved as far as possible in developing new preferably from the less-developed Member States of the transport technology; whereas account should be taken of Community should be involved as far as possible in devel their particular needs without prejudice to the scientific oping new transport technology; whereas account should and technical quality of the programme; be taken of their particular needs without prejudice to the scientific and technical quality of the programme;

(Amendment No 6)

Eighth recital

Whereas the transnational nature of the programme Whereas the transnational nature of the programme should be emphasized by selecting research projects should be emphasized by selecting research projects involving at least two partners from two different Mem involving at least two partners from two different Mem ber States; ber States one of which, in the case of a number of projects of equal value, should preferably be a less-developed state;

(Amendment No 7

Recitals 8a and 8b (new)

Whereas it is desirable that the programme and conse quently the research projects submitted place particular emphasis on the regional dimension and regional prob lems;

Whereas it is also desirable that the programme and con sequently the research projects submitted include in their evaluations and assessments parameters relating to Eas tern European and transit countries;

(Amendment No 8)

Recitals 9a and 9b (new)

Whereas it is essential, when evaluating and selecting the research projects submitted, that an attempt be made to avoid approving and financing proposals which have alrea dy been or are being funded in the context of other Com munity programmes; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/123

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Whereas, in view of the preliminary nature of the present programme, it is absolutely essential that it be followed by a more complete programme with greater financial re sources to meet the Community's increased research requirements in the field of transport;

(Amendment No 9)

Article 1

A specific research and technological development pro A specific research and technological development pro gramme for the European Economic Community in the gramme for the European Economic Community in the field of transport, as defined in the Annex, is hereby field of transport, as defined in the Annex, is hereby adopted for a period of four years, from 1 March 1990. adopted for a period of three years, from 1 October 1990.

(Amendment No 10

Article 2(1)

1. The total Community expenditure considered ne 1. The total Community expenditure considered ne cessary for the implementation of the programme is ECU cessary for the implementation of the programme is ECU 25 million, including expenditure for a staff of 6 per 28 million, including expenditure for a staff of 6 per sons. sons. An indicative breakdown of this amount is given in the Annex.

(Amendment No 11)

Article 4(1)

1. In the third year of the implementation of the pro 1. At the end of the second year of the implementation gramme, the Commission shall undertake a review of the of the programme, the Commission shall undertake a programme and it shall report to the Council and the review of the programme and it shall report to the Coun European Parliament on the results thereof, together, if cil and the European Parliament on the results thereof, necessary, with any proposals for modification or prolon together with proposals for modification and prolonga gation. tion. The review shall be carried out by independent experts.

(Amendment No 12)

Article 5

The Commission shall be assisted by a committee com The Commission shall be assisted by a committee com posed of the representatives of the Member States and posed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. chaired by the representative of the Commission.The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of the representatives of the Member States assisted where appropriate by experts of recognized scientific standing in areas related to the programme and chaired by the representative of the Commission. No C 175/124 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 13)

Article 1, fourth and fifth indents (new)

— to any adjustment in the indicative breakdown of resources contained in the Annex; — to the regulations governing the reporting, protection and evaluation of the results of the research carried out in the context of the programme.

(Amendment No 14)

Article 10(2) and (2a) (new)

2. Where framework agreements for scientific and tech 2. In the absence of any agreement in accordance with nical cooperation between non-member countries in Eu Article 130n of the Treaty, organizations and undertak rope and the European Communities have been con ings established in non-member countries in Europe par cluded, organizations and undertakings established in ticipating in COST activities and in countries which have those countries may participate in a project undertaken concluded framework agreements for scientific and techni within this programme. cal cooperation may participate in a project undertaken within this programme. In such cases, the organizations and undertakings shall bear in full the cost of their participation.

2a. European third countries which participate shall bear in full the additional expenditure which their partici pation incurs.

(Amendment No 15)

Annex, section headings

1. Objectives 1. Objectives

2. Priority themes 2. Priority themes

3. Implementation 3. Implementation

3a. Indicative breakdown of resources earmarked for the EURET programme

(Amendment No 16)

Annex, Section 1, fifth paragraph, fourth indent (new)

— optimization of safety conditions vis-a-vis transport (accidents)

(Amendment No 17)

Annex, Section 1, Point 3, heading

3) Reduction of harmful externalities 3) Optimization of transport safety conditions 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/125

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 18)

Annex, Section 1, Point 3, after fourth paragraph, new heading

3a) Reduction of harmful externalities

(Amendment No 19)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, first indent

Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis for new road 1.1 Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis for new construction; road construction with special emphasis on road connec tions in and with the economically and geographically less-favoured regions within the Community, and with the countries of Eastern Europe taking due account of the problems of saturation on certain sections of the Commu nity network and the links with transit countries;

(Amendment No 20)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, second indent

— European rail traffic management conception; 1.2 European rail traffic management conception both for goods and for passengers with a view to a substantial increase in potential;

(Amendment No 21)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, third indent

Design and assessment of a vessel traffic manage- 1.3 Design and assessment of a vessel traffic manage ment system; ment system with special emphasis on regional maritime areas with high traffic density and island complexes;

(Amendment No 22)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, fourth indent

Trials in automated air/ground data exchange for air 1.4 Trials in automated air/ground data exchange for traffic management systems in Europe; air traffic management systems in Europe. Study on the controller working position in air traffic management sys tems;

(Amendment No 23)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, fifth indent

Study on the controller working position in air traffic 1.5 Comparative analysis of urban traffic management management systems; systems in large Community city centres with serious traf fic problems and optimization of the use of mass public transport resources; NoC 175/126 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 32)

Annex, Section 2, Point 1, sixth indent (new)

1.6 Analysis of urban traffic management systems with a view to preserving the natural and historical splendours of small and medium-sized towns;

(Amendment No 35)

Annex, Section 2, Point 2, first indent

— Economic scenario and demand projections for 2.1 Economic scenario and demand projections for freight transport of the Community; freight transport of the Community with specific refer ence to the transport of freight by rail;

(Amendment No 25)

Annex, Section 2, Point 2, second indent

Economic and technical research of the transfer of 2.2 Economic and technical research of the transfer of goods. Design and evaluation of rapid transfer; goods. Design and evaluation of rapid transfer, in partic ular in railway stations and termini, sea ports and ports on navigable rivers, airports and specially designed multi modal transport centres;

(Amendment No 26)

Annex, Section 2, Point 2, third and fourth indents

— Optimization of manpower in maritime transport; 2.3 Optimization of manpower in maritime transport. Al. . r . • 4 „ tu*. Taking human factors into consideration in the man/ship - taking human factors into consideration ,n the * wiehparticu |ar reference to ferry services; man/ship system; J *

(Amendment No 33)

Annex, Section 2, point 2, fifth indent (new)

2.4 Research into, development of and experiments _ with new technological, electronic and telematics systems to regulate, improve the flow of and reduce the damage caused by traffic in towns and cities.

(Amendment No 27)

Annex, Section 2, Point 3

3. Reduction of harmful externalities 3. Optimization of transport safety conditions — Assessment of the driving safety of possible truck 3.1 Assessment of the driving safety of possible truck and trailer combinations; and trailer combinations; — Safety assessment of road freight trailers. 3.2 Safety assessment of road freight trailers. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/127

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 28)

Annex, Section 2, Point 3a (new)

3a. Reduction of harmful externalities

3a. 1. Development and technical research into systems for reducing noise emissions with special emphasis on road, rail and air transport;

3a.2. Studies, development and technical research into methods for reducing emissions of polluting gases by vehi cles with special emphasis on major urban centres.

(Amendment No 29)

Annex, Section 3, second paragraph

The programmes are open to universities, research The programmes are open to universities, research organizations and industrial companies, including small organizations and industrial companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises, individuals, or any com and medium-sized enterprises, individuals, or any com bination thereof established in the Community. As a rule bination thereof established in the Community. As a rule projects must be transnational. projects must be transnational involving the selection of research projects in which at least two companies from two different Member States will participate, one of which, in the case of a number of projects of equal value, should preferably be a less-developed state.

(Amendment No 30)

Annex, Section 3, third paragraph

The association and involvement of non-member coun The association and involvement of non-member coun tries, international and national organizations will be tries, international and national organizations will be founded on the criterion of mutual advantage. In the case founded on the criterion of mutual advantage and mutual of European non-member countries, their association commitments. In the case of European non-member and involvement will be made possible through the countries, their association and involvement will be COST system and through the bilateral framework agree made possible through the COST system and through the ments with EFTA countries. bilateral framework agreements with EFTA countries.

(Amendment No 31)

Annex, Section 3a (new)

3a. Indicative breakdown of resources earmarked for the EURET programme

1. Optimum network exploitation

(million ecus) 1.1 Agreed activities 0,5 1.2 5 1.3 3 1.4 7 1.5 3 18,5 NoC 175/128 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2. Optimization of logistics 2.1 Agreed activities 0,5 2.2 3 2.3 4 7,5

3. Optimization of transport safety conditions 3.1 Agreed activities 0,5 3.2 Agreed activities 0,5 1,0

3a. Reduction of harmful externalities 3a.l. Agreed activities 0,5 3a.2. Agreed activities 0,5 1,0 Total 28,0

— Doc. A3-148/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure : first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of transport (EURET) 1990-1993

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 557) ('),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 130q(2) of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-244/89 — SYN 226),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology and the opinions of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A 3-148/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal, subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149(3) of the EEC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2) of the EEC Treaty;

(') OJ No C 318, 20.12.1989, p. 5. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/129

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

4. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(b) — Proposal for a decision COM(89) 603 final — SYN 228

Proposal for a Council decision adopting a specific programme concerning the preparation of the development of an operational EUROTRA system

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1) ^ Ninth recital Whereas the objectives of the EUROTRA programme Whereas the revised objectives of the EUROTRA pro- are expected to be achieved by 30 June 1990; gramme will be achieved, in the main, by 30 June 1990;

(Amendment No 2) Recital 10a (new)

Whereas remarkable progress has been achieved, as a result of the EUROTRA programme, in the field of lin guistic research, to the benefit of all the languages of the Community;

(Amendment No 3) Recital 11a (new) Whereas the programme is expected to produce a high- level scientific prototype in the field of machine transla tion;

(Amendment No 4) Recital 15a (new)

Whereas the functional, financial and temporal conditions for carrying out an evaluation of the programme have been met; whereas such an evaluation will make it possible to look forward to the creation of Community added value as a result of the research carried out in this field;

(Amendment No 5) Article 2 1. The amount of Community funds deemed necessa- 1. Irrespective of the amount considered necessary ry for the execution of the programme adopted by this under Decision 89/410/EEC and of the implementation of

(*) For full text see OJ No C 7, 12.1.1990, p. 7. No C 175/130 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Decision is ECU 10 million, including expenditure on the 1989 budget, the amount of Community expenditure five temporary staff. deemed necessary to carry out the action instituted by this Decision for the period in question (1 July 1990 to 30 June 1992) amounts to ECU 10 million, including ex penditure on five temporary staff.

2. The appropriations to be made available each year 2. The budgetary authority shall determine the appro shall be determined in the budget. priations available for each financial year.

(Amendment No 6)

Article 4

The Commission shall conduct an evaluation of the results 1. During the first quarter of 1993, the Commission achieved at the beginning of 1992 and shall transmit a shall forward a report evaluating the results of this pro report on this subject to the Council and the European gramme to the European Parliament and the Council. Parliament. This report shall be established having regard 2. The report shall be drawn up by independent experts to the objectives set out in the Annex and in accordance having regard to the objectives set out in the Annex and with Article 2(2) of Decision 87/516/Euratom, EEC. in accordance with Article 2(2) of Decision 87/516/Eura tom, EEC.

(Amendment No 7)

Annex, Section 1, point (c)a (new)

(c)a Cooperation with institutes at national level — Intensive cooperation with institutes at national level aimed at harmonizing lexical and termino logical resources and making existing systems compatible.

(Amendment No 8)

Annex, Section 3, point 3.1.

3.1. Services contracts 3.1. Service contracts

The implementation of the system development, testing The implementation of the system development, testing and research environment (action line 2.1) which will and research environment (action line 2.1) which will provide all participating parties with a common set of provide all participating parties with a common set of tools, will be entrusted to industrial contractors on the tools, will be entrusted to industrial contractors on the basis of calls for tenders. It will be financed fully from the basis of calls for tenders. The proportion of financing Community budget. which comes from the Community budget will be deter mined in each contract.

(Amendment No 9)

Annex, section 3, point 3.3.

3.3. Shared cost projects 3.3. Shared cost projects

The linguistic research of general interest (action line The linguistic research of general interest (action line 2.3), research and development into advanced system 2.3), research and development into advanced system architectures (action line 2.4) and re-usability of lexical architectures (action line 2.4) and re-usability of lexical and terminological resources (action line 2.5) will be and terminological resources (action line 2.5) will be carried out as cooperative ventures between industries, carried out as cooperative ventures between industries, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/131

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT research centres and EUROTRA teams. The specific pro research centres and the EUROTRA teams. The specific jects and contractors will be selected on a call for ten projects and contractors will be selected on a call for ders/proposals basis. The Community contribution to tenders/proposals basis. The Community contribution to these projects will be in general 50%. these projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis but may not exceed 50% under any circumstances.

(Amendment No 10) Annex, Section 3, point 3.4

3.4. Grants 3.4. Grants Grants will be awarded to qualified post-graduate stu Grants will be awarded to scientifically qualified post dents. graduate students and researchers (at doctoral and post doctoral levels).

— Doc. A3-136/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading)

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific programme concerning the preparation of the develop ment of an operational EUROTRA system

The European Parliament, having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 603 final) ('), having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 130q (2) of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-15/90 —SYN 228), — considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, having regard to the report of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A3-136/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 149 (3) of the EEC Treaty; 3. Calls on the Council to incorporate Parliament's amendments in the common position that it adopts in accordance with Article 149(2)(a) of the EEC Treaty; 4. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJ No C 7, 12.1.1990, p. 7. NoC 175/132 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

13 June 1990

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, AMENDOLA, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDREWS, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BANOTTI, BARROS MOURA, BARTON, BEAZLEY CH., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BELO, BENOIT, BERNARD-REYMOND, BERTENS, BETHELL, BETTINI, BETTIZA, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BJ0RNVIG, BLAK, BLANEY, BLOT, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BOWE, BRAUN-MOSER, BREYER, BRIANT, VAN DEN BRINK, BROK, BRU PURON, BUCHAN, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTETGA, CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASSIDY, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CEYRAC, CHABERT, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTENSEN F. N., CRISTENSEN I., CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOMBO, COLOM I NAVAL, CONTU, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, COT, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DE CLERCQ, DEFRAIGNE, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DENYS, DE PICCOLI, DEPREZ, DE ROSSA, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DIEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, DI RUPO, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DE DONNEA, DONNELLY, DOUSTE-BLAZY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLES, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EPHREMIDIS, ESCUDER CROFT, ESCUDERO, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FALQUI, FANTUZZI, FAYOT, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRARA, FERRER I CASALS, FERRI, FINI, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORLANI, FORMIGONI, FORTE, FRIEDRICH, FUCHS, FUNCK, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, GALLE, GELLENZI, GALLO, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GAS6LIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GOLLNISCH, GOMES, GORIA, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HANSCH, HAPPART, HARRISON, HADJIGEORGLOU, HERMAN, HERMANS, HERVfi, HERZOG, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, HUME, IMBENI, INGLEWOOD, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON C., JACKSON CH., JAKOBSEN, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JEPSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, KOSTOPOULOS, KRIEPS, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LAGORIO, LALOR, LA MALFA, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LA PERGOLA, LARIVE, LARONI, LATAILLADE, LAUGA, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LE PEN, LIMA, LINKOHR, LIVANOS, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LOMAS, LUTTGE, LULLING, LUSTER, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MALANGRE, DE LA MALfeNE, MALHURET, MARCK, MARINHO, MARLEIX, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MAYER, MAZZONE, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MEGRET, MELANDRI, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MICHELINI, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MONTERO ZABALA, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORODO LEONCIO, MORRIS, MOTTOLA, MOLLER, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSCARDINI, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN, NORDMANN, ODDY, O'HAGAN, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PAGOROPOULOS, PANNELLA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PAPOUTSIS, PARTSCH, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PEREIRA, PfiREZ ROYO, PERREAU DE PINNINCK DOMENECH, PERSCHAU, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIQUET, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLANAS PUCHADES, POETTERING, POLLACK, POMPIDOU, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PORTO, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA GUTlfiRREZ, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAFFARIN, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, REGGE, REYMANN, RINSCHE, RISKIER PEDERSEN, ROBLES PIQUER, R0NN, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENT6S, RUIZ-GIMfiNEZ AGUILAR, SABY, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SALEMA, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANDB^K, SANTOS, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SCHONHUBER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SEAL, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/133

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

SIMPSON B., sis6 CRUELLAS, .SMITH A., SMITH L„ SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STAMOULIS, VON STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TARADASH, TAURAN, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TRAUTMANN, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, UKEIWfi, VALENT, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRlVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERTEMATI, VERWAERDE, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VOHRER, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAECHTER, WALTER, WEBER, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN, ZAWOS, ZELLER. NoC 175/134 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

ANNEX

Result of roll-call votes

( + ) = For

(-) = Against

(O) = Abstention

Topical and urgent debate — objections

Chile

( + )

ANASTASSOPULOS, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY P., BELO, BENOIT, BEUMER, BLANEY, BOOKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATHERWOOD, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, COLOM I NAVAL, CORNELISSEN, CRAVINHO, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DALSASS, DALY, DE VITTO, DEFRAIGNE, DfEZ DE RIVERA, DILLEN, DOUSTE-BLAZY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLES J., ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FITZGERALD, FLORENZ, FORMIGONI, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOPPENSTEDT, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LEHIDEUX, LENZ, LULLING, DE LA MAL£NE, MARCK, MATTINA, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENARD, MICHELINI, DE MOTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOTTOLA, MOLLER, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEUBAUER, NEWTON DUNN, NOR CHRISTENSEN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OREJA AGUIRRE, PASTY, PATTERSON, PERREAU DE PINNINCK, PERSCHAU, PIERROS," PINXTEN, PIRKL, PINSONI F., PISONI N,, POETTERING, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, ROBLES PIQUER, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SCHODRUCH, SCHONHUBER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJf, SIMMONDS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TITLEY, TONGUE, TURNER, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGAN, VERTEMATI, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAAL, WELSH, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU.

(-)

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, ARBELOA MURU, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BARTON, BETTINI, BLAK, BOWE, BRU PUR6N, BURON, CAUDRON, CHEYSSON, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COT, COX, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DE VRIES, DENYS, DESAMA, DESMOND, VAN DIJK, DURY, ELLIOTT, EPHREMIDIS, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HARRISON, HINDLEY, HOON, HUGHES, IMBENI, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JOANNY, JUNKER, KOHLER H., LAGAKOS, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, NEWENS, NEWMAN, OLIVA GARCfA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, RAFFARIN, RAGGIO, READ, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIMONS, SIMPSON B„ SMITH A., STAES, STEVENSON, TARADASH, TAZDAtT, THAREAU, TOMLINSON, TOPMANN, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WEST, WHITE, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(O)

BONTEMPI, CATASTA, CECI, COLAJANNI, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DOMINGO SEGARRA, FANTUZZI, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NIELSEN T., PfiREZ ROYO, PORRAZZINI, PUERTA, SPECIALE, VAN HEMELDONCK. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/135

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Harrison report — Doc. A 3-109/90

Amendment of EP Rules of Procedure

Amendment 8

( + )

VON ALEMANN, ALLIOT-MARIE, AMENDOLA, AULAS, BANDRLIS MOLET, BETTINI, BONDE, COCHET, COX, DE DONNEA, FALQUI, FERNEX, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GASDLIBA I BOHM, GUILLAUME, HOLZFUSS, JACKSOM M., JOANNY, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LANE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LATAILLADE, MAHER, MARQUES MENDES, MELANDRI, MELIS, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORETTI, MUSSO, PARTSCH, PASTY, PEREIRA V., PESMAZOGLOU, PIERMONT, PIMENTA, QUISTORP, RISKIER PEDERSEN, ROTH, RUIZ-GIMFCNEZ AGUILLAR, SALEMA, SANDB/EK, SPERONI, STAES, STEWART, UKEIWFI, VEIL, VERWAERDE, VOHRER, WAECHTER, VON WECHMAR, WIJSENBEEK.

(-)

ADAM, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BELO, BENOIT, BETHELL, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BLAK, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, BRU PURON, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTFNEZ, CANAVARRO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CORNELISSEN, COT, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE VITTO, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DI RUPO, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DILLEN, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLES J., ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, FANTUZZI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERRER I CASALS, FERRI, FLORENZ, FORD, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLE, GARCIA AMIGO, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HANSCH, HAPPART, HARRISON, HERMAN, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HOWELL, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF- WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KRIEPS, LAGAKOS, LANGES, LARONI, LE CHEVALLIER, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LOMAS, LULLING, LUSTER, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MALANGRE, MARCK, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORRIS, MOTTOLA, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWTON DUNN, N0R CHRISTENSEN, O'HAGAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PAPOUTSIS, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PERSCHAU, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERROS, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLANAS PUCHADES, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAGGIO, RAMTREZ HEREDIA, READ, REDING, REGGE, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SEAL, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TSIMAS, TURNER, VALENT, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WELSH, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(O)

AINARDI, ELMALAN, MIRANDA DA SILVA. NoC 175/136 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Van Outrive report — Doc. A 3-124/90

Right of residence

Amendment 27

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BARTON, BELO, BENOIT, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PUR6N, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, FALCONER, FERNEX, FERRI, FORD, GALLE, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARIVE, LEMMER, LENZ, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NIANIAS, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, * PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SIERRA BARDAJl, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TSIMAS, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN, ZAWOS.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BETHELL, BEUMER, BINDJ, BOCKLET, BOGE, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CORNELISSEN, COX, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DE VITTO, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, DOUSTE-BLAZY, ESCUDER CROFT, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I.", FUNK, GALLAND, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GASdLlBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF- WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MALANGRfe, MARQUES MENDES, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEGRET, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MOTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEUBAUER, NEWTON DUNN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., POETTERING, POMPIDOU, PORTO, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROVSING, RUIZ-GIMfiNEZ AGUILAR, SALZER, SCHLEICHER, SCHONHUBER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIMPSON A., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TURNER, UKEIWfc, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VEIL, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAAL, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, ZELLER. *

(O)

CHRISTENSEN, SANDBjEK. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/137

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Amendment 9(a)

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, AMENDOLA, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BETTINI, BIRD, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CARVALHAS, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, FAYOT, FERNEX, FERRI, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JOANNY, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARIVE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MAYER, MCGOWAN, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDB/EK, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPERONI, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TAZDAlT, THAREAU, TONGUE, TSIMAS, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WALTER, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WYNN, ZELLER.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ALLI6T-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, .BELO, BENOIT, BERNARD-REYMOND, BETHELL, BEUMER, BINDI, BLAK, BOCKLET, BOGE, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CABEZON ALONSO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTIANSEN, CORNELISSEN, COX, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DE VITTO, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, DONNELLY, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLAND, GALLE, GARCIA AMIGO, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GOEDMAKERS, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MALANGRfi, MARCK, MARINHO, MARQUES MENDES, MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MEGRET, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEUBAUER, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NORDMANN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., POETTERING, PIMPIDOU, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, RISKIER PEDERSEN, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROVSING, SALZER, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHONHUBER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TURNER, UKEIWfi, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAAL, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, ZAWOS.

(O)

GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA, LARONI, MORETTI, PEREIRA V., RUIZ-GIMfiNEZ AGUILAR, SIMPSON A. NoC 175/138 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Amendment 9 (b)

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfiS MOLET, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PUR6N, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLOM I NAVAL, C RAMON-DAI BER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DAVID, DE GUCHT, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FERRI, FORD, GALLE, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GASdLIBA I BOHM, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DfAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LANGER, LARIVE, LARONI, LINKOHR, LOTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORETTI, MORRIS, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, RAMfREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, RISKIER PEDERSEN, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDBjEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPERONI, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TAZDAlfT, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WALTER, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN. '

(-)

ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BENOIT, BERNARD-REYMOND, BETHELL, BEUMER, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BORGO, BOULANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CAPUCHO, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CORNELISSEN, COX, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DE VITTO, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLAND, GARCIA AMIGO, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRfc, MARCK, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEGRET, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NORDMANN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ • CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., POETTERING, POMPIDOU, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROVSING, RUIZ-GIMfiNEZ AGUILAR, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHONHUBER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TURNER, UKEIWfi, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAL, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, VON WOGAU, ZAWOS, ZELLER.

(O)

VON ALEMANN, MENDES BOTA. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/139

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Amendment 26

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRES MOLET, BARTON, BELO, BENOIT, BETTINI, BIRD, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONDE, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HOFF, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., LANGER, LANNOYE, LINKOHR, LOMAS, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDBvEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TARADASH, TAZDAIT, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WALTER, VON WECHMAR, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BERTENS, BETHELL, BEUMER, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CORNELISSEN, COX, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DE GUCHT, DE VITTO, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLAND, GARCIA AMIGO, GASdLIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRE, MARCK, MARQUES MENDES, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEGRET, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEUBAUER, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, POMPIDOU, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAFFARIN, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROVSING, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHONHUBER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIMPSON A., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TURNER, UKEIWfc, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAAL, WELSH, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

(O)

LARONI. NoC 175/140 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Amendment 14

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRfcS MOLET, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., 3EAZLEY P., BELO, BENOIT, BETHELL, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFtLL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PURON, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DALY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DE ROSSA, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FANTUZZI, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JEPSEN, JOAN.NY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARIVE, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, . METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, O'HAGAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PROUT, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, RAMfREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTHE, ROUMELIOTIS, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, TAZDAIT, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WALTER, WELSH, WEST, WETTIG, WHITE, WILSON, WOLTJER.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BANOTTI, BEIROCO, BERTENS, BEUMER, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CAPUCHO, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CORNELISSEN, COX, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DE GUCHT, DE VITTO, DEPREZ, DILLEN, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLAND, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GAS6LIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRfi, MARQUES MENDES, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MEGRET, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEUBAUER, NORDMANN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAFFARIN, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, RISKyER PEDERSEN, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, RUIZ-GIM£NEZ AGUILAR, SALZER, SCHONHUBER, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, UKEIWE, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VAN DER WAL, VON WECHMAR, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

(O)

MARCK, ZAWOS. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/141

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Megahy report — Doc. A 3-133/90

Amendment 7

( + )

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BALFE, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CARNITI, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KILLILEA, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LANGER, LANNOYE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, READ, REGGE, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDBjEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAjf, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., STAES, STEVENSON, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WETTIG, WILSON, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ANASTASSOPOULOS, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY C., BE1ROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, COX, DALSASS, DE GUCHT, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, GASOLIBA I BOHM, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KLEPSCH, KOFOED, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRE, MARQUES MENDES, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, NEWTON DUNN, NORDMANN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRAG, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMAN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROVSING, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, TINDEMANS, TURNER, VEIL, VERHAGEN, WELSH, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

(O)

MORETTI.

Amendment 9 (a)

<+ )

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, AINARDI, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, AMENDOLA, AULAS, BALFE, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTfNEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, NoC 175/142 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAVINHO, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCfA ARIAS, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KOHLER H., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARIVE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MORRIS, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NORDMANN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, POMPIDOU, PONS GRAU, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDB/EK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, UKEIWfi, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VON DER VRING, VON WECHMAR, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

ANASTASSOPOULOS, BANOTTI, BEIROCO, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, DALSASS, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLAND, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRfi, MARCK, MCCARTIN, MENRAD, MERZ, MOTTOLA, MOLLER, NEWTON DUNN, OOMEN-RJJIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PENDERS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROVSING, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIMPSON A., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, STEVENS, STEWART-CLARK, TINDEMANS, TURNER, VERHAGEN, VON WOGAU.

(O)

BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., CASSIDY, INGLEWOOD, JEPSEN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MOORHOUSE, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RAWLINGS, SPENCER, WELSH, ZELLER.

Amendment 9 (b)

( + ) <

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DfEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTlfiRREZ DfAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON M., JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KOHLER H., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/143

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

MAIBAUM, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MOORHOUSE, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, O'HAGAN, ODDY, OLIVA G ARC J A, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, REGGE, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, TELKAMPER, TITLEY, TONGUE, TSIMAS, TURNER, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WELSH, WETTIG, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, BANOTTI, BEIR0CO, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, COX, DALSASS, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JEPSEN, KILLJLEA, KLEPSCH, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MALANGRfi, MARCK, MCCARTIN, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUSSO, NEWTON DUNN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PEIJS, PENDERS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, SARIDAKIS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, TINDEMANS, UKEIWE, VEIL, VERHAGEN, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

(O)

VON ALEMANN, HOLZFUSS, VON WECHMAR.

Amendment 9 (c)

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ALAVANOS, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BARTON, BEAZLEY C., BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PUR6N, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CASSIDY, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EWING, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON M., JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KILLILEA, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LANE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, O'HAGAN, ODDY, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRICE, PROUT, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDB/EK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, No C 175/144 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WETTIG, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ANASTASSOPOULOS, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, DALSASS, DEPREZ,' DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KLEPSCH, KOFOED, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRfi, MARCK, MCCARTIN, MENRAD, MERZ, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRAG, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROVSING, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMMONDS, SIMPSON A., SISO CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, TINDEMANS, UKEIWfe, VERHAGEN, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, ZELLER.

(O)

COX, GUILLAUME.

Amendment 9 rest

( + )

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, AINARDI, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BALFE, BARTON, BEAZLEY P., BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER CRAMPTON, C RAVIN HO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EWING, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCfA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON M., JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KOHLER H., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LANGER, LANNOYE, LARIVE, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNAN1, NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NORDMANN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROVSING, RUBERG DE VENTOS, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, TAZDAIT, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TSIMAS, TURNER, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WETTIG, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN. \

16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/145

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY C., BEIROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BINDI, BOOKLET, BOGE, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, DALSASS, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DOUSTE-BLAZY, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOWELL, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRE, MARCK, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MENRAD, MERZ, MOTTOLA, MULLER, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PEIJS, PENDERS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, SALZER, SANDBjEK, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, TINDEMANS, UKEIWE, VERHAGEN, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

(O)

COX, GUILLAUME.

Amendment 10

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, ALAVANOSj ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BARTON, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COLAJANNI, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EWING, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GAS6LIBA I BOHM, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROYO, JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LANGER, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MATTINA, MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MORETTI, MORRIS, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NORDMANN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PAGOROPOULOS, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHREND, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TAZDAIT, THAREAU, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, UKEIWE, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WETTIG, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

ANASTASSOPOULOS, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY C., BEIROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSIDY, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, DOUSTE-BLAZY, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOWELL, INGLEWOOD, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KLEPSCH, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, MAHER, MALANGRE, MARCK, MARTINEZ, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MENRAD, MERZ, MOORHOUSE, MOTTOLA, MULLER, NEWTON DUNN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, NoC 175/146 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., POETTERING, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROVSING, SANDByEK, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STEVENS, TINDEMANS, VERHAGEN, VAN DER WAAL, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

Amendment 21

( + )

AGLIETTA, AINARDI, AMENDOLA, AULAS, BARTON, BETTINI, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BREYER, CARVALHAS, CATASTA, COCHET, COLAJANNI, CRAMON- DAIBER, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DUVERGER, ELMALAN, FERNEX, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, JOANNY, LANGER, LANNOYE, MAYER, MONNIER-BESOMBES, NAPOLETANO, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PIERMONT, RAGGIO, REGGE, ROSSETTI, ROTH, SANDB/EK, SPECIALE, STAES, TAZDAl'T, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VERBEEK.

(->.'•

ADAM, ALAVANOS, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, BALFE, BANOTTI, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BEIR0CO, BELO, BENOIT, BERNARD-REYMOND, BINDI, BIRD, BLAK, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOURLANGES, BOWE, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, BRU PURON, BURON, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CAPUCHO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLLINS, COX, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DAVID, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, DONNELLY, DOUSTE-BLAZY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, GALLE, GARCIA, GARCfA ARIAS, GAS6LIBA I B(DHM, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HANSCH, • HARRISON, HERMAN, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HORY, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON F., JACKSON M., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JEPSEN, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LARIVE, LARONI, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUSTER, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MALANGRfc, MARCK, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MIHR, DE MOTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORRIS, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUNTJNGH, MUSSO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NORDMANN, O'HAGAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PAGOROPOULOS, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLANAS PUCHADES, POETTERING, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SARIDAKIS, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAUFFENBERG, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, THAREAU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TONGUE, TSIMAS, TURNER, UKEIWfe, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VASQUEZ FOUZ, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WETTIG, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN, ZELLER.

(O)

EWING. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/147

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

Estgen report — Doc. A 3-141/90

Amendment 31

( + )

AINARDI, ALAVANOS, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BREYER, BURON, CABEZON ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CATASTA, CHEYSSON, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FERRI, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GREEN, GRONER, GUTlfiRREZ DfAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HOON, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEty, JOANNY, JUNKER, KOHLER H., KRIEPS, LANGER, LARONI, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MATTINA, MAYER, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORETTI, MORRIS, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PUERTA, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, ROGALLA, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDB/EK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH L., SPECIALE, SPERONI, STEVENSON, STEWART, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(")

VON ALEMANN, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONY, BANOTTI, BEIROCO, BEUMER, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOURLANGES, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, COX, DALSASS, DEPREZ, DILLEN, DE DONNEA, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GAIBISSO, CARCIA, GASOLIBA I B5HM, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HINDLEY, HOLZFUSS, INGLEWOOD, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KELLET-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LANE, LANGES, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MALANGRfi, MARCK, MARQUES MENDES, MCCARTIN, MCINTOSH, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MENRAD, MERZ, MULLER, MUSSO, OREJA AGUIRRE, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROVSING, SALZER, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SIMMONDS, SIS6 CRUELLAS, STEWART-CLARK, THEATO, TINDEMANS, UKEIWfi, VEIL, VON WOGAU, . ZELLER.

Amendment 32

( + )

ALAVANOS, ALEXANDRE, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BARTON, BELO, BENOIT, BETTINI, BIRD, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOMBARD, BONTEMPI, BREYER, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CATASTA, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DENYS, DESAMA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, EWING, FALCONER, FAYOT, FERNEX, FERRI, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA ARIAS, GOEDMAKERS, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOON, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KOHLER H„ KRIEPS, LANGER, LARONI, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MATTINA, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCfA, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, NoC 175/148 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PUERTA, RAGGIO, RAMfREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, ROGALLA, R0NN, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDByfiK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAjf, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, STAES, STEVENSON, STEWART, TITLEY, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VASQUEZ FOUZ, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WETTIG, WILSON, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, ALLIOT-MARIE, ANASTASSOPOULOS, . BANOTTI, BEIROCO, BERNARD-REYMOND, BERTENS, BEUMER, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOURLANGES, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASSIDY, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CORNELISSEN, COX, DALSASS, DE GUCHT, DEPREZ, DILLEN, ESTGEN, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., GAIBISSO, GALLENZI, GARCIA, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HOLZFUSS, INGLEWOOD, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LANE, LANGES, LARIVE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUSTER, MALANGRfi, MARQUES MENDES, MCCARTIN, MELIS, MENRAD, MERZ, MULLER, MUSSO, O'HAGAN, ORE J A, AGUIRRE, PACK, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROVSING, SALZER, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIMEONI, SIMMONDS, SISO CRUELLAS, SPENCER, STAUFFENBERG, STEWART-CLARK, THEATO, TINDEMANS, UKEIWfi, VEIL, VAN DER WAAL, VON WECHMAR, VON WOGAU, ZELLER.

EURET programme

Pierros report — Doc. A 3-148/90

Resolution

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BAGET BOZZO, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEIR6CO, BELO, BERTENS, BETTINI, BINDI, BIRD, BLAK, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BOWE, BRAUN-MOSER, BRU PUR6N, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTIANSEN, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, COX, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLES J., ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FALQUI, FAYOT, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRER I CASALS, FONTAINE, GAIBISSO, GALLAND, GARCIA AMIGO, GASOLIBA I BOHM, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HADJIGEORGIOU, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERMAN, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOFF, HOON, HUGHES, INGLEWOOD, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLET-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANNOYE, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MATTINA, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MIHR, MONNIER-BESOMBES, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MORRIS, MULLER, MUNTINGH, MUSSO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NORDMANN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PARTSCH, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, PISONI F., PLANAS PUCHADES, POETTERING, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PUERTA, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RANDZIO-PLATH, READ, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/149

Wednesday, 13 June 1990

R0NN, ROSMINI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SABY, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDB/EK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMPSON B., SISO CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SMITH L., STAUFFENBERG, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAZDAIT, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TONGUE, UKEIWfi, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERDE I ALDEA, VERTEMATI, VERWAERDE, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WETTIG, WHITE, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN. NoC 175/150 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF THURSDAY, 14 JUNE 1990

(90/C 175/04)

PART I

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MR PETERS

Vice-President

(The sitting was opened at 10.15 a.m.)

1. Approval of minutes would refer the matter to the College of Quaestors and the Bureau).

The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. 2. Official welcome

On behalf of Parliament, the President welcomed a The following spoke: delegation from the Chilean Parliament, led by its President, Mr Jose Viera Gallo, who had taken their — Mr Cox, who referred to the flags with the ANC seats in the official gallery. colours displayed on certain benches in the Chamber the previous day to mark the visit by Mr Nelson Man dela, and asked for measures to be considered to prev TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE ent such displays in the future (the President replied The next item was the debate on topical and urgent that this kind of display had become established as a subjects of major importance (for titles and authors of tradition in this Parliament, but that he would refer the the motions for resolutions, see minutes of 12 June matter to the College of Quaestors); 1990, part I, item 3). — Mr McMillan-Scott, who referred to the latest violent demonstrations in Romania and called, on 3. South Africa (debate and vote) behalf of the ED Group, for the Commission and even the Council to make a statement on the subject and for The next item was the joint debate on nine motions for consideration to be given to the possibility of dividing resolutions (Docs B 3-1205, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1226, the Delegation for Relations with Bulgaria and 1233, 1238, 1244 and 1260/90). Romania into two separate delegations, so as to Mr Wurtz introduced Doc. B 3-1205/90. improve relations with the parliaments of the two coun tries and to examine the problems there in greater Mr Dillen introduced Docs B 3-1219 and 1238/90. depth (the President replied that he would refer this request to the President of Parliament); Mrs Oomen-Ruijten introduced Doc. B 3-1220/90.

— Mr Robles Piquer, who made the same request on Mrs Veil introduced Doc. B 3-1221/90. behalf of the EPP Group; Mr Cot introduced Doc. B 3-1226/90. — Mr Andrews, who objected to Mr Cox's remarks; Mrs Ewing introduced Doc. B 3-1233/90.

— Mr Pannella, on the President's reply to Mr Cox's Mr Telkamper introduced Doc. B 3-1244/90. request; Mrs Napoletano introduced Doc. B 3-1260/90. — Mr Cox, who made a personal statement; The following spoke: Mr Ford, on behalf of the SOC — Mr Veil, on the principle of displaying flags in the Group, Lord Bethell, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Chamber, which she felt should be the subject of a Robles Piquer, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Pan decision by the Bureau (the President replied that he nella, non-attached member, Mrs Simons, Mr Muller, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/151

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Sir James Scott-Hopkins, Mr Marin, Vice-President of Mr Robles Piquer introduced Doc. B 3-1194/90. the Commission, and Mr Telkamper, who put a ques tion to the Commission which Mr Marin answered. Mr Pierros introduced Doc. B 3-1199/90.

The President declared the debate closed. Mr Elmalan introduced Doc. B 3-1207/90.

Mr Prag introduced Doc. B 3-1214/90. VOTE Mr Arbeloa Muru introduced Doc. B 3-1223/90. — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1205, 1226, 1233, 1244 and 1260/90: Mrs Aulas introduced Doc. B 3-1245/90.

Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mrs Simons, Mr Mr Vandemeulebroucke introduced Doc. B 3-1259/90. Wynn and Mrs Dury, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Telkamper, Mrs Santos, Mrs Aulas and Mr Melandri, Mr Iversen introduced Doc. B 3-1261/90. on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Vecchi, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Wurtz, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr Vandemeulebroucke, Mr Blaney, Mrs Ewing and The following spoke: Mr Pons Grau, on behalf of the Mrs Piermont, on behalf of the RB Group, Mr SOC Group, Mr Sonneveld, on behalf of the EPP Andrews, seeking to replace these motions for resolu Group, Mr Habsburg and Mr Matutes, Member of the tions by a new text: Commission.

The SOC, Green and LU Groups had requested a roll- The President declared the debate closed, call vote; the ED Group had requested a separate vote on paragraph 7. VOTE

Whole text excluding paragraph 7: adopted by RCV: — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1194, 1199, 1207, Members voting: 231 1223 and 1245 and 1261/90: For: 178 Against: 48 Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Arbelo Abstentions: 5 Muru, Mr Pons Griau, Mr Sakellariou and Mrs Dury, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Robles Piquer, Mr paragraph 7: adopted by RCV: Pierros and Mr Chanterie, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Aulas, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Vecchi, Members voting: 218 on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr De Rossa, on behalf For: 170 of the LU Group, seeking to replace these motions , for Against: 45 resolutions by a new text: Abstentions: 3 Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV (EPP):

Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 1). Members voting: 86 For: 67 Against: 17 (Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1219, 1220, 1221 and Abstentions: 2 1238/90 fell.)

(part II, item 2). Mr Chanterie disputed the fact that motion for a reso lution Doc. B 3-1220/90 had fallen (the President reminded him of the provisions of Rule 64 (5)). (Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1214, 1251 and 1259/90 fell.)

4. Israel (debate and vote) 5. Situation in certain African countries (debate and vote) The next item was the joint debate on nine motions for resolutions (Docs B 3-1194, 1199, 1207, 1214, 1223, The next item was the joint debate on 16 motions for 1245, 1251, 1259 and 1261/90). resolutions (Docs B 3-1183, 1229, 1201, 1218, 1225, NoC 175/152 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

1235, 1237, 1247, 1262, 1202, 1236, 1246, 1252, 1241, — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1201, 1202, 1218, 1231 and 1234/90. 1225, 1229, 1231, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1246, 1247 and 1262/90: Mr Saby introduced Doc. B 3-1183/90. Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Sakellariou, Mrs Dury and Mr Glinne, on behalf of the SOC Group, IN THE CHAIR: MR MARTIN Mr Verhagen and Mr Chanterie, on behalf of the EPP Group, Sir Christopher Prout, on behalf of the ED Vice-President Group, Mr Ernst de la Graete, Mrs Aulas, Mr Telkam- per, Mr Melandri and Mrs Santos, on behalf of the Mr Newens introduced Doc. B 3-1229/90. Green Group, Mr Vecchi, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Wurtz, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr Vandemeu lebroucke, on behalf of the RB Group, seeking to Mr Vandemeulebroucke introduced Doc. B 3-1201/90. replace these motions for resolutions by a new text:

Mr Verhagen introduced Doc. B 3-1218/90. The LDR and EPP Groups had requested separate Mr Dury introduced Doc. B 3-1225/90. votes.

Mrs Ainardi introduced Doc. B 3-1235/90. Recitals A to D: adopted

Mr Mendes Bota introduced Doc. B 3-1237/90. Recital E: adopted

Mr Staes introduced Doc. B 3-1247/90. Recital F and paragraphs 1 and 2: adopted Mr Vecchi introduced Doc. B 3-1262/90.

Paragraph 3: adopted Mr Simeoni introduced Docs B 3-1202/90 and 1234/ 90. Paragraphs 4 to 7: adopted Mr Melandri introduced Doc. B 3-1246/90.

Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3 (b)). Mr Guillaume introduced Doc. B 3-1252/90.

Mrs Lehideux introduced Doc. B 3-1241/90. Mr McMillan-Scott referred to the comments he had made at the beginning of the sitting and said that he Mr Glinne introduced Doc. B 3-1231/90. had been informed that the Commission would make a statement on the situation in Romania during the sit ting the following day. The following spoke: Mr Ukeiwe, on behalf of the EDA Group, and Mr Marin, Vice-President of the Com mission. 6. Human rights (debate and vote) The President declared the joint debate closed.

The next item was the joint debate on eight motions for VOTE resolutions (Docs B 3-1189, 1195, 1254, 1267, 1224, 1212, 1228 and 1264/90).

— Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1183/90: (Motions for resolutions Doc B 3-1204 had been with Amendments adopted: 1, 2/final, and 3. drawn).

Both unamended and amended parts of the text were Mr Verhagen introduced Doc. B 3-1189/90. adopted.

Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3 (a)). Mr Robles Piquer introduced Doc. B 3-1195/90. J 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/153

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Mrs Aglietta asked the President of Parliament to make Imprisonment of Mr Mordechai Vanunu a statement on the events of the previous day in Romania. — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1212 and 1228/ 90: The President said that an announcement on the sub ject would be made by the Presidency at 3 p.m. Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Coates, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Price, on behalf of the Mr Saby introduced Doc. B 3-1224/90. ED Group, Mr Vecchi, on behalf of the EUL Group, seeking to replace these motions for resolutions by a new text: Mr Price introduced Doc. B 3-1212/90.

Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV (EPP): Mr Coates introduced Doc. B 3-1228/90. Members voting: 128 For: 101 - Mr Gutierrez Diaz introduced Doc. B 3-1264/90. Against: 22 Abstentions: 5 The following spoke: Mrs Lenz, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Bertens, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr (part II, item 4 (c)). Telkamper, on behalf of the Green Group, and Mr Matutes, Member of the Commission.

Assassination of Jesuits in El Salvador: The President declared the joint debate closed.

— Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1264/90:

VOTE Amendments adopted: 1 and 2.

Kashmir-Pakistan Parliament adopted the resolution as amended (part II, item 4 (d)). — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1189, 1195, 1254 and 1267/90: 7. Schengen (debate and vote) Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Sakellariou and Mrs Dury, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Ver- hagen, Mr Robles Piquer and Mr Chanterie, on behalf The next item was the joint debate on ten motions for of the EPP Group, Sir Christopher Prout, on behalf of resolutions (Docs B 3-1208, 1209, 1227, 1232, 1242, the ED Group, Mr Telkamper, on behalf of the Green 1243, 1248, 1255, 1258 and 1266/90). Group, Mr Vecchi, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr de la Malene, on behalf of the EDA Group, seeking to Mrs Dury spoke on behalf of the SOC Group to ask for replace these motions for resolutions by a new text: the sitting, which had only begun at 10.15 a.m., to be extended until 1.15 p.m. in order to conclude the debate. The SOC and LDR Groups had requested a separate vote on recital D. The President said that this had already been decided. Recital D: rejected Mr Carvalhas introduced Doc. B 3-1208/90. Parliament adopted the resolution as amended (part II, item 4 (a)). Mrs Valent introduced Doc. B 3-1209/90.

Mrs van den Brink introduced Doc. B 3-1227/90. Haiti Mr Vandemeulebroucke introduced Doc. B 3-1232/90. — Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1224/90: Mr Le Chevallier introduced Doc. B 3-1242/90 and Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 4 (b)). 1243/90. NoC 175/154 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

In the view of the time, the President suggested that Remainder: adopted members due to speak during the debate other than the authors of motions for resolutions should waive their Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 5). right to speak.

(Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1242 and 1243/90, Mr von Wogau spoke on this proposal. and joint motion for a resolution replacing Docs B 3- 1255, 1258 and 1266/90 fell.) Parliament agreed to the proposal.

Mrs Roth introduced Doc. B 3-1248/90. END OF TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE Mr Lalor introduced Doc. B 3-1255/90. (The sitting was suspended at 1.15p.m. and resumed at 3 p.m.) Mrs Tazdait spoke on the meeting of the ad hoc Group on Immigration, which was currently taking place in Dublin. IN THE CHAIR: MR CRAVINHO

Mr de Vries introduced Doc. B 3-1258/90. Vice-President

Mr von Wogau introduced Doc. B 3-1266/90. 8. Agenda Mr Dondelinger, Member of the Commission, spoke. The President announced to Parliament that the Com The President declared the debate closed. mission would make a statement the following day under Rule 56 on the situation in Romania.

VOTE The following spoke:

— Miss Rawlings, who insisted that this statement — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1208, 1209, 1227, should be made that same day; 1232 and 1248/90: — Mr McMillan-Scott, who seconded this request Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr van Outrive, and suggested that the President-in-Office of the Coun on behalf of the SOC Group, Mrs Roth, on behalf of cil, who, he gathered, was still in Strasbourg, should the Green Group, Mrs Valent, on behalf of the EUL also make a statement on the situation on Romania Group, Mr Wurtz, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr Van- that same day (the President replied that the necessary demeulebroucke, on behalf of the RB Group, seeking steps would be taken); to replace these motions for resolutions by a new text: — Mr Ford, who called for the resolution on the Schengen Agreement, which had been adopted at the Separate votes had been requested on: end of the morning, to be sent immediately to the ad hoc Group on Immigration meeting in Dublin, since the group was due to take a decision on this matter the Preamble, recitals and paragraphs 1 to 4: adopted by following day; electronic vote — Mrs Valent, who agreed with Mr Ford's request paragraph 5: adopted by RCV (SOC and EPP): and added that the resolution should also be forwarded urgently to the Council and the Commission (the Presi Members voting: 166 dent assured the previous two speakers that the neces For: 96 sary steps would be taken); Against: 69 Abstentions: 1 — Mr von Alemann, who seconded Mr McMillan- Scott's proposal; paragraph 6: adopted by RCV (SOC and EPP): — Mr Lane, who stated that the President-in-Office of the Council, was about to leave Strasbourg. Members voting: 165 For: 97 Against: 68 The President then said that, in the meantime, the Abstentions: 0 Commission had announced that it was prepared to 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/155

Thursday, 14 June 1990

make a statement that same day, immediately before I. a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No voting time. 3975/87 laying down the procedure for the applica tion of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector 9. Atypical employment (debate) II. a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3976/87 on the application of Article 85 (3) of the Mrs Salisch introduced her report, drawn up on behalf Treaty to certain categories of agreements and con of the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and certed practices in the air transport sector the Working Environment, on an initiative aimed at a proposal for a directive on atypical employment con III. a regulation on the application of Article 85 (3) of tracts and terms of employment (Doc. A 3-134/90). the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector The following spoke: Mr Hermans, draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights, Mr van (Doc. A 3-106/90). Velzen, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Menrad, on behalf of the EPP Group, Lord O'Hagan, on behalf of The following spoke: Mr Anastassopoulos, draftsman the ED Group, Mrs Catasta, on behalf of the EUL of the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs, Mr Group, Mrs Elmalan, on behalf of the LU Group, Mr Cornelissen, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Lalor, on Alvarez de Paz, Mr Fayot, Mr McMahon, and Mrs Papandreou, Member of the Commission. behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Dondelinger, Member of the Commission, and the rapporteur, who put a ques tion to the Commission, which Mr Dondelinger The President declared the debate closed. answered.

He announced that the vote would be taken at the next The President declared the debate closed. voting time (part I, item 25 of these minutes).

He announced that the vote would be taken at the next 10. EEC-China relations (continuation of debate) voting time (part I, item 8 of minutes of 15 June 1990).

The next item was the continuation of the debate on the oral question on EEC-China relations. IN THE CHAIR: MR CATHERWOOD

Mrs Papandreou, Member of the Commission, answered Vice-President the questions.

The following spoke: Mr Hindley, on behalf of the 12. Efficiency of agricultural structures * (debate) SOC Group, Mrs Cassanmagnago-Cerretti, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Bettini, on behalf of the Green Mr Kofoed introduced his report, drawn up on behalf Group, and Mr Pannella, non-attached member. of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, on the proposal from the Commission to The President declared the joint debate closed. the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 on improving the efficiency of agri cultural structures (COM(89) 597 final — Doc. C 3- Decision on the request for an early vote: 45/90) (Doc. A 3-122/90).

Parliament agreed to an early vote. The following spoke: Mr Goerlach, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Boge, on behalf of the EPP Group, The vote on the motions themselves would be taken at Mrs Martin, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Howell, the beginning of the sitting the following morning (part on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Pasty, on behalf of the I, item 7 of minutes of 15 June 1990). EDA Group, Mr Martinez, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Blaney, on behalf of the RB Group, Mr van der Waal, non-attached member, Mr Carvalho Cardoso, II. Competition in the air transport sector * (debate) Mr Vohrer, Mr Lane and Mr MacSharry, Member of the Commission. Miss Mcintosh introduced her report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on The President declared the debate closed. the proposals from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 417 final — Doc. C 3-149/89) concerning the application of the competition rules to the air trans He announced that the vote would be taken at the next port: voting time (part I, item 9 of minutes of 15 June 1990). 1 I

NoC 175/156 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

13. . Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions of the Commission, and Mr Collins, who moved, under (debate) Rule 103 (1), that the report be referred back to com mittee. Mrs Reding introduced her report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Petitions, on the deliberations of Mr Colino Salamanca, Chairman of the Committee on the Committee on Petitions during the parliamentary Agriculture, spoke on this request. year 1989-1990, with indications as regards future pro cedure for handling petitions (Doc. A 3-107/90). Parliament agreed to the request.

The following spoke: Mr Newman, on behalf of the The report was therefore referred back to committee. SOC Group, Mr Gil Robles, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Cassidy, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Newman, who made a personal statement, Mr Dillen, 16. Commission statement on Romania on behalf of the ER Group, and Mr Dondelinger, Member of the Commission. Mr Millan, Member of the Commission, made a state ment on the situation in Romania. The President declared the debate closed. The following spoke: Miss Rawlings, Vice-Chairman of the delegation for relations with Bulgaria and Romania, He announced that the vote would be taken at the next and Mr Habsburg, who asked whether the statement voting time (part I, item 10 of minutes of 15 June 1990). would be followed by a debate (the President replied that' a decision would be taken on this question the fol lowing morning). 14. Maximum levels for pesticide residues * (debate)

Mrs Ceci, deputizing for the rapporteur, introduced the 17. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGfS programmes report drawn up by Mr Imbeni, on behalf of the Com (debate) mittee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commis The next item was the joint debate on three reports, sion to the Council for a regulation on the fixing of drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Regional maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on cer Policy and Regional Planning. tain products of plant origin, including fruit and veget ables, and amending Directive 76/895/EEC as regards Mr Cushnahan introduced his report on a Community procedural rules (COM(88) 798 final — Doc. C 3-52/ initiative in favour of border areas (INTERREG pro 89) (Doc. A 3-12/90). gramme) (Doc. A 3-139/90).

The following spoke: Mr Bowe, on behalf of the SOC Mr Welsh introduced his report on a Community initia Group\ Mr Florenz, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr tive to assist the most remote regions of the Com Carvalho Cardoso, Mr Valverde Lopez and Mr Mac- munity (REGIS) (Doc. A 3-142/90) (')• Sharry, Member of the Commission. Mr Raffarin introduced his report on a Community ini The President declared the debate closed. tiative concerning regional capacities for research, tech nology and innovation (STRIDE) (Doc. A 3-143/90). He announced that the vote would be taken at the next voting time (part I, item 11 of minutes of 15 June 1990). The following spoke: Mr Escuder Croft, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Rosmini, on behalf of the SOC Group, and Mr Calvo Ortega, on behalf of the LDR Group. 15. EEC-accepted plant protection products * (debate) The debate was suspended at that point for voting The next item was the report drawn up by Mr Valverde time; it would be resumed the following morning (part Lopez, on behalf of the Committee on the Environ I, item 15 of minutes of 15 June 1990). ment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the amendment proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 34 final — Doc. C 3-64/89) for a IN THE CHAIR: MR ANASTASSOPOULOS directive concering the placing of EEC-accepted plant protection products on the market (Doc. A 3-137/90). Vice-President

The following spoke: Mr Collins, Chairman of the (') Oral question Doc. B 3-1102/90 to the Commission was Committee on the Environment, Mr MacSharry, Member included in the debate. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/157

Thursday, 14 June 1990

VOTING TIME been drawn up by the political groups in consultation with the Commission, Mr Dondelinger, Member of the The President drew attention to the problems which Commission, and the rapporteur, who read out the new were caused, for the organization of voting, by the pro text: 'whereas the Commission has proposed to the liferation of requests for split votes submitted at the Council and the European Parliament that these guide last minute. He stated that he was considering referring lines should henceforth be established on a multi- the matter to the Bureau. annual basis for 1991-1995, and whereas the Council has already begun its work on the communication from Mrs Castellina spoke. the Commission'.

18. Calendar of part-sessions in 1991 (debate) This amendment was adopted. The next item was the decision on the calendar of part-sessions for 1991 (part I, item 4 of previous day's Parliament approved the Commission proposal as minutes). amended (part II, item 7). Mr Cot, speaking on behalf of the SOC Group, pointed out that a final decision on whether the first October The rapporteur spoke. part-session was to be maintained would be taken later.

As no amendments had been proposed, the calendar was thus established. Draft legislative resolution:

Mr Speroni spoke on the absence of documents for the vote. Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, item 7). The President reminded him that the draft calendar had been announced the previous day by the President of Parliament and appeared in the previous day's minutes. Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf protested at the fact that he had not been called for an explanation of vote at the end of the vote on BSE, as his group had requested. 19. UK beef exports (vote) (motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1274, 1277, 1285, The President replied that he had only just been 1287 and 1288/90) informed of this request which he therefore regretted he — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1274, 1285, 1287 could no longer agree to. and 1288/90: He pointed out that Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf could Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Thareau, on submit his explanation, of vote in writing if he wished, behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Pisoni, on behalf of the as could also Mr Guillaume and Mr Martinez, who EPP Group, Mr Garcia, on behalf of the LDR Group, were in the same situation. Mr Howell, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Langer, on behalf of the Green Group, seeking to replace these motions for resolutions by a new text: The following spoke: Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf, who pointed out that since recital G had been adopted, the Th'e Green Group had requested a separate vote on Green Group could no longer subscribe to the resolu recital G. tion that had been adopted, and Mr Martinez, on a point of procedure. Whole of text except recital G: adopted

Recital G: adopted 21. Institutional orientations with a view to the second Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 6). Dublin summit (vote)

20. Financial and technical assistance to Latin Ameri (motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1271, 1279, 1284 and can and Asian developing countries * (vote) 1290/90) (Third van Putten report — Doc. A 3-151/90) — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1271, 1279, 1284 — Proposal for a decision SEC(89) 1456 final Doc. and 1290/90: C 3-169/89:

The following spoke: the rapporteur, who announced, Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Cot, on With regard to amendment 1, that a new version had behalf of the SOC Group, Mr von Wogau, Mr Gallenzi, NoC 175/158 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti and Mr Colombo, on Against: 45 behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Giscard d'Estaing, on Abstentions: 2 behalf of the LDR Group, Mr Prag, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Colajanni, on behalf of the EUL Point II: adopted Group, seeking to replace these motions for resolutions by a new text: I Explanations of vote The Green Group had requested a separate vote on paragraph 1. The following spoke: Mr Sakellariou, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mrs Castellina, on behalf of the EUL Text without paragraph 1: adopted Group, Mr Dillen, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Lan ger, on behalf of the Green Group, and Mr Crampton, on behalf of the British members of the SOC Group. Paragraph 1: adopted Mr Dessylas complained that the Greek version of the Explanations of vote: motion for a resolution was incomplete.

The following spoke: Mr von Wechmar, on behalf of The President replied that the matter would be investi the LDR Group, Mr Dessylas, Mr Blot, on behalf of gated. the ER Group, and Mr Veil, on the previous speaker's comments. Parliament adopteld the resolution by RCV (EPP): Members voting: 231 Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 8). For: 199 Against: 28 Abstentions: 4 22. Cooperation on security (vote) (motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1167, 1171, 1175 and (part II, item 9). 1178/90)

Mr Langer disputed the hypothesis that, in the event of — Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1175/90: the joint motion for a resolution tabled by six political groups being adopted, the motion for a resolution Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution. tabled by the Green Group (Doc. B 3-1175/90) would fall. 23. Measures to combat racism and xenophobia (vote) The President agreed with him. (motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1268, 1270, 1273, 1275 and 1291/90) Mr Poettering disagreed with this decision. — Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1268/90: The President upheld his decision. Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution.

— Motions for a resolution Doc. B 3-1167/90: — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1270, 1273, 1275 Recital A to paragraph 5: a split vote had been and 1291/90: requested: Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Ford, on Recitals A to G: adopted behalf of the SOC Group, Mrs Roth, on behalf of the Paragraph 1: adopted Green Group, Mr Papayannakis, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mrs Elmalan, on behalf of the LU Group, seek Paragraph 2: adopted ing to replace these motions for resolutions by a new Paragraphs 3 to 5: adopted text: The LDR and EPP Group and Mr Speroni had Paragraph 6: adopted (amendment 1 withdrawn) requested a split vote: The whole of point I: adopted by RCV (EPP): Recitals A, B, C, D, E, F and paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Members voting: 252 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12: adopted by successive votes (reci For: 205 tal A and paragraph 2 by electronic vote). 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/159

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Explanations of vote: EPP Group, the Green Group, the EUL Group, the LU Group, seeking to replace these motions for resolutions by a new text; The following spoke: Mrs Fontaine, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Le Pen, on behalf of the ER Group, Mrs Tazdait, on Mr Le Pen's statement, Mr Speroni, A split vote had been requested: Mrs Lehideux, Mr Ramirez, on behalf of the Soc Group, Mr Blot, Mrs Tazdait, who made a personal Preamble and recitals: adopted statement, Mr Le Pen, who also made a personal state ment, Miss Mcintosh, on the application of Rule 98, and Mr Melis, on behalf of the RB Group. Paragraph 1, introductory phrase: adopted First indent: adopted

Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV (SOC): Second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh indents: adopted Members voting: 234 For: 207 Eighth indent: adopted Against: 11 Abstentions: 16 Paragraph 2: adopted

(part II, item 10). Paragraph 3: adopted

Paragraphs 4 to 6: adopted 24. Immigrant workers from third countries (vote)

(motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1168/rev., 1169, Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV: 1172,1174, 1180, 1181 and 1182/90) Members voting: 188 For: 152 — Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1168/90/rev.: Against: 14 Abstentions: 22

Amendments adopted: 1 and 2 (part II, item 11).

Amendment rejected: 3. 25. Atypical employment (vote)

Both amended and unamended parts of the text were (motion for a resolution contained in the Salisch report adopted successively. — Doc. A 3-134/90)

Explanations of vote: On the basis of Rule 105, the rapporteur asked that the vote be postponed to the sitting of 10 July.

The following spoke: Mr Le Chevallier, on behalf of Parliament agreed to this. the ER Group, Mr Moretti, Mr Dillen, Mr Ceyrac, Mr Elliott and Mr Ford.

END OF VOTING TIME Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution by RCV: 26. Agenda for next sitting Members voting: 177 For: 13 Against: 158 The President announced the following agenda for the Abstentions: 6 sitting on Friday, 15 June 1990:

— Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1169, 1173, 1174, 9 a.m.: 1180, 1181 and 1182/90:

— procedure without report *; Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mrs Salisch, on , behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Brok, on behalf of the — Merz report on indirect taxes (without debate) *; NoC 175/160 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

— vote on motions for resolutions on which the and REGIS programmes (continuation of debate) (') debate has closed; (2); — Commission statement, on Romania (contribu — Reding report on the seat of the European Envi tion); ronment Agency ('); — Romera i Alcazar report on an integrated transport market * ('); — joint debate on the Miranda da Silva report and — Wynn report on cofinancing operation for the pur on oral question to the Commission on fisheries ('); chase of food products ('); — Vernier report on accidents involving consumer — joint debate on three reports by Mr Raffarin, Mr products ('); Cushnahan and Mr Welsh on STRIDE, INTERREG

(2) Oral question Doc. B 3-1102/90 would be included in the (') Texts would be put to the vote at the close of each debate. . debate.

(The sitting was closed at 8p.m.)

Enrico VINCI NICOLE FONTAINE Secretary-General Vice-President 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/161

Thursday, 14 June 1990

PART II

Texts adopted by the European Parliament

1. South Africa

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1205, 1226, 1233, 1244 and 1260/90

RESOLUTION

on South Africa

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to its previous resolutions on the eradication of apartheid in South Africa and to those of the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly,

B. whereas the recent discussions between the ANC and the South African authorities repre sent a first step towards negotiations but whereas the bases of apartheid remain in South Africa and whereas, in particular: -T- most of the laws which institutionalize the system remain inforce; — the South African police continues to occupy the townships and to oppress the popu lation; — political prisoners remain in prison; — the state of emergency has not been lifted throughout the country,

C. taking into account the EC common policy on South Africa, which consists of a package of restrictive and positive measures; the declared aim of which is 'the complete abolition of apartheid as a whole and not just of certain components of the system' (Council decision of 10 September 1985),

D. recalling the UN declaration on South Africa, unanimously adopted on 14 December 1989, which demands 'to ensure that the international community does not relax existing meas ures aimed at encouraging the South African regime to eradicate apartheid until there is clear evidence of profound and irreversible changes, bearing in mind the objectives of this declaration' and recognizing that the South African Government has still to take many of the steps set out in this declaration,

E. recalling that these objectives are the new constitutional order of a non-racial, democratic state with equal rights for all its citizens,

F. whereas the campaign against apartheid conducted unremittingly by banned or legal organ izations and the pressure exerted at internatipnal level as a result of economic sanctions have been a decisive factor in compelling the South African Government to start negotia tions,

G. having regard to the Commonwealth Committee of Foreign Ministers on Southern Africa meeting in Abuja, Nigeria on 16-17 May 1990 which agreed to 'call on all Commonwealth and non-Commonwealth countries to maintain existing sanctions and measures until Pre toria was brought to the negotiating table and change was clearly and irreversibly secured' and to 'convey its views to non-Commonwealth governments and in particular to the members of the EC and G7 countries',

H. having regard to the meetings of the Council of Ministers of 18 June in Luxembourg and the European Council of 25 and 26 June in Dublin &t which the Community's policy towards South Africa is to be reviewed, NoC 175/162 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

1. Welcomes the freeing of Nelson Mandela, praises his courage and determination after 27 years in prison and welcomes him to the European Parliament;

2. Welcomes the positive changes which have taken place in South Africa following President de Klerk's new policy introduced on 2 February 1990 and the positive way in which Nelson Mandela and the ANC have responded to this opportunity to abolish apartheid;

3. Considers the results of the Grote-Schuur discussions as a starting point towards negotia tions on the basis of the UN declaration;

4. Acknowledges the important contribution which international sanctions and other pres sures including those of the European Community have made towards securing progress towards the ending of apartheid,

5. Supports the appeal made by Nelson Mandela on 16 May 1990 to all governments not to take any premature steps towards lifting, even partially, sanctions against the South African Government;

6. Considers that it would be extremely undesirable for the Community to abandon its anti-apartheid sanctions policy prior to the conclusion of an agreement on the establishment of a new constitutional order in South Africa under which all citizens are treated as equals in a non-racial, democratic society;

7. Calls on the Member States which are currently proposing the partial or phased relaxation of European Community sanctions against South Africa to reconsider their positions in the light of the enormity of the human rights violations which are perpetrated under the apartheid system and with due regard to their past resolve to abolish the apartheid regime;

8. Appeals, accordingly, to the Council of Ministers which is to meet on 18 June in Luxem bourg and to the European Council on 25 and 26 June in Dublin to ensure that all sanctions, including economic, cultural and sporting sanctions, by the Community and the Member States are continued and implemented against South Africa until apartheid is completely and irrevoc ably abolished;

9. Calls on the EC Heads of State or Government meeting in Dublin on 25 June 1990 to renew their full commitment to fight apartheid by confirming the position taken at the Strasbourg Summit on 19 December 1989 as well as the UN declaration jointly adopted on 14 December 1989;

10. Reaffirms its support for the negotiating process as envisaged in the United Nations Declaration in order to ensure agreement on a new constitution, including elections on the principle of 'one person, one vote' on the basis of a non-racial electoral list;

11. Reaffirms its solidarity with the people of South Africa and supports the position it has expressed through its organizations, whereby the aim of the negotiations is not the reform of apartheid but its abolition;

12. Calls on the Council and the Commission to make supplementary funds available under the special programme for victims of apartheid, intended for South Africans returning from exile and for a negotiations trust fund to support the process of democracy in South Africa;

13. Calls on the international Community to continue to support and intensify its physical and moral assistance to the freedom movements and organizations in South Africa;

14. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation, the Commission, the Government of the Republic of South Africa and the African National Congress. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/163

Thursday, 14 June 1990

2. Israel

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1194, 1199, 1207,1223, 1245 and 1261/90

RESOLUTION

on Israel and the situation in the occupied territories

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the terrible massacre of eight Palestinian workers in cold blood on 20 May 1990 at Rishon-le-Zion by an isolated individual, which led to justified protests by the Palestinian population in the occupied territories, followed by bloody repression by the Israeli army, which cost the lives of another six Palestinians and was responsible for wounding nearly 650 more that same day,

B. recalling that these recent deaths follow a long list of killings of Palestinians, estimated at 669 from the beginning of the Intifada in December 1987 until 5 May 1990,

C. whereas the blockage of all peace moves leaves the field open to extremists on all sides, as was shown by the attempted sea landing by a Palestinian commando from the PLF, which was thwarted on 30 May,

D. concerned at the intention of the Government of the State of Israel of encouraging the settlement of thousands of Jews from Eastern Europe in the occupied Palestinian territo ries,

E. having regard to the recent statements by the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation on the new Jewish settlements in the Occupied Territories,

F. having regard to the positions adopted by the UN on this issue, as well as the proposals made by the Chairman of the PLO, Yasser Arafat, at the latest sitting of the Security Council in Geneva on 25 May 1990,

G. noting the persistent refusal of Israel to comply with the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 on civilian populations under occupation,

H. whereas Parliament has always recognized Israel's right to live within secure borders and in peace with its neighbours,

I. whereas Parliament has also defended the rights of the Palestinian people, its physical, economic and cultural integrity and its right to create its own State,

J. recalling its previous resolutions on this issue,

1. Calls for continued efforts to achieve a negotiated solution for just and lasting peace in the Middle East guaranteeing the security and inviolability of the borders of the State of Israel and of all the states of the region as well as the self-determination of the Palestinian people and its right to create a free and independent state and calls on all parties concerned to adopt a clear stance on this matter;

2. Condemns the Government of the State of Israel for its bloody repression of Palestinian civilians and its repeated violations of human rights in Israel and the occupied territories, and insists that it put an immediate end to all acts of repression;

3. Condemns, from wherever it comes, any veiled appeal or open recourse to violence, such as the demonstration.by Rabbi Kahane appealing for support for the murderer Ami Popper, or the attempted sea landing by a Palestinian commando;

4. Calls on the Commission to supply immediate medical and humanitarian aid to the victims; NoC 175/164 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

5. Calls on the Government of the State of Israel to halt immediately the immigration of settlers into the occupied territories;

6. Supports the proposal to send an international commission to the occupied territories to conduct an on-the-spot inquiry into human rights violations;

7. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation, in view of their recent declarations on the new Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, to consider, in cooperation with the United Nations, the possibility of appointing observers to draw up a report on the need to send UN peace-keeping forces into the region and on human rights viola tions;

8. Calls for an immediate meeting of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, with a view to discussing the peace process and preparing an international conference on the Middle East;

9. Calls on the Commission, Council and Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC to consider and implement any measures capable of bringing international pressure to bear on the Government of the State of Israel until such time as the rights of the Palestinian people are fully respected;

10. Calls on the governments of the Member States to urge the UN to extend the UNRWA mandate to monitor the security of all the peoples living in the territory occupied by Israel since June 1967;

11. Calls on the governments of the Member States to send a permanent representative to East Jerusalem to assess the needs of the Palestinian people and to coordinate and monitor the use of aid granted by the European Community;

12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments of the Member States, the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation, the UN, the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

3. Situation in certain African countries

(a) Doc. B3-1183/90

RESOLUTION

on the consequences of the grave violation of human rights in Sudan

The European Parliament,

A. recalling its resolution of 18 January 1990 on the situation in Sudan ('),

B. recalling the personal appeal of the President of the European Parliament to the Sudanese authorities on the death sentences imposed in Sudan in December 1989,

C. recalling the intervention by the Co-President of the ACP-EEC Joint Assembly and the Chairman of the Committee on Development and Cooperation during their meeting with Brigadier General Khalifa on the subject of human rights in Sudan,

D. bearing in mind previous occasions when the Community has responded to repeated and serious human rights violations in other countries,

(') OJ NoC 38, 19.2.1990, p. 78. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/165

Thursday, 14 June 1990

E. whereas the Sudanese authorities have repeatedly ignored appeals by the European Parlia ment and by other European Community institutions for clemency to prisoners condemned to death following arbitrary and summary trials,

F. whereas verified serious human rights violations continue to be reported including the execution of 28 officers on 24 April 1990 and 6 more the following day, the torture of political prisoners, amongst whom Lieutenant Abderrahmarie Sadiq AL-MAHDI, and the continued threat to the life of former elected Prime Minister Sadiq AL-MAHDI overthrown by coup d'etat in June 1989,

G. aware of the condemnation of all these infringements of human rights by the National Democratic Forum of Sudan, which is representative of the 16 main political parties, of 52 trade unions, of the Armed and Regular Forces of Sudan and other organizatons,

H. whereas the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention contains reinforced commitments for the respect of human rights,

1. Urges the Commission to suspend forthwith all programmable aid to Sudan and to freeze scheduled discussions between the European Community and the Government of Sudan con cerning the draft indicative programme under the Fourth Lom6 Convention;

2. Urges the Commission to suspend consideration and implementation of all projects agreed under the Lom6 II or Lom6 III Conventions which have not yet been started;

3. Urges the Commission to maintain and enhance, where possible, direct humanitarian aid to the Sudanese people, including displaced persons and refugees, who urgently require both food aid and health education and other assistance;

4. Commends the efforts of intergovernmental humanitarian agencies and non-governmental organizations who are working under extremely difficult conditions to provide support and assistance to many dispossessed people in Sudan;

5. Calls upon the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation to increase diplomatic pressure on the Sudanese authorities in order that no more executions take place, that all political prisoners be released and that normal democratic provisions of government be reintroduced;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC and the Sudanese Government.

(b) Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1201, 1202, 1218, 1225, 1229, 1231, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1246,1247 and 1262/90

RESOLUTION

on the bloody conflicts in various countries in central Africa

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the recent mass demonstrations, particularly in Cote d'lvoire, Cameroon, Zaire and Gabon, expressing a desire for democracy, justice, dignity and the democratic sharing of responsibilities by the people,

B. aware that in a number of these countries there have been major disturbances and even confrontations which have cost the lives of many hundreds of people, NoC 175/166 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

C. whereas, in particular: — in Liberia hundreds of civilians died during the violent conflicts which took place throughout the country, particularly at Buchanan, — in Gabon violent demonstrations, leaving a number of people dead, followed the death, the cause of which is still unknown, of Mr Joseph Rendjambe, Secretary-General of the Gabonese Progressive Party; — in Zaire, according to information received, students were massacred in Lubumbashi by commandos under the control of the Zaire Government and whereas systematic repres sion is being directed against the Zaire opposition; — in Cameroon demonstrations in Bamenda have also resulted in several deaths and many arrests,

D. whereas the total lack of democracy in the above countries has caused tension and confron tations,

E. having regard to the serious economic difficulties and social tensions affecting the whole of Africa, which has been weakened as a result of its domination by the industrialized countries and the process of structural adjustments carried out by the IMF and the World Bank,

F. whereas the Lom6 Convention, which links these countries to the EC, refers explicitly to the observance of human rights, the African Charter on Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights,

1. Condemns all acts of violence and repression, expresses its solidarity with the families of the victims and calls for human rights to be strictly observed in these countries;

2. Calls on all the states and peoples involved to look for peaceful ways to solve the many political, economic, social and ethnic problems confronting them;

3. Commits the EC and the Member States to offering all possible political and economic assistance to the peoples concerned while, at the same time, refraining from any direct inter vention and ceasing any military cooperation;

4. Calls on the Organization of African Unity to hold a serious enquiry, and to publish the results as soon as possible, in connection with the incidents involving the Lubumbashi students and the alarming reports on them which have been disseminated throughout the world;

5. Calls on the Commission to take account of the observance of human rights in the implementation of Lom6 IV, by considering, for example, withdrawing the exclusive manage ment of aid linked to Lom6 IV from the States concerned and increasing cooperation with local communities, local associations and NGOs in support of their own development projects;

6. In the case of Zaire, supports the Belgian Government's call for an international committee of inquiry to be set up urgently to investigate the recent incidents, their exact circumstances and those, who were responsible for them and calls on the Zaire authorities to provide clear infor mation on the situation of many members of the Zaire opposition who have disappeared or been imprisoned; in the case of Gabon, calls for democratization, without foreign intervention, based on : — genuine participation by the people in the development of the country; — the introduction of individual and collective political freedoms; — the holding of free elections supervised by the international community; in the case of Liberia, calls on the two sides to observe an immediate ceasefire, halt the massacres and summary executions and try to restore peace and requests the Member States of the Community and the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation to take steps in the United Nations Security Council and through direct contact with the parties to the conflict with a view to achieving a peaceful solution; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/167

Thursday, 14 June 1990

7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC, the Governments of the Member States, the OAU and the countries concerned.

4. Human rights

(a) Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1189, 1195, 1254 and 1267/90

RESOLUTION

on the disturbances in Kashmir and Pakistan

The European Parliament,

A. greatly concerned at the continuing tension between India and Pakistan,

B. greatly concerned at the reports of violence and loss of life in Jammu and Kashmir,

C. aware of and concerned about the disturbances which have occurred in the Pakistani province of Sind and which were particularly serious in Karachi and Hyderabad, involving the deaths of about 200 people,

1. Calls on the Governments of both India and Pakistan to open a dialogue in order to find a peaceful resolution of the Kashmir dispute and to avoid taking measures which further increase tension;

2. Calls on the Pakistani authorities to be as restrained as possible in the maintenance of order and welcomes the decision of the Government of Sind to open an initial enquiry into the issue;

3. Deeply regrets what happened, expresses its condolences to those affected and their families, and calls on the Commission to send help to mitigate, as far as possible, the effects of this wave of violence;

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation and the Governments of India and Pakistan.

(b) Doc. B3-1224/90

RESOLUTION

on human rights and support for democracy in Haiti

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to human rights in Haiti,

B. whereas there is an urgent need for international pressure to remedy what is becoming an increasingly intolerable situation for the local population,

C. having regard to the adoption of the 1986 constitution by the people of Haiti, D. having regard to the forthcoming parliamentary elections, NoC 175/168 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

E. having regard to Haiti's accession to the Lom6 IV agreements,

F. noting with satisfaction the establishment of a transitional administration under Mrs Ertha Pascal Trouillot,

1. Assures Mrs Trouillot of its support for the establishment of the rule of law in Haiti;

2. Requests the European Community to pay special attention and provide special assistance to Haiti because of the very difficult situation for the people of that country;

3. Calls on the Council to take all appropriate measures to ensure that human rights are upheld in Haiti;

4. Believes that the Community, and in particular Parliament, must follow the example of the UN and send a delegation to Haiti to monitor the forthcoming elections;

5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the Haitian authorities.

RESOLUTION

on the kidnapping and imprisonment of Mr Mordechai Vanunu

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the dismissal by the Israeli Supreme Court on 27 May of an appeal by Mordechai Vanunu against a prison sentence of 18 years,

B. deeply concerned that Mr Vanunu has already served 3 years and 8 months in solitary confinement at Ashkelon Prison, in a cell measuring only 3 metres by 2 metres,

C. recalling that he was kidnapped in Rome by the Israeli authorities, in order to stand trial,

D. conscious that the offence for which he was sentenced was his decision to reveal, through the Sunday Times newspaper in London, the extent of Israel's stock of atomic weapons,

E. aware that such disclosures might be an offence in other countries but points out that those which have respect for human rights would not have been likely to treat a disclosure in a newspaper for motives of public interest as treason and espionage, the offences for which Mr Vanunu was prosecuted and convicted, and certainly would not have imposed such a long term of imprisonment,

F. noting that the President of Israel has the power of pardon and that he has exercised that power, inter alia, to pardon a number of senior Shin Beth officers who were implicated in the murder of two Palestinians while they were held in custody,

1. Calls upon the President of Israel to exercise his right to pardon or, at the very least, commute the sentence passed on Mordechai Vanunu;

2. Reminds the Government of Israel that the kidnapping of Mordechai Vanunu was a gross violation of the sovereignty of a Member State of the European Community;

3. Declares that, if there is any such violation in the future, there should be a swifter and more effective response from the European Community; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/169

Thursday, 14 June 1990

4. Calls upon the President-in-OfTice of European Political Cooperation, the President of the Commission and the President of the European Parliament to make representations to the President of Israel and to the Government of that country;

5. Decides to review the situation in three months if Mr Vanunu remains in custody, so that consideration can be given to the appropriate action which should be taken;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation, the Commission, the President of Israel and the Prime Minis ter of Israel.

(d) Doc. B3-1264/90

RESOLUTION

on the assassination of Ignacio Ellacurfa and five other Jesuits in El Salvador and the assassina tion of Hector Oqueli and Gilda Flores

The European Parliament,

A. concerned at the obstacles to the inquest into the assassination of Ignacio Ellacurfa, Vice- Chancellor of the University of Central America, and five other Jesuits in El Salvador (documentary evidence burned, disappearance of the record of those entering and leaving the Military Academy, murder of a Supreme Court judge, etc.),

B. recalling its resolution of 23 November 1989 (') calling on the Salvadorean Government to throw light upon these crimes and bring their perpetrators and instigators to justice,

C. profoundly concerned at the consequences of the armed conflicts for the civilian population of El Salvador,

D. having been informed of the negotiation process agreed on in Caracas on 21 May 1990 by the UN Secretariat and the representatives of the Government of El Salvador and the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front,

E. having regard to the resolution adopted on 20 October 1989 by the UN General Assembly in support of the peace process in Central America,

F. having regard to the Tela Agreements of 6 August 1989 on a peace settlement in Central America, G. having regard to its previous resolutions in support of the peace process in Central America and, specifically, El Salvador,

1. Calls on the Government of El Salvador to throw light upon the circumstances surrounding the murder of Ignacio Ellacurfa and five other Jesuits and ensure that the perpetrators and instigators of these crimes are brought to justice thereby removing an obstacle to the negotia tions aimed af bringing peace to El Salvador;

2. Calls also on President Cristiani to make public the report sent by the President of Guatemala, Vinicio Cerezo, on the outcome of the investigation into the assassination of Hector Oqueli, Secretary of the Socialist International for Latin America, and the Guatemalan citizen Gilda Flores, and demands that those responsible, if they are Salvadorean nationals, be brought to justice;

3. Expresses its firm support for the negotiation process and in particular the conclusions of the meeting held on 21 May 1990 in Caracas, under the auspices of the UN Secretariat, between the Government of El Salvador and the FMLN;

(') OJ No C 323, 27.12.1989, p. 100. No C 175/170 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

4. Calls on the Government of El Salvador and the FMLN to make every effort to conclude political agreements, to cease hostilities and to achieve a lasting peace settlement by mid- September 1990;

5. Calls on the governments in the region to facilitate the negotiation process, within the framework of the Tela Agreements;

6. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation to give their express support to the negotiations aimed at bringing peace to El Salvador;

7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC, the UN Secretary-General, the Government of El Salvador and the FMLN.

5. Schengen

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1208, 1209, 1227, 1232 and 1248/90

RESOLUTION

on the Schengen Agreement, the Convention on the right of asylum and the status of refugees as defined by the ad hoc Group on Immigration

The European Parliament,

— having regard to its resolutions of 12 March 1987 (') on the right of asylum and 23 November 1989 (2) and 15 March 1990 (3) on the Schengen Agreement and the supplement ary agreement,

— having regard to Articles 5, 8a, 100 and 235 of the EEC Treaty,

— having regard to the Preamble of the Single European Act in which the Member States express their determination 'to improve the economic and social situation by extending common policies and pursuing new objectives, and to ensure a smoother functioning of the Communities by enabling the institutions to exercise their powers under conditions most in keeping with Community interests',

— having regard to the Commission's White Paper on the completion of the internal market, which states that a proposal for a directive coordinating provisions on the right of asylum and the status of refugees would be drawn up by 1988 and a proposal for a directive coordinating national policies on visas by 1990,

— whereas on 19 June the signatory states to the Schengen Agreement intend to sign the supplementary agreement,

— whereas the twelve Member States also intend to ratify by the end of the Irish Presidency a convention drawn up by the ad hoc Group on Immigration on the right of asylum and the status of refugees, the substance of which has not yet been communicated to Parliament,

— having regard to the aforementioned convention as well as a second draft convention on all aspects of checks on persons at the external frontiers, elaborated by the ad hoc Group on Immigration operating under international law and therefore outside the Community framework, but having, as a 'member', the Commission of the EC,

(•) OJ No C 99, 13.4.1987, p. 167. (J) OJ No C 323, 27.12.1989, p. 98. (3) OJ No C 96, 17.4.1990, p. 274. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/171

Thursday, 14 June 1990

— having regard to the fact that, although this ad hoc Group is not a Community institution, its secretariat is nevertheless assured by the General Secretariat of the Council,

— having regard to the Council's position that expenditure from the Community budget may only be made pursuant to a legal basis created by the Council and that, although the secretariat of the ad hoc Group is not a Community body, its expenses are, however, covered by the Council's budget,

— having regard to the resolutions put forward on 23 November 1989 and 15 March 1990 calling for full transparency in the work of the various intergovernmental bodies composed of some or all the twelve Member States, but operating under international law and not Community law,

— having regard to the resolution of 12 March 1987 on the right of asylum and to the implications of the ruling of the European Court of Justice handed down on 22 May 1990 which extends to the European Parliament the right to address itself to the European Court with a view to annulling a Commission or a Council act,

A. whereas all the negotiations on the supplementary Schengen agreement and those of the ad hoc Group on Immigration have been conducted' without parliamentary scrutiny and without being made public,

B. taking note of the assurances made by the Council on 12 April 1988 and, more recently, on 11 October 1989, that the European Parliament is informed of the activities of the ad hoc Group on Immigration via its Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, but noting that such information is rather superficial and limited to stating the number of meetings held by the ad hoc Group on Immigration,

C. noting that, at the sitting of 14 March, Mr M. Bangemann, speaking on behalf of the Commission, underlined the need to inform national governments and parliaments, as well as the European Parliament, of the negotiations and activities of intergovernmental bodies dealing with the lifting of border controls and free movement, namely the Group of Coordinators which is, after all, a Community structure and is obliged to inform Parliament of its activities,

D. aware that the aforementioned draft directive on the coordination of rules concerning the right of asylum and the status of refugees, considered by many human rights bodies as a positive step in the right direction, has been shelved because of strong opposition on the part of some Member States and apparently has been substituted by a convention among the twelve Member States which is more limited in scope and application and has been elaborated by non-Community fora, thereby avoiding any control by the Community institutions, namely the European Parliament,

E. whereas the Commission has failed to fulfil its duty of safeguarding the interests of the Community and has failed to inform Parliament of its role in the Schengen negotiations,

F. whereas the TREVI working party is also drawing up an agreement on the right of asylum, migration policy, data exchange and drugs policy and whereas an unknown number of bodies have been created in the Council to deal with these issues without Parliament being informed,

G. concerned that this step taken by the twelve Member States to bypass control by the European Parliament in a delicate matter concerning human rights represents a dangerous precedent, and apprehensive that the same procedure will be followed in the process leading up to the signing by the twelve Member States of the second aforementioned convention,

H. whereas the planned Schengen Agreement extends police powers without any provision for legal checks,

I. convinced that a people's Europe can only be brought about if the more than eight million migrant workers who have been legally resident in the Community for generations are also covered by Community policy, NoC 175/172 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

1. Calls on the Council to stop flouting the powers of the European Parliament as recognized in the EC Treaties and the Single European Act and insists that any decision taken on immi gration and internal security regarding free movement of persons in the Community be dealt with in the same manner as any other Community policy;

2. Calls on the Commission to put an end to its status as 'member' on the ad hoc Group on . Immigration and to participate in this Group with its competence as the Community institution with the role as guardian of the EC Treaties as provided for under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty;

3. Calls on the governments and parliaments of the twelve Member States to bring their activities within the Community framework and to keep the European Parliament informed accordingly;

4. Believes that this Convention contains a number of threats to individual freedoms:

— by organizing exchanges of general information and information on individuals between the police forces of the Member States;

— by distributing confidential information on the personal circumstances, in their country of origin or of provenance, of persons seeking asylum;

— through an exchange of information on the reasons given by asylum-seekers and, where applicable, on the decisions taken in respect of their applications;

5. Requests the five Schengen countries not to sign the supplementary Agreement before there are guarantees that Interpol will be completely excluded — now and in the future — from the CSIS (Central Schengen Information System);

6. Calls on the signatory states to the Convention and to the supplementary Agreement to defer signing these two texts, to consult the specialist committees of the national parliaments and the European Parliament forthwith and to seek the opinion of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in respect of the matters falling within his terms of reference;

7. Stresses that the removal of border checks should not be accompanied by the introduction of new administrative checks which might constitute a violation of human rights;

8. Calls on the Commission to frame a common policy on asylum which takes account of the European and international dimensions of the refugee problem and which is based on demo cratic and humane principles;

9. Calls on the future Intergovernmental Conference to bring within the exclusive compe tence of the Community matters of entry, movement and residence of nationals of third countries, as well as of terrorism, crime, the traffic in drugs and illicit trading in works of art and antiques; i 10. Instructs its Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights to examine thoroughly the legal implications of the aforementioned ruling of the Court of Justice in view of the signing of the aforementioned convention by the twelve Member States;

11. Calls on the Commission to promote the establishment of a European legal area, within the framework and limits of which all activities and positive steps in this field would take place;

12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/173

Thursday, 14 June 1990

6. UK beef exports

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1274, 1285, 1287 and 1288/90

RESOLUTION

on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)

The European Parliament,

A. whereas the number of cases of BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) in the United Kingdom, first identified as long ago as 1985, has risen dramatically since the start of this year,

B. having regard to the measures already adopted by the UK Government and the decisions taken by the Council on 7 June 1990 on specific measures relating to BSE,

C. whereas those conclusions can solve only temporarily certain problems relating to Commu nity trade in live animals and meat, leaving unsolved the problem of the disease of BSE,

D. whereas the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee was delivered provisionally on the basis of factors considered to be too general and whereas the Commission will be drafting legal texts in this connection without further consultations,

E. whereas all necessary measures should be adopted by the relevant national authorities and the European Community to reduce the risk of further infection of cattle with BSE,

F. whereas the most stringent measures are needed to prevent any possible risk to public health from this' disease,

G. whereas the Commission, on the basis of the Council's decisions, is to take up with non-Community countries the need to remove immediately any trade restrictions that are still in place;

H. whereas, since the incubation period is presumed to be between two and eight years, it is very difficult to assess the extent of the infection and all that is humanly possible must be done to discover how the disease is transmitted,

1. Notes the specific steps taken by the Council to regulate trade in meat and cattle from the United Kingdom, such as certification;

2. Calls on the Commission to carry out further detailed scientific research in order to clarify the risks of BSE being transmitted to man or other animal species;

3. Stresses the need to carry out an epidemiological survey of the disease in Community countries;

4. Urges that stringent monitoring procedures be adopted, reinforced and implemented by the Commission and the authorities of the Member States in respect of every new case of BSE and the implementation of the measures adopted by the Community and the authorities of the Member States concerned; recalls, in this connection, the recommendations contained in the report of the ad hoc committee oh meat quality, particularly as regards the establishment of a European agency concerned with the quality of food products;

5. Calls for research at European level into the characteristics of this disease and its impli cations for public health to be stepped up as a matter of urgency and requests the Commission to inform the European Parliament of the outcome; NoC 175/174 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

6. Calls on the Commission to offer full compensation at slaughter to producers reporting any suspected cases of BSE;

7. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal to ban the feeding of animal proteins recycled from carcasses to ruminants;

8. Calls on the Commission to consider additional measures to mitigate the adverse impact of BSE on the beef market;

9. Calls on the Commission to forward to Parliament without delay a report on the extent to which feedingstuffs have been produced from animal carcasses, the processing and marketing of meat produced in this way and the measures which the Commission, Council and Member States have taken to date to prevent the spread of the virus and to investigate the means of transmission of the disease between animals and between animals and humans;

10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council.

7. Financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing coun tries *

— Proposal for a decision SEC(89) 1456 final

Proposal for a Council decision setting general guidelines for 1990 for financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing countries

Approved with the following amendment:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Recital la (new)

Whereas the Commission has proposed to the Council and the European Parliament that these guidelines should henceforth be established on a multiannual basis for 1991- 1995 and whereas the Council has already begun work on the communication from the Commission; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/176

Thursday, 14 June 1990

— Doc. A3-151/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision setting general guidelines for 1990 for financial and technical assistance to Latin American and Asian developing countries

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (SEC(89) 1456 final),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 235 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-169/89),

— whereas on 17 May 1990 the Commission informed Parliament that, after repeated insis tence on Parliament's part, it had submitted multiannual guidelines for the period as from 1991 on which Parliament must be consulted,

— whereas the 1990 guidelines are therefore the last to be set annually,

— having regard to the third report of the Committee on Development and Cooperation and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on External Economic Relations (Doc. A3-0151/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal under protest and subject to an amendment;

2. Urges the Council to consult Parliament immediately on the multiannual guidelines proposed by the Commission;

3. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

8. Institutional orientations with a view to the second Dublin Summit

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1271, 1279, 1284 and 1290/90

RESOLUTION

on the institutional guidelines for the second Dublin Summit

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the conclusions of the special European Council in Dublin of 28 April 1990,

B. having regard to the statement by the President-in-Office of the Council on the Irish Presidency and, in particular, on the preparations for the second European Council meeting in Dublin,

C. having regard to its resolutions on European Union, particularly those of 23 November 1989 ('), 14 March 1990 (2) and 17 May 1990 (3),

(') OJ NoC 323, 27.12.1989, p. 111. C) OJ No C 96, 17.4.1990, p. 114. (3) See Minutes of that sitting, Part II, Item 15. NoC 175/176 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

D. whereas, despite favourable reactions on the part of certain governments, the commitments entered into by the latter, the conclusions of the special meeting of the European Council in Dublin and the constructive exchange of views in the course of the preparatory interinstitutional conference, the subsequent meeting of Foreign Ministers in Parknasilla on 18 and 19 May 1990 appears to have resulted only in an inadequate perspective for institutional reform and a number of governments appear to favour institutional solutions which do not meet the need for a real transformation of the Community into a European Union,

E. pointing out that no government has so far been able to put forward a model for European Union and that the only comprehensive and coherent proposal is still that which was adopted by the EP on 14 February 1984('),'

1. Reaffirms that the essential elements of European Union should be:

— economic and monetary Union with a single currency and an autonomous central bank;

— a common foreign policy, including joint consideration of the issues of peace, security and arms control;

— a completed single market with common policies in all the areas in which the economic integration and mutual interdependence of the Member States require common action, notably to ensure economic and social cohesion and a balanced environment;

— elements of common citizenship and a common framework for protecting basic rights;

— an institutional system which is sufficiently efficient to manage these responsibilities effec tively and which is democratically structured, notably by giving the European Parliament the right of initiative, of co-decision with the Council on Community legislation, the right to ratify all constitutional decisions requiring the ratification of the Member States also and the right to elect the President of the Commission;

2. Points out that the guidelines set out by a number of governments — which were drawn up in national foreign ministries without political or parliamentary debate — run counter to the initiatives and proposals put forward by many Heads of State or Government and jeopardize the basic principles and the existing institutional balance;

3. Declares that it will not agree to solutions aimed at strengthening unilaterally the inter governmental institutions of the Community (the Council and the European Council), at withdrawing from Parliament the role which falls to it as the legitimate representative of the citizens of Europe and at confining the Commission to a technical role in areas where, on the contrary, it should be the driving force behind the process of European unification;

4. Recalls that its Committee on Institutional Affairs, pursuant to Parliament's resolution of 14 March 1990, is preparing more detailed proposals for Treaty changes; considers that these proposals should be discussed with the Foreign Ministers in further meetings of the interinstitutional preparatory conference as a basis for the final draft of the Treaty reforms;

5. Recalls that its Committee on Institutional Affairs is also preparing a draft constitution for European Union, updating the draft Treaty of 1984; i

6. Launches a solemn appeal to the Heads of State or Government meeting in the European Council, to the President of the Commission and to the Foreign Ministers, requesting them:

— to give clear expression and backing at the forthcoming Dublin Summit, to the will of the citizens of Europe as expressed through the European Parliament;.

— to agree to convene a second intergovernmental conference on European Union and, for this purpose, to open the consultation procedure under Article 236 of the EEC Treaty;

(') OJ NoC 77, 19.3.1984, p. 33. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/177

Thursday, 14 June 1990

— not to grant their approval to contradictory and ineffective solutions which could jeopardize the basic principles of European unification; — to guarantee the constituent role of the EP in constructing European union; — to reaffirm the urgent need to transform the EC into a real federal European Union so as to contribute to the stability and political cohesion of Europe in view of the developments under way in Eastern and Central Europe and in order to prevent another resurgence of nationalist rivalries, which would have a destructive impact on Europe as a whole;

7. Hopes that an agreement on the requests set out above and on the close involvement of the European Parliament in intergovernmental conferences can be reached between the European Parliament, the Commission and the Member States during the preparatory interinstitutional conference and points out that the opinion which it delivers on the convening of the intergov ernmental conferences will be conditional on the acceptance of these requests;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the govern ments, the national parliaments and the Commission.

9. Cooperation on security

— Doc. B3-1167/90

RESOLUTION

on EPC's role in security policy and on security policy cooperation in Europe

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to its resolutions on the question of European security and security policy cooperation in the context of EPC,

B. having regard to its resolution of 13 December 1989 on security policy and European integration ('),

C. having regard to its resolution of 14 March 1990 on the intergovernmental conference in the context of Parliament's strategy for European Union(2),

D. having regard to the declaration of intent by the Member States, as set out in the preamble to the Single European Act, together to make their own contribution to the preservation of international peace and security,

E. having regard to the provisions of Article 30(6) of the Single European Act on the definition of joint positions on security policy matters by the Member States of the Community,

F. having regard to the outcome of the public hearing held by the Political Affairs Committee on 19 and 20 March 1990 on the significance for Europe of arms control and disarma ment,

G. having regard to the new security situation in Europe resulting from the significant steps taken toward disarmament, the moves toward democracy in Central and Eastern Europe and the imminent reunification of Germany,

(') OJ No C 15, 22.1.1990, p. 49. (2) OJ No C 96, 17.4.1990, p. 114. No C 175/178 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

I. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC to:

1. work toward the full integration of EPC into the Community's activities and to initiate corresponding measures at the forthcoming intergovernmental conference;

2. ensure that consideration is given to all aspects of foreign and security policy when EPC is integrated into the Community's activities;

3. lay the foundations for a common foreign and security policy which takes account of the changed security problems and the new relations between the countries of Europe;

4. ensure that the Community adopts common positions at all levels of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE);

5. draw up proposals to secure lasting peace in Europe and to submit these as a common position at the CSCE summit in autumn 1990;

6. set up, within the context of EPC, a working group commissioned to draw up proposals for the future architecture of European security encompassing the CSCE;

II. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in EPC, the Council and the Commission.

10. Measures to combat racism and xenophobia

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1270, 1273, 1275 and 1291/90

RESOLUTION

on measures to combat racism and xenophobia

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Joint Declaration against Racism and Xenophobia of 11 June 1986 signed by the European Parliament, the Commission, the Council and the representatives of the Member States at the Council meeting, which explicitly refers to third-country workers and their families and contains an undertaking to protect all individuals without discrimi nation on the grounds of nationality, race or religion,

— having regard to Article 5 of the Convention of Lom6 which refers to measures to combat xenophobia and racial discrimination,

— having regard to its resolution of 14 February 1989 on the draft Council resolution on racism and xenophobia ('),

— having regard to the resolution adopted by the Social Affairs Council and the Representa tives of the Member States' Governments in Brussels on 29 May 1990;

— having regard to its resolution of 12 March 1987 on the right of asylum (2),

— having regard to its resolution of 14 October 1987 on discrimination against immigrant women and female migrant workers in legislation and regulations in the Community (3),

(') OJ No C 69, 20.3.1989, p. 43. (2) OJ NoC 99, 13.4.1987, p. 167. (3) OJ NoC 305, 16.11.1987, p. 70. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/179

Thursday, 14 June 1990

A. outraged at the fact that the Council excludes immigrants from third countries from its resolution on combating racism and xenophobia in the Community, thereby discriminating against more than eight million people in the Community,

B. noting that the Commissioner for Social Affairs has distanced herself from the contents of that resolution,

C. convinced that protection from racism and xenophobia must extend to all people in the Community regardless of their nationality, colour, origins, religion or sex,

D. considering that European residents who are not Community nationals often bear the brunt of racist and xenophobic attacks and deserve protection from such acts,

E. having regard to the resurgence of racist and xenophobic activities in all the Member States,

F. considering the ruling of the Court of Justice of 22 May 1990, extending to the European Parliament the power to institute legal proceedings against the Council under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty and Article 146 of the Euratom Treaty,

G. noting that its own Committee of Inquiry into Racism and Xenophobia is due to report to Parliament in September 1990,

1. Condemns all acts of racism, xenophobia and discrimination based on nationality, race or religion;

2. Reiterates its criticism of the resolution on racism and xenophobia adopted by the Council and the Representatives of the Member States' Governments for confining itself to recognizing that certain legal measures both at institutional and administrative level could help to prevent acts inspired by racism or xenophobia;

3. Regrets that the resolution adopted fails to acknowledge the need for Community action to combat racism and xenophobia where the victims are European residents who are not Commu nity nationals;

4. Believes that this failing constitutes a clear breach of the undertaking made in the Joint Declaration against Racism and Xenophobia, which specifically mentions 'workers who have their origins in other Member States or in third countries' and 'the Member State in which they legally reside';

5. Resolves to consult its Committee on Legal Affairs and its Legal Service with a view to examining the possibility of instituting proceedings under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty and Article 146 of the Euratom Treaty against the Council to enforce respect for its prerogatives;

6. Calls on the Commission to use all means of redress to combat this resolution and to lodge an appeal with the European Court of Justice;

7. Calls on the Council to adopt forthwith a declaration extending to immigrants from third countries the same level of protection from racism and xenophobia as is afforded to citizens of Member States;

8. Requests the Commission, the Council and the Member States to introduce immediately the legal instruments needed to follow up the conclusions of the 1986 Joint Declaration against Racism and Xenophobia,

9. Calls, accordingly, on the Member States, in view of the resurgence of racism and xeno phobia, to promulgate stricter legislation condemning all acts of racism and xenophobia and to ensure that it is implemented;

10. Looks forward to the recommendations of its Committee of Inquiry for effective Com munity action to combat racism and xenophobia; No C' 175/180 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

11. Reiterates its belief that an action programme in favour of migrant workers aimed at social, cultural and political integration is long overdue;

12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

11. Immigrant workers from third countries

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1169, 1173, 1174,1180,1181 and 1182/90

RESOLUTION

on migrant workers from third countries

The European Parliament,

— having regard to its resolutions of 9 May 1985 ('), 14 February 1989 (2) and 15 March 1989 (3) and the Joint Declaration of 11 June 1986 on racism and xenophobia,

— having regard to the Commission report on the social integration of third-country migrants of 22 June 1989 (COM(89) 924 final),

A. whereas completion of the single market implies the implementation in parallel and without delay of the social dimension within the Community and whereas it is not possible to exclude from these arrangements a group of 8 million non-Community migrants working and living lawfully within the Community,

B. whereas the phenomenon of immigration by migrant workers from third countries is likely to increase and become a structural problem, in view of recent developments in some countries, especially those in Central and Eastern Europe, and of the worsening situation in the developing countries,

C. whereas a policy for the integration of all migrants, including non-Community migrants, into the host society must be carried out without discrimination and on the basis of the acquisition of fundamental social rights,

D. whereas the Charter of fundamental social rights states 'that workers from non-member countries and members of their families who are legally resident in a Member State of the European Community' should be 'able to enjoy, as regards their living and working condi tions, treatment comparable to that enjoyed by workers who are nationals of the Member State concerned',

E. whereas the absence of a common immigration policy may have adverse consequences and provoke increasingly acute tension on the European labour market, particularly as regards the illegal entry of manpower, clandestine employment, non-contractual working and pay conditions, the absence of social security protection and the development of a precarious economy based on social dumping,

F. whereas the Joint Declaration of 11 June 1986 in which the Community sets itself the objective of combating all forms of racism and segregation requires a coherent Community policy which takes into account and finds a solution to all the problems associated with daily life and work for both Community and non-Community migrants,

(') OJ No C 141, 10.6.1985, p. 462. 0 OJ No C 69, 20.3.1989, p. 32. (3) OJ No C 96, 17.4.1989, p. 106. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/181

Thursday, 14 June 1990

G. deeply concerned at the conclusions adopted by the Social Affairs Council on this subject on 29 May 1990,

1. Considers that there is an urgent need to tackle the problem at Community level so as to establish a definition of Community policy on the subject and examine the possibility of gradually extending the rights devolving on EEC migrant workers, taking particular account of the following aspects: — the entry and residence of workers in Community countries, including the right to reunite families, as laid down in Regulation 1612/68, — the free movement of persons throughout the territory of the Community, — access to employment and living, working and housing conditions, — social rights and social protection, — the right to education, continuing training and vocational skills, — social integration, — the position of female immigrants from third countries, — the right to vote in local elections;

2. Asks the Council to follow Parliament's opinion on the revision of Regulation 1612/68 and of Directive 360/68 and to consider whether and under what conditions it is feasible to extend the scope of the provisions laid down in this legislation to all non-Community second-generation migrants and political refugees;

3. Asks the Council to ensure that all measures concerning non-Community migrants are taken on the basis of the T reaties and not by means of conventions or agreements signed between Member States;

4. Decides to arrange in June 1991 — jointly with the other Community institutions — a European conference on migrant workers from third countries with a view to arriving at the definition of a platform of common problems and to implementing an overall coordinated Community campaign;

5. Instructs its President to determine the organizational arrangements for this conference;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Economic and Social Committee and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. NoC 175/182 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

14 June 1990

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, AINARDI, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALEXANDRE, ALLIOT-MARIE, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDREWS, ANGER, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRFES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEAZLEY CH., BEAZLEY P., BEIROCO, BELO, BERTENS, BETHELL, BETTINI, BETTIZA, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BJ0RNVIG, BLAK, BLANEY, BLOT, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOURLANGES, BOWE, BREYER, BRIANT, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PURON, BUCHAN, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANAVARRO, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHAS, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASSIDY, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CEYRAC, CHABERT, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTENSEN I., CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLAJANNI, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, COT, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DEFRAIGNE, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DENYS, DE PICCOLI, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DE VITTO, DIEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, DI RUPO, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DE DONNEA, DONNELLY, DOUSTE-BLAZY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, ERNST DE LA GRAETE, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FALQUI, FANTUZZI, FAYOT, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRARA, FERRER I CASALS, FINI, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORTE, FRIEDRICH, FUNCK, GALLAND, GALLE, GALLENZI, G ARAIKOETXEA URRIZA, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GASDLIBA I BOHM, GAWRONSKI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GLINNE, GOEDMAKERS, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HANSCH, HAPPART, HARRISON, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERMANS, HERVFI, HERZOG, HINDLEY, HOLZFUSS, HOON, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, HUME, INGLEWOOD, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON C., JANSSEN VAN RAAY, JENSEN, JEPSEN, JOANNY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER H., KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LA MALFA, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LA PERGOLA, LARIVE, LARONI, LEHIDEUX, LEMMER, LENZ, LE PEN, LINKOHR, LIVANOS, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LOMAS, LUCAS PIRES, LUTTGE, LULLING, LUSTER, MCCARTIN, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MALANGRE, MALHURET, MARCK, MARINHO, MARQUES MENDES,' MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MAYER, MAZZONE, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELANDRI, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MONTERO ZABALA, DE MONTESQUIOU-FEZENSAC, MOORHOUSE, MORETTI, MORRIS, MOTTOLA, MULLER, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSCARDINI, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NAPOLITANO, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIANIAS, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN, NORDMANN, ODDY, O'HAGAN, OLIVA GARCIA, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, OREJA AGUIRRE, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PANNELLA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA, PERSCHAU, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIQUET, PIRKL, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLANAS PUCHADES, PLUMB, POETTERING, POLLACK, POMPIDOU, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA GUTIERREZ, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAFFARIN, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, REGGE, REYMANN, RINSCHE, RISKJER PEDERSEN, ROBLES PIQUER, R0NN, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, ROVSING, RUBERT DE VENT6S, RUIZ-GIMFINEZ AGUILAR, SABY, SALZER, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANDBYEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMID, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SCHONHUBER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SEAL, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMMONDS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SMITH L., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAES, STAMOULIS, VON STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENS, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, 1 TARADASH, TAURAN, TAZDAL'T, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TORRES COUTO, TRAUTMANN, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, UKEIWK, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERHAGEN, VERTEMATI, VERWAERDE, VITTINGHOFF, VOHRER, 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/183

Thursday, 14 June 1990

VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAECHTER, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WETTIG, WHITE, WIJSENBEEK, WILSON, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN, ZAWOS, ZELLER. NoC 175/184 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

ANNEX

Result of roll-call votes

(+) = For

(-) = Against

(O) = Abstention

Topical and urgent debate

Joint motion on South Africa

Text as a whole (excludingparagraph 7)

( + )

ADAM, A1NARDI, AMENDOLA, ANDREWS, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BANDRfeS MOLET, BANOTTI, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BINDI, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PUR6N, BUCHAN, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, GECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COT, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EWING, FALCONER, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA ARIAS, GLINNE, GOEDMAKERS, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVfi, HINDLEY, HOON, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., LALOR, LANE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MIHR, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, PAPAYANNAKIS, ' PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PETERS, PIERMONT, PIQUET, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SABY, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, STAES, STEVENS, STEVENSON, TARADASH, TAZDA'fT, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYSSADE, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WELSH, WEST, WILSON, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BOGE, BOURLANGES, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CORNELISSEN, COX, DILLEN, FLORENZ, FERRER I CASALS, GARCIA AMIGO, GASdLIBA I BOHM, GRUND, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HOLZFUSS, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LEHIDEUX, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, MAZZONE, MERZ, MOORHOUSE, MULLER, OOME-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, ORTIZ CLIMENT, PACK, PANNELLA, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PIRKL, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, ROBLES PIQUER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SONNEVELD, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, VERHAGEN, VAN DER WAAL.

(O)

AG LI ETTA, BETHELL, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, NEWTON DUNN, PROUT. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/185

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Paragraph 7

( + )

ADAM, AINARDI, AMENDOLA, ANDREWS, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARTON, BELO, BERTENS, BETTINI, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONDE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, BREYER, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PURON, BUCHAN, BURON, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CECI, CHEYSSON, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COT, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALY, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DENYS, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DURY, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, EWING, FALCONER, FERNEX, FORD, GALLE, GARCIA ARIAS, GLINNE, GOEDMAKERS, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRONER, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HANSCH, HARRISON, HERVE, HINDLEY, HOON, HUGHES, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., LALOR, LANE, LANGER, LANNOYE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MAYER, MCCUBBIN, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MIHR, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONNIER-BESOMBES, MORRIS, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PERY, PETER, PIERMONT, PIQUET, PLANAS PUCHADES, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRICE, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, READ, REGGE, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SABY, SAINJON, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHMID, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPECIALE, STAES, STEVENSON, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYSSADE, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WELSH, WEST, WILSON, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN.

(-)

VON ALEMANN, BEAZLEY C., BEAZLEY P., BETHELL, BOGE, BOURLANGES, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, CORNELISSEN, DILLEN, FLORENZ, FERRER I CASALS, GARCIA AMIGO, GRUND, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HOLZFUSS, JANSSEN VAN RAAY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, LACAZE, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, MAZZONE, MERZ, MOORHOUSE, MULLER, NEWTON DUNN, O'HAGAN, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, PACK, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PIRKL, PRAG, PRONK, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, ROBLES PIQUER, SCOTT-HOPKINS, SELIGMAN, SONNEVELD, VERHAGEN, VAN DER WAAL.

(O)

COX, PANNELLA, TARADASH.

Joint motion on Israel

( + )

ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, AULAS, BEAZLEY C., BERTENS, BONTEMPI, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CHANTERIE, COIMBRA MARTINS, CORNELISSEN, COT, DE GIOVANNI, DESAMA, DESSYLAS, DURY, ELLES J., ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, FALCONER, FALQUI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERRER I CASALS, FITZGERALD, FORD, GLINNE, HOON, IVERSEN, LALOR, LANGER, LUTTGE, MARTIN D., MCGOWAN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MELANDRI, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONNIER-BESOMBES, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, OLIVA GARCIA, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PARTSCH, PEIJS, PETERS, PIERROS, PINXTEN, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, ROBLES PIQUER, SABY, SAKELLARIOU, SCHINZEL, SIERRA BARDAJf, SIMEONI, SMITH L., SONNEVELD, STAES, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, VALENT, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VECCHI, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, WELSH, WURTZ. No C 175/186 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

(-)

BOURLANGES, DILLEN, FONTAINE, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, LEHIDEUX, MENDES BOTA, NORDMANN, PRAG, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, RAWLINGS, ROVSING, SCHODRUCH, SCOTT-HOPKINS, UKEIWfe, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN DER WAAL.

(O)

LENZ, NEWTON DUNN.

Joint motion on Vanunu

( + )

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, ANGER, AULAS, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BEUMER, BLAK, BOFILL ABEILHE, VAN DEN BRINK, CABEZON ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARVALHAS, CASTELLINA, CAUDRON, CHEYSSON, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DE PICCOLI, DESAMA, DI RUPO, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DURY, FALCONER, FERRER I CASALS, FORD, FUNK, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HARRISON, HINDLEY, HUGHES, JENSEN, LAGAKOS, LANGER, LANNOYE, LEMMER, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D„ MCGOWAN, MELANDRI, METTEN, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, OLIVA GARCIA, PACK, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PETER, PETERS, PIQUET, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PRICE, PUERTA, QUISTORP, READ, ROGALLA, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SABY, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SCHINZEL, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPERONI, TARADASH, TAZDAl'T, TELKAMPER, THAREAU, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TORRES COUTO, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN OUTRIVE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, WURTZ, WYNN.

(")

BLOT, BOGE, DE VRIES, DILLEN, FORTE, HABSBURG, KOFOED, LE CHEVALLIER, LE PEN, LEHIDEUX, MAHER, MENRAD, PERSCHAU, PIERROS, PRAG, REY.MANN, RINSCHE, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, THEATO, VERHAGEN, ZAWOS.

(O)

FLORENZ, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, O'HAGAN, POETTERING, VON WOGAU.

Joint motion on Schengen

Paragraph 5

( + )

ADAM, AG LI ETTA, AINARDI, ANGER, AULAS, BARTON, BELO, BETTINI, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PUR6N, BUCHAN, BURON, CASTELLINA, CAUDRON,. COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DURY, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, ERNST DE LA GRAETE, FALCONER, FALQUI, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HINDLEY, HUGHES, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., LALOR, LANGER, LINKOHR, MAGNANI NOYA, MARINHO, MCGOWAN, MELANDRI, MELIS, METTEN, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PETERS, PIQUET, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PUERTA, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTORP, READ, ROSMINI, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/187

Thursday, 14 June 1990

ROSSETTI, ROTH, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHMID, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., SPERONI, STAES, TARADASH, TAZDAIT, TELKAMPER, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VON DER VRING, WURTZ, WYNN.

(-)

ANASTASSOPOULOS, BEAZLEY C., BOCKLET, BOGE, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, DE VRIES, DILLEN, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FLORENZ, FORTE, FUNK, GORLACH, GRUND, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUTTGE, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MARTINEZ, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENRAD, MERZ, MUNCH, NEWTON DUNN, NICHOLSON, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PEIJS, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PIERROS, PIRKL, POETTERING, PRICE, PROUT, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, SARIDAKIS, SIMONS, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, VERHAGEN, VON WOGAU, ZAWOS, ZELLER.

(O)

CABEZ6N ALONSO.

Paragraph 6

( + )

ADAM, AGLIETTA, AINARDI, ANGER,. AULAS, BARTON, BETTINI, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, VAN DEN BRINK, BRU PUR6N, BURON, CASTELLINA, CAUDRON, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAWLEY, DAVID, DI RUPO, DI'EZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DURY, ELLIOTT, ELMALAN, ERNST DE LA GRAETE, EWING, FALCONER, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, GREEN, GRONER, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HINDLEY, HUGHES, JENSEN, JOANNY, KOHLER H., LALOR, LANGER, LINKOHR, MAGNANI NOYA, MARINHO, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MELANDRI, MELIS, METTEN, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NAPOLETANO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PETERS, PIQUET, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PUERTA, VAN PUTTEN, QUISTORP, READ, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SMITH L., STAES, TARADASH, TAZDAlT, TELKAMPER, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TRIVELLI, VALENT, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VAN VELZEN, VON DER VRING, WURTZ, WYNN.

(-)

BEAZLEY C., BOCKLET, BOGE, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CATHERWOOD, CHANTERIE, COONEY, CORNELISSEN, DE VRIES, DILLEN, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FLORENZ, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GORLACH, GRUND, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, LUTTGE, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MARTINEZ, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENRAD, MERZ, MUNCH, NEWTON DUNN, NICHOLSON, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PEIJS,. PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PIERROS, PIRKL, POETTERING, PRICE, PROUT, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, SARIDAKIS, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, THEATO, TINDEMANS, VERHAGEN, VON WOGAU, ZAWOS, ZELLER. NoC 175/188 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

Resolution Doc. B 3-1167/90 — Security policy

Paragraph 1

( + )

ADAM, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBELOA MURU, AVGERINOS, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEIROCO, BELO, BERTENS, BEUMER, BINDI, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOWE, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, COATES, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, COT, COX, CRAVINHO, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DE GIOVANNI, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DfEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP D0HRKOP, ESCUDER CORFT, ESTGEN, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERRER I CASALS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GAWRONSKI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DfAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HARRISON, HERMAN, HERMANS, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HOWELL, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON F., KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOFOED, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LULLING, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MORETTI, MOTTOLA, MUNCH, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, OOSTLANDER, PACK, PAPAYANNAKIS, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PETER, PETERS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIRKL, POETTERING, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROSMINI, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SALZER, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJl, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SISO CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAMOULIS, STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENSON, STEWART-CLARK, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TOMLINSON, TRAUTMANN, TURNER, UKEIWfe, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, VON WOGAU, ZAWOS, ZELLER.

(-)

AMENDOLA, ANGER, BETTINI, BIRD, BLOT, CEYRAC, CHRISTENSEN, CRAMPTON, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, FALCONER, FERNEX, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRUND, HINDLEY, HUGHES, JOANNY, KOHLER K. P., LANGER, LANNOYE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, MARTINEZ, MEGAHY, MELIS, MONNIER-BESOMBES, NEUBAUER, NEWENS, NEWMAN, ODDY, PARTSCH, QUISTORP, ROTH, SANDBvEK, SCHODRUCH, SEAL, SIMENOI, SIMPSON B., TAZDAlfT, TITLEY, TONGUE, VERBEEK, VAN DER WAAL, WYNN.

(O)

ELLIOTT, WHITE.

Text as a whole

( + ) •

ADAM, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBELOA MURU, BARTON, BEIROCO, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, CABEZON ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/189

Thursday, 14 June 1990

PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, GATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, COATES, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, COX, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DE GUCHT, DE PICCOLI, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERRER I CASALS, FITZGERALD, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORD, FORTE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GAWRONSKI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GREEN, GUIDOLIN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HARRISON, HERMAN, HINDLEY, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, HOWELL, HUGHES, JACKSON F., KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOFOED, LACAZE, LAMASSOURE, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LUCAS PIRES, MAGNANI NOYA, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MERZ, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MORETTI, MOTTOLA, MUNCH, NAPOLETANO, NEWTON DUNN, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN T., ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PAPAYANNAKIS, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PINXTEN, PIRKL, POETTERING, POLLACK, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, READ, REDING, ROGALLA, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SALZER, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON A., SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPENCER, SPERONI, STAMOULIS, STAVROU, STEVENSON, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TRAUTMANN, TURNER, UKEIWfc, VALENT, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEIL, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, VON WECHMAR, VON WOGAU, WYNN, ZAWOS, ZELLER.

(")

AMENDOLA, ANGER, BETTINI, BLOT, CHRISTENSEN, CRAMPTON, DESSYLAS, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, FALCONER, FALQUI, FERNEX, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GRUND, JOANNY, KOHLER K P., LANGER, LANNOYE, LEHIDEUX, NEUBAUER, PARTSCH, QUISTORP, ROTH, SANDBtEK, SCHODRUCH, SIMEONI, TAZDAIT, VERBEEK.

(O)

MAHER, SEAL, SMITH A., WHITE.

Resolution on racism and xenophobia

( + )

ADAM, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, AVGERINOS, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEIROCO, BELO, BERTENS, BETTINI, BEUMER, BINDI, BIRD, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOWE, BRIANT, CABEZON ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHEYSSON, CHRISTENSEN, COATES, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FALQUI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRER I CASALS, FITZGERALD, FONTAINE, FORD, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLENZI, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GUIDOLIN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HADJIGEORGIOU, HAPPART, HARRISON, HERMAN, HINDLEY, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HUGHES, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JOANNY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KOFOED, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LENZ, LINKOHR, NoC 175/190 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Thursday, 14 June 1990

LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LUCAS PIRES, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MARTIN D., MCCUBBIN, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MORETTI, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIMENTA, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRONK, PUERTA, QUISTORP, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, READ, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SEAL, SIERRA BARDAJf, SIMEONI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAMOULIS, STAVROU, STEVENSON, TAZDAlfT, TELKAMPER, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TRAUTMANN, VALENT, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYSSADE, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, VOHRER, VON DER VRING, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WHITE, VON WOGAU, WYNN, ZAWOS, ZELLER.

(-)

BLOT, CEYRAC, DILLEN, GRUND, KOHLER K. P., LE CHEVALLIER, LE PEN, LEHIDEUX, MARTINEZ, NEUBAUER, SCHODRUCH.

(O)

DALY, HABSBURG, HOWELL, KELLETT-BOWMAN, MCINTOSH, MERZ, PATTERSON, PIRKL, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RAWLINGS, REDING, SELIGMAN, STAUFFENBERG, TURNER.

Immigrant workers from third countries

Resolution (Doc. B 3-1168/90)

( + )

VON ALEMANN, BERTENS, BRIANT, VAN DIJK, FRIEDRICH I., HABSBURG, KOFOED, LANE, MAHER, MORETTI, NIELSEN' T., SPERONI, VALVERDE LOPEZ.

(-)

ADAM, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, BARTON, BEIROCO, BELO, BETTINI, BINDI, BLOT, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CEYRAC, CHANTERIE, COATES, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, DALSASS, DALY, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DE VITTO, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESSYLAS, DfEZ DE RIVERA, DILLEN, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DOHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FALQUI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FONTAINE, FORD, GALLENZI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUTlfiRREZ DfAZ, tfADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HINDLEY, HOWELL, HUGHES, JOANNY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KOHLER K. P., LAMBRIAS, LE CHEVALLIER, LE PEN, LEHIDEUX, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, MARTIN D., MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENRAD, METTEN, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MUNTINGH, NAPOLETANO, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCfA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PETER, PETERS, PINXTEN, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAMfREZ HEREDIA, READ, REDING, REYMANN, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SARLIS, SCHMIDBAUER, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJf, SIMEONI, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPENCER, STAES, STAMOULIS, STAVROU, TARADASH, TAZDAYT, TELKAMPER, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TURNER, VALENT, VAN 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/191

Thursday, 14 June 1990

HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WHITE, WYNN.

(O)

COX, JACKSON F., LALOR, LANGER, NEUBAUER, SCHODRUCH.

Joint resolution

( + )

ADAM, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, BARTON, BEIROCO, BELO, BERTENS, BETTINI, BINDI, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, CABEZON ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASSANMAGNAGO, CASTELLINA, CATASTA, CAUDRON, CECI, CHANTERIE, COATES, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, COX, CRAMPTON, CRAWLEY, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DE VITTO, DENYS, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, FALCONER, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FITZGERALD, FONTAINE, FORD, FUNK!, GALLENZI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GUIDOLIN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HADJIGEORGIOU, HARRISON, HERMANS, HINDLEY, HOPPENSTEDT, HUGHES, JOANNY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LENZ, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, MAHER, MARTIN D., MCCUBBIN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, METTEN, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MUNTINGH, NEWMAN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PEIJS, PETER, PETERS, PINXTEN, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRONK, PUERTA, QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, QUISTORP, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, READ, REYMANN, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROSSETTI, ROTH, ROTH-BEHRENDT, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHWARTZENBERG, SIERRA BARDAJF, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, STAES, STAMOULIS, STAVROU, TAZDALFT, TELKAMPER, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, VALENT, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WHITE, WYNN.

(-)

BLOT, BRIANT, CEYRAC, DILLEN, FRIEDRICH I., GRUND, KOHLER K. P., LE CHEVALLIER, LE PEN, LEHIDEUX, MORETTI, NEUBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SPERONI.

(O)

VON ALEMANN, DALSASS, DALY, ESTGEN, GARCIA, HERMAN, HOWELL, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KOFOED, MCINTOSH, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., PATTERSON, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, REDING, SELIGMAN, SPENCER, STEWART-CLARK, TURNER, WIJSENBEEK. No C 175/192 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF FRIDAY, 15 JUNE 1990

(90/C 175/05)

PART I

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MRS FONTAINE

Vice-President

(The sitting was opened at 9 a.m.)

1. Approvalof minutes part-session on the UK Government's decision not to build a high-speed rail link between the Channel Tun nel £nd London; The minutes of the previous day's sitting were approved. — Mr Howell, on the admissibility of oral question Doc. B 3-1062/90, which had been entered on the agenda in joint debate with the Miranda da Silva report 2. Agenda (Doc. A 3-132/90) (the President told him that this question had already been examined by the President of Parliament who had decided that it was compatible The President announced that: with Rule 58); (a) the list of speakers for that day's debates would be — Mr Pereira and Mr Escuder Croft, who supported closed at 9.30 a.m. and speaking time for all Members Mr Musso's request. would be limited to two minutes, with the exception of rapporteurs; The President put Mr Musso's request to the House. (b) she had received from the EPP and ED Groups a request under Rule 56 (3) for the Commission state The request was rejected by electronic vote. ment on Romania to be followed by a debate.

The agenda therefore remained unchanged. Parliament approved this request.

The following spoke: Mr von der Vring, on the vote The deadline for tabling motions for resolutions to which had just been taken,, and Mr Amendola, on the wind up the debate was set as 12 noon on 5 July and agenda. the deadline for tabling amendments to them as 7 p.m. on 9 July. 3. Documents received The following spoke:

— Mr Musso, who protested at the fact that the joint The President announced that he had received. debate on the Raffarin, Cushnahan and Welsh reports (Docs A 3-143, 139 and 142/90), which had been inter (a) from the Council requests for opinions on the fol rupted the previous day, appeared on the agenda after lowing proposals from the Commission of the Euro- * the Romera i Alcazar and Wynn reports (Docs A 3-140 pean Communities to the Council: and 149/90) (the President pointed out that these two reports had been entered under urgent procedure); he asked that the continuation of the joint debate be — proposal from the Commission to the Council for placed before the two reports; a regulation laying down additional general rules on the common organization of the market in milk and — Mr von der Vring, on the need to adhere to the milk products as regards cheese (Doc. C 3-146/90 — agenda as established; COM(90) 209 final)

— Mr B. Simpson, who gave notice that he would be referred to: AGRI (responsible) asking for a statement from the Commission at the next BUDG (opinion) 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/193

Friday, 15 June 1990

— proposal from the Commission to the Council for referred to: ENER (responsible) a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation RELA agreement between the European Economic Com BUDG (opinion) munity and the Republic of Austria on a European Sti ECON (opinion) mulation Plan for Economic Science (SPES) (Doc. — proposal from the Commission to the Council for C 3-149/90 — CC)M(90) 25 final — SYN 248) a decision concerning a specific programme of research referred to: ENER (responsible) and technological development in the field of Informa BUDG, ECON, RELA (opinion) tion and Technology (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-156/90 — COM(90) 153 final — SYN 258) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation referred to : ENER (responsible) agreement between the European Economic Com ECON (opinion) munity and the Kingdom of Norway on a European BUDG (opinion) Stimulation Plan for Economic Science (SPES) (Doc. — proposal from the Commission to the Council for C 3-150/90 — COM(90) 23 final — SYN 249) a decision concerning a specific programme of research referred to: ENER (responsible) and technological development in the field of Com BUDG, ECON, RELA (opinion) munication Technologies (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-157/90 — COM(90) 154 final — SYN 259) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation referred to: ENER (responsible) agreement between the European Economic Com ECON (opinion) munity and the Republic of Finland on a research and BUDG (opinion) development programme for the European Economic — proposal from the Commission to the Council for Community in the field of applied metrology and a decision concerning specific programme of research chemical analysis (BCR) (Doc. C 3-151/90 — and technological development in the field of Tele- COM(90) 24 final — SYN 247) matic Systems in areas of General Interest (1990-1994) referred to: ENER (responsible) (Doc. C 3-158/90 — COM(90) 155 final — SYN 260) ECON, RELA, BUDG (opinion) referred to: ENER (responsible) ECON (opinion) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for BUDG (opinion) a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation agreement between the European Economic Com — proposal from the Commission to the Council for munity and the Kingdom of Sweden on a research and a decision adopting a specific research and technologi development programme for the European Economic cal development programme in the field of Industrial Community in the field of applied metrology and and Materials Technologies (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3- chemical analysis (BCR) (Doc.' C 3-152/90 — 159/90 _ COM(90) 156 final — SYN 261) COM(90) 21 final — SYN 244) referred to: ENER (responsible) referred to: ENER (responsible) ECON (opinion) ECON, RELA, BUDG, ENVI (opinion) BUDG (opinion) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation a decision adopting a specific research and technologi agreement between the European Economic Com cal development programme in the field of Measure munity and the Swiss Confederation on a research and ment and Testing (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-160/90 — development programme for the European Economic COM(90) 157 final — SYN 262) Community in the field of applied metrology and referred to: ENER (responsible) chemical analysis (BCR) (Doc. C 3-153/90 — BUDG (opinion) COM(90) 29 final — SYN 250) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for referred to: ENER (responsible) a decision adopting a specific research and technologi ECON, RELA, BUDG, ENVI (opinion) cal development programme in the field of Environ — proposal from the Commission to the Council for ment (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-161/90 — COM(90) 158 a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 final — SYN 263) on the common organization of the market in milk and referred to: ENER (responsible) milk products (Doc. C 3-154/90 — COM(90) 206 final) BUDG (opinion) referred to: AGRI (responsible) ENVI (opinion) BUDG (opinion) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific research and technologi a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation cal development programme in the field of Marine agreement between the European Economic Com Science and Technology (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-162/90 munity and the Kingdom of Sweden on a European — COM(90) 159 final — SYN 264) Stimulation Plan for Economic Science (SPES) (Doc. referred to: ENER (responsible) C 3-155/90 — CQM(90) 20 final — SYN 245) BUDG (opinion) NoC 175/194 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

— proposal from the Commission to the Council for AGRI (opinion) a decision adopting a specific research and technologi BUDG (opinion) cal development programme in the field o,f Biotechnol ECON (opinion) ogy (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-163/90 — COM(90) 160 ENER (opinion) final — SYN 265) TRAN (opinion) referred to: ENER (responsible) ENVI (opinion) BUDG (opinion) CULT (opinion) AGRI (opinion) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for ECON (opinion) a decision concerning the conclusion of a cooperation ENVI (opinion) agreement between the European Economic Com — proposal from the Commission to the Council for munity and the Kingdom of Finland on a European a decision adopting a specific research and technologi Stimulation Plan for Economic Science (SPES) (Doc. cal development programme in the field of Agriculture C 3-170/90 — COM(90) 19 final — SYN 242) and Agro-industry (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-164/90 — referred to: ENER (responsible) CC)M(90) 161 final — SYN 266) ECON (opinion) BUDG (opinion) referred to: ENER (responsible) RELA (opinion) BUDG (opinion) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for AGRI (opinion) a regulation (EEC) on consultation between airports — proposal from the Commission to the Council for and airport users and on airport charging principles a decision adopting a specific research and technologi (Doc. C 3-171/90 — COM(90) 100 final) cal development programme in the field of Biomedi- referred to: TRAN (responsible) cine and Health (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-165/90 — ENVI (opinion) CC)M(90) 162 final — SYN 267) (b) from the Council: referred to: ENER (responsible) BUDG (opinion) — Letter of Amendment No 1 to draft supplementary ENVI (opinion) and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (Doc. C 3-147/90) referred to: BUDG (responsible) — proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision adopting a specific research and technologi — Letter of Amendment No 2 to draft supplementary cal development programme in the field of Life Sci and amending budget No 2 for 1990 (Doc. C 3-148/90) ences and Technologies for Developing Countries referred to: BUDG (responsible) (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-166/90 — COM(90) 163 final — SYN 268) 4. Texts of treaties forwarded by the Council referred to: ENER (responsible) The President announced that she had received from BUDG (opinion) the Council certified true copies of the following docu DEVE (opinion) ments: — proposal from the Commission to the Council for — Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters a decision adopting a specific research and technologi relating to the 1982 agreement between the European cal development programme in the field of Non- Economic Community and the Czechoslovak Socialist nuclear Energies (1990-1994) (Doc. C3-167/90 — Republic on trade in the sheepmeat sector; CC)M(90) 164 final — SYN 269) — Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters referred to: ENER (responsible) relating to the 1981 agreement between the European ECON (opinion) Economic Community and the Socialist Federal BUDG (opinion) Republic of Yugoslavia on trade in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector; — proposal from the Commission to the Council for — Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters a decision adopting a specific research and technologi relating to the 1981 agreement between the European cal development programme in the field of Human Economic Community and the Republic of Poland on Capital and Mobility (1990-1994) (Doc. C 3-168/90 — trade in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector; COM(90) 165 final — SYN 270) — Exchange of letters relating to point 1 of the agree referred to: ENER (responsible) ment in the form of an exchange of letters relating to BUDG (opinion) the 1981 agreement between the European Economic CULT (opinion) Community and the Republic of Poland on trade in the — proposal from the Commission to the Council for sheepmeat and goatmeat sector; a decision on the conclusion by the European Econo — Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters mic Community of an Agreement on trade and com relating to the 1987 agreement between the European mercial and economic cooperation between the Euro Economic Community and the German Democratic pean Economic Community and the German Demo Republic on trade in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sec cratic Republic (Doc. C 3-169/90 — SEC(90) 728 final) tor; referred to: RELA (responsible) — Convention between the European Community POLI (opinion) and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/195

Friday, 15 June 1990

Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) concerning aid to refu tive amending Directive 69/335/EEC concerning indi gees in the countries of the Near East. rect taxes on the raising of capital (COM(90) 94 final — Doc. C 3-116/90) (Doc. A 3-144/90).

5. Procedure without report * — Proposal for a directive COM(90) 94 final — Doc. C 3-116/90:

The next item was the vote on the following proposals Parliament approved the Commission proposal (part under the procedure without report, pursuant to Rule II, item 2). 116:

— Draft legislative resolution: — a directive amending Directive 66/403/EEC on the marketing of seed potatoes (CC)M(90) 134 — Doc. Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, C 3-122/90) item 2). which had been referred to the Committee on Agricul ture 7. EEC-China relations (vote) The proposal was approved (part II, item 1 (a)). (motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1272, 1276 and 1289/90) — a regulation laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1989 harvest (Motion for a resolution Doc. B 3-1286/90 had been (CC>M(90) 140 — Doc. C 3-127/90); withdrawn.) which had been referred to the Committee on Agricul ture — Motions for resolutions Docs B 3-1272, 1276 and 1289/90: The proposal was approved by RCV: Joint motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Sakellariou, Members voting: 158 on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Habsburg, on behalf For: 152 of the EPP Group, Mr de Montesquiou, on behalf of Against: 1 the LDR Group, Mr Rossetti, on behalf of the EUL Abstentions: 5 Group, Mrs Alliot-Marie, on behalf of the EDA Group, seeking to replace these motions for resolutions by a (part II, item I (b)). new text:

— a decision amending Decision 85/360/EEC on the The following spoke: Mr Sakellariou, on the applica restructuring of the system of agricultural surveys in tion of Rule 98 (3), and Mrs Veil, who gave an explana Greece (COM(90) 192 — Doc. C 3-138/90) tion of vote. which had been referred to the Committee on Agricul Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 3). ture

The proposal was approved (part II, item 1 (c)). 8. Competition in the air transport sector * (vote) (Mcintosh report — Doc. A 3-106/90) — a decision amending Decision 89/45/EEC on a Community system for the rapid exchange of informa — Commission proposal (COM(89) 417 final — Doc. tion on dangers arising from the use of consumer prod C 3-149/89: ucts (COM(90) 172 — Doc. C 3-139/90). — Proposal for a regulation I: which had been referred to the Committee on the Envi ronment. Amendments adopted: 1, 8 and 2. The proposal was approved (part II, item I (d)). The rapporteur spoke on amendment 8.

6. Indirect taxes on the raising of capital * (vote) Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 4).

The next item was the report without debate drawn up by Mr Merz, on behalf of the Committee on Economic — Draft legislative resolution: and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on a pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a direc- Mr Kellett-Bowman gave an explanation of vote. NoC 175/196 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, A split vote was held on amendment 32: item 4). First part to 'economically viable'

— Proposal for a regulation II: Second part: remainder.

Amendment adopted: 3. Results of RCVs:

Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amendment 15: amended (part II, item 4). Members voting: 166 For: 77 Against: 88 — Draft legislative resolution: Abstentions: 1

Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, amendment 35: item 4). Members voting: 168 For: 81 Against: 86 — Proposal for a regulation III: Abstentions: 1

Amendments adopted: 4, 5, 6 and 7. Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 5). Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended (part II, item 4). — Draft legislative resolution:

— Draft legislative resolution: Explanations of vote:

The following spoke: the rapporteur, who asked the The following spoke: Mr Verbeek, on behalf of the Commission to state its opinion on the amendments Green Group, Mr Guillaume, on behalFof the EDA adopted by Parliament, and Mr Dondelinger, Member Group, Mrs Fernex and Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf. of the Commission, who said that it could accept amendments 4, 6 and the general thrust of amendment Parliament adopted the legislative resolution by RCV 5. The rapporteur spoke. (EDA).

Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, Members voting: 132 item 4). For: 92 Against: 37 Abstentions: 3

9. Efficiency of agricultural structures * (vote) (part II, item 5). (Kofoed report — Doc. A 3-122/90)

10. Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions (vote) — Proposal for a regulation COM(89) 597 final — Doc. C 3-45/90: (motion for a resolution contained in the Reding report — Doc. A 3-107/90) Amendments adopted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 by electronic vote, 6, 7, 32 by split vote (EPP) (second part by electronic Mr Gutierrez Diaz gave an explanation of vote. vote), 8, 18 by electronic vote, 10, 11, 19, 13, 34, 23, 16/rev. and 17 Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 6).

Amendments rejected: 27, 28 by electronic vote, 29, 24, 11. Maximum levels for pesticide residues * (vote) 30, 9 by electronic vote, 33 by electronic vote, 25, 20 by electronic vote, 26, 31, 21 by electronic vote, 15 by RCV (Imbeni report — Doc. A 3-12/90) (EPP), and 35 by RCV (EPP) Mr Amendola requested that the report should be Amendments fallen: 12, 14 and 22. referred back to committee, pursuant to Rule 103 (1). 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/197

Friday, 15 June 1990

The following spoke on this request: Mr Chanterie, on (second part by split vote), 3, 12 by electronic vote, and behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Ceci, deputizing for the 5; rapporteur, and Mr Valverde Lopez. Amendments rejected: 8, 10 (first part by electronic Parliament approved the request by electronic vote. vote), 6 and 11;

The report was therefore referred back to committee. Amendments fallen: 13, 10 (second part), and 4.

/ IN THE CHAIR: MR PETERS The rapporteur spoke on amendment 15 and the second part of amendment 2 where he pointed out that Vice-President in the second indent 'improvement of alternative infrastructures' should read 'study of alternative infras tructures' (the President said that this correction would 12. Commission statement on the situation in Romania be made). (continuation) A split vote was held on amendment 10: The next item was the debate on the Commission state ment on the situation in Romania. First part to 'Zaragoza-Pau' Second part: remainder. The following spoke: Mr Habsburg, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr McCubbin, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mrs von Alemann, on behalf of the LDR Mr Coimbra Martins spoke on amendment 15. Group, Miss Rawlings, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, on behalf of the EUL Group, Mr Guil- A split vote was held on the second part of amendment laume, on behalf of the EDA Group, Mr Martinez, on 2: behalf of the ER Group, Mr Robles Piquer, Mr Wijsen- beek, Mr Howell and Mr Millan, Member of the Com First part: text without fourth indent mission. Second part: fourth indent.

The President declared the debate closed. Result of RCV: Mrs Roth, Mr Gutierrez Diaz and Mr Anger made per sonal statements. amendment 7: Members voting: 77 13. Integrated transport market * (debate and vote) For: 68 Against: 7 Mr Romera i Alcazar introduced his report, drawn up Abstentions: 2 on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the modified proposal from the Council for a regu Parliament approved the Commission proposal as lation for an action programme in the field of transport amended (part II, item 7). infrastructure with a view to the completion of an inte grated transport market in 1992 (COM(89) 238 final — Doc. C 3-117/90) (Doc. A 3-140/90). — Draft legislative resolution:

The following spoke: Mr Coimbra Martins, on behalf Explanations of vote: of the SOC Group, Mr Wijsenbeek, on behalf of the LDR Group, Mrs Joanny, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Mendes Bota and Mr Millan, Member of The following spoke: Mr B. Simpson, Mrs Trautmann the Commission. and Miss Mcintosh, on behalf of the ED Group.

The President declared the debate closed. Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, item 7).

VOTE 14. Food-aid policy and food-aid management * — Proposal for a regulation COM(89) 238 final — (debate and vote) Doc, C 3-117/90: Mr Wynn introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of Amendments adopted: 1, 9 by electronic vote, 7 by the Committee on Development and Cooperation, on RCV (EPP), 2 (first indent), 15, 14 by electronic vote, 2 the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a NoC 175/198 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

regulation amending Regulation (EEC) Nos 3972/86 The President declared the debate closed. on food-aid policy and food-aid management, No 2507/88 on the implementation of storage programmes and early warning systems, and No 2508/88 on the VOTE implementation of co-financing operations for the pur chase of food products or seeds by international bodies (a) Raffarin report — Doc. A 3-143/90: or non-governmental organizations (COM(90) 193 final — Doc. C 3-134/90) (Doc. A 3-149/90). Amendment withdrawn: 1.

Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 9 (a)).

IN THE CHAIR: MRS FONTAINE (b) Cushnahan report — Doc. A 3-139/90: Vice-President Amendments adopted: 3, 6, and 4 by electronic vote

. The following spoke: Mr Hermans, on behalf of the Amendment rejected: 5. EPP Group, and Mr Dondelinger, Member of the Com mission. Both unamended and amended parts of the text were adopted (paragraph 32 amended by electronic vote).

The President declared the debate closed. A split vote was held on paragraph 9 (&OC): First part to 'operational programmes' Second part: remainder (adopted by electronic vote). VOTE Mr Oliva Garcia spoke on the request by the SOC — Proposal for a regulation C()M(90) 193 final — Group for a split vote on paragraph 32. Doc. C 3-134/90: Parliament adopted the resolution (part II, item 9 (b)).

Parliament approved the Commission proposal (part (c) Welsh report — Doc. A 3-142/90: II, item 8). Amendment adopted: 1 by electronic vote.

— Draft legislative resolution: The EPP, LDR and SOC Groups had requested a split vote on paragraph 12: , First part to 'general Community interest': rejected by Parliament adopted the legislative resolution (part II, RCV (EPP), item 8). Second part: remainder: adopted

The remaining parts of the text were adopted succes 15. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGIS programmes sively. (continuation of debate and vote)

Results of RCVs: The next item was the continuation of the joint debate Members voting: 64 on the reports by Mr Raffarin (Doc. A 3-143/90), Mr Cushnahan (Doc. A 3-139/90) and Mr Welsh (Doc. For: 10 A13-142/90) (for beginning of debate, see part I, item 17 Against: 54 of minutes of 14 June 1990). Abstentions: 0

Explanations of vote The following spoke: Mr Waechter, on behalf of the Green Group, Mr Gutierrez Diaz, on behalf of the EUL The following spoke : Mr David, on behalf of the SOC Group, Mr Fitzgerald, on behalf of the EDA Group, Group, Mr Welsh, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Mr Miranda da Silva, on behalf of the LU Group, Mrs David, on the previous speaker's comments, and Mrs Ewing, on behalf of the RB Group, Mr Montero Ewing. Zabala, Mr David, Mr Mendes Bota, Mrs Onur, Mr Pereira, Mr Oliva Garcia, the latter on a point of proce Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV (EPP): dure, Mr Killilea, Mr Medina Ortega, Mr Nicholson, Mr Carvalho Cardoso and Mr Millan, Member of the Members voting: 60 Commission. For: 56 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/199

Friday, 15 June 1990

Against: 0 and which were rejected (paragraph 3 by electronic Abstentions: 4 vote).

(part II, item 9 (c)). Results of RCVs:

16. Membership of committees Members voting: 58 For: 35 Against: 23 At the fequest of the SOC and EUL Groups, Parlia Abstentions: 0 ment ratified the appointments of:

— Mr Desama as a member of the Committee on Budgets, to replace Mr Luttge, Explanations of vote:

— Mr Imbeni as a member of the Committee on Social Affairs, to replace Mr Bontempi, Mrs Quistorp spoke.

— Mrs Ceci as a member of the Committee on the The rapporteur and Mr Collins spoke. Environment, to replace Mr Imbeni,

— Mr Bontempi as a member of the Committee on Parliament adopted the resolution by RCV (EPP): Legal Affairs, to replace Mrs Ceci, Members voting: 58 — Mr Rossetti as a member of the Committee on For: 36 Development, to replace Mr Trivelli. Against: 5 Abstentions: 17

17. Seat of the European Environment Agency (debate (part II, item 10). and vote)

Mrs Reding introduced her report, drawn up on behalf 18. Fisheries agreement between the EEC, Denmark of the Political Affairs Committee, on the seat of the and Greenland * — Allocation of catch quotas European Environment Agency (Doc. A 3-117/90).

The next item was the joint debate on a report and an The following spoke: Mr Collins, Chairman of the oral question: Committee on the Environment, who also spoke on behalf of the SOC Group, Mrs Jackson, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Muntingh, Mr Millan, Member of — report by Mr Miranda da Silva, drawn up on the Commission, the rapporteur, who proposed that behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and amendment 4 be taken an addition to instead of a Rural Development, on the proposal from the Commis replacement of paragraph 1, and Mr Muntingh, who sion to the Council for a regulation to the conclusion of agreed with this proposal but drew attention to an error the Protocol laying down the conditions relating to in that amendment, indicating that 'and/or' should fishing provided for in the Agreement on fisheries read simply 'and'. between the European Economic Community, on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other The President declared the debate closed. (COM(89) 617 final — Doc. C 3-4/90) (Doc. A 3-132/ 90).

VOTE — oral question with debate to the Commission, by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Amendments adopted: 3, 4 as an addition, 5 by RCV Development, on the European Parliament's participa (EPP); tion in the drafting of fishery agreements and the allo cation of catch quotas; on the granting of structural aid under fishery agreements to regions outside the Com Amendments fallen: 1 and 2. munity; on the exploitation and allocation of catch possibilities under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4054/89 of 19 December 1989 (Doc. B 3-1062/90). Both unamended and amended parts of the text were adopted, with the exception of paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, r on which the SOC Group had requested separate votes, Mr Marinho asked for the sitting to be closed. No C 175/200 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

The following spoke: Mr Lane, who asked for this item 20. Forwarding of resolutions adopted during the sit to be entered on the agenda for the sitting on 9 July, Mr ting Howell, Mr Vazquez Fouz, Mrs Ewing, the latter on the The President informed Parliament, pursuant to Rule application of Rule 58 (4), Mr Marinho, Mr Fitzgerald, 107 (2), that the minutes of that day's sitting would be Mrs Fernex, who seconded Mr Lane's request, Mr Fitz submitted to Parliament for its approval at the begin gerald, Mr Howell and Mr Dondelinger, Member of the ning of its next sitting. Commission. With Parliament's agreement, he stated that he would The President endorsed Mr Marinho's request and put forward the resolution that had just been adopted it to the vote. forthwith to the bodies named therein.

Parliament agreed to the closure of the sitting. 21. Dates for next part-session The President announced that the next part-session 19. Written declarations (Rule 65) would be held from 9 to 13 July 1990.

In accordance with Rule 65 (3), the President informed 22. Adjournment of session Parliament of the number of signatures obtained by The President declared the session of the European these declarations (see Annex II). Parliament adjourned.

(The sitting was closed at 1 p.m.)

ENRICO VINCI Enrique BAR6N CRESPO Secretary-General President 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/201

Friday, 15 June 1990

PART II

Texts adopted by the European Parliament

1. Procedure without report *

(a) proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 134 final — Doc. C3-122/90) for a directive amending Directive 66/403/EEC on the marketing of seed potatoes: approved

(b) proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation (CC)M(90) 140 final — Doc. C3-127/90) laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1989 harvest: approved

(c) proposal from the Commission to the Council (CC)M(90) 192 final — Doc. C3-138/90) for a decision amending Decision 85/360/EEC on the restructuring of the system of agricultural surveys in Greece: approved

(d) proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 172 final — Doc. C3-139/90) for a decision amending Decision 89/45/EEC on a Community system for the rapid exchange of information on dangers arising from the use of consumer products: approved

2. Indirect taxes on the raising of capital *

— Proposal for a directive CC)M(90) 94 final: approved

— Doc. A3-144/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a directive amending Directive 69/335/EEC concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 94 final) ('),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 99 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-116/90),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy (Doc. A3-144/90),

(') OJ No C 111,5.5.1990, p. 12. No C 175/202 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90 l Friday, 15 June 1990

1. Approves the Commission proposal in accordance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal;

4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission and, for information, to the parliaments of the Member States.

3. EEC-China relations

— Joint resolution replacing Docs. B3-1272, 1276 and 1289/90

RESOLUTION

on relations between the EEC and China

The European Parliament,

A. recalling the bloody events of 3 and 4 June 1989 in Tiananmen Square in Beijing which, temporarily at leaist, destroyed hopes of freedom and democracy,

B. having regard to its resolution of 14 September 1989 (') on this subject and the declaration by the European Council of 26 and 27 June 1989,

C. aware of the traditional friendship between the Chinese people and Europe and China's enormous intellectual and cultural achievements which have enriched mankind as a whole,

D. having regard to the 1985 Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and China,

1. Condemns once again the violation of human rights in the People's Republic of China; \ 2. Notes with regret that the current policy of the Chinese Government does not permit the Community to continue the highly promising dialogue and mutual relations of earlier years;

3. Calls on the Commission, the Council and the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation to maintain the guidelines set by the European Council in its Madrid Declaration until such time as there has been a substantial improvement in the respect for human rights in the People's Republic and calls on the Governments of the Member States fully to respect these guidelines in their relations with the People's Republic;

4. Believes that it is necessary for Chinese public opinion to be informed of the concern felt in the European Community about the continuing repression in China;

5. Considers that further cultural exchanges between the Community and China should be encouraged throught cooperation between universities, scientific institutions and economic undertakings and by traineeships and youth exchange schemes;

(') OJ No C 256, 9.10.1989, p. 105. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/203

Friday, 15 June 1990

6. Calls on the Western Economic Summit, at its meeting in Houston, Texas, on 9 and 10 July 1990, to reiterate the appeal which was made at the Paris Summit in July 1989 to the Chinese authorities 'to create conditions which will avoid their isolation and provide for a return to cooperation based uppn the resumption of movement towards political and economic reform and openness'; 7. Calls on the Chinese Government to create as soon as possible the conditions enabling the Community to resume the friendly contacts which have benefited both sides and hopes that the freedom and rights of the Chinese people will also be enhanced in this way; 8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation, and to the Governments of the Member States, the USA, Canada and Japan and also to the President of the People's Republic of China.

4. Competition in the air transport sector *

— Proposal for a regulation I COM(89) 417 final

I. Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 of 14 December 1987 laying down the procedure for the application of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendments Nos 1 and 8) ARTICLE 1(2) Article 18a(3) (Regulation 3975/87) 3. Where agreements with third countries need to be 3. The Commission shall conduct these negotiations in negotiated by the Community, the Council, acting on a consultation with the Advisory Committee and within the proposal by the Commission, shall authorize the Commis framework of such directives as the Council may issue to it sion to open the necessary negotiations. in consultation with the European Parliament. The provi sions of Article 234 of the EEC Treaty shall not be affected by this Regulation for the duration of these negotiations.

(Amendment No 2) ARTICLE 2, FIRST PARAGRAPH This Regulation shall enter into force on the day follow After its publication in the Official Journal of the Euro ing that of its publication in the Official Journal of the pean Communities, this Regulation shall enter into European Communities. force: (a) with respect to air transport between the Community and a third country, upon the entry into force of an agreement concluded at Community level with that country, laying down the conditions for the operation of commercial air services, including conditions con cerning tariffs, capacity and market access;

(•) For full text see OJ No C 248, 29.9.1989, p. 7. No C 175/204 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(b) with respect to air transport within a Member State, upon the entry into force of Community legislation regarding such air transport, including legislation concerning tariffs, capacity and market access.

Doc. A3-106/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 laying down the procedure for the application of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 417 final) ('), — having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 87 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-149/89), — considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy and the Commit tee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A3-106/90), ;

1. Approves the Commission's proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Reserves the right to open the conciliation procedure should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 4. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal; 5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJNoC 248, 29.9.1989, p. 7. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/205

Friday, 15 June 1990

— Proposal for a regulation II COM(89) 417 final

II. Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 3976/87 on the appli cation of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector

Approved with the following amendment:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 3) ARTICLE 2, FIRST PARAGRAPH This Regulation shall enter into force on the day follow- After its publication in the Official Journal of the Euro- ing that of its publication in the Official Journal of the pean Communities, this Regulation shall enter into force European Communities. upon the entry into force of Community legislation regard ing air transport within a Member State, including legis lation concerning tariffs, capacity and market access.

(•) For full text see OJ No C 248, 29.9.1989, p. 9.

— Doc. A3-106/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3976/87 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 417 final) ('),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 87 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C 3-149/89),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy and the Commit tee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A3-106/90),

(') OJ No C 248, 29.9.1989, p. 9. No C 175/206 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

4. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal;

5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

— Proposal for a regulation III COM(89) 417 final

III. Proposal for a Council regulation on the Application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 4)

Article 2(2)

2. The Commission may, in particular, adopt such 2. The Commission may, in particular, adopt such regulations in respect of agreements, decisions or con regulations in respect of agreements, decisions or con certed practices which have as their object any of the certed practices which have as their object any of the following: following: t — joint planning and coordination of the capacity on — joint planning and coordination of the capacity on scheduled air services, scheduled air services where this contributes to a rescheduling of services at less busy times of day, during less busy periods or on less busy routes, with the proviso that each party may, without penalty, withdraw from such agreements, decisions or con certed practices and shall not be required to give more than three months' notice should it decide not to take part in joint planning and coordination of this kind in future seasons, — sharing of revenue from scheduled air services, — sharing of revenue from scheduled air services, — joint preparation of proposals on tariffs, fares, rates — joint preparation of proposals on tariffs, fares, rates and conditions for the carriage of passengers, bag and conditions for the carriage of passengers, bag gage and cargo on scheduled services, gage and cargo on schedules services, with the proviso that the relevant consultations are voluntary, that air lines are not bound by the outcome and that the Com mission and the Member States in which the airlines concerned are based may take part in the consulta tions as observers,

(*) For full text see OJ No C 248, 29.9.1989, p. 10. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/207

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

— slot allocation at airports and airport scheduling. — slot allocation at airports and airport scheduling, on condition that the airlines concerned are entitled to take part in such scheduling, that the national and international procedures for such scheduling are transparent and that, in connection with this schedul ing, due account is taken of all restrictions and alloca tion rules imposed by national or international auth orities and of any historic rights enjoyed by airlines.

(Amendment No 5)

Article 5

Before adopting a regulation, the Commission shall pub Before adopting a regulation, the Commission shall pub lish a draft thereof and invite all persons and organiza lish a draft thereof and in consultation with the European tions concerned to submit their comments within such Parliament invite all persons and organizations con reasonable time limit, being not less than one month, as cerned to submit their comments within such reasonable the Commission shall fix. time limit, being not less than one month, as the Com mission shall fix.

(Amendment No 6) Article 6a (new) Article 6a By 31 December 1992 at the latest, the Council shall revise this Regulation on the basis of a proposal from the Commission to be submitted prior to 1 July 1992.

(Amendment No 7) Article 8, first paragraph ! This Regulation shall enter into force on the day follow- After its publication in the Official Journal of the Euro- ing that of its publication in the Official Journal of the pean Communities, this Regulation shall enter into force, European Communities. with respect to air transport between the Community and a third country, upon the entry into force of an agreement concluded at Community level with that country, laying down the conditions for the operation of commercial air services, including conditions concerning tariffs, capacity and market access. NoC 175/208 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

— Doc. A3-106/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a Council regulation (EEC) on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector

1. Approves the Commission's proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Reserves the right to open the conciliation procedure should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 4. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal; 5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJ No C 248, 29.9.1989, p. 10.

5. Efficiency of agricultural structures *

— Proposal for a regulation COM(89) 597 final

Proposal for a Council regulation (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1) Recital la (new) Whereas, in the present situation of imbalance between supply and demand on the Community cereals market, balance cannot be restored simply by pursuing a policy of

(•) For full text see OJ No C 31, 9.2.1990, p. 7. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/209

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

reducing supply, for which the Community has various methods at its disposal such as prices policy, fixing a maximum guaranteed quantity and setting aside arable land; there is also a need for a policy of stimulating new sources of demand using methods which are entirely inde pendent of those referred to above;

(Amendment No 2)

Recital 2a (new)

Whereas it is therefore essential that, in addition to the present regulation on the promotion of alternative com modities in connection with set-aside, proposals for the promotion of demonstration projects in promising sectors are introduced at the same time;

(Amendment No 3)

Recital 2b (new)

Whereas there must be safeguards to ensure that the use of set-aside land for the production of cereals has positive environmental consequences;

(Amendment No 4)

Recital 2c (new)

Whereas, however, the aim of set-aside is to reduce the production of cereals;

(Amendment No 5)

Third recital

Whereas possibilities for non-food use are sufficiently Whereas possibilities for non-food use are sufficiently advanced, technically and economically, in the case of advanced, technically and economically, in the case of cereals; cereals, provided, however, that the Community and national authorities do not obstruct such use with inappro priate fiscal or industrial policy measures;

(Amendment No 6)

Fourth recital

Whereas the realization of such possibilities enables Whereas the realization of such possibilities enables farmers to turn towards new outlets; whereas, in order to farmers to turn towards new outlets; whereas, in order to encourage them in this direction, cereals must be made encourage them in this direction, cereals and plants for available at attractive prices; energy and industrial use must be made available at attractive prices; No C 175/210 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 7)

Recital 4a (new) Whereas non-food applications for agricultural commodi ties which have proved successful, such as rape-seed oil and the use of cereal starch in packing materials, have a pioneering role to play here;

(Amendment No 32)

Recital 4b (new) Whereas the production of agricultural commodities for non-food uses should take place in such a way that this will be environmentally acceptable, in the long run economical ly viable, and not resulting in any supplementary subsidies for such products; whereas therefore the use of agricultural commodities for the production of bio-ethanol is excluded under this scheme;

(Amendment No 8)

Recital 5a (new)

Whereas, given that the set-aside measures for arable land under Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 have not produced the desired result, solutions of a different nature which com plement the above-mentioned measures should be pro posed to farmers;

(Amendment No 18)

Sixth recital

Whereas the existing aid scheme to encourage the set- Whereas the existing aid scheme to encourage the set aside of arable land should accordingly be adjusted by aside of arable land should be adjusted by providing for providing for specific aid for the use of arable land for specific aid for the use of arable land for non-food ends, non-food ends; with due regard to an environmentally sound production method;

(Amendment No 10)

Recital 6a (new)

Whereas there are severe dangers of fraud where aid is given to the production of cereals for food and non-food use on the same holding;

(Amendment No 11)

Recital 6b (new)

Whereas mechanisms must be introduced to ensure that cereals sold for non-food use are not subsequently submit ted for intervention; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/211

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 19/rev.)

ARTICLE 1(1) Article la(3a), first subparagraph

3a. Member States may provide for a specific aid 3a. The Member States shall, by 31 December 1990, scheme for the use of arable land for non-food purposes, introduce a specific aid scheme for the use of arable land these being the manufacture of products not destined for for non-food purposes, these being the manufacture of human or for animal consumption. products not destined for human or for animal consump tion.

(Amendment No 13)

ARTICLE 1(1) Article la(3a), second subparagraph

The following shall be eligible under the scheme: The arable land of the holding shall be eligible under the scheme, provided that: — it has in fact been used to grow cereals or other surplus crops for a given reference period, or has been with drawn from production under the aid scheme designed to encourage the set-aside of arable land, — recipients under the aid scheme provided for in para — it represents at least 20% of the arable land of the graph 1 on condition that the arable land set aside holding in question, represents at least 30% of the arable land of the holding in question, — arable land on the holding which is the subject of a — it is sown to cereals or other surplus crops, that the set-aside undertaking, extending to at most 50% of whole cereal production of such areas is intended for the area set aside and on condition that it is sown to non-food purposes, that where other areas of the cereals, that the whole cereal production of such holding are sown to cereals, the latter are of a differ areas is intended for non-food purposes and that, ent species from the abovementioned cereals, and where other areas of the holding are sown to cereals, that environmentally sound methods of production are the latter are of a different species from the above- used (restrictions on fertilizers, hormones, etc.). mentioned cereals.

(Amendment No 34)

ARTICLE 1(1) Article la(3a), third, fourth and fifth subparagraphs

To qualify for the specific aid, producers must submit a To qualify for the specific aid, producers must submit a contract concluded with a processing enterprise guaran contract concluded with a processing enterprise guaran teeing the non-food use of the products in question with teeing the commercial non-food use of the products in in the Community. question within the Community. This contract shall be either in respect of the agricultural produce of the holding or products of first-stage processing carried out by the recipient producer or by a group of producers to which the recipient belongs. NoC 175/212 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Applications which have proved successful, such as the use of rape-seed oil to lubricate chain saws and in the hydraul ic systems of construction and agricultural machines, and the use of cereal starch to make biodegradable plastic bags, may play a pioneering role as demonstration projects in the initial phase. Contracts relating to consignments which qualify for the Contracts relating to consignments which qualify for the production refund provided for in Article 1 la of Regula production refund provided for in Article 1 la of Regula tion (EEC) No 2727/75 or the aid provided for in Article tion (EEC) No 2727/75 or the aid provided for in Article 1 lb thereof shall not be eligible for the specific aid. 1 lb thereof shall not be eligible for the specific aid. The specific aid shall be paid for a period of five years The specific aid shall be paid for a period of five years from the first supply of products to the processor in from the first supply of products to the processor in accordance with the delivery contract, with a possibility accordance with the delivery contract, with a possibility of cancellation after three years. of cancellation after three years. This aid scheme shall apply to a maximum of 10% of the arable land of each individual Member State.

(Amendment No 23)

ARTICLE 1(3), SECOND INDENT Article la(7), new indent

— the special detailed rules on the granting of the spe- — the Commission, pursuant to Article 43 of the Treaty, cific aid provided for in paragraph 3a, and in partic- will present to the Council a proposal to implement ular those on the exclusion of certain uses, the deter- the special detailed rules on the granting of the spe- mination of the ceiling and the minimum areas cific aid provided for in paragraph 3a, and in partic- which may qualify for the aid, delivery contracts, ular those on the exclusion of certain uses, the deter- controls including, where appropriate, checks on the mination of the ceiling and the minimum areas processing undertaking, and penalties to be laid which may qualify for the aid, delivery contracts, down where obligations are not complied with. controls including, where appropriate, checks on the processing undertaking, and penalties to be laid down where obligations are not complied with.

(Amendment No 16/rev.)

ARTICLE l(3a) (new)

3a) The following paragraph 7a is added: 7a. The action carried out by Member States refer red to in this Article shall be eligible for refund from the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF.

(Amendment No 17) :

ARTICLE la (new)

ARTICLE la

The Commission shall submit a report to Parliament and the Council on the operation of the aid scheme introduced by this Regulation at the end of each year in order to amend or update it if necessary, and an overview report at 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/213

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

the end of the first three years after its entry into force. This report shall specify, in particular* the varieties which have received aid and the corresponding industrial uses, broken down by region.

Doc. A3-122/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the. Commission to the Council (COM(89) 597 final) ('), — having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 43 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-45/90), — considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Develop ment and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control (Doc. A3-122/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal; 4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.

(') OJ No C 31, 9.2.1990, p. 7. NoC 175/214 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

6. Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions

— Doc. A3-107/90

RESOLUTION

on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the parliamentary year 1989-1990, with indications as regards future procedure for handling petitions

The European Parliament,

— having regard to Rule 129(5) of the Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to its previous resolutions on petitions, in particular the resolution adopted on 26 May 1989 on the basis of the annual report (Doc. A2-79/89) on the activities of the Committee on Petitions during the 1988-1989 parliamentary year('),

— having regard to the interinstitutional declaration signed at the sitting of 12 April 1989 (2) on petitioning the European Parliament,

— having regard to the report of its Committee on Petitions (Doc. A3-107/90),

A. whereas the number of petitions has increased steadily in recent years,

B. whereas in the interinstitutional declaration of 12 April 1989 the Presidents of Parliament, the Council and the Commission were pleased to note that the practice of petitioning was increasing and 'hoped that the European Parliament would be able to obtain as clear and swift replies as possible to those questions which the Commission might decide (...) to forward to the Member States concerned',

1. Affirms that the corollary to the citizen's right to submit petitions in order to request action on his behalf or to ask Parliament to state its position is that Parliament and the other Community institutions have a duty to consider such petitions and to take appropriate action on them;

2. Acknowledges with satisfaction that the Commission, on the basis of a correct perception of interinstitutional relations, is cooperating extremely actively in the handling of the petitions forwarded to it by the Committee on Petitions, and calls for this collaboration to be stepped up, and for tangible measures to be taken, in the interests of petitioners, to achieve a sharp reduction in the time taken to reply;

3. Calls on the Member States, with reference to the interinstitutional declaration mentioned in recital B, to take the measures necessary to reduce the time taken to reply to questions concerning petitions addressed to them by Parliament and the Commission;

4. Expresses its satisfaction with the cooperation initiated between the Committee on Peti tions and the ombudsmen and parliamentary committees in the Member States, which, once it is increased and better organized, will enable the problems raised in petitions to be dealt with by the most appropriate body, at Community or at national level;

5. Calls on the Committee on Petitions to continue its efforts to assist petitioners, within the limits of the Community's powers and responsibilities;

6. Stresses the importance of petitions for Parliament and for the Communities, in that they provide a link with individual citizens, an indicator of a general need or feeling of unease and, in short, a means of contributing to the democratic running of the Community;

(') OJ NoC 158, 26.6.1989, p. 481. (J) OJ No C 120, 16.5.1989, p. 90. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/215

Friday, 15 June 1990

7. Calls, therefore, on all its committees to consider carefully the proposals and ideas con tained in the petitions forwarded to them by the Committee on Petitions and, where necessary, to envisage taking appropriate action;

8. Decides, moreover, that it is vital that the public be informed as fully as possible of the right to petition the European Parliament and of what exactly this right entails and therefore calls on the competent parliamentary services to make basic information on this subject widely available through the appropriate means;

9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of its committee to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the national petitions committees or other committees with competence in this field and the national ombudsmen.

7. Integrated transport market *

— Proposal for a regulation COM(88) 340 final as amended by COM(89) 238 final

Modified proposal for a Council regulation for an action programme in the field of transport infrastructure with a view to the completion of an integrated transport market in 1992

Approved with the following amendments:

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 1)

Article 2

The Community's contribution may, among other The Community's contribution to the implementation of things, take the form ofa declaration of European interest, certain infrastructure projects in the framework of the within the meaning of Article 5 of Council Decision action programme referred to in this Regulation shall be of...on the financing of large-scale infrastructure pro made through the declaration of European interest by the jects of European interest, financial assistance through Commission in respect of certain eligible projects in the appropriations provided for this purpose in the budget of light of the priority areas listed in Article 3 and taking the European Communities and, where applicable, account of national programmes submitted under the con through other financial instruments. sultation procedure provided for in Decision 78/174/EEC. This contribution shall be made through appropriations provided for this purpose in the budget of the European Communities and, where applicable, through other financial instruments.

(Amendments Nos 9, 7, 2, 15, 14)

Article 3

The action of the Community concerns primarily: The action of the Community concerns primarily: — the high-speed railway network. Links: — the high-speed railway network, with due regard to the impact on the environment, the countryside and the interests of the local population. Links: NoC 175/216 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90 '

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

— Paris — London — Brussels — Amsterdam — Paris — London — Brussels — Amsterdam — Koln Koln — Luxembourg — Metz — Strasbourg — Lyon — Turin — Milan — Venice — Lisbon — Seville — Madrid — Barcelona — Oporto — Lisbon ) „ Lyon Seville J Madnd-Barcelona-Lyon (Mediterranean TGV) and Oporto-Valladolid (or preferably Oporto-Vilar Formoso — Medina del Campo — Irun) — Bordeaux — Paris (Atlantic TGV). — Crewe-Holyhead-Ireland the alpine transit axe (Brenner route) — the alpine transit axe the improvement of the European air traffic control — the improvement of the European air traffic control system system — the Valencia-Zaragoza-Pau trans-Pyrenean road axe the road axe toward Ireland (A5/A55 'North Wales — the road axe toward Ireland (A5/A55 'North Wales coast road') coast road') the Scan link — the Scan link the reinforcement of land links in Greece. — the reinforcement of land links in Greece — the study of alternative infrastructures for road links between Greece and the remainder of the Communi ty.

(Amendment No 3)

Article 5(2)

2. The appropriations specifically entered in the bud 2. , The appropriations specifically entered in the bud get of the European Communities to contribute to the get of the European Communities to contribute to the financing of transport infrastructure projects may take financing of transport infrastructure projects may take the form of subsidies or any other form required by the the form of loan guarantees, loans, the reduction of inter financial structure of the project, primarily through the est rates or subsidies and must take account of any addi reduction of interest rates. tional Community financial support received by such pro jects.

(Amendment No 12)

Article 5a (new)

Article Sa

The Commission shall examine:

(a) the consequences of the increase in road traffic result ing from motorway infrastructure projects, (b) the possibilities of reducing road transport by refocus- ing economic structures in the regions and through information on possible intermodal links for the var ious projects submitted in parallel. 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/217

Friday, 15 June 1990

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

(Amendment No 16)

Article 8, second paragraph (new)

The Commission shall include in its decisions to grant financial support a special clause to ensure that Commun ity financial contributions are effectively used to imple ment new infrastructure projects that have not yet been commenced and to speed up their completion.

(Amendment No 5)

Article 9(3a)(new)

3a. Each year Member States shall submit to the Com mission a report on the implementation of projects sup ported by the Community, irrespective of the situation regarding requests for payment of the various instalments of the Community contribution.

— Doc. A3-140/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the modified proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation for an action programme in the field of transport infrastructure with a view to the completion of an integrated transport market in 1992

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 238 final),

— having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 75 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-117/90),

— considering the proposed legal basis to be appropriate,

— having regard to the report of tfre Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A3-140/90),

1. Approves the Commission proposal subject to Parliament's amendments and in accord ance with the vote thereon;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal;

4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission. NoC 175/218 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

8. Food-aid policy and food-aid management *

— Proposal for a regulation CQM(90) 193 final: approved

— Doc. A3-149/90

LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation amending Regulations (EEC) No 3972/86 on food-aid policy and food-aid management, No 2507/88 on the implementation of storage programmes and early warning systems and No 2508/88 on the implementation of co-financing operations for the purchase of food products or seeds by international bodies or non-governmental organizations

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 193 final), — having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 235 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C3-134/90), — having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and Cooperation and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A3-149/90),

1. Approves the Commission's proposal in accordance with the vote thereon; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Reserves the right to open the conciliation procedure should the Council intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 4. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission's proposal; 5. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and the Commission.

9. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGIS programmes

(a) Doc. A3-143/90

RESOLUTION on a Community action programme to aid the location of research and technology in the less developed regions by means of regional development projects, in particular those financed by the ERDF (STRIDE programme)

The European Parliament, — having regard to the reform of the structural funds and, in particular, to the framework regulation, Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the structural funds, Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988 on coordination of the struc tural funds, and Council Regulation (EEC) No 4254/88 of 19 December 1988 on the ERDF, 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/219

Friday, 15 June 1990

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Mr Waechter and others, pursuant to Rule 63 of the Rules of Procedure, on a Community action programme to aid the location of research and technology in the less developed regions by means of regional development projects, in particular those financed by the ERDF (Doc. B3-375/89),

— having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Energy, Research and Techno logy concerning the common position of the Council with a view to the adoption of a decision adopting a specific programme for the dissemination and utilization of results from scientific and technological research (VALUE) (Doc. A2-131/89) ('),

— having regard to the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for a decision concerning the implementation at Community level of the main phase of the strategic programme for innovation and technology transfer (SPRINT) (Doc. A2-366/88) (2),

— having regard to the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, Information and Sport on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council for a decision adopting the second phase of the programme on cooperation between universities and enterprises regarding training in the field of techno logy (COMETT II) (Doc. A2-251/88) (3),

— having regard to the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, Information and Sport on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities for a Council decision adopting an action programme of the Community in education and training for technology (COMETT) (Doc. A2-141/85) (4),

— having regard to the draft opinion drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Budgets on the proposal for a Council decision on the framework programme for Community research and technological development activities (1990-1994),

— having regard to the notice to the Member States laying down guidelines for operational programmes which Member States are invited to establish, in the framework of a Commu nity initiative concerning regional capacities for research technology and innovation (STRIDE) and the explanatory statement thereof (Doc. C3-118/90),

— having regard to the Synthesis Report, Research and Technological Development in the less favoured regions of the Community, (CURDS/NBST, August 19.87),

— having regard to the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy on the economic consequences of the new techno logies (Doc. A2-292/87) and, in particular, to the opinion of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning (5),

— having regard to the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council for a regulation instituting a Community programme for the development of certain less-favoured regions of the Community by improving access to advanced telecom munications services (STAR programme) (Doc. A2-60/86) (6),

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning and the opinions of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology and the Committee on Budgets (Doc. A3-143/90),

A. whereas approximately 15% of ERDF resources are earmarked for programmes undertaken on the Commission's initiative,

(') OJ No C 158, 26.6.1989, pp. 74 and 143. (2) OJ No C 69, 20.3.1989, pp. 119 and 143. (3) OJ No C 326, 19.12.1988, pp. 283 and 302. (*) OJ No C 345, 31.12.1985, pp. 398 and 416. (5) OJ No C 167, 27.6.1988, pp. 253 and 383. (6) OJ No C 176, 14.7.1986, pp. 161 and 189. NoC 175/220 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

B. whereas the disparities among Community regions are greater in terms of access to research and technology than in the social and economic sphere and whereas this poses a severe obstacle to economic and social cohesion,

C. whereas the less developed regions have been unable to become involved in Community research policy measures on account of their inadequate technological infrastructure and the weakness of their economic fabric and their industries,

D. considering that research and technology programmes of the Community have so far primarily favoured other than less favoured regions,

E. considering that the STRIDE initiative strives to integrate research, business and education on a regional basis in a highly flexible way,

F. considering that integrated innovation schemes have proved to be more successful than single plant innovation,

G. whereas the dissemination to industry of the findings of publicly funded research must be taken into account when regional strategies are being drawn up,

H. considering that less-favoured regions are often peripheral with an agricultural and touristic based economy, that need specific basic production improvements and environmentally acceptable innovation,

I. considering that rural and coastal regions are often in need of particular research and development activities, which are not available in the centres of excellence,

J. considering that many less favoured regions are particularly apt for research in new fields of science like bio-technology, marine-technology, aqua-farming, agro-industry, agro-ecology and environmental technology,

K. considering that lack of economic performance shows the surface of which the cause is lack of innovative capacity,

L. considering that economic and scientific competition has increased immensely and that this fact entails the danger of the less-favoured regions further falling behind,

M. considering that the total contribution for STRIDE of the ERDF and ESF will be about ECU 400 million for the years 1990-1993,

/. The Initiative

1. Welcomes the Commission initiative to promote a programme concerning regional capa cities for research, technology and innovation, which is an initial step towards a regional dimension for Community policy in this field; deplores the fact that the Commission is acting on the basis of a communication which has no legal value and does not require an opinion by the European Parliament;

2. Calls on the Commission to adopt a decision on STRIDE as it has for RECHAR and ENVIREG;

II. The Programme

3. Supports the idea to give priority to those fields of research which have been identified as being capable of enhancing the economic potential of the region, by strengthening the indige nous potential and long-term economic growth of the regions; 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/221

Friday, 15 June 1990

4. Agrees that regional research programmes should be directly related to the natural resources' potential and environmental conditions specific to the region or to the regions geographically adjacent and asks the Commission to ensure that the STRIDE proposal takes account of particular regional interests and requirements by giving special support to those projects which are consistent with a strategy for the development of research and technology in the regions;

5. Doubts whether it will be appropriate to have mainly external evaluations of the RTD potentials of research bodies in order to determine technological target areas, rather than including local and regional authorities in such an evaluation;

6. Agrees that measures like the twinning of research institutes and the financing of transfers of RTD activities and research staff from prosperous regions or of nationals from abroad to less favoured regions may also contribute to the strengthening of a research capability in LFRs; hesitates, however, to consider this as a measure to effectively enhance the technological and economic base of a region and to strengthen its indigenous potential in the long term; warns that this could well contribute to community-funded 'science tourism';

7. Supports the STRIDE initiative's approach in category B to support participation in 1 Community and other international research programmes and networks; asks, however, what sort of lasting regional economic impact shall follow from such cooperation;

8. Agrees that 'know-how' of the centres is essential and required and that the dissemination and application of knowledge is a prerequisite for economic growth; is aware of the fact that LFRs are less open to innovation than is the case in the centres; doubts, nevertheless, that this can justify the underlying 'from-top-to-bottom' approach of the STRIDE initiative; is convinced that each region has the people who can evaluate or who can learn to evaluate what should be technological target areas and measures to be taken to increase the capabilities of a particular region;

9. Stresses the need for less-favoured regions to be supported through STRIDE in ways that may be quite different in terms of research fields, organization and communication from those established research centres in the more favoured regions;

10. Supports the initiative in that it offers an expansion of the regional university business training associations set up under the COMETT programme;

11. Supports assistance for the purchase of equipment and know-how for applied research, experimental development, pilot projects and the introduction of innovation into products and processes, and research related to quality control as stated in Article 9b; rejects, however, the restriction to objective 1 regions;

12. Agrees to the encouragement of cooperation between innovation services and facilities and the productive sector especially the regional crofts; proposes, however, that applied science, the implementation of know-how on the practical level of SME-research and development, the development of the research, technology and innovation capacities of these enterprises as well as product testing and improvement should be given more importance;

13. Considers that, in view of the limited nature of the resources available, the STRIDE initiative should focus, as a priority, on development of non-material research and technology measures;

14. Would add to Article 9e, which stresses the importance of supporting different sorts of vocational training, that the bulk of people trained and educated for the productive sector and those to become technology transfer agents should belong to the respective region or at least work there;

15. Asks the Commission to ensure more clearly the aspect of integration of different parti cipants at the regional level; No C 175/222 Official Journal of the European Communities 16.7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

16. Proposes that assistance be provided under STRIDE in order to encourage new industries or the expansion of research and technology-intensive investment;

III. The approach of consortia

17. Congratulates the Commission that in category C the organizational concept of consortia has been introduced to foster cooperative links between firms, among firms and research centres, among education and research bodies and between them and large, small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs);

18. Proposes to elaborate in more detail the concept of consortia to give more weight to both the integrational approach and the regional approach;

19. Favours consortia as organizational and conceptual backbones of research and innova tion activities in LFRs to ensure integrational approaches to research and the participation of the local and regional population; they should also serve as partners to the Commission both in the initial phase as well as later in the phase of evaluation and control;

20. Proposes that the Commission launch a publicity campaign to enhance the reputation of the consortium concept and promote the STRIDE approach through what might be termed 'EUROTEC centres';

IV. The choice of regions

21. Asks the Commission to abandon its plan to exclude objective 5b regions from STRIDE and only support them in the framework of possible future initiatives; considers the separation of objective 1 and objective 5b regions as arbitrary, especially as they tend to be similar in nature as regards the requirements for research and innovation,

22. Reminds the Commission that there are many objective 5b regions just on the verge of falling behind economically or getting the right kick of support to be able to catch up with the better off regions;

23. Asks the Commission to stress — apart from the dedication to objective 1 and objective 2 regions more clearly the regional character of STRIDE;

24. Supports the criterion of excellence as measure of any research activity supported by the Community; asks, however, to apply a definition of excellence which is closer to the needs and the potential of LFRs and of which the measure should be the standard of the regions concerned rather than 'silicon valley';

25. Refers to the MAHER report on an integrated rural development programme for the less-favoured areas in Northern Ireland (Doc. A2-105/86), which called for an integrated devel opment programme to be drawn up, centring primarily on the following: — a programme to encourage diversification of agricultural production, in particular through pilot funding schemes, — measures to take full account of social, cultural and ecological factors, — the development of training services geared to the needs of the local communities;

V. Management of the operational programmes

26. Calls on the Member States to submit every three years a report on the progress of the projects to the Commission and the European Parliament which must deliver opinions on the matter;

27. Calls on the Commission, at the end of the third year, to prepare an evaluation for the European Parliament assessing the real and quantifiable cohesion effects of the STRIDE, actions; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/223

Friday, 15 June 1990

28. Calls on the Commission to take adequate consideration of the regional dimension of Community RTD in the preparation of the specific programmes of the Community Framework Programme for research and technological development.

* • •

29. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

(b) Doc. A3-139/90

RESOLUTION

on a Community initiative in favour of border areas (INTERREG programme)

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Mr Garaikoetxea Urriza on border towns and areas affected by the disappearance of intra-Community borders (Doc. B3-230/90),

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Mr Maher, Mr Vandemeulebroucke and Mr Waechter on a regional action programme concerning measures to encourage closer cooper ation between cross-border regions (Doc. B3-467/90),

— having regard to its resolutions of 18 November 1976 on the Community's regional policy as regards the regions at the Community's internal frontiers ('), 13 April 1984 on the streng thening of transfrontier cooperation (2), 13 June 1986 on the region of Sarreland-Lorraine- Luxembourg (3), 12 March 1987 on transfrontier cooperation at the internal borders of the European Community (4), 13 September 1988 on a development programme for the frontier regions between Spain and Portugal (5), and 26 June 1989 on the drawing up of a develop ment programme for the disadvantaged regions and the stepping up of cooperation at the Community's external frontiers (6),

— having regard to the opinion in the form of a letter of 24 April 1989 from the Chairman of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning to the President of the Council, the President of the Commission and the French and Spanish Governments on the drawing up of a development programme for the border regions between France and Spain,

— having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Member States laying down guidelines for operational programmes, which Member States are invited to establish in the framework of a Community initiative concerning border areas (INTERREG pro gramme) (Doc. C3-118/90),

— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 9 October 1981 on transfrontier coordination for regional development (7),

(') OJ No C 293, 13.12.1976. (J) OJ No C 127, 14.5.1984. (3) OJ NoC 176, 14.7.1986. (4) OJ NoC 99, 13.4.1987. (5) OJ No C 262, 10.10.1988. (6) OJ No C 158, 26.6.1989. (7) OJ No L 321, 10.11.1981. NoC 175/224 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

— having regard to the work of the Council of Europe in this field and in particular the European Outline Convention No 106 of 1980 on Transfrontier Cooperation between Territorial Communities or Authorities and the European Regional/Spatial Planning Chart er of 1983,

— having regard to the work of the Association of European Border. Regions, and in particular its European Charter of Border Regions of 21 January 1977,

— having regard to the study financed by the Commission on cooperation between border regions for local and regional development ('),

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning (Doc. A3-139/90),

— having regard to the report of the Consultative Council of Regional and Local Authorities meeting on 24-25 October 1989 on a support framework for Community border areas,

A. whereas, historically, border regions have suffered the adverse effects of the inward-looking attitudes adopted by certain European countries,

B. whereas the socio-economic situation of these areas is frequently worse than that of other regions in the same country and whereas they have poor infrastructures, fewer services and difficulty in exploiting natural resources, given that they are frequently located in areas where there are natural geographical barriers,

C. whereas the European Community expected thait the common market would automatically resolve the problems of frontier regions and has left this policy in the hands of individual states and other international bodies concerned with cooperation,

D. whereas the disappearance of borders following the completion of the internal market may deprive certain border areas of a major source of revenue,

E. having regard to the importance of the subsidiarity principle which makes for greater efficiency and control in relation to public administration,

F. having regard to the scant results achieved by the Commission's recommendation of 9 October 1981 on transfrontier coordination for regional development, designed to promote transfrontier programmes common to various states which in most cases did not progress beyond the study stage,

G. whereas sectoral transfrontier cooperation which is currently predominant must give way to a wider framework of integral and generalized cooperation,

H. whereas it is also necessary to assist the regions at the Community's external frontiers, particularly those which have frontiers with underdeveloped regions and with the countries of Eastern Europe,

I. whereas in most cases the least developed border areas coincide with the regions included under Objective 1, but whereas some of the border areas covered by Objectives 2 and 5b also suffer from underdevelopment and serious shortcomings as regards infrastructure and services,

J. whereas most of the Member States have signed and ratified the European Outline Con vention on Transfrontier Cooperation drawn up by the Council of Europe,

K. whereas transfrontier cooperation can make a valuable contribution to the achievement in practice of a 'People's Europe' and to forging closer links between peoples on either side of national borders within a European framework,

L. having regard to the particular situation of transfrontier areas in respect of the major environment hazards arising from large industrial plant,

(') Innovation Development Planning Group, London 1990. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/225

Friday, 15 June 1990

M. whereas transfrontier cooperation should not be regarded as the exclusive responsibility of the Member States,

N. having regard to the traditional tourist structures, which are divided by the Community's internal and external borders,

1. Supports the drawing up of a transfrontier cooperation programme in the form of a Commission initiative financed from the structural funds:

Background to the Community initiatives

2. Notes that the Commission has changed the legal procedure used to approve the first two Community initiatives, RECHAR and ENVIREG, and instead of Commission 'decisions' is simply addressing 'communications' to the Member States laying down guiding principles for. the operational programmes (for each individual programme); the result is a lack of both clarity and legal security which the Commission should be required to justify;

3. Considers that, of the Community initiatives so far proposed by the Commission, the present programme is the most consistent with the objectives for this type of programme laid down under the rules in force;

4. Reiterates its rejection of the Commission's practice of submitting each of the Community initiatives separately, thereby avoiding a joint discussion; if the Commission continues to interpret the powers in respect of these programmes assigned to it under the structural fund reform as a blank cheque, the European Parliament will be compelled to use its budgetary powers to make its views felt;

Previous measures in the field of transfrontier cooperation

5. Considers that the INTERREG programme should be supplemented by an assessment of the results achieved by the previous measures taken in this field (studies, non-quota measures, programmes, etc.);

6. Considers that the Community's efforts to date in the field of transfrontier cooperation have not been consistent with the expectations raised by the statements which have been made and by the legislation in force; the Member States have failed to show any genuine willingness to act and have hardly voiced the demands put forward by the regional bodies concerned and the Community has failed to give them sufficient encouragement;

Transfrontier cooperation following the reform of the structural funds

7. Hopes that this programme will serve to awaken the interest of the Member States and offset the almost total lack of provision for transfrontier cooperation in the Community support frameworks and programmes;

8. Considers that, in order to coordinate the contents of the operational programmes to be carried out under INTERREG, the Commission should require the Member States to comply with the joint plan for transfrontier programmes proposed in 1986 by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy;

9. Takes the view that the INTERREG project should require the participation of regional bodies in Community border areas in the drafting of the operational programmes and that the Commission should withhold finance when a Member State fails to comply with this objec tive; J

Definition of eligible regions

10. Endorses the Commission's proposal that the INTERREG programme shall comply with the structural fund regulations and apply to the regions at the internal and external frontiers included under Objectives 1,2 and 5b, at the level of NUTS III, supplementing this in adjoining areas with studies and pilot projects which may be of benefit to the Community as a whole; No C 175/226 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

11. Requests the Commission to enable operations affecting NUTS III areas included in INTERREG to be considered as eligible in cases where the work is commissioned from outside the area;

12. Considers that, since the question of border areas as such is not directly linked to the level of development, Community resources should not be primarily concentrated in areas covered by Objective 1 but should be allocated to the areas under Objectives 1, 2 and 5b in accordance with the problems arising and the possibilities of transfrontier cooperation;

Criteria for the distribution of aid and the implementation of programmes

13. Considers that the programme should focus as a priority on the regions covered by Objective 1 and those regions covered by the remaining objectives which have seriously defi cient infrastructure and services, as advocated in the recent external study funded by the Commission in this field, and in those fields which are particularly affected by the removal of borders as a result of the completion of the internal market; the quality criteria for the programmes will be considered only as a complementary factor and will cover all the aspects proposed by the Commission (impact, additionality, monitoring, global strategy, combination of loans and subsidies);

14. Considers that special attention should be paid to creating alternative employment opportunities in border areas and municipalities affected by significant job losses in the customs sector and elsewhere, as a consequence of the completion of the internal market;

15. Requests the Commission to consider the geographic nature of the area in question in addition to the other criteria for allocating funds to the various programmes;

16. Considers that the impact of each operation on the environment must be one of the basic criteria in assessing programme quality;

17. Calls for a policy of preventing the construction of new industrial plant which is harmful to the environment, organizing the conversion of existing industrial plant in transfrontier areas and providing for alternative economic structures;

18. Urges that, in assessing programme quality, the Commission take into account those programmes which help to develop cooperation between border communities with a common historical, cultural and linguistic background;

Cooperation with the countries of Eastern Europe and with regions at the external frontiers

19. Considers that the six-month deadline set by the Commission for the submission of programmes is acceptable for programmes to be drawn up by a single Member State (regions at 1 external frontiers), but feels that it may be too short for programmes for regions at the internal frontiers, which have to be submitted by two or more Member States, and for programmes concerning frontiers with the countries of Eastern Europe;

20. Requests the Commission, finally, to take all measures to protect consumers against the effects of the abolition of borders;

21. Fully supports the extension of the INTERREG programme to cover transfrontier cooperation with the countries of Eastern Europe by means of measures in the Community regions bordering on these countries and calls on the Commission to set aside for this purpose part of the aid and funds earmarked for the countries of Eastern Europe, under such projects as Operation PHARE, the initiatives of the Group of 24 or future aid to the GDR;

22. Takes the view, nevertheless, that the transfrontier cooperation with the Eastern Euro pean countries provided for in the INTERREG initiative is insufficient, since the legal frame work of the structural fund does not authorize assistance to third countries; calls on the Commission, therefore, to launch a separate transfrontier programme outside the structural fund in order to meet the fresh European challenges, given the importance of opening up the borders with Eastern Europe; 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/227

Friday, 15 June 1990

23. Calls on the Commission to promote basic research and the establishment of institutional frameworks as the basis for future programmes for underdeveloped regions at the Community's external frontiers, particularly those regions which have frontiers with the countries of Eastern Europe;

24. Proposes that, after the creation of German economic and monetary union at the latest, the Commission create the necessary legal framework for extending INTERREG assistance to border areas in the GDR;

Nature of measures

25. Warmly welcomes the broad range of possible measures provided for by the Commission and considers that in their operational programmes the Member States should place the emphasis on filling gaps in infrastructure ('missing links'), mainly in the field of transport and communication, as well as on encouraging private initiatives, through the use of global loans and regional incentives; it should also provide support or subsidies for appropriate technical assist ance; the Commission should also provide specified funding to encourage contact and cooper ative ventures between voluntary and commercial organizations; in creating infrastructures priority must be given to public transport, especially at regional level, paying particular attention to ecological factors; it is essential for the Commission to carry out preliminary statistical studies on traffic flows between transfrontier areas (which are unavailable for ambitious transfrontier cooperation projects involving several different regions);

26. Considers that the criteria applied to INTERREG projects should fully respect the intention of Article 11 of Regulation 4253/88 so that the programme is additional to the normal operations of the Structural Funds and focuses on the particular needs of frontier regions;

27. Takes the view that the Commission must not restrict the assistance provided under paragraph 13(b), in particular investment aid, to small and medium-sized undertakings;

Budgetary measures

28. Stresses that the Commission should specify, as it has done for the other Community initiatives, what contribution is to be made from each of the structural funds and the amounts to be allocated to the programme for research and pilot projects under Article 10 of the ERDF, Article 1 of the ESF and Article 8 of the EAGGF Guidance Section; this deliberate lack of precision is further proof of the need to break down the budget lines for the structural funds to enable the budgetary authority to exert proper control;

29. Considers that the adjustment of the financial perspective carried out on 12 March 1900 will enable an increase of ECU 150 million to be made to the budget proposed by the Commis sion for this programme (ECU 700 million);

Institutional organization

30. Considers it essential that the programmes for regions at the internal borders should be drawn up jointly by two or more Member States in accordance with the priorities defined by the regional governments affected; considers that firm encouragement should also be given to the institutionalization of this type of cooperation by creating and/or supporting organizations and/or agencies which would bring together all the authorities concerned and, where appro priate, the private sector; more effort should also be made to exploit the opportunities offered by the European Economic Interest Group (EEIG) as regards joint participation by the public and private sectors;

31. Calls again on the Commission and those Member States which have not yet done so to ratify and make full use of the Council of Europe's Outline Convention on Transfrontier Cooperation between Territorial Communities or authorities so as to place cooperation between such bodies on a proper legal footing; considers that the Benelux Convention offers an example which should be followed by other countries in this field; NoC 175/228 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

32. Requests the Commission to take account of the time needed to draw up programmes involving partners on either side of a border and therefore not to exclude any such programmes established jointly which are presented after the six-month deadline following the publication of INTERREG;

A Community policy on transfrontier cooperation

33. Proposes that the Commission use all the possibilities available to it under current Community law to make progress towards a Community policy on transfrontier cooperation by: (a) requiring the Member States, in agreement with the local and/or regional authorities, to include transfrontier cooperation measures in the future regional programmes and plans in connection with the different objectives of the structural funds and under the Community support frameworks and corresponding operational programmes; the current Community support frameworks should be revised to take account of this need; (b) setting up a Community centre for information and technical assistance with regard to transfrontier cooperation; (c) drawing up a proposal for a directive to promote exchange of information, consultation and coordination of national measures in frontier regions or measures whose effects extend beyond national frontiers, and establishing a common system for transfrontier programmes; transparency and the exchange of information on transfrontier pollution are essential; (d) ensuring that the new regional planning policy currently being drawn up by the Commission and for which the legal and financial basis will be Article 10 of the ERDF regulation, takes particular account of the problems of frontier regions; (e) ensuring greater sharing of experiences and pooling of knowledge by establishing a pro gramme for interregional cooperation on a wide basis;

* * *

34. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Member States and the regional authorities of the Community border areas.

RESOLUTION

on a Community initiative to assist the most remote regions of the Community (REGIS pro gramme)

The European Parliament,

— having regard to Articles 8c, 130a — 130e, 131 ;— 136a, 227 and 43 of the EEC Treaty,

— having regard to the motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Waechter and others on an ERDF-financed Community aid programme for the ultra-peripheral regions (Doc. B3- 466/90),

— having regard to the draft communication to Member States laying down guidelines for operational programmes in the framework of a Community initiative on the most outlying regions, which Member States are invited to establish (Doc. C3-118/90), 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/229

Friday, 15 June 1990

— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and other existing financial instruments ('),

— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 (2), in particular Article 11,

— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4254/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the European Region al Development Fund (3), in particular Article 3(2),

— having regard to Council Decision (89/687/EEC) establishing a programme of options specific to the remote and insular nature of the French overseas departments (Posei- dom) (4),

— having regard to Parliament's resolutions of 20 May 1983 (5) and 15 September 1987 (6) on the peripheral maritime regions and islands of the European Community, of 11 May 1987 (7) on the regional problems of the French overseas departments (FOD), of 22 January 1988 (8) on an integrated development programme for the Canary Islands, of 14 April 1989 (9) on the problems associated with Portuguese autonomous island regions and of 14 December 1989 (10) on the Poseidom programme and excise duties,

— having regard to the fourth ACP-EEC Convention ("),

— having regard to the report financed by the Commission on 'the socio-economic conse quences of the Single Market for island regions of the European Community' (1989),

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning (Doc. A3-142/90),

A. having regard to the handicaps faced by the most outlying regions of the Community away from'its economic centre, such as excessive transport costs, the absence of economies of scale, the high cost of administration and public utilities, the deficiencies and cost of telecommunications and the postal service, the cost and multiplicity of infrastructure and the cost of its maintenance and operation,

B. whereas the completion of the internal market may have some negative effects on these regions,

C. whereas, in particular, the completion of the internal market requires that a large number of special derogations from Community law and other protective measures from which these regions presently benefit will have to be removed,

D. whereas the REGIS programme should be seen primarily as a means to assist the eligible regions in adapting, within the context of their particular characteristics, to: — the require ments of the completion of the internal market; — the ever-increasing competition from ACP countries which have easier access to the internal market under the fourth Lom6 Convention,

E. whereas all the regions covered by the REGIS programme are included in the list of objective I areas of the Structural Funds and thus benefit from Community Support Frameworks for the period 1989-1993,

F. whereas it is necessary to take account of the inhabitants and to bring their standard of living and living conditions rapidly into line with those of the inhabitants of central areas of the European Community,

(') OJ No C 185, 15.7.1988. (2) OJ NoC 374, 31.12.1988. (3) OJ NoC 374, 31.12.1988. (<) OJ NoC 399, 30.12.1989. (5) OJ NoC 161, 20.6.1983. (6) OJ NoC 281, 19.10.1987. (7) OJ NoC 156, 1 1.5.1987. (8) OJ NoC 49, 22.2.1988. («) OJ No C 120, 16.5.1988. (,0) OJ NoC 15, 22.1.1990. (") Signed on 15 December 1989 (ACP-EEC 2107-90). NoC 175/230 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

G. whereas it is essential that specific Community programmes be set up and approved for the island regions of Madeira, the Azores and the Canaries, taking their cue from the POSEI- DOM programme for the French overseas departments,

1. Welcomes the Commission's decision to consult it on the REGIS programme, as on other own initiative proposals, as a clear demonstration of the good will and smooth functioning of the relations between the institutions, and trusts that the Commission will take due account of its opinion so that this good will and smooth functioning will be continued;

2. Deplores the fact that the Commission has acted through a communication which has no legal value;

3. Asks the Commission, however, to bring forward for Parliamentary opinion proposals setting out exactly how the budgetary allocations devoted to Article II Community Initiatives are to be disbursed, listing those, by fund, which have yet to be allocated;

4. Regrets that the Commission has not yet informed it of the breakdown of expenditure of budgetary allocations of all three Funds by objective and by type of operation; this failure by the Commission to respect the wishes of one arm of the budgetary authority could needlessly lead to difficulties of budgetary control;

5. Considers that the REGIS programme is in line with the objectives of Article II of Regulation 4253/88/EEC as well as Article 227 of the Treaty;

6. Proposes a budget allocation of ECU 300 million for this programme subject to the following stipulations: (a) appropriations under REGIS must be additional to those currently provided for under the Community Support Frameworks. They are intended to finance operations which are not provided for under the Community Support Frameworks, or which are provided for but must be allocated more funds so as to ensure the success of the policy advocated through the REGIS initiative; (b) the establishment of a monitoring system comparable to that established for the IMP's so that the source of funds and the contribution of each Fund is clearly set out in every case; (c) the need to promote cooperation with neighbouring signatory countries of the fourth Lom6 Convention; such cooperation should include all operations provided for under the 'regional cooperation' chapter of the Convention and encourage the setting up of joint regional economic programmes; (d) the provision of the necessary appropriations to extend the programme's duration from three to five years;

7. Considers that all REGIS projects should pay due respect to the protection of the local environment and impact statements should be prepared particularly where tourist develop ments are concerned;

8. Considers that the REGIS programme should contribute to the development of a form of tourism better integrated into the local context, as is the case not only with tourism linked to family hotels, but also with certain types of association tourism; green or integrated tourism is acceptable provided it does not endanger biologically sensitive areas;

9. Considers that a policy for the protection of the local environment in these islands must be backed up by an extensive reafforestation campaign;

10. Considers that the creation, development and conservation of nature parks in these islands, as a complement to the policy of protecting the local environment, must be included among the measures adopted to diversify the development of the tourist sector;

11. Believes that one of the objectives of this programme must be the protection and devel opment of existing natural areas;

12. Considers that, to preserve their tourist potential, the peripheral regions should draw up regional transport plans based on public transport (restoration of small-scale services or ferry links) and regional plans for waste management;

i 16.7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/231

Friday, 15 June 1990

13. Considers that in certain cases the emphasis should be placed on restoring coastal ecosystems with the aim of redeveloping fishing where it is in decline (40 years ago, the tropical islands met 40% of their fish requirements);

14. Calls on the Commission to apply new rules of origin to the industrial production of the regions, so as to make possible a wide-ranging use of raw materials from neighbouring Countries which are signatories to the Lome Convention;

15. Takes the view that the fitting out of ports with modern equipment should be considered to be of Community interest;

16. Considers that this programme must include investment in projects for the treatment of solid waste and the processing of sewage, to protect the environment;

17. Considers that priority should be given to training schemes, particularly in information technology, and to language teaching so as to stimulate employment in advanced service industries, as well as in innovatory fields such as cleaning up pollution, water treatment, managing the architectural and natural heritage and integrated tourism;

18. Believes that universities in these regions should be enabled to offer courses to young people from neighbouring countries through the awarding of Community grants;

19. Considers that, because of their sensitivity, the peripheral regions will need to be allocated specific programmes; the projects for Guadeloupe and Reunion should focus on training with a view to rebuilding an ecological economy, taking account of physical and climatic conditions; for French Guyana, the emphasis should be placed on local development projects compatible with preserving the forest in its present state; heritage training programmes for the local population should permit the potential of this European section of the Amazonian forest to be kept intact;

20. Calls on the Commission to draw up an aid programme for other islands in areas covered by objectives 1, 2 and 5b which are encountering difficulties in their economic development;

21. Believes that the REGIS programme budget should be allocated to the regions of the states concerned on the basis of the following criteria: level of unemployment, per capita income, extent of remoteness, scarcity of infrastructure, quality of programmes and specific natural handicaps;

22. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Member States.

10. Seat of the European Environment Agency

— Doc. A3-117/90

RESOLUTION

on the seat of the European Environment Agency

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Mr CARVALHAS and others on the location of the European Environment Agency (Doc. B3-378/89),

— having regard to the motion for a resolution by Ms JENSEN and others on siting the Environment Agency in Denmark (Doc. B3-68/90), NoC 175/232 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

— having regard to the report of the Political Affairs Committee (Doc. A3-117/90),

A. recalling its resolution of 14 March 1990 embodying the opinion of the European Parlia ment on the proposal from the Commission for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Monitoring and Infor mation Network ('),

B. having regard to the important implications of the seat of the European Environment Agency for its operating conditions and the period within which it could be fully operation al,

C. whereas the choice of seat should not be governed solely by technical or material consider ations but should, on the contrary, fit in with the Community's institutional policy, fully satisfy the Agency's operating requirements and ensure ever closer pan-European cooper ation between the Community and the countries of both EFTA and Central and Eastern Europe, especially as regards the environment,

1. Calls for the seat of the Agency to be decided without delay;

2. Believes that the Commission should be condemned for failing adequately to make clear proposals for the actual seat of the Environment Agency and for the objective criteria which might guide the decision-making proposals;

3. Calls on the Commission to come forward with such proposals by 1 July 1990;

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and Council.

(') OJ NoC 96, 17.4.1990, p. 112. 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/233

Friday, 15 June 1990

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

15 June 1990 ADAM, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMENDOLA, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDREWS, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, ARIAS CANETE, BAGET BOZZO, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARTON, BEIROCO, BERTENS, BETTINI, BETTIZA, BINDI, BIRD, BJ0RNVIG, BLAK, BLANEY, BLOT, BOCKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BORGO, BOWE, BREYER, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CARNITI, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CASINI, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASTELLINA, CATHERWOOD, CAUDRON, CECI, CEYRAC, CHRISTIANSEN, COATES, COCHET, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COONEY, COX, CRAMON-DAIBER, CRAMPTON, CRAVINHO, CUSHNAHAN, DALSASS, DALY, DAVID, DEFRAIGNE, DE GIOVANNI, DE PICCOLI, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DIEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA, VAN DIJK, DILLEN, DONNELLY, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, DUVERGER, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FALQUI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FERRARA, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FONTAINE, FORTE, FRIEDRICH, FUNCK, GELLENZI, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GAWRONSKI, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GRUND, GUIDOLIN, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HANSCH, HARRISON, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERMANS, HINDLEY, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, HORY, HOWELL, HUGHES, IVERSEN, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JACKSON C., JEPSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, KOHLER K. P., KOFOED, KRIEPS, LACAZE, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGER, LANGES, LANNOYE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEMMER, LENZ, LE PEN, LINKOHR, LIVANOS, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LO GIUDICE, LUCAS PIRES, LUTTGE, LULLING, LUSTER, MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MCMAHON, MAGNANI NOYA, MAHER, MAIBAUM, MALANGRE, MALHURET, MARINHO, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MATTINA, MAZZONE, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MELIS, MENDES BOTA, MENARD, METTEN, MIHR, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MORETTI, MOTTOLA, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSCARDINI, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEUBAUER, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NICHOLSON, NIELSEN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PACK, PANNELLA, PAPAYANNAKIS, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PEIJS, PEREIRA, PERREAU DE PINNINCK DOMENECH, PERSCHAU, PERY, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PETERS, PIERROS, PIMENTA, PINXTEN, PIQUET, PIRKL, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PORRAZZINI, PRAG, PRICE, PRONK, PROUT, PUERTA GUTIERREZ, QUISTORP, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, REYMANN, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, R0NN, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSSETTI, ROTH-BEHRENDT, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUMELIOTIS, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SABY, SALZER, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANDByEK, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARLIS, SBOARINA, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SCHODRUCH, SEAL, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMEONI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SISO CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, SPECIALE, SPERONI, STAES, STAMOULIS, VON STAUFFENBERG, STAVROU, STEVENSON, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TARADASH, TAZDAIT, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, TRIVELLI, TSIMAS, TURNER, UKEIWE, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VECCHI, VEIL, VAN VELZEN, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VERNIER, VERWAERDE, VITTINGHOFF, VOHRER, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAECHTER, VON WECHMAR, WELSH, WETTIG, WHITE, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WURTZ, WYNN, ZAWOS. NoC 175/234 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

ANNEX I

Result of roll-call votes

( + ) = For

( —) = Against

(O) = Abstention

Proposal for a regulation CQM(90) 140 final

( + )

ADAM, ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBELOA MURU, BLOT, BOOKLET, BOGE, BOF1LL ABE1LHE, BOWE, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CECI, CHANTERIE, CHRISTIANSEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COONEY, CRAMON-DAIBER, CUSHNAHAN, DAVID, DE GIOVANNI, DE VITTO, DE VRIES, DEFRAIGNE, DESMOND, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DILLEN, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, EWING, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FITZGERALD, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GREEN, GRUND, GUILLAUME, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HARRISON, HERMAN, HERMANS, HINDLEY, HOPPENSTEDT, JEPSEN, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELL'ETT-BOWMAN, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LANE, LANGES, LE PEN, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MALHURET, MARCK, MARTIN S., MCCUBBIN, MCINTOSH, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, METTEN, MOTTOLA, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSSO, NAPOLETANO, NEUBAUER, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PACK, PAPAYANNAKIS, PATTERSON, PERSCHAU, PESMAZOGLOU, PETER, PIQUET, PIRKL, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PROUT, PUERTA, RAWLINGS, READ, REDING, RLNSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROTH-BEHRENDT, SAKELLARIOU, SAMLAND, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARLIS, SCHODRUCH, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SIMPSON B., SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, SPENCER, STAMOULIS, STAUFFENBERG, STEVENSON, STEWARt-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAZDA'lT, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TURNER, UKEIWfe, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAN OUTRIVE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEIL, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VERNIER, VERWAERDE, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, VON WECHMAR, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN, ZAWOS.

(-)

ANGER.

(O) I AMENDOLA, BANDRfiS MOLET, FALQUI, LANNOYE, PARTSCH.

Kofoed report— Doc. A 3-122/90

Agricultural structures

Amendment 15

( + )

ALBER, VON ALEMANN, ARIAS CANETE, BEIROCO, BOCKLET, BOGE, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CHANTERIE, COONEY, COX, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities NoC 175/235

Friday, 15 June 1990

CUSHNAHAN, DEFRAIGNE, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FITZGERALD, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRUND, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERMANS, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KILLILEA, KLEPSCH, LAGAKOS, LALOR, LAMBRIAS, LANE, LANGES, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, LULLING, MARCK, MARTIN S., MARTINEZ, MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MUNCH, MUSSO, NIELSEN T., OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PEIJS, PESMAZOGLOU, PIRKL, POETTERING, PRONK, REDING, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, STAUFFENBERG, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, THEATO, TINDEMANS, UKEIWE, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VEIL, VERHAGEN, VERNIER, VERWAERDE, VOHRER, VON WECHMAR, WIJSENBEEK.

(-)

ADAM, ALVAREZ DE PAZ:, AMENDOLA, ANGER, ARBELOA MURU, BANDR£S MOLET, BETTINI, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CECI, COATES, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, CRAMPTON, DAVID, DESAMA, DESMOND, DIEZ DE, RIVERA, VAN DIJK, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, EWING, FALQUI, FERNEX, GARCFA ARIAS, GORLACH, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HAPPART, HARRISON, HOWELL, JOANNY, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MCINTOSH, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PETER, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PROUT, PUERTA, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RAWLINGS, READ, ROTHE, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHMIDBAUER, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SMITH A., SPENCER, SPERONI, STEVENSON, TARADASH, TAZDAIT, TOMLINSON, TRAUTMANN, TURNER, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERBEEK, VON DER VRING, WAECHTER, WELSH, WHITE, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(O)

DESSYLAS.

Amendment 35

( + )

ADAM, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBELOA MURU, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, BOWE, CABEZON ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CANO PINTO, CATHERWOOD, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, CRAMPTON, DAVID, DESMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, DUHRKOP DUHRKOP, ELLIOTT, EWING, FITZGERALD, GORLACH, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HAPPART, HARRISON, HOWELL, JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KILLILEA, LALOR, LANE, LINKOHR, LUTTGE, MAIBAUM, MARTINEZ, MCINTOSH, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MUNTINGH, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, ODDY, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PATTERSON, PETER, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PROUT, PUERTA, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, RAWLINGS, READ, ROTHE, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHMIDBAUER, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., SPENCER, STEVENSON, TITLEY, TRAUTMANN, TURNER, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERNIER, VON DER VRING, WELSH, WHITE, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

ALBER, VON ALEMANN, AMENDOLA, ANGER, ARIAS CANETE, BANDRES MOLET, BEIROCO, BETTINI, BOCKLET, BOGE, CALVO ORTEGA, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CECI, CHANTERIE, COONEY, DE VRIES, DEFRAIGNE, VAN DIJK, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FALQUI, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GALLENZI, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GRUND, GUILLAUME, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, HERMAN, HERMANS, HOLZFUSS, HOPPENSTEDT, JOANNY, KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, KLEPSCH, LAGAKOS, LAMBRIAS, LANGES, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, MARTIN S., MENDES BOTA, MENRAD, MUNCH, MUSSO, NIELSEN T., NoC 175/236 Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 90

Friday, 15 June 1990

OOMEN-RUIJTEN, PACK, PARTSCH, PEIJS, PESMAZOGLOU, PIRKL, POETTERING, PRONK, QUISTORP, REDING, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I. ALCAZAR, S1S6 CRUELLAS, SONNEVELD, SPERONI, STAUFFENBERG, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAZDAIT, THEATO, TINDEMANS, TOMLINSON, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VEIL, VERBEEK, VERHAGEN, VERWAERDE, VOHRER, WAECHTER, VON WECHMAR, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU.

(O)

UKEIWfe.

Whole

<+ )

ALBER, BOOKLET, BOGE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOWE, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CATASTA, CHANTERIE, COATES, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COONEY, COX, CRAMPTON, DAVID, DEFRAIGNE, DEPREZ, DESAMA, DESMOND, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, ELLIOTT, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, FALCONER, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, GARCIA, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GORLACH, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HAPPART, HARRISON, HERMAN, HERMANS, HOLZFUSS, HORY, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JUNKER, KLEPSCH, LANGES, LEMMER, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, LULLING, LUTTGE, MARCK, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENRAD, MUNTINGH, NIELSEN T., OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PACK, PEIJS, PETERS, PIRKL, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, READ, REDING, ROTHE, SAKELLARIOU, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARIDAKIS, SCHLEICHER, SCHMIDBAUER, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIS6 CRUELLAS, SMITH A., SONNEVELD, STEVENSON, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TOMLINSON, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAYSSADE, VEIL, VERTEMATI, WHITE, VON WOGAU, WOLTJER, WYNN.

(-)

AMENDOLA, ANGER, CATHERWOOD, VAN DIJK, EWING, FALQUI, FERNEX, FITZGERALD, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GUILLAUME, HOWELL, JOANNY, KELLETT-BOWMAN, KILLILEA, LALOR, LANE, LANNOYE, MARQUES MENDES, MARTINEZ, MCINTOSH, MUSSO, NEWMAN, ODDY, PARTSCH, PATTERSON, PRAG, QUISTORP, RAWLINGS, SELIGMAN, SPENCER, TAZDATT, TURNER, UKEIWfi, VERBEEK, VERNIER, VERWAERDE, WELSH.

(O)

VON ALEMANN, GRUND, SANDB^EK.

Romera i Alcazar report — Doc. A 3-140/90

Transport market in 1992

Amendment 7

( + )

ANASTASSOPOULOS, BEIRQCO, BOFILL ABEILHE, BOWE, CABEZON ALONSO, CARVALHO CARDOSO, COLLINS, COONEY, COX, CUSHNAHAN, DAVID, DIEZ DE RIVERA, ELLIOT, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FALCONER, FERNEX, FONTAINE, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GREEN, HABSBURG, HAPPART, HARRISON, HERMANS, JOANNY, KILLILEA, LALOR, LANE, LINKOHR, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LULLING, MCCUBBIN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENDES BOTA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NICHOLSON, ODDY, ONUR, PACK, * PARTSCH, PEIJS, PEREIRA V., POETTERING, READ, REDING, REYMANN, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, 16. 7. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/237

Friday, 15 June 1990

ROTHLEY, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SABY, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SARLIS, SIMPSON B., SMITH A., TINDEMANS, TITLEY, TRAUTMANN, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAN HEMELDONCK, WAECHTER, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, WYNN.

(-)

JUNKER, KELLETT-BOWMAN, MCINTOSH, PONS GRAU, PRAG, SIS6 CRUELLAS, WELSH.

(O)

DOMINGO SEGARRA, GUTIERREZ DIAZ.

Welsh report Doc. A 3-142/90

Regis programme

Amendment 12 (a)

( + ).

EWING, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, HOWELL, JACKSON F., KELLETT-BOWMAN, KILLILEA, LANE, STEWART-CLARK, WELSH.

.(-)

ARIAS CANETE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, CARVALHO CARDOSO, COLINO SALAMANCA, CUSHNAHAN, DAVID, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, ESCUDER CORFT, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, IZQUIERDO ROJO, JUNKER, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, MARINHO, MCCUBBIN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENDES BOTA, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MUNTINGH, NICHOLSON, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PEREIRA V., POETTERING, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, REDING, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMPSON B., STAUFFENBERG, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TINDEMANS, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, WAECHTER, VON WOGAU.

Whole

( + )

ARIAS CANETE, BOFILL ABEILHE, BONTEMPI, CABEZ6N ALONSO, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, COLINO SALAMANCA, CRAMON-DAIBER, CUSHNAHAN, DAVID, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, ESCUDER CROFT, ESTGEN, EWING, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FERNEX, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GREEN, GUTIERREZ DIAZ, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, KILLILEA, LALOR, LANE, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, MCCUBBIN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MENDES BOTA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONTERO ZABALA, MUNTINGH, NICHOLSON, OLIVA GARCIA, ONUR, PEREIRA V., POETTERING, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, REDING, SIERRA BARDAJI, STAUFFENBERG, TINDEMANS, VALVERDE LOPEZ, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERNIER, WAECHTER, VON WOGAU.

(O)

HOWELL, KELLETT-BOWMAN, STEWART-CLARK, WELSH. NoC 175/238 Official Journal ofthe European Communities 16.7.90

Friday, 15 June 1990

Reding report — Doc. A 3-117/90

European Environment Agency

Amendment 5

( + )

BOFILL ABEILHE, CABEZQN ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, COLINO SALAIV1ANCA, COLLINS, CRAMON-DAIBER, DAVID, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, EWING, FERNEX, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GREEN, HOWELL, KELLETT-BOWMAN, MCCUBBIN, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MUNTINGH, OLIVA GARCIA, PIMENTA, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMPSON B., STEWART-CLARK, TURNER, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERNIER, WELSH.

(-)

ARIAS CANETE, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CUSHNAHAN, ESTGEN, FERNANDEZ ALBOR, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, KILLILEA, LANE, LLORCA VILAPLANA, POETTERING, REDING, ROBLES PIQUER, STAUFFENBERG, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TINDEMANS, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VON WOGAU.

Whole

( + ).

BOFILL ABEILHE, CABEZ6N ALONSO, CALVO ORTEGA, DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINS, COONEY, DAVID, DESSYLAS, DIEZ DE RIVERA, DOMINGO SEGARRA, EWING, FONTAINE, GARCIA, GARCIA ARIAS, GREEN, HOWELL, JACKSON F., KELLETT-BOWMAN, MARINHO, MCCUBBIN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MIRANDA DA SILVA, OLIVA GARCIA, PIMENTA, PONS GRAU, QUISTORP, RUBERT DE VENT6S, SELIGMAN, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMPSON B., STEWART-CLARK, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERNIER, WELSH.

(-)

FITZGERALD, HABSBURG, HADJIGEORGIOU, KILLILEA, LANE.

(O)

ARIAS CANETE, CARVALHO CARDOSO, CUSHNAHAN, ESTGEN, FLORENZ, FRIEDRICH I., FUNK, LLORCA VILAPLANA, NICHOLSON, POETTERING, REDING, ROBLES PIQUER, STAUFFENBERG, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TINDEMANS, VALVERDE L6PEZ, VON WOGAU. 16. 7.90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 175/239

Friday, IS June 1990

ANNEX II

Written declarations

Rule 65

Doc. No Author Signatures

5/90 Bird 15 6/90 Donnelly 8 7/90 Piermont 5 Notice No Contents (continued) Page

7. Integrated transport market: * proposal for a regulation COM(89) 238 final 215 legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation for an action programme in the field of transport infrastructure with a view to the completion of an integrated transport market in 1992 (Doc. A 3-140/90) 217 8. Food-aid policy and food-aid management: * proposal for a regulation COM(90) 193 final 218 legislative resolution embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the pro posal from the Commission to the Council for a regulation amending Regulations (EEC) No 3972/86 on food-aid policy and food-aid management, No 2507/88 on the implementation of storage programmes and early warning systems and No 2508/88 on the implementation of co-financing operations for the purchase of food products or seeds by international bodies or non-governmental organizations (Doc. A 3-149/ 90) 218 9. STRIDE, INTERREG and REGIS programmes: (a) resolution on a Community action programme to aid the location of research and technology in the less developed regions by means of regional development pro jects, in particular those financed by the ERDF (STRIDE programme) (Doc. A 3-143/90) 218 (b) resolution on a Community initiative in favour of border areas (INTERREG programme) (Doc. A 3-139/90) 223 (c) resolution on a Community initiative to assist the most remote regions of the Community (REGIS programme) (Doc. A 3-142/90) 228 10. Seat of the European Environment Agency : resolution on the seat of the European Environment Agency (Doc. A 3-117/90) .... 231