Cartels Enforcement, Appeals & Damages Actions 2017 Fifth Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cartels Enforcement, Appeals & Damages Actions 2017 Fifth Edition Cartels Enforcement, Appeals & Damages Actions 2017 Fifth Edition Contributing Editors: Nigel Parr & Euan Burrows GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – CARTELS 2017, FIFTH EDITION Contributing Editors Nigel Parr & Euan Burrows, Ashurst LLP Production Editor Andrew Schofi eld Senior Editor Rachel Williams Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach Group Publisher Richard Firth We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Nigel Parr and Euan Burrows for all of their assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2017 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-911367-34-5 ISSN 2050-7593 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualifi ed professional when dealing with specifi c situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY January 2017 CONTENTS Preface Nigel Parr & Euan Burrows, Ashurst LLP Australia Sharon Henrick, Wayne Leach & Peta Stevenson, King & Wood Mallesons 1 Belgium Hendrik Viaene & Ine Letten, Stibbe 17 Brazil Ricardo Inglez de Souza, Inglez, Werneck, Ramos, Cury e Françolin Advogados 28 Canada Randall J. Hofl ey, Joshua A. Krane & Chris Dickinson, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP 40 China Zhan Hao, AnJie Law Firm 57 Colombia Alfonso Miranda Londoño, Andrés Jaramillo Hoyos & Daniel Beltrán Castiblanco, Esguerra Asesores Jurídicos S.A. 72 Denmark Olaf Koktvedgaard, Søren Zinck & Frederik André Bork, Bruun & Hjejle 78 European Union Euan Burrows, Irene Antypas & Laura Carter, Ashurst LLP 86 Finland Ilkka Aalto-Setälä & Eeva-Riitta Siivonen, Borenius Attorneys Ltd 104 France Bastien Thomas & Cécile Mennétrier, Racine 114 Germany Dr Ulrich Schnelle & Dr Volker Soyez, Haver & Mailänder Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB 126 India G.R. Bhatia, Abdullah Hussain & Kanika Chaudhary Nayar, Luthra & Luthra Law Offi ces 139 Indonesia Anang Triyono, Rinjani Indah Lestari & Ben Clanchy, Makarim & Taira S. 149 Israel Hilla Peleg, Moran Aumann & Joey Lightstone, Agmon & Co. Rosenberg Hacohen & Co. 162 Italy Enrico Adriano Raffaelli & Elisa Teti, Rucellai&Raffaelli 171 Japan Catherine E. Palmer, Daiske Yoshida & Hiroki Kobayashi, Latham & Watkins 182 Malaysia Raymond Yong & Penny Wong, Rahmat Lim & Partners 193 Malta Richard Camilleri & Annalies Azzopardi, Mamo TCV Advocates 202 Portugal Nuno Ruiz & Pedro Saraiva, Vieira de Almeida & Associados 213 Romania Silviu Stoica & Ramona Iancu, Popovici Nițu Stoica & Asociații 223 Russia Anastasia Astashkevich, “Astashkevich and partners” Attorneys at Law 235 Serbia Raško Radovanović, Anja Tasić & Srđan Janković, Petrikić & Partneri AOD in cooperation with CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz 242 Singapore Daren Shiau & Elsa Chen, Allen & Gledhill LLP 253 Spain Antonio Guerra Fernández, Patricia Vidal Martínez & Tomás Arranz Fernández-Bravo, Uría Menéndez 266 Sweden Peter Forsberg, Xandra Carlsson & Haris Catovic, Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd 278 Switzerland Mario Strebel, Christophe Pétermann & Renato Bucher, Meyerlustenberger Lachenal 289 Taiwan Stephen Wu, Rebecca Hsiao & Wei-Han Wu, Lee and Li, Attorneys-at-Law 311 Turkey Gönenç Gürkaynak & Ayşe Güner, ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law 323 United Kingdom Giles Warrington & Tim Riisager, Pinsent Masons LLP 336 USA Mark Rosman & Jeff VanHooreweghe, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati P.C. 350 PREFACE e are delighted to present the fi fth edition of Global Legal Insights – Cartels. This edition covers the most Wsignifi cant developments in 30 jurisdictions around the world and, as before, is designed to provide in-house counsel, government agencies and private practice lawyers with a practical insight into cartel enforcement policy and procedure, including leniency/amnesty regimes, administrative settlement, sanctions and appeals. The aim of this edition, as with other volumes in the Global Legal Insights series, is to collect the views and opinions of a group of leading competition law practitioners from around the world in a single volume. Authors continue to be encouraged to focus their chapter on what they consider to be the most important practice points and recent developments in their jurisdictions, with a free rein to determine the content of their chapter. By giving the authors the opportunity both to select the legal and policy issues which they wish to discuss, and to offer insights into the practical operation of their national regimes, this book aims to look beyond the anti-cartel provisions and enforcement procedures which apply in the various jurisdictions. It also facilitates an up-to-date comparative analysis of the approaches currently being taken by competition agencies around the world to some of the diffi cult issues that can arise in practice, which we hope will prove to be helpful when considering enforcement initiatives and developments in your own jurisdiction. Nigel Parr and Euan Burrows, Ashurst LLP Australia Sharon Henrick, Wayne Leach & Peta Stevenson King & Wood Mallesons Overview of the law and enforcement regime relating to cartels In Australia, there are parallel civil and criminal prohibitions against cartel conduct, which are contained in Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). The Australian Federal Government is proposing to amend the prohibitions and has released exposure draft legislation for consultation. A preliminary bill to amend Australia’s misuse of market power laws has already been placed before the Australian Parliament. A further bill, which will contain any amendments to Australia’s cartel laws, is expected to be placed before the Australian Parliament in the course of 2017. Division 1A of Part IV of the CCA prohibits the making of, or giving effect to, a contract, arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision. A cartel provision is defi ned as a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding between actual or potential competitors that has either: • the purpose or likely effect of fi xing, controlling or maintaining a price or component of a price; or • the purpose of: • preventing, restricting or limiting production, capacity or supply; • allocating customers, suppliers or territories; or • bid rigging. The prohibition against cartel conduct is a per se prohibition, i.e. it is prohibited outright without any competition test having to be satisfi ed. The criminal and civil prohibitions are identical except for the standard of proof required. The criminal offence requires both: • an intention to make or give effect to the contract, arrangement or understanding; and • the knowledge or belief that the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a cartel provision. Although a limitation period of six years applies to civil contraventions, there is no limitation period for criminal contraventions. The CCA also contains: • a general civil prohibition on contracts, arrangements or understandings that contain provisions with a purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition; and • civil prohibitions against price signalling, which currently only apply to the banking sector (although these prohibitions may be extended to other sectors in the future). These prohibitions provide that: GLI - Cartels 2017, Fifth Edition 1 www.globallegalinsights.com © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London King & Wood Mallesons Australia • a corporation must not make private disclosures to competitors of pricing information if the disclosure is not in the ordinary course of business; and • a corporation must not make disclosures about prices, capacity or strategy for the purpose of substantially lessening competition. As part of the exposure draft legislation referred to above, the Australian Federal Government is proposing to repeal the prohibition on price signalling and to enact a new civil prohibition on concerted practices, which will apply to conduct with the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is the body responsible for investigating cartel conduct and managing the immunity application process. The ACCC can initiate civil proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia for civil pecuniary penalties and other orders for a breach of the civil prohibitions on cartel conduct. The ACCC can also refer serious cartel conduct to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) for consideration for criminal prosecution. The CDPP is responsible for prosecuting criminal cartel offences and can initiate criminal proceedings in the Federal Court for breach of the criminal cartel prohibitions. Ultimately, it is the Federal Court of Australia that determines whether there has been a breach of the civil or criminal prohibitions on cartel conduct and makes the appropriate penalty orders. Cartel conduct may also give rise to claims for civil damages. Class actions have featured signifi cantly in the private enforcement of cartel conduct. Overview of investigative powers in Australia Australia has an immunity and
Recommended publications
  • Unit Pricing: Time for a Na2onal Approach?
    Unit Pricing: Time for a Na2onal Approach? May 2019 Table of Contents Copyright 1 Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 11 Methodologies Used in the Research 15 Summary of Consumer Survey Results 19 Summary of Telephone Focus Group Results 23 The Case for Unit Pricing 29 Time for a National Approach? 37 Answers to the Research's Key Questions 45 Conclusions 53 Recommendations 61 Bibliography 64 Appendices 69 Public Survey Questions 70 Focus Group Questions 82 Key Informant Questions Guide 88 Copyright Unit Pricing is the act of displaying the price of a commodity at a standard unit of measurement adjacent to its selling price on retail store shelves (currently mostly prepackaged food products) and online. For example, the unit price representation of a 500 ml carton of milk offered at $2.00 is “$4 per litre”; the unit price representation of a 2-litre carton of milk offered at $7.00 is “$3.50 per litre”. Unit pricing is also known as comparative pricing. This report reveals consumer views on the value of unit pricing as a factor in promoting consumer interests, gauges receptivity to adopting national systems such as those being implemented in other countries, and discusses the challenges and barriers to adopting similar systems in Canada. Keywords: unit pricing, price label, price advertising © 2019, Consumers Council of Canada Author, Jay Jackson Unit Pricing: Time for a National Approach? Consumers Council of Canada 1 Acknowledgements Consumers Council of Canada greatly appreciates the participants who responded to requests to be interviewed to assist this research. This includes survey and focus group respondents and individuals from business, the ISO international standards community, and academia – in particular, dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Limits on the Collection of Personal Information for Online Behavioural Advertising
    How Free is “Free”? Setting limits on the collection of personal information for online behavioural advertising RESEARCH REPORT Produced by Option consommateurs and presented to Industry Canada’s Office of Consumer Affairs June 2015 How Free is “Free”? Option consommateurs received funding for this report under Industry Canada’s Program for Non-Profit Consumer and Voluntary Organizations. The opinions expressed in the report are not necessarily those of Industry Canada or of the Government of Canada. Reproduction of limited excerpts of this report is permitted, provided the source is mentioned. Its reproduction or any reference to its content for advertising purposes or for profit, are strictly prohibited, however. By Alexandre Plourde Legal Deposit Bibliothèque nationale du Québec National Library of Canada ISBN 978-2-89716-024-1 Option consommateurs 50, Ste-Catherine Street West, Suite 440 Montreal (Quebec) H2X 3V4 Phone: 514 598-7288 Fax: 514 598-8511 Email: [email protected] Website: www.option-consommateurs.org Option consommateurs, 2015 ii How Free is “Free”? Table of Contents Option consommateurs ................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ v Summary .......................................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Protection in Canada and the European Union: a Comparision
    PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CANADA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: A COMPARISION 2009 PIAC Consumer Protection in Canada and the European Union: A Comparison Prepared by The Public Interest Advocacy Centre PIAC Suite 1204 ONE Nicholas Street Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7 1 Copyright 2009 PIAC Contents may not be commercially reproduced. Any other reproduction with acknowledgements is encouraged. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) Suite 1204 ONE Nicholas Street Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7 Tel: (613) 562-4002 Fax: (613) 562-0007 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.piac.ca Canadian Cataloguing and Publication Data Consumer Protection in Canada and the European Union: A Comparison ISBN 1-895060-88-5 2 Acknowledgements Financial support from the European Commission through the Directorate General for External Relations to conduct the research on which this report is based is gratefully acknowledged. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Directorate General for External Relations or the European Commission. Esteban Uribe was the principal author of this report. Michael Janigan and Janet Lo were responsible for editing the report. Karen Lam provided additional research. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 Part I: History 10 Part II: Comparing Canada’s Consumer Protection 42 To Europe’s Ten Principles of Consumer Protection Part III: Consumer protection in Europe and Canada 78 applicable to basis services and sensitive areas of the consumer economy Part IV: Recommendations 121 References 123 4 Executive Summary This study uses the document, “Ten Principles of Consumer Protection”,1 a principal source of consumer rights and protections in the European Community, and attempts to compare the content and effect of those provisions with parallel provisions existing in Canadian federal and provincial jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mieux Consommer Et Mieux Vivre Depuis 40 ANS RAPPORT ANNUEL 40 1Er Avril 2012 Au 31 Mars 2013 TABLE DES MATIÈRES
    Mieux consommer et Mieux vivre depuis 40 ANS RAPPORT ANNUEL 40 1er avril 2012 au 31 mars 2013 TABLE DES MATIÈRES 2 Mot du président 3 L’ère du numérique mondialisation des marchés, et devant la pro- Mot du directeur lifération des sources d’information, nous ne général Au cours de l’exercice 2012-2013, le pouvons nous permettre de demeurer isolés. 4 conseil d’administration de Protégez-Vous a Si nous ne pouvons offrir aux consomma- L’équipe de été témoin et a soutenu plusieurs initiatives teurs québécois le contenu qu’ils recherchent, Protégez-Vous de développement qui ont contribué à ancrer notre pertinence disparaîtra. Pour Protégez- Vous, comme pour le milieu québécois de 5 « De gauche à droite : Muriel Ide, Martin Lessard, Nathalie Jackson, Yvan Turcotte, Paule encore plus Protégez-Vous dans l’ère numé- Beaugrand-Champagne, Michel Nadeau, Michèle Giroux et Émile Vallée (Absente : rique. Nous sommes particulièrement fiers de la consommation, il s’agit d’une occasion Contributions Anne-Marie Poitras). » et implication l’arrivée de Protégez-Vous sur les téléphones unique qui contribuera à accroître le rayon- LE CONSEIL D’ADMINISTRATION DE PROTÉGEZ-VOUS – 2012-2013 intelligents ainsi que sur iPad. nement du Québec à l’échelle nationale et 6 internationale. Protégez-Vous Président Administrateurs M. Michel Nadeau, Mme Muriel Ide, consultante Pour assurer le succès du développe- se joint à l’ICRT Institut sur la gouvernance d’organisa- en communication numérique tions privées et publiques (IGOPP) ment et de l’implantation numérique dans En terminant, je joins ma voix à celle de 8 Mme Nathalie Jackson, Office de les activités de l’organisme, les membres tous mes collègues du conseil d’adminis- Sondage annuel Vice-présidente la protection du consommateur tration pour saluer l’engagement et le pro- de satisfaction Mme Paule Beaugrand-Champagne, du conseil d’administration ont été là, cette journaliste et éditrice retraitée M.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Record of the Oecd-Financial Consumer Agency of Canada International Conference on Financial Education: Partnering to Turn Financial Literacy Into Action
    * * with the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust Fund SUMMARY RECORD OF THE OECD-FINANCIAL CONSUMER AGENCY OF CANADA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL EDUCATION: PARTNERING TO TURN FINANCIAL LITERACY INTO ACTION 26-27 MAY 2011, TORONTO, CANADA Introduction and background The OECD-FCAC International Conference Partnering to Turn Financial Literacy into Action was held in Toronto on 26-27 May 2011. It was co-organised by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC) with the sponsorship of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust fund and of several private and public Canadian institutions selected by FCAC. The event was held at the conference centre of the Westin Castle Hotel in Toronto. The conference followed the meetings of the International Network on Financial Education (INFE) Expert Subgroups on the 24 May 2011 and the 7th Meeting of INFE network members on the 25 May 2011. It provided an excellent opportunity to share information about the progress made by INFE and in particular by the Expert Subgroups and discuss initiatives that could inform policy makers and non- government organisations internationally and in Canada. An international audience of high-level governmental officials and experts from public bodies, regulatory and supervisory authorities attended the conference along with senior decision makers and academics from OECD countries and non-OECD members’ economies. Participation from Canada was very high, due notably to the contemporary launching of the renewed Canadian national strategy for financial education and to the strategy of FCAC, which relies on the involvement of the private and voluntary sector in its activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3. the Approach of This Dissertation
    Tracing broadcast diversity and its manifestations in the CRTC’s Let’s Talk TV proceedings by Sylvia Blake M.A., Communication and Culture, Ryerson University and York University, 2011 B.A. (Hons.), Political Studies, Queen’s University 2009 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology © Sylvia Blake 2018 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2018 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Sylvia Blake Degree: Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Title: Tracing broadcast diversity and its manifestations in the CRTC’s Let’s Talk TV proceedings Examining Committee: Chair: Dal Yong Jin Professor Alison Beale Senior Supervisor Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor and Associate Dean, Undergraduate Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Zoë Druick Supervisor Professor Sarah Ganter Internal Examiner Assistant Professor Marc Raboy External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Art History and Communication Studies McGill University Date Defended/Approved: 05 June, 2018 ii Abstract Nurturing diversity is a key objective in Canadian public policy; however, “diversity” is polysemous, contested, flexible, and usually defined in an institutional context. The challenge of defining and ordering diversity objectives is particularly pronounced in broadcasting, wherein the CRTC is tasked with organizing a multitude of economic and social objectives put forward by a broad range of stakeholders. This dissertation unpacks the complex and contested notion of diversity, with a focus on the CRTC’s largest and most topically broad broadcast policy review of the decade: the 2013-2016 Let’s Talk TV (LTTV) proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerton, University of Waterloo, Canada1 Abstract This Review Is a Vision Check on Consumer-Interest Policies As We Approach 2020
    Consumer Interests Annual Volume 64, 2018 Public Policy Based on Consumer-Interest Research: Essential National and International Institutions Robert R. Kerton, University of Waterloo, Canada1 Abstract This review is a vision check on consumer-interest policies as we approach 2020. The appraisal strongly suggests that most countries do not provide their consumers the full range of consumer empowerment agencies. At the national level, the evaluation identifies six major agencies as key institutions for consumer well-being. Further, international cooperation is crucial in the digital world. Links are provided to eight of the most valuable web sites of international consumer policy organizations. Each link facilitates evidence-based policies to improve consumer health and safety, or to advance consumer success with price and quality, or to enhance protection from fraud, fake reviews and other deceptive selling practices. The presentation also outlines a multidisciplinary Canadian experiment to connect academic research to consumer policy using a partnership among academic researchers, consumer protection agencies, consumer NGOs, and a national standards association. Canada’s Partnership on Public Policy- Oriented Consumer Interest Research (PPOCIR at http://ppocir.uwaterloo.ca/) also includes a work-study experience for graduate students to augment the country’s consumer research capability. To measure achievements of the partnership experiment, benchmarks are identified. Overall, three conclusions are beyond dispute: (a) in most countries, consumers face a major challenge - missing institutions. (b) there is genuine ‘policy benefit’ from cooperating on research topics with a team that includes advocates, practical policy experts and academics, and (c), consumers in any country can benefit from building research capacity in a manner that includes experiential learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Regulatory Frameworks in Four Selected Countries, for the Bailey Review of Commercialisation and Sexualisation of Childhood
    Summary of regulatory frameworks in four selected countries, for the Bailey Review of commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood Rodie June Statham Ann Mooney Ann Phoenix May 2011 Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Selection of the countries .................................................................................................................... 4 Cross national literature ...................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Advertising .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Billboard advertising .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Obsolescence of Home Appliances and Electronics: What Is the Role of the Consumer? 2 What Is the Role of the Consumer?
    OBSOLESCENCE OF HOME APPLIANCES AND ELECTRONICS: WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE CONSUMER? 2 WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE CONSUMER? Équiterre, May 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Équiterre has received funding from Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada’s Contribution Program for Non-profit Consumer and Voluntary Organizations. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada or of the Government of Canada. Équiterre also acknowledges the contribution of RECYC-QUÉBEC to the production of this report and its distribution. OTHER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHORS Annick Girard, Senior Project Manager, Équiterre Colleen Thorpe, Director of Educational Programs, Équiterre Fabien Durif (Ph.D.), (Ph.D.), Directeur of the Observatoire de la consommation responsable (OCR), ESG UQÀM Élisabeth Robinot (Ph.D.), member of the Observatoire de la consommation responsable (OCR), ESG UQÀM MONITORING COMMITTEE Hélène Gervais, Industrial Development Officer, RECYC-QUÉBEC Laetitia Vasseur, Co-founder and General Delegate, Halte à l’obsolescence programmée (HOP) Ken Whitehurst, Executive Director, Consumers Council of Canada Olivier Bourgeois, Coordinator, Energy and Social Accountability, Option consommateurs Erick Lachapelle, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Université de Montréal Graphics : Line Godbout. Arts Interne Revision : François Roberge and Ryan Worms Translation : Andrea Neuhofer The use of the masculine in this report is gender-neutral. © Équiterre – 2018 © All images. CCO Public
    [Show full text]
  • Bloggers Or Floggers? Undercover Advertising Exposed
    Bloggers or Floggers? Undercover advertising exposed RESEARCH REPORT by Option consommateurs, Avril 2012 OPTION CONSOMMATEURS MISSION Option consommateurs is a not‐for‐profit association whose mission is to defend the rights and interests of consumers and to ensure that they are respected. HISTORY Option consommateurs has been in existence since 1983, when it arose from the Associations coopératives d’économie familial movement, more specifically, the Montreal ACEF. In 1999 it joined forces with the Association des consommateurs du Québec (ACQ), which had already pursued a similar mission for over 50 years PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES Options consommateurs has a team of some 30 employees working in five departments: Budgeting, Energy Efficiency, Legal Affairs, Press Room, and Research and Representation. Over the years, Option consommateurs has developed special expertise in the areas of financial services, health, agrifood, energy, travel, access to justice, trade practices, indebtedness, and the protection of privacy. Every year, we reach 7,000–10,000 consumers directly, conduct numerous interviews in the media, participate in working groups, sit on boards of directors, carry out large‐scale projects with key partners, and produce research reports, policy papers and buyers’ guides, including the annual Toy Guide in Protégez‐vous magazine. MEMBERSHIP In its quest to bring about change, Option consommateurs is active on many fronts: conducting research, organizing class action suits, and applying pressure on companies and government authorities. You can help us do more for you by becoming a member of Option consommateurs at www.option‐consommateurs.org. ii SUMMARY Since 2006, there has been an explosion in the use of social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Pricing: an Effective Tool?
    Unit pricing: An effective tool? Report conducted by Option consommateurs and presented to the Industry Canada’s Office of Consumer Affairs June 2010 Research Report Option consommateurs 2010 Unit pricing: An effective tool? Option consommateurs MISSION Option consommateurs is a not-for-profit association whose mission is to defend the rights and interests of consumers and to ensure that they are respected. HISTORY Option consommateurs has been in existence since 1983, when it arose from the Associations cooperatives d’economie familial movement, more specifically, the Montreal ACEF. In 1999 it joined forces with the Association des consommateurs du Quebec (ACQ), which had already pursued a similar mission for over 50 years PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES Options consommateurs has a team of some 30 employees working in five departments: Budgeting, Energy Efficiency, Legal Affairs, Press Room, and Research and Representation. Over the years, Option consommateurs has developed special expertise in the areas of financial services, health, agrifood, energy, travel, access to justice, trade practices, indebtedness, and the protection of privacy. Every year, we reach 7,000–10,000 consumers directly, conduct numerous interviews in the media, participate in working groups, sit on boards of directors, carry out large-scale projects with key partners, and produce research reports, policy papers and buyers’ guides, including the annual Toy Guide in Protegez-vous magazine. MEMBERSHIP In its quest to bring about change, Option consommateurs is active on many fronts: conducting research, organizing class action suits, and applying pressure on companies and government authorities. You can help us do more for you by becoming a member of Option consommateurs at www.option-consommateurs.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Prices Advertised Online: Analysis of Business Practices and the Legal Framework in Canada RESEARCH REPORT
    Changes to prices advertised online: Analysis of business practices and the legal framework in Canada RESEARCH REPORT Report produced by Option Consommateurs and submitted to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada’s Office of Consumer Affairs June 2018 Modulation of the price advertised online Option consommateurs received funding under Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada’s Contributions Program for Non-Profit Consumer and Voluntary Organizations. The opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada or the Government of Canada. Reproduction of this report, in whole or in part, is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. Reproduction or any reference to its content for advertising or commercial purposes, however, are strictly prohibited. Legal Deposit Bibliothèque nationale du Québec National Library of Canada 978-2-89716-050-0 Option consommateurs 50, Ste-Catherine Street West, Suite 440 Montreal, Québec) H2X 3V4 Phone: 514 598-7288 Fax: 514 598-8511 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.option-consommateurs.org Option consommateurs, 2018 ii Modulation of the price advertised online Contents Option consommateurs ......................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. v Summary .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]