DOCSLIB.ORG

The Herpetological Collection of Maximilian, Prince of Wied (1782–1867), with Special Reference to Brazilian Materials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Herpetological Collection of Maximilian, Prince of Wied (1782–1867), with Special Reference to Brazilian Materials THE HERPETOLOGICAL COLLECTION OF MAXIMILIAN, PRINCE OF WIED (1782–1867), WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BRAZILIAN MATERIALS PAULO E. VANZOLINI{ Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology) American Museum of Natural History and Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo Deceased April 28, 2013 CHARLES W. MYERS Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology) American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 395, 155 pp., 85 figures, 6 tables Issued June 26, 2015 Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2015 ISSN 0003-0090 Prinz Maximilian zu Wied (1782–1867), with a Botocudo Indian named Qua¨ck (?–1833). In addition to his broad command of vertebrate zoology, Prince Max had a keen interest in native Americans and their languages His pioneering work on the Brazilian Botocudos was classic ethnology and his later work called attention to vanishing North American tribes. Portrait shows the 35-year-old decorated exmilitary man in the prime of life, after fighting in the Napoleonic Wars followed by two years of rugged exploration in tropical forest. (Oil on canvas by Johann Heinrich Richter, 1828, courtesy of Brazilian Library of Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart.) CONTENTS Abstract............................................................6 Preface.............................................................6 PrinceMaximilian’sLife................................................8 The Brazilian Expedition, 1815–1817.....................................10 The North American Expedition, 1832–1834 ...............................15 PermutationsofthePrince’sName .....................................17 Prince Maximilian’s Herpetological Publications ............................19 The Maximilian Collections at AMNH ..................................23 Procedure of Study ..................................................25 Measurements ....................................................25 Scutellation......................................................26 The Abbildungen Plates ..............................................27 About New Species, Type Specimens, and Type Localities .....................27 Method of Presentation Summarized ....................................28 SpeciesAccounts:Reptiles .............................................28 Caretta esculenta Merrem............................................28 Caretta imbricata, Merrem ...........................................28 Caretta cephalo Merrem .............................................29 Sphargis mercurialis Merrem..........................................29 Emys depressa (Wied) ...............................................29 Emys radiolata Mikan...............................................29 Testudo tabulata, Linnaeus ...........................................29 Crocodilus sclerops Schneider..........................................30 Gekko incanescens Wied .............................................30 Gekko armatus Wied................................................30 Anolis gracilis Wied ................................................30 Anolis viridis Wied.................................................31 J. [Iguana] sapidissima Merrem ........................................31 Polychrus marmoratus Merrem ........................................31 Agama picta Wied .................................................31 Agama catenata Wied...............................................37 Tropidurus torquatus (Wied) ..........................................38 Teius monitor, Merrem..............................................39 Teius ameiva, Merrem...............................................39 Teius cyanomelas Wied ..............................................39 Lacerta striata Daudin ..............................................40 Scincus sloanei Daudin..............................................40 Scincus striatus Daudin..............................................40 Gymnophthalmus quadrilineatus, Merrem..................................40 Boa constrictor Linnaeus.............................................41 Boa cenchria Linnaeus ..............................................41 Boa aquatica Wied.................................................41 Scytale coronata, Merrem............................................42 Coluber poecilostoma Wied ...........................................44 Coluber liocercus Wied ..............................................44 Coluber variabilis Kuhlii Wied .........................................44 Coluber nattereri Mikan .............................................47 Coluber bicarinatus Wied.............................................47 Coluber pyrrhopogon Wied ...........................................48 3 4 BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 395 Coluber laevicollis Wied..............................................48 Coluber carinicaudus Wied............................................48 Coluber lichtensteinii Wied ............................................48 Coluber plumbeus Wied..............................................52 Coluber chrysogaster Wied............................................53 Coluber testaceus Wied..............................................53 Coluber acuminatus Wied ............................................54 Coluber modestus Wied..............................................54 Coluber undulatus Wied ..............................................54 Coluber merremii Wied..............................................54 Coluber collaris Wied ...............................................54 Coluber marginatus Wied.............................................55 Coluber dictyodes Wied..............................................55 Coluber pileatus Wied...............................................55 Coluber herbeus Wied...............................................57 Coluber rabdocephalus Wied ..........................................57 Coluber saurocephalus Wied...........................................57 Coluber doliatus,Merrem ............................................59 Coluber poecilogyrus Wied............................................59 Coluber erythrogaster Wied...........................................60 Coluber formosus Wied..............................................61 Coluber venustissimus Wied...........................................61 Dipsas cenchoa (Linnaeus)............................................61 Elaps corallinus Wied ...............................................61 Elaps marcgravii Wied ..............................................62 Crotalus horridus, Daudin ............................................63 Lachesis rhombeata Wied ............................................63 Cophias jararaca Wied ..............................................65 Cophias bilineatus Wied..............................................65 Cophias holosericeus Wied............................................66 Typhlops leucogaster Wied............................................67 Amphisbaena punctata Wied ..........................................68 Amphisbaena flavescens Wied..........................................68 SpeciesAccounts:Amphibians ..........................................69 Caecilia lumbricoides Daudin ..........................................69 Hyla faber Wied...................................................70 Hyla punctata Wied ................................................70 Hyla crepitans Wied................................................72 Hyla elegans Wied .................................................72 Hyla aurata Wied..................................................74 Hyla infulata Wied.................................................74 Hyla luteola Wied..................................................75 Sapomarinheiro(unknownspecies).....................................75 Rana pacybrachion Wied.............................................75 Rana pachypus Spix ................................................76 Rana macrocephala Wied.............................................76 Rana sibilatrix Wied................................................76 Bufo agua, Daudin .................................................77 Bufo bimaculatus Wied..............................................77 Bufo fuliginosus Wied...............................................78 Bufo crucifer Wied .................................................78 Bufo ornatus Spix ..................................................78 Bufo cinctus Wied..................................................78 2015 VANZOLINI AND MYERS: PRINCE MAXIMILIAN 5 Ceratophrys varius Wied.............................................79 Ceratophrys dorsata Wied............................................79 Ceratophrys boiei Wied..............................................79 Taxonomic Summary of the Maximilian Collection ...........................79 Species Collected by Prince Maximilian ...................................79 Primary Type Specimens Still Extant.....................................80 NomenclaturalUpdate...............................................80 Acknowledgments...................................................82 Appendix 1: The 1860 Manuscript Catalog (Verzeichniss der Reptilien-Sammlung nach Dume´ril, Bibron, und Jan). ........................................84 Appendix 2: Gazetteer of Wied’s Herpetological Localities . .....................88 Biographical Sources .................................................89 References.........................................................89 The Abbildungen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Density, Population Size, and Habitat Use by Ameivula Nativo (Teiidae) in a Remnant of Atlantic Forest in Brazil
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 15(3):558–566. Submitted: 13 February 2020; Accepted: 9 October 2020; Published: 16 December 2020. DENSITY, POPULATION SIZE, AND HABITAT USE BY AMEIVULA NATIVO (TEIIDAE) IN A REMNANT OF ATLANTIC FOREST IN BRAZIL JULIANE PEREIRA-RIBEIRO1, ÁTILLA COLOMBO FERREGUETTI, HELENA GODOY BERGALLO, AND CARLOS FREDERICO DUARTE ROCHA Department of Ecology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rua São Francisco Xavier, nº 524, Pavilhão Haroldo Lisboa da Cunha, 2º andar, sala 224. Bairro Maracanã, 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract.—We estimated the population density, size, occupancy, and detectability of the lizard Ameivula nativo (no English common name), an endemic and endangered species, in one of the largest remnants of the Atlantic Forest in Espirito Santo, Brazil, by using methods that consider imperfect detectability. We used linear transect surveys to estimate density and abundance. We also used transect data to estimate large and small-scale species occupancy using six covariates (sampled region, the proportion of exposed soil, the proportion of shrub cover, the proportion of herbaceous cover, air temperature, and relative humidity). The estimated overall density for A. nativo in the Vale Natural Reserve (VNR) was 11.03 ± 2.07 (standard error) individuals/ha with an estimated population size of 7,258 ± 1,365 individuals. At large scales, A. nativo occupancy probability was influenced by region, and local scale occupancy was influenced by proportion of exposed soil. Detectability was affected only by the air temperature, which may be a result of the species physiology because it is an active forager.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Helminth Communities from Unisexual and Bisexual Lizards Different? Evidence from Gastrointestinal Parasites of Darevskia Spp
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 61(3), pp. 279–288, 2015 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.61.3.6.2015 ARE THE HELMINTH COMMUNITIES FROM UNISEXUAL AND BISEXUAL LIZARDS DIFFERENT? EVIDENCE FROM GASTROINTESTINAL PARASITES OF DAREVSKIA SPP. IN TURKEY Vicente Roca1,2, Fátima Jorge2,3, Çetin Ilgaz4, Yusuf KumlutaȘ4 Salih Hakan DurmuȘ5 and Miguel A. Carretero2 1Departament de Zoologia, Facultat de Ciències Biològiques, Universitat de València Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain; E-mail: [email protected] 2CIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 7. 4485–661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal; E-mail: [email protected] 3Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto R. Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169–007 Porto, Portugal; E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca, İzmir, Turkey E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 5Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Specimens of three species of parthenogenetic lizards (Darevskia uzzelli, D. bendimahiensis, and D. sapphirina) from northeastern Turkey were examined for gastrointestinal parasites. Only one species, the nematode Spauligodon saxicolae (Pharyngodonidae), was found. The extremely low infection and diversity parameters, falling among the lowest within the Pal- aearctic saurians, support depauperate helminth communities for these parthenogenetic lacertid lizards. Our results suggest that parthenogenetic Darevskia follow a pattern of parasitism similar to other unisexual lizards (i.e. Aspidocelis). The low rates of infection and diversity may be explained by the decreasing opportunities for interchanging helminths rather than factors of susceptibility of unisexual hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of the Rare Snake Echinanthera Cephalomaculata Di-Bernardo, 1994 in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)
    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 1005-1009 (2019) (published online on 17 October 2019) First records of the rare snake Echinanthera cephalomaculata Di-Bernardo, 1994 in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) Marco Antonio de Freitas1,*, Gessica Gomes Barbosa2, Karol Priscila Bernardino3, João Domingos Pinheiro Filho4, and Arthur Diesel Abegg5 The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most biodiverse The state of Pernambuco published a list of tropical forests, as well as the most threatened biome endangered reptile species in 2017, comprising eight in the world (Myers et al., 2000). The Pernambuco snake species (SEMAS, 2017): Bothrops bilineatus Endemism Center (CEP) comprises the northern portion (Wied, 1821) (vulnerable); Dipsas sazimai Fernandes, of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest, delimited from the Marques, and Argôlo, 2010 (vulnerable); Drymoluber north of the São Francisco River to the southern region dichrous (Peters, 1863) (vulnerable); Erythrolamprus of the state of Rio Grande do Norte, with a considerable reginae (Linnaeus, 1758) (vulnerable); Lachesis muta number of animal and plant species occurring only in (Linnaeus, 1766) (vulnerable); Rodriguesophis iglesiasi this short and extremely fragmented and threatened (Gomes, 1915) (endangered); Siphlophis compressus forest stretch (Tabarelli and Santos, 2004). (Daudin, 1803) (vulnerable); and Xenopholis scalaris Five snake species threatened with extinction at (Wucherer, 1861) (vulnerable). the national level occur in the CEP: Amerotyphlops The genus Echinanthera comprises six species amoipira (Rodrigues and Juncá, 2002), Atractus caete known to occur in the Atlantic rainforests of Brazil Passos, Fernandes, Bérnils and Moura-Leite, 2010, (Di-Bernardo, 1992; Myers and Cadle, 1994; Costa and Bothrops muriciensis Ferrarezzi and Freire, 2001 and Bérnils, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • De Los Reptiles Del Yasuní
    guía dinámica de los reptiles del yasuní omar torres coordinador editorial Lista de especies Número de especies: 113 Amphisbaenia Amphisbaenidae Amphisbaena bassleri, Culebras ciegas Squamata: Serpentes Boidae Boa constrictor, Boas matacaballo Corallus hortulanus, Boas de los jardines Epicrates cenchria, Boas arcoiris Eunectes murinus, Anacondas Colubridae: Dipsadinae Atractus major, Culebras tierreras cafés Atractus collaris, Culebras tierreras de collares Atractus elaps, Falsas corales tierreras Atractus occipitoalbus, Culebras tierreras grises Atractus snethlageae, Culebras tierreras Clelia clelia, Chontas Dipsas catesbyi, Culebras caracoleras de Catesby Dipsas indica, Culebras caracoleras neotropicales Drepanoides anomalus, Culebras hoz Erythrolamprus reginae, Culebras terrestres reales Erythrolamprus typhlus, Culebras terrestres ciegas Erythrolamprus guentheri, Falsas corales de nuca rosa Helicops angulatus, Culebras de agua anguladas Helicops pastazae, Culebras de agua de Pastaza Helicops leopardinus, Culebras de agua leopardo Helicops petersi, Culebras de agua de Peters Hydrops triangularis, Culebras de agua triángulo Hydrops martii, Culebras de agua amazónicas Imantodes lentiferus, Cordoncillos del Amazonas Imantodes cenchoa, Cordoncillos comunes Leptodeira annulata, Serpientes ojos de gato anilladas Oxyrhopus petolarius, Falsas corales amazónicas Oxyrhopus melanogenys, Falsas corales oscuras Oxyrhopus vanidicus, Falsas corales Philodryas argentea, Serpientes liana verdes de banda plateada Philodryas viridissima, Serpientes corredoras
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 5.07
    THE HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN The Herpetological Bulletin is produced quarterly and publishes, in English, a range of articles concerned with herpetology. These include full-length papers, new methodologies, short communications, natural history notes and book reviews. Emphasis is placed on field studies, conservation, veterinary and behavioural aspects. Authors should read and adhere to the British Ecological Society’s Ethical Policy and Guidelines, a full version of which can be found at https://www.thebhs.org/info-advice/134-bhs-ethics-policy or The Herpetological Bulletin (2017), 141: 46- 18. All submissions are liable to assessment by the editorial board for ethical considerations, and publication may be refused on the recommendation of this committee. Contributors may therefore need to justify killing or the use of other animal procedures, if these have been involved in the execution of the work. Likewise, work that has involved the collection of endangered species or disturbance to their habitat(s) will require full justification. Articles reporting the results of experimental research, descriptions of new taxa, or taxonomic revisions should be submitted to The Herpetological Journal (see inside back cover for Editor’s address). Guidelines for Contributing Authors: 1. See the BHS website for a free download of the Bulletin showing Bulletin style. A template is available from the BHS website www.thebhs.org or on request from the Editor. 2. Contributions should be submitted by email to [email protected]. 3. Articles should be arranged in the following general order: Title Name(s) of authors(s) Address(es) of author(s) (please indicate corresponding author) Abstract (required for all full research articles - should not exceed 10% of total word length) Text acknowledgements References Appendices Footnotes should not be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Clelia Plumbea Wied, 1820.Musurana Misionera O Gris
    Cuad. herpetol. 26 (Supl. 1): 327-374 (2012) Categoría UICN plejos de cabañas, clubes recreativos, aumento de No evaluada pobladores en zonas ribereñas, extracción de leña, construcción de represas). Esta especie presenta Justificación otras características que la convierten en Vulnerable Esta especie había sido excluida de Argentina por como ser su especialización en alimentación (ofio- Zaher (1996), y varios taxones que incluyen princi- fagia), crecimiento lento y maduración tardía con palmente a Boiruna maculata, Clelia clelia y Clelia puestas relativamente pequeñas y largos períodos plumbea, habían sido confundidas frecuentemente entre puestas, además de su gran tamaño (Giraudo, en la literatura (Giraudo, 2001). Posteriormente 2001; Webb et al., 2002; Pizzatto, 2005). Scott et al., (2006) examinaron los géneros Boiru- na y Clelia en Argentina y Paraguay, incluyendo Sugerencias y acciones de conservación nuevamente a Clelia clelia en Argentina, mediante Su área de distribución posee pocas áreas protegidas material examinado del este de Formosa, Chaco, y estas están pobremente implementadas (Giraudo, Santa Fe y norte de Corrientes (posiblemente áreas 2001; Arzamendia y Giraudo, 2012). Se debería limítrofes de Misiones). Su distribución está asociada aumentar su superficie, representatividad e invertir a los grandes ríos Paraná y Paraguay (Arzamendia mayor cantidad de recursos humanos y materiales y Giraudo, 2009), donde habita principalmente en para mejorar la situación de las áreas protegidas bosques húmedos, que están siendo rápidamente existentes (por ejemplo: Sitios Ramsar Jaaukanigás y modificados en estas áreas por actividades humanas Chaco, Reserva de Biósfera Laguna Oca, Isla Apipé, (urbanización, construcción de viviendas, com- entre otras). Clelia plumbea Wied, 1820. Musurana misionera o gris Giraudo, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iguanid and Varanid CAMP 1992.Pdf
    CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR IGUANIDAE AND VARANIDAE WORKING DOCUMENT December 1994 Report from the workshop held 1-3 September 1992 Edited by Rick Hudson, Allison Alberts, Susie Ellis, Onnie Byers Compiled by the Workshop Participants A Collaborative Workshop AZA Lizard Taxon Advisory Group IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION A Publication of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124 USA A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, and the AZA Lizard Taxon Advisory Group. Cover Photo: Provided by Steve Reichling Hudson, R. A. Alberts, S. Ellis, 0. Byers. 1994. Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for lguanidae and Varanidae. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of this publication can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. Send checks for US $35.00 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US Banlc Funds may be wired to First Bank NA ABA No. 091000022, for credit to CBSG Account No. 1100 1210 1736. The work of the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group is made possible by generous contributions from the following members of the CBSG Institutional Conservation Council Conservators ($10,000 and above) Australasian Species Management Program Gladys Porter Zoo Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Sponsors ($50-$249) Chicago Zoological
    [Show full text]
  • Emoia Impar and Emoia Cyanura)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902866; this version posted January 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. SIZE-BASED DOMINANCE HIERARCHY IN ONE OF TWO SYMPATRIC CRYPTIC PACIFIC SKINKS (EMOIA IMPAR AND EMOIA CYANURA) MARY “MOLLY” HALLSTEN Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. Emoia impar and Emoia cyanura are two morphologically cryptic Pacific skinks that have different preferred thermal micro-habitats but similar geographic range and overlap. Previously individuals have been noted to display a size-based dominance hierarchy at favored basking sites, though this behavior was not specified between species. I found that only one of the two species, E. impar, naturally presents this size-based dominance hierarchy in areas of high population density. Neither species exhibit the hierarchy in low population density areas. No evidence was found to suggest that the presence of this hierarchy allows one species to exclude the other. Key words: skinks; Emoia; thermal resource partitioning; Moorea, French Polynesia; size- based dominance hierarchy INTRODUCTION Understanding how multiple species co- exist within a shared habitat is a fundamental challenge in ecology (Gause 1934). Hardin (1960) documented the competitive exclusion principle, which states that if two non- interbreeding populations occupy the same ecological niche and geographical territory, and differ in their rate of resource consumption, one species will eventually drive the other to extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Boundaries, Biogeography, and Intra-Archipelago Genetic Variation Within the Emoia Samoensis Species Group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra- archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania Alison Madeline Hamilton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Hamilton, Alison Madeline, "Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra-archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3940. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3940 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. SPECIES BOUNDARIES, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND INTRA-ARCHIPELAGO GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN THE EMOIA SAMOENSIS SPECIES GROUP IN THE VANUATU ARCHIPELAGO AND OCEANIA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Alison M. Hamilton B.A., Simon’s Rock College of Bard, 1993 M.S., University of Florida, 2000 December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my graduate advisor, Dr. Christopher C. Austin, for sharing his enthusiasm for reptile diversity in Oceania with me, and for encouraging me to pursue research in Vanuatu. His knowledge of the logistics of conducting research in the Pacific has been invaluable to me during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • A Single Specimen Reveals Multiple New Aspects of Diet and Distribution of Snakes
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 385-390 (2021) (published online on 15 February 2021) A Matryoshka of scales: a single specimen reveals multiple new aspects of diet and distribution of snakes Thaís B. Guedes1 Snakes comprise approximately 3,800 species et al., 2013). Much of what is known about the diet (Uetz and Hošek, 2020), all of which are carnivorous, of C. plumbea is based on the analysis of gut contents consuming an enormous variety of prey types captured of preserved specimens (Cunha and Nascimento, by active foraging or ambush methods (Greene, 1978; Gaiarsa et al., 2013), with two reports about 1997; Grundler 2020). Despite recent advances, prey ingestion position being head-first (Teixeira and detailed information on feeding ecology is still scarce, Vrcibradic, 2003; Drummond et al., 2010). particularly for many species of the rich snake fauna Here we report four interesting findings that came of the Neotropics (e.g., Marques and Sazima, 1997; from the examination of a single specimen of Clelia Hartmann and Marques, 2005; Gaiarsa et al., 2013; plumbea housed in a scientific collection: (1) two new Roberto and Souza, 2020). The frequency of prey items records of prey items for C. plumbea; (2) an unusual found in the stomachs of specimens collected or housed food item found in the stomach of the Yellow-bellied in scientific collections is low (e.g., Vitt and Vangilder, Puffing-snake (Spilotes sulphureus) eaten by the C. 1983; Marques and Sazima, 1997) and the observation plumbea; (3) the second record of C. plumbea in the of a predation event in the field is rare and unpredictable state of Maranhão; and (4) the second record of S.
    [Show full text]