History of the Spencer Race in America Given by the Oldest Living Descendant Elizabeth Carr Walker, Born Jan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of the Spencer Race in America Given by the Oldest Living Descendant Elizabeth Carr Walker, Born Jan History of the Spencer race in America Given by the oldest living descendant Elizabeth Carr Walker, born Jan. 9th 1806 Daughter of Henry Walker and Mary Gibson Spencer who married Mr. John Blackburn Carson, Nephew of Dr. Gideon Blackburn Winter of 1884 of Winter The writer of this history of the Spencer race has thought best before introducing the Spencers of America and England to their ancestors and descendants to present in order something of the history of New England. The middle States, and the Southern States. Up to the time when all these colonies united in resisting England and became the great and grand United States of America. We give this brief sketch of the struggles and privations of our forefathers, particularly for the benefit of the younger members of the Spencer descendants, who perhaps will by this means become more interested and better acquainted with the history of their ancestors, which has been up to this time, sadly neglected. The United States of America is bounded on the North by the great lakes and the British Possessions. South by the Gulf of Mexico and Mexico. East by Atlantic and west by Pacific Ocean. The English, the nation which was destined to found the most permanent and glorious Empire in North America, began their discoveries in the year 1497. In June of that year, John Cabot sailing in the services of King Henry 7th discovered Newfoundland. Subsequent mariners, men of renown in ocean fame and above all Sir Walter Raleigh explored the Atlantic seaboard of America and claimed it for Sovereigns of England. But more than a century P2. had elapsed from Cabot’s discovery before England had planted her first permanent settlement in the New World. Two years before the English had settled in Virginia, the French established their earliest colony at Port Royal in Nova Scotia in 1605. The three oldest towns in America are Augustine, Florida. Founded in 1565 by Spaniards. Jamestown, Virginia, 1607 by English. Plymouth Massachusetts in 1620 by English. At the time of these early settlements the inhabitants were the North American Indians. The country was not divided off and no English name had been given to it. It was occupied by the forests and hunting grounds and scattered wigwam villages of the Indians and wild animals of this vast and mighty wilderness. The first English name by which it was called was Virginia, named for the Virgin Queen Elizabeth in her reign. Afterwards in the reign of King James the country extending between North Carolina and Nova Scotia was divided into two portions and named North and South Virginia. Later in the same reign Capt John Smith made a map of the region of country now known as the eastern states and presented it to Prince Charles who named the country New England. The history of New England commences with the landing of the Pilgrim Fathers who were Englishmen belonging to a sect of Christians called Puritans. In the reign of the Roman Catholic Queen Mary of England their ancestors had been driven p3 to the continent where they had learned a more simple mode of worship than that practiced by the English Church. When, therefore, on the accession of Queen Elizabeth, they returned to their country, they refused to become members of the church of England, or submit to its usages. They would not use the Book of common prayer, nor wear the Surplice. They endured there, greater or less severity – for about fifty years and in 1608 a small congregation of them fled to Holland. Here they remained twelve years, at the end of which time they resolved to go to the new world, America. They left Holland in a small vessel called the Speedwell, and sailed for England. They remained in England a fortnight and then taking leave of their friends, set sail for America. The Speedwell proved unseaworthy and they came back. This vessel, with those of her company, whose courage failed them was dismissed, and the remainder crowded into the May Flower and on the 6th day of September 1620 the May Flower lost sight of English ground. The number of Pilgrims was one hundred and one (illegible note between lines, possibly “luck”); among them, we will mention Miles Standish, their military captain, made famous in the poems of Longfellow, and their pastor Elder Brewster. During the three months their little bark was tossed upon the Ocean the sound of praise was daily heard and “He who ruleth the raging of the sea heard their cry, and helped them” and because they honored him, He honored them, in making them the forefathers of a great, mighty and good people. P 4 On Monday the 21st day of December, these sea wearied pilgrims stepped ashore on “Forefather’s Rock” named for Plymouth Rock for Plymouth, the last place parted from in England. While on board ship, they drew up a body of laws which they resolved to obey. This first American constitution was draw up and signed on the lid of a pine chest belonging to Elder Brewster. This chest of Norway pine is preserved in the Athenaeum oat Hartford. It served in Elder Brewster’s family as a table and during the famine which followed they lived entirely on clams and over this box table when asking a blessing the good man would thank God, “who had given them the treasures hid in the sand.” Thus commenced in faith and hope this first New England Colony. It is well to be informed by what means colonists were enabled to emigrate to this country. Merchants residing chiefly in London and in the west of England near Wales formed into companies and obtained from the King grants to settle particular “Plantations”!!! in America with rights and privileges of government and commerce. These grants were called charters. The company furnished ships and sent out colonists who were to cultivate the ground and procure fish and furs. It was expected the profit on these articles would repay the company in England for sending them out. Gentlemen of family and fortune agreed themselves to go out to the New England Colonies, P 5 provided the charter should be carried to America and the government not managed by a council of the company in England, as was usually the case; this privilege was granted and many distinguished men embarked to cast their destines for “weal or woe” in the New World. The charters were very precious to these people. During the reign of King Charles 1st he often threatened to take away the charters of the New England colonies, but civil war in England prevented the execution. In May 1660 Charles 2nd (whose father had been beheaded by the Republicans) became King of England (a Stuart king): this was just after Cromwell’s administration. The King demanded that the colonies should submit to the laws passed in the English parliament of England. The people answered that these laws were not binding on them as they “were not represented there.” This struggle was at its height when Charles 2nd died and his brother, King James 2nd ascended the throne. King James the second determined to take away from the New England colonies their charters and make them a royal Province, and thus in sixty years from the landing of the Pilgrims, Sir Edmund Andrews “glittering in scarlet and golden lace” arrived at the town of Boston to enforce the King’s demands. It was at this time Henry Wadsworth hid the charter in the “old Oak tree.” Kim James 2nd was a Roman Catholic, persecution in England sent many wise and able men to the colonies. In April 1689 James 2nd was driven from the throne and the protestant sovereigns William and Mary were placed p 6 upon the throne of England. It was at this age that the belief in witchcraft resulted in Salem, a little town thirteen miles north of Boston, in the death of twenty people. Many were tortured. Such a belief strange and awful as it seems to us, was held, not only by the ignorant, but by the good great and wise Sir Matthew Hale, the Lord Chief Justice of England, the pious Richard Baxter, and the wise philosopher Robert Boyle all believed in it, and while we hear so much of the “Salem Witchcraft” it seems that people forget that many years before and many years after the “Salem witchcraft” more than one hundred and thirty thousand people were executed in England, Scotland, France, and Germany for witchcraft. The history of the colonies in the18th century is one of war. The first called Queen Ann’s war. (so called from the Sovereign then on the throne of England, Queen Ann’s war ended and from 1714 to 1744 the colonies enjoyed peace. The history of the Earl’s Spencer commenced farther back than Queen Ann’s war; we will mention this place in history. Robert Spencer Sunderland 2nd Earl and only son of Henry, the first Earl of Sunderland, who was raised to the peerage in 1643 for exertions in the royal cause. Robert Spencer Sunderland, 2nd Earl, was born in 1642, and after serving as ambassador to courts became secretary of state in 1679. p. 7 He had great talent. Burnet said, “he had a superior genius to all the men of business I ever knew.” At the dissolution of the last of the exclusion parliaments, he lost his office, but was restored in 1682. He had the entire confidence of James 2nd who was Duke of York, during the reign of his brother Charles 2nd.
Recommended publications
  • The Blenheim Papers
    THE BLENHEIM PAPERS J. p. HUDSON THE papers of John, ist Duke of Marlborough, his wife, Sarah, and his son-in-law, Charles 3rd Earl of Sunderland, as well as of other members of the Spencer, Churchill, and related families, formerly kept at Blenheim Palace, were acquired by the British Library in 1978. They were originally offered to the Treasury in part payment of duty on the estate of the ioth Duke of Marlborough (d. 11 March 1972) late in 1973. The present writer spent two long week-ends inspecting the collection in the Muniment Room at Blenheim in January and March 1974, and made a list and valuations based on the original manuscript list, in three volumes, made at the end of the nineteenth century by J. Stuart Reid, which was itself based on the arrangement made by Archdeacon William Coxe at the beginning of the century. Staff of the Department of Manuscripts collected the papers from Blenheim in mid-November 1976, and the papers were stored in the Department pending their allocation to an institution. The Department of Education and Science advertised the collection in mid-March 1977, and the decision to allocate the papers to the British Library was announced in Parliament on 25 January 1978. Save in a single instance, the arrangement of the papers at Blenheim into lettered series, further subdivided into numbered bundles, bore little or no resemblance to any original arrangement which may have existed before Archdeacon Coxe arranged the collection early in the nineteenth century. Such little evidence as there is seems to indicate that Coxe disregarded any earlier arrangement that there may have been.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Sketch of the Descendants of Samuel Spencer Of
    C)\\vA CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 924 096 785 351 Cornell University Library The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924096785351 In compliance with current copyright law, Cornell University Library produced this replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1992 to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. 2003 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY : GENEALOGICAL SKETCH OF THE DESCENDANTS OF Samuel Spencer OF PENNSYLVANIA BY HOWARD M. JENKINS AUTHOR OF " HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS RELATING TO GWYNEDD," VOLUME ONE, "MEMORIAL HISTORY OF PHILADELPHIA," ETC., ETC. |)l)Uabei|it)ia FERRIS & LEACH 29 North Seventh Street 1904 . CONTENTS. Page I. Samuel Spencer, Immigrant, I 11. John Spencer, of Bucks County, II III. Samuel Spencer's Wife : The Whittons, H IV. Samuel Spencer, 2nd, 22 V. William. Spencer, of Bucks, 36 VI. The Spencer Genealogy 1 First and Second Generations, 2. Third Generation, J. Fourth Generation, 79 ^. Fifth Generation, 114. J. Sixth Generation, 175 6. Seventh Generation, . 225 VII. Supplementary .... 233 ' ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. Page 32, third line, "adjourned" should be, of course, "adjoined." Page 33, footnote, the date 1877 should read 1787. " " Page 37, twelfth line from bottom, Three Tons should be "Three Tuns. ' Page 61, Hannah (Shoemaker) Shoemaker, Owen's second wife, must have been a grand-niece, not cousin, of Gaynor and Eliza. Thus : Joseph Lukens and Elizabeth Spencer. Hannah, m. Shoemaker. Gaynor Eliza Other children. I Charles Shoemaker Hannah, m. Owen S. Page 62, the name Horsham is divided at end of line as if pronounced Hor-sham ; the pronunciation is Hors-ham.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheaf Catalogs of George John Spencer Larissa C
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research 2009 The sheaf catalogs of George John Spencer Larissa C. Brookes San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Brookes, Larissa C., "The sheaf catalogs of George John Spencer" (2009). Master's Theses. 3639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.zrp8-k6ky https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3639 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SHEAF CATALOGS OF GEORGE JOHN SPENCER A Thesis Presented to The School of Library and Information Science San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Library and Information Science by Larissa C. Brookes May 2009 UMI Number: 1470960 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 1470960 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Horace Walpole's Letters
    The Letters of Horace Walpole, Volume 1 by Horace Walpole The Letters of Horace Walpole, Volume 1 by Horace Walpole editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. The "legal small print" and other information about this book may now be found at the end of this file. Please read this important information, as it gives you specific rights and tells you about restrictions in how the file may be used. *** This etext was produced by Marjorie Fulton. For easier searching, letters have been numbered. Only the page numbers that appear in the table of contents have been retained in the text of letters. Footnotes have been regrouped as endnotes following the letter to which they relate. THE LETTERS of HORACE WALPOLE, EARL OF ORFORD: page 1 / 793 INCLUDING NUMEROUS LETTERS NOW FIRST PUBLISHED FROM THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. IN FOUR VOLUMES VOL. 1. 1735-1748. CONTENTS OF VOL. 1. PREFACE--25 Advertisement--33 Second advertisement--40 Sir Charles Grey's Letter connecting Walpole with Junius--41 Sketch of the Life of Horace Walpole, Earl of Orford, by Lord Dover--47 REMINISCENCES OF THE COURTS OF GEORGE THE FIRST AND SECOND. CHAPTer 1.--67 page 2 / 793 Motives to the Undertaking-Precedents-George the First's Reign-a Proem to the History of the Reigning House of Brunswick-The Reminiscent introduced to that Monarch-His Person and Dress-The Duchess of Kendal-her Jealousy of Sir Robert Walpole's Credit with the King-the
    [Show full text]
  • Our Spencer-Whitbread Ancestors
    Chapter 15 Our Spencer-Whitbread Ancestors [Updated 26 February 2019] Introduction During the past few years, I have been using DNA to identify distant cousins who are descendants of the various branches of our “Quincy Oakley” family tree. Through my research, I hope to extend the scale and breadth of my knowledge of our family’s ancestry. In this narrative,1 I will discuss how I used DNA analysis at the chromosome level to support the genealogical records that show that a number of my distant cousins and I are all descended from a couple who were born in England over 450 years ago. By extension, all of the “Quincy Oakleys” who are descended from Ray Miller Oakley (1876-1948) and his wife Kate Cameron Burks Oakley (1873-1954) are also descended from this particular couple. Triangulation on the GEDmatch.com Website For genetic genealogy, companies such as Ancestry.com and 23andme.com offer genealogical tests of autosomal DNA. These tests are typically performed on the DNA obtained from cells found in a sample of saliva or cells obtained from swabbing the inside of the person’s cheeks. Websites operated by these companies allow individuals to compare their DNA profiles with those of others, but the comparisons on these sites just provide basic information that someone is a close or distant relative. However, the free GEDmatch.com website allows users to upload their DNA profiles (obtained from sites like Ancestry.com and 23andme.com), and then make much more detailed comparisons of the DNA matches with others at the level of individual chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheaf Catalogs of George John Spencer
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research 2009 The sheaf catalogs of George John Spencer Larissa C. Brookes San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Brookes, Larissa C., "The sheaf catalogs of George John Spencer" (2009). Master's Theses. 3639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.zrp8-k6ky https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3639 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SHEAF CATALOGS OF GEORGE JOHN SPENCER A Thesis Presented to The School of Library and Information Science San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Library and Information Science by Larissa C. Brookes May 2009 UMI Number: 1470960 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 1470960 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duchy of Lorraine and the 1715 Jacobite Rebellion in the Writings About Displacement (1697-1736) ANNEXES VOLUME
    AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite encourt une poursuite pénale. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm Jacobitism on the Grand Tour? The Duchy of Lorraine and the 1715 Jacobite rebellion in the writings about displacement (1697-1736) ANNEXES VOLUME jérémy FILET UNIVERSITE DE LORRAINE | MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY Annexe I: Dynastic links between the Lorraine and Stuart Families…………………………………….………...………. p.2-3 Annexe II: Genealogical tree of the Taaffe Family………………………………………………………… p.5 Annexe III: Travellers from the British Isles in the Duchy of Lorraine……………………………………..………………… pp.7-34 Annexe IV: Transcription of the writings about displacement created by Travellers from the British Isles in the Duchy of Lorraine (1697- 1736) ……………...………………… ………………….. pp. 36-64 1 | P a g e Annexe I: Dynastic links between the Lorraine and Stuart Families 1410 - 1473 1417 - 1471 C63 054 Arnold Duke Catherin of Gueldres De d'Egmont Clèves 1440 - 1469 1438 -
    [Show full text]
  • Property Law and Imperial and British Titles: the Dukes of Marlborough and the Principality of Mindelheim
    Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 77 (2009) 191-210 Revue d’Histoire du Droit 77 (2009) 191-210 The Legal History Review 77 (2009) 191-210 Property law and Imperial and British titles: the Dukes of Marlborough and the Principality of Mindelheim Noel Cox* Summary The title of prince of the Holy Roman Empire was conferred in 1704 upon all the children heirs and lawful descendants, male and female, of John Churchill, the first duke of Marlborough. The title of prince of Mindelheim was granted in 1705 to all male descendants and daughters of the first duke. But following the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 and the Treaty of Rastatt in 1714 the principality passed to Bavaria. The right of the dukes of Marlborough to use the style and title was thus lost, and any residual rights would have expired in 1722 on the death of the duke, as they could not pass to a daughter (unlike his British titles). Despite this it is still common practice to describe the Duke of Marlborough as a Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and Prince of Mindelheim. This paper considers the differences in the treatment of the descent of the British and imperial titles. Keywords Duke of Marlborough; John Churchill; Principality of Mindelheim; Principality of Mellenburg; prince of the Holy Roman Empire; peerage; statutory entail; alienation. Introduction Field Marshal Sir John Churchill, first duke of Marlborough, was one of the greatest military commanders in history. He held the office of Captain- General of the English and then British army (the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century equivalent of Commander-in-Chief of the Forces), in 1690–1691 and 1702–1711.
    [Show full text]
  • Althorp.Com Theodorealexander.Com FOREWORD
    spencerofalthorp.com theodorealexander.com FOREWORD The histories of the Spencer Family’s Heritage and Althorp are so tightly entwined that they would be impossible to unravel and separate. All the Spencers’ favourite possessions, which have cascaded down the generations, have ended up in Althorp, this most English of houses, just an hour north of London. Enter its 550- acre park, and you find yourself in a peaceful setting that radiates timeless good taste, with its swathes of fine English oaks stretching out in every direction, while the family’s rare herd of black fallow deer graze beneath. It’s a scene familiar to each of the 19 generations of Spencers who have known and loved this corner of England. When Columbus was sailing towards America, my family were farming here. When Britain was defying Hitler, it was a Spencer cousin who helped lead the way – our wartime prime minister’s full family name was Spencer-Churchill, though everyone shortens him to Winston Churchill. All through history, during the past five centuries or more, it seems you will find a Spencer there or thereabouts, making their mark, doing their best. These Spencer ancestors were able to indulge their tastes – to commission art, furniture, and all the finer things in life. You can see the Spencer touch in every corner of Althorp – this historic house that my family CONTENTS has called “home” for over 500 years, and which for the past decade, has been given unprecedented care and attention. A massive programme of restoration and repair has taken place, which our partnership with Theodore Alexander has certainly helped.
    [Show full text]
  • Holywell House: a Gothic Villa at St Albans
    HOLYWELL HOUSE: A GOTHIC VILLA AT ST ALBANS FRANCES HARRIS HoLYWELL HOUSE, when the Dowager Lady Spencer first came to live there in November 1783, was a small and rather run-down country house on the southern edge of St Albans: one of many properties inherited by John Spencer of Althorp at the death of his redoubtable and fabulously wealthy grandmother, Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough. In 1746 it passed to his son, who became the ist Earl Spencer, and although in the latter's lifetime it was regarded by the family as no more than a convenient staging-post on the road to Northamptonshire/ at his death in 1783 his widow, Georgiana, fixed upon it as her dower house. The Spencers' three great houses, Althorp, Wimbledon Park, and Spencer House in St James's, now belonged to her son and daughter-in-law, and she was in any case unwilling to settle anywhere that would recall memories of her own happy married life. The house as Lady Spencer found it when she first moved in was virtually unchanged since the late seventeenth century: the product of a somewhat makeshift renovation carried out by the future Duke and Duchess of Marlborough shortly after they had acquired the property from the latter's family in 1684. It consisted of a tall, narrow, north- facing block with a hipped roof and pediment, almost certainly the work of William Talman, who had still to attain fame as the architect of Chatsworth. At right angles to it, and facing east across the extensive gardens, was a much older two-storied wing, with an open colonnade or cloister on the ground fioor and above it a low-ceilinged gallery with a further set of rooms at the soutb end.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glorification of Lady Diana Spencer
    CÉLINE GRÜNHAGEN ‘Our Queen of Hearts’—the Glorification of Lady Diana Spencer A critical appraisal of the glorification of celebrities and new pilgrimage eligiosity and spirituality respectively have always been and will be subject Rto change. The emergence of the manifold forms of new religious and spir- itual movements in the last century includes a variety of cult-like venerations of specific individuals, such as politicians (e.g. Mao, Lenin) and modern idols (e.g. Elvis Presley, Princess Diana, Michael Jackson), who are glorified like saints. Devotees gather annually for memorials of their departed idols or travel long distances to visit the tomb, former home, etc. of a specific person to pay tribute to him or her. Due to the motivations of these devotees, the trouble they take, the practices and the tangible emotionality that are con- nected with this phenomenon, it can be considered a form of pilgrimage. In the following I will present some thoughts about the glorification of celebri- ties which leads to these considerable forms of cult and pilgrimage, using as an example the case of Lady Diana Frances Spencer (d. 1997). The death of a princess Diana Frances Spencer was born on 1 July 1961. Belonging to the high nobil- ity of the United Kingdom, the Spencer family had no material shortcom- ings, but allegedly the divorce of the parents was fought on the backs of the children. Diana was regarded as a very poor student; after school she started working in a kindergarten. In 1981 she married Prince Charles and became Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales, a title she lost due to the divorce.
    [Show full text]