DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Does UK National Strategy?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who Does UK National Strategy? House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Who does UK National Strategy? First Report of Session 2010–11 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 12 October 2010 HC 435 Published on 18 October 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Kevin Brennan MP (Labour, Cardiff West) Nick de Bois MP (Conservative, Enfield North) Michael Dugher MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Greg Mulholland MP (Lib Dem, Leeds North West) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Mr Charles Walker MP (Conservative, Broxbourne) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/pasc Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Clive Porro (Clerk), Ben Williams (Second Clerk), Louise Glen (Senior Committee Assistant) and Su Panchanathan (Committee Assistant) Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Public Administration Select Committee, Committee Office, First Floor, 7 Millbank, House of Commons, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5730; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Who does UK National Strategy? 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Defining Strategy 7 Origins 7 Strategy as process 7 Confusing strategy and policy 8 The value of the term ‘Grand Strategy’ 8 3 Do we a need a ‘National Strategy’? 10 Examples of strategic failure: Iraq and Afghanistan 10 The evolving strategic context 12 Principles of good strategy making 13 4 Capacity to make strategy 14 5 The way forward 16 Strategic Leadership 16 Structure and Frameworks 17 Where should strategy reside? 17 A role for the NSC? 18 Improving cross-departmental working 18 SDSR and strategy 19 Strategic Thinking Skills 20 A national strategic assessment capability? 22 External Input to National Strategy. 23 Accountability and scrutiny 24 Funding National Strategy and strategy making 25 6 Conclusion 26 Formal Minutes 34 Witnesses 35 List of written evidence 35 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 36 Who does UK National Strategy? 3 Summary Strategy is today a ubiquitous a term. Consequently it has lost its precision and become detached from its original military meaning. Every organisation, at almost every level, has strategies for dealing with perceived risks and taking forward opportunities. This report is not concerned with these sorts of plans or lists of actions. It looks instead into the capacity we have as a country to devise and sustain a continuing process which can promote our national interest. This was once defined as ‘Grand Strategy’. However, while its imperial, and potentially hubristic associations, may prove a hindrance, the notion inherent in it, that of an overarching process intrinsic to good governance, remains of value. It can best be described as ‘National Strategy’. It has long been assumed that UK national interests are best served by the touchstones of the US special relationship and our economic interests within the European Union. Uncritical acceptance of these assumptions has led to a waning of our interests in, and ability to make, National Strategy. Recent events such as 9/11, climate change and the banking crisis are making us think differently about the world, but require us to find the means by which we can anticipate and understand these challenges and devise an appropriate response to them. If we now have a renewed need for National Strategy, we have all but lost the capacity to think strategically. We have simply fallen out of the habit, and have lost the culture of strategy making. The new Government’s aspiration to think strategically is most welcome but to restore strategic leadership ministers must invest time and energy into this. It is the only way to stimulate demand for strategic analysis and assessment within government. It must be supported by the establishment of specific mechanisms with appropriate authority. Therefore, we propose that the recently established National Security Council and the post of National Security Adviser should have their remit widened to encompass National Strategy with a central coordinating role. The single most important thing which can be done to restore our strategic capacity is to have a community of strategists, both inside and outside Whitehall. To foster such a community, government will need to look at its recruitment practices. We propose that the Civil Service and defence training establishments should come together to deliver an education programme and a career appraisal system should recognise and reward strategic skills. For this reason we welcome the efforts of the previous Chief of the Defence Staff to engender a culture of strategic thinking. We encourage the new Chief to sustain and enhance this initiative and invite him to report to us on progress. The disparate and uncoordinated elements for analysis and assessment which currently exist in government also need to be harnessed. We propose that the tested Whitehall audit 4 Who does UK National Strategy? tool of a capability review should be employed to ensure that capacity in departments is properly brought together. We anticipate that, in time, this cross-Whitehall capability can be developed into a new agency as a resource available to the whole of government. We propose that research funding to universities in this area is at least maintained to ensure there is sufficient external input into strategy making in government. Interchange with outside bodies and academia must be positively encouraged and facilitated. We also propose that parliamentary accountability and scrutiny is adequate to the task by widening the remit of the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy. Its makeup should also reflect the diverse interests in National Strategy with membership drawn from appropriate select committees, including ours. We are conscious of the current financial circumstances. Our proposals have therefore sought to be largely cost neutral. However, we propose a small budget to enable central coordination of departmental contributions to National Strategy in a coherent fashion. Who does UK National Strategy? 5 1 Introduction Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat. Sun Tzu 1. On 26th May this year, the Rt Hon William Hague MP, Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary told the House of Commons: This Government reject the idea of strategic shrinkage. We believe that this would be to retreat as a nation at the moment when a more ambitious approach is required.1 Later, in July, in the first of four major speeches, he proposed “a distinctive British Foreign Policy that extends our global reach and influence”. He claimed that “the previous government had neglected to lift its eyes to the wider strategic needs of this country, to take stock of British interests…”. 2 2. He said that the Strategic Defence and Security Review, “will be a fundamental reappraisal of Britain’s place in the world and how we operate within it”. He continued: “the increasingly multipolar world […] means […] that we must become more active”.3 In what he called “our new Government’s vision of foreign affairs”, he concluded: So we are raising our sights for the longer term, looking at the promotion of British interests in the widest sense. In the coming months, we will develop a national strategy for advancing our goals in the world […].4 3. This is the context in which we decided to hold an inquiry into, “Who does UK Grand Strategy?” in order to provide a fresh appraisal of the qualities of strategic thinking in government and any recommendations for improvements. 4. PASC’s 2007 inquiry on ‘Governing the Future’ examined strategic thinking within government. That report noted that: Future thinking is an uncertain business. Strategies should be kept under review so that they take account of new information and developments in research. Willingness to adjust policy in light of new evidence or changing circumstances should be seen as a sign of strength, not of weakness.5 1 HC Deb, 26 May 2010, col 174 2 Britain’s Foreign Policy in a Networked World, 1 July 2010 , http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/news/latest- news/?view=Speech&id=22472881. 3 Ibid 4 Ibid 5 Public Administration Select Committee, Second Report of Session 2006–07, Governing the Future, HC 123–I 6 Who does UK National Strategy? 5. The previous Government published the first National Security Strategy in March 2008, followed by a second a year later.6 One of the first acts of the new Government was to establish a National Security Council (NSC). An early priority for the NSC has been to oversee the development of a new version of the National Security Strategy alongside a Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR). 6. However, concerns continue to be expressed, publicly and strongly, that the UK has long since lost both the ability to articulate its national interests and the capacity to think strategically about how to meet them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Limited Capacity of Management to Rescue UK Defence Policy: a Review and a Word of Caution
    The limited capacity of management to rescue UK defence policy: a review and a word of caution TREVOR TAYLOR* The three dimensions of defence In terms of press coverage and political debate, the story of British defence since the end of the Cold War has been marked by three themes: policy (direction and review), management (shortcomings and initiatives), and military opera- tions, although academic studies and courses tend to neglect the management domain.1 In principle, these three elements should be closely linked, with policy defining the evolving state of the world and constraining the direction of the country’s military response, management delivering the leadership, organiza- tion and coordination to build the forces to enable the policy to be implemented, and military operations being undertaken in line with the policy guidance and management preparations made. In practice, however, there have been significant disjunctions between the operations mounted and the policy and management. Military operations launched since 1990 have all been something of a surprise, most of them requiring significant extra funding to be obtained through Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) to enhance and modify British capabilities before the operations could begin. The concept of Force Elements at Readiness (FE@R), the key output of the mainstream defence budget, came to be recognized in the MoD as of only limited utility unless consideration of the specific attributes of a particular adversary, the physical environment of the envisaged operation and the contribution of allies were also included in the equation. Also, in some cases a policy decision associated with specific changes in military posture was significantly undermined or even contradicted by events.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignation Peerages 2016
    Resignation Peerages 2016 The Queen has been graciously pleased to signify Her intention of conferring the following Peerages of the United Kingdom for Life. The Queen has been graciously pleased to signify Her intention of conferring Peerages of the United Kingdom for Life upon the undermentioned: Nominations from the former Leader of the Conservative Party 1. Gabrielle Bertin – lately Director of External Relations at Number 10 2. Olivia Bloomfield – lately Partner at Atlantic Superconnection Corporation and Chairman of the Pump House Project 3. Jonathan Caine – lately Special Adviser to Theresa Villiers 4. Camilla Cavendish – lately Head of the Number 10 Policy Unit 5. Andrew Fraser – Treasurer of the Conservative Party 6. Jitesh Gadhia – lately Senior Managing Director at Blackstone and currently Board Member of UK Financial Investments and UK Government Investments 7. Timothy Kirkhope – MEP for Yorkshire and Humber and former Member of Parliament for Leeds North East 8. Rt Hon Ed Llewellyn OBE – lately Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister 9. Mark McInnes CBE – Conservative Councillor for the Meadows/Morningside Ward in Edinburgh and Director of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party 10. Philippa Roe – Leader of Westminster City Council 11. Liz Sugg CBE – lately Head of Operations at Number 10 12. Charlotte Vere – Executive Director of the Girls' Schools Association and former Executive Director at Conservatives In 13. Laura Wyld – lately Head of the Prime Minister’s Appointments Unit Nominations from the Leader of the Labour Party 14. Shami Chakrabarti – Chancellor of the University of Essex and former Director of Liberty Nominations for Crossbench Peerages 15. Sir Nicholas Macpherson – lately Permanent Secretary to Her Majesty’s Treasury (2005-2016) 16.
    [Show full text]
  • First Defence Meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec
    Source: Wayback Machine Speakers at First Defence meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec. 14, 2009), for www.firstdefence.org Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, President; while he simultaneously ran SCL Group Limited, Terrington Management Speaker sponsored by First Year Mo_Day Speaker Title Topic_of_Speech Venue Defence (Sir Geoffrey Pattie, Pres.) 2009 Nov 23 Tobias Ellwood MP Author of COIN Ops: Bridging the Post conflict reconstruction; how House of Commons, Committee Gap Between Military and Civilian to win in Afghanistan Room 16 Affairs on the Modern Battlefield 2009 Oct 06 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Defending Our Interests; Making Manchester Central Room Charter Defence the Case for Defence 2, Conservative Party Fringe Meeting 2009 Jul 14 Douglas Carswell MP, Shadow Secretary of State for The Next Strategic Defence House of Commons, Committee Defence Review: Options for Change, or Room 17 Options for Cuts? 2009 May 12 Geoffrey van Orden MBE, MEP, Conservative Compting Needs, National, NATO House of Commons, Committee Spokesman on Defence and and European: Resolving the Room 6 Security in the European competition for defence resources Parliament, Vice Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee 2009 Jan 20 Chris Donnelly CMG, TD, Senior Fellow The Forecasing Future Conflict: From House of Commons, Committee Defence Academy of the UK, the Cold War to Hot Peace Room 5 Director of the Institute for Statecraft and Governance 2008 Sep 30 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Resurgent Threats: Terror, Russia Hall 5 Birmingham International
    [Show full text]
  • FRASER, Sir Simon James, GCMG
    BDOHP Interview Index and Biographical Details Sir Simon James Fraser, GCMG, 2016 (KCMG 2013; CMG 2009) Biographical Details with (on right) relevant pages in the interview: Entered Diplomatic Service, 1979 pp 2-3 UKMIS, New York, United Nations, and UN Dept, FCO, 1979-80 pp 3-6 Arabic language training, 1981 pp 6-8 Second Secretary, Baghdad, 1982–84 pp 9-24 Second Secretary, Damascus, 1984-86 pp 14-17 First Secretary, FCO, 1986–88 pp 17-19 (South Africa sanctions desk, pp 16-17; Iran-Iraq war desk, p 18) Private Secretary to Minister of State, FCO, 1989–90 pp 20-22 Policy Planning Staff, FCO, 1991–92 pp 22-24 Assistant Head, Non-Proliferation and Defence Dept, FCO, 1992–93 - First Secretary, Financial and Economic Affairs, Paris, 1993–96 pp 24-26 Deputy Chef de Cabinet of Vice-President of EC, 1996–99 pp 26-29 Political Counsellor, Paris, 1999–2002 pp 30-32 Director for Strategy and Innovation, FCO, 2002–04 pp 32-35 Director Middle East, FCO, 2004 pp 35-36 Chief of Staff to Peter Mandelson, EC, 2004–08 pp 36-41 Director General for Europe and Globalisation, FCO, 2008–09 pp 41-42 Permanent Secretary, BERR, later BIS, 2009–10 pp 43-45 Permanent Under-Secretary of State, FCO, and Head of Diplomatic pp 45-57 Service, 2010–15. 1 BRITISH DIPLOMATIC ORAL HISTORY PROGRAMME RECOLLECTIONS OF SIR SIMON FRASER GCMG RECORDED AND TRANSCRIBED BY ABBEY WRIGHT Copyright: Sir Simon Fraser AW: This is 11 July 2018 and Sir Simon Fraser is giving his recollections of his diplomatic career.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Capability Review: a Changing Security Environment
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy National Security Capability Review: A changing security environment First Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 19 March 2018 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 March 2018 HL Paper 104 HC 756 Published on 23 March 2018 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider the National Security Strategy. Current membership House of Lords Lord Brennan (Labour) Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat) Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative) Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour) Baroness Healy of Primrose Hill (Labour) Baroness Henig (Labour) Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative) Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho (Crossbench) Lord Powell of Bayswater (Crossbench) Lord Trimble (Conservative) House of Commons Margaret Beckett MP (Labour, Derby South) (Chair) Yvette Cooper MP (Labour, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dominic Grieve MP (Conservative, Beaconsfield) Dan Jarvis MP (Labour, Barnsley Central) Dr Julian Lewis MP, (Conservative, New Forest East) Angus Brendan MacNeil MP (Scottish National Party, Na h-Eileanan an Iar) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Rachel Reeves MP (Labour, Leeds West) Tom Tugendhat MP (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Stephen Twigg MP (Labour (Co-op), Liverpool, West Derby) Theresa Villiers MP (Conservative, Chipping Barnet) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place within the United Kingdom, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Full List of Files Released L C P First Date Last Date Scope/Content
    Full list of files released L C P First Date Last Date Scope/Content Former Ref Note KV 2 WORLD WAR II KV 2 German Intelligence Agents and Suspected Agents KV 2 3386 06/03/1935 18/08/1953 Greta Lydia OSWALD: Swiss. Imprisoned in PF 45034 France on grounds of spying for Germany in 1935, OSWALD was said to be working for the Gestapo in 1941 KV 2 3387 12/11/1929 12/01/1939 Oscar Vladimirovich GILINSKY alias PF 46098 JILINSKY, GILINTSIS: Latvian. An arms dealer VOL 1 in Paris, in 1937 GILINSKY was purchasing arms for the Spanish Popular Front on behalf of the Soviet Government. In November 1940 he was arrested by the Germans in Paris but managed to obtain an exit permit. He claimed he achieved this by bribing individual Germans but, after ISOS material showed he was regarded as an Abwehr agent, he was removed in Trinidad from a ship bound for Buenos Aires and brought to Camp 020 for interrogation. He was deported in 1946 KV 2 3388 13/01/1939 16/02/1942 Oscar Vladimirovich GILINSKY alias PF 46098 JILINSKY, GILINTSIS: Latvian. An arms dealer VOL 2 in Paris, in 1937 GILINSKY was purchasing arms for the Spanish Popular Front on behalf of the Soviet Government. In November 1940 he was arrested by the Germans in Paris but managed to obtain an exit permit. He claimed he achieved this by bribing individual Germans but, after ISOS material showed he was regarded as an Abwehr agent, he was removed in Trinidad from a ship bound for Buenos Aires and brought to Camp 020 for interrogation.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report
    Defence and security after Brexit Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU Compendium report James Black, Alex Hall, Kate Cox, Marta Kepe, Erik Silfversten For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1786 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: HMS Vanguard (MoD/Crown copyright 2014); Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4, A Chinook Helicopter of 18 Squadron, HMS Defender (MoD/Crown copyright 2016); Cyber Security at MoD (Crown copyright); Brexit (donfiore/fotolia); Heavily armed Police in London (davidf/iStock) RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Defence and security after Brexit Preface This RAND study examines the potential defence and security implications of the United Kingdom’s (UK) decision to leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).
    [Show full text]
  • UK Land Operations in Iraq 2007
    House of Commons Defence Committee UK land operations in Iraq 2007 First Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 November 2007 HC 110 [Incorporating HC 727-i & ii, Session 2006–07] Published on 3 December 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr David S Borrow MP (Labour, South Ribble) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, North Essex) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Robert Key MP (Conservative, Salisbury) Willie Rennie MP (Liberal Democrat, Dunfermline and West Fife) John Smith MP (Labour, Vale of Glamorgan) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament. Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley and Sidcup) Mr Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, North East Milton Keynes) Mr Desmond Swayne MP (Conservative, New Forest West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to Robert Curtis's Presentation at WL2018
    Notes to Robert Curtis's presentation at WL2018 R. T. Curtis Some students of H.F. Baker Henry Frederick Baker was a hugely influential Cambridge geometer in the late 19th and early 20th century. His students included Coxeter who went on to become one of the most important geometers in the 20C; du Val and Edge, who were distinguished algebraic ge- ometers; and Todd of the Todd-Coxeter coset enumeration algorithm. The eminent number theorist Mordell was another student, as was Jacob Bronowski who wrote and presented The Ascent of Man which in the 1960s was a popular television series about the rise of civilization. Bronowski's daughter Lisa (later Lisa Jardine) also studied Mathematics at Cambridge in the year above me but changed to English in her third year and went on to become Professor of Renaissance Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. This talk will begin with the contribution of Todd. The synthematic totals preserved by the symmetric group S6 The 15 partitions of six letters into pairs are known as synthemes; a set of five synthemes such that every pair appears is a synthematic total; there are just 6 of these totals, and so the symmetric group S6 permutes both the original 6 letters and the 6 totals. Todd wrote the totals on the board in his 1967 Cambridge Part III course which I attended, and demonstrated important properties of these two non-permutation identical actions. From S6 to M12 to M24 Todd's lectures demonstrated an important method of constructing groups: Use a well- known group to construct a new combinatorial or geometric structure; observe that the new structure possesses more symmetries than just the group you used in its construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thepdf
    Volume 59, Issue 5 Page 1395 Stanford Law Review KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 59 STAN. L. REV. 1395 (2007). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker* INTRODUCTION: THE DYNAMICS OF COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICIES AND LAWS................................................................................................ 1395 I. CONTROL ORDERS ..................................................................................... 1403 A. Background to the Enactment of Control Orders............................... 1403 B. The Replacement System..................................................................... 1408 1. Control orders—outline................................................................ 1408 2. Control orders—contents and issuance........................................ 1411 3. Non-derogating control orders..................................................... 1416 4. Derogating control orders............................................................ 1424 5. Criminal prosecution.................................................................... 1429 6. Ancillary issues............................................................................. 1433 7. Review by Parliament and the Executive...................................... 1443 C. Judicial Review..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The British Army, 'Understanding', and the Illusion of Control
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1196359 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Tripodi, C. (2016). The British Army, 'Understanding', and the Illusion of Control. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1- 27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1196359 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]