DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Hist 5505 7,972

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

㛇㛓婾㔯 ⬠䓇烉哋㗕₨ 柴䚖烉㕘䓴⛇⛘ˬ微㪲䭉㚱˭冯⣹䲬ˬ临㛇˭䘬斄Ὢ ⫿㔠烉 䯉ṳ ᶵ⮹Ṣ᷵倥⇘ˬ微㪲䭉㚱˭炷⌛⛲攻㘖念嫃䘬ˬ微㪲ὝỼ˭炸忁ᾳ⎵娆㗪炻⎗傥奢⼿⼰ᶵ⎗ ⿅嬘烊⛐ᶨᾳ㛔幓冒⶙㰺㚱㤕㪲䘬⛇⛘ᶲỼ䓐崭忶ᶨ㭝㗪攻炻⯙⎗ẍㆸ䁢㤕㪲㑩㚱ṢˤṎ㚱 Ṣ娵䁢微㪲䭉㚱㗗ᶵ℔佑䘬㱽⼳炻⚈䁢℞㚫≑攟ˬ䙿䩲⛇⛘˭ ˤ ⤪㝄ㆹᾹ䲼䱡⮯⛇⛘夾ἄ䳽⮵䘬䥩Ṣ屉䓊侴妨炻微㪲䭉㚱ㆾ㚱ᶵ℔ᷳ嗽ˤ䃞侴炻㱽⼳㗗⮯⛇ ⛘夾䁢ᶨ枭䣦㚫屯㸸炻侴⛇⛘㤕㪲᷎朆䳽⮵炻⎒Ⱄˬ㱽⼳㕥埴㟮㝞ẍℏ䘬䚠⮵㤪⾝˭炻℞ ˬ㑩㚱Ṣ˭䘬㤪⾝㗗ˬ℟㚱⶚䡢⭂䘬㚨Ἓ䭉㚱㪲䘬Ṣ˭ 烊㎃妨ᷳ炻微㪲䭉㚱㗗㚱⮯⛇⛘↮惵 Ḱ㚜Ἓ䭉㚱Ṣ䘬⏓シˤ㗗ẍ微㪲䭉㚱㚱≑溻⊝㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ┬䓐⛇⛘炻性⃵ả䓙⛇⛘ᶵ攳䘤␴ 勺⺊䘬ね㱩炻侴劍ˬ㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭˭⛐忁ṃˬ勺⺊䘬⛇⛘˭埴ἧἧ䓐㪲⍲攳䘤佑⊁䴻忶ᶨ㭝㗪 攻⼴炻℞⛇⛘ἧ䓐㪲⇑Ṏ傥䌚⼿ᾅ晄ˤ忁ṃ悥㗗↢㕤℔䛦⇑䙲侫慷炻ἧ⛇⛘屯㸸㚜㚱㓰⛘攳 䘤␴ἧ䓐炻䈡⇍㗗⛐楁㷗忁⛇⛘屯㸸䦨⮹䘬⛘㕡 ˤ䔞䃞炻㚱斄奨溆Ṏ㚱䚠䔞⣂䘬䇕嬘ˤ ⎎ᶨ㕡朊炻⛐姜媠㱽⼳䘬㗪῁炻冱嫱屔ả㗗⛐ˬ㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭˭ -炻天嫱㖶℞⶚⛐㗪㓰㛇ℏ忋临 Ỽ䓐炻㚱斄Ỽ䓐㰺㚱⼿⇘㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ⎴シ炻侴㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ⛐㬌㛇攻᷎㰺㚱ἧ䓐⛇⛘䫱烊⮎晃 ᶲ天䛇㬋德忶微㪲䭉㚱⍾⼿⛇⛘㤕㪲炻᷎朆㖻ḳˤ 㚜ỽ㱩炻昌Ḯ天嫱㖶微㪲䭉㚱炻⛇⛘㤕㪲劍↢䎦嬲⊾炻ḇ⎗傥ἧ℞微㪲䭉㚱ᶵㆸ䩳ˤἳ⤪㕤 ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ⇅㛇炻➢㕤˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临㛇炸㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 BFA 䪈炸⮵㕘䓴㇨㚱䘬⛇ ⛘䘬⍇㚱㤕㪲ˬ临㛇˭炻侴⺽崟⮵㬌ˬ临㛇˭㗗⏎䫱㕤⺢䩳㕘㤕㪲䘬䇕嬘–忁冯⛐ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ ⇵⶚䡢䩳䘬微㪲䭉㚱㗗⏎ṵ䃞ㆸ䩳炻㚱䚜㍍斄Ὢˤ 㛔婾㔯ᶵ㚫⯙ˬ微㪲䭉㚱㗗⏎℔佑˭ἄ↢妶婾炻Ữ㚫⽆ᶨᾳᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ⼴䘬微㪲䭉㚱ᾳ㟰ᷕ炻 Ḯ妋ᶨᶳ㕘䓴⛇⛘䘬⇞⹎␴˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临㛇炸㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 BFA 䪈炸炻⮵微㪲 䭉㚱䘬㗪㓰㛇妰䬿㇨忈ㆸ䘬⼙枧炻ẍ⍲䔞ᷕ㇨妶婾⇘ᶨṃ冯ˬ⛇⛘临㛇˭䚠斄䘬㱽⼳奨溆ˤ 1 微㪲䭉㚱ẍ⍲楁㷗䚠斄㱽ἳ 微㪲䭉㚱炻㗗㊯ảỽṢ⎗忂忶㊩临Ỽ䓐ṾṢ⛇⛘ᶨ㭝㗪攻炻⽆侴⍾⼿娚⛇⛘䘬㤕㪲ˤ⤪㝄㤕 㪲㑩㚱Ṣ⛐㗪㓰㛇⯮㺧ᷳ㗪㛒㚱㓞⚆⛇⛘炻Ṿ⮵⛇⛘䘬㤕㪲⌛⏲䳪䳽炻ṾṎᶵ傥ℵ㓞⚆⛇⛘ ㆾ⼿⇘墄⃇烊侴㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭炷⍰䧙微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ炸⯙㚫ㆸ䁢㕘䘬㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ-ˤ 冯微㪲䭉㚱㚱斄䘬㱽ἳ㗗˪㗪㓰㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 DEH 䪈炸ˤ˪㗪㓰㡅ἳ˫妪㖶炻㓧⹄⛇ ⛘炷䓙㓧⹄㍸↢䓛䳊炸䘬㗪㓰䁢 GA ⸜炻侴℞Ṿ⛇⛘炷䓙℞ṾṢ㍸↢䓛䳊炸⇯䁢 BC⸜- 4- 烊℞ Ṿ⛇⛘⊭㊔⌛㤕㪲㑩㚱侭德忶㓧⹄㈡䦇: *&#;⍾⼿⛇⛘ἧ䓐㪲炻Ữ⮎岒㑩㚱侭ṵ䃞㓧⹄ :+)&.%;䘬ˬ䥩Ṣ⛇⛘˭- ˤ 暨㲐シ䘬㗗炻天䡢䩳㚱㓰䘬微㪲䭉㚱㚱ᶱᾳ天溆烉:B;微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ暨㊩临䭉㚱⛇⛘烊劍⛇⛘㛒 㚱塓℞ṾṢỼ㚱㗪炻⇯Ṏᶵ㚫妰䬿ℍ㗪㓰㛇ℏ /烊:C;㛇攻㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣˬ⶚塓∅⤒⮵⛇⛘䘬䭉 㚱㪲ㆾ⶚ᷕ㬊ἧ䓐⛇⛘˭/烊㱽㓡㚫微㪲䭉㚱⮷䳬⥼⒉㚫ᷣⷕ昛㘗䓇㊯↢炻℞ᷕ䘬斄挝炻㗗㚱 斄ὝỼ㛒㚱⼿⇘⍇⛇⛘㤕ᷣ䘬㶖姙/ ˤ:D;㚱斄Ỽ䓐ᶵ⼿ᷕ㕟/ ˤ 妪䩳˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临㛇炸㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 䪈炸䘬側㘗 ᶨ凔䘬微㪲䭉㚱䘬㟰ẞ炻ᷣ天㗗天嫱㖶微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ㕤㗪㓰㛇ℏ忋临ˬ㔝シỼ䓐˭㚱斄⛇⛘烊 䃞侴炻㕤ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ⇅㛇炻ᶨṃ㚱斄㕘䓴⛇⛘䘬微㪲䭉㚱㟰ẞ炻⯙⚈䁢˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临 㛇炸㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 BFA 䪈炸ᷕ⮵ˬ临㛇˭䘬䎮妋8㗗➢㕤娚临㛇Ⱄˬ⺞临˭冲䦇⣹㈹ ㆾ䬿㗗ˬ慵㕘妪䩳˭ℐ㕘䦇⣹炻侴⺽崟⮵㗪㓰㛇妰䬿䘬䇕嬘ˤ⛐㶙ℍ㍊妶忁ṃᾳ㟰ᷳ⇵炻ㆹ Ᾱ⃰Ḯ妋ᶨᶳ㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬⍲˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临㛇炸㡅ἳ˫䘬䯉╖側㘗ˤ 楁㷗␴ḅ漵⋲Ⲟ炷䓴旸埿ẍ⋿炸↮⇍㕤 BIEB ⸜⍲ BIGA ⸜√嬻Ḱ劙⚳炻ㆸ䁢劙⚳䘬㬾㮹⛘ˤ ㊱⣏劙ⷅ⚳䘬ㄋἳ炻㇨㚱⛇⛘悥㗗Ⱄ㕤劙炷⤛炸䌳炻ἄ䁢㬾㮹⛘䘬楁㷗Ṏᶵἳ⢾ˤ侴楁㷗䳽 ⣏悐ấ䘬⛇⛘悥㗗ẍ䦇䓐⣹䲬:#*&#+%,);⼊⺷㈡↢/ 炻⸜㛇⎗忼 JJJ ⸜/ -ˤ㎃妨ᷳ炻楁 㷗䘬⛇⛘㚨䳪䘬㤕ᷣ㗗㓧⹄炷↢䦇Ṣ炸烊侴ˬ㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ˭㗗㊯␴㓧⹄䯥妪䦇䓐⣹䲬炻傥⣈ 㕤旸㛇ℏ埴ἧ㤕㪲䘬㈧䦇Ṣˤ BIJI ⸜炻劙⚳冯㶭㓧⹄䯥妪˪ᷕ劙⯽㉻楁㷗䓴⛨⮰㡅˫炻⎹ᷕ⚳䦇ῇ㕘䓴炻䁢㛇 JJ ⸜烊劙 ⚳㓧᷎㕤 BIJJ ⸜军 BJAC ⸜㛇攻忚埴⛇⛘㷔慷炻᷎䁢傥㍸ὃ⛇⛘㑩㚱㪲嫱㖶䘬㕘䓴㛹㮹䘣姀 ⛇⛘䘬㤕㪲炻᷎㈡↢普橼㓧⹄䦇⣹ˤ䓙㕤䔞㗪㕘䓴冯楁㷗Ⲟ⍲ḅ漵⋲Ⲟ䘬ね㱩ᶵ⎴炻劙⚳㓧 2 ⹄㗗⎹ᷕ⚳㓧⹄䦇ῇ侴朆√嬻炻⚈㬌㈡䦇㛇旸ᶵ傥崭崲冯ᷕ⚳㓧⹄䯥妪䘬䦇ῇ㛇旸烉㕘䓴⛇ ⛘䘬䦇䓐㛇䁢 HF ⸜炷䓙 BIJI ⸜ H 㚰 B 㖍崟妰䬿炸炻᷎⎗临㛇 CE ⸜㈋昌㚨⼴ᶱ⣑/-炻侴朆⤪ 楁㷗⍲ḅ漵⋲Ⲟ炻䦇䓐㛇㛇旸⎗忼 JJJ ⸜ˤ BJIE ⸜ᷕ劙䯥妪˪倗⎰倚㖶˫炻᷎㕤旬ẞᶱ䫔Ḵ㭝↿㖶烉ˬ昌Ḯ䞕㛇䦇䲬␴䈡㬲䓐徼䘬⣹䲬 ⢾炻⶚䓙楁㷗劙⚳㓧⹄㈡↢䘬BJJH⸜G㚰DA㖍ẍ⇵㺧㛇侴㰺㚱临㛇㪲⇑䘬⛇⛘⣹䲬炻⤪㈧ 䦇Ṣ栀シ炻⛯⎗临㛇⇘ᶵ崭忶CAEH⸜G㚰DA㖍炻ᶵ墄⛘₡ˤ˭/- 侴楁㷗㓧⹄⯙㕤BJII⸜⇞妪˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫炻句⮎㚱斄⬱㌺烊㡅ἳ䫔 G 㡅妪 㖶炻㕘䓴⛇⛘䘬䦇䲬炷昌䞕㛇䦇䲬␴䈡㬲䓐徼䘬⣹䲬⢾炸炻⮯临㛇军 CAEH ⸜ G 㚰 DA 㖍炻᷎ 䃉暨墄丛⛘₡/- ˤ ㎃妨ᷳ炻ᶨ凔㊱普橼㓧⹄䦇⣹㈡↢䘬㕘䓴⛇⛘炻䴻㬟Ḯℑ㫉临㛇烉䫔ᶨ㫉㗗㕤 BJHD ⸜ G 㚰 DA 㖍炻HF ⸜⸜㛇⯮㺧⇵烊䫔Ḵ㫉㗗㕤 BJJH ⸜ G 㚰 CH 㖍炻临㛇 CE ⸜⸜㛇炷㈋昌㚨⼴ᶱ⣑炸 ⯮㺧⇵/- ˤ ⛐ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ⇵Ṏ㚱ᶨṃ㚱斄微㪲䭉㚱䘬㟰ẞ炻⯙ BJHD ⸜恋㫉临㛇Ⱄˬ⺞临˭冲䦇⣹㈹ㆾ䬿㗗 ˬ慵㕘妪䩳˭ℐ㕘䦇⣹侴ἄ↢䇕婾ˤ䯉╖侴妨炻䇕㉿溆䶋㕤 BJGJ ⸜妪䩳˪㕘䓴:⎗临㛇㓧⹄ 䦇⣹;㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 BFC 䪈炸ᷕ㚱㍸⍲ˬ㕘㓧⹄䦇⣹˭ᶨ娆烊侴劙⚳㧆⭮昊/ /㕤 BJJH ⸜⯙,% 姜 $ *#%ᶨ㟰//ἄ㚨䳪塩⭂// 炻娵䁢娚䓐娆炻ẍ军㚱斄㡅ἳ䘬妪䩳⎒Ⱄ埴㓧㍒ 㕥ẍὧ⇑临㛇炻᷎朆妪䩳ℐ㕘䦇⣹䘬シ⿅烊㇨媪ˬ㕘㓧⹄䦇⣹˭㗗⍇㛔䦇⣹䘬暁㕡炷㈧䦇Ṣ ⍲↢䦇Ṣ炸㪲䙲⍲佑⊁䘬⺞临炻⚈㬌䬿㗗⎴ᶨấ䦇⣹炻㚱斄临㛇᷎ᶵ⼙枧微㪲䭉㚱䘬㗪㓰妰 䬿炻⚈㬌忁᷎ᶵ⼙枧昛㮷⶙䡢䩳䘬微㪲䭉㚱䘬忋临⿏ˤ 㚱斄˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬 临㛇 㡅ἳ˫ˬ临㛇˭䘬䇕嬘 侴䫔Ḵ㫉临㛇冯䫔ᶨ㫉临㛇㗗㊱冲䦇⣹㇨庱䘬临㛇㡅㔯ᶵ⎴炻㗗➢㕤˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇; 㡅ἳ˫㇨➟埴烊䓙㕤㬌側㘗䘬ᶵ⎴炻ℵ㫉妠䘤⯙ˬ临㛇˭Ⱄˬ⺞临˭冲䦇⣹㈹ㆾ䬿㗗ˬ慵㕘 妪䩳˭ℐ㕘䦇⣹䘬妶婾ˤ 3 忁ᾳ妶婾ㆸ䁢微㪲䭉㚱㟰ẞ䘬㗪㓰㛇㗗⏎ㆸ䩳䘬斄挝ˤ⚈䁢炻⤪㝄Ⱄˬ慵㕘妪䩳˭炻ᶨṃ㕤 㡅ἳ妪䩳炷ㆾ䓇㓰炻⼴㔯㚫ℵἄ妶婾炸㖍㛇⼴㕡⬴ㆸ䘬㗪㓰㛇⚢䃞㚫⍿⼙枧侴暨慵㕘妰䬿㗪 㓰㛇烊侴⌛ἧᶨṃ⛐㬌⇵⶚崭忶㗪㓰旸㛇᷎Ẍ⍇㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ㤕㪲䳽䘬ᾳ㟰炻䓙㕤⛐ˬ临㛇˭ 㗪㓧⹄冯⍇㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣˬ慵㕘妪䩳˭⣹䲬炻⚈㬌䡢䩳㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ㕘䘬㤕㪲炻ἧ⍇㛔⶚䡢䩳䘬 微㪲䭉㚱⣙㓰ˤ ㆹᾹ⮯德忶℞ᷕᶨᾳ㟰ἳ烉昛⣑ṽ姜㛶⣑復ˣ㛶䘯屉ˣ㛶䘯冰ˣ㛶㥖⭴䫱㟰䘬⇌娆ἄ↮㜸烊 㬌㟰䴻㬟Ḯ⍇姇⍲ᶲ姜炻᷎䓙㕤⛐ᶲ姜㗪⎬㱽⭀↢䎦ᶵ⎴シ夳炻≈ᶲ㴱⍲℔䛦⇑䙲炻㟰ẞ㚨 䳪ᶲ姜军䳪⮑㱽昊// 怠㑯㬌㟰ἄ↮㜸䘬ᷣ⚈㗗炻㬌㟰ᷕ炻微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ䘬㊩临Ỽ䓐⛇⛘嫱㒂⃭ấ炻㚱斄微㪲䭉㚱䘬 䇕嬘ᷣ天普ᷕ㕤㚱斄˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕˬ临㛇˭䘬妶婾烊侴⎴㛇䘬栆Ụ㟰ẞṎ 㗗ẍ㬌㟰ᶵ⎴昶㭝䘬⇌㰢ἄ䁢㟰ἳἄ塩㰢炻⚈㬌㬌㟰㗗⎴㛇㚱斄˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅 ἳ˫ᷕˬ临㛇˭䘬㱽⼳奨溆㚨䁢⬴㔜炻㓭怠ᷳ䁢㛔婾㔯䘬ἳ⫸ˤ 昛⣑ṽ姜㛶⣑復ˣ㛶䘯屉ˣ㛶䘯冰ˣ㛶㥖⭴䫱炷ˬ昛姜㛶㟰˭炸㟰ẞ側㘗 㬌㟰㗗斄㕤ᶨⷭỵ㕤⣏❼⛇⛘炷ᶰ慷䲬ấ䫔 CG䲬⛘㭝 FCF 嘇炸䘬㤕㪲䇕嬘ˤ㴱⍲⛘㭝䘬⛇ ⛘䘣姀侭䁢㛶㥖⭴ˤ㛶㥖⭴㕤㟰ẞℍ䧇㗪⶚暊ᶾ炻㛶⣑復ˣ㛶䘯屉⍲㛶䘯冰䁢℞⃺⫸炻㟡㒂 ˪㕘䓴㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔JH 䪈炸Ⱄ娚ⷭ⛇⛘⎰㱽两㈧Ṣ炻⚈㬌⎴↿䁢㬌㟰ẞ䘬塓⏲ˤ ⛘㭝 FCF 嘇⍇㛔䁢⛘㭝FCF 嘇炻䘣姀侭䁢㛶佑㠭䣾:枛嬗烊⍇㔯䁢 , *&;炻侴ဏ惘䘬 FCA4FCC4FCD4FCE 嘇⛘㭝⇯䓙㛶ᶱ⊅➪炷枛嬗烊⍇㔯䁢 $ %&%炸㇨㊩㚱ˤBJEH ⸜炻㛶ᶱ⊅➪⥼ả椾塓⏲䘬䇞奒㛶㥖⭴䁢䭉䎮Ṣ烊Ữ䓙㕤ṾᾹ夾⛘㭝 FCF嘇䁢冒⶙㇨㑩㚱炻 㕤㗗⛐㓧⹄䘬䘣姀ᷕ炻㚱斄㬌枭䭉䎮Ṣ䘬䘣姀Ṏ⊭㊔⛘㭝 FCF嘇ˤ㓧⹄⛐ BJFE ⸜ BA 㚰⍲ BJGD ⸜ H 㖍ℑ㫉㓞⚆⛘㭝 FCF 嘇悐ấ⛇⛘炻᷎拗婌⎹㛶㥖⭴炷ἄ䁢㛶ᶱ俾➪䭉䎮Ṣ炸岈⃇炻 侴䴻㬟ℑ㫉㓞⚆悐ấ⛇⛘⼴炻⛘㭝 FCF 嘇检ᶳ㛒塓㓧⹄㓞⚆⛇⛘䁢 FCF 嘇ˤ 㛶ᶱ⊅➪冯㛶佑㠭䣾㚱斄⛘㭝 FCF:;嘇㤕㪲䘬㶟Ḫ⼴Ἦ⼿⇘枮⇑妋㰢烉㛶佑㠭䣾㕤 BJGI ⸜ D㚰⮯⛘㭝 FCF 䘬㤕㪲ẍ㷗⸋ DFA ⃫廱嬻Ḱ㛶㥖⭴㛔Ṣ炷ᾳṢ⎵佑炸炻㛶㥖⭴Ṏ晐⌛㕤⛇ ⛘姣Ⅎ嗽䘣姀ㆸ䁢㕘䘬⛘㭝 FCF 㑩㚱Ṣˤ 4 䛇㬋䘬⓷柴↢㕤㛶㥖⭴冯⍇姇Ṣ昛㮷䘬䇞奒ᷳ攻䘬⛇⛘屟岋ˤBJFE ⸜ B 㚰炻㛶㥖⭴ẍ㛶ᶱ⊅ ➪䭉䎮Ṣ䘬幓ấ炻⎹⍇姇Ṣ昛㮷䘬䇞奒⎹ẍ㷗⸋ FAA ⃫↢ⓖ⛘㭝 FCA4FCC4FCD4FCE ⍲ FCF 嘇炻᷎妪䩳ᷕ⺷⣹䲬ˤ侴昛㮷晐⌛⛐悐ấ⛘㭝 FCC 军 FCE 嘇ᶲ⺢⯳⯭ỷ炻⍲㕤ẛ惘䘬⛘㭝 FCF 嘇⺢ᶨ⮷⯳⍲⊾䲆㰈ἄ梲㬾⭞䥥␴➡㢵偍㕁ᷳ䓐炻᷎ᶨ䚜ἧ䓐䚜军 BJJI ⸜㛶㮷ṳℍ䁢 㬊ˤ ᶵ忶炻⌛ἧ⶚妪䩳ᷕ⺷⣹䲬炻㛶㥖⭴ᶨ䚜㉺䳽㬋⺷㕤⛇⛘姣Ⅎ嗽㚜㓡㚱斄⛇⛘㤕㪲炻⊭㊔℞ ᷳ⼴⽆㛶佑㠭䣾岤ℍ᷎ẍᾳṢ⎵佑㊩㚱䘬⛘㭝 FCFˤ䚜军 BJGI ⸜㛶ᶱ⊅➪妋㔋⼴炻昛㮷㕡 傥㬋⺷㕤⛇⛘姣Ⅎ嗽䘣姀㑩㚱⛘㭝 FCC4FCD ⍲ FCE 䘬悐ấ⛇⛘炷⎵䁢⛘㭝 FCC4FCD ⍲ FCE炻Ⱄ℞⶚⺢⯳䘬悐ấ炸炻℞检⛇⛘⯙㬠㛶㥖⭴䈡㚱ˤ侴⌛ἧ昛㮷ᶨℵ天㯪炻㛶㮷ᶨ䚜㉺ 䳽㚜㓡⛘㭝 FCF 嘇䘬⛇⛘䘣姀烊娚⛘㭝䘬䘣姀ᶨ䚜㗗⛐㛶㥖⭴⎵ᶳ炻᷎䓙㛶㮷丛Ṍ㚱斄⛘ 䦭ˤBJJD ⸜炻㛶㥖⭴必ᶾ炻侴℞⃺⫸⍲昛㮷冒 BJJI ⸜崟⯙⛘㭝 FCF 䘬㤕㪲䓊䓇䳃䇕炻⚈ 㬌姜媠㱽⹕妋㰢ˤ 䡢䩳微㪲䭉㚱 ᶨ⤪℞Ṿ微㪲䭉㚱㟰ẞ炻㬌㟰䘬䫔ᶨ㬍炻㗗天䡢䩳微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ炻⌛昛㮷炻㕤㗪㓰㛇ᷳℏᶨ䚜 微㪲䭉㚱娚⛇⛘炻侴⍇㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ㕤㬌℞攻㛒㚱ἧ䓐烊㚱斄忋临䭉㚱䘬悐ấ炻䓙㕤嫱㒂⃭ 嵛炻㕤⍇姇㗪⶚䴻㶭㤂䡢䩳炻ᷳ⼴䘬ᶲ姜Ṏℵ䃉䇕嬘烊䔞㗪ᷣ⮑㱽⭀⻝冱傥㊯↢炻⌛ἧ⛘㭝 FCF 㕤 BJGI ⸜ D 㚰㚦㚱㤕㪲廱嬻炷䓙㛶佑㠭䣾廱Ḱ㛶㥖⭴炸炻㗪㓰㛇ㅱ䓙 BJFE ⸜㈹ㆾ BJGI ⸜攳⥳妰䬿⎗傥⬀⛐䇕嬘炻Ữᶵ婾攳⥳⸜ấ䁢ỽ炻䚜军 JA ⸜ẋᷕ㛶㮷⍲昛㮷⯙⛘㭝 FCF ↢䎦䲦䳃㗪炻昛㮷⶚㊱庫㖑㗪㱽ἳ夷⭂炻䭉㚱娚⛘㭝崭忶 CA ⸜烊㎃妨ᷳ炻㚨怚䚜军 BJII ⸜ D 㚰炻昛㮷⶚䡢䩳⮵⛘㭝 FCF 嘇䘬微㪲䭉㚱// -ˤ ˬ临㛇˭⼴炻微㪲䭉㚱㗗⏎ṵ䃞ㆸ䩳烎 Ữ⌛ἧ忋临䭉㚱嫱㒂⃭ấ炻㱽⹕ṵ暨嗽䎮ᶨᾳ⓷柴–忁ᾳ微㪲䭉㚱炻㕤ˬ临㛇˭⼴㗗⏎ṵ䃞 ㆸ䩳ˤ忁⍾㰢㕤⤪ỽ䎮妋˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬炷临㛇炸㡅ἳ˫⮵⛇⛘ˬ临㛇˭䘬⭂佑烉ˬ临㛇˭ ⼴䘬⛇⛘炻⇘⸽䬿ˬ⺞临˭冲䦇⣹㈹ㆾ䬿㗗ˬ慵㕘妪䩳˭ℐ㕘䦇⣹ˤ 5 㬌㟰㕤⍇姇⹕ᷕ炻㗪ả檀䫱㱽昊㙓⥼㱽⭀⻝冱傥:',+0 &,)+ ,%).,%炸⇌ 㰢昛㮷微㪲䭉㚱㚱㓰烊ᶲ姜⹕⇯ẍ⣏㭼㔠炷伭‹⽿∗⹕攟:&%&)*;ˣ悕伶崭㱽⭀:&% &% ;⎴シ炻⍲堩⭞⮏㱽⭀:&%,% ;⍵⮵炸㍐侣⍇姇塩㰢烊侴䳪⮑㱽昊⇯ᶨ农塩 ⭂炻㍐侣ᶲ姜⹕塩㰢炻娵䁢娚ˬ临㛇˭䁢⺞临冲䲬//-ˤ㔜⎰Ḯ⛐⍇姇ˣᶲ姜⍲䳪⮑ᷕ㍸⇘䘬 ᷣ天奨溆⼴炻䘤䎦㭼庫㰢⭂⿏䘬妶婾炻㗗⚵丆炷ᶨ炸㘖忂㱽䘬旸⇞炻⍲烊炷Ḵ炸㱽ἳ䓐⫿⍲ 䩳㱽⍇シˤ ᶨ炽㘖忂㱽䘬旸⇞ ẋ堐㛶㮷䘬⼳ⷓ㍸↢炻⛐㘖忂㱽䘬旸⇞ᶳ炻᷎ᶵ傥忂忶䦇⣹暁㕡䘬ˬℙ嬀˭⺞攟ᶨấ䦇⣹㛇 旸//- ˤ䳪⮑㱽昊朆ⷠả⣏㱽⭀屨庼㖶⊛䇝炷 &)&$%%炸㕤䳪⮑⇌娆ᷕ⮵㬌㤪⾝≈ẍ妋 慳烉㟡㒂㘖忂㱽炻䦇⣹Ⱄᶨ枭斄㕤⛇⛘㪲䙲䘬屉䓊炻㚨⇅㗗䴻暁㕡⎴シ侴妪䩳烊ᶨ㖎句⮎ᶼ ℔媠㕤ᶾ炻⯙ᶵ傥╖ㄹ暁㕡䘬ˬℙ嬀˭侴ᾖ㓡䔞ᷕ䘬㡅ẞ侴㚜㓡忁ấˬ屉䓊˭烊侴䦇⣹䘬㛇 旸㗗䦇⣹↿㖶䘬㡅ẞᷳᶨ炻⚈㬌⛐㘖忂㱽⍇⇯ᶳ炻Ṏᶵ傥德忶䚠Ḻ⋼嬘⍣ᾖ㓡//- ˤ 屨庼㖶⊛䇝␴⻝冱傥㱽⭀悥⺽䓐㟰ἳ炻㊯劍⛐ᶨ凔ね㱩炻⛐㘖忂㱽䘬⍇⇯ᶳ炻⤪㝄天ˬ⺞ 攟˭䦇⣹炻⎒傥德忶ˬṌ怬⍲慵㈡˭:*,))%)%)8)%+;ㆾˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭:)-)* &%)0 #*炻⌛㕤⇵ᶨấ䦇⣹㛇旸⯮㺧⇵⶚妪䩳⛐㛇㺧⼴䓇㓰䘬䫔Ḵấ䦇⣹;㕡⺷嗽䎮//- ˤ ỮṲ㫉䘬ˬ临㛇˭⍰㗗⏎Ⱄˬᶨ凔ね㱩˭␊烎ẋ堐㛶㮷䘬⼳ⷓ娵䁢㗗烊Ṿ娵䁢㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬 :临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬䫔 G 㡅炷⌛㚱斄临㛇䘬㡅㔯炸// /炻⎒傥德忶㕤㡅ἳ䓇㓰㗪炷⌛ BJII ⸜ E 㚰炸ˬṌ怬炷冲⣹炸⍲慵㈡炷㕘⣹炸˭:*,))%)%)8)%+;炻ㆾ侭㕤 BJJH ⸜ G 㚰冲⣹⣙ 㓰㗪䴎Ḱ㕘⣹䘬⼊⺷➟埴炻⚈㬌ㅱ夾ἄ㕘⣹炻᷎夾ᷳ䁢冯㛶㮷妪䩳㕘䘬㤕㪲斄Ὢˤ㎃妨ᷳ炻 昛㮷㕤 BJII ⸜㇨忼农微㪲䭉㚱䘬㗪㓰㛇⎒Ẍ㛶㮷㕤冲⣹ᷕ䘬㤕㪲䳪䳽烊妪䩳㕘⣹⼴㗪㓰ㅱ慵 㕘妰䬿炻侴ᶵ婾㗗ẍ BJII ⸜ㆾ㗗 BJJH ⸜崟妰炻军 BJJI ⸜ℍ䧇㗪炻㕘⣹ᶳ䘬㗪㓰旸㛇ṵ㛒 ⬴䳸炻⚈㬌昛㮷ㅱ㰺㚱微㪲䭉㚱䘬㪲⇑///ˤ侴ᶲ姜⹕䘬悕伶崭㱽⭀Ṏ娵䁢炻㬌㟰ᶵㅱẍ ,% 姜 $ *#%炷ᶨ⤪⇵徘炻㗗㚱斄˪㕘䓴:⎗临㛇㓧⹄䦇⣹;㡅ἳ˫炷楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔 BFC 䪈炸䘬ˬ临㛇˭㗗⏎䓊䓇㕘㤕㪲炸ἄ㟰ἳẞ⇌㰢炻⚈䁢娚㫉临㛇㚱↿庱㕤⍇⥳䦇䲬ᷕ炻ᶵⰔ 㕘㪲⇑烊ỮṲ㫉˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭᷎䃉庱㕤⍇⥳䦇⣹炻㈧䦇Ṣ炷㤕 㪲㑩㚱侭炸㟡㒂℞⍇⥳䦇䲬㇨ṓ㚱䘬㪲⇑⛐晐叿冲䦇䲬⬴䳸侴㴰⣙炻⚈㬌Ṳ㫉ˬ临㛇˭ㅱ䓊 䓇㕘䘬㤕㪲炻微㪲䭉㚱㗪㓰㛇Ṏㅱ慵㕘攳⥳妰䬿/// ˤ 6 Ữ䳪⮑⹕䘬屨庼㖶⊛䇝␴⍇姇⹕䘬⻝冱傥㱽⭀⇯娵䁢㬌嫃㱽᷎ᶵㆸ䩳ˤṾᾹ⛯娵䁢炻䩳㱽㨇 斄㚱㪲≃⍣德忶䩳㱽⍣ᾖ㓡㓧⹄⛘⣹ᷕ䘬㡅㔯炷㛇旸炸侴ᶵ⍿㘖忂㱽㇨旸/// ˤ屨庼㖶⊛䇝㚜 ㊯↢炻䩳㱽㨇斄炷㲐シ楁㷗㗗ᶱ㪲↮䩳炻䩳㱽㨇斄᷎ᶵ䫱⎴ἄ䁢埴㓧㨇斄䘬㓧⹄炸德忶䩳㱽 ᾖ㓡⛘⣹ᷕ䘬㡅㔯炻㚱斄ᾖ㓡᷎朆ˬ⣹䲬暁㕡ℙ嬀˭烊侴⌛ἧ㟡㒂˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅 ἳ˫䫔 F 㡅/// 炻㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ⎗ẍ⛐㊯⭂旸㛇ℏ怠㑯㗗⏎ˬ临㛇˭炻Ữ↢䦇Ṣ炷⌛㓧⹄炸᷎䃉 怠㑯ㆾ⏎㰢临䦇䘬㪲⇑烊⛐℞ᷕᶨ㕡᷎䃉怠㑯ᷳᶳ炻ᶵ傥夾䁢ˬℙ嬀˭/// -烊⚈㬌炻⮯ˬ临 㛇˭夾䁢冲⣹䘬⺞临炻᷎䃉忽⍵㘖忂㱽ˤ 6ˬṌ怬⍲慵㈡˭:*,))%)%)8)%+;ㆾˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭:)-)* &%)0#*;3 ⛐㚱斄㘖忂㱽䱦䤆䘬妶婾ᷕ炻Ṏ㍸↢ℑᾳ炷㕤㬌㟰ᷕ炸庫㫉天䘬㤪⾝ˤ℞ᷕᶨᾳ㗗ˬṌ怬⍲ 慵㈡˭:*,))%)%)8)%+;ㆾˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭:)-)* &%)0#*;䘬㤪⾝烉侴⛐⍇姇⍲ᶲ姜⇌ 娆ᷕ炻Ṏ㚱ᶵ⮹斄㕤ℑ侭⎗埴⿏䘬妶婾烊忁⮵㕤䳪⮑㱽昊㚨䳪㰢⭂㚱斄ˬ临㛇˭㗗䩳㱽㨇㥳 䘬ṳℍ㚱ᶨ⭂䘬⼙枧烊侴䔞ᷕ炻ᶲ姜⹕㱽⭀堩⭞⮏ᷣ⻝ˬ临㛇˭Ⱄ冲⣹⺞临䘬妋慳㚨䁢㶭 㤂ˤ ⤡椾⃰⏎⭂˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭㗗Ṍ怬⍲慵㈡:*,))%)%)8)%+; 䘬㕡㱽嗽䎮///-ˤ⤡㟡㒂⮵℞Ṿ㱽ἳ䘬奨⮇炻⤪㝄↢䎦暨天德忶Ṍ怬⍲慵㈡㕡⺷忚埴䘬ね㱩炻 ᶨ凔㚫㕤㱽ἳᷕ㖶㔯夷⭂炻Ữ⛐˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫᷎ᷕ䃉㖶䡢妪㖶ˤ Ữ㚜慵天䘬炻㗗➟埴㗪攻烊⤡㊯↢炻ᶨ凔Ṍ怬⍲慵㈡:*,))%)%)8)%+;忶䦳ᷕ炻㗗⛐Ṍ 怬冲⣹⼴炻㕘⣹晐⌛⛐䔞⣑䓇㓰ˤ劍㝄⤪彗㕡炷㛶㮷炸䘬⼳ⷓ㇨ẍ㊯炻Ṍ怬⍲慵㈡˪㕘䓴⛇ ⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䫔 G 㡅䓇㓰㖍炷BJII ⸜ E㚰 CF 㖍炸忚埴䘬娙炻˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅 ἳ˫ᷕ⯙ㅱ㖶䡢妪㖶㕘⣹䘬䓇㓰㖍䁢 E 㚰 CF 㖍炻Ữ㡅ἳ᷎ᷕ㰺㚱㬌枭烊⍵ᷳ炻⛐䫔 G 㡅↿ ↢烉ˬ䓙⣹䲬劍朆⚈㛔㡅ἳὧ㚫⯮㺧䘬㖍㛇崟…˭炻⤡娵䁢忁嬲䚠㈧娵Ḯ㬌ˬ临㛇˭冲⣹䲬 㗗⺞临ˤ ⎎⢾炻⤡Ṏ⏎⭂㗗ẍ⽑㬠䦇⣹:)-)* &%)0#*;㑵ἄ䘬⎗傥///- ˤ⚈䁢⽑㬠䦇⣹㑵ἄ㡅ẞ炻㗗 ↢䦇侭␴㈧䦇侭悥㚱㪲怠㑯㗗⏎临䦇↢炻↢䦇侭Ṏ⎗怠㑯临䦇⮵尉烊Ữᶨ⤪⇵徘炻˪㕘䓴⛇ ⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ炻⎒妪㖶䦇䓐侭⎗怠㑯㉺䳽临㛇䘬㪲⇑炻Ữ↢䦇侭᷎ᶵ傥怠㑯㗗⏎临 7 䦇炻Ṏᶵ傥怠㑯临䦇䘬⮵尉ˤ⚈㬌炻⤡Ṏᶵ娵䁢˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭ ⎗䬿ἄ⽑㬠䦇⣹ˤ 6㚱⏎䡢䩳㕘䘬㤕㪲烎 ⎎ᶨ㕡朊炻ᶨ⤪⇵徘炻➢㕤㕘䓴⛇⛘䘬㚨䳪㤕ᷣ㗗㓧⹄烊⚈㬌炻ˬ㤕㪲˭䘬㤪⾝᷎朆╖䲼䘬 ˬ㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ˭␴ˬ㑭冒Ỽ䓐侭˭ᷳ攻䘬斄Ὢ烊㚱斄微㪲Ỽ㚱䘬䡢䩳炻Ⱄˬ㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ˭␴ ˬ㑭冒Ỽ䓐侭˭ᷳ攻嗽䎮烊侴㚱斄⣹䲬䘬临㛇炻⯙㗗ˬ㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ˭ἄ䁢㈧䦇Ṣ␴㓧⹄ἄ䁢 ↢䦇Ṣᷳ攻䘬斄Ὢˤ㬋⤪ᶲ姜⹕伭‹⽿∗⹕攟⛐⇌娆ᷕ㊯↢炻⍇㛔䘬㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ䘬㤕㪲炻⮵ 㕤㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭炷微㪲䭉㚱侭炸侴妨⭋⏲䳪䳽炻᷎ᶵẋ堐℞ἄ䁢⛇⛘㈧䦇侭冯↢䦇侭炷⌛㓧 ⹄炸ᷳ攻䘬㪲⇑冯佑⊁䳪䳽烊Ṿ㍸↢ᶨᾳ⼰⮎晃㖻㖶䘬ἳ⫸炻⯙㗗㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ炻⌛ἧ⚈微㪲 䭉㚱侴ἧ℞⮵㕤㑭冒Ỽ䓐侭䘬㤕㪲䳪䳽炻Ữṵ䃞暨天两临⎹㓧⹄丛Ṍ⛘䦇ˤ ᶵ忶Ṿ⯙娵䁢炻䓙㕤㑭冒Ỽ䓐侭炷⌛微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ炸冯㚨䳪㤕ᷣ炷⌛㓧⹄炸ᷳ攻ᶵ⬀⛐㤕㪲斄 Ὢ炻㇨ẍ䔞⍇㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ冯↢䦇侭ᷳ攻䘬⣹䲬⬴䳸炻㈧䦇Ṣ冲䘬㤕㪲Ṏ⏲䳪䳽炻㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭 ⍇㛔⛐娚⛇⛘㇨⺢䩳䘬㪲⇑炷⌛微㪲䭉㚱炸Ṏ⏲⣙㓰///- ˤ 伭‹⽿∗⹕攟㍸↢㚱斄⮵ㅱᶵ⎴⮵尉䡢䩳㤕㪲䘬㤪⾝Ṏ夳㕤堩⭞⮏㱽⭀␴屨庼㖶⊛䇝㇨㑘⮓ 䘬⇌娆ᷕˤỮ斄挝ṵ䃞㗗⮵㕤㈧䦇Ṣ炷㤕㪲㑩㚱侭炸⍲↢䦇Ṣᷳ攻䘬⍇㛔⣹䲬炻⛐˪㕘䓴⛇ ⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䘬ˬ临㛇˭ᷳᶳ炻Ⱄ㕤ˬ⺞临˭冲䦇⣹怬㗗夾䁢㕘妪䦇⣹䘬ⶖ䔘ˤ Ḵ炽㱽ἳ䓐⫿⍲䩳㱽⍇シ 䳪⮑㱽昊⯙ˬ⚆㬠➢㛔㬍˭⍣嗽䎮忁ᾳ斄挝烉⽆㱽ἳ䘬䓐⫿⍲䩳㱽⍇シ↢䘤⍣䎮妋㱽ἳ䘬䓐 シˤ䳪⮑㱽昊朆ⷠả㱽↿栗ΐ炷 ) ,*+ ++&% 炸娵䁢炻㱽⭂妋慳⽭⃰㸸㕤㗗㇨䓐娆婆䘬 㘖忂婆妨⏓佑炻᷎ᶵㅱ忶⹎教嬨炻䁢忼农㱽昊㇨㛇㛃㓰㝄侴䁢㱽ἳ㶣ᶲ᷎ᶵ⬀⛐䘬シ⿅炻⏎ ⇯暋ẍ䵕㊩冯℞Ṿ㓧⹄㨇斄䘬斄Ὢ烊Ṿ娵䁢㬌㟰㬌⇵䘬妶婾ᷕ炻䋞㕤⛐㡅㔯ᷕ≈ℍˬ㌰Ḱ㕘 䘬⣹䲬˭䘬⫿䛤炻㗗ᶵ傥䘤䓇䘬///- ˤ嬲䚠㗗⏎⭂䁢Ḯ天ˬ䫎⎰㘖忂㱽䱦䤆˭侴⮯㡅㔯䎮妋 䁢㌰Ḱ㕘⣹䲬炷ᶵ婾㗗ˬṌ怬⍲慵㈡˭ㆾˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭炸䘬妋慳ˤ Ṿ⍰娵䁢炻㬌㟰䘬妶婾ㅱ娚㗗憅⮵˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䫔 G 㡅ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭䘬シ⿅ ⍲㓰㝄烊Ṿ娵䁢˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䫔 G 㡅ᷕ炻㊯㗗䎦⬀⣹䲬䘬⸜㛇ˬ䓙⣹䲬劍朆 8 ⚈㛔㡅ἳὧ㚫⯮㺧䘬㖍㛇崟炻Ḱẍ临㛇:/+%;˭⶚㗗朆ⷠ㶭㤂烊㱽ἳ䘬劙㔯䓐娆/+%炻 ⶚㶭㘘⛘⯽䣢⺞临䘬シ⿅炻侴妋嬨ㅱ䯉╖䚜㍍烉ˬ䎦⬀䘬䦇⣹临㛇炷/+%炸军 CAEH ⸜ G 㚰 DA 㖍炻⎍嘇ˤ˭/// / 侴屨庼㖶⊛䇝昌Ḯ⤪ᶲ㇨徘炻慸㶭Ḯᶨṃ⽆⃰⇵⇌㰢ᷕ℞Ṿ㱽⭀㇨㍸↢䘬奨溆⢾炻ṾṎ㍸⇘ 䩳㱽⍇シ烉Ṿ娵䁢炻˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫⍲˪ᷕ劙倗⎰倚㖶˫侴⇞妪炻侴Ṿ娵䁢炻 䩳㱽䘬⍇シ㗗ⶴ㛃䵕㊩⍇䉨:*++,*(,&;炻ᶵ婾㗗⮵㈧䦇侭炷㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ炸ㆾ㑭冒Ỽ⛘侭侴 妨ˤ⚈㬌炻Ṿ慵䓛炻˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭炻ㅱ夾䁢冲䦇䲬䘬⺞临/#ˤ ䷥䳸 ⌛ἧ⛐⍇姇⍲ᶲ姜⹕⮵㱽⼳奨溆㚱ᶵ⎴䘬斉嬗炻⛐昛姜㛶㟰䘬䳪⮑⇌娆ᷕ炻ℑỵ㱽⭀⶚⼰㶭 㘘⛘ˬ怬⍇➢㛔㬍˭炻塩⭂⮵㱽ἳ䘬䎮妋炻ㅱ娚㗗⽆㚨➢㛔䘬㖍ⷠ妋慳ℍㇳ烊㗗ẍ炻˪㕘䓴 ⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫ᷕ䘬ˬ临㛇˭炻ㅱ夾䁢冲䦇䲬䘬⺞临ˤ㎃妨ᷳ炻忁Ṏ䁢ㆹᾹ㚨⇅ⶴ㛃 妶婾䘬␥柴㍸ὃḮ㚨䚜㍍䘬䫼㟰烊䓙㕤˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䘬妪䩳㗗ㅱˬᷕ劙倗⎰ 倚㖶˭䘬天㯪炻侴倚㖶䘬⍇シ㗗ⶴ㛃䵕㊩⍇䉨炷*++,*(,&炸FA ⸜炻⚈㬌炻㚱斄㕘䓴䦇⣹䘬 ˬ临㛇˭ㅱ夾䁢冲䦇䲬䘬⺞临烊⛐ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍ⇵⶚䡢䩳䘬微㪲䭉㚱炻ㆾ⶚攳⥳䘬㗪㓰㛇妰䬿炻 ⯙ᶵ⍿㬌ˬ临㛇˭⼙枧炻ᶵ暨慵㕘妰䬿ˤ ῤ⼿㲐シ䘬⛘㕡㗗炻㓧⹄ἄ䁢⛇⛘↢䦇侭炻℞ᷣ㪲䓙㷗劙㬾㮹⛘㓧⹄廱嬲䁢楁㷗䈡⇍埴㓧㪲 㓧⹄㬌ᶨ奨溆炻᷎㰺㚱ㆸ䁢㟰ẞ䘬妶婾天溆烊⍵侴炻⯙ˬ临㛇˭㚱⏎⺢䩳㕘㤕㪲䘬妶婾炻ᷣ 天㗗➢㕤㚱斄㘖忂㱽䱦䤆䘬妶婾炻侴朆㚱斄㓧⹄䘬ˬᷣ㪲˭ˤ 劍䳘教⇌娆炻Ṏᶵ暋䔁シ䔞ᷕ䘬⍇⚈烉㬋⤪屨庼㖶⊛䇝㊯↢炻㕤ᷕ劙暁㕡㕤 ⸜ẋ⇅⯙楁 㷗⇵徼婯⇌㗪炻䓙㕤䔞㗪㕘䓴㇨㚱⶚㈡䦇䘬⛇⛘䘬⣹䲬悥㚫⛐ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍᷳ⇵䳪䳸烊䔞㗪⚈⇵ 徼ᶵ䡢⭂侴忈ㆸṢ⽫ゞゞ炻ℑ⚳㓧⹄⯙忼ㆸ⋼嬘炻Ṏ㕤˪ᷕ劙倗⎰倚㖶˫㖶䡢↿㖶炻⮯㇨㚱 ⍇㛔⛐ BJJH ⸜ G 㚰 DA 㖍⇵䳪䳸䘬⛇⛘⣹䲬ˬ临㛇˭军 CAEH ⸜/# 烊侴˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇; 㡅ἳ˫Ṏ䁢句⮎㬌ℙ嬀侴妪䩳ˤ ⎎ᶨ㕡朊˪ᷕ劙倗⎰倚㖶˫᷎䃉ảỽ㡅㔯天㯪炻⚈䁢㓧⹄䘬ᷣ㪲ᶵ⎴侴慵㕘妪䩳⣹䲬炻⍵侴 㗗天㯪临㛇/# 炻劙㔯Ṏἧ䓐“extend”/# 㬌ᶨ㚱⺞临ᷳシ䘬⫿䛤烊侴⛐˪➢㛔㱽˫䫔 BCA ⍲ BCB 9 㡅Ṏ㚱䚠ㅱ㡅㔯/# -ˤ⚈㬌炻⛐忁ṃ㖶䡢䘬㡅㔯ᷳᶳ炻⯙暋ẍ䲼䱡⽆ᷣ㪲䘬廱嬲侴婾嫱㚱斄⣹ 䲬Ⱄˬ㕘⣹䲬˭炻侴暨⽆㱽⼳奨溆ℍㇳˤ 侴晾䃞㚱斄㘖忂㱽䱦䤆妶婾⛐䳪⮑塩㰢ᷕ塓夾䁢⮵㡅ἳ䘬ˬ忶ấ妋嬨˭炻侴䔞ᷕ䘬ˬṌ怬⍲ 慵㈡˭⍲ˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭悥塓夾ᶵ䫎˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫䘬妪䩳⍇シˤ䃞侴炻傥德忶 㬌㟰ἳ⮵忁ṃ⍇⇯㚱忚ᶨ㬍䎮妋炻⎗傥⮵䎮妋℞Ṿ⛇⛘䚠斄㟰ẞ㚱⸓≑烊⎎⢾炻天㲐シ䘬㗗 ⇘⸽㚱斄ˬ临㛇˭ⰔˬṌ怬⍲慵㈡˭㈹ㆾˬ⽑㬠䦇⣹˭℞⮎ᶨ䚜㛒㚱嗽䎮炻⚈䁢㱽⹕娵䁢炻 ᶵ婾怠枭䁢ỽ炻悥㚫忼农䚠⎴䳸㝄侴㛒㚱ἄ㰢⭂烊Ữ䃉婾⤪ỽ炻⚈䁢ℑ侭悥ᶵㆸ䩳侴㚱斄 ˬ临㛇˭夾䁢⺞临冲⣹炻䚠ᾉṎᶵ㚫ℵ⯙㬌ἄ妶婾ˤ 㚨⼴炻㬌婾㔯⚈䁢䭯ⷭ⍲㗪攻㇨旸炻⎒⽆˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫↢䘤Ḯ妋℞⮵微㪲䭉 㚱㗪㓰㛇妰䬿䘬⼙枧烊䃞侴炻ᷣ㪲䦣Ṍᷳ⼴炻昌Ḯ㚱˪㕘䓴⛇⛘⣹䲬:临㛇;㡅ἳ˫⍲冯⛇⛘ 䚜㍍䚠斄䘬夷⭂⢾炻Ṏ㚱⍇㤕㪲㑩㚱Ṣ炷䳁ᶲ㑩㚱Ṣ炸娵䁢˪㗪㓰㡅ἳ˫冯˪➢㛔㱽˫䫔 G 㡅⍲䫔 BAF 㡅斄㕤ᾅ晄䥩㚱屉䓊㡅㔯㚱㇨㉝妠侴姜媠㱽⹕炻㚨⼴⛯塓⼳㓧⎠⍲䳪⮑㱽昊楩⚆ ℞⎠㱽央㟠䘬䓛婳ˤ晾䃞楩⚆䘬ᷣ⚈㗗➢㕤℞㚱㾓䓐㱽⼳䦳⸷ᷳ⩴⍲㚱⍇㤕㪲⛐˪➢㛔㱽˫ 䓇㓰⇵⶚䳪䳽炻Ữ㱽⭀⛐⇌娆ᷕṎ㚱䡢䩳微㪲䭉㚱⇞⹎䘬⽭天⿏–ᷣ天Ṏ㗗➢㕤㱽ἳ䘬䓐⫿ ẍ⍲䥩㚱屉䓊冯℔䛦⇑䙲炷䍵屜䘬⛇⛘屯㸸炸ᷳ攻䘬⸛堅ἄ侫慷/#-烊忁䚠ᾉ⎗ẍἄ䁢㖍⼴㍊ 妶微㪲䭉㚱䘬⬀⛐シ佑㗪䘬ᶨᾳ慵天⍫侫ˤ 㱽⼳㓡朑⥼⒉㚫ˬ微㪲䭉㚱⮷䳬⥼⒉㚫˭媖娊㔯ẞˤCABC ⸜ BC 㚰炻㭝 C6Bˤ⍾冒烉 ++'*577...6")&)$6&-6"7+7',# + &%*7-)*'&**** &%6+$ 6㭝 C6C 6㭝 C6G8C6I ⍲ C6EC -⛐教嬨昛姜㛶㟰䘬⇌娆㗪炻㱽⭀㚦⣂㫉㍸↢昛㮷ἄ䁢微㪲䭉㚱Ṣ㚱冱嫱屔ảˤ &,)+&+&% &%4 &,)+& )*+ %*+%6% % %,%4 &%& 4 &% %% %,%:''& %++&)')*%+ +*++&+* %,;: EBJB7BJJI;BE %,)0CAAD6 -㱽⼳㓡朑⥼⒉㚫ˬ微㪲䭉㚱⮷䳬⥼⒉㚫˭媖娊㔯ẞˤCABC ⸜ BC 㚰ˤ⍾冒烉 ++'*577...6")&)$6&-6"7+7',# + &%*7-)*'&**** &%6+$ - ˪㗪㓰㡅ἳ˫:楁㷗㱽ἳ䫔DEH䪈;䫔 H 㡅炻⍇㔯䁢ˬ:B;冒㚱斄姜姇㪲⛐⭀㕡㕡朊䓊䓇䘬㖍㛇崟妰㺧 GA ⸜⼴炻 ⭀㕡ᶵ⼿㍸↢㓞⚆⛇⛘䘬姜姇烊⤪娚姜姇㪲㚨⇅⛐㝸Ṣ㕡朊䓊䓇炻侴⭀㕡㗗德忶娚㝸Ṣ侴䓛䳊䘬炻⇯⭀㕡Ṏᶵ ⼿⛐娚姜姇㪲⛐娚Ṣ㕡朊䓊䓇䘬㖍㛇崟妰㺧 GA ⸜⼴㍸↢㓞⚆⛇⛘䘬姜姇ˤ:C;冒㚱斄姜姇㪲⛐ảỽ℞ṾṢ㕡朊 䓊䓇䘬㖍㛇崟妰㺧 BC ⸜⼴炻Ṿᶵ⼿㍸↢㓞⚆⛇⛘䘬姜姇烊⤪娚姜姇㪲㚨⇅⛐㝸Ṣ㕡朊䓊䓇炻侴Ṿ㗗德忶娚㝸Ṣ 侴䓛䳊䘬炻⇯ṾṎᶵ⼿⛐娚姜姇㪲⛐娚㝸Ṣ㕡朊䓊䓇䘬㖍㛇崟妰㺧 BC ⸜⼴㍸↢㓞⚆⛇⛘䘬姜姇ˤ˭⍾冒烉 ++'*577...6# *#+ &%6&-6"7"7'DEH2%818%+8 3 9K烊侴㱽⼳㓡朑⥼⒉㚫ˬ微㪲䭉㚱⮷䳬⥼⒉ 㚫˭媖娊㔯ẞṎ㚱⮵㬌枭ἄ妋慳ˤ - 㕤˪BJJB⸜㗪㓰:ᾖ妪;㡅ἳ˫䫔 DB 嘇䫔F㡅⮵䫔DEH䪈ἄ↢ᾖ妪ˤ⛐㬌ᷳ⇵炻㓞⚆⛇⛘䘬㗪㓰㛇䁢CA⸜ˤ 10 - ⍫夳 Cheung, S.W.
Recommended publications
  • VAHONGKONG 15 Hebei V Polytek HKLII

    VAHONGKONG 15 Hebei V Polytek HKLII

    Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback I. COURT OF FINAL APPEAL You are here: HKLII >> Databases >> Court of Final Appeal >> 1999 >> [1999] HKCFA 40 Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | MS Word Format | Chinese Translation | Help A. HEBEI IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION V. POLYTEK ENGINEERING CO. LTD. [1999] HKCFA 40; [1999] 1 HKLRD 665; (1999) 2 HKCFAR 111; FACV10/1998 (9 FEBRUARY 1999) FACV000010/1998 FACV No. 10 of 1998 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 1998 (CIVIL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV No. 116 OF 1997) _____________________ Between: HEBEI IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION Appellant AND POLYTEK ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Respondent _____________________ Court: Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Sir Anthony Mason NPJ Date of Hearing: 21, 22, 27 and 28 January 1999 Date of Judgment: 9 February 1999 ___________________ J U D G M E N T ___________________ Chief Justice Li : 1. I have read the judgment of Sir Anthony Mason NPJ. I agree with it and the orders he proposes. Mr Justice Litton PJ : Introduction 2. I have had the advantage of reading in draft Sir Anthony Mason NPJ's judgment. As he has set out fully the background to this appeal, it is unnecessary for me to repeat it. History of the proceedings 3. It is important at the outset to bear in mind that the court is here concerned with a Convention award: an award which, in this case, has been determined by a court in the supervisory jurisdiction to have been made in conformity with the rules governing the arbitral process.
  • 附錄列表- List of Appendices

    附錄列表- List of Appendices

    ! List of Appendices 2001 !" Appendix 1 Highlights of Events 2001 142 !"#$% Appendix 2 List of Judges and Judicial Officers 148 ! Appendix 3 Structure of Courts 154 !"#$!%&!'( Appendix 4 Membership List of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission 155 !"#$%&$'( Appendix 5 Membership List of the Court Users’ Committees 156 !"#$%&#'(#)* Appendix 6 Membership List of the Judicial Studies Board 158 !"#$!%&'( / !"#$ Appendix 7 Training Activities Organised / Co-ordinated by the Judicial Studies Board 159 !"#$% / Appendix 8 Number of Visits and Visitors to the Judiciary 166 2000–2001 !"#$%&'() Appendix 9 Expenditure and Revenue of the Judiciary for 2000–2001 167 !"#$%&! Appendix 10 Organisation of the Judiciary Administration 168 List of Appendices ! 141 Appendix 1 !" 2001 2001 !" Highlights of Events 2001 Highlights of Events 2001 January March 10 !"#$%&'()*$+, Virginia Bonoan-Dandan !"#$% Paul Hunt 22-28 !"#$%&'() 1980 10 25 !"# !"#$%&'() !"# $%& !" !"##$ Professor Virginia Bonoan-Dandan, Chairperson, and Professor Paul Hunt, Rapporteur, Committee The Hon Mr Justice Hartmann attended the “Fourth Special Commission to review the operation on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the United Nations, called on the Hon Chief Justice of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Mr Andrew Li Child Abduction” in Hague, the Netherlands 11 !"#$%&'()$*+,-$./01234567238-9: 23-24 !"# $%&'( $%)*+ $%,-. $%/01$23456789:;< $ The terms of office of The Rt Hon The Lord Nicholls of
  • In the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    In the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    FACV No. 17 of 2008 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2008 (CIVIL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 248 OF 2006) _____________________ Between : PECONIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LTD Plaintiff (Appellant) - and - LAU KWOK FAI 1st Defendant (Respondent) ALBERT K.K. LUK & CO. (a firm) 2nd Defendant K.F. LAU & CO. (a firm) 3rd Defendant (Respondent) _____________________ FACV No. 18 of 2008 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2008 (CIVIL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 245 OF 2006) _____________________ - 2 - Between : PECONIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LTD Plaintiff (Appellant) - and – LAU KWOK FAI 1st Defendant ALBERT K.K. LUK & CO. (a firm) 2nd Defendant (Respondent) K.F. LAU & CO. (a firm) 3rd Defendant _____________________ Court : Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Litton NPJ and Lord Hoffmann NPJ Dates of Hearing : 9 to 11 February 2009 Date of Judgment : 27 February 2009 J U D G M E N T Mr Justice Bokhary PJ : 1. I agree with the judgment of Lord Hoffmann NPJ. Mr Justice Chan PJ : 2. I agree with the judgment of Lord Hoffmann NPJ. Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ : 3. I agree with the judgment of Lord Hoffmann NPJ. - 3 - Mr Justice Litton NPJ : 4. On 1 June 2006, after trial, the judge ordered Danny Lau to pay to Peconic the sum of HK$350,534,416, leaving the question of interest and cost for later determination. He also gave judgment against the firms Albert K.K.
  • Document Country: Hong Kong

    Document Country: Hong Kong

    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 5 Tab Number: 17 Document Title: Hong Kong Elections?Transition to Autonomy Document Date: 1997 Document Country: Hong Kong IFES 10: R01655 I~ D * I I I I I Hong Kong Elections Transition to Autonomy I I I I I I Jeff Fischer Sandy Shuster I International Foundation for Elections Systems I June 25, 1997 I I I I I gs--"_S)lt!ms I 11011~\IFHl,KW.' lIRlRfll· ~ OUIl~' ~1MI11' fI.I~&.8)I I I Table of Contents I Page I. Introduction I II. Institutions I I A. Preparatory Committee 2 B. Selection Committee 3 C. Election Committee 3 I D. Legislatures 3 E. Elections and Boundaries Commission/Registration and Electoral Offices 4 I F. Judiciary 5 G. Secretary for Constitutional Affairs 5 H. Political Parties 5 I I. Independent Commission Against Corruption 5 J. Commissioner of Police 6 K. China-British Joint Liaison Council 6 I L. Immigration Office 6 M. People's Republic of China Government Institutions 6 III. Issues 6 A. Multi-memberISingle-Vote District 6 I B. Functional Constituencies 7 C. Voter Turnout 7 D. Political Party Development 7 I E. Transparency and the Election Law 8 F. Pennanent Residency and Voting Rights 8 G. Election Monitoring 8 I H. Chief Executive and Legislative Council 9 (Special Administrative Regions) Government I. Civil Liberties and Social Order Ordinances 9 I J. Article 23 of Basic Law 9 K. Independent Election Commission 10 L. judiciary 10 I M. Voter Infonnation and Civic Education 10 IV. Project Objectives 11 A.
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 23 June

    OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 23 June

    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 23 June 2016 12395 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 23 June 2016 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. 12396 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 23 June 2016 THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, S.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, S.B.S. THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM, G.B.S., J.P.
  • CJ's Address at Ceremony for the Admission of the New Senior Counsel

    CJ's Address at Ceremony for the Admission of the New Senior Counsel

    CJ's address at Ceremony for the Admission of the New Senior Counsel Secretary for Justice, Chairman of the Bar, President of the Law Society, fellow judges, ladies and gentlemen, I extend a warm welcome to all of you on the occasion of the call to the Inner Bar of Mr Abraham Chan, on a day coinciding with the 96th birthday of HRH The Duke of Edinburgh and the very day in 1840 when Queen Victoria married Prince Albert. This is the first time since the rank of Senior Counsel was introduced in 1997 that only one barrister has been accorded this honour. On behalf of the Judiciary, I congratulate Mr Chan on his elevation to the rank of Senior Counsel. Those present in this court are all family and friends of Mr Chan and it is right to congratulate them warmly as well. I am sure you will all be acknowledged presently, but I would like to be the first to say that without your support and love, Mr Chan would not be able to accomplish all that he has achieved so far, and to continue from his success here. I wish to mention specially Abraham's wife, Veronica, their children and also Mr Chan’s parents, all of whom are present this morning. I started practice as a barrister in Hong Kong in 1980. In the Hong Kong Bar Association's 50th Anniversary book, in the Chapter "The Golden Age" by Corinne Remedios and Mohan Bharwaney, it was part of the 1980s: "Life at the Bar was exciting because the Bar was comprised of colourful characters like Albert Sanguinetti and, as skeleton arguments had not yet been invented, advocacy was in its heyday: Charles Ching, Henry Litton and Patrick Yu, to name a few, were a joy for the budding barrister to watch and learn from.
  • The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations Introduction Iii

    The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations Introduction Iii

    Introduction i Hong Kong University Press thanks Xu Bing for writing the Press’s name in his Square Word Calligraphy for the covers of its books. For further information, see p. iv. ii The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations Introduction iii Sonny Shiu-Hing Lo iv The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations Hong Kong University Press 14/F Hing Wai Centre 7 Tin Wan Praya Road Aberdeen Hong Kong © Hong Kong University Press 2008 Hardback ISBN 978-962-209-908-1 Paperback ISBN 978-962-209-909-8 All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Secure On-line Ordering http://www.hkupress.org Printed and bound by Condor Production Ltd., Hong Kong, China. Hong Kong University Press is honoured that Xu Bing, whose art explores the complex themes of language across cultures, has written the Press’s name in his Square Word Calligraphy. This signals our commitment to cross-cultural thinking and the distinctive nature of our English-language books published in China. “At first glance, Square Word Calligraphy appears to be nothing more unusual than Chinese characters, but in fact it is a new way of rendering English words in the format of a square so they resemble Chinese characters. Chinese viewers expect to be able to read Square Word Calligraphy but cannot.
  • LC Paper No. CB(2)549/99-00(01) FACV Nos 10 and 11 of 1999 IN

    LC Paper No. CB(2)549/99-00(01) FACV Nos 10 and 11 of 1999 IN

    - 1 - LC Paper No. CB(2)549/99-00(01) FACV Nos 10 and 11 of 1999 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NOS 10 AND 11 OF 1999 (CIVIL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV NOS 108 AND 109 OF 1999) Between: LAU KONG YUNG (an infant suing by his Respondents father and next friend LAU YI TO) and 16 others -and- THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Appellant Court: Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Sir Anthony Mason NPJ Date of Hearing: 25, 26, 27 and 28 October 1999 Date of Judgment: 3 December 1999 JUDGMENT - 2 - Chief Justice Li: In February 1999, the Director of Immigration made removal orders under sec 19(1)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance against the 17 respondents. They applied to challenge the removal orders by judicial review and habeas corpus. That challenge failed before Yeung J, [1999] 2 HKLRD 58, but succeeded before the Court of Appeal [1999] 2 HKLRD 516 (Chief Judge, Nazareth and Mortimer VPP). The Director appeals to the Court. The central question in this appeal relates to "the Interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of Articles 22(4) and 24(2)(3) of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China" ("the Interpretation"). The Interpretation was adopted on 26 June 1999, after the Court of Appeal's judgment on 11 June 1999. Terminology I shall refer to the Director of Immigration, the appellant, as "the Director" and the 17 respondents to the appeal, who were the applicants on the challenge, as "the applicants".
  • Issue 2 2020

    Issue 2 2020

    Newsletter Issue 2, 2020 Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong Enrich Students’ Lives & Empower the Community Hong Kong Law Journal Turns 50 Long Service Awards Copyright Classroom Contents 1 DEAN’S MESSAGE Dean’s Message FACULTY NEWS The new semester is upon us. Due to the continuing impact of COVID-19, the 2 Congratulations University has decided to continue teaching online in the first three weeks 5 Copyright Classroom of September. While face-to-face teaching may resume in parallel to online 5 The New HKU/UC Berkeley LLB/LLM teaching after the first three weeks if the public health situation improves, Programme the social distance rules regarding classrooms are such that online teaching 6 Events on National Security Law is likely to remain the dominant way of teaching in this semester for the 6 Webinar Series ‘Coping with Legal Challenges majority of courses. Online teaching has been with us since November Arising from the Pandemic’ 2019 making us the institution with the longest duration of online teaching! 6 HKU-SCF FinTech Academy We have coped with crises, one after another, with a high degree of 7 Thank You and Goodbye! efficiency and have managed our research and teaching very well under 7 Meet our New Staff difficult circumstances. While the quality of online teaching has improved and both teachers and students are discovering the inherent strength of online teaching - part of it will continue in the post-COVID-19 world, we all MOOTING miss the dynamism of face-to-face contact and teaching and learning in 8 HKU’s Success in 2020 International Moot the customary way.
  • Understanding the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Statistics and Inexplicable Patterns

    Understanding the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Statistics and Inexplicable Patterns

    Understanding the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Statistics and Inexplicable Patterns Martin Kwan* Chief Justice Ma notably said in 2019 that “everyone should be aware of just how the courts operate and handle cases”, which is vital to the rule of law and the maintenance of public confidence. In order to better understand the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (“CFA”), a number of statistical surveys have been done regarding various areas of the work of the CFA as a whole and the individual judges. This Article discovers three inexplicable patterns. The first one concerns the significantly lower rate of contribution by the Chief Justice than other Permanent Judges, where there is not any apparent justification. The second pattern involves two judges writing most of the main judgments for criminal cases, and on certain other areas of laws. This raises questions as to why this is the case and whether other judges have less opportunity to build up their expertise on these areas of laws. Out of the three unexplainable patterns, the most baffling one reveals that there are unusually high rates of (1) unanimous judgments and (2) single judgments (i.e. other panel members simply saying “I agree” to the main judgment) without writing separate judgments such as in depth concurrences or additional observations. There could be a number of explanations, ranging from (1) having a coercive, but undisclosed, norm of pushing for unanimity, (2) administrative reasons and (3) personal reasons on the part of the judges. There are also profound implications which could affect the public’s confidence in the CFA.