Appendix 2: Defining Housing Market Area Geographies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 2: Defining Housing Market Area Geographies Appendix 2: Defining Housing Market Area Geographies Defining Housing Market Area Geographies Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme Strategic Housing Market Assessment November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Strategic Housing Market Area 3 3. Sub-Authority Market Geographies 21 4. Sub-Area Profiles 36 5. Conclusion 45 November 2014 1. Introduction 1.1 Housing markets are dynamic, and it is important that up-to-date evidence is used to define them. Available guidance highlights the importance of understanding the operation and scope of housing market areas, as referenced in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and specifically the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG). 1.2 The concept and use of housing market areas in strategic planning is well established. It has long been recognised that housing markets do not operate based on administrative boundaries, and the identification of spatial market boundaries is an important part of understanding the balance between supply and demand. This relates to housing preferences and affordability, and the strategic choices available for the location of new housing supply. 1.3 The NPPF establishes a requirement to address need and demand for housing at both authority and housing market area level. Within paragraph 14, following the presumption in favour of sustainable development, the NPPF states: “Local planning authorities should positively seek opportunities to meet the development needs of their area”1 1.4 This underlines the importance of understanding housing needs within the local authority area in question, although – importantly – the wider operation of spatial housing market area geographies is recognised in paragraph 47, where there is an emphasis on boosting significantly the supply of housing with Local Plans expected to meet: “The full, objectively assessed needs for market and affordable housing in the housing market area, as far as is consistent with the policies set out in this Framework, including identifying key sites which are critical to the delivery of the housing strategy over the plan period”2 1.5 Understanding functional housing market areas is an essential prerequisite in ensuring that an objective assessment of housing need is set and interpreted within the correct context. 1.6 The purpose of this appendix is to assess the housing market area geography for the authorities of Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme and to understand the extent to which they operate as a housing market area, as defined in the PPG. The analysis also considers the operation of more local sub-markets within the two authorities. This will directly inform the preparation of a new Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) for the Councils. 1 DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework (para 14) 2 Ibid (para 47) 1 Approach to Defining Housing Market Areas 1.7 The PPG provides the first point of reference on the approach to defining a Housing Market Area (HMA). A HMA is defined within the PPG as: “A geographical area defined by household demand and preferences for all types of housing, reflecting the key functional linkages between places where people live and work. It might be the case that housing market areas overlap”3 1.8 The PPG sets out the key sources of information to be considered in assessing the definition of a HMA: • House prices and rates of change in house prices – analysis of these leading indicators is intended to provide a market-based reflection of housing market area boundaries; • Household migration and search patterns – considering peoples movements provides an indication of housing search patterns, and the extent to which people move house within a specific geography. Importantly, the PPG states that the findings can identify areas within which a relatively high proportion of household moves – typically 70% – are contained; and • Contextual data – the guidance suggests that this could include commuting patterns, retail and school catchment areas. On commuting, the guidance suggests that this can provide information about commuting flows and the spatial structure of the labour market, which can influence household price and location. These geographies can also provide information about the areas within which people move without changing other aspects of their lives, such as work or service use. 1.9 The analysis presented within this appendix uses these principal sources of information to explore the extent to which the authorities of Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under- Lyme can be considered as operating as a HMA. The datasets are also used to identify, within this wider geography, the operation of smaller local sub-markets within each of the authorities. 1.10 Importantly, the PPG confirms that no single source of information on needs will be comprehensive in identifying the appropriate assessment area. In constructing market geographies, plan makers will need to consider the usefulness of each source of information and approach for the specific area being examined. The approach for defining the most appropriate HMA for planning purposes will therefore include an element of reasoned judgement. 3 http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/housing-and-economic-development-needs- assessments/scope-of-assessments/#paragraph_010 2 2. Strategic Housing Market Area 2.1 The PPG highlights the importance of considering the need for housing across housing market areas. This section assesses the housing market area geography for Stoke-on- Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme, through an analysis of the key indicators introduced in the previous chapter. Other research to define housing market areas – based on neighbouring authorities’ evidence and previous national and regional studies – is also summarised later in this section. Migration 2.2 While the previous definitions introduced above represent a useful starting point in considering the extent of housing market areas, it is also important to analyse spatial data in line with the PPG, particularly where new data has been published. 2.3 Migration data from the 2011 Census was released in July 2014, and provides the most reliable and up-to-date picture of movements across the country. However, at the time of writing, only local authority level data has been released, and it is not possible to determine movements between different areas of authorities. 2.4 The PPG recognises that migration flows and housing search patterns can help to identify relationships around housing preferences, and can highlight the extent to which people move house within an area. 2.5 The concept of containment of moves is therefore central to the definition of housing market areas. The Census 2011 migration data allows an assessment of the proportion of moves that are contained within Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme. Calculating the proportion of people moving from an authority shows the likelihood of moving households to remain within the same authority, while a similar calculation can show the propensity of moving households to remain within a wider HMA. This is summarised in the following table, based on 2011 Census data. Figure 2.1: Containment of Moves 2011 Origin Containment within authority Containment within Stoke-on- Trent and Newcastle-under- Lyme Stoke-on-Trent 67.4% 76.1% Newcastle-under-Lyme 55.6% 72.2% Stoke-on-Trent and – 74.9% Newcastle-under-Lyme Source: Census 2011 2.6 As shown, only around one in four people who move from an address in Stoke-on-Trent or Newcastle-under-Lyme moved to another address outside the two authorities, 3 suggesting a relative containment of moves. Notably, this surpasses the 70% threshold highlighted in the PPG. 2.7 The PPG recognises that the 70% threshold includes most people who move relatively short distances, due to connections with families, friends, jobs and schools. Long distance moves – which may be due to a change in lifestyle or retirement – do not fall within this threshold4. 2.8 It is also important to recognise that neither authority surpasses this threshold in isolation, indicating that based on this indicator neither can be considered as an independent housing market without including another local authority. It is noted, however, that Stoke-on-Trent comes close to achieving a level of containment close to 70%, which, if longer distance moves were excluded would suggest it operates as a separate HMA. 2.9 Importantly, however, based on all moves Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme together do show a level of containment of moves which exceeds 70% and therefore suggests that they can be considered as operating as a HMA. 2.10 A similar calculation can show the proportion of people who moved from an address in Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme during the year before the Census that moved from another area within the same authority or wider housing market area. Figure 2.2: Origin of Migrants 2011 Origin Moved from within authority Moved from within Stoke-on- Trent and Newcastle-under- Lyme Stoke-on-Trent 69.2% 77.4% Newcastle-under-Lyme 52.5% 69.7% Stoke-on-Trent and – 74.8% Newcastle-under-Lyme Source: Census 2011 2.11 Again, this shows a relatively high level of containment, indicating that around 75% of people who moved to an address in Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme moved from one of the two authorities. While Stoke-on-Trent in isolation is relatively contained in this regard – with a high proportion of movers originating from Stoke-on-Trent – around half of people who moved to an address in Newcastle-under-Lyme moved from another authority, with a high proportion – 17.2% – moving from Stoke-on-Trent. 2.12 While there is evidently a level of containment within this geography, it is beneficial to widen the assessment to consider authorities with which Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle- under-Lyme share a strong relationship. This allows an understanding of the strength and direction of migration flows between authorities.
Recommended publications
  • 13/2136C Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-On
    Application No: 13/2136C Location: Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-on-Trent, ST7 3EQ Proposal: Outline application for demolition of house, garage, barns and outbuildings, removal of hardstanding and construction of housing development Applicant: Northwest Heritage Expiry Date: 27-Aug-2013 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve with conditions MAIN ISSUES • Principle of Development • Sustainability • Character and Appearance • Landscape Impact • Ecology • Highway Safety and Traffic Generation. • Affordable Housing • Drainage and Flooding • Open Space • Residential Amenity • Other Considerations REFERRAL The application has been referred to the Southern Planning Committee because the site area is just over 0.5 hectares in size and is therefore a small scale major development. 1. SITE DESCRIPTION This application relates to the former Rectory Farm situated to the northwest of Church Lawton and to the east of the Town of Alsager. The site lies wholly within the Infill Boundary Line for Lawton Gate, which is a small settlement washed over by Green Belt. The site accommodates the main rectory farm dormer bungalow, a detached dormer ancillary outbuilding and some detached barns / stables towards. To the north and the east, the site is bound by field and paddocks. Beyond the northern boundary of the site, the levels drop away significantly where the curtilage of Rectory Farm ceases. The land slopes downwards towards a brook beyond which there is the Trent and Mersey Canal which occupies an elevated position relative to the northern end of the site. The site can be viewed from the adjacent canal towpath. There are residential properties further to the east and residential properties bounding the southern boundary of the site which form part of the Lawton Gate settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire and Warrington
    Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire & Warrington
    Access to the countryside without the car One issue to which the Forum has not given much attention hitherto is ensuring that the Cheshire countryside is accessible to all residents and visitors irrespective of their means of travel. With increasing attention rightly being given to climate change and the need to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the need for people to be able to reach the countryside easily in a more sustainable way CHESHIRE & than by car perhaps merits being placed higher up the Forum’s agenda. The Forum has a duty to improve public access, and this should extend equally to those who are socially excluded, or who WARRINGTON suffer disability, or who for various reasons either cannot or do not drive a car, as well as car owners who might decide not to drive if The Forum might equally lobby for the introduction of new they are made aware of the other options available. multi-modal tickets, along the lines of the one-time Sunday LOCAL ACCESS FORUM Adventurer Ticket which was valid on buses throughout Cheshire, The two new unitary authorities are responsible for co-ordinating or for the extension of the area of validity of some existing leisure public transport, thus relevant aspects the Forum might press for tickets such as the Wayfarer Ticket, which for almost 30 years has the Councils to consider could include the existence and viability provided a cheap and flexible means of access by bus and rail to of local bus services which provide access to key countryside sites the northern part of the Forum’s area.
    [Show full text]
  • Trader Register Report
    Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Wilcox Plumbing & Heating Ltd Street Address: Unit 19 West Cannock Way, Cannock Chase Enterprise Centre City / Town: Hednesford Postcode: WS125QU Company Website: http://www.wilcoxplumbing.com Company Number: 6376714 Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: Darren Contact Last Name: Wilcox Contact Telephone: 01543 458074 Contact Mobile: 07970 076582 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: cheshire oak construction Street Address: 1 whetsone road, gillow heath City / Town: stoke on trent Postcode: st8 6qf Company Website: Company Number: 8456116 Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: andy Contact Last Name: maddox Contact Telephone: 01782 514911 Contact Mobile: 07854951056 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: 01782 514911 Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Creative Domestic Installations Street Address: 42 Sands Road, Harriseahead City / Town: Stoke-on-Trent Postcode: ST7 4LA Company Website: http://www.cdistaffs.co.uk Company Number: Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: Len Contact Last Name: Harrison Contact Telephone: 01782 516110 Contact Mobile: 07711821689 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: 01782 518237 Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Homecare Builders Ltd Street Address: 1 Southbank Street, City / Town: Leek Postcode: ST13 5LS Company
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming North Staffordshire Overview
    Transforming North Staffordshire Overview Prepared for the North Staffordshire Regeneration Partnership March 2008 Contents Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation 3 Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 10 1.1 This report 10 1.2 Overview of North Staffordshire – diverse but inter-linked 12 1.3 Why is change so urgent? 17 1.4 Leading change 21 2. Where is North Staffordshire now? 24 2.1 The Ideopolis framework 24 2.2 North Staffordshire’s economy 25 2.3 North Staffordshire’s place and infrastructure 29 2.4 North Staffordshire’s people 35 2.5 North Staffordshire’s leadership 40 2.6 North Staffordshire’s image 45 2.7 Conclusions 48 3. Vision for the future of North Staffordshire and priorities for action 50 3.1 Creating a shared vision 50 3.2 Vision for the future of North Staffordshire 53 3.3 Translating the vision into practice 55 3.4 Ten key priorities in the short and medium term 57 A. Short-term priorities: deliver in next 12 months 59 B. Short and medium-term priorities: some tangible progress in next 12 months 67 C. Medium-term priorities 90 4. Potential scenarios for the future of North Staffordshire 101 4.1 Scenario 1: ‘Policy Off’ 101 4.2 Scenario 2: ‘All Policy’ 102 4.3 Scenario 3: ‘Priority Policy’ 104 4.4 Summary 105 5. Conclusions 106 2 Transforming North Staffordshire – Overview Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation North Staffordshire is at a crossroads. Despite the significant economic, social and environmental challenges it faces, it has an opportunity in 2008 to start building on its assets and turning its economy around to become a prosperous, creative and enterprising place to live, work and study.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Overview and Scrutiny Functions at Similarly Sized Unitary Authorities
    Appendix B (4) – Comparison of overview and scrutiny functions at similarly sized unitary authorities No. of Resident Authority elected Committees Committee membership population councillors Children and Families OSC 12 members + 2 co-optees Corporate OSC 12 members Cheshire East Council 378,800 82 Environment and Regeneration OSC 12 members Health and Adult Social Care and Communities 15 members OSC Children and Families OSC 15 members, 2 co-optees Customer and Support Services OSC 15 members Cornwall Council 561,300 123 Economic Growth and Development OSC 15 members Health and Adult Social Care OSC 15 members Neighbourhoods OSC 15 members Adults, Wellbeing and Health OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees 21 members, 4 church reps, 3 school governor reps, 2 co- Children and Young People's OSC optees Corporate Overview and Scrutiny Management Durham County Council 523,000 126 Board 26 members, 4 faith reps, 3 parent governor reps Economy and Enterprise OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Environment and Sustainable Communities OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Safeter and Stronger Communities OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Children's Select Committee 13 members Environment Select Committee 13 members Wiltshere Council 496,000 98 Health Select Committee 13 members Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee 15 members Adults, Children and Education Scrutiny Commission 11 members Communities Scrutiny Commission 11 members Bristol City Council 459,300 70 Growth and Regeneration Scrutiny Commission 11 members Overview and Scrutiny Management Board 11 members Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Site Options Consultation Booklet
    Site Options Consultation Booklet Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 Site Options Consultation Booklet Foreword For further information relating to this document, or for a large copy print, audio cassette, Braille or other language version, please contact: Forward Plans, Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Regeneration Services, Moorlands House Stockwell Street, Leek ST13 6HQ Tel: 01538 395570 Email: [email protected] Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 1 Site Options Consultation Booklet Part A 6 Consultation details and how to make comments 8 Part B 11 1 Introduction 12 2 Towns 14 Leek 16 Biddulph 20 Cheadle 23 3 Town Centre Maps 29 4 Larger Villages 34 4.1 Alton 35 4.2 Biddulph Moor 37 4.3 Blythe Bridge and Forsbrook 39 4.4 Brown Edge 41 4.5 Cheddleton 43 4.6 Endon 46 4.7 Ipstones 48 4.8 Kingsley 50 4.9 Upper Tean 52 4.10 Waterhouses 54 4.11 Werrington and Cellarhead 56 4.12 Wetley Rocks 58 Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 Site Options Consultation Booklet 5 Smaller Villages 61 5.1 Bagnall 63 5.2 Blackshaw Moor 65 5.3 Boundary 67 5.4 Bradnop 69 5.5 Caverswall and Cookshill 71 5.6 Checkley 73 5.7 Consall 75 5.8 Cotton 77 5.9 Dilhorne 79 5.10 Draycott 81 5.11 Foxt 83 5.12 Froghall 85 5.13 Heaton 87 5.14 Hollington 89 5.15 Hulme 91 5.16 Kingsley Holt 93 5.17 Leekbrook 95 5.18 Longsdon 97 5.19 Lower Tean 99 5.20 Meerbrook 101 5.21 Oakamoor 103 5.22 Rudyard 105 5.23 Rushton Spencer 107 5.24 Stanley 109 5.25 Stockton Brook 111 5.26 Swinscoe 113 5.27 Whiston 115
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire. (Kelly's
    694 FAR STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'S FA.HMERS-continned, Wilkins W. H. Huddlesford, Whitting- Woddi!l.'ie T. Hope, Alstonfield, A~.hbrne \Vhieldon William, Gravelly bank, Hol- ton, Lic:hfield Wood .A. Loxley, Uttoxeter S.O. lington, Stafford WC.lkinson Hy. R. Tyrley castle, Alrn- Wood C. Clmthill, Longdon, Ruge{ley Whieldon William, Ipstones, Stoke ington, Market Drayton Wood Enoch, Litley Huntl~y, Stoke Whilock Wm. Forsbrook, Stoke Wilkinson John,, Rangemore, Burton Wood George, Eaves, Whiston, Stoke Whilton Mrs. M . .Acton Trussell,Stffd Williinson R.S. Chapel Chorlton,Nwcstl Wood! Geo. Finney grn. Madeley Heath Whiston Joseph, Moorleigh heath, Mid- Wilkinson Thos. Biddulph, Oongleton Wood Jas. Alder:> brook, Rocester S.O dleton Green, Stoke Wilkinson W. F. Gt. Madeley, Nwcstle Wood J.Reap's moor,Fawfieldhead,Bxtn Whiston M. Mucklestone, Mrkt. Drytn Wilder Miss Elizh. Pl.ardiwick, Staffrd Wood John, lliaycott, Derby Whiston Samuel. Gutter lane, Bid. Willetts Geo.Abbot's Bromley,Rugeley Wood John, Ella.stone, Ashborne dulph, Cong!eton Willialll.8 Willia.rn & John, Ga.rsh.all Wood John, Grartton, Stoke Whistou Wm. Saverley Green, Stoke gr~en, !Milwich, Stone Wood J.Latherfu-d. Shareshill,W'hptn Whitaker Thomas, Turner's pool, vVilliams David, Milwich, Stone Wood Jn. Mare dol~, Sheen, .Ashbrn.e Leek l<'rith, Stoke Willi[Ll11s Edward, Moreton park, 1 WOO'd J. R~dge, l''awfieJdhead, Buxton White William & Francis, Caste m, Moreton. Newport (S-alop) Wood J oS€ph, Up. Eili.stone, .Ashbrne Wetton, Ashborne Willia.ms Miss Elizabeth, Hinksford, Wood Joshua, Clough head, Hollins- White Charles, Beech, Newcastle Swind0111, Dudley clough, Buxton White Elijah, Oulton, Newport (Salop) Willia.ms George, Ellenha.ll park, Ellen- •Wood Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    18 bus time schedule & line map 18 Hanley View In Website Mode The 18 bus line (Hanley) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Hanley: 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM (2) Leek Town Centre: 6:30 AM - 6:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 18 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 18 bus arriving. Direction: Hanley 18 bus Time Schedule 43 stops Hanley Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 10:14 AM - 6:14 PM Monday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Bus Station, Leek Town Centre Cornwell Terrace, Leek Tuesday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM King Street, Leek Town Centre Wednesday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Sneyd Street, Leek Town Centre Thursday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Broad Street, Leek Friday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Daintry Street, Barnƒelds Saturday 7:32 AM - 7:14 PM Campbell Avenue, Barnƒelds Wallbridge Drive, Barnƒelds 18 bus Info Council Depot, Ladderedge Direction: Hanley Ladderedge, Leek Civil Parish Stops: 43 Trip Duration: 41 min Beech Close, Ladderedge Line Summary: Bus Station, Leek Town Centre, King Street, Leek Town Centre, Sneyd Street, Leek Town Ladderedge Centre, Daintry Street, Barnƒelds, Campbell Avenue, Barnƒelds, Wallbridge Drive, Barnƒelds, Council The Heights, Ladderedge Depot, Ladderedge, Beech Close, Ladderedge, Ladderedge, The Heights, Ladderedge, School Lane, Longsdon, The New Inn, Longsdon, Leek Old Road, School Lane, Longsdon Dunwood, Dunwood Lane, Dunwood, The Village, Endon, Park Lane, Endon, Toby Carvery, Endon, The New Inn, Longsdon Methodist Church, Endon, Endon High School, Endon, Bassnets Wood Road, Stocton Brook, Trintity
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Dtoc Nov-17
    Lancashire DToC Nov-17 Delayed Transfers of Care (DToC) Analysis Lancashire DToC Nov-17 v02 Data Sources Used in this Report DToC All figures relating to the number of delayed days or the number of DToC bed days have been taken from the CSV Format Monthly Delayed Transfers of Care files as published on the NHS website on the second Thursday of each month at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/delayed-transfers-of- care/ Population Rates per 100,000 population for each local authority use the appropriate mid-year estimates for the population aged 18+ as produced by the Office for National Statistics each year. Version Control Document name: Lancashire DToC Nov-17 Version: 02 Date: 12 January 2018 Document control / revision history Version Revision date Summary of changes 01 11/01/2018 02 12/01/2018 Addition of data sources note on page 1 Andrew MacLeod Performance Officer Business Intelligence Lancashire County Council For further information on the work of Business Intelligence, please contact us at: Business Intelligence Lancashire County Council 2nd floor Christ Church Precinct County Hall Fishergate Hill Preston PR1 8XJ E: [email protected] W: www.lancashire.gov.uk/lancashire-insight • 1 • Lancashire DToC Nov-17 v02 Contents 1 Lancashire Overview ..................................................................................... 3 1.1 Lancashire Detail Nov-17 ...................................................................... 3 1.2 Proportions attributable to NHS and social
    [Show full text]