The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture 2017 Volume 2 JAEA www.egyptian-architecture.com Editors: DAVID IAN LIGHTBODY FRANCK MONNIER Design and webmastering: PAUL FRANÇOIS Committee members: FELIX ARNOLD (German Archaeological Institute, Cairo Department), EDWARD BROVARSKI (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston), MARIA CORREAS AMADOR (Department of Archaeology, Auto- nomous University of Madrid), GLEN DASH (Independent MIT trained Giza surveyor, Connecticut), DELPHINE DRIAUX («Mondes pharaoniques», Paris-Sorbonne, Paris IV, UMR 8167 Orient et Méditerranée CNRS), ULRIKE FAUERBACH (Fakultät Architektur, OTH Regensburg), PIERRE GRUSSENMEYER (National Institute of Applied Science, Strasbourg),JAMES A. HARRELL (Uni- versity of Toledo, Department of Environmental Sciences), STEPHEN HARVEY (Department of History, Stony Brook University, New York), STAN HENDRICKX (MAD faculty of Hasselt, Fine arts), ALEJANDRO JIMÉNEZ-SERRANO (University of Jaén), PETER LACOVARA (Director of The Ancient Egyptian Archaeology and Heritage Fund), FRANÇOIS LARCHÉ (CNRS, UMR8167 Orient et Méditerranée), DIMITRI MEEKS (Honorary Director of Research, CNRS), NICHOLAS PICARDO (Harvard University, Near Eastern languages and Civilizations), THIERRY VERDEL (University of Lorraine, CNRS, École nationale supérieure des Mines de Nancy) Please send manuscripts by email to [email protected] Guidelines for contributors: http://www.egyptian-architecture.com/ressources/Formatting_Guidelines_for_ JAEA_Contributors.pdf ISSN 2472-999X Published under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 2.0 The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture is a peer-reviewed, scientific, open access, and annual periodical. Its purpose is to promote the publication of research devoted to ancient Egyptian architecture (domestic, civil, military, ritual/religious, elite, and funerary), from the Predynastic Period to the Roman imperial era, whatever the modern geographical context (Egypt, Sudan, Near East, etc.). The subject scope includes all things relating to construction, regardless of its original importance or purpose. The journal publishes fieldwork reports and studies undertaken in the Egyptological tradition, including discussions of epigraphy and iconography, and also research that utilizes specific skills such as structural and materials sciences, and modern investigative techniques. In this way,JAEA seeks to encourage the development of detailed technical descriptions, and deeply theorized understanding (of architectural symbolism, propaganda, climatic and geological influences, etc.). This interdisciplinary approach will help connect adjacent areas of expertise which, alone, could not reflect the richness and complexity of the ancient Egyptian built heritage. The periodical welcomes studies that meets any one of these goals, only on the condition that the formatting and content of articles are subject to JAEA scientific publication requirements. http://www.egyptian-architecture.com/ Front cover: photo credit by Valery Androsov The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture 2017 Volume 2 Contents G. DASH Occam’s Egyptian razor: the equinox and the alignment of the pyramids .........................................1 The builders of the Old Kingdom pyramids oriented the monuments to the cardinal points with great accuracy. How they managed to achieve this has long been debated. Several candidate methods have been proposed, tested, and found workable, yet there is one straightforward method that scholars have largely ignored, perhaps because it was thought to be incapable of achieving the requisite accuracy. This is the ‘equinoctial solar gnomon method’ which uses a vertical rod to track the movement of the sun on the equinox. In this article, the author describes an experiment carried out to evaluate the method, and compares the results with archaeological survey data from the Memphite Necropolis in Egypt. C. READER A potentially significant dimension recorded on an Old Kingdom papyrus from Saqqara .............. 9 An analysis of texts on a fragmentary Old Kingdom papyrus from Saqqara suggests that they record the construction of the pyramid complex of pharaoh Teti. Amongst the information obtained from the papyrus was a dimension – 441 cubits. This paper discusses the possible significance of this dimension in the context of Old Kingdom pyramid building. D. MAZZONE The dark side of a model community: The ‘ghetto’ of el-Lahun .......................................................19 Studies of the earliest urban settlements in the Nile Valley often neglect to address the significance of built environments for the ‘poor’ and their relationship with social organization. The western workers’ quarter at el- Lahun; the xnrt mentioned in hieratic papyri, has received little scholarly attention in comparison to the eastern area containing the ‘élite residences’. In 1889 Flinders Petrie noted that the western streets of the town showed signs of a greater degree of poverty. Later examinations indicated the presence of a type of corrective labor camp; what might be described today as a ‘ghetto’. Convicts may have been forced to live in such places of confinement as a form of punishment. Life for a multitude of people in the ancient town of el-Lahun might, in fact, have been radically different from previously held views. Rather than a quiet township community, this article uncovers a social order built upon racial discrimination and cultural intolerance, marked by seclusion, coercion, and possibly violence. D. I. LIGHTBODY & FR. MONNIER An elegant vault design principle identified in Old and New Kingdom architecture ......................55 Architectural sketches showing profiles most likely used for constructing arched mudbrick and stone roofs and rock-cut vaulted chambers have been recovered from ancient Egyptian archaeological contexts. The procedures and/or mathematical principles used to construct the profiles and the data sets recorded on the relevant artifacts have been discussed for over a century. Certain interpretations seem to have attained the status of established fact, despite the lack of a solid rational basis. Catenary, elliptical, and circular arcs can often have similar pro- files, so it has proved difficult to reach firm conclusions regarding the geometric construction methods, using the limited evidence available. This article revisits two of the major sources of evidence: ostracon JE50036, now in the Imhotep Museum at Saqqara, and a sketched form drawn out by tomb KV9, which is now, unfortunately, almost completely lost. The authors present a new combined analysis and propose that both of these arcs may have been constructed using the same elegant geometric procedure, which is based on a 3-4-5 triangle. M. CORREAS AMADOR An interactive tool for the recording, analysis and interpretation of ancient Egyptian domestic mudbrick architecture .................................................................................................................................71 This article presents an interpretive digital tool designed to facilitate the study of Egyptian domestic mudbrick archaeological sites. Ancient Egyptian domestic architecture is comparatively less well known than funerary or religious architecture. Traditionally, the discourse regarding ancient Egyptian houses has been built upon artistic sources such as tomb wall representations and models recovered from tombs and domestic spaces. These sources were generally produced by certain social groups and during certain periods, which limits their use to those contexts. In response to this situation, this article outlines a practical way in which an ethnoarchaeological study of Egyptian domestic architecture has been translated into the development of a digital tool for the recording, analysis and interpretation of Ancient Egyptian houses. Reviews Gilles Dormion et Jean-Yves Verd’hurt, La chambre de Snéfrou, Actes Sud, 2016, reviewed by Franck Monnier ...............................................................................................................83 Errata ............................................................................................................................................................91 JAEA 2, 2017, pp. 1-8. www.egyptian-architecture.com Occam’s Egyptian razor: the equinox and the alignment of the pyramids Glen Dash The builders of the Great Pyramid of Khufu aligned the great monument to the cardinal points with an accuracy of better than four minutes of arc, or one-fifteenth of one degree.1 The Great Pyramid’s neighbor, the Pyramid of Khafre, is aligned with an error of approximately 6 minutes, one tenth of one degree.2 The builders of Snefru’s Red Pyramid at Dahshur achieved an accuracy of 8.7 minutes.3 All three pyramids exhibit the same manner of error; they are rotated slightly counterclockwise from the cardinal points. How the Egyptians managed to achieve such accuracy has long been debated. In recent years, four of the candidate methods have been tested and found workable.4 These include the pole star method proposed by Flinders Petrie,5 the circumpolar star method tested by Joseph Dorner,6 the simultaneous transit method proposed by Kate Spence,7 and the solar gnomon shadow method suggested by Martin Isler.8 Yet there is one straightforward method that scholars have largely ig- nored, perhaps because it was thought to lack any hope of achieving the requisite accuracy.9 This is the ‘equinoctial solar gnomon method’. It uses a vertical rod to track the movement of the sun
Recommended publications
  • Article Download
    wjert, 2016, Vol. 2, Issue 6, 109 -124 Review Article ISSN 2454-695X Hassaan . World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology WJERT www.wjert.org SJIF Impact Factor: 3.419 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN ANCIENT EGYPT, PART XXXI: HUMAN WOODEN STATUES (PREDYNASTIC TO 13th DYNASTY) Prof. Dr. Galal Ali Hassaan* Emeritus Professor, Department of Mechanical Design & Production, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt. Article Received on 12/10/2016 Article Revised on 01/11/2016 Article Accepted on 21/11/2016 ABSTRACT *Corresponding Author This is the 31st research paper exploring the evolution of Mechanical Prof. Dr. Galal Ali Hassaan Engineering in Ancient Egypt. The paper investigates the production of Emeritus Professor, human wooden statues in ancient Egypt starting from the Predynastic Department of Mechanical Period up to the 13th Dynasty. The design of the wooden statues, the Design & Production, used raw material, date and present location are investigated. The Faculty of Engineering, clothing and headdress of the statues is highlighted and the beauty Cairo University, Egypt. aspects associated with some wooden statues. The analysis outlined also the degree of sophistication of the used mechanical technology producing amazing statues. KEYWORDS: History of mechanical engineering, ancient Egypt, human wooden statues, Predynastic to 13th Dynasty. INTRODUCTION This is the 31st research paper in a series aiming at exploring the evolution of mechanical engineering in ancient Egypt through the different activities of their wonderful civilization. The ancient Egyptians used different materials for the production of their human statues such as wood, ivory, clay, pottery, faience, brass, bronze and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Kv2 Dysfunction After Peripheral Axotomy Enhances Sensory Neuron
    Our reference: YEXNR 11584 P-authorquery-v11 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: YEXNR Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: Bennett, Timothy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +1 619 699 6721 Article Number: 11584 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return your corrections within 48 hours. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof. Click on the ‘Q’ link to go to the location in the proof. Location in article Query / Remark: click on the Q link to go Please insert your reply or correction at the corresponding line in the proof Q1 Please confirm that given names and surnames have been identified correctly. Q2 Please check the layout of Table 5, and correct if necessary. Q3 A dummy footnote citation of footnote [**] has been inserted as a corresponding footnote text has been provided. Please check if the placement is correct and amend if necessary. Q4, Q5 This sentence has been slightly modified for clarity. Please check that the meaning is still correct, and amend if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012: Providence, Rhode Island
    The 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Research Center in Egypt April 27-29, 2012 Renaissance Providence Hotel Providence, RI Photo Credits Front cover: Egyptian, Late Period, Saite, Dynasty 26 (ca. 664-525 BCE) Ritual rattle Glassy faience; h. 7 1/8 in Helen M. Danforth Acquisition Fund 1995.050 Museum of Art Rhode Island School of Design, Providence Photography by Erik Gould, courtesy of the Museum of Art, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence. Photo spread pages 6-7: Conservation of Euergates Gate Photo: Owen Murray Photo page 13: The late Luigi De Cesaris conserving paintings at the Red Monastery in 2011. Luigi dedicated himself with enormous energy to the suc- cess of ARCE’s work in cultural heritage preservation. He died in Sohag on December 19, 2011. With his death, Egypt has lost a highly skilled conservator and ARCE a committed colleague as well as a devoted friend. Photo: Elizabeth Bolman Abstracts title page 14: Detail of relief on Euergates Gate at Karnak Photo: Owen Murray Some of the images used in this year’s Annual Meeting Program Booklet are taken from ARCE conservation projects in Egypt which are funded by grants from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The Chronique d’Égypte has been published annually every year since 1925 by the Association Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth. It was originally a newsletter but rapidly became an international scientific journal. In addition to articles on various aspects of Egyptology, papyrology and coptology (philology, history, archaeology and history of art), it also contains critical reviews of recently published books.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15:2, 2005
    Location of the Old Kingdom Pyramids in Egypt Miroslav Bârta The principal factors influencing the location of the Old Kingdom pyramids in Egypt are reconsidered. The decisive factors influencing their distribution over an area of c. eighty kilometres were essentially of economic, géomorphologie, socio-political and unavoidably also of religious nature. Primary importance is to be attributed to the existence of the Old Kingdom capital of Egypt, Memphis, which was a central place with regard to the Old Kingdom pyramid fields. Its economic potential and primacy in the largely redistribution- driven state economy sustained construction of the vast majority of the pyramid complexes in its vicinity. The location of the remaining number of the Old Kingdom pyramids, including many of the largest ever built, is explained using primarily archaeological evidence. It is claimed that the major factors influencing their location lie in the sphere of general trends governing ancient Egyptian society of the period. For millennia, megaliths and monumental arts were pyramids see Edwards 1993; Fakhry 1961; Hawass commissioned by the local chieftains and later by the 2003; Lehner 1997; Stadelmann 1985; 1990; Vallogia kings of Egypt. The ideological reasons connected 2001; Verner 2002; Dodson 2003). The reasons that may with the construction and symbolism of the pyra­ be put forward to explain their location and arrange­ mids were manifold, and in most cases obvious: the ment are numerous but may be divided into two basic manifestation of power, status and supremacy over groups: practical and religious. It will be argued that the territory and population, the connection with the whereas the general pattern in the distribution of the sacred world and the unlimited authority of the rulers pyramid sites may be due mainly to practical reasons, (O'Connor & Silverman 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of the Theban Mapping Project by Kent Weeks Saturday, January 30, 2021
    Virtual Lecture Transcript: Does the Past Have a Future? The Work of the Theban Mapping Project By Kent Weeks Saturday, January 30, 2021 David A. Anderson: Well, hello, everyone, and welcome to the third of our January public lecture series. I'm Dr. David Anderson, the vice president of the board of governors of ARCE, and I want to welcome you to a very special lecture today with Dr. Kent Weeks titled, Does the Past Have a Future: The Work of the Theban Mapping Project. This lecture is celebrating the work of the Theban Mapping Project as well as the launch of the new Theban Mapping Project website, www.thebanmappingproject.com. Before we introduce Dr. Weeks, for those of you who are new to ARCE, we are a private nonprofit organization whose mission is to support the research on all aspects of Egyptian history and culture, foster a broader knowledge about Egypt among the general public and to support American- Egyptian cultural ties. As a nonprofit, we rely on ARCE members to support our work, so I want to first give a special welcome to our ARCE members who are joining us today. If you are not already a member and are interested in becoming one, I invite you to visit our website arce.org and join online to learn more about the organization and the important work that all of our members are doing. We provide a suite of benefits to our members including private members-only lecture series. Our next members-only lecture is on February 6th at 1 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lion in a Lettuce? Some Ideas on a Group of Late Old Kingdom Maceheads*
    A lion in a lettuce? Some ideas on a group of late Old Kingdom maceheads* Andrés Diego Espinel Instituto de Lenguas y Culturas del Mediterráneo y Oriente Próximo – CSIC, Madrid [email protected] th URING THE FIRST DECADES of the 20 century several piriform or ḥḏ-maceheads carved with a hard-tipped leaf scale motif were retrieved around the mortuary D complex of king Teti (6th dynasty) at Saqqara [fig. 1]. In 1906-1907, Quibell discovered “parts of two of them made of reddish limestone” probably at the east of the king’s pyramid1. At least three other limestone maceheads “were found in the offering room or in the rubbish near it” by Firth and Gunn while digging in the Teti pyramid temple in the early 1920s2. Two of the former were given by the Egyptian Antiquities Service to the Museum of Fine Arts of Boston in 19243. The rest, along with other ones probably discovered about the same time, went to the Cairo Museum. Five of them are currently on display in the Imhotep Museum at Saqqara4. Almost all of the published examples are made of limestone, but, at least, there is a wooden example at Boston5. According to the images at hand of the four published limestone examples, all of them were inscribed with the Horus name of Teti (s.ḥtp tȝ.wy (rḏỉ ʿnḫ)) and a brief phrase connected to the practical use of these weapons: “subduing the znṯy.w-rebels (dȝ znṯ(y.)w)”6. Moreover, two of them contain a cartouche with the name of * I thank Francisco Borrego Gallardo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) for the critical reading of a preliminary draft of this article and for his comments that have enriched significantly this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Nubian Contacts from the Middle Kingdom Onwards
    SUDAN & NUBIA 1 2 SUDAN & NUBIA 1 SUDAN & NUBIA and detailed understanding of Meroitic architecture and its The Royal Pyramids of Meroe. building trade. Architecture, Construction The Southern Differences and Reconstruction of a We normally connect the term ‘pyramid’ with the enormous structures at Gizeh and Dahshur. These pyramids, built to Sacred Landscape ensure the afterlife of the Pharaohs of Egypt’s earlier dynas- ties, seem to have nearly destroyed the economy of Egypt’s Friedrich W. Hinkel Old Kingdom. They belong to the ‘Seven Wonders of the World’ and we are intrigued by questions not only about Foreword1 their size and form, but also about their construction and the types of organisation necessary to build them. We ask Since earliest times, mankind has demanded that certain about their meaning and wonder about the need for such an structures not only be useful and stable, but that these same enormous undertaking, and we admire the courage and the structures also express specific ideological and aesthetic con- technical ability of those in charge. These last points - for cepts. Accordingly, one fundamental aspect of architecture me as a civil engineer and architect - are some of the most is the unity of ‘planning and building’ or of ‘design and con- important ones. struction’. This type of building represents, in a realistic and In the millennia following the great pyramids, their in- symbolic way, the result of both creative planning and tar- tention, form and symbolism have served as the inspiration get-orientated human activity. It therefore becomes a docu- for numerous imitations. However, it is clear that their origi- ment which outlasts its time, or - as was said a hundred years nal monumentality was never again repeated although pyra- ago by the American architect, Morgan - until its final de- mids were built until the Roman Period in Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Civilizations
    Ancient civilizations Mediterranean EUROPE & MEDITERRANEAN COASTS / ANTALYA TO ATHENS Cruise 8 DAYS /7 NIGHTS ◆ EXTEND YOUR STAY IN A CLUB MED RESORT: Gregolimano CRUISE ON THE CLUB MED 2 Welcome aboard Club Med 2, for a unique experience that provides a gateway to the world. Elegance and comfort are the essence of this magnificent 5-masted sailing ship EUROPE & MEDITERRANEAN COASTS / ANTALYA TO ATHENS Mediterranean Ancient civilizations Cruise ◆ From 29/08/2020 to 05/09/2020 - 8 days / 7 ◆ EXTEND YOUR STAY IN A CLUB MED RESORT: Gnirgehgtsolimano Your cruise Days Stages Arrival Departure Nautical Hall 1. Saturday ANTALYA .. 20:00 CLOSED 2. Sunday PAPHOS 12:00 19:00 CLOSED 3. Monday ALEXANDRIA 13:00 CLOSED 4. Tuesday ALEXANDRIA .. 21:00 CLOSED 5. Wednesday RHODES 21:00 CLOSED 6. Thursday RHODES .. 19:00 CLOSED 7. Friday SANTORINI 08:00 19:00 CLOSED 8. Saturday ATHENS 08:00 CLOSED Day 1 : Boarding from 16h to 19h Day 8 : Landing from 9h to 11h Date of publication: 10/03/2020 The information contained in this document is valid on this date, and is subject to change. For full, up-to-date information, contact your travel agent or the Club Med website. The images are non contractual, and serve only as an indication. 2 EUROPE & MEDITERRANEAN COASTS / ANTALYA TO ATHENS Mediterranean Ancient civilizations Cruise ◆ From 29/08/2020 to 05/09/2020 - 8 days / 7 ◆ EXTEND YOUR STAY IN A CLUB MED RESORT: Gnirgehgtsolimano Itinerary of your cruise Nicknamed the "Turkish Riviera", this seaside resort, which is the most popular in the country, is home to an old city which contains fine Day 1 - Saturday Antalya examples of local architecture, beautifully carved woodwork, mosques, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Buhen in the New Kingdom
    Buhen in the New Kingdom George Wood Background - Buhen and Lower Nubia before the New Kingdom Traditionally ancient Egypt ended at the First Cataract of the Nile at Elephantine (modern Aswan). Beyond this lay Lower Nubia (Wawat), and beyond the Dal Cataract, Upper Nubia (Kush). Buhen sits just below the Second Cataract, on the west bank of the Nile, opposite modern Wadi Halfa, at what would have been a good location for ships to carry goods to the First Cataract. The resources that flowed from Nubia included gold, ivory, and ebony (Randall-MacIver and Woolley 1911a: vii, Trigger 1976: 46, Baines and Málek 1996: 20, Smith, ST 2004: 4). Egyptian operations in Nubia date back to the Early Dynastic Period. Contact during the 1st Dynasty is linked to the end of the indigenous A-Group. The earliest Egyptian presence at Buhen may have been as early as the 2nd Dynasty, with a settlement by the 3rd Dynasty. This seems to have been replaced with a new town in the 4th Dynasty, apparently fortified with stone walls and a dry moat, somewhat to the north of the later Middle Kingdom fort. The settlement seems to have served as a base for trade and mining, and royal seals from the 4th and 5th Dynasties indicate regular communications with Egypt (Trigger 1976: 46-47, Baines and Málek 1996: 33, Bard 2000: 77, Arnold 2003: 40, Kemp 2004: 168, Bard 2015: 175). The latest Old Kingdom royal seal found was that of Nyuserra, with no archaeological evidence of an Egyptian settlement after the reign of Djedkara.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Egypt-Skydive.Pdf
    Giza Pyramids Skydive Adventure February 15-19, 2019 “Yesterday we fell over the pyramids of Giza. Today we climbed into the King’s Chamber of the Great Pyramid. I could not think of any other way on (or above) the earth to experience all of the awe inspiring mysteries that this world has to offer.” JUMP Like a Pharaoh in 2019 Start making plans now for our first Tandem Jump Adventure over the Pyramids of Giza! Tandem Skydive over the Great Giza Pyramid, one of the Seven Ancient Wonders of the World. Leap from an Egyptian military Hercules C-130 and land between the pyramids. No prior skydiving experience is necessary….just bring your sense of adventure! Skydive Egypt – Sample Itinerary February 15th-19th, 2019 Day 1, February 15 – Arrival Arrive in Cairo, Egypt at own expense Met by Incredible Adventures Representative Transfer to Mercure La Sphinx Hotel * Days 2, 3 - February 16 – 17 – Designated Jump Days** Arrive at Drop Zone Review and sign any necessary waivers Group briefing and equipment fitting Review of aircraft safety procedures and features Individual training with assigned tandem master Complete incredible Great Giza Tandem Skydive Day 4 (5) – February 18 (19) Free Day for Sightseeing & Jump Back-Up Day - Depart Egypt Note: Hotel room will be kept until check-out time on the 19th. American clients should plan to depart on an “overnight flight” leaving after midnight on the 18th. * Designated hotel may change, based on availability. Upgrade to the Marriott Mena for an additional fee. ** You’ll be scheduled in advance to tandem jump on Day 2 or 3, with Day 4 serving as a weather back-up day.
    [Show full text]
  • Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza
    Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza Donald E. Jennings Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA (retired) email: [email protected] Posted to arXiv: physics.hist-ph April 6, 2021 Abstract The pyramids of ancient Egypt are said to have shone brilliantly in the sun. Surfaces of polished limestone would not only have reflected diffusely in all directions, but would also likely have produced specular reflections in particular directions. Reflections toward points on the horizon would have been visible from large distances. On a particular day and time when the sun was properly situated, an observer stationed at a distant site would have seen a momentary flash as the sun’s reflection moved across the face of the pyramid. The positions of the sun that are reflected to the horizon are confined to narrow arcs in the sky, one arc for each side of the pyramid. We model specular reflections from the pyramid of Khufu and derive the annual dates and times when they would have been visible at important ancient sites. Certain of these events might have coincided with significant dates on the Egyptian calendar, as well as with solar equinoxes, solstices and cross-quarter days. The celebration of Wepet-Renpet, which at the time of the pyramid’s construction occurred near the spring cross-quarter day, would have been marked by a specular sweep of sites on the southern horizon. On the autumn and winter cross-quarter days reflections would have been directed to Heliopolis. We suggest that on those days the pyramidion of Khafre might have been visible in specular reflection over the truncated top of Khufu’s pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and the Pyramids of Giza Known As “The Age of the Pyramids,” the Old Kingdom Was Characterized by Revolutionary
    Architecture and the Pyramids of Giza Known as “the Age of the Pyramids,” the Old Kingdom was characterized by revolutionary advancements in architecture. Figure 1: The Pyramids of Giza This view shows all three pyramid structures: the Great Pyramid, the Pyramid of Khafre, and the Pyramid of Menkaure. The Old Kingdom (2686 BC - 2182 BC) was a period of political stability and economic prosperity, during which great tombs were built for Egyptian Kings in the form of pyramids. The first king to launch a major pyramid building project was King Djoser, who built his famous “Step Pyramid” at Saqqara. The Pyramids of Giza are the greatest architectural achievement of the time, and include three pyramid structures and the Great Sphinx monument. It would have taken several thousand workers decades to complete just one pyramid. While we know that the stone for the pyramids was quarried, transported and cut from the nearby Nile, we still cannot be sure just how the massive stones were then put into place. While stone was generally reserved for tombs and temples, sun-baked mud bricks were used in the construction of Egyptian houses, palaces, fortresses, and town walls. Note: Limestone is an abundant rock of marine and freshwater sediments, primarily composed of calcite (CaCO₃). It occurs in a variety of forms, both crystalline and amorphous. To quarry means to obtain (mine) stone from an excavation pit, usually by blasting, cutting, or digging. A quarry is a site for mining stone, limestone or slate. A sphinx was a creature with the head of a human and the body of an animal (commonly a lion).
    [Show full text]