Usgs Permo-Carboniferous Fossil Locality Register

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY USGS PERMO-CARBONIFEROUS FOSSIL LOCALITY REGISTER PART 2: KANSAS PC-FILES by Thomas W. Henry1 and Patricia A. Holroyd1 Open-File Report 93-549 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents ...................................................... / Introduction .......................................................... 1 Introduction to the PC-FILES Series ........................................ 1 Components of Subsequent PC-FILES Reports .................................. 2 Systems Requirements ................................................... 2 Hardware and Software ................................................ 2 PC-FILES Diskettes .................................................. 2 Limitations of PC-FILES .................................................. 2 Structure of dBASE for PC-FILES and KSPCFILE.dbf ............................... 3 PC-Catalogue Number Fields ............................................ 5 Geographic Fields ................................................... 5 Stratigraphic and Age Fields ............................................. 8 Collector and Related Fields ............................................. 11 Type of Fossils Field ................................................. 12 Miscellaneous Fields .................................................. 12 References Cited ....................................................... 12 Appendix 1: Printout of PC-FILES for Kansas (KSPCFILE.dbf) .......................... 13 FIGURE INDEX Figure 1. Map of Kansas showing counties in which USGS collections exist .................. 6 TABLE INDEX Table 1. Structure of dBASE IV fields for KSPCFILE.dbf ............................. 4 2. List of counties for which USGS collections exist in Kansas ...................... 5 3. List of 7 1/£-minute quadrangle names used in KSPCFILE.dbf ..................... 7 4. List of group names used in KSPCFILE.dbf ................................ 8 5. List of formation names used in KSPCFILE.dbf ............................. 9 6. List of member names used in KSPCFILE.dbf .............................. 10 7. List of collector names used in KSPCFILE.dbf .............................. 11 DISKETTE INDEX Volume: KANSAS. Files: KSPCFILE.dbfandABBREV.doc .......................... (in pocket) USGS PERMO-CARBONIFEROUS FOSSIL LOCALITY REGISTER PART 2: KANSAS PC-FILES INTRODUCTION This Open-File Report is the second in a series of reports in which locality and age data are presented for upper Paleozoic invertebrate fossil collections of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). These locality and age data are derived from the Permo-Carboniferous1 Fossil Locality Register (PC-Register) and have been entered in a computerized database referred to as PC-FILES2. dBASE IV has been used to enter and access records. In the present report, locality and age data are presented for collections from the State of Kansas. These data are provided in text form in Appendix 1 and distributed as a dBASE file, KSPCFILE.dbf, on the accompanying diskette. This report also contains a brief introduction to the PC-FILES database and its specific application to the Kansas database. PC-FILES is a part of the National Paleontological Data Base (NPDB), a thematic geologic database mandated by the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-285). When completed, PC-FILES will comprise more than 45,000 discrete invertebrate fossil locality records from upper Paleozoic sections (Mississippian through Permian) from all states from which UGSG collections have been made. Introduction to the PC-FILES Series Part 1 of this Open-File Report series (Henry, Williams, and Holroyd, 1993) is the introduction to the PC-Fossil Locality and the computerized databases, PC-FILES. That report describes the purpose of the database and the protocols (standards) used for PC-FILES. The Part 1 report contains listings of the other USGS paleontologic databases used by the Branch of Paleontology and Stratigraphy of the USGS, the sites of repository for the various collections, and a detailed discussion of the USGS Permo-Carboniferous Fossil Locality Register. That report includes sections on the procedure for assignment of the PC-Numbers, record keeping, limitations of the files, protocols for data entry (including abbreviations used in the records), systems requirements, procedures used in updating the records, and structure of the computerized PC-Fossil Locality Register (PC-FILES). Information critical for the use of KSPCFILE.dbf is repeated in the current text. However, the user should obtain USGS Open-File Report 93-513 for more detailed discussions and for examples of using dBASE in manipulation of the information in PC-FILES. 1 The term "Permo-Carboniferous" has been applied to this database since its beginning in the 1880's. It is a term informally used in reference to the upper Paleozoic geologic systems (i.e., the Mississippian, Pennsylvanian, and Permian) and particularly to the invertebrate fossil locality register (PC-Register) for the upper Paleozoic. 2 The original cards that make up the PC-Register are 4- by 5-inch and 5- by 7-inch library cards on which pertinent information for a given fossil collection has been typed or entered by hand. The entire set of card files for the upper Paleozoic fossil collections is referred to as the PC-Register. 1 Components of Subsequent PC-FILES Reports The current report for the State of Kansas and all subsequent reports in this series present the fossil locality data by State or region in dBASE. The database files included on the diskettes are keyed to the appropriate State by their U.S. Postal Service abbreviation. For example, the database accompanying the current report for Kansas is KSPCFILE.dbf. All of the State database files are provided as read-only files in order to protect the integrity of the distributed data. The diskettes accompanying this and subsequent reports in this series also will contain an ASCII file, ABBREV.doc, that lists all abbreviations used in PC-FILES. These abbreviations are for directions, location, measurements, miscellaneous surveying, highways and roads, natural geographic features, lithologic and stratigraphic terminology, rock color, textural and bedding features, organizations, and fossil types. These tables can be converted from ASCII text into any one of several word processing systems or printed out directly from the ASCII file (ABBREV.doc) itself. SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS Hardware and Software Because the data in PC-FILES are provided as dBASE records, the hardware requirements are the same as for dBASE IV i.e., an IBM-PC, -XT, -AT, or compatible computer. A hard-disk drive with a minimum of 3.5 MB free is required to use dBASE IV. A minimum of 640 K RAM with at least 450 K available to run files is needed. Also, a floppy disk drive capable of accessing high-density (1.2 MB) 514 -inch or 3 !/£-inch diskettes is necessary to access the files distributed on diskette. The minimum software requirements are: (1) any DOS version 2.2 or higher; and (2) dBASE IV, version 1.1 or higher. The PC-FILES can also be accessed through dBASE III Plus, but we recommend using dBASE IV. Additionally, a word-processing system capable of handling ASCII files is strongly recommended. PC-FILES Diskettes Either 5V4-inch high-density diskettes or 3'/4-inch disks are used to distribute State PC-FILES. The data are not compressed. Some databases will exceed standard diskette capacity and will be released on more than one diskette. KSPCFILE.dbf is released on a single diskette. LIMITATIONS OF PC-FILES Few databases are error-free. The following precautions must be kept in mind when using the Kansas State PC-FILES database (KSPCFILE.dbf). The following quotation is from Henry, Holroyd, and Williams (1993, p. 4-5). The PC-Register has been kept by approximately four generations of geologists and technicians. The oldest records date to the early 1880's, a few years after the Survey was founded. For nearly 40 years, ending in 1987, Harold T. Saunders, employed by the USGS at the National Museum of Natural History, faithfully kept up the locality data for the PC-Register. It is the largest database for upper Paleozoic fossil invertebrates in the world. However, the PC- Register cannot be regarded as a static entity, because the information contained in it is subject to error and reinterpretation. Areas in which such error and/or reinterpretation affect the data found in the register are discussed below. Although carefully maintained and appended, the PC-Register is not error-free. Some mistakes certainly occur within the computerized files. These are understandably ascribable to any one or a combination of the following sources: (1) mistakes may have been made in the field by the original geologist or collector; (2) errors may have been introduced in transcription or interpretation of the information from the field label and/or collector's notebook into the locality register itself; (3) subsequent "corrections" or attempts to update information in the PC-Register by any of dozens of research geologists or technicians may have introduced errors, although an attempt has been made to clearly distinguish between
Recommended publications
  • V2.0.0-Beta.1

    V2.0.0-Beta.1

    Liquidprompt Mark Vander Stel Dec 09, 2020 CONTENTS: 1 Installation 3 1.1 Packages.................................................3 1.2 Download.................................................5 1.3 Dependencies...............................................5 1.4 Test Drive.................................................6 1.5 Shell Installation.............................................6 2 Config Options 7 2.1 General..................................................8 2.2 Features..................................................8 2.3 Thresholds................................................ 12 2.4 Marks................................................... 12 2.5 Colors.................................................. 14 3 Theming 19 3.1 Default Theme.............................................. 19 3.2 Included Themes............................................. 22 3.3 Custom Themes............................................. 28 3.4 Switching Themes............................................ 30 4 Functions 31 4.1 Public Functions............................................. 31 4.2 Data Functions.............................................. 33 4.3 Default Theme Functions........................................ 46 4.4 Utility Functions............................................. 49 4.5 Internal Functions............................................ 50 5 Release Notes 55 5.1 Version 2.0 Release Notes........................................ 55 5.2 Version 1.12 Release Notes....................................... 57 6 Upgrading Liquidprompt
  • Wilson's Creek National Battlefield Geologic Resources Inventory

    Wilson's Creek National Battlefield Geologic Resources Inventory

    Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield, Missouri Geologic Resources Division Prepared by John Graham National Park Service June 8, 2011 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a Geologic Resources Inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield on April 5, 2011 at park headquarters. Jason Kenworthy (NPS Geologic Resources Division) presented an overview of the Geologic Resources Inventory and led the discussion regarding geologic issues, features, and processes at Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield. After Bill Duley (Missouri Department of Natural Resources) presented an overview of Missouri’s geology, Tim Connors (NPS Geologic Resources Division) facilitated the discussion of map coverage at the park. In addition to Bill Duley, other geologists who were familiar with the local geology included Jerry Prewett (Missouri Department of Natural Resources) and Doug Gouzie (Missouri State University). Participants at the meeting also included Superintendent Ted Hillmer and Resource Manager Gary Sullivan. In the afternoon, Gary Sullivan led the participants on a field trip throughout the park.
  • 65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 Weis Earth Science Museum Menasha, Wisconsin The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago Joanne Kluessendorf & Donald G. Mikulic Organizers The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago 65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 by Joanne Kluessendorf Weis Earth Science Museum, Menasha and Donald G. Mikulic Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign With contributions by Bruce Brown, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stop 1 Tom Hooyer, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stops 2 & 5 William Mode, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stops 2 & 5 Maureen Muldoon, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stop 1 Weis Earth Science Museum University of Wisconsin-Fox Valley Menasha, Wisconsin WELCOME TO THE TH 65 ANNUAL TRI-STATE GEOLOGICAL FIELD CONFERENCE. The Tri-State Geological Field Conference was founded in 1933 as an informal geological field trip for professionals and students in Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin. The first Tri-State examined the LaSalle Anticline in Illinois. Fifty-two geologists from the University of Chicago, University of Iowa, University of Illinois, Northwestern University, University of Wisconsin, Northern Illinois State Teachers College, Western Illinois Teachers College, and the Illinois State Geological Survey attended that trip (Anderson, 1980). The 1934 field conference was hosted by the University of Wisconsin and the 1935 by the University of Iowa, establishing the rotation between the three states. The 1947 Tri-State visited quarries at Hamilton Mound and High Cliff, two of the stops on this year’s field trip.
  • Citrix Gateway Service

    Citrix Gateway Service

    Citrix Gateway Service Citrix Product Documentation | docs.citrix.com September 28, 2021 Citrix Gateway Service Contents Release Notes 3 Get started with Citrix Gateway service 14 Technical Security Overview 15 Migrate Citrix Gateway to Citrix Gateway service for HDX Proxy 18 HDX Adaptive transport with EDT support for Citrix Gateway service 24 Support for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 27 Route tables to resolve conflicts if the related domains in both SaaS and web apps are the same ‑ Tech Preview 29 Contextual access to Enterprise Web and SaaS applications – Tech Preview 33 Read‑only access for admins to SaaS and Web apps 37 Support for Software as a Service apps 41 Apps configuration using a template 52 SaaS app server specific configuration 59 Citrix Gateway Connector 73 Citrix Gateway Connector dashboard 96 Support for Enterprise web apps 97 Support for Citrix Endpoint Management 109 Citrix Cloud Gateway Connector availability in Azure Marketplace 113 Citrix Cloud Gateway Connector availability in Azure 118 Deploy a Citrix Gateway Connector instance on AWS ‑ Tech Preview 125 ADFS integration with Secure Workspace Access 131 FAQ 140 © 1999–2021 Citrix Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 Citrix Gateway Service Release Notes August 24, 2021 The Citrix Gateway service release to cloud release notes describe the new features, enhancements to existing features, fixed issues, and known issues available in a service release. The release notes include one or more of the following sections: What’s new: The new features and enhancements available in the current release. Fixed issues: The issues that are fixed in the current release.
  • Pennsylvanian Crinoids of New Mexico

    Pennsylvanian Crinoids of New Mexico

    Pennsylvanian crinoids of New Mexico Gary D. Webster, Department of Geology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, and Barry S. Kues, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 Abstract north of Alamogordo; (2) Morrowan and groups present on the outcrop were sam- Atokan specimens from the La Pasada For- pled, often repeatedly over the years. Crinoids from each of the five Pennsylvanian mation in the Santa Fe area; and (3) a mid- These collections, reposited at the Univer- epochs are described from 26 localities in dle Desmoinesian species from the Alami- sity of New Mexico (UNM), testify to the New Mexico. The crinoid faunas occupied tos Formation, north of Pecos. Bowsher rarity of identifiable crinoid cups and diverse shelf environments around many intermontane basins of New Mexico during and Strimple (1986) described 15 late crowns in these assemblages, even in cases the Pennsylvanian. The crinoids described Desmoinesian or early Missourian crinoid where crinoid stem elements are common. here include 29 genera, 39 named species, species (several not named) from near the In nearly all collections, crinoid cups rep- and at least nine unnamed species, of which top of the Bug Scuffle Member of the Gob- resent only a small fraction of 1% of the one genus and 15 named species are new. bler Formation south of Alamogordo in the total identifiable specimens. The only This report more than doubles the number of Sacramento Mountains. Kietzke (1990) exception is the fauna from the Missourian previously known Pennsylvanian crinoid illustrated a Desmoinesian microcrinoid Sol se Mete Member, Wild Cow Formation, species from New Mexico; 17 of these species from the Flechado Formation near Talpa.
  • Kubuntu Desktop Guide

    Kubuntu Desktop Guide

    Kubuntu Desktop Guide Ubuntu Documentation Project <[email protected]> Kubuntu Desktop Guide by Ubuntu Documentation Project <[email protected]> Copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006 Canonical Ltd. and members of the Ubuntu Documentation Project Abstract The Kubuntu Desktop Guide aims to explain to the reader how to configure and use the Kubuntu desktop. Credits and License The following Ubuntu Documentation Team authors maintain this document: • Venkat Raghavan The following people have also have contributed to this document: • Brian Burger • Naaman Campbell • Milo Casagrande • Matthew East • Korky Kathman • Francois LeBlanc • Ken Minardo • Robert Stoffers The Kubuntu Desktop Guide is based on the original work of: • Chua Wen Kiat • Tomas Zijdemans • Abdullah Ramazanoglu • Christoph Haas • Alexander Poslavsky • Enrico Zini • Johnathon Hornbeck • Nick Loeve • Kevin Muligan • Niel Tallim • Matt Galvin • Sean Wheller This document is made available under a dual license strategy that includes the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and the Creative Commons ShareAlike 2.0 License (CC-BY-SA). You are free to modify, extend, and improve the Ubuntu documentation source code under the terms of these licenses. All derivative works must be released under either or both of these licenses. This documentation is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AS DESCRIBED IN THE DISCLAIMER. Copies of these licenses are available in the appendices section of this book. Online versions can be found at the following URLs: • GNU Free Documentation License [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html] • Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/] Disclaimer Every effort has been made to ensure that the information compiled in this publication is accurate and correct.
  • 1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 1 S1 Expanded

    1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 1 S1 Expanded

    1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 2 S1 Expanded Geologic and Paleogeographic Information 3 The carbonate nodules from Montañez et al., (2007) utilized in this study were collected from well-developed and 4 drained paleosols from: 1) the Eastern Shelf of the Midland Basin (N.C. Texas), 2) Paradox Basin (S.E. Utah), 3) Pedregosa 5 Basin (S.C. New Mexico), 4) Anadarko Basin (S.C. Oklahoma), and 5) the Grand Canyon Embayment (N.C. Arizona) (Fig. 6 1a; Richey et al., (2020)). The plant cuticle fossils come from localities in: 1) N.C. Texas (Lower Pease River [LPR], Lake 7 Kemp Dam [LKD], Parkey’s Oil Patch [POP], and Mitchell Creek [MC]; all representing localities that also provided 8 carbonate nodules or plant organic matter [POM] for Montañez et al., (2007), 2) N.C. New Mexico (Kinney Brick Quarry 9 [KB]), 3) S.E. Kansas (Hamilton Quarry [HQ]), 4) S.E. Illinois (Lake Sara Limestone [LSL]), and 5) S.W. Indiana (sub- 10 Minshall [SM]) (Fig. 1a, S2–4; Richey et al., (2020)). These localities span a wide portion of the western equatorial portion 11 of Euramerica during the latest Pennsylvanian through middle Permian (Fig. 1b). 12 13 S2 Biostratigraphic Correlations and Age Model 14 N.C. Texas stratigraphy and the position of pedogenic carbonate samples from Montañez et al., (2007) and cuticle were 15 inferred from N.C. Texas conodont biostratigraphy and its relation to Permian global conodont biostratigraphy (Tabor and 16 Montañez, 2004; Wardlaw, 2005; Henderson, 2018). The specific correlations used are (C. Henderson, personal 17 communication, August 2019): (1) The Stockwether Limestone Member of the Pueblo Formation contains Idiognathodus 18 isolatus, indicating that the Carboniferous-Permian boundary (298.9 Ma) and base of the Asselian resides in the Stockwether 19 Limestone (Wardlaw, 2005).
  • Some Crinoids from the Argentine Limestone (Late Pennsylvania- Missourian) of Southeastern Nebraska and Southwestern Iowa

    Some Crinoids from the Argentine Limestone (Late Pennsylvania- Missourian) of Southeastern Nebraska and Southwestern Iowa

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 1980 Some Crinoids from the Argentine Limestone (Late Pennsylvania- Missourian) of Southeastern Nebraska and Southwestern Iowa Roger K. Pabian University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Harrell L. Strimple University of Iowa Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Pabian, Roger K. and Strimple, Harrell L., "Some Crinoids from the Argentine Limestone (Late Pennsylvania-Missourian) of Southeastern Nebraska and Southwestern Iowa" (1980). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 288. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/288 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1980. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, VIII: 155-186. SOME CRINOIDS FROM THE ARGENTINE LIMESTONE (LATE PENNSYLVANIAN-MISSOURIAN) OF SOUTHEASTERN NEBRASKA AND SOUTHWESTERN IOWA Roger K. Pabian and Harrell L. Strimple Conservation and Survey Division, Department of Geology Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Iowa University of Nebraska-Lincoln Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 Familial diversity of crinoids is relatively constant throughout positions in cyclothems or to provide ecological interpreta­ the Missourian Series of southeastern Nebraska and southwestern Iowa. tions based on cyclothemic models sensu Heckel and Baese­ Beginning with the deposition of the Argentine Limestone, there ap­ mann (1975), or Heckel (1977).
  • U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover

    U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover

    rf Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis- - Concept and Application u.s. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover. Calcic paleo-Vertisol underlying the resistant transgressive marine limestone Little Stone Gap Member of the Hinton Formation (Upper Mississippian) in southwestern West Virginia. This paleosol is indicative of a relatively dry climate when evapotranspira- tion exceeded rainfall for more than 6 months out of the year. The light-gray color at the level of the photograph scale (center) is the result of gleying (bleaching) after burial. A calcified root system, located in the proximity of the scale, branches downward and sug­ gests a well-developed root system for a plant whose stem may have been up to 15 centi­ meters in diameter. Numerous mineralized fossil roots at this level indicate that land plants were very well adapted to seasonally dry conditions in nonwaterlogged environ­ ments by Late Mississippian time. Cross-cutting fractures, known as mukkara structures and caused by seasonal expansion (wet) and contraction (dry), are visible throughout the outcrop beneath the resistant limestone layer except where interrupted or destroyed by paleoroot systems. Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis Concept and Application Edited by C. Blaine Cecil and N. Terence Edgar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2110 A collection of extended abstracts of papers presented at two workshops on the title subject UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • What Is Revision Control?  Why Should I Care?  Hints  Which Tool Should I Use?  Etckeeper  Git  Bazaar  Mercurial  Meld  What Next?  Urls, Wrap up and Q&A

    What Is Revision Control?  Why Should I Care?  Hints  Which Tool Should I Use?  Etckeeper  Git  Bazaar  Mercurial  Meld  What Next?  Urls, Wrap up and Q&A

    Revision Control for the Rest of Us * * SysAdmins, scripters and anyone who is not a full-time Real Programmer™ Updated: 2017-11-21 JP Vossen, CISSP bashcookbook.com http://www.jpsdomain.org/public/Revision_Control_for_the_Rest_of_Us.pdf http://www.jpsdomain.org/public/Revision_Control_for_the_Rest_of_Us.odp Agenda The “rest of us?” What is revision control? Why should I care? Hints Which tool should I use? etckeeper git Bazaar Mercurial Meld What next? URLs, Wrap up and Q&A The “rest of us?” Not all of us are “Real Programmers” working on large-scale, world-wide distributed teams Not everyone realizes how useful revision control is If you use a computer, you probably do something that revision control can help with If you are a system administrator or scripter, you should be using revision control If you are any kind of programmer, revision control should be like breathing, it's critical and I shouldn't have to tell you to do it What is revision control? A way to travel back in time to see what changed, and when, and who, and why Similar to Mac's Time Machine AKA “version control,” “source control,” “code management” and more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revision_control http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-visual-guide-to-version-control/ http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/version-control/version-control.html Why should I care? If you work on a development team, it's just required; but you already know that and aren't the audience for this. Have you ever changed something then wished you could undo the change? Have you ever forgotten why you changed something? (Or who changed it?) Would a new backup every time anything changed, detailing why it changed, and with the ability to compare (diff) the change ever be useful? Hints Most useful for plain text: code, wiki markup, configs /etc/ Not good for binaries: ODF, OOXML, ZIP, ISO, music, videos, etc.
  • Liquidprompt Documentation

    Liquidprompt Documentation

    Liquidprompt Mark Vander Stel Jan 28, 2021 CONTENTS: 1 Installation 3 1.1 Packages.................................................3 1.2 Download.................................................5 1.3 Dependencies...............................................5 1.4 Test Drive.................................................6 1.5 Shell Installation.............................................6 2 Config Options 7 2.1 General..................................................8 2.2 Features..................................................9 2.3 Thresholds................................................ 13 2.4 Marks................................................... 13 2.5 Colors.................................................. 15 3 Theming 21 3.1 Default Theme.............................................. 21 3.2 Included Themes............................................. 24 3.3 Custom Themes............................................. 33 3.4 Switching Themes............................................ 35 4 Functions 37 4.1 Public Functions............................................. 37 4.2 Data Functions.............................................. 39 4.3 Default Theme Functions........................................ 53 4.4 Utility Functions............................................. 57 4.5 Internal Functions............................................ 58 5 Release Notes 63 5.1 Version 2.0 Release Notes........................................ 63 5.2 Version 1.12 Release Notes....................................... 65 6 Upgrading Liquidprompt
  • Xerox University Microfiims

    Xerox University Microfiims

    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they a e spiiced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complote continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corrser of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority o f users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.