DOCSLIB.ORG

Alliance Defending Freedom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alliance Defending Freedom RIGHTS at RISK Time for Action Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 The Observatory on the Universality of Rights (OURs) is a collaborative initiative that aims to monitor, analyze, and share information on initiatives that misuse religion, culture, and tradition to undermine the universality of human rights. Grounded in a feminist framework, the OURs initiative works across regions, issues, and human rights spaces towards the advancement of social justice. The OURs Working Group is made up of organizations and activists who work to protect and promote the universality of rights. For more on OURs, please visit www.oursplatform.org Lead Author: Naureen Shameem Contributing Authors: Alejandra Sardá-Chandiramani, Alex McCarthy, Ana Inés Abelenda, Anthea Taderera, Felogene Anumo, Fenya Fischler, Fernando D’Elio, Gillian Kane, Hyshyama Hamin, Inna Michaeli, Isabel Marler, Lola Guerra, María Luisa Peralta, Mirta Moragas Mereles, Paula Sánchez-Mejorada, Varyanne Sika, Verónica Vidal Degiorgis Knowledge-building exercises: Daniela Fonkatz Lead Editor: Isabel Marler © 2021 AWID Published by Association for Women’s Editor: Inna Michaeli Rights in Development (AWID) Copyeditor: Chinelo Onwualu Address: 215 Spadina Ave, Suite 225, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2C7 Canada Proofreader: Shaina Greiff Website: www.awid.org Research team: Daniela Marin Platero, This publication may be redistributed Gabby De Cicco, Isabel Marler, non-commercially in any media, Naureen Shameem, Rochelle Jones. unchanged and in whole, with credit given to AWID and the authors. Production: Isabel Marler Designer: Claman Chu Infographics: Chelsea Very Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike AWID would like to thank all our funders and 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) our members for their generous support. www.creativecommons.org The OURs Working Group includes: • ARC International • Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW) • Association for Progressive Communications (APC) • Association for Women’s Rights in Acknowledgements: Development (AWID) • Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir The authors extend their gratitude Mexico (CDD-Mexico) to the members of the Observatory on the Universality of Rights (OURs) • Coalition for Sexual and Bodily Rights Working Group, who contributed in Muslim Societies (CSBR) a wealth of analysis to this report • Cynthia Rothschild (independent expert) and provided valuable feedback • Due Diligence Project on drafts. We also thank Sibongile • FEMENA Ndashe (Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa) for her review of • Global Interfaith Network for People of “Silencing Feminists in the African All Sexes, Sexual Orientation, Gender Human Rights System” and Heron Identity and Expression (GIN-SSOGIE) Greenesmith (Political Research • International Civil Society Action Network Associates) for their review of “The (ICAN) Links Between Anti-trans Feminists • International Women’s Rights Action and Christian Fundamentalists.” We Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW-AP) also extend our gratitude to the team • Ipas at OpenDemocracy 50.50, whose investigative research informed parts • Musawah: global movement for justice of “Funding of Anti-rights Actors.” and equality in the Muslim family • Muslims for Progressive Values • Planned Parenthood – Global (PPFA) • Sexual Rights Initiative (SRI) • Soulforce • Synergía • World Council of Churches (WCC) Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 Inna Michaeli and Isabel Marler How to read this report .......................................................................................................13 Chapter 1 Advancing Feminist Agendas: Key Progressions on Gender and Sexuality ... 17 Naureen Shameem Global Spaces ......................................................................................................................19 Exercise: Let’s map and celebrate our wins! ..............................................................................27 Chapter 2 Understanding the Context of Anti-Rights Threats .......................................... 29 Nationalism and Ultra-nationalism .......................................................................................29 Isabel Marler Corporate Capture: Untamed Corporate Power is Putting Rights at Risk ..........................37 Felogene Anumo and Ana Ines Abelenda Reprisals and Closing Civic Spaces for Feminist Activists, LGBTQI and Women Human Rights Defenders ........................................................................................48 Verónica Vidal Degiorgis Movement Resistance Stories: CEDAW’s Article 16: A Pathway for Reformation of Discriminatory Family Laws in Muslim Contexts .......................................................................52 Alex McCarthy and Hyshyama Hamin Chapter 3 Anti-Rights Discourses ...................................................................................... 55 Gender Ideology ..................................................................................................................55 Fernando D’Elio and María Luisa Peralta Cultural Imperialism and Ideological Colonization ...............................................................59 Naureen Shameem Abortion ...............................................................................................................................63 Naureen Shameem Conscientious Objection ............................................................................................................................63 Prenatal Genocide ......................................................................................................................................65 Exercise: Let’s Take Back the Narrative ......................................................................................68 Movement Resistance Stories: The Nairobi Principles: Cross-Movement Commitments on Disability and SRHR .............................................................................................................70 Fenya Fischler Chapter 4 Anti-Rights Actors .............................................................................................. 73 CitizenGo .............................................................................................................................73 Naureen Shameem Alliance Defending Freedom ................................................................................................88 Naureen Shameem Funding of Anti-rights Actors ..................................................................................................102 Naureen Shameem The Links Between Anti-trans Feminists and Christian Fundamentalists ...............................110 Inna Michaeli and Fenya Fischler Exercise: Let’s Map the Landscape ..........................................................................................112 Movement Resistance Stories: Catolicadas, a Powerful Communication Tool to Promote Gender Equality and Sexual and Reproductive Rights ............................................113 Lola Guerra and Paula Sánchez-Mejorada Chapter 5 Anti-Rights Tactics, Strategies, and Impacts .................................................. 115 Naureen Shameem Institutionalization of Anti-rights Actors in UN Mechanisms ..............................................115 Opting-out and Delegitimization .......................................................................................120 Lowering Human Rights Standards ...................................................................................125 Co-optation – Building a Parallel Human Rights Framework ............................................130 Exercise: Holding Governments Accountable ..........................................................................134 Exercise: Yes, they are strong, but so are we! ..........................................................................136 Chapter 6 Anti-Rights Trends in Regional Human Rights Systems ................................ 139 Silencing Feminists in the African Human Rights System .................................................139 Anthea Taderera and Varyanne Sika Anti-rights Groups in Latin America: Organization of American States (OAS) General Assembly and the Inter-American Human Rights System ...................................156 Mirta Moragas Mereles and Gillian Kane Movement Resistance Stories: The LAC LGBTTTI Coalition at the OAS .....................................174 Alejandra Sardá-Chandiramani RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Introduction Introduction www.oursplatform.org 6 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Introduction Introduction oday, we face a global backlash against the human rights of women and LGBTQI people, against the right – Inna Michaeli and Isabel Marler AWID Tof each and every person to live freely and safely in their body and identity. This backlash intensifies in response to the positive changes that threaten oppressive laws and social norms. Since the publication of our first report in 2017, millions of people’s human rights have been defended and advanced in domestic and international law, against all the efforts of anti-rights actors. In 2018, Uruguay passed an act for trans rights, while Portugal prohibited genital surgeries in intersex children. In 2019, laws criminalizing same-sex relations were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1327 American Grand Strat Text
    DAY V U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS:THE U.S. DOMESTIC CONTEXT THOMAS E. DONILON1 PARTNER O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP u U.S. relations with China have for decades been subject to the push and pull of domestic politi- cal influences and pressures. As Ambassador Richard Holbrooke recently noted, “[w]hat vastly complicates U.S.-China relations is that every major policy issue between the two countries is also a domestic matter with its own lobbying groups and nongovernmental organizations ranging across the political spectrum.”2 These influences have ebbed and flowed over time. During the 1950s, the “Who Lost China” debate and domestic fears over Communist infiltration played a major role in shaping U.S. attitudes Seven Presidents from both toward “Red China.” By the 1970s, the strategic priority of containing the Soviet political parties have pursued a bloc had submerged hostile domestic atti- strikingly consistent policy of tudes toward China and allowed President Nixon to make his historic “opening” in engagement toward China. 1972. Subsequently, the collapse of the Soviet Union eroded the foundation on which the Sino-American relationship had been built, leaving it exposed to the currents of domes- tic opinion and the hailstorm of criticism after the events at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. Through it all, seven Presidents from both political parties have pursued a strikingly consistent policy of engagement toward China with the goal of integrating the People’s Republic into full and constructive membership in the international community.3 On the surface, the George W. Bush years have seen stability and relative calm in U.S.-China relations.
    [Show full text]
  • FPC Disclosure Amicus Brief
    Nos. 19-251, 19-255 In The Supreme Court of the United States ____________ AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECCERA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Respondent, — and — THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECCERA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Respondent. ____________ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ____________ Brief of Amici Curiae 24 Family Policy Organiza- tions Supporting Petitioners ____________ Anita Y. Milanovich Counsel of Record MILANOVICH LAW, PLLC 100 E. Broadway Street The Berkeley Room Butte, Montana 59701 Ph.: 406/589-6856 Email: aymilanovich@ milanovichlaw.com September 25, 2019 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the exacting scrutiny this Court has long required of laws that abridge the freedoms of speech and association outside the election con- text—as called for by NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny— can be satisfied absent any showing that a blanket governmental demand for the individual identities and addresses of major donors to private nonprofit organizations is narrowly tailored to an asserted law-enforcement interest (Petitioner Americans for Prosperity Foundation). 2) Whether exacting scrutiny or strict scrutiny applies to disclosure requirements that burden nonelectoral, expressive association rights (Peti- tioner Thomas More Center). 3) Whether California’s disclosure requirement violates charities’ and their donors’ freedom of association and speech facially or as applied to the Law Center (Petitioner Thomas More Center). (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Question Presented .................................................... i Table of Contents .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom for Churches the U.S
    Protecting how we practice our faith BRUCE HAUSKNECHT, ESQ Paying a High Price 2 PAYING A HIGH PRICE Religious Freedom for Churches The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. today for religious freedom in the U.S. (and not just and Religious Organizations 3 Hodges,1 handed down on June 26, 2015, made in regard to marriage): same-sex marriage the law of the land and created Religious Freedom a “new” set of constitutional rights. By a vote of 5-4, ■ Aaron and Melissa Klein3 are a Christian in the Military 5 the millennia-old, one-man, one-woman definition couple from Gresham, Oregon, who owned of marriage was tossed aside in favor of sexual a bakery. They were fined $135,000 by the Religious Freedom liberty—a decision that will have profound effects state for failing to bake a cake for a same-sex in Public Schools 7 on American life and the freedoms we often take wedding, and have been forced to close their for granted. bakery due to the controversy. Religious Freedom in the Workplace 10 In 2016, the Obergefell impact spread to the issue of “gender identity” as the U.S. Department of Education issued an edict to the nation's schools, Religious Freedom in Government saying that boys who claim to “identify” as girls (and and the Public Square 11 vice versa) can choose to use the restrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities of the opposite sex. What Can I Do to Common sense, public safety, and the orthodox Protect Religious Freedom? 13 Christian view2 that “male and female He created them” have been rejected in the government push for the new sexual orthodoxy made possible by 4 ■ Barronelle Stutzman, a florist in the Obergefell ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Orientation | Kurmanji
    KURMANJI A Kurdish village, Palangan, Kurdistan Flickr / Ninara DLIFLC DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER 2018 CULTURAL ORIENTATION | KURMANJI TABLE OF CONTENTS Profile Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Government .................................................................................................................. 6 Iraqi Kurdistan ......................................................................................................7 Iran .........................................................................................................................8 Syria .......................................................................................................................8 Turkey ....................................................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Bodies of Water ...........................................................................................................10 Lake Van .............................................................................................................10 Climate ..........................................................................................................................11 History ...........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus Anth 5900.713 Special Problems Queer Anthropology and Activism Spring 2018
    SYLLABUS ANTH 5900.713 SPECIAL PROBLEMS QUEER ANTHROPOLOGY AND ACTIVISM SPRING 2018 Professor: Dr. Jara Carrington Email: [email protected] Voice/Text: 346-201-2888 Office Hours: Tuesdays 2:00-3:30, Thursdays 10:30-12, or by appointment Office: Chilton Hall 308C Class meetings: TBD Course Description: This guided readings course will help you, as an anthropologist, to think more “Queerly” about the construction and reproduction of sexual norms, identities, and subjects in the United States, and to consider how these norms, identities, and subject positions have influenced advocacy efforts for LGBTQ-identified individuals and communities. Like much of cultural anthropology, Queer anthropological theory and practice is by nature interdisciplinary. We will cover influential texts from a range of disciplines to understand how these ideas have helped shape the development and trajectory of queer anthropology. This collection of readings will also highlight the intersections of, and contradictions between, queer theoretical perspectives and ethnography. We will begin by tracing the development of queer anthropology as a subfield of anthropological theory and practice. Readings will elaborate a variety of frames that have been used to study sexuality as an object of analysis, and will reveal influential debates and contentions about its study. Next, we will examine foundational texts that interrogate how sexual norms, identities, and subject positions have been discursively produced in the west. To conclude, we will focus on Queer analyses of activism in the United States to understand how LGBTQ-identified individuals, communities, and activists have worked to navigate, and sometimes contest, processes of state recognition. Course Objectives: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHTS at RISK
    RIGHTS at RISK Time for Action Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors 4 www.oursplatform.org 72 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Chapter 4: CitizenGo Anti-Rights Actors – Naureen Shameem AWID Mission and History ounded in August 2013 and headquartered Fin Spain,221 CitizenGo is an anti-rights platform active in multiple regions worldwide. It describes itself as a “community of active citizens who work together, using online petitions and action alerts as a resource, to defend and promote life, family and liberty.”222 It also claims that it works to ensure respect for “human dignity and individuals’ rights.”223 United Families Ordo Iuris, International Poland Center for World St. Basil the Istoki Great Family and Endowment Congress of Charitable Fund, Russia Foundation, Human Rights Families Russia (C-Fam) The International Youth Alliance Coalition Russian Defending Orthodox Freedom Church Anti-Rights (ADF) Human Life Actors Across International Heritage Foundation, USA FamilyPolicy, Russia the Globe Group of Friends of the and their vast web Family of connections Organization Family Watch of Islamic International Cooperation Anti-rights actors engage in tactical (OIC) alliance building across lines of nationality, religion, and issue, creating a transnational network of state and non-state actors undermining rights related to gender and sexuality. This El Yunque, Mexico visual represents only a small portion Vox party, The Vatican World Youth Spain of the global anti-rights lobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Message to the 117Th Congress: Don't Draft Our Daughters
    Special Message to the 117th Congress: Don’t Draft Our Daughters August 31, 2021 Dear Senators and Representatives, We write to you united in serious concern about the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2022 which the Senate Armed Services Committee approved on July 21. The legislation is unacceptable because it would amend the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) to require young women to register with Selective Service for a possible future draft. Sen. Jack Reed’s deceptively simple language – reportedly to change the MSSA words “male citizens” to “all Americans” – is unnecessary, unwise, and, in our view, outrageous. Imposition of Selective Service obligations, including a possible future draft of our daughters, sisters, and nieces, would not only hurt women, it would compromise our military’s essential function during a time of catastrophic national emergency. A monumental and consequential reversal such as this should not be approved behind closed doors, and the full Senate and House should not rubber-stamp “Draft Our Daughters” language in the NDAA. The only acceptable option is to strike the Reed amendment and seriously, thoroughly, and responsibly consider what the Selective Service law really means. This is a matter of national security – not “women’s rights,” “men’s rights,” or civilian volunteer service. Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution assigns to Congress the authority to establish and support the armed forces and to ensure that they are prepared to secure our nation and defend our freedom. As the Supreme Court has recognized, the purpose of a draft is not to fill various non- combat billets, it is to quickly provide qualified replacements for combat casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Fisher Prelims Reading List: History of Sexuality, Gender, and Intimacy, 1860S-Present Supervising Professor: Finn Enke Spring 2014
    Simon Fisher Prelims Reading List: History of Sexuality, Gender, and Intimacy, 1860s-present Supervising Professor: Finn Enke Spring 2014 Historiographic Questions and Commentary Boydston, Jeanne. “Gender as a Question of Historical Analysis.” Gender & History 20, no. 3 (November 2008): 558–583. Bérubé, Allan, John D’Emilio, and Estelle B. Freedman. My Desire for History: Essays in Gay, Community, and Labor History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011. Garber, Marjorie B. Vested Interests: Cross Dressing & Cultural Anxiety. New York: Harper Perennial, 1991. Halperin, David M. How to Do the History of Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002. Hewitt, Nancy. "Re-rooting American Women's Activism: Global Perspectives on 1848," in Woman's Rights as Human Rights, eds. Patricia Grimshaw et al. New York: Palgrave, 2001. Najmabadi, Afsaneh. “Beyond the Americas: Are Gender and Sexuality Useful Categories of Analysis?” Journal of Women’s History 18, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 11–21. Scott, Joan W. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91, no. 5 (December 1986): 1053 – 1075. ———. “The Evidence of Experience.” Critical Inquiry 17, no. 4 (July 1991): 773–797. Scott, Joan W. “Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis?” Diogenes 57, no. 1 (February 2010): 7–14. Vicinus, Martha. Intimate Friends: Women Who Loved Women, 1778-1928. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. History of Sexuality: Foundational Texts Bullough, Vern, ed. Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights in Historical Context. New York: Harrington Park Press, 2002. Chauncey, George. Gay New York Gender, Urban Culture, and the Makings of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2015
    SUMMER 2015 The Public Eye When the Exception Is the Rule Christianity in the Religious Freedom Debates editor’s letter perspectives BY LInDsay BeyersTEIn THE PUBLIC EYE quarterly PUBLIsHER Tarso Luís Ramos Struggling to Get Church GUEsT EDIToR Kathryn Joyce Beyond the Hate Frame LAYoUT and State Right Jennifer Hall CoVER art Political Research Associates always strives to see both the trees and the forest: to go Asad Badat Whether it’s a spree killing, a vandalized mosque, or a beyond caricatures to provide fresh research and analysis on individual conservative bias attack on a queer teen, Americans are quick to chalk it PRInTInG activists and coalitions, but also to situate these actors in the larger infrastructure of Red Sun Press up to hate. The label “hate crime” invites us to blame over- the Right. The first piece in our Summer 2015 issue,“Beyond the Hate Frame” (page wrought individuals acting on extreme personal prejudice, EDIToRIAL BoARD , speaks to this ideal: an interview with Kay Whitlock and Michael Bronski, authors of 3) T.F. Charlton • Frederick Clarkson making it seem as if a small cadre of social deviants is our the new book Considering Hate, which explores how “the hate frame” obscures broader Alex DiBranco • Eric Ethington main obstacle to a peaceful society. In fact, such individu- issues of systemic violence. Kapya Kaoma • L. Cole Parke als are products of a society that endorses all kinds of vio- Tarso Luís Ramos • Spencer Sunshine lence against the very same groups who are targeted in hate As this issue is going to press, the Supreme Court has just announced its historic rul- Mariya Strauss crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th UPR WORKING GROUP SESSIONS SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS (3 - 14 May 2021)
    38th UPR WORKING GROUP SESSIONS SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS (3 - 14 May 2021) This report contains a summary and the SOGIESC recommendations of the 38th UPR Working Group Sessions. The structure of the report includes SOGIESC remarks made by the State under Review, advanced questions from Member States and recommendations of Cycle II and III. The report is based on the draft report submitted by the Working Group and notes taken by ILGA during the Working Group Sessions and drafted by Gabriel Galil (Senior Programme Officer) and Farai Chikwanha (UN Advocacy Intern) For further information on the UPR, please contact: [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS BELGIUM 3 DENMARK 8 ESTONIA 15 LATVIA 22 MOZAMBIQUE 29 NAMIBIA 34 NIGER 42 PALAU 45 PARAGUAY 48 SEYCHELLES 55 SIERRA LEONE 61 SINGAPORE 64 SOLOMON ISLANDS 72 SOMALIA 76 BELGIUM UPR SOGIESC RECOMMENDATIONS DATE AND TIME OF THE REVIEW: 5 MAY 2021, 09:00-12:30 DATE AND TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE REPORT: 7 MAY 2021, 15:00-1800 During the 38th UPR Working Group Sessions, Belgium received 4 SOGIESC recommendations. It will respond to these recommendations no later than the 48th session of the Human Rights Council. A. SOGIESC Information National Report 31. At all levels of government, Belgium has developed tools to tackle discrimination against LGBTQI+ persons and vulnerable groups more generally. At the regional level, the Flemish Region’s plan of action against discrimination in the workplace focuses on awareness-raising, self-regulation, monitoring and sanctions. Self-regulation has been introduced through sectoral agreements and an action plan providing for “mystery calls” to be made to service-voucher companies.
    [Show full text]