DOCSLIB.ORG

Religious Freedom for Churches the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Religious Freedom for Churches the U.S Protecting how we practice our faith BRUCE HAUSKNECHT, ESQ Paying a High Price 2 PAYING A HIGH PRICE Religious Freedom for Churches The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. today for religious freedom in the U.S. (and not just and Religious Organizations 3 Hodges,1 handed down on June 26, 2015, made in regard to marriage): same-sex marriage the law of the land and created Religious Freedom a “new” set of constitutional rights. By a vote of 5-4, ■ Aaron and Melissa Klein3 are a Christian in the Military 5 the millennia-old, one-man, one-woman definition couple from Gresham, Oregon, who owned of marriage was tossed aside in favor of sexual a bakery. They were fined $135,000 by the Religious Freedom liberty—a decision that will have profound effects state for failing to bake a cake for a same-sex in Public Schools 7 on American life and the freedoms we often take wedding, and have been forced to close their for granted. bakery due to the controversy. Religious Freedom in the Workplace 10 In 2016, the Obergefell impact spread to the issue of “gender identity” as the U.S. Department of Education issued an edict to the nation's schools, Religious Freedom in Government saying that boys who claim to “identify” as girls (and and the Public Square 11 vice versa) can choose to use the restrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities of the opposite sex. What Can I Do to Common sense, public safety, and the orthodox Protect Religious Freedom? 13 Christian view2 that “male and female He created them” have been rejected in the government push for the new sexual orthodoxy made possible by 4 ■ Barronelle Stutzman, a florist in the Obergefell ruling. Although the Department Washington State, and another baker in of Education edict was revoked by the Trump Denver, Colorado, named Jack Phillips,5 Administration in 2017, activists nevertheless have been found guilty of “discrimination” continue to push this policy through local school for declining, on conscience grounds, to administrators, as well as through the courts. provide services that would celebrate a same-sex ceremony. Even before the Obergefell decision, government hostility toward Christianity was evident due to the ■ Andrew Cash,6 an aspiring counselor, was rise of homosexual activism. Consider these recent expelled from Missouri State University in cases, which paint a picture of serious concern 2014 for expressing his opinion in a class Religious Freedom 2 presentation that because of his religious But you need to know what those rights are! beliefs, he would refer a homosexual couple to another counselor to deal with relationship To help you, Focus on the Family created this issues, although he would be willing to Thriving Values Religious Freedom resource to counsel homosexuals individually. help you better understand and respond to threats in five key areas of culture: ■ Wes Modder 7 was a decorated military chaplain with a 19-year service record 1. churches and religious organizations who faced a Navy discharge for offering his biblical views on sex and marriage in 2. the military private counseling sessions. After months of legal wrangling, the Navy exonerated8 3. public schools Modder, and he was able to retire in 4. the workplace good standing. 5. government and the public square Religious freedom rights are in jeopardy10—and the 2015 Obergefell ruling RELIGIOUS FREEDOM will only make things more difficult for people of faith, FOR CHURCHES their businesses and their organizations. Similar scenarios AND RELIGIOUS will increase in frequency, and ORGANIZATIONS new challenges to religious freedom will arise. However, The U.S. was founded on religious liberty, so you it’s not all bad news. might assume churches and religious organizations are the most protected of any of this country’s People of faith still have institutions, and their rights are easiest to explain. rights; state legislatures are regularly adding new It’s more complicated than that, however, due to the protections;11 and religious-freedom lawyers cumulative effect of more than 200 years of court and organizations stand ready and willing to cases, legislation and the ever-increasing size and intervene, so as to safeguard those rights. encroachment of government into our daily lives. Religious Freedom 3 While specific laws exist to protect the rights follow God’s design for marriage may find their of churches and religious organizations, legal tax-exempt status14 in jeopardy. This was a topic challenges remain. of discussion during the Obergefell oral arguments before the Supreme Court. SAME-SEX WEDDINGS—MINISTERS A couple of states have gone so far as to suggest AND CHURCH FACILITIES that certain church functions that are “open to the Does the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. public” must comply with SOGI laws. This creates Hodges mean ministers will have to perform same- opportunities for churches to be targeted and sued sex wedding ceremonies and churches will have to for “discrimination” by LGBT activists. rent out facilities for such weddings? Alliance Defending Freedom15 and Christian Church pastors will probably not be at personal Legal Society16 each has a helpful resource risk for the foreseeable future, although recent for churches concerned about these issues. history suggests ministers who operate “for- profit”12 wedding chapels may have a harder time resisting requests to officiate GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS same-sex ceremonies. Due to the In the important 2017 Trinity Lutheran17 “All of which, I assume is little increasing prevalence of “sexual decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a comfort to the Huguenins, who orientation/gender identity” (SOGI) state government cannot deny the benefits of a now are compelled by law to nondiscrimination laws13 churches generally available public program or benefit to compromise the very religious will need to pay attention to their a church—simply because it is a church. This beliefs that inspire their lives. facility use policies. For example, principle would also apply favorably to other Though the rule of law requires it, churches that allow non-members religious organizations, such as religious schools the result is sobering.… In short, to rent church facilities may be and charities. I would say to the Huguenins, open to demands from same-sex with the utmost respect: It is couples who want to hold a wedding the price of citizenship.” reception or demands from gay HIRING AND EMPLOYMENT ISSUES —Justice Bosson and lesbian groups for access, Churches and religious organizations have the right, New Mexico state supreme court followed by lawsuits if they are under Title VII18 of the U.S. Code and similar state the Elane Photography case 9 refused. At some point, churches laws, to give employment preference to members and organizations that continue to of their own religion. There’s also the right to select Religious Freedom 4 ministers and other religious leaders free from any In a previous case, religiously owned, for-profit government interference via typical employment laws. companies won an important victory against the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate in 2014, in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. ZONING LAWS (See “Religious Freedom in Government and Churches19 have the right to be treated similarly the Public Square,” pp.11-13.) to other community groups in situations like rental of government buildings20 or zoning and land-use21 issues. There is a history of local OTHER PROTECTIONS governments discriminating against churches— Churches and religious organizations have either because of hostility to religion, or the fear of additional protections from government laws that losing tax revenue (churches are typically exempt affect their free exercise of religion under federal23 from state and local sales taxes). and state versions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).24 Under these RFRA statutes, courts try to balance any burdens placed OBAMACARE’S ABORTION on religion with the compelling interest of the DRUG MANDATE government behind its law or action. Some states The Little Sisters of the Poor22 is a congregation are actively protecting25 churches and pastors of Catholic sisters who run homes for the poor and from the effects of the Obergefell same-sex elderly of every race and denomination. The marriage decision by forbidding government from sisters face huge government fines for penalizing them for holding fast to God’s design refusing to include contraception and for marriage and sexuality. possible abortion-causing drugs in their employee health-care plan, as part of the Affordable Care Act (also called “ObamaCare”). Their RELIGIOUS FREEDOM challenge has reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ordered IN THE MILITARY the parties in May 2016 to go back Court cases involving military personnel and to the negotiating table and reach a religious freedom are often outside of the public compromise acceptable to both sides. eye because the military is covered primarily by its Religious Freedom 5 own internal justice system, policies Air Force Senior Master Sergeant Phillip Monk,27 and procedures. for example, found himself under the command of a lesbian officer, who demanded that Monk, a But since the repeal of “Don’t Christian, affirm his support for same-sex Ask, Don’t Tell,”26 a policy that marriage, which he declined to do. prohibited openly practicing She relieved him of his duties and homosexuals from serving in he was investigated for possible the military, as well as the U.S. court-martial. In a surprise ending Supreme Court’s rulings in to this story, Monk was later 2013 (striking down federal law honored by the Air Force for defining marriage) and 2015 his service, rather than punished (striking down every remaining for his politically incorrect views one-man, one-woman state on marriage. marriage law in the nation), military life and religious freedom Nevertheless, this story is disturbing continue to clash in a big way.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1327 American Grand Strat Text
    DAY V U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS:THE U.S. DOMESTIC CONTEXT THOMAS E. DONILON1 PARTNER O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP u U.S. relations with China have for decades been subject to the push and pull of domestic politi- cal influences and pressures. As Ambassador Richard Holbrooke recently noted, “[w]hat vastly complicates U.S.-China relations is that every major policy issue between the two countries is also a domestic matter with its own lobbying groups and nongovernmental organizations ranging across the political spectrum.”2 These influences have ebbed and flowed over time. During the 1950s, the “Who Lost China” debate and domestic fears over Communist infiltration played a major role in shaping U.S. attitudes Seven Presidents from both toward “Red China.” By the 1970s, the strategic priority of containing the Soviet political parties have pursued a bloc had submerged hostile domestic atti- strikingly consistent policy of tudes toward China and allowed President Nixon to make his historic “opening” in engagement toward China. 1972. Subsequently, the collapse of the Soviet Union eroded the foundation on which the Sino-American relationship had been built, leaving it exposed to the currents of domes- tic opinion and the hailstorm of criticism after the events at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. Through it all, seven Presidents from both political parties have pursued a strikingly consistent policy of engagement toward China with the goal of integrating the People’s Republic into full and constructive membership in the international community.3 On the surface, the George W. Bush years have seen stability and relative calm in U.S.-China relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCKET Nos. 02-16708-D, 02-16949-D
    DOCKET Nos. 02-16708-D, 02-16949-D ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ____________________ STEPHEN R. GLASSROTH, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROY S. MOORE, Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Defendant-Appellant ____________________ MELINDA MADDOX and BEVERLY HOWARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. ROY S. MOORE, Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Defendant-Appellant ____________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, CIVIL ACTION NOS. 01-T1268-N AND 01-T1269-N THE HONORABLE MYRON H. THOMPSON, PRESIDING ____________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ALABAMA CLERGY, BAPTIST JOINT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC AFFAIRS, AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE, THE COMMISSION ON SOCIAL ACTION OF REFORM JUDAISM, THE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE, THE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE OF ALABAMA, AND REVEREND CLIFTON KIRKPATRICK AS STATED CLERK OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (U.S.A.) IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES ____________________ K. Hollyn Hollman Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs 200 Maryland Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002-5797 (202) 544-4226 Counsel for Amici Curiae Glassroth v. Moore, Docket Nos. 02-16708-D, 02-16949-D CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 1. Alabama Clergy, amicus for appellees; 2. American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama, Attorney for plaintiffs-appellees Melinda Maddox and Beverly Howard; 3. American Jewish Committee, amicus for appellees; 4. Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Attorney for plaintiffs- appellees Melinda Maddox and Beverly Howard; 5. Anti-Defamation League, amicus for appellees; 6. Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs, amicus for appellees; 7. Boyd, The Honorable Delores R., United States Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of Alabama; 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Midterm Election
    A10 SUNDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2018 THE PRESS-REGISTER AL.COM 2018 midterm election Secretary of State HEATHER MILAM (D) JOHN H. MERRILL (R)(I*) Website: milamforsecretary.com Facebook: facebook.com/JohnMerrill The first point of Heather Milam’s platform is one that comes up often in her messag- John Merrill says he gladly gives his cell phone number to the citizens whom he meets, ing: Empower voters. “Whether you are in Marshall County, or Talladega County, or Lee putting it on his business cards. “If you need to get in touch with me — With me! — you County or Madison County, we just want our humanity recognized and identified,” she need to do so when it’s convenient for you,” he told a women’s group in Cullman County. says in a video on her website. “That’s why voting is so personal to me. It’s because it’s “If that’s not your expectation for the people that represent you at the municipal, county, your voice, and it’s the only thing we really have in a democracy. And people want to talk the state, the regional, federal level, you change your expectation.” about it, people care about it, and I’m going to fight like hell for it.” Merrill, 54, the Republican nominee for secretary of state, seeks a second term. He Milam, 39, the Democratic nominee for secretary of state, easily won the June 5 pri- takes pride in the long history of the office, which was established even before the state mary. was, and describes it as being more efficient under his watch than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • (New) Constitution of the Family
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2006 Family Constitutions and the (New) Constitution of the Family Linda C. McClain Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Linda C. McClain, Family Constitutions and the (New) Constitution of the Family, 75 Fordham Law Review 833 (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/405 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No. 06-34 Family Constitutions and the (New) Constitution of the Family Linda C. McClain 75 Fordham Law Review 833 (2006) This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=951027 FAMILY CONSTITUTIONS AND THE (NEW) CONSTITUTION OF THE FAMILY Linda C. McClain* A mission statement is . meant to be the literal constitution of your family life. And just as the United States Constitution has survived for more than two hundred sometimes turbulent years, your family constitution can be the foundational document that will unify and hold your family together for decades—even generations—to come. By creating and living by a mission statement, families are gradually able to build moral authority in the family itself.
    [Show full text]
  • People for the American Way Collection of Conservative Political Ephemera, 1980-2004
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb596nb6hz No online items Finding Aid to People for the American Way Collection of Conservative Political Ephemera, 1980-2004 Sarah Lopez The processing of this collection was made possible by the Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements, Institute for the Study of Social Change, U.C. Berkeley, and by the generosity of the People for the American Way. The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. BANC MSS 2010/152 1 Finding Aid to People for the American Way Collection of Conservative Political Ephemera, 1980-2004 Collection number: BANC MSS 2010/152 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ The processing of this collection was made possible by the Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements, Institute for the Study of Social Change, U.C. Berkeley, and by the generosity of the People for the American Way. Finding Aid Author(s): Sarah Lopez Finding Aid Encoded By: GenX © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: People for the American Way collection of conservative political ephemera Date (inclusive): 1980-2004 Collection Number: BANC MSS 2010/152 Creator: People for the American Way Extent: 118 cartons; 1 box; 1 oversize box.circa 148 linear feet Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: This collection is comprised of ephemera assembled by the People For the American Way and pertaining to right-wing movements in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Winter 2018
    WINTER 2018 The Public Eye In this issue: One Year In: A Q&A with Tarso Luís Ramos Emmanuel Macron and Authoritarian Liberalism The Far Right and Neopaganism A Manual to Restore a Christian Nation That Never Was editor’s letter THE PUBLIC EYE It’s been a long year since Trump was elected, and the assaults on civil and human rights QUARTERLY are almost too many to name. Some of what’s happened has been “predictable in broad out- PUBLISHER lines, if not always the details,” notes PRA Executive Director Tarso Luís Ramos in a discus- Tarso Luís Ramos sion with Public Eye, At the start of Trump’s term, PRA warned that “One Year In” (pg. 3). EDITOR White supremacist and other bigoted groups would be emboldened, the Christian Right Kathryn Joyce rewarded, and Trump’s economic populist campaign promises abandoned to deliver culture COVER ART war tokens in their stead. But there’s “a gift in this moment,” finds Luís Ramos, as masses Karl Orozco of people “are newly aware of themselves as historical actors and are forming (or reforming) LAYOUT their sense of purpose in this extended moment of crisis.” There’s also a challenge: that Gabriel Joffe anything-but-Trumpism doesn’t convince progressives to settle for an old status quo that PRINTING enables more right-wing victories down the road. Red Sun Press EDITORIAL BOARD Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco That threat is the subject of Ajay Singh Chaudhary’s essay, “In the Court of the Centrist Gabriel Joffe • Kapya Kaoma King” (pg. 6), about the rise of France’s supposedly liberal savior, President Emmanuel Greeley O’Connor • L.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Demographics Demographics
    Overview “The greatest resource that America has is her people. The most precious gift in all the world is human life. The greatest good is to serve your fellowman. The greatest tragedy is the refusal of American people to get involved on behalf of those who will come after us.” – Donald W. Wildmon, Chairman, American Family Association The American Family Association (AFA) exists to motivate and equip citizens to change the culture to reflect Biblical truth. The AFA is a non-profit organization that represents and stands for traditional family values. Founder Don Wildmon is an ordained United Methodist minister, having earned his MDiv. from Emory College in 1965. After serving in the U.S. Army's Special Services he pastored churches from 1965 until he founded National Federation for Decency in 1977. NFD became American Family Association in 1988. The impact of AFA is recognized nationwide. Don Wildmon and other AFA personnel have appeared on programs such as Good Morning America, The Today Show, MacNeill Lehrer Report, Nightline, The 700 Club, Meet the Press, Crossfire and Focus on the Family. AFA is a long-time member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability. Demographics AFA Online Audience:* • 55.4 % female; 44.6% male • Age ranges between 25 and 45 AFR Listening Audience:** • 60% female; 40% male • Ages ranges between 35 and 54 AFA Journal Readers:*** • 55 % female; 45% male • 57% have read the Journal for more than 5 years • 50% of readers are over 65 *Source: AFA Online Questionnaire Results, A Profile of AFA’s Online Community .. AFA Media Department **Source: American Family Radio Listener Questionnaire Results, A Profile of AFR Listeners .
    [Show full text]
  • Debating the Religious Right's Trump Endorsement and Gender
    Debating the Religious Right’s Trump Endorsement and Gender: Macho Descriptive Identity or Substantive Pragmatism? Blandine Chelini-Pont, Robin Presthus To cite this version: Blandine Chelini-Pont, Robin Presthus. Debating the Religious Right’s Trump Endorsement and Gen- der: Macho Descriptive Identity or Substantive Pragmatism?. Strictly Observant: Religion, Gender and the State Wolf Institute.Westminster College, Mar 2019, Cambridge, United Kingdom. hal- 02272508 HAL Id: hal-02272508 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02272508 Submitted on 27 Aug 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CONFERENCE STRICTLY OBSERVANT RELIGION, GENDER AND THE STATE 25-26 March 2019 Woolf Institute Westminster College Cambridge Debating the Religious Right’s Trump Endorsement and Gender: Macho Descriptive Identity or Substantive Pragmatism? Blandine CHELINI-PONT (LID2MS-Aix-Marseille University) Robin PRESTHUS (LID2MS, Aix-Marseille University) I. Presentation of the Paradox It is late 2015 and GOP nominees are carving up the conservative electorate in hopes of consolidating a base significant enough to win the ticket— the climate is not entirely unlike the late 19th century Scramble for Africa. One thing is certain, in recent years garnering the coveted Evangelical vote (which, incidentally, generally encompasses not only Evangelicals, but also conservative Catholics) has been indispensable to the winning the Republican nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election Margaret
    ABSTRACT The Elephant in the Room: White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election Margaret Thonnard Director: Elizabeth Corey, PhD In 2016, eighty-one percent of white evangelical voters voted for Donald Trump—the demographics’ highest showing of support for any presidential candidate in over two decades. Using both existing and original research, this thesis attempts to create awareness for the historical context behind white evangelical support for Donald Trump. Topics covered include the relationships between high-profile evangelicals and presidents such as Nixon and Reagan, as well as the role of televangelists in the 2016 election. After considering the development of partisanship within the evangelical community, the thesis concludes by assessing the practical options available to evangelical voters in upcoming elections. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: __________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Honors Program APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ______________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director DATE: ________________ The Elephant in the Room: White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Margaret Thonnard Waco, Texas May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tea with Žižek
    Tea with Žižek Hasmet Uluorta (Trent University, Canada) and Lawrence Quill (San José State University, USA) DRAFT. Not to be cited. In April 2009 I was resting in a hotel room in Syracuse, hopping between two channels: a PBS documentary on Pete Seeger, the great American country singer of the left; and a Fox News report on the anti-tax Tea Party, with a country singer performing a populist song about how Washington is taxing hard-working ordinary people to finance the Wall Street financiers. There was a weird similarity between the two singers: both were articulating an anti-establishment, populist complaint against the exploitative rich and their state; both were calling for radical measures, including civil disobedience. Slavoj Žižek (2013) Introduction In late 2011, Occupy Wall Street (OWS) quickly came to symbolize dissent across the United States and beyond. Almost seamlessly the Lacanian intellectual Slavoj Žižek seemed to be at the epicentre of framing the significance of the movement to the occupiers and a global audience. Žižek was able to do so not only due to his personally charged style of presentation but through his use of the Lacanian lens. In short while the OWS made the slogan ‘we are the 99%’ famous Lacanian political analysis, through Žižek and others, became a critical lens by which to understand events as they unfolded. Specifically, the application of the so-called ‘ethical moment’ and ‘the politics of withdrawal’ via the Lacanian analysis of the heroine Antigone gained popular resonance. Yet this was not the first instance of widespread dissent in the United States to follow from the crisis of 2008-09.
    [Show full text]