Faculty Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Faculty Handbook MISSION The mission of the University of Michigan is to serve the people of Michigan and the world through preeminence in creating, communicating, preserving and applying knowledge, art, and academic values, and in developing leaders and citizens who will challenge the present and enrich the future. Regents of the University Jordan B. Acker, Huntington Woods Michael J. Behm, Grand Blanc Mark J. Bernstein, Ann Arbor Paul W. Brown, Ann Arbor Shauna Ryder Diggs, Grosse Pointe Denise Ilitch, Bingham Farms Ron Weiser, Ann Arbor Katherine E. White, Ann Arbor Mark S. Schlissel (ex officio) Nondiscrimination Policy Statement The University of Michigan, as an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer, complies with all applicable federal and state laws regarding nondiscrimination and affirmative action. The University of Michigan is committed to a policy of equal opportunity for all persons and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, disability, religion, height, weight, or veteran status in employment, educational programs and activities, and admissions. Inquiries or complaints may be addressed to the Senior Director for Institutional Equity, and Title IX/Section 504/ADA Coordinator, Office of Institutional Equity, 2072 Administrative Services Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1432, 734-763-0235, TTY 734-647-1388. For other University of Michigan information, call 734-764-1817. © 2020 Regents of the University of Michigan. Last Revised July 2020 Faculty Handbook Ann Arbor Campus 2019-2021 Abridged Print Version (also available online) www.provost.umich.edu/faculty/handbook/ AbridgedFacultyHandbook Unabridged Online Version www.provost.umich.edu/faculty/handbook Preface to the Abridged Print Version The University of Michigan is one about key resources available to Bylaws of the Board of Regents, of the great public research faculty. the Standard Practice Guide universities of the United States, (SPG), the bylaws of the schools The University is a highly complex guided by the commitment and and colleges, and many other and decentralized institution. It vision of its Board of Regents, documents, some of which are would be virtually impossible to executive officers, deans, and, referenced in the handbook (see, capture in detail the many policies, importantly, by its faculty. Since http://spg.umich.edu/about/policy procedures, and information that the nineteenth century, the -hierarchy). Throughout the affect faculty, and to attempt to do University has provided a national handbook, references to so would duplicate many existing model of a complex, diverse, and authoritative sources of University resources. With this in mind, the comprehensive public institution of policy are provided. The handbook Office of the Provost provides the higher learning that supports is not intended to directly establish Faculty Handbook, both the excellence in research; provides or imply contractual obligations to unabridged and abridged versions, outstanding undergraduate, any faculty group or individual as a navigation aid. The reader is graduate, and professional faculty member. Official University given brief descriptions of existing education; and demonstrates policies may be revised at any time. policies, procedures, and resources, commitment to service through Unless otherwise stated, revised and referred to primary resources partnerships and collaborations University policies, when for more information. that extend to the community, approved, apply to University region, state, nation, and around This abridged faculty handbook, faculty and staff, regardless of their the world. which is produced for the initial appointment dates. convenience of those who prefer a Michigan’s position of leading Although the Faculty Handbook is summary document for reference, excellence in higher education rests written for Ann Arbor faculty, it contains information about policies on the outstanding quality of its includes information about and procedures affecting faculty at nineteen schools and colleges on University of Michigan-Dearborn the University of Michigan. The the Ann Arbor campus, as well as and University of Michigan- Flint. unabridged Faculty Handbook is on the national recognition of the Key differences among the available on-line at excellence of individual campuses are noted and some http://www.provost.umich.edu/fac departments and programs and on information about local resources ulty/handbook/. the many major scholarly and provided by the provosts on those creative contributions of its faculty. The abridged version contains the campuses has been included. The complete table of contents for the UM-Dearborn Faculty Handbook It is the University's goal to create a unabridged handbook and several Supplement is available online at climate that enables faculty to key chapters printed in full. It also http://www.umd.umich.edu/11790 focus their time and energy on includes a list of acronyms. 1/. UM-Flint’s Faculty Code of the their scholarly, research, or University of Michigan-Flint is creative pursuits; their teaching; Since the unabridged handbook is posted online at their clinical work; and their updated on an as-needed basis to https://www.umflint.edu/sites/def service. As in any complex reflect changes in policy and to ault/files/users/jillhubb/faculty_c institution, clear policies and revise outdated information, it is ode_may_2018.pdf procedures help the University to the most up-to-date source of function more effectively and information. In addition, the online Every effort was made to ensure efficiently, enabling faculty and versions of the unabridged that the information contained in staff to focus on their pursuits and handbook provides direct access to this abridged version of the Faculty responsibilities. The purpose of the a wide variety of resources through Handbook is accurate as of June Faculty Handbook is to provide hyperlinks. Some of the resources 2019. However, the University of information to faculty about a wide (for example, the Standard Practice Michigan is a dynamic institution, range of administrative matters Guide references) are provided in constantly growing and changing. that include general University Portable Documents Format Some of the information will principles and practices, the ins (PDF). become out of date. Please contact and outs of faculty appointments, the Provost’s Office with questions tenure, faculty governance, and The Faculty Handbook is not, nor at (734) 764-9290. many more topics. In addition, the is it intended to be, a primary handbook provides information source of official University policy. Official policies are found in the Table of Contents SECTION I- Unabridged Chapters FUNDAMENTAL TENETS OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY .....................................1 1.A FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ARTISTIC EXPRESSION ........................................................................................... 1 1.B FUNDAMENTAL TENETS STATEMENT ............................................................................................................ 1 1.C SENATE ASSEMBLY STATEMENT ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM ............................................................................... 2 1.D PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR FACULTY .................................................................................................... 3 DIVERSITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION ...............................................................................................5 2.A GENERAL PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.B UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND STATEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 5 2.B.1 REGENTAL STATEMENT OF NONDISCRIMINATION ................................................................................ 5 2.B.2 VALUE OF DIVERSITY STATEMENT ...................................................................................................... 6 2.B.3 DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT POLICY ....................................................................................... 6 2.B.4 DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION POLICY .................................................................... 6 2.B.5 POLICY REGARDING INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ............................................................................. 6 2.B.6 RELIGIOUS ACADEMIC CONFLICTS POLICY ........................................................................................... 6 2.B.7 SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY ........................................................................................................... 7 2.B.8 STANDARDS OF FACULTY CONDUCT ................................................................................................... 7 2.C ANN ARBOR CAMPUS RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 7 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................9 3.A GENERAL PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.B REGENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 9 3.C PRESIDENT
Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 12-682 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BILL SCHUETTE, MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Petitioner, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY (BAMN), ET AL., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, MARY SUE COLEMAN, AND LOU ANNA K. SIMON --------------------------------- --------------------------------- LEONARD M. NIEHOFF HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN, LLP 130 S. First Street 4th Floor Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 [email protected] (734) 418-4246 Attorney for University Respondents ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .............................. 4 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 8 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 11 I. Petitioning the elected public officials who constitute the governing boards of the University Respondents is a political process ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Tax-Exempt) Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series B
    Amended Commercial Paper Memorandum Ratings Moody's: P-1 S&P: A-1+ Fitch: F1+ $300,000,000 The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes consisting of: Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series A (Tax-Exempt) Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series B (Taxable) Offering This Amended Commercial Paper Memorandum provides information concerning two series of commercial paper notes (collectively, the "Notes") issued by The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (the "University"). The Notes consist of (i) a tax-exempt series (the "Series A Notes") and (ii) a taxable series (the "Series B Notes"). The first Notes were issued in 2003 and are issued from time to time to finance and refinance certain capital projects and cash requirements of the University. Currently, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are serving as dealers for the Notes (the "Dealers") and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company is serving as Issuing and Paying Agent for the Notes. Liquidity support for the Notes is provided solely by the University. See "APPENDIX A — THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA" and the audited financial statements of the University in APPENDIX B. The Notes The Notes are issued in denominations of $100,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess of $100,000. The Notes are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) in the case of the Series A Notes and Section 3(a)(4) in the case of the Series B Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 2003–04
    University of Michigan College of Engineering CELEBRATING 150 years of ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE Bulletin 2003–04 THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN BULLETIN Volume 32, Number 3 The University of Michigan College of Engineering 2003–2004 Volume 32, Number 3 August 6, 2003 The University of Michigan Bulletin (USPS 651-660) is published six times per year in the months of June, July, August, September, October and November, by Marketing Communications, University of Michigan, 200 Hill Street, Ste. 2000, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104- 3297. Periodicals Rate postage is paid at Ann Arbor, Michigan. Postmaster send address changes to: College of Engineering University of Michigan 1221 Beal Avenue Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2102 Production Credits College of Engineering Jeanne Murabito, Director of Academic Support Services, Editor Connie Scheibe, Editorial Assistant Design College of Engineering Cover design by Mark Nystrom See inside-back cover for photo captions © 2003 The Regents of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA University of Michigan College of Engineering CELEBRATING 150 years of ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE Bulletin 2003–04 2003-2004 Bulletin 2003-2004 Bulletin The University of Michigan Mary Sue Coleman, President Paul N. Courant, Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Lazar J. Greenfi eld, Interim Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs E. Royster Harper, Vice President for Student Affairs Marvin Krislov, Vice President and General Counsel Daniel Little, Chancellor, University of Michigan - Dearborn Jerry A. May, Vice President for Development Juan E. Mestas, Chancellor, University of Michigan - Flint Lisa M. Rudgers, Vice President for Communications Timothy P. Slottow, Interim Chief Financial Offi cer and Associate Vice President for Finance Lisa A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Michigan Review
    THE MICHIGAN REviEW THE JOUR NAL OF CAMPUS AF FAirS AT THE UNivERSitY OF MICHIGAN 03.20.07 VOLUME XXV, ISSUE 10 Task Force Holds Features Final Meeting on Examining substance abuse at Day Before Michigan Spring Break P. 3 BY ADAM PAUL, ‘08 HE DIVERSITY BluEPRINTS Task A look at campus TForce, whose creation was announced the bars: why some fail day before winter break, held its final public fo- while others flourish rum the day before spring break. “This is not the ideal day as many have al- ready left for spring break,” said Provost and P. 12 Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Teresa Sullivan to kick off the event. She ran the event with fellow Diversity Blueprints co- chair, Senior Vice Provost for Academic Af- News fairs Lester Monts. “Even though the last forum was on Feb- While Michigan ruary 23, the day before the break, we had a Barricades close off Washington Street for the Arena’s annual St. Patrick’s Day celebration. full list of speakers and a substantial audience,” bans preferences in The local bar faced opposition from the Ann Arbor City Council while planning for this said Sullivan, stressing that each of the four fo- admissions, year’s event. rums was held in an attempt to accommodate Wisconsin goes the greatest number of participants. holisitc with “I don’t see a lot of students here. It’s kind Councilmember, of disappointing; I guess they all left for Spring applications Break,” stated engineering student Darshan Karwat. Karwat explained that he had attended P.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Campus Medical Campus
    D. R R LLE FU CENTRAL CAMPUS & MEDICAL CAMPUS MEDICAL 1 R DR. ENTE P BUILDING DIRECTORY SCHOOL L C A P CAMPUS F5 Alumni Center E5 Rackham Building OF NURSING IC D P D8 Angell Hall F8 Randall Laboratory (RAND) KKINGSLINGSLEY ST. E P . M UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL . T T E S C7 Betsy Barbour Residence (BBR) E11 Ross School of Business (ROSS) S W . 2 E5 Burton Memorial Tower G7 Ruthven Museums M E LLS H7 Central Campus Recreation Building (CCRB) F9 Shapiro Undergraduate Library (UGL) LLS D I C GA GA F6 Chemistry Building (CHEM) F10 School of Social Work A L E9 Clements Library (CL) D10 South Hall C N. IN N. IN E E9 Martha Cook Residence (COOK) C10 South Quad P N CATHERHERINE ST. T . TAUBMAN E E H4 Couzens Hall D5 202 S. Thayer Building (THAYER) E LIBRARY R R 3 V V D E A F7 Dana Building, School of Natural H6 Stockwell Hall A R H TAUBMAN MOLECULAR AND P . Resources & Environment (DANA) C8 Student Activities Building (SAB) C BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE BEHAVIORAL T I RESEARCH NEUROSCIENCE P GLEN GLEN G8 Dennison Building (DENN) D9 Tappan Hall (TAP) GRADUATE DETROIT A P Taubman Biomedical Science Research Building E. ANN ST. OBSERVATORY G6 School of Dentistry (DENT) G4 HOTEL N I I3 Detroit Observatory G3 Taubman Library Z COUZENS F7 Dow Laboratory (DOW) D8 Tisch Hall 4 G9 East Hall I9 Trotter Multicultural Center LL E. MEDMEDIICAL CENTERCENTER DR. E. HHUURON ST. P O ALMER FIELD P OWE G11 East Quad (Residential College) G5 Undergraduate Science Building (USB) Y D MARY F10 School of Education F5 University Health Service (UHS) RACKHKHAAM POWER P MARKLEY R A P CENTER LM F11 Executive Education J2 University Hospital NORTH L HALL A N QUAD E C8 Fleming Administration Building D11 Weill Hall (Ford School) R R E.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Michigan Union Renovation
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN UNION RENOVATION Strategic Positioning and Concept Study 06.03.16 This report is a result of a collaborative PROJECT NUMBERS UNIVERSITY PLANNING TEAM effort led by Integrated Design Solutions, Workshop Architects, and Hartman-Cox University of Michigan: P00007758 Diana Adzemovic, Lead Design Manager, UM AEC Architects. The design team is grateful to Integrated Design Solutions: 15203-1000 Eric Heilmeier, Interim Director, Michigan Union and Director of Campus Information Center those who have devoted their concentrated time, vision, ideas and energy to this Workshop Architects: 15-212 Heather Livingston, Program Manager, Student Life ACP process. Hartman-Cox: 1513 Deanna Mabry, Associate Director for Planning and Design, UM AEC Susan Pile, Senior Director, University Unions and Auxiliary Services Laura Rayner, Senior Interior Designer, Auxiliary Capital Planning Loren Rullman, Associate Vice President for Student Life Greg Wright, AIA, Assistant Director, Auxiliary Capital Planning Robert Yurk, Director, Auxiliary Capital Planning 3 06.03.16 A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT UNIVERSITY PLANNING TEAM PLANNING TEAM STUDENT INVOLVEMENT INTEGRATED DESIGN SOLUTIONS, LLC WORKSHOP ARCHITECTS, INC HARTMAN-COX ARCHITECTS Building a Better Michigan Charles Lewis, AIA, Senior Vice President, Director of Student Life Jan van den Kieboom, AIA, NCARB, Principal MK Lanzillotta, FAIA, LEED AP Lee Becker, FAIA Michigan Union Board of Representatives Aubree Robichaud, Assoc. AIA Peter van den Kieboom Tyler Pitt Student Renovation Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Stanford University
    Learning•Teaching•Outcomes•Access School&Work•K-16Transitions Quality&Efficiency•Accountability Restructuring•Technology•Assessment Access•Accountability•Outcomes K-16Transitions•Quality&Efficiency Technology•Teaching•Restructuring How do we create change? • Who benefits? • Where is change occurring? • What’s at stake? • Why is change necessary? Who benefits? • Where is change occurring? • What’s at stake? Why is change necessary? • How do we create change? Where is change occurring? • What’s at stake? • Why is change necessary? • How do we create change? • Who benefits? • A Collaborative Research Venture Stanford University • University of Pennsylvania • University of Michigan he National Center for Postsecondary Improvement contributes to dialogue and policy analysis aimed at T defining a common ground amidst increasingly complex and often contradictory environmental demands. FROM THE DIRECTOR NCPI research: In the wake of fifty years of rapid higher education • Provides policymakers, institutions, and students and expansion, colleges and universities are now facing their parents with an understanding of the marketplace a rapidly changing set of local, national, and for higher education. international pressures. Pursuing an ambitious research agenda, the National Center for Postsec- • Helps consumers and institutions better understand ondary Improvement (NCPI) aims to provide its student outcomes. various constituent groups—faculty, researchers, • Provides researchers, policymakers, and institutions administrators, students, parents, policymakers, with information on institutional and state responses and employers—with analysis, recommendations, to changing environmental demands. and conceptual tools that will enable them to adapt to, and even thrive in, this environment. • Offers educators, employers, and policymakers insights to improve student transitions from school to school NCPI’s research, dissemination, and outreach efforts and school to work.
    [Show full text]
  • CV-Sourav.Pdf
    SOURAV DUTTA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Department of Physics, Purdue University, 525 Northwestern Avenue, West Lafayette, IN 47907 [email protected], Phone: (765) 496-3059 CURRENT RESEARCH INTEREST --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • UM-Dearborn Engr and Computer Science.Pdf
    TRANSFER GUIDE WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE College of Engineering and Computer Science Bachelor of Science in Engineering Transferring to the University of Michigan-Dearborn is easier than you think! Utilize this transfer guide for a smooth transition into the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS). MICHIGAN DIFFERENCE Classes are small—undergraduate lectures average 24 At the University of Michigan-Dearborn, we emphasize students and the student/faculty ratio is 15:1. Whatever your hands-on learning, small class sizes, engaged faculty and a course of study, you’ll get plenty of personal attention and commitment to impact southeast Michigan. Students are support. developed to become Difference Makers in the workplace and in the community long before graduation. BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING MAJORS • Bioengineering (BENG) We are addressing challenges to the region head-on through • Computer Engineering (COEN) pioneering research, strategic partnerships and civic • Electrical Engineering (EE) engagement. We are creative thinkers, innovators and • Industrial and Systems Engineering (IMSE) leaders, and we’re proud to call Dearborn home. Our • Manufacturing Engineering (MFGE) beautiful campus, once the grounds of the Henry Ford Estate, • Mechanical Engineering (ME) continues to foster his bold spirit of entrepreneurship and • Robotics Engineering (RE) collaboration. For other College of Engineering and Computer Science After graduation from UM-Dearborn, you will become a majors, please see the Bachelor of Science Transfer Guide. member of the University of Michigan Alumni Association – one of the largest living alumni networks in the world. RESOURCES FACULTY & THE CLASSROOM For more transfer information, visit your hub: umdearborn.edu/wcc All of our bachelor’s, master’s, doctoral and professional degree programs are designed and led by highly qualified and To determine credit evaluation for courses not listed, view engaged faculty, not teaching assistants.
    [Show full text]
  • An Operating Manual for the University of Michigan
    An Operating Manual for the University of Michigan James and Anne Duderstadt © 2018 The Millennium Project, The University of Michigan All rights reserved. The Millennium Project The University of Michigan 2001 Duderstadt Center 2281 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2094 http://milproj.dc.umich.edu i Preface The University of Michigan clearly qualifies for on a firm belief that great things happen because of the inclusion in the small group of institutions that have ability, creativity, and commitment of great students, shaped American higher education. Michigan has faculty, and staff at the grassroots level. Put another long defined the model of the large, comprehensive, way, Michigan long ago discarded a top-down culture, public research university, with a serious commitment in which leaders tossed ideas out to be embraced and to scholarship and service. It has been distinguished implemented by the community. Instead, great ideas by unusual breadth, a rich diversity of academic and achievements at Michigan bubble up from the disciplines and professional schools, social and cultural academic programs at the department and school or activities, and intellectual pluralism. This unrelenting college level. commitment to academic excellence, broad student This ability to take risks, to experiment and access, and public service continues today. In virtually innovate, to explore various new directions in teaching, all national and international surveys, the university’s research, and service, defines Michigan’s unique role in programs rank among the very best, with most of its American higher education. In fact, beyond academic schools, colleges, and departments ranking in quality leadership, from time to time the University actually among the top ten nationally and with several regarded does something that changes the world! For example, as the leading programs in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Number 2203-1817 Applicant: University of Michigan (UM), Ann Arbor, MI Project Title: Integrated Biochemical and Electro
    Control Number 2203-1817 Applicant: University of Michigan (UM), Ann Arbor, MI Project Title: Integrated biochemical and electrochemical technologies (IBET) to convert organic waste to biopower via North American research and educational partnerships Principal Investigator: Prof. Lutgarde Raskin (UM) Team: Prof. Steven Skerlos (UM), Dr. Kuang Zhu (UM); Prof. George Wells (Northwestern University - NU), Prof. Jennifer Dunn (NU), Dr. Meltem Urgun Demirtas (Argonne National Laboratory - ANL), Dr. Yupo Lin (ANL), Lauren Valentino (ANL), Meridith Bruozas (ANL) Project Objectives: The overall goal of this project is to leverage resources and talents from five North American universities, a national lab, a water resource recovery facility, and two private companies to form a bioenergy technology research and educational consortium. We propose to develop an innovative, integrated biochemical and electrochemical technologies (IBET) system to produce pipeline-ready renewable methane from organic solid waste streams. This research effort will be integrated with an educational program to support next-generation workforce development. The IBET consists of two key modules that work synergistically: (i) a small- footprint, low-maintenance two-phase biogas production module, which enhances the production rate of biogas (60% methane and 40% carbon dioxide) and (ii) a tandem electrochemical and gas-phase bioreactor system to upgrade the biogas to renewable methane by capturing the carbon dioxide electrochemically and convert it to methane biologically. Compared to state-of-the-art technologies, the IBET system can generate high-purity renewable methane, rather than biogas only, increase the methane production rate by at least 40%, and reduce capital and operating costs by at least 20%. The educational platform will (i) provide cross-institutional research exchanges for Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Traditional Educational Programs at UM Task Force Report April 2010
    Non-traditional Educational Programs at UM Task Force Report April 2010 1 Table of Contents Overview of Task Force’s Work ....................................................................................................... 3 Key Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 4 Continuing Education .......................................................................................................................... 8 Space & Partnerships ......................................................................................................................... 17 Higher Education for Universities ................................................................................................. 20 Emeritus Faculty Engagement ........................................................................................................ 23 Community Ideas................................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix A: NEPU Task Force Charge ........................................................................................ 27 Appendix B: NEPU Task Force Membership ............................................................................. 29 Appendix C: Continuing Education at Michigan survey ........................................................ 30 Appendix D: Continuing Education Google Search Results ................................................. 54 Appendix E:
    [Show full text]