DOCSLIB.ORG

CONTENTS Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONTENTS Contents ETIAM, a.s. Integral repository for RAW CONTENTS Contents ................................................................................................................................................... 2 I. General Data on Proponent ............................................................................................................. 5 1. Name ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Company Identification Number ...................................................................................................... 5 3. Registered Office .............................................................................................................................. 5 4. Authorised Representative of Proponent ........................................................................................ 5 5. Contact Person ................................................................................................................................. 5 II. General Data on Proposed Activity .................................................................................................. 6 1. Name ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3. User .................................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Proposed Activity Character ............................................................................................................. 6 5. Location of the Proposed Activity .................................................................................................... 6 6. Situational Drawing of the Location of the Proposed Activity ......................................................... 7 7. Commencement and Completion Dates of Proposed Activity Construction and Operation .......... 7 8. General Description of Technical and Technological Solution ......................................................... 7 8.1. Technical Solution of RAW IR as Independent Nuclear Facility ........................................... 7 8.2. Technological Solution ......................................................................................................... 9 9. Justification of the Activity on the Site .......................................................................................... 13 10. Total Costs .................................................................................................................................... 13 11. Municipalities Likely to be Concerned ......................................................................................... 13 12. Affected Self-governing Region .................................................................................................... 14 13. Authorities Likely to be Concerned .............................................................................................. 14 14. Permission Authority .................................................................................................................... 14 15. Responsible Department .............................................................................................................. 15 16. Type of Permit Required for the Proposed Activity Pursuant to Special Regulations ................. 15 17. Information about Transboundary Impacts of the Proposed Activity ......................................... 15 III. General Information on Current Environmental Situation in the Relevant Territory ............... 16 1. Characteristics of Natural Environment, Including Conservation Areas.................................... 16 1.1. Delineation of Relevant Territory ...................................................................................... 16 1.2. Geo-Morphological Conditions .......................................................................................... 16 1.3. Geological Conditions ......................................................................................................... 17 1.4. Climatic Conditions............................................................................................................. 21 1.5. Hydrological Conditions ..................................................................................................... 23 1.6. Hydro-geological Conditions .............................................................................................. 25 1.7. Soil Conditions .................................................................................................................... 27 1.8. Biotic Conditions ................................................................................................................ 28 1.9. Conservation Areas and Protection Zones ......................................................................... 32 2. Landscape, Landscape Picture, Stability, Protection, Scenery ....................................................... 33 2.1. Landscape Structure ........................................................................................................... 33 2.2. Landscape Scenery ............................................................................................................. 34 2.3. Territorial System of Ecologic Stability ............................................................................... 35 3. Population and Its Activities, Infrastructure and Cultural-Historic Values Within the Territory ... 36 3.1. Demographic Data.............................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Settlements and Build-up Areas ......................................................................................... 41 Bratislava, 02/2011 2/74 ETIAM, a.s. Integral repository for RAW 3.3. Industrial Production .......................................................................................................... 41 3.4. Agriculture and Forestry .................................................................................................... 42 3.5. Transport ............................................................................................................................ 43 3.6. Technical Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 43 3.7. Recreation and Tourism ..................................................................................................... 44 3.8. Cultural and Historic Monuments and Sights .................................................................... 45 4. Current Environmental Quality ...................................................................................................... 45 4.1. Air Pollution ........................................................................................................................ 46 4.2. Water Pollution .................................................................................................................. 48 4.3. Ground Pollution ................................................................................................................ 51 4.4. Waste ................................................................................................................................. 52 4.5. Noise and Vibrations .......................................................................................................... 52 4.6. Radiation Sources and Other Physical Fields ..................................................................... 52 4.7. Heat and Odour Sources .................................................................................................... 53 4.8. Existing Health Condition of Population ............................................................................ 53 IV. General Data on the Expected Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Activity, INCLUDING HEALTH Impacts, and on Possible Mitigation Measures ....................................................................... 55 1. Requirements on Inputs ................................................................................................................. 55 1.1. Ground Requirements ........................................................................................................ 55 1.2. Water Consumption ........................................................................................................... 56 1.3. Material Resources ............................................................................................................. 56 1.4. Energy Sources ................................................................................................................... 56 1.5. Requirements on Transport and Other Infrastructure ...................................................... 56 1.6. Labour Force Requirements ............................................................................................... 57 2. Output Data .................................................................................................................................... 57 2.1. Air Pollution Sources .......................................................................................................... 57 2.2. Waste
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OKRESNÝ ÚRAD GALANTA Odbor Krízového Riadenia Nová Doba 1408/31, 924 36 Číslo: OU-GA-OKR-2017/002264-1 30
    OKRESNÝ ÚRAD GALANTA odbor krízového riadenia Nová Doba 1408/31, 924 36 Číslo: OU-GA-OKR-2017/002264-1 30. január 2017 S ch v a ľ u j e m : ................................... Ing. Kornel Lomboš vedúci odboru KR Ozn. Názvy kapitol a ich častí Strany časti 1-3 Titulná strana a obsah A. CHARAKTERISTIKA ÚZEMIA 4-5 Geografická charakteristika územia (umiestnenie, poloha, prevládajúci profil, ur- a) 4 čenie chránených prírodných území) b) Demografická charakteristika územia 4 Hospodárska charakteristika územia – (všeobecná charakteristika hospodárstva - zhodnotenie prevažujúceho hospodárstva - priemysel alebo poľnohospodárska vý- c) 4-5 roba, z ktorých vyplývajú riziká vymedzené v jednotlivých bodoch časti B. ana- lýzy) B. MOŽNÉ RIZIKÁ VZNIKU MIMORIADNYCH UDALOSTÍ 6-23 B.1. Ohrozenie mimoriadnymi javmi poveternostného a klimatického charakteru 6-9 a) Vietor (víchrice) 6 b) Teplotné extrémy (horúčavy, mrazy) 7 c) Búrky a prívalové dažde (krupobitie) 8 d) Inverzia 8 e) Hmly 9 f) Snehové lavíny 9 g) Snehové kalamity 9 h) Námrazy a poľadovice 9 B.2. Oblasti možného ohrozenia svahovými deformáciami a seizmickou činnosťou 10 Svahové deformácie - zosuvy pôdy, skál, pokles pôdy, prepady dutín (kamenné la- a) víny), vrátane udalostí spôsobených ľudskou činnosťou (v oblastiach postihnutých 10 banskou činnosťou) b) Seizmická činnosť 10 Oblasti možného ohrozenia povodňami, oblasti možného ohrozenia v prípade B.3. 10-13 porušenia vodnej stavby (vrátane odkalísk) a) Povodne 10-11 b) Vodné stavby nachádzajúce sa na území okresu 11-12 Vodné stavby nachádzajúce sa na území iného okresu ohrozujúce územie hodnote- c) 12-13 ného okresu B.4 Oblasti možného ohrozenia požiarmi a výbuchmi 13-14 a) Lesné požiare 13 b) Požiare a výbuchy vo výrobných podnikoch vyplývajúce z povahy ich činnosti 14 2 B.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Pariláková, K. Hlavačková, V. Sklenár, Š
    ENVIRONMENTÁLNE SPRÁVANIE OBCÍ V OKRESE NITRA Z POHĽADU ODPADOVÉHO HOSPODÁRSTVA ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF MUNICIPALITIES IN NITRA DISTRICT FROM THE WIEW OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT. Klaudia Pariláková – Veronika Hlavačková – Štefan Sklenár Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita v Nitre Abstrakt The priority of the state environmental politics in SR, concerning to wastes, is minimalization of their creation, exploitation and correct wastes disposal. For fulfilling of these priorities it is necessary to execute mainly regional goals, given in the Programmes of the Waste Management. Environmental behaviour monitoring is in this area an imperative supposition of their further integrate approach. Basis for this evaluation is Law no. 223/2001 of Codex about Wastes. In generally it is possible to state, that the awareness of Nitra district municipalities is on the low level. Some municipalities’ mayors have absences in the procedural resolution of the communal waste handling; thereby automatically do not fulfil duties given by the law. Positively it is possible to evaluate municipalities, those start-upped to put in a separate collection (about 60% of Nitra municipalities), however on the different level and not with fully satisfied results. The most often separate parts of the municipalities waste are: paper, cardboard, glass, textile and ferrous scrap. What it is concerning to municipality obligation to assure collection of the large-volume waste minimally two time per year, this majority of municipalities is fulfilling (about 70%). An obligation to assure dangerous wastes two times per year, lesser part of municipalities is this fulfilling and some are delimited only on the certain sorts of these wastes. In generally by the wastes separation put in almost 60% of municipalities although not on the State required level.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Geography Proceedin
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA V BRNĚ PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ČESKÁ GEOGRAFICKÁ SPOLEČNOST FYZICKOGEOGRAFICKÝ SBORNÍK 1 Fyzická geografie – vzdělávání, výzkum, aplikace Příspěvky z 20. výroční konference Fyzickogeografické sekce České geografické společnosti konané 11. a 12. února 2003 v Brně Editor: Vladimír Herber ___________________________________________ Brno 2003 Recenzent: RNDr. Pavel Trnka, CSc. Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v Brně © Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 2003 ISBN 80-210-3284-7 OBSAH Úvod 5 Vladimír Herber 7 Fyzickogeografické konference ČGS: minulost, přítomnost, budoucnost Lubomír Procházka 10 Předpoklady absolventa fyzické geografie k uplatnění ve výrobní činnosti společnosti GEOtest Brno, a.s. Peter Mackovčin 12 Podíl geografů na činnosti AOPK ČR Karel Kirchner 18 Současný stav fyzickogeografických výzkumů v Ústavu geoniky AV ČR Jan Lacina 24 Biogeografický výzkum následků antropogenních a přírodních disturbancí Florin Žigrai 30 Integračná funkcia štúdia využitia zeme v krajinnej ekológii (vybrané metavedné, teoreticko-metodické a aplikačné aspekty) Alois Hynek 36 Přírodní a kulturní krajiny České republiky: prostorové uspořádání Vít Voženílek 44 Vyjádření reliéfu v modelech fyzickogeografických jevů Tatiana Hrnčiarová 57 Krajinoekologické hodnotenie urbánnych ekosystémov – teória a aplikácia Marta Dobrovodská 63 Kultúrno-historické zdroje na Slovensku Peter Tremboš 67 Hodnotenie vplyvov na prírodné prostredie v priestore parcely č. 10125/4, k. ú. Piešťany (Nanogeografická príkladová štúdia) Ivan Farský 71 Mikroklimatická
    [Show full text]
  • Krajske Mesta V Cislach AJ
    REGIONAL CITIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF QUALITY OF LIFE New analytical and promotional publication brings the evaluation of regional cities based on the selected available variables on quality of life important not only at local and national level, but also at European level for monitoring the quality of life in European cities. Throu- gh the statistical data we analyse the development of individual aspects in the last years and we chose a simple and graphically understandable form on interes- ting information on eight largest Slovak cities. REGIONAL CITIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF QUALITY OF LIFE www.statistics.sk 2020 ISBN 978-80-8121-816-3 (online) ISBN 978-80-8121-815-6 (printed version) REGIONAL CITIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF QUALITY OF LIFE 2020 Okruh: Regional statistics Dátum: August 2020 Statistical Oce of the Slovak Republic Statistical Products and Service Provision Directorate Miletičova 3 824 67 Bratislava Slovak Republic Information service Telefón: +421 2 50236 339 E-mail: [email protected] www.statistics.sk ISBN 978-80-8121-816-3 (online) ISBN 978-80-8121-815-6 (printed version) Copyring contents of this publication either whole or its single parts, both in original and adjusted from is possible only unless the Statistical Oce of the Slovak Republic gives written permission. Data of this publication can be used only with identification of the source. INTRODUCTION First of all a little bit of statistics. More than half of the world population live in cities. In Slovakia, we have 140 towns of dierent sizes, starting with the town Dudince with 1.4 thousand inhabitants up to the capital city with almost 433 thousand inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia
    Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia Importance and development priorities of regions The following previews list short characteristics of individual regions in terms of their current state, development possibilities and specific needs. The previews include a list of the most important destinations in the individual regions, the infrastructure that needs to be completed and the anticipated environmental impacts on tourism in the region. These lists are not entirely comprehensive and only include the main elements that create the character of the region as a tourist destination. 1. Bratislava Region Category / relevance Medium-term perspective International Long-term perspective International Sub-region, specific Medium-term perspective - Small Carpathians sub-region (viniculture) location - Bratislava - Senec Long-term perspective - Strip along the right bank of the Danube Type of tourism Long-term incoming foreign tourism over 50%; intensive domestic tourism as well Stay tourism – short-term in incoming as well as in domestic tourism Long–stay waterside tourism only in the summer time; one-day visits – domestic as well as foreign tourism. Transit Forms of tourism - Sightseeing tourism - Business tourism - Summer waterside stays Activities with the - Discovering cultural heritage – Business tourism - Congress/conference tourism – highest long-term Visiting cultural and sport events – Stays/recreation near water – Water sports – Boat potential sports and water tourism - Cycle tourism Position on the Slovak Number
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Mesto Leopoldov 2. Obec Bojnicky 3. Obec Červeník 4. Obec Dolné
    DODATOK č. 1 ZMLUVY O ZRIADENÍ SPOLOČNÉHO OBECNÉHO ÚRADU Účastníci zmluvy: 1. Mesto Leopoldov Hlohovská cesta 104/2, 920 41 Leopoldov IČO: 00 312 703 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Trnava, expozitúra Leopoldov Číslo účtu: SK15 0200 0000 0000 2722 3212 > Zastúpené: Mgr. Terézia Kavuliaková, primátor 2. Obec Bojnicky Bojnicky 90, 920 55 Bojnicky IČO: 312 274 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK47 0200 0000 0016 1026 8359 Zastúpená: Ing. Igor Bojnanský, starosta 3. Obec Červeník Kalinčiakova 26, 920 42 Červeník IČO: 312 355 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a.s . Číslo účtu: SK09 0200 0000 0000 0202 6212 Zastúpená: Marián Mihálik, starosta 4. Obec Dolné Otrokovce Dolné Otrokovce 44, 920 61 Dolné Otrokovce IČO: 312 428 Bankové spojenie: Slovenská sporiteľňa Číslo účtu: SK90 0900 0000 0050 2449 9152 Zastúpená: Ján Maršála, starosta 5. Obec Dolné Zelenice Dolné Zelenice 107, 920 52 Siladice IČO: 653 942 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK97 0200 0000 0000 2422 5212 Zastúpená: Mgr.Dagmar Jakubcová, starosta 6. Obec Dvorníky Dvorníky 428, 920 56 Dvorníky IČO: 312 495 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK30 0200 0000 0000 0412 8212 Zastúpená: Mgr. Ľuboš Gubáň, starosta 7. Obec Horné Otrokovce Horné Otrokovce 146, 920 62 Horné Otrokovce IČO: 312 541 Bankové spojenie: Príma Banka a. s., pobočka Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK28 5600 0000 0052 4207 3002 Zastúpená: Mgr. Eva Kukučková, starosta 8. Obec Horné Trhovište Horné Trhovište 73,920 66 Horné Trhovište IČO: 682 152 Bankové spojenie: VÚB a. s. Číslo účtu: SK82 0200 0000 0000 2442 8212 Zastúpená: Ing. Tibor Veľký, starosta 9. Obec Horné Zelenice Horné Zelenice 89, 920 52 Siladice IČO: 312 568 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional DISPARITIES in the SLOVAK REPUBLIC from the POINT of VIEW of STRUCTURAL EMPLOYMENT
    DOI: 10.2478/aree-2014-0006 Zuzana POLÁKOVÁ, Zlata SOJKOVÁ, Peter OBTULOvič Acta regionalia et environmentalica 1/2014 Acta regionalia et environmentalica 1 Nitra, Slovaca Universitas Agriculturae Nitriae, 2014, p. 30–35 REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF STRUCTURAL EMPLOYMENT Zuzana POLÁkoVÁ*, Zlata SOJKOVÁ, Peter ObtuLOVIč Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovak Republic Recently, much attention has been paid to the topic of employment in Slovakia and regional disparities. The aim of this paper is, on the basis of available data from regional databases and through the use of appropriate methodological apparatus, to draw attention to the development of Slovak regions’ structural employment proportion on the total employment according to the sectors of agriculture, industry, construction and services in the time period from 2004 to 2012. The article examined the similarity of regions in terms of structural employment through cluster analysis at NUTS 2 level. Counties are grouped into four mutually similar clusters. Keywords: employment, region, disparity The overall situation in the labour market is affected by experiencing a migration loss. On the other hand, there is the labour supply which is conditioned by development an increasing migration to the Bratislava region. Nižňanský and non-economic factors (demographic and social ones (2007) stresses that economic development and thereby in particular). Another factor affecting the labour market solution of regional disparities between regions and also situation is demand for labour, which is determined by within regions is not a task for the national governments technological and economic implications arising from the primarily. The approach is different in different countries and use of labour in combination with other production factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Návrh Generel Dopravy Mesta Hlohovec
    MESTO HLOHOVEC GENEREL DOPRAVY MESTA HLOHOVEC E. NÁVRH SPRIEVODNÁ SPRÁVA Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ, METAG, Banská Bystrica Apríl 2012 Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq MESTO HLOHOVEC wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgGenerel dopravy mesta Hlohovec E. NÁVRH hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc SPRIEVODNÁ SPRÁVA vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq Apríl 2012 wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui Zhotoviteľ : Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ, METAG, Banská Bystrica opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgUrbanizmus: Ing. Oto Janík, CSc., aut. stav. inž. Vedúci projektant: Ing. Oto Janík, CSc., aut. stav. inž. Zodpovedný projektant: Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ Projektant: Ing. Oto Janík, aut. stav. inž. hjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnProjektant: Erika Kyseľová mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas GENEREL DOPRAVY MESTA HLOHOVEC E. NÁVRH E. Návrh Generelu dopravy mesta Hlohovec 1. ÚVOD 3 1.1. Všeobecný popis dopravnej situácie 3 1.2. Ciele riešenia 4 1.3. Východiskové vstupy, použité podklady 4 1.3.1. Východiskové vstupy 4 1.3.2. Použité materiály (podklady) 5 1.4. Skladba dokumentácie 5 2. ŠIRŠIE VZŤAHY 6 3. CESTNÁ DOPRAVA 8 3.1. Návrh ZÁKOS podľa GD mesta Hlohovec 8 3.2. Schémy križovatiek a vzorové priečne rezy 9 3.3. Dopravnoinžinierske výpočty 10 3.3.1. Intenzity automobilovej dopravy podľa výsledkov sčítania SSC v roku 2010 Sk.v./24 hodín 10 3.3.2. Zaťaženie ZÁKOS automobilovou dopravou 10 3.4. Návrh obchvatu mesta Hlohovec podľa GD mesta Hlohovec 16 3.5. Rozdiely v riešení doplnkovej komunikačnej siete a požiadavky čistopisu zadania na spodrobnenie 18 4. STATICKÁ DOPRAVA 19 5. ŽELEZNIČNÁ DOPRAVA 23 6. VODNÁ DOPRAVA 24 7. AUTOBUSOVÁ DOPRAVA 26 7.1. Prímestská autobusová doprava 26 7.2. MHD 27 8. PEŠIA DOPRAVA 27 9. CYKLISTICKÁ DOPRAVA 27 10. DOPADY NÁVRHU GD MESTA HLOHOVEC NA PRIESTOROVÉ A FUNKČNÉ USPORIADANIE 29 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Related Aspects of University Spending – Case Study of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
    6th Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS, 2017 - 642 - Spatial and related aspects of university spending – case study of Slovak university of agriculture in Nitra MICHAL HRIVNÁK, KATARÍNA MELICHOVÁ, OĽGA ROHÁČIKOVÁ Department of Regional and Rural Development, Faculty of European Studies and Regional Development, Slovak University of Agriculture Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra Slovakia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract In the last decades, many empirical studies focused on elaboration of demand side effects of university in local economy, claiming that local benefits that imply annualized rates of return on local investment, exceeded 100 %. Due to such results, universities are today considered to be one of “key players“ in local economy that create jobs, boost tax revenues and stimulate local economies trough their spending. In this case study, we will describe the direct economic effects of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra expenditures on local, regional and national economy. In order to demonstrate the spatial aspects of university spending, we chose a GIS-based approach to demonstrate the spatial distribution of university expenditures, suppliers and the ownership and size characteristics of suppliers of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Key words: university, spending, economic effects, local economy JEL Classification: O31, O35 1 Introduction Main objective of this paper is to assess the direct economic impact of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra on local, regional and national economy by evaluation of spending in these territorial levels. We will also elaborate the size structure of economic actors cooperating with university and sector affiliation of this actors according to SK-NACE classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Form
    Application form European Entrepreneurial Regions (EER) Pilot scheme 1. Contact details Applicant region Trnava Self‐Governing Region Name of the person in charge Tibor Mikuš with the project President Postal address Starohájska 10 917 01 Trnava Slovakia Telephone +421335559100 e‐mail predseda@trnava‐vuc.sk Website www.trnava‐vuc.sk EER year 2011 EER year 2012 2. Presentation of the political vision 1 Trnava Self‐Governing Region, the smallest region in the Slovak Republic, has a population of more than 558,807 (as of 31 December 2008). Administratively it consists of seven districts (Dunajská Streda, Galanta, Hlohovec, Piešťany, Senica, Skalica, and Trnava). It has 251 municipalities; 2 the population density is 133.6 inhabitants per km . The unemployment rate last year was approximately 6%. The gross domestic product per capita was around EUR 18,000, which represents more than 100% of the average for the Slovak Republic. The TSGR is one of the Slovak Republic’s most successful regions in the field of foreign direct investment (PSA Peugeot Citroën, Samsung Electronics Slovakia, Samsung LCD Slovakia and others). The TSGR can be described as an industrial and agricultural region. The Slovak Government has set three poles of growth for the TSGR in terms of industrial sectors: the automotive, electronics and energy industries. SWOT analysis of the Industry Development Strategy Strengths Weaknesses significant diversification of the industrial base high dependence on key industry leaders in the region the existence of industry leaders,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1. Conceptual Frameworks of the Research
    Linguistic and ethnic border changes: within the frames of Ister-Granum Euroregion settlement group György FARKAS Abstract The main objective of the study is to clarify the context of a data analysis with ethnic geographical approach, namely how the increased crossing traffic through the rebuilding Mária Valéria Bridge is reflected in the ethnic composition of the given Slovakian settlements. The spatial structure analyzes the direction and depth of the changes that are reflected through the three-decade nationality statistics. The study applies a set of concepts of ethnic geography and it explores the changes within the ethnic block zones and the Hungarian-Slovak linguistic boundaries in the region. Keywords: Mária Valéria Bridge, ethnic structure of population, assimilation, ethnic geography, spatial structure analysis, ethnic blocks, changes of linguistic borders Introduction This study is based on official data about the social changes of the past 20 years, and it attempts to provide a reliable basis to assess the question whether the observable ethnic changes within the settlements that are influenced by the significant developments in infrastructure before and after the reconstruction of the Mária Valéria Bridge, may be interpreted as indicators of changes that may lead to the relatively fast and profound rearrangement of the region’s ethnic spatial structure. 1. Conceptual frameworks of the research 1.1 Literary background This study is mainly based on the theoretical approaches, definitions, methodology, hypotheses and case studies that reflect the Southern-Slovakian region, namely the ethnic structure model of the Levice District developed and defended in the dissertation thesis in 2003, at E​ötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Faculty of Science, Doctoral School of Earth Sciences.​1 The study aims to answer the identified and articulated primary question.
    [Show full text]
  • Okresný Súd Galanta DODATOK Č. 3
    Okresný súd Galanta Mierové námestie č. 1, PSČ 924 23 031/8823701 e-mail: [email protected] číslo konania: Spr / 112 / 2017 V Galante dňa 24. februára 2017 DODATOK č. 3 k rozvrhu práce Okresného súdu Galanta na rok 2017 Rozdeľovník: sekretariát predsedu sudcovia okresného súdu dozorná úradníčka tajomníčky senátov asistentky senátov vyšší súdni úradníci elektronická podateľňa odbor informatiky pri KS TT Rozvrh práce na rok 2017 pre Okresný súd Galanta sa mení takto: 1. Dňom 01. marca 2017 po ukončení dlhodobej práceneschopnosti nastupuje na výkon štátnej služby Anna Pifková, ktorá sa týmto dňom zaraduje ako asistentka senátu do oddelenia 8, 30 Er, Erd, Ercud, Ed, Ecud. 2. Dňom 01. marca 2017 sa mení čas trvania dočasnej štátnej služby u Eleny Doményovej, ktorá trvá do doby ukončenia dlhodobej práceneschopnosti asistentky Eriky Sakovej. 3. Mení sa zastupovanie asistentov na Er oddelení: - Annu Pifkovú zastupuje Mgr. Zs. Oros - Mgr. Zs. Oros zastupuje M. Bozsakyová - Martu Bozsakyovú zastupuje A. Pifková 4. Dňom 01. marca 2017 sa z dôvodu zániku notárskeho úradu JUDr. Otta Szabóa, notára so sídlom v Galante a to z dôvodu jeho úmrtia mení Rozvrh práce notárov – súdnych komisárov so sídlom pôsobnosti OS Galanta na rok 2017 nasledovne: A. Zoznam notárskych úradov so sídlom v obvode Okresného súdu Galanta Notársky úrad, jeho sídlo a poverený zástupca v prípade vylúčenia (§ 49 a nasl. CSP a § 19 a nasl. CMP) alebo odňatia veci (§ 18 a nasl. CMP) Meno notára Sídlo Poverený zástupca________ JUDr. Alena Kovácsová Šaľa JUDr. Karol Kovács JUDr. Karol Kovács Šaľa JUDr. Alena Kovácsová JUDr. Michal Irsák Sereď JUDr. Janka Plachá JUDr.
    [Show full text]