Galenson, Walter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IZA Discussion Papers No
IZA DP No. 896 What Can We Learn About the Decline in U.S. Union Membership from International Data? Solomon W. Polachek DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER October 2003 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor What Can We Learn About the Decline in U.S. Union Membership from International Data? Solomon W. Polachek State University of New York at Binghamton and IZA Bonn Discussion Paper No. 896 October 2003 IZA P.O. Box 7240 D-53072 Bonn Germany Tel.: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-210 Email: [email protected] This Discussion Paper is issued within the framework of IZA’s research area Internationalization of Labor Markets. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the institute. Research disseminated by IZA may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent, nonprofit limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung) supported by Deutsche Post World Net. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its research networks, research support, and visitors and doctoral programs. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. The current research program deals with (1) mobility and flexibility of labor, (2) internationalization of labor markets, (3) welfare state and labor market, (4) labor markets in transition countries, (5) the future of labor, (6) evaluation of labor market policies and projects and (7) general labor economics. -
Literature Review
PARODY FOR THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE DAILY SHOW’S NARRATIVE ON DEMOCRACY INACTION by KRISTEN MARIE HEFLIN (Under the Direction of Dwight E. Brooks) ABSTRACT Parody is a narrative device that twists the conventions of an original work to create a new and typically subversive form of the original. Literary critics have studied parody in written works, but parody on television has not been closely examined. This study uses narrative analysis to look at how parody operates in the television show, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Findings indicate that parody functioned to tell three major narrative themes in the show: 1) The television news media is not fulfilling its role in society. 2) The political institutions of the United States are not fulfilling their role their role in society. 3) Intolerant ideologies place harmful limits on society. This study discusses how parody works in The Daily Show to produce these particular meanings, as well as, what these recurring narratives say about the show’s opinion of our American democracy and our public sphere. INDEX WORDS: Parody, Narratives, Television News Narratives, Television Criticism, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Public Sphere, Democracy, Television News, Political Institutions, Intolerance PARODY FOR THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE DAILY SHOW’S NARRATIVE ON DEMOCRACY INACTION by KRISTEN MARIE HEFLIN B.A., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Kristen Marie Heflin All Rights Reserved PARODY FOR THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE DAILY SHOW’S NARRATIVE ON DEMOCRACY INACTION by KRISTEN MARIE HEFLIN Major Professor: Dwight E. -
Finn Moe - En Utenrikspolitisk Biografi
1 Finn Moe - en utenrikspolitisk biografi Vebjørn Kristen Elvebakk Hovedfagsoppgave i historie Universitetet i Oslo, Historisk institutt Høsten 2004 2 Forord Først og fremst vil jeg takke Knut Einar Eriksen for konstruktiv og hyggelig veiledning gjennom hele dette arbeidet. Takk fortjener også alle ved NUPI, herunder spesielt Erik Nord, Andreas Selliaas, John Kristen Skogan og personalet ved biblioteket. Sven Holtsmark ved IFS har sjenerøst stilt sitt private arkiv til disposisjon og vært en god rådgiver og samtalepartner. Min medstudent Nils August Andresen har kyndig foretatt nødvendige oversettelser fra russisk til norsk. Takk også til Guri Hjeltnes, Finn Olstad og Even Lange som har kommet med gode faglige råd og interessant informasjon. Halvard Fossheim ved Filosofisk institutt, UiO har bistått meg med oversettelse fra fransk og fortolkning av Finn Moes gullmedaljeoppgave. Beate Elvebakk har foreslått språklige forbedringer og ellers gitt mange nyttige tips og vink. Takk også til alle som i sin travle hverdag har latt seg intervjue. Endelig må jeg fremheve imøtekommenheten fra personalet ved Arbeiderbevegelsens Arkiv og Bibliotek, Nasjonalbiblioteket, Riksarkivet, Stortingsarkivet og Utenriksdepartementets arkiv. Aller mest takk til Elen. Oslo, 16.10.2004. Vebjørn Elvebakk 3 Innholdsfortegnelse Innledning 4 Oppgavens bakgrunn og problemstilling 4 Kapittel 5: Avgrensning og struktur 6 Tøvær og tro på forandring (1955-1964) 90 Betraktninger rundt metode og sjanger 8 Nye premisser 91 Litteratur 10 Konvergens og atomtrusselens perspektiver -
Walter Galenson
Walter Galenson December 5, 1914 — December 30, 1999 Walter Galenson, the son of Russian immigrants, was born in New York City. He graduated from Columbia University in 1935 and joined his father’s accounting firm. But coming of age during the depression had given him a concern of the problems of workers and he returned to Columbia for a Doctorate in Economics, which he received in 1940. He then devoted his career to studying how workers fared in both rich and poor countries, advising governments and unions on how to improve labor conditions and teaching about the role of labor in economic development. After working as principal economist in the War Department and Office of Strategic Services during World War II and serving as American labor attaché in Norway and Denmark during 1945-46, he returned to academia. He taught at Harvard and the University of California at Berkeley before moving to Cornell in 1966 where he was appointed the Jacob Gould Schurman Professor in the Department of Economics and the School of Industrial and Labor Relations. He spent the next 14 years on the faculty at Cornell and became a Professor Emeritus in 1980. During his career, Professor Galenson held a number of visiting positions, including the Pitt Professor of American History and Institutions at Cambridge University. He was a Fulbright and Guggenheim Fellow, served as president of the Association for Comparative Economic Studies and was an advisor to the International Labor Organization’s World Employment Program. Former Secretary of Labor and Harvard Professor John Dunlop, a longtime friend of Professor Galenson, described him as “a prolific scholar of industrial relations, labor movements in Scandinavia, and American labor unions and their federations.” His 28 published books included four volumes on American labor history, four on Scandinavian labor movements, three on labor in communist economies, six on comparative labor movements, and five on labor and economic growth in less developed countries. -
Who Needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’S Political Past in the Middle East
Evaluation Report 9/2000 Hilde Henriksen Waage "Norwegians? Who needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’s Political Past in the Middle East A report prepared by PRIO International Peace Research Institute, Oslo Institutt for fredsforskning Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rests with the author. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with the views of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Preface In September 1998, I was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to carry out a preliminary study looking into Norway’s role in the Middle East. According to the agreement with the Ministry, the study should focus on the years prior to 1993 and examine whether Norway’s political past in the Middle East – and, not least, the mediating and confidence-building efforts of Norwegians prior to the opening of the secret Oslo Back Channel – had had any influence on the process that followed. The study should also try to answer the question ‘Why Norway?’ – that is, what had made Norway, of all countries, suitable for such an extraordinary task? The work on the study started on 15 September 1998. The date of submission was stipulated as 15 April 2000. This was achieved. The following report is based on recently declassified and partly still classified documents (to which I was granted access) at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the verbatim records of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, records of government proceedings and the Norwegian Parliament, Labour Party Archives, documents from the US State Department and the Socialist International – to mention the most important. -
Predicting Elections from Politicians' Faces
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Marketing Papers Wharton Faculty Research June 2008 Predicting Elections from Politicians' Faces J. Scott Armstrong University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Kesten C. Green Monash University Randall J. Jones Jr. University of Central Oklahoma Malcolm Wright University of South Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers Recommended Citation Armstrong, J. S., Green, K. C., Jones, R. J., & Wright, M. (2008). Predicting Elections from Politicians' Faces. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/136 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/136 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predicting Elections from Politicians' Faces Abstract Prior research found that people's assessments of relative competence predicted the outcome of Senate and Congressional races. We hypothesized that snap judgments of "facial competence" would provide useful forecasts of the popular vote in presidential primaries before the candidates become well known to the voters. We obtained facial competence ratings of 11 potential candidates for the Democratic Party nomination and of 13 for the Republican Party nomination for the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. To ensure that raters did not recognize the candidates, we relied heavily on young subjects from Australia and New Zealand. We obtained between 139 and 348 usable ratings per candidate between May and August 2007. The top-rated candidates were Clinton and Obama for the Democrats and McCain, Hunter, and Hagel for the Republicans; Giuliani was 9th and Thompson was 10th. At the time, the leading candidates in the Democratic polls were Clinton at 38% and Obama at 20%, while Giuliani was first among the Republicans at 28% followed by Thompson at 22%. -
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 10 January 08
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll 10 January 08 Polling was conducted by telephone January 9, 2008, in the evening. The total sample is 500 likely Republican primary voters in South Carolina with a margin of error of ±4%. Respondents were randomly selected from two sources: 250 were randomly selected from a list of voters who had previously voted in a South Carolina Republican primary, and 250 were drawn from a random digit dial sample which gives every household in the state an equal chance of being called. All respondents were screened to ensure that they are registered to vote in South Carolina and likely to vote in the 2008 Republican primary. 1. I’m going to read you a list of candidates. If the South Carolina Republican presidential primary were held today, would you vote for...? (ROTATE CHOICES) 9 Jan 08 1-3 Apr 07 John McCain 25% 25% Mike Huckabee 18 2 Mitt Romney 17 14 Fred Thompson 9 2* Rudy Giuliani 5 26 Ron Paul 5 1 Duncan Hunter 1 1 (Newt Gingrich – vol.) na 5* Sam Brownback na 2 Tommy Thompson na 2 Jim Gilmore na 1 Tom Tancredo na 1 (Other) 1 1 (Don’t know) 19 16 *responses were volunteered in April 2. Are you certain to support that person or do you think you may change your mind and support someone else in the 2008 South Carolina presidential primary? Certain to support May change mind (Don’t know) 9 Jan 08 58% 40 1 McCain supporters 58% 41 2 Romney supporters 57% 42 1 Huckabee supporters 60% 38 2 1-3 Apr 07 30% 62 8 McCain supporters 30% 62 8 Romney supporters 20% 73 8 3. -
THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY from 1955-2005.Pdf
NATO Parliamentary Assembly 1955-2005 NATO Parliamentary Assembly 1955-2005 This book was produced with the generous assistance of the 50 Years parliaments of Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia, and Turkey. of Parliamentary Diplomacy Editor’s Note n 2004 the Assembly’s Standing Committee decided to There may be slight inconsistencies between articles. I commemorate the Assembly’s 50th anniversary. It was However, as we have aimed for articles based on personal rec- decided to hold a special plenary sitting during the 50th annual ollections, we have not attempted to reconcile occasional dif- session. To that end, during that session, which took place in ferences or discrepancies. Our goal was to retain the original Venice, a special meeting was held involving, for the first time, spontaneity of the authors’ perceptions and memories. the permanent representatives to the North Atlantic Council. This was an outstanding success, as a record number of session As with so many projects of this kind, the book has evolved participants – over a thousand – clearly showed. and become more substantial than was first envisaged. Contributions were generally longer than anticipated and as The Standing Committee also decided that the Assembly we began to see a whole picture of the project emerging, it should produce a commemorative book as an enduring way of became clear that it would merit a more visually appealing marking this important milestone in the Assembly’s history. and enduring format than was foreseen at the outset. This The volume should cover the entire span of the Assembly’s exis- had obvious financial implications, but several delegations tence, but focus specifically on the Assembly’s role from the end came forward with generous offers of assistance. -
Anderson, George A
The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Labor Series GEORGE A. ANDERSON Interviewed by: Don Kienzle Initial interview date: June 6, 1996 Copyright 2013 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Nebraska and raised in Iowa University of Missouri; University of Copenhagen; Brussels (Masters) US Navy service Jointed the Foreign Service in 1957 A-100 Course State Department: Board of Examiners 1957 State Department: Foreign Service Institute (FSI); French language instruction Copenhagen, Denmark: Rotation Officer: Labor Attaché (acting) 1957-1959 Operations Personnel Labor Attaché interests and responsibilities Post-war development End user reports State Department: Executive Secretariat; European desk 1960-1962 Duties and operations Presidential and other senior level foreign travel Macmillan meeting re Vietnam Prince Suwanafilmer British and Vietnam Ho Chi Minh war strategy Vienna Summit on East Germany Kennedy-Khrushchev standoff Kennedy’s Berlin views Berlin wall 17 Nation Disarmament Conference in Geneva 1 American University and George Washington University; Labor 1962-1963 Economics study Comments on course on European labor movements Free movement of workers Consequences of Swiss ethnic divisions De Gaulle vetoes British entry in EC Thesis European “guest workers” Oslo, Norway: Labor Officer 1963-1968 Personnel issues Haakon Lie Prime Minister Gerhardsen Labor Seminars Ambassador Wharton Vice President Lyndon Johnson visit Niels Olsen Multilateral Force Ambassador Margaret Joy Tibbetts -
Bringing Capital Back In, Or Social Democracy Reconsidered
Bringing Capital Back in, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer D Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in STOR ® Denmark and Sweden Peter Swenson World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 4. (Jul., 1991), pp. 513-544. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici ?sici=0043-887 l %28199107%2943%3A4%3C5 l 3%3ABCBIOS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L World Politics is currently published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. Your use of the JS TOR archive indicates your acceptance of JS TOR' s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JS TOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/jhup.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JS TOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org/ Wed Dec 6 14:57:35 2006 BRINGING CAPITAL BACK IN, OR SOCIAL DEMOCRACY RECONSIDERED Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden By PETER SWENSON OCIAL democracy in power, according to the prevailing wisdom of Sover a decade of comparative study, needs unified, encompassing, and centralized labor unions. -
Is Calm in City As Scene Is
•9") f : S ; r #iHlife,;3A: ^^^'^'^is^^'u'k^Jlaiii 5i;i*r; ;$?;. ;--S?^V:^l^ ^^1^^^4^8¾¾¾^^¾½^^¾¾¾ -.^-^:-¾¾^ ? ^. ' '-v^>. ^ V.->^->i^.-?. ;i ; : •vW"-j.-':'-i:^r-VH _4.vt.^n :-^r m ,--.v<^ '£tm £^^£^££^£^12,22^¾¾¾^^¾.^^ ^M« » -.-1-. t Volume 19' Number 46 Thursday, December t, 1983 ' Westland, Michigan 48 Pages Twenty-five cents *%^}W®S MzMmmMmM^MMMMmi ftjL^vrtifSJSa^ All is calm in city as scene is By 8«ndr« Arm brut t«f PLYMOUTH has a city NaUvity the Oakland County ACLU and a plain editor scene located in Kellogg Park, and tiff in the Oak Park suit. Wayne has a Nativity scene on the The Wayne-Westland School District Westland's Nativity scene was being grounds of the library. Garlands and has an American Indian education pro erected on City Hall grounds Tuesday lanterns also are being strung along gram, and there is a small Arabic com despite several pending lawsuits which Simms Instead of Michigan Ave., this munity in Westland. .•'; ".• question such displays in other cities. year due to road construction this year. "The Pilgrims came to this country * The Nativity scene in Westland is Wayne will nave its tree lighting at 5 to flee religious persecution. They were part of the annual decorations around p.m. Sunday at the Veterans Peace Me trying to get away from a situation City Hall, Including numerous tree morial. where government favored one religion lights purchased through donations A Wayne department of public ser over another," Fealk said. from city unions and Mayor Charles vice spokeswoman said that the deco •That's where we got this Idea of sep Pickering. -
NATO-Guiden»
Forkortelser og ordforklaringer til «NATO-guiden» Stopp NATO – mai 2020 Jaltakonferansen (også kalt Krimkonferansen) var et ukelangt møte fra 4. til 11. februar 1945 – tre måneder før den andre verdenskrig var over i Europa – mellom statslederne i USA (Franklin D. Roosevelt), Storbritannia (Winston Churchill) og Sovjetunionen (Josef Stalin). Møtet fant sted i Livadiapalasset, tsarfamiliens tidligere sommerresidens, nær byen Jalta på Krim. Temaet for møtet var de alliertes videre krigføring inne i selve Tyskland og kampen mot Japan. Størst interesse knyttet det seg imidlertid til de avtaler og planer de tre lederne laget for etterkrigstiden. Jaltaavtalen stadfestet at det okkuperte Tyskland skulle deles inn i fire okkupasjonssoner, som hver skulle styres av en av okkupasjonsmaktene; Sovjetunionen, USA, Storbritannia og Frankrike. Videre ble man enige om prinsippet og utgangspunktet for hvordan Tyskland skulle betale krigserstatninger. Det var også her Churchill og Stalin avtalte såkalte interessesfærer etter krigen. Marshallplanen, også kalt Marshallhjelpen, offisielt European Recovery Program (ERP),[1] var et amerikansk hjelpeprogram for Europa som følge av ødeleggelsene under andre verdenskrig. Planen ble vedtatt av Kongressen i USA i 1948. Den er oppkalt etter den amerikanske politikeren George C. Marshall, som var initiativtaker til planen. Marshallplanen medførte økonomisk hjelp i form av lån, økonomisk støtte, og forsyning av næringsmidler og andre varer, til 18 europeiske land og territorier. Samlet beløp hjelpen seg til 14 milliarder dollar. De politiske virkningene av Marshallplanen kan kanskje ha vært minst like viktig som de økonomiske og var viktig for å knytte Vest-Europa til USA. Marshallplanen ble sett på som et av de første elementene til europeisk-integrering fordi den blant annet fjernet tollbarrierer.