Mary Midgley Interviewed by Paul Merchant: Full Transcript of The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013
PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age. -
Theos Turbulentpriests Reform:Layout 1
Turbulent Priests? The Archbishop of Canterbury in contemporary English politics Daniel Gover Theos Friends’ Programme Theos is a public theology think tank which seeks to influence public opinion about the role of faith and belief in society. We were launched in November 2006 with the support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. We provide • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events programme; • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers. We can only do this with your help! Theos Friends receive complimentary copies of all Theos publications, invitations to selected events and monthly email bulletins. If you would like to become a Friend, please detach or photocopy the form below, and send it with a cheque to Theos for £60. Thank you. Yes, I would like to help change public opinion! I enclose a cheque for £60 made payable to Theos. Name Address Postcode Email Tel Data Protection Theos will use your personal data to inform you of its activities. If you prefer not to receive this information please tick here By completing you are consenting to receiving communications by telephone and email. Theos will not pass on your details to any third party. Please return this form to: Theos | 77 Great Peter Street | London | SW1P 2EZ S: 97711: D: 36701: Turbulent Priests? what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. We aim to impact opinion around issues of faith and belief in The Archbishop of Canterbury society. -
PETER Geach's Views of Relative Identity, Together With
SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES By jAMES CAIN ETER Geach's views of relative identity, together with his Paccount of proper names and quantifiers, 1 while presenting what I believe is an inwardly coherent and consistent account, presents us with radical consequences regarding what arguments are to be accepted as valid. For example, consider the argument: ( 1) All men are mortal Fido is a man Thus, Fido is mortal in which 'Fido' names a dog. While this would normally be thought to be a valid argument with a false premise, we shall see that on Geach's theories it turns out to be invalid. In fact for every form of general categorical syllogism we can produce an argument of that form which on Geach's theories turns out invalid. 1 I will only be concerned with the theory of restricted quantifiers worked out in the main body of Reference and Generality, third edition {Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980), not with either his theory of unrestricted quantifiers or the method of interpreting restricted quantifiers mentioned in the appendix to Reference and Generality. 84 ANALYSIS Let us see how this situation arises. We first look briefly at Geach's semantics. According to Geach every proper name is associ ated with a criterion of identity which could be expressed using a substantival term; e.g., 'Fido' is, let's say, associated with the criterion of identity given by 'same dog': this can be expressed by saying that 'Fido' is a name for a dog (we may go on to say that it is a name of a dog if it is non-empty; Reference and Generality p. -
Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress
The Law of Education: Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress R. GEORGE WRIGHT* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 385 II. EDUCATION: PURPOSES, RECENT OUTCOMES, AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR REFORM ................................................................ 391 A. EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AND RIGHTS LANGUAGE ...................... 391 B. SOME RECENT GROUNDS FOR CONCERN IN FULFILLING EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ............................................................. 393 C. THE BROAD RANGE OF AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES FOR THE LEGAL REFORM OF EDUCATION ............................................................... 395 III. SOME LINKAGES BETWEEN EDUCATION AND THE BASIC VIRTUES, PERFECTIONISM, AND CULTURAL PROGRESS ..................................... 397 IV. VIRTUES AND THEIR LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 401 V. PERFECTIONISM AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 410 VI. CULTURAL PROGRESS OVER TIME AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM .............................................. 417 VII. CONCLUSION: EDUCATION LAW AS RIGHTS-CENTERED AND AS THE PURSUIT OF WORTHY VALUES AND GOALS: THE EXAMPLE OF HORNE V. FLORES ............................................................................................ 431 I. INTRODUCTION The law of education -
Hymns Ancient and Modern Booksonix Records
Complete Stock List January 2016 Canterbury Press Name of Bookshop: Address: Order Number: Buyer: Representative: Date: Canterbury Press Titles A-Z Canterbury Press Titles A-Z ISBN QTY TITLE AUTHOR £ ISBN QTY TITLE AUTHOR £ Canterbury Press Norwich: 1-9 1897 to 1987* Jagger 19.99 9781853116834 100 Ways to Make John 9781853117534 Michael 5.99 Alfred Hope Patten* 20.00 Poverty History Madeley Yelton 9781853116735 101 (at Least) 9781853119323 Joan Wilson Reasons to Get Up Julie Tanner 7.99 All Shall be Well* / Alf 7.99 in the Morning McCreary 9781848250451 101 Great Ideas for 9781853112171 All the Company of Kenneth 12.99 Growing Healthy Various 18.99 Heaven* Stevenson Churches 9781853113505 All Through the MIchael 12.99 9781853116230 2000 Years of Michael Night* Counsell 25.00 Prayer* Counsell 9781853119903 Barbara An Altar in the World 12.99 9781848250604 Church Brown Taylor 365 Days of Yes Mission 19.99 9781848251205 Alternative Pastoral Tess Ward 25.00 Society Prayers 9781853115967 365 Ways to Make a Peter 9781853110221 John 14.99 Amor Dei* 30.00 Difference Graystone Burnaby 9781853117206 99 Things to Do Peter 9781848252424 Ancient and Modern Between Here and 9.99 Various 30.00 Graystone Full Music Edition Heaven* 9781848252448 Ancient and Modern Large Print Words Various 24.00 Canterbury Press Norwich: A Edition 9781853113826 Kenneth 9781848252455 Ancient and Modern Abba Father* 12.99 Various 20.00 Stevenson Melody Edition 9781853111099 Norman 9781848257030 Ancient and Modern Abba Imma 4.95 120.00 Goodacre Organ Edition 9781853119781 Timothy 9781848252431 Ancient and Modern Various 12.50 Above Every Name Dudley 12.99 Words Edition Smith 9781853119040 An Anglican 9781848258235 Nadia Bolz Norman Doe 16.99 Accidental Saints 12.99 Covenant Weber 9781848250871 Anglican 9781853119415 Admission to Eucharistic Colin 45.00 Communion 27.50 Liturgies Buchanan Register 1985-2010 9781853116643 Adult Baptism 9781853110450 Anglican Heritage: H. -
Peter Geach's Ethics
July 1, 2018 Grammar and Function: Peter Geach's Ethics Katharina Nieswandt Pre-print, to appear in: Martin Hähnel (ed.) (forthcoming) Aristotelian Naturalism: A Research Companion. Springer: Dordrecht. A German version of this paper appeared as: Katharina Nieswandt (2017): “Grammatik und Funktion: Peter Geach.” In: Martin Hähnel (ed.): Der Aristotelische Naturalismus: Ein Handbuch. Metzler: Stuttgart,163-174. ISBN: 978-3-476-04332-0 (Hardcover). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-04333-7. Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 Short Biography......................................................................................................................................2 The Grammar of Moral Expressions such as “Good” or “Should”.............................................3 The Frege-Geach Problem....................................................................................................................6 The Supposed “Naturalistic Fallacy”..................................................................................................8 Natural Teleology...................................................................................................................................9 The Role of the Virtues in Moral Life..............................................................................................10 Annotated Bibliography......................................................................................................................11 -
[Sample Title Page Format]
To Want Nothing: A Badiouian Reading of Radical Orthodoxy By David John DeCoste A Thesis Submitted to Atlantic School of Theology, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Theology and Religious Studies. March 2013, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright David John DeCoste, 2013. Approved: Dr. David Deane Supervisor Dr. Susan Slater Examiner Dr. Neil Robertson Examiner Date: April 3, 2013 2 Abstract To Want Nothing: A Badiouian Reading of Radical Orthodoxy by David John DeCoste April 3, 2013 This thesis argues that Alain Badiou presents a challenge to Radically Orthodox thinkers by claiming that theological discourse on being can only articulate a description of a structured presentation of an inconsistent multiplicity; a situation referred to throughout the thesis as “a Badiouian thinking of the One.” The argument begins by explaining how in the contemporary context Badiou identifies two forms of thinking the One: positivism and theology. It follows that if positivism and theology are two forms of the same thinking then there must be common elements or logics at work in their separate discourses. Three elements shared by both discourses are shown to be at work in both a positivist project—Daniel Dennett’s philosophy of consciousness—and a theological project—Radical Orthodoxy. Ultimately, in establishing how the three elements are common to both discourses Radical Orthodoxy is identified as an example of a Badiouian thinking of the One. 3 Contents Introduction: 0 ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.0 Thinking the One: A Positivist Example............................................................................... 8 1.01 Evolutionary progression ............................................................................................... 33 1.02 Positing an abstraction: Dennett’s Universal Acid ....................................................... -
Can Art Be Used to Both Celebrate Indian Culture and Keep It Alive?
Can art be used to both celebrate Indian culture and keep it alive? Rianne Karra ID: S17104342 Birmingham City University BA Art and Design 13/01/20 1 Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………4 Chapter 2………………………………………………………………………5 Chapter 3.……………………………………………………………………..6 Chapter 4……………………………………………………………………….7-12 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..13 Bibliography………………………………………………………………….14-17 Appendix………………………………………………………………………..18 2 Introduction This dissertation looks into the importance of both celebrating and keeping Indian culture alive in the UK today and how art can be used to do that. Celebrating the diversity and difference within the UK, that came as a part of immigration. Chapter one, addresses how the current situation of Britain, has left us to believe if Britain is as diverse as we imagine it to be, with issues like Brexit allowing for hate crimes and discrimination. Chapter two, reflects how Britain has become home to minority communities through post war immigration and highlights the issues of low minority participation in the arts but how art can be used to sustain Indian culture. By doing so, might prevent assimilation from occurring which chapter three looks into. By looking at the work of two British Asian artists through case studies: Chila Kumari Burman and Navi Kaur, who use their practice to display culture through community and celebrate difference. As a person of British Asian heritage, the idea of identity can be difficult to define, as it is made up of multiple aspects, and two very different components, Britishness and our ancestral culture. Our culture has been carried between generations, and continued on within Britain by us and the beliefs we uphold. -
Churchof England
THE TaTakinkingtgthehe CHURCHOF GospeGospelonlon ENGLAND tourtour Newspaper p9p9 25.05.18 £1.50 No: 6434 Established in 1828 AVAILABLE ON GooglePlay iTunes DIGEST Churches unitetoremember Youth Trust boost AYoung Leaders Award scheme runbythe Archbishop of York is to be expanded fatefulManchesterbombing nationally. CHURCHES in Manchester St Ann’s Squarewas the focal The Allchurches Trust this wereatthe centreofevents point for people’s grief when an week awarded agrant of over this weekmarking the first estimated 300,000 floral tributes £500,000 to the Archbishop of anniversaryofthe bombing and gifts wereleft in the Square. York Youth Trust to enable the in Manchester Arena. This year the flower festival expansion. The Bishop of Manchester, featured displays created by 23 Dr John Sentamu founded the theRtRev David Walker,said: groups of flower arrangers from Trust in 2009 with the aim of “At the heartofour commemo- around the country empowering anew generation rations will be those families Each of the 25 floral displays of young leaders. So far over mostaffectedbythe attack. We depicted an aspect of Manches- 63,000 young people across the will gatherwith them, first in ter.They included titles such as North of England have benefit- the cathedral and later outside ‘A City United’ sponsored by ted from the scheme. the Town Halland in St Ann’s Manchester City and Manches- Square. We will let them know ter United Football Clubs, ‘Suf- Kirkbacks same-sex theyare not forgotten, andthat fragette City’, a‘City of Prayer ourcommitment to them, and Contemplation’ and ‘Coro- marriage through word, prayer and nation Street’, complete with action, is not diminished by a pigeon and Minnie Caldwell’s year’s passing.” Bobby the cat. -
Metaphysics and Natural Kinds: Slingshots, Fundamentality, and Causal Structure
METAPHYSICS AND NATURAL KINDS: SLINGSHOTS, FUNDAMENTALITY, AND CAUSAL STRUCTURE By ANDREW LEE MCFARLAND Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chair: John Symons ________________________________ John Bricke ________________________________ Armin Schulz ________________________________ Clif Pye ________________________________ Philippe Huneman Date Defended: May 16, 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Andrew Lee McFarland certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: METAPHYSICS AND NATURAL KINDS: SLINGSHOTS, FUNDAMENTALITY, AND CAUSAL STRUCTURE ________________________________ JOHN SYMONS Date approved: May 16, 2014 ii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Metaphysics and Natural Kinds: Slingshots, Fundamentality, and Causal Structure Andrew Lee McFarland My dissertation addresses a question relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of language, and philosophy of science: What are natural kinds? I explore a view that holds that natural kinds are complex, structural properties that involve causal structure. Causal structure describes the idea that for the many properties associated with natural kinds, these properties are nomically linked – that is causally connected – in such a way that the properties of non-natural kinds are not. After criticizing arguments in favor of a nominalist theory of kinds – one that holds that a natural kind just is to be identified with its class of instances – and after defending the notion of a complex structural property from several prominent objections posed by David Lewis, I apply a causal account of natural kinds to a set of problematic cases, paying special attention to isomeric kinds from chemistry. iii Dedication I dedicate this doctoral thesis to my family and to the tireless support they have given me over the years. -
The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History
The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History 1960 FIRST COLLOQUIUM Wilfrid Sellars, "On Looking at Something and Seeing it" Ronald Hepburn, "God and Ambiguity" Comments: Dennis O'Brien Kurt Baier, "Itching and Scratching" Comments: David Falk/Bruce Aune Annette Baier, "Motives" Comments: Jerome Schneewind 1961 SECOND COLLOQUIUM W.D. Falk, "Hegel, Hare and the Existential Malady" Richard Cartwright, "Propositions" Comments: Ruth Barcan Marcus D.A.T. Casking, "Avowals" Comments: Martin Lean Zeno Vendler, "Consequences, Effects and Results" Comments: William Dray/Sylvan Bromberger PUBLISHED: Analytical Philosophy, First Series, R.J. Butler (ed.), Oxford, Blackwell's, 1962. 1962 THIRD COLLOQUIUM C.J. Warnock, "Truth" Arthur Prior, "Some Exercises in Epistemic Logic" Newton Garver, "Criteria" Comments: Carl Ginet/Paul Ziff Hector-Neri Castenada, "The Private Language Argument" Comments: Vere Chappell/James Thomson John Searle, "Meaning and Speech Acts" Comments: Paul Benacerraf/Zeno Vendler PUBLISHED: Knowledge and Experience, C.D. Rollins (ed.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1964. 1963 FOURTH COLLOQUIUM Michael Scriven, "Insanity" Frederick Will, "The Preferability of Probable Beliefs" Norman Malcolm, "Criteria" Comments: Peter Geach/George Pitcher Terrence Penelhum, "Pleasure and Falsity" Comments: William Kennick/Arnold Isenberg 1964 FIFTH COLLOQUIUM Stephen Korner, "Some Remarks on Deductivism" J.J.C. Smart, "Nonsense" Joel Feinberg, "Causing Voluntary Actions" Comments: Keith Donnellan/Keith Lehrer Nicholas Rescher, "Evaluative Metaphysics" Comments: Lewis W. Beck/Thomas E. Patton Herbert Hochberg, "Qualities" Comments: Richard Severens/J.M. Shorter PUBLISHED: Metaphysics and Explanation, W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966. 1965 SIXTH COLLOQUIUM Patrick Nowell-Smith, "Acts and Locutions" George Nakhnikian, "St. Anselm's Four Ontological Arguments" Hilary Putnam, "Psychological Predicates" Comments: Bruce Aune/U.T. -
The Problem of Evil and the Grammar of Goodness
religions Article The Problem of Evil and the Grammar of Goodness Eric Wiland Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri-St. Louis, One University Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA; [email protected] Received: 5 January 2018; Accepted: 20 January 2018; Published: 31 January 2018 Abstract: I consider the two venerated arguments about the existence of God: the Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil. The Ontological Argument purports to show that God’s nature guarantees that God exists. The Argument from Evil purports to show that God’s nature, combined with some plausible facts about the way the world is, guarantees (or is very compelling grounds for thinking) that God does not exist. Both presume that it is coherent to predicate goodness (or greatness) of God. But if Peter Geach’s claim that goodness is logically attributive is cogent, then both arguments fall to the ground. Keywords: god; evil; goodness; religion 1. Here I consider two venerated arguments about the existence of God: the Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil. The Ontological Argument purports to show that God’s nature guarantees that God exists. The Argument from Evil purports to show that God’s nature, combined with some plausible facts about the way the world is, guarantees (or is very compelling grounds for thinking) that God does not exist. Obviously, both arguments cannot be sound. But I argue here that they both are unsound for the very same reason. 2. Consider first the Argument from Evil. There are very many ways the Argument from Evil can be formulated. For the most part, these differences will not affect the issue at hand in this article.