Mary Midgley Interviewed by Paul Merchant: Full Transcript of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mary Midgley Interviewed by Paul Merchant: Full Transcript of The NATIONAL LIFE STORIES Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum. Life Story Interviews Mary Midgely Interviewed by Paul Merchant C1672/05 IMPORTANT This interview and transcript is accessible via http://sounds.bl.uk. © The British Library Board. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7412 7404 [email protected] Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this transcript, however no transcript is an exact translation of the spoken word, and this document is intended to be a guide to the original recording, not replace it. Should you find any errors please inform the Oral History curators. The British Library National Life Stories Interview Summary Sheet Title Page Ref no: C1672/05 Collection title: ‘Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum’ Life Story Interviews Interviewee’s surname: Midgley Title: Interviewee’s Mary Sex: Female forename: Occupation: Philosopher Date and place of birth: 13th September 1919, East Dulwich, London Mother’s occupation: Father’s occupation: curate Dates of recording, Compact flash cards used, tracks (from – to): 17/04/2015 (track 1-4), 11/05/2015 (track 5-9) Location of interview: British Library, London Name of interviewer: Paul Merchant Type of recorder: Marantz PMD661on compact flash Recording format : audio file 9 WAV 24 bit 48 kHz 2-channel Total no. of tracks 9 Mono or stereo: Stereo Total Duration: 4 hrs. 16 min. 31 sec. Additional material: Copyright/Clearance: OPEN Interviewer’s comments: Mary Midgley Page 1 C1672/05 Track 1 [Track 1] Could I start by asking when and where you were born please? 1919, in East Dulwich, a part of London where my father was then a curate. And I know from reading your autobiography that you spent a short time in Cambridge very early on. That’s right. The first things I can remember are from Cambridge. I have a vague impression of Cambridge. And when I go to Cambridge it looks a bit familiar, you know. And I was there from, about six months or something, to five years. [00:45] I wondered, at one point in your autobiography you talk about a family acquaintance who put a sort of, brace of rabbits in your pram, and you were very hard to console. And you say that this wasn’t a memory, but something that someone had told you. I think it’s… No, I was told it by other people. Yes. Yes. I was interested in who had told you that story. Oh, one of my parents told me, my mother told me. I’ve no doubt my nurse told me, because she had had the pram out, and, it was an obvious thing in those days, if you had got, been shooting, [laughs] that you would hand over some, you see. [laughs] I can’t think who it was that we knew that shot rabbits, but somebody did. Yah. And you suggest that this might explain your dislike of fur in later life. Yes. I had, for a long time, I mean, and to some extent still I dislike fur, you know, it gave me the horrors. So, that probably accounts for it. And my parents thought it accounted for it. Mary Midgley Page 2 C1672/05 Track 1 And, another thing which you say is that, the teaching of drawing that you had, and in particular of perspective in drawing, led you later on to like to look at things from different positions, or to appreciate the difference in looking at things from different positions. Yah. Which raised the question of, how you think about the influence of your childhood generally on you as, as an adult. What kind of, I suppose it’s a sort of philosophical question really, what sort of idea of the self are you working… when you think about the influence of childhood on you as an adult? I can’t give you anything terribly general about that I think. I can only say that there isn’t, I think, any particular strong prejudice so to speak. I had quite a nice time as a child, and I wasn’t thinking [laughs] what an extraordinary life I have. in any kind of way. It seemed to me to be a normal, normal way to live, you know. [02:49] Thank you. Could you, could we go straight… Because, as you say, your memories of Cambridge are vague, could we go straight to Greenford? Yes. And, to Greenford rectory, where your father worked next. Yes. And I wonder whether you could say more about, give us more descriptions of the way in which you played with your brother in the sort of disused farmland with neglected buildings that surrounded the rectory. Well, I’m sorry to say, it was all fairly straightforward to me. [laughs] Yes, we moved into, I do remember moving into this house, because it was something bigger and grander. A big garden, rather neglected, where we could play as we chose, and we went into the neighbouring fields as well. So, there was a lot of space, and, I was just thinking there, saying these days that it’s good for your health if you got messy Mary Midgley Page 3 C1672/05 Track 1 when you were young. Well I did. You know, we were very very much into mud pies in the garden [laughs], and, it’s a rather clay-ey kind of neighbourhood, Greenford, and was muddy. And the… Yes, from time to time we had floods, so, we were aware of the possibility of flooding. My brother was usually around. We did not see many other children. There were some who we played with, and after a bit we went to school in Ealing, both of us, so we began to meet other children. But, my parents hadn’t friends living immediately around, so, it was in a way a slightly isolated childhood, which accounts for us reading a great deal. I realise not everybody does. [laughs] Yes, you say you read especially when your brother went away to, to boarding school. Yes. Yes. But do you remember particular things that you did, in this landscape with your brother, particular games? At one point you mention a, a penknife, and, you also mention, let me see, pampas grass, which you said was good for darts and plumes. Pampas grass. Very good, yes. I wondered what plumes was. Oh, do you not know the plumes on pampas grass? Yah, well I mean you, you can pick these big, flower stalks really, off the pampas frond, and you can throw them. They, they act as spears, really good, because they flew [laughs] as directed. We were being, I have to say, cowboys and Indians a lot of the time, we had suits for being cowboys and Indians, and threw these things about. We had a rather good swing down the garden on a tree. I’m sorry, it all sounds to me so obvious, but I can’t pick things out very easily. I mean there’s nothing, I don’t think there’s anything dramatic about it. I think it’s, I think it’s of interest to people listening now, because it’s a kind of exploratory play that children often don’t have now, so… Mary Midgley Page 4 C1672/05 Track 1 Well I think so. I think we were lucky, not only could we potter around the local fields, we could go further, we could go and find ponds in which there were newts and we could catch the newts. And this was absolutely a matter of course. If you wanted to wander across any piece of country, mostly you could. Yes, and it was very important to me, yes. Were there other adults in the landscape walking about that you interacted with while at play? I’m saying, not very many, because my parents’ friends were not local; they gradually got to know people of course, and they… but mostly their friends were either in Cambridge or London or somewhere else. So, there weren’t a lot of influential adults at that point I think. The school did, of course. [07:15] And, in terms of character, personality, how were you like, and how were you not like your brother Hugh? I think he, somehow, was always rather frightened of life and particularly of people. And I wasn’t. I think, I mean, an older child often does have that situation, don’t they. But I particularly remember at some point, he was teenage, we were being told that somebody, some visitors were coming. ‘Oh God, not another!’ says Hugh, you see. He was a bit like that. And he remained a bit like that, although he, you know, was quite a successful director of art galleries in his later life. I didn’t have that trouble, I was always quite pleased to see people and talk to them, unless they frightened me in some way, as they sometimes did. [08:15] And how were, how were you and your brother treated differently, if you were treated differently, by your parents, on account of he being a boy and you a girl? Oh no, I don’t think there was much, certainly not much objectionable sex difference made. Both my parents’ families were already feminist, quite keen. I don’t mean that they’d been suffragettes, but they, they felt strongly about the education of women.
Recommended publications
  • Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013
    PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age.
    [Show full text]
  • Theos Turbulentpriests Reform:Layout 1
    Turbulent Priests? The Archbishop of Canterbury in contemporary English politics Daniel Gover Theos Friends’ Programme Theos is a public theology think tank which seeks to influence public opinion about the role of faith and belief in society. We were launched in November 2006 with the support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. We provide • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events programme; • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers. We can only do this with your help! Theos Friends receive complimentary copies of all Theos publications, invitations to selected events and monthly email bulletins. If you would like to become a Friend, please detach or photocopy the form below, and send it with a cheque to Theos for £60. Thank you. Yes, I would like to help change public opinion! I enclose a cheque for £60 made payable to Theos. Name Address Postcode Email Tel Data Protection Theos will use your personal data to inform you of its activities. If you prefer not to receive this information please tick here By completing you are consenting to receiving communications by telephone and email. Theos will not pass on your details to any third party. Please return this form to: Theos | 77 Great Peter Street | London | SW1P 2EZ S: 97711: D: 36701: Turbulent Priests? what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. We aim to impact opinion around issues of faith and belief in The Archbishop of Canterbury society.
    [Show full text]
  • PETER Geach's Views of Relative Identity, Together With
    SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES By jAMES CAIN ETER Geach's views of relative identity, together with his Paccount of proper names and quantifiers, 1 while presenting what I believe is an inwardly coherent and consistent account, presents us with radical consequences regarding what arguments are to be accepted as valid. For example, consider the argument: ( 1) All men are mortal Fido is a man Thus, Fido is mortal in which 'Fido' names a dog. While this would normally be thought to be a valid argument with a false premise, we shall see that on Geach's theories it turns out to be invalid. In fact for every form of general categorical syllogism we can produce an argument of that form which on Geach's theories turns out invalid. 1 I will only be concerned with the theory of restricted quantifiers worked out in the main body of Reference and Generality, third edition {Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980), not with either his theory of unrestricted quantifiers or the method of interpreting restricted quantifiers mentioned in the appendix to Reference and Generality. 84 ANALYSIS Let us see how this situation arises. We first look briefly at Geach's semantics. According to Geach every proper name is associ­ ated with a criterion of identity which could be expressed using a substantival term; e.g., 'Fido' is, let's say, associated with the criterion of identity given by 'same dog': this can be expressed by saying that 'Fido' is a name for a dog (we may go on to say that it is a name of a dog if it is non-empty; Reference and Generality p.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress
    The Law of Education: Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress R. GEORGE WRIGHT* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 385 II. EDUCATION: PURPOSES, RECENT OUTCOMES, AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR REFORM ................................................................ 391 A. EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AND RIGHTS LANGUAGE ...................... 391 B. SOME RECENT GROUNDS FOR CONCERN IN FULFILLING EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ............................................................. 393 C. THE BROAD RANGE OF AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES FOR THE LEGAL REFORM OF EDUCATION ............................................................... 395 III. SOME LINKAGES BETWEEN EDUCATION AND THE BASIC VIRTUES, PERFECTIONISM, AND CULTURAL PROGRESS ..................................... 397 IV. VIRTUES AND THEIR LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 401 V. PERFECTIONISM AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 410 VI. CULTURAL PROGRESS OVER TIME AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM .............................................. 417 VII. CONCLUSION: EDUCATION LAW AS RIGHTS-CENTERED AND AS THE PURSUIT OF WORTHY VALUES AND GOALS: THE EXAMPLE OF HORNE V. FLORES ............................................................................................ 431 I. INTRODUCTION The law of education
    [Show full text]
  • Hymns Ancient and Modern Booksonix Records
    Complete Stock List January 2016 Canterbury Press Name of Bookshop: Address: Order Number: Buyer: Representative: Date: Canterbury Press Titles A-Z Canterbury Press Titles A-Z ISBN QTY TITLE AUTHOR £ ISBN QTY TITLE AUTHOR £ Canterbury Press Norwich: 1-9 1897 to 1987* Jagger 19.99 9781853116834 100 Ways to Make John 9781853117534 Michael 5.99 Alfred Hope Patten* 20.00 Poverty History Madeley Yelton 9781853116735 101 (at Least) 9781853119323 Joan Wilson Reasons to Get Up Julie Tanner 7.99 All Shall be Well* / Alf 7.99 in the Morning McCreary 9781848250451 101 Great Ideas for 9781853112171 All the Company of Kenneth 12.99 Growing Healthy Various 18.99 Heaven* Stevenson Churches 9781853113505 All Through the MIchael 12.99 9781853116230 2000 Years of Michael Night* Counsell 25.00 Prayer* Counsell 9781853119903 Barbara An Altar in the World 12.99 9781848250604 Church Brown Taylor 365 Days of Yes Mission 19.99 9781848251205 Alternative Pastoral Tess Ward 25.00 Society Prayers 9781853115967 365 Ways to Make a Peter 9781853110221 John 14.99 Amor Dei* 30.00 Difference Graystone Burnaby 9781853117206 99 Things to Do Peter 9781848252424 Ancient and Modern Between Here and 9.99 Various 30.00 Graystone Full Music Edition Heaven* 9781848252448 Ancient and Modern Large Print Words Various 24.00 Canterbury Press Norwich: A Edition 9781853113826 Kenneth 9781848252455 Ancient and Modern Abba Father* 12.99 Various 20.00 Stevenson Melody Edition 9781853111099 Norman 9781848257030 Ancient and Modern Abba Imma 4.95 120.00 Goodacre Organ Edition 9781853119781 Timothy 9781848252431 Ancient and Modern Various 12.50 Above Every Name Dudley 12.99 Words Edition Smith 9781853119040 An Anglican 9781848258235 Nadia Bolz Norman Doe 16.99 Accidental Saints 12.99 Covenant Weber 9781848250871 Anglican 9781853119415 Admission to Eucharistic Colin 45.00 Communion 27.50 Liturgies Buchanan Register 1985-2010 9781853116643 Adult Baptism 9781853110450 Anglican Heritage: H.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Geach's Ethics
    July 1, 2018 Grammar and Function: Peter Geach's Ethics Katharina Nieswandt Pre-print, to appear in: Martin Hähnel (ed.) (forthcoming) Aristotelian Naturalism: A Research Companion. Springer: Dordrecht. A German version of this paper appeared as: Katharina Nieswandt (2017): “Grammatik und Funktion: Peter Geach.” In: Martin Hähnel (ed.): Der Aristotelische Naturalismus: Ein Handbuch. Metzler: Stuttgart,163-174. ISBN: 978-3-476-04332-0 (Hardcover). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-04333-7. Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 Short Biography......................................................................................................................................2 The Grammar of Moral Expressions such as “Good” or “Should”.............................................3 The Frege-Geach Problem....................................................................................................................6 The Supposed “Naturalistic Fallacy”..................................................................................................8 Natural Teleology...................................................................................................................................9 The Role of the Virtues in Moral Life..............................................................................................10 Annotated Bibliography......................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • [Sample Title Page Format]
    To Want Nothing: A Badiouian Reading of Radical Orthodoxy By David John DeCoste A Thesis Submitted to Atlantic School of Theology, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Theology and Religious Studies. March 2013, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright David John DeCoste, 2013. Approved: Dr. David Deane Supervisor Dr. Susan Slater Examiner Dr. Neil Robertson Examiner Date: April 3, 2013 2 Abstract To Want Nothing: A Badiouian Reading of Radical Orthodoxy by David John DeCoste April 3, 2013 This thesis argues that Alain Badiou presents a challenge to Radically Orthodox thinkers by claiming that theological discourse on being can only articulate a description of a structured presentation of an inconsistent multiplicity; a situation referred to throughout the thesis as “a Badiouian thinking of the One.” The argument begins by explaining how in the contemporary context Badiou identifies two forms of thinking the One: positivism and theology. It follows that if positivism and theology are two forms of the same thinking then there must be common elements or logics at work in their separate discourses. Three elements shared by both discourses are shown to be at work in both a positivist project—Daniel Dennett’s philosophy of consciousness—and a theological project—Radical Orthodoxy. Ultimately, in establishing how the three elements are common to both discourses Radical Orthodoxy is identified as an example of a Badiouian thinking of the One. 3 Contents Introduction: 0 ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.0 Thinking the One: A Positivist Example............................................................................... 8 1.01 Evolutionary progression ............................................................................................... 33 1.02 Positing an abstraction: Dennett’s Universal Acid .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can Art Be Used to Both Celebrate Indian Culture and Keep It Alive?
    Can art be used to both celebrate Indian culture and keep it alive? Rianne Karra ID: S17104342 Birmingham City University BA Art and Design 13/01/20 1 Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………4 Chapter 2………………………………………………………………………5 Chapter 3.……………………………………………………………………..6 Chapter 4……………………………………………………………………….7-12 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..13 Bibliography………………………………………………………………….14-17 Appendix………………………………………………………………………..18 2 Introduction This dissertation looks into the importance of both celebrating and keeping Indian culture alive in the UK today and how art can be used to do that. Celebrating the diversity and difference within the UK, that came as a part of immigration. Chapter one, addresses how the current situation of Britain, has left us to believe if Britain is as diverse as we imagine it to be, with issues like Brexit allowing for hate crimes and discrimination. Chapter two, reflects how Britain has become home to minority communities through post war immigration and highlights the issues of low minority participation in the arts but how art can be used to sustain Indian culture. By doing so, might prevent assimilation from occurring which chapter three looks into. By looking at the work of two British Asian artists through case studies: Chila Kumari Burman and Navi Kaur, who use their practice to display culture through community and celebrate difference. As a person of British Asian heritage, the idea of identity can be difficult to define, as it is made up of multiple aspects, and two very different components, Britishness and our ancestral culture. Our culture has been carried between generations, and continued on within Britain by us and the beliefs we uphold.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchof England
    THE TaTakinkingtgthehe CHURCHOF GospeGospelonlon ENGLAND tourtour Newspaper p9p9 25.05.18 £1.50 No: 6434 Established in 1828 AVAILABLE ON GooglePlay iTunes DIGEST Churches unitetoremember Youth Trust boost AYoung Leaders Award scheme runbythe Archbishop of York is to be expanded fatefulManchesterbombing nationally. CHURCHES in Manchester St Ann’s Squarewas the focal The Allchurches Trust this wereatthe centreofevents point for people’s grief when an week awarded agrant of over this weekmarking the first estimated 300,000 floral tributes £500,000 to the Archbishop of anniversaryofthe bombing and gifts wereleft in the Square. York Youth Trust to enable the in Manchester Arena. This year the flower festival expansion. The Bishop of Manchester, featured displays created by 23 Dr John Sentamu founded the theRtRev David Walker,said: groups of flower arrangers from Trust in 2009 with the aim of “At the heartofour commemo- around the country empowering anew generation rations will be those families Each of the 25 floral displays of young leaders. So far over mostaffectedbythe attack. We depicted an aspect of Manches- 63,000 young people across the will gatherwith them, first in ter.They included titles such as North of England have benefit- the cathedral and later outside ‘A City United’ sponsored by ted from the scheme. the Town Halland in St Ann’s Manchester City and Manches- Square. We will let them know ter United Football Clubs, ‘Suf- Kirkbacks same-sex theyare not forgotten, andthat fragette City’, a‘City of Prayer ourcommitment to them, and Contemplation’ and ‘Coro- marriage through word, prayer and nation Street’, complete with action, is not diminished by a pigeon and Minnie Caldwell’s year’s passing.” Bobby the cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics and Natural Kinds: Slingshots, Fundamentality, and Causal Structure
    METAPHYSICS AND NATURAL KINDS: SLINGSHOTS, FUNDAMENTALITY, AND CAUSAL STRUCTURE By ANDREW LEE MCFARLAND Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chair: John Symons ________________________________ John Bricke ________________________________ Armin Schulz ________________________________ Clif Pye ________________________________ Philippe Huneman Date Defended: May 16, 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Andrew Lee McFarland certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: METAPHYSICS AND NATURAL KINDS: SLINGSHOTS, FUNDAMENTALITY, AND CAUSAL STRUCTURE ________________________________ JOHN SYMONS Date approved: May 16, 2014 ii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Metaphysics and Natural Kinds: Slingshots, Fundamentality, and Causal Structure Andrew Lee McFarland My dissertation addresses a question relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of language, and philosophy of science: What are natural kinds? I explore a view that holds that natural kinds are complex, structural properties that involve causal structure. Causal structure describes the idea that for the many properties associated with natural kinds, these properties are nomically linked – that is causally connected – in such a way that the properties of non-natural kinds are not. After criticizing arguments in favor of a nominalist theory of kinds – one that holds that a natural kind just is to be identified with its class of instances – and after defending the notion of a complex structural property from several prominent objections posed by David Lewis, I apply a causal account of natural kinds to a set of problematic cases, paying special attention to isomeric kinds from chemistry. iii Dedication I dedicate this doctoral thesis to my family and to the tireless support they have given me over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History
    The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History 1960 FIRST COLLOQUIUM Wilfrid Sellars, "On Looking at Something and Seeing it" Ronald Hepburn, "God and Ambiguity" Comments: Dennis O'Brien Kurt Baier, "Itching and Scratching" Comments: David Falk/Bruce Aune Annette Baier, "Motives" Comments: Jerome Schneewind 1961 SECOND COLLOQUIUM W.D. Falk, "Hegel, Hare and the Existential Malady" Richard Cartwright, "Propositions" Comments: Ruth Barcan Marcus D.A.T. Casking, "Avowals" Comments: Martin Lean Zeno Vendler, "Consequences, Effects and Results" Comments: William Dray/Sylvan Bromberger PUBLISHED: Analytical Philosophy, First Series, R.J. Butler (ed.), Oxford, Blackwell's, 1962. 1962 THIRD COLLOQUIUM C.J. Warnock, "Truth" Arthur Prior, "Some Exercises in Epistemic Logic" Newton Garver, "Criteria" Comments: Carl Ginet/Paul Ziff Hector-Neri Castenada, "The Private Language Argument" Comments: Vere Chappell/James Thomson John Searle, "Meaning and Speech Acts" Comments: Paul Benacerraf/Zeno Vendler PUBLISHED: Knowledge and Experience, C.D. Rollins (ed.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1964. 1963 FOURTH COLLOQUIUM Michael Scriven, "Insanity" Frederick Will, "The Preferability of Probable Beliefs" Norman Malcolm, "Criteria" Comments: Peter Geach/George Pitcher Terrence Penelhum, "Pleasure and Falsity" Comments: William Kennick/Arnold Isenberg 1964 FIFTH COLLOQUIUM Stephen Korner, "Some Remarks on Deductivism" J.J.C. Smart, "Nonsense" Joel Feinberg, "Causing Voluntary Actions" Comments: Keith Donnellan/Keith Lehrer Nicholas Rescher, "Evaluative Metaphysics" Comments: Lewis W. Beck/Thomas E. Patton Herbert Hochberg, "Qualities" Comments: Richard Severens/J.M. Shorter PUBLISHED: Metaphysics and Explanation, W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966. 1965 SIXTH COLLOQUIUM Patrick Nowell-Smith, "Acts and Locutions" George Nakhnikian, "St. Anselm's Four Ontological Arguments" Hilary Putnam, "Psychological Predicates" Comments: Bruce Aune/U.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil and the Grammar of Goodness
    religions Article The Problem of Evil and the Grammar of Goodness Eric Wiland Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri-St. Louis, One University Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA; [email protected] Received: 5 January 2018; Accepted: 20 January 2018; Published: 31 January 2018 Abstract: I consider the two venerated arguments about the existence of God: the Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil. The Ontological Argument purports to show that God’s nature guarantees that God exists. The Argument from Evil purports to show that God’s nature, combined with some plausible facts about the way the world is, guarantees (or is very compelling grounds for thinking) that God does not exist. Both presume that it is coherent to predicate goodness (or greatness) of God. But if Peter Geach’s claim that goodness is logically attributive is cogent, then both arguments fall to the ground. Keywords: god; evil; goodness; religion 1. Here I consider two venerated arguments about the existence of God: the Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil. The Ontological Argument purports to show that God’s nature guarantees that God exists. The Argument from Evil purports to show that God’s nature, combined with some plausible facts about the way the world is, guarantees (or is very compelling grounds for thinking) that God does not exist. Obviously, both arguments cannot be sound. But I argue here that they both are unsound for the very same reason. 2. Consider first the Argument from Evil. There are very many ways the Argument from Evil can be formulated. For the most part, these differences will not affect the issue at hand in this article.
    [Show full text]