Great Events and People from British History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Events and People from British History GREAT EVENTS AND PEOPLE FROM BRITISH HISTORY CONTENTS: 1. Augustine’s Mission 2. Alfred the Great 3. The Norman Conquest 4. Henry II and Thomas Becket 5. Richard the Lionheart and Saladin the Merciful 6. King John and Magna Carta 7. Edward I and the Conquest of Wales 8. The Peasants’ Revolt 9. Henry’s ‘Great Matter’ 10. The Spanish Armada 0 11. The Gunpowder Plot 12. The Trial and Execution of Charles I Chronology Glossary 1 10. THE SPANISH ARMADA “I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and a king of England too, and think it foul scorn that Parma, or Spain, or any prince of Europe should dare to invade the borders of my realm.” Elizabeth I’s Tilbury speech The Elizabethan Golden Age Elizabeth I is usually regarded as one of England’s greatest monarchs. Her reign is seen as a golden age when art and literature flourished, trade boomed, and England enjoyed a long period of peace and stability after the religious turmoil of the previous two reigns. Elizabeth was Queen of England for forty-five years: from 1558 to 1603. Of all her achievements, the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 was the most spectacular. Elizabeth was eulogised afterwards as ‘Gloriana’, and she has gone down in history as the ever popular ‘Good Queen Bess’. Portrait of Elizabeth I commemorating the defeat of the Spanish Armada, known as the ‘Armada Portrait’ 2 Philip II of Spain Philip II of Spain ruled over a vast empire, including Portugal, the Spanish Netherlands and extensive territories in the ‘New World’. He was the most powerful king in Europe at the time, and he had many reasons to wage war on Elizabeth. First and foremost were his religious reasons. Philip was a devout Catholic and regarded all Protestants as heretics. Philip saw himself as the champion of Catholicism in Europe. He had been married to Elizabeth’s Catholic sister, Mary Tudor, and on Mary’s death, Philip proposed marriage to Elizabeth, in the hope that he could keep England in the Catholic fold, but Elizabeth declined him (as she did all her suitors). Philip was horrified when England reverted once more to Protestantism. Moreover, Elizabeth supported the Protestant Dutch rebels in the Netherlands in their struggle against Catholic Spain. The final religious reason was the execution of the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots in 1587. Philip also had a commercial reason to wage war: English pirates were attacking and Portrait of Philip II of Spain robbing Spanish treasure ships carrying home gold and silver bullion from the Spanish mines in South America. The invasion plan The invasion plan centred around the formidable Spanish infantry, the bulk of which was stationed in the Spanish Netherlands, under the command of the Duke of Parma. A fleet of flat-bottomed boats was built in Antwerp to transport the Spanish soldiers. Meanwhile, in the ports of Spain, Philip ordered a huge armada of 130 ships to be assembled, ready to sail to the Netherlands to escort Parma’s invasion force safely across the English Channel, and to carry additional soldiers and supplies. 3 Singeing the King of Spain’s beard Whilst the armada was being assembled, one of the commanders of the English fleet, Sir Francis Drake, led a daring raid on the Spanish port of Cadiz. Drake had recently completed a circumnavigation of the globe, and on his return in 1580 had been knighted by Elizabeth on board his flagship, the Golden Hind. He was an experienced and confident commander, and a crafty pirate and buccaneer to boot. He entered the harbour at Cadiz and let loose fire ships amongst the Spanish vessels, to devastating effect. He described the incident mockingly as ‘singeing the King of Spain’s beard’. Portrait of Sir Francis Drake The armada sets sail Drake’s Cadiz raid caused many months’ delay for Philip, but, by the summer of 1588, the armada was ready to set off. The Spanish fleet sailed in a crescent formation, with their merchant ships in the middle, protected by warships at either end. Once the Spanish had been sighted off Cornwall, fires were lit, one by one, along the south coast of England, heralding the armada’s progress up the English Channel. There is an apocryphal story of Drake playing a game of bowls in Plymouth: when warned that the Spanish fleet was approaching, he is supposed to have said that there would be plenty of time to finish the game and then beat the Spanish! There were skirmishes off Plymouth, Portland Bill and the Isle of Wight, but the Spanish could not get close enough to the English ships for their soldiers to board them as the Spanish ships were heavier and slower-moving than the English. The commander of the Spanish fleet, the Duke of Medina Sidonia, decided against a full naval engagement as he was intent on his rendezvous with the Duke of Parma. The Spanish fleet finally reached Calais, where they dropped anchor. To his dismay, the Duke of Medina Sidonia discovered that the Duke of Parma’s forces had been delayed fighting the Dutch rebels, and would not be ready to sail for a fortnight. 4 Painting of the Spanish Armada The Battle of Gravelines On the evening of 7th August, whilst the Spanish lay at anchor off Calais, awaiting the arrival of Parma and his army, the English sent in fire ships. The Spanish vessels were forced to cut their anchor ropes and flee. The next day, with their crescent formation scattered, the English confronted the Spanish with a full-blown naval attack. At the Battle of Gravelines, the English, under the command of Lord Howard of Effingham, with Sir Francis Drake as his deputy, used their long-range broadside guns to good effect, damaging a number of Spanish ships. The Spanish were forced to abandon their plans to rendezvous with Parma. They turned tail northwards, with the English in hot pursuit. Tilbury Meanwhile, the English troops were assembled at Tilbury, awaiting the Spanish invasion. Elizabeth donned a gleaming silver breastplate and helmet, and rode out to her troops on a magnificent white stallion to deliver her famous speech. She told them that she would live and die fighting alongside them. In the event, the battle had already been won 5 on the high seas by the British navy. The defeat of the Spanish Armada was a spectacular victory for Protestant England against the might of Catholic Spain. The armada sails home The armada limped home, forced to take the long and dangerous journey back around the British Isles. Some ships had been so badly damaged that they sank on the way home. Others were captured by the Dutch rebels. Many of the sailors and soldiers on board died from their wounds. Supplies of food and water ran low. Terrible storms caused numerous shipwrecks on the Scottish and Irish coasts. It is estimated that only half the Spanish ships reached home safely. Key words and concepts: Golden age: Idyllic, often imaginary past time of peace, prosperity and happiness. Armada: Fleet of warships. Elizabethan: From the reign of Elizabeth I. Gloriana: Name, meaning glorious, given to Elizabeth I towards the end of her reign. New World: Name given to North and South America, when these continents had been ‘discovered’ at the end of the 15th century. Catholic: Member of the Roman Catholic Church. Protestant: Member of one of the Western Christian Churches which emerged during the 16th century in protest against Catholicism. Heretic: Person whose beliefs question or contradict the established church. Gravelines, Battle of: 1588. Naval battle in which the Spanish Armada was defeated. Broadside guns: Guns fired from the side of ships. Key people: Elizabeth I: Queen of England (ruled 1558 – 1603). Known as ‘Gloriana’ and ‘Good Queen Bess’. Philip II: King of Spain who was married to Mary Tudor and who launched the Spanish Armada against Elizabeth I. 6 Mary Tudor: Queen of England (reigned 1553 -58). Wife of Philip II of Spain. Mary, Queen of Scots: Queen of Scotland. Cousin of Elizabeth I. Mother of James I. Executed in 1587. Parma, Duke of: Commander of the Spanish forces fighting the Dutch rebels in the reign of Elizabeth I. Francis Drake: Naval commander and pirate who completed a circumnavigation of the globe and who played a key role in the defeat of the Spanish Armada. Medina Sidonia, Duke of: Commander of the Spanish Armada. Howard of Effingham, Lord: Commander of the English navy. Defeated the Spanish Armada. Vocabulary activities: 1. Which of these words most closely matches the meaning of the adjective ‘feeble’? a. Stupid b. Funny c. Weak 2. Which of these words most closely matches the meaning of the noun ‘realm’? a. A ship b. A kingdom c. A house 3. Which of these phrases most closely matches the meaning of the phrase ‘golden age’? a. An idyllic period of time b. An expensive object c. A yellow ball 4. Which of these words most closely matches the meaning of the noun ‘turmoil’? a. Certainty b. Bravery c. Confusion 7 5. Which of these phrases most closely matches the meaning of the verb ‘eulogised’? a. Left empty b. Taken apart c. Highly praised 6. Which of these words or phrases most closely matches the meaning of the adjective ‘apocryphal’? a. Unlikely to be completely true but widely circulated nevertheless b. Definitely true c. Ancient 7. Which of these phrases most closely matches the meaning of the noun ‘skirmish’? a.
Recommended publications
  • Tyrwhitt Drake Armada Portrait © Melanie V Taylor June 2016
    The importance of the Tyrwhitt Drake Armada Portrait © Melanie V Taylor June 2016 The Tyrwhitt Drake Armada portrait of Elizabeth I has been put up for sale by the descendants of Sir Francis Drake who have owned this painting since 1775. Of the three Armada portraits, it is by far, the most superior. Like the other two, it is dripping in symbolism, but there are subtle differences between the two landscape format paintings and similarities between The Woburn Abbey Armada Portrait and that held by the National Portrait Gallery (NPG). The NPG painting has been cut down at some time, probably because it did not fit a certain space NPG portrait. What remains in the NPG version is the central figure of the queen and some elements of the background similar to the Woburn Abbey version. These elements are the columns of red with gold coloured bases, which suggests these two paintings may have come from the same workshop. In 1563 Sir William Cecil drew up a draft proclamation regarding the use of the queen’s portrait because there were so many portraits that bore no resemblance to her. There was no official template for a royal portrait; neither was there a ‘special person’ appointed to provide an approved template for use by artists’ workshops. It was not until later in her reign that George Gower was appointed Serjeant Painter, and Nicholas Hilliard became her sole portrayer in miniature portraits. Both were Englishmen, and Hilliard, like Sir Francis Drake, was a Devon man. In my opinion, a superior artist has painted the Tyrwhitt-Drake portrait.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary, Queen of Scots at the Palace of Holyroodhouse Information for Teachers
    PALACE OF HOLYROODHOUSE Mary, Queen of Scots at the Palace of Holyroodhouse Information for Teachers Planning Your Visit We hope you enjoy your visit to the Palace of Holyroodhouse. Before you arrive, please read this information to help you make the most of your time here. Frequently Asked Questions Is my booking confirmed? The attached letter is your confirmation. Please read it carefully and if the details are not correct please telephone us on 0131 557 2500. If there are any fees due on your booking, your letter will confirm the date by which full payment must be received. All bookings are made subject to our terms and conditions, which are available on request. Can I make changes to the size of my group? You can confirm any increase in the number of your group up to 24 hours in advance of your visit. Please note, if you would like to book additional accompanying adults, above the stated ratios, a reduced-rate admission fee of £3 per adult will be payable. How do I arrange a complimentary planning visit? If you and a colleague would like to make a planning trip before your group visit, please contact the Learning Bookings Team to arrange this. Two complimentary tickets will be booked for you, for collection on the day. If you would like to meet a member of the Learning Team or see the Learning Rooms during your planning visit, please advise us during booking. Is there a lunch room at the Palace? There is limited space for eating packed lunches in the Learning Rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine De' Medici: the Crafting of an Evil Legend
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2020 Apr 27th, 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM Catherine de' Medici: The Crafting of an Evil Legend Lindsey J. Donohue Clackamas High School Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, History Commons, and the Italian Language and Literature Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Donohue, Lindsey J., "Catherine de' Medici: The Crafting of an Evil Legend" (2020). Young Historians Conference. 23. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2020/papers/23 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. CATHERINE DE’ MEDICI: THE CRAFTING OF AN EVIL LEGEND Lindsey Donohue Western Civilization February 18, 2020 1 When describing the legend of the evil Italian queen, Catherine de’ Medici, and why Medici has been historically misrepresented, being credited with such malediction and wickedness, N.M Sutherland states that she has been viewed as a, “. .monster of selfish ambition, who sacrificed her children, her adopted country, her principles - if she ever had any - , and all who stood in her way to the satisfaction of her all-consuming desire for power.”1 The legend of the wicked Italian queen held widespread attraction among many, especially after Medici’s death in 1589. The famous legend paints Medici inaccurately by disregarding her achievements as queen regent as well as her constant struggle to administer peace during a time of intense political turmoil and religious feuding, and it assumes that Medici was a victim of circumstance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secrets of Tudor Art We Must Try to Put Ourselves Back Into the Minds of the Tudor Courtier
    • The Tudors loved secrets, puzzles and word play and a lot of time and effort has gone into trying to understand what it all meant. • In order to decode the secrets of Tudor art we must try to put ourselves back into the minds of the Tudor courtier. • There were concepts that are alien or unknown to us today on which the interpretation hinges. • Some of the most important are the divine right of kings, magnificence, chivalry and melancholia. • I will start with one of the most puzzling – melancholia. Notes 1. Melancholy 2. The Accession Day Tilt 3. The Impressa 4. Symbolic meaning in Tudor art 5. Nicholas Hilliard, Young Man Amongst Roses. 6. Isaac Oliver, A Man Against a Background of Flames. 7. Nicholas Hilliard, Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland 8. Ditchley Portrait, reject the Renaissance conventions of space and time 9. Armada Portrait 10. The Origins and Functions of the Portrait Miniature • See shafe.uk ‘Tudor: The Origins and Functions of the Portrait Miniature’ • Holbein, Mrs Jane Small • Simon Bening • Lucas Horenbout • Nicolas Hilliard, ‘Young Man Among Roses’, the Art of Limning • Isaac Oliver, Hilliard’s pupil and Limner to Queen Anne of Denmark 1604, Lord Herbert of Cherbury. • Levina Teerlinc 1 Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619), Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-1595, miniature on parchment, 25.7 x 17.3 cm (slightly small than A4), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Secret Knowledge • In order to explain what I mean by ‘secret knowledge’ I have selected one Elizabethan miniature and will spend some time analysing its many levels of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabethan Propaganda How Did England Try to Show Spain Planned to Invade in 1588?
    The National Archives Education Service Elizabethan Propaganda How did England try to show Spain planned to invade in 1588? Court of King’s Bench Coram Rege Rolls 1589 (KB27/1309/2) Elizabethan Propaganda How did England try to show Spain planned to invade in 1588? Introduction Lesson at a Glance Preparing for the Armada Suitable For: KS3 In the 1580s, relations between England and Spain had been getting worse and worse. By May 1588, King Philip II of Spain had finished Time Period: preparing a fleet, the Spanish Armada, to invade England. His plan was for the fleet of 130 ships, carrying 30,000 sailors and soldiers, to sail up Early Modern 1485-1750 the English Channel. They would link up with the Spanish army based Curriculum Link: in the Low Countries, and together they would invade England. The Protestant Queen Elizabeth I would be removed from the throne and The development of replaced with a Catholic ruler. The Catholic religion would be restored Church, state and society in England. in Britain 1509-1745 The arrival of the Armada on 29 July 1588 was no surprise. The English The Elizabethan religious had known about its preparation for several years and had been settlement and conflict with making their own preparations to face the attack. The government had Catholics (including Scotland, been building new ships, forts and warning beacons. They made efforts Spain and Ireland) to disrupt the Spanish preparations. Francis Drake attacked the Spanish fleet in Cadiz harbour in 1587. They had also been trying to win the Learning Objective: war of words – the propaganda battle between the two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • From Allegory to Domesticity and Informality, Elizabeth I and Elizabeth II
    The Image of the Queen; From Allegory to Domesticity and Informality, Elizabeth I and Elizabeth II. By Mihail Vlasiu [Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Glasgow] Christie’s Education London Master’s Programme September 2000 © Mihail Vlasiu ProQuest Number: 13818866 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13818866 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 GLASGOW 1 u n iv er sity .LIBRARY: \1S3lS Abstract This thesis focuses on issues of continuity and change in the evolution royal portraiture and examines the similarities and differences in portraying Elizabeth I in the 16th and 17th centuries and Elizabeth II in the 20th century. The thesis goes beyond the similarity of the shared name of the two monarchs; it shows the major changes not only in the way of portraying a queen but also in the way in which the public has changed its perception of the monarch and of the monarchy. Elizabeth I aimed to unite a nation by focusing the eye upon herself, while Elizabeth II triumphed through humanity and informality.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science the Ideological Origins of Piracy in International Legal Thought Tor Krever
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The ideological origins of piracy in international legal thought Tor Krever A thesis submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, May 2018 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 88,133 words. 2 Abstract This thesis explores the origins of the pirate in international legal thought. It takes as its starting point the recent wave of piracy off the coast of Somalia, mapping the image of the pirate constructed by contemporary legal commentators. The figure of the pirate that takes shape is the archetype of illegitimacy and epitome of enmity in international law: hostis humani generis. Where and when did this figure first emerge in international legal thought? My argument is twofold. First, against dominant transhistorical accounts which project the pirate backwards in an unbroken arc from the present to antiquity, I show that its juridical identity has been marked by fundamental discontinuities and transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine De' Medici: a Woman Before Her Time by Sara Grace
    Catherine de' Medici: A Woman Before her Time by Sara Grace Ericsson Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History Acadia University April, 2014 © Copyright by Sara G. Ericsson, 2014 This thesis by Sara Grace Ericsson is accepted in its present form by the Department of History as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honours Approved by the Thesis Supervisor __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Leigh Whaley Date Approved by the Head of the Department __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Paul Doerr Date Approved by the Honours Committee __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Matthew Lukeman Date ii I, Sara Ericsson, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I, however, retain the copyright in my thesis. _________________________ Signature of Author __________________________ Date iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout this long, difficult, frustrating, but ultimately rewarding process, there are several people who have served to inspire me. To my mum, whose reassurance I depend on daily; To my aunt, whose gift was inspiring; To my sister, whose interest in a topic she knew nothing about was insatiable; To my brother, whose patience knows no bounds; To my dad, whose faith is appreciated; To my nana, whose wry sense of humour is always refreshing; To my grampie, whose quiet yet constant love I could never do without; And finally, to my supervisor Dr. Whaley, whose ongoing advice and encouragement were the main reasons I was able to complete this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary I, Queen of England: How ‘Bloody’ Was She?
    Mary I, Queen of England: How ‘Bloody’ Was She? By Johanna Strong Johanna is a PhD student at the University of Winchester One significant formal event in Winchester Cathedral has consequences which are felt to this day: the July 1554 wedding of Mary I – England’s first crowned queen regnant, that is: queen in her own right – and Philip II of Spain. Their marriage has significantly influenced how Mary is remembered in the English historical narrative and her legacy is very much tied to Philip’s unpopularity in England and Spain’s expansionist hopes in the early modern world. It is their wedding, their marriage, and the legacy of Mary’s reign which is the focus of this article. Mary’s Life and Reign in Contemporary Eyes Mary was born on 18 February 1516 to Catherine of Aragon and Henry VIII and was the only one of Catherine of Aragon’s children to live past childhood. As a result of the breakdown of her parents’ marriage, Mary suffered greatly watching her mother exiled from court and left to die alone at Kimbolton in 1536. Just under 20 years later, Mary’s situation changed drastically when she was proclaimed queen in July 1553 after Lady Jane Grey’s brief tenure on the throne. On 25 July 1554, Mary married Philip II of Spain at Winchester Cathedral in an elaborate ceremony with a banquet following at Wolvesey Castle. Most of the time when heirs to the throne become king or queen, their suffering and unhappiness ends. Unfortunately for Mary, this was not the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmasking the “Droeshout” Portrait of William Shakespeare Simon Miles
    The Prank of the Face: Unmasking the “Droeshout” Portrait of William Shakespeare by Simon Miles 1. Introduction In 1977, art historian and pioneer computer artist Lillian Schwartz made a remarkable observation with potentially far-reaching implications for the Shakespeare authorship debate. She took a copy of the famous “Droeshout” portrait of William Shakespeare which appears in the First Folio of 1623, and scanned it into her computer. Then she did the same with a portrait of Queen Elizabeth 1. She overlaid the two images one on top of the other, scaling them to the same size. Then, adjusting their relative transparency so that they could be readily compared, she noticed something very strange: there were certain portions of the Shakespeare portrait which exactly reproduced the features of Elizabeth. It was not a question of an approximate copy, or a close facsimile, or a loose likeness. There was an exact reproduction of the key sections. Her discovery, extraordinary as it appears to be, seems to have attracted almost no commentary in the intervening years. It’s perhaps not hard to see why. There does not seem to be any obvious reason why a portrait of Shakespeare should share elements of a portrait of Elizabeth. I must admit that when I first heard of this discovery, my initial reaction was to dismiss it out of hand as too ridiculous to contemplate. The internet is awash with foolish claims of identity between different people based on dubious photo-shop manipulations, wishful thinking and outright stupidity. This claim, I thought when I first heard about it, no doubt fell directly into such a category.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's House Conference 2018 – Elizabeth I
    Queen’s House Conference 2018 Call for Papers Elizabeth I: The Armada and Beyond, 1588 to 2018 19–21 April 2018 English School, The Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I (c.1590, RMG) Cate Blanchett in ‘Elizabeth: The Golden Age’ (2007) In September 2016, Royal Museums Greenwich acquired the Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I. This remarkable work of art has captured widespread attention from its creation until the present day, providing a defining image of what has come to be seen as a critical moment in history: the failed invasion of England by the Spanish Armada in the summer of 1588. This conference will address this moment in time and its consequences both for Elizabeth and her subjects in the immediate aftermath of the Armada and for subsequent generations, as the idea of the Virgin Queen and her great triumph has been shaped and remade throughout history until the present day. While the image was inspired by a specific event, its complex symbolism embraces issues of monarchy, dynasty, nation and empire in the early modern period. It was designed to be a spectacle of female power and majesty, carefully calibrated to inspire awe and wonder, an impression which has lasted to the present day. Scholars have described the portrait as a definitive representation of the English Renaissance, encapsulating the creativity, ideals and ambitions of the entire Elizabethan era. Equally the portrait has inspired and informed countless representations of Elizabeth I in the visual and performing arts, and across film, theatre and television. It has thus been instrumental in making her one of the most recognizable historical figures for audiences today.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirk O' Field What Happened in 1567?
    Education Service Kirk o' Field What happened in 1567? This resource was produced using documents from the collections of The National Archives. It can be freely modified and reproduced for use in the classroom only. Kirk o’ Field : What happened in 1567? 2 Introduction Early in the morning of 10 February 1567, Kirk o’ Field house in Edinburgh was destroyed by an explosion. The partially clothed bodies of Lord Darnley, the second husband of Mary, Queen of Scots, and his servant were found in a nearby orchard, apparently strangled but unharmed by the explosion. Suspicion immediately fell upon Mary and James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell, one of her closest and most trusted noblemen. Although Bothwell was considered to be the lead conspirator, he was found not guilty at his trial in April, 1567. Mary married Bothwell the following month, just three months after Darnley's murder. Darnley's death remains an unsolved historical mystery. Work through the available evidence and see if you can work out what happened. Tasks Look at close up 1 1. This is the bodies of Lord Darnley and his servant in the garden a) Why are the men half naked? b) How did the bodies get there? c) What might the chair have been used for? d) Are there any obvious marks on the bodies? e) Who do you think the dagger belonged to? f) How do you think they died? Look at close up 2 2. This section shows Lord Darnley being carried away and the funeral of his servant a) Where are the men taking Lord Darnley’s body? b) Why do you think the soldiers were there? c) Where is Lord Darnley’s servant being buried? Look at close up 3 3.
    [Show full text]