DOCSLIB.ORG

San Luis Obispo County Investigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Luis Obispo County Investigation «***£ DAVIS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of California, Davis Libraries http://archive.org/details/sanluisobispocou181cali ft-sis I STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION OF RESOURCES PLANNING STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD BULLETIN NO. 18 Volume I TEXT AND PLATES SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY INVESTIGATION GOODWIN J. KNIGHT HARVEY O. BANKS Governor Director of Water Resources UNlVhKSITY OF CAU DAVIS May, 1958 L STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION OF RESOURCES PLANNING STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD BULLETIN NO. 18 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY INVESTIGATION Volume I TEXT AND PLATES GOODWIN J. KNIGHT |%^fS^5Bl HARVEY O. BANKS '':-. > Governor \ \ i ':^kM$<?j?l Director of Water Resources May, 1958 -P \7?V ^ RNiX . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, STATE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES . xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENT . .. • xiv ORGANIZATION, CALIFORNIA WATER COMMISSION . * * ....... xv ORGANIZATION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES ....... xvi OBGANIZATION, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • e c & o # * • e • o * • •999 xviii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Authorization for Investigation *•«»£> 909OO 2 Related Investigations and Reports « o • • • o <?•••» 9 o o a h Scope of Investigation and Report • 8 Area Under Investigation »»• *•«*•*«« *•••#••«* » 1U Drainage Basins • «« <>•«•••<>« O0««0*»*0 « • C Ik U-Lirna i»e oo • oo»*o«*ooo6o 17 Geology ••••••«•«•••• . 18 OOXJ.S *co.*ooo »•«». o»» 19 Present Development •••••*«•• 21 Hydrologic Units • ••«••*•»•••• »•»»•» 26 CHAPTER II WATER SUPPLY 28 Precipitation cooft*««o»o«oo9* • •oo«e»*9«t< 30 Precipitation Stations and Records • <, « • • • O O 30 Precipitation Characteristics O o « n o • • • ••0 9<?#« 35 Runoff o . OOO'.*»Ofcc09O«OO««»»OC»Or>»9 • iiO Stream Gaging Stations and Records la Runoff Characteristics •••••. k$ has. III! V Quantity of fas&bSt • ««••«• .»....©*.><..*«, U8 Major Exchanges «t Ifeter o o » © « ..- a * »• » „„.<*<».*.. 5^ Underground Hydrology * -© c © * « » © * t 4 i ............ „ 53 »'•• Upper Salinas Unit «'*«- «"t » .<* * f.-.^ ,* * '*'•*.•»»,** * 62 Pa&o Robl«B Basin * » *©«.»«• « * © « « ,. e » « < . , . « Peso Basin and . Miscellaneous Ground o (C- to '. - a- o I^OU-TC^H* O O « a * O c- [ • * . Coast ai a © » » * a «. , . » .. - - - ,. ...... 67 Cambria Subviiri t o*.©*©. *..»•***»•«*..„ 6t' San Luis Obispo £ubuniv, «<-« • a * © » •;».'.% © * * * „ * . * 70 *''.*-„» Arroyo Grande Subunit » * ;• * « 4 «• * * * * * * . » 4 73 Santa Maria Unit © © © , < »»..<-, „ »©•*««« . s „ . „ 77 Guyana Unit » o • © e * e . © < ...»,.... © • • * . • . 78 Carilzo Plain Unit * © . © » * * * » .. t. » . c « „, , . „ . 79 San Joaquin Unit ©••>;. * •> © c * * o ..<*„.,..« e „<,„. „ 3<-? - '» Quality of Mater 9 > «* 9 # s » >* * » o <» » * * • %. 4 * # » .* ,* 03 ( Standards of Vteter Quality » © © © » * » * * . s . s , , .. „ 81* Irrigation Use » © * © * © o » * « -.. «.*.».«„<.(. <* CI4 Domestic and Municipal Tme „ , * * . » , , i . , „ 87 ,&-*.-•»• '*>•>' '#••* Industrial ties * * » * - * * v - »- « « » * 89 Quality of Surmise Mater © © * o © © . * * . ,.,..«, 90 Quality of Groutid. Jator © © © <, ©©.»..«.-,..,. o . <> 9h Sources of Impairment of Hates' Quality *. • « * .« « : .> **«#,» 97 Natural Souroee it t • .> > ,a .* «.* ........ Domestic Sei«ege . © * * » * » • ».,.,...> « 1 # ».,* • ?9 Irrigation Return ©.©.,,.,.... 90 Industrial Wastes .................... 100 Sea-Water Intrusion . o <> . o . o . 100 CHAPTER III. WATER UTILIZATION AND REQUIREMENTS 102 Present Water Supply Development . o . • . 105 Major Water Supply Developments . , . 105 Water Service Agencies . <> . > . 110 Appropriation of Water .................... 11^ Dams Under State Supervision o = . 115 JjCLDCL U S6 oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo© X J.O XTrcSGIlTi jjfiUP U Sc 0OO»0OO000O«OO 00000*000 XXO X Probable Ultimate Pattern of Land Use ............ 120 UDXT> U S6 OX TlCLvQT' O O O O O O OOOOOOOOOOOO O O o o o X^& ". Unit Values of Consumptive Use . „ . » » . 132 Units of Applied Water o . • ...... • . 138 Water Requirements . „ . <> ................. 1^3 Present Water Requirements . «... a . ......... ikk Probable Ultimate Water Requirements ............. 1^5 Future Water Requirements of the City of San Luis Obispo . lk$ Monthly Demands for Water ..................... 150 Supplemental Water Requirements .................. 152 Present Supplemental Water Requirements ........... 153 Probable Ultimate Supplemental Water Requirements ...... 15^ CHAPTER IV. PLANS FOR WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT 156 Plans for Local Conservation Development ............. 159 Further Development of Ground Water Storage ......... l60 iii 1 Page Potential Surface Storage Developments .o<.« o 0(. o. 162 Lower Jack Dam and Reservoir <, « n « • « • « . „ . 172 Santa Rita Dam and Reservoir ».•<>. « „ . <, 178 San Miguelito Dam and Reservoir O0 o« e 96 <, o«o iQk Jarrett Shut -In Dam and Reservoir ,o 80 o c.«,ooo 4 191 Bald Top Dam and Reservoir « . „ « . » . <, <, e « o . 200 Upper Ragged Point Dam and Reservoir . » <. » » 207 Yellow Hill Dam and Reservoir «. „ e « « » « e «, . «, * 213 San Simeon Dam and Reservoir ° . « » e • « . o <> • <, 221 Santa Rosa Dam and Reservoir . > „ „ « „ « . * <, . » » 227 Whale Rock Dam and Reservoir , » . <, o <, <, • « . » <> . 23*+ Lopez Dam and Reservoir . „ «. „ » « . » . <> « » . 242 Alternative Plans for Water Supply Development » «, « . « . 2^9 Jack Creek and Santa Rita Projects » . • . • « » . « . « . « 25^ Nacimiento Projects ». e ,oo«coor,.ooeo»oc. 255 L"Oasx>aj_ Jrrojecus e©»©«e©a«oooo©©©e©ooooe dip . Whale Rock Project <> 8 <,»<> . o <, o o » «©...> » n » 26 Organizational and Financial Aspects of Water Resources Development « e <> 8 <> « <> <> o e <, » e <> <> * <> « <> 263 Plans for Importation of Water . » . = <, s « <, « . « » . 26> Featner River Project o«ooo6«o«eooo««ooooo 2o,' Other Units of the California Aqueduct System • <, • « . 2 68 rJ-OOQ. L'On"trol ooo©oeeoo»t>ooe«>oooooooe€>oo« <— f 2 Upper Salinas River Valley » a • . » a . e » » •> © o • e * ° 27 3 Arroyo Grande Valley «.o©eooe« 8a «o«io©oooeo 27^ Santa Maria River Valley . <> © ooooooooooaooooo iv Page CHAPTER V. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 282 Summary of Conclusions ...................... 282 Recommendations .......................... 288 TABLES Table No . Page 1 Summary of Climatological Data for Selected Stations in San Luis Obispo County and Vicinity ...... 18 2 Population of Incorporated Cities, San Luis Obispo County ...................... 22 3 Areas of Hydrologic Units and Subunits ......... 27 k Maximum, Minimum and Mean Seasonal Precipitation at Selected Stations in San Luis Obispo County .... 32 5 Recorded and Estimated Seasonal Precipitation at Selected Stations in San Luis Obispo County and Vicinity ................... 37 6 Mean Monthly Distribution of Precipitation at Paso Robles and San Luis Obispo ............ ^0 7 Stream Gaging Stations in San Luis Obispo County and Vicinity ..................... ^3 8 Average Monthly Distribution of Seasonal Natural Runoff of Nacimiento River and Arroyo Grande Creek During Base Period, 1935 -3°" Through 1950-51 ...................... kj 9 Estimated Seasonal Natural Runoff in Selected Streams in San Luis Obispo County During Base Period, 1935-36 Through 1950-51 ....... U9 10 Major Exchanges of Water Between Hydrologic Units in San Luis Obispo County .............. 52 11 Summary of Characteristics of Selected Ground Water Basins in San Luis Obispo County . ....... 60 12 Estimated Presently Developed and Maximum Safe Seasonal Yield of Ground Water Supplies in Portions of San Luis Obispo County and Vicinity . 6l 13 Mineral Analyses of Surface Waters at Selected Stations in San Luis Obispo County ........ 92 Ik Typical Mineral Analyses of Ground Waters in San Luis Obispo County ................... 95 vi Table No . 15 Historic Diversions and Releases From Salinas ri6s srvoir 000000000 a o o o o o • 000 o » # jLeLm 16 Organized Water Agencies in San Luis Obispo County, Xy^lX o o * o • o o 0000c 0000 00 00 © o © * JLX (L 17 Present Water Service Areas in San Luis Obispo County, X./J J> 0009009000009000 000000^0 JLJ_0 18 Land Classification Standards o <> o » . » » » . » . 122 19 Classification of Irrigable Lands in San Luis Obispo wO\iriVy" > J.ypti X C. ( i ooooooooooooouoo oooo 20 Probable Ultimate Water Service Areas in San Luis Obispo wOuilujr o#ooo©ooo 90000000*00000 J-^Jl 21 Estimated Unit Values of Mean Seasonal Consumptive Use of Water in San Luis Obispo County <> . » o <, » <. « 137 22 Measured Average Seasonal Application of Irrigation Water on Representative Crops in San Luis Obispo wOUil uV ooo»oooooooooo • OOOO 0000 X.J/ 23 Estimated Irrigation Efficiencies Under Present and Probable Ultimate Conditions of Development in San Luis Obispo County 00000.000000000 lUl 2k Estimated Mean Seasonal Units of Applied Water in San Luis Obispo County Under Present Conditions of jJ€V6J_ 0piri6n"C 00*000000 00000 o 00 0000 Xli'L. 25 Estimated Present Mean Seasonal Water Requirements in San Luis Obispo County 000000000000000 lli5 26 Estimated Probable Ultimate Mean Seasonal Water Requirements in San Luis Obispo County . ° o » IkQ 27 Estimated Average Monthly Distribution of Seasonal Demand for Water in San Luis Obispo County o o » o 152 28 Estimated Presently Developed and Maximum Practicable Safe Yield of Ground Water Supplies in Portions of San Luis Obispo County and Vicinity » ° ° . o . • l6l 29 Recorded and Estimated Seasonal Runoff During Base Period at Selected Dam Sites in San Luis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basement Beginnings for Cuesta College
    October 17, 2017 Vol. 56 Issue 1 Cuestonian.com # Cuesta student lives on boat Cursed Child book review Opinion: NFL Protests Cuesta’s new volleyball coach Page 2 Page 4 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Basement beginnings for Cuesta students affected by Cuesta College # EPARTMENT D OVAK N ARKETING ULIA J M OF OLLEGE C OURTESY C UESTA C HOTO P OF OURTESY ! !#" C this pain in my stomach ever since I HOTO By Stephen Kondor P Managing Editor of Content left,” Novak said, holding back tears. “My eyes hurt and my lungs feel Cuesta student Julia Novak’s child- constricted like it is hard to breathe,” "# ! " hood home in Sonoma County has been she said recalling the traumatic ordeal. was located on Johnson Street near school for people to attend after Novak, a sophomore and com- BY AMANDA VASQUEZ # ) ! Distribution Director where Smart and Final is now,” said high school. The small junior col- ! ( munications major, is one of many Shon Hand, alumni and long-time lege was then shut down when the $ ' Cuesta students who grew up in So- Cuesta College may have been San Luis Obispo resident. United States entered into World Novak was visiting family in Wind- # # ( founded in a basement underneath “They came up with the idea War I in 1917. sor for her mother’s birthday when The Cuestonian reached out San Luis Obispo High School in the for Cuesta in a basement, under- In 1936, the San Luis Obispo ( to other students who have been early 1900’s, according to Cuesta neath the old San Luis Obispo High School District reopened the junior returning to school for a few days.
    [Show full text]
  • AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan
    FINALFINAL AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan Prepared for Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District November 2007 Todd Engineers with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants FINAL AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District Kern County, California Prepared for: Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District 12109 Highway 166 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Prepared by: Todd Engineers 2200 Powell Street, Suite 225 Emeryville, CA 94608 with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 1000 Hill Road, Suite 200 Ventura, CA 93003-4455 November 2007 Table of Contents List of Tables....................................................................................................................... v List of Figures..................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices............................................................................................................... v Executive Summary...................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................1 1.1. Background......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Goals and Objectives of the Plan........................................................................ 2 1.3. Public Participation............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy
    Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy Monterey County Water Resources Agency Adopted by the Board of Directors February 20, 2018 Recommended by the Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee November 30, 2017 Contents Contents Section I – Introduction and Background ................................................................................ 1 General Description / Information ............................................................................................. 2 Nacimiento River ..................................................................................................................... 2 Nacimiento Dam ..................................................................................................................... 3 Nacimiento Hydroelectric Plant .............................................................................................. 3 Nacimiento Water Project (NWP) ........................................................................................... 4 Pertinent Nacimiento Reservoir Elevations ............................................................................ 4 Section II – Governance and Water Rights .............................................................................. 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Supervisors ............................................ 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Directors ................................................ 7 Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Luis Obispo County San Carpoforo (San Carpojo) San Carpoforo Creek (San Carpojo Creek) consists of more than ten stream miles. It flows southwest, entering the Pacific Ocean at Ragged Point. Staff from DFG surveyed San Carpoforo Creek in 1961 and observed O. mykiss, with highest population density in the lower one mile of the creek. The survey report relays information from local residents and DFG staff including an estimate of “…155 adult steelhead in three holes between the mouth of the stream and the mine” in the late 1950s (DFG 1961a). The creek was deemed, “…a good steelhead nursery and spawning area” (DFG 1961a). In a 1966 letter DFG states, “San Carpojo and Arroyo de la Cruz Creeks are the best steelhead waters in San Luis Obispo County” (DFG 1966a). A 1973 draft report on the effects of potential water developments included estimates of steelhead run size in several San Luis Obispo County creeks. The estimated adult run in San Carpoforo Creek was 500 individuals (Macias 1973). Staff from DFG surveyed San Carpoforo Creek in 1995 and observed “numerous” young of the year, age 1+ and age 2+ steelhead (DFG 1995a). The survey report indicates that the surveyed stream reach usually becomes intermittent by the end of summer. In 1999, USFS staff surveyed San Carpoforo Creek and observed “lots of trout” including fry and adults (USFS 1999a). Staff from NMFS performed systematic surveys of south coast streams in 2002-2003 to determine steelhead presence/absence. The survey report form for San Carpoforo Creek indicates multiple O.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California
    Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California By P. R. WOOD and R. H. DALE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1656 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Heater Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for tbis publication appears on page following tbe index. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract______________-_______----_-_._________________________ 1 Introduction._________________________________-----_------_-______ 3 The water probiem-________--------------------------------__- 3 Purpose of the investigation.___________________________________ 4 Scope and methods of study.___________________________________ 5 Location and general features of the area_________________________ 6 Previous investigations.________________________________________ 8 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 9 Well-numbering system._______________________________________ 9 Geography ___________________________________________________ 11 Climate.__-________________-____-__------_-----_---_-_-_----_ 11 Physiography_..__________________-__-__-_-_-___-_---_-----_-_- 14 General features_________________________________________ 14 Sierra Nevada___________________________________________ 15 Tehachapi Mountains..---.________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Connectivity Planning for Selected Focal Species in the Carrizo Plain
    Habitat Connectivity Planning for Selected Focal Species in the Carrizo Plain BLM Chuck Graham Chuck Graham Agena Garnett-Ruskovich Advisory Panel Members: Paul Beier, Ph.D., Northern Arizona University Patrick Huber, Ph.D., University of California Davis Steve Kohlmann, Ph.D., Tierra Resource Management Bob Stafford, California Department of Fish and Game Brian Cypher, Ph.D., University of Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program also served as an Advisory Panel Member when this project was under the California Energy Commission’s jurisdiction. Preferred Citation: Penrod, K., W. Spencer, E. Rubin, and C. Paulman. April 2010. Habitat Connectivity Planning for Selected Focal Species in the Carrizo Plain. Prepared for County of San Luis Obsipo by SC Wildlands, http://www.scwildlands.org Habitat Connectivity Planning for Selected Focal Species in the Carrizo Plain Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 2.1. Background and Project Need 3. Project Setting 3.1. The Study Area 3.1.1. Location 3.1.2. Physical Features 3.1.3. Biological Features 3.1.4. Human Features 3.2. The Proposed Energy Projects 3.2.1. Topaz Solar Farm 3.2.2. SunPower – California Valley Solar Ranch 4. The Focal Species 4.1. Pronghorn antelope 4.2. Tule elk 4.3. San Joaquin kit fox 5. Conservation Planning Approach 5.1. Modeling Baseline Conditions Of Habitat Suitability And Connectivity For Each Focal Species 5.1.1. Compilation And Refinement Of Digital Data Layers 5.1.2. Modeling Habitat Suitability 5.1.3. Modeling Landscape Permeability 5.1.4. Species-Specific Model Input Data And Conceptual Basis For Model Development 5.1.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal IR for Geology
    FIG. 1. Index (nap showing major physiographic features and approximate location of areas described and illustrated in this report. EDWARDW. WOLFE* U.S. Geological Survey Flagstaff, Ariz. 86001 Thermal IR for Geology An evaluation for Caliente and Temblor Ranges in Southern California compares pre-dawn and post-dawn imagery and a conventional photograph. (Abstract on next page) in the Caliente Range, and unpublished maps by both T. W. Dibblee and G. Vedder HERMAL INFRARED IMAGERY, recording J. radiation from 8 to 13 micrometers in were used to evaluate the imagery in the T Temblor Range. wavelength, was flown by NASA on June 18, 1965, in the Carrizo Plain of southern Calif- Figure 2 is a generalized geologic map of ornia. A line approximately normal to the re- the area in which imagery was studied in gional geologic structure was selected for detail. The stratigraphic nomenclature used detailed analysis and is shown in Figure 1. A on the map and in this report is that of preliminary report on imagery from the Car- Dibblee (1962). Its use herein does not consti- rizo Plain was made by Wallace and Moxham tute adoption of the names by the U.S. (1966). A published geologic map by Vedder Geological Survey. and Repenning (1965) was extensively used In the image area the Caliente and Temblor Ranges are underlain by steeply dipping * Publication authorized by the Director, U.S. clastic rocks of late Tertiary age. In addi- Geological Survey. tion, three basalt flows occur within the Caliente Range sequence. The Caliente and Figure 5, an aerial photograph of the north- Temblor Ranges in the image area are largely eastern part of the imaged strip, was taken mantled by debris derived from the under- from about 35,000 feet on a midsummer day.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    DOE/EIS–0458D DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME I DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE TO ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND STARTUP OF THE TOPAZ SOLAR FARM SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA US Department of Energy, Lead Agency Loan Guarantee Program Office Washington, DC 20585 In Cooperation with US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District March 2011 COVER SHEET Lead Federal Agency: US Department of Energy Cooperating Agency: US Army Corps of Engineers Title: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the US Department of Energy Loan Guarantee to Royal Bank of Scotland for Construction and Startup of the Topaz Solar Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California Contact: For additional copies or more information on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), please contact: Ms. Angela Colamaria US Department of Energy Loan Programs Office (LP-10) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-287-5387 Electronic mail: [email protected] Abstract: The US Department of Energy is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to Royal Bank of Scotland to provide funding to Topaz Solar Farms, Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) to construct and start up the Topaz Solar Farm, a nominal 550-megawatt photovoltaic solar energy generating facility. The facility would be located in unincorporated eastern San Luis Obispo County, California, approximately one mile north of the community of California Valley and six miles northwest of the Carrizo Plain National Monument. The proposed facility would consist of a solar field of ground-mounted PV modules, an electrical collection system that converts generated power from direct current to alternating current and delivers it to a Project substation for collection and conversion from 34.5 to 230 kV for delivery via a new on-site Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) switching station, and the PG&E switching station that interconnects the Project to PG&E’s existing Morro Bay to Midway 230-kV transmission line.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 4/16/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 4/16/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, April 19, 2021 CHANNEL MAINTENANCE DREDGING - DEPARTMENT OF ARMY Addenda: 1 SCOL65 4/19/21 1:00 PM 21-00903 Redwood City $10,000,000 to $25,000,000 State-Federal Plan Issuer: Department of Army- Contracting Division 000-000-0000 Contract #: W912P721B0003 Maintenance dredging (using contour dredging) of the Redwood City Channel to -30-ft (MLLW) plus 2-ft of paid overdepth and transporting of the dredged material to the Government-furnished site SF-11 and to the Contractor furnished beneficial reuse upland site. Project Contact For Questions: Erica Miller Email: [email protected] Bidders: Accurate Earthworks, Inc. General Contractor Ph: 415-206-1192 Fax: 415-206-1194 DESIGN AND INSTALL A STEAM AND CONDENSATE SYSTEM Addenda: 4 4/19/21 10:30 AM 20-03518 San Luis Obispo $656,791 Public Works Prebid Conf: MAND 1/28 @ 10am- California Men’s Colony, Highway 1, San Luis Obispo Contract #: C5609913-D The Contractor shall design and install a fully functioning and operational Steam and Condensate System and will be compensated in accordance with the services rates on Exhibit B-1, Public Works Rate Sheet. The Contractor shall include all labor, design, engineering, equipment, parts, devices, materials, programming, tools, installation, supervision, inspection, training, taxes, licenses, permits, insurance, transportation, travel and per diem and any other costs necessary to perform services for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Inmate/Ward Labor Program (IWL) at the California Men's Colony located at Highway 1, San Luis Obispo, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Project Description
    CHAPTER 5 Regional Project Description 5.1 Introduction This introduction discusses the origin of the Monterey Regional Water Supply Program (Regional Project), places the Regional Project in the context of the Coastal Water Project (CWP) as a whole, describes the regional water supplies and needs, and provides an overview of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Regional Project components. 5.1.1 Project Overview and Background As explained in prior chapters, this environmental impact report (EIR) evaluates the potential environmental effects of a project proposed by California American Water Company (CalAm) to provide a new water supply for the Monterey Peninsula. The project is known as the Coastal Water Project. The water supply is needed to replace existing supplies that are constrained by recent legal decisions affecting the Carmel River and Seaside Groundwater Basin water resources, as described in more detail in Chapter 2. The CWP would produce desalinated water, convey it to the existing CalAm distribution system, and increase the system’s use of storage capacity in the Seaside Groundwater Basin. The CWP would consist of several distinct components: a seawater intake system; a desalination plant; a brine discharge system; product water conveyance pipelines and storage facilities; and an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) system. Coastal Northern Monterey County has long faced water supply challenges (Figure 3-1 shows the area referred to as Coastal Northern Monterey County). The problems of seawater intrusion and excess diversion have existed for decades. Seawater intrusion was identified in Monterey County in the late 1930s and documented by the State of California in 1946 as part of Bulletin 52.
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan
    San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan October 2008 Prepared by the Nacitone Watersheds Steering Committee and Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc. Prepared for the Monterey County Water Resources Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use. (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Acknowledgements Facilitation of the Nacitone Watersheds Planning Process was managed by Traci Roberts of the Monterey County Farm Bureau. Stephnie Wald of Central Coast Salmon Enhancement prepared the watershed management plan with grateful assistance of Nicole Smith, Elise Torres, and Sarah Paddack. The preparation of the management plan was guided by Steering Committee Co-chairs Duane Wolgomott and Phil Humphrey. Ken Ekelund of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency managed the SWRCB grant that funded the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan. Each member of the Steering Committee also contributed valuable information and assistance and is acknowledged below. Ann Beckett, Lockwood resident Marilyn Breland, Heritage Ranch resident Bill Capps, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Terry Chavis, Heritage Ranch resident Ken Ekelund, Program Manager, Monterey County
    [Show full text]